fit for the future · fit for the future: technology and the changing world of research publishing...
TRANSCRIPT
Fit for the Future:Technology and the changing world of research publishing
Leon Heward MillsGlobal Publishing Director, JournalsTaylor & Francis Group
Factors driving change in journal publishing 2018-2022
1. Digital technology
2. Networks and sharing
3. Research integrity, trust and openness
4. Research outputs 2018
2
Digital Technology
After Hargroves & Smith, The Natural Advantage of Nations, Routledge 2006
Waves of innovation
A historical overview shows how technological advancement is accelerating
2018
After Hargroves & Smith, The Natural Advantage of Nations, Routledge 2006
Waves of innovation
A historical overview shows how technological advancement is accelerating
2018
After Hargroves & Smith, The Natural Advantage of Nations, Routledge 2006
Artificial
Intelligence (AI)
Waves of innovation
A historical overview shows how technological advancement is accelerating
From Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 to Web 4.0
Credit: Nova Spivack, Radar Networkshttp://novaspivack.typepad.com/ http://www.mindingtheplanet
7
Digital workflow and new players
8https://101innovations.wordpress.com/
Digital technology facilitates discoverability & visibility
9
Funder Registry
Submit. Review. Accept
Submitted manuscript
Published Content
AI technologies, researchand analytics
• Natural Language Processing– machines interpreting “normal” real time speech
• Translation Technologies
• Machine Learning & data mining
• Semantic Enrichment and Contextualization– reviewing other data sets to add additional information, links and
understanding data based on appropriate context within the source material
• Big Data Analytics
10
Future possibilities with AI tools
• Reviewer identification
• Research trends
• Connect researchers
• Identify plagiarism and data fabrication
• Text scans to identify errors in results, statistics etc
• Full machine peer review?!
11
Blockchain technology
• Decentralized research cycle, and dissemination, fully integrated on same chain, ‘living document’ with all collaborative research, protocols, data, ideas etc – aid to reproducibility
• Could aid: peer review
digital rights management
sharing
accurate usage counts
new metrics and credits
12
Networks & The Sharing Economy
Networks driving quality impact and engagement
14
Submit. Review. Accept
Submitted manuscript
Published Content
Citing ContentCited Content AuthorsAuthors
Authors Readers
Editor
Reviewers
RelatedContent
Authors
Editorial Board
Employer
Research Ministry
Funder
Co-Publisher Societies and Associations
15
Networks driving quality impact and engagement
16
Submit. Review. Accept
Submitted manuscript
Published Content
Citing ContentCited Content AuthorsAuthors
Authors Readers
Editor
Reviewers
RelatedContent
Authors
Editorial Board
Employer
Research Ministry
Funder
Co-Publisher Societies and Associations
17
Sharing and Scholarly Collaboration Networks (SCNs)
18
http://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/sharing-your-work/
Public
Article version Solution (how) Outcome (for who)
Gold OA• CC-BY post-embargo
AM• CC-BY VOR
• License ref Crossref Metadata API
Access for any user
Green OA / non-subscription articles• Post-embargo AM• Pre-print
• Article tagging:
DOI/JAV tagsPDF XMP
• Policy identifiersCrossref MetadataAPI (URIs)
Access for any user
Subscription articles• Pre-embargo AM• Subscription VOR
• EntitlementAPI
• STM RA21(beyond IP)
Access for subscribed user (includingremote access)No access forunsubscribed user
Private
OA & subscriptionarticles• Any article version
• Article tagging:DOI/JAV tagsPDF XMP
• Crossref DUL
Access for any user
Publishers are working with SCNs
Author shares
Researcher reads
Research Output Trends
Global % of research outputTop countries by WoS Documents
Data Source: InCites (Clarivate Analytics) 2017 21
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
% o
f G
lob
al R
esea
rch
Ou
tpu
t
USA
China (Mainland)
United Kingdom
Germany
Japan
France
Canada
Italy
Australia
India
New Zealand
Citations per Article: proxy for quality content
Data from SCImago, 2017
22
Global Average
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
Australia UnitedKingdom
Italy Canada France USA NewZealand
China Germany Japan India
Cit
atio
ns
per
Do
cum
ent
Science Tech MedResearch Output 2016
Data Source: InCites (Clarivate Analytics) 2017 23
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
USA ChinaMainland
UnitedKingdom
Germany Japan France India Canada Australia NewZealand
STM
Do
cum
ents
, 20
16
Social Science & Humanities Research Output 2016
Data Source: InCites (Clarivate Analytics) 2017
24
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
USA UnitedKingdom
ChinaMainland
Germany Australia Canada France Japan SouthKorea
NewZealand
HSS
Do
cum
ents
, 20
16
International Collaboration 2016(co-authorships, world average 49%)
Data Source: InCites (Clarivate Analytics) 2017
25
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Singapore New Zealand France Australia United Kingdom Canada Hong Kong Taiwan USA
Singapore
New Zealand France
Australia UKCanada
Hong Kong
Taiwan USA
JapanSouth Korea
China(Mainland) India
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%2017 (Relative to Global average)
International Collaboration 2016(co-authorships, world average 49%)
Data Source: InCites (Clarivate Analytics) 2017
26
27
Research is a collaborative, networked effort.
Our strategy at Taylor & Francis is to:
• Create and strengthen rewarding connections between people, knowledge and organisations
• Empower and assist world class research
• Promote access and readership
We will create services and products based on innovative technology to amplify these network effects
Connections within and betweennetworks to drive impact