fisheries economics of the united states 2016

264
Fisheries Economics of the United States 2016 Economics and Sociocultural Status and Trends Series U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-187a December 2018

Upload: others

Post on 24-Nov-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Fisheries Economicsof the United States2016 Economics and SocioculturalStatus and Trends Series

US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-FSPO-187a December 2018

Front cover Fishing in Imperial Beach California Photo UnsplashcomDakota Corbin Inside cover Boats in Newport Oregon Photo Pacific Fishery Management Council

Fisheries Economics of the United States2016Economics and Social Analysis Division Office of Science and TechnologyNOAA Fisheries (NMFS)1315 East-West Highway 12th floorSilver Spring MD 20910

NOAA TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NMFS-FSPO-187A DECEMBER 2018

US Department of CommerceWilbur Ross Jr Secretary of Commerce

National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationRDML Timothy Gallaudet Acting NOAA Administrator

National Marine Fisheries ServiceChris Oliver Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

ii

NOAA Fisheries PublicationsEach year NOAA Fisheries produces three annual reports covering different aspects of the status of United States marine fisheries

Status of Stocks is an annual report to Congress on the status of US fisheries and is required by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act This report which is published each spring summarizes the number of stocks on the overfished overfishing and rebuilt lists for US federally managed fish stocks and stock complexes The report also shows trends over time discusses the value and contributions of our partners and highlights how management actions taken by NOAA Fisheries have improved the status of US federally managed stocks For example the 2017 report shows that the number of stocks on the overfished list just reached a new all-time lows httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationalpopulation-assessmentsfishery-stock-status-updates2018-quarterly-updates

Fisheries of the United States published each fall has been produced in its various forms for more than 100 years It is the NOAA Fisheries yearbook of fishery statistics for the United States It provides a snapshot of data primarily at the national level on US recreational catch and commercial fisheries landings and value In addition data are reported on US aquaculture production the US fishery processing industry imports and exports of fishery-related products and domestic supply and per capita consumption of fishery products The focus is not on economic analysis although value of landings processed products and foreign trade are included httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationalcommercial-fishingfisheries-united-states

Fisheries Economics of the United States published each fall provides a detailed look at the economic performance of commercial and recreational fisheries and other marine-related sectors on a state regional and national basis The economic impact of commercial and recreational fishing activities in the US is also reported in terms of employment sales and value-added impacts The report provides management highlights for each region that include a summary of stock status updates on catch share programs and other selected management issues httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationalcommercial-fishingfisheries-economics-united-states

Suggested CitationNational Marine Fisheries Service 2018 Fisheries Economics of the United States 2016 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-187a 243 p

An earlier version of this report FSPO-187 was published online in December 2018 This revised version includes updates to the acknowledgments section and the data sources section

Supplementary material An addendum published online in September 2019 provides updates to the recreational impacts and expenditures tables of this report The revised tables reflect changes to the number of trips in Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) states updates to the average expenditures based on new survey data and a new economic impact model for every state This addendum is available at httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovresourcedocumentfisheries-economics-united-states-report-2016

A copy of this report may be obtained fromEconomics and Social Analysis DivisionOffice of Science and TechnologyNOAA Fisheries (NMFS)1315 East-West Highway 12th floorSilver Spring MD 20910

Or online athttpswwwfisheriesnoaagovcontentfisheries-economics-united-states-2016

iii

ContentsPreface v Key Terminology vi

National Overview 1United States Summary 2 United States Tables 17

North Pacific Region 21North Pacific Summary 22Alaska Tables 31

Pacific Region 35Pacific Summary 36 Pacific Tables 43 California Tables 47 Oregon Tables 51 Washington Tables 55

Western Pacific Region 59Western Pacific Summary 60 Hawaiʻi Tables 67

New England Region 71New England Summary 72 New England Tables 79Connecticut Tables 83 Maine Tables 87Massachusetts Tables 91 New Hampshire Tables 95 Rhode Island Tables 99

Mid-Atlantic Region 103Mid-Atlantic Summary 104 Mid-Atlantic Tables 111Delaware Tables 115 Maryland Tables 119 New Jersey Tables 123 New York Tables 127 Virginia Tables 131

South Atlantic Region 135South Atlantic Summary 136 South Atlantic Tables 143 East Florida Tables 147 Georgia Tables 151 North Carolina Tables 155 South Carolina Tables 159

Gulf of Mexico Region 163Gulf of Mexico Summary 164 Gulf of Mexico Tables 171 Alabama Tables 175 West Florida Tables 179 Louisiana Tables 183 Mississippi Tables 187 Texas Tables 191

Data Sources 195Publications 199Resources 237Glossary 243

v

The hand of a person who has spent their life on the water Photo South Atlantic Fishery Management CouncilCameron J Rhodes

PrefaceFisheries Economics of the United States 2016 Fisheries Economics of the United States 2016 is the eleventh volume in this annual series which is intended to provide the public with easily accessible economic information about the nationrsquos commercial and recreational fishing activities and fishing-related industries

This yearrsquos report covers the years 2007 to 2016 and provides descriptive statistics for the following catego-ries economic impacts of the commercial fishing and seafood industry commercial fisheries landings rev-enue and price trends saltwater angler expenditures and economic impacts of marine recreational fishing recreational fishing catch effort and participation rates and employer and non-employer establishment payroll employees and annual receipt information for fishing-related industries

The report also provides management highlights for each region that include a summary of stock status updates on catch share programs and other selected management issues Economic performance indicators for catch share programs are reported

Sources of DataInformation in this report came from many sources Commercial landings revenue and price data as well as recreational fishing effort and participation data were primarily obtained from the Fisheries Statistics Division Office of Science and Technology NOAA Fish-eries Other data sources included the NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center Alaska Department of Fish and Game California Department of Fish and Game Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Washing-ton Department of Fish and Wildlife the Pacific Coast Fisheries Information Network (PacFIN) Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and Western Pacific Fisheries Information Network (WPacFIN) Economic impacts from the commercial fishing and seafood industry and recreational fishing sectors are from two separate na-tional IMPLAN models of the Economics and Sociocultur-al Analysis Division Office of Science and Technology NOAA Fisheries Fishing-related industry information was obtained from the US Census Bureau Bureau of

Economic Analysis and Bureau of Labor Statistics

AcknowledgmentsMany people participated in the production of this report Cameron Speir and Cara Mayo are the editors of this report series Rita Curtis Sabrina Lovell Kate Quigley and Cara Mayo were primary authors and analysts on this edition of Fisheries Economics of the United States Key collaborators include Jami Larson Lauren Dolinger Few Karen Greene Laura Johansen Jean Lee Michael Lewis Michael Liddel Alan Lowther Emily Markowitz and Eric Thunberg The reportrsquos design and layout was done by Avi Litwack Jacqui Fenner and Cara Mayo

NOAA Fisheries staff in the regional fisheries science centers and regional offices provided expertise Alan Haynie Justin Hospital Christopher Liese Michael Tra-vis and Stephen Holiman Other colleagues who pro-vided information and expertise included Mike Brown (California Department of Fish and Wildlife) and Jason Edwards and Rob Ames (Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission)

Address all comments and questions to Kathryn Cuff | KathrynCuffnoaagov

Economics and Sociocultural Analysis DivisionOffice of Science and TechnologyNOAA Fisheries (NMFS)1315 East-West Highway 12th floorSilver Spring MD 20910-3282Phone 301-427-8121Fax 301-713-4137

v

vi

Commercial FisheriesWhat Does the Term MeanCommercial fisheries in this report refers to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit It does not include saltwater anglers that fish for sport or subsistence fishermen It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key species and species groups

Metrics Definitions1

Economic ImpactsThe employment personal income and output generated by the commercial harvest sector and other major components of the US seafood industry

Landings RevenueThe price that fishermen are paid for their catch

LandingsThe poundage or number of fish unloaded by commercial fishermen or brought to shore

Ex-vessel PricesThe price received by a captain at the point of landing for the catch

Frequently Asked Questions

What are fish caught with in commercial fishingFish can be caught using a variety of gear including potts and traps trawls and seines gillnets dredges and hooks and lines

What happens to seafood caught by commercial fishermenFish caught by commercial fishermen are first processed and packaged Then they are sold to various establishments for consumption such as restaurants and supermarkets They can also be used as animal food and for medical purposes (such as fish oil pills)

Does the United States get seafood from anywhere elseNot all fish are caught by US commercial fishermen A large percent of the seafood the US receives is imported

1 For full definitions see the Glossary at the back of this publication

vii

Recreational FisheriesWhat Does the Term MeanRecreational fisheries or recreational fishing refer to fishing for pleasure rather than selling the fish for profit (ie commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section of Fisheries Economics of the US reports on angler trips participation expenditures and economic impacts and catch of key species and species groups Only saltwater or marine recreational fishing is included in FEUS

Metrics Definitions

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe employment sales and personal income generated by expenditures on fishing trips and fishing-related durable goods (ie equipment used for recreational fishing)

Fishing Trips EffortThe number of fishing trips taken by recreational fishermen (anglers)

ParticipationThe number of anglers who fish in a given state or region Anglers can be from in-state or out-of-state and from a coastal county or non-coastal county

Harvest and ReleaseThe total number or fish either 1) caught and kept (harvested) or 2) caught and released by recreational anglers from an area over a period of time Total catch is the sum of the number of fish harvested and released

Frequently Asked Questions

How do anglers affect the fishing economyWhen anglers participate in fishing activities they support sales and employment in recreational fishing and other types of businesses Anglers buy fishing equipment from bait and tackle shops rent or buy boats or pay to have others take them on charter boats to fish They may also pay for food and drink at local restaurants purchase gas for their boat and stay in hotels for overnight fishing trips

What do anglers spend their money onDurable goods such as fishing tackle and boat vehicle and second home expenses Trips which can be taken in one of three modes as for-hire (charter or party boat) private (or rental boat) and shore (fishing from shore) Some examples of trip expenditures include fuel bait ice and charter or guide fees

What do anglers do with their catchSome anglers catch fish to eat (ie harvest) while others practice catch and release In recreational fishing anglers do not sell the fish they catch for profit

viii

Marine EconomyWhat Does the Term MeanThe ldquoMarine Economyrdquo in this report refers to the economic activity generated by sectors of the economy that depend directly on oceans (or Great Lakes) We report on two industry sectors within the marine economy 1) seafood sales and processing and 2) transport support and marine operations Information such as the number of establishments number of employees and annual payroll for these fishing and marine-related industries is used to determine their relative levels of economic activity in a state

Metrics Definitions

Seafood Sales and ProcessingThese sectors are a direct representation of the Establishments Employees Sales and Payroll for seafood processors wholesalers and retailers that buy fish from commercial fishermen and distribute to consumers

Transport Support and Marine OperationsThe various sectors that contribute to the overall marine economy that may or may not support the fishing economy

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the marine economy include commercial and recreational fisheriesYes commercial and recreational fisheries contribute to the overall marine economy

What marine economy sectors featured in the report are related to commercial and recreational fisheriesThe seafood product preparation amp packaging wholesale and retail seafood sales sectors are major parts of the commercial fishing industry The Marinas Navigational Services Port amp Harbor operations and Ship amp Boat Building sectors provide goods and services used in both commercial and recreational fisheries

Why does the report include sectors that are independent of the fishing economyInformation on sectors that are independent of the fishing economy like freight transportation provides context for how national and regional economies are affected by the use of ocean resources

National Overview

Surf fishing on Chincoteague Island Virginia Photo Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management CouncilMary Sabo

2

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe authority to manage federal fisheries in the United States was granted to the Secretary of Commerce by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (PL 94-265 as amended by PL 109-479) NOAA Fisheries is the federal agency with delegated authority from the Secretary of Commerce to oversee fishing activities in federal waters Federal fisheries are generally defined as fishing activities that take place in the US Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ between 3 and 200 nautical miles from the coastline) Generally individual states retain management authority over fishing activities within three nautical miles of their coasts

Nationwide 46 fishery management plans (FMPs) provide a framework for managing the harvest of 474 fish stocks and stock complexes These plans aim to manage the harvest of fish in US and shared waters using sound scientific research to maximize fishing opportunity while ensuring the sustainability of fisheries and fishing communities Regional Fishery Management Councils (FMCs) develop FMPs in eight regions nationwide North Pacific Pacific Western Pacific New England Mid-Atlantic South Atlantic Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean1 After an FMP is developed the Secretary of Commerce in consultation with NOAA Fisheries must approve it before it is implemented

Regional Fishery Management Councils

bull North Pacificbull Pacificbull Western Pacificbull New England

bull Mid-Atlanticbull South Atlanticbull Gulf of Mexicobull Caribbean

Fishery management plans must specify objective and measurable criteria to determine when a stock is overfished or subject to overfishing Enough information exists to determine the overfishing status for 316 (or 67) of the 474 stocks and stock complexes Of these 316 30 stocks are subject to overfishing (or 9 of stocks with known status) The overfished status of 235 (or 50) of the 474 stocks and stock complexes is known Of these 235 stocks 38 (or 16 of stocks with

known status) are categorized as overfished2

Transboundary and International FisheriesNOAA Fisheries is also actively involved in negotiating conservation and management measures including total allowable catch levels fishery allocations and monitoring and control schemes for internationally shared fisheries resources Shared fisheries resources include those in areas where the EEZ of the US overlaps with other nations (transboundary areas) and in areas beyond the US EEZ ie international waters or the high seas The Gulf of Alaska and the Gulf of Maine are examples of these transboundary areas An area in the Bering Sea outside the EEZs of Canada Japan and Russia called the Donut Hole is an example of international waters Loss of sea ice will create new transboundary areas and international waters in the Arctic

Regional Fishery Management Organizations (RFMOs) are multinational organizations with interests in internationally shared fish stocks and associated fishing activities Primary objectives of these RFMOs are to research assess and adopt measures for the conservation and coordinated management of target species such as bigeye tuna Some RFMOs also collect data and evaluate and adopt measures for the conservation and scientific assessment of non-target species also known as bycatch Non-target species include seabirds marine mammals sea turtles and fish species caught incidentally while fishing for target species The commitment to conserving and protecting all species associated with or affected by fishing activities is outlined in the Food and Agriculture Organizationrsquos (FAOrsquos) Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries established in 1995

Another issue of particular concern for NOAA Fisheries is illegal unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing activities (see Policy Updates) IUU fishing generally refers to fishing that violates national laws or internationally agreed conservation and management measures in effect in oceans around the world IUU fishing can include fishing without a license or quota for certain species unauthorized transshipments to cargo

1 Fishery management plans and fishery ecosystem plans for each region covered in this report are listed in their respective sections The four FMPs developed by the Caribbean Fishery Management Council and the Atlantic Highly Migratory Species FMP developed by NOAA Fisheries are not included in this report2 Source NOAA Fisheries Office of Sustainable Fisheries Status of Stocks 2016 httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovfeature-storystatus-stocks-2016

3

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

vessels failing to report catches or making false reports keeping undersized fish or fish that are otherwise protected by regulations fishing in closed areas or during closed seasons and using prohibited fishing gear

Experts estimate that global economic losses from IUU fishing range from $10 billion to $235 billion annually representing between 11 and 26 million tons of fish3

Regional Fishery Management OrganizationsNOAA Fisheries participates in eight RFMOs globally Each RMFO is listed by ocean basin below4

Pacificbull Pacific Salmon Commissionbull International Pacific Halibut Commissionbull Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commissionbull Western and Central Pacific Fishery

Commission

Atlanticbull International Commission for the

Conservation of Atlantic Tunasbull North Atlantic Salmon Conservation

Organizationbull Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization

Antarcticbull Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic

Marine Living Resources

NOAA Fisheries is actively collaborating with other federal agencies as part of the National Ocean Council Committee on IUU Fishing and Seafood Fraud This network of agencies works together to implement measures outlined in an action plan developed by the Presidential Task Force on Combatting IUU Fishing and Seafood Fraud The plan includes actions that will strengthen enforcement create and expand partnerships with state and local governments industry and non-governmental organizations and create a risk-based traceability program to track seafood from harvest to entry into US commerce The plan also highlights ways in which the United States will work with our foreign partners to strengthen international governance enhance cooperation and build capacity to combat IUU fishing and seafood fraud

Saltwater Recreational Fisheries Policy In February 2015 NOAA Fisheries established a formal National Saltwater Recreational Fisheries Policy to broadly guide future actions and better integrate recreational fishing with NOAA Fisheriesrsquo mission The policy focuses on six guiding principles 1) support ecosystem conservation and enhancement 2) promote public access to quality recreational fishing opportunities 3) coordinate with state and federal management entities4) advance innovative solutions to evolving sciencemanagement and environmental challenges 5) providescientifically sound and trusted social cultural economicand ecological information and 6) communicate andengage with the recreational fishing public

Threatened and Endangered SpeciesNOAA Fisheries is also the lead agency for the conservation and protection of marine and anadromous species that fall within the purview of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Currently there are 161 threatened and endangered marine species under the ESA (see Table 1)

Table 1 Endangered and Threatened Species under NOAA Fisheries Jurisdiction5

Species Group Number of SpeciesMarine and Anadromous Fish 74Marine Mammals 33Sea Turtles 26Marine Invertebrates 27Plants 1Total Threatened andEndangered Marine Species 161

In addition to threatened and endangered marine and anadromous species NOAA Fisheries also helps identify candidate and proposed species Candidate species are actively being considered for listing as endangered or threatened under the ESA These species also include those for which NOAA Fisheries has initiated a status review that it has announced in the Federal Register Proposed species are candidate species that were found to warrant listing as either threatened or endangered These species were officially proposed as such in a Federal Register notice after the completion of a status review and consideration of other protective measures

3 Agnew DJ Pearce J Pramod G Peatman T Watson R Beddington JR et al (2009) Estimating the Worldwide Extent of Illegal Fishing PLoS ONE 4(2) e4570 doi101371journalpone00045704 Source httpwwwnmfsnoaagoviaagreementsregional_agreementsintlagreehtml 5 See NOAA Fisheries Office of Protected Resources (httpwwwnmfsnoaagovprspeciesesa) for current and proposed ESA species listings

4

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

Currently 12 candidate species and three proposed species are under consideration for listing

NOAA Fisheries is also responsible for protecting marine mammals under the Marine Mammal Protection Act6 In authorizing this act in 1972 Congress recognized that marine mammal species or stocks may be in danger of extinction or depletion as a result of human activities marine mammal species or stocks should not be allowed to fall below their optimum sustainable population levels measures should be taken to replenish marine mammal species or stocks there is inadequate knowledge of the marine mammal ecology and population dynamics and marine mammals have proven to be resources of great international significance NOAA Fisheries engages in activities such as preventing the harassment capture or killing of marine mammals preparing marine mammal stock assessments and studying interactions between marine mammals and fisheries

Essential Fish HabitatsSustainable commercial and recreational fisheries depend on healthy habitats These habitats include rivers estuaries and the open ocean where marine and anadromous species feed grow and reproduce Consideration of these habitat areas is part of an ecosystem-based management approach for managing fisheries in a more sustainable and holistic manner Since 1996 federal fishery management plans are required to identify and describe essential fish habitat (EFH) for all federally managed species Habitat areas that are necessary for a fish speciesrsquo growth reproduction and development are considered EFH To the extent practicable NOAA Fisheries and the FMCs must minimize adverse effects to EFH caused by fishing

Though not required Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) can be identified to help focus EFH conservation efforts The HAPC designation alone does not confer additional protection to or place restrictions on an area but helps to focus EFH conservation management and research priorities HAPC designation is a valuable way to acknowledge areas where detailed information exists on ecological function and habitat vulnerability indicating a greater need for conservation and management To

date approximately 100 HAPCs have been designated including specific coral seamount and spawning areas A recent effort undertaken by NOAA Fisheries was the creation of a Habitat Assessment Improvement Plan7 The goal of this plan is to advance NOAA Fisheriesrsquo ability to identify EFH and HAPCs and provide the information needed to assess impacts to EFH

Catch Share Programs Market-based management tools are used by fishery managers to reduce over-capitalization increase the economic viability of fisheries and promote individual accountability for harvest and harvesting practices Catch share programs are one of these tools and encompass a range of management strategies that share a common feature A secure share of fish is dedicated to individual fishermen cooperatives fishing communities and other entities for their exclusive use In 2010 the NOAA catch share policy was released to encourage well-designed catch share programs to help maintain or rebuild fisheries8 The policy also aims to sustain fishermen communities and vibrant working waterfronts including the cultural and resource-access traditions that have been part of this country since its founding

Currently there are 16 federal catch share programs nationwide These programs include limited access privilege programs (LAPPs) individual fishing quota programs (IFQs) individual transferable quota programs (ITQs) fishing community development quota programs (CDQs) fishing cooperatives and fishing sectors9 Implementation dates of these programs span three decades with five programs established in the 1990s and six established since 2010 (see Table 2) Ten programs manage a single species or in some cases two species but as separate management units the other six programs manage multiple species Six of the programs operate in the Alaska Region

In 2010 NOAA Fisheries initiated an effort to track catch share program performance10 Findings from the initial report show that existing catch share programs have ended the race to fish (in their respective fisheries) resulting in longer fishing seasons safer working conditions and improved management performance The

6 The US Fish and Wildlife Service protects walrus manatees otters and polar bears7 The Habitat Assessment Improvement Plan is available at httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovst4documentshabitatAssesmentImprovement-Plan_052110PDF8 See httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationallaws-and-policiescatch-shares9 See Section 303A of the Magnuson-Stevens Act for more information on LAPP requirements10 See httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriescommercialcatch-share-programindex

5

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

report also shows that existing catch share programs have resulted in reduced fishing capacity to better match stock sizemdash a management objective in the majority of catch share programs evaluated Economic performance for the vessels remaining in the program improved as measured by such metrics as revenue per vessel and average price

Updated information on selected performance indicators is provided in Table 3 Briefly results show that inflation-

adjusted revenue from catch share species increased in 10 of the 15 programs andor sub-components of the programs since their implementation In addition the number of active vessels decreased in all but one program (Central GOA Rockfish) while inflation-adjusted revenue per active vessel increased in all programs since their implementation Further results show that no stocks exceeded the annual catch limit (ACL) in 2015

Table 2 Existing Catch Share Programs in Federal Fisheries

Region Program Year Implemented

Mid-Atlantic Mid-Atlantic Surfclam amp Ocean Quahog ITQ 1990Mid-Atlantic Golden Tilefish IFQ 2009

New England Northeast Multispecies Sectors 2010Northeast General Category Atlantic Sea Scallop IFQ 2010

North Pacific

Western Alaska Community Development Quota 1992Alaska Halibut and Sablefish IFQ 1995American Fisheries Act (AFA) Pollock Cooperatives 1999Bering Sea and Aleutian Island (BSAI) Crab Rationalization 2005Central Gulf of Alaska (GOA) Rockfish (pilot implemented in 2007) 2012Non-Pollock Trawl CatcherProcessor Groundfish Cooperatives (Amendment 80) 2008

South Atlantic South Atlantic Wreckfish ITQ 1992

Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper IFQ 2007Grouper-Tilefish IFQ 2010

Pacific Pacific Coast Sablefish Permit Stacking 2001Pacific Groundfish Trawl Rationalization Program (Whiting and Non-Whiting trawl) 2011

Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Individual Bluefin Quota Program 2016

Table 3 Economic Performance Indicators for US Federal Catch Share Programs (2015 dollars)11

Management Context Participation Economic Benefits

ACL Exceeded Active Vessels Total Revenue fromCatch Share Species Revenue per Active Vessel

Baseline 2015 Baseline 2015 Baseline 2015 Baseline 2015Gulf of MexicoGrouper-Tilefish Y N 630 446 $22771411 $27854557 $36145 $62454Red Snapper Y N 482 415 $13958514 $28884023 $28960 $69600

Mid-AtlanticGolden Tilefish - N 14 11 $4707700 $5028563 $336264 $457142Ocean Quahog N N 67 16 $29406847 $21858000 $438908 $1366125Surfclam - N 137 37 $39625107 $28589183 $289234 $772681

New EnglandGeneral Category Scallop - - 271 150 $28366002 $31591134 $104672 $210608Multispecies Sectors Y N 417 206 $86215431 $52666418 $206751 $255662

North PacificAlaska Halibut Y N 3432 874 $93232899 $102001633 $27168 $116707 Alaska Sablefish Y N 1139 306 $93929829 $74449319 $82467 $243298 AFA Pollock Cooperatives Y N 147 99 $253467523 $368407672 $1720368 $3721290 BSAI Crab Rationalization Y N 264 80 $186746805 $244176102 $706482 $3052201 Amendment 80 N N 22 18 $92131777 $105158733 $4187808 $5842152 Central GOA Rockfish Y N 42 51 $5729012 $10982900 $136405 $215351

PacificPacific Sablefish - N 135 89 $6701698 $7904987 $49642 $88820Whiting and Non-Whiting Directed - N 124 94 $39979907 $39930830 $322419 $424796

11 The South Atlantic Wreckfish ITQ is not included due to confidentiality restrictions The Western Alaska CDQ program was excluded because it is the onlyCDQ and thus fundamentally different from the other programs In addition note that some programs did not have a catch quota prior to the catch shareprogram For these programs ldquo-rdquo indicates that the question of whether the ACL was exceeded is not applicable

6

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

Policy UpdatesIn December 2016 NOAA Fisheries issued the final rule establishing the Seafood Import Monitoring Program to further curb illegal unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing practices and to identify misrepresented seafood imports before they enter the US market The program requires that importers report information and maintain records about the harvest landing and chain of custody of imported fish and fish products for certain priority species identified as especially vulnerable to IUU fishing and seafood fraud The data collected under this program will allow these priority species of seafood to be traced from the point of entry into US commerce back to the point of harvest or production to verify whether it was lawfully harvested or produced For 11 of the 13 speciesspecies groups covered in the final rule the rule went into effect January 1 2018 shrimp and abalone compliance will be mandatory by December 31 2018

Other Market-Based Management ToolsVessel or permit buyback programs are another market-based tool used by fishery managers Under these programs the government purchases fishing vessels or permits Doing so permanently decreases the number of participants in the fishery and eases fishing-related pressure on marine resources Recent buyback programs include BSAI Crab Pacific Coast Groundfish Longline CP Non-Pol-lock Groundfish Southeast Alaska Purse Seine Salmon and AFA Pollock

License limitation programs (LLPs) also known as limited entry programs are another management tool available to fishery managers In these programs the number of fishing vessels allowed to harvest a specific fish stock or stock complex is limited to fishermen or vessels with permission to fish LLPs have been implemented in almost all federally managed commercial fisheries and in every region except the Caribbean

Ecolabels are market-based tools offered by third-party entities An ecolabeling program entitles a fishery product to bear a distinctive logo or statement that certifies the fishery resource was harvested in compliance with specified conservation and sustainability standards It allows the buyer to potentially influence the sustainable harvest of fishery resources through the purchase of such

ecolabeled seafood products at a price premium

The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) has one of the most recognizable ecolabeling programs in the world Currently nearly 300 fisheries worldwide meet MSC sustainability standards 19 of which are US fisheries (see Table 4) Fisheries obtaining MSC certification for the first time in 2016 include the US Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog fishery and the Gulf of Maine Lobster fishery

Table 4 US Fisheries with MSC Certification12

Region Fishery Certified

North Pacific

Alaska flatfish - Bering Sea amp Aleutian Islands 2010

Alaska flatfish - Gulf of Alaska 2010Alaska Pacific cod - Bering Sea amp Aleutian Islands 2010

Alaska Pacific cod - Gulf of Alaska 2010Alaska pollock - Bering Sea amp Aleutian Islands 2010

Alaska pollock - Gulf of Alaska 2010American Western Fish Boat Owners Association albacore tuna North Pacific

2010

US North Pacific halibut 2006US North Pacific sablefish 2006Alaska salmon 2000

Pacific

American Albacore Fishing Association Pacific albacore tuna - north

2007

American Albacore Fishing Association Pacific albacore tuna - south

2007

Pacific hake mid-water trawl 2009US West Coast limited entry groundfish trawl 2014

Gulf Louisiana blue crab 2012

North-east

US Atlantic spiny dogfish 2012US North Atlantic swordfish 2013US Atlantic sea scallop 2013US Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog 2016

Gulf of Maine Lobster 2016

NATIONAL OVERVIEWIn 2016 commercial and recreational fisheries throughout the United States generated approximately 17 million jobs in the US economy In addition commercial and recreational fishing together generated $2122 billion in sales impacts $642 billion in income

12 For more information about these fisheries and the Marine Stewardship Council certification process see httpswwwmscorg

7

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

impacts and $995 billion in value-added impacts throughout the economy Florida had the largest employment impacts from the combined fishing industry with approximately 173000 jobs Florida also had the largest sales impacts from the combined fishing industry ($278 billion) the largest income impacts ($73 billion) and the largest value-added impacts ($122 billion)

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fishing refers to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key US Commercial Species

bull American lobsterbull Blue crabbull Menhadenbull Pacific halibutbull Pacific salmon

bull Sablefishbull Sea scallopbull Shrimpbull Tunasbull Walleye pollock

Regional HighlightsAt the national level this report includes landings revenue landings and prices for 10 key species or species groups which were selected so that each region has at least one species in the top 10 Results show that commercial fishermen in Alaska caught the most salmon (5877 million pounds) and earned $4073 million for their catch in 2016 Tuna was caught in large numbers in Hawailsquoi (235 million pounds) and generated $885 million in landings revenue Maine fishermen contributed the most to American lobster landings (132 million pounds) and earned $5379 million for their catch in 2016 In Massachusetts sea scallopers harvested 229 million pounds of scallop and earned $2814 million for their catch More blue crab was caught in Louisiana (401 million pounds) than in any other state earning more than $494 million Louisiana

also accounted for the greatest quantity of menhaden landed in 2016 with fishermen landing 11 billion pounds worth $1321 million in dockside revenue Sea scallop garnered the highest average ex-vessel price per pound ($12) among the key species and species groups in 2016 with state-specific prices ranging from $951 in New York to $1281 in Maine

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers13

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the

13 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)

8

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 the seafood industry supported 12 million full- and part-time jobs and generated $1443 billion in sales $399 billion in income and $608 billion in value-added impacts nationwide (Table 5) The retail sector generated the largest employment impacts across sectors (583000 jobs) the largest income impacts ($136 billion) and the largest value-added

impacts ($185 billion) The importers sector generated the largest sales impacts ($576 billion)

The largest state-level employment impacts generated by the seafood industry occurred in California (125000 jobs) followed by Massachusetts (87000 jobs) and Florida (77000 jobs) see Graph 1 The highest income impacts were generated in California ($49 billion) followed by Florida and Washington The highest sales impacts were generated by the seafood industry in California ($228 billion) followed by Florida and Massachusetts The highest value-added impacts were generated in California ($81 billion) followed by Florida and Washington (Table 6)

Table 5 US Seafood Industry Economic Impacts Trends ($ billions)2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Jobs 1270141 1350627 1394833 1179848 1190092Sales $14070 $14220 $15330 $14419 $14429Income $3870 $3980 $4200 $3974 $3990Value Added $5900 $6030 $6410 $6057 $6076Total Revenue $529 $555 $553 $522 $534

Table 6 Sales Income and Value-Added Impacts Generated by the US Seafood Industry 2016 ($ millions)

State Sales Income Value Added

US $144293 $39905 $60758California $22776 $4912 $8141Florida $16874 $3172 $5659Washington $7464 $2004 $3048Massachusetts $7663 $1999 $3045Alaska $3895 $1654 $2074New Jersey $6226 $1413 $2282New York $4412 $950 $1567Maine $2582 $856 $1236Louisiana $2022 $752 $1023Texas $2091 $597 $899Virginia $1435 $464 $660Oregon $1190 $416 $584New Hampshire $1511 $348 $558Georgia $1554 $344 $567Maryland $1241 $335 $504Rhode Island $1375 $335 $529North Carolina $985 $276 $411Hawairsquoi $867 $269 $392Alabama $555 $220 $288Mississippi $218 $87 $113Connecticut $387 $83 $137South Carolina $118 $39 $55Delaware $136 $26 $44

Graph 1 Jobs supported by the US Seafood Industry (With and Without Imports) 2016

0 30000 60000 90000 120000 150000

DESCCTMSHINHGANCRIAL

MDORVATXNYLANJMEAKWAFL

MACA

Jobs Without Imports

Jobs With Imports

9

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

Landings TrendsWhile nationally landings revenue ticked up 2 percent from 2015 to 2016 there was considerably more variation among the key speciesspecies groups Most notably Pacific salmon (down $948 million) and walleye pollock (down $498 million) had the largest declines in landings revenue while American lobster and sea scallops (both up $460 million) had the largest increases in landings revenue Salmon landings revenue declined due to a sharp decline in landings in 2016 (down 46) relative to 2015 This was largely due to the decline in pink salmon landings which fell 488 million pounds from 2015 levels While pink salmon landings are typically lower in ldquoeven yearsrdquo due to their biennial cycle in 2016 the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) pink salmon harvests came in far below forecasted levels The walleye pollock landings revenue decline (down 11 or $498 million) was directly attributable to lower ex-vessel prices in both the Bering SeandashAleutian Islands and Gulf of Alaska

New Englandrsquos American lobster fishery continued its strong performance driven by record abundance levels of Gulf of Maine lobsters that have allowed landings to almost double (up 99) since 2007 The increase in New England and Mid-Atlantic sea scallop fisheries landings revenue (up $171 million and $294 million respectively) over 2015 levels was similarly driven by an increase in landings

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the United States totaled $53 billion

in 2016 (Table 7) This represented a 28 increase in nominal value from 2007 levels (an 11 increase in realterms after adjusting for inflation) and a year-over-year increase of 2 from 2015 (Graph 2) Finfish landings revenue accounted for 43 of all landings revenue American lobster had the highest landings revenue in 2016

Table 7 Commercial Fisheries Landings Revenue by Region 2016 ($ millions)

Region LandingsRevenue Region Landings

Revenue US $533710 Pacific $68890North Pacific $160960 Mid-Atlantic $55030New England $132590 South Atlantic $19090Gulf of Mexico $91210 Western Pacific $11810

From 2007 to 2016 menhaden (96 71 in real terms) American lobster (81 58 in real terms) and tunas (64 44 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while Pacific halibut (-45 -52 in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 tunas (12) sea scallop (11) and American lobster (7) had the largest revenue increases while Pacific salmon (-17) and walleye pollock (-11) had the largest revenue decreases

Alaska earned the greatest share of landings revenue in 2016 ($16 billion) contributing 30 of the national total (Table 7) Maine ($574 million or 19 of US shellfish revenue) and Massachusetts ($4516 million or 15 of US shellfish revenue) earned the most ex-vessel revenue from shellfish landings

Graph 2 US Commercial Fisheries Landings Revenue 2007-2016 (nominal values $ billions)

$3

$4

$5

$6

2016201520142013201220112010200920082007

10

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Menhaden (96 71 in real terms)bull American lobster (81 58 in real terms)bull Tunas (64 44 in real terms)From 2015bull Tunas (12)bull Sea scallop (11)bull American lobster (7)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Pacific halibut (-45 -52 in real terms)From 2015bull Pacific salmon (-17)bull Walleye pollock (-11)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull American lobster (96)bull Menhaden (18)bull Tunas (10)From 2015bull Sea scallop (11)bull American lobster (8)bull Menhaden(7)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Pacific halibut (-64)bull Pacific salmon (-38)bull Sea scallop (-31)From 2015bull Pacific salmon (-46)bull Shrimp (-15)bull Sablefish (-3)

LandingsLandings volume in the United States totaled 96 billion pounds in 2016 (Table 8) This represented a 3 increase from 2007 levels and a year-over-year decrease of 2 from 2015 see Graph 3 Finfish landings

accounted for 88 of all landed weight Walleye pollock had the highest landings volume in 2016

From 2007 to 2016 American lobster (96) menhaden (18) and tunas (10) had the largest landings increases while Pacific halibut (-64) Pacific salmon (-38) and sea scallop (-31) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 sea scallop (11) American lobster (8) and menhaden (7) had the largest landings increases while Pacific salmon (-46) shrimp (-15) and sablefish (-3) had the largest landings decreases

Alaska accounted for the greatest share of landings volume in 2016 (56 billion pounds) contributing 59 of the national total (see Table 8) Louisiana (1633 million pounds or 14 of US shellfish landings) and Maine (1507 million pounds 13) had the highest shellfish landings by volume

Table 8 Commercial Fisheries Landings by Region 2016 (millions of pounds)Region Landings Region Landings US 960200 Mid-Atlantic 59750North Pacific 563099 New England 59500Gulf of Mexico 174450 South Atlantic 10630Pacific 93780 Western Pacific 3510

PricesOf all key species or species groups sea scallop ($12 per pound) had the highest national ex-vessel price Menhaden ($010 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price of all key species nationally

From 2007 to 2016 large price increases were observed for sea scallop (82 67 in real terms) menhaden (67 52 in real terms) and Pacific salmon (59 39 in real terms) while walleye pollock (-9 -5 in real terms) and American lobster (-8 -22 in real terms) had the largest decreases in price From 2015 to 2016 large year-over-year price increases were observed for Pacific salmon (53) shrimp (19) and tunas (15) while walleye pollock (-25) menhaden (-9) and sea scallop (-3) had the largest annual percentage decreases in price from 2015 to 2016

11

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

Graph 3 US Commercial Fisheries Landings 2007-2016 (billions of pounds)

6

8

10

2016201520142013201220112010200920082007

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on angler participation trips economic impacts and expenditures and catch of key speciesspecies groups14

Key US Recreational Species

bull Atlantic croakerand spot

bull Little tunny andAltlantic bonito

bull Pacific halibutbull Rockfishes and

scorpionfishes

bull Pacific salmonbull Seatroutbull Sharksbull Striped bassbull Summer flounderbull Tunas

Regional HighlightsAt the national level the report includes fishing trips participation and the harvest and release numbers of 10 key species or species groups which were selected so that each region has at least one species in the top 10 Results show that in 2016 recreational anglers in West Florida took the most trips (132 million trips) and spent the most on trips ($6463 million) North Carolina spent the second most on trips ($4467 million) West Florida also had the most recreational anglers participate in fishing in their state with 37 million anglers

West Florida caught the most seatrouts (119 million fish) Virginia caught the most Atlantic croaker and spot (56 million fish) and New Jersey caught the most summer flounder (69 million fish) Alaska caught the most Pacific halibut (643000 fish) and more striped bass (51 million fish) was caught in Maryland than in any other state

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures1516 Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures were estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing It includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a

14 Except where noted Atlantic and Gulf recreational catch and effort estimates are based upon the MRIP APAIS and CHTS (httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovrecreational-fisheriesSurveyssurvey-details) and not the revised MRIP estimates (httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovleadership-messagenoaa-fisheries-releases-revised-mrip-recreational-catch-and-effort-estimates) released in 201815 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable goods expenditure im-pacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were gen-erated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011) 16 Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contri-bution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-ex-pendituresmarine-angler-2011) and IMPLAN version 31100112

12

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities supported 472000 jobs across the United States in 2016 (see Table 9) Recreational fishing also generated about $679 billion in sales impacts $243 billion in income impacts and $387 billion in value-added impacts Impacts from durable equipment expenditures (eg rods and reels fishing-related equipment boats vehicles and second homes) accounted for 86 of total job impacts 85 of sales impacts 87 of income impacts and 87 of value added impacts Of the three fishing trip modes private-boat-based fishing trips had the greatest economic impact accounting for 5 of employment 6 of sales 4 of income impacts and 5 of value-added impacts

Table 9 Recreational Economic Impacts Trends for the United States ($ billions)

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Number of Jobs 425321 420191 438590 439242 472020Sales $5880 $5810 $6060 $6344 $6791 Income $2140 $2110 $2200 $2268 $2433 Value Added $3440 $3400 $3550 $3608 $3869 Total Trips (millions) 711 721 690 617 633

The greatest employment impacts from saltwater recreational fishing were generated in West Florida followed by East Florida and California (see Graph 4) The highest sales impacts were generated in West Florida followed by East Florida and California (see Table 10)

Graph 4 Jobs supported by the US Recreational Fishing Industry 2016

0 20000 40000 60000 80000NHHIMEGADEORCTRI

WAAKSCMSVAMDMANYLANJTXALNCCA

E FLW FL

Jobs

Table 10 Sales Income and Value-Added Impacts Generated by the Recreational Fishing Industry 2016 ($ millions)State Sales Income Value AddedUS National Total $67912 $24334 $38693 West Florida $6827 $2575 $4112 East Florida $4084 $1540 $2466 California $2123 $819 $1305 Texas $2000 $746 $1237 New Jersey $1752 $746 $1168 North Carolina $1699 $656 $1021 Louisiana $1630 $608 $1003 Alabama $1436 $616 $1030 New York $1127 $488 $770 Massachusetts $1071 $496 $716 Maryland $785 $327 $513 Mississippi $638 $211 $345 Virginia $584 $239 $379 Washington $542 $209 $340 Alaska $539 $195 $316 South Carolina $498 $181 $292 Connecticut $430 $186 $292 Rhode Island $412 $176 $270 Oregon $297 $132 $192 Delaware $168 $67 $110 Georgia $161 $67 $106 Hawaii $105 $33 $55 Maine $99 $37 $59 New Hampshire $48 $22 $31

13

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

In 2016 expenditures for fishing trips and durable equipment in the United States totaled $308 billion

Approximately $43 billion of these expenditures were related to trip expenses Total trip expenditures were composed of expenses on trips in the private boat (42) shore (32) and for-hire (26) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $266 billion in 2016 with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($154 billion) see Graph 5

Fishing TripsNationwide anglers took approximately 633 million saltwater fishing trips around the country (see Table 11)17 This number represents a 28 decrease from 2007 and a 3 increase from 2015 (see Graph 6) Forty-nine percent of fishing trips were taken via the private boat mode West Florida anglers took the most fishing trips (132 million trips) followed by those in East Florida and North Carolina (Table 12)

Table 11 Recreational Fishing Trips by Region 2016 (millions of fishing trips)Region TripsUS Total 633Guld of Mexico 195 South Atlantic 168 Mid-Atlantic 140 New England 61Pacific 52Hawairsquoi 10

Table 12 Recreational Fishing Trips by State 2016 (thousands of trips)State Trips State TripsWest Florida 13219 South Carolina 1909East Florida 8827 Connecticut 1644North Carolina 5411 Mississippi 1512New Jersey 4306 Rhode Island 1159New York 4294 Hawairsquoi 1024California 3532 Washington 1008Alabama 2567 Delaware 910Massachusetts 2384 Georgia 696Maryland 2383 Oregon 684Louisiana 2242 Maine 573Virginia 2108 New Hampshire 293

Graph 5 Recreational Fishing Trip and Durable Expenditures 2016 ($ billions)

Other Equipment$19Second Home Expenses$21Vehicle Expenses$35

Fishing Tackle$37

Trips$43

Boat Expenses$154

Graph 6 Recreational Fishing Trips 2007-2016 (millions of angler trips)

60

80

100

2016201520142013201220112010200920082007

Trips 2007-2016 (millions of anglers)

17 Trip estimates include Puerto Rico but do not include Alaska or Texas Hawaiʻi trip estimates are available only for the shore and private boat mode

14

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

ParticipationNationwide 98 million recreational saltwater anglers fished in their home states in 201618 This number represented a 29 decrease from 2007 and a 9 increase from 2015 Coastal county residents made up 86 of this total while non-coastal county residents made up 14 West Florida had the highest participation of anglers (37 million) followed by North Carolina and East Florida

Harvest and ReleaseIn 2016 drum (seatrouts) (364 million fish) drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (193 million fish) and summer flounder (142 million fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen in the United States19 From 2007 to 2016 rockfishes and scorpionfishes (44) had the largest increase in catch while drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (-60) Pacific salmon (-44) and Pacific halibut (-37) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 little tunny and Atlantic bonito (45) striped bass (37) and drum (seatrouts) (30) had the largest increases in catch while Pacific salmon (-37) tunas (Thunnus species) (-25) and drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (-24) had the largest decreases

Harvest and Release Largest Increases

From 2007bull Rockfishes amp scorpionfishes (44)From 2015bull Little tunny amp Atlantic bonito (45)bull Striped bass (37)bull Drum (seatrouts) (30)

Harvest and Release Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Drum (Atlantic croaker amp spot) (-60)bull Pacific salmon (-44)bull Pacific halibut (-37)From 2015bull Pacific salmon (-37)bull Tunas (Thunnus species) (-25)bull Drum (Atlantic croaker amp spot) (-24)

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The national marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments)

These sectors include several different marine-related industries Note that Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 2015 Percentage changes in inflation-adjusted (real dollar) terms are calculated using the annual Gross Domestic Product implicit price deflator published by the US Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis20

The Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) measures the proportional size of this sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy21 The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average

In 2015 77 million employee establishments operated throughout the entire US economy (including marine and non-marine related establishments)22 These establishments employed 1241 million workers and had a total annual payroll of $63 trillion The nationrsquos gross domestic product was approximately $179 trillion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 there were 2108 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 62 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $1636 million (a 64 increase in real terms from 2007) More of these non-employer

18 Participation estimates include Puerto Rico but do not include Alaska Texas or Hawairsquoi19 Harvest and release estimates do not include Puerto Rico or Alaska For Hawailsquoi these estimates are available only for shore and private boat mode 20 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS IndustryrdquohttpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)21 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017) 22 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)

15

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

firms were located in Florida (300) New York (183) Texas (178) and California (169) than in any other state There were 618 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 10 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 30708 workers (a 7 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of about $1 billion (this remained unchanged in real terms from 2007) Alaska (109) and Washington (85) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 2471 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood (a 5 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $2067 million (a 21 decrease in real terms from 2007) More of these non-employer firms were located in Florida (355) and California (221) than in any other state There were 2059 employer firms in the retail seafood sales sector (a 2 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 11443 workers (a 10 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $2927 million (a 24 increase in real terms from 2007) New York (409) Florida (181) and California (170) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 2132 employer firms in the wholesale seafood sales sector (a 13 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 22060 workers (a 9 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $9993 million (a 4 decrease in real terms from 2007) California (349) New York (275) and Florida (242) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Transport Support and Marine OperationsCoastal and Great Lakes Freight Transportation There were 593 employer firms providing coastal and Great Lakes freight transportation (a 3 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 19983 workers (an 11 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of about $2 billion (this remained unchanged in real terms from 2007) Louisiana (116) Alaska (74) and New York (73) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Deep Sea Freight Transportation There were 350 employer firms providing deep sea freight transportation (an 18 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 8014 workers (a 29 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $6716 million in 2015 Florida (76) California (56) and Texas (35) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Deep Sea Passenger Transportation There were 61 employer firms in the deep sea passenger transportation sector (a 34 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 15157 workers and had a total annual payroll of $1 billion Florida (32) California (6) and Washington (6) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Marinas There were 3881 employer firms classified as marinas in 2015 (a 5 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 26999 workers (a 6 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of about $1 billion (a 3 decrease in real terms from 2007) Florida (466) New York (429) and California (258) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Marine Cargo Handling There were 492 employer firms providing marine cargo handling services in 2015 (an 11 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 66414 workers (a 6 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of about $4 billion (a 12 increase in real terms from 2007) Florida (69) California (67) and Texas (56) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Navigational Services to Shipping There were 889 employer firms providing navigational services to shipping in 2015 (a 7 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 11864 workers (a 9 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $9233 million (an 8 increase in real terms from 2007) Florida (196) Louisiana (142) and Texas (91) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Port and Harbor Operations There were 337 employer firms in the port and harbor operations

16

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

sector in 2015 (a 51 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 7855 workers (a 20 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $4342 million (a 21 increase in real terms from 2007) Florida (55) California (30) and Texas (25) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Ship and Boat Building There were 1541 employer firms in the ship and boat building sector in 2015 (a 13 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 143287 workers (a 4 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of about $8 billion (an 11 increase in real terms from 2007) Florida (278) Washington (143) and Louisiana (109) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Tables | National Overview

18

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

United States | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the United States Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)

With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 1190092 144293187 39904566 60758157 711409 53110090 19407193 27553434

Commercial Harvesters 166952 14231679 4698535 7334409 166952 14231679 4698535 7334409Seafood Processors amp Dealers 200543 30837015 9731961 13528514 54238 8340003 2632051 3658845

Importers 186295 57572994 9227170 17550769 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 53765 8192076 2691973 3851846 25204 3840327 1261959 1805690

Retail 582536 33459425 13554926 18492619 465015 26698081 10814648 14754491

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (millions of dollars) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 4182 4436 3839 4515 5390 5285 5553 5529 5219 5337Finfish amp Other 2048 2301 1789 2161 2606 2544 2669 2431 2360 2300Shellfish 2135 2135 2051 2354 2785 2742 2884 3098 2859 3038

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 369 325 311 404 423 431 463 564 621 667Blue crab 149 161 163 205 184 193 193 215 220 219Menhaden 93 91 90 93 133 126 125 114 180 181Pacific halibut 227 217 140 207 213 152 117 115 118 125Pacific salmon 451 484 445 614 716 637 835 690 543 448 Sablefish 116 128 130 139 197 154 110 119 123 124 Sea scallop 386 370 376 456 585 559 467 424 440 486Shrimp 430 445 379 409 538 510 597 702 512 522Tunas 94 107 96 108 136 164 146 134 137 154Walleye pollock 392 435 328 334 473 510 462 466 457 407

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (millions of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 9306 8347 7889 8027 9888 9475 9742 9511 9750 9602Finfish amp Other 8228 7292 6618 6719 8516 8148 8466 8244 8608 8475Shellfish 1078 1056 1270 1308 1372 1328 1275 1267 1142 1127

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 81 88 101 118 126 150 150 147 147 159Blue crab 157 162 176 199 202 185 135 140 161 160Menhaden 1484 1344 1407 1259 1899 1598 1341 1232 1632 1748Pacific halibut 70 67 60 56 43 34 30 23 24 25Pacific salmon 971 726 764 848 839 683 1111 754 1122 606 Sablefish 48 46 45 42 43 43 39 35 35 34Sea scallop 58 53 58 58 59 57 41 34 36 40Shrimp 274 249 305 249 312 309 293 326 342 292Tunas 51 48 49 48 50 59 56 58 57 56Walleye pollock 3068 2278 1869 1947 2811 2872 3003 3146 3263 3355

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

American lobster 455 371 309 344 335 287 308 383 423 420Blue crab 095 099 093 103 091 105 143 153 136 137Menhaden 006 007 006 007 007 008 009 009 011 010Pacific halibut 325 325 235 367 498 448 392 497 488 503Pacific salmon 046 067 058 072 085 093 075 092 048 074Sablefish 242 278 289 331 458 357 281 341 350 366Sea scallop 660 693 648 792 989 982 1139 1252 1232 1200Shrimp 157 179 124 164 172 165 204 216 150 178Tunas 185 223 196 225 274 275 262 231 240 276Walleye pollock 011 019 014 014 014 016 015 013 016 012

19

National O

verview |enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

United States | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts byFishing Mode

For-Hire 19890 2893120 1000008 1550124Private Boat 23523 3868886 1095035 1933559Shore 22588 3164227 962607 1661185

Total Durable Expenditures 406019 57985702 21276476 33548301Total Impacts 472020 67911935 24334126 38693169

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)1

Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 1113595Private Boat 1769038Shore 1375153Total 4257786

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 3679848Other Equipment 1908759Boat Expenses 15398019Vehicle Expenses 3473756Second Home Expenses 2102010Total Durable Expenditures 26562392

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 30820178

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)23

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 12251 10550 9515 9496 9082 9561 9509 9232 7721 8427Non-Coastal 1607 1526 1488 1499 1380 1468 1461 1460 1301 1419Total Anglers 13858 12076 11004 10994 10462 11028 10970 10692 9022 9846

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016For-Hire 4091 3317 3232 2603 3210 3219 3883 4171 4139 3216Private 46497 45008 38292 38054 35492 34870 34293 32815 29459 31169Shore 37024 37233 33633 32135 31694 32976 33882 32049 28108 28955Total Trips 87611 85558 75156 72792 70395 71064 72058 69035 61706 63339

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)5

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Drum (Atlantic H 26566 24014 15766 13355 13319 11950 17597 17615 13162 8381croaker amp spot) R 21370 24973 20371 15979 18093 18618 25484 16047 12441 10959

Drum (seatrouts)6HR

1756028961

2107532339

2018925795

1673623823

2223228643

2087431542

1755526965

961115212

1164816324

1438921971

Little tunny amp H 292 201 233 185 282 386 345 384 428 414Atlantic bonito R 1221 722 806 599 702 855 651 1137 517 956

Pacific halibutHR

585438

516359

440321

398304

394311

388324

454324

408251

420271

400244

Pacific salmonHR

1013567

651358

789458

660286

750367

667281

996497

972303

944452

596283

Rockfishes amp H 2664 2162 2439 2448 3116 3677 4160 4380 4215 3830scorpionfishes R 624 537 534 617 698 773 1025 986 931 891

Sharks7HR

3085184

1815006

1724203

2094181

1843100

1573923

2524538

2044133

1313713

1393434

Striped bassHR

242516186

232512677

19618094

19686347

22196120

14945369

21958638

17727365

12618543

153211863

Summer H 3109 2362 1830 1511 1848 2278 2532 2460 1624 2029flounder R 17628 20548 22297 22227 19722 14257 13584 16512 10535 12148Tunas (Thunnus H 730 801 524 590 440 726 723 709 833 567species) R 97 93 57 54 70 53 33 62 67 107

1 All anglers reported in this table are US residents2 Participation estimates do not include Puerto Rico Alaska Texas or Hawairsquoi 3 Includes Louisiana resident participation estimated from historical Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) data and a state creel survey 4 Effort estimates do not include Alaska or Texas Hawairsquoi effort estimates are available only for the shore and private boat modes 5 Harvest and release estimates do not include Puerto Rico or Alaska 6 Drum (seatrouts) include spotted seatrout silver seatrout sand seatrout weakfish and other species in the Cynoscion genus7 Sharks do not include spiny dogfish

20

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

United States | Marine Economy

2015 United States Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms

(millions)

Establishments(millions)

Employees(millions)

AnnualPayroll

($ trillions)

Employee Compensation

($ trillions)

Gross Domestic Product

($ trillions)

CommercialLocation

Quotient2

Totals 2433 766 12409 625 970 1793 1

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 1303 1308 1395 1617 1757 1766 1812 1947 2108Receipts 88230 89670 95219 104990 110745 115167 128927 146626 163625

Seafood salesretail

Firms 2610 2522 2455 2513 2514 2657 2497 2557 2471Receipts 231776 233002 207139 199810 212679 217702 205555 203459 206676

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 685 663 645 638 620 589 604 640 618Employees 33169 33323 30894 31789 31261 30988 31390 32180 30708

Payroll 1196086 1161637 1091727 1116305 1200263 1196207 1228826 1311910 1354572

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 2438 2063 2099 2183 2287 1954 2098 2100 2132Employees 24232 20116 19290 19386 20622 20030 20367 21155 22060

Payroll 924654 782178 758332 798794 848454 867179 884645 910527 999264

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 2094 2044 1967 1982 1972 1957 1995 2015 2059Employees 10380 9732 9439 9857 10006 10293 10631 11037 11443

Payroll 209404 205423 211264 219045 222508 237619 253490 271732 292726

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp Great Lakes freighttransportation

Establishments 573 513 513 547 549 496 497 598 593Employees 22568 21019 20919 17528 18590 19099 18659 20884 19983

Payroll 1552467 1694613 1470159 1288001 1400267 1467709 1512053 1835024 1746612

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 427 365 376 372 378 375 305 332 350Employees 11308 10231 11180 10288 10362 12375 8704 8646 8014

Payroll 855683 852063 863363 867797 921990 1073529 703003 683281 671624Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 92 71 78 56 55 58 62 56 61Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 15157

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1246384

MarinasEstablishments 4085 3972 3891 3937 3896 3782 3844 3811 3881

Employees 28788 28686 26643 26657 26557 25764 26373 26709 26999Payroll 945355 954032 905488 927499 953497 913140 951123 995248 1036253

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 552 532 541 507 545 343 458 482 492Employees 62941 63736 56386 57275 59517 43824 66301 69830 66414

Payroll 3428126 3272723 2776791 3026861 3159964 2601146 4086182 4406525 4334958Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 830 868 846 847 836 850 847 881 889Employees 12997 13419 12689 13529 13441 12532 12485 12148 11864

Payroll 756552 847938 826384 937980 893889 838959 929419 907763 923303

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 223 268 258 287 255 525 383 351 337Employees 6573 5608 5100 4844 4933 25396 7000 6769 7855

Payroll 318608 282671 250358 290467 306882 1345857 420664 399502 434209

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 1771 1782 1615 1540 1497 1560 1514 1524 1541Employees 148864 157512 137759 127691 127522 136365 135287 138687 143287

Payroll 6405570 7269306 6674187 6529523 6845322 7543402 7556373 7882846 8030983

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

North Pacific Regionbull Alaska

Holding king crabs Photo NOAAMaria Shawback

22

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Pacific Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe North Pacific Region includes the fisheries in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) off the state of Alaska Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (NPFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under six fishery management plans (FMPs)

North Pacific Region FMPs

bull Bering SeaAleutian Islands(BSAI)groundfish

bull Gulf of Alaska(GOA) groundfish

bull BSAI king andtanner crabs

bull Alaska scallopbull Salmon in the EEZbull Arctic

Of the stocks or stock complexes covered in these FMPs only the blue king crab-Pribilof Islands stock is listed as overfished and subject to overfishing

Catch Share programsThe North Pacific Region has six catch share programs more than any other region These are the 1) Western Alaska Community Development Quota (CDQ) Program 2) Alaska Halibut and Sablefish Individual Fishing Quota(IFQ) Program 3) American Fisheries Act (AFA) PollockCooperatives 4) Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI)Crab Rationalization Program 5) Bering Sea and AleutianIslands (BSAI) Non-Pollock Trawl CatcherProcessorGroundfish Cooperatives (Amendment 80) and 6)Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program The landingsrevenues for these programs totaled $8549 million in2015 exceeding the total landings revenue of any otherstate Following are descriptions of these catch shareprograms and their performance

Western Alaska Community Development Quota (CDQ) Program The program was originally implemented in 1992 as part of a restructuring of the BSAI groundfish fishery Under this program a percentage of the total allowable catch for groundfish prohibited species halibut and crab is apportioned to 65 eligible villages in Western Alaska that are organized into six CDQ groups The program has the following goals 1) provide eligible Western Alaska villages with the opportunity to participate and invest in fisheries in

the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area 2) support economic development in Western Alaska3) alleviate poverty and provide economic and socialbenefits to residents and 4) achieve a sustainable anddiversified local economy

Alaska Halibut and Sablefish IFQ Program The program was implemented in 1995 The primary objectives of this IFQ program include the following 1) eliminate gear conflicts 2) address safety concerns and 3) improve product quality The performance results ofthe halibut fishery show that relative to its baseline period(3-year period prior to implementation) the followingindicators decreased 2015 quota landings and numberof active vessels However inflation-adjusted halibutrevenue and revenue per vessel increased The 2015performance results for the sablefish fishery show thatquota landings inflation-adjusted revenue and numberof active vessels decreased while inflation-adjustedrevenue per vessel increased

American Fisheries Act (AFA) Pollock Cooperatives The program was established in 1999 and 2000 with the goals of settling allocation disputes between inshore (catcher vessels) offshore (catcherprocessors) and mothership sectors and ending the race for fish Key performance indicators of this program show that relative to its baseline the 2015 quota landings inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per vessel increased while the number of active vessels decreased

In 2017 the council approved two catch share program reviews the AFA Program Review and the Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program Review In February 2017 the council reviewed and accepted the AFA Program Review as final with one addition a section describing the revenue collected by the state for AFA fishing activity using the Alaska Fisheries Business tax and the Fisheries Resource Landing tax how those revenues may have changed over time and how they were distributed to communities In October 2017 the council reviewed the Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program review and allocation policy review and accepted both as complete and final NOAA Fisheries and industry participants identified housekeeping issues and NOAA Fisheries intends to incorporate those into the reauthorization of the program starting in 2018

23

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

North Pacific Region | Regional Summary

Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) Crab Rationalization Program The program was implemented for the 2005ndash2006 crab fishing season to address the race to harvest high bycatch and discard mortality and product quality issues The program also aims to balance the interests of those who depend on crab fisheries This program includes share allocations to harvesters and processors Processor quota was incorporated to preserve the viability of processing facilities in dependent communities and in particular to maintain competitive conditions in ex-vessel markets The CDQ and Adak Community allocations regional landings and processing requirements and several community protection measures protect community interests The key 2015 performance indicators of this program show that relative to its baseline quota landings and number of active vessels decreased However inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per active vessel increased

In June 2016 the council approved a 10-year review of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab Rationalization Program One key finding of the review was that total allowable catch (TAC) had never been exceeded evidence that resource conservation has improved In addition the program has led to decreased deadloss and greater accountability as deadloss is deducted from IFQ holdings The program was also successful at reducing harvest capacity which sharply decreased from 256 vessels in the 200405 season to 91 vessels in the 200607 season (currently there are 72 vessels in the fishery) Consolidation also occurred in the processor sector eg 11 processing plants processed Bristol Bay red king crab in 2005 down from 17 plants in 2004 The program also improved vessel safety an important achievement for the fishery once recognized as the most hazardous in the nation The review resulted in council initiation of a discussion paper focused on the arbitration system

BSAI Non-Pollock Trawl CatcherProcessor Groundfish Cooperatives The program commonly referred to as the Amendment 80 Program was implemented in 2008 to create economic incentives that would improve retention of all fish caught The cooperatives also seek to reduce bycatch by commercial

fishing vessels using trawl gear in the non-pollock groundfish fisheries Key 2015 performance indicators of this program show that relative to its baseline there was an increase in quota landings inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per vessel However the number of active vessels declined

Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program The program was initially established as a two-year (2007ndash2008) pilot program by the US Congress and was later extended to five years NOAA Fisheries implemented this catch share program in 2012 The objectives of this program are to reduce bycatch and discards encourage conservation-minded practices improve product quality and value and provide stability to the processing labor force Results show that in 2015 the quota landings number of active vessels inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per active vessel increased relative to the baseline

Policy UpdatesIn October 2015 Alaska Department of Fish and Game reduced the Bering Sea snow crab quota by 40 to 406 million pounds for the 20152016 fishing year This reduction was deemed necessary due to the 56 decline in biomass from 2014 to 2015 to 46410 metric tons which is below the 20-year average While the 2015 assessment noted strong future recruitment potential in the fishery the 2016 assessment resulted in a 50 reduction in the 20162017 quota from the previous fishing year (2157 million pounds which would be the fisheryrsquos lowest harvest since the 19691970 season) The recent decline in snow crab mature biomass is similar to other crab stocks in the Bering Sea and is correlated to a substantial increase in ocean temperature and decreases in sea ice extent relative to the short- and long-term averages for environmental conditions in the region

In February 2016 NOAA Fisheries implemented a cost-recovery fee program for the Western Alaska CDQ Program for groundfish and three limited access privilege programs (LAPPs) The three LAPPS with new cost recovery programs are AFA pollock Aleutian Islands pollock and the Amendment 80 fisheries) The cost-recovery fees recover the actual costs directly related to

24

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Pacific Region | Regional Summary

the management data collection efforts and enforcement of the programs However the fees cannot exceed 3 of the annual ex-vessel value of fish harvested by a program that is subject to the cost-recovery fee

In late 2016 the council approved a plan to allow guided recreational halibut fishermen to purchase commercial halibut individual fishing quota through the newly established Recreational Quota Entity (RQE) Program The RQE Program is distinct from the Guided Angler Fish program implemented in 2014 which allows halibut anglers to lease commercial quota A recent study found that while the charter (guided) operators leased very little quota relative to the guided angler fish (GAF) program limits GAF transfers reached up to 50 of quota transfers in some small boat IFQ sub-markets1 Under the 2016 plan the RQE can hold up to 10 of Area 2C (Southeast Alaska) and 12 of Area 3C (Southcentral Alaska) which could potentially make it the single largest Alaska halibut quota holder The RQE program should be effective in late 2018

Also in late 2016 the council took final action to establish electronic monitoring as a part of the North Pacific Observer Program Under this action regulations were implemented to allow electronic monitoring to be used for catch estimation Electronic monitoring was effective in 2017

In early 2017 the council took final action to approve a regulatory amendment that would allow CDQ groups to lease Area 4B 4C and 4D halibut IFQ in years where the catch limits are below certain thresholds In Area 4B this option would become available to the groups if the catch limit was 1 million pounds or lower This option would be available for Area 4C and 4D when the catch limit in Area 4CDE was at or below 15 million pounds Leased IFQ would be available to vessels less than or equal to 51 feet length overall subject to the groupsrsquo internal management This action would not convert IFQ to CDQ The council also added some restrictive provisions into this amendment in order to mitigate adverse impacts on other IFQ stakeholders and the quota share (QS) market Specifically the council adopted an option intended to prevent individuals from buying QS with the sole intention of leasing it This

provision would not allow an individual to lease IFQ within the first three years after they have acquired it Also in an effort to discourage the reliance on the leasing of Area 4 QS a QS holder may not lease halibut IFQ on a consecutive basis for more than two years In any year that CDQ groups use this additional opportunity the groups would be required to submit a report specifying the criteria used to select IFQ holders leasing to a CDQ group the criteria used to determine who can receive leased IFQ and the amount and type of IFQ leased This action is expected to be in effect in late 2018

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key North Pacific Commercial Species

bull Atka mackerelbull Crabbull Flatfishbull Pacific codbull Pacific halibut

bull Pacific herringbull Rockfishbull Sablefishbull Salmonbull Walleye pollock

The North Pacific groundfish fishery is different from most other United States fisheries in that a large portion of the fishery is processed at sea and therefore no landings revenues are reported The landings revenue for the species landed and processed at sea is estimated by using prices obtained from the shore-side sector These species include Atka mackerel flatfish Pacific cod rockfish sablefish and walleye pollock When data from the shore-side sector are inadequate historical information about the relationship between the ex-vessel price and the wholesale price of finished products is used to estimate ex-vessel prices and revenue for portions of the fishery mostly processed at sea

1 Kroetz Kailin and Lew Daniel and Sanchirico James N Recreational Leasing of Alaska Commercial Halibut Quota The First Two Years of the Guided Angler Fish Provision (September 30 2016) Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 16-39

25

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers2

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 Alaskarsquos commercial fishing and seafood industry generated $39 billion in sales impacts $17 billion in income impacts $21 billion in value-added impacts and 47200 full- and part-time jobs The commercial harvesters sector generated the largest employment impacts (33400) sales impacts ($27 billion) income impacts ($12 billion) and value-added impacts ($14 billion) across sectors

Landings TrendsAmong the Alaska key species pollock (down $49 million) crab (down $60 million) and Pacific salmon (down $88 million) had the largest one-year declines from 2015 to 2016 Alaska pollock landings revenue ($407 million in 2016) fell 108 relative to the previous year despite landings being at their highest level since 2006 The landings revenue decline was directly attributable to lower ex-vessel prices in both the Bering SeaAleutian Islands (BSAI $375 million) and Gulf of Alaska (GOA $32 million)3 Pollock ex-vessel prices fell in both the BSAI and GOA and while retained catch increased (particularly in the GOA) the net effect was a decrease in landings revenue of 92 in the BSAI and 26 in the GOA A decrease in the price of head-and-gut (HampG) products and low roe yields due to small-sized pollocks were factors in ex-vessel price decline Despite the year-over-year decline in landings revenue 2016 landings revenues were above the 10-year average

In contrast to ex-vessel value pollock first-wholesale value increased 62 in the BSAI to $135 billion and decreased 02 in the GOA to $1052 million The difference in performance between the ex-vessel and first-wholesale sectors can be attributed to higher prices on more highly processed value-added products such as surimi and deep-skin fillets and higher prices for roe due to reduced supply The fillet market faced challenges throughout 2016 including insolvency of a major international pollock trader and competition from low Russian pollock prices The surimi market which has been a strong performer in recent years continued to grow in 2016 albeit at a more modest pace 6 in the BSAI and 5 in the GOA as the supply of raw surimi material continues to be constrained in Japan The 2016 first-wholesale value in the pollock fishery was also above its 10-year average

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

North Pacific Region | Regional Summary

2 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)3 Alaska pollock trends are summarized or quoted verbatim from the Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report for the Groundfish Fisheries of the Gulf of Alaska and Bering SeaAleutian Islands Area Economic Status of the Groundfish Fisheries off Alaska 2016

26

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Pacific Region | Regional Summary

Crab landings revenue was down in 2016 relative to 2015 largely due to the 40 reduction in the snow crab TAC as described above Production declines occurred however in nearly all crab fisheries for example Dungeness crab landings fell 23 and king crab landings fell 17 year-over-year Prices for these species were however near record highs After adjusting for inflation the price of king crab ($717 per pound) and the price of Dungeness crab ($309 per pound) were at their highest since 1999 and 1997 respectively

Salmon landings also declined sharply in 2016 (down 46) relative to 2015 This was largely due to the decline in pink salmon landings which fell 488 million pounds from 2015 levels While pink salmon landings are typically lower in ldquoeven yearsrdquo due to their biennial cycle in 2016 the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) pink salmon harvests came in far below forecasted levels In January 2017 the Department of Commerce declared a fishery disaster for GOA pink salmon citing ldquosudden and unexpected large decreases in fish stock biomass due to unusual ocean and climate conditionsrdquo4 Overall pink salmon landings were down 76 from 2015 and down 62 from the 10-year average Chinook and chum salmon landings each had a sizable decline in landings (down 18 and 14 respectively) from 2015 to 2016 Due to reduced inventory for pink salmon and lower overall supply of salmon (global capture fishery production was down 16)5 the average price per pound of salmon was up 75 in 2016 relative to the previous year

Landings RevenueIn 2016 Alaska landings revenue totaled $16 billion a 3 decrease from 2007 (a 15 decrease in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 10 decrease from 2015 Finfish landings revenue accounted for 86 of all landings revenue in the region In 2016 salmon ($4073 million) walleye pollock ($4071 million) and crab ($2188 million) dominated Alaskan landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 Atka mackerel (75 53 in real terms) rockfish (59 39 in real terms) and crab (25 9 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while Pacific herring (-64 -68 in real terms) Pacific halibut (-46 -53 in real terms) and Pacific cod (-8 -19 in real terms) had the largest

revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 flatfish (15) Pacific halibut (6) and Pacific cod (2) had the largest revenue increases while Pacific herring (-24) crab (-23) and salmon (-18) had the largest revenue decreases

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Atka mackerel (75 53 in real terms)bull Rockfish (59 39 in real terms)bull Crab (25 9 in real terms)From 2015bull Flatfish (15)bull Pacific halibut (6)bull Pacific cod (2)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Pacific herring (-64 -68 in real terms)bull Pacific halibut (-46 -53 in real terms)bull Pacific cod (-8 -19 in real terms)From 2015bull Pacific herring (-24)bull Crab (-23)bull Salmon (-18)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Rockfish (69)bull Pacific cod (44)bull Flatfish (24)From 2015bull Atka mackerel (3)bull Rockfish (3)bull Walleye pollock (3)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Pacific halibut (-65)bull Sablefish (-40)bull Salmon (-38)From 2015bull Salmon (-46)bull Crab (-29)bull Pacific herring (-24)

4 See httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovmedia-releasecommerce-secretary-declares-fisheries-disasters-nine-west-coast-species5 See FAO Global Capture Production 1950-2016 at httpwwwfaoorgfisherystatisticsglobal-capture-productionqueryen

27

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

North Pacific Region | Regional Summary

LandingsIn 2016 North Pacific Region commercial fishermen landed over 56 billion pounds of finfish and shellfish a 4 increase from 2007 and a 7 decrease from 2015 Walleye pollock contributed the most to landings accounting for 60 of total volume

From 2007 to 2016 rockfish (69) Pacific cod (44) and flatfish (24) had the largest landings increases while Pacific halibut (-65) sablefish (-40) and salmon (-38) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 Atka mackerel (3) rockfish (3) and walleye pollock (3) had the largest landings increases while salmon (-46) crab (-29) and Pacific herring (-24) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 Pacific halibut ($503 per pound) received the highest North Pacific Region ex-vessel price Landings of Pacific herring ($010 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price

From 2007 to 2016 Atka mackerel (86 62 in real terms) salmon (75 53 in real terms) and sablefish (60 40 in real terms) had the largest price increases while Pacific herring (-53 -60 in real terms) Pacific cod (-35 -43 in real terms) and flatfish (-28 -37 in real terms) had the largest price decreases From 2015 to 2016 salmon (75) crab (34) and sablefish (9) had the largest price increases while walleye pollock (-25) and Pacific cod (-4) had the largest price decreases

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups

Key North Pacific Recreational Species

bull Chinook salmonbull Chum salmonbull Coho salmonbull Greenlings

(lingcod)

bull Pacific halibutbull Pink salmonbull Razor clamsbull Rockfishbull Sockeye salmon

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities6 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

In 2016 economic impacts from recreational fishing activities in Alaska generated 4865 jobs $5394 million in sales $1951 million in income and $3155 million in value-added impacts Impacts from durable equipment expenditures (eg rods and reels fishing-related

6 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

28

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Pacific Region | Regional Summary

equipment boats vehicles and second homes) accounted for 30 of employment 20 of sales 23 of income and 21 of value-added impacts Of the three fishing trip modes for-hire fishing trips had the greatest economic impact accounting for 38 of employment impacts

Expenditures for fishing trips and durable equipment across Alaska in 2016 totaled over $412 million Approximately $299 million of these expenditures were related to trip expenses with a large portion coming from trips in the for-hire (48) and private boat (47) sectors In 2016 durable goods expenditures totaled more than $113 million with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($518 million)

Days FishedThe state of Alaska records recreational fishing effort in terms of the number of days fished rather than the number of fishing trips Anglers who fished in Alaska spent approximately 863648 days fishing in 2016 This number represented an 18 decrease from the days spent fishing in 2007 From 2015 to 2016 there was an 11 decrease in the number of days fished

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Pacific cod (84)bull Rockfish species (34)From 2015bull Razor clams (107)bull Rockfish species (6)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Razor clams (-79)bull Shark species (-78)bull Lingcod (-57)From 2015bull Coho salmon (-47)bull Pacific cod (-35)bull Pink salmon (-27)

ParticipationIn 2016 about 293000 recreational saltwater anglers

fished in Alaska This number represented a 12 decrease from 2007 and a 4 decrease from 2015 These anglers are categorized as either residents of coastalnon-coastal counties in Alaska (39) or out-of-state anglers (61)

Harvest and ReleaseOf Alaskarsquos key species and species groups Pacific halibut (643000 fish) rockfish species (504000 fish) and coho salmon (305000 fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 Pacific cod (84) and rockfish species (34) had the largest increases in catch while razor clams (-79) shark species (-78) and lingcod (-57) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 razor clams (107) and rockfish species (6) had the largest increases in catch while coho salmon (-47) Pacific cod (-35) and pink salmon (-27) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries78

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ)9 The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average The Bureau of Labor Statistics did not disclose CFLQ data for Alaska for 2015

7 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)8 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)9 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

29

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

North Pacific Region | Regional Summary

In 2015 20907 employer establishments operated throughout the entire Alaskan economy (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed about 268000 workers and had a total annual payroll of $156 billion The gross state product of Alaska was approximately $534 billion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 Alaska had 30 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 9 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $41 million (a 97 increase in real terms from 2007) There were 109 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 4 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 8472 workers (a 30 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $3569 million

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 11 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in Alaska (an 8 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $761000 (a 50 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 15 employer firms in the retail seafood sales sector (a 114 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 64 workers and had a total annual payroll of $25 million

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 37 employer firms in the wholesale seafood sales sector (a 46 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 94 workers and had a total annual payroll of $73 million

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of Alaskarsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons It is clear however that these sectors play an important role in the regional economy For example in 2015 the coastal and Great Lakes freight transportation sector in Alaska accounted for $892 million in payroll

Tables | Alaska

32

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oAlaska | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Alaska Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 47151 3895150 1653458 2074342 46942 3855070 1644526 2059974

Commercial Harvesters 33414 2724805 1154017 1448489 33414 2724805 1154017 1448489Seafood Processors amp Dealers 10726 967808 422333 523622 10659 961779 419696 520358

Importers 99 30442 4879 9280 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 335 39282 13450 17563 317 37166 12726 16617

Retail 2578 132814 58780 75388 2552 131319 58087 74511

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 1653205 1871763 1443124 1737518 2170704 2132501 2018139 1910778 1784980 1609630Finfish amp Other 1464901 1612011 1243109 1498581 1862213 1813059 1778006 1662309 1496651 1380040Shellfish 188304 259752 200015 238937 308492 319443 240134 248469 288328 229590

Key SpeciesAtka mackerel 17599 21636 29669 30197 30371 30567 16874 24555 30293 30759 Crab 175587 248781 184700 221857 290342 308927 230139 237813 278865 218762 Flatfish 77900 99800 71800 80700 113000 127100 103100 94500 71100 81800 Pacific cod 213964 246145 120217 141376 182407 216581 180369 206731 193792 197213 Pacific halibut 217399 208983 134603 200454 205211 144801 111483 106674 110709 117066 Pacific herring 14817 22912 29294 23026 12305 19430 16280 11492 7040 5364 Rockfish 17400 17000 12600 19200 29300 33500 27700 30200 28800 27700 Sablefish 95674 101049 95200 103097 151734 125730 90016 94611 93983 92843 Salmon 416866 456536 419676 564696 662141 589046 757270 619135 494784 407259 Walleye pollock 391763 435092 328186 333666 472737 510480 461609 465817 456315 407116

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 5408420 4604863 4128898 4408396 5413956 5392685 5832979 5703903 6069071 5630998Finfish amp Other 5330051 4497908 4032927 4322836 5328134 5276459 5741926 5612863 5963794 5557727Shellfish 78369 106955 95971 85560 85822 116226 91053 91040 105277 73271

Key SpeciesAtka mackerel 126962 127030 156888 145205 112594 103994 51425 69512 117678 121285Crab 70699 99454 89530 79574 80457 111914 87089 85106 97230 68607Flatfish 423340 599585 506166 563817 649451 646680 659799 663865 510860 522934Pacific cod 491020 494975 491073 538741 663100 716882 681407 716564 697174 707150Pacific halibut 67242 64639 57749 54857 41291 32422 28696 21616 22850 23262Pacific herring 67137 83787 86951 108116 98600 75058 85076 96789 68461 51822Rockfish 86569 89761 83987 100068 106287 114581 122950 133320 141854 145970Sablefish 36103 32540 28960 27026 28847 31427 30150 25679 23845 21775Salmon 946377 706018 730292 816778 797151 658394 1053839 715927 1095633 587697Walleye pollock 3068211 2277527 1869214 1947453 2810726 2872187 3003183 3145639 3262568 3355059

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atka mackerel 014 017 019 021 027 029 032 036 026 026Crab 238 242 201 237 309 246 264 279 235 319Flatfish 018 016 014 014 017 019 016 013 013 013Pacific cod 037 049 020 027 025 024 028 022 025 024Pacific halibut 323 323 233 365 497 447 389 493 485 503Pacific herring 022 027 034 021 012 026 019 012 010 010Rockfish 020 019 017 022 032 029 022 024 021 021Sablefish 245 283 301 360 484 382 273 340 362 393Salmon 040 058 051 067 077 072 067 080 040 070Walleye pollock 011 019 014 014 014 016 015 013 016 012

33

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Alaska | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Alaska Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)1

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts byFishing Mode

For-Hire 1857 238118 89312 132960Private Boat 1295 163384 51722 97917Shore 253 28338 9709 16879

Total Durable Expenditures 1460 109549 44341 67703Total State Economic Impacts 4865 539389 195084 315459

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 144052Private Boat 141703Shore 13156Total 298911

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Chinook salmon

H 110 71 89 78 85 63 81 111 111 101R 110 80 96 66 95 62 120 94 116 87

Coho salmon

H 506 404 418 350 386 263 493 390 479 263R 122 89 94 74 88 50 122 60 99 41

Pink salmon

H 133 88 117 82 72 78 113 69 110 103R 281 152 224 121 135 141 203 118 204 126

Sockeye salmon

H 32 29 34 28 31 28 40 35 33 34R 21 10 10 6 10 8 13 12 9 7

Chum salmon

H 18 12 22 11 21 11 25 12 13 10R 34 28 34 19 38 20 39 19 25 22

Pacific halibut

H 585 516 440 398 394 388 454 408 420 400R 438 359 321 304 311 324 324 251 271 244

Rockfish species

H 198 226 209 224 211 230 256 335 332 347R 178 171 149 151 122 121 121 148 143 157

LingcodH 42 37 32 32 33 33 34 32 28 26R 70 65 46 39 36 36 33 29 27 23

Pacific codH 20 25 36 37 48 42 38 61 58 44R 27 39 63 81 76 50 48 73 75 43

Shark species

H 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0R 75 52 33 29 14 13 11 28 20 16

Razor clams

H 389 593 556 357 436 324 291 90 39 77R 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 24717Other Equipment 32640Boat Expenses 51807Vehicle Expenses 4241Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 113405

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 412316

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler fishing days)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Days Fished 1053 935 914 811 812 808 980 960 975 864

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)23

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Out-of-State 205 190 158 159 159 159 176 169 180 180CoastalNon-Coastal 127 119 127 122 117 109 121 118 125 113Total Anglers 332 309 284 281 276 268 298 287 305 293

1 Data reported in this table include saltwater fishing activities only2 Information reported in this table is from the Sport Fish Division of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADFampG) and includes saltwater fishing activities only3 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

34

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oAlaska | Marine Economy

2015 Alaska State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 55818 (02) 20907 (03) 267999 (02) 1564 (03) 2795 (03) 5338 (03) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 33 31 32 28 26 25 35 31 30Receipts 1837 1455 1693 2482 2882 2708 3268 2472 4091

Seafood salesretail

Firms 12 13 16 23 15 15 11 17 11Receipts 1358 1431 1350 1595 903 1626 1458 1539 761

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 114 122 121 119 122 116 115 108 109Employees 6506 7707 7572 8074 8578 8289 8638 9115 8472

Payroll 262127 254894 255403 268208 296851 297284 308961 337171 356855

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 68 57 54 52 48 47 43 43 37Employees 167 143 ds ds 159 143 102 120 94

Payroll 8528 8389 8445 9141 9985 10943 7205 7024 7306

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 7 9 10 10 10 15 14 14 15Employees ds 37 44 ds ds ds ds ds 64

Payroll ds 1839 1824 1986 2487 2019 2337 2687 2498

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 46 49 50 55 63 47 53 72 74Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1067

Payroll 27357 33888 33132 ds ds ds 82692 89020 89281

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 3 3 3 3 1 2 3 6 5Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 6 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1Employees ds ds ds NA ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds NA ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 13 14 13 14 14 13 12 11 11

Employees 48 66 56 ds ds ds ds ds 30Payroll 1763 2303 2181 1932 2053 1613 1449 ds 1423

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 17 12 13 13 14 8 9 9 9Employees 677 ds ds ds ds 334 ds ds 437

Payroll 35345 ds ds ds ds 26481 ds ds 32326Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 31 25 23 25 22 21 22 25 24Employees ds 296 312 303 321 97 103 138 140

Payroll 25058 23233 25630 27543 27156 9938 10805 13015 13596

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 7 8 9 8 18 13 12 11Employees ds ds ds ds ds 582 ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds 1790 25545 ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 16 17 21 22 23 23 20 27 23Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 335 344

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 15845 17748

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this state than thenational average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Pacific Regionbull Californiabull Oregonbull Washington

Commercial boat Photo Pacific Fishery Management Council

36

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oPacific Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe Pacific Region includes California Oregon and Washington Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the Pacific Fishery Management Council (PFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under four fishery management plans (FMPs)

Pacific Region FMPs

bull Coastal pelagic species

bull Pacific coast salmon

bull Pacific coast groundfish

bull West Coast highly migratory species

Three of the stocks or stock complexes covered in these FMPs were listed as overfished in 2016 Pacific ocean perch yelloweye rockfish and Pacific bluefin tuna Three stockscomplexes were subject to overfishing in 2016 coho salmon (Puget Sound Hood Canal) Pacific bluefin tuna (Pacific) and swordfish (Eastern Pacific) Also in 2016 three stocks of Chinook salmon (Columbia River Basin Upper River Summer Washington Coast Willapa Bay Fall Natural and Washington Coast Grays Harbor Fall) and one stock of coho salmon (Washington Coast Hoh which is prosecuted by both US and international fleets) were removed from the overfishing list

Conservative management techniques are employed in the Pacific Regionrsquos fisheries For example the Pacific groundfish and salmon fisheries are subject to weak stock management where access to the surplus of healthier stocks that can be harvested is often restricted to protect weaker stocks with which they commingle in the ocean These weaker stocks include seven rebuilding groundfish stocks salmon (listed under the Endangered Species Act) and other non-listed stocks that constrain the fishery

Salmon management is further complicated by the need to ensure equal allocation of harvest among diverse user groups and coordination with other entities that have jurisdiction over various aspects of salmon management Decades of habitat modification hatchery practices harvest and growing competition for water have affected the viability of salmon stocks and made them more vulnerable to adverse environmental conditions These

conditions include the prolonged drought and adverse ocean conditions experienced in recent years Low returns of salmon to the Klamath River in 2006 and to the Sacramento River in 2008 and 2009 resulted in unprecedented closures of ocean and in-river fisheries leading to federal disaster relief for affected entities

Coastal pelagic species (CPS) are highly variable environmentally sensitive stocks that provide food for marine mammals birds and fish These species include Pacific sardine northern anchovy Pacific and jack mackerel and market squid Of these species Pacific sardine is the most commonly targeted CPS finfish and is managed according to an innovative harvest control rule allowable harvest varies with sea surface temperature Because the geographic range of sardine tends to expand with abundance harvest allocation between the California and Pacific Northwest fisheries is an ongoing and dynamic issue The annual guideline for sardine harvest is allocated coast-wide on a seasonal basis Recent decreases in harvest guideline limits have contributed to the development of an intense derby fishery

Catch limits for Pacific halibut a transboundary fish stock are set in January by the International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) This bilateral commission between the United States and Canada determines total allowable catch levels (TACs) for Pacific halibut that will be caught in the United States and Canadian exclusive economic zones (EEZs) After catch levels are determined the PFMC develops a catch-sharing plan for tribal and non-tribal (ie commercial and recreational) fisheries in the federal waters of California Oregon and Washington Pacific Halibut is targeted only with hook gear but there are allocations to the trawl sector for bycatch including individual bycatch quotas in the Pacific groundfish trawl IFQ

The Highly Migratory Species (HMS) FMP includes tunas billfish and pelagic sharks as managed species The albacore surface hook-and-line fishery is by far the most economically important commercial HMS fishery followed by the drift gillnet fishery for swordfish and thresher shark HMS is also a very important component of the catch for the Pacific Regionrsquos commercial passenger fishing vessel fleet and the private recreational boat fleet

37

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Pacific Region | Regional Summary

Catch Share ProgramsThe Pacific Region has two catch share programs 1) the Pacific Sablefish Permit Stacking Program and 2) the Pacific Groundfish Trawl Rationalization Program The landings revenues for these programs totaled more than $47 million in 2015 Following are descriptions of these catch share programs and their performance

Pacific Sablefish Permit Stacking Program This program was implemented in 2001 and allows vessels to stack multiple vessel permits on a single vessel The goal of this approach is to improve economic efficiency through rationalization of the fixed gear fleet increase benefits for fishing communities promote equity lessen reallocation effects of previous harvest regulations promote safety and improve product quality and value Results for this program show that in 2015 the number of active vessels and landings decreased compared with the baseline period (average of the 3-year period prior to the start of the program) while inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per vessel increased during 2015

A recent study1 of this fleet demonstrated that after the catch share program was implemented the probability of fishermen taking a fishing trip in high wind conditions decreased 82 This provides evidence that institutional changes can significantly reduce risk-taking behavior and result in safer fisheries

Pacific Trawl Rationalization Program This program was implemented by the PFMC in January 2011 It involves individual fishing quotas (IFQs) for non-whiting groundfish and whiting trawlers delivering to shoreside plants and cooperatives for whiting mothership and catcher processor sectors Program objectives are to provide a mechanism for total catch accounting provide a viable profitable and efficient groundfish fishery promote practices that reduce bycatch and discard mortality while minimizing ecological impacts increase operational flexibility minimize adverse effects from the IFQ program on fishing communities and other fisheries promote measurable economic and employment benefits through the seafood catching processing distribution and support sectors of the industry provide quality product for the consumer and increase safety in the fishery

As required by law the council is reviewing the trawl catch share program five years after implementation According to findings from the draft public review the economic performance of the program has been strong Net revenue per active catcher vessel increased 65 relative to the pre-catch share period (2009-2010) for the non-whiting groundfish fishery and 400 for the whiting fishery Meanwhile motherships experienced a 62 increase and catcher-processors experienced a 7 decrease in net revenue

Results for this program show that in 2015 landings inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per vessel increased compared to the baseline period However the number of active vessels decreased during this period There was no change in inflation-adjusted revenue Expanded observer coverage and dockside monitoring which were implemented with the catch share program coupled with long-term adherence to catch targets and improved stock assessment models have to varying degrees also contributed to improved fishery performance For example in the first three years of catch shares the total catch of rebuilding stocks (of which twomdashcanary rockfish and petrale solemdashare now declared rebuilt) was 50 lower than in the previous three years

Policy UpdatesIn September 2016 the council decided to manage darkblotched rockfish and Pacific ocean perch (POP) caught as bycatch by the at-sea whiting sectors using set-asides instead of total catch limits Exceeding a set-aside does not result in an automatic fishery closure and thus mitigates the risk of the Pacific whiting at-sea sectors not attaining their respective Pacific whiting allocations due to the incidental catch of these two species Importantly this action does not increase the risk of exceeding darkblotched rockfish or POP ACLs because NMFS was given in-season authority to automatically close the fishery if species-specific set-aside amounts plus buffer amounts were expected to be exceeded The final rule was published on January 8 2018

In April 20162 the PFMC recommended closing the directed non-tribal Pacific sardine fishery for the 2016-2017 season due to the estimated biomass (106137 metric tons) falling below the 150000 metric tons

1 Pfeiffer Lisa and Trevor Gratz The effect of rights-based fisheries management on risk taking and fishing safety (March 8 2016) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (10) 2615-2620 DOI 101073pnas15094561132 httpswwwdfwstateorusagencycommissionminutes1606_JuneExhibit20I_Attachment201_Agenda20Item20Summarypdf

38

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oPacific Region | Regional Summary

required for the directed commercial fishery to open This decision continued the closure implemented for the 2015-2016 season Although the directed commercial fishery remains closed the PFMC allowed up to 8000 metric tons of sardine to be harvested to account for small amounts taken as incidental catch in other fisheries live bait harvest tribal harvest and research

At the April 2017 meeting the PFMC recommended closing the directed commercial sardine fishery for the third year in a row based on the severely depleted biomass which declined 18 from the previous year The Pacific sardine biomass which is prone to significant natural fluctuation due to large-scale changes in oceanic temperature declined over 90 between 2006 and 2017 from approximately 1 million metric tons to 86586 metric tons

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key Pacific Region Commercial Species

bull Albacore tunabull Crabbull Flatfishbull Hakebull Other shellfish

bull Rockfishbull Sablefishbull Salmonbull Shrimpbull Squid

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending

generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers3

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 commercial fishing in California generated the largest employment impacts in the region 124800 jobs Income impacts ($49 billion) sales impacts ($228 billion) and value-added impacts ($81 billion) were also largest in California The importers sector in California generated the highest employment impacts of any

3 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)

39

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Pacific Region | Regional Summary

state-level sector 55100 jobs The importers sector in California also generated the highest state-level income impacts ($27 billion) sales impacts ($17 billion) and value-added impacts in the region ($52 billion)

Landings TrendsLandings revenue increased in the Pacific Region (up $1312 million or 24) from 2015 to 2016 largely due to the increase in crab landings revenue ($1117 million) during this period A fishery disaster had been declared for the Dungeness crab fishery in California and for the Quileute tribe in Washington State for the 2015 to 2016 season because of the closures that were implemented due to high levels of domoic acid a neurotoxin As these fisheries re-opened landings bounced back to their highest level since 2013

Whiting was another bright spot for the West Coast region with 2016 landings and landings revenue up 67 and 93 respectively relative to 2015 While the 2016 whiting total allowable catch was unchanged from 2015 the major difference in performance between the two years was a higher utilization rate of the TAC The 2015 utilization rate (474) of the whiting TAC was the fisheriesrsquo lowest in the last decade Reasons cited by industry for the 2015 performance included the unusual dispersed distribution of the fish later in the season after the at-sea fleet returned from Alaska possibly due to anomalously warm ocean conditions as well as less-favorable market conditions4

Squid landings revenue also bounced back to a degree in 2016 (up $158 million) but only because global supply shortages due to the strong El Nintildeo event from 2015 to 2016 caused prices to surge 60 in California Squid landings were essentially flat relative to 2015 landings Prior to the most recent El Nintildeo event squid had been Californiarsquos largest fishery by value and volume in 2014 and had represented 80 of US squid landings and 64 of US squid revenues in recent years In 2016 California represented only 58 and 40 of US squid landings and landings revenue respectively Similarly revenues from albacore landings on the West Coast were up 28 relative to 2015 despite a 7 drop in landings Tight inventories drove albacore prices up 39 in 2016

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Shrimp (178 143 in real terms)bull Crab (79 56 in real terms)bull Albacore tuna (75 53 in real terms)From 2015bull Crab (106)bull Hake (93)bull Squid (65)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull There were no decreases from 2007 (in

nominal dollar values)From 2015bull Shrimp (-45)bull Salmon (-16)bull Rockfish (-10)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Shrimp (108)bull Rockfish (41)bull Hake (23)From 2015bull Crab (177)bull Hake (67)bull Other shellfish (31)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Salmon (-25)bull Squid (-23)bull Flatfish (-22)From 2015bull Shrimp (-48)bull Salmon (-28)bull Rockfish (-12)

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the Pacific Region totaled $6889 million in 2016 This number represented a 50 increase from 2007 (a 31 increase in real terms after adjusting

4 httpswwwfederalregistergovdocuments201605162016-11329magnuson-stevens-act-provisions-fisheries-off-west-coast-states-pacific-coast-groundfish-fishery

40

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oPacific Region | Regional Summary

for inflation) and a 24 increase from 2015 Landings revenue was highest in Washington ($2875 million) followed by California ($2161 million) Shellfish landings revenue made up 67 of total revenue in the region Crab ($2167 million) and other shellfish ($1565 million) had the highest landings revenue in the Pacific Region in 2016 Together they accounted for 54 of total landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 shrimp (178 143 in real terms) crab (79 56 in real terms) and albacore tuna (75 53 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases There were no decreases in revenue from 2007 to 2016 (in nominal dollar values) From 2015 to 2016 crab (106) hake (93) and squid (65) had the largest revenue increases while shrimp (-45) salmon (-16) and rockfish (-10) had the largest revenue decreases

LandingsIn 2016 Pacific Region commercial fishermen landed 9378 million pounds of finfish and shellfish a 15 decrease from 2007 and a 26 increase from 2015 Hake had the highest landings volume in the Pacific Region accounting for 60 of landed weight

From 2007 to 2016 shrimp (108) rockfish (41) and hake (23) had the largest landings increases while salmon (-25) squid (-23) and flatfish (-22) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 crab (177) hake (67) and other shellfish (31) had the largest landings increases while shrimp (-48) salmon (-28) and rockfish (-12) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 other shellfish ($1012 per pound) received the highest Pacific Region ex-vessel price Landings of hake ($008 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price From 2007 to 2016 albacore tuna (93 69 in real terms) squid (79 56 in real terms) and salmon (57 37 in real terms) had the largest price increases while rockfish (-10 -22 in real terms) had the largest price decreases From 2015 to 2016 squid (58) albacore tuna (39) and salmon (17) had the largest price increases while crab (-25) and other shellfish (-13) had the largest price decreases

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups

Key Pacific Region Recreational Species

bull Albacore amp other tunas

bull Barracuda bass amp bonito

bull Croakersbull Flatfish

bull Greenlingsbull Rockfishes amp

scorpionfishesbull Salmonbull Sculpinsbull Surfperches

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities5 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietors income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses

5 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

41

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Pacific Region | Regional Summary

a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

The greatest employment impacts from expenditures on saltwater recreational fishing in the Pacific Region were generated in California (17100 jobs) followed by Washington (4600 jobs) The largest sales impacts were observed in California ($21 billion) followed by Washington ($5421 million) The biggest income impacts were generated in California ($8194 million) followed by Washington ($2094 million) The greatest value-added impacts were in California ($13 billion) followed by Washington ($3396 million)

Recreational fishing expenditures (on both fishing trips and durable equipment purchases) across the Pacific Region in 2016 totaled about $23 billion Trip expenditures totaled more than $526 million with a large portion coming from trips in the shore (35) and for-hire (33) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $18 billion with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($8802 million)

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Greenlings (98)bull Rockfishes amp scorpionfishes (45)bull Surfperches (2)From 2015bull Croakers (29)bull Barracuda bass amp bonito (19)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Croakers (-72)bull Salmon (-61)bull Sculpins (-7)From 2015bull Albacore amp other tunas (-61)bull Salmon (-58)bull Surfperches (-31)

Fishing TripsIn 2016 recreational fishermen took 52 million fishing

trips in the Pacific Region This number represented a 16 decrease from 2007 and an 11 decrease from 2015 The largest proportions of trips were taken in the shore mode (60) and private boat mode (26) States with the highest number of recorded trips in the Pacific Region were California (35 million trips) and Washington (1 million trips)

ParticipationIn 2016 there were 12 million recreational anglers who fished in the Pacific Region This number represented a 26 decrease from 2007 and an 8 decrease from 2015 These anglers were Pacific Region residents from either a coastal county (71) or non-coastal county (29)

Harvest and ReleaseOf the Pacific Regions key species and species groups rockfishes and scorpionfishes (42 million fish) barracuda bass and bonito (195 million fish) and surfperches (18 million fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 greenlings (98) rockfishes and scorpionfishes (45) and surfperches (2) had the largest increases in catch while croakers (-72) salmon (-61) and sculpins (-7) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 croakers (29) and barracuda bass and bonito (19) had the largest increases in catch while albacore and other tunas (-61) salmon (-58) and surfperches (-31) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries 67

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a states economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy8 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient

6 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)7 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)8 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

42

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oPacific Region | Regional Summary

(CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average

The Bureau of Labor Statistics suppressed the CFLQ value for Washington for 2015 Of the remaining states Oregon had the highest CFLQ at 352 California had a CFLQ value of 061

In 2015 12 million employer establishments operated throughout the entire Pacific Region (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed about 184 million workers and had a total annual payroll of $11 trillion The combined gross state product of Washington Oregon and California was approximately $32 trillion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 the Pacific Region had 240 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 30 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $176 million (this remained unchanged in real terms from 2007) There were 153 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 9 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 8330 workers (this remained unchanged from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $4264 million (this remained unchanged in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of seafood product preparation and packaging establishments was located in California (217) followed by Washington (144) and Oregon (32)

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 271 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the three states that make up the Pacific Region (a 2 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $208 million (an 18 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 234 employer firms in

the retail sales of seafood sector (an 8 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 1668 workers (an 18 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $443 million (a 21 increase in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of retail seafood establishments was located in California (391) followed by Washington (74) and Oregon (40)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 491 employer firms in the wholesale sales of seafood sector in the Pacific Region in 2015 (a 10 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 5443 workers and had a total annual payroll of $2654 million The greatest number of wholesale seafood establishments was located in California (349) followed by Washington (118) and Oregon (24)

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of the Pacific Regions economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons However these sectors play an important role in the regional economy For example the ship and boat building sector accounted for $9444 million in payroll in 2015

43

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Pacific Region | Regional Summary

Tables | Pacific Region

44

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oPacific Region | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Pacific Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Landings Revenue Jobs Sales Income Value

Added Jobs Sales Income Value Added

California 216139 124803 22776152 4911619 8141191 14900 1225433 459683 632590Oregon 151707 16162 1190017 415939 583687 14100 817764 339604 454934Washington 287543 55325 7463634 2003817 3047760 21345 1547501 638452 865335

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 459772 500447 501938 566579 729785 674465 814834 776098 557669 688918Finfish amp Other 177529 218718 170610 206161 267963 252144 282370 265357 203535 227249Shellfish 282243 281729 331327 360418 461821 422321 532464 510742 354134 461669

Key SpeciesAlbacore tuna 21612 28845 27541 28780 43347 45827 41930 32792 29387 37744Crab 121136 107107 123865 132843 182085 176880 249579 199222 105053 216733Flatfish 16266 18016 16716 12828 13377 13492 17417 15664 16751 17791Hake (whiting) 32603 58492 14104 27316 52869 47054 61321 58630 24109 46639Other shellfish 114639 122905 133940 134460 172541 141221 166551 177487 137035 156483Rockfish 7541 9257 8974 9226 9446 9421 9872 9820 10531 9526Sablefish 20984 27279 34481 35977 44873 28108 19559 24178 28719 31346Salmon 34508 27548 25549 49534 54267 48197 77754 71416 48157 40453Shrimp 17298 25132 16594 21941 40638 40326 42614 61100 87556 48139Squid 29169 26585 56928 71173 66557 63894 73720 72932 24491 40315

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 1109222 1091673 899043 1065499 1176780 1070065 1255594 1208811 747113 937751Finfish amp Other 903860 908242 583273 652515 758522 721080 850058 816757 526113 719615Shellfish 205362 183431 315771 412984 418258 348985 405537 392053 221000 218136

Key SpeciesAlbacore tuna 25483 24507 27055 25477 24284 30638 28471 27247 24821 23010Crab 51888 45075 59158 61668 66518 52860 87157 52133 22745 62945Flatfish 33828 37852 41192 33785 25959 24779 29106 24188 24861 26508Hake (whiting) 454533 531277 253053 355216 496363 347171 505614 574921 333290 558047Other shellfish 17513 17357 17513 16446 17072 14819 16509 17107 11805 15466Rockfish 7447 9469 10458 11038 9910 10406 10794 10720 11913 10489Sablefish 11630 12978 15822 15055 14139 11580 9159 9633 11377 11799Salmon 25050 19503 34132 31107 42224 24619 56892 37187 26134 18757Shrimp 26497 35799 33456 46191 66686 66319 71505 93150 105324 55017Squid 109464 85200 205643 288678 267983 214988 230365 229664 81127 84708

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Albacore tuna 085 118 102 113 178 150 147 120 118 164Crab 233 238 209 215 274 335 286 382 462 344Flatfish 048 048 041 038 052 054 060 065 067 067Hake (whiting) 007 011 006 008 011 014 012 010 007 008Other shellfish 655 708 765 818 1011 953 1009 1038 1161 1012Rockfish 101 098 086 084 095 091 091 092 088 091Sablefish 180 210 218 239 317 243 214 251 252 266Salmon 138 141 075 159 129 196 137 192 184 216Shrimp 065 070 050 048 061 061 060 066 083 087Squid 027 031 028 025 025 030 032 032 030 048

45

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Pacific Region | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Pacific Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars trips)Trips Jobs Sales Income Value Added

California 3532 17050 2123040 819382 1305411Oregon 684 3048 296940 131937 192078Washington 1008 4597 542066 209416 339605

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip Expenditures Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFor-HirePrivate BoatShoreTotal

Total State Trip and Durable

176426164271186120526817

Goods Expenditures

Fishing TackleOther EquipmentBoat ExpensesVehicle ExpensesSecond Home ExpensesTotal Durable Expenditures

426331215139880157252846

393617784082305225

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 1216 1082 1384 1167 1052 1358 1321 1235 935 833Non-Coastal 370 320 379 381 342 378 426 428 344 340Out-of-State NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 1587 1402 1763 1548 1394 1736 1748 1664 1279 1173

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 517 415 442 457 681 689 753 1085 881 759Private 1860 1517 2114 1727 1833 1971 2070 1991 1876 1341Shore 3818 3859 4345 3770 3791 4973 4859 4351 3131 3124Total Trips 6195 5791 6901 5954 6305 7633 7682 7427 5888 5224

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Albacore amp other tunas

H 113 59 90 80 54 151 108 188 272 109R 2 2 2 0 0 2 1 4 8 1

Barracuda bass amp bonito

H 534 411 387 389 425 354 153 384 367 276R 1488 1127 1236 998 747 792 1173 1727 1277 1674

CroakersH 758 355 499 248 132 302 201 168 110 151R 301 242 290 270 93 185 229 148 123 148

FlatfishesH 258 368 367 416 607 559 711 992 404 357R 325 351 250 277 221 295 453 341 241 200

GreenlingsH 188 164 178 194 276 309 362 393 458 419R 156 137 172 199 288 294 268 261 255 261

Rockfishes amp scorpionfishes

H 2467 1935 2230 2223 2904 3448 3904 4045 3884 3483R 446 367 386 466 576 652 903 838 788 734

Salmon13H 213 47 108 111 154 224 244 356 198 83R NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

SculpinsH 49 68 59 52 95 70 66 60 62 58R 208 218 198 199 234 226 300 200 187 180

SurfperchesH 875 937 788 721 1075 1279 1060 1244 1477 1072R 850 714 670 383 874 1144 979 1162 1072 681

1 NA = data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but whether an angler is a resident of a region is not specified2 In this table rsquo0rsquo = 0-999 fish3 Salmon harvest estimates exclude release mortality

Tables | California

48

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oCalifornia | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the California Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 124803 22776152 4911619 8141191 14900 1225433 459683 632590

Commercial Harvesters 4093 431853 146717 215772 4093 431853 146717 215772Seafood Processors amp Dealers 4586 526972 195405 259284 1707 196155 72736 96514

Importers 55117 17033566 2729954 5192577 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 11051 1750326 567718 793142 582 92256 29923 41805

Retail 49956 3033436 1271825 1680416 8518 505169 210306 278500

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 127580 120861 159253 187263 222160 243963 266488 253768 129143 216139

Finfish amp Other 51037 48671 47738 45558 59289 57103 66416 61163 54526 50101Shellfish 76543 72190 111515 141704 162871 186860 200071 192605 74617 166038

Key SpeciesCrab 28626 24227 32508 43016 53762 88207 91851 70563 20467 85620Pacific sardine 8218 7575 5544 4366 4398 4249 1510 2003 343 95Rockfish 4924 5781 5330 5453 5644 5170 5748 5604 5797 5400Sablefish 4873 6224 9765 11491 15121 8988 7047 8945 8870 8804Salmon 7835 6 NA 1215 5096 12850 22957 12127 8058 5277Sea urchins 5400 6550 7806 7413 8102 8320 9832 9057 6879 7269Shrimp 4064 5696 5462 4951 8598 8492 9520 11791 13769 11107Spiny lobster 6916 8008 7934 11386 12972 13749 13842 18238 15806 13731Squid 29131 26477 56877 71165 66546 63886 73701 72903 24458 39194Swordfish 3127 2365 1932 2203 3350 2090 2699 3049 3628 3717

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 384826 323884 376053 439440 409837 353875 364790 361290 186418 176403

Finfish amp Other 259139 224763 148478 120700 108999 102261 90128 98771 89788 59908Shellfish 125687 99121 227575 318740 300838 251614 274661 262518 96630 116495

Key SpeciesCrab 12393 9845 16660 23352 22206 27589 33094 20888 5412 28135Pacific sardine 178480 126945 82842 73814 60993 50660 15636 17112 3724 913Rockfish 3136 3933 3984 3949 3450 3457 3862 3555 3239 2530Sablefish 3240 3507 5089 5501 5646 3916 3291 3960 4033 3858Salmon 1743 1 NA 255 1133 2862 4337 2558 1339 709Sea urchins 11131 10283 12205 11230 11465 11443 12945 11833 8106 5885Shrimp 2015 3011 3596 4522 8217 7255 9712 9873 9443 4818Spiny lobster 663 741 706 716 751 876 764 951 768 680Squid 109150 84071 205278 288497 267890 214867 230061 229466 80968 81751Swordfish 1210 1168 898 815 1365 887 1174 1252 1358 1364

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Crab 231 246 195 184 242 320 278 338 378 304Pacific sardine 005 006 007 006 007 008 010 012 009 010Rockfish 157 147 134 138 164 150 149 158 179 213Sablefish 150 177 192 209 268 229 214 226 220 228Salmon 450 416 NA 476 450 449 529 474 602 744Sea urchins 049 064 064 066 071 073 076 077 085 124Shrimp 202 189 152 109 105 117 098 119 146 231Spiny lobster 1044 108 1124 1591 1727 1569 1811 1917 2059 2019Squid 027 031 028 025 025 030 032 032 030 048Swordfish 258 203 215 270 246 236 230 244 267 272

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

49

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

California | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of California Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impactsby Fishing Mode

For-Hire 1818 258084 97532 147866Private Boat 554 92377 28333 49784Shore 1608 224305 73732 128216

Total Durable Expenditures 13070 1548274 619785 979545Total State Economic Impacts 17050 2123040 819382 1305411

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip Expenditures EquipmentFor-Hire 136408 Fishing TacklePrivate Boat 61998 Other EquipmentShore 148056 Boat ExpensesTotal 346462 Vehicle Expenses

Second Home ExpensesTotal Durable Expenditures

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures

Durable Goods Expenditures327770163085528338168135

011873271533789

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 913 812 992 863 722 1024 964 893 591 576Non-Coastal 215 177 220 230 190 222 264 263 182 189Out-of-State 82 206 221 183 215 87 94 121 96 77Total Anglers 1210 1195 1433 1277 1127 1334 1322 1277 869 842

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 373 305 308 334 554 557 613 929 727 632Private 843 640 681 690 683 800 786 785 676 522Shore 3072 3113 3599 3024 3045 4227 4113 3605 2385 2378Total Trips 4288 4058 4588 4048 4282 5584 5512 5319 3788 3532

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)14

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Albacore amp other tunas

H 28 13 23 11 9 37 32 65 158 24R 2 2 2 lt 1 lt 1 2 1 4 8 lt 1

Barracuda bass amp bonito2

H 534 411 387 389 425 354 153 384 367 276R 1488 1127 1236 998 747 792 1173 1727 1277 1674

CroakersH 758 355 499 248 132 302 201 168 110 151R 301 242 290 270 93 185 229 148 123 148

FlatfishesH 185 298 300 351 541 490 640 921 333 280R 279 303 199 231 175 248 405 294 193 153

GreenlingsH 70 48 63 60 123 143 176 229 286 250R 74 53 84 92 169 183 160 169 153 156

Rockfishes amp scorpionfishes2

H 1919 1445 1670 1639 2379 2871 3229 3326 3000 2650R 396 311 320 383 506 583 823 752 674 635

Salmon3H 48 lt 1 lt 1 15 50 124 116 75 38 38R NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

SculpinsH 19 37 27 19 62 39 37 32 34 30R 58 69 50 47 82 74 147 48 35 29

SurfperchesH 623 685 537 470 823 1027 809 992 1226 817R 690 554 510 223 714 984 819 1002 912 520

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish2 This species may not be equivalent to species with similar names listed in the commercial tables3 Salmon harvest estimates exclude release mortality4 NA = not available

50

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oCalifornia | Marine Economy

2015 California State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 3117591 (128) 908120 (118) 14325377 (115) 85695 (137) 132114 (136) 249162 (139) 061

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 121 139 159 184 187 151 157 164 169Receipts 10842 11460 10852 9695 9788 9283 9866 11112 12978

Seafood salesretail

Firms 222 210 202 203 209 236 218 227 221Receipts 19703 19892 17095 19021 18006 18238 18581 17055 17896

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 49 45 47 48 48 41 44 53 48Employees 2229 2024 2167 1820 1842 1668 1871 1799 1661

Payroll 75886 65215 69529 62480 60411 52977 57603 60762 59829

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 300 278 289 314 404 275 320 341 349Employees 4429 3321 3183 3223 3505 3441 3671 3912 4170

Payroll 159672 132139 128813 137810 149302 173959 181698 175927 201903

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 182 161 153 158 157 149 155 167 170Employees 1004 932 976 985 1088 1043 1119 1124 1208

Payroll 21224 20585 21785 22718 25168 24221 26702 28044 28437

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 29 28 30 25 21 22 24 30 34Employees ds ds ds 554 395 ds ds ds 851

Payroll ds ds ds 30431 24708 ds ds ds 70978

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 51 43 41 54 51 45 34 43 56Employees 1643 ds ds 2562 2464 2431 2073 2467 2554

Payroll 116628 ds ds 236235 256962 236423 218054 187383 235546Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 13 5 5 3 2 2 4 5 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 276 277 276 270 269 251 250 249 258

Employees 2680 2652 2514 2390 2401 2237 2199 2332 2439Payroll 80216 85315 78890 80631 82958 71777 72737 79840 84427

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 56 61 62 63 71 38 64 64 67Employees 22395 22086 17428 18449 18812 18759 ds ds 18859

Payroll 1484308 1453281 1211572 1273268 1333805 1351874 ds ds 1761284Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 39 40 39 41 45 35 36 37 38Employees 858 815 804 765 760 800 805 634 587

Payroll 63610 65225 61720 58899 62065 61166 67665 59927 60228

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 18 17 19 21 19 59 31 33 30Employees 443 256 345 435 508 ds 651 535 570

Payroll 30001 23316 26889 37560 41688 ds 52401 33599 40887

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 136 136 123 117 108 120 113 108 103Employees 9250 11630 10483 9720 9165 12681 12651 9814 11379

Payroll 433846 477300 460239 448338 434449 544819 537438 534787 583717

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Tables | Oregon

52

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oOregon | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Oregon Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 16162 1190017 415939 583687 14100 817764 339604 454934

Commercial Harvesters 4795 287124 119939 168205 4795 287124 119939 168205Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1522 144852 55632 72687 1431 136197 52308 68344

Importers 979 302502 48482 92216 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 572 76670 26009 34885 399 53458 18135 24323

Retail 8293 378870 165878 215695 7475 340985 149223 194063

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 97298 103042 106959 106378 148354 128222 179215 158080 113990 151707

Finfish amp Other 47589 56912 52750 58730 76718 72329 81445 78214 60860 64925Shellfish 49709 46130 54210 47648 71636 55893 97770 79866 53130 86782

Key SpeciesAlbacore tuna 9468 10666 10191 12425 18766 15168 16085 11023 9212 12502Crab 38208 29168 42413 32757 44696 29189 71208 48149 11935 55737Flatfish 7930 9163 8468 6861 6779 7315 9854 8651 9765 10716Hake (whiting) 6501 6830 3783 5414 16518 14611 20405 18274 7146 8601Oysters 1847 2748 4506 3317 1869 1661 1798 1774 NA 3615Pacific sardine 4551 5665 5291 5252 3192 8979 6299 3522 813 0Rockfish 2002 2610 2500 2520 2473 2661 3023 3246 3744 3589Sablefish 9494 13737 15919 15069 17351 11530 7595 8076 12807 15086Salmon 4647 4166 3546 7698 6737 6950 12422 20115 11864 8311Shrimp 9488 14056 6994 11313 24901 24848 24430 29605 40634 25245

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 253543 195688 199458 201974 274533 296091 339589 291655 194575 209486

Finfish amp Other 216134 155837 154147 153588 208445 237822 265454 227318 138601 153909Shellfish 37410 39851 45310 48386 66088 58269 74136 64337 55974 55578

Key SpeciesAlbacore tuna 10468 8876 10082 10703 9682 9938 10209 8767 7574 7250Crab 17007 13875 21848 15817 17240 8681 26016 11910 2284 15702Flatfish 19697 23842 26047 22226 15957 15322 18965 15955 16722 18640Hake (whiting) 81481 55511 53466 57017 142092 102651 160098 161589 88728 98003Oysters 197 162 1127 829 467 415 449 443 NA 743Pacific sardine 90037 49298 45902 44743 23479 91459 57022 16938 4688 2Rockfish 2905 3820 4207 4533 3819 3918 4745 5293 6628 6324Sablefish 5349 6514 7219 6269 5074 4739 3840 3293 5002 5502Salmon 1370 1860 2311 2765 2386 1918 3505 6373 3142 1838Shrimp 20027 25433 22085 31516 48276 49054 47535 51835 53457 35344

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Albacore tuna 090 120 101 116 194 153 158 126 122 172Crab 225 210 194 207 259 336 274 404 522 355Flatfish 040 038 033 031 042 048 052 054 058 057Hake (whiting) 008 012 007 009 012 014 013 011 008 009Oysters 940 1696 400 400 400 400 400 400 NA 487Pacific sardine 005 011 012 012 014 010 011 021 017 018Rockfish 069 068 059 056 065 068 064 061 056 057Sablefish 178 211 221 240 342 243 198 245 256 274Salmon 339 224 153 278 282 362 354 316 378 452Shrimp 047 055 032 036 052 051 051 057 076 071

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

53

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Oregon | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Oregon Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts byFishing Mode

For-Hire 264 31161 11928 16950Private Boat 394 37694 14070 22495Shore 153 14523 5327 8628

Total Durable Expenditures 2237 213562 100612 144005Total State Economic Impacts 3048 296940 131937 192078

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 19024Private Boat 43426Shore 15352Total 77801

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 45798Other Equipment 25522Boat Expenses 77351Vehicle Expenses 60103Second Home Expenses 3936Total Durable Expenditures 212711

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 290512

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 86 79 85 82 82 86 89 92 90 86Non-Coastal 130 121 129 125 125 129 134 137 135 129Out-of-State 15 14 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 15Total Anglers 232 213 229 223 222 230 239 246 241 230

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 61 48 55 51 51 58 64 68 71 63Private 401 357 402 385 380 402 424 440 416 388Shore 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233Total Trips 695 638 690 669 664 693 721 741 720 684

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)12

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

BaitfishesH 221 221 221 223 221 220 220 221 221 220R 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125

FlatfishesH 22 20 16 14 15 17 18 15 17 18R 6 8 9 5 5 5 6 5 5 6

GreenlingsH 94 92 90 99 108 120 142 119 130 114R 67 70 72 82 88 85 90 74 85 84

RockfishesH 280 266 317 332 251 278 361 376 516 443

22 30 36 44 34 33 42 42 75 56

Salmon3 H 68 14 91 23 24 35 45 118 38 13R NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

SculpinsH 15 16 16 16 16 15 14 12 13 13R 58 58 58 61 61 61 63 60 60 61

SturgeonH 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12R 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25

SurfperchesH 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118R 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish2 NA = not available3 Salmon estimates exclude release mortality

54

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oOregon | Marine Economy

2015 Oregon State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 269901 (11) 112393 (15) 1498727 (12) 7101 (11) 11227 (12) 21652 (12) 352

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms ds 19 15 15 16 14 11 11 12Receipts ds 957 466 510 467 346 319 484 1088

Seafood salesretail

Firms 11 16 12 15 16 11 ds 16 15Receipts 1210 2101 1140 1907 1896 1600 ds 1036 841

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 22 23 20 21 22 18 19 20 20Employees 819 850 812 806 805 934 907 980 916

Payroll 27394 27616 26202 27007 32438 31970 37265 39290 41181

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 18 18 19 22 27 21 19 22 24Employees ds ds ds ds ds 180 189 192 196

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds 7602 8065 8601 9121

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 23 21 23 21 20 18 20 23 25Employees 171 178 151 162 163 126 147 170 181

Payroll 3185 3370 3515 3651 3613 2851 4238 4440 4951

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 13 8 9 8 8 8 7 8 8Employees 476 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 437

Payroll 25206 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 40746

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 5 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Employees ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 38 37 33 30 33 32 34 34 36

Employees 138 106 109 102 102 119 104 113 119Payroll 3754 2178 2602 2290 2382 3034 3148 3584 3643

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 9 13 13 12 13 5 8 7 7Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 17 20 17 18 18 20 15 15 15Employees 183 200 189 144 152 176 81 67 74

Payroll 11331 11808 10154 9577 9592 12219 6534 3958 3998

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 1 1 3 3 10 5 5 5Employees ds ds ds ds ds 90 ds ds 49

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds 6512 ds ds 3437

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 40 41 35 34 34 33 32 30 29Employees 1441 1692 1886 980 1179 1504 1406 ds 1506

Payroll 47950 74583 90446 42004 55068 77718 79913 ds 94956

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Washington

56

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oWashington | Commercial Fisheries2016 Economic Impacts of the Washington Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)

With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 55325 7463634 2003817 3047760 21345 1547501 638452 865335

Commercial Harvesters 6195 573085 242998 343112 6195 573085 242998 343112Seafood Processors amp Dealers 14355 1528504 574083 759711 2340 249115 93564 123818

Importers 13057 4035021 646689 1230051 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 2317 333504 111737 152447 765 110120 36895 50337

Retail 19401 993521 428309 562439 12046 615181 264996 348069

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 216119 232841 227773 255332 329785 275585 335450 329109 299952 287543Finfish amp Other 60137 69445 62173 84269 102481 96026 100844 90855 73583 78694Shellfish 155981 163396 165600 171063 227305 179560 234606 238254 226368 208849

Key SpeciesClams 56428 64142 72647 73625 88774 69445 83788 83643 75342 82882Crab 54302 53712 48944 57070 83627 59485 86520 80509 72651 75376Hake (whiting) 7121 7249 2334 4105 7183 5882 7452 5431 2563 4509Halibut 8842 7525 4879 5764 6740 6122 4929 6985 6199 6896Mussels 3820 5293 4851 4318 4740 6065 9253 6830 7704 6452Oysters 37437 34794 34993 30370 43021 37576 46378 47555 37507 32353Sablefish 6608 7312 8796 9402 12378 7578 4888 7098 7020 7456Salmon 22026 23376 22003 40622 42434 28398 42376 39174 28235 26866Shrimp 3746 5380 4139 5677 7140 6986 8664 19704 33152 11786Tuna albacore 10439 17225 16390 14575 22253 28440 24745 21177 19961 24769

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 194449 173176 163937 189486 210282 213578 263639 191391 153568 168136Finfish amp Other 152221 128825 121060 143705 159034 174597 207194 126364 85300 122279Shellfish 42228 44351 42877 45782 51248 38982 56445 65027 68268 45856

Key SpeciesClams 3363 4071 4267 3876 4038 3677 3978 4320 4262 3355Crab 22487 21355 20651 22500 27072 16590 28046 19335 15048 19109Hake (whiting) 91272 67159 36378 58900 73494 38524 58696 49654 32977 77808Halibut 2428 2055 1731 1371 1301 1295 1065 1284 1157 1370Mussels 475 593 568 589 547 559 734 579 600 2790Oysters 11189 10258 9386 8650 9389 8143 9420 9329 5911 5748Sablefish 3035 2954 3514 3277 3410 2916 2006 2345 2317 2391Salmon 21938 17641 31821 28086 38706 19839 49050 28256 21654 16211Shrimp 4455 7355 7775 10153 10193 10009 14259 31441 42423 14855Tuna albacore 13129 14801 16112 13148 13209 19275 17552 18039 17133 15500

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Clams 1678 1576 1703 1899 2198 1889 2106 1936 1768 2470Crab 241 252 237 254 309 359 308 416 483 394Hake (whiting) 008 011 006 007 010 015 013 011 008 006Halibut 364 366 282 420 518 473 463 544 536 503Mussels 805 893 854 733 866 1085 1260 1179 1285 231Oysters 335 339 373 351 458 461 492 510 634 563Sablefish 218 248 250 287 363 260 244 303 303 312Salmon 100 133 069 145 110 143 086 139 130 166Shrimp 084 073 053 056 070 070 061 063 078 079Tuna albacore 080 116 102 111 168 148 141 117 117 160

57

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Washington | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Washington Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impactsby Fishing Mode

For-Hire 242 35333 13478 20196Private Boat 442 71852 20302 35897Shore 206 28890 9153 15626

Total Durable Expenditures 3707 405991 166483 267886Total State Economic Impacts 4597 542066 209416 339605

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 20994Private Boat 58847Shore 22712Total 102554

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 52763Other Equipment 26532Boat Expenses 274468Vehicle Expenses 24608Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 378370

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 480924

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 217 191 307 222 248 248 268 250 253 172Non-Coastal 26 22 30 25 27 27 28 28 28 21Out-of-State 20 17 24 19 21 21 22 22 22 17Total Anglers 262 230 361 266 296 295 318 300 303 210

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 83 62 79 72 76 74 76 88 83 64Private 616 520 1031 652 770 769 860 766 784 431Shore 513 513 513 513 513 513 513 513 513 513Total Trips 1212 1095 1623 1237 1359 1356 1449 1367 1380 1008

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)14

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Baitfishes H 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486

R 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126Flatfishes H 51 50 51 50 51 52 53 55 54 59

R 40 40 42 41 41 41 42 42 42 42Greenlings H 24 24 26 35 46 46 44 45 42 56

R 14 14 16 25 31 25 19 18 17 21Rockfishes2 H 222 179 198 208 229 253 268 298 322 345

R 12 9 13 22 18 18 21 26 23 25Salmon3 H 97 34 16 73 80 65 83 163 123 33

R NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASculpins H 16 15 16 16 17 16 16 16 16 16

R 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91Sharks amp Skates H 5 8 5 4 2 3 3 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1

R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 3Sturgeon34 H NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

R NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASurfperches H 133 134 133 133 133 134 134 134 133 137

R 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 123

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish2 This species may not be equivalent to species with similar names listed in the commercial tables3 Data on sturgeon harvest not available for 2007-2016 Salmon harvest estimates exclude release mortality4 NA = not available

58

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oWashington | Marine Economy

2015 Washington State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 430670 (18) 182913 (24) 2602408 (21) 14926 (24) 23574 (24) 44642 (25) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 63 44 47 39 37 42 42 51 59Receipts 4698 5167 5022 4228 3859 4377 4094 5270 3555

Seafood salesretail

Firms 32 33 42 30 34 42 41 36 35Receipts 1458 1807 2462 1273 2370 1871 3017 2559 2071

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 98 96 86 93 90 90 86 90 85Employees 5249 5893 4860 5296 5387 6118 6224 5945 5753

Payroll 275662 306213 232543 254592 293112 326827 315379 329739 325389

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 127 107 108 105 107 101 116 119 118Employees 1086 996 1103 970 911 1085 999 1098 1077

Payroll 46085 48251 48044 45871 45543 51508 49683 52761 54339

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 50 44 43 47 44 40 35 33 39Employees 244 247 239 282 253 256 266 276 279

Payroll 8001 7947 8324 9098 7786 8210 9069 9938 10865

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 37 24 24 30 28 28 35 38 35Employees 1903 2222 2245 1731 1684 1557 2186 2020 1879

Payroll 136543 168832 168783 130398 132068 126401 170003 163075 162635

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 30 21 25 20 14 12 8 8 8Employees 227 263 305 209 ds ds 200 204 194

Payroll 19692 24843 28897 24711 ds 14014 14892 14991 13981Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 3 4 5 4 2 2 5 4 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1412 1277

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 54346 73134

MarinasEstablishments 114 116 110 117 114 100 110 106 102

Employees 485 573 570 560 517 479 529 530 588Payroll 15623 18931 18811 18783 18364 18038 18914 20348 21944

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 28 25 27 26 32 13 30 29 30Employees 4913 4821 2953 ds 3910 ds ds ds 3966

Payroll 334601 334193 239490 ds 323286 ds ds ds 424469Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 61 76 69 79 78 72 73 71 68Employees 950 1213 1168 1225 1207 ds ds 1297 1176

Payroll 72912 100542 102934 102766 94781 ds ds 101251 88363

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 6 11 11 9 9 48 28 27 23Employees 129 111 118 74 75 1509 181 304 250

Payroll 4631 6359 6437 4662 4937 85042 11894 16449 14278

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 167 169 162 152 135 141 138 131 143Employees 7742 8067 6710 5406 5232 5294 5387 5060 4653

Payroll 354084 402253 312240 284759 276402 290400 273825 262730 265732

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Western Pacific Regionbull Hawaiʻi

Fish flags highlight catch for the day (Lahaina Maui Hawaiʻi) Photo NOAA FisheriesCourtney Beavers

60

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe US Pacific Islands Region includes the state of Hawairsquoi the territories of American Samoa and Guam the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) and the Pacific Remote Island Areas Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (WPFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under five fishery ecosystem plans (FEPs) These plans focus on place-based rather than species- or fishery-based management

Western Pacific Fishery Ecosystem Plans

bull American Samoabull Hawaiʻibull Mariana Archipela-

go (Guam and the CNMI)

bull Pacific Remote Island Areas

bull Western Pacific Pelagics

Because fishery data are limited in most of these areas only information for the Hawairsquoi and Western Pacific Pelagics fisheries is reported here No catch share programs operate in this region

Hawaiʻi FEP NOAA Fisheries the WPFMC and the State of Hawairsquoi collaborate to manage fisheries across the Hawairsquoi Archipelago The major fisheries in Hawairsquoi include trolling for pelagic species such as tuna marlin wahoo and mahimahi deepwater hook-and-line bottom fishing and various forms of net fishing that target nearshore pelagic and reef fish species Under this FEP the Hancock Seamount groundfish complex is currently overfished This fishery has been closed since 1986

Western Pacific Pelagics FEP The management species covered under this FEP include tunas billfishes sharks squids and an assortment of other species These species include mahimahi wahoo moonfish and pomfret caught by the Hawairsquoi longline fishery as well as smaller boats that use diverse gear including trolling handline and traditional fishing methods Of these species bigeye tuna Pacific bluefin tuna swordfish and the Central Western Pacific striped marlin stock are considered subject to overfishing The Central Western Pacific striped marlin stock and Pacific bluefin tuna stock are also listed as overfished

In addition to management by the WPFMC and NOAA Fisheries pelagic fish such as bigeye and yellowfin tunas are managed by two regional fishery management organizations (RFMOs) The Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) has authority to manage pelagic fisheries in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean while the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) manages pelagic fisheries in the Eastern Pacific Ocean Fish species and fisheries under the purview of both RFMOs migrate across national boundaries and between RFMO areas requiring coordinated management Since 2009 the annual bigeye tuna catch limit has been recommended by the WCPFC and implemented by NOAA Fisheries for the US longline fleet in the Western and Central Pacific The IATTC establishes the harvest limit for bigeye tuna for US longline vessels longer than 24 meters in the Eastern Tropical Pacific

Policy UpdatesThe Hawairsquoi-based pelagic longline fleet accounts for most of the US longline catch of bigeye tuna in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean Under the authority of the WCPFC Implementation Act the 2016 bigeye catch limit for US longline vessels was set at 3554 metric tons less any overage from 2015 Under this same rule US purse seine vessels fishing in the convention area between the latitudes of 20 degrees north and 20 degrees south were required to have a WCPFC observer on board unless the fishing took place entirely within a single nationrsquos jurisdiction outside the United States Although US purse seine vessels are exempt from this requirement on trips in which fishing occurs in the waters of a single foreign nation those foreign nations generally require US purse seine vessels to carry observers if fishing in their waters The rule also established restrictions on US purse seine vesselsrsquo use of fish aggregating devices (FADs)

On February 3 2016 NOAA Fisheries published a final rule allowing large federally permitted US longline vessels to fish in certain areas of the American Samoa Large Vessel Prohibited Area (LVPA) The LVPA was established in 2002 to prevent the potential for gear conflicts and catch competition between large and small fishing vessels However by 2016 the American Samoa

61

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

pelagic fisheries had changed so that the conditions that led to the establishment of the LVPA appeared no longer to exist The final rule allowed fishing in an additional 16817 square nautical miles of federal waters On March 20 2017 however a US federal judge in American Samoa v National Marine Fisheries Service 16-cv-00095 (DHaw) issued an order vacating the regulations at 50 CFR 665818(b) thus barring large federally permitted US longline vessels from fishing within the LVPA

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key Western Pacific Commercial Species

bull Lobstersbull Mahimahibull Marlinbull Moonfishbull Pomfret

bull Scadbull Snappersbull Swordfishbull Tunasbull Wahoo

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales

made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers1

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 the commercial fishing and seafood industry in Hawairsquoi generated $8671 million in sales impacts $2693 million in income impacts $3918 million in value-added impacts and 9900 full-and part-time jobs The retail sector generated the largest employment impacts across sectors (4100 jobs) The importers sector generated the largest sales impacts ($3184 million) while the retail sector generated the largest income impacts ($1007 million) and the largest value-added impacts ($1312 million)

Landings TrendsHawairsquoi recorded its second highest commercial fisheries landings revenue (both nominally and after adjusting for inflation) on record in 2016 ($1181 million) only slightly bested by 2012 landings revenue Landings

1 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)

62

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

revenue increased (up $147 million or 14) from 2015 to 2016 largely due to the increase in tuna landings revenue (up $69 million or 8) but with broad gains in landings revenue across most key speciesspecies groups Mahimahi marlins scads snappers and wahoo were all up $1 million or more during this period From 2015 to 2016 yellowfin tuna landings revenue increased $5 million while bigeye tuna landings revenue increased $16 million The deep-set longline fishery which set a record number of hooks (511 million hooks) in 2016 accounted for most of this increase2

In recent years Hawairsquoirsquos landings and landings revenue trends largely reflect the growth of the tuna fishery From 2007 to 2016 bigeye tuna dominated Hawairsquoirsquos landings revenue accounting for 55 or more of state landings revenue Overall bigeye tuna landings increased 37 during this period driving landings revenue up 72 (51 in real terms after adjusting for inflation) Yellowfin tuna on average accounted for 10 of state landings revenue from 2007 to 2016 an increase in landings (up 44) that coupled with significantly higher prices (up 36 nominally 19 after adjusting for inflation) led to an almost doubling of yellowfin landings revenue (up 94 nominally 72 in real terms) Overall Hawairsquoi accounted for 57 of US tuna landings revenue in 2016 slightly higher than the average annual rate for the 2007 to 2016 period (54)

Landings RevenueIn 2016 landings revenue totaled about $1181 million a 56 increase from 2007 (a 36 increase in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 14 increase from 2015 Finfish landings revenue accounted for more than 99 of all landings revenue in the region In 2016 tunas ($885 million) swordfish ($48 million) and mahimahi (dolphin) ($45 million) dominated landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 pomfret (140 109 in real terms) marlin (100 75 in real terms) and tunas (73 51 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while lobsters (-69 -73 in real terms) and swordfish (-38 -46 in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 scad (989) snappers (102) and wahoo (41) had the largest revenue increases There

were no revenue decreases from 2015 to 2016

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Pomfret (140 109 in real terms)bull Marlin (100 75 in real terms)bull Tunas (73 51 in real terms)From 2015bull Scad (989)bull Snappers (102)bull Wahoo (41)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Lobsters (-69 -73 in real terms)bull Swordfish (-38 -46 in real terms)From 2015There were no revenue decreases from 2015 to 2016

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Pomfret (97)bull Marlin (69)bull Wahoo (60)From 2015bull Scad (923)bull Snappers (113)bull Wahoo (15)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Lobsters (-58)bull Swordfish (-55)bull Scad (-20)From 2015bull Swordfish (-20)bull Pomfret (-13)bull Marlin (-11)

LandingsIn 2016 Western Pacific Region commercial fishermen landed about 351 million pounds of finfish and shellfish in

2 Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report Pacific Island Pelagic Fisheries 2016

63

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

the state of Hawairsquoi This represents a 21 increase from 2007 and a 1 increase from 2015 Tunas contributed the most to landings accounting for 67 of total landings

From 2007 to 2016 pomfret (97) marlin (69) and wahoo (60) had the largest landings increases while lobsters (-58) swordfish (-55) and scad (-20) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 scad (923) snappers (113) and wahoo (15) had the largest landings increases while swordfish (-20) pomfret (-13) and marlin (-11) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 lobsters ($856 per pound) received the highest ex-vessel price in Hawairsquoi Landings of marlin ($175 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price From 2007 to 2016 mahimahi (dolphin) (51 32 in real terms) swordfish (38 21 in real terms) and snappers (35 18 in real terms) had the largest price increases while lobsters (-28 -37 in real terms) and wahoo (-2 -14 in real terms) had the largest price decreases From 2015 to 2016 marlin (52) pomfret (40) and swordfish (30) had the largest price increases while snappers (-5) had the largest price decrease

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups

Key Western Pacific Recreational Species

bull Blue marlinbull Dolphinfishbull Goatfishesbull Trevallys and other

jacksbull Bigeye and

mackerel scad

bull Skipjack tunabull Smallmouth

bonefishbull Snappersbull Wahoobull Yellowfin tuna

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities3 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

Note that no information is available for durable goods expenditures related to recreational fishing in Hawairsquoi

In 2016 economic impacts from recreational fishing activities in Hawairsquoi generated 854 jobs $1054 million in sales $333 million in income and $547 million in value-added impacts Of the three fishing trip modes trips in the for-hire fishing trips sector had the greatest economic impact accounting for 45 of employment impacts Expenditures for fishing trips in Hawairsquoi in 2016 totaled over $82 million A large portion of these trip expenditures came from trips in the shore (37) and for-hire (35) sectors

3 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

64

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

Fishing Trips In 2016 recreational fishermen took 1 million saltwater fishing trips in the state of Hawairsquoi This number represented a 60 decrease from 2007 and a 28 decrease from 2015 Of all fishing trips 77 were taken from the shore sector

Participation Participation estimates for Hawairsquoi are not available after 2006

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Smallmouth bonefish (7)From 2015bull Snappers (4)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Yellowfin tuna (-69)bull Dolphinfish (mahimahi) (-68)bull Skipjack tuna (-61)From 2015bull Goatfishes (-75)bull Yellowfin tuna (-71)bull Skipjack tuna (-67)

Harvest and Release Of Hawairsquoirsquos key species and species groups scads (bigeye and mackerel) (693000 fish) goatfishes (261000 fish) and jacks (trevallys and other jacks) (234000 fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 smallmouth bonefish (7) had the largest increase in catch while yellowfin tuna (-69) dolphinfish (mahimahi) (-68) and skipjack tuna (-61) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 snappers (4) had the largest increase in catch while goatfishes (-75) yellowfin tuna (-71) and skipjack tuna (-67) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the

economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries45

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy6 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average The Bureau of Labor Statistics did not disclose CFLQ data for Hawairsquoi for 2015

In 2015 31915 employer establishments operated throughout the entire Hawailsquoian economy (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed about 524000 workers and had a total annual payroll of $221 billion The gross state product of Hawairsquoi was approximately $81 billion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 Hawailsquoi had 12 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 20 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $13 million (a 10 increase in real terms from 2007) There were two employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 100 increase from 2007) The Census Bureau suppressed data on employment and annual payroll for this sector in Hawairsquoi

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 39 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the state of Hawairsquoi (a 5 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $41 million (an

4 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)5 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)6 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

65

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

18 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 25 employer firms in the retail seafood sales sector (this remained unchanged from 2007) These establishments employed 293 workers (a 25 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $74 million (a 9 decrease in real terms from 2007)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 30 employer firms in the wholesale seafood sales sector (a 17 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 639 workers (a 16 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $245 million (a 14 increase in real terms from 2007)

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of Hawairsquoirsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons These sectors however are economically important in the regional economy For example the marine cargo handling sector accounted for $834 million in payroll in 2015 in Hawairsquoi

Tables | Hawaiʻi

68

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Hawaiʻi | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Hawaiʻi Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 9916 867111 269335 391841 7790 469772 186129 252787

Commercial Harvesters 3691 205769 75140 108000 3691 205769 75140 108000Seafood Processors amp Dealers 580 56661 22429 28927 427 41737 16521 21308

Importers 1030 318378 51026 97056 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 540 57050 20009 26618 324 34210 11998 15961

Retail 4075 229252 100730 131241 3348 188055 82469 107518

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 75690 84877 71202 84044 91565 112300 107979 101249 103399 118134Finfish amp Other 75426 84556 70856 83700 91274 111865 107413 100754 103341 117832Shellfish 264 321 347 343 291 435 567 495 58 302

Key SpeciesLobsters 93 120 136 117 104 98 95 105 NA 28Mahimahi (dolphin) 3483 3174 2853 3303 4314 5309 4130 4412 3427 4512Marlin 2028 2072 2142 1756 2375 2888 2802 3197 3015 4064Moonfish (opah) 2171 2198 2409 2591 2853 3163 3203 2910 3151 NAPomfret 1461 1662 1381 1549 1449 2097 2576 2466 2874 3502Scad 1094 889 1198 1251 964 1181 1147 1128 108 1173Snappers 1690 1715 1860 1681 1415 1738 2003 2223 1124 2272Swordfish 7730 7177 7336 7303 6669 6693 4493 5405 4629 4813Tunas 51171 60863 47710 59775 66628 83298 81819 73657 81576 88467Wahoo 2085 2225 1673 1746 1806 2330 2375 2800 2328 3279

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 28934 30652 26906 28069 29289 31048 32447 33474 34623 35051

Finfish amp Other 28890 30599 26849 28007 29240 30968 32346 33387 34612 34999Shellfish 44 52 57 62 49 79 101 86 11 52

Key SpeciesLobsters 8 10 11 9 10 8 9 10 NA 3Mahimahi (dolphin) 1388 1250 1287 1518 1423 1746 1515 1689 1132 1193Marlin 1375 1952 1677 1221 1826 1459 1935 2318 2616 2327Moonfish (opah) 1226 1313 1884 1824 1564 1549 2072 2004 2067 NAPomfret 593 671 627 593 427 731 1142 1243 1339 1166Scad 461 318 405 460 323 383 361 356 36 368Snappers 381 378 391 342 269 308 357 369 178 380Swordfish 3643 3835 3881 3153 2592 2381 1674 2480 2044 1640Tunas 17594 18295 14594 16706 18519 20147 20900 20296 22932 23507Wahoo 715 849 605 600 564 652 744 1056 993 1144

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Lobsters 1184 1214 1237 1236 1039 1184 1071 1021 NA 856Mahimahi (dolphin) 251 254 222 218 303 304 273 261 303 378Marlin 147 106 128 144 130 198 145 138 115 175Moonfish (opah) 177 167 128 142 182 204 155 145 152 NAPomfret 246 248 220 261 339 287 225 198 215 300Scad 237 280 295 272 298 308 318 317 299 319Snappers 444 454 476 492 526 565 560 603 631 598Swordfish 212 187 189 232 257 281 268 218 226 293Tunas 291 333 327 358 360 413 391 363 356 376Wahoo 292 262 277 291 320 357 319 265 234 287

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

69

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Hawaiʻi | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Hawaiʻi Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)1

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 384 45734 16617 26852Private Boat 157 24579 6212 10309Shore 313 35088 10427 17575

Total Durable Expenditures NA NA NA NATotal State Economic Impacts 854 105401 33256 54736

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)1

Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 29411Private Boat 22508Shore 30942Total 82862

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle NAOther Equipment NABoat Expenses NAVehicle Expenses NASecond Home Expenses NATotal Durable Expenditures NA

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 82862

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2 3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 1216 1082 1384 1167 1052 1358 1321 1235 935 833Non-Coastal 370 320 379 381 342 378 426 428 344 340Out-of-State NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 1587 1402 1763 1548 1394 1736 1748 1664 1279 1173

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Private 475 564 441 484 224 325 297 324 273 235Shore 2102 1966 1722 1907 1158 1195 1216 1051 1158 790Total Trips 2577 2531 2163 2390 1382 1519 1513 1374 1431 1024

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue marlin H 2 11 3 1 2 3 4 3 5 2R lt 1 0 lt 1 0 0 0 0 lt 1 0 0

Dolphinfish (mahimahi)

H 136 184 103 164 63 163 94 92 78 44R lt 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 lt 1 0 lt 1

Goatfishes5 H 298 468 712 270 173 158 873 537 1052 246R 9 6 7 18 13 13 3 22 15 16

Jacks (trevallys and other jacks)6

H 169 277 123 140 99 110 144 156 170 112R 130 120 85 126 59 129 126 263 319 122

Scads (bigeye and mackerel)

H 1089 402 1102 840 662 608 889 899 1245 690R 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 lt 1 4

Skipjack tuna H 228 568 230 289 125 197 380 199 268 88R 5 2 0 0 lt 1 0 0 0 lt 1 2

Smallmouth bonefish

H 20 50 37 55 13 27 23 29 26 26R 13 4 2 13 2 8 10 20 17 9

Snappers7 H 104 138 147 340 113 195 152 220 119 119R 40 7 24 25 14 15 10 3 9 14

Wahoo H 57 78 61 41 15 32 37 43 55 45R lt 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1

Yellowfin tuna H 273 461 198 302 141 182 150 220 292 85R 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 lt 1 1 lt 1

1 NA = not available2 Participation (number of anglers) data are not available for 2007 through 20163 Data are not available because all Hawairsquoi residents are considered coastal county residents4 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish5 Goatfishes include yellowstripe yellowfin pfulgers bandtail doublebar diespot whitesaddle manybar blue and rsquoGoastfish familygenusrsquo6 Trevallys amp other jacks includes bluefin trevally giant trevally bigeye trevally black trevally African pompano greater amberjack island jack and other species in the jack family7 Snappers include bluestip blacktail ruby longtailed pink VonSiebolds Binghams green jobfish ironjaw and smalltooth jobfish

70

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Hawaiʻi | Marine Economy

2015 Hawailsquoi State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 102544 (04) 31915 (04) 523677 (04) 2207 (04) 4467 (05) 8060 (04) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 10 9 7 11 14 14 16 14 12Receipts 1023 1020 712 741 866 965 821 1048 1271

Seafood salesretail

Firms 41 37 35 37 39 42 40 38 39Receipts 4353 4394 3666 4124 3558 4086 3764 3727 4053

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 36 37 38 37 40 33 32 30 30Employees 550 695 538 531 538 483 542 567 639

Payroll 18932 20665 19347 19290 19416 19413 20039 21369 24477

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 25 25 25 24 25 24 25 26 25Employees 393 173 158 177 187 303 318 305 293

Payroll 7209 3674 3559 3533 3521 6493 7366 7142 7410

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 11 5 5 2 2 5 5 6 7Employees 557 478 475 ds ds 431 ds ds 452

Payroll 36635 34544 34367 ds ds 34538 ds ds 36675

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1Employees NA ds NA ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll NA ds NA ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 11 9 10 13 13 9 11 9 9

Employees 167 156 164 189 208 162 166 153 120Payroll 4151 4317 4368 5362 5237 3779 4003 3304 3412

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 8 11 11 14 14 11 10 10 11Employees 1048 1098 1075 1236 1278 664 709 700 782

Payroll 87770 89104 87833 109059 109134 54309 61651 66034 83408Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 8 11 11 11 8 8 9 9 11Employees ds 105 120 90 105 97 100 80 70

Payroll 3340 5846 5258 5113 5310 5567 6518 5416 4463

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds 3218 2031 ds ds ds ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 13 14 13 15 15 18 18 14 14Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 660

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 46560

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

New England Regionbull Connecticutbull Mainebull Massachusettsbull New Hampshirebull Rhode Island

Black sea bass Photo NOAA FisheriesScott Steinback

72

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New England Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe New England Region includes Connecticut Maine Massachusetts New Hampshire and Rhode Island Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under nine fishery management plans (FMPs) Two of these FMPs monkfish and spiny dogfish are developed in conjunction with the Mid-Atlantic Fisheries Management Council (MAFMC) The MAFMC is the lead council for the Spiny Dogfish FMP the NEFMC is the lead for the Monkfish FMP

New England Regional FMPs

bull Northeast multi-species

bull Sea scallopsbull Monkfish (with

the MAFMC)bull Atlantic herringbull Small mesh

multi-species

bull Spiny dogfish (with the MAFMC)

bull Red crabbull Northeast skate

complexbull Atlantic salmon

Fourteen of the stocks or stock complexes covered in these FMPs were listed as overfished in 2016 Atlantic cod (two stocks) Atlantic halibut Atlantic salmon Atlantic wolffish ocean pout thorny skate windowpane flounder winter flounder (two stocks) witch flounder and yellowtail flounder (three stocks) Seven stocks or stock complexes are currently subject to overfishing Atlantic cod (two stocks) witch flounder yellowtail flounder (three stocks) and winter flounder (Georges Bank stock)

Catch Share ProgramsTwo catch share programs operate in the New England Region 1) Northeast Multi-Species Sectors and 2) Northeast General Category Atlantic Sea Scallop Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program Following are descriptions of these catch share programs and their performance

Northeast Multi-Species Sectors This program was developed between 2004 and 2006 and included two pilot sectors that operated with an allocation of Georges Bank cod The program was expanded in 2010 to 17 sectors and approximately 55 of eligible limited-access permit holders joined a sector At the same time annual catch limits were implemented for the first time

and sharply reduced the available quota for fishermen The key performance indicators of this program show that compared with the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) the following 2015 metrics decreased quotas landings number of active vessels and inflation-adjusted revenue for catch share species On the other hand inflation-adjusted revenue per vessel increased during this period

Northeast General Category Atlantic Sea Scallop IFQ Program This program began in 2010 with two primary objectives 1) Control capacity and mortality in the General Category Scallop fishery and 2) Allow better and more timely integration of sea scallop assessment results in management The key performance indicators of this program show that 2015 inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per vessel increased However landings quota and the number of active vessels decreased compared with the baseline period

Policy UpdatesIn May 2016 NOAA Fisheries implemented Framework 27 which specifies measures for fishing year 2016 and includes fishing year 2017 measures that will go into place as a default should the next specifications-setting framework be delayed beyond the start of fishing year 2017 This action also includes two set-asides An annual research set-aside (RSA) of 125 million pounds was established for 2016 and 2017 to fund scallop research and to compensate participating vessels through the sale of scallops harvested under research set-aside projects In addition the action set aside 1 of the annual biological catch for the industry-funded observer program to help defray the cost of scallop vessels that carry an observer The observer set-aside for fishing years 2016 and 2017 is 084 million pounds

In November 2016 NOAA Fisheries implemented Amendment 19 to the Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery Management Plan The amendment adjusts the start of the scallop fishing year from March 1 to April 1 This change will help reduce potential economic and biological consequences from late implementation of specifications and reduce the overall administrative burden associated with late implementation As a result of this change NOAA Fisheries will be able to implement simple

73

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New England Region | Regional Summary

specifications actions at the start of the fishing year on a more consistent basis

In August 2016 NOAA Fisheries approved two out of three actions set out in Framework Adjustment 9 to the Monkfish Fishery Management Plan This plan eliminates the monkfish possession limit for monkfish Category C- and D-permitted vessels fishing in the Northern Fishery Management Area under both a Northeast multispecies and monkfish days-at-sea allocation The new measure is designed to help increase monkfish landings and better achieve the annual catch target The plan also implements a measure that allows a Category C or D vessel fishing under both a Northeast multispecies and a monkfish days-at-sea allocation in the Southern Fishery Management Area to use 65-inch (165-cm) roundfish gillnets Under the rule a monkfish-permitted vessel fishing on a monkfish-only days-at-sea allocation in the Mid-Atlantic Exemption Area may now use 5-inch (127-cm) roundfish gillnets In addition monkfish-permitted vessels fishing on a monkfish-only days-at-sea limit in either the SNE Dogfish Gillnet Exemption Area or the Southern New England Monkfish and Skate Gillnet Exemption Area may retain both monkfish and dogfish on the same trip when declared into either area Finally this measure limits a vessel to using 50 roundfish gillnets in the SNE Dogfish and the Mid-Atlantic Exemption Areas

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key New England Region Commercial Species

bull American lobsterbull Atlantic herringbull Atlantic mackerelbull Cod and haddockbull Flounders

bull Goosefishbull Quahog clambull Sea scallopbull Softshell clambull Squid

Economic Impacts The premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers1

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 commercial fishing in Massachusetts generated

1 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)

74

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New England Region | Regional Summary

the largest employment impacts in the New England Region 87200 jobs Income impacts ($2 billion) sales impacts ($77 billion) and value-added impacts ($3 billion) were also largest in Massachusetts The retail sector in Massachusetts generated the highest employment impacts of any state-level sector 53300 jobs The importers sector in Massachusetts generated the highest state-level income impacts ($6436 million) sales impacts ($4 billion) and value-added impacts ($12 billion) in the region

Landings TrendsNew England landings revenue was up $854 million in 2016 from the previous year with lobster (up $46 million) sea scallops (up $171 million) and squid (up $174 million) comprising the majority of this increase The lobster fishery New Englandrsquos largest fishery in terms of landings revenue continued its strong performance with revenues up 84 since 2007 due to landings almost doubling (up 99) during this period Although 2016 prices were slightly lower than in 2007 (down 7) and 2015 (down 15) strong demand has kept prices well above the 10-year average (up 16) The higher landings trend is due to record abundance levels of Gulf of Maine lobsters which have comprised between 85-90 of landings in recent years Indeed average annual landings in the past five years are more than three times the average annual landings for the previous 60 years On average Maine has accounted for 80 of New Englandrsquos lobster landings revenue since 2007

Sea scallop landings declined 30 over this 10-year period primarily due to a 35 reduction in the catch limit that was implemented in 2012 to protect young sea scallops and prevent localized overfishing Significantly higher prices (up 83 from 2007 but unchanged from 2015) have helped to offset the reduction in landings For 2016 the increase in landings revenue was driven by higher harvest levels (up 6 relative to 2015)

Rhode Island is the center of the New England squid fishery which comprised 36 of Rhode Islandrsquos total landings revenue in 2016 Overall squid landings in New England increased 66 from 2015 to 2016 Prices were also up (4) year-over-year due to the 30 decrease in global production which has been attributed to the

strong El Nintildeo event in 2016 Illex squid prices which are determined in the international market increased 65 during this period in large part due to global supply shortages

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Bluefin tuna (361 303 in real terms)bull Squid (135 106 in real terms)bull American lobster (84 61 in real terms)From 2015bull Squid (72)bull Bluefin tuna (24)bull Atlantic herring (17)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Quahog clam (-60 -65 in real terms)bull Cod and haddock (-51 -57 in real terms)bull Atlantic mackerel (-50 -57 in real terms)From 2015bull Atlantic mackerel (-11)bull Flounders (-5)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Bluefin tuna (455)bull American lobster (99)bull Squid (48)From 2015bull Squid (66)bull Atlantic mackerel (14)bull Bluefin tuna (11)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Atlantic mackerel (-78)bull Quahog clam (-71)bull Flounders (-45)From 2015bull Flounders (-28)bull Atlantic herring (-22)bull Quahog clam (-7)

75

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New England Region | Regional Summary

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the New England Region totaled $13 billion in 2016 This number represented a 48 increase from 2007 (a 29 increase in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 7 increase from 2015 Landings revenue was highest in Maine ($633 million) followed by Massachusetts ($5508 million) Shellfish landings revenue made up 86 of total revenue in the region American lobster ($6635 million) and sea scallop ($3039 million) had the highest landings revenue in the New England Region in 2016 Together they accounted for 73 of total landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 bluefin tuna (361 303 in real terms) squid (135 106 in real terms) and American lobster (84 61 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while quahog clam (-60 -65 in real terms) cod and haddock (-51 -57 in real terms) and Atlantic mackerel (-50 -57 in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 squid (72) bluefin tuna (24) and Atlantic herring (17) had the largest revenue increases while Atlantic mackerel (-11) and flounders (-5) had the largest revenue decreases LandingsIn 2016 New England Region commercial fishermen landed about 595 million pounds of finfish and shellfish a 2 increase from 2007 and a 1 decrease from 2015 American lobster had the highest landings volume in the New England Region accounting for 27 of landed weight

From 2007 to 2016 bluefin tuna (455) American lobster (99) and squid (48) had the largest landings increases while Atlantic mackerel (-78) quahog clam (-71) and flounders (-45) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 squid (66) Atlantic mackerel (14) and bluefin tuna (11) had the largest landings increases while flounders (-28) Atlantic herring (-22) and quahog clam (-7) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 sea scallop ($1227 per pound) received the highest New England Region ex-vessel price Landings of Atlantic herring ($021 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price

From 2007 to 2016 Atlantic mackerel (120 93 in real terms) sea scallop (83 60 in real terms) and Atlantic herring (78 56 in real terms) had the largest price increases while bluefin tuna (-17 -27 in real terms) cod and haddock (-14 -25 in real terms) and goosefish (-11 -23 in real terms) had the largest price decreases From 2015 to 2016 Atlantic herring (50) flounders (31) and quahog clam (14) had the largest price increases while Atlantic mackerel (-22) goosefish (-2) and American lobster (-1) had the largest price decreases

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups2

Key New England Recreational Species

bull Atlantic codbull Atlantic mackerelbull Bluefin tunabull Bluefishbull Little tuny

bull Scupbull Striped bassbull Summer flounderbull Winter flounderbull Tautog

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities3 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity

2 Except where noted Atlantic and Gulf recreational catch and effort estimates are based upon the MRIP APAIS and CHTS (httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovrecreational-fisheriesSurveyssurvey-details) and not the revised MRIP estimates (httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovleadership-messagenoaa-fisheries-releases-revised-mrip-recreational-catch-and-effort-estimates) released in 20183 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpswwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

76

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New England Region | Regional Summary

such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

The greatest employment impacts from expenditures on saltwater recreational fishing in the New England Region were generated in Massachusetts (10000 jobs) followed by Rhode Island (4200 jobs) The largest sales impacts were observed in Massachusetts ($11 billion) followed by Connecticut ($4302 million) The biggest income impacts were generated in Massachusetts ($4955 million) followed by Connecticut ($1864 million) The greatest value-added impacts were in Massachusetts ($7157 million) followed by Connecticut ($2918 million)

Recreational fishing expenditures (on both fishing trips and durable equipment purchases) across the New England Region in 2016 totaled about $19 billion Trip expenditures totaled more than $2628 million with a large portion coming from trips in the private boat (54) and shore (28) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $17 billion with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($1 billion)

Fishing TripsIn 2016 recreational fishermen took 61 million fishing trips in the New England Region This number represented a 35 decrease from 2007 and a 20 increase from 2015 The largest proportions of trips were taken in the private boat mode (55) and shore mode (42) States with the highest number of recorded trips were Massachusetts (24 million trips) and Connecticut (16 million trips)

ParticipationIn 2016 there were 12 million recreational anglers who fished in the New England Region This number represented a 26 decrease from 2007 and an 18 increase from 2015 These anglers were New England Region residents from either a coastal county (92) or a non-coastal county (8)

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Little tunny (524)bull Atlantic mackerel (226)bull Winter flounder (103)From 2015bull Little tunny (205)bull Atlantic cod (103)bull Summer flounder (60)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Bluefish (-61)bull Striped bass (-51)bull Bluefin tuna (-43)From 2015There were no decreases from 2015 to 2016

Harvest and ReleaseOf New Englandrsquos key species and species groups Atlantic mackerel (65 million fish) porgies (scup) (65 million fish) and striped bass (44 million fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 little tunny (524) Atlantic mackerel (226) and winter flounder (103) had the largest increases in catch while bluefish (-61) striped bass (-51) and bluefin tuna (-43) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 little tunny (205) Atlantic cod (103) and summer flounder (60) had the largest increases in catch There were no decreases in catch from 2015 to 2016

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine

77

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New England Region | Regional Summary

4 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)5 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)6 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries45

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy6 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average

The Bureau of Labor Statistics suppressed the CFLQ value for Connecticut Massachusetts and New Hampshire for 2015 Of the remaining states Maine had the highest CFLQ at 2007 Rhode Island had a CFLQ value of 39

In 2015 371314 employer establishments operated throughout the entire New England Region (including marine- and non-marine- related establishments) These establishments employed about 62 million workers and had a total annual payroll of about $359 billion The combined gross state product of Connecticut Maine Massachusetts New Hampshire and Rhode Island was approximately $932 billion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 the New England Region had 105 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 3 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $125 million (a 2 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 85 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (an 11 decrease from 2007) The Census Bureau suppressed employment and payroll data for one or more states in the New England Region for this

sector in 2015 The greatest number of seafood product preparation and packaging establishments was located in Massachusetts (79) followed by Maine (64) and Connecticut (26)

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 145 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the five states that make up the New England Region (a 16 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $158 million (a 30 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 235 employer firms in the retail sales of seafood sector (a 7 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 1278 workers (a 1 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $419 million (an 11 increase in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of retail seafood establishments was located in Massachusetts (158) followed by Maine (110) and Connecticut (53)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 332 employer firms in the wholesale sales of seafood sector in the New England Region in 2015 (a 16 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 3432 workers and had a total annual payroll of $1776 million The greatest number of wholesale seafood establishments was located in Maine (146) followed by Massachusetts (129) and Rhode Island (28)

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of the New England Regionrsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons It is clear however that these sectors play an important role in the regional economy For example the ship and boatbuilding sector in Massachusetts Maine New Hampshire and Rhode Island accounted for a total of $5006 million in payroll in 2015

Tables | New England Region

80

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New England Region | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the New England Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Landings Value Value Jobs Sales Income Jobs Sales IncomeRevenue Added AddedConnecticut 15087 2306 387244 83307 137449 808 53328 18277 25482Maine 633014 41960 2581806 855773 1236431 40246 2300020 795211 1136921Massachusetts 550755 87201 7662911 1998842 3045410 55384 2318125 851027 1161180New Hampshire 33215 9922 1511091 348439 558040 2577 160077 59239 81009Rhode Island 93872 10828 1375375 334588 528970 5193 332575 120271 168541

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 895381 808816 787206 960090 1103010 1192900 1163328 1195545 1240539 1325943

Finfish amp Other 178819 190526 176399 189803 212059 243355 204318 193491 182234 188670Shellfish 716562 618290 610806 770288 890951 949546 959010 1002054 1058305 1137273

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 359783 317909 305195 397768 417931 425562 458779 560618 617448 663457Atlantic herring 18591 20507 24459 20692 24759 28545 31388 27947 24286 28515Atlantic mackerel 6000 5265 7892 3459 295 3480 1738 3111 3332 2975Bluefin tuna 2077 2993 4448 8470 9258 8394 3649 6114 7723 9583Cod amp haddock 39326 47166 38745 49710 48775 29972 16350 20681 19042 19373Flounders 33658 30654 27286 27685 30851 35155 32092 30609 28103 26564Goosefish 21209 19945 14321 14064 19792 19693 13576 14094 14628 15042Quahog clam 30026 8901 9002 9713 8314 9276 9383 10121 11285 11922Sea scallop 237299 203124 209168 265493 352632 389501 366007 296983 286785 303899Squid 17711 19848 16696 14788 22887 18187 15547 21411 24263 41673

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 584849 602950 648988 580145 612952 665778 634766 646106 599125 594999Finfish amp Other 376334 400732 422141 334220 357225 380850 358155 376330 333534 297386Shellfish 208514 202219 226848 245925 255728 284928 276610 269776 265592 297613

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 79435 86229 99199 116024 125167 148906 149116 146454 146095 157942Atlantic herring 156602 167709 210784 140789 174338 190532 203763 197908 171823 134696Atlantic mackerel 50760 38359 39398 16904 913 9680 9049 12934 10016 11418Bluefin tuna 300 447 772 1201 1085 915 523 971 1502 1663Cod amp haddock 24856 33122 32470 39261 30108 14800 9072 15133 15257 14237Flounders 16093 15501 16232 14531 17913 18353 16320 14270 12304 8865Goosefish 19968 17757 14256 12378 14700 16422 14321 14552 15272 15981Quahog clam 4630 1468 1628 1790 1513 1570 1594 1584 1464 1355Sea scallop 35390 28867 31604 32884 35285 39209 32103 23482 23296 24770Squid 26421 28615 28014 21722 27907 16153 14575 28781 23698 39224

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

American lobster 453 369 308 343 334 286 308 383 423 420Atlantic herring 012 012 012 015 014 015 015 014 014 021Atlantic mackerel 012 014 020 020 032 036 019 024 033 026Bluefin tuna 693 669 576 705 854 918 698 629 514 576Cod amp haddock 158 142 119 127 162 203 180 137 125 136Flounders 209 198 168 191 172 192 197 215 228 300Goosefish 106 112 100 114 135 120 095 097 096 094Quahog clam 649 606 553 543 550 591 589 639 771 880Sea scallop 671 704 662 807 999 993 1140 1265 1231 1227Squid 067 069 060 068 082 113 107 074 102 106

81

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New England Region | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the New England Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars trips)Trips Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Connecticut 1644 3974 430216 186430 291827Maine 573 1097 98666 37412 59185Massachusetts 2384 9957 1070935 495481 715659New Hampshire 293 473 47954 21470 30575Rhode Island 1159 4173 412071 176221 270081

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 47916Private Boat 141993Shore 72851Total 262760

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 380822Other Equipment 136449Boat Expenses 1024515Vehicle Expenses 134455Second Home Expenses 1574Total Durable Expenditures 1677814

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1940574

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 1408 1389 1222 1317 1156 1171 1043 1080 924 1104Non-Coastal 205 187 165 169 131 144 100 99 95 94Out-of-State NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 1614 1576 1387 1486 1288 1316 1143 1179 1018 1198

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 518 512 464 321 367 345 516 487 354 226Private 4820 4894 3374 3967 3161 3132 3459 3226 2677 3312Shore 3951 3735 3321 2926 2532 2687 2313 2939 2004 2516Total Trips 9289 9141 7160 7213 6060 6164 6287 6652 5036 6054

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic cod

H 305 385 391 509 530 337 392 264 22 112R 966 954 833 1071 915 472 642 667 509 969

Atlantic mackerel

H 1886 3358 2464 3471 5335 3276 3712 3263 5138 5767R 116 452 343 381 535 484 283 1420 1002 770

Bluefin tuna

H 11 9 9 1 2 9 0 8 3 8R 10 2 5 0 5 4 0 0 6 4

BluefishH 1512 1461 674 1183 658 1503 1682 863 680 657R 2906 2995 1435 1848 1931 1951 1954 2753 913 1087

Little tunny

H 5 0 1 2 0 11 1 9 51 36R 65 16 16 20 44 103 14 427 92 399

Porgies (scup)

H 3049 1944 1498 2411 2286 2953 3800 3171 2216 2268R 2802 4048 3278 3586 2376 3530 3091 3275 2199 4253

Striped bass

H 595 602 547 527 458 530 697 492 292 254R 8366 7713 4164 2771 2041 1780 3796 2655 3010 4170

Summer flounder

H 426 582 167 199 267 241 429 417 336 360R 1045 2112 908 818 1252 939 1456 1393 910 1633

Winter flounder

H 51 180 112 105 100 56 44 96 57 40R 44 71 102 85 60 27 24 56 65 153

Wrasses (tautog)

H 569 305 196 359 78 323 298 487 264 276R 1425 514 395 562 385 909 966 2213 749 1335

1 NA = data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but does not specify whether an angler resides in a region2 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

Tables | Connecticut

84

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Connecticut | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Connecticut Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 2306 387244 83307 137449 808 53328 18277 25482

Commercial Harvesters 403 26755 7338 11307 403 26755 7338 11307Seafood Processors amp Dealers 100 11559 4414 5706 50 5791 2212 2859

Importers 916 283114 45374 86305 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 139 24734 8096 10877 16 2811 920 1236

Retail 748 41083 18085 23253 339 17970 7807 10080

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 42053 17206 15007 17626 20032 21132 14632 14144 15422 15087Finfish amp Other 3270 3962 3108 5229 4817 5467 5123 4428 5040 4718Shellfish 38782 13243 11899 12397 15215 15665 9509 9716 10382 10369

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 3222 2102 1763 1894 943 1057 577 608 1073 1316Goosefish 512 551 591 564 976 1040 1022 510 680 467Other flounders 232 172 87 42 33 65 184 89 164 253Red hake 110 181 137 76 89 88 115 104 112 108Scups or Porgies 311 383 196 272 408 837 705 573 820 773Sea scallop 8605 10032 8952 9458 13007 12005 7219 7219 7039 5881Silver hake 1115 1436 1011 1341 1617 1380 1301 1586 1164 914Squid loligo 744 546 260 473 694 1861 1257 1354 1631 2012Summer flounder 648 680 649 850 1005 940 902 921 1078 806Whelks and Conchs 312 453 796 449 159 616 295 336 487 992

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 10050 7131 6568 6698 7403 8940 7957 7523 9390 12370Finfish amp Other 3845 4520 4155 4409 5218 5756 5875 5221 7110 9602Shellfish 6205 2611 2414 2288 2186 3184 2082 2302 2280 2768

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 569 426 412 442 199 248 127 127 205 259Goosefish 460 424 546 358 630 765 967 493 605 431Other flounders 140 88 58 26 27 40 142 60 86 109Red hake 266 284 310 176 158 185 173 167 146 162Scups or Porgies 256 282 204 324 644 907 1195 811 983 932Sea scallop 1313 1407 1386 1260 1318 1231 640 609 577 530Silver hake 1565 2178 1881 1973 2041 1848 1647 2037 1320 943Squid loligo 811 523 256 366 498 1518 1098 1318 1317 1671Summer flounder 205 221 251 308 401 316 284 253 287 191Whelks and Conchs 117 174 229 113 28 91 81 98 81 211

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

American lobster 567 493 427 429 474 426 453 478 523 509Goosefish 111 130 108 158 155 136 106 104 112 108Other flounders 166 196 150 160 123 160 129 149 191 233Red hake 041 064 044 043 056 047 066 062 077 067Scups or Porgies 122 136 096 084 063 092 059 071 083 083Sea scallop 655 713 646 751 987 975 1129 1185 1220 1109Silver hake 071 066 054 068 079 075 079 078 088 097Squid loligo 092 104 101 129 139 123 115 103 124 120Summer flounder 316 308 259 276 250 298 318 363 376 422Whelks and Conchs 266 261 347 398 563 675 365 343 604 471

85

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Connecticut | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Connecticut Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 63 10270 4764 6443Private Boat 204 21457 9119 13792Shore 91 7411 3204 4564

Total Durable Expenditures 3616 391078 169343 267028Total State Economic Impacts 3974 430216 186430 291827

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 5889Private Boat 28496Shore 7433Total 41818

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 75576Other Equipment 20370Boat Expenses 225694Vehicle Expenses 16369Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 338010

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 379828

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 302 381 438 402 420 397 198 209 252 297Non-Coastal NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAOut-of-State 61 123 93 112 98 67 43 64 57 88Total Anglers 363 504 531 514 518 464 240 273 309 385

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 63 74 43 41 46 27 63 62 80 38Private 1097 1292 711 871 863 825 830 865 671 1021Shore 559 609 665 614 399 475 316 437 590 585Total Trips 1719 1975 1419 1526 1309 1326 1210 1365 1341 1644

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic cod

H 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 20R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12

BluefishH 451 623 262 591 307 480 893 288 365 311R 888 1144 295 715 997 679 727 425 401 340

Hickory shad

H 35 0 0 1 16 39 8 73 0 4R 4 5 lt 1 0 0 0 1 67 lt 1 5

Little tunny

H 0 0 0 1 0 lt 1 0 1 0 lt 1R lt 1 0 9 8 14 57 0 13 1 32

Porgies (scup)

H 925 549 289 1088 933 868 937 561 477 824R 1006 974 1204 1192 539 1049 1218 1413 764 1787

Striped bass

H 119 108 61 93 63 65 140 84 75 49R 985 3105 1161 671 612 265 775 310 667 621

Summer flounder

H 112 146 45 35 47 63 270 120 93 218R 297 991 428 373 345 306 866 638 408 1105

White perch

H 0 7 60 0 0 10 0 14 lt 1 4R 18 52 72 0 lt 1 48 2 7 lt 1 2

Winter flounder

H 0 0 12 14 19 9 0 lt 1 12 lt 1R 15 0 7 12 lt 1 7 4 lt 1 31 lt 1

Wrasses (tautog)

H 353 167 86 116 26 194 104 318 126 165R 745 250 112 257 36 599 453 1668 272 933

1 NA = data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but does not specify whether an angler resides in a region2 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

86

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Connecticut | Marine Economy

2015 Connecticut State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 269845 (11) 89232 (12) 1503102 (12) 9256 (15) 13755 (14) 25631 (14) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms ds 18 17 17 14 13 25 26 25Receipts ds 2375 2550 1518 1066 882 3058 3969 2692

Seafood salesretail

Firms 26 25 23 25 21 21 20 18 19Receipts 4436 3247 2142 2473 2165 1388 1543 1655 1813

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1Employees ds 59 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds 1040 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 20 24 25 23 24 16 17 19 20Employees 183 185 212 216 212 187 178 172 211

Payroll 8347 8551 8842 9219 9224 8237 7920 8174 20558

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 36 35 36 39 37 37 36 35 34Employees 177 203 205 204 171 233 218 244 230

Payroll 5252 5248 5551 5563 4824 6349 6344 7380 7533

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 4 5 5 6 5 10 9 9 9Employees ds ds ds ds 95 256 ds ds 216

Payroll ds ds ds 8148 7856 32789 ds ds 27698

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 14 12 12 10 11 14 11 11 11Employees 228 243 222 225 225 297 184 ds 164

Payroll 48110 46595 45045 29407 41302 37711 28513 26891 26880Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 124 125 126 129 128 130 130 128 125

Employees 1224 1352 1261 1284 1283 1257 1265 1174 1153Payroll 50809 60016 58065 58877 59851 60803 63211 59054 59526

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 5 4 3 3 3 0 1 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds NA ds ds ds

Payroll 5925 ds ds ds ds NA ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 6 6 6 6 5 2 2 4 3Employees ds ds 5 ds 5 ds ds 3 2

Payroll 432 338 696 242 898 ds ds 185 159

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 4 8 8 6 5 4 5 5 5Employees ds 179 166 122 34 ds ds ds 22

Payroll ds 6136 5787 2162 848 1414 ds ds 1142

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 22 15 13 12 11 8 7 9 8Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Maine

88

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Maine | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Maine Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 41960 2581806 855773 1236431 40246 2300020 795211 1136921

Commercial Harvesters 18927 1214883 332762 543832 18927 1214883 332762 543832Seafood Processors amp Dealers 3157 246437 98941 126425 2888 225457 90518 115662

Importers 710 219310 35149 66855 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 1285 136984 49138 63941 1126 120068 43070 56045

Retail 17881 764192 339784 435378 17304 739612 328861 421383

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 344022 308233 292315 380435 411983 450926 476423 547333 591356 633014Finfish amp Other 37507 37440 30367 30196 43816 77546 72857 50692 49092 59005Shellfish 306515 270793 261948 350240 368168 373380 403566 496641 542264 574009

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 280634 245146 237519 318304 334577 341861 370207 459183 501194 537872Atlantic herring 9173 8396 7867 8643 14404 14490 15514 16212 13534 19422Bloodworms 6051 5913 6196 5893 5847 5191 5644 6085 6335 6168Blue mussel 1934 1627 2203 2071 1969 1919 2341 2153 2458 2400Cod amp haddock 3728 5257 1752 1528 1666 1362 976 1267 1069 886Goosefish 2402 1478 526 393 578 1059 773 566 616 456Ocean quahog clam 3194 2195 1821 1721 2117 1737 1378 1238 1311 1299Pollock 2160 2321 2047 1503 1929 2527 2562 2878 1965 1663Sea urchins 4367 5410 5866 5490 5113 5024 5781 5325 4950 6616Softshell clam 12574 12826 11686 12960 15852 15655 18102 20232 22847 16219

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 186324 186696 188388 200876 249496 263421 266413 265182 242662 247946Finfish amp Other 99230 98951 82505 79375 122944 121322 120555 127687 104291 97245Shellfish 87094 87745 105883 121501 126552 142099 145859 137495 138371 150701

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 63959 69863 81179 96246 104923 127237 127756 124218 122402 131954Atlantic herring 74817 67731 64606 57557 97116 92506 98859 103530 86485 78156Bloodworms 549 537 574 534 526 457 470 448 401 387Blue mussel 2643 2289 2760 2582 2810 2399 2282 2270 2401 1743Cod amp haddock 2345 2455 1401 876 842 549 418 685 658 489Goosefish 2376 1178 603 404 533 1075 874 633 740 542Ocean quahog clam 1011 669 556 549 645 698 557 438 416 367Pollock 4245 4064 3040 1640 2325 2666 2227 2319 1381 1049Sea urchins 2761 2900 3487 2592 2407 1904 1988 1981 1775 2058Softshell clam 1948 1998 1902 2077 2365 2257 2297 2080 1892 1569

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

American lobster 439 351 293 331 319 269 290 370 409 408Atlantic herring 012 012 012 015 015 016 016 016 016 025Bloodworms 1102 1101 1079 1103 1112 1136 1200 1359 158 1596Blue mussel 073 071 080 080 070 080 103 095 102 138Cod amp haddock 159 214 125 174 198 248 233 185 162 181Goosefish 101 125 087 097 109 099 088 089 083 084Ocean quahog clam 316 328 327 313 328 249 247 282 315 354Pollock 051 057 067 092 083 095 115 124 142 158Sea urchins 158 187 168 212 212 264 291 269 279 322Softshell clam 646 642 614 624 670 693 788 973 1208 1034

89

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Maine | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Maine Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 57 5764 1959 2989Private Boat 65 7351 2044 3371Shore 110 10080 3262 5519

Total Durable Expenditures 865 75471 30147 47306Total State Economic Impacts 1097 98666 37412 59185

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 3504Private Boat 7172Shore 7730Total 18406

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 20480Other Equipment 7679Boat Expenses 39871Vehicle Expenses 332Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 68361

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 86767

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 174 121 117 122 85 116 102 79 67 114Non-Coastal 13 9 12 9 7 6 4 5 4 13Out-of-State 260 180 324 159 107 126 129 129 74 110Total Anglers 447 310 453 290 198 248 235 213 145 237

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 33 26 26 23 22 20 29 24 21 15Private 460 408 334 327 265 212 313 188 192 293Shore 531 421 544 366 240 405 254 327 201 265Total Trips 1024 854 904 716 527 637 596 539 414 573

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American shad

H 0 lt 1 lt 1 0 0 0 0 lt 1 1 2R 4 5 18 9 4 18 lt 1 0 14 7

Atlantic cod

H 19 41 45 14 39 26 61 22 3 2R 73 50 36 45 99 80 75 50 100 77

Atlantic mackerel

H 806 837 1111 1093 1544 1028 709 706 883 1754R 80 265 194 177 304 163 62 1165 136 307

Blue sharkH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0R lt 1 0 lt 1 0 9 2 13 10 11 lt 1

Bluefin tuna

H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0R 0 lt 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

BluefishH 49 30 3 14 lt 1 4 20 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1R 74 56 26 10 8 126 22 0 0 lt 1

HaddockH 12 20 10 4 12 4 6 3 26 27R 11 2 1 3 4 8 47 55 72 100

PollockH 50 68 61 58 57 49 141 136 66 29R 23 135 35 105 135 88 296 178 109 94

Striped bass

H 54 59 62 17 18 12 23 21 5 11R 1115 465 264 194 143 214 422 277 214 676

Winter flounder

H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0R 0 1 5 0 0 0 lt 1 4 0 14

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

90

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Maine | Marine Economy

2015 Maine State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 111777 (05) 40801 (05) 500549 (04) 2041 (03) 3355 (03) 5733 (03) 2007

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 65 64 63 59 51 51 36 37 32Receipts 7177 4261 6605 4480 3077 3294 2757 4142 2583

Seafood salesretail

Firms 55 46 48 47 48 46 49 57 50Receipts 5905 4035 4882 5835 4608 4492 4200 4664 5848

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 27 29 25 27 28 29 28 30 32Employees 536 490 545 594 500 492 376 546 552

Payroll 9351 9288 10427 12851 10353 12011 11797 18713 18506

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 170 168 164 164 152 136 150 142 146Employees 1015 1210 1126 1153 1109 1047 1340 1047 1123

Payroll 32005 36185 37687 39915 38412 40734 46782 40392 42337

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 50 45 49 51 51 48 51 54 60Employees 181 148 152 176 177 215 243 235 237

Payroll 4635 4148 4481 5126 5108 6902 7618 7558 9601

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 3 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 3Employees ds ds 22 28 ds ds ds ds 17

Payroll ds 1058 1037 1067 1105 ds ds ds 1071

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0Employees NA ds ds ds NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll NA ds ds ds NA NA NA NA NADeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0Employees ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 86 87 89 86 84 80 79 79 80

Employees 464 411 376 395 349 428 403 435 430Payroll 18600 15206 14654 14699 15426 17102 17476 19694 20400

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 15 15 14 13 13 13 14 14 13Employees 105 138 93 68 63 65 86 75 77

Payroll 6737 6148 5369 4928 4776 4730 5660 5243 4752

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 2 1 1 1 6 3 3 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds 2 ds 4

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds 130 113 142

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 94 90 82 75 76 76 79 84 84Employees 6751 6930 ds ds ds ds ds ds 6654

Payroll 345036 354899 ds ds ds ds ds ds 418591

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Massachusetts

92

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Massachusetts | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Massachusetts Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 87201 7662911 1998842 3045410 55384 2318125 851027 1161180

Commercial Harvesters 11490 1008163 317973 467913 11490 1008163 317973 467913Seafood Processors amp Dealers 6698 966228 368384 478963 1586 228715 87200 113375

Importers 12994 4015577 643573 1224124 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 2762 488166 159524 216451 1003 177294 57937 78612

Retail 53257 1184777 509387 657960 41306 903952 387917 501281

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 420004 399822 400473 478691 571583 616466 565739 523410 524112 550755

Finfish amp Other 109089 121567 113973 126262 132388 126152 93961 103615 99325 99112Shellfish 310915 278254 286500 352430 439195 490314 471779 419795 424787 451643

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 51258 45418 42731 50330 53302 53357 61662 68376 78290 82007Atlantic herring 8265 11342 15062 10251 8802 11529 10750 9432 8787 7559Atlantic mackerel 4736 4265 4528 1487 137 654 1223 2421 1926 2426Clams all other 15680 15255 16745 17966 19154 37294 28311 26484 27502 39140Cod amp haddock 32043 38696 33684 45210 43397 26123 14083 18440 17577 17919Eastern oyster 4559 5496 6432 8225 9066 12071 13896 19575 22742 22631Flounders 22095 20924 19645 19975 22025 25058 20612 17949 17340 17203Goosefish 14380 14035 9902 9922 13431 13596 8870 10028 10251 11294Ocean quahog clam 10100 9575 10710 8981 7995 NA 10229 9814 9063 NASea scallop 218292 189891 197280 252253 330944 364864 334205 271373 264933 281445

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 304774 326632 356105 283025 264991 296037 262256 272601 260347 244218

Finfish amp Other 227208 255603 278908 200844 179757 193481 163944 181680 169307 147519Shellfish 77566 71029 77197 82181 85233 102556 98312 90921 91040 96699

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 10145 10600 11782 12760 13373 14485 15260 15323 16451 17687Atlantic herring 73268 94266 133531 71922 66970 81781 74992 77873 70888 46969Atlantic mackerel 46240 35406 30199 12156 515 4131 7279 10755 6935 9894Clams all other 4135 4376 6552 10242 13352 35053 22495 20725 20088 33499Cod amp haddock 20298 28537 28515 36461 27164 13164 8123 13977 14393 13445Eastern oyster 123 138 159 215 231 310 329 444 593 613Flounders 10977 11609 12405 11159 13692 14250 11517 9018 8294 5974Goosefish 13597 12680 10015 8887 10143 11583 9498 10533 11084 12474Ocean quahog clam 20158 18126 18691 15646 12479 NA 14476 13422 13340 NASea scallop 32540 27011 29782 31156 33092 36725 29287 21392 21515 22867

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American lobster 505 428 363 394 399 368 404 446 476 464Atlantic herring 011 012 011 014 013 014 014 012 012 016Atlantic mackerel 010 012 015 012 027 016 017 023 028 025Clams all other 379 349 256 175 143 106 126 128 137 117Cod amp haddock 158 136 118 124 160 198 173 132 122 133Eastern oyster 3700 3977 4036 3830 3925 3896 4228 4412 3832 369Flounders 201 180 158 179 161 176 179 199 209 288Goosefish 106 111 099 112 132 117 093 095 092 091Ocean quahog clam 050 053 057 057 064 NA 071 073 068 NASea scallop 671 703 662 810 1000 993 1141 1269 1231 1231

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

93

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Massachusetts | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Massachusetts Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 350 43788 18509 25541 Private Boat 588 66670 28719 42310 Shore 521 54729 22551 35522

Total Durable Expenditures 8498 905748 425702 612286Total State Economic Impacts 9957 1070935 495481 715659

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 26142Private Boat 85474Shore 45193Total 156809

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 192074Other Equipment 79020Boat Expenses 538561Vehicle Expenses 95299Second Home Expenses 795Total Durable Expenditures 905748

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1062557

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 664 655 489 586 490 502 546 582 428 476Non-Coastal 179 170 144 152 115 130 77 82 85 73Out-of-State 465 469 421 433 293 309 275 532 199 289Total Anglers 1309 1293 1054 1171 897 941 898 1196 711 837

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 234 255 240 154 189 203 259 243 116 93Private 2440 2338 1760 2148 1319 1471 1621 1568 1223 1440Shore 1947 1929 1451 1186 1305 1151 1058 1586 842 850Total Trips 4622 4522 3450 3489 2813 2825 2939 3397 2181 2384

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic bonito

H 4 7 5 1 5 5 0 18 8 2R 12 9 lt 1 3 0 lt 1 lt 1 8 6 5

Atlantic cod

H 231 261 214 413 360 229 216 185 2 29R 658 672 581 884 542 240 411 479 137 616

Atlantic mackerel

H 952 2024 471 2083 1649 1132 2274 1926 4019 3219R 27 152 68 186 42 161 178 225 815 336

BluefishH 683 519 343 474 225 337 447 438 245 273R 1240 1302 953 1028 598 714 580 2213 254 461

HaddockH 293 233 155 143 52 89 105 115 56 371R 56 158 36 33 12 68 310 403 113 848

Porgies (scup)

H 1770 762 1069 925 785 1587 2043 1634 1197 867R 1183 1687 1741 1858 1174 1806 1257 1283 822 1061

Striped bass

H 315 378 344 341 256 378 299 277 171 132R 5331 3649 2283 1671 973 990 1691 1826 1546 2225

Summer flounder

H 138 232 50 45 58 76 31 113 79 55R 135 273 96 215 183 250 62 337 90 145

Winter flounder

H 41 169 87 86 69 46 44 92 43 33R 19 62 84 67 58 18 17 46 30 132

Wrasses (tautog)

H 91 34 25 46 33 25 58 100 40 24R 413 77 96 118 210 96 231 423 185 119

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

94

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Massachusetts | Marine Economy

2015 Massachusett State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 502274 (21) 175225 (23) 3167329 (26) 19803 (32) 28694 (3) 48810 (27) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 24 26 22 27 36 25 28 33 38Receipts 908 1250 1943 2082 2433 1699 1857 2356 4474

Seafood salesretail

Firms 57 64 64 61 66 65 51 56 52Receipts 4421 7982 7686 6287 7640 5213 3842 5782 5154

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 52 44 44 44 44 39 40 42 41Employees 2684 2355 2396 2159 2214 1638 1755 1819 1948

Payroll 113580 109747 119282 107635 112399 74541 87153 99445 108090

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 160 141 144 149 141 140 142 130 129Employees 1803 1442 1542 1591 2013 1841 1910 1859 1808

Payroll 81863 68898 70864 83467 94105 100801 104637 101512 102009

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 126 118 115 112 106 114 114 114 106Employees 737 549 542 584 576 576 708 647 641

Payroll 19267 15017 15261 16495 16037 15776 18304 19516 20201

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 14 14 12 12 10 14 8 12 12Employees 283 169 166 ds ds ds 22 25 36

Payroll 18620 11701 10011 ds ds 3266 1352 1478 2766

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 12 8 10 8 7 9 8 9 8Employees ds 361 ds 313 381 ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds 38908 35473 36069 38797 ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0Employees ds NA ds NA NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA ds NA NA NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 173 175 177 175 176 172 178 177 178

Employees 1154 1138 1188 1150 1125 977 1054 1161 1076Payroll 51705 53694 56663 57002 58251 48657 55053 57797 63422

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 5 3 2 2 2 4 3 3 2Employees 69 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll 2867 2271 ds ds ds ds ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 9 8 11 9 9 8 11 9 8Employees 65 75 71 150 139 120 94 83 88

Payroll 4540 4355 4342 9413 6980 5965 6578 6645 7311

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 3 4 4 8 6 5 3 1 1Employees 69 63 66 86 95 35 ds ds ds

Payroll 647 1289 1323 2662 3035 1519 ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 49 43 38 37 37 40 41 43 39Employees 588 603 579 535 445 446 463 623 576

Payroll 26445 28402 20685 20196 22066 23195 23615 31451 31153

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | New Hampshire

96

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New Hampshire | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the New Hampshire Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 9922 1511091 348439 558040 2577 160077 59239 81009

Commercial Harvesters 890 58255 16465 25569 890 58255 16465 25569Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1060 128231 50387 64971 204 24709 9709 12519

Importers 3395 1049319 168173 319878 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 638 90836 32020 42138 79 11272 3974 5229

Retail 3940 184450 81394 105484 1404 65841 29092 37692

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 17021 17471 17754 20599 23483 23241 20163 24313 27816 33215

Finfish amp Other 4151 4824 5569 5122 6147 5579 2908 2932 2732 2425Shellfish 12870 12647 12186 15477 17336 17662 17256 21381 25084 30790

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 12517 12267 11919 14836 16343 17169 16601 20741 24546 30372Atlantic cod 1972 2311 2587 2187 2500 1750 546 571 93 109Atlantic herring 147 134 271 375 208 349 216 NA 584 NAGoosefish 375 290 280 212 207 153 186 NA 351 338Haddock 123 89 68 29 35 95 22 18 8 14Hake 244 167 215 237 445 474 374 NA 263 271Pollock 902 1093 1283 839 1355 1224 1135 860 356 207Sea scallop 30 16 4 3 26 143 287 346 399 286Shrimp NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 23Spiny dogfish NA 419 557 293 451 420 96 NA NA NA

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 8430 10464 13886 11809 12315 12148 8254 9115 11094 7926

Finfish amp Other 5174 7180 10093 7026 7144 7546 3995 4302 6148 1961Shellfish 3256 3284 3793 4783 5171 4603 4259 4813 4946 5965

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 2469 2567 2985 3648 3919 4229 3818 4373 4722 5782Atlantic cod 1168 1479 1984 1227 1286 726 230 263 45 55Atlantic herring 936 1198 3120 2830 1514 2391 1579 NA 3999 NAGoosefish 325 250 250 172 153 126 162 NA 314 331Haddock 61 53 45 18 19 45 10 10 6 9Hake 313 222 423 322 587 1135 393 NA 309 329Pollock 2025 2456 2017 1042 1732 1049 983 629 270 98Sea scallop 4 2 1 0 3 12 25 27 31 23Shrimp NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4Spiny dogfish NA 1370 2073 1214 1646 1789 515 NA NA NA

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American lobster 507 478 399 407 417 406 435 474 520 525Atlantic cod 169 156 130 178 194 241 238 217 209 197Atlantic herring 016 011 009 013 014 015 014 NA 015 NAGoosefish 115 116 112 123 136 121 115 NA 112 102Haddock 201 170 152 157 191 213 216 174 141 155Hake 078 075 051 074 076 042 095 NA 085 082Pollock 045 045 064 081 078 117 115 137 132 212Sea scallop 826 768 722 884 1035 1168 1154 1271 1288 1238Shrimp NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 585Spiny dogfish NA 031 027 024 027 023 019 NA NA NA

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

97

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New Hampshire | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of New Hampshire Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 59 6924 2646 3728Private Boat 44 4581 2004 2838Shore 28 2515 1015 1553

Total Durable Expenditures 342 33934 15805 22456Total State Economic Impacts 473 47954 21470 30575

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 4161Private Boat 6224Shore 2187Total 12572

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 48330

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 97 63 67 46 56 58 68 50 54 69Non-Coastal 13 8 9 7 10 9 19 11 6 8Out-of-State 63 46 58 33 30 54 66 58 54 57Total Anglers 172 118 134 86 96 121 153 120 115 134

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 114 90 98 61 71 55 116 105 86 34Private 233 139 147 90 178 163 107 113 79 145Shore 155 103 155 92 48 81 89 34 57 114Total Trips 502 333 401 243 297 299 313 252 221 293

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atlantic codH 53 81 128 80 127 64 115 44 1 5R 235 232 209 130 259 150 156 132 260 229

Atlantic mackerel

H 128 497 882 295 2142 1116 707 628 233 793R 9 35 81 18 188 160 14 29 47 127

Bluefin tunaH 0 lt 1 lt 1 0 0 lt 1 0 0 0 0R 0 0 lt 1 lt 1 2 0 0 0 0 0

BluefishH 34 6 lt 1 2 2 9 0 lt 1 2 lt 1R 18 3 2 lt 1 1 5 lt 1 2 0 0

HaddockH 97 90 100 48 76 74 72 76 140 119R 44 18 28 11 20 114 258 424 322 271

PollockH 70 52 40 52 101 65 118 101 93 69R 17 20 50 75 104 147 237 154 320 134

Striped bassH 6 5 9 6 33 14 17 6 2 4R 257 77 57 52 99 64 82 79 56 234

Winter flounder

H 9 11 10 2 12 lt 1 0 4 3 6R 7 6 5 5 1 1 3 5 4 7

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 13200Other Equipment 4065Boat Expenses 16746Vehicle Expenses 1747Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 35758

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

98

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New Hampshire | Marine Economy

2015 New Hampshire State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 103345 (04) 37669 (05) 576424 (05) 2808 (04) 4244 (04) 7427 (04) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 5 ds ds 3 7 7 6 6 4Receipts 927 ds ds 687 856 1166 1239 1019 1411

Seafood salesretail

Firms 11 17 14 11 11 12 15 15 9Receipts 1540 1894 1870 1502 2152 2096 1861 2419 1722

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 7 7 8 8 8 8 7 6 8Employees ds ds 115 292 231 229 225 ds 182

Payroll ds ds 3234 10971 12010 12181 13751 ds 11160

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 8 8 8 8 7 8 9 8 9Employees 92 101 88 80 84 99 113 106 108

Payroll 3360 4142 4268 4171 4123 5738 4562 4271 4543

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 15 14 14 12 16 9 9 9 9Employees 93 83 95 102 88 48 45 ds 57

Payroll 2077 2011 2299 2296 1934 870 966 1699 1659

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0Employees ds NA NA NA NA ds NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA NA NA NA ds NA NA NA

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds NADeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Employees NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 35 37 37 35 34 31 35 35 35

Employees 171 173 146 135 139 131 155 144 153Payroll 7774 8114 7022 6920 7090 6927 8031 8043 8788

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Employees ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 18

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1920

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 1Employees NA NA NA NA NA ds ds ds ds

Payroll NA NA NA NA NA ds ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 8 9 8 7 7 7 7 8 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 181

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 9800

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Rhode Island

100

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Rhode Island | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Rhode Island Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 10828 1375375 334588 528970 5193 332575 120271 168541

Commercial Harvesters 2316 161929 48839 76197 2316 161929 48839 76197Seafood Processors amp Dealers 535 62563 24243 31504 326 38108 14767 19190

Importers 2755 851288 136435 259510 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 586 78598 27849 36644 133 17778 6299 8288

Retail 4636 220998 97221 125116 2419 114760 50366 64866

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 72282 66085 61657 62739 75929 81136 86371 86344 81833 93872Finfish amp Other 24802 22732 23383 22995 24891 28611 29470 31824 26044 23411Shellfish 47480 43353 38274 39744 51038 52525 56901 54521 55788 70462

Key SpeciesAll other flounders 3585 2171 1455 593 806 1025 2124 2945 1771 1462American lobster 12151 12976 11264 12404 12765 12119 9732 11709 12345 11889Atlantic herring 982 631 1260 1423 1343 2174 4907 2303 1373 1525Atlantic mackerel 1182 882 3301 1886 100 2804 339 309 1074 448Goosefish 3540 3590 3022 2973 4600 3844 2725 2990 2730 2486Quahog clam 4010 3273 2849 3293 3920 5169 5033 5099 5449 5609Scups or porgies 2767 2324 2640 2833 3312 3904 3666 4118 4278 4056Sea scallop 8963 2170 2342 2156 6834 9191 18639 10273 7885 9242Squid 15339 17687 15249 12590 20380 12744 13208 17718 20288 33938Summer flounder 4346 4485 4502 5534 6408 6937 6751 7298 6107 5475

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 75271 72027 84041 77738 78747 85232 89886 91684 75633 82539Finfish amp Other 40878 34478 46479 42566 42162 52745 63787 57440 46678 41058Shellfish 34393 37549 37562 35172 36585 32487 26099 34245 28955 41480

Key SpeciesAll other flounders 1871 1144 1027 358 615 664 1368 2158 1057 766American lobster 2293 2772 2840 2929 2754 2706 2156 2413 2316 2260Atlantic herring 7537 4504 9528 8479 8729 13839 28330 16505 10431 9539Atlantic mackerel 4242 2385 9057 4356 162 5497 714 539 1906 1143Goosefish 3209 3225 2841 2556 3242 2873 2818 2893 2529 2201Quahog clam 610 556 511 599 666 903 818 764 683 659Scups or porgies 3932 2151 3619 4299 6335 6309 7346 6949 6794 6815Sea scallop 1357 310 356 267 690 944 1646 841 661 799Squid 23718 26417 26452 19799 25996 11689 12609 24938 20495 32914Summer flounder 1516 1473 1794 2289 2824 2409 2193 2056 1716 1305

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

All other flounders 192 190 142 166 131 154 155 136 168 191American lobster 530 468 397 424 464 448 451 485 533 526Atlantic herring 013 014 013 017 015 016 017 014 013 016Atlantic mackerel 028 037 036 043 062 051 047 057 056 039Goosefish 110 111 106 116 142 134 097 103 108 113Quahog clam 657 588 558 550 589 572 615 667 798 851Scups or porgies 070 108 073 066 052 062 050 059 063 060Sea scallop 661 700 658 807 990 973 1132 1221 1193 1157Squid 065 067 058 064 078 109 105 071 099 103Summer flounder 287 304 251 242 227 288 308 355 356 420

101

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Rhode Island | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Rhode Island Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 113 13793 5244 7604Private Boat 117 12243 4885 7840Shore 81 8587 3433 5535

Total Durable Expenditures 3862 377448 162659 249102Total State Economic Impacts 4173 412071 176221 270081

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 8220Private Boat 14627Shore 10308Total 33155

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 79492Other Equipment 25315Boat Expenses 203643Vehicle Expenses 20708Second Home Expenses 779Total Durable Expenditures 329937

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 363092

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 171 169 111 161 105 99 129 160 123 149Non-Coastal NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAOut-of-State 229 297 209 225 190 169 255 304 175 243Total Anglers 401 465 320 387 296 268 383 464 298 392

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 74 67 56 41 39 40 48 52 52 45Private 590 716 423 531 536 461 587 491 513 412Shore 759 673 507 667 539 575 595 556 314 701Total Trips 1423 1456 986 1239 1114 1077 1229 1099 879 1159

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic bonito

H 5 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 0 lt 1 4 2 lt 1 0R 4 1 0 0 0 0 4 6 2 lt 1

Atlantic cod

H lt 1 2 4 2 4 16 lt 1 13 16 55R lt 1 lt 1 7 12 14 1 lt 1 5 12 35

Black seabass

H 44 52 36 160 50 103 75 214 234 255R 118 128 134 212 221 766 684 859 752 1162

BluefishH 295 282 65 103 124 673 323 136 67 73R 686 491 160 94 328 427 625 114 258 286

Porgies (scup)

H 353 633 140 398 568 498 820 976 542 577R 613 1386 333 536 662 675 616 579 614 1405

Striped bass

H 101 51 71 70 89 62 217 104 40 58R 678 416 399 183 214 247 826 163 527 414

Summer flounder

H 176 204 72 118 161 103 128 185 164 87R 612 848 382 230 724 382 528 417 413 382

Winter flounder

H lt 1 lt 1 4 2 0 0 0 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1R 3 1 1 lt 1 lt 1 1 0 lt 1 0 lt 1

Wrasses (tautog)

H 125 104 85 197 19 104 136 69 98 87R 267 187 187 187 139 214 281 122 292 282

Yellowfin tuna

H 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 lt 1 4 lt 1R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0

1 NA = not applicable because all Rhode Island residents are considered coastal county residents2 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

102

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Rhode Island | Marine Economy

2015 Rhode Islandrsquos State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 75223 (03) 28387 (04) 425748 (03) 197 (03) 3185 (03) 5565 (03) 39

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 8 7 9 6 9 10 8 8 6Receipts 2291 1376 1045 907 1168 1441 1393 1418 1381

Seafood salesretail

Firms 23 19 16 17 25 20 22 16 15Receipts 3536 2748 2821 2769 3033 2536 2501 1331 1259

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 6 8 7 5 4 3 3 3 3Employees 196 270 275 193 178 ds ds ds 71

Payroll 6876 6354 5821 6096 5544 ds ds ds 2243

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 35 29 34 32 34 32 31 28 28Employees 224 226 202 204 230 278 182 188 182

Payroll 11447 10505 9534 9815 10264 13064 8412 8763 8140

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 27 23 24 26 23 24 24 27 26Employees 109 94 127 113 109 111 113 114 113

Payroll 2207 2027 2398 2309 2232 2388 2610 2608 2925

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 18

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1574

MarinasEstablishments 68 73 70 72 71 67 71 65 72

Employees 463 476 459 428 460 424 466 449 409Payroll 22029 23204 21372 22227 22618 20811 24214 24876 25206

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 2 5 5 5 5 4 4 3 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 7 8 8 8 8 7 7 6 6Employees ds ds ds ds 107 ds ds ds 69

Payroll ds 5904 3728 3955 4002 3272 ds ds 4209

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 2 1 1 1 5 2 3 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 18

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 951

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 37 39 33 29 30 37 33 33 33Employees 1374 1342 1085 954 916 717 768 939 902

Payroll 55788 54225 41246 40004 33316 32070 34483 42200 41096

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Mid-Atlantic Regionbull Delawarebull Marylandbull New Jerseybull New Yorkbull Virginia

Black sea bass catch on party boat near Ocean City Maryland Photo Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management CouncilMary Sabo

104

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe Mid-Atlantic Region includes Delaware Maryland New Jersey New York and Virginia Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under seven fishery management plans (FMPs) Two of these FMPs are developed in conjunction with the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC) The MAFMC is the lead council for the Spiny Dogfish FMP the NEFMC is the lead for the Monkfish FMP

Mid-Atlantic Region FMPs

bull Atlantic mackerel squid and butterfish

bull Atlantic bluefishbull Spiny dogfish (with

the NEFMC)bull Summer flounder

scup and black sea bass

bull Surfclam and ocean quahog

bull Golden tilefishbull Monkfish (with the

NEFMC)

Summer flounder was listed as experiencing overfishing in 2016

Catch Share ProgramsTwo catch share programs operate in the Mid-Atlantic 1) Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ) Program and 2) Golden Tilefish Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program Following is a description of these catch share programs and their performance Each program is described separately because the surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries are prosecuted as independent fisheries despite being in the same ITQ program

Atlantic Surfclam ITQ Program This program was implemented in 1990 to conserve the surfclam resource and stabilize harvest rates simplify regulatory requirements to minimize public and private management costs promote economic efficiency by bringing harvest capacity in line with processing and biological capacity and create a management approach that is flexible and adaptive to short-term events or circumstances The key performance indicators of

this program show that compared with the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) the 2015 quota and inflation-adjusted revenue per vessel increased However landings the number of active vessels and inflation-adjusted total revenue decreased

Atlantic Ocean Quahog ITQ Program This program was implemented in 1990 to conserve the quahog resource and stabilize harvest rates simplify regulatory requirements to minimize public and private management costs promote economic efficiency by bringing harvest capacity in line with processing and biological capacity and create a management approach that is flexible and adaptive to short-term events or circumstances The key performance indicators of this program show that relative to the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) the 2015 inflation-adjusted revenue per vessel increased However quota landings number of active vessels and inflation-adjusted total revenue decreased

Golden Tilefish IFQ Program This program was implemented in 2009 to reduce over-capacity and eliminate problems associated with the race to fish golden tilefish This IFQ program is unique because many key events occurred outside the traditional management process Prior to the implementation of the IFQ program fishermen crafted internal agreements that promoted cooperation Their cooperative processes helped fishing businesses stay viable under new regulations which laid the foundation for implementing the IFQ program The key performance indicators of this program show that relative to the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) the 2015 inflation-adjusted revenue and inflation-adjusted revenue per vessel increased However landings quota and the number of active vessels decreased

Policy UpdatesIn 2016 Amendment 16 to the Atlantic mackerel squid and butterfish FMP established the Frank R Lautenberg Deep-Sea Coral Protection Area The action prohibits the use of bottom-tending commercial fishing gear within the designated deep-sea coral area to protect deep-sea corals and deep-sea coral habitats in the Mid-Atlantic Vessels can transit the deep-sea coral area protection

105

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Mid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

area provided the vessels bring bottom-tending fishing gear onboard and reel bottom-tending trawl gear onto the net reel Exemptions for some fishing activities apply This rule went into effect on January 13 2017

In April 2016 the council approved an amendment for golden tilefish The amendment made changes to how discards are deducted from quota made changes to certain reporting requirements prohibited vessels from fishing more than one golden tilefish IFQ allocation at a time required golden tilefish to be landed with the head attached and required that for incidental permit holders golden tilefish not make up more than 25 of the total of all combined species landed

Also in April 2016 the council approved measures to establish management of blueline tilefish in federal waters off the Mid-Atlantic and New England coasts Since June 2015 the portion of the fishery north of North Carolina has been managed under emergency measures that include a commercial trip limit The amendment established a separate blueline tilefish management unit in federal waters north of the North CarolinaVirginia border extending up to the boundary with Canada

In August 2016 final action was taken on an amendment to require electronic submission of vessel trip reports by for-hire vessels with federal permits for council-managed species While electronic submission has been an option since 2011 for some for-hire fisheries the first mobile app-based system for submitting electronically was approved by NOAA Fisheries in 2016 The council voted to require the electronic submission of vessel trip reports and to change the submission time frame to 48 hours instead of monthly

COMMERCIAL FISHERIES In this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries

section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key Mid-Atlantic Region Commercial Species

bull American lobsterbull Atlantic surfclambull Blue crabbull Eastern oysterbull Menhaden

bull Quahog clambull Sea scallopbull Squidbull Striped bassbull Summer flounder

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers1

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total

1 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp SeafoodIndustry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)

106

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 commercial fishing in New Jersey generated the largest employment impacts in the Mid-Atlantic Region 37100 jobs Income impacts ($14 billion) sales impacts ($62 billion) and value-added impacts ($23 billion) were also largest in New Jersey The retail sector in New York generated the highest employment impacts of any state-level sector 16700 jobs The importers sector in New Jersey generated the highest state-level income impacts ($6729 million) sales impacts ($42 billion) and value-added impacts ($13 billion) in the region

Landings TrendsLandings revenue increased $366 million (7) in the Mid-Atlantic Region from 2015 to 2016 with all states experiencing gains with the exception of New York (down 7) New Jersey (up 16) accounted for the majority of this increase ($268 million) while Delaware had the highest growth rate (up 47 or $33 million) In New Jersey the landings revenue increase was primarily due to an increase in landings in a high-value fishery ndash sea scallop harvest was up 34 driving landings revenue up $254 million Region-wide sea scallop landings revenue was up $294 million (20) due to higher landings (up 28)

Other species with sizable increases in landings revenue from 2015 to 2016 included blue crab (up 19 or $187 million) and squid (up 81 or $69 million) The blue crab fishery is the most important fishery in terms of value for Maryland and Delaware and is the second-most-valuable fishery in Virginia Combined these three states comprise 90 and 93 of regional blue crab landings and landings revenue respectively Landings revenue increased in all three states from 2015 to 2016 Delaware was up by $34 million (75) Maryland by

$87 million (17) and Virginia by $78 million (23)

New Jersey and New York account for almost all of the Mid-Atlantic squid landings In a year when global squid production fell 30 year-over-year Mid-Atlantic squid landings almost doubled (up 94)2 While this regional surge in supply depressed overall squid prices (down 7) illex squid prices which are determined in the international market increased 119

Oysters was the only Mid-Atlantic key species with a sizable decrease in landings and landings revenue (down 22 and 25 respectively) from 2015 to 2016 Although 2016 was down relative to the previous year both landings and landings revenue exceeded the 10-year average by 45 and 62 respectively due to surging aquaculture production in Virginia during this time period

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the Mid-Atlantic Region totaled $5503 million in 2016 This number represented a 30 increase from 2007 (a 14 increase in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 7 increase from 2015 Landings revenue was highest in Virginia ($2047 million) followed by New Jersey ($193 million) Shellfish landings revenue made up 80 of total revenue in the region Sea scallop ($1801 million) and blue crab ($1175 million) had the highest landings revenue in the Mid-Atlantic Region in 2016 Together they accounted for 54 of total landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 Eastern oyster (381 320 in real terms) squid (107 81 in real terms) and quahog clam (91 67 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while Atlantic surfclam (-65 -70 in real terms) and American lobster (-64 -69 in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 squid (81) sea scallop (20) and blue crab (19) had the largest revenue increases while Eastern oyster (-25) Atlantic surfclam (-17) and menhaden (-10) had the largest revenue decreases

Landings In 2016 Mid-Atlantic Region commercial fishermen landed 5975 million pounds of finfish and shellfish a 20 decrease from 2007 and an 8 decrease from 2015

2 The decline in global squid production has been attributed to the strong El Nintildeo event in 2015ndash2016

107

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Mid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

Menhaden had the highest landings volume in the Mid-Atlantic Region accounting for 63 of landed weightCommercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Eastern oyster (381 320 in real terms)bull Squid (107 81 in real terms)bull Quahog clam (91 67 in real terms)From 2015bull Squid (81)bull Sea scallop (20)bull Blue crab (19)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Atlantic surfclam (-65 -70 in real terms)bull American lobster (-64 -69 in real terms)From 2015bull Eastern oyster (-25)bull Atlantic surfclam (-17)bull Menhaden (-10)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Eastern oyster (99)bull Squid (80)bull Quahog clam (51)From 2015bull Squid (94)bull Sea scallop (27)bull Quahog clam (20)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Atlantic surfclam (-66)bull American lobster (-62)bull Striped bass (-32)From 2015bull Summer flounder (-28)bull Eastern oyster (-22)bull Atlantic surfclam (-18)

From 2007 to 2016 Eastern oyster (99) squid (80) and quahog clam (51) had the largest landings increases while Atlantic surfclam (-66) American lobster (-62) and striped bass (-32) had the largest

landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 squid (94) sea scallop (27) and quahog clam (20) had the largest landings increases while summer flounder (-28) Eastern oyster (-22) and Atlantic surfclam (-18) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 sea scallop ($1158 per pound) received the highest Mid-Atlantic Region ex-vessel price Landings of menhaden ($010 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price From 2007 to 2016 Eastern oyster (142 111 in real terms) striped bass (99 74 in real terms) and sea scallop (79 57 in real terms) had the largest price increases while American lobster (-5 -17 in real terms) had the largest price decrease From 2015 to 2016 summer flounder (29) striped bass (17) and blue crab (9) had the largest price increases while quahog clam (-7) squid (-7) and sea scallop (-6) had the largest price decreases

RECREATIONAL FISHERIES In this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups3

Key Mid-Atlantic Region Recreational Species

bull Atlantic croakerbull Black sea bassbull Bluefishbull Scupbull Spot

bull Striped bassbull Summer flounderbull Tautogbull Weakfish drumbull Winter flounder

Economic Impacts and Expenditures The contribution of recreational fishing activities4 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean

3 Except where noted Atlantic and Gulf recreational catch and effort estimates are based upon the MRIP APAIS and CHTS (httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovrecreational-fisheriesSurveyssurvey-details) and not the revised MRIP estimates (httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovleadership-messagenoaa-fish-eries-releases-revised-mrip-recreational-catch-and-effort-estimates) released in 20184 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpswwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecre-ationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 avail-able at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

108

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

The greatest employment impacts from expenditures on saltwater recreational fishing in the Mid-Atlantic Region were generated in New Jersey (15400 jobs) followed by New York (10400 jobs) The largest sales impacts were observed in New Jersey ($18 billion) followed by New York ($11 billion) The biggest income impacts were generated in New Jersey ($7462 million) followed by New York ($488 million) The greatest value-added impacts were in New Jersey ($12 billion) followed by New York ($7702 million)

Recreational fishing expenditures (on both fishing trips and durable equipment purchases) across the Mid-Atlantic Region in 2016 totaled about $39 billion Trip expenditures totaled more than $6709 million with a large portion coming from trips in the private boat (59) and shore (27) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $33 billion with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($19 billion) Fishing TripsIn 2016 recreational fishermen took 14 million fishing

trips in the Mid-Atlantic Region This number represented a 37 decrease from 2007 and a 13 increase from 2015 The largest proportions of trips were taken in the private boat mode (55) and shore mode (41) States with the highest number of recorded trips were New Jersey (43 million trips) and New York (43 million trips)

ParticipationIn 2016 there were 24 million recreational anglers who fished in the Mid-Atlantic Region This number represented a 30 decrease from 2007 and a 21 increase from 2015 These anglers were Mid-Atlantic Region residents from either a coastal county (93) or non-coastal county (7)

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Porgies (scup) (33)bull Black sea bass (21)bull Wrasses (tautog) (8)From 2015bull Winter flounder (97)bull Wrasses (tautog) (51)bull Black sea bass (47)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Drum (spot) (-86)bull Drum (Atlantic croaker) (-68)bull Winter flounder (-63)From 2015bull Drum (Atlantic croaker) (-22)bull Drum (weakfish) (-2)

Harvest and ReleaseOf the Mid-Atlantic Regionrsquos key species and species groups summer flounder (122 million fish) black sea bass (93 million fish) and striped bass (86 million fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 porgies (scup) (33) black sea bass (21) and wrasses (tautog) (8) had the largest increases in catch while drum (spot) (-86) drum (Atlantic croaker) (-68) and winter flounder (-63) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 winter flounder (97) wrasses (tautog) (51) and black sea

109

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Mid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

bass (47) had the largest increases in catch while drum (Atlantic croaker) (-22) and drum (weakfish) (-2) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMY For this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries56

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy7 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average The Bureau of Labor Statistics suppressed the CFLQ value for Delaware for 2015 Of the remaining states in the Mid-Atlantic Region New Jersey had the highest CFLQ at 087

In 2015 11 million employer establishments operated throughout the entire Mid-Atlantic Region (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed over 17 million workers and had a total annual payroll of $1 trillion The combined gross state product of Delaware Maryland New Jersey New York and Virginia was approximately $29 trillion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 the Mid-Atlantic Region had 360 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 71 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $255 million (a 53 increase

in real terms from 2007) There were 67 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 20 decrease from 2007) The greatest number of seafood product preparation and packaging establishments was located in New York (200) followed by Virginia (102) and Maryland (70)

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 420 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the five states that make up the Mid-Atlantic Region (a 24 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $371 million (a 38 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 676 employer firms in the retail sales of seafood sector (a 2 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 3463 workers (a 14 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $894 million (a 28 increase in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of retail seafood establishments was located in New York (581) followed by New Jersey (185) and Maryland (166)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 477 employer firms in the wholesale sales of seafood sector in the Mid-Atlantic Region in 2015 (a 12 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 3943 workers and had a total annual payroll of $186 million The greatest number of wholesale seafood establishments was located in New York (275) followed by New Jersey (78) and Virginia (65)

Transport Support and Marine Operations Data for the transport support and marine operations sector of the Mid-Atlantic Regionrsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons These sectors however play an important role in the regional economy For example the regionrsquos ship and boatbuilding sector accounted for over $2 billion in payroll in 2015 The marine cargo handling sector in Delaware Maryland New Jersey and New York totaled $5793 million in payroll in 2015

5 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)6 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)7 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

Tables | Mid-Atlantic Region

112

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMid-Atlantic Region | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Mid-Atlantic Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Landings Value Value Jobs Sales Income Jobs Sales IncomeRevenue Added AddedDelaware 10097 711 135690 25669 44201 389 49444 10472 16794Maryland 94814 12084 1241437 334891 503948 7794 455214 167654 228300New Jersey 193011 37127 6226130 1412545 2282101 8244 737544 245105 351891New York 47731 33081 4411529 949879 1567277 3400 175363 60931 85227Virginia 204690 18220 1434996 463734 660196 15852 972185 371324 502628

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 423232 452636 435847 521140 552315 510297 435977 476778 513724 550343Finfish amp Other 103372 91280 101445 111451 119630 130357 124379 119146 117041 108192Shellfish 319861 361356 334403 409690 432685 379941 311598 357633 396682 442150

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 8744 7213 5989 6265 4692 5271 4063 3731 3195 3132Atlantic surfclam 32479 30019 26426 19940 18737 16501 13688 12792 13581 11212Blue crab 69498 80912 80019 127737 101630 101942 86787 88992 98759 117454Eastern oyster 9039 11205 9356 12038 13043 20231 37230 54577 57914 43459Menhaden 29918 24457 28581 40315 39666 40043 33780 33332 40358 36243Quahog clam 23601 35853 23022 28880 27607 29502 35902 38153 40377 45021Sea scallop 147053 165916 161814 184288 227443 168921 100411 125680 150716 180147Squid 7443 7724 7158 12031 20646 17819 12078 8294 8529 15443Striped bass 10993 10671 11459 9450 10520 14622 19792 16553 13181 14837Summer flounder 10855 9693 9980 12849 15614 17194 17131 13195 14576 13478

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 749980 687788 694960 812857 797355 759928 582307 595351 650684 597535Finfish amp Other 555560 481567 489221 578227 574674 568026 444182 455886 506475 437180Shellfish 194420 206221 205739 234630 222681 191901 138125 139464 144209 160355

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 1604 1520 1576 1549 1086 1271 980 818 632 602Atlantic surfclam 53952 48099 41692 30946 30272 26535 22788 21430 22452 18328Blue crab 65070 67975 76097 119286 104414 88964 55424 54407 67949 74064Eastern oyster 2388 1778 1438 1770 2038 2749 4311 5456 6067 4750Menhaden 472086 397537 395469 499578 496829 492532 366343 379997 436568 375201Quahog clam 4115 5246 3255 3685 3551 3730 4586 5016 5154 6203Sea scallop 22793 24355 25646 23998 23385 17627 8855 10256 12202 15557Squid 8607 8241 8310 26822 33333 26069 14549 8142 7970 15454Striped bass 5477 5693 5852 5582 5461 5589 4709 5045 3853 3719Summer flounder 4725 4260 5137 6384 8672 7795 8010 4901 5031 3610

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

American lobster 545 475 380 404 432 415 414 456 506 520Atlantic surfclam 060 062 063 064 062 062 060 060 060 061Blue crab 107 119 105 107 097 115 157 164 145 159Eastern oyster 379 630 651 680 640 736 864 1000 955 915Menhaden 006 006 007 008 008 008 009 009 009 010Quahog clam 574 683 707 784 777 791 783 761 783 726Sea scallop 645 681 631 768 973 958 1134 1225 1235 1158Squid 086 094 086 045 062 068 083 102 107 100Striped bass 201 187 196 169 193 262 420 328 342 399Summer flounder 230 228 194 201 180 221 214 269 290 373

113

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Mid-Atlantic Region | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Mid-Atlantic Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars trips)Trips Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Delaware 910 1658 168169 67446 110381Maryland 2383 7608 784528 327372 512722New Jersey 4306 15363 1751578 746203 1167991New York 4294 10404 1127261 488015 770189Virginia 2108 5893 583806 239344 378694

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 91613Private Boat 398542Shore 180755Total 670909

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 835169Other Equipment 290995Boat Expenses 1925349Vehicle Expenses 199636Second Home Expenses 14542Total Durable Expenditures 3265692

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 3936601

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 3234 2823 2437 2598 2244 2093 2080 2111 1860 2238Non-Coastal 212 197 187 178 145 175 139 130 124 169Out-of-State NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 3446 3020 2623 2776 2389 2268 2219 2241 1984 2407

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 1690 1143 1111 873 1050 951 1365 1258 1316 624Private 12371 11566 9708 9366 8512 7676 6851 7633 6082 7682Shore 8125 8005 6196 6346 6413 5805 6000 5455 5022 5695Total Trips 22186 20714 17015 16585 15976 14432 14216 14346 12420 14001

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bassH 1302 926 1335 1317 532 1134 786 1049 1306 1460R 6403 8475 6273 6458 3203 7666 5110 4997 5026 7842

BluefishH 4947 3515 2933 2560 2467 2640 2167 3210 1635 1928R 8011 7211 4457 3936 4242 4269 2463 4049 2612 2985

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 8583 9978 7308 6019 3993 4788 6571 5165 4406 3244R 11025 12910 9405 6232 5390 8429 10516 5638 3567 3001

Drum (spot)H 11998 6557 4346 3698 4032 2849 5791 5444 1402 1536R 3940 4490 2238 2575 2610 2642 5798 1845 839 729

Drum (weakfish)

H 332 372 38 15 8 157 49 21 38 22R 1037 1987 180 459 469 955 211 217 509 517

Porgies (scup)H 1699 1543 1637 2736 770 714 1242 1228 1991 1570R 2500 3171 2292 2413 1041 1628 1967 1765 2260 4006

Striped bassH 1775 1683 1387 1407 1653 951 1478 1271 944 1271R 7730 4787 3802 3467 3781 3410 4706 4609 5414 7334

Summer flounder

H 2543 1724 1564 1226 1513 1968 2048 1995 1245 1650R 16577 18433 21371 21400 18466 13317 12128 15117 9621 10510

Winter flounder

H 108 44 76 56 92 44 6 37 6 46R 43 32 138 102 126 36 33 20 23 10

Wrasses (tautog)

H 728 669 692 761 352 165 236 547 278 403R 2202 1979 1911 2317 1531 1110 1219 1852 1823 2763

1 NA = data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but does not specify whether an angler resides in a region

Tables | Delaware

116

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oDelaware | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Delaware Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 711 135690 25669 44201 389 49444 10472 16794

Commercial Harvesters 190 18499 4402 5960 190 18499 4402 5960Seafood Processors amp Dealers 43 8539 1502 2888 36 7162 1260 2423

Importers 237 73132 11721 22294 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 63 9472 3602 4294 24 3618 1376 1640

Retail 178 26049 4442 8764 138 20165 3434 6771

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 7931 6900 7543 7845 7092 8464 7422 7220 6846 10097

Finfish amp Other 1303 1092 1004 1047 1248 1012 1493 1219 1075 1070Shellfish 6628 5808 6538 6798 5844 7452 5929 6001 5771 9027

Key SpeciesAmerican eel 292 190 134 206 274 159 244 156 127 130Black sea bass 198 156 25 8 2 0 2 NA 304 7Blue crab 5329 4605 5435 5957 4819 6664 4576 4379 4498 7856Eastern oyster 490 410 334 404 347 345 407 420 358 462Quahog clam 181 127 117 110 143 123 177 133 97 65Sea scallop NA 256 173 NA NA NA NA NA NA NASpot 57 40 49 50 66 16 64 104 3 23Striped bass 300 403 327 400 412 470 766 496 465 505Weakfish 31 18 5 4 2 56 16 7 3 8Whelks 540 352 389 272 361 83 414 577 436 333

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 5346 4706 5011 5214 4921 5640 4048 3727 3529 4980

Finfish amp Other 899 630 773 718 881 628 774 853 658 519Shellfish 4448 4076 4238 4496 4040 5012 3274 2874 2871 4461

Key SpeciesAmerican eel 131 80 60 69 91 54 83 62 45 45Black sea bass 73 61 6 3 4 0 4 NA 112 2Blue crab 3799 3508 3414 4110 3502 4571 2488 2000 2124 3928Eastern oyster 80 67 67 71 62 60 71 73 61 73Quahog clam 44 36 31 30 39 32 43 41 30 17Sea scallop NA 38 25 NA NA NA NA NA NA NASpot 62 32 61 60 82 18 73 107 3 14Striped bass 143 189 184 185 185 190 187 167 144 137Weakfish 25 11 3 2 1 29 9 4 1 5Whelks 288 217 313 138 131 29 156 229 177 126

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American eel 222 238 224 300 303 293 294 250 283 293Black sea bass 273 257 431 263 050 085 050 NA 273 450Blue crab 140 131 159 145 138 146 184 219 212 200Eastern oyster 614 609 497 567 556 576 571 571 585 635Quahog clam 409 357 379 369 372 384 407 325 326 380Sea scallop NA 681 680 NA NA NA NA NA NA NASpot 092 124 081 084 081 089 088 097 093 165Striped bass 209 213 177 216 222 247 409 298 323 370Weakfish 127 175 193 156 201 195 185 187 192 181Whelks 188 162 124 197 276 289 266 251 246 263

1 NA = these data are confidential therefore not disclosable

117

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Delaware | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Delaware Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 20 2666 1003 1480Private Boat 99 11581 2921 5394Shore 277 25987 7737 13995

Total Durable Expenditures 1262 127935 55785 89512Total State Economic Impacts 1658 168169 67446 110381

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 1678Private Boat 11500Shore 22756Total 35934

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 41297Other Equipment 13820Boat Expenses 79480Vehicle Expenses 7711Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 142308

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 178242

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 150 134 114 128 129 111 82 93 67 104Non-Coastal NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAOut-of-State 224 182 173 165 190 151 97 146 84 168Total Anglers 374 315 287 293 318 262 179 239 151 272

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 71 55 44 21 18 20 37 40 38 13Private 721 528 487 408 511 481 349 363 195 312Shore 459 444 379 391 397 374 378 464 262 585Total Trips 1251 1028 911 819 926 875 765 867 495 910

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic mackerel

H 0 0 0 0 0 0 lt 1 0 lt 1 0R 0 0 2 0 0 lt 1 lt 1 0 0 lt 1

Black sea bassH 93 23 37 21 43 40 37 24 23 24R 584 464 293 231 211 204 249 229 167 289

BluefishH 153 69 98 32 46 36 25 128 59 42R 538 167 167 57 128 118 70 324 132 151

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 359 369 452 75 92 88 232 413 145 8R 673 602 538 229 89 447 770 665 119 171

Drum (weakfish)

H 4 4 6 lt 1 lt 1 4 8 3 lt 1 lt 1R 23 61 4 13 7 85 22 23 16 26

Striped bassH 8 27 20 16 18 25 20 9 3 2R 249 261 146 65 110 110 83 185 44 116

Summer flounder

H 108 35 87 54 67 45 58 93 51 90R 1072 605 964 619 616 253 238 292 156 285

White perchH 34 40 64 187 112 70 119 106 34 4R 191 243 121 397 272 187 369 65 106 19

Wrasses (tautog)

H 100 102 120 57 45 47 38 50 7 30R 267 164 224 196 88 107 99 77 27 163

Yellowfin tunaH lt 1 1 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 1 lt 1 lt 1R 0 0 lt 1 0 lt 1 0 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 0

1 Data is not available because all Delaware residents are considered coastal county residents2 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 ish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

118

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oDelaware | Marine Economy

2015 Delaware State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 59078 (02) 24852 (03) 397385 (03) 2131 (03) 3063 (03) 6886 (04) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms ds 3 NA ds ds ds ds ds dsReceipts ds 27 NA ds ds ds ds ds ds

Seafood salesretail

Firms 12 9 10 9 9 11 8 13 11Receipts 1025 418 813 1107 1226 1333 520 452 479

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 3 6 7 7 7 7 9 8 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 54

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds 3020 2381 2404

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 19 18 16 15 18 16 17 17 14Employees 105 ds 50 47 49 ds 60 52 36

Payroll 2997 1498 1348 1414 1493 1545 1396 1261 1224

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 1Employees ds ds ds ds NA NA NA NA ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds NA NA NA NA ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 0 4 4 5 2 1 1 2 4Employees NA ds ds 120 ds ds ds ds 98

Payroll NA ds ds 10768 ds ds ds ds 8771Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 1Employees NA NA NA ds NA NA ds ds ds

Payroll NA NA NA ds NA NA ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 17 19 16 19 17 18 19 18 18

Employees 88 65 ds 65 ds 67 64 95 86Payroll 2540 1738 1877 2342 3106 1963 2196 2293 2527

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3Employees 527 629 ds 434 511 ds 565 541 577

Payroll 19027 19204 16952 16835 19203 ds 20698 22789 23370Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 8 9 8 8 8 8 8 10 10Employees 76 79 85 76 78 ds 82 92 81

Payroll 4961 5360 5672 5176 5096 3111 5330 5350 5938

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 2 2 3 3 4 3 2 2Employees ds ds ds 29 44 ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds 1182 1512 ds ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 1 2 2 2 3 4 4 6 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds 50 61 55 57

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds 2313 2516 2174 2168

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Maryland

120

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMaryland | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Maryland Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 12084 1241437 334891 503948 7794 455214 167654 228300

Commercial Harvesters 3115 167264 47699 74435 3115 167264 47699 74435Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1310 129799 50582 64590 706 69971 27267 34819

Importers 1977 611003 97925 186261 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 544 80243 27277 36218 223 32895 11182 14847

Retail 5137 253128 111409 142444 3750 185085 81507 104199

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 65329 73196 75893 103825 82567 85069 75860 91051 88839 94814Finfish amp Other 12252 11264 11691 13012 13126 15724 17217 18846 16293 16042Shellfish 53077 61933 64202 90813 69441 69345 58643 72205 72546 78772

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 335 442 415 482 482 663 450 492 360 146Black sea bass 454 445 451 590 507 421 702 834 859 898Blue crab 41690 50115 52049 79055 60326 60467 49956 52848 52026 60677Clams or bivalves 5074 5436 4403 5400 4173 2259 362 1253 1915 3563Eastern oyster 3146 2277 3849 4385 3691 5710 7357 15687 15093 12265Menhaden 1379 915 884 729 685 1669 861 1380 1253 987Sea scallop 2809 3758 3160 1188 551 202 8 1328 3077 1783Striped bass 5333 5232 5180 5425 5623 6933 9931 8092 6357 7102Summer flounder 546 578 551 541 463 380 519 598 770 624White perch 619 776 942 1154 1493 1430 1029 1360 1317 1221

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 61585 63534 66819 101739 76258 75416 43374 49922 54248 56316Finfish amp Other 21644 18732 20038 27229 18582 27350 16904 21201 21580 17917Shellfish 39942 44802 46781 74510 57675 48066 26470 28721 32667 38399

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 576 778 550 589 804 1041 855 504 358 162Black sea bass 171 159 126 203 167 141 219 252 263 272Blue crab 30778 34872 38801 66262 51163 43737 24179 24690 28674 34861Clams or bivalves 7947 8600 6292 6971 5412 2962 609 1955 1983 2224Eastern oyster 317 249 498 432 356 618 788 1196 1191 887Menhaden 13751 9615 9419 15467 8016 16383 7298 8363 8989 6098Sea scallop 450 569 521 153 58 20 1 110 248 149Striped bass 2640 2655 2812 2510 2343 2541 2018 2353 1752 1709Summer flounder 229 208 214 261 259 165 178 192 244 159White perch 973 858 1301 1700 2059 1956 1244 1516 1698 1851

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atlantic croaker 058 057 075 082 060 064 053 098 101 090Black sea bass 266 279 359 290 304 299 320 331 327 330Blue crab 135 144 134 119 118 138 207 214 181 174Clams or bivalves 064 063 070 077 077 076 059 064 097 160Eastern oyster 992 913 773 1015 1037 924 934 1311 1267 1383Menhaden 010 010 009 005 009 010 012 017 014 016Sea scallop 625 660 606 777 953 1023 1227 1211 124 1194Striped bass 202 197 184 216 240 273 492 344 363 415Summer flounder 239 278 258 207 178 230 292 311 316 393White perch 064 090 072 068 073 073 083 090 078 066

121

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Maryland | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Maryland Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 395 41511 15987 23622Private Boat 468 47234 17255 26957Shore 461 42382 15513 25445

Total Durable Expenditures 6284 653401 278617 436698Total State Economic Impacts 7608 784528 327372 512722

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 27564Private Boat 58098Shore 38494Total 124156

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 142447Other Equipment 65672Boat Expenses 398169Vehicle Expenses 48903Second Home Expenses 3479Total Durable Expenditures 658670

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 782826

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 850 643 514 552 415 374 404 413 364 453Non-Coastal 78 50 43 54 49 40 36 41 31 23Out-of-State 528 507 327 462 372 258 329 338 352 352Total Anglers 1456 1200 884 1068 836 672 769 792 748 829

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 270 194 203 139 161 151 154 211 180 128Private 2352 1891 1608 1643 1453 1281 1576 1388 1477 1450Shore 1082 1273 1082 1150 1206 817 1005 874 662 805Total Trips 3704 3358 2893 2932 2819 2249 2735 2473 2319 2383

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bassH 39 26 33 36 47 33 30 68 58 80R 577 674 454 669 353 290 350 501 302 404

BluefishH 676 551 591 273 259 114 54 160 102 113R 1172 1631 670 161 408 138 259 142 194 136

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 873 620 1335 1137 554 979 1140 1080 815 188R 1258 2127 1138 1011 366 1731 2937 1146 627 245

Drum (spot)H 3615 1892 2064 1164 913 766 936 1254 524 467R 1619 1738 633 1155 297 920 2622 566 243 230

Striped bassH 765 415 502 458 445 262 477 583 406 596R 3065 1339 1423 1509 1128 2207 2387 2415 3118 4511

Summer flounder

H 104 58 65 25 15 23 53 80 44 22R 1018 923 816 1225 473 214 280 631 244 382

Weakfish drum

H 7 2 4 5 lt 1 11 2 1 3 1R 64 37 8 163 18 25 10 5 118 81

White perchH 2890 1511 551 2613 1572 1534 2258 808 710 1945R 5424 3853 1137 2891 2348 4143 6295 2164 2125 2344

Wrasses (tautog)

H 43 19 38 57 12 5 4 lt 1 3 2R 178 151 133 361 76 110 53 2 79 80

Yellowfin tunaH 4 lt 1 5 1 lt 1 0 2 10 5 11R lt 1 0 2 lt 1 0 0 4 1 0 13

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 ish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

122

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMaryland | Marine Economy

2015 Maryland State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 473516 (19) 137204 (18) 2239817 (18) 1185 (19) 20255 (21) 36624 (2) 048

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 56 56 42 43 55 67 49 60 53Receipts 3940 3310 2268 2138 2374 3030 3158 3230 3133

Seafood salesretail

Firms 99 84 94 85 86 96 95 87 87Receipts 10493 9010 8819 6177 7396 6454 6147 8437 8104

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 22 22 19 18 17 16 16 17 17Employees 1296 1003 245 273 264 266 309 284 288

Payroll 32386 39328 13049 12652 12773 13587 12455 13131 13631

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 62 60 61 63 57 60 58 58 53Employees 978 851 777 795 775 724 636 630 605

Payroll 50353 42296 39055 39067 38971 34194 30119 31503 33739

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 102 94 87 87 88 87 87 83 79Employees 613 590 485 526 562 575 574 562 539

Payroll 14777 11510 11499 11810 12883 13027 13623 13907 15033

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 8 6 7 8 6 4 4 8 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds 538 ds ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 14 13 15 15 16 14 10 11 11Employees 244 250 255 390 329 245 139 135 118

Payroll 14905 19765 20722 24185 25071 17938 10041 11600 11097Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 3 2 1 0 0 1 0 0Employees ds ds ds ds NA NA ds NA NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds NA NA ds NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 183 179 176 175 172 159 170 166 172

Employees 1326 1383 1289 1275 1294 1276 1328 1366 1380Payroll 48752 45965 45483 43508 43330 43531 45540 47443 50633

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 15 15 16 17 17 6 12 12 12Employees 1791 1572 1599 2742 1924 ds 1519 1132 1140

Payroll 85328 48382 46727 95182 86680 ds 60500 60962 81751Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 8 9 11 10 11 10 11 10 11Employees 157 92 77 84 84 ds 245 131 125

Payroll 4882 3968 3807 4015 4259 ds 17066 6345 6411

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 8 3 4 5 5 22 16 17 15Employees 323 ds ds ds ds 1875 962 1220 1349

Payroll 13427 ds ds ds ds 93001 44436 57543 55375

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 48 46 38 35 35 34 31 35 36Employees 874 677 416 ds 633 378 371 449 456

Payroll 29500 22363 16238 ds 36675 14619 16822 18130 20599

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | New Jersey

124

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNew Jersey | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the New Jersey Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 37127 6226130 1412545 2282101 8244 737544 245105 351891

Commercial Harvesters 2935 384655 101056 163908 2935 384655 101056 163908Seafood Processors amp Dealers 5099 529766 200633 261867 753 78228 29627 38669

Importers 13585 4198321 672861 1279832 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 2172 388025 124711 169583 217 38701 12439 16914

Retail 13337 725362 313284 406911 4339 235959 101984 132401

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 151509 168508 151539 178572 220377 187707 132860 149301 166181 193011Finfish amp Other 24234 19936 24074 23031 26808 28639 25951 24911 29095 26218Shellfish 127275 148572 127465 155540 193569 159068 106909 124390 137086 166794

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 4056 3215 2278 2895 3039 3938 2797 2380 2249 1892Atlantic herring 562 548 1507 422 415 147 401 615 308 292Atlantic mackerel 668 1568 1539 848 53 589 18 12 546 79Blue crab 5471 7284 184 12030 9422 10009 8111 4145 8704 7696Eastern oyster NA 2547 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAGoosefish 4486 4005 3018 2752 3654 3301 2453 2428 2364 2470Ocean quahog amp surfclams 26547 30838 27496 23889 25301 25453 22962 11455 10889 9970Quahog clam 968 6254 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASea scallop 77359 91317 90150 109118 142505 110560 65190 87746 97856 123266Summer flounder 3988 3461 3376 4552 5461 5434 4899 4862 5059 5389

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 153848 162308 162029 162164 187539 180505 119912 125114 148419 123565Finfish amp Other 65166 62821 73623 74881 94678 104174 61790 64901 94220 62297Shellfish 88683 99487 88406 87282 92861 76331 58122 60213 54198 61268

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 680 633 585 689 687 919 660 526 445 351Atlantic herring 6038 6539 13692 4140 2385 1114 2344 4087 3428 2798Atlantic mackerel 5384 9426 10255 4692 107 2017 46 17 2188 306Blue crab 4636 5816 257 9461 9600 7393 4391 3233 7247 6910Eastern oyster NA 550 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAGoosefish 4231 3698 2692 2024 2274 2212 2231 2172 1903 1885Ocean quahog amp surfclams 44791 51597 45306 38538 41281 38921 35960 19447 18283 16492Quahog clam 240 1516 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASea scallop 11808 13282 14045 14171 14545 11379 5640 7133 7847 10481Summer flounder 1697 1541 1799 2165 2831 2269 2004 1826 1682 1286

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American lobster 596 508 389 420 442 428 423 452 505 538Atlantic herring 009 008 011 010 017 013 017 015 009 010Atlantic mackerel 012 017 015 018 050 029 040 073 025 026Blue crab 118 125 072 127 098 135 185 128 120 111Eastern oyster NA 463 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAGoosefish 106 108 112 136 161 149 110 112 124 131Ocean quahog amp surfclams 059 060 061 062 061 065 064 059 060 060Quahog clam 404 412 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASea scallop 655 688 642 770 980 972 1156 1230 1247 1176Summer flounder 235 225 188 210 193 239 244 266 301 419

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

125

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New Jersey | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of New Jersey Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 221 33359 14459 20176Private Boat 1138 154152 54285 87574Shore 594 71915 26791 43350

Total Durable Expenditures 13410 1492152 650668 1016891Total State Economic Impacts 15363 1751578 746203 1167991

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 19646Private Boat 138129Shore 59141Total 216915

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 302804Other Equipment 90772Boat Expenses 711797Vehicle Expenses 76099Second Home Expenses 3715Total Durable Expenditures 1185188

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1402103

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 890 765 656 776 687 662 581 607 515 507Non-Coastal 19 26 35 36 23 27 20 17 24 32Out-of-State 518 456 454 449 357 431 330 566 448 378Total Anglers 1427 1246 1145 1261 1067 1121 931 1189 987 916

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 605 449 434 320 383 369 550 514 466 183Private 3614 3595 2671 3265 2446 2580 1914 2508 1877 2347Shore 2979 2857 2234 2278 2334 2072 1900 1846 1945 1776Total Trips 7198 6901 5339 5863 5163 5020 4364 4868 4287 4306

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Black sea bass

H 725 580 583 687 148 735 345 468 310 294R 2423 4432 3138 3870 1302 3818 2546 2243 2053 2454

Bluefin tuna

H 7 3 14 6 2 lt 1 9 5 lt 1 2R lt 1 1 2 7 6 0 0 lt 1 lt 1 4

Bluefish H 1654 1028 814 910 1150 1190 792 1343 827 924R 2735 1477 1476 1886 1911 1996 884 1853 1055 1675

Drum (weakfish)

H 230 298 12 2 3 114 31 7 30 7R 613 1436 79 103 100 732 94 80 246 136

Red hake H 1 152 240 124 206 58 82 177 19 29R 0 20 23 24 13 15 55 13 6 7

Striped bass

H 290 309 283 320 393 169 401 226 284 271R 1789 1309 801 690 884 406 1073 1051 859 794

Summer flounder

H 1067 762 825 552 737 1130 1232 1175 497 755R 6192 8959 10414 10565 8096 6981 6427 9513 4677 6114

Winter flounder

H 97 3 7 24 28 lt 1 5 13 lt 1 19R 28 15 27 38 25 2 29 9 22 7

Wrasses (tautog)

H 300 173 127 375 137 38 111 170 157 83R 1290 902 856 1063 843 510 461 778 683 693

Yellowfin tuna

H 58 7 7 25 17 69 95 7 7 17R 0 1 16 lt 1 lt 1 9 7 0 9 12

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 ish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

126

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNew Jersey | Marine Economy

2015 New Jersey State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 653271 (27) 230961 (3) 3558619 (29) 20907 (33) 30841 (32) 56436 (31) 087

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 25 22 33 47 29 35 48 45 39Receipts 2399 1851 3670 3613 3447 3565 4981 5736 3603

Seafood salesretail

Firms 90 92 86 66 68 77 74 74 70Receipts 11320 11196 11131 8265 8049 8972 8257 7135 7711

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 16 14 13 11 12 11 13 13 15Employees 628 566 661 482 518 404 671 647 715

Payroll 18403 18703 22025 17427 17940 13747 22764 21933 25929

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 101 81 83 90 91 82 80 78 78Employees 978 856 858 848 935 1058 765 795 784

Payroll 41994 37462 37348 38065 40103 44033 37405 36773 39900

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 124 118 106 108 109 114 114 108 115Employees 472 368 332 332 332 382 419 434 446

Payroll 10352 9372 9126 9094 9264 11561 11657 12520 12591

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 23 18 19 18 20 16 16 13 13Employees 778 645 594 600 508 402 367 365 414

Payroll 56017 48911 41925 44246 40587 32007 32431 33308 37888

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 31 27 26 26 26 25 20 21 24Employees 566 1115 1045 ds ds 390 225 212 193

Payroll 44133 75848 66547 78898 81936 27481 12263 11271 11522Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 2 2 3 2 2 2 0 2 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds NA ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds NA ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 216 211 214 212 206 210 206 190 196

Employees 1045 916 784 781 773 811 787 737 776Payroll 41624 39596 35811 35475 34675 35760 37606 36583 38469

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 23 21 22 21 22 15 20 21 20Employees 4781 4244 3479 3292 3744 2582 6912 6082 5005

Payroll 350690 278189 230886 260894 273636 203148 538991 563746 521401Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 26 20 19 16 17 18 18 18 20Employees 227 191 133 75 110 96 106 92 88

Payroll 11403 7776 6638 6125 5619 5983 6057 5597 6914

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 8 6 6 11 7 25 18 18 17Employees 271 143 54 124 163 ds ds ds 106

Payroll 12197 12446 5548 10463 16933 139276 5995 6334 6305

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 31 30 25 24 23 21 24 24 23Employees 2305 2019 1188 1056 864 901 917 1080 1329

Payroll 91460 79309 42909 37920 39810 36334 41886 50459 59130

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = data not available

Tables | New York

128

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNew York | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the New York Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 33081 4411529 949879 1567277 3400 175363 60931 85227

Commercial Harvesters 1591 85636 24618 37859 1591 85636 24618 37859Seafood Processors amp Dealers 709 114261 43444 56508 119 19233 7313 9512

Importers 10815 3342329 535672 1018888 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 3235 261688 88467 119283 117 9480 3205 4321

Retail 16730 607617 257679 334739 1572 61015 25796 33536

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 60314 57429 48856 47717 48303 54524 56809 56316 51372 47731Finfish amp Other 19936 18534 17331 18575 20087 23515 23271 19688 19261 19067Shellfish 40378 38896 31525 29142 28215 31009 33537 36628 32112 28665

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 4623 3821 3468 3165 1398 999 938 985 710 1035Atlantic surfclam 5932 5670 5858 3929 545 2783 2410 1338 1530 1242Eastern oyster 2627 2870 1428 2046 2174 2227 4149 9372 6196 NALoligo squid 5157 5290 4167 4516 7250 8648 5949 5448 5413 7795Quahog clam 14224 13185 8397 7774 6905 9218 13475 11777 12244 11914Scups or porgies 2348 1710 1887 2112 2551 3536 2971 2313 3138 2905Sea scallop 3872 5050 5018 3778 4960 4083 2602 2963 978 3783Softshell clam 1628 1076 700 709 351 332 848 982 1427 NASummer flounder 3131 2933 3087 3550 3732 3653 3197 2997 3043 2524Tilefishes 3843 3343 3262 4077 4525 4260 4676 4255 3656 2985

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 35785 34175 34304 33267 32010 35864 33366 27377 27002 29152

Finfish amp Other 15696 14686 15867 18275 18442 18864 18369 15645 15660 15450Shellfish 20089 19489 18438 14992 13567 17000 14997 11732 11343 13702

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 912 850 932 814 344 275 248 223 147 218Atlantic surfclam 9161 8753 8799 5857 809 4117 3452 1983 2266 1836Eastern oyster 124 135 64 81 98 108 204 422 241 NALoligo squid 5437 5469 4098 3900 5630 7838 4985 5138 4259 6275Quahog clam 1592 1476 1410 1216 1131 1299 1932 1781 1898 2166Scups or porgies 2325 1214 1850 2690 3729 4307 4574 3175 4050 3506Sea scallop 619 782 918 508 522 430 256 262 87 398Softshell clam 198 131 114 116 57 54 138 160 194 NASummer flounder 942 856 1142 1364 1517 1238 1033 833 830 603Tilefishes 1393 1199 1435 1586 1521 1413 1468 1383 936 745

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American lobster 507 449 372 389 406 363 378 442 482 474Atlantic surfclam 065 065 067 067 067 068 070 067 068 068Eastern oyster 2121 2121 2223 2541 2223 2058 2032 2223 2570 NALoligo squid 095 097 102 116 129 110 119 106 127 124Quahog clam 894 893 596 639 610 710 697 661 645 550Scups or porgies 101 141 102 079 068 082 065 073 077 083Sea scallop 625 646 547 744 950 950 1018 1133 1121 951Softshell clam 823 824 613 613 613 613 613 613 735 NASummer flounder 333 343 270 260 246 295 309 360 367 419Tilefishes 276 279 227 257 297 301 318 308 390 401

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

129

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New York | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of New York Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 450 63405 26298 36650Private Boat 781 78747 29530 48514Shore 292 24997 9322 15200

Total Durable Expenditures 8881 960112 422865 669825Total State Economic Impacts 10404 1127261 488015 770189

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 38058Private Boat 117183Shore 29688Total 184929

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 221233Other Equipment 75713Boat Expenses 527516Vehicle Expenses 41535Second Home Expenses 529Total Durable Expenditures 866527

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1051456

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 881 817 638 646 497 533 595 657 555 780Non-Coastal 39 32 21 24 18 30 8 19 10 29Out-of-State 147 118 58 69 46 53 93 155 53 113Total Anglers 1067 967 717 740 561 616 695 830 618 922

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 684 388 381 348 458 366 565 439 567 261Private 3315 3199 2819 2351 2320 1908 1711 2165 1407 2321Shore 2522 2341 1625 1675 1389 1492 1597 1351 1261 1712Total Trips 6521 5928 4824 4374 4168 3766 3873 3955 3235 4294

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic herring2

H 214 69 4 79 76 174 222 188 1462 268R 230 50 0 17 lt 1 0 59 15 25 15

Black sea bass

H 410 260 566 543 274 322 353 469 877 1033R 1549 1655 1236 1163 893 2471 1372 1447 2234 4043

BluefishH 2151 1484 1293 1026 927 1150 1108 1424 509 686R 2650 3224 1793 1471 1598 1809 1030 1543 1055 845

Drum (weakfish)

H 4 40 0 3 lt 1 5 7 lt 1 lt 1 2R 109 25 3 3 55 11 6 lt 1 4 2

Porgies (scup)

H 1596 1451 1460 1990 715 592 1096 1182 1957 1255R 1964 2838 2124 1864 998 1235 1865 1730 2136 3707

Shortfin mako shark

H lt 1 lt 1 0 1 0 lt 1 0 11 7 lt 1R 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 11 9 9

Striped bass

H 474 686 356 538 675 425 491 392 154 290R 1678 1346 1073 1069 1506 586 990 703 592 1107

Summer flounder

H 866 609 299 334 376 509 518 508 492 712R 5272 5521 5564 6571 7295 5013 4667 4041 3929 3553

Winter flounder

H 11 41 69 31 65 43 1 24 5 28R 15 17 110 63 101 33 3 11 1 3

Wrasses (tautog)

H 224 319 346 146 111 62 77 300 99 271R 387 728 665 567 487 365 590 939 1018 1766

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 ish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish2 This species may not be equivalent to species with similar names listed in the commercial tables

130

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNew York | Marine Economy

2015 New York State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 1674297 (69) 540298 (7) 7998994 (64) 51308 (82) 78066 (81) 144561 (81) 013

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 68 73 101 115 142 133 150 181 183Receipts 3516 3383 4896 6784 7380 8279 9946 10681 12890

Seafood salesretail

Firms 266 247 196 214 183 205 197 188 172Receipts 23157 23983 19753 18999 16286 16714 15923 14369 13299

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 15 17 15 15 18 17 17 17 17Employees 294 379 ds 272 299 265 280 ds 310

Payroll 18723 18570 15227 16976 21372 25666 22776 22687 24100

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 291 231 246 263 291 243 264 270 275Employees 2058 1627 1741 1798 1876 1839 1937 2051 2056

Payroll 84361 72233 68345 72442 76970 78324 84346 87511 93859

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 372 368 386 394 391 385 399 401 409Employees 1575 1470 1509 1586 1660 1674 1796 2054 2163

Payroll 28497 30741 31640 32001 35664 38721 45049 51605 53952

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 50 50 48 65 62 42 59 72 73Employees 1746 1759 2299 1654 1708 ds ds ds 1551

Payroll 125570 160735 198352 136577 154087 ds ds ds 185742

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 34 29 32 30 31 23 20 23 22Employees ds 732 782 704 752 214 ds ds 174

Payroll 65632 108744 89313 98499 88354 31229 22691 19387 26452Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 4 3 4 2 1 2 3 2 2Employees 7 ds 8 ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll 240 316 126 ds ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 411 419 418 429 431 415 424 427 429

Employees 2070 2263 2099 2052 2033 1868 1907 1986 1930Payroll 88862 100910 96640 94654 96408 87124 93212 95900 99181

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 12 10 9 13 12 6 9 12 11Employees ds ds ds 1086 1019 ds 922 835 577

Payroll ds ds ds 68555 66439 ds 60079 52523 52731Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 36 32 37 37 35 53 33 36 33Employees 578 386 312 598 596 712 687 722 695

Payroll 40976 23294 19126 50119 54406 63334 68141 74395 73699

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 5 3 4 8 9 18 15 15 14Employees ds ds ds ds 33 1294 196 168 230

Payroll ds ds ds 568 1493 105325 12358 10342 13774

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 53 49 47 41 43 49 45 42 42Employees 643 688 585 575 552 560 ds ds 487

Payroll 26653 30462 28880 26771 25998 24599 24338 28028 25591

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Tables | Virginia

132

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oVirginia | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Virginia Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 18220 1434996 463734 660196 15852 972185 371324 502628

Commercial Harvesters 4867 350620 112172 166798 4867 350620 112172 166798Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1592 156599 60928 78634 1540 151541 58961 76095

Importers 1251 386636 61966 117864 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 764 103879 35911 47860 523 71120 24586 32767

Retail 9747 437263 192757 249039 8921 398904 175605 226968

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 138149 146602 152017 183181 193976 174534 163027 172891 200485 204690Finfish amp Other 45646 40455 47345 55784 58360 61467 56447 54482 51318 45796Shellfish 92503 106147 104672 127397 135616 113067 106580 118409 149167 158894

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 4445 5269 6940 6025 4571 7532 6247 4186 4150 3173Black sea bass 663 759 569 928 1003 1401 1716 1365 1607 1938Blue crab 15793 18013 21169 29133 26274 24561 23991 27047 33104 40862Goosefish 781 951 631 594 752 1218 920 654 516 401Menhaden 25317 21271 23578 34476 32995 31107 25343 26046 28209 25856Oysters 2775 3101 3745 5202 6832 11949 25318 29099 36267 30732Sea Scallop 63013 65534 63312 70204 79427 54076 32610 33643 48806 51315Spot 3232 1171 3411 975 3431 769 2406 5763 2471 414Striped bass 3831 3378 4219 3635 4497 5542 5702 6390 4735 4968Summer flounder 3184 2719 2959 4202 5956 7725 8513 4733 5699 4933

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 493415 423066 426798 510474 496629 462503 381607 389211 417487 383523Finfish amp Other 452156 384698 378921 457124 442091 417011 346345 353287 374357 340998Shellfish 41259 38367 47877 53350 54538 45492 35262 35924 43130 42525

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 10588 11214 8576 7873 5569 6942 6325 4814 4582 3999Black sea bass 189 215 164 264 275 392 496 388 422 512Blue crab 25141 23243 32756 38490 39656 33144 24258 24205 29682 28135Goosefish 847 972 743 596 604 907 846 587 445 365Menhaden 420481 353895 351392 433241 414159 390318 317950 326817 353934 323146Oysters 1867 776 809 1187 1522 1963 3248 3765 4574 3790Sea Scallop 9916 9685 10137 9167 8260 5798 2958 2752 4020 4529Spot 4328 1977 3910 1024 3742 613 2085 3983 1576 281Striped bass 1962 2196 2109 2139 2077 2175 1680 1995 1441 1334Summer flounder 1856 1654 1980 2592 4065 4122 4794 2049 2274 1561

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atlantic croaker 042 047 081 077 082 109 099 087 091 079Black sea bass 350 352 346 352 365 357 346 352 380 379Blue crab 063 077 065 076 066 074 099 112 112 145Goosefish 092 098 085 100 125 134 109 111 116 110Menhaden 006 006 007 008 008 008 008 008 008 008Oysters 149 400 463 438 449 609 780 773 793 811Sea Scallop 635 677 625 766 962 933 1102 1223 1214 1133Spot 075 059 087 095 092 125 115 145 157 147Striped bass 195 154 200 170 216 255 339 320 329 373Summer flounder 172 164 149 162 147 187 178 231 251 316

133

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Virginia | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Virginia Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 58 6837 2581 3850Private Boat 612 61041 21280 35638Shore 381 33958 12700 21197

Total Durable Expenditures 4842 481970 202783 318009Total State Economic Impacts 5893 583806 239344 378694

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 4667Private Boat 73632Shore 30676Total 108975

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 127388Other Equipment 45018Boat Expenses 208387Vehicle Expenses 25388Second Home Expenses 6819Total Durable Expenditures 412999

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 521974

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 463 464 515 496 516 412 419 341 359 394Non-Coastal 76 89 87 63 56 78 74 53 59 86Out-of-State 297 338 305 279 320 193 267 206 203 244Total Anglers 836 891 907 838 892 684 760 600 620 724

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 60 57 48 45 30 45 59 53 65 39Private 2369 2353 2124 1700 1782 1426 1302 1209 1126 1252Shore 1083 1089 876 852 1086 1051 1120 920 892 817Total Trips 3511 3499 3048 2597 2899 2522 2480 2182 2083 2108

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bass H 36 38 115 30 19 4 21 19 39 29R 1271 1251 1153 525 444 883 593 578 270 652

Cobia H 10 5 17 7 4 1 11 6 21 27R 3 3 13 9 9 9 16 15 25 33

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 6945 8388 5327 4744 3306 3454 4307 3408 3330 3045R 8504 7807 7621 4824 4873 5100 6011 3622 2744 2544

Drum (spot) H 8203 4398 2147 1670 2967 1350 4265 3832 867 1058R 2157 1488 1458 1156 2245 1146 2214 1185 509 490

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 159 104 23 17 248 126 55 47 9 67R 363 367 171 550 1215 429 291 404 482 1653

Drum (weakfish)

H 87 28 16 4 4 22 2 9 4 11R 229 428 85 177 288 102 79 109 125 272

Red drum H 46 21 39 11 0 28 124 54 8 4R 111 237 178 29 61 2503 220 116 26 50

Striped bassH 238 245 226 74 122 70 89 61 96 111R 949 532 359 134 154 102 172 255 801 805

Summer flounder

H 397 260 289 260 318 260 186 139 159 72R 3023 2425 3613 2420 1987 857 515 640 615 177

Wrasses (tautog)

H 61 56 60 127 46 14 6 26 12 17R 80 34 34 129 36 17 16 56 16 61

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 ish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

134

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oVirginia | Marine Economy

2015 Virginia State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 560597 (23) 197384 (26) 3198718 (26) 16579 (27) 28014 (29) 48172 (27) 065

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 62 74 69 56 73 76 84 83 85Receipts 4845 5020 4053 3698 3792 4691 4276 5720 5849

Seafood salesretail

Firms 84 80 82 82 78 87 94 90 80Receipts 7265 8273 6642 6951 7819 8373 7612 7084 7489

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 30 26 25 23 18 19 18 20 17Employees 955 490 941 961 899 919 781 804 790

Payroll 34520 11366 30600 30460 33285 32955 30682 29763 31614

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 83 69 72 76 62 64 70 65 65Employees 734 621 519 518 469 492 483 448 444

Payroll 25365 17667 15620 17901 15733 14271 14719 14769 16089

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 73 68 62 59 58 51 55 57 59Employees 282 251 271 265 277 280 254 224 279

Payroll 5227 5170 5401 5480 5453 5563 5526 5537 6641

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 15 10 9 7 7 12 11 12 10Employees 565 ds ds ds ds ds 177 152 186

Payroll 30704 ds ds ds ds ds 10077 9264 11951

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 20 18 16 17 21 19 12 12 12Employees 1611 409 ds 421 492 ds ds ds 254

Payroll 148502 32473 19241 35917 42018 ds ds ds 33057Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 126 119 118 115 110 105 113 107 108

Employees 992 964 829 868 818 673 840 814 818Payroll 26186 24326 24631 24182 23379 18874 24468 24436 25146

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 15 12 12 7 11 6 8 8 8Employees 1085 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll 56696 ds ds 41280 41262 ds ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 18 23 25 26 21 20 18 20 20Employees 216 375 384 411 419 428 303 322 302

Payroll 11700 21014 22177 22910 22132 25732 20283 21348 20746

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 10 8 6 7 6 13 14 15 14Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1922

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 132983

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 52 59 53 56 51 59 54 56 54Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 30622

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1955354

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

South Atlantic Regionbull East Floridabull Georgiabull North Carolinabull South Carolina

Returning to port during the Virginia Beach Billfish Tournament Photo South Atlantic Fishery Management CouncilCameron J Rhodes

136

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

o

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe South Atlantic Region includes East Florida Georgia North Carolina and South Carolina Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (SAFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under eight fishery management plans (FMPs) The coastal migratory pelagic resources and spiny lobster FMPs are managed jointly with the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (GMFMC) The SAFMC in cooperation with the Mid-Atlantic and New England Fishery Management Councils developed a dolphin wahoo FMP for the Atlantic

South Atlantic Region FMPs

bull Coastal migratory pelagic resources (with GMFMC)

bull Coral coral reef and livehardbot-tom habitat

bull Dolphinwahoo

bull Golden crabbull Pelagic sargassum

habitatbull Shrimpbull Snapper grouperbull Spiny lobster

(with GMFMC)

Red porgy red snapper snowy grouper and Southeast Florida hogfish were listed as overfished in 2016 Six stocks or stock complexes are currently subject to overfishing red snapper speckled hind Warsaw grouper Southeast Florida hogfish blueline tilefish and tilefish (Southern Atlantic coast)

Catch Share ProgramsSouth Atlantic Wreckfish Individual Transferable Quota Program This program was implemented in 1992 and is the only catch share program in the South Atlantic Region This program was developed to create incentives for the conservation of wreckfish to provide a management regime that promotes stability and facilitates long-range planning and investment by harvesters and dealers to promote management regimes that minimize gear and area conflicts among fishermen to minimize the tendency for over-capitalization in the harvesting and processingdistribution sectors and to provide a reasonable opportunity for fishermen to make adequate returns from commercial fishing by limiting entry into the program NOAA Fisheries continues to collect data on this program to develop standard performance indicators

that measure its basic economic performance

Policy UpdatesIn 2016 a System Management Plan was approved for eight deepwater Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) established through the Snapper Grouper FMP in 2009 The council developed this plan to serve as the framework for resource protection research and monitoring outreach administration and evaluation of the MPAs The System Management Plan includes action items to assist in achieving the goals and objectives as well as potential metrics for evaluating the management effectiveness of the Marine Protected Areas Eventually the plan will be expanded to encompass all of the councilrsquos managed areas with sections for Marine Protected Areas Spawning Special Management Zones other Special Management Zones and Coral Habitat Areas of Particular Concern

Under Amendment 36 of the Snapper Group FMP NOAA Fisheries approved the designation of five offshore areas as Spawning Special Management Zones in June 2017 to help protect spawning fish and unique habitat associated with spawning activities in the South Atlantic Spawning Special Management Zones are expected to protect important spawning habitat and associated species of fish by limiting specific fishing and anchoring activity within the sites The action includes a sunset provision that would require the areas be reauthorized after a period of 10 years based on their effectiveness The five areas ranging in size from 3 to 5 square miles off North Carolina South Carolina and Florida are the first Spawning Special Management Zones designated in federal waters off the South Atlantic coast

Also in June 2017 following a recent stock assessment the council approved measures that will allow increases in the harvest of spiny lobster in both the South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico The action would increase the acceptable biological catch from 732 million pounds to 96 million pounds The amendment would also prohibit the use of traps for recreational harvest of spiny lobster

South Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

137

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

South Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key South Atlantic Commercial Species

bull Blue crabbull Clamsbull Floundersbull Groupersbull King mackerels

bull Oystersbull Shrimpbull Snappersbull Swordfishbull Tunas

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is

defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers12

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 commercial fishing in Florida generated the largest employment impacts in the South Atlantic Region 76700 jobs Income impacts ($32 billion) sales impacts ($169 billion) and value-added impacts ($57 billion) were also largest in Florida The importers sector in Florida generated the highest employment impacts of any state-level sector 39200 jobs The importers sector in Florida also generated the highest state-level income impacts ($19 billion) sales impacts ($121 billion) and value-added impacts ($37 billion) in the region

Landings TrendsSouth Atlantic landings revenue was up $61 million in 2016 relative to the previous year Gains from shrimp landings revenue (up $66 million) and numerous finfish species more than offset declines in blue crab (down $98 million) and clams (down $31 million) The shrimp fishery generates the highest landings revenue of all South Atlantic fisheries Shrimp fishery performance was driven largely by a banner year for North Carolina shrimp trawlers which had their highest level of production since 1953 and after adjusting for inflation their highest landings revenue since 2000 Mild weather in the fall of 2016 that extended the fishing season was among the reasons cited for the 68 increase in North Carolina shrimp landings revenue from 2015 to 2016

The blue crab fishery is the second most important

1 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp SeafoodIndustry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)2 Commercial economic impacts data were not available for East Florida data for the entire state of Florida are reported here

138

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oSouth Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

fishery in the South Atlantic Region in terms of landings revenue Reduced landings coupled with lower prices both regionally and nationally resulted in a 21 decline in landings revenue from 2015 to 2016 The precipitous decline was prompted in part by new management measures implemented in 2016 in North Carolina to improve the condition of its blue crab stock While showing some improvement from the 2014 stock assessment the 2015 assessment continued to show decreased recruitment and adult abundance

Oyster landings increased more than seven-fold from 2007-2016 largely due to expanding South Carolina production In recent years South Carolina has accounted for almost 90 of oyster production in the South Atlantic Region As this industry took off South Carolina implemented a moratorium in April 2014 on importing oyster seed from all points north of South Carolina due to a concern over disease transfer By 2016 all seed orders by South Carolina oyster farmers were filled with seed produced in-state using South Carolina broodstock3

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the South Atlantic Region totaled $1909 million in 2016 This number represented a 25 increase from 2007 (a 9 increase in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 3 increase from 2015 Landings revenue was highest in North Carolina ($941 million) followed by East Florida ($646 million) Shellfish landings revenue made up 61 of total revenue in the region Shrimp ($57 million) and blue crab ($366 million) had the highest landings revenue in the South Atlantic Region in 2016 Together they accounted for 49 of total landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 oysters (76 54 in real terms) shrimp (30 14 in real terms) and blue crab (9 -5 in real terms) had the largest revenue increaseswhile groupers (-53 -59 in real terms) snappers(-16 -27 in real terms) and tunas (-12 -23in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From2015 to 2016 shrimp (13) king mackerels (11)and oysters (1) had the largest revenue increaseswhile clams (-44) blue crab (-21) and tunas(-15) had the largest revenue decreases

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Oysters (76 54 in real terms)bull Shrimp (30 14 in real terms)bull Blue crab (9 -5 in real terms) From 2015bull Shrimp (13)bull King mackerels (11)bull Oysters (1)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Groupers (-53 -59 in real terms)bull Snappers (-16 -27 in real terms)bull Tunas (-12 -23 in real terms) From 2015bull Clams (-44)bull Blue crab (-21)bull Tunas (-15)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Oysters (608)bull Shrimp (13)bull Blue crab (1)From 2015bull King mackerels (15)bull Shrimp (4)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Groupers (-68)bull Flounders (-37)bull Snappers (-31) From 2015bull Clams (-28)bull Flounders (-26)bull Swordfish (-21)

LandingsIn 2016 South Atlantic Region commercial fishermen landed 1063 million pounds of finfish and shellfish a 1 increase from 2007 and a 6 decrease from 2015 Blue crab had the highest landings volume in the South Atlantic Region accounting for 32 of landed weight

3 httpwwwscseagrantorgpdf_filesFY16-17-Impacts-and-Accomplishments-SFApdf

139

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

South Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

From 2007 to 2016 oysters (608) shrimp (13) and blue crab (1) had the largest landings increases while groupers (-68) flounders (-37) and snappers (-31) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 king mackerels (15) and shrimp (4) had the largest landings increases while clams (-28) flounders (-26) and swordfish (-21) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 clams ($777 per pound) received the highest South Atlantic Region ex-vessel price Landings of blue crab ($106 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price From 2007 to 2016 flounders (65 57 in real terms) groupers (45 39 in real terms) and king mackerels (30 26 in real terms) had the largest price increases while oysters (-75 -66 in real terms) and tunas (-4 -4 in real terms) had the largest price decreases From 2015 to 2016 flounders (25) swordfish (12) and shrimp (8) had the largest price increases while clams (-22) tunas (-14) and blue crab (-8) had the largest price decreases

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups4

Key South Atlantic Recreational Species

bull Atlantic croakerand spot

bull Black sea bassbull Bluefishbull Dolphinfishbull King mackerel

bull Sharksbull Sheepshead porgybull Red drumbull Spanish mackerelbull Spotted seatrout

Economic Impacts and Expenditures The contribution of recreational fishing activities5 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures

are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

The greatest employment impacts from expenditures on saltwater recreational fishing in the South Atlantic Region were generated in East Florida (36100 jobs) followed by North Carolina (16800 jobs) The largest sales impacts were observed in East Florida ($41 billion) followed by North Carolina ($17 billion) The biggest income impacts were generated in East Florida ($15 billion) followed by North Carolina ($6558 million) The greatest value-added impacts were in East Florida ($25 billion) followed by North Carolina ($1 billion)

Recreational fishing expenditures (on both fishing trips and durable equipment purchases) across the South Atlantic Region in 2016 totaled about $54 billion Trip expenditures totaled nearly $982 million with a large portion coming from trips in the shore (49) and private boat (32) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $44 billion with the largest portion coming

4 Except where noted Atlantic and Gulf recreational catch and effort estimates are based upon the MRIP APAIS and CHTS (httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovrecreational-fisheriesSurveyssurvey-details) and not the revised MRIP estimates (httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovleadership-messagenoaa-fisheries-releases-revised-mrip-recreational-catch-and-effort-estimates) released in 20185 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpswwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

140

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oSouth Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

from boat expenses ($26 billion)

Fishing TripsIn 2016 recreational fishermen took 168 million fishing trips in the South Atlantic Region This number represented a 23 decrease from 2007 and a 2 increase from 2015 The largest proportions of trips were taken in the shore mode (55) and private boat mode (42) East Florida (88 million trips) and North Carolina (54 million trips) had the highest number of recorded trips

ParticipationIn 2016 there were 23 million recreational anglers who fished in the South Atlantic Region This number represented a 36 decrease from 2007 and a 5 increase from 2015 These anglers were South Atlantic Region residents from either a coastal county (80) or non-coastal county (20)

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Red drum (37)bull Porgies (sheepshead) (30)bull Black sea bass (4)From 2015bull King mackerel (42)bull Porgies (sheepshead) (29)bull Spanish mackerel (27)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull King mackerel (-75)bull Dolphinfish (-57)bull Sharks (-28)From 2015bull Dolphinfish (-48)bull Drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (-38)bull Sharks (-22)

Harvest and ReleaseOf the South Atlanticrsquos key species and species groups drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (74 million fish) drum (spotted seatrout) (56 million fish) and bluefish (5 million fish) were most frequently caught by recreational

fishermen From 2007 to 2016 red drum (37) porgies (sheepshead) (30) and black sea bass (4) had the largest increases in catch while king mackerel (-75) dolphinfish (-57) and sharks (-28) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 king mackerel (42) porgies (sheepshead) (29) and Spanish mackerel (27) had the largest increases in catch while dolphinfish (-48) drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (-38) and sharks (-22) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries Note that when discussing the marine economy in the South Atlantic Region all statistics include the entire state of Florida and not just East Florida678

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy9 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average Florida had the highest CFLQ in the South Atlantic Region in 2015 at 097

In 2015 11 million employer establishments operated throughout the entire South Atlantic Region (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed about 168 million workers and had a total annual payroll of $743 billion The combined gross state product of Florida Georgia North Carolina and

6 Marine Economy information was not available for East Florida information for the entire state of Florida is provided here7 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)8 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS IndustryrdquohttpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)9 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

141

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

South Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

South Carolina was approximately $21 trillion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 the South Atlantic Region had 485 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 95 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $353 million (a 103 increase in real terms from 2007) There were 51 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 4 decrease from 2007) The Census Bureau suppressed employment and payroll data in this sector for one or more states in the South Atlantic Region in 2015 The greatest number of seafood product preparation and packaging establishments was located in Florida (327) followed by Georgia (93) and North Carolina (88)

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 642 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the four states that make up the South Atlantic Region (a 2 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $561 million (a 10 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 396 employer firms in the retail sales of seafood sector (a 10 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 1825 workers (a 13 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $442 million (a 28 increase in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of retail seafood establishments was located in Florida (536) followed by North Carolina (225) and Georgia (154)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 340 employer firms in the wholesale sales of seafood sector in the South Atlantic Region in 2015 (a 16 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 4089 workers and had a total annual payroll of $1603 million The greatest number of wholesale seafood establishments was located in Florida (242) followed by North Carolina (59) and Georgia (23)

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of the South Atlantic Regionrsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons It is clear however that these sectors play an important role in the

regional economy For example the deep sea passenger transportation sector in Florida alone accounted for $967 million in payroll in 2015 The ship and boat building sector for the entire South Atlantic Region totaled $7797 million in payroll in 2015

Tables | South Atlantic Region

144

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oSouth Atlantic Region | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the South Atlantic Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Landings Value Value Jobs Sales Income Jobs Sales IncomeRevenue Added AddedFlorida 64593 76749 16873652 3171513 5658897 11083 1081344 284434 437467Georgia 11488 9983 1554347 343991 566586 1349 69592 27316 37213North Carolina 94050 10156 984700 275651 410851 6105 332945 135957 180719South Carolina 20784 1478 118153 38818 55055 1209 71612 29332 39034

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 152400 165632 147205 165447 171306 171214 162637 188919 184776 190915Finfish amp Other 61335 60797 63112 65922 66499 64757 62875 69564 63261 74295Shellfish 91065 104835 84093 99525 104807 106456 99763 119355 121515 116620

Key SpeciesBlue crab 33634 39986 37703 36080 33862 37608 44131 46734 46416 36606Clams 4039 3862 3516 3809 3396 2873 2940 3973 7029 3948Flounders 11802 11230 10389 11118 9528 8011 7529 13509 13204 12209Groupers 6060 5287 4348 3878 3786 3433 3375 3475 3198 2824King mackerels 6872 7695 8088 7585 6580 5559 5214 5829 5637 6252Oysters 3806 4028 4603 7175 6850 5133 6076 7207 6641 6689Shrimp 43807 51064 33078 46146 53652 54921 38770 50698 50423 56993Snappers 3922 4554 4024 3497 3757 3838 3763 3998 3528 3285Swordfish 4298 3661 4821 7519 9400 9895 8690 5915 5075 4474Tunas 4894 4672 4869 3681 5096 6926 5849 6049 5104 4322

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 105285 116527 113479 119494 123657 113530 98737 111059 113345 106336Finfish amp Other 46613 43948 51117 52569 53824 39673 37338 50244 38348 35489Shellfish 58672 72580 62362 66925 69833 73858 61398 60815 74998 70847

Key SpeciesBlue crab 34045 44970 38959 38840 42127 40388 32762 34228 40445 34486Clams 663 628 611 641 569 512 446 614 705 508Flounders 4939 5151 5362 5109 4355 2961 2889 4739 4181 3090Groupers 1820 1580 1295 1105 949 856 783 762 676 587King mackerels 3736 4352 4858 4247 3048 2456 1899 2380 2267 2615Oysters 776 857 938 1439 1233 6074 6464 6057 5782 5493Shrimp 21235 23341 20109 23203 22940 22361 13842 15816 22983 23955Snappers 1354 1515 1373 1196 1246 1227 1171 1181 1034 940Swordfish 1417 1307 1800 2288 2611 2850 2540 1762 1699 1336Tunas 2310 1658 1945 1805 2209 2442 2306 2557 2169 2126

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue crab 099 089 097 093 080 093 135 137 115 106Clams 609 615 576 594 597 561 659 647 998 777Flounders 239 218 194 218 219 271 261 285 316 395Groupers 333 335 336 351 399 401 431 456 473 481King mackerels 184 177 166 179 216 226 275 245 249 239Oysters 491 470 491 499 555 084 094 119 115 122Shrimp 206 219 164 199 234 246 280 321 219 238Snappers 290 301 293 292 302 313 321 338 341 350Swordfish 303 280 268 329 360 347 342 336 299 335Tunas 212 282 250 204 231 284 254 237 235 203

145

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

South Atlantic Region | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the South Atlantic Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars trips)Trips Jobs Sales Income Value Added

East Florida 8827 36066 4084156 1540223 2466383Georgia 696 1642 160818 66636 106409North Carolina 5411 16811 1699040 655798 1020499South Carolina 1909 5117 497748 181326 292141

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 191544Private Boat 309468Shore 480634Total 981645

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 1026335Other Equipment 435279Boat Expenses 2618108Vehicle Expenses 313426Second Home Expenses 42561Total Durable Expenditures 4435707

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 5417352

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 3157 2330 1922 1933 1893 2135 2092 2189 1753 1873Non-Coastal 493 560 462 536 450 502 396 530 475 472Out-of-State NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 3650 2890 2384 2470 2343 2637 2488 2719 2229 2345

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 503 415 391 368 372 348 336 414 499 493Private 11536 10910 8923 9514 8663 8775 7878 7836 7301 7085Shore 9956 10469 9371 9185 8637 8669 8402 9395 8739 9266Total Trips 21995 21794 18684 19066 17673 17793 16616 17646 16539 16844

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bassH 435 347 271 509 337 293 246 338 213 188R 2863 2568 1906 2595 3031 4374 2865 4967 3351 3253

BluefishH 1914 1688 1587 2348 1936 1380 1895 1802 1683 1716R 4089 3085 2559 4268 3457 2367 3680 3412 3221 3284

DolphinfishH 1079 1025 728 825 824 802 522 575 923 583R 394 188 98 127 355 126 167 244 296 49

Drum (Atlantic croaker and spot)

H 4575 5514 2817 1946 3074 2796 3314 4255 5991 2275R 3775 4181 4868 3334 4183 3560 5786 6278 5849 5106

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 1547 1633 1411 932 859 1690 1069 876 521 1085R 5554 5166 4169 5772 4890 6519 4289 4524 4565 4466

King mackerelH 818 484 420 234 153 149 99 128 142 225R 301 169 97 75 47 27 23 67 52 51

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 638 694 626 705 664 523 593 736 448 645R 545 692 509 496 517 629 746 945 743 895

Red drumH 414 463 276 607 494 458 633 589 419 569R 1838 2414 1870 3320 2137 2966 3068 2957 2168 2520

Sharks2H 50 37 38 30 26 18 40 50 22 41R 2317 2757 2312 2739 1645 1948 3367 2514 2162 1655

Spanish mackerel

H 1061 1315 1124 1072 868 820 1055 863 604 878R 606 886 519 605 396 424 679 486 402 401

1 NA = data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but does not specifiy whether an angler residesin a region2 Sharks include species within the requiem shark family blacktip sharks Atlantic sharpnose sharks and unidentified sharks

Tables | East Florida

148

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oEast Florida | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Florida Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)1

With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 76749 16873652 3171513 5658897 11083 1081344 284434 437467

Commercial Harvesters 7158 520252 163093 217024 7158 520252 163093 217024Seafood Processors amp Dealers 4442 801532 155120 304952 580 112172 21709 42677

Importers 39207 12116639 1941923 3693682 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 9586 1226678 481589 599160 482 61714 24229 30144

Retail 16356 2208551 429788 844078 2862 387205 75404 147621

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 42767 47856 40992 51151 60643 57766 48669 55949 52000 64593Finfish amp Other 19768 21131 23164 25756 26344 26061 24139 25212 24115 35509Shellfish 23000 26726 17828 25395 34300 31705 24530 30737 27885 29084

Key SpeciesBlue crab 4924 4333 2376 3415 4155 4747 3785 3118 3369 3244Clams 391 510 415 331 220 138 28 61 58 31Groupers 1062 848 662 620 613 893 734 799 879 684King mackerel 4833 6036 6563 6911 5500 4685 4320 4583 4804 5309Lobsters 2488 3312 1089 2825 3207 1720 3437 5150 3736 2826Sharks 726 636 949 757 677 458 491 548 643 347Shrimp 13821 17225 12455 17071 24361 21903 14125 18306 16400 16019Snappers 1279 1905 2383 1454 1673 1604 1769 2188 1658 1322Spanish mackerel 2332 1827 2004 2414 2686 2448 2650 2652 2171 2533Swordfish 2529 2339 2385 3677 4005 4838 3287 2560 2532 2228

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 25196 26307 27501 29713 31244 28579 21415 24573 25160 26445Finfish amp Other 13893 14111 16105 17137 16051 14241 12553 13592 12602 13672Shellfish 11303 12196 11396 12576 15193 14338 8862 10981 12558 12773

Key SpeciesBlue crab 4063 3342 1640 2553 3226 3440 2211 1500 1639 1579Clams 41 55 54 42 22 17 5 8 8 3Groupers 315 239 188 167 154 222 174 179 187 142King mackerel 2631 3299 4064 3905 2633 2143 1547 1811 1859 2160Lobsters 361 506 298 481 514 302 486 543 481 369Sharks 818 776 1109 781 716 631 657 662 706 367Shrimp 6174 7619 8662 8743 10528 8869 5044 5805 7105 5972Snappers 461 635 805 510 564 523 572 661 497 393Spanish mackerel 3264 2263 2629 3553 3433 2586 2246 2585 1808 2460Swordfish 772 791 838 1028 1067 1343 831 698 716 592

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue crab 121 130 145 134 129 138 171 208 205 205Clams 952 929 773 790 984 817 600 758 749 980Groupers 337 355 352 372 399 402 421 446 471 480King mackerel 184 183 161 177 209 219 279 253 258 246Lobsters 690 655 365 587 623 569 707 948 776 766Sharks 089 082 086 097 095 073 075 083 091 095Shrimp 224 226 144 195 231 247 280 315 231 268Snappers 278 300 296 285 297 307 309 331 334 337Spanish mackerel 071 081 076 068 078 095 118 103 120 103Swordfish 328 296 285 358 375 360 396 367 354 377

1 Information reported in this table is for the state of Florida not East Florida

149

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

East Florida | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of East Florida Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 1430 172872 61464 95631Private Boat 1345 140979 47642 82849Shore 1213 119962 41321 72738

Total Durable Expenditures 32078 3650343 1389796 2215165Total State Economic Impacts 36066 4084156 1540223 2466383

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 96793Private Boat 149818Shore 100052Total 346662

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 630517Other Equipment 275233Boat Expenses 1709364Vehicle Expenses 205568Second Home Expenses 15638Total Durable Expenditures 2836319

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 3182981

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 2168 1317 1099 1033 1109 1181 1263 1334 1001 1059Non-Coastal NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAOut-of-State 1008 703 643 629 553 514 540 807 819 674Total Anglers 3176 2021 1741 1662 1662 1695 1803 2141 1821 1733

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 169 137 149 118 124 144 156 193 255 248Private 7157 6452 5394 5706 5298 5028 4643 4951 4133 4217Shore 5277 4651 4577 4393 4735 4219 4183 4500 4246 4362Total Trips 12603 11240 10120 10218 10156 9390 8981 9644 8634 8827

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

BluefishH 471 377 623 787 556 278 409 526 433 294R 932 499 681 1621 912 1111 1492 1457 1063 1157

DolphinfishH 513 661 328 248 346 434 298 370 481 293R 373 185 77 118 347 105 163 240 266 47

Drum (kingfish)

H 854 949 409 721 936 825 971 1212 495 746R 1099 552 609 935 807 1102 1115 1252 1395 1000

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 278 182 172 251 287 427 336 308 164 353R 3094 2830 1642 2937 2141 3026 1939 2400 1997 1660

Gray snapperH 689 352 224 161 187 209 640 611 427 755R 2073 1552 1707 498 678 1549 1991 2054 1669 2663

Jack (Florida pompano)

H 126 272 90 263 106 180 110 92 91 57R 164 360 81 160 297 278 184 313 175 287

King mackerelH 515 349 291 183 133 114 73 99 101 168R 227 125 52 58 45 21 16 51 44 24

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 255 237 227 352 287 267 253 573 306 518R 307 465 354 336 357 475 472 704 563 689

Red drumH 161 159 80 176 180 238 298 276 227 369R 759 890 522 1414 1051 799 1542 1649 1094 1197

Spanish mackerel

H 456 503 369 512 406 247 534 382 82 374R 198 364 150 282 147 89 365 208 86 143

1 NA = Data are not available because all East Florida residents are considered coastal county residents

150

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oEast Florida | Marine Economy

2015 East Florida State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 1948357 (8) 532830 (7) 7777990 (63) 33707 (54) 49239 (51) 88386 (49) 097

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 173 202 217 280 294 307 300 315 300Receipts 10497 11065 12473 14635 14618 17557 17214 22329 21841

Seafood salesretail

Firms 319 331 316 361 362 383 338 346 355Receipts 27557 26087 25667 27964 29037 30765 25332 26433 29033

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 20 23 25 27 24 27 25 27 27Employees 1748 1637 1143 1269 1095 1608 1374 1419 1429

Payroll 58233 53455 46235 45772 42612 51735 50003 50556 58246

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 267 229 215 229 250 226 234 233 242Employees 2308 1913 1762 1747 1913 1957 1878 1974 2055

Payroll 85019 75203 72159 70889 77115 75945 79266 83964 90247

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 169 168 158 145 145 151 165 166 181Employees 989 991 885 865 849 945 909 1037 1137

Payroll 20595 21604 21182 20783 20158 21577 23476 25844 29066

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 47 42 42 50 54 60 47 62 57Employees 1242 1106 972 709 753 1381 1050 1743 1815

Payroll 94429 50115 37774 50217 53341 100402 82078 175366 173004

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 69 57 58 61 65 75 69 77 76Employees 3190 2486 2801 2279 2374 3345 2485 2015 2154

Payroll 208144 169055 180139 159025 177386 231887 140564 131069 137786Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 34 31 33 29 29 39 31 28 32Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 10510

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 967938

MarinasEstablishments 493 442 428 430 411 432 444 464 466

Employees 4935 5024 4665 4439 4657 4918 5076 5421 5472Payroll 148592 151677 132955 133017 142997 148573 145265 168185 171354

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 53 56 59 55 64 43 58 61 69Employees 6585 8052 7288 7547 7484 4598 6258 6992 7834

Payroll 173788 192473 185309 191560 195458 86461 188997 179024 208186Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 145 147 145 145 150 151 180 190 196Employees 1484 894 829 980 1047 853 1390 878 861

Payroll 61470 56917 60641 76853 75561 68366 130893 74185 72483

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 29 40 32 34 32 66 61 56 55Employees 459 712 527 470 377 2082 555 588 987

Payroll 12872 24668 19006 20525 16879 72554 25439 20647 32032

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 296 297 261 248 246 258 259 263 278Employees 12332 12419 8221 7363 7909 8621 8813 9608 10913

Payroll 469382 442096 296537 302909 325942 374831 390853 448514 488050

1 All data presented on this page are for the entire state of Florida not just East Florida2 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20154 ds = these data are suppressed

Tables | Georgia

152

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGeorgia | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Georgia Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 9983 1554347 343991 566586 1349 69592 27316 37213

Commercial Harvesters 472 19841 6808 9784 472 19841 6808 9784Seafood Processors amp Dealers 844 74101 28558 37696 142 12468 4805 6343

Importers 3731 1153174 184818 351538 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 793 108635 37465 52650 29 3930 1355 1905

Retail 4142 198596 86342 114918 707 33353 14348 19181

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 11331 13081 11761 13731 16179 16637 11581 16065 16677 11488

Finfish amp Other 625 623 626 279 448 180 512 473 52 28Shellfish 10706 12458 11135 13452 15732 16457 11069 15591 16625 11460

Key SpeciesBlue crab 3767 3910 3839 2648 3341 4259 3974 3770 4240 3703Clams 290 383 473 430 605 603 564 999 1885 1308Groupers 183 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAShrimp 6446 7877 6608 10103 11398 11045 5773 10469 9759 5983Snails (conchs) 1 6 11 27 39 27 1 3 2 NASnappers 269 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 7908 8930 7424 7220 12795 10746 11452 10366 7824 6182

Finfish amp Other 304 267 306 168 4828 113 155 4729 38 16Shellfish 7603 8663 7118 7053 7967 10633 11297 5636 7786 6166

Key SpeciesBlue crab 4421 4227 3598 2329 3427 4265 3216 2667 2934 3069Clams 49 54 76 81 107 91 86 168 275 170Groupers 54 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAShrimp 2797 3132 3324 4553 4355 3928 1901 2751 3652 2120Snails (conchs) 1 5 11 18 30 18 1 2 1 NASnappers 93 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Blue crab 085 092 107 114 097 1 124 141 145 121Clams 589 703 624 530 568 660 657 596 686 772Groupers 337 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAShrimp 230 251 199 222 262 281 304 381 267 282Snails (conchs) 125 131 100 150 130 152 165 151 261 NASnappers 289 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

153

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Georgia | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Georgia Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 92 11240 4193 6143Private Boat 119 11379 3934 6561Shore 148 13749 4739 7940

Total Durable Expenditures 1283 124450 53770 85765Total State Economic Impacts 1642 160818 66636 106409

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 5947Private Boat 13201Shore 11391Total 30540

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 40029Other Equipment 12504Boat Expenses 46469Vehicle Expenses 22650Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 121652

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 152192

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 149 190 146 145 146 134 99 125 81 110Non-Coastal 115 154 91 136 131 96 72 115 80 89Out-of-State 45 98 45 61 78 74 53 70 70 49Total Anglers 308 441 282 342 355 303 225 310 231 248

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 31 17 16 7 16 20 21 31 34 26Private 577 731 516 530 620 496 387 340 255 344Shore 421 456 311 335 335 376 283 456 301 326Total Trips 1029 1204 842 873 970 892 690 827 590 696

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black drumH 51 92 16 70 11 19 18 15 8 24R 35 66 23 40 5 20 10 8 13 16

Black sea bassH 34 99 18 13 44 15 81 37 41 9R 292 581 113 163 227 134 294 528 232 82

BluefishH 11 7 2 13 3 6 3 20 6 3R 103 116 72 108 70 52 7 120 74 23

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 45 38 82 36 44 38 55 64 111 54R 229 294 435 264 262 167 298 471 210 152

Drum (southern kingfish)

H 575 697 587 585 873 377 396 441 451 305R 625 873 559 465 668 604 287 244 210 262

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 577 642 507 384 290 527 238 256 163 253R 1039 721 915 742 552 1029 321 774 398 552

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 58 65 52 105 138 59 42 21 22 43R 84 98 33 39 45 29 38 18 21 16

Red drumH 113 133 69 195 107 46 74 93 48 75R 226 314 168 484 214 90 199 290 168 160

Sharks2H 9 11 7 4 6 4 6 lt 1 1 7

R 592 541 345 284 342 366 265 314 166 257Southern flounder

H 92 49 34 36 29 18 19 14 24 18R lt 1 1 10 3 12 5 7 9 18 6

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish2 Sharks include species within the requiem shark family blacktip sharks Atlantic sharpnose sharks and unidentified sharks

154

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGeorgia | Marine Economy

2015 Georgia State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient3

Totals 848952 (35) 224593 (29) 3692490 (3) 17484 (28) 27559 (28) 50152 (28) 005

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 34 45 51 52 61 71 60 62 87Receipts 2187 3489 3817 5458 5540 4974 4378 5471 6265

Seafood salesretail

Firms 87 101 98 96 89 97 77 103 84Receipts 8671 6922 5701 6474 8646 8233 6932 9338 8379

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 6 7 6 6 5 6 5 7 6Employees ds ds ds 1056 1022 854 945 895 854

Payroll ds ds ds 37343 39433 32928 35987 37122 37368

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 42 30 33 36 28 18 28 24 23Employees 688 565 532 514 562 468 469 792 701

Payroll 31033 20122 18628 20075 20660 15459 17326 24726 26254

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 44 48 42 48 51 54 60 62 70Employees 179 160 162 176 176 214 210 229 248

Payroll 2633 2433 2447 2502 2566 3425 3390 3745 4539

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 6 6 5 4 4 3 4 7 8Employees 33 28 ds ds ds ds ds ds 66

Payroll 1883 2040 1700 ds ds ds ds ds 4356

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 13 14 13 14 12 12 7 9 9Employees 132 156 29 ds 51 236 28 63 64

Payroll 10090 11275 2192 2465 4833 11238 2311 3856 4421Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2Employees ds NA NA NA ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds NA NA NA ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 68 60 58 62 63 63 59 65 67

Employees 569 527 541 631 580 636 644 586 639Payroll 12701 15571 15736 17428 16986 17921 17768 18604 20210

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 17 17 18 17 20 10 19 19 18Employees 2501 2660 3707 2971 4655 ds 2986 3561 4956

Payroll 110857 97869 87410 84675 108674 ds 120985 124394 117785Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 11 11 9 8 8 10 8 7 9Employees 217 182 ds ds ds ds ds ds 203

Payroll 11141 10193 12185 11237 ds ds ds ds 12202

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 4 5 5 4 2 13 7 4 4Employees 98 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 68

Payroll 3108 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 2961

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 21 20 14 12 15 14 15 16 17Employees 2225 2159 ds ds ds ds ds ds 3150

Payroll 68646 69096 ds ds ds ds ds ds 110951

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | North Carolina

156

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Carolina | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the North Carolina Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 10156 984700 275651 410851 6105 332945 135957 180719

Commercial Harvesters 2500 160050 62995 86364 2500 160050 62995 86364Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1166 87099 33865 43760 481 35959 13981 18066

Importers 1631 504063 80786 153660 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 473 57041 20005 26405 141 16972 5952 7856

Retail 4386 176447 78000 100660 2983 119965 53029 68432

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 82285 86822 77196 79361 71183 72571 79104 94105 94711 94050Finfish amp Other 36199 34430 33984 33147 31278 31017 29820 37035 32395 32700Shellfish 46086 52392 43212 46214 39905 41554 49284 57070 62316 61350

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 2714 3142 3004 3491 3164 2136 1724 1866 1646 2216Black sea bass 1195 1156 1401 953 628 688 869 1414 1367 1343Blue crab 21432 27555 27429 26425 21282 22807 30006 34027 33980 24116Clams 2660 2435 2086 2359 1933 2131 2349 2913 5086 2609Flounders 11335 10886 10124 10845 8890 7421 7059 13072 12916 11853Groupers 2394 2274 1879 1734 1463 1421 1247 1265 1120 1103King mackerel 1967 1632 1500 650 1062 831 877 1204 801 869Shrimp 17905 19251 8528 10804 10886 13333 12947 14145 16834 28242Snappers 1601 1784 1073 963 1004 900 917 865 803 942Tunas 4046 3393 2922 1193 2437 4398 3207 3631 2883 3194

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 62871 71209 68955 71994 67487 56670 50191 61958 65942 59936Finfish amp Other 30422 27630 32323 32491 29725 22714 21996 29450 23290 19899Shellfish 32450 43580 36632 39503 37762 33956 28194 32508 42652 40037

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 7271 5792 6135 7312 5054 3107 1928 2630 1819 2092Black sea bass 473 485 615 401 272 256 330 529 468 423Blue crab 21425 32917 29707 30683 30035 26786 22203 26231 32127 25463Clams 438 400 359 366 302 404 356 438 422 335Flounders 4754 5009 5256 5001 4102 2736 2728 4589 4082 2970Groupers 828 785 638 561 409 382 311 299 261 256King mackerel 1059 1037 778 329 408 297 345 550 391 420Shrimp 9537 9427 5408 5955 5140 6141 4860 4691 9097 13192Snappers 550 603 374 320 326 279 276 251 232 275Tunas 1836 1041 1028 703 1056 1482 1283 1653 1320 1448

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atlantic croaker 037 054 049 048 063 069 089 071 091 106Black sea bass 253 239 228 238 231 269 264 267 292 318Blue crab 100 084 092 086 071 085 135 130 106 095Clams 608 609 582 644 639 528 661 665 1206 778Flounders 238 217 193 217 217 271 259 285 316 399Groupers 289 289 295 309 358 372 401 422 430 430King mackerel 186 157 193 198 260 279 254 219 205 207Shrimp 188 204 158 181 212 217 266 302 185 214Snappers 291 296 287 301 308 322 332 344 347 342Tunas 220 326 284 170 231 297 250 220 218 221

157

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

North Carolina | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of North Carolina Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 762 85734 31143 45817Private Boat 1202 111300 39105 62592Shore 4151 361064 127533 208080

Total Durable Expenditures 10696 1140942 458017 704010Total State Economic Impacts 16811 1699040 655798 1020499

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 51307Private Boat 115696Shore 279678Total 446680

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 272244Other Equipment 110838Boat Expenses 697609Vehicle Expenses 63785Second Home Expenses 26923Total Durable Expenditures 1171398

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1618078

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 564 587 446 544 490 614 564 549 479 541Non-Coastal 265 303 259 296 254 283 240 301 239 281Out-of-State 1079 1079 976 1073 755 764 601 805 830 1066Total Anglers 1908 1970 1681 1914 1499 1661 1405 1656 1548 1889

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 218 192 146 165 152 160 111 97 114 141Private 2671 2461 2005 2199 1899 2061 2101 1707 2041 1792Shore 3445 4246 3158 3313 2690 3082 2756 3150 2491 3478Total Trips 6333 6898 5309 5678 4740 5303 4968 4954 4646 5411

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bassH 110 57 107 139 95 76 49 75 69 58R 951 559 667 1104 1063 2085 1368 1334 1429 1836

BluefishH 1257 1177 828 1104 1152 889 1184 1084 978 1179R 2377 2136 1553 2221 1924 1036 1872 1538 1427 1792

DolphinfishH 533 358 367 499 472 327 212 185 434 262R 5 2 3 5 8 3 3 4 30 lt 1

Drum (Atlantic croaker and spot)

H 3540 2161 1425 1313 1454 1073 1876 2654 1553 882R 2805 2741 3135 2469 2799 2014 3299 3605 3186 2646

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 532 654 609 195 216 501 369 234 87 389R 849 881 1214 1685 1916 1647 1427 961 1776 1772

Flounder (lefteye and summer)

H 190 71 99 144 93 105 91 145 81 31R 1091 1690 1213 1586 988 1397 1529 1060 926 1022

King mackerel H 269 105 91 37 14 27 23 23 34 55R 44 25 12 6 lt 1 3 5 10 7 24

Spanish mackerel

H 495 744 678 484 367 491 497 398 388 424R 258 449 313 294 171 235 289 241 216 188

Striped bass H 49 36 12 34 107 8 20 8 17 4R 82 174 122 108 296 176 124 95 115 357

Yellowfin tuna H 102 26 29 23 25 57 45 27 24 60R lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 4 1 4 2 10

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

158

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Carolina | Marine Economy

2015 North Carolina State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 706538 (29) 223209 (29) 3670284 (3) 16494 (26) 26388 (27) 49974 (28) 006

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 30 ds 34 40 50 46 58 63 72Receipts 1813 ds 1297 1652 2705 1630 4605 4599 4715

Seafood salesretail

Firms 150 114 140 126 144 136 127 137 134Receipts 14999 10918 12188 9057 10386 11990 12175 13430 12705

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 22 18 16 16 14 12 13 14 16Employees ds 232 170 171 ds ds 135 128 128

Payroll 12659 5373 4461 4749 4830 5084 4563 4720 6582

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 71 65 66 66 64 59 59 56 59Employees 597 559 584 590 603 793 849 966 1187

Payroll 15655 16843 17383 18348 19344 23949 26687 30292 38462

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 86 90 77 82 84 88 86 93 91Employees 241 219 243 247 244 289 254 278 255

Payroll 4170 4143 4494 5017 5250 5860 5872 6263 6681

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 6 4 6 4 5 6 5 5 6Employees 54 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll 2061 ds 2366 ds ds ds ds ds ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 6 5 6 10 8 7 8 8 6Employees ds ds 9 ds ds 25 ds ds ds

Payroll 510 533 617 ds ds 1579 ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0Employees ds NA ds NA ds NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA ds NA ds NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 96 107 105 102 104 102 99 100 105

Employees 522 656 501 536 524 531 501 541 579Payroll 14922 17164 15858 16238 16187 15975 16369 16774 18672

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 13 13 12 11 14 6 9 9 9Employees 652 760 914 600 ds ds ds ds 797

Payroll 25164 23328 20707 20755 ds ds ds ds 14767Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 14 10 11 13 11 8 10 13 13Employees 102 87 96 94 86 90 77 78 78

Payroll 3773 3668 4313 3968 4041 3203 3583 3844 4350

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 3 3 2 4 3 9 5 2 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds 46 ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds 1579 ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 78 77 64 60 57 60 52 52 62Employees ds 4281 1983 1501 1515 1760 1059 1153 1422

Payroll ds 138243 68004 64807 66929 74843 49462 50102 65388

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | South Carolina

160

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oSouth Carolina | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the South Carolina Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 1478 118153 38818 55055 1209 71612 29332 39034

Commercial Harvesters 441 34441 13550 18648 441 34441 13550 18648Seafood Processors amp Dealers 101 8582 3357 4317 89 7590 2969 3818

Importers 124 38394 6153 11704 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 55 6222 2186 2871 31 3569 1254 1647

Retail 757 30515 13572 17515 647 26013 11559 14921

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 16017 17872 17256 21205 23300 24239 23284 22800 21387 20784

Finfish amp Other 4744 4614 5338 6740 8429 7499 8403 6844 6699 6058Shellfish 11274 13259 11918 14465 14871 16740 14880 15956 14688 14726

Key SpeciesBlack sea bass 236 257 362 213 182 296 459 328 246 149Blue crab 3511 4187 4059 3593 5084 5794 6365 5819 4827 5543Clams 697 535 542 688 638 NA NA NA NA NAGroupers 2421 2165 1808 1524 1710 1119 1394 1412 1199 1037Oysters 1375 1739 1738 1858 1975 2153 2403 2242 2252 2318Sharks 78 78 56 123 166 95 52 60 43 47Shrimp 5634 6712 5487 8168 7008 8640 5925 7778 7430 6749Snappers 773 864 568 1079 1080 1334 1078 945 1067 1021Swordfish NA 187 1116 1944 2777 2048 2467 1245 1266 1043Tilefish 5 66 9 25 8 128 379 506 536 503

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 9310 10081 9599 10567 12131 17535 15679 14163 14419 13773

Finfish amp Other 1994 1940 2384 2774 3220 2604 2633 2473 2417 1901Shellfish 7316 8141 7215 7793 8911 14930 13046 11690 12002 11871

Key SpeciesBlack sea bass 114 132 168 98 100 114 172 125 81 47Blue crab 4137 4484 4014 3275 5439 5897 5132 3831 3745 4375Clams 135 119 123 152 137 NA NA NA NA NAGroupers 624 556 469 378 386 252 298 284 229 188Oysters 285 324 309 332 337 5538 5805 5244 5061 4780Sharks 105 110 63 87 108 93 42 42 27 29Shrimp 2727 3162 2716 3951 2918 3422 2037 2569 3129 2671Snappers 250 277 194 365 356 425 322 269 305 272Swordfish NA 71 459 630 741 603 651 369 389 299Tilefish 4 28 5 15 4 46 150 187 170 132

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Black sea bass 207 194 215 216 182 259 266 262 304 318Blue crab 085 093 101 110 093 098 124 152 129 127Clams 517 451 442 454 465 NA NA NA NA NAGroupers 388 390 385 404 442 445 468 497 524 552Oysters 482 536 563 560 585 039 041 043 045 048Sharks 074 071 089 142 153 102 123 144 159 162Shrimp 207 212 202 207 240 252 291 303 237 253Snappers 309 312 292 295 303 314 334 352 350 376Swordfish NA 264 243 309 375 339 379 337 325 349Tilefish 136 230 200 171 184 278 253 271 315 382

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

161

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

South Carolina | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of South Carolina Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 571 58758 20698 31797Private Boat 308 25617 8457 14116Shore 1188 102134 33925 59974

Total Durable Expenditures 3050 311239 118246 186254Total State Economic Impacts 5117 497748 181326 292141

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 37497Private Boat 30753Shore 89513Total 157763

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 83545Other Equipment 36704Boat Expenses 164666Vehicle Expenses 21423Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 306338

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 464101

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 277 236 231 210 148 207 166 181 192 163Non-Coastal 113 103 112 104 66 123 84 114 157 102Out-of-State 551 604 554 494 264 406 602 569 684 510Total Anglers 941 942 898 809 478 736 852 864 1033 775

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 85 69 80 77 81 25 48 94 96 77Private 1132 1266 1008 1078 847 1189 748 838 873 732Shore 813 1116 1325 1143 879 992 1181 1289 1701 1100Total Trips 2030 2451 2413 2298 1806 2206 1977 2221 2670 1909

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bassH 126 90 37 216 57 92 24 108 42 21R 921 864 470 640 660 811 381 1593 896 616

BluefishH 175 127 135 444 225 206 298 172 265 240R 677 333 252 318 551 169 309 298 657 311

Drum (Atlantic croaker and spot)

H 643 2798 828 369 946 1029 832 615 3477 739R 376 394 841 354 463 359 1751 1207 1758 1361

Drum (southern kingfish)

H 699 823 1056 389 610 778 1195 698 462 399R 540 613 690 0 68 145 0 7 3 13

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 161 155 124 101 66 235 126 78 106 91R 572 734 399 407 280 817 601 389 393 481

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 109 216 222 102 172 77 25 80 44 42R 21 60 24 58 93 45 81 150 124 115

Red drumH 72 119 70 173 162 121 97 104 107 63R 437 552 751 786 664 544 673 636 571 338

Sharks2H 10 10 23 11 12 5 15 21 6 6R 418 475 804 1170 389 673 1164 845 898 409

Southern flounder

H 77 102 88 108 101 92 62 59 59 58R 106 102 75 lt 1 17 35 0 0 0 lt 1

Spanish mackerel

H 95 53 74 70 87 80 22 81 133 78R 97 68 56 28 67 98 25 36 100 70

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish 2 Sharks include species within the requiem shark family blacktip sharks Atlantic sharpnose sharks and unidentified sharks

162

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oSouth Carolina | Marine Economy

2015 South Carolina State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 319046 (13) 103973 (14) 1662251 (13) 6612 (11) 11317 (12) 20183 (11) 008

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 12 15 21 23 32 35 30 28 26Receipts 857 1155 1794 1386 1326 1868 1657 2690 2438

Seafood salesretail

Firms 75 64 77 78 87 67 67 73 69Receipts 3876 4650 4709 3978 5535 4818 3765 4845 6007

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 5 2 2 2 1 0 0 4 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds NA NA ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds NA NA ds ds

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 26 20 15 16 12 15 16 12 16Employees 220 108 111 120 101 125 134 148 146

Payroll 6186 3770 3676 3868 3760 4506 4849 5329 5327

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 60 64 57 56 61 60 56 56 54Employees 210 292 261 260 245 228 222 224 185

Payroll 3155 4871 4901 4580 4231 3670 3713 3633 3883

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4Employees 60 ds ds ds ds 40 ds ds ds

Payroll 2352 ds ds ds ds 2625 ds ds ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 6 4 8 7 6 6 4 1 1Employees 67 ds ds 20 ds ds 21 ds ds

Payroll 3419 659 ds 758 722 ds 633 ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 7 6 2 2 1 0 0 0Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 72 68 69 73 75 70 77 70 70

Employees 469 588 533 537 543 595 650 661 633Payroll 11498 13753 12642 13786 15805 15408 16147 17212 16996

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 15 17 14 12 14 10 13 14 15Employees 1419 1282 1953 1731 1717 715 ds 1902 2467

Payroll 75967 56812 43170 39625 49172 30381 ds 66803 59595Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 6 8 8 7 8 10 8 9 9Employees 152 227 208 222 217 247 221 219 236

Payroll 7369 11916 12522 12591 11922 16625 13820 14513 16311

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 3 3 2 2 5 7 2 3 4Employees 113 ds ds ds ds 676 ds ds ds

Payroll 7058 ds ds ds ds 29332 ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 41 46 41 39 41 39 37 37 34Employees 2962 3001 1929 1922 1943 1980 2262 2225 2690

Payroll 102531 97743 73988 74945 85568 90942 96081 98324 115262

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Gulf of Mexico Regionbull Alabamabull West Floridabull Louisianabull Mississippibull Texas

Offloading a commercial harvest of reef fish Photo Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management CouncilAva Lasseter

164

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe Gulf of Mexico Region includes Alabama Louisiana Mississippi Texas and West Florida Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (GMFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under seven fishery management plans (FMPs) The coastal migratory pelagic resources and spiny lobster fisheries are managed jointly with the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (SAFMC)

FMPs in the Gulf of Mexico Region

bull Aquaculturebull Coastal migratory

pelagic resources (with SAFMC)

bull Corals

bull Red drumbull Reef fishbull Shrimpbull Spiny lobster

(with SAFMC)

Three stocks or stock complexes in the Gulf of Mexico Region were identified as overfished in 2016 gray triggerfish greater amberjack and red snapper

Catch Share ProgramsTwo catch share programs have been implemented in the Gulf of Mexico the Red Snapper Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program and the GrouperndashTilefish IFQ Program Following are descriptions of these catch share programs and their performance

Red Snapper IFQ Program This program was implemented in 2007 to reduce overcapacity and mitigate derby fishing conditions in the red snapper segment of the commercial reef fish fishery The key performance indicators of this program show that relative to the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) the 2015 quota landings inflation-adjusted total revenue and inflation-adjusted total revenue per vessel increased In contrast the number of active vessels has decreased since the implementation of the IFQ Program

Grouper-Tilefish IFQ Program This program was implemented in 2010 to reduce overcapacity increase harvesting efficiency and eliminate the race to fish in the grouper-tilefish segment of the commercial reef fish fishery The key performance indicators of this program

generally show that relative to the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) 2015 landings inflation-adjusted total revenue and inflation-adjusted revenue per active vessel increased However overall quota and the number of active vessels decreased during this period

Policy UpdatesIn May 2016 NOAA Fisheries implemented Amendment 28 to the FMP for reef fish resources of the Gulf of Mexico The amendment changed the allocation of the red snapper annual catch limit (ACL) between the commercial and recreational sectors from 5149 to 485515 respectively After a court order rejected the change NOAA Fisheries in June 2017 returned the allocation to its previous levels Sector ACLs annual catch targets (ACTs) and the commercial quota were also adjusted to their pre-Amendment 28 levels

In October 2016 new regulations increased the Gulf of Mexico red grouper allowable catch limit from 603 pounds gutted weight to 819 pounds gutted weight Similarly the quotaannual catch target for Gulf of Mexico red grouper was raised for the commercial sector from 572 million to 778 million pounds gutted weight The new regulations increased the red grouper allowable catch limit for the recreational sector from 19 to 258 and increased the recreational sectorrsquos red grouper annual catch target from 173 million to 237 million pounds gutted weight

The increase to the commercial allocation was not distributed until the 2017 fishing season to ensure that the 2016 gag commercial ACL was not exceeded as a result of the red grouper commercial ACL increase The increase in the recreational ACL was expected to allow the recreational sector to remain open for the entire 2017 fishing year by avoiding the implementation of an in-season accountability measure Also in 2016 NOAA Fisheries issued notices prohibiting the recreational harvest of gray triggerfish and greater amberjack from August 1 through December 31 and prohibiting the commercial harvest of greater amberjack from July 17 through December 31 as a result of meeting or exceeding their respective ACTs

165

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Gulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

In addition recreational harvest of gray triggerfish was prohibited in the Gulf of Mexico Exclusive Economic Zone for 2017 due to a harvest overage during the 2016 recreational fishing season The harvest overage reduced the annual catch target to 0 pounds Gulf of Mexico gray triggerfish are currently overfished and under a rebuilding plan that expires at the end of 2017 The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council is expected to establish a new gray triggerfish rebuilding plan and modify management measures in 2018

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key Gulf of Mexico Region Commercial Species

bull Blue crabbull Crawfishbull Groupersbull Menhadenbull Mullets

bull Oystersbull Red snapperbull Shrimpbull Stone crabbull Tunas

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income

(wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers12

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 commercial fishing in Florida generated the largest employment impacts in the Gulf of Mexico Region 76700 jobs Income impacts ($32 billion) sales impacts ($169 billion) and value-added impacts ($57 billion) were also largest in Florida

The importers sector in Florida generated the highest employment impacts of any state-level sector 39200 jobs The importers sector in Florida also generated the highest state-level income impacts ($19 billion) sales impacts ($121 billion) and value-added impacts ($37 billion) in the region

Landings TrendsGulf of Mexico landings revenue rose $255 million from 2015 to 2016 largely due to the increase in shrimp landings revenue which was up $411 million (11)

1 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp SeafoodIndustry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)2 Separate commercial economic impacts were not available for West Florida Impacts for the entire state of Florida are reported here

166

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

and which more than offset declines in blue crab (down 13 -$99 million) oyster (down 9 -$89 million) and spiny lobster (down 11 -$47 million ) The shrimp fishery is the most important fishery in terms of landings revenue in the region and in each Gulf state White shrimp landings revenue increased $508 million year-over-year due to the combined effect of higher landings and prices (up 28 and 4 respectively) Brown shrimp landings declined 24 from 2015 to 2016 which had been predicted by NOAA Fisheries3 High rainfall in Texas and Louisiana in spring 2016 led to large freshwater discharges into the estuaries In Texas the resulting flooding forced young shrimp out of the nursery habitat needed for growth and survival and into the mouths of the bays Extremely low levels of dissolved oxygen in Texas and western Louisianarsquos shallow coastal water also impacted harvest predictionsMenhaden the second most valuable fishery in the region was another bright spot in 2016 Landings (up 15 from 2015) were at their highest level since 2011 and after adjusting for inflation landings revenue was at its highest level since 1984 Demand for menhaden was strong in 2016 in part due to the fact that the global production of sardines and anchovies which are also used for fishmeal and fish oil fell to their lowest levels since 19914

Oyster landings revenue was down in 2016 which was not surprising given that 2015 represented a banner year for Louisiana oystermen with inflation-adjusted landings revenue at an all-time high Louisiana has comprised almost 70 of the Gulfrsquos oyster harvest in recent years while Louisiana harvest was down relative to 2015 the 2016 harvest was on par with the 5-year average (less than 1 difference)

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the Gulf Region totaled $9121 million in 2016 This number represented a 32 increase from 2007 (a 15 increase in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 3 increase from 2015 Landings revenue was highest in Louisiana ($4261 million) followed by West Florida ($1967 million) Shellfish landings revenue made up 71 of total revenue in the region Shrimp ($4129 million) and menhaden ($1433 million) had the highest landings

revenue in the Gulf of Mexico Region in 2016 Together they accounted for 61 of total landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 red snapper (176 141 in real terms) menhaden (131 102 in real terms) and spiny lobster (61 40 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while tunas (-45 -52 in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 crawfish (73) tunas (29) and shrimp (11) had the largest revenue increases while blue crab (-13) spiny lobster (-11) and oysters (-9) had the largest revenue decreases

LandingsIn 2016 Gulf Region commercial fishermen landed 17 billion pounds of finfish and shellfish a 24 increase from 2007 and an 11 increase from 2015 Menhaden had the highest landings volume in the Gulf of Mexico Region accounting for 78 of landed weight

From 2007 to 2016 red snapper (115) spiny lobster (41) and menhaden (36) had the largest landings increases while tunas (-50) oysters (-29) and crawfish (-14) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 crawfish (149) tunas (27) and menhaden (15) had the largest landings increases while spiny lobster (-12) oysters (-7) and red snapper (-4) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 spiny lobster ($818 per pound) received the highest Gulf of Mexico Region ex-vessel price Landings of menhaden ($011 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price

From 2007 to 2016 oysters (83 60 in real terms) menhaden (70 49 in real terms) and blue crab (59 39 in real terms) had the largest price increases There were no price decreases from 2007 to 2016 From 2015 to 2016 shrimp (11) mullets (6) and groupers (2) had the largest price increases while crawfish (-30) blue crab (-11) and menhaden (-10) had the largest price decreases

3 httpseronmfsnoaagovnews_roompress_releases201608_noaa_prehtml4 FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Global Production Statistics httpwwwfaoorgfigisservletTabLandAreatb_ds=Productionamptb_mode=TABLEamptb_act=SELECTamptb_grp=COUNTRYamplang=en

167

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Gulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Red snapper (176 141 in real terms)bull Menhaden (131 102 in real terms)bull Spiny lobster (61 40 in real terms)From 2015bull Crawfish (73)bull Tunas (29)bull Shrimp (11)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Tunas (-45 -52 in real terms)From 2015bull Blue crab (-13)bull Spiny lobster (-11)bull Oysters (-9)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Red snapper (115)bull Spiny lobster (41)bull Menhaden (36)From 2015bull Crawfish (149)bull Tunas (27)bull Menhaden (15)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Tunas (-50)bull Oysters (-29)bull Crawfish (-14)From 2015bull Spiny lobster (-12)bull Oysters (-7)bull Red snapper (-4)

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for

fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups5

Key Gulf of Mexico Region Recreational Species

bull Atlantic croakerbull Gulf and southern

kingfishbull Red drumbull Red snapperbull Sand and silver

seatrout

bull Sheepshead porgybull Southern flounderbull Spanish mackerel bull Spotted seatroutbull Striped mullet

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities6 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA

5 Except where noted Atlantic and Gulf recreational catch and effort estimates are based upon the MRIP APAIS and CHTS (httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovrecreational-fisheriesSurveyssurvey-details) and not the revised MRIP estimates (httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovleadership-messagenoaa-fisheries-releases-revised-mrip-recreational-catch-and-effort-estimates) released in 20186 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpswwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

168

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

The greatest employment impacts from expenditures on saltwater recreational fishing in the Gulf of Mexico Region were generated in West Florida (60200 jobs) followed by Alabama (16100 jobs) The largest sales impacts were observed in West Florida ($68 billion) followed by Texas ($2 billion) The biggest income impacts were generated in West Florida ($26 billion) followed by Texas ($746 million) The greatest value-added impacts were in West Florida ($41 billion) followed by Texas ($12 billion)

Recreational fishing expenditures (on both fishing trips and durable equipment purchases) across the Gulf of Mexico Region in 2016 totaled about $11 billion Trip expenditures totaled more than $14 billion with a large portion coming from trips in the private boat (41) and for-hire (30) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $96 billion with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($55 billion)

Fishing TripsIn 2016 recreational fishermen took 195 million fishing trips in the Gulf of Mexico Region This number represented a 20 decrease from 2007 and a 1 decrease from 2015 The largest proportions of trips were taken in the private boat mode (57) and shore mode (37) West Florida (132 million trips) and Alabama (26 million trips) had the highest number of recorded trips

ParticipationIn 2016 there were 27 million recreational anglers who fished in the Gulf of Mexico Region This number represented a 24 decrease from 2007 and an 8 increase from 2015 These anglers were Gulf of Mexico Region residents from either a coastal county (87) or non-coastal county (13)

Harvest and ReleaseOf the Gulf of Mexicorsquos key species and species groups drum (spotted seatrout) (23 million fish) red drum (49 million fish) and drum (sand and silver seatrouts) (43 million fish) were most frequently caught by

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Striped mullet (85)bull Drum (Gulf and southern kingfish) (1)From 2015bull Red snapper (78)bull Drum (Gulf and southern kingfish) (41)bull Drum (spotted seatrout) (37)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Red drum (-47)bull Southern flounder (-46)bull Drum (spotted seatrout) (-26)From 2015bull Porgies (sheepshead) (-31)bull Red drum (-20)bull Drum (Atlantic Croaker) (-4)

recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 striped mullet (85) and drum (Gulf and southern kingfish) (1) had the largest increases in catch while red drum (-47) southern flounder (-46) and drum (spotted seatrout) (-26) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 red snapper (78) drum (Gulf and southern kingfish) (41) and drum (spotted seatrout) (37) had the largest increases in catch while porgies (sheepshead) (-31) red drum (-20) and drum (Atlantic Croaker) (-4) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries Note that when discussing the marine economy in the Gulf of Mexico Region all statistics include the entire state of Florida and not just West Florida789

169

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Gulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy10 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average Louisiana had the highest CFLQ in the Gulf region in 2015 at 233

In 2015 14 million employer establishments operated within the five states included in the Gulf of Mexico Region (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed over 22 million workers and had a total annual payroll of $1 trillion The combined gross state product of Alabama Florida Louisiana Mississippi and Texas was approximately $3 trillion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 the Gulf of Mexico Region had 654 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 64 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $474 million (a 75 increase in real terms from 2007) There were 132 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (this remained unchanged from 2007) These establishments employed 6781 workers (a 22 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $2387 million (a 4 decrease in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of seafood product preparation and packaging establishments was located in Florida (327) followed by Texas (207) and Louisiana (153)

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 801 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the five states that make up the Gulf of Mexico Region (a 2 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $699 million (a 17 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 373 employer firms

in the retail sales of seafood sector (a 2 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 2494 workers and had a total annual payroll of $566 million The greatest number of retail seafood establishments was located in Florida (536) followed by Louisiana (259) and Texas (240)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 478 employer firms in the wholesale sales of seafood sector in the Gulf of Mexico Region in 2015 (a 12 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 4211 workers and had a total annual payroll of $1652 million The greatest number of wholesale seafood establishments was located in Florida (242) followed by Louisiana (111) and Texas (90)

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of the Gulf of Mexico Regionrsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons It is clear however that these sectors play an important role in the regional economy For example the ship and boatbuilding sector accounted for $2 billion in payroll in 2015

7 Marine Economy information was not available for West Florida information for the entire state of Florida is provided in this report8 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)9 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)10 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

Tables | Gulf of Mexico Region

172

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGulf of Mexico Region | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Landings Value Value Jobs Sales Income Jobs Sales IncomeRevenue Added AddedAlabama 6459 12058 555373 219712 287906 11911 535846 214883 280529Florida 196706 76749 16873652 3171513 5658897 11083 1081344 284434 437467Louisiana 426116 36102 2021911 751727 1023361 35024 1836128 713007 958966Mississippi 28969 4586 217948 87253 112697 4578 216661 86981 112250Texas 195668 21507 2091002 597409 898617 16352 1079847 394235 552041

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 690211 663848 636427 624629 811905 784869 941557 1059780 886519 912050Finfish amp Other 146525 147115 142425 117831 184721 188283 200892 200092 251733 262150Shellfish 543686 516732 494003 506797 627184 596586 740665 859688 634786 649901

Key SpeciesBlue crab 46028 39813 45484 41264 48794 53708 61804 79458 74525 64632Crawfish 9034 9507 15547 13971 9914 8325 16490 16088 6851 11877Groupers 21488 24108 18435 14270 20326 24657 24628 30435 27671 28694Menhaden 62110 64376 60606 51750 92855 85890 90643 80402 138511 143339Mullets 5543 6099 6105 5221 10368 7557 13222 11626 7568 7825Oysters 69542 60464 73464 55085 65273 76042 76450 93007 99324 90399Red snapper 9570 7972 7984 10202 11413 13681 20621 23158 27437 26450Shrimp 367060 366808 327608 339228 441384 412209 513055 587267 371845 412947Spiny lobster 24527 19141 12203 32747 35610 21128 46744 53415 44055 39367Tunas 10535 6170 8180 2688 5516 10657 7308 6334 4502 5790

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 1404307 1278879 1435665 1072068 1792550 1489595 1346244 1245301 1567151 1744452Finfish amp Other 1071825 994813 1071919 810889 1472911 1177685 1043696 931158 1259884 1437436Shellfish 332482 284066 363746 261179 319640 311910 302548 314143 307267 307017

Key SpeciesBlue crab 57964 49258 61277 41240 55606 55444 46941 51664 52609 51298Crawfish 15848 15735 19312 14557 9599 6853 19676 13055 5461 13573Groupers 7723 8941 7008 5075 7175 8325 7613 8991 7815 7936Menhaden 1005325 927517 1002579 753442 1398654 1102539 971308 848599 1188984 1364030Mullets 8933 10609 11303 8963 14233 10772 13482 15101 10784 10545Oysters 22518 20723 22829 15824 18742 21192 19257 17957 17134 15975Red snapper 2998 2370 2503 3259 3567 4042 5306 5739 6741 6457Shrimp 225163 188806 250572 178902 221469 219216 206839 215903 212273 211787Spiny lobster 3402 2975 3960 5286 5302 3634 5600 5038 5450 4811Tunas 3426 1786 2836 1322 1588 3070 2094 1760 1343 1706

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue crab 079 081 074 100 088 097 132 154 142 126Crawfish 057 060 081 096 103 121 084 123 125 088Groupers 278 270 263 281 283 296 324 339 354 362Menhaden 006 007 006 007 007 008 009 009 012 011Mullets 062 057 054 058 073 070 098 077 070 074Oysters 309 292 322 348 348 359 397 518 580 566Red snapper 319 336 319 313 320 339 389 403 407 410Shrimp 163 194 131 190 199 188 248 272 175 195Spiny lobster 721 643 308 620 672 581 835 106 808 818Tunas 307 345 288 203 347 347 349 360 335 339

173

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Gulf of Mexico Region | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars trips)

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)12

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 3235 2926 2550 2480 2737 2803 2973 2616 2250 2379Non-Coastal 326 262 296 235 311 268 400 273 262 345Out-of-State3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 3562 3188 2846 2715 3048 3071 3373 2890 2512 2724

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016For-Hire 852 819 822 580 735 884 907 927 1086 1115Private 14980 15195 13443 12685 12911 12782 13510 11547 10952 11170Shore 8457 8776 8332 7783 8930 9506 10817 8582 7686 7255Total Trips 24289 24790 22597 21047 22576 23172 25233 21056 19724 19540

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)5

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 1408 1936 1291 1634 2208 1462 1883 2681 1349 1288R 2616 3149 3856 3828 5899 3920 3269 2239 2167 2085

Drum (Gulf and southern kingfish)

H 1136 1305 1065 1421 939 918 1622 707 1173 1406R 842 728 576 624 539 536 474 358 248 595

Drum (sand and silver seatrouts)

H 3184 3556 4314 4701 5960 5056 3013 2674 3162 3112R 1911 1990 2444 1806 2540 2476 1851 482 675 1156

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 12104 15042 14147 10871 14719 13593 12762 5818 7800 9932R 18850 21017 17364 14565 19119 20215 19527 8932 9067 13104

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 1244 1615 1607 1195 2273 1596 1355 1391 1327 1060R 1222 1487 1339 1739 1633 1516 1672 1579 1562 925

Red drumH 3135 3560 2893 3516 3891 3013 4138 2115 2250 2049R 6222 7016 5525 6467 6449 6329 7701 3480 3912 2881

Red snapperH 1268 719 827 367 557 625 1289 559 805 1001R 3258 2111 2146 1436 1521 1425 2824 1786 1543 3175

Southern flounderH 701 538 691 802 858 836 1102 486 419 459R 240 122 193 220 222 310 339 73 83 49

Spanish mackerelH 1338 1899 1508 1577 1542 1841 3355 1722 1780 1997R 2104 2041 1636 2476 1942 1442 4159 2779 1200 962

Striped mulletH 1150 1259 742 1666 1902 2356 2984 2366 1949 2114R 157 146 225 126 313 204 195 293 68 300

Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 432633Private Boat 590553Shore 410695Total 1433882

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 2025330Other Equipment 885813Boat Expenses 5543627Vehicle Expenses 983006Second Home Expenses 130943Total Durable Expenditures 9568717

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 11002599

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Trips Jobs Sales Income Value AddedAlabama 2567 16114 1436429 616372 1029958West Florida 13219 60179 6827238 2575065 4111852Louisiana 2242 14142 1629917 608048 1003379Mississippi 1512 5351 637880 211438 344605Texas 1187 16030 2000004 746008 1237327

1 The Marine Recreational Program (MRIP) does not collect angler participation data for Texas2 Includes Louisiana resident participation estimated from historical MRIP data (2006-2013) and a state creel survey (2014-2015) 3 Data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but whether an angler is a resident of a region is not specified4 The Marine Recreational Program (MRIP) does not collect effort data for Texas5 Data on the number of fish released in Texas are not collected by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) and therefore not reported in this table

Tables | Alabama

176

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oAlabama | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Alabama Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 12058 555373 219712 287906 11911 535846 214883 280529

Commercial Harvesters 1977 106619 31624 47088 1977 106619 31624 47088Seafood Processors amp Dealers 2030 143433 56183 71397 1933 136560 53491 67975

Importers 40 12251 1963 3735 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 183 9641 3380 4353 181 9560 3351 4317

Retail 7829 283429 126561 161333 7820 283106 126417 161149

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 48845 44503 39624 26335 50910 46527 56832 70497 50940 64592Finfish amp Other 3686 4358 3662 2748 4072 5183 4680 4572 5023 4927Shellfish 45160 40145 35962 23587 46838 41344 52153 65925 45917 59665

Key SpeciesBlue crab 1711 1533 961 732 1128 1044 1036 1319 1225 1788Flounders 261 214 197 97 222 185 58 53 66 56Menhaden 71 59 42 15 58 84 104 147 154 164Mullets 984 1030 765 594 687 1206 1178 1046 761 514Oysters 2698 243 77 390 1322 1253 786 441 290 590Red snapper 213 239 263 329 314 316 401 697 1443 1423Sharks 250 403 275 111 381 330 247 219 262 256Shrimp 40742 38355 34894 22463 44361 39040 50321 64149 44399 57271Spanish mackerel 453 664 301 499 582 1149 940 472 705 833Vermillion snapper 323 507 841 384 622 393 88 387 247 242

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 29434 24612 29199 14063 26119 26335 23421 25790 26565 29355Finfish amp Other 4857 5577 4478 3441 4966 6596 5831 5276 5095 5115Shellfish 24578 19035 24721 10622 21153 19739 17590 20514 21470 24240

Key SpeciesBlue crab 2557 1799 1458 927 1617 1325 1025 1184 1300 1919Flounders 133 107 97 48 111 83 25 23 26 19Menhaden 470 268 190 81 364 521 496 700 695 804Mullets 1798 2017 1814 1202 1262 1946 1793 1829 1385 944Oysters 769 71 23 68 296 265 133 58 34 52Red snapper 59 61 65 83 78 78 108 180 356 320Sharks 315 424 328 140 450 495 343 272 392 401Shrimp 21247 17154 23215 9625 19224 18137 16418 19257 20132 22256Spanish mackerel 580 921 418 733 839 1377 972 431 617 859Vermillion snapper 129 199 346 148 224 132 28 124 74 76

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue crab 067 085 066 079 07 079 101 111 094 093Flounders 197 201 204 205 2 221 235 224 251 286Menhaden 015 022 022 018 016 016 021 021 022 02Mullets 055 051 042 049 054 062 066 057 055 054Oysters 351 341 333 575 447 472 591 76 862 1144Red snapper 362 393 404 397 404 405 37 386 405 445Sharks 079 095 084 079 085 067 072 081 067 064Shrimp 192 224 15 233 231 215 306 333 221 257Spanish mackerel 078 072 072 068 069 083 097 109 114 097Vermillion snapper 25 255 243 259 278 297 312 311 333 319

177

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Alabama | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 528 59410 21180 31020Private Boat 512 48766 14659 25245Shore 1100 92952 30450 51589

Total Durable Expenditures 13974 1235301 550083 922104Total State Economic Impacts 16114 1436429 616372 1029958

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 37554Private Boat 47904Shore 76315Total 161773

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 315526Other Equipment 103942Boat Expenses 1097700Vehicle Expenses 48043Second Home Expenses 24625Total Durable Expenditures 1589834

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1751607

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 253 192 205 195 295 254 279 220 225 274Non-Coastal 169 116 151 140 177 131 224 123 151 176Out-of-State 291 237 209 220 435 339 549 510 455 465Total Anglers 712 545 566 554 907 723 1052 853 831 915

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 75 56 56 34 75 59 90 87 98 103Private 985 946 885 840 1206 1035 1006 714 918 958Shore 901 702 772 812 1202 1211 1767 1368 1308 1505Total Trips 1961 1704 1713 1686 2483 2305 2862 2169 2324 2567

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Bluefish H 26 16 14 30 75 56 163 36 17 120R 175 54 46 80 167 197 639 518 192 740

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 463 1163 250 918 886 345 391 1105 539 334R 924 1371 1821 1861 2593 1206 886 1393 1401 638

Drum (kingfishes)1

H 476 668 593 633 626 227 929 322 350 436R 289 257 284 309 341 97 260 156 131 259

Drum (sand seatrout)

H 704 1216 1428 2069 2346 1415 486 524 881 1062R 481 409 752 835 743 480 294 246 317 567

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 359 269 318 610 826 773 539 242 522 679R 488 844 757 454 1301 1126 761 254 907 1499

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 320 289 166 218 480 313 285 121 316 94R 30 159 48 51 146 48 46 18 168 35

Red drum H 84 88 62 123 143 124 188 90 161 157R 136 227 110 151 150 305 425 318 254 304

Red snapper H 217 107 138 42 217 152 450 132 297 340R 851 340 394 288 488 194 857 758 610 1490

Southern flounder

H 96 93 139 243 163 155 84 29 50 28R 38 38 22 65 60 53 43 18 26 7

Spanish mackerel

H 92 111 76 255 334 516 1313 128 707 679R 21 32 60 101 128 148 1130 53 275 114

1 Kingfishes include southern kingfish and Gulf kingfish

178

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oAlabama | Marine Economy

2015 Alabama State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 318136 (13) 98540 (13) 1634391 (13) 6737 (11) 11025 (11) 19998 (11) 047

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 47 33 41 68 67 47 58 57 49Receipts 1547 1894 1809 3314 4354 1965 3069 3446 2901

Seafood salesretail

Firms 61 57 67 71 58 68 66 55 46Receipts 4279 5632 5484 5197 4759 7073 5520 4351 3274

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 23 23 22 21 16 17 22 23 20Employees 1510 1450 1086 1128 882 778 989 963 961

Payroll 32774 29277 24900 22824 21922 19730 22641 23973 25951

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 31 29 28 23 25 16 18 18 21Employees 395 494 339 332 321 306 281 388 378

Payroll 6202 8751 5893 5119 6547 6221 6861 9321 10034

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 33 33 31 34 32 32 28 31 32Employees ds ds 130 132 120 189 219 200 234

Payroll 1809 1710 2044 2016 1888 2990 3267 3330 3706

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 8 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 4Employees 48 ds ds ds 215 ds ds 45 ds

Payroll 3266 ds ds ds 13117 ds ds 2617 ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 5 7 7 5 6 5 5 2 2Employees 46 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll 3553 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 2 3 2 2 1 0 0 0Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 52 56 55 54 53 57 54 54 57

Employees 364 316 278 609 ds 329 332 343 387Payroll 9382 9170 8418 12149 12196 10253 9659 9804 11182

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 19 20 19 19 19 10 13 13 14Employees 491 756 658 548 536 ds 554 778 666

Payroll 21076 33244 27272 32143 34998 ds 34481 37273 37154Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 16 17 16 16 16 14 12 16 14Employees 338 287 294 276 283 241 208 124 121

Payroll 17554 16712 15383 14737 14981 8808 14761 6902 6922

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 4 5 5 3 6 3 2 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds 101 4 ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds 5788 160 ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 42 42 40 32 35 37 38 37 41Employees 3570 4435 3913 2598 3176 4936 5948 5904 6049

Payroll 172380 188543 159065 151813 166116 251063 303016 311296 342082

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | West Florida

180

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oWest Florida | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Florida1 Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 76749 16873652 3171513 5658897 11083 1081344 284434 437467

Commercial Harvesters 7158 520252 163093 217024 7158 520252 163093 217024Seafood Processors amp Dealers 4442 801532 155120 304952 580 112172 21709 42677

Importers 39207 12116639 1941923 3693682 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 9586 1226678 481589 599160 482 61714 24229 30144

Retail 16356 2208551 429788 844078 2862 387205 75404 147621

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 132162 123850 117324 139046 166015 143886 182172 212961 215678 196706

Finfish amp Other 46828 51698 49976 41321 59580 60710 67994 74935 67107 69389Shellfish 85334 72152 67349 97725 106434 83176 114178 138026 148572 127317

Key SpeciesBlue crab 5769 3289 4195 6706 7719 5142 6454 7385 8487 6127Gag 4348 4913 2759 2079 1439 2437 2799 2889 2782 4659Lobsters 24546 19175 12206 32752 35616 21136 46749 53418 44056 39371Mullets 3663 4172 5069 4188 8630 5050 11081 9387 6148 6336Oyster 6631 5519 6968 6298 8582 9706 5783 4178 4722 4266Quahog clam 914 1825 1524 1002 921 753 921 NA NA NARed grouper 11024 13591 10488 8992 15087 16737 16219 21217 18931 17836Red snapper 3066 2951 2980 4552 5417 6141 8073 8111 9997 8599Shrimp 20976 23265 24446 27554 28456 22161 29164 42690 53175 46958Stone crab 26213 19019 17806 23335 24430 23934 24710 27911 35758 28106

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 59784 60380 66387 63678 78459 63648 63231 81775 81626 75378

Finfish amp Other 31146 35740 39000 32251 42392 39077 38003 49090 37202 39929Shellfish 28638 24640 27386 31428 36067 24570 25227 32685 44424 35449

Key SpeciesBlue crab 6110 2660 3371 5759 6833 4157 4463 4456 4871 3515Gag 1339 1478 825 572 369 612 676 689 642 1073Lobsters 3405 2981 3961 5287 5303 3635 5601 5040 5451 4812Mullets 5619 6980 9167 7262 11410 7249 10879 11943 8595 8472Oyster 2959 2526 2877 2165 3100 3316 1298 757 844 722Quahog clam 116 279 255 156 137 128 183 NA NA NARed grouper 4352 5628 4387 3488 5635 6141 5412 6629 5664 5290Red snapper 919 849 863 1317 1538 1698 2181 2104 2642 2324Shrimp 8628 9942 11451 12892 11975 7958 9676 11946 18944 16864Stone crab 5884 6163 5382 5100 5460 5202 3767 1944 2758 2838

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Blue crab 094 124 124 116 113 124 145 166 174 174Gag 325 332 334 363 390 398 414 419 433 434Lobsters 721 643 308 619 672 581 835 1060 808 818Mullets 065 060 055 058 076 070 102 079 072 075Oyster 224 219 242 291 277 293 446 552 560 590Quahog clam 790 653 597 643 674 586 503 NA NA NARed grouper 253 241 239 258 268 273 300 320 334 337Red snapper 334 347 345 346 352 362 370 386 378 370Shrimp 243 234 213 214 238 278 301 357 281 278Stone crab 445 309 331 458 447 460 656 1436 1296 990

1 Information reported in this table is for the entire state of Florida not just West Florida2 NA = These data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

181

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

West Florida | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 4211 499717 179975 275706Private Boat 2502 260148 89392 154162Shore 1333 130653 45408 79359

Total Durable Expenditures 52133 5936720 2260290 3602625Total State Economic Impacts 60179 6827238 2575065 4111852

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 273518Private Boat 267642Shore 105111Total 646271

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 1129797Other Equipment 470826Boat Expenses 2687489Vehicle Expenses 274063Second Home Expenses 50660Total Durable Expenditures 4612836

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 5259107

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 1934 1820 1551 1538 1592 1718 1813 1649 1414 1393Non-Coastal1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAOut-of-State 2151 2029 1671 1470 1624 2141 2538 2716 2399 2306Total Anglers 4085 3849 3222 3008 3216 3859 4351 4365 3813 3699

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 612 571 573 461 536 699 684 694 786 807Private 10005 10145 8623 8160 7520 7865 8328 8115 6997 7363Shore 6319 6782 6482 5645 5845 6216 6937 6370 5643 5049Total Trips 16936 17497 15677 14266 13901 14780 15949 15179 13425 13219

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Common snook H 35 25 14 0 lt 1 lt 1 33 14 21 27R 1591 1595 1924 600 747 1040 1547 1578 2119 2366

Drum (sand and silver seatrouts)

H 1120 746 893 410 865 1415 706 578 396 187R 598 584 460 210 294 742 239 122 206 187

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 1514 1543 1371 1115 1475 1626 1406 1340 1295 1547R 10059 9584 7672 8470 11382 10920 7759 7936 7342 10023

Gag H 285 434 203 232 98 132 213 105 96 86R 2676 4077 2724 2018 1158 981 1170 818 483 745

Gray snapper H 1047 1393 1176 560 419 948 1482 1933 1449 1507R 4289 5690 3014 1858 2240 3126 5136 7519 5706 4647

King mackerel H 271 184 453 172 127 180 205 306 252 258R 85 155 138 81 47 62 87 118 73 105

Mullets3 H 613 1238 656 966 857 1549 1641 1480 1096 1490R 183 143 191 73 106 88 224 319 204 434

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 591 557 681 455 607 628 524 895 589 581R 894 855 808 1246 1275 1177 1084 1535 902 865

Red drum H 412 457 225 240 287 414 364 389 504 395R 2558 2561 1440 1992 2895 2299 2197 2647 3428 2292

Spanish mackerel H 1205 1754 1392 1284 1155 1215 1970 1566 1033 1204R 2065 1988 1546 2360 1780 1219 3017 2724 920 823

1 Data is not available because all West Florida residents are considered coastal county residents2 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish3 Mullets encompass species within the mullet genus including striped mullets

182

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oWest Florida | Marine Economy

2015 West Florida State Economy ( of national total)12

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient3

Totals 1948357 (8) 532830 (7) 7777990 (63) 33707 (54) 49239 (51) 88386 (49) 097

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 173 202 217 280 294 307 300 315 300Receipts 10497 11065 12473 14635 14618 17557 17214 22329 21841

Seafood salesretail

Firms 319 331 316 361 362 383 338 346 355Receipts 27557 26087 25667 27964 29037 30765 25332 26433 29033

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 20 23 25 27 24 27 25 27 27Employees 1748 1637 1143 1269 1095 1608 1374 1419 1429

Payroll 58233 53455 46235 45772 42612 51735 50003 50556 58246

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 267 229 215 229 250 226 234 233 242Employees 2308 1913 1762 1747 1913 1957 1878 1974 2055

Payroll 85019 75203 72159 70889 77115 75945 79266 83964 90247

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 169 168 158 145 145 151 165 166 181Employees 989 991 885 865 849 945 909 1037 1137

Payroll 20595 21604 21182 20783 20158 21577 23476 25844 29066

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 47 42 42 50 54 60 47 62 57Employees 1242 1106 972 709 753 1381 1050 1743 1815

Payroll 94429 50115 37774 50217 53341 100402 82078 175366 173004

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 69 57 58 61 65 75 69 77 76Employees 3190 2486 2801 2279 2374 3345 2485 2015 2154

Payroll 208144 169055 180139 159025 177386 231887 140564 131069 137786Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 34 31 33 29 29 39 31 28 32Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 10510

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 967938

MarinasEstablishments 493 442 428 430 411 432 444 464 466

Employees 4935 5024 4665 4439 4657 4918 5076 5421 5472Payroll 148592 151677 132955 133017 142997 148573 145265 168185 171354

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 53 56 59 55 64 43 58 61 69Employees 6585 8052 7288 7547 7484 4598 6258 6992 7834

Payroll 173788 192473 185309 191560 195458 86461 188997 179024 208186Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 145 147 145 145 150 151 180 190 196Employees 1484 894 829 980 1047 853 1390 878 861

Payroll 61470 56917 60641 76853 75561 68366 130893 74185 72483

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 29 40 32 34 32 66 61 56 55Employees 459 712 527 470 377 2082 555 588 987

Payroll 12872 24668 19006 20525 16879 72554 25439 20647 32032

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 296 297 261 248 246 258 259 263 278Employees 12332 12419 8221 7363 7909 8621 8813 9608 10913

Payroll 469382 442096 296537 302909 325942 374831 390853 448514 488050

1 All data presented on this page are for the entire state of Florida not just West Florida 2 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20153 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Tables | Louisiana

184

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oLouisiana | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Louisiana Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 36102 2021911 751727 1023361 35024 1836128 713007 958966

Commercial Harvesters 14635 794582 272048 397100 14635 794582 272048 397100Seafood Processors amp Dealers 2111 198996 77186 98454 2033 191662 74342 94826

Importers 483 149370 23939 45535 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 1065 129730 44195 57208 978 119105 40576 52523

Retail 17807 749233 334358 425063 17377 730778 326041 414517

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 289288 275701 286993 233559 324123 329754 399064 487718 373393 426116Finfish amp Other 65201 64118 62632 56912 102097 88989 103919 98773 109672 158548Shellfish 224087 211582 224361 176647 222026 240766 295145 388945 263720 267567

Key SpeciesBlue crab 35044 32203 37301 30325 36784 43921 51568 66706 58069 49408Crawfish 9034 9507 15547 13971 9914 8325 16490 16088 6851 11877King mackerel 1298 1307 1184 1149 1594 1475 1517 2414 2006 2152Menhaden 41368 45768 42555 43331 82881 63374 80262 72844 85322 132105Mullets 690 749 73 185 775 976 626 893 418 720Oysters 40148 39009 50950 24986 41652 42186 44872 67482 85090 68540Red snapper 2529 2038 2185 2311 2261 2551 4824 6427 6610 5948Shrimp 139842 130854 120555 107362 133670 146318 182210 238665 113700 137735Tunas 8334 4409 6338 1649 3369 7893 4595 4276 2743 4414Vermillion snapper 991 819 806 399 517 670 474 700 633 925

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 999343 919017 1007474 793377 1311040 1044376 993879 872507 1070077 1255333Finfish amp Other 814647 759440 806845 665677 1153921 878405 823989 687557 917426 1092079Shellfish 184696 159577 200629 127700 157119 165971 169890 184950 152652 163253

Key SpeciesBlue crab 45107 41714 53057 30752 43893 46327 39193 43219 41308 40100Crawfish 15848 15735 19312 14557 9599 6853 19676 13055 5461 13573King mackerel 879 789 927 691 1002 969 788 1167 1047 996Menhaden 789621 738092 785575 648561 1131287 853012 800101 663693 893789 1068690Mullets 1375 1503 189 362 1385 1385 609 1186 692 1005Oysters 12858 12840 15006 6874 11156 11368 11364 12692 14488 12053Red snapper 807 589 667 828 918 1028 1216 1489 1591 1444Shrimp 110860 89285 113250 75515 92469 101406 99655 115982 91390 97522Tunas 2476 1248 2009 490 932 2152 1241 1142 661 1211Vermillion snapper 517 409 412 186 234 291 174 242 213 335

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue crab 078 077 070 099 084 095 132 154 141 123Crawfish 057 060 081 096 103 121 084 123 125 088King mackerel 148 166 128 166 159 152 193 207 192 216Menhaden 005 006 005 007 007 007 010 011 010 012Mullets 050 050 039 051 056 070 103 075 060 072Oysters 312 304 340 363 373 371 395 532 587 569Red snapper 313 346 328 279 246 248 397 432 415 412Shrimp 126 147 106 142 145 144 183 206 124 141Tunas 337 353 316 337 362 367 370 374 415 365Vermillion snapper 192 200 195 215 221 230 273 289 297 276

185

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Louisiana | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 657 91711 35617 52914Private Boat 694 93278 24446 45273Shore 287 35654 9419 17411

Total Durable Expenditures 12504 1409274 538566 887781Total State Economic Impacts 14142 1629917 608048 1003379

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 53884Private Boat 73854Shore 29712Total 157451

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 242851Other Equipment 120737Boat Expenses 987716Vehicle Expenses 184993Second Home Expenses 15767Total Durable Expenditures 1552064

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1709515

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 853 795 669 609 690 651 709 NA NA NANon-Coastal 124 120 108 67 86 77 109 NA NA NAOut-of-State 157 170 139 120 183 165 262 NA NA NATotal Anglers 1134 1084 916 796 959 893 1080 NA NA NA

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016For-Hire 144 179 183 79 113 115 122 131 160 179Private 3156 3508 3176 3055 3342 2891 3190 2096 2264 2063Shore 889 933 769 729 1122 1131 1349 NA NA NATotal Trips 4188 4620 4128 3862 4576 4137 4661 2227 2424 2242

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black drum H 386 543 519 398 468 424 454 217 220 138R 729 1117 974 1033 1085 881 1638 NA NA NA

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 683 357 471 229 606 520 829 235 209 150R 1006 1187 1100 1268 2319 1675 1797 NA NA NA

Drum (sand seatrout)

H 888 1085 879 1065 1187 895 755 532 368 354R 541 825 854 514 1032 679 990 NA NA NA

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 8930 11705 10557 7857 10440 9608 9004 3231 4291 5326R 7394 9580 7975 5054 5803 6776 9709 NA NA NA

Drum(southern kingfish)

H 67 74 103 41 16 110 15 4 20 6R 28 118 59 47 25 40 65 NA NA NA

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 271 706 703 430 869 397 368 262 257 225R 287 448 473 439 188 237 477 NA NA NA

Red drum H 2308 2673 2237 2812 3023 2011 3169 1283 1242 1045R 3455 4075 3733 4111 3195 2871 4676 NA NA NA

Red snapper H 160 84 97 7 31 101 83 128 171 145R 285 262 195 7 108 131 224 NA NA NA

Southern flounder

H 349 235 286 327 399 331 685 209 217 222R 67 37 50 72 61 98 134 NA NA NA

Yellowfin tuna H 8 17 3 lt 1 13 25 11 14 23 28R lt 1 7 0 0 4 3 2 NA NA NA

1 Louisiana data not available for 2014-20162 Effort for 2014-2016 is estimated using data from a state creel survey and does not capture shore-based effort separately from private boat effort3 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish4 Harvest and release totals for 2014-2016 are estimated using data from a state creel survey

186

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oLouisiana | Marine Economy

2015 Louisiana State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 357815 (15) 105575 (14) 1724973 (14) 7668 (12) 12055 (12) 23807 (13) 233

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 85 77 68 120 94 78 99 111 115Receipts 6523 7365 5308 10358 9308 8492 9136 8632 10086

Seafood salesretail

Firms 196 182 173 197 192 184 173 177 169Receipts 20932 25900 17622 16001 18758 16804 17538 17383 17870

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 41 36 38 34 33 35 36 37 38Employees 1253 991 1301 1209 1006 1117 964 943 1015

Payroll 41391 32382 37657 35770 46440 51237 49339 50881 63909

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 119 98 98 97 94 103 106 109 111Employees 954 739 702 683 767 862 846 672 865

Payroll 21604 15858 17261 15554 18427 22296 23235 24107 25837

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 101 107 106 101 100 97 94 90 90Employees 781 681 703 527 590 704 643 562 612

Payroll 11827 11141 11564 11214 11090 13042 11213 10421 11802

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 138 123 117 125 125 105 102 124 116Employees 7680 6506 6077 5610 5834 6422 5317 6275 5212

Payroll 527290 549388 391914 405796 417362 497165 458589 556693 396625

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 22 18 21 16 17 18 11 19 21Employees 685 1095 1192 93 93 ds 95 ds 451

Payroll 39843 87479 91760 6147 5608 ds 5435 ds 21706Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 3 2 2 1 3 2 4 4 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds 3 ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds 363 ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 50 43 43 43 45 44 41 39 36

Employees 378 274 244 314 329 257 250 229 194Payroll 17794 9581 8989 14716 10771 9209 8693 7276 4683

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 49 39 44 41 42 37 44 49 45Employees 2978 2010 2193 2511 2526 2016 2834 3106 3418

Payroll 128207 85484 92883 105063 108491 93896 174054 212786 175092Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 128 145 137 138 138 136 133 137 142Employees 2508 2884 2893 3176 3396 2545 2533 2816 2862

Payroll 141757 183381 175271 224533 208306 162094 169795 206318 218379

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 14 22 17 21 20 46 18 14 15Employees 467 517 440 431 461 1205 443 ds 399

Payroll 31734 37181 33907 38776 38745 80780 37122 ds 37866

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 112 117 109 109 109 116 110 117 109Employees 12808 12815 12521 11737 11722 10933 7413 8512 8470

Payroll 503199 619606 613188 600259 639047 631098 416319 479243 401977

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Tables | Mississippi

188

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMississippi | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Mississipi Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 4586 217948 87253 112697 4578 216661 86981 112250

Commercial Harvesters 841 46904 14225 20823 841 46904 14225 20823Seafood Processors amp Dealers 708 59308 23463 29400 707 59216 23427 29355

Importers 3 1020 163 311 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 60 6243 2203 2775 60 6172 2178 2744

Retail 2973 104473 47199 59387 2970 104368 47151 59328

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 39340 43696 37956 21895 30291 49337 34970 26014 68535 28969

Finfish amp Other 21359 19233 18667 8963 10527 23172 10938 8102 53743 11830Shellfish 17981 24464 19289 12932 19764 26165 24032 17912 14792 17139

Key SpeciesBlue crab 741 447 573 366 318 724 416 997 1209 895Flounders 58 40 58 64 118 101 45 55 76 75Menhaden 20658 18534 17987 8378 9871 22394 10230 7358 52962 10973Mullets 35 32 30 31 56 63 61 25 12 22Oysters 819 6858 6094 4268 928 1596 1544 1685 969 1088Red snapper NA NA 158 NA 168 226 NA 307 NA NAShrimp 16418 17146 12612 8293 18514 23846 22072 15229 12613 15156

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 227834 201822 230255 111229 278075 263640 180600 190555 307035 307565

Finfish amp Other 216375 190191 217461 105274 267407 249382 171000 184393 294723 294641Shellfish 11459 11631 12794 5955 10668 14259 9599 6162 12312 12923

Key SpeciesBlue crab 737 450 545 366 370 782 359 570 798 773Flounders 25 17 25 28 55 43 19 21 29 27Menhaden 215182 189118 216709 104729 266774 248824 170500 183950 294233 294189Mullets 70 57 62 59 93 99 95 39 21 40Oysters 299 2606 2189 1453 247 425 336 321 182 245Red snapper NA NA 57 NA 86 115 NA 170 NA NAShrimp 10421 8570 10054 4135 10048 13051 8903 5270 11332 11905

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Blue crab 101 099 105 100 086 093 116 175 151 116Flounders 238 236 234 233 214 233 238 266 261 283Menhaden 010 010 008 008 004 009 006 004 018 004Mullets 050 057 048 052 061 064 064 064 056 055Oysters 274 263 278 294 375 375 459 525 532 444Red snapper NA NA 275 NA 196 197 NA 181 NA NAShrimp 158 200 125 201 184 183 248 289 111 127

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

189

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Mississippi | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 91 10531 3625 5225Private Boat 215 24227 6300 10518Shore 100 9514 2667 4454

Total Durable Expenditures 4945 593608 198846 324408Total State Economic Impacts 5351 637880 211438 344605

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 6250Private Boat 27039Shore 9768Total 43057

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 85603Other Equipment 43333Boat Expenses 277687Vehicle Expenses 81652Second Home Expenses 291Total Durable Expenditures 488566

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 531623

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 196 119 125 137 160 179 171 171 195 156Non-Coastal 34 26 36 29 48 60 67 62 48 83Out-of-State 55 48 50 50 60 91 101 94 114 106Total Anglers 284 194 212 216 268 331 339 328 357 345

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 21 13 11 7 11 11 11 16 42 25Private 834 596 759 629 843 991 986 621 773 786Shore 349 359 310 597 761 948 764 843 736 701Total Trips 1204 969 1079 1233 1615 1950 1761 1481 1551 1512

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 72 182 340 209 453 317 330 820 328 582R 264 388 715 422 606 695 330 375 710 1258

Drum (kingfishes)2

H 161 180 126 174 177 234 519 190 550 655R 48 57 61 47 36 157 94 32 54 121

Drum (sand and silver seatrouts)

H 296 351 1003 986 1336 1151 916 891 1406 1373R 230 166 378 246 472 574 327 113 152 402

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 385 608 1090 556 841 776 1016 415 867 1356R 909 1008 960 586 633 1394 1298 743 818 1581

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 17 17 22 43 260 115 93 75 113 54R 11 25 9 3 24 54 65 27 492 26

Red drum H 43 77 84 77 91 140 148 106 100 165R 73 153 241 213 208 853 403 515 229 286

Red snapper H 2 9 15 1 7 27 35 6 7 45R 9 103 55 25 lt 1 2 95 42 194 165

Sharks3 H 5 3 21 70 35 16 89 6 13 5R 43 31 36 87 38 104 75 44 12 76

Southern flounder

H 121 109 209 196 182 227 215 168 64 93R 31 45 120 79 99 153 159 54 57 38

Striped mullet H 66 79 119 188 491 396 647 602 712 465R 14 4 4 13 83 108 19 5 43 6

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish 2 Kingfishes include southern kingfish and Gulf kingfish3 Sharks include species within the requiem shark family blacktip sharks Atlantic sharpnose sharks and unidentified sharks

190

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMississippi | Marine Economy

2015 Mississippi State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 209279 (09) 58662 (08) 926391 (07) 3395 (05) 5745 (06) 10587 (06) 104

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms ds 17 16 30 25 27 ds 21 12Receipts ds 1055 753 1937 2108 930 ds 1932 1539

Seafood salesretail

Firms 57 48 56 69 51 50 54 42 53Receipts 4126 3437 4206 3421 3505 3957 3855 3129 4053

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 22 20 20 20 18 18 19 19 18Employees 3022 3062 2796 2849 2464 2368 2284 2289 2370

Payroll 60633 61723 61926 61731 52502 55407 59212 57324 60906

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 25 18 16 18 18 17 14 14 14Employees 106 61 113 ds 64 102 ds ds 39

Payroll 3285 3088 2836 2542 2532 4412 1546 1587 1800

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 15 18 14 15 17 13 13 10 8Employees ds 50 46 50 58 ds ds ds 96

Payroll ds 699 841 810 838 1902 ds ds 2672

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 4 5 5 4 4 4 6 4 4Employees ds 119 114 ds 127 ds 230 277 259

Payroll 7585 8351 7730 8058 7233 ds 17080 16365 17353

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1Employees ds NA ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds NA ds ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Employees ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 19 17 13 18 19 16 16 18 17

Employees ds 111 172 183 189 204 154 193 197Payroll 2145 2794 3479 4163 5137 5361 3972 4960 5047

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 5 7 8 7 7 2 4 5 5Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 241

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 10390Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 9 8 7 8 6 7 6 7 7Employees ds ds ds 141 ds ds ds ds 57

Payroll 1754 ds ds 6982 ds ds ds ds 2698

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 23 24 20 20 20 18 19 18 18Employees 14578 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 14722

Payroll 615837 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 892317

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Texas

192

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oTexas | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Texas Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 21507 2091002 597409 898617 16352 1079847 394235 552041

Commercial Harvesters 4446 411184 122134 193538 4446 411184 122134 193538Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1466 134823 50719 66799 1336 122801 46197 60842

Importers 2682 828853 132839 252671 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 1035 153639 51263 70990 490 72696 24256 33589

Retail 11877 562503 240453 314620 10081 473167 201649 264071

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 180575 176098 154530 203795 240566 215365 268519 262589 177973 195668Finfish amp Other 9452 7709 7488 7888 8445 10231 13361 13709 16188 17455Shellfish 171123 168389 147043 195907 232121 205134 255158 248880 161785 178213

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 450 446 484 531 622 743 819 681 NA NABlack drum 1660 1363 1377 1573 1448 1491 1699 1981 2074 2266Blue crab 2763 2342 2454 3134 2845 2878 2331 3050 5534 6414Flounders 62 144 91 62 205 175 73 97 187 236Groupers 474 606 695 389 572 774 1168 1156 1483 1601Oysters 19246 8835 9376 19144 12789 21302 23465 19221 8254 15915Red snapper 3762 2744 2398 3009 3254 4448 7324 7617 9387 10480Shrimp 149084 157187 135100 173556 216382 180844 229289 226535 147957 155829Tunas NA 94 139 4 2 5 7 14 3 NAVermilion snapper 1554 1430 1233 1337 1274 1434 659 604 920 572

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 87912 73048 102351 89721 98857 91596 85113 74674 81848 76822

Finfish amp Other 4800 3866 4134 4247 4224 4225 4872 4842 5438 5671Shellfish 83111 69182 98216 85475 94633 87371 80241 69832 76410 71151

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 62 59 63 67 79 89 96 78 NA NABlack drum 1687 1468 1610 1729 1795 1623 1689 1747 1879 1973Blue crab 3454 2635 2844 3436 2893 2853 1902 2234 4331 4990Flounders 24 58 32 26 75 60 20 25 51 63Groupers 161 188 227 156 199 227 306 281 355 375Oysters 5633 2679 2733 5265 3943 5817 6126 4129 1587 2903Red snapper 1213 870 851 1031 948 1123 1800 1797 2152 2369Shrimp 74007 63855 92602 76734 87753 78665 72186 63448 70475 63240Tunas NA 22 45 1 1 3 3 6 1 NAVermilion snapper 672 592 561 539 465 511 234 203 307 188

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atlantic croaker 729 758 764 798 784 831 855 877 NA NABlack drum 098 093 086 091 081 092 101 113 110 115Blue crab 080 089 086 091 098 101 123 137 128 129Flounders 255 248 284 237 275 294 355 389 365 373Groupers 295 322 306 249 287 341 381 412 418 427Oysters 342 330 343 364 324 366 383 466 520 548Red snapper 310 315 282 292 343 396 407 424 436 442Shrimp 201 246 146 226 247 230 318 357 210 246Tunas NA 426 308 319 182 183 210 229 243 NAVermilion snapper 231 242 220 248 274 281 281 298 300 304

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

193

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Texas | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 867 115114 42016 64744Private Boat 2129 274752 82530 149912Shore 2595 300626 93946 169102

Total Durable Expenditures 10439 1309512 527516 853569Total State Economic Impacts 16030 2000004 746008 1237327

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)1

Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 61427Private Boat 174114Shore 189789Total 425330

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 251553Other Equipment 146975Boat Expenses 493035Vehicle Expenses 394255Second Home Expenses 39600Total Durable Expenditures 1325417

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1750747

Harvest (H) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Black drum 66 82 98 165 129 257 150 139 128 138Drum (Atlantic croaker) 95 64 117 125 157 157 152 117 214 126

Drum (sand seatrout) 95 152 111 127 227 177 151 147 110 135

Drum (spotted seatrout) 916 917 810 732 1137 810 796 590 825 1025

King mackerel 11 8 16 6 9 9 10 13 9 12Porgies (sheepshead) 46 46 34 49 57 143 84 39 51 106

Red drum 289 266 285 264 347 323 269 247 241 288Red snapper 45 41 31 33 36 34 48 40 50 31Southern flounder 49 64 47 30 92 96 92 71 85 104

1 The Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) does not collect participation (number of anglers) or effort (number of trips) data for TexasTo calculate trip expenditure estimates effort by fishing mode was estimated based on 2013 data provided by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department(TPWD) These effort estimates were reviewed by the TPWD To calculate angler expenditure estimates (durable equipment expenditures) participationestimates were based on the sum of saltwater licenses sold in Texas plus a proportion of combination licenses sold in Texas A change in the method ofreporting landings occurred in 2007 so data from 2007 is not comparable to earlier years 2 Data collected by the TPWD is reported in this table The data collected by the TPWD differs from the data collected and reported in the MRIP Data onthe number of fish released are not reported by TPWD Please see the TPWD for more information wwwtpwdstatetxusfishboat

194

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oTexas | Marine Economy

2015 Texas State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 2150702 (88) 569091 (74) 10239710 (83) 5211 (83) 80268 (83) 161119 (9) 026

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 94 85 82 99 119 123 123 128 178Receipts 5386 3466 3858 3224 5734 6675 7484 6706 11051

Seafood salesretail

Firms 182 188 196 184 171 194 173 199 178Receipts 17442 18204 13177 12124 13433 14891 15094 15160 15660

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 26 27 24 22 24 22 30 32 29Employees 1207 1169 1026 1184 1273 1248 1026 1062 1006

Payroll 27813 27045 29006 24961 26425 27737 27638 28643 29729

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 104 69 75 77 82 71 75 89 90Employees 970 734 683 715 723 603 729 816 874

Payroll 51597 24498 23650 23879 26356 25309 30370 35553 37315

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 62 60 51 52 50 60 60 59 62Employees 189 206 189 199 ds ds 331 395 415

Payroll 3703 3403 3393 3742 4090 6102 6891 8201 9319

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 43 42 43 48 48 39 42 48 48Employees 2513 2815 2729 1909 1764 1814 2253 2227 2058

Payroll 131946 251997 200219 161080 177549 174686 207831 215950 208286

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 41 35 36 30 39 40 33 33 35Employees 920 514 802 764 860 742 ds 790 639

Payroll 49761 40764 61309 63408 71515 65818 44902 55106 47119Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 4 3 2 1 1 0 2 2 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds NA ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds NA ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 141 143 131 148 144 132 124 128 138

Employees 1200 1486 1423 1198 1233 1169 1258 1222 1209Payroll 28359 34039 33803 33968 34928 34711 36461 36776 37054

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 62 55 57 54 55 42 48 53 56Employees 6237 6313 6276 5262 5259 4373 6390 7451 8179

Payroll 186416 196006 167562 166877 153360 130817 272286 327690 324552Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 90 99 95 87 91 91 89 93 91Employees 1709 1884 1849 1606 1448 1676 1485 1588 1415

Payroll 125061 137962 137289 132283 113444 124500 130572 139259 144090

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 15 24 30 29 26 37 27 25 25Employees 98 ds 421 ds 439 1381 630 387 395

Payroll 5163 10538 13778 18627 18842 55470 25229 13544 16436

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 96 102 99 97 91 89 87 88 84Employees 4810 5368 3891 3386 2773 5601 5686 5178 4956

Payroll 210275 235190 158261 147492 153077 310230 297248 306571 283838

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Data Sources

Fish on the line Photo NOAA FisheriesMelanie King

196

Data Sources

MANAGEMENT CONTEXT

bull Excess Harvesting Capacity in US Fisheries A Report to Congress April 28 2008 National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpwwwpcouncilorgbb20080608C2b_SUP_ATT2_0608pdf

bull rdquoStatus of US Fisheriesrdquo Office of Sustainable Fisheries National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationalpopulation-assessmentsstatus-us-fisheries

bull rdquoEndangered Species Act (ESA)rdquo Office of Protected Resources National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationalendangered-species-conservationendangered-species-act

bull rdquoCertified Fisheriesrdquo Marine Stewardship Council wwwmscorgbull rdquoCatch Sharesrdquo Office of Sustainable Fisheries National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric

Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationallaws-and-policiescatch-shares

Fishery Management Councils amp Fishery Plansbull Caribbean Fishery Management Council wwwcaribbeanfmccombull Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council wwwgulfcouncilorgbull Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council wwwmafmcorgbull New England Fishery Management Council wwwnefmcorgbull North Pacific Fishery Management Council wwwnpfmcorgbull Pacific Fishery Management Council wwwpcouncilorgbull South Atlantic Fishery Management Council wwwsafmcnetbull Western Pacific Fishery Management Council wwwwpcouncilorg

COMMERCIAL FISHERIES Data for New England Mid-Atlantic South Atlantic Gulf of Mexico North Pacific Pacific and Western Pacific Regionsbull Commercial Landings Database Obtained December 5 2017 Office of Science amp Technology National Marine

Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovtopiccommercial-fishingoverview

Pacific cod flatfish Atka mackerel walleye pollock rockfish and sablefish data North Pacific Regionbull Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric

Administration (NOAA Fisheries) Obtained December 5 2017 wwwafscnoaagov

Economic Impacts of the US Commercial Seafood Industrybull A Userrsquos Guide to the National and Coastal State IO Model

httpwwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf

Additional informationbull rdquoData Caveatsrdquo Office of Science amp Technology National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovcommercial-fisheriescommercial-landingsdata-caveatsindex

bull rdquoNOAA Fisheries Economics amp Social Sciences Programrdquo Office of Science amp Technology National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) wwwstnmfsnoaagovst5indexhtml

197

Data Sources

RECREATIONAL FISHERIES

Data for New England Mid-Atlantic South Atlantic Gulf of Mexico and Western Pacific Regionsbull Recreational Fishery Statistics Queriesrdquo Obtained August 15 2017 Office of Science amp Technology National

Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovrecreational-fishing-datarecreational-fishing-data-and-statistics-queriesrun-a-data-query

Data for Pacific Regionbull Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Recreational Fisheries Information Network (RecFIN) Obtained

September 12 2017 httpwwwrecfinorg

Data for North Pacific Regionbull Alaska Department of Fish amp Game Obtained October 26 2017 httpwwwadfgstateakus

Data for Texas (Gulf of Mexico Region)bull Texas Parks amp Wildlife Department Obtained June 30 2017 wwwtpwdstatetxusbull Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Obtained June 30 2017 httpwwwwlflouisianagov

Recreational Fishing Expenditures and Impactsbull Lovell Sabrina James Hilger Emily Rollins and Scott Steinback 2019 Marine Angler Trip Expenditures in the

United States 2017 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Draft Reportbull Lovell Sabrina Scott Steinback and James Hilger 2013 The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler

Expenditures in the United States 2011 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-134 188p httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovAssetseconomicspublicationsAnglerExpenditureReport2011pdfThe20Economic20Contribution20of20Marine20Angler20Expenditures20in20the20United20States202011pdf

bull Lovell J Sabrina James Hilger Scott Steinback and Clifford Hutt 2016 The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures on Durable Goods in the United States 2014 US Dept of Commerce US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-165 72p httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovAssetseconomicsdurable-expendituresdocumentsTM165_Durable_Goods_2014pdf

THE MARINE ECONOMY

bull rdquoCounty Business Patterns Data Seriesrdquo Obtained September 26 2017 US Census Bureau httpswwwcensusgovprograms-surveyscbphtml

bull rdquoGross Domestic Product by Staterdquo Obtained September 26 2017 Bureau of Economic Analysis httpwwwbeagoviTableiTablecfmreqid=70ampstep=1ampisuri=1ampacrdn=2reqid=70ampstep=1ampisuri=1

bull rdquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo Obtained September 26 2017 Bureau of Labor Statistics httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm

bull rdquoNonemployer Statisticsrdquo Obtained September 26 2017 US Census Bureau httpswwwcensusgovprograms-surveysnonemployer-statisticshtml

Publications

Herring catch Photo NOAA Northeast Fisheries Science Center

200

Publications

Selected publications by NOAA Fisheries Economics and Social Sciences Program staff are grouped by geographic region of focus and then organized under the following categories

Climate Change ResearchCoastal amp Marine Recreation ResearchCommercial Fisheries Economics ResearchSpatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchOcean Policy amp Management ResearchOther Marine Environmental Research

Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchHabitat Economics ResearchSeafood Marketing amp Trade ResearchSociocultural ResearchUS Territories amp International Fisheries ResearchProtected Resources Economics Research

United StatesUNITED STATES | Climate Change ResearchHimes-Cornell A and M Orbach 2013 Impacts of Climate Change on Human Uses of the Ocean Oceans and Marine Resources in a Changing Climate Technical Input to the 2013 National Climate Assessment Griffis R and J Howard eds Washington DC Island Press pp 64-118

Himes-Cornell A S Allen G Auad M Boatman P Clay M Dalton S Herrick D Kotowicz P Little C Lopez P Loring P Niemeier K Norman L Pfeiffer M Plummer M Rust M Singer and C Speirs 2013 Impacts of Climate Change on Human uses of the Ocean and Ocean Services Section 4 Oceans and Marine Resources in a Changing Climate Technical Input to the 2013 National Climate Assessment US Global Change Research Program Washington DC pp 73-137

Howard J E Babij R Griffis B Helmuth A Himes-Cornell P Niemier M Orbach L Petes S Allen G Auad R Beard M Boatman N Bond T Boyer D Brown P Clay K Crane S Cross M Dalton J Diamond R Diaz Q Dortch E Duffy D Fauquier W Fisher M Graham B Halpern L Hansen B Hayum S Herrick AHollowed D Hutchins E Jewett D Jin N Knowlton D Kotowicz T Kristiansen P Little C Lopez P LoringR Lumpkin A Mace K Mengerink J Ru Morrison Jason Murray K Norman J Orsquodonnell J Overland RParsons N Pettigrew L Pfeiffer E Pidgeon M Plummer J Polovina J Quintrell T Rowles J Runge MRust E Sanford U Send M Singer C Speir D Stanitski C Thornber C Wilson and Y Xue 2013 Oceansand Marine Resources in a Changing Climate Oceanography and Marine Biology An Annual Review 51 71-192

Ocean and Coastal Indicator Technical Team (R Griffis L Mcgilvray D Cahoon T Clay E Curchitser K Curtis J Devivo B Duncan S Gill J Grear B Halpern J Hare A Himes-Cornell J Howard R Johnston MKenney D Legler E Lindstrom T OrsquoBrien S Rumrill E Thunberg T Webler J West R Wood S Zador SBusch and E Fly) 2013 Research priorities to advance the oceans and coasts climate indicators system Reportto the National Climate Assessment Indicator System Working Group Project information available at httpwwwglobalchangegovwhat-we-doassessmentindicators-system

Babij E P Niemeier B Hayum A Himes-Cornell A Hollowed P Little M Orbach and E Pidgeon 2012 International Implications of Climate Change Section 5 in Oceans and Marine Resources in a Changing Climate Technical Input to the 2013 National Climate Assessment US Global Change Research Program Washington DC pp 138-162

201

Publications

Haynie A and L Pfeiffer 2012 Why Economics Matters for Understanding the Effects of Climate Change on Fisheries ICES Journal of Marine Science DOI 101093icesjmsfss021

McIlgorm A S Hanna G Knapp P Flocrsquoh F Millerd and M Pan 2010 How will climate change alter fishery governance Insights from seven international case studies Marine Policy 34(1) 170-177

Dalton M B OrsquoNeill A Prskawetz L Jiang and J Pitkin 2008 Population aging and future carbon emissions in the United States Energy Economics 30(2) 642-675

Hannesson R M Barange and S Herrick eds 2006 Climate Change and the Economics of the Worldrsquos Fisheries UK Edward Elgar 310p

Dalton M 2002 Synthesizing trends of the twentieth century population and climate change Climatic Change 55 409-412

UNITED STATES | Coastal amp Marine Recreation Research Marvasti A 2013 Estimating Outdoor Recreation Demand A Revealed Preference Approach Ocean and Coastal Management 71(1) 170-175

UNITED STATES | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchHolland D E Thunberg J Agar S Crosson C Demarest S Kasperski L Perruso E Steiner J Stephen A Strelcheck and M Travis 2015 US Catch Share Markets A Review of Data Availability and Impediments to Transparent Markets Marine Policy 57(2015) 103ndash110

Kroetz K J Sanchirico and D Lew 2015 Efficiency Costs of Social Objectives in Tradable Permit Programs Forthcoming in the Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists

Collier T A Mamula and J Ruggiero 2014 Estimation of multi-output production functions in commercial fisheries Omega 42(1) 157-165

Holland D E Thunberg J Agar S Crosson C Demarest S Kasperski L Perruso E Steiner J Stephen A Strelcheck and M Travis 2014 US Catch Share Markets A Review of Characteristics and Data Availability US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-145 67p

Kasperski S 2014 Optimal Multi-Species Harvesting in Ecologically and Economically Interdependent Fisheries Environmental and Resource Economics DOI 101007s10640-014-9805-9

Walden J J Agar R Felthoven A Harley S Kasperski J Lee T Lee A Mamula J Stephen A Strelcheck and E Thunberg 2014 Productivity Change in US Catch Share Fisheries US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-146

Crosson S T Yandle and B Stoffle 2013 Renegotiating property rights in the Florida golden crab fishery International Journal of the Commons 7(2) 521-548

Fissel B B Gilbert and J LaRiviere 2013 Technology Adoption and Diffusion with Uncertainty in a Commons Economic Letters 120(2) 297-301

202

Publications

Lee M-Y and E Thunberg 2013 An Inverse Demand System for New England Groundfish Welfare Analysis of the Transition to Catch Share Management American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95(5) 1178-1195

Schnier K and R Felthoven 2013 Production Efficiency and Exit in Rights-Based Fisheries Land Economics 89(3) 538-557

Abbott J and A Haynie 2012 What are we Protecting Fisher behavior and the unintended consequences of spatial closures as a fishery management tool Ecological Applications 22(3) 762-777

Hospital J and C Beavers 2012 Economic and Social Characteristics of Bottomfish Fishing in the Main Hawaiian Islands US Dept of Commerce Administrative Report H-12-01

Lian C 2012 West Coast Open Access Groundfish and Salmon Troller Survey Protocol and Results for 2005 and 2006 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-116

Fell H and A Haynie 2011 Estimating Time-varying Bargaining Power A Fishery Application Economic Inquiry 49(3) 685-696 DOI 101111j1465-7295200900275x

Walden J and D Tomberlin 2010 Estimating Fishing Vessel Capacity A Comparison of Nonparametric Frontier Approaches Marine Resource Economics 25(1) 23-36

Smith M C Roheim L Crowder B Halpern M Turnipseed J Anderson F Asche L Bourilln A Guttormsen A Khan L Liguori A McNevin M OConnor D Squires P Tyedmers C Brownstein K Carden D Klinger R Sagarin and K Selkoe 2010 Sustainability and Global Seafood Science 327(5967) 784-786

Squires D Y Jeon R Grafton and J Kirkley 2010 Controlling Excess Capacity in Common-Pool Resource Industries The Transition from Input to Output Controls Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 54(3) 361-377

Herrick S J Norton R Hannesson U Sumaila M Ahmed and J Pena-Torres 2010 Global production and economics of small pelagic fish Climate Change and Small Pelagic Fish Checkley DM J Alheit Y Oozeki and C Roy eds pp 256-274 New York Cambridge University Press

Holland D 2010 Markets Pooling and Insurance for Managing Bycatch in Fisheries Ecological Economics 70(1) 121-133

Squires D 2010 Fisheries Buybacks A Review and Guidelines Fish and Fisheries 11(4) 366-387

Grafton R R Hilborn D Squires and M Williams 2010 Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management At the Crossroads Chapter 1 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management RQ Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait and M Williams eds pp 1-19 Oxford Oxford University Press

Squires D T Groves R Grafton R Curtis J Joseph and R Allen 2010 Fisheries Buybacks Chapter 37 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management RQ Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait and M Williams eds pp 507-519 Oxford Oxford University Press

Walden J J Kirkley and R Fre 2010 Measuring and managing fishing capacity Chapter 40 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management RQ Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait and M Williams eds pp 546-554 Oxford Oxford University Press

203

Publications

Smith C and P Clay 2010 Measuring Subjective and Objective Well-Being Examples from Five Commercial Fisheries Human Organization 69(2) 158-168

Holland D and G Herrera 2010 The Benefits and Risks of Increased Spatial Resolution in Management of Fishery Metapopulations Under Uncertainty Natural Resource Modeling 23(4) 494-520

Felthoven R K Schnier and W Horrace 2009 Estimating Heterogeneous Primal Capacity and Capacity Utilization Measures in a Multi-Species Fishery Journal of Productivity Analysis 32 173-189

Grafton R R Hilborn L Ridgeway D Squires M Williams S Garcia T Groves R Hilborn J Joseph K Kelleher TKompas G Libecap C Lundin M Makino T Matthiasson R McLoughlin A Parma G San Marin B Satia C-CSchmidt M Tait and L Zhang 2008 Positioning Fisheries in a Changing World Marine Policy 32(4) 630-634

Milazzo M J Terry and J Walden 2008 Excess Harvesting Capacity in US Fisheries A Report to Congress US Dept of Commerce National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service 101p Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovmsa2007docs042808_312_b_6_reportpdf

Terry J J Walden and J Kirkley 2008 National Assessment of Excess Harvesting Capacity in Federally Managed Commercial Fisheries US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-93 366p Available at httpsponwrnoaagovtmspo93pdf

Kirkley J J Walden and J Waters 2007 Buyback programs goals objectives and industry restructuring in fisheries Fisheries Buybacks R Curtis and D Squires eds pp 227-237 Blackwell Publishing

Kirkley J J Walden and J Ward 2007 The status of USArsquos commercial fisheries and management and crystal-balling the future International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 7(23) 119-136

Terry J 2007 An assessment of the use of capacity analysis in US federal fishery management Marine Resource Economics 22 99-103

Curtis R and D Squires eds 2007 Fisheries Buybacks pp 288 Oxford Blackwell Publishing

Grafton R R Arnason T Bjoslashrndal D Campbell H Campbell C W Clark R Connor D Dupont R Hannesson R Hilborn J Kirkley T Kompas D Lane G Munro S Pascoe D Squires S Steinshamn B Turris and Q Weninger 2006 Incentive-based approaches to sustainable fisheries Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63(3) 699-710

Branch T R Hilborn A Haynie G Fay L Flynn J Griffiths K Marshall J Randall J Scheuerell E Ward and M Young 2006 Fleet dynamics and Fishermen Behavior Lessons for Fisheries Managers Canadian Journal ofFisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63(7) 1647-1668

Kerstens K N Vestergaard and D Squires 2006 A short-run Johansen industry model for common-pool resources planning a fisheryrsquos industrial capacity to curb overfishing European Review of Agricultural Economics 33(3) 1-29

Kerstens K D Squires and N Vestergaard 2006 Methodological reflections on the short-run Johansen industry model in relation to capacity management Marine Resource Economics 20(4) 425-443

204

Publications

Seung C and E Waters 2006 A Review of Regional Economic Models for Fisheries Management in the US Marine Resource Economics 21(1) 101-124

Grafton Q J Kirkley T Kompas and D Squires 2006 Economics for Fisheries Management Aldershot England Ashgate Publishing 165p

Kirkley J J Ward J Nance F Patella K Brewster-Geisz C Rogers E Thunberg J Walden W Daspit B Stenberg S Freese J Hastie S Holiman and M Travis 2006 Reducing Capacity in US Managed Fisheries US Dept ofCommerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-76 45p Available at httpsponwrnoaagovtmtm76pdf

Seung C and E Waters 2005 A Review of Regional Economic Models for Alaska fisheries Alaska Fisheries Science Center Processed Report 2005-01

Edwards S 2005 Ownership of multi-attribute fishery resources in Large Marine Ecosystems Sustaining Large Marine Ecosystems The Human Dimension T Hennessey and J Sutinen eds pp 137-154 New York Elsevier

Edwards S J Link and B Rountree 2004 Portfolio management of wild fish stocks Ecological Economics 49(3) 317-329

Agar J and J Sutinen 2004 Rebuilding strategies for multispecies fisheries a stylized bioeconomic model Environmental and Resource Economics 29(1) 1-29

Felthoven R and C Morrison Paul 2004 Directions for Productivity Measurement in Fisheries Marine Policy 28 161-169

Ward J P Mace and E Thunberg 2004 The relationship of fish harvesting capacity to excess capacity and overcapacity Marine Resource Economics 19(4) 525-529

Felthoven R 2004 Methods for Estimating Fishing Capacity with Routinely Collected Data A Comparison Review of International Fisheries Law and Policy 1(2) 125-137

Edwards S 2003 Property rights to multi-attribute fishery resources Ecological Economics 44(2-3) 309-323

Kitts A and S Edwards 2003 Cooperatives in fisheries realizing the potential of the Fishermenrsquos Collective Marketing Act Marine Policy 27 357-366

Curtis R and C Sarmiento 2002 Identification of economies of scope in a stochastic production environment Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 50(3) 257-267

Grafton R and D Squires 2002 A property-rights perspective of efficiency privatizing the commons Efficiency in the Public Sector KJ Fox ed pp 83-100 Boston Massachusetts Dordrecht and London

Kirkley J C Morrison Paul and D Squires 2002 Capacity and capacity utilization in common-pool resource industries definition measurement and a comparison of approaches Environmental and Resource Economics 22(1-2) 71-97

Ward J T Brainerd S Freese P Mace M Milazzo D Squires J Terry EM Thunberg M Travis and J Walden 2001 Report of the National Task Force for Defining and Measuring Fishing Capacity National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Science and Technology Silver Spring Maryland

205

Publications

Ward J T Brainerd M Milazzo E Thunberg A Kitts J Walden M Travis J Terry T Lee D Holland J Hastie D Squires S Herrick M Hamilton K Brewster-Geisz and R Lent 2001 Identifying Harvest Capacity and Overcapacity in Federally Managed Fisheries A Preliminary and Qualitative Report National Marine Fisheries Service Offices of Science and Technology and Sustainable Fisheries Silver Spring Maryland 118p

Walden J and J Kirkley 2000 Measuring Technical Efficiency and Capacity in Fisheries by Data Envelopment Analysis Using the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) A Workbook US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NE-160 15p Available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagovst5commercialcapacity_toolboxdocumentsgams_workbookpdf

UNITED STATES | Habitat Economics ResearchHolland D J Sanchirico R Johnston and D Joglekar 2010 Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Based Management Applications to Marine and Coastal Environments pp 240 Washington DC RFF Press

UNITED STATES | Ocean Policy amp Management Research Queirolo L In progress When Rationalization Programs Leave Small Fishery-Dependent Communities Out Innovative Management Structures May Offer a Way Back In People and the Sea VIII Geopolitics of the Oceans Centre for Maritime Research Universiteit van Amsterdam Netherlands (2015)

Seung C 2014 Estimating effects of exogenous output changes An application of multi-regional social accounting matrix (MRSAM) method to natural resource management Regional Science Policy and Practice 6(2) 177-193

Crosson S 2013 The impact of empowering scientific advisory committees to constrain catch limits in US fisheries Science and Public Policy 40(2) 261-273

Fell H and A Haynie 2013 Spatial Competition with Changing Market Institutions Journal of Applied Econometrics 28(4) 702-719

UNITED STATES | Other Marine Environmental ResearchLipton D D Lew K Wallmo P Wiley and A Dvarskas 2014 The Evolution of Non-Market Valuation of US Coastal and Marine Resources Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics 2014 (6) DOI httpcbemiisedujocevol2014iss16

Marvasti A 2013 The role of price expectations and legal uncertainties in ocean mineral exploration activities Resources Policy 38(1) 68-74

Lovell S and L Drake 2009 Tiny stowaways analyzing the economic benefits of a US Environmental Protection Agency permit regulating ballast water discharges Environmental Management 43(3) 546-555

Marvasti A 2000 Resource Characteristics Extraction Costs and Discovery of a New Resource Base Environmental and Resource Economics 17(4) 397-410

UNITED STATES | Protected Resources Economics ResearchJohnston R D Jarvis K Wallmo and D Lew 2015 Characterizing Large Scale Spatial Pattern in Nonuse Willingness to Pay An Application to Threatened and Endangered Marine Species Forthcoming in Land Economics

206

Publications

Pienaar E D Lew and K Wallmo 2015 The Importance of Survey Content Testing for the Context Dependency of the New Ecological Paradigm Scale Social Science Research 51 338-349

Pienaar E D Lew and K Wallmo 2013 Are Environmental Attitudes Influenced by Survey Context An Investigation of the Context Dependency of the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale Social Science Research 42(6) 1542-1554

Magnusson G K Bisack and H Milliken 2012 The Cost-effectiveness of Gear Research Relative to a Closure Pound Nets and Sea Turtles as an Example Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 12-01

Wallmo K and D Lew 2012 The Value of Recovering Threatened and Endangered Marine Species A Multi-Species Choice Experiment Conservation Biology 26(5) 830-839

Lew D and K Wallmo 2011 External Tests of Embedding and Scope in Stated Preference Choice Experiments An Application to Endangered Species Valuation Environmental and Resource Economics 48(1) 1-23 DOI 101007s10640-010-9394-1

Wallmo K and D Lew 2011 Valuing Improvements to Threatened and Endangered Marine Species An Application of Stated Preference Choice Experiments Journal of Environmental Management 92 1793-1801

Tomberlin D 2010 Endangered seabird habitat management as a partially observable Markov decision process Marine Resource Economics 25(1) 93-104

Dutton P H Gjertsen and D Squires 2010 Conservation of the Leatherback Sea Turtle in the Pacific Chapter 14 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management RQ Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait andM Williams eds pp 195-204 Oxford Oxford University Press

Janisse C D Squires J Seminoff and P Dutton 2010 Conservation Investments and Mitigation The California Drift Gillnet Fishery and Pacific Sea Turtles Chapter 17 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management R Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait and M Williams eds pp 231-240 Oxford Oxford University Press

Dutton P and D Squires 2008 Reconciling Biodiversity with Fishing A Holistic Strategy for Pacific Sea Turtle Recovery Ocean Development and International Law 39(2) 200-222

UNITED STATES | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchLarson D and D Lew 2014 The Opportunity Cost of Travel Time as a Noisy Wage Fraction American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96(2) 420-437

Lovell S and D Carter 2014 The use of sampling weights in regression models of recreational fishing-site choice Fishery Bulletin 112 243-252

Carter D and C Liese 2012 The Economic Value of Catching and Keeping or Releasing Saltwater Sport Fish in the Southeast USA North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32(4) 613-25

Kuriyama K W Hanemann and J Hilger 2010 A latent segmentation approach to a Kuhn-Tucker model An application to recreation demand Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 60(3) 209-220

Steinback S K Wallmo and P Clay 2009 Saltwater sport fishing in the US for food and income statistical estimates and policy implications Marine Policy 33 49-57

207

Publications

Gentner B and S Steinback 2008 The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2006 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-94 p301 Available at httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovst5publicationAnglerExpenditureReportAnglerExpendituresReport_ALLpdf

Gentner B 2007 Sensitivity of angler benefit estimates from a model of recreational demand to the definition of the substitute sites considered by the angler Fishery Bulletin 105 161-167

Johnston R M Ranson E Besedin and E Helm 2006 What determines willingness to pay per fish A meta-analysis of recreational fishing values Marine Resource Economics 21(1) 1-32

Olson J 2005 Re-placing the space of community a story of cultural politics policies and fisheries management Anthropological Quarterly 78(1) 233-254

Sepez J 2005 Introduction to traditional environmental knowledge in federal natural resource management agencies Practicing Anthropology 27(1) 1-48

Leeworthy V J Bowker J Hospital and E Stone 2005 Projected Participation in Marine Recreation 2005 amp 2010 Silver Spring Maryland Special Projects NOS 164pp

Kline J R Alig B Garber-Yonts 2004 Forestland Social Values and Open Space Preservation Journal of Forestry 102(8) 39-45

Steinback S B Gentner and J Castle 2004 The Economic Importance of Marine Angler Expenditures in the US NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 2 169p

Sepez J 2002 Treaty rights and the right to culture Native American subsistence issues in US law Cultural Dynamics 14(2) 143-159

Gentner B and A Lowther 2002 Evaluating marine sport fisheries in the USA Recreational Fisheries Ecological and Economic and Social Evaluation TJ Pitcher and CE Hollingsworth eds pp 186-206 Oxford Blackwell Science

Hicks R A Gautam D Van Voorhees M Osborn and B Gentner 2000 Thalassorama an introduction to the NMFS Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey with an emphasis on economic valuation Marine Resource Economics 14(2) 375-385

UNITED STATES | Seafood Marketing amp Trade ResearchBrinson A M-Y Lee and B Rountree 2011 Direct marketing strategies The rise of community supported fishery programs Marine Policy 35 542-548

Kirkley J J Ward C Moore C Hayes B Hooker and JWalden 2008 International Trade in Seafood and Related Products An Assessment of US trade Patterns NOAA NMFS Office of Constituent Services

UNITED STATES | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchClay P and A Himes-Cornell 2014 Bringing Social Science into US National Climate Policy Anthroplogy News April 2014

Felthoven R and S Kasperski 2013 Socioeconomic Indicators for United States Fisheries and Fishing Communities PICES Press 21(2) 20-23

208

Publications

Jepson M and L Colburn 2013 Development of Social Indicators of Fishing Community Vulnerability and Resilience in the US Southeast and Northeast Regions US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-129 64p

Colburn L and M Jepson 2012 Social Indicators of Gentrification Pressure in Fishing Communities A Context for Social Impact Assessment Coastal Management 40(3) 289-300

Abbott-Jamieson S 2010 Voices from the Fisheries projects combine oral history interviews and place-based education to create learning opportunities for students Current Journal of Marine Education 26(1) 20-24

Abbott-Jamieson S and P Clay 2010 The Long Voyage to Including Sociocultural Analysis in NOAAs National Marine Fisheries Service Marine Fisheries Review 72(2)14-33

Clay P and J Olson 2008 Defining fishing communities vulnerability and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Human Ecology Review 15(2) 143-160

Ingles P and J Sepez 2007 Anthropologyrsquos contributions to fisheries management National Association of Practicing Anthropologists Bulletin 28(1) 1-12

Abbott-Jamieson S 2007 Using oral history techniques in a NOAA Fisheries Service (NMFS) education and outreach project pressing local fisheries knowledge linking generations and improving environmental literacy National Association of Practicing Anthropologists Bulletin 28(1) 136-147

Clay P and J Olson 2007 Defining fishing communities issues in theory and practice National Association of Practicing Anthropologists Bulletin 28(1) 27-42

Colburn L S Abbott-Jamieson and P Clay 2006 Anthropological applications in the management of federally managed fisheries context institutional history and prospectus Human Organization 65(3) 231-239

Allen S and A Gough 2006 Monitoring environmental justice impacts Vietnamese-American longline fishermen adapt to the Hawaii swordfish fishery closure Human Organization 65(3) 319-328

UNITED STATES | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchMeiyappan P M Dalton B OrsquoNeill and A Jain 2014 Spatial modeling of agricultural land use change at global scale Ecological Modelling 291 152-174

Mason J R Kosaka A Mamula and C Speir 2012 Effort changes around a marine reserve The case of the California Rockfish Conservation Area Marine Policy 36(5) 1054-1063

Schnier K and R Felthoven 2011 Accounting for Spatial Heterogeneity and Autocorrelation in Spatial Discrete Choice Models Implications for Behavioral Predictions Land Economics 3 382-402

Wallmo K and S Edwards 2007 Estimating Public Values for Marine Protected Areas in the Northeast A Latent Class Modeling Approach US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-84 72p Available at httpsponwrnoaagovtmtm84pdf

Holland D J Sanchirico R Curtis and R Hicks 2004 An introduction to spatial modeling in fisheries economics Marine Resource Economics 19(1) 1-6

209

Publications

Curtis R and K McConnell 2004 Incorporating information and expectations in fishermenrsquos spatial decisions Marine Resource Economics 19 131-143

UNITED STATES | US Territories amp International Fisheries ResearchAnderson J C Anderson J Chu J Meredith F Asche G Sylvia M Smith D Anggraeni R Arthur A Guttormsen M Schmid W Akpalu F Alfredsson H Eggert J Flores M Freeman D Holland G Knapp M Kobayashi SLarkin K MacLauchlin K Schnier M Soboil S Tveteras H Uchida D Valderrama and T Ward 2015 The FisheryPerformance Indicators A Management Tool for the Triple Bottom Line Forthcoming in PLOS One

Woods P C Bouchard D Holland A Punt G and Marteinsdoacutettir 2015 Catch-quota balancing mechanisms in the Icelandic multi-species demersal fishery are all species equal Marine Policy 55 1-10

Woods P D Holland A Punt and G Marteinsdoacutettir 2015 How a catch-quota balancing system can go wrong an evaluation of the species quota transformation provisions in the Icelandic multi-species demersal fishery ICES Journal of Marine Science DOI 101093icesjmsfsv001

Chan V R Clarke and D Squires 2014 Full Retention in Tuna Fisheries Benefits Costs and Unintended Consequences Marine Policy 45 213-221

Gjertsen H D Squires P Dutton and T Eguchi 2014 Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Conservation Strategies An Application to the Pacific Leatherback Turtle Conservation Biology 28(1) 140-149

Kronbak L D Squires and N Vestergaard 2014 Recent Developments in Fisheries Economics Research International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 7(1) 67-108

Mengerink K C Van Dover M Baker E Escobar-Briones K Gjerde J Koslow E Ramierez-Llodara A Lara-Lopez D Squires T Sutton A Sweetman and L Levin 2014 A Call for Deep Ocean Stewardship Science 344 696-698

Smith M F Asch L Bennear E Havice A Read and D Squires 2014 Will a Catch Share for Whales Improve Social Welfare Ecological Applications 24(1) 15-23

Squires D 2014 Biodiversity Conservation in Asia Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 1(1) 144-159

Squires D and M Maunder 2014 Synthesis of Workshop Results Pros and cons of effort based management Chapter 2 in Squires D M Maunder N Vestergaard V Restrepo R Metzner S Herrick R Hannesson I del Valle and P Andersen eds Effort Rights in Fisheries Management General principles and case studies from around the world FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings P34 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Squires D M Maunder N Vestergaard V Restrepo R Metzner S Herrick R Hannesson I del Valle and P Andersen 2014 Effort Rights in Fisheries Management General principles and case studies from around the world Chapter 1 in Squires D M Maunder N Vestergaard V Restrepo R Metzner S Herrick R Hannesson I del Valle and P Andersen eds Effort Rights in Fisheries Management General principles and case studies from around the world FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings P34 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Squires D M Maunder N Vestergaard V Restrepo R Metzner S Herrick R Hannesson I del Valle and P Anderson eds 2014 Effort Rights in Fisheries Management General Principles and Case Studies from Around the World 2014 FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings P34 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

210

Publications

Squires D M Maunder S Herrick M Helvey and R Clarke 2014 Effort Rights-Based Management 2014 Chapter 3 in Squires D M Maunder N Vestergaard V Restrepo R Metzner S Herrick R Hannesson I del Valle and P Andersen eds Effort Rights in Fisheries Management General principles and case studies from around the world FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings P34 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Squires D V Chan and R Clarke 2014 Subsidies Public Goods and External Benefits in Fisheries Marine Policy 45 222-227

Grafton R and D Squires 2013 Theory and Practice of Water and Fisheries In J Shogren ed Encyclopaedia of Energy Natural Resource and Environmental Economics Elsevier Publishing Vol 2 pp 31-38

Guillotreau P D Squires J Sun and G Compean 2013 Local Regional and Global Markets What Drives the Fisheries In A Hobday R Brill L Dagorn eds Tunas and Their Fisheries Safeguarding Sustainability in the 21st Century Wiley-Blackwell

Squires D and N Vestergaard 2013 Technical Change and the Commons Review of Economics and Statistics 95(5) 1769-1787

Squires D and N Vestergaard 2013 Technical Change in Fisheries Marine Policy 42 286-292

Squires D R Allen and V Restreppo 2013 Rights-Based Management in International Tuna Fisheries FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No 571 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Wolff F-C P Guillotreau and D Squires 2013 The Firmrsquos Management in Production Management Firm and Time Effects in an Indian Ocean Tuna fishery American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95(3) 547-567

Grafton R and D Squires 2012 Theory and Practice of Fisheries and Water Economics in J Shogren ed Encyclopedia of Energy Natural Resources and Environmental Economics Elsevier

Valdes-Pizzini M and J Agar 2012 Papa-dem (puertorriquenos) crucenos y britanicos (garrets) el etnopaisaje de la diaspora de los pescadores en la Isla de Santa Cruz en las Islas Virgenes Estadounidenses (lVE) Op Cit Revista del Centro de Investigaciones Historicas 20 143-179

Dalzell P P Dutton K Simonds and D Squires 2011 Introduction to the Conservation of Pacific Sea Turtles Chapter 1 in P Dutton D Squires and M Ahmed eds 2010 Conservation of Pacific Sea Turtles Honolulu University of Hawaii Press

Dutton P and D Squires 2011 A Holistic Strategy for Pacific Sea Turtle Conservation Chapter 3 in P Dutton D Squires and M Ahmed eds 2011 Conservation of Pacific Sea TurtlesHonolulu University of Hawaii Press

Dutton P D Squires and M Ahmed eds 2011 Conservation of Pacific Sea Turtles Honolulu University of Hawaii Press

Yeo B D Squires K Ibrahim H Gjertsen S Kamil T Groves M Hong and C Tan 2011 Can Coastal Fisheries Bear the Cost of Sea Turtle Conservation Evidence from the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia Chapter 16 in P Dutton D Squires and M Ahmed eds 2011 Conservation of Pacific Sea Turtles Honolulu University of Hawaii Press

211

Publications

Squires D 2010 Review of Bjorndal et al Advances in Fisheries Economics in Fish and Fisheries

Joseph J D Squires W Bayliff and T Groves 2010 Addressing the Problem of Excess Fishing Capacity in Tuna Fisheries Chapter 2 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 11-38 Wiley-Blackwell

Squires D J Joseph and T Groves 2010 Buybacks in Transnational Fisheries Chapter 11 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 181-194 Wiley-Blackwell

Hallman B S Barrett R Clarke J Joseph and D Squires 2010 Limited Access in Transnational Tuna Fisheries Chapter 12 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 195-214 Wiley-Blackwell

Gjertsen H M Hall and D Squires 2010 Incentives to Address Bycatch Issues Chapter 15 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 225-250 Wiley-Blackwell

Allen R J Joseph D Squires and E Stryjewski 2010 Introduction Chapter 1 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 3-10 Wiley-Blackwell

Squires D 2010 Property and use Rights in Fisheries Chapter 3 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 39-64 Wiley-Blackwell

Allen R W Bayliff J Joseph and D Squires 2010 Rights-Based Management in Transnational Tuna Fisheries Chapter 4 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 65-86 Wiley-Blackwell

Allen R W Bayliff J Joseph and D Squires 2010 The Benefits and Costs of Transformation of Open Access on the High Seas Chapter 5 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 87-98 Wiley-Blackwell

Allen J J Joseph and D Squires 2010 Managing World Tuna Fisheries with Emphasis on Rights-Based Management Chapter 55 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management RQ Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait and M Williams eds pp 698-712 Oxford Oxford University Press

Hannesson R K Salvanes and D Squires 2010 The Lofoten Fishery over Hundred Years Land Economics 86(4) 746-765

Allen R J Joseph and D Squires eds 2010 Conservation and Management of Pacific Tunas Ames Iowa Wiley-Blackwell Publishing 392p

Brinson A D Die P Bannerman and Y Diatta 2009 Socioeconomic performance of West African fleets that target Atlantic billfish Fisheries Research 99 55-62

Jeon Y R Allen J Joseph T Groves and D Squires 2009 Rights-Based Transnational Fishery Management and Its Implementation to Korean Tuna Fishery Korean Journal of Law and Economics 6(2) 223-254

212

Publications

Liese C 2009 Fishery Management for Artisanal Reef Fisheries in Developing Countries A Holistic Economic Approach Proceedings of the 11th International Coral Reef Symposium Ft Lauderdale Florida 2008(July) 1116-1120

Squires D C Reid and Y Jeon 2008 Productivity growth in natural resource industries and the environment an application to the Korean tuna purse-seine fleet in the Pacific International Economic Journal 22(1) 81-94

Jeon Y C Reid and D Squires 2008 Is there a global market for tuna Policy implications for tropical tuna fisheries Ocean Development and International Law 39(1) 32-50

Liese C M Smith and R Kramer 2007 Open access in a spatially delineated artisanal fishery the case of Minahasa Indonesia Environment and Development Economics 12(1) 123-143

Ahmed M P Boonchuwongse W Dechboon and D Squires 2007 Overfishing in the Gulf of Thailand policy challenges and bioeconomic analysis Environment and Development Economics 12(1) 145-172

Miller M D McClellan J Wiener and B Stoffle 2007 Comment apparent rapid fisheries escalation at a remote Caribbean island Environmental Conservation 34(2) 1-3

Squires D J Kirkley J Joseph T Groves and C Reid 2007 Relating Estimates of Fishing Capacity Obtained from Data Envelopment Analysis to Traditional Measures of Fishing Capacity FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp 141-152 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Squires D J Joseph and T Groves 2007 Buybacks in Fisheries FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp 193-218 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Reid C and D Squires 2007 Measuring Fishing Capacity in Tuna Fisheries Data Envelopment Analysis Industry Surveys and Data Collection FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp 87-98 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Squires D T Groves J Kirkley C Reid and J Joseph 2007 Relating DEA Estimates of Capacity Utilization to Traditional Measures of Fishing Capacity FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp 87-98 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Scott T J Kirkley R Rinaldo and D Squires 2007 Assessing Capacity in the US Northwest Atlantic Pelagic Longline Fishery for Highly Migratory Species with Undesirable Outputs FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp 99-106 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Joseph J D Squires W Bayliff and T Groves 2007 Requirements and Alternatives for the Limitation of Fishing Capacity in Tuna Purse-Seine Fleets FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp153-192 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Stoffle B and R Stoffle 2007 At the searsquos edge elders and children in the littorals of Barbados and the Bahamas Human Ecology 35(5) 547-558

213

Publications

Yeo B D Squires K Ibrahim H Gjertsen S Syed Mohd Kamil R Zulkifi T Groves M Hong and C Tan 2007 Fisher Profiles and Perceptions of Sea Turtle-Fishery Interactions Case Study of East Coast Peninsular Malaysia The WorldFish Center Discussion Series No 6 69p Penang Malaysia The WorldFish Center

Jeon Y O Ishak K Kuperan D Squires and I Susilowati 2006 Developing country fisheries and technical efficiency the Java Sea purse seine fishery Applied Economics 38(13) 1541-1552

Bisack KD and J Sutinen 2006 A New Zealand ITQ Fishery With an In-Season Stock Externality Marine Resource Economics 21(3) 231-249

Reid C J Kirkley D Squires and J Ye 2005 Analysis of the Fishing Capacity of the Global Tuna Purse Seine Fleet Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity Conservation And Socio Economics 2 117-156

Vestergaard N D Squires F Jensen and J Andersen 2003 Technical efficiency of the Danish trawl fleet are the industrial vessels better than others Danish Journal of Economics 141 225-242

Squires D O Ishak Y Jeon J Kirkley K Kuperan and I Susilowati 2003 Excess capacity and sustainable development in Java Sea fisheries Environment and Development Economics 8(1) 105-127

Squires D R Grafton F Alam and O Ishak 2003 Technical efficiency of the Malaysian artisanal gill net fishery Environment and Development Economics 8 481-504

Vestergaard N D Squires and J Kirkley 2003 Measures of Capacity in a Multispecies Danish Fishery FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 445 Measuring capacity in fisheries S Pascoe and D Greboval eds pp 169-180 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations of the United Nations

Kirkley J D Squires M Alam and O Ishak 2003 Capacity and Offshore Fisheries Development The Malaysian Purse Seine Fishery FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 445 Measuring capacity in fisheries S Pascoe and D Greboval eds pp 193-212 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations of the United Nations

Kirkley J R Fre S Grosskkopf K McConnell D Squires and I Strand 2003 Assessing Capacity and Capacity Utilization in Fisheries When Data Are Limited FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 445 Measuring capacity in fisheries S Pascoe and D Greboval eds pp 213-232 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations of the United Nations

Squires D Y Jeon R Grafton and J Kirkley 2003 Tradable Property Rights and Overcapacity Organization of the United Nations 181-192 FAO Technical Paper 445 Measuring capacity in fisheries S Pascoe and D Greboval eds pp 181-192 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations of the United Nations

Vestergaard N D Squires and J Kirkley 2003 Measuring capacity and capacity utilization in fisheries the case of the Danish gill-net fleet Fisheries Research 60 357-368

Alam F O Ishak and D Squires 2002 Sustainable fisheries development in the tropics trawlers and license limitation in Malaysia Applied Economics 34(3) 325-337

Kuperan K O Ishak Y Jeon J Kirkley D Squires and I Susilowati 2002 A fishing capacity and fishing skill in developing country fisheries the Kedah Malaysia trawl fishery Marine Resource Economics 16(4) 293-313

214

Publications

Dupont D R Grafton J Kirkley and D Squires 2002 Capacity utilization measures and excess capacity in multi-product privatized fisheries Resource and Energy Economics 24(3) 193-210

Kremen C J Niles M Dalton G Daily P Ehrlich J Fay D Grewal and R Guillery 2000 Economics of rain forest conservation across scales Science 288(5472) 1828-1832

North PacificNORTH PACIFIC | Climate Change Research Punt A D Poljak M Dalton and R Foy 2014 Evaluating the impact of ocean acidification on fishery yields and profits The example of red king crab in Bristol Bay Ecological Modelling 285 39-53

Haynie A and L Pfeiffer 2013 Climatic and economic drivers of the Bering Sea pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) fishery Implications for the future Canadian Journal of Aquatic and Fisheries Science 70(6) 841-853 101139cjfas-2012-0265

C Carothers K Criddle C Chambers P Cullenberg J Fall A Himes-Cornell J Johnsen N Kimball CMenzies and E Springer (eds) 2012 Fishing People of the North Cultures Economies and ManagementResponding to Change Alaska Sea Grant University of AlaskamdashFairbanks

NORTH PACIFIC | Coastal amp Marine Recreation ResearchWolf P R Gimblett L Kennedy R Itami and B Garber-Yonts 2008 Monitoring and Simulating Recreation and Subsistence use in Prince William Sound Alaska Monitoring Simulation and Management of Visitor Landscapes R Gimblett and H Skov-Petersen eds Tucson AZ University of Arizona Press

NORTH PACIFIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchAbbott J A Haynie and M Reimer 2015 Hidden Flexibility Institutions Incentives and the Margins of Selectivity in Fishing Land Economics 91(1) 169ndash195

Call I and D Lew 2015 Tradable Permit Programs What are the Lessons for the New Alaska Halibut Catch Sharing Plan Marine Policy 52 125-137

Fissel B 2015 Methods for the Alaska Groundfish First-Wholesale Price Projections US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-[NTIS pending]

Seung C 2015 Untangling Economic Impacts for Alaska Fisheries A Structural Path Analysis Forthcoming in Marine Resource Economics

Abbott J A Haynie and M Reimer 2014 Targeting Ability Under Rights-Based Management The Amendment 80 Bering SeaAleutian Islands Groundfish Fishery Forthcoming in Land Economics

Felthoven R J Lee and K Schnier 2014 Cooperative Formation and Peer Effects in Fisheries Marine Resource Economics 29(2) 133-156

215

Publications

Fissel B 2014 Economic Indices for the North Pacific Groundfish Fisheries Calculation and Visualization US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-279 59p

Haynie A 2014 Estimating the Value of a Fishing Right An Analysis of Changing Usage and Value in the Western Alaska Community Development Quota (CDQ) Program Fisheries Science 80(2) 181-191

Peterson M F Mueter K Criddle and A Haynie 2014 Costs incurred by Alaskan sablefish Pacific halibut and Greenland turbot longliners due to killer whale depredation PLOS ONE 9(2) e88906 DOI 101371journalpone0088906

Seung C 2014 Measuring Spillover Effects of Shocks to Alaska Economy An Interregional Social Accounting Matrix (IRSAM) Model Approach Economic Systems Research 26(2) 224-238 DOI 101080095353142013803039

Seung C E Waters and J Leonard 2014 Economic Impacts of Alaska Fisheries A Multiregional Computable General Equilibrium (MRCGE) Analysis Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies DOI 101111rurd12026

Torres M and R Felthoven 2014 Productivity Growth and Product Choice in Catch Share Fisheries the Case of the Alaska Pollock Marine Policy 50 Part A 280-289 DOI 101016jmarpol201407008

Waters E C Seung M Hartley and M Dalton 2014 Measuring the Multiregional Economic Contribution of an Alaska Fishing Fleet with Linkages to International Markets Marine Policy 50 Part A 238-248

Kasperski S and D Holland 2013 Income Diversification and Risk for Fishermen Proceedings of the National Academies of Science 110(6) 2076-2081

Seung C and E Waters 2013 Calculating Impacts of Exogenous Output Changes Application of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) Model to Alaska Fisheries The Annals of Regional Science 51(2) 553-573

Pfeiffer L and A Haynie 2012 The Effect of Decreasing Seasonal Sea-Ice Cover on the Winter Bering Sea Pollock Fishery ICES Journal of Marine Science DOI 101093icesjmsfss097

Punt A M Siddeek B Garber-Yonts M Dalton L Rugolo D Stram B Turnock and J Zheng 2012 Evaluating the impact of buffers to account for scientific uncertainty when setting TACs Application to red king crab in Bristol Bay Alaska ICES Journal of Marine Science 69(4) 624ndash634 DOI 101093icesjmsfss047

Seung C and C Zhang 2012 Developing Socioeconomic Indicators for Fisheries off Alaska a Multi-Attribute Utility Function Approach Fisheries Research 112 117-126

Lazrus H J Sepez R Felthoven and J Lee 2011 Post-Rationalization Restructuring of Commercial Crew Member Opportunities in Bering Sea and Aleutian Island Crab Fisheries US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-217

Morrison Paul C R Felthoven and M Torres 2010 Economic Performance in Fisheries Modeling Measurement and Management Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 54(3) 343-360

Seung C and E Waters 2010 Evaluating Supply-Side and Demand-Side Shocks for Fisheries a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model for Alaska Economic Systems Research 22(1) 87-109

216

Publications

Seung C 2010 Estimating Economic Information for Fisheries using Unequal Probability Sampling Fisheries Research 105(2) 134-140

Haynie A and D Layton 2010 An Expected Profit Model for Monetizing Fishing Location Choices Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59(2) 165-176

Waters E and C Seung 2010 Impacts of Recent Shocks to Alaska Fisheries A Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model Analysis Marine Resource Economics 25(2) 155-183

Abbott J B Garber-Yonts and J Wilen 2010 Employment and Renumeration Effects of IFQs in the Bering SeaAleutian Islands Crab Fisheries Marine Resource Economics 25(4) 33-354

Haynie A R Hicks and K Schnier 2009 Common Property Information and Cooperation Commercial Fishing in the Bering Sea Ecological Economics 69(2) 406-413

Morrison Paul C M Torres and R Felthoven 2009 Fishing Revenue Productivity and Product Choice in the Alaskan Pollock Fishery Environmental and Resource Economics 44 457-474

Seung C and E Waters 2009 Measuring the Economic Linkage of Alaska Fisheries A Supply-Driven Social Accounting Matrix (SDSAM) Approach Fisheries Research 97 17-23

Felthoven R C Morrison Paul and M Torres 2009 Measuring Productivity Change and its Components for Fisheries The Case of the Alaskan Pollock Fishery 1994-2002 Natural Resource Modeling 22(1) 105-136

Layton D and S Lee 2006 Embracing model uncertainty strategies for response pooling and model averaging Environmental and Resource Economics 34(1) 51-85

Felthoven R and C Morrison Paul 2004 Multi-output non-frontier primal measures of capacity and capacity utilization American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(3) 615-629

Felthoven R T Hiatt and J Terry 2004 Measuring fishing capacity and utilization with commonly available data an application to Alaskan fisheries Marine Fisheries Review 64(4) 29-39

Felthoven R C Morrison Paul V Ball and R Nehring 2002 Costs of Production and Environmental Risk Resource-Factor Substitution in US Agriculture Agricultural Productivity Measurement and Sources of Growth VE Ball and GW Norton eds pp 293-310 Boston Kluwer Academic Press

Felthoven R 2002 Effects of the American Fisheries Act on Capacity Utilization and Technical Efficiency Marine Resource Economics 17(3) 181-205

Felthoven R T Hiatt and J Terry 2002 Quantitative Estimates of Fishing Capacity Capacity Utilization and Fishery Utilization for Alaskan Commercial Fisheries 2001 National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Fisheries Science Center

NORTH PACIFIC | Ocean Policy amp Management ResearchSanchirico J D Lew A Haynie D Kling and D Layton 2013 Conservation Values in Marine Ecosystem-Based Management Marine Policy 38 523-530

217

Publications

NORTH PACIFIC | Other Marine Environmental ResearchJohnson K P Bettinger J Kline T Spies M Lennette G Lettman B Garber-Yonts and T Larsen 2006 Simulating Forest Structure Timber Production and Socio-Economic Effects in a Multi-Owner Province Ecological Applications 17(1) 34-47

Spies T K Johnson K Burnett J Ohmann B Mccomb G Reeves P Bettinger J Kline and B Garber-Yonts 2006 Cumulative Ecological and Socio-Economic Effects of Forest Policies in Coastal Oregon Ecological Applications 17(1) 5-17

Garber-Yonts B 2004 The Economics of Amenities and Migration in the Pacific Northwest Review of Selected Literature with Implications for National Forest Management US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland OR General Technical Report PNW-GTR-617 48p

Morrison Paul C V Ball R Felthoven A Grube and R Nehring 2002 Effective Costs and Chemicals use in US Agricultural Production Benefits of using the Environment as a Free Input American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(4) 897-901

NORTH PACIFIC | Protected Resources Economics ResearchLew D D Layton and R Rowe 2010 Valuing Enhancements to Endangered Species Protection Under Alternative Baseline Futures The Case of the Steller Sea Lion Marine Resource Economics 25(2) 133-54

NORTH PACIFIC | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchLew D G Sampson A Himes-Cornell and J Lee 2015 Costs Earnings and Employment in the Alaska Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Sector 2011-2013 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-2738 134p

Lew D and C Seung 2014 On the Statistical Significance of Regional Economic Impacts from Changes in Recreational Fishing Harvest Limits in Southern Alaska Marine Resource Economics 29(3) 241-257

Lew D and D Larson 2014 Is a Fish in Hand Worth Two in the Sea Evidence from a Stated Preference Study Fisheries Research 157 124-135

Larson D and D Lew 2013 How Do Harvest Rates Affect Angler Trip Patterns Marine Resource Economics 28(2) 155-173

Seung C and D Lew 2013 Accounting for Variation in Exogenous Shocks in Economic Impact Modeling The Annals of Regional Science DOI 101007s00168-012-0550-0

Lew D and D Larson 2012 Economic Values for Saltwater Sport Fishing in Alaska A Stated Preference Analysis North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32(4) 745-759

Lew D and D Larson 2011 A Repeated Mixed Logit Approach to Valuing a Local Sport Fishery The Case of Southeast Alaska Salmon Land Economics 87 712-729

Lew D and C Seung 2010 The Economic Impact Of Saltwater Sportfishing Harvest Restrictions In Alaska An Empirical Analysis Of Non-Resident Anglers North American Journal Of Fisheries Management 30 538-551

Lew D J Lee and D Larson 2010 Saltwater Sport Fishing In Alaska A Summary and Description of the Alaska Saltwater Sport Fishing Economic Survey 2007 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-214 229p

218

Publications

NORTH PACIFIC | Seafood Marketing amp Trade ResearchCarothers C D Lew and J Sepez 2010 Fishing Rights and Small Communities Alaska Halibut IFQ Transfer Patterns Ocean and Coastal Management 53(9) 518-523

Seung C 2008 Estimating dynamic impacts of seafood industry in Alaska Marine Resource Economics 23(1) 87-104

Seung C and E Waters 2006 The role of the Alaska seafood industry a social accounting matrix (SAM) model approach to economic base analysis The Annals of Regional Science 40(2) 335-360

NORTH PACIFIC | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchHimes-Cornell A and K Hoelting 2015 Resilience strategies in the face of short and long term change Outmigration and fisheries regulation in Alaska fishing communities Ecology and Society 20(2) 9

Himes-Cornell A and S Kasperski 2015 Using indicators to assess the vulnerability and resiliency of Alaskan fishing communities to climate change Fisheries Research 162 1-11

Lew D A Himes-Cornell and J Lee 2015 Weighting and Data Imputation for Missing Data in Fisheries Economic and Social Survey Marine Resource Economics 30(2) 219-230

Himes-Cornell A and K Kent 2014 Involving Fishing Communities in Data Collection A Summary and Description of the Alaska Community Survey 2011 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC 284 171p

Himes-Cornell A and K Kent 2014 Involving Fishing Communities in Data Collection A Summary and Description of the Alaska Community Survey 2010 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC 280 170p

Kasperski S and A Himes-Cornell 2014 Indicators of Fishing Engagement and Reliance of Alaskan Fishing Communities AFSC Quarterly Report Feature (January-February-March 2014) 7p

Package-Ward C and A Himes-Cornell 2014 Utilizing oral histories to understand the social networks of Oregon fishermen in Alaska Human Organization 73(3) 277-288

Himes-Cornell A K Hoelting C Maguire L Munger-Little J Lee J Fisk R Felthoven and P Little 2013 Community Profiles of North Pacific Fisheries Alaska 2nd edition US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-259 (1-12)

Himes-Cornell A C Package and A Durland 2011 Improving Community Profiles for the North Pacific Fisheries NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-230

Lew D and A Himes-Cornell 2011 A Guide to Designing Testing and Implementing AFSC Economic and Social Surveys US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-228 43p

Vaccaro I L Zanotti and J Sepez 2009 Commons and Markets Opportunities for Development of Local Sustainability Environmental Politics 18(4) 522-538

Sepez J 2008 Historical Ecology of Makah Subsistence Foraging Patterns Journal of Ethnobiology 28(1) 110-133

219

Publications

Etnier M and J Sepez 2008 Changing Patterns of Sea Mammal Exploitation among the Makah Pp Time and Change Archaeology and Anthropological Perspectives on the Long-Term in Hunter-Gatherer Societies R Layton H Maschner and D Papagianni eds pp 143-158 Woodbridge CT Oxbow Press

Sepez J K Norman and R Felthoven 2007 A quantitative model for ranking and selecting communities most involved in commercial fisheries National Association of Practicing Anthropologists Bulletin 28(1) 43-56

Sepez J C Package P Malcolm and A Poole 2007 Unalaska Alaska Memory and Denial in the Globalization of the Aleutian Landscape Polar Geography 30(3) 193-209

Norman K J Sepez H Lazrus N Milne C Package S Russell K Grant R Petersen J Primo M Styles B Tilt and I Vaccaro 2007 Community Profiles for West Coast and North Pacific Fisheries-Washington Oregon California and other US States US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-85 602p Available at httpwwwnwfscnoaagovresearchdivisionssdcommunityprofilesCaliforniaSanta_Rosa_CApdf

Poole A and J Sepez 2006 Distribution and abundance of human populations in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 2005 North Pacific Groundfish Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Reports for 2006 Economic Status of the Groundfish Fisheries Off Alaska 2006 T Hiatt ed pp 255-276 Seattle Alaska Fisheries Science Center

Sepez J K Norman A Poole and B Tilt 2006 Fish scales scale and method in social science research for North Pacific and West Coast fishing communities Human Organization 65(3) 280-293

Sepez J and H Lazrus 2005 Traditional Environmental Knowledge in Federal Natural Resource Management Agencies Practicing Anthropology 27(1) 1-48

Lazrus H and J Sepez 2005 The NOAA Fisheries Alaska Native Traditional Knowledge Database Practicing Anthropology 27(1) 33-37

Sepez J B Tilt C Package H Lazrus and I Vaccaro 2005 Community Profiles for North Pacific Fisheries-Alaska US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-160 552p

Package C and J Sepez 2004 Fishing communities of the North Pacific social science research at the Alaska Fisheries Science Center AFSC Quarterly Report April-May-June 2004 11p Available at httpwwwafscnoaagovQuarterlyamj2004amj04featpdf

Sepez J 2003 Makah Dictionary of American History 3rd Edition Charles Scribnerrsquos Sons New York

PacificPACIFIC | Coastal amp Marine Recreation ResearchPolasky S E Nelson J Camm B Csuti P Fackler E Lonsdorf C Montgomery D White J Arthur B Garber-Yonts R Haight J Kagan A Starfield and C Tobalske 2008 Where to Put Things Spatial Land Management to Sustain Biodiversity and Economic Returns Biological Conservation 141(6) 1505-1524

220

Publications

Lew D and D Larson 2005 Valuing recreation and amenities at San Diego County beaches Coastal Management 33(1) 71-86

Garber-Yonts B 2005 Conceptualizing and Measuring Demand for Recreation on National Forests A Review and Synthesis General Technical Report PNW-GTR-64540 US Department of Agriculture US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland OR

Garber-Yonts B J Kerkvliet and R Johnson 2004 Public Values for Biodiversity Conservation Policies in the Oregon Coast Range Forest Science 50(5) 589-602

Harris T C Seung T Darden and W Riggs 2002 Rangeland fires in Northern Nevada an application of computable general equilibrium modeling Western Economics Forum 1(2) 3-10

PACIFIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchRose K J Fiechter E Curchitser K Hedstrom M Bernal SCreekmore A Haynie S Ito S Lluch-Cota B Megrey C Edwards D Checkley T Koslow S McClatchie F Werner A MacCall and V Agostini 2015 Demonstration of afully coupled end-to-end model for small pelagic fish using sardine and anchovy in the California Current Forthcomingin Progress in Oceanography Available online httpwwwsciencedirectcomsciencearticlepiiS0079661115000233

Collier T A Mamula and J Ruggiero 2014 Estimation of a Multi-Output Production Functions in Commercial Fisheries Omega The International Journal of Management Science 42(1) 157165

Speir C C Pomeroy and J Sutinen 2014 Port Level Fishing Dynamics Assessing Changes in the Distribution of Fishing Activity over Time Marine Policy 46 171-191

Mamula A and J Walden 2013 Proceedings of the National Marine Fisheries Service Productivity Workshop (Santa Cruz June 11-12 2012) US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-503

Thomson C 2010 Data requirements for integrating socioeconomic considerations into regulatory analysis examples from California commercial fisheries In RM Starr et al (eds) Managing Data-Poor Fisheries Case Studies Models and Solutions California Sea Grant College Program Publication No T-070

Tomberlin D and G Holloway 2010 Bayesian hierarchical estimation of technical efficiency in a fishery Applied Economics Letters 17(2) 201-204

Grafton R R Hannesson B Shallard D Sykes and J Terry 2010 The Economics of Allocation in Tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 155-162 Wiley-Blackwell

Hannesson R and S Herrick 2010 The value of Pacific sardine as forage fish Marine Policy 34(5) 935-942

Lian C 2010 West Coast limited entry groundfish trawl cost earnings survey protocols and results for 2004 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-107 35p Available at httpwwwnwfscnoaagovassets257569_11092010_161408_CostEarningsSurveyTM107WebFinalpdf

Hannesson R S Herrick and J Field 2009 Ecological and economic considerations in the conservation and management of the Pacific sardine (Sardinops sagax) Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66(5) 859-868

221

Publications

Lian C R Singh and Q Weninger 2010 Fleet Restructuring Rent Generation and the Design of Individual Fishing Quota Programs Empirical Evidence from the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Marine Resource Economics 24 329-359

Norton J S Herrick and J Mason 2009 Fisheries abundance cycles in ecosystem and economic management of California fish and invertebrate resources The future of fisheries science in North America RJ Beamish and BJ Rothschild eds pp 227-244 Springer BV

Hannesson R and S Herrick 2008 Catch strategies for the pacific sardine California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI) Reports 49 222-231

Herrick S J Norton J Mason and C Bessey 2007 Management application of an empirical model of sardine-climate regime shifts Marine Policy 31 71-80

Thomson C D VenTresca and D Colpo 2007 Logbook Pilot Program for Californiarsquos Nearshore Groundfish Fishery Results and Lessons Learned US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-NMFS-SWFSC-408

Herrick S K Hill and C Reiss 2006 An optimal harvest policy for the recently renewed United States Pacific sardine fishery Climate Change and the Economics of the Worldrsquos Fisheries R Hannesson M Barange and S Herrick eds pp 126-150 United Kingdon Edward Elgar

Squires D Y Jeon T Kim and R Clarke 2006 Price linkages in Pacific tuna markets implications for the South Pacific tuna treaty and the Western and Central Pacific region Environment and Development Economics 11(6) 747-767

Plummer M 2006 The grand unified theory of natural resource economics a special case Explorations in Environmental amp Natural Resource Economics Essays in Honor of Gardner M Brown DF Layton and R Halvorsen eds pp 150-160 United Kingdom Edward Elgar

Holloway G and D Tomberlin 2006 Bayesian ranking and selection of fishing boat efficiencies Marine Resource Economics 21(4) 415-432

Squires D J Joseph and T Groves 2006 Tuna resource management buybacks in transnational fisheries Pacific Economic Bulletin 21(3) 63-74

Reid C J Kirkley D Squires and J Ye 2005 An analysis of the fishing capacity of the global tuna purse seine fleet FAO Fisheries Proceedings 2 Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity Conservation and Socio-economics pp 117-156 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Holloway G D Tomberlin and X Irz 2005 Hierarchical analysis of production efficiency in a coastal trawl fishery Sustaining Large Marine Ecosystems The Human Dimension TM Hennessey and JG Sutinen eds pp 159-185 Amsterdam Elsevier BV

Haraden J S Herrick D Squires and C Tisdell 2004 Economic benefits of dolphins in the United States Eastern Tropical Pacific purse seine tuna industry Environmental and Resource Economics 28 451-468

Dalton M and S Ralston 2004 The California Rockfish Conservation Area and groundfish trawlers at Moss Landing Harbor Marine Resource Economics 19(1) 67-83

222

Publications

Kirkley J P Morrison J Catherine and D Squires 2004 Deterministic and stochastic capacity estimation for fishery capacity reduction Marine Resource Economics 19(3) 271-294

Kirkley J D Squires F Alam and H Ishak 2003 Excess capacity and asymmetric information in developing country fisheries the Malaysian purse seine fishery American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(3) 647-662

Fox K R Grafton J Kirkley and D Squires 2003 Property rights productivity and profits in a common-pool resource Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46(1) 156-177

Reid C D Squires Y Jeon L Clarke and R Clarke 2003 Fishing capacity of tuna purse seine vessels in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean Marine Policy 27(6) 449-469

Thomson C 2001 Human ecosystem dimension Californiarsquos Living Marine Resources A Status Report T Larinto ed pp 47-66 Monterey California Department of Fish and Game

Dalton M 2001 El Nino expectations and fishing effort in Monterey Bay California Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42(3) 336-359

Viswanathan K I Omar Y Jeon J Kirkley D Squires and I Susilowati 2001 Fishing skill in developing country fisheries the Kedah Malaysia trawl fishery Marine Resource Economics 16(4) 293-314

Grafton R Squires D and K Fox 2000 Private property and economic efficiency a study of a common-pool resource Journal of Law and Economics 43(2) 679-713

Campbell H S Herrick and D Squires 2000 The role of research in fisheries management the conservation of dolphins in the Eastern Tropical Pacific and the exploitation of southern bluefin tuna in the Southern Ocean Ocean Development and International Law 31(4) 347-375

PACIFIC | Habitat Economics ResearchSpeir C A Mamula and D Ladd In press Effects of Water Supply on Labor Demand and Agricultural Production in Californiarsquos San Joaquin Valley Forthcoming in Water Economics and Policy

Thomson C 2012 Resighini Rancheria Tribe Fishery Socioeconomics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C 2012 Hoopa Valley Tribe Fishery Socioeconomics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C 2012 Karuk Tribe Fishery Socioeconomics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C 2012 Klamath Tribes Fishery Socioeconomics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C 2012 Commercial Fishing Economics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

223

Publications

Thomson C 2012 Yurok Tribe Fishery Socioeconomics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C and A Mamula 2012 Ocean Sport Fishing Economics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C and C Speir 2011 Inriver Sport Fishing Economics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Plummer M 2009 Assessing benefit transfer for the valuation of ecosystem services Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(1) 38-45

Benson S H Dewar P Dutton C Fahy C Heberer D Squires and S Stohs 2009 Swordfish and Leatherback use of Temperate Habitat (SLUTH) Administrative Report LJ-09-06

Schneidler M and M Plummer 2009 Human Well-being Indicators Background and Applications for the Puget Sound Partnership Northwest Fisheries Science Center Processed Report 38p+Appendix Available at httpsitesgooglecomsitepspartnershipdocumentsHome

Thomson C and C Pinkerton 2008 Habitat Restoration Cost References for Salmon Recovery Planning US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-425

Plummer M 2007 Welcome to the data-poor real world incorporating benefit-cost principles into environmental policymaking Research in Law and Economics 23 103-130

Hildner K and C Thomson 2007 Using the California Habitat Restoration Project Database to estimate habitat restoration costs for ESA-listed salmonids US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-403

Hildner K and C Thomson 2007 Salmon Habitat Restoration Cost Modeling Results and Lessons Learned US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-404

Tomberlin D and V Bosetti 2006 An Iterative Finite Difference Approach to Project Valuation under Multiple Interacting Options US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-389 16p Available at httpswfscnoaagovpublicationsTMSWFSCNOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-389PDF

OrsquoHanley J and D Tomberlin 2005 Optimizing the removal of small fish passage barriers Environmental Modeling and Assessment 10(2) 85-98

Plummer M 2005 The economic evaluation of stream and watershed restoration projects Methods for Monitoring Stream and Watershed Restoration P Roni ed pp 310-330 Bethesda American Fisheries Society

Ise J and S Abbott-Jamieson 2005 Students gather local fisheries knowledge as part of a NOAA Fisheries education and outreach project Practicing Anthropology 27(1) 29-32

PACIFIC | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchField J Punt A Methot R and C Thomson 2006 Does MPA mean major problem for assessments Considering the consequences of place-based management systems Fish and Fisheries 7 284-302

224

Publications

Dalton M and S Ralston 2006 Empirical Evaluation of Regional Scale Marine Reserves and the Groundfish Trawl Fishery California Sea Grant College Program Research Completion Reports Paper MA06 01 Available at httpnsglgsourieducasgcasgt06010pdf

PACIFIC | Ocean Policy amp Management ResearchWells B T Wainwright C Thomson T Williams N Mantua L Crozier S Breslow and K Fresh 2014 CCIEA Phase III Report 2014 Ecosystem Components Protected Species ndash Pacific Salmon Available at httpwwwnoaagovieaAssetsieacaliforniaReportpdf8Salmon_2013pdf

Khanna M and C Speir 2013 Motivations for Proactive Environmental Management Sustainability 5 2664-2692 DOI 103390su5062664

Norman K D Holland and S Kasperski 2013 Resilient and Economically Viable Coastal Communities In Levin P B Wells and M Sheer (eds) California Current Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Phase II Report Available at httpwwwnoaagovieaCCIEA-Reportindexhtml

Squires D 2009 Opportunities in social science research The Future of Fisheries Science in North America R Beamish and B Rothschild eds pp 637-696 Netherlands Springer American Institute of Fisheries Research Biologists

PACIFIC | Other Marine Environmental ResearchHarvey C Bartz J Davies T Francis T Good A Guerry M Hanson K Holsman J Miller M Plummer J Reum L Rhodes C Rice J Samhouri G Williams N Yoder P Levin and M Ruckelshaus 2010 A mass-balance model for evaluating food web structure and community-scale indicators in the central basin of Puget Sound US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-106 180p Available at httpwwwnwfscnoaagovassets257363_08042010_120050_MassBalanceModelTM106WebFinalpdf

PACIFIC | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchHilger J and J Englin 2009 Utility theoretic semi-logarithmic incomplete demand systems in a natural experiment Forest fire impacts on recreational values and use Resource and Energy Economics Volume 31(4) 287-298

Lew D and D Larson 2008 Valuing a beach day with a repeated nested logit model of participation site choice and stochastic time value Marine Resource Economics 23(3) 233-252

Layton D and S Lee 2006 From ratings to rankings the econometric analysis of stated preference ratings data Explorations in Environmental amp Natural Resource Economics Essays in Honor of Gardner M Brown DF Layton and R Halvorsen eds pp 224-244 United Kingdom Edward Elgar

Lew D and D Larson 2005 Accounting for stochastic shadow values of time in discrete-choice recreation demand models Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50(2) 341-361

Larson D and D Lew 2005 Measuring the utility of ancillary travel revealed preferences in recreation site demand and trips taken Transportation Research 39(2-3) 237-55

Gentner B S Steinback and M Price 2001 Marine Angler Expenditures in the Pacific Coast Region 2000 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-49 57p Available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagovst5RecEconPublicationsNMFS_F_SPO_49revpdf

225

Publications

PACIFIC | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchBreslow S D Holland P Levin K Norman M Poe C Thomson R Barnea P Dalton N Dolsak C Greene K Hoelting S Kasperski R Kosaka D Ladd A Mamula S Miller B Sojka C Speir S Steinbeck and N Tolimieri 2014 Human Dimensions of the CCIEA In Levin P B Wells and M Sheer (eds) California Current Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Phase III Report 2013 Available from httpwwwnoaagovieaAssetsieacaliforniaReportpdf10Human20Dimensions_2013pdf

Holland D and S Kasperski 2014 Fishery Income Diversification and Risk for Fishermen and Fishing Communities of the US West Coast and Alaska ndash Updated to 2012 Appendix HD1 Appendix to Human Dimensions of the CCIEA In Levin P B Wells and M Sheer (Eds) California Current Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Phase III Report 2013 Available from httpwwwnoaagovieaAssetsieacaliforniaReportpdf11Human20dimensions20Appendix_2013pdf

Pomeroy C C Thomson and M Stevens 2010 Californiarsquos North Coast Fishing Communities Historical Perspective and Recent Trends California Sea Grant College Program Publication No T-072

Vaccaro I and K Norman 2008 Social sciences and landscape analysis opportunities for the improvement of conservation policy design Journal of Environmental Management 88(2) 360-371

Sepez J K Norman A Poole and B Tilt 2005 Fish Scales Scale and Method in Social Science Research for North Pacific and West Coast Fishing Communities Human Organization 65(3) 280-293

PACIFIC | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas Research Wallmo K and R Kosaka 2014 Public Preferences for Marine Protected Areas Off the US West Coast The Significance of Restrictions and Size on Economic Value US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-144

J Mason R Kosaka A Mamula and C Speir 2012 Effort Changes Around a Marine Reserve The Case of the California Rockfish Conservation Area Marine Policy 36(5) 1054-1063

Western PacificWESTERN PACIFIC | Coastal amp Marine Recreation ResearchHu W K Boehle L Cox and M Pan 2009 Economic Values of Dolphin Excursions in Hawaii A Stated Choice Analysis Marine Resource Economics 24 61-76

WESTERN PACIFIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchRichmond L D Kotowicz and J Hospital 2015 Monitoring socioeconomic impacts of Hawaiʻirsquos 2010 bigeye tuna closure Complexities of local management in a global fishery Ocean and Coastal Management 106 87-96 DOI 101016jocecoaman201501015

Hospital J and C Beavers 2014 Catch shares and the main Hawaiian Islands bottomfish fishery Linking fishery conditions and fisher perceptions Marine Policy 44 9-17 DOI 101016jmarpol201308006

Arita S M Pan J Hospital and P Leung 2013 The distributive economic impacts of Hawaiirsquos commercial fishery a SAM analysis Fisheries Research 145 82-89 DOI 101016jfishres201302005

226

Publications

Hospital J and M Pan 2009 Demand for Hawaii bottomfish revisited incorporating economics into total allowable catch management US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-PIFSC-20 19p + Appendix Available at httpwwwpifscnoaagovtechNOAA_Tech_Memo_PIFSC_20pdf

Pan M and A Griesemer 2006 Economic Analysis of Bottomfish Fishing Vessels Operating in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands in 2003 Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center Administrative Report H-06-03 12p

Cai J P Leung M Pan and S Pooley 2005 Economic linkage impacts of Hawaiirsquos longline fishing regulations Fisheries Research 74(1-3) 232-242

Cai J P Leung M Pan and S Pooley 2005 Linkage of Fisheries Sector to Hawaiirsquos Economy and Economic Impacts of Longline Fishing Regulations SOEST Publication 05-01 JIMAR Contribution 05-355 24p

OrsquoMalley J and S Pooley 2002 A Description and Economic Analysis of Large American Samoa Longline Vessels SOEST Publication 02-2 JIMAR Contribution 02-345 24p

OrsquoMalley J and S Pooley 2002 Economic and Operational Characteristics of the Hawaii-based Longline Fleet in 2000 SOEST Publication 03-01 JIMAR Contribution 03-348 31p

Pan M P Leung and S Pooley 2001 A decision support model for fisheries management in Hawaii a multilevel and multiobjective programming approach North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21 293-309

Curtis R and R Hicks 2000 The cost of sea turtle preservation the case of Hawaiirsquos pelagic longliners American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(5) 1191-1197

Pan M P Leung F Ji S Nakamoto and S Pooley 2000 A Multilevel and Multiobjective Programming Model for the Hawaii Fishery Model Documentation and Application Results JIMAR Contribution 99-324 University of Hawaii

Kawamoto K and S Pooley 2000 Annual Report of the 1998 Western Pacific Lobster Fishery (with preliminary 1999 data) Southwest Fish Sci Cent Admin Rep H-00-02 38p Available at httpwwwpifscnoaagovadminrpts2000-presentSWFC_Admin_Report_00-02pdf

WESTERN PACIFIC | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchPan M A Griesemer and R Mamiit 2006 Economic assessment of open fishing tournament in Hawaiʻi Newsletter Volume 11 Number 2 Pelagic Fisheries Program University of Hawaii

Curran D P Dalzell J Schultz J OrsquoMalley and S Pooley 2006 Recreational Metadata Using Tournament Data to Describe a Poorly Documented Pelagic Fishery SOEST Publication 06-03 JIMAR Contribution 06-363 40p

Leeworthy V P Wiley and J Hospital 2004 Importance-satisfaction Ratings Five-year Comparison SPA amp ER use and Socioeconomic and Ecological Monitoring Comparison of Results 1995-96 to 2000-01 Silver Spring Maryland Special Projects NOS 59p

WESTERN PACIFIC | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchAllen S and A Gough 2007 Filipino crew community in Hawaiʻi-based longline fishing fleet National Association of Practicing Anthropologists Bulletin 28(1) 87-98

227

Publications

Allen S and A Gough 2007 Hawaii Longline Fishermenrsquos Experiences with the Observer Program US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-PIFSC-8 39p Available at httpwwwpifscnoaagovtechNOAA_Tech_Memo_PIFSC_8pdf

Allen S and A Gough 2006 A Sociocultural Assessment of Filipino Crew Members Working in the Hawaii-based Longline Fleet US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-PIFSC-6 54p Available at httpwwwpifscnoaagovtechNOAA_Tech_Memo_PIFSC_6pdf

New EnglandNEW ENGLAND | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchHolland D P Pinto da Silva and A Kitts 2015 Social Capital and Economic Performance of New England Groundfish Harvest Cooperatives An Evolving Story Forthcoming in Marine Resource Economics

Olson J 2010 Seeding nature ceding culture Redefining the boundaries of the marine commons through spatial management and GIS Geoforum 41(2) 293-303

Holland D and J Wiersma 2010 Free form property rights for fisheries The decentralized design of rights-based management through groundfish sectors in New England Marine Policy 34(5) 1076-1081

Lee M 2010 Economic tradeoffs in the Gulf of Maine ecosystem Herring and whale-watching Marine Policy 34 156-162

Holland D and GE Herrera 2009 Uncertainty in the Management of Fisheries Contradictory Implications and a New Approach Marine Resource Economics 24(3) 289-299

Thunberg E 2009 Trends in Selected Northeast Region Marine Industries US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS NE 211 107p Available at httpwwwnefscnoaagovpublicationstmtm211

Rountree B A Kitts and P Pinto da Silva 2008 Complexities of collaboration in fisheries management the Northeast US tilefish fishery FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No 504 Case Studies in Fisheries Self-governance R Townsend R Shotton and H Uchida eds pp 135-147 Rome FAO

Steinback S R Allen and E Thunberg 2008 The benefits of rationalization the case of the American lobster fishery Marine Resource Economics 23(1) 37-63

Bisack K 2008 Integrating Porpoise and Cod Management A comparison of Days-at-Sea ITQs and Closures Marine Resource Economics 23(4) 361-378

Jin D E Thunberg and P Hoaglund 2008 Economic impact of the 2005 red tide event on commercial shellfish fisheries in New England Ocean and Coastal Management 51(5) 420-429

Thunberg E A Kitts and J Walden 2007 A case study of New England groundfish fishing capacity reduction Fishery Buybacks D Squires and R Curtis eds pp 239-248 Blackwell Publishing

228

Publications

Kitts A P Pinto da Silva and B Rountree 2007 Evolution and outcomes of collaborative management institutions in the NE US tilefish fishery Marine Policy 31 192-200

Thunberg E 2007 Demographic and Economic Trends in the Northeastern United States Lobster (Homarus americanus) Fishery 1970-2005 US Dept of Commerce Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 07-17 National Marine Fisheries Service Woods Hole MA

Fare R J Kirkley and J Walden 2007 Estimating Capacity and Efficiency in Fisheries with Undesirable Outputs VIMS Marine Resource Report No 2007-6 Available at httpwwwvimseduGreylitVIMSmrr07-6pdf

Fare R J Kirkley and J Walden 2006 Adjusting technical efficiency to reflect discarding the case of the US Georges Bank multi-species otter trawl fishery Fisheries Research 78(2006) 257-265

Bisack K and J Sutinen 2006 Harbor porpoise bycatch ITQs or timearea closures in the New England gillnet fishery Land Economics 82(1) 85-102

Jin D P Hoagland and E Thunberg 2006 An analysis of the relationship between fish harvesting and processing sectors in New England Marine Resource Economics 21(1) 47-62

Walden J 2006 Estimating vessel efficiency using a bootstrapped data envelopment analysis model Marine Resource Economics 21(2) 181-192

Jin D and E Thunberg 2005 An analysis of fishing vessel accidents in fishing areas off the Northeastern United States Safety Science 43(8) 523-540

Edwards S J Link and B Rountree 2005 Portfolio management of fish communities in Large Marine Ecosystems Sustaining Large Marine Ecosystems The Human Dimension TM Hennessey and JG Sutinen eds pp 181-200 Amsterdam Elsevier BV

Thunberg E T Helser and R Mayo 2002 Bioeconomic analysis of alternative selection patterns in the United States Atlantic silver hake fishery Marine Resource Economics 13(1) 51-74

Kitts A E Thunberg and J Robertson 2000 Willingness to participate and bids in a fishing vessel buyout program a case study of New England groundfish Marine Resource Economics 15(3) 221-232

Steinback S and E Thunberg 2000 A Method of Analyzing Trip Limits in Northeast Fisheries A Case Study of the Spiny Dogfish Fishery Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 00-06

NEW ENGLAND | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchWallmo K and S Edwards 2008 Estimating Non-market Values of Marine Protected Areas A Latent Class Modeling Approach Marine Resource Economics 23(3) 301-323

Edwards S 2008 Ocean zoning first possession and Coasean contracts Marine Policy 32(1) 46-54

229

Publications

NEW ENGLAND | Ocean Policy amp Management ResearchSutinen J P Clay C Dyer S Edwards J Gates T Grigalunas T Hennessy L Juda A Kitts P Logan J Poggie Jr B Rountree S Steinback E Thunberg H Upton and J Walden 2005 A framework for monitoring and assessing socioeconomics and governance of large marine ecosystems Sustaining Large Marine Ecosystems The Human Dimension TM Hennessey and JG Sutinen eds pp 27-83 Amsterdam Elsevier BV

NEW ENGLAND | Other Marine Environmental ResearchPortman M Di Jin and E Thunberg 2009 Waterfront land use change and marine resource conditions the case of New Bedford and Fairhaven Massachusetts Ecological Economics 68 2354-2362

Steinback S 2004 Using ready-made regional input-output models to estimate backward-linkage effects of exogenous output shocks Review of Regional Studies 34(1) 57-71

NEW ENGLAND | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchThunberg E and C Fulcher 2006 Testing the stability of recreational fishing participation probabilities North American Journal of Fisheries Management 26 636-644

Salz R D Loomis M Ross and S Steinback 2002 A Baseline Socio-economic Study of Massachusettsrsquo Marine Recreational Fisheries US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NE-165 129p Available at httpwwwnefscnoaagovpublicationstmtm165tm165pdf

NEW ENGLAND | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchJohnston R D Holland and S Tuler 2010 New England Fishing Communities Prospects and Uncertainties Communities and Banking 21(2) 3-5Tuler S J Agyeman and P Pinto da Silva 2008 Improving the social sustainability of fisheries management by assessing stakeholder vulnerability Human Ecology Review 15(2) 171-184

Pinto da Silva P and M Hall-Arber eds 2008 Weathering the storms vulnerability and resilience in the Northeast fishing industry Special issue of Human Ecology Review 15(2) 141-142

Olson J 2006 Changing property spatializing difference the sea scallop fishery in New Bedford Massachusetts Human Organization 65(3) 307-318

Pinto da Silva P and A Kitts 2006 Collaborative fisheries management in the Northeast US emerging initiatives and future directions Marine Policy 30(6) 832-841

Pinto da Silva P 2006 Fishermen at the frontlines of conservation The Common Property Resource Digest March 2006 issue

Pinto da Silva P and C Fulcher 2005 Human dimensions of marine fisheries Using GIS to illustrate land-sea connections in the Northeast US herring fishery Marine Fisheries Review 67(4) 19-25

NEW ENGLAND | US Territories amp International Fisheries ResearchPascoe S J Innes D Holland M Fina O Theacutebaud R Townsend J Sanchirico R Arnason C Wilcox and T Hutton 2010 Use of incentive-based management systems to limit bycatch and discarding International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 4(1) 123-161

230

Publications

Mid-AtlanticMID-ATLANTIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchSteinback S and E Thunberg 2006 Northeast region commercial fishing input-output model US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NE-188 54p Available at httpwwwnefscnoaagovpublicationstmtm188tm188pdf

Edwards S 2005 Rents for the taking a contemporary history of property rights formation in the US Atlantic sea scallop fishery Evolving Property Rights in Marine Fisheries D Leal ed pp 111-126 New York Rowman amp Littlefield Publishers

Edwards S 2005 Accounting for rents in the US Atlantic sea scallop fishery Marine Resource Economics 20(1) 61-76

Hoagland P D Jin E Thunberg and S Steinback 2005 Economic activity associated with the Northeast Shelf Large Marine Ecosystem application of an input-output approach Chapter 7 Sustaining Large Marine Ecosystems The Human Dimension TM Hennessey and JG Sutinen eds pp 157-179 Amsterdam Elsevier BV

Walden J J Kirkley and A Kitts 2003 A limited economics assessment of the Northeast groundfish fishery buyout program Land Economics 79(3) 426-439Link J J Brodziak S Edwards W Overholtz D Mountain J Jossi T Smith and M Fogarty 2002 Marine ecosystem assessment in a fisheries management context Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59 1429-1440

Jin D H Kite-Powell E Thunberg A Solow and W Talley 2002 A model of fishing vessel accident probability Journal of Safety Research 33 497-510

Edwards S 2002 Rent-seeking and property rights formation in the US Atlantic sea scallop fishery Marine Resource Economics 16 263-275

Kirkley J R Fare S Grosskopf T McConnell D Squires and I Strand 2001 Assessing efficiency and capacity in fisheries when data are limited North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21(3) 482-497

MID-ATLANTIC | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchKasperski S and R Weiland 2010 When Is It Optimal To Delay Harvesting The Role of Ecological Services In The Northern Chesapeake Bay Oyster Fishery Marine Resource Economics 24(4) 361-385

MID-ATLANTIC | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchWallmo K and B Gentner 2008 Catch-and-release fishing a comparison of intended and actual behavior of marine anglers North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28(5) 1459-1471

Massey D S Newbold and B Gentner 2006 Valuing water quality changes using a bioeconomic model of a coastal recreational fishery Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52(1) 482-500

Massey M S Newbold and B Gentner 2005 The effects of water quality on coastal recreation flounder fishing NCEE Working Paper Series No 05-03 National Center for Environmental Economics (NCEE) Environmental Protection Agency

Thunberg E and J Milon 2002 Projecting recreational fishing participation Recreational Fisheries Ecological Economic and Social Evaluation T J Pitcher and C Hollingworth eds pp 63-73 United Kingdon Blackwell Science

231

Publications

Steinback S and B Gentner 2001 Marine Angler Expenditures in the Northeast Region 1998 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-4

MID-ATLANTIC | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchOlson J and P Clay 2001 An Overview of the Social and Economic Survey Administered During Round II of the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Disaster Assistance Program US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NE-164 80p Available at httpwwwnefscnoaagovpublicationstmtm164tm164pdf

South AtlanticSOUTH ATLANTIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchCrosson S 2015 Anticipating exit from North Carolinarsquos commercial fisheries Forthcoming in Society and Natural Resources

Shideler G D Carter C Liese and J Serafy 2015 Lifting the goliath grouper harvest ban Angler perspectives and willingness to pay Fisheries Research 161(Jan) 156-165

Yandle T and S Crosson 2015 Whatever Happened to the Wreckfish Fishery An Evaluation of the Oldest Finfish ITQ Program in the United States Marine Resource Economics 30(2) 193-217

Fleming C F Tonioli and J Agar 2014 A review of principal coastal economic sectors within the southeast United States and US Caribbean NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-669 44 p DOI 107289V5J10135

Tokitch B C Meindl A Hoare and M Jepson 2012 Stakeholder Perceptions of the Northern Gulf of Mexico Grouper and Tilefish Individual Fishing Quota Program Marine Policy 36 34ndash41

Walter J E Orbesen C Liese and J Serafy 2012 Can Circle Hooks Improve Western Atlantic Sailfish Istiophorus Platypterus Populations Bulletin of Marine Science 88(3) 755-770

Crosson S 2011 Resistance to Alternative Management in Fisheries Economic and Cultural Considerations of North Carolinarsquos Commercial fishers Politics and the Life Sciences 30(2) 31-42

Matos-Caraballo D and J Agar 2011 Census of Active Commercial Fishermen in Puerto Rico 2008 Marine Fisheries Review 73(1) 13-27

Tonioli F and J Agar 2011 Synopsis of Puerto Rican Commercial Fisheries NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-622 47p

Crosson S 2010 Trends in the South Atlantic Golden Crab Fishery US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-608 24p

Perrusso L R Weldon and S Larkin 2005 Predicting optimal targeting strategies in multispecies fisheries a portfolio approach Marine Resource Economics 20(1) 25-45

232

Publications

Thunberg E 2004 Buyback programs for overcapitalized fisheries approaches experiences and impacts for Southeast fisheries discussion Journal of Agricultural amp Applied Economics 36(2) 347-349

Porter R M Wendt M Travis and I Strand 2001 Cost-earnings Study of the Atlantic-based US Pelagic Longline Fleet SOEST Publication 01-02 JIMAR Contribution 01-337 102p

Waters J R Rhodes and R Wiggers 2001 Description of Economic Data Collected with Random Sample of Commercial Reef Fish Boats in the Florida Keys US Dept of Commerce NOAA Technical Report NMFS-154 45p

SOUTH ATLANTIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchFleming C F Toniolo and J Agar 2014 A review of principal coastal economic sectors within the southeast United States and US Caribbean NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-669 44p DOI 107289V5J10135

SOUTH ATLANTIC | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchLiese C and D Carter 2011 Collecting Economic Data from the For-Hire Fishing Sector Lessons from a Cost and Earnings Survey of the Southeast US Charter Boat Industry 14p In Beard T D Jr A J Loftus and R Arlinghaus (eds) The Angler and the Environment American Fisheries Society Bethesda MD

Marvasti A 2010 A Welfare Estimation of Beach Recreation with Aggregate Data Applied Economics 42(1-3) 291-96

Carter D and D Letson 2009 Structural vector error correction modeling of integrated sport fishery data Marine Resource Economics 24(1) 19-41

Carter D C Rivero S Aguilar and K Kleisner 2008 South Florida Sportfishing Geodatabase (SFSGEO) design document US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-578 27p Available at httpwwwsefscnoaagovsfsgeodesignpdf

SOUTH ATLANTIC | Sociocultural ResearchStoffle B J Contillo C Grace and D Snodgrass 2011 The Socio-Economic Importance of Fishing in St Thomas USVI An Examination of Fishing Community Designation NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-623 47p

SOUTH ATLANTIC | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchCarter D 2003 Protected areas in marine resource management another look at the economics and research issues Ocean and Coastal Management 46(5) 439-456

Gulf of MexicoGULF OF MEXICO | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchKarnaukas M M Schirripa J Craig G Cook C Kelble J Agar B Black D Enfield D Lindo-Atichati B Muhling K Purcell P Richards and C Wang 2015 Evidence of climate-driven ecosystem reorganization in the Gulf of Mexico Forthcoming in Global Change Biology

Agar J and D Carter 2014 Are the 2012 allocations of gag red and black grouper in the Gulf of Mexico economically efficient US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-660 40p

233

Publications

Agar J and D Carter 2014 Is the 2012 allocation of red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico economically efficient US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-659 32p

Agar J J Stephen A Strelcheck and A Diagne 2014 The Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper IFQ Program The First Five Years Marine Resource Economics 29(2) 177-198

Marvasti A 2014 Crew Injuries and Fatalities Employment Estimates and Casualty Rates in the Gulf of Mexico Commercial Fisheries NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-656 17p

Solis D J del Corral L Perruso and J Agar 2014 Evaluating the impact of individual fishing quotas (IFQs) on the technical efficiency and composition of the US Gulf of Mexico red snapper commercial fishing fleet Food Policy 46 74-83

Solis D J del Corral L Perruso and J Agar 2014 Individual fishing quotas and fishing capacity in the US Gulf of Mexico red snapper fishery Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 58 1-23

Solis D L Perruso J del Corral B Stoffle and D Letson 2013 Measuring the initial economic effects of hurricanes on commercial fish production the US Gulf of Mexico grouper (Serranidae) fishery Natural Hazards 66(2) 271-289

Liese C and M Travis 2010 The Annual Economic Survey of Federal Gulf Shrimp Permit Holders Implementation and Descriptive Results for 2008 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-601 99p Available at httpwwwsefscnoaagovdocsShrimpEconTM601pdf

Liese C M Travis and J Waters 2009 The Annual Economic Survey of Federal Gulf Shrimp Permit Holders Implementation and Descriptive Results for 2007 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-590 97p Available at httpwwwsefscnoaagovdocsShrimpEconTM590pdf

Liese C M Travis D Pina and J Waters 2009 The Annual Economic Survey of Federal Gulf Shrimp Permit Holders Report on the Design Implementation and Descriptive Results for 2006 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-584 91p Available at httpaquaticcommonsorg21061tm_584pdf

Nance J W Keithly Jr C Caillouet Jr J Cole W Gaidry B Gallaway W Griffin R Hart and M Travis 2008 Estimation of Effort Maximum Sustainable Yield and Maximum Economic Yield in the Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-570 71p

Keithly W H Diop R Kazmierczak and M Travis 2006 The Impacts of Imports Particularly Farm-Raised Product on the Southeast US Shrimp Processing Sector Report to the Gulf and South Atlantic Fisheries Foundation 50p

Travis M and W Griffin 2004 Update on the Economic Status of the Gulf of Mexico Commercial Shrimp Fishery SERO-ECON-04-01 National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Regional Office St Petersburg Florida 10p

Weninger Q and J Waters 2003 Economic benefits of management reform in the Northern Gulf of Mexico reef fish fishery Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46(2) 207-230

Waters J 2001 Quota management in the commercial red snapper fishery Marine Resource Economics 16(1) 65-78

Travis M 2000 Data and Modeling Issues in the Gulf of Mexicorsquos Shrimp Fishery SERO-ECON-00-14 National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Regional Office St Petersburg Florida 17p

234

Publications

GULF OF MEXICO | Habitat Economics ResearchMinello T L Rozas P Caldwell and C Liese 2012 A Comparison of Salt Marsh Construction Costs with the Value of Exported Shrimp Production Wetlands 32(5) 791-799

GULF OF MEXICO | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchCarter D and C Liese 2010 Hedonic Valuation of Sportfishing Harvest Marine Resource Economics 25(4) 391-407

Carter D J Agar and J Waters 2008 Economic Framework for Fishery Allocation Decisions with an Application to the Gulf of Mexico Red Grouper US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-576 95p Available at httpwwwsefscnoaagovdocstm576pdf

Oh C-O Ditton R B Gentner and R Reichers 2005 A stated preference choice approach to understanding angler preferences for management options Human Dimensions of Wildlife 10(3) 173-186

GULF OF MEXICO | Sociocultural Fisheries Research Blount B S Jacob P Weeks and M Jepson 2015 Testing Cognitive Ethnography Mixed-Methods in Developing Indicators of Well-Being in Fishing Communities Human Organization 74(1)

Jacob S P Weeks B Blount and M Jepson 2013 Development and Evaluation of Social Indicators of Vulnerability and Resiliency for Fishing Communities in the Gulf of Mexico Marine Policy 37(1) 86-95

Jacob S P Weeks B Blount and M Jepson 2010 Exploring Fishing Dependence in Gulf Coast Communities Marine Policy 34(6) 1307-1314

Ingles P 2008 Sunken boats tangled nets and disrupted lives impacts of Hurricane Katrina on two coastal areas of Louisiana Mitigating Impacts of Natural Disasters on Fisheries Ecosystems KD McLaughlin ed American Fisheries Society Bethesda Maryland

CaribbeanCARIBBEAN | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchAgar J J Waters M Valdes-Pizzini M Shivlani T Murray J Kirkley and D Suman 2008 US Caribbean Fish Trap Fishery Socioeconomic Study Bulletin of Marine Science 82(3) 315-331

CARIBBEAN | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchKarras C and J Agar 2009 Cruzan fisherrsquos perspectives on the performance of the Buck Island Reef National Monument and the red hind seasonal closure Ocean and Coastal Management 52 578-585

CARIBBEAN | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchValds-Pizzini M J Agar K Kitner C Garca-Quijano M Tust and F Forrestal 2010 Cruzan Fisheries A rapid assessment of the historical social cultural and economic processes that shaped coastal communitiesrsquo dependence and engagement in fishing in the island of St Croix US Virgin Islands NOAA Series on US Caribbean Fishing Communities NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-597 144p

235

Publications

Tonioli F and J Agar 2009 Extending the Bajo de Sico Puerto Rico Seasonal Closure An Examination of Small-scale Fishermenrsquos Perceptions of Possible Socio-economic Impacts on Fishing Practices Families and Community Marine Fisheries Review 71(2) 15-23

Pollnac R S Abbott-Jamieson C Smith M Miller P Clay and B Oles 2008 Toward a Model for Fisheries Social Impact Assessment Marine Fisheries Review 68(1-4) 1-18

CARIBBEAN | US Territories amp International Fisheries ResearchAgar J M Shivlani J Waters M Valdes-Pizzini T Murray J Kirkley and D Suman 2005 US Caribbean Fish Trap Fishery Costs and Earnings Study US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-534 127p Available at httpwwwsefscnoaagovdocsTrap_May2006pdf

Resources

Tuna tails Photo NOAA FisheriesBrad McHale

238

Resources

UNITED STATESFederal Agenciesbull Economics amp Social Analysis Division Office of Science amp Technology NOAA Fisheries

wwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsbull Office of Science amp Technology NOAA Fisheries

httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovaboutoffice-science-and-technologybull Marine Recreational Information Program

httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovtopicrecreational-fishing-databull Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs US Department of State

wwwstategoveoesocnsfish

NORTH PACIFICFederal Agenciesbull Economic amp Social Sciences Research Alaska Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

httpwwwafscnoaagovREFMSocioeconomicsdefaultphpbull Alaska Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwafscnoaagovbull Alaska Regional Office NOAA Fisheries | httpsalaskafisheriesnoaagovbull Alaska Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | httpwwwfwsgovalaskabull District 17 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD17State Agenciesbull Alaska Department of Fish amp Game | wwwadfgstateakusCouncils amp Commissionsbull North Pacific Fishery Management Council | wwwnpfmcorgbull Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwpsmfcorgbull Fisheries Economics Data Program Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwpsmfcorgefinbull International Pacific Halibut Commission | wwwiphcint

PACIFICFederal Agenciesbull Economics Groundfish Analysis Program Northwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

httpwwwnwfscnoaagovresearchdivisionsframeconomicbull Human Dimensions Program Northwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

wwwnwfscnoaagovresearchdivisionscbdhumandimbull Northwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwnwfscnoaagovbull West Coast Regional Office NOAA Fisheries | wwwwestcoastfisheriesnoaagovbull Socioeconomics Research Southwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

httpsswfscnoaagovtextblockaspxid=1038ampParentMenuId=109bull Southwest Fisheries Science Center | httpsswfscnoaagovbull Pacific Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovpacificbull California amp Nevada US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovcnobull District 13 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD13State Agenciesbull California Department of Fish amp Game | wwwwildlifecagovbull Oregon Department of Fish amp Wildlife | wwwdfwstateorusbull Washington Department of Fish amp Wildlife | httpwdfwwagov

239

Resources

Councils amp Commissionsbull Pacific Fishery Management Council | wwwpcouncilorgbull Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwpsmfcorgbull Fisheries Economics Data Program - Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwpsmfcorgefinbull International Pacific Halibut Commission | wwwiphcint

WESTERN PACIFICFederal Agenciesbull Socioeconomics amp Planning Group Office of the Director Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

wwwpifscnoaagovsocioeconomicsbull Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwpifscnoaagovbull Pacific Islands Regional Office NOAA Fisheries | wwwfpirnoaagovbull Pacific Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovpacificbull District 14 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmild14State Agenciesbull Hawaiʻi Department of Land amp Natural Resources | wwwhawaiigovdlnrbull Guam Office of the Governor | httpgovernorguamgovbull Department of Marine amp Wildlife Resources American Samoa Office of the Governor

httpswwwamericansamoagovdepartment-of-marine-wildlifebull Division of Fish amp Wildlife Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands | httpwwwcnmi-dfwcomCouncils amp Commissionsbull Western Pacific Fishery Management Council | wwwwpcouncilorg

NEW ENGLANDFederal Agenciesbull Social Sciences Branch Northeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwnefscnoaagovreadsocialscibull Northeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwnefscnoaagovbull Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office NOAA Fisheries | wwwgreateratlanticfisheriesnoaagovbull Northeast Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovnortheastbull District 1 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD1State Agenciesbull Maine Department of Marine Resources | wwwmainegovdmrbull Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management | wwwdemrigovbull Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries | wwwmassgoveealand-use-habitatsmarine-fisheriesbull Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection | wwwctgovdepsitebull New Hampshire Fish amp Game Department | wwwwildlifestatenhusCouncils amp Commissionsbull New England Fishery Management Council | wwwnefmcorgbull Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwasmfcorg

240

Resources

MID-ATLANTICFederal Agenciesbull Social Sciences Branch Northeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwnefscnoaagovreadsocialscibull Northeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwnefscnoaagovbull Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office NOAA Fisheries | wwwgreateratlanticfisheriesnoaagovbull Northeast Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovnortheastbull District 5 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD5State Agenciesbull Bureau of Marine Resources New York Department of Environmental Conservation

wwwdecnygovabout796htmlbull New Jersey Division of Fish amp Wildlife | wwwstatenjusdepfgwbull Pennsylvania Fish amp Boat Commission | httpfishandboatcombull Delaware Division of Fish amp Wildlife | wwwfwdelawaregovbull Fisheries Service Maryland Department of Natural Resources | wwwdnrstatemdusfisheriesbull Virginia Marine Resources Commission | wwwmrcstatevausCouncils amp Commissionsbull Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council | wwwmafmcorgbull Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwasmfcorg

SOUTH ATLANTICFederal Agenciesbull Social Science Research Group Southeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

wwwsefscnoaagovsocialsciencejspbull Southeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwsefscnoaagovbull Southeast Regional Office NOAA Fisheries | httpseronmfsnoaagovbull Southeast Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovsoutheastbull Southwest Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovsouthwestbull District 7 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD7State Agenciesbull Division of Marine Fisheries North Carolina Department of Environment amp Natural Resources

httpportalncdenrorgwebmfbull Marine Resources Division South Carolina Department of Natural Resources | wwwdnrscgovbull Coastal Resources Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources | httpscoastalgadnrorgbull Florida Fish amp Wildlife Conservation Commission | httpmyfwccomCouncils amp Commissionsbull South Atlantic Fishery Management Council | wwwsafmcnetbull Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwasmfcorg

241

Resources

GULF OF MEXICOFederal Agenciesbull Social Science Research Group Southeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

wwwsefscnoaagovsocialsciencejspbull Southeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwsefscnoaagovbull Southeast Regional Office NOAA Fisheries | httpseronmfsnoaagovbull Southeast Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovsoutheastbull Southwest Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovsouthwestbull District 8 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD8State Agenciesbull Florida Fish amp Wildlife Conservation Commission | httpmyfwccombull Marine Resources Division Alabama Department of Conservation amp Natural Resources

wwwoutdooralabamacombull Mississippi Department of Marine Resources | wwwdmrstatemsusbull Louisiana Department of Wildlife amp Fisheries | wwwwlflouisianagovbull Texas Parks amp Wildlife Department | wwwtpwdstatetxusCouncils amp Commissionsbull Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council | wwwgulfcouncilorgbull Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwgsmfcorg

PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONSbull North American Association of Fisheries Economists | httporegonstateedudeptIIFETNAAFEHomehtmlbull International Institute of Fisheries Economics amp Trade | httporegonstateedudeptiifet

OTHER ORGANIZATIONS amp INFORMATIONbull Organisation for Economic Co-operation amp Development | httpwwwoecdorgbull Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

httpwwwfaoorgfisherycaptureenbull Marine Stewardship Council | wwwmscorg

Glossary

Fishing in Florida Photo NOAA FisheriesAyeisha Brinson

244

Glossary

Angler1 ndash A person catching fish or shellfish with no intent to sell including people releasing the catch Also known as a recreational fisherman

Annual Payroll2 ndash Includes all forms of compensation such as salaries wages reported tips commissions bonuses vacation allowances sick-leave pay employee contributions to qualified pension plans and the value of taxable fringe benefits For corporations it includes amounts paid to officers and executives for unincorporated businesses it does not include profit or other compensation of proprietors or partners Payroll is reported before deductions for Social Security income tax insurance union dues etc

Annual Receipts3 ndash Includes gross receipts sales commissions and income from trades and businesses as reported on annual business income tax returns Business income consists of all payments received for services rendered by nonemployer businesses such as payments received as independent agents and contractors The composition of nonemployer receipts may differ from receipts data published for employer establishments For ex-ample for wholesale agents and brokers without payroll (nonemployers) the receipts item contains commissions or earnings In contrast for wholesale agents and brokers with payroll (employers) the sales and receipts item published in the Economic Census represents the value of the goods involved in the transactions

Buyback Program4 ndash A management tool available to fishery managers intended to ease fishing-related pressure on marine resources Fishing vessels are purchased by the government or by the fishing industry itself Then they are removed from a specific fishery where fish stocks or stock complexes are considered overfished or subject to overfishing

Bycatch1 ndash Species other than the primary target species that are caught incidental to the harvest of the primary species Bycatch may be retained or discarded discards may occur for regulatory or economic reasons

Catch1 ndash 1 To undertake any activity that results in taking fish out of its environment dead or alive or to bring fish on board a vessel dead or alive 2 The total number (or weight) of fish caught by fishing operations Catch should include all fish killed by the act of fishing not just those landed 3 The component of fish encountering fishing gear which is retained by the gear Catch is usually expressed in terms of wet weight It refers sometimes to the total amount caught and sometimes only to the amount landed The fish that are not landed but returned to the sea are called discards or bycatch For this report recreational catch refers to the total number of individual fish released (thrown back into the sea) and harvested (not thrown back into the sea) by recreational fishermen (anglers)

Catch Share Program5 ndash This is a generic term used to describe a fishery management program that allocates a specific portion of the total fishery catch to individuals cooperatives communities or other entities including sectors The term encompasses more specific programs defined in legislation such as Limited Access Privilege Pro-grams (LAPPs) and Individual Fishing Quotas (IFQs) Note that a catch share allocated to a sector is different from a general sectoral allocation or distribution to an entire segment of a fishery (such as a recreational sector alloca-tion or a longline gear sector allocation) The two differ because the recipient of the catch share is responsible for terminating fishing activity when their specific share is reached

Coastal County6 ndash A coastal county meets one of the following criteria 1) at least 15 percent of a countyrsquos total land area is located within the nationrsquos coastal watershed 2) a portion of or an entire county accounts for at least 15 percent of a coastal cataloging unit Any US county that meets these criteria is classified as coastal

Coastal County Angler ndash For this report a coastal county angler refers to a recreational fishermen who lives within a given state and within a coastal county of that state

245

Glossary

Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ)7 ndash For this report the CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of a statersquos distribution of employment in commercial fishing industries compared with the distribution of commercial fishing industries in the US The CFLQ is calculated using the rdquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics US Department of Labor

Community Development Quota Program (CDQ)1 ndash A program in western Alaska under which a per-centage of the total allowable catch (TAC) of Bering Sea commercial fisheries is allocated to specific communities Communities eligible for this program must be located within 50 miles of the Bering Sea coast or on an island within the Bering Sea meet criteria established by the State of Alaska be a village certified by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act and consist of residents who conduct more than half of their current commercial or subsistence fishing in the Bering Sea or waters surrounding the Aleutian Islands Currently 75 percent of the TAC in the pollock halibut sablefish crab and groundfish fisheries is allocated to the CDQ Program

Dedicated Access Privileges (DAPs)8 ndash As defined by the US Commission on Ocean Policy a DAP pro-gram assigns an individual or other entity access to a predetermined portion of the annual catch in a particular fishery In some cases the privilege is transferable and may be bought and sold creating a market The term en-compasses a range of tools including access privileges assigned to individuals (that is individual transferable quo-tas) and to groups or communities (for example community development quotas cooperatives and area-based quotas) DAP programs are sometimes known as rights-based management and are of 10 synonymous with Limited Access Privilege Programs (see rdquoLimited Access Privilege Programrdquo) However rdquorights-based managementrdquo implies granting an individual the rdquorightrdquo to fish With the exception of certain tribes US fishermen do not have inalienable rights to fish because the fishery resources of the US belong to all people of the US Under current law fishermen are granted a rdquoprivilegerdquo to fish subject to certain conditions

Discards1 ndash To release or return a fish or other species to the sea dead or alive whether or not such fish or other species are brought fully on board a fishing vessel Estimates of discards can be made in a variety of ways including samples from observers and logbook records Fish (or parts of fish) can be discarded for a variety of rea-sons such as having physical damage being a non-target species for the trip and compliance with management regulations like minimum size limits or quotas

Durable Equipment Expenditures or Durable Goods Expenditures9 ndash For this report this term refers to expenses related to equipment used for recreational fishing activities These expenses include the purchase of semi-durable goods (tackle rods reels line etc) durable goods (motor boats and accessories non-motorized boats boating electronics mooring boat storage boat insurance and vehicles or homes) and angling accessories and multi-purpose items (magazines club dues saltwater angling-specific clothing and camping gear)

Ecolabel or Ecolabelling Scheme10 ndash In fisheries ecolabelling schemes entitle a fishery product to bear a distinctive logo or statement that certifies that the fish has been harvested in compliance with specified conserva-tion and sustainability standards The logo or statement is intended to facilitate informed decisions by purchasers whose choices may promote and stimulate the sustainable use of fishery resources

246

Glossary

Economic Impact Model1112 ndash Economic impact models capture how sales in a sector generate economic impacts directly in the sector in which the sale was made The sales then ripple throughout the state and national economies as each dollar spent generates additional sales by other firms and consumers The NOAA Fisheries Com-mercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model uses an IMPLAN platform to estimate the economic impacts associated with the harvesting of fish by US commercial fishermen and other major components of the US seafood industry As used here the term fish refers to the entire range of finfish shellfish and other life (that is sea urchins seaweed kelp and worms) from marine and freshwaters that are included in the landings data maintained by the Na-tional Marine Fisheries Service The NOAA Fisheries Recreational Economic Impact Model which also uses an IMPLAN platform estimates the economic impacts generated by expenditures made by saltwater anglers

Economic Impacts1112 ndash For this report the economic impacts of the commercial fishing sector and seafood industry refer to the employment (full-time and part-time jobs) personal income and output (sales by US busi-nesses) generated by the commercial harvest sector and other major components of the US seafood industry These components include processors and dealers wholesalers and distributors grocers and restaurants Economic impacts of recreational fishing activities refer to the amount of sales generated the number of jobs supported and the contribution to gross domestic product (GDP) by state (also known as value-added impacts) from expenditures related to recreational fishing

Effort1 ndash For this report effort refers to the number of fishing trips taken by recreational fishermen (anglers) The term can also refer to the amount of time and fishing power used to harvest fish in commercial fisheries including gear size boat size and horsepower

Employee Compensation13 ndash This is related to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by State and is an estimate of the sum of employee wages and salaries and supplements to wages and salaries Wages and salaries are mea-sured on an accrual or rdquowhen earnedrdquo basis which may be different from the measure of wages and salaries measured on a disbursement or rdquowhen paidrdquo basis Wages and salaries and supplements of Federal military and civilian government employees stationed abroad are excluded from the measure of GDP by state

Employer Establishments14 ndash Businesses with payroll and paid employees with a single physical location at which business is conducted or services or industrial operations are performed An employee establishment is not necessarily identical to a company or enterprise which may consist of one or more establishments When two or more activities are carried on at a single location under a single ownership all activities generally are grouped to-gether as a single establishment The entire establishment is classified on the basis of its major activity and all data are included in that classification

Endangered Species15 ndash As defined by the Endangered Species Act (ESA) an endangered species is any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range See also rdquoThreatened Speciesrdquo

Endangered Species Act (ESA)15 ndash The ESA was signed on December 28 1973 and provides for the con-servation of species that are endangered or threatened throughout all or a significant portion of their range and the conservation of the ecosystems on which they depend The ESA replaced the Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 Congress has amended the ESA several times

Expenditures9 ndash For this report expenditures are related to recreational fishing activities and described as be-ing one of two types 1) expenditures related to a specific fishing trip or 2) durable equipment expenditures

Ex-Vessel10 ndash Refers to activities that occur when a commercial fishing boat lands or unloads a catch For exam-ple the price for the catch that a captain receives at the point of landing is an ex-vessel price

247

Glossary

Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)1 ndash The EEZ is the area that extends 200 nautical miles from the seaward boundaries of the coastal states The seaward boundary for most states is 3 nautical miles with the exceptions of Texas Puerto Rico and the Gulf Coast of Florida which is 9 nautical miles The US claims and exercises sover-eign rights and exclusive fishery management authority over all fish and continental shelf resources through this 200-nautical-mile boundary

Fish Stock1 ndash A fish stock refers to the living resources in the community or population from which catches are taken in a fishery The term ldquofish stockrdquo usually implies that the particular population is more or less isolated from other stocks of the same species and hence self-sustaining In a particular fishery the fish stock may be one or several species of fish Here it also includes commercial invertebrates and plants

Fishery Management Council (FMC) or Regional Fishery Management Council4 ndash A regional fish-eries management body established by the Magnuson-Stevens Act to manage fishery resources in eight designated regions of the United States

Fishery Management Plan (FMP)4 ndash 1 A document prepared under supervision of the appropriate fishery management council (FMC) for the management of stocks of fish judged to require management The plan must gen-erally be formally approved An FMP includes data analyses and management measures 2 A plan containing con-servation and management measures for fishery resources and other provisions required by the Magnuson-Ste-vens Act developed by fishery management councils or the Secretary of Commerce

Fishing Cooperatives4 ndash A market-based fisheries management tool where access to fisheries resources is limited to a specific group of fishermen See also rdquoCatch Share Programrdquo

Fishing Day ndash For this report a fishing day refers to a partial or full day spent in recreational fishing and can be different from a fishing trip For example one fishing trip can consist of more than 1 fishing day This term is used in the Alaska recreational fishing tables

Fishing Effort10 ndash The amount of fishing gear of a specific type used on the fishing grounds over a given unit of time For example hours trawled per day number of hooks set per day or number of hauls of a beach seine per day When two or more kinds of gear are used the respective efforts must be adjusted to some standard type before being added For recreational fishing activities fishing effort refers to the number of participants (that is recreational fishermen or anglers) who engage in recreational fishing activities

Fishing Mode ndash For this report fishing mode refers to the type of recreational fishing a recreational fisherman (angler) engages in such as fishing from shore a private or rental boat or a for-hire boat

Fishing Trip ndash For this report a fishing trip refers to a recreational fishing excursion and can be different from a fishing day For example one fishing trip can consist of more than 1 fishing day Fishing trips are classified as occurring in one of three fishing modes 1) a shore-based fishing trip 2) by a private or rental boat or 3) on a for-hire fishing boat

For-Hire Mode ndash For this report this fishing mode refers to trips taken by a recreational fishermen (anglers) on a party (also referred to as a headboat) or charter boat

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by State or Gross State Product (GSP)13 - Previously known as the Gross State Product the GDP by state is the value added in production by the labor and capital located in a state GDP for a state is derived as the sum of the GDP originating in all industries in the state

248

Glossary

Harvest1 ndash The total number of weight or fish caught and kept from an area over a period of time Note that landings catch and harvest are different For recreational fishing activities harvest refers to the number of indi-vidual fish not thrown back into the sea by a recreational fisherman (angler) However in Hawaiʻi and the Gulf states harvest includes fish thrown back dead See also rdquoCatchrdquo and rdquoReleaserdquo

Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ)1 ndash A type of limited entry an allocation to an individual (a person or a legal entity for example a vessel owner or company) of a right (privilege) to harvest a certain amount of fish in a cer-tain period of time It is also of 10 expressed as an individual share of an aggregate quota or total allowable catch (TAC) See also rdquoIndividual Transferable Quotardquo and rdquoCatch Share Programrdquo

Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ)1 ndash A type of individual fishing quota (IFQ) allocated to individual fish-ermen or vessel owners that can be transferred (sold or leased) to others See also rdquoIndividual Fishing Quotardquo

Industry Sector ndash For this report fishing- and marine-related industries were combined into industry sectors Two industry sectors were included in this report 1) seafood sales and processing and 2) transport support and marine operations Fishing and marine-related industries were chosen from the County Business Patterns Data Series based on data availability and perceived relevance to fishing or marine activities These industries were then combined into one of these two industry sectors

Key Species or Species Groups ndash For this report up to 10 species or species groups were chosen as rdquokeyrdquo species or species groups due to their regional importance to commercial and recreational fisheries The regional importance of these key species or species groups was chosen based on their economic andor historical signifi-cance to a state or region

Landings1 ndash 1 The number or poundage of fish unloaded by commercial fishermen or brought to shore by rec-reational fishermen for personal use Landings are reported at the locations at which fish are brought to shore 2 The part of the catch that is selected and kept during the sorting procedures on board vessels and successively discharged at dockside

Limited Access Privilege Program (LAPP) or Limited Access Privilege System4 ndash As defined in the Magnuson-Stevens Act LAPPs limit participation in a fishery to those satisfying certain eligibility criteria or require-ments contained in a fishery management plan (FMP) or associated regulation A limited access privilege is a federal permit issued as part of a limited access system to harvest a quantity of fish expressed by a unit or units representing a portion of the total allowable catch (TAC) of the fishery that may be received or held for exclusive use by a person A LAPP includes an individual fishing quota (IFQ) or individual tradable quota (ITQ) but does not include community de-velopment quotas (CDQs) LAPPs are sometimes known as Dedicated Access Privileges (DAPs) However unlike LAPPs DAPs generally encompass CDQs as well as IFQs (see rdquoDedicated Access Privilegesrdquo) LAPPs are a type of catch share program See also rdquoCatch Share Programrdquo

License Limitation Program or Limited Entry Program1 ndash A management tool available to fishery man-agers where the number of commercial fishermen or vessels licensed to participate in a fishery is legally restricted A management agency of 10 uses this management tool to limit entry into a fishery

Limited Entry Program ndash Also known as a license limitation program see rdquoLicense Limitation Programrdquo

249

Glossary

Location Quotient7 ndash Location Quotients (LQs) are ratios that allow an arearsquos distribution of employment by industry to be compared to a reference or base arearsquos distribution The reference area is usually the US but it can also be a state or metropolitan area The reference or base industry is usually the all-industry total The follow-ing discussion assumes the defaults are used LQs also allow areas to be easily compared with each other If an LQ is equal to 1 then the industry has the same share of its area employment as it does in the reference area An LQ greater than 1 indicates an industry with a greater share of the local area employment than in the reference area

For example (assuming the US as the reference area) Las Vegas will have an LQ greater than 1 in the Leisure and Hospitality industry because this industry makes up a larger share of the Las Vegas employment total than it does for the country as a whole LQs are calculated by first dividing local industry employment by the all-industry total of local employment Next reference area industry employment is divided by the all-industry total for the reference area Finally the local ratio is divided by the reference area ratio

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act or Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA)1

Federal legislation responsible for establishing the Regional Fishery Management Councils (FMCs) and the manda-tory and discretionary guidelines for federal fishery management plans (FMPs) This legislation was originally en-acted in 1976 as the Fishery Management and Conservation Act Its name was changed to the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act in 1980 and in 1996 it was renamed the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conserva-tion and Management Act

Market-based Management4 ndash Market-based management is an umbrella term that encompasses approach-es that provide economic incentives to protect fisheries from overharvest These approaches contrast with con-ventional fisheries management approaches such as buyback programs and license limitation programs (see rdquoBuyback Programrdquo and rdquoLicense Limitation Programrdquo) One example of a market-based management approach for fisheries is a limited access privilege program (LAPP see rdquoLimited Access Privilege Programrdquo) that includes an individual fishing quota A LAPP provides individual fishermen an exclusive market-based share of a harvest quota or total allowable catch (TAC) of a fishery

Marine Coastal County ndash For this report a marine coastal county is a coastal county that is adjacent to an ocean coastline See also rdquoCoastal Countyrdquo

Marine Economy ndash For this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fish-ing- and marine-related industries located in a coastal state Fishing- and marine-related industries were chosen from industries defined in the County Business Patterns Data Series provided by the US Census Bureau Indus-tries listed in this report were chosen based on that industryrsquos direct contribution to fishing and marine activities and whether data was available for that industry Information such as the number of establishments number of employees and annual payroll for these fishing and marine-related industries was used to determine their relative levels of economic activity in a state These industries were categorized into one of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing and 2) transport support and marine operations See also rdquoIndustry Sectorrdquo

Non-Coastal County Angler ndash For this report a non-coastal county angler refers to a recreational fisherman who lives within a given state but not in a coastal county of that state

Nonemployer Firms3 ndash A nonemployer business is one that has no paid employees has annual business re-ceipts of $1000 or more ($1 or more in the construction industries) and is subject to federal income taxes Most nonemployers are self-employed individuals operating very small unincorporated businesses that may or may not be the ownerrsquos principal source of income

250

Glossary

Non-Resident ndash For this report a non-resident in the US table refers to a recreational fisherman (angler) who resides outside the US a non-resident in the regional and state tables refers to an angler who did not reside in the state where they fished

Out-of-state Angler ndash For this report an out-of-state angler is a recreational fisherman (angler) who does not reside within a given coastal state

Overcapacity16 ndash When the harvesting capability within a given fishery exceeds the level of harvest allowed for that fishery

Overcapitalization10 ndash When the amount of harvesting capacity in a fishery exceeds the amount needed to harvest the desired amount of fish at least cost

Overfished1 ndash 1 An overfished stock or stock complex rdquowhose size is sufficiently small that a change in man-agement practices is required to achieve an appropriate level and rate of rebuildingrdquo A stock or stock complex is considered overfished when its population size falls below the minimum stock size threshold (MSST) A rebuilding plan is required for stocks that are deemed overfished 2 A stock is considered overfished when exploited beyond an explicit limit past which its abundance is considered ldquotoo lowrdquo to ensure safe reproduction In many fisheries the term is used when biomass has been estimated to be below a biological reference point that is used as the signpost defining an rdquooverfished conditionrdquo

Overfishing1 ndash 1 According to the National Standard Guidelines rdquooverfishing occurs whenever a stock or stock complex is subjected to a rate or level of fishing mortality that jeopardizes the capacity of a stock or stock com-plex to produce maximum sustainable yield (MSY) on a continuing basisrdquo Overfishing is occurring if the maximum fishing mortality threshold (MFMT) is exceeded for 1 year or more 2 In general the action of exerting fishing pressure (fishing intensity) beyond the agreed optimum level A reduction of fishing pressure would in the medi-um term lead to an increase in the total catch

Protected Species17 ndash Refers to any species that is protected by either the Endangered Species Act (ESA) or the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) and that is under the jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries This total includes all threatened endangered and candidate species as well as all cetaceans and pinnipeds excluding walruses

Regional Fishery Management Council or Fishery Management Council (FMC)4 ndash The Magnu-son-Stevens Act established eight Regional FMCs around the United States Each council consists of voting and non-vot-ing members who represent various federal state and tribal governments fishing industry groups (commercial andor recreational) and non-fishing groups (such as environmental organizations and academic institutions) Each council is tasked with creating fishery management plans for important fisheries within their regions

Release ndash For this report release refers to the number of individual fish caught by a recreational fisherman (an-gler) that are then returned to the sea (dead or alive) In Hawaiʻi and the Atlantic and Gulf states release does not include fish returned to the sea that are dead See also rdquoCatchrdquo and rdquoHarvestrdquo

Resident ndash For this report a resident in the US table refers to a recreational fisherman (angler) who resides inside the US a resident in the regional and state tables refers to an angler who resides in the state where they fished

Sector Allocation Program17 ndash A fisheries management tool where a group of fishermen are allocated a quota or share of a total allowable catch (TAC) in accordance with an approved plan This program is considered a type of catch share program See also rdquoCatch Share Programrdquo

251

Glossary

Species1 ndash A group of animals or plants having common characteristics that are able to breed together to produce fertile (capable of reproducing) offspring and maintain their rdquoseparatenessrdquo from other groups

Species Group1 ndash Group of species considered together of 10 because they are difficult to differentiate without detailed examination (very similar species) or because data for the separate species are not available (for example in fishery statistics or commercial categories)

Threatened Species13 ndash As defined by the Endangered Species Act (ESA) a threatened species is any species that is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range See also rdquoEndangered Speciesrdquo

Trip Expenditures ndash For this report trip expenditures refer to expenses incurred by recreational fishermen (an-glers) on a fishing trip Trip expenditures are described for residents (individuals who reside in a coastal or non-coast-al county within a given state a US resident) and non-residents (individuals who do not reside within the US)

Value-Added1 ndash A firmrsquos sales minus the cost of the goods and services it purchases from other industries to pro-duce its outputs GLOSSARY NOTES 1 NOAA Fisheries Glossary October 2005 K Blackhart DG Stanton and AM Shimada eds Revised edition June 2006 National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration US Department of Commerce NOAA Technical MemorandumNMFS-FSPO-69 Available at httpwwwstnmfsgovst4documentsF_Glossarypdf [accessed September 19 2014]2 ldquoCBP Definitionsrdquo County Business Patterns US Census Bureau US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwcensusgoveconcbpdefi-nitionshtm [accessed September 19 2014]3 ldquoNonemployer Definitionsrdquo Nonemployer Statistics US Census Bureau US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwcensusgovepcdnonemployerviewdefinehtml [accessed September 19 2014]4 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act as amended through January 12 2007 (PL 94-265 as amended through PL109-479) Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovmsa2007docsact_draftpdf [accessed September 19 2014]5 NOAA Catch Share Policy Office of Policy National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) National Oceanic amp AtmosphericAdministration US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovsfamanagementcatch_sharesaboutdocumentsnoaa_cs_policypdf [accessed September 22 2014]6 rdquoCoastal Countiesrdquo US Census Bureau US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwcensusgovgeolandviewlv6helpcoastal_ctyhtml [accessed September 19 2014]7 Location Quotient Calculator Bureau of Labor Statistics US Department of Labor Available at httpdatablsgovhelpdeflqhtmlocation_quotient_application [accessed September 19 2014]8 Pages 288-289 in An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century Final Report 2004 US Commission on Ocean Policy Washington DC Available athttpwwwoceancommissiongov [accessed September 19 2014]9 P 4 in The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2006 2008 B Gentner and S Steinback NationalMarine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration US Department of Commerce NOAA Technical Memoran-dum NMFS-FSPO-94 Available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagovst5publicationmarine_anglerhtml [accessed September 19 2014]10 rdquoFisheries Term Portalrdquo FAO Fisheries Department United Nations Food amp Agriculture Organization Available at httpwwwfaoorgfaotermcollec-tionfisheriesen [accessed September 19 2014]11 The NMFS Commercial Fishing and Seafood Industry InputOutput Model (CFSI IO Model) August 2009 J Kirkley Virginia Institute of MarineScience Available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2006pdf [accessed September 19 2014]12 Pages 11-12 in ldquoThe Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2006rdquo November 2008 B Gentner and SSteinback National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration US Dept of Commerce NOAATechnical Memorandum NMFS-FSPO-94 301p Available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresma-rine-angler-2006 [accessed September 19 2014]13 rdquoRegional Definitionsrdquo Regional Economic Accounts Bureau of Economic Analysis US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwbeagovregionaldefinitions [accessed September 19 2014]14 ldquoEconomic Census Definitionsrdquo US Census Bureau Available at httpwwwcensusgoveconcensushelpsectordefinitionshtml [accessed Sep-tember 22 2014]15 Endangered Species Act of 1973 (PL 93-205 as amended through PL 100-707) Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovprlawsesa [accessed September 22 2014]16 rdquoStatus of US Fisheriesrdquo Office of Sustainable Fisheries National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) National Oceanic amp AtmosphericAdministration US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovsfastatusoffisheriesSOSmainhtm [accessed September 22 2014]16 P 4 in ldquoAn Assessment of Excess Harvesting Capacity in Federally Managed Commercial Fisheriesrdquo US Dept of Commerce NOAA Technical Memo-randum NMFSFSPO-93 366p Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovmsa2007docs042808_312_b_6_reportpdf [accessed September 22 2014]

Commercial fishing vessels in Ocean City Maryland Photo Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management CouncilJason Didden

  • Fisheries Economics of the United States 2016
  • Preface
  • National Overview
  • National Overview Tables
  • North Pacific Region
  • Alaska Tables
  • Pacific Region
  • Pacific Region Tables
  • California Tables
  • Oregon Tables
  • Washington Tables
  • Western Pacific Region
  • Hawaii Tables
  • New England Region
  • New England Region Tables
  • Connecticut Tables
  • Maine Tables
  • Massachusetts Tables
  • New Hampshire Tables
  • Rhode Island Tables
  • Mid-Atlantic Region
  • Mid-Atlantic Region Tables
  • Delaware Tables
  • Maryland Tables
  • New Jersey Tables
  • New York Tables
  • Virginia Tables
  • South Atlantic Region
  • South Atlantic Region Tables
  • East Florida Tables
  • Georgia Tables
  • North Carolina Tables
  • South Carolina Tables
  • Gulf of Mexico Region
  • Gulf of Mexico Region Tables
  • Alabama Tables
  • West Florida Tables
  • Louisiana Tables
  • Mississippi Tables
  • Texas Tables
  • Data Sources
  • Publications
  • Resources
  • Glossary

Front cover Fishing in Imperial Beach California Photo UnsplashcomDakota Corbin Inside cover Boats in Newport Oregon Photo Pacific Fishery Management Council

Fisheries Economics of the United States2016Economics and Social Analysis Division Office of Science and TechnologyNOAA Fisheries (NMFS)1315 East-West Highway 12th floorSilver Spring MD 20910

NOAA TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NMFS-FSPO-187A DECEMBER 2018

US Department of CommerceWilbur Ross Jr Secretary of Commerce

National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationRDML Timothy Gallaudet Acting NOAA Administrator

National Marine Fisheries ServiceChris Oliver Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

ii

NOAA Fisheries PublicationsEach year NOAA Fisheries produces three annual reports covering different aspects of the status of United States marine fisheries

Status of Stocks is an annual report to Congress on the status of US fisheries and is required by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act This report which is published each spring summarizes the number of stocks on the overfished overfishing and rebuilt lists for US federally managed fish stocks and stock complexes The report also shows trends over time discusses the value and contributions of our partners and highlights how management actions taken by NOAA Fisheries have improved the status of US federally managed stocks For example the 2017 report shows that the number of stocks on the overfished list just reached a new all-time lows httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationalpopulation-assessmentsfishery-stock-status-updates2018-quarterly-updates

Fisheries of the United States published each fall has been produced in its various forms for more than 100 years It is the NOAA Fisheries yearbook of fishery statistics for the United States It provides a snapshot of data primarily at the national level on US recreational catch and commercial fisheries landings and value In addition data are reported on US aquaculture production the US fishery processing industry imports and exports of fishery-related products and domestic supply and per capita consumption of fishery products The focus is not on economic analysis although value of landings processed products and foreign trade are included httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationalcommercial-fishingfisheries-united-states

Fisheries Economics of the United States published each fall provides a detailed look at the economic performance of commercial and recreational fisheries and other marine-related sectors on a state regional and national basis The economic impact of commercial and recreational fishing activities in the US is also reported in terms of employment sales and value-added impacts The report provides management highlights for each region that include a summary of stock status updates on catch share programs and other selected management issues httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationalcommercial-fishingfisheries-economics-united-states

Suggested CitationNational Marine Fisheries Service 2018 Fisheries Economics of the United States 2016 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-187a 243 p

An earlier version of this report FSPO-187 was published online in December 2018 This revised version includes updates to the acknowledgments section and the data sources section

Supplementary material An addendum published online in September 2019 provides updates to the recreational impacts and expenditures tables of this report The revised tables reflect changes to the number of trips in Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) states updates to the average expenditures based on new survey data and a new economic impact model for every state This addendum is available at httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovresourcedocumentfisheries-economics-united-states-report-2016

A copy of this report may be obtained fromEconomics and Social Analysis DivisionOffice of Science and TechnologyNOAA Fisheries (NMFS)1315 East-West Highway 12th floorSilver Spring MD 20910

Or online athttpswwwfisheriesnoaagovcontentfisheries-economics-united-states-2016

iii

ContentsPreface v Key Terminology vi

National Overview 1United States Summary 2 United States Tables 17

North Pacific Region 21North Pacific Summary 22Alaska Tables 31

Pacific Region 35Pacific Summary 36 Pacific Tables 43 California Tables 47 Oregon Tables 51 Washington Tables 55

Western Pacific Region 59Western Pacific Summary 60 Hawaiʻi Tables 67

New England Region 71New England Summary 72 New England Tables 79Connecticut Tables 83 Maine Tables 87Massachusetts Tables 91 New Hampshire Tables 95 Rhode Island Tables 99

Mid-Atlantic Region 103Mid-Atlantic Summary 104 Mid-Atlantic Tables 111Delaware Tables 115 Maryland Tables 119 New Jersey Tables 123 New York Tables 127 Virginia Tables 131

South Atlantic Region 135South Atlantic Summary 136 South Atlantic Tables 143 East Florida Tables 147 Georgia Tables 151 North Carolina Tables 155 South Carolina Tables 159

Gulf of Mexico Region 163Gulf of Mexico Summary 164 Gulf of Mexico Tables 171 Alabama Tables 175 West Florida Tables 179 Louisiana Tables 183 Mississippi Tables 187 Texas Tables 191

Data Sources 195Publications 199Resources 237Glossary 243

v

The hand of a person who has spent their life on the water Photo South Atlantic Fishery Management CouncilCameron J Rhodes

PrefaceFisheries Economics of the United States 2016 Fisheries Economics of the United States 2016 is the eleventh volume in this annual series which is intended to provide the public with easily accessible economic information about the nationrsquos commercial and recreational fishing activities and fishing-related industries

This yearrsquos report covers the years 2007 to 2016 and provides descriptive statistics for the following catego-ries economic impacts of the commercial fishing and seafood industry commercial fisheries landings rev-enue and price trends saltwater angler expenditures and economic impacts of marine recreational fishing recreational fishing catch effort and participation rates and employer and non-employer establishment payroll employees and annual receipt information for fishing-related industries

The report also provides management highlights for each region that include a summary of stock status updates on catch share programs and other selected management issues Economic performance indicators for catch share programs are reported

Sources of DataInformation in this report came from many sources Commercial landings revenue and price data as well as recreational fishing effort and participation data were primarily obtained from the Fisheries Statistics Division Office of Science and Technology NOAA Fish-eries Other data sources included the NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center Alaska Department of Fish and Game California Department of Fish and Game Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Washing-ton Department of Fish and Wildlife the Pacific Coast Fisheries Information Network (PacFIN) Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and Western Pacific Fisheries Information Network (WPacFIN) Economic impacts from the commercial fishing and seafood industry and recreational fishing sectors are from two separate na-tional IMPLAN models of the Economics and Sociocultur-al Analysis Division Office of Science and Technology NOAA Fisheries Fishing-related industry information was obtained from the US Census Bureau Bureau of

Economic Analysis and Bureau of Labor Statistics

AcknowledgmentsMany people participated in the production of this report Cameron Speir and Cara Mayo are the editors of this report series Rita Curtis Sabrina Lovell Kate Quigley and Cara Mayo were primary authors and analysts on this edition of Fisheries Economics of the United States Key collaborators include Jami Larson Lauren Dolinger Few Karen Greene Laura Johansen Jean Lee Michael Lewis Michael Liddel Alan Lowther Emily Markowitz and Eric Thunberg The reportrsquos design and layout was done by Avi Litwack Jacqui Fenner and Cara Mayo

NOAA Fisheries staff in the regional fisheries science centers and regional offices provided expertise Alan Haynie Justin Hospital Christopher Liese Michael Tra-vis and Stephen Holiman Other colleagues who pro-vided information and expertise included Mike Brown (California Department of Fish and Wildlife) and Jason Edwards and Rob Ames (Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission)

Address all comments and questions to Kathryn Cuff | KathrynCuffnoaagov

Economics and Sociocultural Analysis DivisionOffice of Science and TechnologyNOAA Fisheries (NMFS)1315 East-West Highway 12th floorSilver Spring MD 20910-3282Phone 301-427-8121Fax 301-713-4137

v

vi

Commercial FisheriesWhat Does the Term MeanCommercial fisheries in this report refers to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit It does not include saltwater anglers that fish for sport or subsistence fishermen It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key species and species groups

Metrics Definitions1

Economic ImpactsThe employment personal income and output generated by the commercial harvest sector and other major components of the US seafood industry

Landings RevenueThe price that fishermen are paid for their catch

LandingsThe poundage or number of fish unloaded by commercial fishermen or brought to shore

Ex-vessel PricesThe price received by a captain at the point of landing for the catch

Frequently Asked Questions

What are fish caught with in commercial fishingFish can be caught using a variety of gear including potts and traps trawls and seines gillnets dredges and hooks and lines

What happens to seafood caught by commercial fishermenFish caught by commercial fishermen are first processed and packaged Then they are sold to various establishments for consumption such as restaurants and supermarkets They can also be used as animal food and for medical purposes (such as fish oil pills)

Does the United States get seafood from anywhere elseNot all fish are caught by US commercial fishermen A large percent of the seafood the US receives is imported

1 For full definitions see the Glossary at the back of this publication

vii

Recreational FisheriesWhat Does the Term MeanRecreational fisheries or recreational fishing refer to fishing for pleasure rather than selling the fish for profit (ie commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section of Fisheries Economics of the US reports on angler trips participation expenditures and economic impacts and catch of key species and species groups Only saltwater or marine recreational fishing is included in FEUS

Metrics Definitions

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe employment sales and personal income generated by expenditures on fishing trips and fishing-related durable goods (ie equipment used for recreational fishing)

Fishing Trips EffortThe number of fishing trips taken by recreational fishermen (anglers)

ParticipationThe number of anglers who fish in a given state or region Anglers can be from in-state or out-of-state and from a coastal county or non-coastal county

Harvest and ReleaseThe total number or fish either 1) caught and kept (harvested) or 2) caught and released by recreational anglers from an area over a period of time Total catch is the sum of the number of fish harvested and released

Frequently Asked Questions

How do anglers affect the fishing economyWhen anglers participate in fishing activities they support sales and employment in recreational fishing and other types of businesses Anglers buy fishing equipment from bait and tackle shops rent or buy boats or pay to have others take them on charter boats to fish They may also pay for food and drink at local restaurants purchase gas for their boat and stay in hotels for overnight fishing trips

What do anglers spend their money onDurable goods such as fishing tackle and boat vehicle and second home expenses Trips which can be taken in one of three modes as for-hire (charter or party boat) private (or rental boat) and shore (fishing from shore) Some examples of trip expenditures include fuel bait ice and charter or guide fees

What do anglers do with their catchSome anglers catch fish to eat (ie harvest) while others practice catch and release In recreational fishing anglers do not sell the fish they catch for profit

viii

Marine EconomyWhat Does the Term MeanThe ldquoMarine Economyrdquo in this report refers to the economic activity generated by sectors of the economy that depend directly on oceans (or Great Lakes) We report on two industry sectors within the marine economy 1) seafood sales and processing and 2) transport support and marine operations Information such as the number of establishments number of employees and annual payroll for these fishing and marine-related industries is used to determine their relative levels of economic activity in a state

Metrics Definitions

Seafood Sales and ProcessingThese sectors are a direct representation of the Establishments Employees Sales and Payroll for seafood processors wholesalers and retailers that buy fish from commercial fishermen and distribute to consumers

Transport Support and Marine OperationsThe various sectors that contribute to the overall marine economy that may or may not support the fishing economy

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the marine economy include commercial and recreational fisheriesYes commercial and recreational fisheries contribute to the overall marine economy

What marine economy sectors featured in the report are related to commercial and recreational fisheriesThe seafood product preparation amp packaging wholesale and retail seafood sales sectors are major parts of the commercial fishing industry The Marinas Navigational Services Port amp Harbor operations and Ship amp Boat Building sectors provide goods and services used in both commercial and recreational fisheries

Why does the report include sectors that are independent of the fishing economyInformation on sectors that are independent of the fishing economy like freight transportation provides context for how national and regional economies are affected by the use of ocean resources

National Overview

Surf fishing on Chincoteague Island Virginia Photo Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management CouncilMary Sabo

2

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe authority to manage federal fisheries in the United States was granted to the Secretary of Commerce by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (PL 94-265 as amended by PL 109-479) NOAA Fisheries is the federal agency with delegated authority from the Secretary of Commerce to oversee fishing activities in federal waters Federal fisheries are generally defined as fishing activities that take place in the US Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ between 3 and 200 nautical miles from the coastline) Generally individual states retain management authority over fishing activities within three nautical miles of their coasts

Nationwide 46 fishery management plans (FMPs) provide a framework for managing the harvest of 474 fish stocks and stock complexes These plans aim to manage the harvest of fish in US and shared waters using sound scientific research to maximize fishing opportunity while ensuring the sustainability of fisheries and fishing communities Regional Fishery Management Councils (FMCs) develop FMPs in eight regions nationwide North Pacific Pacific Western Pacific New England Mid-Atlantic South Atlantic Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean1 After an FMP is developed the Secretary of Commerce in consultation with NOAA Fisheries must approve it before it is implemented

Regional Fishery Management Councils

bull North Pacificbull Pacificbull Western Pacificbull New England

bull Mid-Atlanticbull South Atlanticbull Gulf of Mexicobull Caribbean

Fishery management plans must specify objective and measurable criteria to determine when a stock is overfished or subject to overfishing Enough information exists to determine the overfishing status for 316 (or 67) of the 474 stocks and stock complexes Of these 316 30 stocks are subject to overfishing (or 9 of stocks with known status) The overfished status of 235 (or 50) of the 474 stocks and stock complexes is known Of these 235 stocks 38 (or 16 of stocks with

known status) are categorized as overfished2

Transboundary and International FisheriesNOAA Fisheries is also actively involved in negotiating conservation and management measures including total allowable catch levels fishery allocations and monitoring and control schemes for internationally shared fisheries resources Shared fisheries resources include those in areas where the EEZ of the US overlaps with other nations (transboundary areas) and in areas beyond the US EEZ ie international waters or the high seas The Gulf of Alaska and the Gulf of Maine are examples of these transboundary areas An area in the Bering Sea outside the EEZs of Canada Japan and Russia called the Donut Hole is an example of international waters Loss of sea ice will create new transboundary areas and international waters in the Arctic

Regional Fishery Management Organizations (RFMOs) are multinational organizations with interests in internationally shared fish stocks and associated fishing activities Primary objectives of these RFMOs are to research assess and adopt measures for the conservation and coordinated management of target species such as bigeye tuna Some RFMOs also collect data and evaluate and adopt measures for the conservation and scientific assessment of non-target species also known as bycatch Non-target species include seabirds marine mammals sea turtles and fish species caught incidentally while fishing for target species The commitment to conserving and protecting all species associated with or affected by fishing activities is outlined in the Food and Agriculture Organizationrsquos (FAOrsquos) Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries established in 1995

Another issue of particular concern for NOAA Fisheries is illegal unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing activities (see Policy Updates) IUU fishing generally refers to fishing that violates national laws or internationally agreed conservation and management measures in effect in oceans around the world IUU fishing can include fishing without a license or quota for certain species unauthorized transshipments to cargo

1 Fishery management plans and fishery ecosystem plans for each region covered in this report are listed in their respective sections The four FMPs developed by the Caribbean Fishery Management Council and the Atlantic Highly Migratory Species FMP developed by NOAA Fisheries are not included in this report2 Source NOAA Fisheries Office of Sustainable Fisheries Status of Stocks 2016 httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovfeature-storystatus-stocks-2016

3

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

vessels failing to report catches or making false reports keeping undersized fish or fish that are otherwise protected by regulations fishing in closed areas or during closed seasons and using prohibited fishing gear

Experts estimate that global economic losses from IUU fishing range from $10 billion to $235 billion annually representing between 11 and 26 million tons of fish3

Regional Fishery Management OrganizationsNOAA Fisheries participates in eight RFMOs globally Each RMFO is listed by ocean basin below4

Pacificbull Pacific Salmon Commissionbull International Pacific Halibut Commissionbull Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commissionbull Western and Central Pacific Fishery

Commission

Atlanticbull International Commission for the

Conservation of Atlantic Tunasbull North Atlantic Salmon Conservation

Organizationbull Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization

Antarcticbull Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic

Marine Living Resources

NOAA Fisheries is actively collaborating with other federal agencies as part of the National Ocean Council Committee on IUU Fishing and Seafood Fraud This network of agencies works together to implement measures outlined in an action plan developed by the Presidential Task Force on Combatting IUU Fishing and Seafood Fraud The plan includes actions that will strengthen enforcement create and expand partnerships with state and local governments industry and non-governmental organizations and create a risk-based traceability program to track seafood from harvest to entry into US commerce The plan also highlights ways in which the United States will work with our foreign partners to strengthen international governance enhance cooperation and build capacity to combat IUU fishing and seafood fraud

Saltwater Recreational Fisheries Policy In February 2015 NOAA Fisheries established a formal National Saltwater Recreational Fisheries Policy to broadly guide future actions and better integrate recreational fishing with NOAA Fisheriesrsquo mission The policy focuses on six guiding principles 1) support ecosystem conservation and enhancement 2) promote public access to quality recreational fishing opportunities 3) coordinate with state and federal management entities4) advance innovative solutions to evolving sciencemanagement and environmental challenges 5) providescientifically sound and trusted social cultural economicand ecological information and 6) communicate andengage with the recreational fishing public

Threatened and Endangered SpeciesNOAA Fisheries is also the lead agency for the conservation and protection of marine and anadromous species that fall within the purview of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Currently there are 161 threatened and endangered marine species under the ESA (see Table 1)

Table 1 Endangered and Threatened Species under NOAA Fisheries Jurisdiction5

Species Group Number of SpeciesMarine and Anadromous Fish 74Marine Mammals 33Sea Turtles 26Marine Invertebrates 27Plants 1Total Threatened andEndangered Marine Species 161

In addition to threatened and endangered marine and anadromous species NOAA Fisheries also helps identify candidate and proposed species Candidate species are actively being considered for listing as endangered or threatened under the ESA These species also include those for which NOAA Fisheries has initiated a status review that it has announced in the Federal Register Proposed species are candidate species that were found to warrant listing as either threatened or endangered These species were officially proposed as such in a Federal Register notice after the completion of a status review and consideration of other protective measures

3 Agnew DJ Pearce J Pramod G Peatman T Watson R Beddington JR et al (2009) Estimating the Worldwide Extent of Illegal Fishing PLoS ONE 4(2) e4570 doi101371journalpone00045704 Source httpwwwnmfsnoaagoviaagreementsregional_agreementsintlagreehtml 5 See NOAA Fisheries Office of Protected Resources (httpwwwnmfsnoaagovprspeciesesa) for current and proposed ESA species listings

4

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

Currently 12 candidate species and three proposed species are under consideration for listing

NOAA Fisheries is also responsible for protecting marine mammals under the Marine Mammal Protection Act6 In authorizing this act in 1972 Congress recognized that marine mammal species or stocks may be in danger of extinction or depletion as a result of human activities marine mammal species or stocks should not be allowed to fall below their optimum sustainable population levels measures should be taken to replenish marine mammal species or stocks there is inadequate knowledge of the marine mammal ecology and population dynamics and marine mammals have proven to be resources of great international significance NOAA Fisheries engages in activities such as preventing the harassment capture or killing of marine mammals preparing marine mammal stock assessments and studying interactions between marine mammals and fisheries

Essential Fish HabitatsSustainable commercial and recreational fisheries depend on healthy habitats These habitats include rivers estuaries and the open ocean where marine and anadromous species feed grow and reproduce Consideration of these habitat areas is part of an ecosystem-based management approach for managing fisheries in a more sustainable and holistic manner Since 1996 federal fishery management plans are required to identify and describe essential fish habitat (EFH) for all federally managed species Habitat areas that are necessary for a fish speciesrsquo growth reproduction and development are considered EFH To the extent practicable NOAA Fisheries and the FMCs must minimize adverse effects to EFH caused by fishing

Though not required Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) can be identified to help focus EFH conservation efforts The HAPC designation alone does not confer additional protection to or place restrictions on an area but helps to focus EFH conservation management and research priorities HAPC designation is a valuable way to acknowledge areas where detailed information exists on ecological function and habitat vulnerability indicating a greater need for conservation and management To

date approximately 100 HAPCs have been designated including specific coral seamount and spawning areas A recent effort undertaken by NOAA Fisheries was the creation of a Habitat Assessment Improvement Plan7 The goal of this plan is to advance NOAA Fisheriesrsquo ability to identify EFH and HAPCs and provide the information needed to assess impacts to EFH

Catch Share Programs Market-based management tools are used by fishery managers to reduce over-capitalization increase the economic viability of fisheries and promote individual accountability for harvest and harvesting practices Catch share programs are one of these tools and encompass a range of management strategies that share a common feature A secure share of fish is dedicated to individual fishermen cooperatives fishing communities and other entities for their exclusive use In 2010 the NOAA catch share policy was released to encourage well-designed catch share programs to help maintain or rebuild fisheries8 The policy also aims to sustain fishermen communities and vibrant working waterfronts including the cultural and resource-access traditions that have been part of this country since its founding

Currently there are 16 federal catch share programs nationwide These programs include limited access privilege programs (LAPPs) individual fishing quota programs (IFQs) individual transferable quota programs (ITQs) fishing community development quota programs (CDQs) fishing cooperatives and fishing sectors9 Implementation dates of these programs span three decades with five programs established in the 1990s and six established since 2010 (see Table 2) Ten programs manage a single species or in some cases two species but as separate management units the other six programs manage multiple species Six of the programs operate in the Alaska Region

In 2010 NOAA Fisheries initiated an effort to track catch share program performance10 Findings from the initial report show that existing catch share programs have ended the race to fish (in their respective fisheries) resulting in longer fishing seasons safer working conditions and improved management performance The

6 The US Fish and Wildlife Service protects walrus manatees otters and polar bears7 The Habitat Assessment Improvement Plan is available at httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovst4documentshabitatAssesmentImprovement-Plan_052110PDF8 See httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationallaws-and-policiescatch-shares9 See Section 303A of the Magnuson-Stevens Act for more information on LAPP requirements10 See httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriescommercialcatch-share-programindex

5

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

report also shows that existing catch share programs have resulted in reduced fishing capacity to better match stock sizemdash a management objective in the majority of catch share programs evaluated Economic performance for the vessels remaining in the program improved as measured by such metrics as revenue per vessel and average price

Updated information on selected performance indicators is provided in Table 3 Briefly results show that inflation-

adjusted revenue from catch share species increased in 10 of the 15 programs andor sub-components of the programs since their implementation In addition the number of active vessels decreased in all but one program (Central GOA Rockfish) while inflation-adjusted revenue per active vessel increased in all programs since their implementation Further results show that no stocks exceeded the annual catch limit (ACL) in 2015

Table 2 Existing Catch Share Programs in Federal Fisheries

Region Program Year Implemented

Mid-Atlantic Mid-Atlantic Surfclam amp Ocean Quahog ITQ 1990Mid-Atlantic Golden Tilefish IFQ 2009

New England Northeast Multispecies Sectors 2010Northeast General Category Atlantic Sea Scallop IFQ 2010

North Pacific

Western Alaska Community Development Quota 1992Alaska Halibut and Sablefish IFQ 1995American Fisheries Act (AFA) Pollock Cooperatives 1999Bering Sea and Aleutian Island (BSAI) Crab Rationalization 2005Central Gulf of Alaska (GOA) Rockfish (pilot implemented in 2007) 2012Non-Pollock Trawl CatcherProcessor Groundfish Cooperatives (Amendment 80) 2008

South Atlantic South Atlantic Wreckfish ITQ 1992

Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper IFQ 2007Grouper-Tilefish IFQ 2010

Pacific Pacific Coast Sablefish Permit Stacking 2001Pacific Groundfish Trawl Rationalization Program (Whiting and Non-Whiting trawl) 2011

Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Individual Bluefin Quota Program 2016

Table 3 Economic Performance Indicators for US Federal Catch Share Programs (2015 dollars)11

Management Context Participation Economic Benefits

ACL Exceeded Active Vessels Total Revenue fromCatch Share Species Revenue per Active Vessel

Baseline 2015 Baseline 2015 Baseline 2015 Baseline 2015Gulf of MexicoGrouper-Tilefish Y N 630 446 $22771411 $27854557 $36145 $62454Red Snapper Y N 482 415 $13958514 $28884023 $28960 $69600

Mid-AtlanticGolden Tilefish - N 14 11 $4707700 $5028563 $336264 $457142Ocean Quahog N N 67 16 $29406847 $21858000 $438908 $1366125Surfclam - N 137 37 $39625107 $28589183 $289234 $772681

New EnglandGeneral Category Scallop - - 271 150 $28366002 $31591134 $104672 $210608Multispecies Sectors Y N 417 206 $86215431 $52666418 $206751 $255662

North PacificAlaska Halibut Y N 3432 874 $93232899 $102001633 $27168 $116707 Alaska Sablefish Y N 1139 306 $93929829 $74449319 $82467 $243298 AFA Pollock Cooperatives Y N 147 99 $253467523 $368407672 $1720368 $3721290 BSAI Crab Rationalization Y N 264 80 $186746805 $244176102 $706482 $3052201 Amendment 80 N N 22 18 $92131777 $105158733 $4187808 $5842152 Central GOA Rockfish Y N 42 51 $5729012 $10982900 $136405 $215351

PacificPacific Sablefish - N 135 89 $6701698 $7904987 $49642 $88820Whiting and Non-Whiting Directed - N 124 94 $39979907 $39930830 $322419 $424796

11 The South Atlantic Wreckfish ITQ is not included due to confidentiality restrictions The Western Alaska CDQ program was excluded because it is the onlyCDQ and thus fundamentally different from the other programs In addition note that some programs did not have a catch quota prior to the catch shareprogram For these programs ldquo-rdquo indicates that the question of whether the ACL was exceeded is not applicable

6

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

Policy UpdatesIn December 2016 NOAA Fisheries issued the final rule establishing the Seafood Import Monitoring Program to further curb illegal unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing practices and to identify misrepresented seafood imports before they enter the US market The program requires that importers report information and maintain records about the harvest landing and chain of custody of imported fish and fish products for certain priority species identified as especially vulnerable to IUU fishing and seafood fraud The data collected under this program will allow these priority species of seafood to be traced from the point of entry into US commerce back to the point of harvest or production to verify whether it was lawfully harvested or produced For 11 of the 13 speciesspecies groups covered in the final rule the rule went into effect January 1 2018 shrimp and abalone compliance will be mandatory by December 31 2018

Other Market-Based Management ToolsVessel or permit buyback programs are another market-based tool used by fishery managers Under these programs the government purchases fishing vessels or permits Doing so permanently decreases the number of participants in the fishery and eases fishing-related pressure on marine resources Recent buyback programs include BSAI Crab Pacific Coast Groundfish Longline CP Non-Pol-lock Groundfish Southeast Alaska Purse Seine Salmon and AFA Pollock

License limitation programs (LLPs) also known as limited entry programs are another management tool available to fishery managers In these programs the number of fishing vessels allowed to harvest a specific fish stock or stock complex is limited to fishermen or vessels with permission to fish LLPs have been implemented in almost all federally managed commercial fisheries and in every region except the Caribbean

Ecolabels are market-based tools offered by third-party entities An ecolabeling program entitles a fishery product to bear a distinctive logo or statement that certifies the fishery resource was harvested in compliance with specified conservation and sustainability standards It allows the buyer to potentially influence the sustainable harvest of fishery resources through the purchase of such

ecolabeled seafood products at a price premium

The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) has one of the most recognizable ecolabeling programs in the world Currently nearly 300 fisheries worldwide meet MSC sustainability standards 19 of which are US fisheries (see Table 4) Fisheries obtaining MSC certification for the first time in 2016 include the US Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog fishery and the Gulf of Maine Lobster fishery

Table 4 US Fisheries with MSC Certification12

Region Fishery Certified

North Pacific

Alaska flatfish - Bering Sea amp Aleutian Islands 2010

Alaska flatfish - Gulf of Alaska 2010Alaska Pacific cod - Bering Sea amp Aleutian Islands 2010

Alaska Pacific cod - Gulf of Alaska 2010Alaska pollock - Bering Sea amp Aleutian Islands 2010

Alaska pollock - Gulf of Alaska 2010American Western Fish Boat Owners Association albacore tuna North Pacific

2010

US North Pacific halibut 2006US North Pacific sablefish 2006Alaska salmon 2000

Pacific

American Albacore Fishing Association Pacific albacore tuna - north

2007

American Albacore Fishing Association Pacific albacore tuna - south

2007

Pacific hake mid-water trawl 2009US West Coast limited entry groundfish trawl 2014

Gulf Louisiana blue crab 2012

North-east

US Atlantic spiny dogfish 2012US North Atlantic swordfish 2013US Atlantic sea scallop 2013US Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog 2016

Gulf of Maine Lobster 2016

NATIONAL OVERVIEWIn 2016 commercial and recreational fisheries throughout the United States generated approximately 17 million jobs in the US economy In addition commercial and recreational fishing together generated $2122 billion in sales impacts $642 billion in income

12 For more information about these fisheries and the Marine Stewardship Council certification process see httpswwwmscorg

7

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

impacts and $995 billion in value-added impacts throughout the economy Florida had the largest employment impacts from the combined fishing industry with approximately 173000 jobs Florida also had the largest sales impacts from the combined fishing industry ($278 billion) the largest income impacts ($73 billion) and the largest value-added impacts ($122 billion)

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fishing refers to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key US Commercial Species

bull American lobsterbull Blue crabbull Menhadenbull Pacific halibutbull Pacific salmon

bull Sablefishbull Sea scallopbull Shrimpbull Tunasbull Walleye pollock

Regional HighlightsAt the national level this report includes landings revenue landings and prices for 10 key species or species groups which were selected so that each region has at least one species in the top 10 Results show that commercial fishermen in Alaska caught the most salmon (5877 million pounds) and earned $4073 million for their catch in 2016 Tuna was caught in large numbers in Hawailsquoi (235 million pounds) and generated $885 million in landings revenue Maine fishermen contributed the most to American lobster landings (132 million pounds) and earned $5379 million for their catch in 2016 In Massachusetts sea scallopers harvested 229 million pounds of scallop and earned $2814 million for their catch More blue crab was caught in Louisiana (401 million pounds) than in any other state earning more than $494 million Louisiana

also accounted for the greatest quantity of menhaden landed in 2016 with fishermen landing 11 billion pounds worth $1321 million in dockside revenue Sea scallop garnered the highest average ex-vessel price per pound ($12) among the key species and species groups in 2016 with state-specific prices ranging from $951 in New York to $1281 in Maine

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers13

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the

13 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)

8

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 the seafood industry supported 12 million full- and part-time jobs and generated $1443 billion in sales $399 billion in income and $608 billion in value-added impacts nationwide (Table 5) The retail sector generated the largest employment impacts across sectors (583000 jobs) the largest income impacts ($136 billion) and the largest value-added

impacts ($185 billion) The importers sector generated the largest sales impacts ($576 billion)

The largest state-level employment impacts generated by the seafood industry occurred in California (125000 jobs) followed by Massachusetts (87000 jobs) and Florida (77000 jobs) see Graph 1 The highest income impacts were generated in California ($49 billion) followed by Florida and Washington The highest sales impacts were generated by the seafood industry in California ($228 billion) followed by Florida and Massachusetts The highest value-added impacts were generated in California ($81 billion) followed by Florida and Washington (Table 6)

Table 5 US Seafood Industry Economic Impacts Trends ($ billions)2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Jobs 1270141 1350627 1394833 1179848 1190092Sales $14070 $14220 $15330 $14419 $14429Income $3870 $3980 $4200 $3974 $3990Value Added $5900 $6030 $6410 $6057 $6076Total Revenue $529 $555 $553 $522 $534

Table 6 Sales Income and Value-Added Impacts Generated by the US Seafood Industry 2016 ($ millions)

State Sales Income Value Added

US $144293 $39905 $60758California $22776 $4912 $8141Florida $16874 $3172 $5659Washington $7464 $2004 $3048Massachusetts $7663 $1999 $3045Alaska $3895 $1654 $2074New Jersey $6226 $1413 $2282New York $4412 $950 $1567Maine $2582 $856 $1236Louisiana $2022 $752 $1023Texas $2091 $597 $899Virginia $1435 $464 $660Oregon $1190 $416 $584New Hampshire $1511 $348 $558Georgia $1554 $344 $567Maryland $1241 $335 $504Rhode Island $1375 $335 $529North Carolina $985 $276 $411Hawairsquoi $867 $269 $392Alabama $555 $220 $288Mississippi $218 $87 $113Connecticut $387 $83 $137South Carolina $118 $39 $55Delaware $136 $26 $44

Graph 1 Jobs supported by the US Seafood Industry (With and Without Imports) 2016

0 30000 60000 90000 120000 150000

DESCCTMSHINHGANCRIAL

MDORVATXNYLANJMEAKWAFL

MACA

Jobs Without Imports

Jobs With Imports

9

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

Landings TrendsWhile nationally landings revenue ticked up 2 percent from 2015 to 2016 there was considerably more variation among the key speciesspecies groups Most notably Pacific salmon (down $948 million) and walleye pollock (down $498 million) had the largest declines in landings revenue while American lobster and sea scallops (both up $460 million) had the largest increases in landings revenue Salmon landings revenue declined due to a sharp decline in landings in 2016 (down 46) relative to 2015 This was largely due to the decline in pink salmon landings which fell 488 million pounds from 2015 levels While pink salmon landings are typically lower in ldquoeven yearsrdquo due to their biennial cycle in 2016 the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) pink salmon harvests came in far below forecasted levels The walleye pollock landings revenue decline (down 11 or $498 million) was directly attributable to lower ex-vessel prices in both the Bering SeandashAleutian Islands and Gulf of Alaska

New Englandrsquos American lobster fishery continued its strong performance driven by record abundance levels of Gulf of Maine lobsters that have allowed landings to almost double (up 99) since 2007 The increase in New England and Mid-Atlantic sea scallop fisheries landings revenue (up $171 million and $294 million respectively) over 2015 levels was similarly driven by an increase in landings

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the United States totaled $53 billion

in 2016 (Table 7) This represented a 28 increase in nominal value from 2007 levels (an 11 increase in realterms after adjusting for inflation) and a year-over-year increase of 2 from 2015 (Graph 2) Finfish landings revenue accounted for 43 of all landings revenue American lobster had the highest landings revenue in 2016

Table 7 Commercial Fisheries Landings Revenue by Region 2016 ($ millions)

Region LandingsRevenue Region Landings

Revenue US $533710 Pacific $68890North Pacific $160960 Mid-Atlantic $55030New England $132590 South Atlantic $19090Gulf of Mexico $91210 Western Pacific $11810

From 2007 to 2016 menhaden (96 71 in real terms) American lobster (81 58 in real terms) and tunas (64 44 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while Pacific halibut (-45 -52 in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 tunas (12) sea scallop (11) and American lobster (7) had the largest revenue increases while Pacific salmon (-17) and walleye pollock (-11) had the largest revenue decreases

Alaska earned the greatest share of landings revenue in 2016 ($16 billion) contributing 30 of the national total (Table 7) Maine ($574 million or 19 of US shellfish revenue) and Massachusetts ($4516 million or 15 of US shellfish revenue) earned the most ex-vessel revenue from shellfish landings

Graph 2 US Commercial Fisheries Landings Revenue 2007-2016 (nominal values $ billions)

$3

$4

$5

$6

2016201520142013201220112010200920082007

10

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Menhaden (96 71 in real terms)bull American lobster (81 58 in real terms)bull Tunas (64 44 in real terms)From 2015bull Tunas (12)bull Sea scallop (11)bull American lobster (7)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Pacific halibut (-45 -52 in real terms)From 2015bull Pacific salmon (-17)bull Walleye pollock (-11)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull American lobster (96)bull Menhaden (18)bull Tunas (10)From 2015bull Sea scallop (11)bull American lobster (8)bull Menhaden(7)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Pacific halibut (-64)bull Pacific salmon (-38)bull Sea scallop (-31)From 2015bull Pacific salmon (-46)bull Shrimp (-15)bull Sablefish (-3)

LandingsLandings volume in the United States totaled 96 billion pounds in 2016 (Table 8) This represented a 3 increase from 2007 levels and a year-over-year decrease of 2 from 2015 see Graph 3 Finfish landings

accounted for 88 of all landed weight Walleye pollock had the highest landings volume in 2016

From 2007 to 2016 American lobster (96) menhaden (18) and tunas (10) had the largest landings increases while Pacific halibut (-64) Pacific salmon (-38) and sea scallop (-31) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 sea scallop (11) American lobster (8) and menhaden (7) had the largest landings increases while Pacific salmon (-46) shrimp (-15) and sablefish (-3) had the largest landings decreases

Alaska accounted for the greatest share of landings volume in 2016 (56 billion pounds) contributing 59 of the national total (see Table 8) Louisiana (1633 million pounds or 14 of US shellfish landings) and Maine (1507 million pounds 13) had the highest shellfish landings by volume

Table 8 Commercial Fisheries Landings by Region 2016 (millions of pounds)Region Landings Region Landings US 960200 Mid-Atlantic 59750North Pacific 563099 New England 59500Gulf of Mexico 174450 South Atlantic 10630Pacific 93780 Western Pacific 3510

PricesOf all key species or species groups sea scallop ($12 per pound) had the highest national ex-vessel price Menhaden ($010 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price of all key species nationally

From 2007 to 2016 large price increases were observed for sea scallop (82 67 in real terms) menhaden (67 52 in real terms) and Pacific salmon (59 39 in real terms) while walleye pollock (-9 -5 in real terms) and American lobster (-8 -22 in real terms) had the largest decreases in price From 2015 to 2016 large year-over-year price increases were observed for Pacific salmon (53) shrimp (19) and tunas (15) while walleye pollock (-25) menhaden (-9) and sea scallop (-3) had the largest annual percentage decreases in price from 2015 to 2016

11

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

Graph 3 US Commercial Fisheries Landings 2007-2016 (billions of pounds)

6

8

10

2016201520142013201220112010200920082007

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on angler participation trips economic impacts and expenditures and catch of key speciesspecies groups14

Key US Recreational Species

bull Atlantic croakerand spot

bull Little tunny andAltlantic bonito

bull Pacific halibutbull Rockfishes and

scorpionfishes

bull Pacific salmonbull Seatroutbull Sharksbull Striped bassbull Summer flounderbull Tunas

Regional HighlightsAt the national level the report includes fishing trips participation and the harvest and release numbers of 10 key species or species groups which were selected so that each region has at least one species in the top 10 Results show that in 2016 recreational anglers in West Florida took the most trips (132 million trips) and spent the most on trips ($6463 million) North Carolina spent the second most on trips ($4467 million) West Florida also had the most recreational anglers participate in fishing in their state with 37 million anglers

West Florida caught the most seatrouts (119 million fish) Virginia caught the most Atlantic croaker and spot (56 million fish) and New Jersey caught the most summer flounder (69 million fish) Alaska caught the most Pacific halibut (643000 fish) and more striped bass (51 million fish) was caught in Maryland than in any other state

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures1516 Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures were estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing It includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a

14 Except where noted Atlantic and Gulf recreational catch and effort estimates are based upon the MRIP APAIS and CHTS (httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovrecreational-fisheriesSurveyssurvey-details) and not the revised MRIP estimates (httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovleadership-messagenoaa-fisheries-releases-revised-mrip-recreational-catch-and-effort-estimates) released in 201815 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable goods expenditure im-pacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were gen-erated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011) 16 Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contri-bution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-ex-pendituresmarine-angler-2011) and IMPLAN version 31100112

12

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities supported 472000 jobs across the United States in 2016 (see Table 9) Recreational fishing also generated about $679 billion in sales impacts $243 billion in income impacts and $387 billion in value-added impacts Impacts from durable equipment expenditures (eg rods and reels fishing-related equipment boats vehicles and second homes) accounted for 86 of total job impacts 85 of sales impacts 87 of income impacts and 87 of value added impacts Of the three fishing trip modes private-boat-based fishing trips had the greatest economic impact accounting for 5 of employment 6 of sales 4 of income impacts and 5 of value-added impacts

Table 9 Recreational Economic Impacts Trends for the United States ($ billions)

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Number of Jobs 425321 420191 438590 439242 472020Sales $5880 $5810 $6060 $6344 $6791 Income $2140 $2110 $2200 $2268 $2433 Value Added $3440 $3400 $3550 $3608 $3869 Total Trips (millions) 711 721 690 617 633

The greatest employment impacts from saltwater recreational fishing were generated in West Florida followed by East Florida and California (see Graph 4) The highest sales impacts were generated in West Florida followed by East Florida and California (see Table 10)

Graph 4 Jobs supported by the US Recreational Fishing Industry 2016

0 20000 40000 60000 80000NHHIMEGADEORCTRI

WAAKSCMSVAMDMANYLANJTXALNCCA

E FLW FL

Jobs

Table 10 Sales Income and Value-Added Impacts Generated by the Recreational Fishing Industry 2016 ($ millions)State Sales Income Value AddedUS National Total $67912 $24334 $38693 West Florida $6827 $2575 $4112 East Florida $4084 $1540 $2466 California $2123 $819 $1305 Texas $2000 $746 $1237 New Jersey $1752 $746 $1168 North Carolina $1699 $656 $1021 Louisiana $1630 $608 $1003 Alabama $1436 $616 $1030 New York $1127 $488 $770 Massachusetts $1071 $496 $716 Maryland $785 $327 $513 Mississippi $638 $211 $345 Virginia $584 $239 $379 Washington $542 $209 $340 Alaska $539 $195 $316 South Carolina $498 $181 $292 Connecticut $430 $186 $292 Rhode Island $412 $176 $270 Oregon $297 $132 $192 Delaware $168 $67 $110 Georgia $161 $67 $106 Hawaii $105 $33 $55 Maine $99 $37 $59 New Hampshire $48 $22 $31

13

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

In 2016 expenditures for fishing trips and durable equipment in the United States totaled $308 billion

Approximately $43 billion of these expenditures were related to trip expenses Total trip expenditures were composed of expenses on trips in the private boat (42) shore (32) and for-hire (26) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $266 billion in 2016 with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($154 billion) see Graph 5

Fishing TripsNationwide anglers took approximately 633 million saltwater fishing trips around the country (see Table 11)17 This number represents a 28 decrease from 2007 and a 3 increase from 2015 (see Graph 6) Forty-nine percent of fishing trips were taken via the private boat mode West Florida anglers took the most fishing trips (132 million trips) followed by those in East Florida and North Carolina (Table 12)

Table 11 Recreational Fishing Trips by Region 2016 (millions of fishing trips)Region TripsUS Total 633Guld of Mexico 195 South Atlantic 168 Mid-Atlantic 140 New England 61Pacific 52Hawairsquoi 10

Table 12 Recreational Fishing Trips by State 2016 (thousands of trips)State Trips State TripsWest Florida 13219 South Carolina 1909East Florida 8827 Connecticut 1644North Carolina 5411 Mississippi 1512New Jersey 4306 Rhode Island 1159New York 4294 Hawairsquoi 1024California 3532 Washington 1008Alabama 2567 Delaware 910Massachusetts 2384 Georgia 696Maryland 2383 Oregon 684Louisiana 2242 Maine 573Virginia 2108 New Hampshire 293

Graph 5 Recreational Fishing Trip and Durable Expenditures 2016 ($ billions)

Other Equipment$19Second Home Expenses$21Vehicle Expenses$35

Fishing Tackle$37

Trips$43

Boat Expenses$154

Graph 6 Recreational Fishing Trips 2007-2016 (millions of angler trips)

60

80

100

2016201520142013201220112010200920082007

Trips 2007-2016 (millions of anglers)

17 Trip estimates include Puerto Rico but do not include Alaska or Texas Hawaiʻi trip estimates are available only for the shore and private boat mode

14

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

ParticipationNationwide 98 million recreational saltwater anglers fished in their home states in 201618 This number represented a 29 decrease from 2007 and a 9 increase from 2015 Coastal county residents made up 86 of this total while non-coastal county residents made up 14 West Florida had the highest participation of anglers (37 million) followed by North Carolina and East Florida

Harvest and ReleaseIn 2016 drum (seatrouts) (364 million fish) drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (193 million fish) and summer flounder (142 million fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen in the United States19 From 2007 to 2016 rockfishes and scorpionfishes (44) had the largest increase in catch while drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (-60) Pacific salmon (-44) and Pacific halibut (-37) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 little tunny and Atlantic bonito (45) striped bass (37) and drum (seatrouts) (30) had the largest increases in catch while Pacific salmon (-37) tunas (Thunnus species) (-25) and drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (-24) had the largest decreases

Harvest and Release Largest Increases

From 2007bull Rockfishes amp scorpionfishes (44)From 2015bull Little tunny amp Atlantic bonito (45)bull Striped bass (37)bull Drum (seatrouts) (30)

Harvest and Release Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Drum (Atlantic croaker amp spot) (-60)bull Pacific salmon (-44)bull Pacific halibut (-37)From 2015bull Pacific salmon (-37)bull Tunas (Thunnus species) (-25)bull Drum (Atlantic croaker amp spot) (-24)

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The national marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments)

These sectors include several different marine-related industries Note that Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 2015 Percentage changes in inflation-adjusted (real dollar) terms are calculated using the annual Gross Domestic Product implicit price deflator published by the US Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis20

The Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) measures the proportional size of this sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy21 The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average

In 2015 77 million employee establishments operated throughout the entire US economy (including marine and non-marine related establishments)22 These establishments employed 1241 million workers and had a total annual payroll of $63 trillion The nationrsquos gross domestic product was approximately $179 trillion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 there were 2108 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 62 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $1636 million (a 64 increase in real terms from 2007) More of these non-employer

18 Participation estimates include Puerto Rico but do not include Alaska Texas or Hawairsquoi19 Harvest and release estimates do not include Puerto Rico or Alaska For Hawailsquoi these estimates are available only for shore and private boat mode 20 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS IndustryrdquohttpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)21 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017) 22 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)

15

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

firms were located in Florida (300) New York (183) Texas (178) and California (169) than in any other state There were 618 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 10 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 30708 workers (a 7 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of about $1 billion (this remained unchanged in real terms from 2007) Alaska (109) and Washington (85) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 2471 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood (a 5 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $2067 million (a 21 decrease in real terms from 2007) More of these non-employer firms were located in Florida (355) and California (221) than in any other state There were 2059 employer firms in the retail seafood sales sector (a 2 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 11443 workers (a 10 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $2927 million (a 24 increase in real terms from 2007) New York (409) Florida (181) and California (170) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 2132 employer firms in the wholesale seafood sales sector (a 13 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 22060 workers (a 9 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $9993 million (a 4 decrease in real terms from 2007) California (349) New York (275) and Florida (242) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Transport Support and Marine OperationsCoastal and Great Lakes Freight Transportation There were 593 employer firms providing coastal and Great Lakes freight transportation (a 3 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 19983 workers (an 11 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of about $2 billion (this remained unchanged in real terms from 2007) Louisiana (116) Alaska (74) and New York (73) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Deep Sea Freight Transportation There were 350 employer firms providing deep sea freight transportation (an 18 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 8014 workers (a 29 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $6716 million in 2015 Florida (76) California (56) and Texas (35) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Deep Sea Passenger Transportation There were 61 employer firms in the deep sea passenger transportation sector (a 34 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 15157 workers and had a total annual payroll of $1 billion Florida (32) California (6) and Washington (6) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Marinas There were 3881 employer firms classified as marinas in 2015 (a 5 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 26999 workers (a 6 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of about $1 billion (a 3 decrease in real terms from 2007) Florida (466) New York (429) and California (258) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Marine Cargo Handling There were 492 employer firms providing marine cargo handling services in 2015 (an 11 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 66414 workers (a 6 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of about $4 billion (a 12 increase in real terms from 2007) Florida (69) California (67) and Texas (56) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Navigational Services to Shipping There were 889 employer firms providing navigational services to shipping in 2015 (a 7 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 11864 workers (a 9 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $9233 million (an 8 increase in real terms from 2007) Florida (196) Louisiana (142) and Texas (91) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Port and Harbor Operations There were 337 employer firms in the port and harbor operations

16

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

sector in 2015 (a 51 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 7855 workers (a 20 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $4342 million (a 21 increase in real terms from 2007) Florida (55) California (30) and Texas (25) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Ship and Boat Building There were 1541 employer firms in the ship and boat building sector in 2015 (a 13 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 143287 workers (a 4 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of about $8 billion (an 11 increase in real terms from 2007) Florida (278) Washington (143) and Louisiana (109) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Tables | National Overview

18

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

United States | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the United States Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)

With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 1190092 144293187 39904566 60758157 711409 53110090 19407193 27553434

Commercial Harvesters 166952 14231679 4698535 7334409 166952 14231679 4698535 7334409Seafood Processors amp Dealers 200543 30837015 9731961 13528514 54238 8340003 2632051 3658845

Importers 186295 57572994 9227170 17550769 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 53765 8192076 2691973 3851846 25204 3840327 1261959 1805690

Retail 582536 33459425 13554926 18492619 465015 26698081 10814648 14754491

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (millions of dollars) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 4182 4436 3839 4515 5390 5285 5553 5529 5219 5337Finfish amp Other 2048 2301 1789 2161 2606 2544 2669 2431 2360 2300Shellfish 2135 2135 2051 2354 2785 2742 2884 3098 2859 3038

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 369 325 311 404 423 431 463 564 621 667Blue crab 149 161 163 205 184 193 193 215 220 219Menhaden 93 91 90 93 133 126 125 114 180 181Pacific halibut 227 217 140 207 213 152 117 115 118 125Pacific salmon 451 484 445 614 716 637 835 690 543 448 Sablefish 116 128 130 139 197 154 110 119 123 124 Sea scallop 386 370 376 456 585 559 467 424 440 486Shrimp 430 445 379 409 538 510 597 702 512 522Tunas 94 107 96 108 136 164 146 134 137 154Walleye pollock 392 435 328 334 473 510 462 466 457 407

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (millions of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 9306 8347 7889 8027 9888 9475 9742 9511 9750 9602Finfish amp Other 8228 7292 6618 6719 8516 8148 8466 8244 8608 8475Shellfish 1078 1056 1270 1308 1372 1328 1275 1267 1142 1127

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 81 88 101 118 126 150 150 147 147 159Blue crab 157 162 176 199 202 185 135 140 161 160Menhaden 1484 1344 1407 1259 1899 1598 1341 1232 1632 1748Pacific halibut 70 67 60 56 43 34 30 23 24 25Pacific salmon 971 726 764 848 839 683 1111 754 1122 606 Sablefish 48 46 45 42 43 43 39 35 35 34Sea scallop 58 53 58 58 59 57 41 34 36 40Shrimp 274 249 305 249 312 309 293 326 342 292Tunas 51 48 49 48 50 59 56 58 57 56Walleye pollock 3068 2278 1869 1947 2811 2872 3003 3146 3263 3355

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

American lobster 455 371 309 344 335 287 308 383 423 420Blue crab 095 099 093 103 091 105 143 153 136 137Menhaden 006 007 006 007 007 008 009 009 011 010Pacific halibut 325 325 235 367 498 448 392 497 488 503Pacific salmon 046 067 058 072 085 093 075 092 048 074Sablefish 242 278 289 331 458 357 281 341 350 366Sea scallop 660 693 648 792 989 982 1139 1252 1232 1200Shrimp 157 179 124 164 172 165 204 216 150 178Tunas 185 223 196 225 274 275 262 231 240 276Walleye pollock 011 019 014 014 014 016 015 013 016 012

19

National O

verview |enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

United States | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts byFishing Mode

For-Hire 19890 2893120 1000008 1550124Private Boat 23523 3868886 1095035 1933559Shore 22588 3164227 962607 1661185

Total Durable Expenditures 406019 57985702 21276476 33548301Total Impacts 472020 67911935 24334126 38693169

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)1

Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 1113595Private Boat 1769038Shore 1375153Total 4257786

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 3679848Other Equipment 1908759Boat Expenses 15398019Vehicle Expenses 3473756Second Home Expenses 2102010Total Durable Expenditures 26562392

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 30820178

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)23

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 12251 10550 9515 9496 9082 9561 9509 9232 7721 8427Non-Coastal 1607 1526 1488 1499 1380 1468 1461 1460 1301 1419Total Anglers 13858 12076 11004 10994 10462 11028 10970 10692 9022 9846

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016For-Hire 4091 3317 3232 2603 3210 3219 3883 4171 4139 3216Private 46497 45008 38292 38054 35492 34870 34293 32815 29459 31169Shore 37024 37233 33633 32135 31694 32976 33882 32049 28108 28955Total Trips 87611 85558 75156 72792 70395 71064 72058 69035 61706 63339

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)5

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Drum (Atlantic H 26566 24014 15766 13355 13319 11950 17597 17615 13162 8381croaker amp spot) R 21370 24973 20371 15979 18093 18618 25484 16047 12441 10959

Drum (seatrouts)6HR

1756028961

2107532339

2018925795

1673623823

2223228643

2087431542

1755526965

961115212

1164816324

1438921971

Little tunny amp H 292 201 233 185 282 386 345 384 428 414Atlantic bonito R 1221 722 806 599 702 855 651 1137 517 956

Pacific halibutHR

585438

516359

440321

398304

394311

388324

454324

408251

420271

400244

Pacific salmonHR

1013567

651358

789458

660286

750367

667281

996497

972303

944452

596283

Rockfishes amp H 2664 2162 2439 2448 3116 3677 4160 4380 4215 3830scorpionfishes R 624 537 534 617 698 773 1025 986 931 891

Sharks7HR

3085184

1815006

1724203

2094181

1843100

1573923

2524538

2044133

1313713

1393434

Striped bassHR

242516186

232512677

19618094

19686347

22196120

14945369

21958638

17727365

12618543

153211863

Summer H 3109 2362 1830 1511 1848 2278 2532 2460 1624 2029flounder R 17628 20548 22297 22227 19722 14257 13584 16512 10535 12148Tunas (Thunnus H 730 801 524 590 440 726 723 709 833 567species) R 97 93 57 54 70 53 33 62 67 107

1 All anglers reported in this table are US residents2 Participation estimates do not include Puerto Rico Alaska Texas or Hawairsquoi 3 Includes Louisiana resident participation estimated from historical Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) data and a state creel survey 4 Effort estimates do not include Alaska or Texas Hawairsquoi effort estimates are available only for the shore and private boat modes 5 Harvest and release estimates do not include Puerto Rico or Alaska 6 Drum (seatrouts) include spotted seatrout silver seatrout sand seatrout weakfish and other species in the Cynoscion genus7 Sharks do not include spiny dogfish

20

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

United States | Marine Economy

2015 United States Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms

(millions)

Establishments(millions)

Employees(millions)

AnnualPayroll

($ trillions)

Employee Compensation

($ trillions)

Gross Domestic Product

($ trillions)

CommercialLocation

Quotient2

Totals 2433 766 12409 625 970 1793 1

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 1303 1308 1395 1617 1757 1766 1812 1947 2108Receipts 88230 89670 95219 104990 110745 115167 128927 146626 163625

Seafood salesretail

Firms 2610 2522 2455 2513 2514 2657 2497 2557 2471Receipts 231776 233002 207139 199810 212679 217702 205555 203459 206676

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 685 663 645 638 620 589 604 640 618Employees 33169 33323 30894 31789 31261 30988 31390 32180 30708

Payroll 1196086 1161637 1091727 1116305 1200263 1196207 1228826 1311910 1354572

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 2438 2063 2099 2183 2287 1954 2098 2100 2132Employees 24232 20116 19290 19386 20622 20030 20367 21155 22060

Payroll 924654 782178 758332 798794 848454 867179 884645 910527 999264

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 2094 2044 1967 1982 1972 1957 1995 2015 2059Employees 10380 9732 9439 9857 10006 10293 10631 11037 11443

Payroll 209404 205423 211264 219045 222508 237619 253490 271732 292726

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp Great Lakes freighttransportation

Establishments 573 513 513 547 549 496 497 598 593Employees 22568 21019 20919 17528 18590 19099 18659 20884 19983

Payroll 1552467 1694613 1470159 1288001 1400267 1467709 1512053 1835024 1746612

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 427 365 376 372 378 375 305 332 350Employees 11308 10231 11180 10288 10362 12375 8704 8646 8014

Payroll 855683 852063 863363 867797 921990 1073529 703003 683281 671624Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 92 71 78 56 55 58 62 56 61Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 15157

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1246384

MarinasEstablishments 4085 3972 3891 3937 3896 3782 3844 3811 3881

Employees 28788 28686 26643 26657 26557 25764 26373 26709 26999Payroll 945355 954032 905488 927499 953497 913140 951123 995248 1036253

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 552 532 541 507 545 343 458 482 492Employees 62941 63736 56386 57275 59517 43824 66301 69830 66414

Payroll 3428126 3272723 2776791 3026861 3159964 2601146 4086182 4406525 4334958Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 830 868 846 847 836 850 847 881 889Employees 12997 13419 12689 13529 13441 12532 12485 12148 11864

Payroll 756552 847938 826384 937980 893889 838959 929419 907763 923303

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 223 268 258 287 255 525 383 351 337Employees 6573 5608 5100 4844 4933 25396 7000 6769 7855

Payroll 318608 282671 250358 290467 306882 1345857 420664 399502 434209

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 1771 1782 1615 1540 1497 1560 1514 1524 1541Employees 148864 157512 137759 127691 127522 136365 135287 138687 143287

Payroll 6405570 7269306 6674187 6529523 6845322 7543402 7556373 7882846 8030983

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

North Pacific Regionbull Alaska

Holding king crabs Photo NOAAMaria Shawback

22

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Pacific Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe North Pacific Region includes the fisheries in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) off the state of Alaska Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (NPFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under six fishery management plans (FMPs)

North Pacific Region FMPs

bull Bering SeaAleutian Islands(BSAI)groundfish

bull Gulf of Alaska(GOA) groundfish

bull BSAI king andtanner crabs

bull Alaska scallopbull Salmon in the EEZbull Arctic

Of the stocks or stock complexes covered in these FMPs only the blue king crab-Pribilof Islands stock is listed as overfished and subject to overfishing

Catch Share programsThe North Pacific Region has six catch share programs more than any other region These are the 1) Western Alaska Community Development Quota (CDQ) Program 2) Alaska Halibut and Sablefish Individual Fishing Quota(IFQ) Program 3) American Fisheries Act (AFA) PollockCooperatives 4) Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI)Crab Rationalization Program 5) Bering Sea and AleutianIslands (BSAI) Non-Pollock Trawl CatcherProcessorGroundfish Cooperatives (Amendment 80) and 6)Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program The landingsrevenues for these programs totaled $8549 million in2015 exceeding the total landings revenue of any otherstate Following are descriptions of these catch shareprograms and their performance

Western Alaska Community Development Quota (CDQ) Program The program was originally implemented in 1992 as part of a restructuring of the BSAI groundfish fishery Under this program a percentage of the total allowable catch for groundfish prohibited species halibut and crab is apportioned to 65 eligible villages in Western Alaska that are organized into six CDQ groups The program has the following goals 1) provide eligible Western Alaska villages with the opportunity to participate and invest in fisheries in

the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area 2) support economic development in Western Alaska3) alleviate poverty and provide economic and socialbenefits to residents and 4) achieve a sustainable anddiversified local economy

Alaska Halibut and Sablefish IFQ Program The program was implemented in 1995 The primary objectives of this IFQ program include the following 1) eliminate gear conflicts 2) address safety concerns and 3) improve product quality The performance results ofthe halibut fishery show that relative to its baseline period(3-year period prior to implementation) the followingindicators decreased 2015 quota landings and numberof active vessels However inflation-adjusted halibutrevenue and revenue per vessel increased The 2015performance results for the sablefish fishery show thatquota landings inflation-adjusted revenue and numberof active vessels decreased while inflation-adjustedrevenue per vessel increased

American Fisheries Act (AFA) Pollock Cooperatives The program was established in 1999 and 2000 with the goals of settling allocation disputes between inshore (catcher vessels) offshore (catcherprocessors) and mothership sectors and ending the race for fish Key performance indicators of this program show that relative to its baseline the 2015 quota landings inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per vessel increased while the number of active vessels decreased

In 2017 the council approved two catch share program reviews the AFA Program Review and the Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program Review In February 2017 the council reviewed and accepted the AFA Program Review as final with one addition a section describing the revenue collected by the state for AFA fishing activity using the Alaska Fisheries Business tax and the Fisheries Resource Landing tax how those revenues may have changed over time and how they were distributed to communities In October 2017 the council reviewed the Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program review and allocation policy review and accepted both as complete and final NOAA Fisheries and industry participants identified housekeeping issues and NOAA Fisheries intends to incorporate those into the reauthorization of the program starting in 2018

23

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

North Pacific Region | Regional Summary

Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) Crab Rationalization Program The program was implemented for the 2005ndash2006 crab fishing season to address the race to harvest high bycatch and discard mortality and product quality issues The program also aims to balance the interests of those who depend on crab fisheries This program includes share allocations to harvesters and processors Processor quota was incorporated to preserve the viability of processing facilities in dependent communities and in particular to maintain competitive conditions in ex-vessel markets The CDQ and Adak Community allocations regional landings and processing requirements and several community protection measures protect community interests The key 2015 performance indicators of this program show that relative to its baseline quota landings and number of active vessels decreased However inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per active vessel increased

In June 2016 the council approved a 10-year review of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab Rationalization Program One key finding of the review was that total allowable catch (TAC) had never been exceeded evidence that resource conservation has improved In addition the program has led to decreased deadloss and greater accountability as deadloss is deducted from IFQ holdings The program was also successful at reducing harvest capacity which sharply decreased from 256 vessels in the 200405 season to 91 vessels in the 200607 season (currently there are 72 vessels in the fishery) Consolidation also occurred in the processor sector eg 11 processing plants processed Bristol Bay red king crab in 2005 down from 17 plants in 2004 The program also improved vessel safety an important achievement for the fishery once recognized as the most hazardous in the nation The review resulted in council initiation of a discussion paper focused on the arbitration system

BSAI Non-Pollock Trawl CatcherProcessor Groundfish Cooperatives The program commonly referred to as the Amendment 80 Program was implemented in 2008 to create economic incentives that would improve retention of all fish caught The cooperatives also seek to reduce bycatch by commercial

fishing vessels using trawl gear in the non-pollock groundfish fisheries Key 2015 performance indicators of this program show that relative to its baseline there was an increase in quota landings inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per vessel However the number of active vessels declined

Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program The program was initially established as a two-year (2007ndash2008) pilot program by the US Congress and was later extended to five years NOAA Fisheries implemented this catch share program in 2012 The objectives of this program are to reduce bycatch and discards encourage conservation-minded practices improve product quality and value and provide stability to the processing labor force Results show that in 2015 the quota landings number of active vessels inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per active vessel increased relative to the baseline

Policy UpdatesIn October 2015 Alaska Department of Fish and Game reduced the Bering Sea snow crab quota by 40 to 406 million pounds for the 20152016 fishing year This reduction was deemed necessary due to the 56 decline in biomass from 2014 to 2015 to 46410 metric tons which is below the 20-year average While the 2015 assessment noted strong future recruitment potential in the fishery the 2016 assessment resulted in a 50 reduction in the 20162017 quota from the previous fishing year (2157 million pounds which would be the fisheryrsquos lowest harvest since the 19691970 season) The recent decline in snow crab mature biomass is similar to other crab stocks in the Bering Sea and is correlated to a substantial increase in ocean temperature and decreases in sea ice extent relative to the short- and long-term averages for environmental conditions in the region

In February 2016 NOAA Fisheries implemented a cost-recovery fee program for the Western Alaska CDQ Program for groundfish and three limited access privilege programs (LAPPs) The three LAPPS with new cost recovery programs are AFA pollock Aleutian Islands pollock and the Amendment 80 fisheries) The cost-recovery fees recover the actual costs directly related to

24

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Pacific Region | Regional Summary

the management data collection efforts and enforcement of the programs However the fees cannot exceed 3 of the annual ex-vessel value of fish harvested by a program that is subject to the cost-recovery fee

In late 2016 the council approved a plan to allow guided recreational halibut fishermen to purchase commercial halibut individual fishing quota through the newly established Recreational Quota Entity (RQE) Program The RQE Program is distinct from the Guided Angler Fish program implemented in 2014 which allows halibut anglers to lease commercial quota A recent study found that while the charter (guided) operators leased very little quota relative to the guided angler fish (GAF) program limits GAF transfers reached up to 50 of quota transfers in some small boat IFQ sub-markets1 Under the 2016 plan the RQE can hold up to 10 of Area 2C (Southeast Alaska) and 12 of Area 3C (Southcentral Alaska) which could potentially make it the single largest Alaska halibut quota holder The RQE program should be effective in late 2018

Also in late 2016 the council took final action to establish electronic monitoring as a part of the North Pacific Observer Program Under this action regulations were implemented to allow electronic monitoring to be used for catch estimation Electronic monitoring was effective in 2017

In early 2017 the council took final action to approve a regulatory amendment that would allow CDQ groups to lease Area 4B 4C and 4D halibut IFQ in years where the catch limits are below certain thresholds In Area 4B this option would become available to the groups if the catch limit was 1 million pounds or lower This option would be available for Area 4C and 4D when the catch limit in Area 4CDE was at or below 15 million pounds Leased IFQ would be available to vessels less than or equal to 51 feet length overall subject to the groupsrsquo internal management This action would not convert IFQ to CDQ The council also added some restrictive provisions into this amendment in order to mitigate adverse impacts on other IFQ stakeholders and the quota share (QS) market Specifically the council adopted an option intended to prevent individuals from buying QS with the sole intention of leasing it This

provision would not allow an individual to lease IFQ within the first three years after they have acquired it Also in an effort to discourage the reliance on the leasing of Area 4 QS a QS holder may not lease halibut IFQ on a consecutive basis for more than two years In any year that CDQ groups use this additional opportunity the groups would be required to submit a report specifying the criteria used to select IFQ holders leasing to a CDQ group the criteria used to determine who can receive leased IFQ and the amount and type of IFQ leased This action is expected to be in effect in late 2018

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key North Pacific Commercial Species

bull Atka mackerelbull Crabbull Flatfishbull Pacific codbull Pacific halibut

bull Pacific herringbull Rockfishbull Sablefishbull Salmonbull Walleye pollock

The North Pacific groundfish fishery is different from most other United States fisheries in that a large portion of the fishery is processed at sea and therefore no landings revenues are reported The landings revenue for the species landed and processed at sea is estimated by using prices obtained from the shore-side sector These species include Atka mackerel flatfish Pacific cod rockfish sablefish and walleye pollock When data from the shore-side sector are inadequate historical information about the relationship between the ex-vessel price and the wholesale price of finished products is used to estimate ex-vessel prices and revenue for portions of the fishery mostly processed at sea

1 Kroetz Kailin and Lew Daniel and Sanchirico James N Recreational Leasing of Alaska Commercial Halibut Quota The First Two Years of the Guided Angler Fish Provision (September 30 2016) Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 16-39

25

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers2

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 Alaskarsquos commercial fishing and seafood industry generated $39 billion in sales impacts $17 billion in income impacts $21 billion in value-added impacts and 47200 full- and part-time jobs The commercial harvesters sector generated the largest employment impacts (33400) sales impacts ($27 billion) income impacts ($12 billion) and value-added impacts ($14 billion) across sectors

Landings TrendsAmong the Alaska key species pollock (down $49 million) crab (down $60 million) and Pacific salmon (down $88 million) had the largest one-year declines from 2015 to 2016 Alaska pollock landings revenue ($407 million in 2016) fell 108 relative to the previous year despite landings being at their highest level since 2006 The landings revenue decline was directly attributable to lower ex-vessel prices in both the Bering SeaAleutian Islands (BSAI $375 million) and Gulf of Alaska (GOA $32 million)3 Pollock ex-vessel prices fell in both the BSAI and GOA and while retained catch increased (particularly in the GOA) the net effect was a decrease in landings revenue of 92 in the BSAI and 26 in the GOA A decrease in the price of head-and-gut (HampG) products and low roe yields due to small-sized pollocks were factors in ex-vessel price decline Despite the year-over-year decline in landings revenue 2016 landings revenues were above the 10-year average

In contrast to ex-vessel value pollock first-wholesale value increased 62 in the BSAI to $135 billion and decreased 02 in the GOA to $1052 million The difference in performance between the ex-vessel and first-wholesale sectors can be attributed to higher prices on more highly processed value-added products such as surimi and deep-skin fillets and higher prices for roe due to reduced supply The fillet market faced challenges throughout 2016 including insolvency of a major international pollock trader and competition from low Russian pollock prices The surimi market which has been a strong performer in recent years continued to grow in 2016 albeit at a more modest pace 6 in the BSAI and 5 in the GOA as the supply of raw surimi material continues to be constrained in Japan The 2016 first-wholesale value in the pollock fishery was also above its 10-year average

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

North Pacific Region | Regional Summary

2 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)3 Alaska pollock trends are summarized or quoted verbatim from the Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report for the Groundfish Fisheries of the Gulf of Alaska and Bering SeaAleutian Islands Area Economic Status of the Groundfish Fisheries off Alaska 2016

26

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Pacific Region | Regional Summary

Crab landings revenue was down in 2016 relative to 2015 largely due to the 40 reduction in the snow crab TAC as described above Production declines occurred however in nearly all crab fisheries for example Dungeness crab landings fell 23 and king crab landings fell 17 year-over-year Prices for these species were however near record highs After adjusting for inflation the price of king crab ($717 per pound) and the price of Dungeness crab ($309 per pound) were at their highest since 1999 and 1997 respectively

Salmon landings also declined sharply in 2016 (down 46) relative to 2015 This was largely due to the decline in pink salmon landings which fell 488 million pounds from 2015 levels While pink salmon landings are typically lower in ldquoeven yearsrdquo due to their biennial cycle in 2016 the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) pink salmon harvests came in far below forecasted levels In January 2017 the Department of Commerce declared a fishery disaster for GOA pink salmon citing ldquosudden and unexpected large decreases in fish stock biomass due to unusual ocean and climate conditionsrdquo4 Overall pink salmon landings were down 76 from 2015 and down 62 from the 10-year average Chinook and chum salmon landings each had a sizable decline in landings (down 18 and 14 respectively) from 2015 to 2016 Due to reduced inventory for pink salmon and lower overall supply of salmon (global capture fishery production was down 16)5 the average price per pound of salmon was up 75 in 2016 relative to the previous year

Landings RevenueIn 2016 Alaska landings revenue totaled $16 billion a 3 decrease from 2007 (a 15 decrease in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 10 decrease from 2015 Finfish landings revenue accounted for 86 of all landings revenue in the region In 2016 salmon ($4073 million) walleye pollock ($4071 million) and crab ($2188 million) dominated Alaskan landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 Atka mackerel (75 53 in real terms) rockfish (59 39 in real terms) and crab (25 9 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while Pacific herring (-64 -68 in real terms) Pacific halibut (-46 -53 in real terms) and Pacific cod (-8 -19 in real terms) had the largest

revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 flatfish (15) Pacific halibut (6) and Pacific cod (2) had the largest revenue increases while Pacific herring (-24) crab (-23) and salmon (-18) had the largest revenue decreases

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Atka mackerel (75 53 in real terms)bull Rockfish (59 39 in real terms)bull Crab (25 9 in real terms)From 2015bull Flatfish (15)bull Pacific halibut (6)bull Pacific cod (2)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Pacific herring (-64 -68 in real terms)bull Pacific halibut (-46 -53 in real terms)bull Pacific cod (-8 -19 in real terms)From 2015bull Pacific herring (-24)bull Crab (-23)bull Salmon (-18)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Rockfish (69)bull Pacific cod (44)bull Flatfish (24)From 2015bull Atka mackerel (3)bull Rockfish (3)bull Walleye pollock (3)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Pacific halibut (-65)bull Sablefish (-40)bull Salmon (-38)From 2015bull Salmon (-46)bull Crab (-29)bull Pacific herring (-24)

4 See httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovmedia-releasecommerce-secretary-declares-fisheries-disasters-nine-west-coast-species5 See FAO Global Capture Production 1950-2016 at httpwwwfaoorgfisherystatisticsglobal-capture-productionqueryen

27

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

North Pacific Region | Regional Summary

LandingsIn 2016 North Pacific Region commercial fishermen landed over 56 billion pounds of finfish and shellfish a 4 increase from 2007 and a 7 decrease from 2015 Walleye pollock contributed the most to landings accounting for 60 of total volume

From 2007 to 2016 rockfish (69) Pacific cod (44) and flatfish (24) had the largest landings increases while Pacific halibut (-65) sablefish (-40) and salmon (-38) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 Atka mackerel (3) rockfish (3) and walleye pollock (3) had the largest landings increases while salmon (-46) crab (-29) and Pacific herring (-24) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 Pacific halibut ($503 per pound) received the highest North Pacific Region ex-vessel price Landings of Pacific herring ($010 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price

From 2007 to 2016 Atka mackerel (86 62 in real terms) salmon (75 53 in real terms) and sablefish (60 40 in real terms) had the largest price increases while Pacific herring (-53 -60 in real terms) Pacific cod (-35 -43 in real terms) and flatfish (-28 -37 in real terms) had the largest price decreases From 2015 to 2016 salmon (75) crab (34) and sablefish (9) had the largest price increases while walleye pollock (-25) and Pacific cod (-4) had the largest price decreases

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups

Key North Pacific Recreational Species

bull Chinook salmonbull Chum salmonbull Coho salmonbull Greenlings

(lingcod)

bull Pacific halibutbull Pink salmonbull Razor clamsbull Rockfishbull Sockeye salmon

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities6 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

In 2016 economic impacts from recreational fishing activities in Alaska generated 4865 jobs $5394 million in sales $1951 million in income and $3155 million in value-added impacts Impacts from durable equipment expenditures (eg rods and reels fishing-related

6 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

28

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Pacific Region | Regional Summary

equipment boats vehicles and second homes) accounted for 30 of employment 20 of sales 23 of income and 21 of value-added impacts Of the three fishing trip modes for-hire fishing trips had the greatest economic impact accounting for 38 of employment impacts

Expenditures for fishing trips and durable equipment across Alaska in 2016 totaled over $412 million Approximately $299 million of these expenditures were related to trip expenses with a large portion coming from trips in the for-hire (48) and private boat (47) sectors In 2016 durable goods expenditures totaled more than $113 million with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($518 million)

Days FishedThe state of Alaska records recreational fishing effort in terms of the number of days fished rather than the number of fishing trips Anglers who fished in Alaska spent approximately 863648 days fishing in 2016 This number represented an 18 decrease from the days spent fishing in 2007 From 2015 to 2016 there was an 11 decrease in the number of days fished

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Pacific cod (84)bull Rockfish species (34)From 2015bull Razor clams (107)bull Rockfish species (6)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Razor clams (-79)bull Shark species (-78)bull Lingcod (-57)From 2015bull Coho salmon (-47)bull Pacific cod (-35)bull Pink salmon (-27)

ParticipationIn 2016 about 293000 recreational saltwater anglers

fished in Alaska This number represented a 12 decrease from 2007 and a 4 decrease from 2015 These anglers are categorized as either residents of coastalnon-coastal counties in Alaska (39) or out-of-state anglers (61)

Harvest and ReleaseOf Alaskarsquos key species and species groups Pacific halibut (643000 fish) rockfish species (504000 fish) and coho salmon (305000 fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 Pacific cod (84) and rockfish species (34) had the largest increases in catch while razor clams (-79) shark species (-78) and lingcod (-57) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 razor clams (107) and rockfish species (6) had the largest increases in catch while coho salmon (-47) Pacific cod (-35) and pink salmon (-27) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries78

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ)9 The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average The Bureau of Labor Statistics did not disclose CFLQ data for Alaska for 2015

7 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)8 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)9 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

29

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

North Pacific Region | Regional Summary

In 2015 20907 employer establishments operated throughout the entire Alaskan economy (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed about 268000 workers and had a total annual payroll of $156 billion The gross state product of Alaska was approximately $534 billion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 Alaska had 30 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 9 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $41 million (a 97 increase in real terms from 2007) There were 109 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 4 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 8472 workers (a 30 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $3569 million

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 11 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in Alaska (an 8 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $761000 (a 50 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 15 employer firms in the retail seafood sales sector (a 114 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 64 workers and had a total annual payroll of $25 million

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 37 employer firms in the wholesale seafood sales sector (a 46 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 94 workers and had a total annual payroll of $73 million

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of Alaskarsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons It is clear however that these sectors play an important role in the regional economy For example in 2015 the coastal and Great Lakes freight transportation sector in Alaska accounted for $892 million in payroll

Tables | Alaska

32

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oAlaska | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Alaska Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 47151 3895150 1653458 2074342 46942 3855070 1644526 2059974

Commercial Harvesters 33414 2724805 1154017 1448489 33414 2724805 1154017 1448489Seafood Processors amp Dealers 10726 967808 422333 523622 10659 961779 419696 520358

Importers 99 30442 4879 9280 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 335 39282 13450 17563 317 37166 12726 16617

Retail 2578 132814 58780 75388 2552 131319 58087 74511

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 1653205 1871763 1443124 1737518 2170704 2132501 2018139 1910778 1784980 1609630Finfish amp Other 1464901 1612011 1243109 1498581 1862213 1813059 1778006 1662309 1496651 1380040Shellfish 188304 259752 200015 238937 308492 319443 240134 248469 288328 229590

Key SpeciesAtka mackerel 17599 21636 29669 30197 30371 30567 16874 24555 30293 30759 Crab 175587 248781 184700 221857 290342 308927 230139 237813 278865 218762 Flatfish 77900 99800 71800 80700 113000 127100 103100 94500 71100 81800 Pacific cod 213964 246145 120217 141376 182407 216581 180369 206731 193792 197213 Pacific halibut 217399 208983 134603 200454 205211 144801 111483 106674 110709 117066 Pacific herring 14817 22912 29294 23026 12305 19430 16280 11492 7040 5364 Rockfish 17400 17000 12600 19200 29300 33500 27700 30200 28800 27700 Sablefish 95674 101049 95200 103097 151734 125730 90016 94611 93983 92843 Salmon 416866 456536 419676 564696 662141 589046 757270 619135 494784 407259 Walleye pollock 391763 435092 328186 333666 472737 510480 461609 465817 456315 407116

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 5408420 4604863 4128898 4408396 5413956 5392685 5832979 5703903 6069071 5630998Finfish amp Other 5330051 4497908 4032927 4322836 5328134 5276459 5741926 5612863 5963794 5557727Shellfish 78369 106955 95971 85560 85822 116226 91053 91040 105277 73271

Key SpeciesAtka mackerel 126962 127030 156888 145205 112594 103994 51425 69512 117678 121285Crab 70699 99454 89530 79574 80457 111914 87089 85106 97230 68607Flatfish 423340 599585 506166 563817 649451 646680 659799 663865 510860 522934Pacific cod 491020 494975 491073 538741 663100 716882 681407 716564 697174 707150Pacific halibut 67242 64639 57749 54857 41291 32422 28696 21616 22850 23262Pacific herring 67137 83787 86951 108116 98600 75058 85076 96789 68461 51822Rockfish 86569 89761 83987 100068 106287 114581 122950 133320 141854 145970Sablefish 36103 32540 28960 27026 28847 31427 30150 25679 23845 21775Salmon 946377 706018 730292 816778 797151 658394 1053839 715927 1095633 587697Walleye pollock 3068211 2277527 1869214 1947453 2810726 2872187 3003183 3145639 3262568 3355059

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atka mackerel 014 017 019 021 027 029 032 036 026 026Crab 238 242 201 237 309 246 264 279 235 319Flatfish 018 016 014 014 017 019 016 013 013 013Pacific cod 037 049 020 027 025 024 028 022 025 024Pacific halibut 323 323 233 365 497 447 389 493 485 503Pacific herring 022 027 034 021 012 026 019 012 010 010Rockfish 020 019 017 022 032 029 022 024 021 021Sablefish 245 283 301 360 484 382 273 340 362 393Salmon 040 058 051 067 077 072 067 080 040 070Walleye pollock 011 019 014 014 014 016 015 013 016 012

33

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Alaska | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Alaska Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)1

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts byFishing Mode

For-Hire 1857 238118 89312 132960Private Boat 1295 163384 51722 97917Shore 253 28338 9709 16879

Total Durable Expenditures 1460 109549 44341 67703Total State Economic Impacts 4865 539389 195084 315459

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 144052Private Boat 141703Shore 13156Total 298911

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Chinook salmon

H 110 71 89 78 85 63 81 111 111 101R 110 80 96 66 95 62 120 94 116 87

Coho salmon

H 506 404 418 350 386 263 493 390 479 263R 122 89 94 74 88 50 122 60 99 41

Pink salmon

H 133 88 117 82 72 78 113 69 110 103R 281 152 224 121 135 141 203 118 204 126

Sockeye salmon

H 32 29 34 28 31 28 40 35 33 34R 21 10 10 6 10 8 13 12 9 7

Chum salmon

H 18 12 22 11 21 11 25 12 13 10R 34 28 34 19 38 20 39 19 25 22

Pacific halibut

H 585 516 440 398 394 388 454 408 420 400R 438 359 321 304 311 324 324 251 271 244

Rockfish species

H 198 226 209 224 211 230 256 335 332 347R 178 171 149 151 122 121 121 148 143 157

LingcodH 42 37 32 32 33 33 34 32 28 26R 70 65 46 39 36 36 33 29 27 23

Pacific codH 20 25 36 37 48 42 38 61 58 44R 27 39 63 81 76 50 48 73 75 43

Shark species

H 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0R 75 52 33 29 14 13 11 28 20 16

Razor clams

H 389 593 556 357 436 324 291 90 39 77R 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 24717Other Equipment 32640Boat Expenses 51807Vehicle Expenses 4241Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 113405

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 412316

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler fishing days)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Days Fished 1053 935 914 811 812 808 980 960 975 864

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)23

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Out-of-State 205 190 158 159 159 159 176 169 180 180CoastalNon-Coastal 127 119 127 122 117 109 121 118 125 113Total Anglers 332 309 284 281 276 268 298 287 305 293

1 Data reported in this table include saltwater fishing activities only2 Information reported in this table is from the Sport Fish Division of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADFampG) and includes saltwater fishing activities only3 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

34

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oAlaska | Marine Economy

2015 Alaska State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 55818 (02) 20907 (03) 267999 (02) 1564 (03) 2795 (03) 5338 (03) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 33 31 32 28 26 25 35 31 30Receipts 1837 1455 1693 2482 2882 2708 3268 2472 4091

Seafood salesretail

Firms 12 13 16 23 15 15 11 17 11Receipts 1358 1431 1350 1595 903 1626 1458 1539 761

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 114 122 121 119 122 116 115 108 109Employees 6506 7707 7572 8074 8578 8289 8638 9115 8472

Payroll 262127 254894 255403 268208 296851 297284 308961 337171 356855

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 68 57 54 52 48 47 43 43 37Employees 167 143 ds ds 159 143 102 120 94

Payroll 8528 8389 8445 9141 9985 10943 7205 7024 7306

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 7 9 10 10 10 15 14 14 15Employees ds 37 44 ds ds ds ds ds 64

Payroll ds 1839 1824 1986 2487 2019 2337 2687 2498

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 46 49 50 55 63 47 53 72 74Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1067

Payroll 27357 33888 33132 ds ds ds 82692 89020 89281

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 3 3 3 3 1 2 3 6 5Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 6 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1Employees ds ds ds NA ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds NA ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 13 14 13 14 14 13 12 11 11

Employees 48 66 56 ds ds ds ds ds 30Payroll 1763 2303 2181 1932 2053 1613 1449 ds 1423

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 17 12 13 13 14 8 9 9 9Employees 677 ds ds ds ds 334 ds ds 437

Payroll 35345 ds ds ds ds 26481 ds ds 32326Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 31 25 23 25 22 21 22 25 24Employees ds 296 312 303 321 97 103 138 140

Payroll 25058 23233 25630 27543 27156 9938 10805 13015 13596

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 7 8 9 8 18 13 12 11Employees ds ds ds ds ds 582 ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds 1790 25545 ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 16 17 21 22 23 23 20 27 23Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 335 344

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 15845 17748

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this state than thenational average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Pacific Regionbull Californiabull Oregonbull Washington

Commercial boat Photo Pacific Fishery Management Council

36

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oPacific Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe Pacific Region includes California Oregon and Washington Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the Pacific Fishery Management Council (PFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under four fishery management plans (FMPs)

Pacific Region FMPs

bull Coastal pelagic species

bull Pacific coast salmon

bull Pacific coast groundfish

bull West Coast highly migratory species

Three of the stocks or stock complexes covered in these FMPs were listed as overfished in 2016 Pacific ocean perch yelloweye rockfish and Pacific bluefin tuna Three stockscomplexes were subject to overfishing in 2016 coho salmon (Puget Sound Hood Canal) Pacific bluefin tuna (Pacific) and swordfish (Eastern Pacific) Also in 2016 three stocks of Chinook salmon (Columbia River Basin Upper River Summer Washington Coast Willapa Bay Fall Natural and Washington Coast Grays Harbor Fall) and one stock of coho salmon (Washington Coast Hoh which is prosecuted by both US and international fleets) were removed from the overfishing list

Conservative management techniques are employed in the Pacific Regionrsquos fisheries For example the Pacific groundfish and salmon fisheries are subject to weak stock management where access to the surplus of healthier stocks that can be harvested is often restricted to protect weaker stocks with which they commingle in the ocean These weaker stocks include seven rebuilding groundfish stocks salmon (listed under the Endangered Species Act) and other non-listed stocks that constrain the fishery

Salmon management is further complicated by the need to ensure equal allocation of harvest among diverse user groups and coordination with other entities that have jurisdiction over various aspects of salmon management Decades of habitat modification hatchery practices harvest and growing competition for water have affected the viability of salmon stocks and made them more vulnerable to adverse environmental conditions These

conditions include the prolonged drought and adverse ocean conditions experienced in recent years Low returns of salmon to the Klamath River in 2006 and to the Sacramento River in 2008 and 2009 resulted in unprecedented closures of ocean and in-river fisheries leading to federal disaster relief for affected entities

Coastal pelagic species (CPS) are highly variable environmentally sensitive stocks that provide food for marine mammals birds and fish These species include Pacific sardine northern anchovy Pacific and jack mackerel and market squid Of these species Pacific sardine is the most commonly targeted CPS finfish and is managed according to an innovative harvest control rule allowable harvest varies with sea surface temperature Because the geographic range of sardine tends to expand with abundance harvest allocation between the California and Pacific Northwest fisheries is an ongoing and dynamic issue The annual guideline for sardine harvest is allocated coast-wide on a seasonal basis Recent decreases in harvest guideline limits have contributed to the development of an intense derby fishery

Catch limits for Pacific halibut a transboundary fish stock are set in January by the International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) This bilateral commission between the United States and Canada determines total allowable catch levels (TACs) for Pacific halibut that will be caught in the United States and Canadian exclusive economic zones (EEZs) After catch levels are determined the PFMC develops a catch-sharing plan for tribal and non-tribal (ie commercial and recreational) fisheries in the federal waters of California Oregon and Washington Pacific Halibut is targeted only with hook gear but there are allocations to the trawl sector for bycatch including individual bycatch quotas in the Pacific groundfish trawl IFQ

The Highly Migratory Species (HMS) FMP includes tunas billfish and pelagic sharks as managed species The albacore surface hook-and-line fishery is by far the most economically important commercial HMS fishery followed by the drift gillnet fishery for swordfish and thresher shark HMS is also a very important component of the catch for the Pacific Regionrsquos commercial passenger fishing vessel fleet and the private recreational boat fleet

37

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Pacific Region | Regional Summary

Catch Share ProgramsThe Pacific Region has two catch share programs 1) the Pacific Sablefish Permit Stacking Program and 2) the Pacific Groundfish Trawl Rationalization Program The landings revenues for these programs totaled more than $47 million in 2015 Following are descriptions of these catch share programs and their performance

Pacific Sablefish Permit Stacking Program This program was implemented in 2001 and allows vessels to stack multiple vessel permits on a single vessel The goal of this approach is to improve economic efficiency through rationalization of the fixed gear fleet increase benefits for fishing communities promote equity lessen reallocation effects of previous harvest regulations promote safety and improve product quality and value Results for this program show that in 2015 the number of active vessels and landings decreased compared with the baseline period (average of the 3-year period prior to the start of the program) while inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per vessel increased during 2015

A recent study1 of this fleet demonstrated that after the catch share program was implemented the probability of fishermen taking a fishing trip in high wind conditions decreased 82 This provides evidence that institutional changes can significantly reduce risk-taking behavior and result in safer fisheries

Pacific Trawl Rationalization Program This program was implemented by the PFMC in January 2011 It involves individual fishing quotas (IFQs) for non-whiting groundfish and whiting trawlers delivering to shoreside plants and cooperatives for whiting mothership and catcher processor sectors Program objectives are to provide a mechanism for total catch accounting provide a viable profitable and efficient groundfish fishery promote practices that reduce bycatch and discard mortality while minimizing ecological impacts increase operational flexibility minimize adverse effects from the IFQ program on fishing communities and other fisheries promote measurable economic and employment benefits through the seafood catching processing distribution and support sectors of the industry provide quality product for the consumer and increase safety in the fishery

As required by law the council is reviewing the trawl catch share program five years after implementation According to findings from the draft public review the economic performance of the program has been strong Net revenue per active catcher vessel increased 65 relative to the pre-catch share period (2009-2010) for the non-whiting groundfish fishery and 400 for the whiting fishery Meanwhile motherships experienced a 62 increase and catcher-processors experienced a 7 decrease in net revenue

Results for this program show that in 2015 landings inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per vessel increased compared to the baseline period However the number of active vessels decreased during this period There was no change in inflation-adjusted revenue Expanded observer coverage and dockside monitoring which were implemented with the catch share program coupled with long-term adherence to catch targets and improved stock assessment models have to varying degrees also contributed to improved fishery performance For example in the first three years of catch shares the total catch of rebuilding stocks (of which twomdashcanary rockfish and petrale solemdashare now declared rebuilt) was 50 lower than in the previous three years

Policy UpdatesIn September 2016 the council decided to manage darkblotched rockfish and Pacific ocean perch (POP) caught as bycatch by the at-sea whiting sectors using set-asides instead of total catch limits Exceeding a set-aside does not result in an automatic fishery closure and thus mitigates the risk of the Pacific whiting at-sea sectors not attaining their respective Pacific whiting allocations due to the incidental catch of these two species Importantly this action does not increase the risk of exceeding darkblotched rockfish or POP ACLs because NMFS was given in-season authority to automatically close the fishery if species-specific set-aside amounts plus buffer amounts were expected to be exceeded The final rule was published on January 8 2018

In April 20162 the PFMC recommended closing the directed non-tribal Pacific sardine fishery for the 2016-2017 season due to the estimated biomass (106137 metric tons) falling below the 150000 metric tons

1 Pfeiffer Lisa and Trevor Gratz The effect of rights-based fisheries management on risk taking and fishing safety (March 8 2016) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (10) 2615-2620 DOI 101073pnas15094561132 httpswwwdfwstateorusagencycommissionminutes1606_JuneExhibit20I_Attachment201_Agenda20Item20Summarypdf

38

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oPacific Region | Regional Summary

required for the directed commercial fishery to open This decision continued the closure implemented for the 2015-2016 season Although the directed commercial fishery remains closed the PFMC allowed up to 8000 metric tons of sardine to be harvested to account for small amounts taken as incidental catch in other fisheries live bait harvest tribal harvest and research

At the April 2017 meeting the PFMC recommended closing the directed commercial sardine fishery for the third year in a row based on the severely depleted biomass which declined 18 from the previous year The Pacific sardine biomass which is prone to significant natural fluctuation due to large-scale changes in oceanic temperature declined over 90 between 2006 and 2017 from approximately 1 million metric tons to 86586 metric tons

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key Pacific Region Commercial Species

bull Albacore tunabull Crabbull Flatfishbull Hakebull Other shellfish

bull Rockfishbull Sablefishbull Salmonbull Shrimpbull Squid

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending

generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers3

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 commercial fishing in California generated the largest employment impacts in the region 124800 jobs Income impacts ($49 billion) sales impacts ($228 billion) and value-added impacts ($81 billion) were also largest in California The importers sector in California generated the highest employment impacts of any

3 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)

39

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Pacific Region | Regional Summary

state-level sector 55100 jobs The importers sector in California also generated the highest state-level income impacts ($27 billion) sales impacts ($17 billion) and value-added impacts in the region ($52 billion)

Landings TrendsLandings revenue increased in the Pacific Region (up $1312 million or 24) from 2015 to 2016 largely due to the increase in crab landings revenue ($1117 million) during this period A fishery disaster had been declared for the Dungeness crab fishery in California and for the Quileute tribe in Washington State for the 2015 to 2016 season because of the closures that were implemented due to high levels of domoic acid a neurotoxin As these fisheries re-opened landings bounced back to their highest level since 2013

Whiting was another bright spot for the West Coast region with 2016 landings and landings revenue up 67 and 93 respectively relative to 2015 While the 2016 whiting total allowable catch was unchanged from 2015 the major difference in performance between the two years was a higher utilization rate of the TAC The 2015 utilization rate (474) of the whiting TAC was the fisheriesrsquo lowest in the last decade Reasons cited by industry for the 2015 performance included the unusual dispersed distribution of the fish later in the season after the at-sea fleet returned from Alaska possibly due to anomalously warm ocean conditions as well as less-favorable market conditions4

Squid landings revenue also bounced back to a degree in 2016 (up $158 million) but only because global supply shortages due to the strong El Nintildeo event from 2015 to 2016 caused prices to surge 60 in California Squid landings were essentially flat relative to 2015 landings Prior to the most recent El Nintildeo event squid had been Californiarsquos largest fishery by value and volume in 2014 and had represented 80 of US squid landings and 64 of US squid revenues in recent years In 2016 California represented only 58 and 40 of US squid landings and landings revenue respectively Similarly revenues from albacore landings on the West Coast were up 28 relative to 2015 despite a 7 drop in landings Tight inventories drove albacore prices up 39 in 2016

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Shrimp (178 143 in real terms)bull Crab (79 56 in real terms)bull Albacore tuna (75 53 in real terms)From 2015bull Crab (106)bull Hake (93)bull Squid (65)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull There were no decreases from 2007 (in

nominal dollar values)From 2015bull Shrimp (-45)bull Salmon (-16)bull Rockfish (-10)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Shrimp (108)bull Rockfish (41)bull Hake (23)From 2015bull Crab (177)bull Hake (67)bull Other shellfish (31)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Salmon (-25)bull Squid (-23)bull Flatfish (-22)From 2015bull Shrimp (-48)bull Salmon (-28)bull Rockfish (-12)

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the Pacific Region totaled $6889 million in 2016 This number represented a 50 increase from 2007 (a 31 increase in real terms after adjusting

4 httpswwwfederalregistergovdocuments201605162016-11329magnuson-stevens-act-provisions-fisheries-off-west-coast-states-pacific-coast-groundfish-fishery

40

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oPacific Region | Regional Summary

for inflation) and a 24 increase from 2015 Landings revenue was highest in Washington ($2875 million) followed by California ($2161 million) Shellfish landings revenue made up 67 of total revenue in the region Crab ($2167 million) and other shellfish ($1565 million) had the highest landings revenue in the Pacific Region in 2016 Together they accounted for 54 of total landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 shrimp (178 143 in real terms) crab (79 56 in real terms) and albacore tuna (75 53 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases There were no decreases in revenue from 2007 to 2016 (in nominal dollar values) From 2015 to 2016 crab (106) hake (93) and squid (65) had the largest revenue increases while shrimp (-45) salmon (-16) and rockfish (-10) had the largest revenue decreases

LandingsIn 2016 Pacific Region commercial fishermen landed 9378 million pounds of finfish and shellfish a 15 decrease from 2007 and a 26 increase from 2015 Hake had the highest landings volume in the Pacific Region accounting for 60 of landed weight

From 2007 to 2016 shrimp (108) rockfish (41) and hake (23) had the largest landings increases while salmon (-25) squid (-23) and flatfish (-22) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 crab (177) hake (67) and other shellfish (31) had the largest landings increases while shrimp (-48) salmon (-28) and rockfish (-12) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 other shellfish ($1012 per pound) received the highest Pacific Region ex-vessel price Landings of hake ($008 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price From 2007 to 2016 albacore tuna (93 69 in real terms) squid (79 56 in real terms) and salmon (57 37 in real terms) had the largest price increases while rockfish (-10 -22 in real terms) had the largest price decreases From 2015 to 2016 squid (58) albacore tuna (39) and salmon (17) had the largest price increases while crab (-25) and other shellfish (-13) had the largest price decreases

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups

Key Pacific Region Recreational Species

bull Albacore amp other tunas

bull Barracuda bass amp bonito

bull Croakersbull Flatfish

bull Greenlingsbull Rockfishes amp

scorpionfishesbull Salmonbull Sculpinsbull Surfperches

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities5 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietors income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses

5 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

41

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Pacific Region | Regional Summary

a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

The greatest employment impacts from expenditures on saltwater recreational fishing in the Pacific Region were generated in California (17100 jobs) followed by Washington (4600 jobs) The largest sales impacts were observed in California ($21 billion) followed by Washington ($5421 million) The biggest income impacts were generated in California ($8194 million) followed by Washington ($2094 million) The greatest value-added impacts were in California ($13 billion) followed by Washington ($3396 million)

Recreational fishing expenditures (on both fishing trips and durable equipment purchases) across the Pacific Region in 2016 totaled about $23 billion Trip expenditures totaled more than $526 million with a large portion coming from trips in the shore (35) and for-hire (33) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $18 billion with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($8802 million)

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Greenlings (98)bull Rockfishes amp scorpionfishes (45)bull Surfperches (2)From 2015bull Croakers (29)bull Barracuda bass amp bonito (19)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Croakers (-72)bull Salmon (-61)bull Sculpins (-7)From 2015bull Albacore amp other tunas (-61)bull Salmon (-58)bull Surfperches (-31)

Fishing TripsIn 2016 recreational fishermen took 52 million fishing

trips in the Pacific Region This number represented a 16 decrease from 2007 and an 11 decrease from 2015 The largest proportions of trips were taken in the shore mode (60) and private boat mode (26) States with the highest number of recorded trips in the Pacific Region were California (35 million trips) and Washington (1 million trips)

ParticipationIn 2016 there were 12 million recreational anglers who fished in the Pacific Region This number represented a 26 decrease from 2007 and an 8 decrease from 2015 These anglers were Pacific Region residents from either a coastal county (71) or non-coastal county (29)

Harvest and ReleaseOf the Pacific Regions key species and species groups rockfishes and scorpionfishes (42 million fish) barracuda bass and bonito (195 million fish) and surfperches (18 million fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 greenlings (98) rockfishes and scorpionfishes (45) and surfperches (2) had the largest increases in catch while croakers (-72) salmon (-61) and sculpins (-7) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 croakers (29) and barracuda bass and bonito (19) had the largest increases in catch while albacore and other tunas (-61) salmon (-58) and surfperches (-31) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries 67

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a states economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy8 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient

6 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)7 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)8 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

42

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oPacific Region | Regional Summary

(CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average

The Bureau of Labor Statistics suppressed the CFLQ value for Washington for 2015 Of the remaining states Oregon had the highest CFLQ at 352 California had a CFLQ value of 061

In 2015 12 million employer establishments operated throughout the entire Pacific Region (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed about 184 million workers and had a total annual payroll of $11 trillion The combined gross state product of Washington Oregon and California was approximately $32 trillion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 the Pacific Region had 240 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 30 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $176 million (this remained unchanged in real terms from 2007) There were 153 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 9 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 8330 workers (this remained unchanged from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $4264 million (this remained unchanged in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of seafood product preparation and packaging establishments was located in California (217) followed by Washington (144) and Oregon (32)

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 271 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the three states that make up the Pacific Region (a 2 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $208 million (an 18 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 234 employer firms in

the retail sales of seafood sector (an 8 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 1668 workers (an 18 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $443 million (a 21 increase in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of retail seafood establishments was located in California (391) followed by Washington (74) and Oregon (40)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 491 employer firms in the wholesale sales of seafood sector in the Pacific Region in 2015 (a 10 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 5443 workers and had a total annual payroll of $2654 million The greatest number of wholesale seafood establishments was located in California (349) followed by Washington (118) and Oregon (24)

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of the Pacific Regions economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons However these sectors play an important role in the regional economy For example the ship and boat building sector accounted for $9444 million in payroll in 2015

43

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Pacific Region | Regional Summary

Tables | Pacific Region

44

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oPacific Region | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Pacific Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Landings Revenue Jobs Sales Income Value

Added Jobs Sales Income Value Added

California 216139 124803 22776152 4911619 8141191 14900 1225433 459683 632590Oregon 151707 16162 1190017 415939 583687 14100 817764 339604 454934Washington 287543 55325 7463634 2003817 3047760 21345 1547501 638452 865335

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 459772 500447 501938 566579 729785 674465 814834 776098 557669 688918Finfish amp Other 177529 218718 170610 206161 267963 252144 282370 265357 203535 227249Shellfish 282243 281729 331327 360418 461821 422321 532464 510742 354134 461669

Key SpeciesAlbacore tuna 21612 28845 27541 28780 43347 45827 41930 32792 29387 37744Crab 121136 107107 123865 132843 182085 176880 249579 199222 105053 216733Flatfish 16266 18016 16716 12828 13377 13492 17417 15664 16751 17791Hake (whiting) 32603 58492 14104 27316 52869 47054 61321 58630 24109 46639Other shellfish 114639 122905 133940 134460 172541 141221 166551 177487 137035 156483Rockfish 7541 9257 8974 9226 9446 9421 9872 9820 10531 9526Sablefish 20984 27279 34481 35977 44873 28108 19559 24178 28719 31346Salmon 34508 27548 25549 49534 54267 48197 77754 71416 48157 40453Shrimp 17298 25132 16594 21941 40638 40326 42614 61100 87556 48139Squid 29169 26585 56928 71173 66557 63894 73720 72932 24491 40315

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 1109222 1091673 899043 1065499 1176780 1070065 1255594 1208811 747113 937751Finfish amp Other 903860 908242 583273 652515 758522 721080 850058 816757 526113 719615Shellfish 205362 183431 315771 412984 418258 348985 405537 392053 221000 218136

Key SpeciesAlbacore tuna 25483 24507 27055 25477 24284 30638 28471 27247 24821 23010Crab 51888 45075 59158 61668 66518 52860 87157 52133 22745 62945Flatfish 33828 37852 41192 33785 25959 24779 29106 24188 24861 26508Hake (whiting) 454533 531277 253053 355216 496363 347171 505614 574921 333290 558047Other shellfish 17513 17357 17513 16446 17072 14819 16509 17107 11805 15466Rockfish 7447 9469 10458 11038 9910 10406 10794 10720 11913 10489Sablefish 11630 12978 15822 15055 14139 11580 9159 9633 11377 11799Salmon 25050 19503 34132 31107 42224 24619 56892 37187 26134 18757Shrimp 26497 35799 33456 46191 66686 66319 71505 93150 105324 55017Squid 109464 85200 205643 288678 267983 214988 230365 229664 81127 84708

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Albacore tuna 085 118 102 113 178 150 147 120 118 164Crab 233 238 209 215 274 335 286 382 462 344Flatfish 048 048 041 038 052 054 060 065 067 067Hake (whiting) 007 011 006 008 011 014 012 010 007 008Other shellfish 655 708 765 818 1011 953 1009 1038 1161 1012Rockfish 101 098 086 084 095 091 091 092 088 091Sablefish 180 210 218 239 317 243 214 251 252 266Salmon 138 141 075 159 129 196 137 192 184 216Shrimp 065 070 050 048 061 061 060 066 083 087Squid 027 031 028 025 025 030 032 032 030 048

45

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Pacific Region | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Pacific Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars trips)Trips Jobs Sales Income Value Added

California 3532 17050 2123040 819382 1305411Oregon 684 3048 296940 131937 192078Washington 1008 4597 542066 209416 339605

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip Expenditures Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFor-HirePrivate BoatShoreTotal

Total State Trip and Durable

176426164271186120526817

Goods Expenditures

Fishing TackleOther EquipmentBoat ExpensesVehicle ExpensesSecond Home ExpensesTotal Durable Expenditures

426331215139880157252846

393617784082305225

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 1216 1082 1384 1167 1052 1358 1321 1235 935 833Non-Coastal 370 320 379 381 342 378 426 428 344 340Out-of-State NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 1587 1402 1763 1548 1394 1736 1748 1664 1279 1173

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 517 415 442 457 681 689 753 1085 881 759Private 1860 1517 2114 1727 1833 1971 2070 1991 1876 1341Shore 3818 3859 4345 3770 3791 4973 4859 4351 3131 3124Total Trips 6195 5791 6901 5954 6305 7633 7682 7427 5888 5224

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Albacore amp other tunas

H 113 59 90 80 54 151 108 188 272 109R 2 2 2 0 0 2 1 4 8 1

Barracuda bass amp bonito

H 534 411 387 389 425 354 153 384 367 276R 1488 1127 1236 998 747 792 1173 1727 1277 1674

CroakersH 758 355 499 248 132 302 201 168 110 151R 301 242 290 270 93 185 229 148 123 148

FlatfishesH 258 368 367 416 607 559 711 992 404 357R 325 351 250 277 221 295 453 341 241 200

GreenlingsH 188 164 178 194 276 309 362 393 458 419R 156 137 172 199 288 294 268 261 255 261

Rockfishes amp scorpionfishes

H 2467 1935 2230 2223 2904 3448 3904 4045 3884 3483R 446 367 386 466 576 652 903 838 788 734

Salmon13H 213 47 108 111 154 224 244 356 198 83R NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

SculpinsH 49 68 59 52 95 70 66 60 62 58R 208 218 198 199 234 226 300 200 187 180

SurfperchesH 875 937 788 721 1075 1279 1060 1244 1477 1072R 850 714 670 383 874 1144 979 1162 1072 681

1 NA = data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but whether an angler is a resident of a region is not specified2 In this table rsquo0rsquo = 0-999 fish3 Salmon harvest estimates exclude release mortality

Tables | California

48

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oCalifornia | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the California Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 124803 22776152 4911619 8141191 14900 1225433 459683 632590

Commercial Harvesters 4093 431853 146717 215772 4093 431853 146717 215772Seafood Processors amp Dealers 4586 526972 195405 259284 1707 196155 72736 96514

Importers 55117 17033566 2729954 5192577 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 11051 1750326 567718 793142 582 92256 29923 41805

Retail 49956 3033436 1271825 1680416 8518 505169 210306 278500

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 127580 120861 159253 187263 222160 243963 266488 253768 129143 216139

Finfish amp Other 51037 48671 47738 45558 59289 57103 66416 61163 54526 50101Shellfish 76543 72190 111515 141704 162871 186860 200071 192605 74617 166038

Key SpeciesCrab 28626 24227 32508 43016 53762 88207 91851 70563 20467 85620Pacific sardine 8218 7575 5544 4366 4398 4249 1510 2003 343 95Rockfish 4924 5781 5330 5453 5644 5170 5748 5604 5797 5400Sablefish 4873 6224 9765 11491 15121 8988 7047 8945 8870 8804Salmon 7835 6 NA 1215 5096 12850 22957 12127 8058 5277Sea urchins 5400 6550 7806 7413 8102 8320 9832 9057 6879 7269Shrimp 4064 5696 5462 4951 8598 8492 9520 11791 13769 11107Spiny lobster 6916 8008 7934 11386 12972 13749 13842 18238 15806 13731Squid 29131 26477 56877 71165 66546 63886 73701 72903 24458 39194Swordfish 3127 2365 1932 2203 3350 2090 2699 3049 3628 3717

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 384826 323884 376053 439440 409837 353875 364790 361290 186418 176403

Finfish amp Other 259139 224763 148478 120700 108999 102261 90128 98771 89788 59908Shellfish 125687 99121 227575 318740 300838 251614 274661 262518 96630 116495

Key SpeciesCrab 12393 9845 16660 23352 22206 27589 33094 20888 5412 28135Pacific sardine 178480 126945 82842 73814 60993 50660 15636 17112 3724 913Rockfish 3136 3933 3984 3949 3450 3457 3862 3555 3239 2530Sablefish 3240 3507 5089 5501 5646 3916 3291 3960 4033 3858Salmon 1743 1 NA 255 1133 2862 4337 2558 1339 709Sea urchins 11131 10283 12205 11230 11465 11443 12945 11833 8106 5885Shrimp 2015 3011 3596 4522 8217 7255 9712 9873 9443 4818Spiny lobster 663 741 706 716 751 876 764 951 768 680Squid 109150 84071 205278 288497 267890 214867 230061 229466 80968 81751Swordfish 1210 1168 898 815 1365 887 1174 1252 1358 1364

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Crab 231 246 195 184 242 320 278 338 378 304Pacific sardine 005 006 007 006 007 008 010 012 009 010Rockfish 157 147 134 138 164 150 149 158 179 213Sablefish 150 177 192 209 268 229 214 226 220 228Salmon 450 416 NA 476 450 449 529 474 602 744Sea urchins 049 064 064 066 071 073 076 077 085 124Shrimp 202 189 152 109 105 117 098 119 146 231Spiny lobster 1044 108 1124 1591 1727 1569 1811 1917 2059 2019Squid 027 031 028 025 025 030 032 032 030 048Swordfish 258 203 215 270 246 236 230 244 267 272

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

49

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

California | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of California Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impactsby Fishing Mode

For-Hire 1818 258084 97532 147866Private Boat 554 92377 28333 49784Shore 1608 224305 73732 128216

Total Durable Expenditures 13070 1548274 619785 979545Total State Economic Impacts 17050 2123040 819382 1305411

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip Expenditures EquipmentFor-Hire 136408 Fishing TacklePrivate Boat 61998 Other EquipmentShore 148056 Boat ExpensesTotal 346462 Vehicle Expenses

Second Home ExpensesTotal Durable Expenditures

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures

Durable Goods Expenditures327770163085528338168135

011873271533789

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 913 812 992 863 722 1024 964 893 591 576Non-Coastal 215 177 220 230 190 222 264 263 182 189Out-of-State 82 206 221 183 215 87 94 121 96 77Total Anglers 1210 1195 1433 1277 1127 1334 1322 1277 869 842

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 373 305 308 334 554 557 613 929 727 632Private 843 640 681 690 683 800 786 785 676 522Shore 3072 3113 3599 3024 3045 4227 4113 3605 2385 2378Total Trips 4288 4058 4588 4048 4282 5584 5512 5319 3788 3532

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)14

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Albacore amp other tunas

H 28 13 23 11 9 37 32 65 158 24R 2 2 2 lt 1 lt 1 2 1 4 8 lt 1

Barracuda bass amp bonito2

H 534 411 387 389 425 354 153 384 367 276R 1488 1127 1236 998 747 792 1173 1727 1277 1674

CroakersH 758 355 499 248 132 302 201 168 110 151R 301 242 290 270 93 185 229 148 123 148

FlatfishesH 185 298 300 351 541 490 640 921 333 280R 279 303 199 231 175 248 405 294 193 153

GreenlingsH 70 48 63 60 123 143 176 229 286 250R 74 53 84 92 169 183 160 169 153 156

Rockfishes amp scorpionfishes2

H 1919 1445 1670 1639 2379 2871 3229 3326 3000 2650R 396 311 320 383 506 583 823 752 674 635

Salmon3H 48 lt 1 lt 1 15 50 124 116 75 38 38R NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

SculpinsH 19 37 27 19 62 39 37 32 34 30R 58 69 50 47 82 74 147 48 35 29

SurfperchesH 623 685 537 470 823 1027 809 992 1226 817R 690 554 510 223 714 984 819 1002 912 520

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish2 This species may not be equivalent to species with similar names listed in the commercial tables3 Salmon harvest estimates exclude release mortality4 NA = not available

50

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oCalifornia | Marine Economy

2015 California State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 3117591 (128) 908120 (118) 14325377 (115) 85695 (137) 132114 (136) 249162 (139) 061

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 121 139 159 184 187 151 157 164 169Receipts 10842 11460 10852 9695 9788 9283 9866 11112 12978

Seafood salesretail

Firms 222 210 202 203 209 236 218 227 221Receipts 19703 19892 17095 19021 18006 18238 18581 17055 17896

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 49 45 47 48 48 41 44 53 48Employees 2229 2024 2167 1820 1842 1668 1871 1799 1661

Payroll 75886 65215 69529 62480 60411 52977 57603 60762 59829

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 300 278 289 314 404 275 320 341 349Employees 4429 3321 3183 3223 3505 3441 3671 3912 4170

Payroll 159672 132139 128813 137810 149302 173959 181698 175927 201903

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 182 161 153 158 157 149 155 167 170Employees 1004 932 976 985 1088 1043 1119 1124 1208

Payroll 21224 20585 21785 22718 25168 24221 26702 28044 28437

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 29 28 30 25 21 22 24 30 34Employees ds ds ds 554 395 ds ds ds 851

Payroll ds ds ds 30431 24708 ds ds ds 70978

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 51 43 41 54 51 45 34 43 56Employees 1643 ds ds 2562 2464 2431 2073 2467 2554

Payroll 116628 ds ds 236235 256962 236423 218054 187383 235546Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 13 5 5 3 2 2 4 5 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 276 277 276 270 269 251 250 249 258

Employees 2680 2652 2514 2390 2401 2237 2199 2332 2439Payroll 80216 85315 78890 80631 82958 71777 72737 79840 84427

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 56 61 62 63 71 38 64 64 67Employees 22395 22086 17428 18449 18812 18759 ds ds 18859

Payroll 1484308 1453281 1211572 1273268 1333805 1351874 ds ds 1761284Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 39 40 39 41 45 35 36 37 38Employees 858 815 804 765 760 800 805 634 587

Payroll 63610 65225 61720 58899 62065 61166 67665 59927 60228

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 18 17 19 21 19 59 31 33 30Employees 443 256 345 435 508 ds 651 535 570

Payroll 30001 23316 26889 37560 41688 ds 52401 33599 40887

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 136 136 123 117 108 120 113 108 103Employees 9250 11630 10483 9720 9165 12681 12651 9814 11379

Payroll 433846 477300 460239 448338 434449 544819 537438 534787 583717

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Tables | Oregon

52

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oOregon | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Oregon Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 16162 1190017 415939 583687 14100 817764 339604 454934

Commercial Harvesters 4795 287124 119939 168205 4795 287124 119939 168205Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1522 144852 55632 72687 1431 136197 52308 68344

Importers 979 302502 48482 92216 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 572 76670 26009 34885 399 53458 18135 24323

Retail 8293 378870 165878 215695 7475 340985 149223 194063

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 97298 103042 106959 106378 148354 128222 179215 158080 113990 151707

Finfish amp Other 47589 56912 52750 58730 76718 72329 81445 78214 60860 64925Shellfish 49709 46130 54210 47648 71636 55893 97770 79866 53130 86782

Key SpeciesAlbacore tuna 9468 10666 10191 12425 18766 15168 16085 11023 9212 12502Crab 38208 29168 42413 32757 44696 29189 71208 48149 11935 55737Flatfish 7930 9163 8468 6861 6779 7315 9854 8651 9765 10716Hake (whiting) 6501 6830 3783 5414 16518 14611 20405 18274 7146 8601Oysters 1847 2748 4506 3317 1869 1661 1798 1774 NA 3615Pacific sardine 4551 5665 5291 5252 3192 8979 6299 3522 813 0Rockfish 2002 2610 2500 2520 2473 2661 3023 3246 3744 3589Sablefish 9494 13737 15919 15069 17351 11530 7595 8076 12807 15086Salmon 4647 4166 3546 7698 6737 6950 12422 20115 11864 8311Shrimp 9488 14056 6994 11313 24901 24848 24430 29605 40634 25245

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 253543 195688 199458 201974 274533 296091 339589 291655 194575 209486

Finfish amp Other 216134 155837 154147 153588 208445 237822 265454 227318 138601 153909Shellfish 37410 39851 45310 48386 66088 58269 74136 64337 55974 55578

Key SpeciesAlbacore tuna 10468 8876 10082 10703 9682 9938 10209 8767 7574 7250Crab 17007 13875 21848 15817 17240 8681 26016 11910 2284 15702Flatfish 19697 23842 26047 22226 15957 15322 18965 15955 16722 18640Hake (whiting) 81481 55511 53466 57017 142092 102651 160098 161589 88728 98003Oysters 197 162 1127 829 467 415 449 443 NA 743Pacific sardine 90037 49298 45902 44743 23479 91459 57022 16938 4688 2Rockfish 2905 3820 4207 4533 3819 3918 4745 5293 6628 6324Sablefish 5349 6514 7219 6269 5074 4739 3840 3293 5002 5502Salmon 1370 1860 2311 2765 2386 1918 3505 6373 3142 1838Shrimp 20027 25433 22085 31516 48276 49054 47535 51835 53457 35344

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Albacore tuna 090 120 101 116 194 153 158 126 122 172Crab 225 210 194 207 259 336 274 404 522 355Flatfish 040 038 033 031 042 048 052 054 058 057Hake (whiting) 008 012 007 009 012 014 013 011 008 009Oysters 940 1696 400 400 400 400 400 400 NA 487Pacific sardine 005 011 012 012 014 010 011 021 017 018Rockfish 069 068 059 056 065 068 064 061 056 057Sablefish 178 211 221 240 342 243 198 245 256 274Salmon 339 224 153 278 282 362 354 316 378 452Shrimp 047 055 032 036 052 051 051 057 076 071

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

53

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Oregon | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Oregon Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts byFishing Mode

For-Hire 264 31161 11928 16950Private Boat 394 37694 14070 22495Shore 153 14523 5327 8628

Total Durable Expenditures 2237 213562 100612 144005Total State Economic Impacts 3048 296940 131937 192078

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 19024Private Boat 43426Shore 15352Total 77801

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 45798Other Equipment 25522Boat Expenses 77351Vehicle Expenses 60103Second Home Expenses 3936Total Durable Expenditures 212711

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 290512

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 86 79 85 82 82 86 89 92 90 86Non-Coastal 130 121 129 125 125 129 134 137 135 129Out-of-State 15 14 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 15Total Anglers 232 213 229 223 222 230 239 246 241 230

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 61 48 55 51 51 58 64 68 71 63Private 401 357 402 385 380 402 424 440 416 388Shore 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233Total Trips 695 638 690 669 664 693 721 741 720 684

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)12

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

BaitfishesH 221 221 221 223 221 220 220 221 221 220R 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125

FlatfishesH 22 20 16 14 15 17 18 15 17 18R 6 8 9 5 5 5 6 5 5 6

GreenlingsH 94 92 90 99 108 120 142 119 130 114R 67 70 72 82 88 85 90 74 85 84

RockfishesH 280 266 317 332 251 278 361 376 516 443

22 30 36 44 34 33 42 42 75 56

Salmon3 H 68 14 91 23 24 35 45 118 38 13R NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

SculpinsH 15 16 16 16 16 15 14 12 13 13R 58 58 58 61 61 61 63 60 60 61

SturgeonH 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12R 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25

SurfperchesH 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118R 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish2 NA = not available3 Salmon estimates exclude release mortality

54

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oOregon | Marine Economy

2015 Oregon State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 269901 (11) 112393 (15) 1498727 (12) 7101 (11) 11227 (12) 21652 (12) 352

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms ds 19 15 15 16 14 11 11 12Receipts ds 957 466 510 467 346 319 484 1088

Seafood salesretail

Firms 11 16 12 15 16 11 ds 16 15Receipts 1210 2101 1140 1907 1896 1600 ds 1036 841

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 22 23 20 21 22 18 19 20 20Employees 819 850 812 806 805 934 907 980 916

Payroll 27394 27616 26202 27007 32438 31970 37265 39290 41181

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 18 18 19 22 27 21 19 22 24Employees ds ds ds ds ds 180 189 192 196

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds 7602 8065 8601 9121

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 23 21 23 21 20 18 20 23 25Employees 171 178 151 162 163 126 147 170 181

Payroll 3185 3370 3515 3651 3613 2851 4238 4440 4951

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 13 8 9 8 8 8 7 8 8Employees 476 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 437

Payroll 25206 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 40746

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 5 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Employees ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 38 37 33 30 33 32 34 34 36

Employees 138 106 109 102 102 119 104 113 119Payroll 3754 2178 2602 2290 2382 3034 3148 3584 3643

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 9 13 13 12 13 5 8 7 7Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 17 20 17 18 18 20 15 15 15Employees 183 200 189 144 152 176 81 67 74

Payroll 11331 11808 10154 9577 9592 12219 6534 3958 3998

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 1 1 3 3 10 5 5 5Employees ds ds ds ds ds 90 ds ds 49

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds 6512 ds ds 3437

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 40 41 35 34 34 33 32 30 29Employees 1441 1692 1886 980 1179 1504 1406 ds 1506

Payroll 47950 74583 90446 42004 55068 77718 79913 ds 94956

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Washington

56

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oWashington | Commercial Fisheries2016 Economic Impacts of the Washington Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)

With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 55325 7463634 2003817 3047760 21345 1547501 638452 865335

Commercial Harvesters 6195 573085 242998 343112 6195 573085 242998 343112Seafood Processors amp Dealers 14355 1528504 574083 759711 2340 249115 93564 123818

Importers 13057 4035021 646689 1230051 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 2317 333504 111737 152447 765 110120 36895 50337

Retail 19401 993521 428309 562439 12046 615181 264996 348069

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 216119 232841 227773 255332 329785 275585 335450 329109 299952 287543Finfish amp Other 60137 69445 62173 84269 102481 96026 100844 90855 73583 78694Shellfish 155981 163396 165600 171063 227305 179560 234606 238254 226368 208849

Key SpeciesClams 56428 64142 72647 73625 88774 69445 83788 83643 75342 82882Crab 54302 53712 48944 57070 83627 59485 86520 80509 72651 75376Hake (whiting) 7121 7249 2334 4105 7183 5882 7452 5431 2563 4509Halibut 8842 7525 4879 5764 6740 6122 4929 6985 6199 6896Mussels 3820 5293 4851 4318 4740 6065 9253 6830 7704 6452Oysters 37437 34794 34993 30370 43021 37576 46378 47555 37507 32353Sablefish 6608 7312 8796 9402 12378 7578 4888 7098 7020 7456Salmon 22026 23376 22003 40622 42434 28398 42376 39174 28235 26866Shrimp 3746 5380 4139 5677 7140 6986 8664 19704 33152 11786Tuna albacore 10439 17225 16390 14575 22253 28440 24745 21177 19961 24769

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 194449 173176 163937 189486 210282 213578 263639 191391 153568 168136Finfish amp Other 152221 128825 121060 143705 159034 174597 207194 126364 85300 122279Shellfish 42228 44351 42877 45782 51248 38982 56445 65027 68268 45856

Key SpeciesClams 3363 4071 4267 3876 4038 3677 3978 4320 4262 3355Crab 22487 21355 20651 22500 27072 16590 28046 19335 15048 19109Hake (whiting) 91272 67159 36378 58900 73494 38524 58696 49654 32977 77808Halibut 2428 2055 1731 1371 1301 1295 1065 1284 1157 1370Mussels 475 593 568 589 547 559 734 579 600 2790Oysters 11189 10258 9386 8650 9389 8143 9420 9329 5911 5748Sablefish 3035 2954 3514 3277 3410 2916 2006 2345 2317 2391Salmon 21938 17641 31821 28086 38706 19839 49050 28256 21654 16211Shrimp 4455 7355 7775 10153 10193 10009 14259 31441 42423 14855Tuna albacore 13129 14801 16112 13148 13209 19275 17552 18039 17133 15500

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Clams 1678 1576 1703 1899 2198 1889 2106 1936 1768 2470Crab 241 252 237 254 309 359 308 416 483 394Hake (whiting) 008 011 006 007 010 015 013 011 008 006Halibut 364 366 282 420 518 473 463 544 536 503Mussels 805 893 854 733 866 1085 1260 1179 1285 231Oysters 335 339 373 351 458 461 492 510 634 563Sablefish 218 248 250 287 363 260 244 303 303 312Salmon 100 133 069 145 110 143 086 139 130 166Shrimp 084 073 053 056 070 070 061 063 078 079Tuna albacore 080 116 102 111 168 148 141 117 117 160

57

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Washington | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Washington Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impactsby Fishing Mode

For-Hire 242 35333 13478 20196Private Boat 442 71852 20302 35897Shore 206 28890 9153 15626

Total Durable Expenditures 3707 405991 166483 267886Total State Economic Impacts 4597 542066 209416 339605

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 20994Private Boat 58847Shore 22712Total 102554

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 52763Other Equipment 26532Boat Expenses 274468Vehicle Expenses 24608Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 378370

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 480924

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 217 191 307 222 248 248 268 250 253 172Non-Coastal 26 22 30 25 27 27 28 28 28 21Out-of-State 20 17 24 19 21 21 22 22 22 17Total Anglers 262 230 361 266 296 295 318 300 303 210

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 83 62 79 72 76 74 76 88 83 64Private 616 520 1031 652 770 769 860 766 784 431Shore 513 513 513 513 513 513 513 513 513 513Total Trips 1212 1095 1623 1237 1359 1356 1449 1367 1380 1008

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)14

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Baitfishes H 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486

R 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126Flatfishes H 51 50 51 50 51 52 53 55 54 59

R 40 40 42 41 41 41 42 42 42 42Greenlings H 24 24 26 35 46 46 44 45 42 56

R 14 14 16 25 31 25 19 18 17 21Rockfishes2 H 222 179 198 208 229 253 268 298 322 345

R 12 9 13 22 18 18 21 26 23 25Salmon3 H 97 34 16 73 80 65 83 163 123 33

R NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASculpins H 16 15 16 16 17 16 16 16 16 16

R 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91Sharks amp Skates H 5 8 5 4 2 3 3 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1

R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 3Sturgeon34 H NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

R NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASurfperches H 133 134 133 133 133 134 134 134 133 137

R 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 123

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish2 This species may not be equivalent to species with similar names listed in the commercial tables3 Data on sturgeon harvest not available for 2007-2016 Salmon harvest estimates exclude release mortality4 NA = not available

58

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oWashington | Marine Economy

2015 Washington State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 430670 (18) 182913 (24) 2602408 (21) 14926 (24) 23574 (24) 44642 (25) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 63 44 47 39 37 42 42 51 59Receipts 4698 5167 5022 4228 3859 4377 4094 5270 3555

Seafood salesretail

Firms 32 33 42 30 34 42 41 36 35Receipts 1458 1807 2462 1273 2370 1871 3017 2559 2071

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 98 96 86 93 90 90 86 90 85Employees 5249 5893 4860 5296 5387 6118 6224 5945 5753

Payroll 275662 306213 232543 254592 293112 326827 315379 329739 325389

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 127 107 108 105 107 101 116 119 118Employees 1086 996 1103 970 911 1085 999 1098 1077

Payroll 46085 48251 48044 45871 45543 51508 49683 52761 54339

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 50 44 43 47 44 40 35 33 39Employees 244 247 239 282 253 256 266 276 279

Payroll 8001 7947 8324 9098 7786 8210 9069 9938 10865

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 37 24 24 30 28 28 35 38 35Employees 1903 2222 2245 1731 1684 1557 2186 2020 1879

Payroll 136543 168832 168783 130398 132068 126401 170003 163075 162635

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 30 21 25 20 14 12 8 8 8Employees 227 263 305 209 ds ds 200 204 194

Payroll 19692 24843 28897 24711 ds 14014 14892 14991 13981Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 3 4 5 4 2 2 5 4 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1412 1277

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 54346 73134

MarinasEstablishments 114 116 110 117 114 100 110 106 102

Employees 485 573 570 560 517 479 529 530 588Payroll 15623 18931 18811 18783 18364 18038 18914 20348 21944

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 28 25 27 26 32 13 30 29 30Employees 4913 4821 2953 ds 3910 ds ds ds 3966

Payroll 334601 334193 239490 ds 323286 ds ds ds 424469Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 61 76 69 79 78 72 73 71 68Employees 950 1213 1168 1225 1207 ds ds 1297 1176

Payroll 72912 100542 102934 102766 94781 ds ds 101251 88363

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 6 11 11 9 9 48 28 27 23Employees 129 111 118 74 75 1509 181 304 250

Payroll 4631 6359 6437 4662 4937 85042 11894 16449 14278

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 167 169 162 152 135 141 138 131 143Employees 7742 8067 6710 5406 5232 5294 5387 5060 4653

Payroll 354084 402253 312240 284759 276402 290400 273825 262730 265732

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Western Pacific Regionbull Hawaiʻi

Fish flags highlight catch for the day (Lahaina Maui Hawaiʻi) Photo NOAA FisheriesCourtney Beavers

60

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe US Pacific Islands Region includes the state of Hawairsquoi the territories of American Samoa and Guam the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) and the Pacific Remote Island Areas Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (WPFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under five fishery ecosystem plans (FEPs) These plans focus on place-based rather than species- or fishery-based management

Western Pacific Fishery Ecosystem Plans

bull American Samoabull Hawaiʻibull Mariana Archipela-

go (Guam and the CNMI)

bull Pacific Remote Island Areas

bull Western Pacific Pelagics

Because fishery data are limited in most of these areas only information for the Hawairsquoi and Western Pacific Pelagics fisheries is reported here No catch share programs operate in this region

Hawaiʻi FEP NOAA Fisheries the WPFMC and the State of Hawairsquoi collaborate to manage fisheries across the Hawairsquoi Archipelago The major fisheries in Hawairsquoi include trolling for pelagic species such as tuna marlin wahoo and mahimahi deepwater hook-and-line bottom fishing and various forms of net fishing that target nearshore pelagic and reef fish species Under this FEP the Hancock Seamount groundfish complex is currently overfished This fishery has been closed since 1986

Western Pacific Pelagics FEP The management species covered under this FEP include tunas billfishes sharks squids and an assortment of other species These species include mahimahi wahoo moonfish and pomfret caught by the Hawairsquoi longline fishery as well as smaller boats that use diverse gear including trolling handline and traditional fishing methods Of these species bigeye tuna Pacific bluefin tuna swordfish and the Central Western Pacific striped marlin stock are considered subject to overfishing The Central Western Pacific striped marlin stock and Pacific bluefin tuna stock are also listed as overfished

In addition to management by the WPFMC and NOAA Fisheries pelagic fish such as bigeye and yellowfin tunas are managed by two regional fishery management organizations (RFMOs) The Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) has authority to manage pelagic fisheries in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean while the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) manages pelagic fisheries in the Eastern Pacific Ocean Fish species and fisheries under the purview of both RFMOs migrate across national boundaries and between RFMO areas requiring coordinated management Since 2009 the annual bigeye tuna catch limit has been recommended by the WCPFC and implemented by NOAA Fisheries for the US longline fleet in the Western and Central Pacific The IATTC establishes the harvest limit for bigeye tuna for US longline vessels longer than 24 meters in the Eastern Tropical Pacific

Policy UpdatesThe Hawairsquoi-based pelagic longline fleet accounts for most of the US longline catch of bigeye tuna in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean Under the authority of the WCPFC Implementation Act the 2016 bigeye catch limit for US longline vessels was set at 3554 metric tons less any overage from 2015 Under this same rule US purse seine vessels fishing in the convention area between the latitudes of 20 degrees north and 20 degrees south were required to have a WCPFC observer on board unless the fishing took place entirely within a single nationrsquos jurisdiction outside the United States Although US purse seine vessels are exempt from this requirement on trips in which fishing occurs in the waters of a single foreign nation those foreign nations generally require US purse seine vessels to carry observers if fishing in their waters The rule also established restrictions on US purse seine vesselsrsquo use of fish aggregating devices (FADs)

On February 3 2016 NOAA Fisheries published a final rule allowing large federally permitted US longline vessels to fish in certain areas of the American Samoa Large Vessel Prohibited Area (LVPA) The LVPA was established in 2002 to prevent the potential for gear conflicts and catch competition between large and small fishing vessels However by 2016 the American Samoa

61

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

pelagic fisheries had changed so that the conditions that led to the establishment of the LVPA appeared no longer to exist The final rule allowed fishing in an additional 16817 square nautical miles of federal waters On March 20 2017 however a US federal judge in American Samoa v National Marine Fisheries Service 16-cv-00095 (DHaw) issued an order vacating the regulations at 50 CFR 665818(b) thus barring large federally permitted US longline vessels from fishing within the LVPA

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key Western Pacific Commercial Species

bull Lobstersbull Mahimahibull Marlinbull Moonfishbull Pomfret

bull Scadbull Snappersbull Swordfishbull Tunasbull Wahoo

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales

made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers1

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 the commercial fishing and seafood industry in Hawairsquoi generated $8671 million in sales impacts $2693 million in income impacts $3918 million in value-added impacts and 9900 full-and part-time jobs The retail sector generated the largest employment impacts across sectors (4100 jobs) The importers sector generated the largest sales impacts ($3184 million) while the retail sector generated the largest income impacts ($1007 million) and the largest value-added impacts ($1312 million)

Landings TrendsHawairsquoi recorded its second highest commercial fisheries landings revenue (both nominally and after adjusting for inflation) on record in 2016 ($1181 million) only slightly bested by 2012 landings revenue Landings

1 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)

62

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

revenue increased (up $147 million or 14) from 2015 to 2016 largely due to the increase in tuna landings revenue (up $69 million or 8) but with broad gains in landings revenue across most key speciesspecies groups Mahimahi marlins scads snappers and wahoo were all up $1 million or more during this period From 2015 to 2016 yellowfin tuna landings revenue increased $5 million while bigeye tuna landings revenue increased $16 million The deep-set longline fishery which set a record number of hooks (511 million hooks) in 2016 accounted for most of this increase2

In recent years Hawairsquoirsquos landings and landings revenue trends largely reflect the growth of the tuna fishery From 2007 to 2016 bigeye tuna dominated Hawairsquoirsquos landings revenue accounting for 55 or more of state landings revenue Overall bigeye tuna landings increased 37 during this period driving landings revenue up 72 (51 in real terms after adjusting for inflation) Yellowfin tuna on average accounted for 10 of state landings revenue from 2007 to 2016 an increase in landings (up 44) that coupled with significantly higher prices (up 36 nominally 19 after adjusting for inflation) led to an almost doubling of yellowfin landings revenue (up 94 nominally 72 in real terms) Overall Hawairsquoi accounted for 57 of US tuna landings revenue in 2016 slightly higher than the average annual rate for the 2007 to 2016 period (54)

Landings RevenueIn 2016 landings revenue totaled about $1181 million a 56 increase from 2007 (a 36 increase in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 14 increase from 2015 Finfish landings revenue accounted for more than 99 of all landings revenue in the region In 2016 tunas ($885 million) swordfish ($48 million) and mahimahi (dolphin) ($45 million) dominated landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 pomfret (140 109 in real terms) marlin (100 75 in real terms) and tunas (73 51 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while lobsters (-69 -73 in real terms) and swordfish (-38 -46 in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 scad (989) snappers (102) and wahoo (41) had the largest revenue increases There

were no revenue decreases from 2015 to 2016

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Pomfret (140 109 in real terms)bull Marlin (100 75 in real terms)bull Tunas (73 51 in real terms)From 2015bull Scad (989)bull Snappers (102)bull Wahoo (41)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Lobsters (-69 -73 in real terms)bull Swordfish (-38 -46 in real terms)From 2015There were no revenue decreases from 2015 to 2016

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Pomfret (97)bull Marlin (69)bull Wahoo (60)From 2015bull Scad (923)bull Snappers (113)bull Wahoo (15)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Lobsters (-58)bull Swordfish (-55)bull Scad (-20)From 2015bull Swordfish (-20)bull Pomfret (-13)bull Marlin (-11)

LandingsIn 2016 Western Pacific Region commercial fishermen landed about 351 million pounds of finfish and shellfish in

2 Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report Pacific Island Pelagic Fisheries 2016

63

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

the state of Hawairsquoi This represents a 21 increase from 2007 and a 1 increase from 2015 Tunas contributed the most to landings accounting for 67 of total landings

From 2007 to 2016 pomfret (97) marlin (69) and wahoo (60) had the largest landings increases while lobsters (-58) swordfish (-55) and scad (-20) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 scad (923) snappers (113) and wahoo (15) had the largest landings increases while swordfish (-20) pomfret (-13) and marlin (-11) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 lobsters ($856 per pound) received the highest ex-vessel price in Hawairsquoi Landings of marlin ($175 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price From 2007 to 2016 mahimahi (dolphin) (51 32 in real terms) swordfish (38 21 in real terms) and snappers (35 18 in real terms) had the largest price increases while lobsters (-28 -37 in real terms) and wahoo (-2 -14 in real terms) had the largest price decreases From 2015 to 2016 marlin (52) pomfret (40) and swordfish (30) had the largest price increases while snappers (-5) had the largest price decrease

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups

Key Western Pacific Recreational Species

bull Blue marlinbull Dolphinfishbull Goatfishesbull Trevallys and other

jacksbull Bigeye and

mackerel scad

bull Skipjack tunabull Smallmouth

bonefishbull Snappersbull Wahoobull Yellowfin tuna

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities3 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

Note that no information is available for durable goods expenditures related to recreational fishing in Hawairsquoi

In 2016 economic impacts from recreational fishing activities in Hawairsquoi generated 854 jobs $1054 million in sales $333 million in income and $547 million in value-added impacts Of the three fishing trip modes trips in the for-hire fishing trips sector had the greatest economic impact accounting for 45 of employment impacts Expenditures for fishing trips in Hawairsquoi in 2016 totaled over $82 million A large portion of these trip expenditures came from trips in the shore (37) and for-hire (35) sectors

3 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

64

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

Fishing Trips In 2016 recreational fishermen took 1 million saltwater fishing trips in the state of Hawairsquoi This number represented a 60 decrease from 2007 and a 28 decrease from 2015 Of all fishing trips 77 were taken from the shore sector

Participation Participation estimates for Hawairsquoi are not available after 2006

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Smallmouth bonefish (7)From 2015bull Snappers (4)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Yellowfin tuna (-69)bull Dolphinfish (mahimahi) (-68)bull Skipjack tuna (-61)From 2015bull Goatfishes (-75)bull Yellowfin tuna (-71)bull Skipjack tuna (-67)

Harvest and Release Of Hawairsquoirsquos key species and species groups scads (bigeye and mackerel) (693000 fish) goatfishes (261000 fish) and jacks (trevallys and other jacks) (234000 fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 smallmouth bonefish (7) had the largest increase in catch while yellowfin tuna (-69) dolphinfish (mahimahi) (-68) and skipjack tuna (-61) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 snappers (4) had the largest increase in catch while goatfishes (-75) yellowfin tuna (-71) and skipjack tuna (-67) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the

economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries45

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy6 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average The Bureau of Labor Statistics did not disclose CFLQ data for Hawairsquoi for 2015

In 2015 31915 employer establishments operated throughout the entire Hawailsquoian economy (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed about 524000 workers and had a total annual payroll of $221 billion The gross state product of Hawairsquoi was approximately $81 billion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 Hawailsquoi had 12 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 20 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $13 million (a 10 increase in real terms from 2007) There were two employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 100 increase from 2007) The Census Bureau suppressed data on employment and annual payroll for this sector in Hawairsquoi

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 39 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the state of Hawairsquoi (a 5 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $41 million (an

4 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)5 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)6 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

65

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

18 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 25 employer firms in the retail seafood sales sector (this remained unchanged from 2007) These establishments employed 293 workers (a 25 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $74 million (a 9 decrease in real terms from 2007)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 30 employer firms in the wholesale seafood sales sector (a 17 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 639 workers (a 16 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $245 million (a 14 increase in real terms from 2007)

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of Hawairsquoirsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons These sectors however are economically important in the regional economy For example the marine cargo handling sector accounted for $834 million in payroll in 2015 in Hawairsquoi

Tables | Hawaiʻi

68

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Hawaiʻi | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Hawaiʻi Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 9916 867111 269335 391841 7790 469772 186129 252787

Commercial Harvesters 3691 205769 75140 108000 3691 205769 75140 108000Seafood Processors amp Dealers 580 56661 22429 28927 427 41737 16521 21308

Importers 1030 318378 51026 97056 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 540 57050 20009 26618 324 34210 11998 15961

Retail 4075 229252 100730 131241 3348 188055 82469 107518

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 75690 84877 71202 84044 91565 112300 107979 101249 103399 118134Finfish amp Other 75426 84556 70856 83700 91274 111865 107413 100754 103341 117832Shellfish 264 321 347 343 291 435 567 495 58 302

Key SpeciesLobsters 93 120 136 117 104 98 95 105 NA 28Mahimahi (dolphin) 3483 3174 2853 3303 4314 5309 4130 4412 3427 4512Marlin 2028 2072 2142 1756 2375 2888 2802 3197 3015 4064Moonfish (opah) 2171 2198 2409 2591 2853 3163 3203 2910 3151 NAPomfret 1461 1662 1381 1549 1449 2097 2576 2466 2874 3502Scad 1094 889 1198 1251 964 1181 1147 1128 108 1173Snappers 1690 1715 1860 1681 1415 1738 2003 2223 1124 2272Swordfish 7730 7177 7336 7303 6669 6693 4493 5405 4629 4813Tunas 51171 60863 47710 59775 66628 83298 81819 73657 81576 88467Wahoo 2085 2225 1673 1746 1806 2330 2375 2800 2328 3279

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 28934 30652 26906 28069 29289 31048 32447 33474 34623 35051

Finfish amp Other 28890 30599 26849 28007 29240 30968 32346 33387 34612 34999Shellfish 44 52 57 62 49 79 101 86 11 52

Key SpeciesLobsters 8 10 11 9 10 8 9 10 NA 3Mahimahi (dolphin) 1388 1250 1287 1518 1423 1746 1515 1689 1132 1193Marlin 1375 1952 1677 1221 1826 1459 1935 2318 2616 2327Moonfish (opah) 1226 1313 1884 1824 1564 1549 2072 2004 2067 NAPomfret 593 671 627 593 427 731 1142 1243 1339 1166Scad 461 318 405 460 323 383 361 356 36 368Snappers 381 378 391 342 269 308 357 369 178 380Swordfish 3643 3835 3881 3153 2592 2381 1674 2480 2044 1640Tunas 17594 18295 14594 16706 18519 20147 20900 20296 22932 23507Wahoo 715 849 605 600 564 652 744 1056 993 1144

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Lobsters 1184 1214 1237 1236 1039 1184 1071 1021 NA 856Mahimahi (dolphin) 251 254 222 218 303 304 273 261 303 378Marlin 147 106 128 144 130 198 145 138 115 175Moonfish (opah) 177 167 128 142 182 204 155 145 152 NAPomfret 246 248 220 261 339 287 225 198 215 300Scad 237 280 295 272 298 308 318 317 299 319Snappers 444 454 476 492 526 565 560 603 631 598Swordfish 212 187 189 232 257 281 268 218 226 293Tunas 291 333 327 358 360 413 391 363 356 376Wahoo 292 262 277 291 320 357 319 265 234 287

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

69

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Hawaiʻi | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Hawaiʻi Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)1

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 384 45734 16617 26852Private Boat 157 24579 6212 10309Shore 313 35088 10427 17575

Total Durable Expenditures NA NA NA NATotal State Economic Impacts 854 105401 33256 54736

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)1

Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 29411Private Boat 22508Shore 30942Total 82862

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle NAOther Equipment NABoat Expenses NAVehicle Expenses NASecond Home Expenses NATotal Durable Expenditures NA

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 82862

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2 3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 1216 1082 1384 1167 1052 1358 1321 1235 935 833Non-Coastal 370 320 379 381 342 378 426 428 344 340Out-of-State NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 1587 1402 1763 1548 1394 1736 1748 1664 1279 1173

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Private 475 564 441 484 224 325 297 324 273 235Shore 2102 1966 1722 1907 1158 1195 1216 1051 1158 790Total Trips 2577 2531 2163 2390 1382 1519 1513 1374 1431 1024

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue marlin H 2 11 3 1 2 3 4 3 5 2R lt 1 0 lt 1 0 0 0 0 lt 1 0 0

Dolphinfish (mahimahi)

H 136 184 103 164 63 163 94 92 78 44R lt 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 lt 1 0 lt 1

Goatfishes5 H 298 468 712 270 173 158 873 537 1052 246R 9 6 7 18 13 13 3 22 15 16

Jacks (trevallys and other jacks)6

H 169 277 123 140 99 110 144 156 170 112R 130 120 85 126 59 129 126 263 319 122

Scads (bigeye and mackerel)

H 1089 402 1102 840 662 608 889 899 1245 690R 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 lt 1 4

Skipjack tuna H 228 568 230 289 125 197 380 199 268 88R 5 2 0 0 lt 1 0 0 0 lt 1 2

Smallmouth bonefish

H 20 50 37 55 13 27 23 29 26 26R 13 4 2 13 2 8 10 20 17 9

Snappers7 H 104 138 147 340 113 195 152 220 119 119R 40 7 24 25 14 15 10 3 9 14

Wahoo H 57 78 61 41 15 32 37 43 55 45R lt 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1

Yellowfin tuna H 273 461 198 302 141 182 150 220 292 85R 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 lt 1 1 lt 1

1 NA = not available2 Participation (number of anglers) data are not available for 2007 through 20163 Data are not available because all Hawairsquoi residents are considered coastal county residents4 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish5 Goatfishes include yellowstripe yellowfin pfulgers bandtail doublebar diespot whitesaddle manybar blue and rsquoGoastfish familygenusrsquo6 Trevallys amp other jacks includes bluefin trevally giant trevally bigeye trevally black trevally African pompano greater amberjack island jack and other species in the jack family7 Snappers include bluestip blacktail ruby longtailed pink VonSiebolds Binghams green jobfish ironjaw and smalltooth jobfish

70

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Hawaiʻi | Marine Economy

2015 Hawailsquoi State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 102544 (04) 31915 (04) 523677 (04) 2207 (04) 4467 (05) 8060 (04) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 10 9 7 11 14 14 16 14 12Receipts 1023 1020 712 741 866 965 821 1048 1271

Seafood salesretail

Firms 41 37 35 37 39 42 40 38 39Receipts 4353 4394 3666 4124 3558 4086 3764 3727 4053

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 36 37 38 37 40 33 32 30 30Employees 550 695 538 531 538 483 542 567 639

Payroll 18932 20665 19347 19290 19416 19413 20039 21369 24477

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 25 25 25 24 25 24 25 26 25Employees 393 173 158 177 187 303 318 305 293

Payroll 7209 3674 3559 3533 3521 6493 7366 7142 7410

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 11 5 5 2 2 5 5 6 7Employees 557 478 475 ds ds 431 ds ds 452

Payroll 36635 34544 34367 ds ds 34538 ds ds 36675

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1Employees NA ds NA ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll NA ds NA ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 11 9 10 13 13 9 11 9 9

Employees 167 156 164 189 208 162 166 153 120Payroll 4151 4317 4368 5362 5237 3779 4003 3304 3412

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 8 11 11 14 14 11 10 10 11Employees 1048 1098 1075 1236 1278 664 709 700 782

Payroll 87770 89104 87833 109059 109134 54309 61651 66034 83408Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 8 11 11 11 8 8 9 9 11Employees ds 105 120 90 105 97 100 80 70

Payroll 3340 5846 5258 5113 5310 5567 6518 5416 4463

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds 3218 2031 ds ds ds ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 13 14 13 15 15 18 18 14 14Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 660

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 46560

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

New England Regionbull Connecticutbull Mainebull Massachusettsbull New Hampshirebull Rhode Island

Black sea bass Photo NOAA FisheriesScott Steinback

72

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New England Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe New England Region includes Connecticut Maine Massachusetts New Hampshire and Rhode Island Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under nine fishery management plans (FMPs) Two of these FMPs monkfish and spiny dogfish are developed in conjunction with the Mid-Atlantic Fisheries Management Council (MAFMC) The MAFMC is the lead council for the Spiny Dogfish FMP the NEFMC is the lead for the Monkfish FMP

New England Regional FMPs

bull Northeast multi-species

bull Sea scallopsbull Monkfish (with

the MAFMC)bull Atlantic herringbull Small mesh

multi-species

bull Spiny dogfish (with the MAFMC)

bull Red crabbull Northeast skate

complexbull Atlantic salmon

Fourteen of the stocks or stock complexes covered in these FMPs were listed as overfished in 2016 Atlantic cod (two stocks) Atlantic halibut Atlantic salmon Atlantic wolffish ocean pout thorny skate windowpane flounder winter flounder (two stocks) witch flounder and yellowtail flounder (three stocks) Seven stocks or stock complexes are currently subject to overfishing Atlantic cod (two stocks) witch flounder yellowtail flounder (three stocks) and winter flounder (Georges Bank stock)

Catch Share ProgramsTwo catch share programs operate in the New England Region 1) Northeast Multi-Species Sectors and 2) Northeast General Category Atlantic Sea Scallop Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program Following are descriptions of these catch share programs and their performance

Northeast Multi-Species Sectors This program was developed between 2004 and 2006 and included two pilot sectors that operated with an allocation of Georges Bank cod The program was expanded in 2010 to 17 sectors and approximately 55 of eligible limited-access permit holders joined a sector At the same time annual catch limits were implemented for the first time

and sharply reduced the available quota for fishermen The key performance indicators of this program show that compared with the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) the following 2015 metrics decreased quotas landings number of active vessels and inflation-adjusted revenue for catch share species On the other hand inflation-adjusted revenue per vessel increased during this period

Northeast General Category Atlantic Sea Scallop IFQ Program This program began in 2010 with two primary objectives 1) Control capacity and mortality in the General Category Scallop fishery and 2) Allow better and more timely integration of sea scallop assessment results in management The key performance indicators of this program show that 2015 inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per vessel increased However landings quota and the number of active vessels decreased compared with the baseline period

Policy UpdatesIn May 2016 NOAA Fisheries implemented Framework 27 which specifies measures for fishing year 2016 and includes fishing year 2017 measures that will go into place as a default should the next specifications-setting framework be delayed beyond the start of fishing year 2017 This action also includes two set-asides An annual research set-aside (RSA) of 125 million pounds was established for 2016 and 2017 to fund scallop research and to compensate participating vessels through the sale of scallops harvested under research set-aside projects In addition the action set aside 1 of the annual biological catch for the industry-funded observer program to help defray the cost of scallop vessels that carry an observer The observer set-aside for fishing years 2016 and 2017 is 084 million pounds

In November 2016 NOAA Fisheries implemented Amendment 19 to the Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery Management Plan The amendment adjusts the start of the scallop fishing year from March 1 to April 1 This change will help reduce potential economic and biological consequences from late implementation of specifications and reduce the overall administrative burden associated with late implementation As a result of this change NOAA Fisheries will be able to implement simple

73

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New England Region | Regional Summary

specifications actions at the start of the fishing year on a more consistent basis

In August 2016 NOAA Fisheries approved two out of three actions set out in Framework Adjustment 9 to the Monkfish Fishery Management Plan This plan eliminates the monkfish possession limit for monkfish Category C- and D-permitted vessels fishing in the Northern Fishery Management Area under both a Northeast multispecies and monkfish days-at-sea allocation The new measure is designed to help increase monkfish landings and better achieve the annual catch target The plan also implements a measure that allows a Category C or D vessel fishing under both a Northeast multispecies and a monkfish days-at-sea allocation in the Southern Fishery Management Area to use 65-inch (165-cm) roundfish gillnets Under the rule a monkfish-permitted vessel fishing on a monkfish-only days-at-sea allocation in the Mid-Atlantic Exemption Area may now use 5-inch (127-cm) roundfish gillnets In addition monkfish-permitted vessels fishing on a monkfish-only days-at-sea limit in either the SNE Dogfish Gillnet Exemption Area or the Southern New England Monkfish and Skate Gillnet Exemption Area may retain both monkfish and dogfish on the same trip when declared into either area Finally this measure limits a vessel to using 50 roundfish gillnets in the SNE Dogfish and the Mid-Atlantic Exemption Areas

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key New England Region Commercial Species

bull American lobsterbull Atlantic herringbull Atlantic mackerelbull Cod and haddockbull Flounders

bull Goosefishbull Quahog clambull Sea scallopbull Softshell clambull Squid

Economic Impacts The premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers1

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 commercial fishing in Massachusetts generated

1 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)

74

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New England Region | Regional Summary

the largest employment impacts in the New England Region 87200 jobs Income impacts ($2 billion) sales impacts ($77 billion) and value-added impacts ($3 billion) were also largest in Massachusetts The retail sector in Massachusetts generated the highest employment impacts of any state-level sector 53300 jobs The importers sector in Massachusetts generated the highest state-level income impacts ($6436 million) sales impacts ($4 billion) and value-added impacts ($12 billion) in the region

Landings TrendsNew England landings revenue was up $854 million in 2016 from the previous year with lobster (up $46 million) sea scallops (up $171 million) and squid (up $174 million) comprising the majority of this increase The lobster fishery New Englandrsquos largest fishery in terms of landings revenue continued its strong performance with revenues up 84 since 2007 due to landings almost doubling (up 99) during this period Although 2016 prices were slightly lower than in 2007 (down 7) and 2015 (down 15) strong demand has kept prices well above the 10-year average (up 16) The higher landings trend is due to record abundance levels of Gulf of Maine lobsters which have comprised between 85-90 of landings in recent years Indeed average annual landings in the past five years are more than three times the average annual landings for the previous 60 years On average Maine has accounted for 80 of New Englandrsquos lobster landings revenue since 2007

Sea scallop landings declined 30 over this 10-year period primarily due to a 35 reduction in the catch limit that was implemented in 2012 to protect young sea scallops and prevent localized overfishing Significantly higher prices (up 83 from 2007 but unchanged from 2015) have helped to offset the reduction in landings For 2016 the increase in landings revenue was driven by higher harvest levels (up 6 relative to 2015)

Rhode Island is the center of the New England squid fishery which comprised 36 of Rhode Islandrsquos total landings revenue in 2016 Overall squid landings in New England increased 66 from 2015 to 2016 Prices were also up (4) year-over-year due to the 30 decrease in global production which has been attributed to the

strong El Nintildeo event in 2016 Illex squid prices which are determined in the international market increased 65 during this period in large part due to global supply shortages

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Bluefin tuna (361 303 in real terms)bull Squid (135 106 in real terms)bull American lobster (84 61 in real terms)From 2015bull Squid (72)bull Bluefin tuna (24)bull Atlantic herring (17)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Quahog clam (-60 -65 in real terms)bull Cod and haddock (-51 -57 in real terms)bull Atlantic mackerel (-50 -57 in real terms)From 2015bull Atlantic mackerel (-11)bull Flounders (-5)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Bluefin tuna (455)bull American lobster (99)bull Squid (48)From 2015bull Squid (66)bull Atlantic mackerel (14)bull Bluefin tuna (11)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Atlantic mackerel (-78)bull Quahog clam (-71)bull Flounders (-45)From 2015bull Flounders (-28)bull Atlantic herring (-22)bull Quahog clam (-7)

75

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New England Region | Regional Summary

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the New England Region totaled $13 billion in 2016 This number represented a 48 increase from 2007 (a 29 increase in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 7 increase from 2015 Landings revenue was highest in Maine ($633 million) followed by Massachusetts ($5508 million) Shellfish landings revenue made up 86 of total revenue in the region American lobster ($6635 million) and sea scallop ($3039 million) had the highest landings revenue in the New England Region in 2016 Together they accounted for 73 of total landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 bluefin tuna (361 303 in real terms) squid (135 106 in real terms) and American lobster (84 61 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while quahog clam (-60 -65 in real terms) cod and haddock (-51 -57 in real terms) and Atlantic mackerel (-50 -57 in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 squid (72) bluefin tuna (24) and Atlantic herring (17) had the largest revenue increases while Atlantic mackerel (-11) and flounders (-5) had the largest revenue decreases LandingsIn 2016 New England Region commercial fishermen landed about 595 million pounds of finfish and shellfish a 2 increase from 2007 and a 1 decrease from 2015 American lobster had the highest landings volume in the New England Region accounting for 27 of landed weight

From 2007 to 2016 bluefin tuna (455) American lobster (99) and squid (48) had the largest landings increases while Atlantic mackerel (-78) quahog clam (-71) and flounders (-45) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 squid (66) Atlantic mackerel (14) and bluefin tuna (11) had the largest landings increases while flounders (-28) Atlantic herring (-22) and quahog clam (-7) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 sea scallop ($1227 per pound) received the highest New England Region ex-vessel price Landings of Atlantic herring ($021 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price

From 2007 to 2016 Atlantic mackerel (120 93 in real terms) sea scallop (83 60 in real terms) and Atlantic herring (78 56 in real terms) had the largest price increases while bluefin tuna (-17 -27 in real terms) cod and haddock (-14 -25 in real terms) and goosefish (-11 -23 in real terms) had the largest price decreases From 2015 to 2016 Atlantic herring (50) flounders (31) and quahog clam (14) had the largest price increases while Atlantic mackerel (-22) goosefish (-2) and American lobster (-1) had the largest price decreases

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups2

Key New England Recreational Species

bull Atlantic codbull Atlantic mackerelbull Bluefin tunabull Bluefishbull Little tuny

bull Scupbull Striped bassbull Summer flounderbull Winter flounderbull Tautog

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities3 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity

2 Except where noted Atlantic and Gulf recreational catch and effort estimates are based upon the MRIP APAIS and CHTS (httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovrecreational-fisheriesSurveyssurvey-details) and not the revised MRIP estimates (httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovleadership-messagenoaa-fisheries-releases-revised-mrip-recreational-catch-and-effort-estimates) released in 20183 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpswwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

76

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New England Region | Regional Summary

such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

The greatest employment impacts from expenditures on saltwater recreational fishing in the New England Region were generated in Massachusetts (10000 jobs) followed by Rhode Island (4200 jobs) The largest sales impacts were observed in Massachusetts ($11 billion) followed by Connecticut ($4302 million) The biggest income impacts were generated in Massachusetts ($4955 million) followed by Connecticut ($1864 million) The greatest value-added impacts were in Massachusetts ($7157 million) followed by Connecticut ($2918 million)

Recreational fishing expenditures (on both fishing trips and durable equipment purchases) across the New England Region in 2016 totaled about $19 billion Trip expenditures totaled more than $2628 million with a large portion coming from trips in the private boat (54) and shore (28) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $17 billion with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($1 billion)

Fishing TripsIn 2016 recreational fishermen took 61 million fishing trips in the New England Region This number represented a 35 decrease from 2007 and a 20 increase from 2015 The largest proportions of trips were taken in the private boat mode (55) and shore mode (42) States with the highest number of recorded trips were Massachusetts (24 million trips) and Connecticut (16 million trips)

ParticipationIn 2016 there were 12 million recreational anglers who fished in the New England Region This number represented a 26 decrease from 2007 and an 18 increase from 2015 These anglers were New England Region residents from either a coastal county (92) or a non-coastal county (8)

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Little tunny (524)bull Atlantic mackerel (226)bull Winter flounder (103)From 2015bull Little tunny (205)bull Atlantic cod (103)bull Summer flounder (60)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Bluefish (-61)bull Striped bass (-51)bull Bluefin tuna (-43)From 2015There were no decreases from 2015 to 2016

Harvest and ReleaseOf New Englandrsquos key species and species groups Atlantic mackerel (65 million fish) porgies (scup) (65 million fish) and striped bass (44 million fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 little tunny (524) Atlantic mackerel (226) and winter flounder (103) had the largest increases in catch while bluefish (-61) striped bass (-51) and bluefin tuna (-43) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 little tunny (205) Atlantic cod (103) and summer flounder (60) had the largest increases in catch There were no decreases in catch from 2015 to 2016

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine

77

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New England Region | Regional Summary

4 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)5 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)6 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries45

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy6 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average

The Bureau of Labor Statistics suppressed the CFLQ value for Connecticut Massachusetts and New Hampshire for 2015 Of the remaining states Maine had the highest CFLQ at 2007 Rhode Island had a CFLQ value of 39

In 2015 371314 employer establishments operated throughout the entire New England Region (including marine- and non-marine- related establishments) These establishments employed about 62 million workers and had a total annual payroll of about $359 billion The combined gross state product of Connecticut Maine Massachusetts New Hampshire and Rhode Island was approximately $932 billion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 the New England Region had 105 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 3 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $125 million (a 2 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 85 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (an 11 decrease from 2007) The Census Bureau suppressed employment and payroll data for one or more states in the New England Region for this

sector in 2015 The greatest number of seafood product preparation and packaging establishments was located in Massachusetts (79) followed by Maine (64) and Connecticut (26)

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 145 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the five states that make up the New England Region (a 16 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $158 million (a 30 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 235 employer firms in the retail sales of seafood sector (a 7 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 1278 workers (a 1 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $419 million (an 11 increase in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of retail seafood establishments was located in Massachusetts (158) followed by Maine (110) and Connecticut (53)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 332 employer firms in the wholesale sales of seafood sector in the New England Region in 2015 (a 16 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 3432 workers and had a total annual payroll of $1776 million The greatest number of wholesale seafood establishments was located in Maine (146) followed by Massachusetts (129) and Rhode Island (28)

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of the New England Regionrsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons It is clear however that these sectors play an important role in the regional economy For example the ship and boatbuilding sector in Massachusetts Maine New Hampshire and Rhode Island accounted for a total of $5006 million in payroll in 2015

Tables | New England Region

80

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New England Region | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the New England Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Landings Value Value Jobs Sales Income Jobs Sales IncomeRevenue Added AddedConnecticut 15087 2306 387244 83307 137449 808 53328 18277 25482Maine 633014 41960 2581806 855773 1236431 40246 2300020 795211 1136921Massachusetts 550755 87201 7662911 1998842 3045410 55384 2318125 851027 1161180New Hampshire 33215 9922 1511091 348439 558040 2577 160077 59239 81009Rhode Island 93872 10828 1375375 334588 528970 5193 332575 120271 168541

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 895381 808816 787206 960090 1103010 1192900 1163328 1195545 1240539 1325943

Finfish amp Other 178819 190526 176399 189803 212059 243355 204318 193491 182234 188670Shellfish 716562 618290 610806 770288 890951 949546 959010 1002054 1058305 1137273

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 359783 317909 305195 397768 417931 425562 458779 560618 617448 663457Atlantic herring 18591 20507 24459 20692 24759 28545 31388 27947 24286 28515Atlantic mackerel 6000 5265 7892 3459 295 3480 1738 3111 3332 2975Bluefin tuna 2077 2993 4448 8470 9258 8394 3649 6114 7723 9583Cod amp haddock 39326 47166 38745 49710 48775 29972 16350 20681 19042 19373Flounders 33658 30654 27286 27685 30851 35155 32092 30609 28103 26564Goosefish 21209 19945 14321 14064 19792 19693 13576 14094 14628 15042Quahog clam 30026 8901 9002 9713 8314 9276 9383 10121 11285 11922Sea scallop 237299 203124 209168 265493 352632 389501 366007 296983 286785 303899Squid 17711 19848 16696 14788 22887 18187 15547 21411 24263 41673

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 584849 602950 648988 580145 612952 665778 634766 646106 599125 594999Finfish amp Other 376334 400732 422141 334220 357225 380850 358155 376330 333534 297386Shellfish 208514 202219 226848 245925 255728 284928 276610 269776 265592 297613

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 79435 86229 99199 116024 125167 148906 149116 146454 146095 157942Atlantic herring 156602 167709 210784 140789 174338 190532 203763 197908 171823 134696Atlantic mackerel 50760 38359 39398 16904 913 9680 9049 12934 10016 11418Bluefin tuna 300 447 772 1201 1085 915 523 971 1502 1663Cod amp haddock 24856 33122 32470 39261 30108 14800 9072 15133 15257 14237Flounders 16093 15501 16232 14531 17913 18353 16320 14270 12304 8865Goosefish 19968 17757 14256 12378 14700 16422 14321 14552 15272 15981Quahog clam 4630 1468 1628 1790 1513 1570 1594 1584 1464 1355Sea scallop 35390 28867 31604 32884 35285 39209 32103 23482 23296 24770Squid 26421 28615 28014 21722 27907 16153 14575 28781 23698 39224

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

American lobster 453 369 308 343 334 286 308 383 423 420Atlantic herring 012 012 012 015 014 015 015 014 014 021Atlantic mackerel 012 014 020 020 032 036 019 024 033 026Bluefin tuna 693 669 576 705 854 918 698 629 514 576Cod amp haddock 158 142 119 127 162 203 180 137 125 136Flounders 209 198 168 191 172 192 197 215 228 300Goosefish 106 112 100 114 135 120 095 097 096 094Quahog clam 649 606 553 543 550 591 589 639 771 880Sea scallop 671 704 662 807 999 993 1140 1265 1231 1227Squid 067 069 060 068 082 113 107 074 102 106

81

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New England Region | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the New England Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars trips)Trips Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Connecticut 1644 3974 430216 186430 291827Maine 573 1097 98666 37412 59185Massachusetts 2384 9957 1070935 495481 715659New Hampshire 293 473 47954 21470 30575Rhode Island 1159 4173 412071 176221 270081

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 47916Private Boat 141993Shore 72851Total 262760

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 380822Other Equipment 136449Boat Expenses 1024515Vehicle Expenses 134455Second Home Expenses 1574Total Durable Expenditures 1677814

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1940574

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 1408 1389 1222 1317 1156 1171 1043 1080 924 1104Non-Coastal 205 187 165 169 131 144 100 99 95 94Out-of-State NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 1614 1576 1387 1486 1288 1316 1143 1179 1018 1198

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 518 512 464 321 367 345 516 487 354 226Private 4820 4894 3374 3967 3161 3132 3459 3226 2677 3312Shore 3951 3735 3321 2926 2532 2687 2313 2939 2004 2516Total Trips 9289 9141 7160 7213 6060 6164 6287 6652 5036 6054

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic cod

H 305 385 391 509 530 337 392 264 22 112R 966 954 833 1071 915 472 642 667 509 969

Atlantic mackerel

H 1886 3358 2464 3471 5335 3276 3712 3263 5138 5767R 116 452 343 381 535 484 283 1420 1002 770

Bluefin tuna

H 11 9 9 1 2 9 0 8 3 8R 10 2 5 0 5 4 0 0 6 4

BluefishH 1512 1461 674 1183 658 1503 1682 863 680 657R 2906 2995 1435 1848 1931 1951 1954 2753 913 1087

Little tunny

H 5 0 1 2 0 11 1 9 51 36R 65 16 16 20 44 103 14 427 92 399

Porgies (scup)

H 3049 1944 1498 2411 2286 2953 3800 3171 2216 2268R 2802 4048 3278 3586 2376 3530 3091 3275 2199 4253

Striped bass

H 595 602 547 527 458 530 697 492 292 254R 8366 7713 4164 2771 2041 1780 3796 2655 3010 4170

Summer flounder

H 426 582 167 199 267 241 429 417 336 360R 1045 2112 908 818 1252 939 1456 1393 910 1633

Winter flounder

H 51 180 112 105 100 56 44 96 57 40R 44 71 102 85 60 27 24 56 65 153

Wrasses (tautog)

H 569 305 196 359 78 323 298 487 264 276R 1425 514 395 562 385 909 966 2213 749 1335

1 NA = data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but does not specify whether an angler resides in a region2 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

Tables | Connecticut

84

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Connecticut | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Connecticut Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 2306 387244 83307 137449 808 53328 18277 25482

Commercial Harvesters 403 26755 7338 11307 403 26755 7338 11307Seafood Processors amp Dealers 100 11559 4414 5706 50 5791 2212 2859

Importers 916 283114 45374 86305 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 139 24734 8096 10877 16 2811 920 1236

Retail 748 41083 18085 23253 339 17970 7807 10080

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 42053 17206 15007 17626 20032 21132 14632 14144 15422 15087Finfish amp Other 3270 3962 3108 5229 4817 5467 5123 4428 5040 4718Shellfish 38782 13243 11899 12397 15215 15665 9509 9716 10382 10369

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 3222 2102 1763 1894 943 1057 577 608 1073 1316Goosefish 512 551 591 564 976 1040 1022 510 680 467Other flounders 232 172 87 42 33 65 184 89 164 253Red hake 110 181 137 76 89 88 115 104 112 108Scups or Porgies 311 383 196 272 408 837 705 573 820 773Sea scallop 8605 10032 8952 9458 13007 12005 7219 7219 7039 5881Silver hake 1115 1436 1011 1341 1617 1380 1301 1586 1164 914Squid loligo 744 546 260 473 694 1861 1257 1354 1631 2012Summer flounder 648 680 649 850 1005 940 902 921 1078 806Whelks and Conchs 312 453 796 449 159 616 295 336 487 992

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 10050 7131 6568 6698 7403 8940 7957 7523 9390 12370Finfish amp Other 3845 4520 4155 4409 5218 5756 5875 5221 7110 9602Shellfish 6205 2611 2414 2288 2186 3184 2082 2302 2280 2768

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 569 426 412 442 199 248 127 127 205 259Goosefish 460 424 546 358 630 765 967 493 605 431Other flounders 140 88 58 26 27 40 142 60 86 109Red hake 266 284 310 176 158 185 173 167 146 162Scups or Porgies 256 282 204 324 644 907 1195 811 983 932Sea scallop 1313 1407 1386 1260 1318 1231 640 609 577 530Silver hake 1565 2178 1881 1973 2041 1848 1647 2037 1320 943Squid loligo 811 523 256 366 498 1518 1098 1318 1317 1671Summer flounder 205 221 251 308 401 316 284 253 287 191Whelks and Conchs 117 174 229 113 28 91 81 98 81 211

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

American lobster 567 493 427 429 474 426 453 478 523 509Goosefish 111 130 108 158 155 136 106 104 112 108Other flounders 166 196 150 160 123 160 129 149 191 233Red hake 041 064 044 043 056 047 066 062 077 067Scups or Porgies 122 136 096 084 063 092 059 071 083 083Sea scallop 655 713 646 751 987 975 1129 1185 1220 1109Silver hake 071 066 054 068 079 075 079 078 088 097Squid loligo 092 104 101 129 139 123 115 103 124 120Summer flounder 316 308 259 276 250 298 318 363 376 422Whelks and Conchs 266 261 347 398 563 675 365 343 604 471

85

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Connecticut | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Connecticut Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 63 10270 4764 6443Private Boat 204 21457 9119 13792Shore 91 7411 3204 4564

Total Durable Expenditures 3616 391078 169343 267028Total State Economic Impacts 3974 430216 186430 291827

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 5889Private Boat 28496Shore 7433Total 41818

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 75576Other Equipment 20370Boat Expenses 225694Vehicle Expenses 16369Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 338010

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 379828

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 302 381 438 402 420 397 198 209 252 297Non-Coastal NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAOut-of-State 61 123 93 112 98 67 43 64 57 88Total Anglers 363 504 531 514 518 464 240 273 309 385

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 63 74 43 41 46 27 63 62 80 38Private 1097 1292 711 871 863 825 830 865 671 1021Shore 559 609 665 614 399 475 316 437 590 585Total Trips 1719 1975 1419 1526 1309 1326 1210 1365 1341 1644

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic cod

H 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 20R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12

BluefishH 451 623 262 591 307 480 893 288 365 311R 888 1144 295 715 997 679 727 425 401 340

Hickory shad

H 35 0 0 1 16 39 8 73 0 4R 4 5 lt 1 0 0 0 1 67 lt 1 5

Little tunny

H 0 0 0 1 0 lt 1 0 1 0 lt 1R lt 1 0 9 8 14 57 0 13 1 32

Porgies (scup)

H 925 549 289 1088 933 868 937 561 477 824R 1006 974 1204 1192 539 1049 1218 1413 764 1787

Striped bass

H 119 108 61 93 63 65 140 84 75 49R 985 3105 1161 671 612 265 775 310 667 621

Summer flounder

H 112 146 45 35 47 63 270 120 93 218R 297 991 428 373 345 306 866 638 408 1105

White perch

H 0 7 60 0 0 10 0 14 lt 1 4R 18 52 72 0 lt 1 48 2 7 lt 1 2

Winter flounder

H 0 0 12 14 19 9 0 lt 1 12 lt 1R 15 0 7 12 lt 1 7 4 lt 1 31 lt 1

Wrasses (tautog)

H 353 167 86 116 26 194 104 318 126 165R 745 250 112 257 36 599 453 1668 272 933

1 NA = data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but does not specify whether an angler resides in a region2 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

86

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Connecticut | Marine Economy

2015 Connecticut State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 269845 (11) 89232 (12) 1503102 (12) 9256 (15) 13755 (14) 25631 (14) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms ds 18 17 17 14 13 25 26 25Receipts ds 2375 2550 1518 1066 882 3058 3969 2692

Seafood salesretail

Firms 26 25 23 25 21 21 20 18 19Receipts 4436 3247 2142 2473 2165 1388 1543 1655 1813

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1Employees ds 59 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds 1040 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 20 24 25 23 24 16 17 19 20Employees 183 185 212 216 212 187 178 172 211

Payroll 8347 8551 8842 9219 9224 8237 7920 8174 20558

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 36 35 36 39 37 37 36 35 34Employees 177 203 205 204 171 233 218 244 230

Payroll 5252 5248 5551 5563 4824 6349 6344 7380 7533

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 4 5 5 6 5 10 9 9 9Employees ds ds ds ds 95 256 ds ds 216

Payroll ds ds ds 8148 7856 32789 ds ds 27698

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 14 12 12 10 11 14 11 11 11Employees 228 243 222 225 225 297 184 ds 164

Payroll 48110 46595 45045 29407 41302 37711 28513 26891 26880Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 124 125 126 129 128 130 130 128 125

Employees 1224 1352 1261 1284 1283 1257 1265 1174 1153Payroll 50809 60016 58065 58877 59851 60803 63211 59054 59526

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 5 4 3 3 3 0 1 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds NA ds ds ds

Payroll 5925 ds ds ds ds NA ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 6 6 6 6 5 2 2 4 3Employees ds ds 5 ds 5 ds ds 3 2

Payroll 432 338 696 242 898 ds ds 185 159

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 4 8 8 6 5 4 5 5 5Employees ds 179 166 122 34 ds ds ds 22

Payroll ds 6136 5787 2162 848 1414 ds ds 1142

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 22 15 13 12 11 8 7 9 8Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Maine

88

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Maine | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Maine Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 41960 2581806 855773 1236431 40246 2300020 795211 1136921

Commercial Harvesters 18927 1214883 332762 543832 18927 1214883 332762 543832Seafood Processors amp Dealers 3157 246437 98941 126425 2888 225457 90518 115662

Importers 710 219310 35149 66855 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 1285 136984 49138 63941 1126 120068 43070 56045

Retail 17881 764192 339784 435378 17304 739612 328861 421383

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 344022 308233 292315 380435 411983 450926 476423 547333 591356 633014Finfish amp Other 37507 37440 30367 30196 43816 77546 72857 50692 49092 59005Shellfish 306515 270793 261948 350240 368168 373380 403566 496641 542264 574009

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 280634 245146 237519 318304 334577 341861 370207 459183 501194 537872Atlantic herring 9173 8396 7867 8643 14404 14490 15514 16212 13534 19422Bloodworms 6051 5913 6196 5893 5847 5191 5644 6085 6335 6168Blue mussel 1934 1627 2203 2071 1969 1919 2341 2153 2458 2400Cod amp haddock 3728 5257 1752 1528 1666 1362 976 1267 1069 886Goosefish 2402 1478 526 393 578 1059 773 566 616 456Ocean quahog clam 3194 2195 1821 1721 2117 1737 1378 1238 1311 1299Pollock 2160 2321 2047 1503 1929 2527 2562 2878 1965 1663Sea urchins 4367 5410 5866 5490 5113 5024 5781 5325 4950 6616Softshell clam 12574 12826 11686 12960 15852 15655 18102 20232 22847 16219

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 186324 186696 188388 200876 249496 263421 266413 265182 242662 247946Finfish amp Other 99230 98951 82505 79375 122944 121322 120555 127687 104291 97245Shellfish 87094 87745 105883 121501 126552 142099 145859 137495 138371 150701

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 63959 69863 81179 96246 104923 127237 127756 124218 122402 131954Atlantic herring 74817 67731 64606 57557 97116 92506 98859 103530 86485 78156Bloodworms 549 537 574 534 526 457 470 448 401 387Blue mussel 2643 2289 2760 2582 2810 2399 2282 2270 2401 1743Cod amp haddock 2345 2455 1401 876 842 549 418 685 658 489Goosefish 2376 1178 603 404 533 1075 874 633 740 542Ocean quahog clam 1011 669 556 549 645 698 557 438 416 367Pollock 4245 4064 3040 1640 2325 2666 2227 2319 1381 1049Sea urchins 2761 2900 3487 2592 2407 1904 1988 1981 1775 2058Softshell clam 1948 1998 1902 2077 2365 2257 2297 2080 1892 1569

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

American lobster 439 351 293 331 319 269 290 370 409 408Atlantic herring 012 012 012 015 015 016 016 016 016 025Bloodworms 1102 1101 1079 1103 1112 1136 1200 1359 158 1596Blue mussel 073 071 080 080 070 080 103 095 102 138Cod amp haddock 159 214 125 174 198 248 233 185 162 181Goosefish 101 125 087 097 109 099 088 089 083 084Ocean quahog clam 316 328 327 313 328 249 247 282 315 354Pollock 051 057 067 092 083 095 115 124 142 158Sea urchins 158 187 168 212 212 264 291 269 279 322Softshell clam 646 642 614 624 670 693 788 973 1208 1034

89

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Maine | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Maine Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 57 5764 1959 2989Private Boat 65 7351 2044 3371Shore 110 10080 3262 5519

Total Durable Expenditures 865 75471 30147 47306Total State Economic Impacts 1097 98666 37412 59185

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 3504Private Boat 7172Shore 7730Total 18406

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 20480Other Equipment 7679Boat Expenses 39871Vehicle Expenses 332Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 68361

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 86767

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 174 121 117 122 85 116 102 79 67 114Non-Coastal 13 9 12 9 7 6 4 5 4 13Out-of-State 260 180 324 159 107 126 129 129 74 110Total Anglers 447 310 453 290 198 248 235 213 145 237

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 33 26 26 23 22 20 29 24 21 15Private 460 408 334 327 265 212 313 188 192 293Shore 531 421 544 366 240 405 254 327 201 265Total Trips 1024 854 904 716 527 637 596 539 414 573

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American shad

H 0 lt 1 lt 1 0 0 0 0 lt 1 1 2R 4 5 18 9 4 18 lt 1 0 14 7

Atlantic cod

H 19 41 45 14 39 26 61 22 3 2R 73 50 36 45 99 80 75 50 100 77

Atlantic mackerel

H 806 837 1111 1093 1544 1028 709 706 883 1754R 80 265 194 177 304 163 62 1165 136 307

Blue sharkH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0R lt 1 0 lt 1 0 9 2 13 10 11 lt 1

Bluefin tuna

H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0R 0 lt 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

BluefishH 49 30 3 14 lt 1 4 20 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1R 74 56 26 10 8 126 22 0 0 lt 1

HaddockH 12 20 10 4 12 4 6 3 26 27R 11 2 1 3 4 8 47 55 72 100

PollockH 50 68 61 58 57 49 141 136 66 29R 23 135 35 105 135 88 296 178 109 94

Striped bass

H 54 59 62 17 18 12 23 21 5 11R 1115 465 264 194 143 214 422 277 214 676

Winter flounder

H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0R 0 1 5 0 0 0 lt 1 4 0 14

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

90

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Maine | Marine Economy

2015 Maine State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 111777 (05) 40801 (05) 500549 (04) 2041 (03) 3355 (03) 5733 (03) 2007

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 65 64 63 59 51 51 36 37 32Receipts 7177 4261 6605 4480 3077 3294 2757 4142 2583

Seafood salesretail

Firms 55 46 48 47 48 46 49 57 50Receipts 5905 4035 4882 5835 4608 4492 4200 4664 5848

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 27 29 25 27 28 29 28 30 32Employees 536 490 545 594 500 492 376 546 552

Payroll 9351 9288 10427 12851 10353 12011 11797 18713 18506

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 170 168 164 164 152 136 150 142 146Employees 1015 1210 1126 1153 1109 1047 1340 1047 1123

Payroll 32005 36185 37687 39915 38412 40734 46782 40392 42337

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 50 45 49 51 51 48 51 54 60Employees 181 148 152 176 177 215 243 235 237

Payroll 4635 4148 4481 5126 5108 6902 7618 7558 9601

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 3 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 3Employees ds ds 22 28 ds ds ds ds 17

Payroll ds 1058 1037 1067 1105 ds ds ds 1071

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0Employees NA ds ds ds NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll NA ds ds ds NA NA NA NA NADeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0Employees ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 86 87 89 86 84 80 79 79 80

Employees 464 411 376 395 349 428 403 435 430Payroll 18600 15206 14654 14699 15426 17102 17476 19694 20400

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 15 15 14 13 13 13 14 14 13Employees 105 138 93 68 63 65 86 75 77

Payroll 6737 6148 5369 4928 4776 4730 5660 5243 4752

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 2 1 1 1 6 3 3 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds 2 ds 4

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds 130 113 142

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 94 90 82 75 76 76 79 84 84Employees 6751 6930 ds ds ds ds ds ds 6654

Payroll 345036 354899 ds ds ds ds ds ds 418591

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Massachusetts

92

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Massachusetts | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Massachusetts Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 87201 7662911 1998842 3045410 55384 2318125 851027 1161180

Commercial Harvesters 11490 1008163 317973 467913 11490 1008163 317973 467913Seafood Processors amp Dealers 6698 966228 368384 478963 1586 228715 87200 113375

Importers 12994 4015577 643573 1224124 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 2762 488166 159524 216451 1003 177294 57937 78612

Retail 53257 1184777 509387 657960 41306 903952 387917 501281

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 420004 399822 400473 478691 571583 616466 565739 523410 524112 550755

Finfish amp Other 109089 121567 113973 126262 132388 126152 93961 103615 99325 99112Shellfish 310915 278254 286500 352430 439195 490314 471779 419795 424787 451643

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 51258 45418 42731 50330 53302 53357 61662 68376 78290 82007Atlantic herring 8265 11342 15062 10251 8802 11529 10750 9432 8787 7559Atlantic mackerel 4736 4265 4528 1487 137 654 1223 2421 1926 2426Clams all other 15680 15255 16745 17966 19154 37294 28311 26484 27502 39140Cod amp haddock 32043 38696 33684 45210 43397 26123 14083 18440 17577 17919Eastern oyster 4559 5496 6432 8225 9066 12071 13896 19575 22742 22631Flounders 22095 20924 19645 19975 22025 25058 20612 17949 17340 17203Goosefish 14380 14035 9902 9922 13431 13596 8870 10028 10251 11294Ocean quahog clam 10100 9575 10710 8981 7995 NA 10229 9814 9063 NASea scallop 218292 189891 197280 252253 330944 364864 334205 271373 264933 281445

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 304774 326632 356105 283025 264991 296037 262256 272601 260347 244218

Finfish amp Other 227208 255603 278908 200844 179757 193481 163944 181680 169307 147519Shellfish 77566 71029 77197 82181 85233 102556 98312 90921 91040 96699

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 10145 10600 11782 12760 13373 14485 15260 15323 16451 17687Atlantic herring 73268 94266 133531 71922 66970 81781 74992 77873 70888 46969Atlantic mackerel 46240 35406 30199 12156 515 4131 7279 10755 6935 9894Clams all other 4135 4376 6552 10242 13352 35053 22495 20725 20088 33499Cod amp haddock 20298 28537 28515 36461 27164 13164 8123 13977 14393 13445Eastern oyster 123 138 159 215 231 310 329 444 593 613Flounders 10977 11609 12405 11159 13692 14250 11517 9018 8294 5974Goosefish 13597 12680 10015 8887 10143 11583 9498 10533 11084 12474Ocean quahog clam 20158 18126 18691 15646 12479 NA 14476 13422 13340 NASea scallop 32540 27011 29782 31156 33092 36725 29287 21392 21515 22867

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American lobster 505 428 363 394 399 368 404 446 476 464Atlantic herring 011 012 011 014 013 014 014 012 012 016Atlantic mackerel 010 012 015 012 027 016 017 023 028 025Clams all other 379 349 256 175 143 106 126 128 137 117Cod amp haddock 158 136 118 124 160 198 173 132 122 133Eastern oyster 3700 3977 4036 3830 3925 3896 4228 4412 3832 369Flounders 201 180 158 179 161 176 179 199 209 288Goosefish 106 111 099 112 132 117 093 095 092 091Ocean quahog clam 050 053 057 057 064 NA 071 073 068 NASea scallop 671 703 662 810 1000 993 1141 1269 1231 1231

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

93

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Massachusetts | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Massachusetts Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 350 43788 18509 25541 Private Boat 588 66670 28719 42310 Shore 521 54729 22551 35522

Total Durable Expenditures 8498 905748 425702 612286Total State Economic Impacts 9957 1070935 495481 715659

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 26142Private Boat 85474Shore 45193Total 156809

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 192074Other Equipment 79020Boat Expenses 538561Vehicle Expenses 95299Second Home Expenses 795Total Durable Expenditures 905748

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1062557

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 664 655 489 586 490 502 546 582 428 476Non-Coastal 179 170 144 152 115 130 77 82 85 73Out-of-State 465 469 421 433 293 309 275 532 199 289Total Anglers 1309 1293 1054 1171 897 941 898 1196 711 837

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 234 255 240 154 189 203 259 243 116 93Private 2440 2338 1760 2148 1319 1471 1621 1568 1223 1440Shore 1947 1929 1451 1186 1305 1151 1058 1586 842 850Total Trips 4622 4522 3450 3489 2813 2825 2939 3397 2181 2384

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic bonito

H 4 7 5 1 5 5 0 18 8 2R 12 9 lt 1 3 0 lt 1 lt 1 8 6 5

Atlantic cod

H 231 261 214 413 360 229 216 185 2 29R 658 672 581 884 542 240 411 479 137 616

Atlantic mackerel

H 952 2024 471 2083 1649 1132 2274 1926 4019 3219R 27 152 68 186 42 161 178 225 815 336

BluefishH 683 519 343 474 225 337 447 438 245 273R 1240 1302 953 1028 598 714 580 2213 254 461

HaddockH 293 233 155 143 52 89 105 115 56 371R 56 158 36 33 12 68 310 403 113 848

Porgies (scup)

H 1770 762 1069 925 785 1587 2043 1634 1197 867R 1183 1687 1741 1858 1174 1806 1257 1283 822 1061

Striped bass

H 315 378 344 341 256 378 299 277 171 132R 5331 3649 2283 1671 973 990 1691 1826 1546 2225

Summer flounder

H 138 232 50 45 58 76 31 113 79 55R 135 273 96 215 183 250 62 337 90 145

Winter flounder

H 41 169 87 86 69 46 44 92 43 33R 19 62 84 67 58 18 17 46 30 132

Wrasses (tautog)

H 91 34 25 46 33 25 58 100 40 24R 413 77 96 118 210 96 231 423 185 119

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

94

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Massachusetts | Marine Economy

2015 Massachusett State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 502274 (21) 175225 (23) 3167329 (26) 19803 (32) 28694 (3) 48810 (27) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 24 26 22 27 36 25 28 33 38Receipts 908 1250 1943 2082 2433 1699 1857 2356 4474

Seafood salesretail

Firms 57 64 64 61 66 65 51 56 52Receipts 4421 7982 7686 6287 7640 5213 3842 5782 5154

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 52 44 44 44 44 39 40 42 41Employees 2684 2355 2396 2159 2214 1638 1755 1819 1948

Payroll 113580 109747 119282 107635 112399 74541 87153 99445 108090

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 160 141 144 149 141 140 142 130 129Employees 1803 1442 1542 1591 2013 1841 1910 1859 1808

Payroll 81863 68898 70864 83467 94105 100801 104637 101512 102009

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 126 118 115 112 106 114 114 114 106Employees 737 549 542 584 576 576 708 647 641

Payroll 19267 15017 15261 16495 16037 15776 18304 19516 20201

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 14 14 12 12 10 14 8 12 12Employees 283 169 166 ds ds ds 22 25 36

Payroll 18620 11701 10011 ds ds 3266 1352 1478 2766

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 12 8 10 8 7 9 8 9 8Employees ds 361 ds 313 381 ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds 38908 35473 36069 38797 ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0Employees ds NA ds NA NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA ds NA NA NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 173 175 177 175 176 172 178 177 178

Employees 1154 1138 1188 1150 1125 977 1054 1161 1076Payroll 51705 53694 56663 57002 58251 48657 55053 57797 63422

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 5 3 2 2 2 4 3 3 2Employees 69 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll 2867 2271 ds ds ds ds ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 9 8 11 9 9 8 11 9 8Employees 65 75 71 150 139 120 94 83 88

Payroll 4540 4355 4342 9413 6980 5965 6578 6645 7311

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 3 4 4 8 6 5 3 1 1Employees 69 63 66 86 95 35 ds ds ds

Payroll 647 1289 1323 2662 3035 1519 ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 49 43 38 37 37 40 41 43 39Employees 588 603 579 535 445 446 463 623 576

Payroll 26445 28402 20685 20196 22066 23195 23615 31451 31153

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | New Hampshire

96

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New Hampshire | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the New Hampshire Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 9922 1511091 348439 558040 2577 160077 59239 81009

Commercial Harvesters 890 58255 16465 25569 890 58255 16465 25569Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1060 128231 50387 64971 204 24709 9709 12519

Importers 3395 1049319 168173 319878 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 638 90836 32020 42138 79 11272 3974 5229

Retail 3940 184450 81394 105484 1404 65841 29092 37692

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 17021 17471 17754 20599 23483 23241 20163 24313 27816 33215

Finfish amp Other 4151 4824 5569 5122 6147 5579 2908 2932 2732 2425Shellfish 12870 12647 12186 15477 17336 17662 17256 21381 25084 30790

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 12517 12267 11919 14836 16343 17169 16601 20741 24546 30372Atlantic cod 1972 2311 2587 2187 2500 1750 546 571 93 109Atlantic herring 147 134 271 375 208 349 216 NA 584 NAGoosefish 375 290 280 212 207 153 186 NA 351 338Haddock 123 89 68 29 35 95 22 18 8 14Hake 244 167 215 237 445 474 374 NA 263 271Pollock 902 1093 1283 839 1355 1224 1135 860 356 207Sea scallop 30 16 4 3 26 143 287 346 399 286Shrimp NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 23Spiny dogfish NA 419 557 293 451 420 96 NA NA NA

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 8430 10464 13886 11809 12315 12148 8254 9115 11094 7926

Finfish amp Other 5174 7180 10093 7026 7144 7546 3995 4302 6148 1961Shellfish 3256 3284 3793 4783 5171 4603 4259 4813 4946 5965

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 2469 2567 2985 3648 3919 4229 3818 4373 4722 5782Atlantic cod 1168 1479 1984 1227 1286 726 230 263 45 55Atlantic herring 936 1198 3120 2830 1514 2391 1579 NA 3999 NAGoosefish 325 250 250 172 153 126 162 NA 314 331Haddock 61 53 45 18 19 45 10 10 6 9Hake 313 222 423 322 587 1135 393 NA 309 329Pollock 2025 2456 2017 1042 1732 1049 983 629 270 98Sea scallop 4 2 1 0 3 12 25 27 31 23Shrimp NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4Spiny dogfish NA 1370 2073 1214 1646 1789 515 NA NA NA

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American lobster 507 478 399 407 417 406 435 474 520 525Atlantic cod 169 156 130 178 194 241 238 217 209 197Atlantic herring 016 011 009 013 014 015 014 NA 015 NAGoosefish 115 116 112 123 136 121 115 NA 112 102Haddock 201 170 152 157 191 213 216 174 141 155Hake 078 075 051 074 076 042 095 NA 085 082Pollock 045 045 064 081 078 117 115 137 132 212Sea scallop 826 768 722 884 1035 1168 1154 1271 1288 1238Shrimp NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 585Spiny dogfish NA 031 027 024 027 023 019 NA NA NA

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

97

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New Hampshire | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of New Hampshire Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 59 6924 2646 3728Private Boat 44 4581 2004 2838Shore 28 2515 1015 1553

Total Durable Expenditures 342 33934 15805 22456Total State Economic Impacts 473 47954 21470 30575

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 4161Private Boat 6224Shore 2187Total 12572

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 48330

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 97 63 67 46 56 58 68 50 54 69Non-Coastal 13 8 9 7 10 9 19 11 6 8Out-of-State 63 46 58 33 30 54 66 58 54 57Total Anglers 172 118 134 86 96 121 153 120 115 134

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 114 90 98 61 71 55 116 105 86 34Private 233 139 147 90 178 163 107 113 79 145Shore 155 103 155 92 48 81 89 34 57 114Total Trips 502 333 401 243 297 299 313 252 221 293

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atlantic codH 53 81 128 80 127 64 115 44 1 5R 235 232 209 130 259 150 156 132 260 229

Atlantic mackerel

H 128 497 882 295 2142 1116 707 628 233 793R 9 35 81 18 188 160 14 29 47 127

Bluefin tunaH 0 lt 1 lt 1 0 0 lt 1 0 0 0 0R 0 0 lt 1 lt 1 2 0 0 0 0 0

BluefishH 34 6 lt 1 2 2 9 0 lt 1 2 lt 1R 18 3 2 lt 1 1 5 lt 1 2 0 0

HaddockH 97 90 100 48 76 74 72 76 140 119R 44 18 28 11 20 114 258 424 322 271

PollockH 70 52 40 52 101 65 118 101 93 69R 17 20 50 75 104 147 237 154 320 134

Striped bassH 6 5 9 6 33 14 17 6 2 4R 257 77 57 52 99 64 82 79 56 234

Winter flounder

H 9 11 10 2 12 lt 1 0 4 3 6R 7 6 5 5 1 1 3 5 4 7

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 13200Other Equipment 4065Boat Expenses 16746Vehicle Expenses 1747Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 35758

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

98

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New Hampshire | Marine Economy

2015 New Hampshire State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 103345 (04) 37669 (05) 576424 (05) 2808 (04) 4244 (04) 7427 (04) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 5 ds ds 3 7 7 6 6 4Receipts 927 ds ds 687 856 1166 1239 1019 1411

Seafood salesretail

Firms 11 17 14 11 11 12 15 15 9Receipts 1540 1894 1870 1502 2152 2096 1861 2419 1722

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 7 7 8 8 8 8 7 6 8Employees ds ds 115 292 231 229 225 ds 182

Payroll ds ds 3234 10971 12010 12181 13751 ds 11160

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 8 8 8 8 7 8 9 8 9Employees 92 101 88 80 84 99 113 106 108

Payroll 3360 4142 4268 4171 4123 5738 4562 4271 4543

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 15 14 14 12 16 9 9 9 9Employees 93 83 95 102 88 48 45 ds 57

Payroll 2077 2011 2299 2296 1934 870 966 1699 1659

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0Employees ds NA NA NA NA ds NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA NA NA NA ds NA NA NA

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds NADeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Employees NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 35 37 37 35 34 31 35 35 35

Employees 171 173 146 135 139 131 155 144 153Payroll 7774 8114 7022 6920 7090 6927 8031 8043 8788

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Employees ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 18

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1920

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 1Employees NA NA NA NA NA ds ds ds ds

Payroll NA NA NA NA NA ds ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 8 9 8 7 7 7 7 8 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 181

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 9800

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Rhode Island

100

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Rhode Island | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Rhode Island Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 10828 1375375 334588 528970 5193 332575 120271 168541

Commercial Harvesters 2316 161929 48839 76197 2316 161929 48839 76197Seafood Processors amp Dealers 535 62563 24243 31504 326 38108 14767 19190

Importers 2755 851288 136435 259510 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 586 78598 27849 36644 133 17778 6299 8288

Retail 4636 220998 97221 125116 2419 114760 50366 64866

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 72282 66085 61657 62739 75929 81136 86371 86344 81833 93872Finfish amp Other 24802 22732 23383 22995 24891 28611 29470 31824 26044 23411Shellfish 47480 43353 38274 39744 51038 52525 56901 54521 55788 70462

Key SpeciesAll other flounders 3585 2171 1455 593 806 1025 2124 2945 1771 1462American lobster 12151 12976 11264 12404 12765 12119 9732 11709 12345 11889Atlantic herring 982 631 1260 1423 1343 2174 4907 2303 1373 1525Atlantic mackerel 1182 882 3301 1886 100 2804 339 309 1074 448Goosefish 3540 3590 3022 2973 4600 3844 2725 2990 2730 2486Quahog clam 4010 3273 2849 3293 3920 5169 5033 5099 5449 5609Scups or porgies 2767 2324 2640 2833 3312 3904 3666 4118 4278 4056Sea scallop 8963 2170 2342 2156 6834 9191 18639 10273 7885 9242Squid 15339 17687 15249 12590 20380 12744 13208 17718 20288 33938Summer flounder 4346 4485 4502 5534 6408 6937 6751 7298 6107 5475

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 75271 72027 84041 77738 78747 85232 89886 91684 75633 82539Finfish amp Other 40878 34478 46479 42566 42162 52745 63787 57440 46678 41058Shellfish 34393 37549 37562 35172 36585 32487 26099 34245 28955 41480

Key SpeciesAll other flounders 1871 1144 1027 358 615 664 1368 2158 1057 766American lobster 2293 2772 2840 2929 2754 2706 2156 2413 2316 2260Atlantic herring 7537 4504 9528 8479 8729 13839 28330 16505 10431 9539Atlantic mackerel 4242 2385 9057 4356 162 5497 714 539 1906 1143Goosefish 3209 3225 2841 2556 3242 2873 2818 2893 2529 2201Quahog clam 610 556 511 599 666 903 818 764 683 659Scups or porgies 3932 2151 3619 4299 6335 6309 7346 6949 6794 6815Sea scallop 1357 310 356 267 690 944 1646 841 661 799Squid 23718 26417 26452 19799 25996 11689 12609 24938 20495 32914Summer flounder 1516 1473 1794 2289 2824 2409 2193 2056 1716 1305

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

All other flounders 192 190 142 166 131 154 155 136 168 191American lobster 530 468 397 424 464 448 451 485 533 526Atlantic herring 013 014 013 017 015 016 017 014 013 016Atlantic mackerel 028 037 036 043 062 051 047 057 056 039Goosefish 110 111 106 116 142 134 097 103 108 113Quahog clam 657 588 558 550 589 572 615 667 798 851Scups or porgies 070 108 073 066 052 062 050 059 063 060Sea scallop 661 700 658 807 990 973 1132 1221 1193 1157Squid 065 067 058 064 078 109 105 071 099 103Summer flounder 287 304 251 242 227 288 308 355 356 420

101

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Rhode Island | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Rhode Island Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 113 13793 5244 7604Private Boat 117 12243 4885 7840Shore 81 8587 3433 5535

Total Durable Expenditures 3862 377448 162659 249102Total State Economic Impacts 4173 412071 176221 270081

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 8220Private Boat 14627Shore 10308Total 33155

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 79492Other Equipment 25315Boat Expenses 203643Vehicle Expenses 20708Second Home Expenses 779Total Durable Expenditures 329937

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 363092

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 171 169 111 161 105 99 129 160 123 149Non-Coastal NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAOut-of-State 229 297 209 225 190 169 255 304 175 243Total Anglers 401 465 320 387 296 268 383 464 298 392

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 74 67 56 41 39 40 48 52 52 45Private 590 716 423 531 536 461 587 491 513 412Shore 759 673 507 667 539 575 595 556 314 701Total Trips 1423 1456 986 1239 1114 1077 1229 1099 879 1159

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic bonito

H 5 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 0 lt 1 4 2 lt 1 0R 4 1 0 0 0 0 4 6 2 lt 1

Atlantic cod

H lt 1 2 4 2 4 16 lt 1 13 16 55R lt 1 lt 1 7 12 14 1 lt 1 5 12 35

Black seabass

H 44 52 36 160 50 103 75 214 234 255R 118 128 134 212 221 766 684 859 752 1162

BluefishH 295 282 65 103 124 673 323 136 67 73R 686 491 160 94 328 427 625 114 258 286

Porgies (scup)

H 353 633 140 398 568 498 820 976 542 577R 613 1386 333 536 662 675 616 579 614 1405

Striped bass

H 101 51 71 70 89 62 217 104 40 58R 678 416 399 183 214 247 826 163 527 414

Summer flounder

H 176 204 72 118 161 103 128 185 164 87R 612 848 382 230 724 382 528 417 413 382

Winter flounder

H lt 1 lt 1 4 2 0 0 0 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1R 3 1 1 lt 1 lt 1 1 0 lt 1 0 lt 1

Wrasses (tautog)

H 125 104 85 197 19 104 136 69 98 87R 267 187 187 187 139 214 281 122 292 282

Yellowfin tuna

H 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 lt 1 4 lt 1R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0

1 NA = not applicable because all Rhode Island residents are considered coastal county residents2 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

102

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Rhode Island | Marine Economy

2015 Rhode Islandrsquos State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 75223 (03) 28387 (04) 425748 (03) 197 (03) 3185 (03) 5565 (03) 39

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 8 7 9 6 9 10 8 8 6Receipts 2291 1376 1045 907 1168 1441 1393 1418 1381

Seafood salesretail

Firms 23 19 16 17 25 20 22 16 15Receipts 3536 2748 2821 2769 3033 2536 2501 1331 1259

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 6 8 7 5 4 3 3 3 3Employees 196 270 275 193 178 ds ds ds 71

Payroll 6876 6354 5821 6096 5544 ds ds ds 2243

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 35 29 34 32 34 32 31 28 28Employees 224 226 202 204 230 278 182 188 182

Payroll 11447 10505 9534 9815 10264 13064 8412 8763 8140

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 27 23 24 26 23 24 24 27 26Employees 109 94 127 113 109 111 113 114 113

Payroll 2207 2027 2398 2309 2232 2388 2610 2608 2925

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 18

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1574

MarinasEstablishments 68 73 70 72 71 67 71 65 72

Employees 463 476 459 428 460 424 466 449 409Payroll 22029 23204 21372 22227 22618 20811 24214 24876 25206

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 2 5 5 5 5 4 4 3 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 7 8 8 8 8 7 7 6 6Employees ds ds ds ds 107 ds ds ds 69

Payroll ds 5904 3728 3955 4002 3272 ds ds 4209

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 2 1 1 1 5 2 3 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 18

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 951

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 37 39 33 29 30 37 33 33 33Employees 1374 1342 1085 954 916 717 768 939 902

Payroll 55788 54225 41246 40004 33316 32070 34483 42200 41096

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Mid-Atlantic Regionbull Delawarebull Marylandbull New Jerseybull New Yorkbull Virginia

Black sea bass catch on party boat near Ocean City Maryland Photo Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management CouncilMary Sabo

104

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe Mid-Atlantic Region includes Delaware Maryland New Jersey New York and Virginia Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under seven fishery management plans (FMPs) Two of these FMPs are developed in conjunction with the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC) The MAFMC is the lead council for the Spiny Dogfish FMP the NEFMC is the lead for the Monkfish FMP

Mid-Atlantic Region FMPs

bull Atlantic mackerel squid and butterfish

bull Atlantic bluefishbull Spiny dogfish (with

the NEFMC)bull Summer flounder

scup and black sea bass

bull Surfclam and ocean quahog

bull Golden tilefishbull Monkfish (with the

NEFMC)

Summer flounder was listed as experiencing overfishing in 2016

Catch Share ProgramsTwo catch share programs operate in the Mid-Atlantic 1) Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ) Program and 2) Golden Tilefish Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program Following is a description of these catch share programs and their performance Each program is described separately because the surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries are prosecuted as independent fisheries despite being in the same ITQ program

Atlantic Surfclam ITQ Program This program was implemented in 1990 to conserve the surfclam resource and stabilize harvest rates simplify regulatory requirements to minimize public and private management costs promote economic efficiency by bringing harvest capacity in line with processing and biological capacity and create a management approach that is flexible and adaptive to short-term events or circumstances The key performance indicators of

this program show that compared with the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) the 2015 quota and inflation-adjusted revenue per vessel increased However landings the number of active vessels and inflation-adjusted total revenue decreased

Atlantic Ocean Quahog ITQ Program This program was implemented in 1990 to conserve the quahog resource and stabilize harvest rates simplify regulatory requirements to minimize public and private management costs promote economic efficiency by bringing harvest capacity in line with processing and biological capacity and create a management approach that is flexible and adaptive to short-term events or circumstances The key performance indicators of this program show that relative to the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) the 2015 inflation-adjusted revenue per vessel increased However quota landings number of active vessels and inflation-adjusted total revenue decreased

Golden Tilefish IFQ Program This program was implemented in 2009 to reduce over-capacity and eliminate problems associated with the race to fish golden tilefish This IFQ program is unique because many key events occurred outside the traditional management process Prior to the implementation of the IFQ program fishermen crafted internal agreements that promoted cooperation Their cooperative processes helped fishing businesses stay viable under new regulations which laid the foundation for implementing the IFQ program The key performance indicators of this program show that relative to the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) the 2015 inflation-adjusted revenue and inflation-adjusted revenue per vessel increased However landings quota and the number of active vessels decreased

Policy UpdatesIn 2016 Amendment 16 to the Atlantic mackerel squid and butterfish FMP established the Frank R Lautenberg Deep-Sea Coral Protection Area The action prohibits the use of bottom-tending commercial fishing gear within the designated deep-sea coral area to protect deep-sea corals and deep-sea coral habitats in the Mid-Atlantic Vessels can transit the deep-sea coral area protection

105

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Mid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

area provided the vessels bring bottom-tending fishing gear onboard and reel bottom-tending trawl gear onto the net reel Exemptions for some fishing activities apply This rule went into effect on January 13 2017

In April 2016 the council approved an amendment for golden tilefish The amendment made changes to how discards are deducted from quota made changes to certain reporting requirements prohibited vessels from fishing more than one golden tilefish IFQ allocation at a time required golden tilefish to be landed with the head attached and required that for incidental permit holders golden tilefish not make up more than 25 of the total of all combined species landed

Also in April 2016 the council approved measures to establish management of blueline tilefish in federal waters off the Mid-Atlantic and New England coasts Since June 2015 the portion of the fishery north of North Carolina has been managed under emergency measures that include a commercial trip limit The amendment established a separate blueline tilefish management unit in federal waters north of the North CarolinaVirginia border extending up to the boundary with Canada

In August 2016 final action was taken on an amendment to require electronic submission of vessel trip reports by for-hire vessels with federal permits for council-managed species While electronic submission has been an option since 2011 for some for-hire fisheries the first mobile app-based system for submitting electronically was approved by NOAA Fisheries in 2016 The council voted to require the electronic submission of vessel trip reports and to change the submission time frame to 48 hours instead of monthly

COMMERCIAL FISHERIES In this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries

section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key Mid-Atlantic Region Commercial Species

bull American lobsterbull Atlantic surfclambull Blue crabbull Eastern oysterbull Menhaden

bull Quahog clambull Sea scallopbull Squidbull Striped bassbull Summer flounder

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers1

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total

1 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp SeafoodIndustry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)

106

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 commercial fishing in New Jersey generated the largest employment impacts in the Mid-Atlantic Region 37100 jobs Income impacts ($14 billion) sales impacts ($62 billion) and value-added impacts ($23 billion) were also largest in New Jersey The retail sector in New York generated the highest employment impacts of any state-level sector 16700 jobs The importers sector in New Jersey generated the highest state-level income impacts ($6729 million) sales impacts ($42 billion) and value-added impacts ($13 billion) in the region

Landings TrendsLandings revenue increased $366 million (7) in the Mid-Atlantic Region from 2015 to 2016 with all states experiencing gains with the exception of New York (down 7) New Jersey (up 16) accounted for the majority of this increase ($268 million) while Delaware had the highest growth rate (up 47 or $33 million) In New Jersey the landings revenue increase was primarily due to an increase in landings in a high-value fishery ndash sea scallop harvest was up 34 driving landings revenue up $254 million Region-wide sea scallop landings revenue was up $294 million (20) due to higher landings (up 28)

Other species with sizable increases in landings revenue from 2015 to 2016 included blue crab (up 19 or $187 million) and squid (up 81 or $69 million) The blue crab fishery is the most important fishery in terms of value for Maryland and Delaware and is the second-most-valuable fishery in Virginia Combined these three states comprise 90 and 93 of regional blue crab landings and landings revenue respectively Landings revenue increased in all three states from 2015 to 2016 Delaware was up by $34 million (75) Maryland by

$87 million (17) and Virginia by $78 million (23)

New Jersey and New York account for almost all of the Mid-Atlantic squid landings In a year when global squid production fell 30 year-over-year Mid-Atlantic squid landings almost doubled (up 94)2 While this regional surge in supply depressed overall squid prices (down 7) illex squid prices which are determined in the international market increased 119

Oysters was the only Mid-Atlantic key species with a sizable decrease in landings and landings revenue (down 22 and 25 respectively) from 2015 to 2016 Although 2016 was down relative to the previous year both landings and landings revenue exceeded the 10-year average by 45 and 62 respectively due to surging aquaculture production in Virginia during this time period

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the Mid-Atlantic Region totaled $5503 million in 2016 This number represented a 30 increase from 2007 (a 14 increase in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 7 increase from 2015 Landings revenue was highest in Virginia ($2047 million) followed by New Jersey ($193 million) Shellfish landings revenue made up 80 of total revenue in the region Sea scallop ($1801 million) and blue crab ($1175 million) had the highest landings revenue in the Mid-Atlantic Region in 2016 Together they accounted for 54 of total landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 Eastern oyster (381 320 in real terms) squid (107 81 in real terms) and quahog clam (91 67 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while Atlantic surfclam (-65 -70 in real terms) and American lobster (-64 -69 in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 squid (81) sea scallop (20) and blue crab (19) had the largest revenue increases while Eastern oyster (-25) Atlantic surfclam (-17) and menhaden (-10) had the largest revenue decreases

Landings In 2016 Mid-Atlantic Region commercial fishermen landed 5975 million pounds of finfish and shellfish a 20 decrease from 2007 and an 8 decrease from 2015

2 The decline in global squid production has been attributed to the strong El Nintildeo event in 2015ndash2016

107

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Mid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

Menhaden had the highest landings volume in the Mid-Atlantic Region accounting for 63 of landed weightCommercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Eastern oyster (381 320 in real terms)bull Squid (107 81 in real terms)bull Quahog clam (91 67 in real terms)From 2015bull Squid (81)bull Sea scallop (20)bull Blue crab (19)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Atlantic surfclam (-65 -70 in real terms)bull American lobster (-64 -69 in real terms)From 2015bull Eastern oyster (-25)bull Atlantic surfclam (-17)bull Menhaden (-10)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Eastern oyster (99)bull Squid (80)bull Quahog clam (51)From 2015bull Squid (94)bull Sea scallop (27)bull Quahog clam (20)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Atlantic surfclam (-66)bull American lobster (-62)bull Striped bass (-32)From 2015bull Summer flounder (-28)bull Eastern oyster (-22)bull Atlantic surfclam (-18)

From 2007 to 2016 Eastern oyster (99) squid (80) and quahog clam (51) had the largest landings increases while Atlantic surfclam (-66) American lobster (-62) and striped bass (-32) had the largest

landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 squid (94) sea scallop (27) and quahog clam (20) had the largest landings increases while summer flounder (-28) Eastern oyster (-22) and Atlantic surfclam (-18) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 sea scallop ($1158 per pound) received the highest Mid-Atlantic Region ex-vessel price Landings of menhaden ($010 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price From 2007 to 2016 Eastern oyster (142 111 in real terms) striped bass (99 74 in real terms) and sea scallop (79 57 in real terms) had the largest price increases while American lobster (-5 -17 in real terms) had the largest price decrease From 2015 to 2016 summer flounder (29) striped bass (17) and blue crab (9) had the largest price increases while quahog clam (-7) squid (-7) and sea scallop (-6) had the largest price decreases

RECREATIONAL FISHERIES In this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups3

Key Mid-Atlantic Region Recreational Species

bull Atlantic croakerbull Black sea bassbull Bluefishbull Scupbull Spot

bull Striped bassbull Summer flounderbull Tautogbull Weakfish drumbull Winter flounder

Economic Impacts and Expenditures The contribution of recreational fishing activities4 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean

3 Except where noted Atlantic and Gulf recreational catch and effort estimates are based upon the MRIP APAIS and CHTS (httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovrecreational-fisheriesSurveyssurvey-details) and not the revised MRIP estimates (httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovleadership-messagenoaa-fish-eries-releases-revised-mrip-recreational-catch-and-effort-estimates) released in 20184 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpswwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecre-ationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 avail-able at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

108

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

The greatest employment impacts from expenditures on saltwater recreational fishing in the Mid-Atlantic Region were generated in New Jersey (15400 jobs) followed by New York (10400 jobs) The largest sales impacts were observed in New Jersey ($18 billion) followed by New York ($11 billion) The biggest income impacts were generated in New Jersey ($7462 million) followed by New York ($488 million) The greatest value-added impacts were in New Jersey ($12 billion) followed by New York ($7702 million)

Recreational fishing expenditures (on both fishing trips and durable equipment purchases) across the Mid-Atlantic Region in 2016 totaled about $39 billion Trip expenditures totaled more than $6709 million with a large portion coming from trips in the private boat (59) and shore (27) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $33 billion with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($19 billion) Fishing TripsIn 2016 recreational fishermen took 14 million fishing

trips in the Mid-Atlantic Region This number represented a 37 decrease from 2007 and a 13 increase from 2015 The largest proportions of trips were taken in the private boat mode (55) and shore mode (41) States with the highest number of recorded trips were New Jersey (43 million trips) and New York (43 million trips)

ParticipationIn 2016 there were 24 million recreational anglers who fished in the Mid-Atlantic Region This number represented a 30 decrease from 2007 and a 21 increase from 2015 These anglers were Mid-Atlantic Region residents from either a coastal county (93) or non-coastal county (7)

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Porgies (scup) (33)bull Black sea bass (21)bull Wrasses (tautog) (8)From 2015bull Winter flounder (97)bull Wrasses (tautog) (51)bull Black sea bass (47)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Drum (spot) (-86)bull Drum (Atlantic croaker) (-68)bull Winter flounder (-63)From 2015bull Drum (Atlantic croaker) (-22)bull Drum (weakfish) (-2)

Harvest and ReleaseOf the Mid-Atlantic Regionrsquos key species and species groups summer flounder (122 million fish) black sea bass (93 million fish) and striped bass (86 million fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 porgies (scup) (33) black sea bass (21) and wrasses (tautog) (8) had the largest increases in catch while drum (spot) (-86) drum (Atlantic croaker) (-68) and winter flounder (-63) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 winter flounder (97) wrasses (tautog) (51) and black sea

109

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Mid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

bass (47) had the largest increases in catch while drum (Atlantic croaker) (-22) and drum (weakfish) (-2) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMY For this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries56

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy7 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average The Bureau of Labor Statistics suppressed the CFLQ value for Delaware for 2015 Of the remaining states in the Mid-Atlantic Region New Jersey had the highest CFLQ at 087

In 2015 11 million employer establishments operated throughout the entire Mid-Atlantic Region (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed over 17 million workers and had a total annual payroll of $1 trillion The combined gross state product of Delaware Maryland New Jersey New York and Virginia was approximately $29 trillion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 the Mid-Atlantic Region had 360 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 71 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $255 million (a 53 increase

in real terms from 2007) There were 67 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 20 decrease from 2007) The greatest number of seafood product preparation and packaging establishments was located in New York (200) followed by Virginia (102) and Maryland (70)

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 420 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the five states that make up the Mid-Atlantic Region (a 24 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $371 million (a 38 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 676 employer firms in the retail sales of seafood sector (a 2 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 3463 workers (a 14 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $894 million (a 28 increase in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of retail seafood establishments was located in New York (581) followed by New Jersey (185) and Maryland (166)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 477 employer firms in the wholesale sales of seafood sector in the Mid-Atlantic Region in 2015 (a 12 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 3943 workers and had a total annual payroll of $186 million The greatest number of wholesale seafood establishments was located in New York (275) followed by New Jersey (78) and Virginia (65)

Transport Support and Marine Operations Data for the transport support and marine operations sector of the Mid-Atlantic Regionrsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons These sectors however play an important role in the regional economy For example the regionrsquos ship and boatbuilding sector accounted for over $2 billion in payroll in 2015 The marine cargo handling sector in Delaware Maryland New Jersey and New York totaled $5793 million in payroll in 2015

5 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)6 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)7 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

Tables | Mid-Atlantic Region

112

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMid-Atlantic Region | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Mid-Atlantic Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Landings Value Value Jobs Sales Income Jobs Sales IncomeRevenue Added AddedDelaware 10097 711 135690 25669 44201 389 49444 10472 16794Maryland 94814 12084 1241437 334891 503948 7794 455214 167654 228300New Jersey 193011 37127 6226130 1412545 2282101 8244 737544 245105 351891New York 47731 33081 4411529 949879 1567277 3400 175363 60931 85227Virginia 204690 18220 1434996 463734 660196 15852 972185 371324 502628

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 423232 452636 435847 521140 552315 510297 435977 476778 513724 550343Finfish amp Other 103372 91280 101445 111451 119630 130357 124379 119146 117041 108192Shellfish 319861 361356 334403 409690 432685 379941 311598 357633 396682 442150

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 8744 7213 5989 6265 4692 5271 4063 3731 3195 3132Atlantic surfclam 32479 30019 26426 19940 18737 16501 13688 12792 13581 11212Blue crab 69498 80912 80019 127737 101630 101942 86787 88992 98759 117454Eastern oyster 9039 11205 9356 12038 13043 20231 37230 54577 57914 43459Menhaden 29918 24457 28581 40315 39666 40043 33780 33332 40358 36243Quahog clam 23601 35853 23022 28880 27607 29502 35902 38153 40377 45021Sea scallop 147053 165916 161814 184288 227443 168921 100411 125680 150716 180147Squid 7443 7724 7158 12031 20646 17819 12078 8294 8529 15443Striped bass 10993 10671 11459 9450 10520 14622 19792 16553 13181 14837Summer flounder 10855 9693 9980 12849 15614 17194 17131 13195 14576 13478

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 749980 687788 694960 812857 797355 759928 582307 595351 650684 597535Finfish amp Other 555560 481567 489221 578227 574674 568026 444182 455886 506475 437180Shellfish 194420 206221 205739 234630 222681 191901 138125 139464 144209 160355

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 1604 1520 1576 1549 1086 1271 980 818 632 602Atlantic surfclam 53952 48099 41692 30946 30272 26535 22788 21430 22452 18328Blue crab 65070 67975 76097 119286 104414 88964 55424 54407 67949 74064Eastern oyster 2388 1778 1438 1770 2038 2749 4311 5456 6067 4750Menhaden 472086 397537 395469 499578 496829 492532 366343 379997 436568 375201Quahog clam 4115 5246 3255 3685 3551 3730 4586 5016 5154 6203Sea scallop 22793 24355 25646 23998 23385 17627 8855 10256 12202 15557Squid 8607 8241 8310 26822 33333 26069 14549 8142 7970 15454Striped bass 5477 5693 5852 5582 5461 5589 4709 5045 3853 3719Summer flounder 4725 4260 5137 6384 8672 7795 8010 4901 5031 3610

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

American lobster 545 475 380 404 432 415 414 456 506 520Atlantic surfclam 060 062 063 064 062 062 060 060 060 061Blue crab 107 119 105 107 097 115 157 164 145 159Eastern oyster 379 630 651 680 640 736 864 1000 955 915Menhaden 006 006 007 008 008 008 009 009 009 010Quahog clam 574 683 707 784 777 791 783 761 783 726Sea scallop 645 681 631 768 973 958 1134 1225 1235 1158Squid 086 094 086 045 062 068 083 102 107 100Striped bass 201 187 196 169 193 262 420 328 342 399Summer flounder 230 228 194 201 180 221 214 269 290 373

113

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Mid-Atlantic Region | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Mid-Atlantic Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars trips)Trips Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Delaware 910 1658 168169 67446 110381Maryland 2383 7608 784528 327372 512722New Jersey 4306 15363 1751578 746203 1167991New York 4294 10404 1127261 488015 770189Virginia 2108 5893 583806 239344 378694

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 91613Private Boat 398542Shore 180755Total 670909

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 835169Other Equipment 290995Boat Expenses 1925349Vehicle Expenses 199636Second Home Expenses 14542Total Durable Expenditures 3265692

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 3936601

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 3234 2823 2437 2598 2244 2093 2080 2111 1860 2238Non-Coastal 212 197 187 178 145 175 139 130 124 169Out-of-State NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 3446 3020 2623 2776 2389 2268 2219 2241 1984 2407

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 1690 1143 1111 873 1050 951 1365 1258 1316 624Private 12371 11566 9708 9366 8512 7676 6851 7633 6082 7682Shore 8125 8005 6196 6346 6413 5805 6000 5455 5022 5695Total Trips 22186 20714 17015 16585 15976 14432 14216 14346 12420 14001

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bassH 1302 926 1335 1317 532 1134 786 1049 1306 1460R 6403 8475 6273 6458 3203 7666 5110 4997 5026 7842

BluefishH 4947 3515 2933 2560 2467 2640 2167 3210 1635 1928R 8011 7211 4457 3936 4242 4269 2463 4049 2612 2985

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 8583 9978 7308 6019 3993 4788 6571 5165 4406 3244R 11025 12910 9405 6232 5390 8429 10516 5638 3567 3001

Drum (spot)H 11998 6557 4346 3698 4032 2849 5791 5444 1402 1536R 3940 4490 2238 2575 2610 2642 5798 1845 839 729

Drum (weakfish)

H 332 372 38 15 8 157 49 21 38 22R 1037 1987 180 459 469 955 211 217 509 517

Porgies (scup)H 1699 1543 1637 2736 770 714 1242 1228 1991 1570R 2500 3171 2292 2413 1041 1628 1967 1765 2260 4006

Striped bassH 1775 1683 1387 1407 1653 951 1478 1271 944 1271R 7730 4787 3802 3467 3781 3410 4706 4609 5414 7334

Summer flounder

H 2543 1724 1564 1226 1513 1968 2048 1995 1245 1650R 16577 18433 21371 21400 18466 13317 12128 15117 9621 10510

Winter flounder

H 108 44 76 56 92 44 6 37 6 46R 43 32 138 102 126 36 33 20 23 10

Wrasses (tautog)

H 728 669 692 761 352 165 236 547 278 403R 2202 1979 1911 2317 1531 1110 1219 1852 1823 2763

1 NA = data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but does not specify whether an angler resides in a region

Tables | Delaware

116

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oDelaware | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Delaware Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 711 135690 25669 44201 389 49444 10472 16794

Commercial Harvesters 190 18499 4402 5960 190 18499 4402 5960Seafood Processors amp Dealers 43 8539 1502 2888 36 7162 1260 2423

Importers 237 73132 11721 22294 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 63 9472 3602 4294 24 3618 1376 1640

Retail 178 26049 4442 8764 138 20165 3434 6771

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 7931 6900 7543 7845 7092 8464 7422 7220 6846 10097

Finfish amp Other 1303 1092 1004 1047 1248 1012 1493 1219 1075 1070Shellfish 6628 5808 6538 6798 5844 7452 5929 6001 5771 9027

Key SpeciesAmerican eel 292 190 134 206 274 159 244 156 127 130Black sea bass 198 156 25 8 2 0 2 NA 304 7Blue crab 5329 4605 5435 5957 4819 6664 4576 4379 4498 7856Eastern oyster 490 410 334 404 347 345 407 420 358 462Quahog clam 181 127 117 110 143 123 177 133 97 65Sea scallop NA 256 173 NA NA NA NA NA NA NASpot 57 40 49 50 66 16 64 104 3 23Striped bass 300 403 327 400 412 470 766 496 465 505Weakfish 31 18 5 4 2 56 16 7 3 8Whelks 540 352 389 272 361 83 414 577 436 333

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 5346 4706 5011 5214 4921 5640 4048 3727 3529 4980

Finfish amp Other 899 630 773 718 881 628 774 853 658 519Shellfish 4448 4076 4238 4496 4040 5012 3274 2874 2871 4461

Key SpeciesAmerican eel 131 80 60 69 91 54 83 62 45 45Black sea bass 73 61 6 3 4 0 4 NA 112 2Blue crab 3799 3508 3414 4110 3502 4571 2488 2000 2124 3928Eastern oyster 80 67 67 71 62 60 71 73 61 73Quahog clam 44 36 31 30 39 32 43 41 30 17Sea scallop NA 38 25 NA NA NA NA NA NA NASpot 62 32 61 60 82 18 73 107 3 14Striped bass 143 189 184 185 185 190 187 167 144 137Weakfish 25 11 3 2 1 29 9 4 1 5Whelks 288 217 313 138 131 29 156 229 177 126

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American eel 222 238 224 300 303 293 294 250 283 293Black sea bass 273 257 431 263 050 085 050 NA 273 450Blue crab 140 131 159 145 138 146 184 219 212 200Eastern oyster 614 609 497 567 556 576 571 571 585 635Quahog clam 409 357 379 369 372 384 407 325 326 380Sea scallop NA 681 680 NA NA NA NA NA NA NASpot 092 124 081 084 081 089 088 097 093 165Striped bass 209 213 177 216 222 247 409 298 323 370Weakfish 127 175 193 156 201 195 185 187 192 181Whelks 188 162 124 197 276 289 266 251 246 263

1 NA = these data are confidential therefore not disclosable

117

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Delaware | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Delaware Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 20 2666 1003 1480Private Boat 99 11581 2921 5394Shore 277 25987 7737 13995

Total Durable Expenditures 1262 127935 55785 89512Total State Economic Impacts 1658 168169 67446 110381

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 1678Private Boat 11500Shore 22756Total 35934

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 41297Other Equipment 13820Boat Expenses 79480Vehicle Expenses 7711Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 142308

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 178242

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 150 134 114 128 129 111 82 93 67 104Non-Coastal NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAOut-of-State 224 182 173 165 190 151 97 146 84 168Total Anglers 374 315 287 293 318 262 179 239 151 272

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 71 55 44 21 18 20 37 40 38 13Private 721 528 487 408 511 481 349 363 195 312Shore 459 444 379 391 397 374 378 464 262 585Total Trips 1251 1028 911 819 926 875 765 867 495 910

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic mackerel

H 0 0 0 0 0 0 lt 1 0 lt 1 0R 0 0 2 0 0 lt 1 lt 1 0 0 lt 1

Black sea bassH 93 23 37 21 43 40 37 24 23 24R 584 464 293 231 211 204 249 229 167 289

BluefishH 153 69 98 32 46 36 25 128 59 42R 538 167 167 57 128 118 70 324 132 151

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 359 369 452 75 92 88 232 413 145 8R 673 602 538 229 89 447 770 665 119 171

Drum (weakfish)

H 4 4 6 lt 1 lt 1 4 8 3 lt 1 lt 1R 23 61 4 13 7 85 22 23 16 26

Striped bassH 8 27 20 16 18 25 20 9 3 2R 249 261 146 65 110 110 83 185 44 116

Summer flounder

H 108 35 87 54 67 45 58 93 51 90R 1072 605 964 619 616 253 238 292 156 285

White perchH 34 40 64 187 112 70 119 106 34 4R 191 243 121 397 272 187 369 65 106 19

Wrasses (tautog)

H 100 102 120 57 45 47 38 50 7 30R 267 164 224 196 88 107 99 77 27 163

Yellowfin tunaH lt 1 1 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 1 lt 1 lt 1R 0 0 lt 1 0 lt 1 0 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 0

1 Data is not available because all Delaware residents are considered coastal county residents2 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 ish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

118

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oDelaware | Marine Economy

2015 Delaware State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 59078 (02) 24852 (03) 397385 (03) 2131 (03) 3063 (03) 6886 (04) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms ds 3 NA ds ds ds ds ds dsReceipts ds 27 NA ds ds ds ds ds ds

Seafood salesretail

Firms 12 9 10 9 9 11 8 13 11Receipts 1025 418 813 1107 1226 1333 520 452 479

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 3 6 7 7 7 7 9 8 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 54

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds 3020 2381 2404

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 19 18 16 15 18 16 17 17 14Employees 105 ds 50 47 49 ds 60 52 36

Payroll 2997 1498 1348 1414 1493 1545 1396 1261 1224

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 1Employees ds ds ds ds NA NA NA NA ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds NA NA NA NA ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 0 4 4 5 2 1 1 2 4Employees NA ds ds 120 ds ds ds ds 98

Payroll NA ds ds 10768 ds ds ds ds 8771Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 1Employees NA NA NA ds NA NA ds ds ds

Payroll NA NA NA ds NA NA ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 17 19 16 19 17 18 19 18 18

Employees 88 65 ds 65 ds 67 64 95 86Payroll 2540 1738 1877 2342 3106 1963 2196 2293 2527

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3Employees 527 629 ds 434 511 ds 565 541 577

Payroll 19027 19204 16952 16835 19203 ds 20698 22789 23370Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 8 9 8 8 8 8 8 10 10Employees 76 79 85 76 78 ds 82 92 81

Payroll 4961 5360 5672 5176 5096 3111 5330 5350 5938

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 2 2 3 3 4 3 2 2Employees ds ds ds 29 44 ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds 1182 1512 ds ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 1 2 2 2 3 4 4 6 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds 50 61 55 57

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds 2313 2516 2174 2168

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Maryland

120

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMaryland | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Maryland Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 12084 1241437 334891 503948 7794 455214 167654 228300

Commercial Harvesters 3115 167264 47699 74435 3115 167264 47699 74435Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1310 129799 50582 64590 706 69971 27267 34819

Importers 1977 611003 97925 186261 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 544 80243 27277 36218 223 32895 11182 14847

Retail 5137 253128 111409 142444 3750 185085 81507 104199

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 65329 73196 75893 103825 82567 85069 75860 91051 88839 94814Finfish amp Other 12252 11264 11691 13012 13126 15724 17217 18846 16293 16042Shellfish 53077 61933 64202 90813 69441 69345 58643 72205 72546 78772

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 335 442 415 482 482 663 450 492 360 146Black sea bass 454 445 451 590 507 421 702 834 859 898Blue crab 41690 50115 52049 79055 60326 60467 49956 52848 52026 60677Clams or bivalves 5074 5436 4403 5400 4173 2259 362 1253 1915 3563Eastern oyster 3146 2277 3849 4385 3691 5710 7357 15687 15093 12265Menhaden 1379 915 884 729 685 1669 861 1380 1253 987Sea scallop 2809 3758 3160 1188 551 202 8 1328 3077 1783Striped bass 5333 5232 5180 5425 5623 6933 9931 8092 6357 7102Summer flounder 546 578 551 541 463 380 519 598 770 624White perch 619 776 942 1154 1493 1430 1029 1360 1317 1221

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 61585 63534 66819 101739 76258 75416 43374 49922 54248 56316Finfish amp Other 21644 18732 20038 27229 18582 27350 16904 21201 21580 17917Shellfish 39942 44802 46781 74510 57675 48066 26470 28721 32667 38399

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 576 778 550 589 804 1041 855 504 358 162Black sea bass 171 159 126 203 167 141 219 252 263 272Blue crab 30778 34872 38801 66262 51163 43737 24179 24690 28674 34861Clams or bivalves 7947 8600 6292 6971 5412 2962 609 1955 1983 2224Eastern oyster 317 249 498 432 356 618 788 1196 1191 887Menhaden 13751 9615 9419 15467 8016 16383 7298 8363 8989 6098Sea scallop 450 569 521 153 58 20 1 110 248 149Striped bass 2640 2655 2812 2510 2343 2541 2018 2353 1752 1709Summer flounder 229 208 214 261 259 165 178 192 244 159White perch 973 858 1301 1700 2059 1956 1244 1516 1698 1851

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atlantic croaker 058 057 075 082 060 064 053 098 101 090Black sea bass 266 279 359 290 304 299 320 331 327 330Blue crab 135 144 134 119 118 138 207 214 181 174Clams or bivalves 064 063 070 077 077 076 059 064 097 160Eastern oyster 992 913 773 1015 1037 924 934 1311 1267 1383Menhaden 010 010 009 005 009 010 012 017 014 016Sea scallop 625 660 606 777 953 1023 1227 1211 124 1194Striped bass 202 197 184 216 240 273 492 344 363 415Summer flounder 239 278 258 207 178 230 292 311 316 393White perch 064 090 072 068 073 073 083 090 078 066

121

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Maryland | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Maryland Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 395 41511 15987 23622Private Boat 468 47234 17255 26957Shore 461 42382 15513 25445

Total Durable Expenditures 6284 653401 278617 436698Total State Economic Impacts 7608 784528 327372 512722

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 27564Private Boat 58098Shore 38494Total 124156

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 142447Other Equipment 65672Boat Expenses 398169Vehicle Expenses 48903Second Home Expenses 3479Total Durable Expenditures 658670

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 782826

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 850 643 514 552 415 374 404 413 364 453Non-Coastal 78 50 43 54 49 40 36 41 31 23Out-of-State 528 507 327 462 372 258 329 338 352 352Total Anglers 1456 1200 884 1068 836 672 769 792 748 829

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 270 194 203 139 161 151 154 211 180 128Private 2352 1891 1608 1643 1453 1281 1576 1388 1477 1450Shore 1082 1273 1082 1150 1206 817 1005 874 662 805Total Trips 3704 3358 2893 2932 2819 2249 2735 2473 2319 2383

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bassH 39 26 33 36 47 33 30 68 58 80R 577 674 454 669 353 290 350 501 302 404

BluefishH 676 551 591 273 259 114 54 160 102 113R 1172 1631 670 161 408 138 259 142 194 136

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 873 620 1335 1137 554 979 1140 1080 815 188R 1258 2127 1138 1011 366 1731 2937 1146 627 245

Drum (spot)H 3615 1892 2064 1164 913 766 936 1254 524 467R 1619 1738 633 1155 297 920 2622 566 243 230

Striped bassH 765 415 502 458 445 262 477 583 406 596R 3065 1339 1423 1509 1128 2207 2387 2415 3118 4511

Summer flounder

H 104 58 65 25 15 23 53 80 44 22R 1018 923 816 1225 473 214 280 631 244 382

Weakfish drum

H 7 2 4 5 lt 1 11 2 1 3 1R 64 37 8 163 18 25 10 5 118 81

White perchH 2890 1511 551 2613 1572 1534 2258 808 710 1945R 5424 3853 1137 2891 2348 4143 6295 2164 2125 2344

Wrasses (tautog)

H 43 19 38 57 12 5 4 lt 1 3 2R 178 151 133 361 76 110 53 2 79 80

Yellowfin tunaH 4 lt 1 5 1 lt 1 0 2 10 5 11R lt 1 0 2 lt 1 0 0 4 1 0 13

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 ish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

122

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMaryland | Marine Economy

2015 Maryland State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 473516 (19) 137204 (18) 2239817 (18) 1185 (19) 20255 (21) 36624 (2) 048

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 56 56 42 43 55 67 49 60 53Receipts 3940 3310 2268 2138 2374 3030 3158 3230 3133

Seafood salesretail

Firms 99 84 94 85 86 96 95 87 87Receipts 10493 9010 8819 6177 7396 6454 6147 8437 8104

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 22 22 19 18 17 16 16 17 17Employees 1296 1003 245 273 264 266 309 284 288

Payroll 32386 39328 13049 12652 12773 13587 12455 13131 13631

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 62 60 61 63 57 60 58 58 53Employees 978 851 777 795 775 724 636 630 605

Payroll 50353 42296 39055 39067 38971 34194 30119 31503 33739

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 102 94 87 87 88 87 87 83 79Employees 613 590 485 526 562 575 574 562 539

Payroll 14777 11510 11499 11810 12883 13027 13623 13907 15033

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 8 6 7 8 6 4 4 8 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds 538 ds ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 14 13 15 15 16 14 10 11 11Employees 244 250 255 390 329 245 139 135 118

Payroll 14905 19765 20722 24185 25071 17938 10041 11600 11097Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 3 2 1 0 0 1 0 0Employees ds ds ds ds NA NA ds NA NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds NA NA ds NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 183 179 176 175 172 159 170 166 172

Employees 1326 1383 1289 1275 1294 1276 1328 1366 1380Payroll 48752 45965 45483 43508 43330 43531 45540 47443 50633

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 15 15 16 17 17 6 12 12 12Employees 1791 1572 1599 2742 1924 ds 1519 1132 1140

Payroll 85328 48382 46727 95182 86680 ds 60500 60962 81751Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 8 9 11 10 11 10 11 10 11Employees 157 92 77 84 84 ds 245 131 125

Payroll 4882 3968 3807 4015 4259 ds 17066 6345 6411

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 8 3 4 5 5 22 16 17 15Employees 323 ds ds ds ds 1875 962 1220 1349

Payroll 13427 ds ds ds ds 93001 44436 57543 55375

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 48 46 38 35 35 34 31 35 36Employees 874 677 416 ds 633 378 371 449 456

Payroll 29500 22363 16238 ds 36675 14619 16822 18130 20599

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | New Jersey

124

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNew Jersey | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the New Jersey Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 37127 6226130 1412545 2282101 8244 737544 245105 351891

Commercial Harvesters 2935 384655 101056 163908 2935 384655 101056 163908Seafood Processors amp Dealers 5099 529766 200633 261867 753 78228 29627 38669

Importers 13585 4198321 672861 1279832 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 2172 388025 124711 169583 217 38701 12439 16914

Retail 13337 725362 313284 406911 4339 235959 101984 132401

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 151509 168508 151539 178572 220377 187707 132860 149301 166181 193011Finfish amp Other 24234 19936 24074 23031 26808 28639 25951 24911 29095 26218Shellfish 127275 148572 127465 155540 193569 159068 106909 124390 137086 166794

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 4056 3215 2278 2895 3039 3938 2797 2380 2249 1892Atlantic herring 562 548 1507 422 415 147 401 615 308 292Atlantic mackerel 668 1568 1539 848 53 589 18 12 546 79Blue crab 5471 7284 184 12030 9422 10009 8111 4145 8704 7696Eastern oyster NA 2547 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAGoosefish 4486 4005 3018 2752 3654 3301 2453 2428 2364 2470Ocean quahog amp surfclams 26547 30838 27496 23889 25301 25453 22962 11455 10889 9970Quahog clam 968 6254 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASea scallop 77359 91317 90150 109118 142505 110560 65190 87746 97856 123266Summer flounder 3988 3461 3376 4552 5461 5434 4899 4862 5059 5389

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 153848 162308 162029 162164 187539 180505 119912 125114 148419 123565Finfish amp Other 65166 62821 73623 74881 94678 104174 61790 64901 94220 62297Shellfish 88683 99487 88406 87282 92861 76331 58122 60213 54198 61268

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 680 633 585 689 687 919 660 526 445 351Atlantic herring 6038 6539 13692 4140 2385 1114 2344 4087 3428 2798Atlantic mackerel 5384 9426 10255 4692 107 2017 46 17 2188 306Blue crab 4636 5816 257 9461 9600 7393 4391 3233 7247 6910Eastern oyster NA 550 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAGoosefish 4231 3698 2692 2024 2274 2212 2231 2172 1903 1885Ocean quahog amp surfclams 44791 51597 45306 38538 41281 38921 35960 19447 18283 16492Quahog clam 240 1516 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASea scallop 11808 13282 14045 14171 14545 11379 5640 7133 7847 10481Summer flounder 1697 1541 1799 2165 2831 2269 2004 1826 1682 1286

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American lobster 596 508 389 420 442 428 423 452 505 538Atlantic herring 009 008 011 010 017 013 017 015 009 010Atlantic mackerel 012 017 015 018 050 029 040 073 025 026Blue crab 118 125 072 127 098 135 185 128 120 111Eastern oyster NA 463 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAGoosefish 106 108 112 136 161 149 110 112 124 131Ocean quahog amp surfclams 059 060 061 062 061 065 064 059 060 060Quahog clam 404 412 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASea scallop 655 688 642 770 980 972 1156 1230 1247 1176Summer flounder 235 225 188 210 193 239 244 266 301 419

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

125

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New Jersey | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of New Jersey Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 221 33359 14459 20176Private Boat 1138 154152 54285 87574Shore 594 71915 26791 43350

Total Durable Expenditures 13410 1492152 650668 1016891Total State Economic Impacts 15363 1751578 746203 1167991

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 19646Private Boat 138129Shore 59141Total 216915

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 302804Other Equipment 90772Boat Expenses 711797Vehicle Expenses 76099Second Home Expenses 3715Total Durable Expenditures 1185188

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1402103

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 890 765 656 776 687 662 581 607 515 507Non-Coastal 19 26 35 36 23 27 20 17 24 32Out-of-State 518 456 454 449 357 431 330 566 448 378Total Anglers 1427 1246 1145 1261 1067 1121 931 1189 987 916

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 605 449 434 320 383 369 550 514 466 183Private 3614 3595 2671 3265 2446 2580 1914 2508 1877 2347Shore 2979 2857 2234 2278 2334 2072 1900 1846 1945 1776Total Trips 7198 6901 5339 5863 5163 5020 4364 4868 4287 4306

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Black sea bass

H 725 580 583 687 148 735 345 468 310 294R 2423 4432 3138 3870 1302 3818 2546 2243 2053 2454

Bluefin tuna

H 7 3 14 6 2 lt 1 9 5 lt 1 2R lt 1 1 2 7 6 0 0 lt 1 lt 1 4

Bluefish H 1654 1028 814 910 1150 1190 792 1343 827 924R 2735 1477 1476 1886 1911 1996 884 1853 1055 1675

Drum (weakfish)

H 230 298 12 2 3 114 31 7 30 7R 613 1436 79 103 100 732 94 80 246 136

Red hake H 1 152 240 124 206 58 82 177 19 29R 0 20 23 24 13 15 55 13 6 7

Striped bass

H 290 309 283 320 393 169 401 226 284 271R 1789 1309 801 690 884 406 1073 1051 859 794

Summer flounder

H 1067 762 825 552 737 1130 1232 1175 497 755R 6192 8959 10414 10565 8096 6981 6427 9513 4677 6114

Winter flounder

H 97 3 7 24 28 lt 1 5 13 lt 1 19R 28 15 27 38 25 2 29 9 22 7

Wrasses (tautog)

H 300 173 127 375 137 38 111 170 157 83R 1290 902 856 1063 843 510 461 778 683 693

Yellowfin tuna

H 58 7 7 25 17 69 95 7 7 17R 0 1 16 lt 1 lt 1 9 7 0 9 12

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 ish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

126

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNew Jersey | Marine Economy

2015 New Jersey State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 653271 (27) 230961 (3) 3558619 (29) 20907 (33) 30841 (32) 56436 (31) 087

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 25 22 33 47 29 35 48 45 39Receipts 2399 1851 3670 3613 3447 3565 4981 5736 3603

Seafood salesretail

Firms 90 92 86 66 68 77 74 74 70Receipts 11320 11196 11131 8265 8049 8972 8257 7135 7711

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 16 14 13 11 12 11 13 13 15Employees 628 566 661 482 518 404 671 647 715

Payroll 18403 18703 22025 17427 17940 13747 22764 21933 25929

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 101 81 83 90 91 82 80 78 78Employees 978 856 858 848 935 1058 765 795 784

Payroll 41994 37462 37348 38065 40103 44033 37405 36773 39900

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 124 118 106 108 109 114 114 108 115Employees 472 368 332 332 332 382 419 434 446

Payroll 10352 9372 9126 9094 9264 11561 11657 12520 12591

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 23 18 19 18 20 16 16 13 13Employees 778 645 594 600 508 402 367 365 414

Payroll 56017 48911 41925 44246 40587 32007 32431 33308 37888

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 31 27 26 26 26 25 20 21 24Employees 566 1115 1045 ds ds 390 225 212 193

Payroll 44133 75848 66547 78898 81936 27481 12263 11271 11522Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 2 2 3 2 2 2 0 2 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds NA ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds NA ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 216 211 214 212 206 210 206 190 196

Employees 1045 916 784 781 773 811 787 737 776Payroll 41624 39596 35811 35475 34675 35760 37606 36583 38469

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 23 21 22 21 22 15 20 21 20Employees 4781 4244 3479 3292 3744 2582 6912 6082 5005

Payroll 350690 278189 230886 260894 273636 203148 538991 563746 521401Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 26 20 19 16 17 18 18 18 20Employees 227 191 133 75 110 96 106 92 88

Payroll 11403 7776 6638 6125 5619 5983 6057 5597 6914

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 8 6 6 11 7 25 18 18 17Employees 271 143 54 124 163 ds ds ds 106

Payroll 12197 12446 5548 10463 16933 139276 5995 6334 6305

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 31 30 25 24 23 21 24 24 23Employees 2305 2019 1188 1056 864 901 917 1080 1329

Payroll 91460 79309 42909 37920 39810 36334 41886 50459 59130

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = data not available

Tables | New York

128

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNew York | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the New York Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 33081 4411529 949879 1567277 3400 175363 60931 85227

Commercial Harvesters 1591 85636 24618 37859 1591 85636 24618 37859Seafood Processors amp Dealers 709 114261 43444 56508 119 19233 7313 9512

Importers 10815 3342329 535672 1018888 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 3235 261688 88467 119283 117 9480 3205 4321

Retail 16730 607617 257679 334739 1572 61015 25796 33536

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 60314 57429 48856 47717 48303 54524 56809 56316 51372 47731Finfish amp Other 19936 18534 17331 18575 20087 23515 23271 19688 19261 19067Shellfish 40378 38896 31525 29142 28215 31009 33537 36628 32112 28665

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 4623 3821 3468 3165 1398 999 938 985 710 1035Atlantic surfclam 5932 5670 5858 3929 545 2783 2410 1338 1530 1242Eastern oyster 2627 2870 1428 2046 2174 2227 4149 9372 6196 NALoligo squid 5157 5290 4167 4516 7250 8648 5949 5448 5413 7795Quahog clam 14224 13185 8397 7774 6905 9218 13475 11777 12244 11914Scups or porgies 2348 1710 1887 2112 2551 3536 2971 2313 3138 2905Sea scallop 3872 5050 5018 3778 4960 4083 2602 2963 978 3783Softshell clam 1628 1076 700 709 351 332 848 982 1427 NASummer flounder 3131 2933 3087 3550 3732 3653 3197 2997 3043 2524Tilefishes 3843 3343 3262 4077 4525 4260 4676 4255 3656 2985

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 35785 34175 34304 33267 32010 35864 33366 27377 27002 29152

Finfish amp Other 15696 14686 15867 18275 18442 18864 18369 15645 15660 15450Shellfish 20089 19489 18438 14992 13567 17000 14997 11732 11343 13702

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 912 850 932 814 344 275 248 223 147 218Atlantic surfclam 9161 8753 8799 5857 809 4117 3452 1983 2266 1836Eastern oyster 124 135 64 81 98 108 204 422 241 NALoligo squid 5437 5469 4098 3900 5630 7838 4985 5138 4259 6275Quahog clam 1592 1476 1410 1216 1131 1299 1932 1781 1898 2166Scups or porgies 2325 1214 1850 2690 3729 4307 4574 3175 4050 3506Sea scallop 619 782 918 508 522 430 256 262 87 398Softshell clam 198 131 114 116 57 54 138 160 194 NASummer flounder 942 856 1142 1364 1517 1238 1033 833 830 603Tilefishes 1393 1199 1435 1586 1521 1413 1468 1383 936 745

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American lobster 507 449 372 389 406 363 378 442 482 474Atlantic surfclam 065 065 067 067 067 068 070 067 068 068Eastern oyster 2121 2121 2223 2541 2223 2058 2032 2223 2570 NALoligo squid 095 097 102 116 129 110 119 106 127 124Quahog clam 894 893 596 639 610 710 697 661 645 550Scups or porgies 101 141 102 079 068 082 065 073 077 083Sea scallop 625 646 547 744 950 950 1018 1133 1121 951Softshell clam 823 824 613 613 613 613 613 613 735 NASummer flounder 333 343 270 260 246 295 309 360 367 419Tilefishes 276 279 227 257 297 301 318 308 390 401

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

129

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New York | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of New York Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 450 63405 26298 36650Private Boat 781 78747 29530 48514Shore 292 24997 9322 15200

Total Durable Expenditures 8881 960112 422865 669825Total State Economic Impacts 10404 1127261 488015 770189

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 38058Private Boat 117183Shore 29688Total 184929

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 221233Other Equipment 75713Boat Expenses 527516Vehicle Expenses 41535Second Home Expenses 529Total Durable Expenditures 866527

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1051456

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 881 817 638 646 497 533 595 657 555 780Non-Coastal 39 32 21 24 18 30 8 19 10 29Out-of-State 147 118 58 69 46 53 93 155 53 113Total Anglers 1067 967 717 740 561 616 695 830 618 922

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 684 388 381 348 458 366 565 439 567 261Private 3315 3199 2819 2351 2320 1908 1711 2165 1407 2321Shore 2522 2341 1625 1675 1389 1492 1597 1351 1261 1712Total Trips 6521 5928 4824 4374 4168 3766 3873 3955 3235 4294

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic herring2

H 214 69 4 79 76 174 222 188 1462 268R 230 50 0 17 lt 1 0 59 15 25 15

Black sea bass

H 410 260 566 543 274 322 353 469 877 1033R 1549 1655 1236 1163 893 2471 1372 1447 2234 4043

BluefishH 2151 1484 1293 1026 927 1150 1108 1424 509 686R 2650 3224 1793 1471 1598 1809 1030 1543 1055 845

Drum (weakfish)

H 4 40 0 3 lt 1 5 7 lt 1 lt 1 2R 109 25 3 3 55 11 6 lt 1 4 2

Porgies (scup)

H 1596 1451 1460 1990 715 592 1096 1182 1957 1255R 1964 2838 2124 1864 998 1235 1865 1730 2136 3707

Shortfin mako shark

H lt 1 lt 1 0 1 0 lt 1 0 11 7 lt 1R 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 11 9 9

Striped bass

H 474 686 356 538 675 425 491 392 154 290R 1678 1346 1073 1069 1506 586 990 703 592 1107

Summer flounder

H 866 609 299 334 376 509 518 508 492 712R 5272 5521 5564 6571 7295 5013 4667 4041 3929 3553

Winter flounder

H 11 41 69 31 65 43 1 24 5 28R 15 17 110 63 101 33 3 11 1 3

Wrasses (tautog)

H 224 319 346 146 111 62 77 300 99 271R 387 728 665 567 487 365 590 939 1018 1766

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 ish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish2 This species may not be equivalent to species with similar names listed in the commercial tables

130

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNew York | Marine Economy

2015 New York State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 1674297 (69) 540298 (7) 7998994 (64) 51308 (82) 78066 (81) 144561 (81) 013

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 68 73 101 115 142 133 150 181 183Receipts 3516 3383 4896 6784 7380 8279 9946 10681 12890

Seafood salesretail

Firms 266 247 196 214 183 205 197 188 172Receipts 23157 23983 19753 18999 16286 16714 15923 14369 13299

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 15 17 15 15 18 17 17 17 17Employees 294 379 ds 272 299 265 280 ds 310

Payroll 18723 18570 15227 16976 21372 25666 22776 22687 24100

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 291 231 246 263 291 243 264 270 275Employees 2058 1627 1741 1798 1876 1839 1937 2051 2056

Payroll 84361 72233 68345 72442 76970 78324 84346 87511 93859

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 372 368 386 394 391 385 399 401 409Employees 1575 1470 1509 1586 1660 1674 1796 2054 2163

Payroll 28497 30741 31640 32001 35664 38721 45049 51605 53952

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 50 50 48 65 62 42 59 72 73Employees 1746 1759 2299 1654 1708 ds ds ds 1551

Payroll 125570 160735 198352 136577 154087 ds ds ds 185742

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 34 29 32 30 31 23 20 23 22Employees ds 732 782 704 752 214 ds ds 174

Payroll 65632 108744 89313 98499 88354 31229 22691 19387 26452Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 4 3 4 2 1 2 3 2 2Employees 7 ds 8 ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll 240 316 126 ds ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 411 419 418 429 431 415 424 427 429

Employees 2070 2263 2099 2052 2033 1868 1907 1986 1930Payroll 88862 100910 96640 94654 96408 87124 93212 95900 99181

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 12 10 9 13 12 6 9 12 11Employees ds ds ds 1086 1019 ds 922 835 577

Payroll ds ds ds 68555 66439 ds 60079 52523 52731Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 36 32 37 37 35 53 33 36 33Employees 578 386 312 598 596 712 687 722 695

Payroll 40976 23294 19126 50119 54406 63334 68141 74395 73699

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 5 3 4 8 9 18 15 15 14Employees ds ds ds ds 33 1294 196 168 230

Payroll ds ds ds 568 1493 105325 12358 10342 13774

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 53 49 47 41 43 49 45 42 42Employees 643 688 585 575 552 560 ds ds 487

Payroll 26653 30462 28880 26771 25998 24599 24338 28028 25591

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Tables | Virginia

132

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oVirginia | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Virginia Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 18220 1434996 463734 660196 15852 972185 371324 502628

Commercial Harvesters 4867 350620 112172 166798 4867 350620 112172 166798Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1592 156599 60928 78634 1540 151541 58961 76095

Importers 1251 386636 61966 117864 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 764 103879 35911 47860 523 71120 24586 32767

Retail 9747 437263 192757 249039 8921 398904 175605 226968

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 138149 146602 152017 183181 193976 174534 163027 172891 200485 204690Finfish amp Other 45646 40455 47345 55784 58360 61467 56447 54482 51318 45796Shellfish 92503 106147 104672 127397 135616 113067 106580 118409 149167 158894

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 4445 5269 6940 6025 4571 7532 6247 4186 4150 3173Black sea bass 663 759 569 928 1003 1401 1716 1365 1607 1938Blue crab 15793 18013 21169 29133 26274 24561 23991 27047 33104 40862Goosefish 781 951 631 594 752 1218 920 654 516 401Menhaden 25317 21271 23578 34476 32995 31107 25343 26046 28209 25856Oysters 2775 3101 3745 5202 6832 11949 25318 29099 36267 30732Sea Scallop 63013 65534 63312 70204 79427 54076 32610 33643 48806 51315Spot 3232 1171 3411 975 3431 769 2406 5763 2471 414Striped bass 3831 3378 4219 3635 4497 5542 5702 6390 4735 4968Summer flounder 3184 2719 2959 4202 5956 7725 8513 4733 5699 4933

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 493415 423066 426798 510474 496629 462503 381607 389211 417487 383523Finfish amp Other 452156 384698 378921 457124 442091 417011 346345 353287 374357 340998Shellfish 41259 38367 47877 53350 54538 45492 35262 35924 43130 42525

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 10588 11214 8576 7873 5569 6942 6325 4814 4582 3999Black sea bass 189 215 164 264 275 392 496 388 422 512Blue crab 25141 23243 32756 38490 39656 33144 24258 24205 29682 28135Goosefish 847 972 743 596 604 907 846 587 445 365Menhaden 420481 353895 351392 433241 414159 390318 317950 326817 353934 323146Oysters 1867 776 809 1187 1522 1963 3248 3765 4574 3790Sea Scallop 9916 9685 10137 9167 8260 5798 2958 2752 4020 4529Spot 4328 1977 3910 1024 3742 613 2085 3983 1576 281Striped bass 1962 2196 2109 2139 2077 2175 1680 1995 1441 1334Summer flounder 1856 1654 1980 2592 4065 4122 4794 2049 2274 1561

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atlantic croaker 042 047 081 077 082 109 099 087 091 079Black sea bass 350 352 346 352 365 357 346 352 380 379Blue crab 063 077 065 076 066 074 099 112 112 145Goosefish 092 098 085 100 125 134 109 111 116 110Menhaden 006 006 007 008 008 008 008 008 008 008Oysters 149 400 463 438 449 609 780 773 793 811Sea Scallop 635 677 625 766 962 933 1102 1223 1214 1133Spot 075 059 087 095 092 125 115 145 157 147Striped bass 195 154 200 170 216 255 339 320 329 373Summer flounder 172 164 149 162 147 187 178 231 251 316

133

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Virginia | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Virginia Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 58 6837 2581 3850Private Boat 612 61041 21280 35638Shore 381 33958 12700 21197

Total Durable Expenditures 4842 481970 202783 318009Total State Economic Impacts 5893 583806 239344 378694

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 4667Private Boat 73632Shore 30676Total 108975

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 127388Other Equipment 45018Boat Expenses 208387Vehicle Expenses 25388Second Home Expenses 6819Total Durable Expenditures 412999

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 521974

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 463 464 515 496 516 412 419 341 359 394Non-Coastal 76 89 87 63 56 78 74 53 59 86Out-of-State 297 338 305 279 320 193 267 206 203 244Total Anglers 836 891 907 838 892 684 760 600 620 724

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 60 57 48 45 30 45 59 53 65 39Private 2369 2353 2124 1700 1782 1426 1302 1209 1126 1252Shore 1083 1089 876 852 1086 1051 1120 920 892 817Total Trips 3511 3499 3048 2597 2899 2522 2480 2182 2083 2108

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bass H 36 38 115 30 19 4 21 19 39 29R 1271 1251 1153 525 444 883 593 578 270 652

Cobia H 10 5 17 7 4 1 11 6 21 27R 3 3 13 9 9 9 16 15 25 33

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 6945 8388 5327 4744 3306 3454 4307 3408 3330 3045R 8504 7807 7621 4824 4873 5100 6011 3622 2744 2544

Drum (spot) H 8203 4398 2147 1670 2967 1350 4265 3832 867 1058R 2157 1488 1458 1156 2245 1146 2214 1185 509 490

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 159 104 23 17 248 126 55 47 9 67R 363 367 171 550 1215 429 291 404 482 1653

Drum (weakfish)

H 87 28 16 4 4 22 2 9 4 11R 229 428 85 177 288 102 79 109 125 272

Red drum H 46 21 39 11 0 28 124 54 8 4R 111 237 178 29 61 2503 220 116 26 50

Striped bassH 238 245 226 74 122 70 89 61 96 111R 949 532 359 134 154 102 172 255 801 805

Summer flounder

H 397 260 289 260 318 260 186 139 159 72R 3023 2425 3613 2420 1987 857 515 640 615 177

Wrasses (tautog)

H 61 56 60 127 46 14 6 26 12 17R 80 34 34 129 36 17 16 56 16 61

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 ish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

134

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oVirginia | Marine Economy

2015 Virginia State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 560597 (23) 197384 (26) 3198718 (26) 16579 (27) 28014 (29) 48172 (27) 065

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 62 74 69 56 73 76 84 83 85Receipts 4845 5020 4053 3698 3792 4691 4276 5720 5849

Seafood salesretail

Firms 84 80 82 82 78 87 94 90 80Receipts 7265 8273 6642 6951 7819 8373 7612 7084 7489

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 30 26 25 23 18 19 18 20 17Employees 955 490 941 961 899 919 781 804 790

Payroll 34520 11366 30600 30460 33285 32955 30682 29763 31614

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 83 69 72 76 62 64 70 65 65Employees 734 621 519 518 469 492 483 448 444

Payroll 25365 17667 15620 17901 15733 14271 14719 14769 16089

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 73 68 62 59 58 51 55 57 59Employees 282 251 271 265 277 280 254 224 279

Payroll 5227 5170 5401 5480 5453 5563 5526 5537 6641

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 15 10 9 7 7 12 11 12 10Employees 565 ds ds ds ds ds 177 152 186

Payroll 30704 ds ds ds ds ds 10077 9264 11951

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 20 18 16 17 21 19 12 12 12Employees 1611 409 ds 421 492 ds ds ds 254

Payroll 148502 32473 19241 35917 42018 ds ds ds 33057Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 126 119 118 115 110 105 113 107 108

Employees 992 964 829 868 818 673 840 814 818Payroll 26186 24326 24631 24182 23379 18874 24468 24436 25146

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 15 12 12 7 11 6 8 8 8Employees 1085 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll 56696 ds ds 41280 41262 ds ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 18 23 25 26 21 20 18 20 20Employees 216 375 384 411 419 428 303 322 302

Payroll 11700 21014 22177 22910 22132 25732 20283 21348 20746

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 10 8 6 7 6 13 14 15 14Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1922

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 132983

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 52 59 53 56 51 59 54 56 54Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 30622

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1955354

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

South Atlantic Regionbull East Floridabull Georgiabull North Carolinabull South Carolina

Returning to port during the Virginia Beach Billfish Tournament Photo South Atlantic Fishery Management CouncilCameron J Rhodes

136

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

o

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe South Atlantic Region includes East Florida Georgia North Carolina and South Carolina Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (SAFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under eight fishery management plans (FMPs) The coastal migratory pelagic resources and spiny lobster FMPs are managed jointly with the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (GMFMC) The SAFMC in cooperation with the Mid-Atlantic and New England Fishery Management Councils developed a dolphin wahoo FMP for the Atlantic

South Atlantic Region FMPs

bull Coastal migratory pelagic resources (with GMFMC)

bull Coral coral reef and livehardbot-tom habitat

bull Dolphinwahoo

bull Golden crabbull Pelagic sargassum

habitatbull Shrimpbull Snapper grouperbull Spiny lobster

(with GMFMC)

Red porgy red snapper snowy grouper and Southeast Florida hogfish were listed as overfished in 2016 Six stocks or stock complexes are currently subject to overfishing red snapper speckled hind Warsaw grouper Southeast Florida hogfish blueline tilefish and tilefish (Southern Atlantic coast)

Catch Share ProgramsSouth Atlantic Wreckfish Individual Transferable Quota Program This program was implemented in 1992 and is the only catch share program in the South Atlantic Region This program was developed to create incentives for the conservation of wreckfish to provide a management regime that promotes stability and facilitates long-range planning and investment by harvesters and dealers to promote management regimes that minimize gear and area conflicts among fishermen to minimize the tendency for over-capitalization in the harvesting and processingdistribution sectors and to provide a reasonable opportunity for fishermen to make adequate returns from commercial fishing by limiting entry into the program NOAA Fisheries continues to collect data on this program to develop standard performance indicators

that measure its basic economic performance

Policy UpdatesIn 2016 a System Management Plan was approved for eight deepwater Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) established through the Snapper Grouper FMP in 2009 The council developed this plan to serve as the framework for resource protection research and monitoring outreach administration and evaluation of the MPAs The System Management Plan includes action items to assist in achieving the goals and objectives as well as potential metrics for evaluating the management effectiveness of the Marine Protected Areas Eventually the plan will be expanded to encompass all of the councilrsquos managed areas with sections for Marine Protected Areas Spawning Special Management Zones other Special Management Zones and Coral Habitat Areas of Particular Concern

Under Amendment 36 of the Snapper Group FMP NOAA Fisheries approved the designation of five offshore areas as Spawning Special Management Zones in June 2017 to help protect spawning fish and unique habitat associated with spawning activities in the South Atlantic Spawning Special Management Zones are expected to protect important spawning habitat and associated species of fish by limiting specific fishing and anchoring activity within the sites The action includes a sunset provision that would require the areas be reauthorized after a period of 10 years based on their effectiveness The five areas ranging in size from 3 to 5 square miles off North Carolina South Carolina and Florida are the first Spawning Special Management Zones designated in federal waters off the South Atlantic coast

Also in June 2017 following a recent stock assessment the council approved measures that will allow increases in the harvest of spiny lobster in both the South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico The action would increase the acceptable biological catch from 732 million pounds to 96 million pounds The amendment would also prohibit the use of traps for recreational harvest of spiny lobster

South Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

137

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

South Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key South Atlantic Commercial Species

bull Blue crabbull Clamsbull Floundersbull Groupersbull King mackerels

bull Oystersbull Shrimpbull Snappersbull Swordfishbull Tunas

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is

defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers12

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 commercial fishing in Florida generated the largest employment impacts in the South Atlantic Region 76700 jobs Income impacts ($32 billion) sales impacts ($169 billion) and value-added impacts ($57 billion) were also largest in Florida The importers sector in Florida generated the highest employment impacts of any state-level sector 39200 jobs The importers sector in Florida also generated the highest state-level income impacts ($19 billion) sales impacts ($121 billion) and value-added impacts ($37 billion) in the region

Landings TrendsSouth Atlantic landings revenue was up $61 million in 2016 relative to the previous year Gains from shrimp landings revenue (up $66 million) and numerous finfish species more than offset declines in blue crab (down $98 million) and clams (down $31 million) The shrimp fishery generates the highest landings revenue of all South Atlantic fisheries Shrimp fishery performance was driven largely by a banner year for North Carolina shrimp trawlers which had their highest level of production since 1953 and after adjusting for inflation their highest landings revenue since 2000 Mild weather in the fall of 2016 that extended the fishing season was among the reasons cited for the 68 increase in North Carolina shrimp landings revenue from 2015 to 2016

The blue crab fishery is the second most important

1 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp SeafoodIndustry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)2 Commercial economic impacts data were not available for East Florida data for the entire state of Florida are reported here

138

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oSouth Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

fishery in the South Atlantic Region in terms of landings revenue Reduced landings coupled with lower prices both regionally and nationally resulted in a 21 decline in landings revenue from 2015 to 2016 The precipitous decline was prompted in part by new management measures implemented in 2016 in North Carolina to improve the condition of its blue crab stock While showing some improvement from the 2014 stock assessment the 2015 assessment continued to show decreased recruitment and adult abundance

Oyster landings increased more than seven-fold from 2007-2016 largely due to expanding South Carolina production In recent years South Carolina has accounted for almost 90 of oyster production in the South Atlantic Region As this industry took off South Carolina implemented a moratorium in April 2014 on importing oyster seed from all points north of South Carolina due to a concern over disease transfer By 2016 all seed orders by South Carolina oyster farmers were filled with seed produced in-state using South Carolina broodstock3

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the South Atlantic Region totaled $1909 million in 2016 This number represented a 25 increase from 2007 (a 9 increase in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 3 increase from 2015 Landings revenue was highest in North Carolina ($941 million) followed by East Florida ($646 million) Shellfish landings revenue made up 61 of total revenue in the region Shrimp ($57 million) and blue crab ($366 million) had the highest landings revenue in the South Atlantic Region in 2016 Together they accounted for 49 of total landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 oysters (76 54 in real terms) shrimp (30 14 in real terms) and blue crab (9 -5 in real terms) had the largest revenue increaseswhile groupers (-53 -59 in real terms) snappers(-16 -27 in real terms) and tunas (-12 -23in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From2015 to 2016 shrimp (13) king mackerels (11)and oysters (1) had the largest revenue increaseswhile clams (-44) blue crab (-21) and tunas(-15) had the largest revenue decreases

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Oysters (76 54 in real terms)bull Shrimp (30 14 in real terms)bull Blue crab (9 -5 in real terms) From 2015bull Shrimp (13)bull King mackerels (11)bull Oysters (1)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Groupers (-53 -59 in real terms)bull Snappers (-16 -27 in real terms)bull Tunas (-12 -23 in real terms) From 2015bull Clams (-44)bull Blue crab (-21)bull Tunas (-15)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Oysters (608)bull Shrimp (13)bull Blue crab (1)From 2015bull King mackerels (15)bull Shrimp (4)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Groupers (-68)bull Flounders (-37)bull Snappers (-31) From 2015bull Clams (-28)bull Flounders (-26)bull Swordfish (-21)

LandingsIn 2016 South Atlantic Region commercial fishermen landed 1063 million pounds of finfish and shellfish a 1 increase from 2007 and a 6 decrease from 2015 Blue crab had the highest landings volume in the South Atlantic Region accounting for 32 of landed weight

3 httpwwwscseagrantorgpdf_filesFY16-17-Impacts-and-Accomplishments-SFApdf

139

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

South Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

From 2007 to 2016 oysters (608) shrimp (13) and blue crab (1) had the largest landings increases while groupers (-68) flounders (-37) and snappers (-31) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 king mackerels (15) and shrimp (4) had the largest landings increases while clams (-28) flounders (-26) and swordfish (-21) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 clams ($777 per pound) received the highest South Atlantic Region ex-vessel price Landings of blue crab ($106 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price From 2007 to 2016 flounders (65 57 in real terms) groupers (45 39 in real terms) and king mackerels (30 26 in real terms) had the largest price increases while oysters (-75 -66 in real terms) and tunas (-4 -4 in real terms) had the largest price decreases From 2015 to 2016 flounders (25) swordfish (12) and shrimp (8) had the largest price increases while clams (-22) tunas (-14) and blue crab (-8) had the largest price decreases

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups4

Key South Atlantic Recreational Species

bull Atlantic croakerand spot

bull Black sea bassbull Bluefishbull Dolphinfishbull King mackerel

bull Sharksbull Sheepshead porgybull Red drumbull Spanish mackerelbull Spotted seatrout

Economic Impacts and Expenditures The contribution of recreational fishing activities5 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures

are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

The greatest employment impacts from expenditures on saltwater recreational fishing in the South Atlantic Region were generated in East Florida (36100 jobs) followed by North Carolina (16800 jobs) The largest sales impacts were observed in East Florida ($41 billion) followed by North Carolina ($17 billion) The biggest income impacts were generated in East Florida ($15 billion) followed by North Carolina ($6558 million) The greatest value-added impacts were in East Florida ($25 billion) followed by North Carolina ($1 billion)

Recreational fishing expenditures (on both fishing trips and durable equipment purchases) across the South Atlantic Region in 2016 totaled about $54 billion Trip expenditures totaled nearly $982 million with a large portion coming from trips in the shore (49) and private boat (32) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $44 billion with the largest portion coming

4 Except where noted Atlantic and Gulf recreational catch and effort estimates are based upon the MRIP APAIS and CHTS (httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovrecreational-fisheriesSurveyssurvey-details) and not the revised MRIP estimates (httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovleadership-messagenoaa-fisheries-releases-revised-mrip-recreational-catch-and-effort-estimates) released in 20185 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpswwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

140

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oSouth Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

from boat expenses ($26 billion)

Fishing TripsIn 2016 recreational fishermen took 168 million fishing trips in the South Atlantic Region This number represented a 23 decrease from 2007 and a 2 increase from 2015 The largest proportions of trips were taken in the shore mode (55) and private boat mode (42) East Florida (88 million trips) and North Carolina (54 million trips) had the highest number of recorded trips

ParticipationIn 2016 there were 23 million recreational anglers who fished in the South Atlantic Region This number represented a 36 decrease from 2007 and a 5 increase from 2015 These anglers were South Atlantic Region residents from either a coastal county (80) or non-coastal county (20)

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Red drum (37)bull Porgies (sheepshead) (30)bull Black sea bass (4)From 2015bull King mackerel (42)bull Porgies (sheepshead) (29)bull Spanish mackerel (27)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull King mackerel (-75)bull Dolphinfish (-57)bull Sharks (-28)From 2015bull Dolphinfish (-48)bull Drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (-38)bull Sharks (-22)

Harvest and ReleaseOf the South Atlanticrsquos key species and species groups drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (74 million fish) drum (spotted seatrout) (56 million fish) and bluefish (5 million fish) were most frequently caught by recreational

fishermen From 2007 to 2016 red drum (37) porgies (sheepshead) (30) and black sea bass (4) had the largest increases in catch while king mackerel (-75) dolphinfish (-57) and sharks (-28) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 king mackerel (42) porgies (sheepshead) (29) and Spanish mackerel (27) had the largest increases in catch while dolphinfish (-48) drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (-38) and sharks (-22) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries Note that when discussing the marine economy in the South Atlantic Region all statistics include the entire state of Florida and not just East Florida678

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy9 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average Florida had the highest CFLQ in the South Atlantic Region in 2015 at 097

In 2015 11 million employer establishments operated throughout the entire South Atlantic Region (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed about 168 million workers and had a total annual payroll of $743 billion The combined gross state product of Florida Georgia North Carolina and

6 Marine Economy information was not available for East Florida information for the entire state of Florida is provided here7 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)8 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS IndustryrdquohttpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)9 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

141

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

South Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

South Carolina was approximately $21 trillion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 the South Atlantic Region had 485 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 95 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $353 million (a 103 increase in real terms from 2007) There were 51 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 4 decrease from 2007) The Census Bureau suppressed employment and payroll data in this sector for one or more states in the South Atlantic Region in 2015 The greatest number of seafood product preparation and packaging establishments was located in Florida (327) followed by Georgia (93) and North Carolina (88)

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 642 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the four states that make up the South Atlantic Region (a 2 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $561 million (a 10 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 396 employer firms in the retail sales of seafood sector (a 10 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 1825 workers (a 13 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $442 million (a 28 increase in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of retail seafood establishments was located in Florida (536) followed by North Carolina (225) and Georgia (154)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 340 employer firms in the wholesale sales of seafood sector in the South Atlantic Region in 2015 (a 16 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 4089 workers and had a total annual payroll of $1603 million The greatest number of wholesale seafood establishments was located in Florida (242) followed by North Carolina (59) and Georgia (23)

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of the South Atlantic Regionrsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons It is clear however that these sectors play an important role in the

regional economy For example the deep sea passenger transportation sector in Florida alone accounted for $967 million in payroll in 2015 The ship and boat building sector for the entire South Atlantic Region totaled $7797 million in payroll in 2015

Tables | South Atlantic Region

144

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oSouth Atlantic Region | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the South Atlantic Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Landings Value Value Jobs Sales Income Jobs Sales IncomeRevenue Added AddedFlorida 64593 76749 16873652 3171513 5658897 11083 1081344 284434 437467Georgia 11488 9983 1554347 343991 566586 1349 69592 27316 37213North Carolina 94050 10156 984700 275651 410851 6105 332945 135957 180719South Carolina 20784 1478 118153 38818 55055 1209 71612 29332 39034

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 152400 165632 147205 165447 171306 171214 162637 188919 184776 190915Finfish amp Other 61335 60797 63112 65922 66499 64757 62875 69564 63261 74295Shellfish 91065 104835 84093 99525 104807 106456 99763 119355 121515 116620

Key SpeciesBlue crab 33634 39986 37703 36080 33862 37608 44131 46734 46416 36606Clams 4039 3862 3516 3809 3396 2873 2940 3973 7029 3948Flounders 11802 11230 10389 11118 9528 8011 7529 13509 13204 12209Groupers 6060 5287 4348 3878 3786 3433 3375 3475 3198 2824King mackerels 6872 7695 8088 7585 6580 5559 5214 5829 5637 6252Oysters 3806 4028 4603 7175 6850 5133 6076 7207 6641 6689Shrimp 43807 51064 33078 46146 53652 54921 38770 50698 50423 56993Snappers 3922 4554 4024 3497 3757 3838 3763 3998 3528 3285Swordfish 4298 3661 4821 7519 9400 9895 8690 5915 5075 4474Tunas 4894 4672 4869 3681 5096 6926 5849 6049 5104 4322

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 105285 116527 113479 119494 123657 113530 98737 111059 113345 106336Finfish amp Other 46613 43948 51117 52569 53824 39673 37338 50244 38348 35489Shellfish 58672 72580 62362 66925 69833 73858 61398 60815 74998 70847

Key SpeciesBlue crab 34045 44970 38959 38840 42127 40388 32762 34228 40445 34486Clams 663 628 611 641 569 512 446 614 705 508Flounders 4939 5151 5362 5109 4355 2961 2889 4739 4181 3090Groupers 1820 1580 1295 1105 949 856 783 762 676 587King mackerels 3736 4352 4858 4247 3048 2456 1899 2380 2267 2615Oysters 776 857 938 1439 1233 6074 6464 6057 5782 5493Shrimp 21235 23341 20109 23203 22940 22361 13842 15816 22983 23955Snappers 1354 1515 1373 1196 1246 1227 1171 1181 1034 940Swordfish 1417 1307 1800 2288 2611 2850 2540 1762 1699 1336Tunas 2310 1658 1945 1805 2209 2442 2306 2557 2169 2126

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue crab 099 089 097 093 080 093 135 137 115 106Clams 609 615 576 594 597 561 659 647 998 777Flounders 239 218 194 218 219 271 261 285 316 395Groupers 333 335 336 351 399 401 431 456 473 481King mackerels 184 177 166 179 216 226 275 245 249 239Oysters 491 470 491 499 555 084 094 119 115 122Shrimp 206 219 164 199 234 246 280 321 219 238Snappers 290 301 293 292 302 313 321 338 341 350Swordfish 303 280 268 329 360 347 342 336 299 335Tunas 212 282 250 204 231 284 254 237 235 203

145

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

South Atlantic Region | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the South Atlantic Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars trips)Trips Jobs Sales Income Value Added

East Florida 8827 36066 4084156 1540223 2466383Georgia 696 1642 160818 66636 106409North Carolina 5411 16811 1699040 655798 1020499South Carolina 1909 5117 497748 181326 292141

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 191544Private Boat 309468Shore 480634Total 981645

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 1026335Other Equipment 435279Boat Expenses 2618108Vehicle Expenses 313426Second Home Expenses 42561Total Durable Expenditures 4435707

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 5417352

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 3157 2330 1922 1933 1893 2135 2092 2189 1753 1873Non-Coastal 493 560 462 536 450 502 396 530 475 472Out-of-State NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 3650 2890 2384 2470 2343 2637 2488 2719 2229 2345

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 503 415 391 368 372 348 336 414 499 493Private 11536 10910 8923 9514 8663 8775 7878 7836 7301 7085Shore 9956 10469 9371 9185 8637 8669 8402 9395 8739 9266Total Trips 21995 21794 18684 19066 17673 17793 16616 17646 16539 16844

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bassH 435 347 271 509 337 293 246 338 213 188R 2863 2568 1906 2595 3031 4374 2865 4967 3351 3253

BluefishH 1914 1688 1587 2348 1936 1380 1895 1802 1683 1716R 4089 3085 2559 4268 3457 2367 3680 3412 3221 3284

DolphinfishH 1079 1025 728 825 824 802 522 575 923 583R 394 188 98 127 355 126 167 244 296 49

Drum (Atlantic croaker and spot)

H 4575 5514 2817 1946 3074 2796 3314 4255 5991 2275R 3775 4181 4868 3334 4183 3560 5786 6278 5849 5106

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 1547 1633 1411 932 859 1690 1069 876 521 1085R 5554 5166 4169 5772 4890 6519 4289 4524 4565 4466

King mackerelH 818 484 420 234 153 149 99 128 142 225R 301 169 97 75 47 27 23 67 52 51

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 638 694 626 705 664 523 593 736 448 645R 545 692 509 496 517 629 746 945 743 895

Red drumH 414 463 276 607 494 458 633 589 419 569R 1838 2414 1870 3320 2137 2966 3068 2957 2168 2520

Sharks2H 50 37 38 30 26 18 40 50 22 41R 2317 2757 2312 2739 1645 1948 3367 2514 2162 1655

Spanish mackerel

H 1061 1315 1124 1072 868 820 1055 863 604 878R 606 886 519 605 396 424 679 486 402 401

1 NA = data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but does not specifiy whether an angler residesin a region2 Sharks include species within the requiem shark family blacktip sharks Atlantic sharpnose sharks and unidentified sharks

Tables | East Florida

148

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oEast Florida | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Florida Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)1

With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 76749 16873652 3171513 5658897 11083 1081344 284434 437467

Commercial Harvesters 7158 520252 163093 217024 7158 520252 163093 217024Seafood Processors amp Dealers 4442 801532 155120 304952 580 112172 21709 42677

Importers 39207 12116639 1941923 3693682 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 9586 1226678 481589 599160 482 61714 24229 30144

Retail 16356 2208551 429788 844078 2862 387205 75404 147621

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 42767 47856 40992 51151 60643 57766 48669 55949 52000 64593Finfish amp Other 19768 21131 23164 25756 26344 26061 24139 25212 24115 35509Shellfish 23000 26726 17828 25395 34300 31705 24530 30737 27885 29084

Key SpeciesBlue crab 4924 4333 2376 3415 4155 4747 3785 3118 3369 3244Clams 391 510 415 331 220 138 28 61 58 31Groupers 1062 848 662 620 613 893 734 799 879 684King mackerel 4833 6036 6563 6911 5500 4685 4320 4583 4804 5309Lobsters 2488 3312 1089 2825 3207 1720 3437 5150 3736 2826Sharks 726 636 949 757 677 458 491 548 643 347Shrimp 13821 17225 12455 17071 24361 21903 14125 18306 16400 16019Snappers 1279 1905 2383 1454 1673 1604 1769 2188 1658 1322Spanish mackerel 2332 1827 2004 2414 2686 2448 2650 2652 2171 2533Swordfish 2529 2339 2385 3677 4005 4838 3287 2560 2532 2228

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 25196 26307 27501 29713 31244 28579 21415 24573 25160 26445Finfish amp Other 13893 14111 16105 17137 16051 14241 12553 13592 12602 13672Shellfish 11303 12196 11396 12576 15193 14338 8862 10981 12558 12773

Key SpeciesBlue crab 4063 3342 1640 2553 3226 3440 2211 1500 1639 1579Clams 41 55 54 42 22 17 5 8 8 3Groupers 315 239 188 167 154 222 174 179 187 142King mackerel 2631 3299 4064 3905 2633 2143 1547 1811 1859 2160Lobsters 361 506 298 481 514 302 486 543 481 369Sharks 818 776 1109 781 716 631 657 662 706 367Shrimp 6174 7619 8662 8743 10528 8869 5044 5805 7105 5972Snappers 461 635 805 510 564 523 572 661 497 393Spanish mackerel 3264 2263 2629 3553 3433 2586 2246 2585 1808 2460Swordfish 772 791 838 1028 1067 1343 831 698 716 592

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue crab 121 130 145 134 129 138 171 208 205 205Clams 952 929 773 790 984 817 600 758 749 980Groupers 337 355 352 372 399 402 421 446 471 480King mackerel 184 183 161 177 209 219 279 253 258 246Lobsters 690 655 365 587 623 569 707 948 776 766Sharks 089 082 086 097 095 073 075 083 091 095Shrimp 224 226 144 195 231 247 280 315 231 268Snappers 278 300 296 285 297 307 309 331 334 337Spanish mackerel 071 081 076 068 078 095 118 103 120 103Swordfish 328 296 285 358 375 360 396 367 354 377

1 Information reported in this table is for the state of Florida not East Florida

149

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

East Florida | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of East Florida Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 1430 172872 61464 95631Private Boat 1345 140979 47642 82849Shore 1213 119962 41321 72738

Total Durable Expenditures 32078 3650343 1389796 2215165Total State Economic Impacts 36066 4084156 1540223 2466383

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 96793Private Boat 149818Shore 100052Total 346662

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 630517Other Equipment 275233Boat Expenses 1709364Vehicle Expenses 205568Second Home Expenses 15638Total Durable Expenditures 2836319

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 3182981

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 2168 1317 1099 1033 1109 1181 1263 1334 1001 1059Non-Coastal NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAOut-of-State 1008 703 643 629 553 514 540 807 819 674Total Anglers 3176 2021 1741 1662 1662 1695 1803 2141 1821 1733

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 169 137 149 118 124 144 156 193 255 248Private 7157 6452 5394 5706 5298 5028 4643 4951 4133 4217Shore 5277 4651 4577 4393 4735 4219 4183 4500 4246 4362Total Trips 12603 11240 10120 10218 10156 9390 8981 9644 8634 8827

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

BluefishH 471 377 623 787 556 278 409 526 433 294R 932 499 681 1621 912 1111 1492 1457 1063 1157

DolphinfishH 513 661 328 248 346 434 298 370 481 293R 373 185 77 118 347 105 163 240 266 47

Drum (kingfish)

H 854 949 409 721 936 825 971 1212 495 746R 1099 552 609 935 807 1102 1115 1252 1395 1000

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 278 182 172 251 287 427 336 308 164 353R 3094 2830 1642 2937 2141 3026 1939 2400 1997 1660

Gray snapperH 689 352 224 161 187 209 640 611 427 755R 2073 1552 1707 498 678 1549 1991 2054 1669 2663

Jack (Florida pompano)

H 126 272 90 263 106 180 110 92 91 57R 164 360 81 160 297 278 184 313 175 287

King mackerelH 515 349 291 183 133 114 73 99 101 168R 227 125 52 58 45 21 16 51 44 24

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 255 237 227 352 287 267 253 573 306 518R 307 465 354 336 357 475 472 704 563 689

Red drumH 161 159 80 176 180 238 298 276 227 369R 759 890 522 1414 1051 799 1542 1649 1094 1197

Spanish mackerel

H 456 503 369 512 406 247 534 382 82 374R 198 364 150 282 147 89 365 208 86 143

1 NA = Data are not available because all East Florida residents are considered coastal county residents

150

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oEast Florida | Marine Economy

2015 East Florida State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 1948357 (8) 532830 (7) 7777990 (63) 33707 (54) 49239 (51) 88386 (49) 097

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 173 202 217 280 294 307 300 315 300Receipts 10497 11065 12473 14635 14618 17557 17214 22329 21841

Seafood salesretail

Firms 319 331 316 361 362 383 338 346 355Receipts 27557 26087 25667 27964 29037 30765 25332 26433 29033

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 20 23 25 27 24 27 25 27 27Employees 1748 1637 1143 1269 1095 1608 1374 1419 1429

Payroll 58233 53455 46235 45772 42612 51735 50003 50556 58246

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 267 229 215 229 250 226 234 233 242Employees 2308 1913 1762 1747 1913 1957 1878 1974 2055

Payroll 85019 75203 72159 70889 77115 75945 79266 83964 90247

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 169 168 158 145 145 151 165 166 181Employees 989 991 885 865 849 945 909 1037 1137

Payroll 20595 21604 21182 20783 20158 21577 23476 25844 29066

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 47 42 42 50 54 60 47 62 57Employees 1242 1106 972 709 753 1381 1050 1743 1815

Payroll 94429 50115 37774 50217 53341 100402 82078 175366 173004

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 69 57 58 61 65 75 69 77 76Employees 3190 2486 2801 2279 2374 3345 2485 2015 2154

Payroll 208144 169055 180139 159025 177386 231887 140564 131069 137786Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 34 31 33 29 29 39 31 28 32Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 10510

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 967938

MarinasEstablishments 493 442 428 430 411 432 444 464 466

Employees 4935 5024 4665 4439 4657 4918 5076 5421 5472Payroll 148592 151677 132955 133017 142997 148573 145265 168185 171354

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 53 56 59 55 64 43 58 61 69Employees 6585 8052 7288 7547 7484 4598 6258 6992 7834

Payroll 173788 192473 185309 191560 195458 86461 188997 179024 208186Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 145 147 145 145 150 151 180 190 196Employees 1484 894 829 980 1047 853 1390 878 861

Payroll 61470 56917 60641 76853 75561 68366 130893 74185 72483

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 29 40 32 34 32 66 61 56 55Employees 459 712 527 470 377 2082 555 588 987

Payroll 12872 24668 19006 20525 16879 72554 25439 20647 32032

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 296 297 261 248 246 258 259 263 278Employees 12332 12419 8221 7363 7909 8621 8813 9608 10913

Payroll 469382 442096 296537 302909 325942 374831 390853 448514 488050

1 All data presented on this page are for the entire state of Florida not just East Florida2 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20154 ds = these data are suppressed

Tables | Georgia

152

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGeorgia | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Georgia Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 9983 1554347 343991 566586 1349 69592 27316 37213

Commercial Harvesters 472 19841 6808 9784 472 19841 6808 9784Seafood Processors amp Dealers 844 74101 28558 37696 142 12468 4805 6343

Importers 3731 1153174 184818 351538 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 793 108635 37465 52650 29 3930 1355 1905

Retail 4142 198596 86342 114918 707 33353 14348 19181

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 11331 13081 11761 13731 16179 16637 11581 16065 16677 11488

Finfish amp Other 625 623 626 279 448 180 512 473 52 28Shellfish 10706 12458 11135 13452 15732 16457 11069 15591 16625 11460

Key SpeciesBlue crab 3767 3910 3839 2648 3341 4259 3974 3770 4240 3703Clams 290 383 473 430 605 603 564 999 1885 1308Groupers 183 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAShrimp 6446 7877 6608 10103 11398 11045 5773 10469 9759 5983Snails (conchs) 1 6 11 27 39 27 1 3 2 NASnappers 269 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 7908 8930 7424 7220 12795 10746 11452 10366 7824 6182

Finfish amp Other 304 267 306 168 4828 113 155 4729 38 16Shellfish 7603 8663 7118 7053 7967 10633 11297 5636 7786 6166

Key SpeciesBlue crab 4421 4227 3598 2329 3427 4265 3216 2667 2934 3069Clams 49 54 76 81 107 91 86 168 275 170Groupers 54 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAShrimp 2797 3132 3324 4553 4355 3928 1901 2751 3652 2120Snails (conchs) 1 5 11 18 30 18 1 2 1 NASnappers 93 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Blue crab 085 092 107 114 097 1 124 141 145 121Clams 589 703 624 530 568 660 657 596 686 772Groupers 337 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAShrimp 230 251 199 222 262 281 304 381 267 282Snails (conchs) 125 131 100 150 130 152 165 151 261 NASnappers 289 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

153

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Georgia | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Georgia Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 92 11240 4193 6143Private Boat 119 11379 3934 6561Shore 148 13749 4739 7940

Total Durable Expenditures 1283 124450 53770 85765Total State Economic Impacts 1642 160818 66636 106409

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 5947Private Boat 13201Shore 11391Total 30540

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 40029Other Equipment 12504Boat Expenses 46469Vehicle Expenses 22650Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 121652

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 152192

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 149 190 146 145 146 134 99 125 81 110Non-Coastal 115 154 91 136 131 96 72 115 80 89Out-of-State 45 98 45 61 78 74 53 70 70 49Total Anglers 308 441 282 342 355 303 225 310 231 248

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 31 17 16 7 16 20 21 31 34 26Private 577 731 516 530 620 496 387 340 255 344Shore 421 456 311 335 335 376 283 456 301 326Total Trips 1029 1204 842 873 970 892 690 827 590 696

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black drumH 51 92 16 70 11 19 18 15 8 24R 35 66 23 40 5 20 10 8 13 16

Black sea bassH 34 99 18 13 44 15 81 37 41 9R 292 581 113 163 227 134 294 528 232 82

BluefishH 11 7 2 13 3 6 3 20 6 3R 103 116 72 108 70 52 7 120 74 23

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 45 38 82 36 44 38 55 64 111 54R 229 294 435 264 262 167 298 471 210 152

Drum (southern kingfish)

H 575 697 587 585 873 377 396 441 451 305R 625 873 559 465 668 604 287 244 210 262

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 577 642 507 384 290 527 238 256 163 253R 1039 721 915 742 552 1029 321 774 398 552

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 58 65 52 105 138 59 42 21 22 43R 84 98 33 39 45 29 38 18 21 16

Red drumH 113 133 69 195 107 46 74 93 48 75R 226 314 168 484 214 90 199 290 168 160

Sharks2H 9 11 7 4 6 4 6 lt 1 1 7

R 592 541 345 284 342 366 265 314 166 257Southern flounder

H 92 49 34 36 29 18 19 14 24 18R lt 1 1 10 3 12 5 7 9 18 6

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish2 Sharks include species within the requiem shark family blacktip sharks Atlantic sharpnose sharks and unidentified sharks

154

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGeorgia | Marine Economy

2015 Georgia State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient3

Totals 848952 (35) 224593 (29) 3692490 (3) 17484 (28) 27559 (28) 50152 (28) 005

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 34 45 51 52 61 71 60 62 87Receipts 2187 3489 3817 5458 5540 4974 4378 5471 6265

Seafood salesretail

Firms 87 101 98 96 89 97 77 103 84Receipts 8671 6922 5701 6474 8646 8233 6932 9338 8379

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 6 7 6 6 5 6 5 7 6Employees ds ds ds 1056 1022 854 945 895 854

Payroll ds ds ds 37343 39433 32928 35987 37122 37368

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 42 30 33 36 28 18 28 24 23Employees 688 565 532 514 562 468 469 792 701

Payroll 31033 20122 18628 20075 20660 15459 17326 24726 26254

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 44 48 42 48 51 54 60 62 70Employees 179 160 162 176 176 214 210 229 248

Payroll 2633 2433 2447 2502 2566 3425 3390 3745 4539

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 6 6 5 4 4 3 4 7 8Employees 33 28 ds ds ds ds ds ds 66

Payroll 1883 2040 1700 ds ds ds ds ds 4356

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 13 14 13 14 12 12 7 9 9Employees 132 156 29 ds 51 236 28 63 64

Payroll 10090 11275 2192 2465 4833 11238 2311 3856 4421Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2Employees ds NA NA NA ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds NA NA NA ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 68 60 58 62 63 63 59 65 67

Employees 569 527 541 631 580 636 644 586 639Payroll 12701 15571 15736 17428 16986 17921 17768 18604 20210

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 17 17 18 17 20 10 19 19 18Employees 2501 2660 3707 2971 4655 ds 2986 3561 4956

Payroll 110857 97869 87410 84675 108674 ds 120985 124394 117785Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 11 11 9 8 8 10 8 7 9Employees 217 182 ds ds ds ds ds ds 203

Payroll 11141 10193 12185 11237 ds ds ds ds 12202

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 4 5 5 4 2 13 7 4 4Employees 98 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 68

Payroll 3108 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 2961

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 21 20 14 12 15 14 15 16 17Employees 2225 2159 ds ds ds ds ds ds 3150

Payroll 68646 69096 ds ds ds ds ds ds 110951

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | North Carolina

156

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Carolina | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the North Carolina Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 10156 984700 275651 410851 6105 332945 135957 180719

Commercial Harvesters 2500 160050 62995 86364 2500 160050 62995 86364Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1166 87099 33865 43760 481 35959 13981 18066

Importers 1631 504063 80786 153660 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 473 57041 20005 26405 141 16972 5952 7856

Retail 4386 176447 78000 100660 2983 119965 53029 68432

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 82285 86822 77196 79361 71183 72571 79104 94105 94711 94050Finfish amp Other 36199 34430 33984 33147 31278 31017 29820 37035 32395 32700Shellfish 46086 52392 43212 46214 39905 41554 49284 57070 62316 61350

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 2714 3142 3004 3491 3164 2136 1724 1866 1646 2216Black sea bass 1195 1156 1401 953 628 688 869 1414 1367 1343Blue crab 21432 27555 27429 26425 21282 22807 30006 34027 33980 24116Clams 2660 2435 2086 2359 1933 2131 2349 2913 5086 2609Flounders 11335 10886 10124 10845 8890 7421 7059 13072 12916 11853Groupers 2394 2274 1879 1734 1463 1421 1247 1265 1120 1103King mackerel 1967 1632 1500 650 1062 831 877 1204 801 869Shrimp 17905 19251 8528 10804 10886 13333 12947 14145 16834 28242Snappers 1601 1784 1073 963 1004 900 917 865 803 942Tunas 4046 3393 2922 1193 2437 4398 3207 3631 2883 3194

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 62871 71209 68955 71994 67487 56670 50191 61958 65942 59936Finfish amp Other 30422 27630 32323 32491 29725 22714 21996 29450 23290 19899Shellfish 32450 43580 36632 39503 37762 33956 28194 32508 42652 40037

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 7271 5792 6135 7312 5054 3107 1928 2630 1819 2092Black sea bass 473 485 615 401 272 256 330 529 468 423Blue crab 21425 32917 29707 30683 30035 26786 22203 26231 32127 25463Clams 438 400 359 366 302 404 356 438 422 335Flounders 4754 5009 5256 5001 4102 2736 2728 4589 4082 2970Groupers 828 785 638 561 409 382 311 299 261 256King mackerel 1059 1037 778 329 408 297 345 550 391 420Shrimp 9537 9427 5408 5955 5140 6141 4860 4691 9097 13192Snappers 550 603 374 320 326 279 276 251 232 275Tunas 1836 1041 1028 703 1056 1482 1283 1653 1320 1448

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atlantic croaker 037 054 049 048 063 069 089 071 091 106Black sea bass 253 239 228 238 231 269 264 267 292 318Blue crab 100 084 092 086 071 085 135 130 106 095Clams 608 609 582 644 639 528 661 665 1206 778Flounders 238 217 193 217 217 271 259 285 316 399Groupers 289 289 295 309 358 372 401 422 430 430King mackerel 186 157 193 198 260 279 254 219 205 207Shrimp 188 204 158 181 212 217 266 302 185 214Snappers 291 296 287 301 308 322 332 344 347 342Tunas 220 326 284 170 231 297 250 220 218 221

157

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

North Carolina | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of North Carolina Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 762 85734 31143 45817Private Boat 1202 111300 39105 62592Shore 4151 361064 127533 208080

Total Durable Expenditures 10696 1140942 458017 704010Total State Economic Impacts 16811 1699040 655798 1020499

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 51307Private Boat 115696Shore 279678Total 446680

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 272244Other Equipment 110838Boat Expenses 697609Vehicle Expenses 63785Second Home Expenses 26923Total Durable Expenditures 1171398

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1618078

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 564 587 446 544 490 614 564 549 479 541Non-Coastal 265 303 259 296 254 283 240 301 239 281Out-of-State 1079 1079 976 1073 755 764 601 805 830 1066Total Anglers 1908 1970 1681 1914 1499 1661 1405 1656 1548 1889

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 218 192 146 165 152 160 111 97 114 141Private 2671 2461 2005 2199 1899 2061 2101 1707 2041 1792Shore 3445 4246 3158 3313 2690 3082 2756 3150 2491 3478Total Trips 6333 6898 5309 5678 4740 5303 4968 4954 4646 5411

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bassH 110 57 107 139 95 76 49 75 69 58R 951 559 667 1104 1063 2085 1368 1334 1429 1836

BluefishH 1257 1177 828 1104 1152 889 1184 1084 978 1179R 2377 2136 1553 2221 1924 1036 1872 1538 1427 1792

DolphinfishH 533 358 367 499 472 327 212 185 434 262R 5 2 3 5 8 3 3 4 30 lt 1

Drum (Atlantic croaker and spot)

H 3540 2161 1425 1313 1454 1073 1876 2654 1553 882R 2805 2741 3135 2469 2799 2014 3299 3605 3186 2646

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 532 654 609 195 216 501 369 234 87 389R 849 881 1214 1685 1916 1647 1427 961 1776 1772

Flounder (lefteye and summer)

H 190 71 99 144 93 105 91 145 81 31R 1091 1690 1213 1586 988 1397 1529 1060 926 1022

King mackerel H 269 105 91 37 14 27 23 23 34 55R 44 25 12 6 lt 1 3 5 10 7 24

Spanish mackerel

H 495 744 678 484 367 491 497 398 388 424R 258 449 313 294 171 235 289 241 216 188

Striped bass H 49 36 12 34 107 8 20 8 17 4R 82 174 122 108 296 176 124 95 115 357

Yellowfin tuna H 102 26 29 23 25 57 45 27 24 60R lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 4 1 4 2 10

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

158

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Carolina | Marine Economy

2015 North Carolina State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 706538 (29) 223209 (29) 3670284 (3) 16494 (26) 26388 (27) 49974 (28) 006

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 30 ds 34 40 50 46 58 63 72Receipts 1813 ds 1297 1652 2705 1630 4605 4599 4715

Seafood salesretail

Firms 150 114 140 126 144 136 127 137 134Receipts 14999 10918 12188 9057 10386 11990 12175 13430 12705

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 22 18 16 16 14 12 13 14 16Employees ds 232 170 171 ds ds 135 128 128

Payroll 12659 5373 4461 4749 4830 5084 4563 4720 6582

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 71 65 66 66 64 59 59 56 59Employees 597 559 584 590 603 793 849 966 1187

Payroll 15655 16843 17383 18348 19344 23949 26687 30292 38462

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 86 90 77 82 84 88 86 93 91Employees 241 219 243 247 244 289 254 278 255

Payroll 4170 4143 4494 5017 5250 5860 5872 6263 6681

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 6 4 6 4 5 6 5 5 6Employees 54 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll 2061 ds 2366 ds ds ds ds ds ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 6 5 6 10 8 7 8 8 6Employees ds ds 9 ds ds 25 ds ds ds

Payroll 510 533 617 ds ds 1579 ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0Employees ds NA ds NA ds NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA ds NA ds NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 96 107 105 102 104 102 99 100 105

Employees 522 656 501 536 524 531 501 541 579Payroll 14922 17164 15858 16238 16187 15975 16369 16774 18672

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 13 13 12 11 14 6 9 9 9Employees 652 760 914 600 ds ds ds ds 797

Payroll 25164 23328 20707 20755 ds ds ds ds 14767Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 14 10 11 13 11 8 10 13 13Employees 102 87 96 94 86 90 77 78 78

Payroll 3773 3668 4313 3968 4041 3203 3583 3844 4350

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 3 3 2 4 3 9 5 2 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds 46 ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds 1579 ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 78 77 64 60 57 60 52 52 62Employees ds 4281 1983 1501 1515 1760 1059 1153 1422

Payroll ds 138243 68004 64807 66929 74843 49462 50102 65388

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | South Carolina

160

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oSouth Carolina | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the South Carolina Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 1478 118153 38818 55055 1209 71612 29332 39034

Commercial Harvesters 441 34441 13550 18648 441 34441 13550 18648Seafood Processors amp Dealers 101 8582 3357 4317 89 7590 2969 3818

Importers 124 38394 6153 11704 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 55 6222 2186 2871 31 3569 1254 1647

Retail 757 30515 13572 17515 647 26013 11559 14921

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 16017 17872 17256 21205 23300 24239 23284 22800 21387 20784

Finfish amp Other 4744 4614 5338 6740 8429 7499 8403 6844 6699 6058Shellfish 11274 13259 11918 14465 14871 16740 14880 15956 14688 14726

Key SpeciesBlack sea bass 236 257 362 213 182 296 459 328 246 149Blue crab 3511 4187 4059 3593 5084 5794 6365 5819 4827 5543Clams 697 535 542 688 638 NA NA NA NA NAGroupers 2421 2165 1808 1524 1710 1119 1394 1412 1199 1037Oysters 1375 1739 1738 1858 1975 2153 2403 2242 2252 2318Sharks 78 78 56 123 166 95 52 60 43 47Shrimp 5634 6712 5487 8168 7008 8640 5925 7778 7430 6749Snappers 773 864 568 1079 1080 1334 1078 945 1067 1021Swordfish NA 187 1116 1944 2777 2048 2467 1245 1266 1043Tilefish 5 66 9 25 8 128 379 506 536 503

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 9310 10081 9599 10567 12131 17535 15679 14163 14419 13773

Finfish amp Other 1994 1940 2384 2774 3220 2604 2633 2473 2417 1901Shellfish 7316 8141 7215 7793 8911 14930 13046 11690 12002 11871

Key SpeciesBlack sea bass 114 132 168 98 100 114 172 125 81 47Blue crab 4137 4484 4014 3275 5439 5897 5132 3831 3745 4375Clams 135 119 123 152 137 NA NA NA NA NAGroupers 624 556 469 378 386 252 298 284 229 188Oysters 285 324 309 332 337 5538 5805 5244 5061 4780Sharks 105 110 63 87 108 93 42 42 27 29Shrimp 2727 3162 2716 3951 2918 3422 2037 2569 3129 2671Snappers 250 277 194 365 356 425 322 269 305 272Swordfish NA 71 459 630 741 603 651 369 389 299Tilefish 4 28 5 15 4 46 150 187 170 132

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Black sea bass 207 194 215 216 182 259 266 262 304 318Blue crab 085 093 101 110 093 098 124 152 129 127Clams 517 451 442 454 465 NA NA NA NA NAGroupers 388 390 385 404 442 445 468 497 524 552Oysters 482 536 563 560 585 039 041 043 045 048Sharks 074 071 089 142 153 102 123 144 159 162Shrimp 207 212 202 207 240 252 291 303 237 253Snappers 309 312 292 295 303 314 334 352 350 376Swordfish NA 264 243 309 375 339 379 337 325 349Tilefish 136 230 200 171 184 278 253 271 315 382

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

161

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

South Carolina | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of South Carolina Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 571 58758 20698 31797Private Boat 308 25617 8457 14116Shore 1188 102134 33925 59974

Total Durable Expenditures 3050 311239 118246 186254Total State Economic Impacts 5117 497748 181326 292141

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 37497Private Boat 30753Shore 89513Total 157763

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 83545Other Equipment 36704Boat Expenses 164666Vehicle Expenses 21423Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 306338

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 464101

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 277 236 231 210 148 207 166 181 192 163Non-Coastal 113 103 112 104 66 123 84 114 157 102Out-of-State 551 604 554 494 264 406 602 569 684 510Total Anglers 941 942 898 809 478 736 852 864 1033 775

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 85 69 80 77 81 25 48 94 96 77Private 1132 1266 1008 1078 847 1189 748 838 873 732Shore 813 1116 1325 1143 879 992 1181 1289 1701 1100Total Trips 2030 2451 2413 2298 1806 2206 1977 2221 2670 1909

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bassH 126 90 37 216 57 92 24 108 42 21R 921 864 470 640 660 811 381 1593 896 616

BluefishH 175 127 135 444 225 206 298 172 265 240R 677 333 252 318 551 169 309 298 657 311

Drum (Atlantic croaker and spot)

H 643 2798 828 369 946 1029 832 615 3477 739R 376 394 841 354 463 359 1751 1207 1758 1361

Drum (southern kingfish)

H 699 823 1056 389 610 778 1195 698 462 399R 540 613 690 0 68 145 0 7 3 13

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 161 155 124 101 66 235 126 78 106 91R 572 734 399 407 280 817 601 389 393 481

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 109 216 222 102 172 77 25 80 44 42R 21 60 24 58 93 45 81 150 124 115

Red drumH 72 119 70 173 162 121 97 104 107 63R 437 552 751 786 664 544 673 636 571 338

Sharks2H 10 10 23 11 12 5 15 21 6 6R 418 475 804 1170 389 673 1164 845 898 409

Southern flounder

H 77 102 88 108 101 92 62 59 59 58R 106 102 75 lt 1 17 35 0 0 0 lt 1

Spanish mackerel

H 95 53 74 70 87 80 22 81 133 78R 97 68 56 28 67 98 25 36 100 70

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish 2 Sharks include species within the requiem shark family blacktip sharks Atlantic sharpnose sharks and unidentified sharks

162

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oSouth Carolina | Marine Economy

2015 South Carolina State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 319046 (13) 103973 (14) 1662251 (13) 6612 (11) 11317 (12) 20183 (11) 008

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 12 15 21 23 32 35 30 28 26Receipts 857 1155 1794 1386 1326 1868 1657 2690 2438

Seafood salesretail

Firms 75 64 77 78 87 67 67 73 69Receipts 3876 4650 4709 3978 5535 4818 3765 4845 6007

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 5 2 2 2 1 0 0 4 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds NA NA ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds NA NA ds ds

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 26 20 15 16 12 15 16 12 16Employees 220 108 111 120 101 125 134 148 146

Payroll 6186 3770 3676 3868 3760 4506 4849 5329 5327

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 60 64 57 56 61 60 56 56 54Employees 210 292 261 260 245 228 222 224 185

Payroll 3155 4871 4901 4580 4231 3670 3713 3633 3883

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4Employees 60 ds ds ds ds 40 ds ds ds

Payroll 2352 ds ds ds ds 2625 ds ds ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 6 4 8 7 6 6 4 1 1Employees 67 ds ds 20 ds ds 21 ds ds

Payroll 3419 659 ds 758 722 ds 633 ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 7 6 2 2 1 0 0 0Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 72 68 69 73 75 70 77 70 70

Employees 469 588 533 537 543 595 650 661 633Payroll 11498 13753 12642 13786 15805 15408 16147 17212 16996

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 15 17 14 12 14 10 13 14 15Employees 1419 1282 1953 1731 1717 715 ds 1902 2467

Payroll 75967 56812 43170 39625 49172 30381 ds 66803 59595Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 6 8 8 7 8 10 8 9 9Employees 152 227 208 222 217 247 221 219 236

Payroll 7369 11916 12522 12591 11922 16625 13820 14513 16311

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 3 3 2 2 5 7 2 3 4Employees 113 ds ds ds ds 676 ds ds ds

Payroll 7058 ds ds ds ds 29332 ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 41 46 41 39 41 39 37 37 34Employees 2962 3001 1929 1922 1943 1980 2262 2225 2690

Payroll 102531 97743 73988 74945 85568 90942 96081 98324 115262

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Gulf of Mexico Regionbull Alabamabull West Floridabull Louisianabull Mississippibull Texas

Offloading a commercial harvest of reef fish Photo Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management CouncilAva Lasseter

164

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe Gulf of Mexico Region includes Alabama Louisiana Mississippi Texas and West Florida Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (GMFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under seven fishery management plans (FMPs) The coastal migratory pelagic resources and spiny lobster fisheries are managed jointly with the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (SAFMC)

FMPs in the Gulf of Mexico Region

bull Aquaculturebull Coastal migratory

pelagic resources (with SAFMC)

bull Corals

bull Red drumbull Reef fishbull Shrimpbull Spiny lobster

(with SAFMC)

Three stocks or stock complexes in the Gulf of Mexico Region were identified as overfished in 2016 gray triggerfish greater amberjack and red snapper

Catch Share ProgramsTwo catch share programs have been implemented in the Gulf of Mexico the Red Snapper Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program and the GrouperndashTilefish IFQ Program Following are descriptions of these catch share programs and their performance

Red Snapper IFQ Program This program was implemented in 2007 to reduce overcapacity and mitigate derby fishing conditions in the red snapper segment of the commercial reef fish fishery The key performance indicators of this program show that relative to the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) the 2015 quota landings inflation-adjusted total revenue and inflation-adjusted total revenue per vessel increased In contrast the number of active vessels has decreased since the implementation of the IFQ Program

Grouper-Tilefish IFQ Program This program was implemented in 2010 to reduce overcapacity increase harvesting efficiency and eliminate the race to fish in the grouper-tilefish segment of the commercial reef fish fishery The key performance indicators of this program

generally show that relative to the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) 2015 landings inflation-adjusted total revenue and inflation-adjusted revenue per active vessel increased However overall quota and the number of active vessels decreased during this period

Policy UpdatesIn May 2016 NOAA Fisheries implemented Amendment 28 to the FMP for reef fish resources of the Gulf of Mexico The amendment changed the allocation of the red snapper annual catch limit (ACL) between the commercial and recreational sectors from 5149 to 485515 respectively After a court order rejected the change NOAA Fisheries in June 2017 returned the allocation to its previous levels Sector ACLs annual catch targets (ACTs) and the commercial quota were also adjusted to their pre-Amendment 28 levels

In October 2016 new regulations increased the Gulf of Mexico red grouper allowable catch limit from 603 pounds gutted weight to 819 pounds gutted weight Similarly the quotaannual catch target for Gulf of Mexico red grouper was raised for the commercial sector from 572 million to 778 million pounds gutted weight The new regulations increased the red grouper allowable catch limit for the recreational sector from 19 to 258 and increased the recreational sectorrsquos red grouper annual catch target from 173 million to 237 million pounds gutted weight

The increase to the commercial allocation was not distributed until the 2017 fishing season to ensure that the 2016 gag commercial ACL was not exceeded as a result of the red grouper commercial ACL increase The increase in the recreational ACL was expected to allow the recreational sector to remain open for the entire 2017 fishing year by avoiding the implementation of an in-season accountability measure Also in 2016 NOAA Fisheries issued notices prohibiting the recreational harvest of gray triggerfish and greater amberjack from August 1 through December 31 and prohibiting the commercial harvest of greater amberjack from July 17 through December 31 as a result of meeting or exceeding their respective ACTs

165

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Gulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

In addition recreational harvest of gray triggerfish was prohibited in the Gulf of Mexico Exclusive Economic Zone for 2017 due to a harvest overage during the 2016 recreational fishing season The harvest overage reduced the annual catch target to 0 pounds Gulf of Mexico gray triggerfish are currently overfished and under a rebuilding plan that expires at the end of 2017 The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council is expected to establish a new gray triggerfish rebuilding plan and modify management measures in 2018

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key Gulf of Mexico Region Commercial Species

bull Blue crabbull Crawfishbull Groupersbull Menhadenbull Mullets

bull Oystersbull Red snapperbull Shrimpbull Stone crabbull Tunas

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income

(wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers12

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 commercial fishing in Florida generated the largest employment impacts in the Gulf of Mexico Region 76700 jobs Income impacts ($32 billion) sales impacts ($169 billion) and value-added impacts ($57 billion) were also largest in Florida

The importers sector in Florida generated the highest employment impacts of any state-level sector 39200 jobs The importers sector in Florida also generated the highest state-level income impacts ($19 billion) sales impacts ($121 billion) and value-added impacts ($37 billion) in the region

Landings TrendsGulf of Mexico landings revenue rose $255 million from 2015 to 2016 largely due to the increase in shrimp landings revenue which was up $411 million (11)

1 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp SeafoodIndustry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)2 Separate commercial economic impacts were not available for West Florida Impacts for the entire state of Florida are reported here

166

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

and which more than offset declines in blue crab (down 13 -$99 million) oyster (down 9 -$89 million) and spiny lobster (down 11 -$47 million ) The shrimp fishery is the most important fishery in terms of landings revenue in the region and in each Gulf state White shrimp landings revenue increased $508 million year-over-year due to the combined effect of higher landings and prices (up 28 and 4 respectively) Brown shrimp landings declined 24 from 2015 to 2016 which had been predicted by NOAA Fisheries3 High rainfall in Texas and Louisiana in spring 2016 led to large freshwater discharges into the estuaries In Texas the resulting flooding forced young shrimp out of the nursery habitat needed for growth and survival and into the mouths of the bays Extremely low levels of dissolved oxygen in Texas and western Louisianarsquos shallow coastal water also impacted harvest predictionsMenhaden the second most valuable fishery in the region was another bright spot in 2016 Landings (up 15 from 2015) were at their highest level since 2011 and after adjusting for inflation landings revenue was at its highest level since 1984 Demand for menhaden was strong in 2016 in part due to the fact that the global production of sardines and anchovies which are also used for fishmeal and fish oil fell to their lowest levels since 19914

Oyster landings revenue was down in 2016 which was not surprising given that 2015 represented a banner year for Louisiana oystermen with inflation-adjusted landings revenue at an all-time high Louisiana has comprised almost 70 of the Gulfrsquos oyster harvest in recent years while Louisiana harvest was down relative to 2015 the 2016 harvest was on par with the 5-year average (less than 1 difference)

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the Gulf Region totaled $9121 million in 2016 This number represented a 32 increase from 2007 (a 15 increase in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 3 increase from 2015 Landings revenue was highest in Louisiana ($4261 million) followed by West Florida ($1967 million) Shellfish landings revenue made up 71 of total revenue in the region Shrimp ($4129 million) and menhaden ($1433 million) had the highest landings

revenue in the Gulf of Mexico Region in 2016 Together they accounted for 61 of total landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 red snapper (176 141 in real terms) menhaden (131 102 in real terms) and spiny lobster (61 40 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while tunas (-45 -52 in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 crawfish (73) tunas (29) and shrimp (11) had the largest revenue increases while blue crab (-13) spiny lobster (-11) and oysters (-9) had the largest revenue decreases

LandingsIn 2016 Gulf Region commercial fishermen landed 17 billion pounds of finfish and shellfish a 24 increase from 2007 and an 11 increase from 2015 Menhaden had the highest landings volume in the Gulf of Mexico Region accounting for 78 of landed weight

From 2007 to 2016 red snapper (115) spiny lobster (41) and menhaden (36) had the largest landings increases while tunas (-50) oysters (-29) and crawfish (-14) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 crawfish (149) tunas (27) and menhaden (15) had the largest landings increases while spiny lobster (-12) oysters (-7) and red snapper (-4) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 spiny lobster ($818 per pound) received the highest Gulf of Mexico Region ex-vessel price Landings of menhaden ($011 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price

From 2007 to 2016 oysters (83 60 in real terms) menhaden (70 49 in real terms) and blue crab (59 39 in real terms) had the largest price increases There were no price decreases from 2007 to 2016 From 2015 to 2016 shrimp (11) mullets (6) and groupers (2) had the largest price increases while crawfish (-30) blue crab (-11) and menhaden (-10) had the largest price decreases

3 httpseronmfsnoaagovnews_roompress_releases201608_noaa_prehtml4 FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Global Production Statistics httpwwwfaoorgfigisservletTabLandAreatb_ds=Productionamptb_mode=TABLEamptb_act=SELECTamptb_grp=COUNTRYamplang=en

167

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Gulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Red snapper (176 141 in real terms)bull Menhaden (131 102 in real terms)bull Spiny lobster (61 40 in real terms)From 2015bull Crawfish (73)bull Tunas (29)bull Shrimp (11)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Tunas (-45 -52 in real terms)From 2015bull Blue crab (-13)bull Spiny lobster (-11)bull Oysters (-9)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Red snapper (115)bull Spiny lobster (41)bull Menhaden (36)From 2015bull Crawfish (149)bull Tunas (27)bull Menhaden (15)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Tunas (-50)bull Oysters (-29)bull Crawfish (-14)From 2015bull Spiny lobster (-12)bull Oysters (-7)bull Red snapper (-4)

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for

fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups5

Key Gulf of Mexico Region Recreational Species

bull Atlantic croakerbull Gulf and southern

kingfishbull Red drumbull Red snapperbull Sand and silver

seatrout

bull Sheepshead porgybull Southern flounderbull Spanish mackerel bull Spotted seatroutbull Striped mullet

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities6 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA

5 Except where noted Atlantic and Gulf recreational catch and effort estimates are based upon the MRIP APAIS and CHTS (httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovrecreational-fisheriesSurveyssurvey-details) and not the revised MRIP estimates (httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovleadership-messagenoaa-fisheries-releases-revised-mrip-recreational-catch-and-effort-estimates) released in 20186 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpswwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

168

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

The greatest employment impacts from expenditures on saltwater recreational fishing in the Gulf of Mexico Region were generated in West Florida (60200 jobs) followed by Alabama (16100 jobs) The largest sales impacts were observed in West Florida ($68 billion) followed by Texas ($2 billion) The biggest income impacts were generated in West Florida ($26 billion) followed by Texas ($746 million) The greatest value-added impacts were in West Florida ($41 billion) followed by Texas ($12 billion)

Recreational fishing expenditures (on both fishing trips and durable equipment purchases) across the Gulf of Mexico Region in 2016 totaled about $11 billion Trip expenditures totaled more than $14 billion with a large portion coming from trips in the private boat (41) and for-hire (30) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $96 billion with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($55 billion)

Fishing TripsIn 2016 recreational fishermen took 195 million fishing trips in the Gulf of Mexico Region This number represented a 20 decrease from 2007 and a 1 decrease from 2015 The largest proportions of trips were taken in the private boat mode (57) and shore mode (37) West Florida (132 million trips) and Alabama (26 million trips) had the highest number of recorded trips

ParticipationIn 2016 there were 27 million recreational anglers who fished in the Gulf of Mexico Region This number represented a 24 decrease from 2007 and an 8 increase from 2015 These anglers were Gulf of Mexico Region residents from either a coastal county (87) or non-coastal county (13)

Harvest and ReleaseOf the Gulf of Mexicorsquos key species and species groups drum (spotted seatrout) (23 million fish) red drum (49 million fish) and drum (sand and silver seatrouts) (43 million fish) were most frequently caught by

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Striped mullet (85)bull Drum (Gulf and southern kingfish) (1)From 2015bull Red snapper (78)bull Drum (Gulf and southern kingfish) (41)bull Drum (spotted seatrout) (37)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Red drum (-47)bull Southern flounder (-46)bull Drum (spotted seatrout) (-26)From 2015bull Porgies (sheepshead) (-31)bull Red drum (-20)bull Drum (Atlantic Croaker) (-4)

recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 striped mullet (85) and drum (Gulf and southern kingfish) (1) had the largest increases in catch while red drum (-47) southern flounder (-46) and drum (spotted seatrout) (-26) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 red snapper (78) drum (Gulf and southern kingfish) (41) and drum (spotted seatrout) (37) had the largest increases in catch while porgies (sheepshead) (-31) red drum (-20) and drum (Atlantic Croaker) (-4) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries Note that when discussing the marine economy in the Gulf of Mexico Region all statistics include the entire state of Florida and not just West Florida789

169

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Gulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy10 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average Louisiana had the highest CFLQ in the Gulf region in 2015 at 233

In 2015 14 million employer establishments operated within the five states included in the Gulf of Mexico Region (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed over 22 million workers and had a total annual payroll of $1 trillion The combined gross state product of Alabama Florida Louisiana Mississippi and Texas was approximately $3 trillion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 the Gulf of Mexico Region had 654 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 64 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $474 million (a 75 increase in real terms from 2007) There were 132 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (this remained unchanged from 2007) These establishments employed 6781 workers (a 22 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $2387 million (a 4 decrease in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of seafood product preparation and packaging establishments was located in Florida (327) followed by Texas (207) and Louisiana (153)

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 801 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the five states that make up the Gulf of Mexico Region (a 2 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $699 million (a 17 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 373 employer firms

in the retail sales of seafood sector (a 2 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 2494 workers and had a total annual payroll of $566 million The greatest number of retail seafood establishments was located in Florida (536) followed by Louisiana (259) and Texas (240)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 478 employer firms in the wholesale sales of seafood sector in the Gulf of Mexico Region in 2015 (a 12 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 4211 workers and had a total annual payroll of $1652 million The greatest number of wholesale seafood establishments was located in Florida (242) followed by Louisiana (111) and Texas (90)

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of the Gulf of Mexico Regionrsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons It is clear however that these sectors play an important role in the regional economy For example the ship and boatbuilding sector accounted for $2 billion in payroll in 2015

7 Marine Economy information was not available for West Florida information for the entire state of Florida is provided in this report8 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)9 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)10 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

Tables | Gulf of Mexico Region

172

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGulf of Mexico Region | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Landings Value Value Jobs Sales Income Jobs Sales IncomeRevenue Added AddedAlabama 6459 12058 555373 219712 287906 11911 535846 214883 280529Florida 196706 76749 16873652 3171513 5658897 11083 1081344 284434 437467Louisiana 426116 36102 2021911 751727 1023361 35024 1836128 713007 958966Mississippi 28969 4586 217948 87253 112697 4578 216661 86981 112250Texas 195668 21507 2091002 597409 898617 16352 1079847 394235 552041

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 690211 663848 636427 624629 811905 784869 941557 1059780 886519 912050Finfish amp Other 146525 147115 142425 117831 184721 188283 200892 200092 251733 262150Shellfish 543686 516732 494003 506797 627184 596586 740665 859688 634786 649901

Key SpeciesBlue crab 46028 39813 45484 41264 48794 53708 61804 79458 74525 64632Crawfish 9034 9507 15547 13971 9914 8325 16490 16088 6851 11877Groupers 21488 24108 18435 14270 20326 24657 24628 30435 27671 28694Menhaden 62110 64376 60606 51750 92855 85890 90643 80402 138511 143339Mullets 5543 6099 6105 5221 10368 7557 13222 11626 7568 7825Oysters 69542 60464 73464 55085 65273 76042 76450 93007 99324 90399Red snapper 9570 7972 7984 10202 11413 13681 20621 23158 27437 26450Shrimp 367060 366808 327608 339228 441384 412209 513055 587267 371845 412947Spiny lobster 24527 19141 12203 32747 35610 21128 46744 53415 44055 39367Tunas 10535 6170 8180 2688 5516 10657 7308 6334 4502 5790

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 1404307 1278879 1435665 1072068 1792550 1489595 1346244 1245301 1567151 1744452Finfish amp Other 1071825 994813 1071919 810889 1472911 1177685 1043696 931158 1259884 1437436Shellfish 332482 284066 363746 261179 319640 311910 302548 314143 307267 307017

Key SpeciesBlue crab 57964 49258 61277 41240 55606 55444 46941 51664 52609 51298Crawfish 15848 15735 19312 14557 9599 6853 19676 13055 5461 13573Groupers 7723 8941 7008 5075 7175 8325 7613 8991 7815 7936Menhaden 1005325 927517 1002579 753442 1398654 1102539 971308 848599 1188984 1364030Mullets 8933 10609 11303 8963 14233 10772 13482 15101 10784 10545Oysters 22518 20723 22829 15824 18742 21192 19257 17957 17134 15975Red snapper 2998 2370 2503 3259 3567 4042 5306 5739 6741 6457Shrimp 225163 188806 250572 178902 221469 219216 206839 215903 212273 211787Spiny lobster 3402 2975 3960 5286 5302 3634 5600 5038 5450 4811Tunas 3426 1786 2836 1322 1588 3070 2094 1760 1343 1706

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue crab 079 081 074 100 088 097 132 154 142 126Crawfish 057 060 081 096 103 121 084 123 125 088Groupers 278 270 263 281 283 296 324 339 354 362Menhaden 006 007 006 007 007 008 009 009 012 011Mullets 062 057 054 058 073 070 098 077 070 074Oysters 309 292 322 348 348 359 397 518 580 566Red snapper 319 336 319 313 320 339 389 403 407 410Shrimp 163 194 131 190 199 188 248 272 175 195Spiny lobster 721 643 308 620 672 581 835 106 808 818Tunas 307 345 288 203 347 347 349 360 335 339

173

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Gulf of Mexico Region | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars trips)

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)12

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 3235 2926 2550 2480 2737 2803 2973 2616 2250 2379Non-Coastal 326 262 296 235 311 268 400 273 262 345Out-of-State3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 3562 3188 2846 2715 3048 3071 3373 2890 2512 2724

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016For-Hire 852 819 822 580 735 884 907 927 1086 1115Private 14980 15195 13443 12685 12911 12782 13510 11547 10952 11170Shore 8457 8776 8332 7783 8930 9506 10817 8582 7686 7255Total Trips 24289 24790 22597 21047 22576 23172 25233 21056 19724 19540

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)5

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 1408 1936 1291 1634 2208 1462 1883 2681 1349 1288R 2616 3149 3856 3828 5899 3920 3269 2239 2167 2085

Drum (Gulf and southern kingfish)

H 1136 1305 1065 1421 939 918 1622 707 1173 1406R 842 728 576 624 539 536 474 358 248 595

Drum (sand and silver seatrouts)

H 3184 3556 4314 4701 5960 5056 3013 2674 3162 3112R 1911 1990 2444 1806 2540 2476 1851 482 675 1156

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 12104 15042 14147 10871 14719 13593 12762 5818 7800 9932R 18850 21017 17364 14565 19119 20215 19527 8932 9067 13104

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 1244 1615 1607 1195 2273 1596 1355 1391 1327 1060R 1222 1487 1339 1739 1633 1516 1672 1579 1562 925

Red drumH 3135 3560 2893 3516 3891 3013 4138 2115 2250 2049R 6222 7016 5525 6467 6449 6329 7701 3480 3912 2881

Red snapperH 1268 719 827 367 557 625 1289 559 805 1001R 3258 2111 2146 1436 1521 1425 2824 1786 1543 3175

Southern flounderH 701 538 691 802 858 836 1102 486 419 459R 240 122 193 220 222 310 339 73 83 49

Spanish mackerelH 1338 1899 1508 1577 1542 1841 3355 1722 1780 1997R 2104 2041 1636 2476 1942 1442 4159 2779 1200 962

Striped mulletH 1150 1259 742 1666 1902 2356 2984 2366 1949 2114R 157 146 225 126 313 204 195 293 68 300

Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 432633Private Boat 590553Shore 410695Total 1433882

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 2025330Other Equipment 885813Boat Expenses 5543627Vehicle Expenses 983006Second Home Expenses 130943Total Durable Expenditures 9568717

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 11002599

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Trips Jobs Sales Income Value AddedAlabama 2567 16114 1436429 616372 1029958West Florida 13219 60179 6827238 2575065 4111852Louisiana 2242 14142 1629917 608048 1003379Mississippi 1512 5351 637880 211438 344605Texas 1187 16030 2000004 746008 1237327

1 The Marine Recreational Program (MRIP) does not collect angler participation data for Texas2 Includes Louisiana resident participation estimated from historical MRIP data (2006-2013) and a state creel survey (2014-2015) 3 Data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but whether an angler is a resident of a region is not specified4 The Marine Recreational Program (MRIP) does not collect effort data for Texas5 Data on the number of fish released in Texas are not collected by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) and therefore not reported in this table

Tables | Alabama

176

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oAlabama | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Alabama Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 12058 555373 219712 287906 11911 535846 214883 280529

Commercial Harvesters 1977 106619 31624 47088 1977 106619 31624 47088Seafood Processors amp Dealers 2030 143433 56183 71397 1933 136560 53491 67975

Importers 40 12251 1963 3735 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 183 9641 3380 4353 181 9560 3351 4317

Retail 7829 283429 126561 161333 7820 283106 126417 161149

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 48845 44503 39624 26335 50910 46527 56832 70497 50940 64592Finfish amp Other 3686 4358 3662 2748 4072 5183 4680 4572 5023 4927Shellfish 45160 40145 35962 23587 46838 41344 52153 65925 45917 59665

Key SpeciesBlue crab 1711 1533 961 732 1128 1044 1036 1319 1225 1788Flounders 261 214 197 97 222 185 58 53 66 56Menhaden 71 59 42 15 58 84 104 147 154 164Mullets 984 1030 765 594 687 1206 1178 1046 761 514Oysters 2698 243 77 390 1322 1253 786 441 290 590Red snapper 213 239 263 329 314 316 401 697 1443 1423Sharks 250 403 275 111 381 330 247 219 262 256Shrimp 40742 38355 34894 22463 44361 39040 50321 64149 44399 57271Spanish mackerel 453 664 301 499 582 1149 940 472 705 833Vermillion snapper 323 507 841 384 622 393 88 387 247 242

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 29434 24612 29199 14063 26119 26335 23421 25790 26565 29355Finfish amp Other 4857 5577 4478 3441 4966 6596 5831 5276 5095 5115Shellfish 24578 19035 24721 10622 21153 19739 17590 20514 21470 24240

Key SpeciesBlue crab 2557 1799 1458 927 1617 1325 1025 1184 1300 1919Flounders 133 107 97 48 111 83 25 23 26 19Menhaden 470 268 190 81 364 521 496 700 695 804Mullets 1798 2017 1814 1202 1262 1946 1793 1829 1385 944Oysters 769 71 23 68 296 265 133 58 34 52Red snapper 59 61 65 83 78 78 108 180 356 320Sharks 315 424 328 140 450 495 343 272 392 401Shrimp 21247 17154 23215 9625 19224 18137 16418 19257 20132 22256Spanish mackerel 580 921 418 733 839 1377 972 431 617 859Vermillion snapper 129 199 346 148 224 132 28 124 74 76

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue crab 067 085 066 079 07 079 101 111 094 093Flounders 197 201 204 205 2 221 235 224 251 286Menhaden 015 022 022 018 016 016 021 021 022 02Mullets 055 051 042 049 054 062 066 057 055 054Oysters 351 341 333 575 447 472 591 76 862 1144Red snapper 362 393 404 397 404 405 37 386 405 445Sharks 079 095 084 079 085 067 072 081 067 064Shrimp 192 224 15 233 231 215 306 333 221 257Spanish mackerel 078 072 072 068 069 083 097 109 114 097Vermillion snapper 25 255 243 259 278 297 312 311 333 319

177

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Alabama | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 528 59410 21180 31020Private Boat 512 48766 14659 25245Shore 1100 92952 30450 51589

Total Durable Expenditures 13974 1235301 550083 922104Total State Economic Impacts 16114 1436429 616372 1029958

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 37554Private Boat 47904Shore 76315Total 161773

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 315526Other Equipment 103942Boat Expenses 1097700Vehicle Expenses 48043Second Home Expenses 24625Total Durable Expenditures 1589834

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1751607

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 253 192 205 195 295 254 279 220 225 274Non-Coastal 169 116 151 140 177 131 224 123 151 176Out-of-State 291 237 209 220 435 339 549 510 455 465Total Anglers 712 545 566 554 907 723 1052 853 831 915

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 75 56 56 34 75 59 90 87 98 103Private 985 946 885 840 1206 1035 1006 714 918 958Shore 901 702 772 812 1202 1211 1767 1368 1308 1505Total Trips 1961 1704 1713 1686 2483 2305 2862 2169 2324 2567

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Bluefish H 26 16 14 30 75 56 163 36 17 120R 175 54 46 80 167 197 639 518 192 740

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 463 1163 250 918 886 345 391 1105 539 334R 924 1371 1821 1861 2593 1206 886 1393 1401 638

Drum (kingfishes)1

H 476 668 593 633 626 227 929 322 350 436R 289 257 284 309 341 97 260 156 131 259

Drum (sand seatrout)

H 704 1216 1428 2069 2346 1415 486 524 881 1062R 481 409 752 835 743 480 294 246 317 567

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 359 269 318 610 826 773 539 242 522 679R 488 844 757 454 1301 1126 761 254 907 1499

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 320 289 166 218 480 313 285 121 316 94R 30 159 48 51 146 48 46 18 168 35

Red drum H 84 88 62 123 143 124 188 90 161 157R 136 227 110 151 150 305 425 318 254 304

Red snapper H 217 107 138 42 217 152 450 132 297 340R 851 340 394 288 488 194 857 758 610 1490

Southern flounder

H 96 93 139 243 163 155 84 29 50 28R 38 38 22 65 60 53 43 18 26 7

Spanish mackerel

H 92 111 76 255 334 516 1313 128 707 679R 21 32 60 101 128 148 1130 53 275 114

1 Kingfishes include southern kingfish and Gulf kingfish

178

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oAlabama | Marine Economy

2015 Alabama State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 318136 (13) 98540 (13) 1634391 (13) 6737 (11) 11025 (11) 19998 (11) 047

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 47 33 41 68 67 47 58 57 49Receipts 1547 1894 1809 3314 4354 1965 3069 3446 2901

Seafood salesretail

Firms 61 57 67 71 58 68 66 55 46Receipts 4279 5632 5484 5197 4759 7073 5520 4351 3274

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 23 23 22 21 16 17 22 23 20Employees 1510 1450 1086 1128 882 778 989 963 961

Payroll 32774 29277 24900 22824 21922 19730 22641 23973 25951

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 31 29 28 23 25 16 18 18 21Employees 395 494 339 332 321 306 281 388 378

Payroll 6202 8751 5893 5119 6547 6221 6861 9321 10034

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 33 33 31 34 32 32 28 31 32Employees ds ds 130 132 120 189 219 200 234

Payroll 1809 1710 2044 2016 1888 2990 3267 3330 3706

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 8 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 4Employees 48 ds ds ds 215 ds ds 45 ds

Payroll 3266 ds ds ds 13117 ds ds 2617 ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 5 7 7 5 6 5 5 2 2Employees 46 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll 3553 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 2 3 2 2 1 0 0 0Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 52 56 55 54 53 57 54 54 57

Employees 364 316 278 609 ds 329 332 343 387Payroll 9382 9170 8418 12149 12196 10253 9659 9804 11182

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 19 20 19 19 19 10 13 13 14Employees 491 756 658 548 536 ds 554 778 666

Payroll 21076 33244 27272 32143 34998 ds 34481 37273 37154Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 16 17 16 16 16 14 12 16 14Employees 338 287 294 276 283 241 208 124 121

Payroll 17554 16712 15383 14737 14981 8808 14761 6902 6922

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 4 5 5 3 6 3 2 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds 101 4 ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds 5788 160 ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 42 42 40 32 35 37 38 37 41Employees 3570 4435 3913 2598 3176 4936 5948 5904 6049

Payroll 172380 188543 159065 151813 166116 251063 303016 311296 342082

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | West Florida

180

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oWest Florida | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Florida1 Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 76749 16873652 3171513 5658897 11083 1081344 284434 437467

Commercial Harvesters 7158 520252 163093 217024 7158 520252 163093 217024Seafood Processors amp Dealers 4442 801532 155120 304952 580 112172 21709 42677

Importers 39207 12116639 1941923 3693682 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 9586 1226678 481589 599160 482 61714 24229 30144

Retail 16356 2208551 429788 844078 2862 387205 75404 147621

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 132162 123850 117324 139046 166015 143886 182172 212961 215678 196706

Finfish amp Other 46828 51698 49976 41321 59580 60710 67994 74935 67107 69389Shellfish 85334 72152 67349 97725 106434 83176 114178 138026 148572 127317

Key SpeciesBlue crab 5769 3289 4195 6706 7719 5142 6454 7385 8487 6127Gag 4348 4913 2759 2079 1439 2437 2799 2889 2782 4659Lobsters 24546 19175 12206 32752 35616 21136 46749 53418 44056 39371Mullets 3663 4172 5069 4188 8630 5050 11081 9387 6148 6336Oyster 6631 5519 6968 6298 8582 9706 5783 4178 4722 4266Quahog clam 914 1825 1524 1002 921 753 921 NA NA NARed grouper 11024 13591 10488 8992 15087 16737 16219 21217 18931 17836Red snapper 3066 2951 2980 4552 5417 6141 8073 8111 9997 8599Shrimp 20976 23265 24446 27554 28456 22161 29164 42690 53175 46958Stone crab 26213 19019 17806 23335 24430 23934 24710 27911 35758 28106

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 59784 60380 66387 63678 78459 63648 63231 81775 81626 75378

Finfish amp Other 31146 35740 39000 32251 42392 39077 38003 49090 37202 39929Shellfish 28638 24640 27386 31428 36067 24570 25227 32685 44424 35449

Key SpeciesBlue crab 6110 2660 3371 5759 6833 4157 4463 4456 4871 3515Gag 1339 1478 825 572 369 612 676 689 642 1073Lobsters 3405 2981 3961 5287 5303 3635 5601 5040 5451 4812Mullets 5619 6980 9167 7262 11410 7249 10879 11943 8595 8472Oyster 2959 2526 2877 2165 3100 3316 1298 757 844 722Quahog clam 116 279 255 156 137 128 183 NA NA NARed grouper 4352 5628 4387 3488 5635 6141 5412 6629 5664 5290Red snapper 919 849 863 1317 1538 1698 2181 2104 2642 2324Shrimp 8628 9942 11451 12892 11975 7958 9676 11946 18944 16864Stone crab 5884 6163 5382 5100 5460 5202 3767 1944 2758 2838

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Blue crab 094 124 124 116 113 124 145 166 174 174Gag 325 332 334 363 390 398 414 419 433 434Lobsters 721 643 308 619 672 581 835 1060 808 818Mullets 065 060 055 058 076 070 102 079 072 075Oyster 224 219 242 291 277 293 446 552 560 590Quahog clam 790 653 597 643 674 586 503 NA NA NARed grouper 253 241 239 258 268 273 300 320 334 337Red snapper 334 347 345 346 352 362 370 386 378 370Shrimp 243 234 213 214 238 278 301 357 281 278Stone crab 445 309 331 458 447 460 656 1436 1296 990

1 Information reported in this table is for the entire state of Florida not just West Florida2 NA = These data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

181

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

West Florida | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 4211 499717 179975 275706Private Boat 2502 260148 89392 154162Shore 1333 130653 45408 79359

Total Durable Expenditures 52133 5936720 2260290 3602625Total State Economic Impacts 60179 6827238 2575065 4111852

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 273518Private Boat 267642Shore 105111Total 646271

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 1129797Other Equipment 470826Boat Expenses 2687489Vehicle Expenses 274063Second Home Expenses 50660Total Durable Expenditures 4612836

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 5259107

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 1934 1820 1551 1538 1592 1718 1813 1649 1414 1393Non-Coastal1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAOut-of-State 2151 2029 1671 1470 1624 2141 2538 2716 2399 2306Total Anglers 4085 3849 3222 3008 3216 3859 4351 4365 3813 3699

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 612 571 573 461 536 699 684 694 786 807Private 10005 10145 8623 8160 7520 7865 8328 8115 6997 7363Shore 6319 6782 6482 5645 5845 6216 6937 6370 5643 5049Total Trips 16936 17497 15677 14266 13901 14780 15949 15179 13425 13219

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Common snook H 35 25 14 0 lt 1 lt 1 33 14 21 27R 1591 1595 1924 600 747 1040 1547 1578 2119 2366

Drum (sand and silver seatrouts)

H 1120 746 893 410 865 1415 706 578 396 187R 598 584 460 210 294 742 239 122 206 187

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 1514 1543 1371 1115 1475 1626 1406 1340 1295 1547R 10059 9584 7672 8470 11382 10920 7759 7936 7342 10023

Gag H 285 434 203 232 98 132 213 105 96 86R 2676 4077 2724 2018 1158 981 1170 818 483 745

Gray snapper H 1047 1393 1176 560 419 948 1482 1933 1449 1507R 4289 5690 3014 1858 2240 3126 5136 7519 5706 4647

King mackerel H 271 184 453 172 127 180 205 306 252 258R 85 155 138 81 47 62 87 118 73 105

Mullets3 H 613 1238 656 966 857 1549 1641 1480 1096 1490R 183 143 191 73 106 88 224 319 204 434

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 591 557 681 455 607 628 524 895 589 581R 894 855 808 1246 1275 1177 1084 1535 902 865

Red drum H 412 457 225 240 287 414 364 389 504 395R 2558 2561 1440 1992 2895 2299 2197 2647 3428 2292

Spanish mackerel H 1205 1754 1392 1284 1155 1215 1970 1566 1033 1204R 2065 1988 1546 2360 1780 1219 3017 2724 920 823

1 Data is not available because all West Florida residents are considered coastal county residents2 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish3 Mullets encompass species within the mullet genus including striped mullets

182

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oWest Florida | Marine Economy

2015 West Florida State Economy ( of national total)12

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient3

Totals 1948357 (8) 532830 (7) 7777990 (63) 33707 (54) 49239 (51) 88386 (49) 097

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 173 202 217 280 294 307 300 315 300Receipts 10497 11065 12473 14635 14618 17557 17214 22329 21841

Seafood salesretail

Firms 319 331 316 361 362 383 338 346 355Receipts 27557 26087 25667 27964 29037 30765 25332 26433 29033

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 20 23 25 27 24 27 25 27 27Employees 1748 1637 1143 1269 1095 1608 1374 1419 1429

Payroll 58233 53455 46235 45772 42612 51735 50003 50556 58246

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 267 229 215 229 250 226 234 233 242Employees 2308 1913 1762 1747 1913 1957 1878 1974 2055

Payroll 85019 75203 72159 70889 77115 75945 79266 83964 90247

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 169 168 158 145 145 151 165 166 181Employees 989 991 885 865 849 945 909 1037 1137

Payroll 20595 21604 21182 20783 20158 21577 23476 25844 29066

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 47 42 42 50 54 60 47 62 57Employees 1242 1106 972 709 753 1381 1050 1743 1815

Payroll 94429 50115 37774 50217 53341 100402 82078 175366 173004

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 69 57 58 61 65 75 69 77 76Employees 3190 2486 2801 2279 2374 3345 2485 2015 2154

Payroll 208144 169055 180139 159025 177386 231887 140564 131069 137786Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 34 31 33 29 29 39 31 28 32Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 10510

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 967938

MarinasEstablishments 493 442 428 430 411 432 444 464 466

Employees 4935 5024 4665 4439 4657 4918 5076 5421 5472Payroll 148592 151677 132955 133017 142997 148573 145265 168185 171354

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 53 56 59 55 64 43 58 61 69Employees 6585 8052 7288 7547 7484 4598 6258 6992 7834

Payroll 173788 192473 185309 191560 195458 86461 188997 179024 208186Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 145 147 145 145 150 151 180 190 196Employees 1484 894 829 980 1047 853 1390 878 861

Payroll 61470 56917 60641 76853 75561 68366 130893 74185 72483

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 29 40 32 34 32 66 61 56 55Employees 459 712 527 470 377 2082 555 588 987

Payroll 12872 24668 19006 20525 16879 72554 25439 20647 32032

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 296 297 261 248 246 258 259 263 278Employees 12332 12419 8221 7363 7909 8621 8813 9608 10913

Payroll 469382 442096 296537 302909 325942 374831 390853 448514 488050

1 All data presented on this page are for the entire state of Florida not just West Florida 2 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20153 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Tables | Louisiana

184

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oLouisiana | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Louisiana Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 36102 2021911 751727 1023361 35024 1836128 713007 958966

Commercial Harvesters 14635 794582 272048 397100 14635 794582 272048 397100Seafood Processors amp Dealers 2111 198996 77186 98454 2033 191662 74342 94826

Importers 483 149370 23939 45535 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 1065 129730 44195 57208 978 119105 40576 52523

Retail 17807 749233 334358 425063 17377 730778 326041 414517

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 289288 275701 286993 233559 324123 329754 399064 487718 373393 426116Finfish amp Other 65201 64118 62632 56912 102097 88989 103919 98773 109672 158548Shellfish 224087 211582 224361 176647 222026 240766 295145 388945 263720 267567

Key SpeciesBlue crab 35044 32203 37301 30325 36784 43921 51568 66706 58069 49408Crawfish 9034 9507 15547 13971 9914 8325 16490 16088 6851 11877King mackerel 1298 1307 1184 1149 1594 1475 1517 2414 2006 2152Menhaden 41368 45768 42555 43331 82881 63374 80262 72844 85322 132105Mullets 690 749 73 185 775 976 626 893 418 720Oysters 40148 39009 50950 24986 41652 42186 44872 67482 85090 68540Red snapper 2529 2038 2185 2311 2261 2551 4824 6427 6610 5948Shrimp 139842 130854 120555 107362 133670 146318 182210 238665 113700 137735Tunas 8334 4409 6338 1649 3369 7893 4595 4276 2743 4414Vermillion snapper 991 819 806 399 517 670 474 700 633 925

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 999343 919017 1007474 793377 1311040 1044376 993879 872507 1070077 1255333Finfish amp Other 814647 759440 806845 665677 1153921 878405 823989 687557 917426 1092079Shellfish 184696 159577 200629 127700 157119 165971 169890 184950 152652 163253

Key SpeciesBlue crab 45107 41714 53057 30752 43893 46327 39193 43219 41308 40100Crawfish 15848 15735 19312 14557 9599 6853 19676 13055 5461 13573King mackerel 879 789 927 691 1002 969 788 1167 1047 996Menhaden 789621 738092 785575 648561 1131287 853012 800101 663693 893789 1068690Mullets 1375 1503 189 362 1385 1385 609 1186 692 1005Oysters 12858 12840 15006 6874 11156 11368 11364 12692 14488 12053Red snapper 807 589 667 828 918 1028 1216 1489 1591 1444Shrimp 110860 89285 113250 75515 92469 101406 99655 115982 91390 97522Tunas 2476 1248 2009 490 932 2152 1241 1142 661 1211Vermillion snapper 517 409 412 186 234 291 174 242 213 335

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue crab 078 077 070 099 084 095 132 154 141 123Crawfish 057 060 081 096 103 121 084 123 125 088King mackerel 148 166 128 166 159 152 193 207 192 216Menhaden 005 006 005 007 007 007 010 011 010 012Mullets 050 050 039 051 056 070 103 075 060 072Oysters 312 304 340 363 373 371 395 532 587 569Red snapper 313 346 328 279 246 248 397 432 415 412Shrimp 126 147 106 142 145 144 183 206 124 141Tunas 337 353 316 337 362 367 370 374 415 365Vermillion snapper 192 200 195 215 221 230 273 289 297 276

185

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Louisiana | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 657 91711 35617 52914Private Boat 694 93278 24446 45273Shore 287 35654 9419 17411

Total Durable Expenditures 12504 1409274 538566 887781Total State Economic Impacts 14142 1629917 608048 1003379

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 53884Private Boat 73854Shore 29712Total 157451

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 242851Other Equipment 120737Boat Expenses 987716Vehicle Expenses 184993Second Home Expenses 15767Total Durable Expenditures 1552064

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1709515

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 853 795 669 609 690 651 709 NA NA NANon-Coastal 124 120 108 67 86 77 109 NA NA NAOut-of-State 157 170 139 120 183 165 262 NA NA NATotal Anglers 1134 1084 916 796 959 893 1080 NA NA NA

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016For-Hire 144 179 183 79 113 115 122 131 160 179Private 3156 3508 3176 3055 3342 2891 3190 2096 2264 2063Shore 889 933 769 729 1122 1131 1349 NA NA NATotal Trips 4188 4620 4128 3862 4576 4137 4661 2227 2424 2242

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black drum H 386 543 519 398 468 424 454 217 220 138R 729 1117 974 1033 1085 881 1638 NA NA NA

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 683 357 471 229 606 520 829 235 209 150R 1006 1187 1100 1268 2319 1675 1797 NA NA NA

Drum (sand seatrout)

H 888 1085 879 1065 1187 895 755 532 368 354R 541 825 854 514 1032 679 990 NA NA NA

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 8930 11705 10557 7857 10440 9608 9004 3231 4291 5326R 7394 9580 7975 5054 5803 6776 9709 NA NA NA

Drum(southern kingfish)

H 67 74 103 41 16 110 15 4 20 6R 28 118 59 47 25 40 65 NA NA NA

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 271 706 703 430 869 397 368 262 257 225R 287 448 473 439 188 237 477 NA NA NA

Red drum H 2308 2673 2237 2812 3023 2011 3169 1283 1242 1045R 3455 4075 3733 4111 3195 2871 4676 NA NA NA

Red snapper H 160 84 97 7 31 101 83 128 171 145R 285 262 195 7 108 131 224 NA NA NA

Southern flounder

H 349 235 286 327 399 331 685 209 217 222R 67 37 50 72 61 98 134 NA NA NA

Yellowfin tuna H 8 17 3 lt 1 13 25 11 14 23 28R lt 1 7 0 0 4 3 2 NA NA NA

1 Louisiana data not available for 2014-20162 Effort for 2014-2016 is estimated using data from a state creel survey and does not capture shore-based effort separately from private boat effort3 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish4 Harvest and release totals for 2014-2016 are estimated using data from a state creel survey

186

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oLouisiana | Marine Economy

2015 Louisiana State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 357815 (15) 105575 (14) 1724973 (14) 7668 (12) 12055 (12) 23807 (13) 233

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 85 77 68 120 94 78 99 111 115Receipts 6523 7365 5308 10358 9308 8492 9136 8632 10086

Seafood salesretail

Firms 196 182 173 197 192 184 173 177 169Receipts 20932 25900 17622 16001 18758 16804 17538 17383 17870

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 41 36 38 34 33 35 36 37 38Employees 1253 991 1301 1209 1006 1117 964 943 1015

Payroll 41391 32382 37657 35770 46440 51237 49339 50881 63909

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 119 98 98 97 94 103 106 109 111Employees 954 739 702 683 767 862 846 672 865

Payroll 21604 15858 17261 15554 18427 22296 23235 24107 25837

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 101 107 106 101 100 97 94 90 90Employees 781 681 703 527 590 704 643 562 612

Payroll 11827 11141 11564 11214 11090 13042 11213 10421 11802

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 138 123 117 125 125 105 102 124 116Employees 7680 6506 6077 5610 5834 6422 5317 6275 5212

Payroll 527290 549388 391914 405796 417362 497165 458589 556693 396625

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 22 18 21 16 17 18 11 19 21Employees 685 1095 1192 93 93 ds 95 ds 451

Payroll 39843 87479 91760 6147 5608 ds 5435 ds 21706Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 3 2 2 1 3 2 4 4 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds 3 ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds 363 ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 50 43 43 43 45 44 41 39 36

Employees 378 274 244 314 329 257 250 229 194Payroll 17794 9581 8989 14716 10771 9209 8693 7276 4683

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 49 39 44 41 42 37 44 49 45Employees 2978 2010 2193 2511 2526 2016 2834 3106 3418

Payroll 128207 85484 92883 105063 108491 93896 174054 212786 175092Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 128 145 137 138 138 136 133 137 142Employees 2508 2884 2893 3176 3396 2545 2533 2816 2862

Payroll 141757 183381 175271 224533 208306 162094 169795 206318 218379

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 14 22 17 21 20 46 18 14 15Employees 467 517 440 431 461 1205 443 ds 399

Payroll 31734 37181 33907 38776 38745 80780 37122 ds 37866

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 112 117 109 109 109 116 110 117 109Employees 12808 12815 12521 11737 11722 10933 7413 8512 8470

Payroll 503199 619606 613188 600259 639047 631098 416319 479243 401977

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Tables | Mississippi

188

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMississippi | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Mississipi Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 4586 217948 87253 112697 4578 216661 86981 112250

Commercial Harvesters 841 46904 14225 20823 841 46904 14225 20823Seafood Processors amp Dealers 708 59308 23463 29400 707 59216 23427 29355

Importers 3 1020 163 311 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 60 6243 2203 2775 60 6172 2178 2744

Retail 2973 104473 47199 59387 2970 104368 47151 59328

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 39340 43696 37956 21895 30291 49337 34970 26014 68535 28969

Finfish amp Other 21359 19233 18667 8963 10527 23172 10938 8102 53743 11830Shellfish 17981 24464 19289 12932 19764 26165 24032 17912 14792 17139

Key SpeciesBlue crab 741 447 573 366 318 724 416 997 1209 895Flounders 58 40 58 64 118 101 45 55 76 75Menhaden 20658 18534 17987 8378 9871 22394 10230 7358 52962 10973Mullets 35 32 30 31 56 63 61 25 12 22Oysters 819 6858 6094 4268 928 1596 1544 1685 969 1088Red snapper NA NA 158 NA 168 226 NA 307 NA NAShrimp 16418 17146 12612 8293 18514 23846 22072 15229 12613 15156

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 227834 201822 230255 111229 278075 263640 180600 190555 307035 307565

Finfish amp Other 216375 190191 217461 105274 267407 249382 171000 184393 294723 294641Shellfish 11459 11631 12794 5955 10668 14259 9599 6162 12312 12923

Key SpeciesBlue crab 737 450 545 366 370 782 359 570 798 773Flounders 25 17 25 28 55 43 19 21 29 27Menhaden 215182 189118 216709 104729 266774 248824 170500 183950 294233 294189Mullets 70 57 62 59 93 99 95 39 21 40Oysters 299 2606 2189 1453 247 425 336 321 182 245Red snapper NA NA 57 NA 86 115 NA 170 NA NAShrimp 10421 8570 10054 4135 10048 13051 8903 5270 11332 11905

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Blue crab 101 099 105 100 086 093 116 175 151 116Flounders 238 236 234 233 214 233 238 266 261 283Menhaden 010 010 008 008 004 009 006 004 018 004Mullets 050 057 048 052 061 064 064 064 056 055Oysters 274 263 278 294 375 375 459 525 532 444Red snapper NA NA 275 NA 196 197 NA 181 NA NAShrimp 158 200 125 201 184 183 248 289 111 127

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

189

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Mississippi | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 91 10531 3625 5225Private Boat 215 24227 6300 10518Shore 100 9514 2667 4454

Total Durable Expenditures 4945 593608 198846 324408Total State Economic Impacts 5351 637880 211438 344605

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 6250Private Boat 27039Shore 9768Total 43057

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 85603Other Equipment 43333Boat Expenses 277687Vehicle Expenses 81652Second Home Expenses 291Total Durable Expenditures 488566

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 531623

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 196 119 125 137 160 179 171 171 195 156Non-Coastal 34 26 36 29 48 60 67 62 48 83Out-of-State 55 48 50 50 60 91 101 94 114 106Total Anglers 284 194 212 216 268 331 339 328 357 345

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 21 13 11 7 11 11 11 16 42 25Private 834 596 759 629 843 991 986 621 773 786Shore 349 359 310 597 761 948 764 843 736 701Total Trips 1204 969 1079 1233 1615 1950 1761 1481 1551 1512

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 72 182 340 209 453 317 330 820 328 582R 264 388 715 422 606 695 330 375 710 1258

Drum (kingfishes)2

H 161 180 126 174 177 234 519 190 550 655R 48 57 61 47 36 157 94 32 54 121

Drum (sand and silver seatrouts)

H 296 351 1003 986 1336 1151 916 891 1406 1373R 230 166 378 246 472 574 327 113 152 402

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 385 608 1090 556 841 776 1016 415 867 1356R 909 1008 960 586 633 1394 1298 743 818 1581

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 17 17 22 43 260 115 93 75 113 54R 11 25 9 3 24 54 65 27 492 26

Red drum H 43 77 84 77 91 140 148 106 100 165R 73 153 241 213 208 853 403 515 229 286

Red snapper H 2 9 15 1 7 27 35 6 7 45R 9 103 55 25 lt 1 2 95 42 194 165

Sharks3 H 5 3 21 70 35 16 89 6 13 5R 43 31 36 87 38 104 75 44 12 76

Southern flounder

H 121 109 209 196 182 227 215 168 64 93R 31 45 120 79 99 153 159 54 57 38

Striped mullet H 66 79 119 188 491 396 647 602 712 465R 14 4 4 13 83 108 19 5 43 6

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish 2 Kingfishes include southern kingfish and Gulf kingfish3 Sharks include species within the requiem shark family blacktip sharks Atlantic sharpnose sharks and unidentified sharks

190

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMississippi | Marine Economy

2015 Mississippi State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 209279 (09) 58662 (08) 926391 (07) 3395 (05) 5745 (06) 10587 (06) 104

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms ds 17 16 30 25 27 ds 21 12Receipts ds 1055 753 1937 2108 930 ds 1932 1539

Seafood salesretail

Firms 57 48 56 69 51 50 54 42 53Receipts 4126 3437 4206 3421 3505 3957 3855 3129 4053

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 22 20 20 20 18 18 19 19 18Employees 3022 3062 2796 2849 2464 2368 2284 2289 2370

Payroll 60633 61723 61926 61731 52502 55407 59212 57324 60906

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 25 18 16 18 18 17 14 14 14Employees 106 61 113 ds 64 102 ds ds 39

Payroll 3285 3088 2836 2542 2532 4412 1546 1587 1800

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 15 18 14 15 17 13 13 10 8Employees ds 50 46 50 58 ds ds ds 96

Payroll ds 699 841 810 838 1902 ds ds 2672

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 4 5 5 4 4 4 6 4 4Employees ds 119 114 ds 127 ds 230 277 259

Payroll 7585 8351 7730 8058 7233 ds 17080 16365 17353

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1Employees ds NA ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds NA ds ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Employees ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 19 17 13 18 19 16 16 18 17

Employees ds 111 172 183 189 204 154 193 197Payroll 2145 2794 3479 4163 5137 5361 3972 4960 5047

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 5 7 8 7 7 2 4 5 5Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 241

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 10390Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 9 8 7 8 6 7 6 7 7Employees ds ds ds 141 ds ds ds ds 57

Payroll 1754 ds ds 6982 ds ds ds ds 2698

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 23 24 20 20 20 18 19 18 18Employees 14578 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 14722

Payroll 615837 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 892317

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Texas

192

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oTexas | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Texas Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 21507 2091002 597409 898617 16352 1079847 394235 552041

Commercial Harvesters 4446 411184 122134 193538 4446 411184 122134 193538Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1466 134823 50719 66799 1336 122801 46197 60842

Importers 2682 828853 132839 252671 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 1035 153639 51263 70990 490 72696 24256 33589

Retail 11877 562503 240453 314620 10081 473167 201649 264071

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 180575 176098 154530 203795 240566 215365 268519 262589 177973 195668Finfish amp Other 9452 7709 7488 7888 8445 10231 13361 13709 16188 17455Shellfish 171123 168389 147043 195907 232121 205134 255158 248880 161785 178213

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 450 446 484 531 622 743 819 681 NA NABlack drum 1660 1363 1377 1573 1448 1491 1699 1981 2074 2266Blue crab 2763 2342 2454 3134 2845 2878 2331 3050 5534 6414Flounders 62 144 91 62 205 175 73 97 187 236Groupers 474 606 695 389 572 774 1168 1156 1483 1601Oysters 19246 8835 9376 19144 12789 21302 23465 19221 8254 15915Red snapper 3762 2744 2398 3009 3254 4448 7324 7617 9387 10480Shrimp 149084 157187 135100 173556 216382 180844 229289 226535 147957 155829Tunas NA 94 139 4 2 5 7 14 3 NAVermilion snapper 1554 1430 1233 1337 1274 1434 659 604 920 572

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 87912 73048 102351 89721 98857 91596 85113 74674 81848 76822

Finfish amp Other 4800 3866 4134 4247 4224 4225 4872 4842 5438 5671Shellfish 83111 69182 98216 85475 94633 87371 80241 69832 76410 71151

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 62 59 63 67 79 89 96 78 NA NABlack drum 1687 1468 1610 1729 1795 1623 1689 1747 1879 1973Blue crab 3454 2635 2844 3436 2893 2853 1902 2234 4331 4990Flounders 24 58 32 26 75 60 20 25 51 63Groupers 161 188 227 156 199 227 306 281 355 375Oysters 5633 2679 2733 5265 3943 5817 6126 4129 1587 2903Red snapper 1213 870 851 1031 948 1123 1800 1797 2152 2369Shrimp 74007 63855 92602 76734 87753 78665 72186 63448 70475 63240Tunas NA 22 45 1 1 3 3 6 1 NAVermilion snapper 672 592 561 539 465 511 234 203 307 188

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atlantic croaker 729 758 764 798 784 831 855 877 NA NABlack drum 098 093 086 091 081 092 101 113 110 115Blue crab 080 089 086 091 098 101 123 137 128 129Flounders 255 248 284 237 275 294 355 389 365 373Groupers 295 322 306 249 287 341 381 412 418 427Oysters 342 330 343 364 324 366 383 466 520 548Red snapper 310 315 282 292 343 396 407 424 436 442Shrimp 201 246 146 226 247 230 318 357 210 246Tunas NA 426 308 319 182 183 210 229 243 NAVermilion snapper 231 242 220 248 274 281 281 298 300 304

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

193

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Texas | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 867 115114 42016 64744Private Boat 2129 274752 82530 149912Shore 2595 300626 93946 169102

Total Durable Expenditures 10439 1309512 527516 853569Total State Economic Impacts 16030 2000004 746008 1237327

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)1

Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 61427Private Boat 174114Shore 189789Total 425330

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 251553Other Equipment 146975Boat Expenses 493035Vehicle Expenses 394255Second Home Expenses 39600Total Durable Expenditures 1325417

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1750747

Harvest (H) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Black drum 66 82 98 165 129 257 150 139 128 138Drum (Atlantic croaker) 95 64 117 125 157 157 152 117 214 126

Drum (sand seatrout) 95 152 111 127 227 177 151 147 110 135

Drum (spotted seatrout) 916 917 810 732 1137 810 796 590 825 1025

King mackerel 11 8 16 6 9 9 10 13 9 12Porgies (sheepshead) 46 46 34 49 57 143 84 39 51 106

Red drum 289 266 285 264 347 323 269 247 241 288Red snapper 45 41 31 33 36 34 48 40 50 31Southern flounder 49 64 47 30 92 96 92 71 85 104

1 The Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) does not collect participation (number of anglers) or effort (number of trips) data for TexasTo calculate trip expenditure estimates effort by fishing mode was estimated based on 2013 data provided by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department(TPWD) These effort estimates were reviewed by the TPWD To calculate angler expenditure estimates (durable equipment expenditures) participationestimates were based on the sum of saltwater licenses sold in Texas plus a proportion of combination licenses sold in Texas A change in the method ofreporting landings occurred in 2007 so data from 2007 is not comparable to earlier years 2 Data collected by the TPWD is reported in this table The data collected by the TPWD differs from the data collected and reported in the MRIP Data onthe number of fish released are not reported by TPWD Please see the TPWD for more information wwwtpwdstatetxusfishboat

194

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oTexas | Marine Economy

2015 Texas State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 2150702 (88) 569091 (74) 10239710 (83) 5211 (83) 80268 (83) 161119 (9) 026

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 94 85 82 99 119 123 123 128 178Receipts 5386 3466 3858 3224 5734 6675 7484 6706 11051

Seafood salesretail

Firms 182 188 196 184 171 194 173 199 178Receipts 17442 18204 13177 12124 13433 14891 15094 15160 15660

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 26 27 24 22 24 22 30 32 29Employees 1207 1169 1026 1184 1273 1248 1026 1062 1006

Payroll 27813 27045 29006 24961 26425 27737 27638 28643 29729

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 104 69 75 77 82 71 75 89 90Employees 970 734 683 715 723 603 729 816 874

Payroll 51597 24498 23650 23879 26356 25309 30370 35553 37315

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 62 60 51 52 50 60 60 59 62Employees 189 206 189 199 ds ds 331 395 415

Payroll 3703 3403 3393 3742 4090 6102 6891 8201 9319

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 43 42 43 48 48 39 42 48 48Employees 2513 2815 2729 1909 1764 1814 2253 2227 2058

Payroll 131946 251997 200219 161080 177549 174686 207831 215950 208286

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 41 35 36 30 39 40 33 33 35Employees 920 514 802 764 860 742 ds 790 639

Payroll 49761 40764 61309 63408 71515 65818 44902 55106 47119Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 4 3 2 1 1 0 2 2 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds NA ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds NA ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 141 143 131 148 144 132 124 128 138

Employees 1200 1486 1423 1198 1233 1169 1258 1222 1209Payroll 28359 34039 33803 33968 34928 34711 36461 36776 37054

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 62 55 57 54 55 42 48 53 56Employees 6237 6313 6276 5262 5259 4373 6390 7451 8179

Payroll 186416 196006 167562 166877 153360 130817 272286 327690 324552Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 90 99 95 87 91 91 89 93 91Employees 1709 1884 1849 1606 1448 1676 1485 1588 1415

Payroll 125061 137962 137289 132283 113444 124500 130572 139259 144090

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 15 24 30 29 26 37 27 25 25Employees 98 ds 421 ds 439 1381 630 387 395

Payroll 5163 10538 13778 18627 18842 55470 25229 13544 16436

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 96 102 99 97 91 89 87 88 84Employees 4810 5368 3891 3386 2773 5601 5686 5178 4956

Payroll 210275 235190 158261 147492 153077 310230 297248 306571 283838

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Data Sources

Fish on the line Photo NOAA FisheriesMelanie King

196

Data Sources

MANAGEMENT CONTEXT

bull Excess Harvesting Capacity in US Fisheries A Report to Congress April 28 2008 National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpwwwpcouncilorgbb20080608C2b_SUP_ATT2_0608pdf

bull rdquoStatus of US Fisheriesrdquo Office of Sustainable Fisheries National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationalpopulation-assessmentsstatus-us-fisheries

bull rdquoEndangered Species Act (ESA)rdquo Office of Protected Resources National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationalendangered-species-conservationendangered-species-act

bull rdquoCertified Fisheriesrdquo Marine Stewardship Council wwwmscorgbull rdquoCatch Sharesrdquo Office of Sustainable Fisheries National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric

Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationallaws-and-policiescatch-shares

Fishery Management Councils amp Fishery Plansbull Caribbean Fishery Management Council wwwcaribbeanfmccombull Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council wwwgulfcouncilorgbull Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council wwwmafmcorgbull New England Fishery Management Council wwwnefmcorgbull North Pacific Fishery Management Council wwwnpfmcorgbull Pacific Fishery Management Council wwwpcouncilorgbull South Atlantic Fishery Management Council wwwsafmcnetbull Western Pacific Fishery Management Council wwwwpcouncilorg

COMMERCIAL FISHERIES Data for New England Mid-Atlantic South Atlantic Gulf of Mexico North Pacific Pacific and Western Pacific Regionsbull Commercial Landings Database Obtained December 5 2017 Office of Science amp Technology National Marine

Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovtopiccommercial-fishingoverview

Pacific cod flatfish Atka mackerel walleye pollock rockfish and sablefish data North Pacific Regionbull Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric

Administration (NOAA Fisheries) Obtained December 5 2017 wwwafscnoaagov

Economic Impacts of the US Commercial Seafood Industrybull A Userrsquos Guide to the National and Coastal State IO Model

httpwwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf

Additional informationbull rdquoData Caveatsrdquo Office of Science amp Technology National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovcommercial-fisheriescommercial-landingsdata-caveatsindex

bull rdquoNOAA Fisheries Economics amp Social Sciences Programrdquo Office of Science amp Technology National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) wwwstnmfsnoaagovst5indexhtml

197

Data Sources

RECREATIONAL FISHERIES

Data for New England Mid-Atlantic South Atlantic Gulf of Mexico and Western Pacific Regionsbull Recreational Fishery Statistics Queriesrdquo Obtained August 15 2017 Office of Science amp Technology National

Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovrecreational-fishing-datarecreational-fishing-data-and-statistics-queriesrun-a-data-query

Data for Pacific Regionbull Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Recreational Fisheries Information Network (RecFIN) Obtained

September 12 2017 httpwwwrecfinorg

Data for North Pacific Regionbull Alaska Department of Fish amp Game Obtained October 26 2017 httpwwwadfgstateakus

Data for Texas (Gulf of Mexico Region)bull Texas Parks amp Wildlife Department Obtained June 30 2017 wwwtpwdstatetxusbull Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Obtained June 30 2017 httpwwwwlflouisianagov

Recreational Fishing Expenditures and Impactsbull Lovell Sabrina James Hilger Emily Rollins and Scott Steinback 2019 Marine Angler Trip Expenditures in the

United States 2017 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Draft Reportbull Lovell Sabrina Scott Steinback and James Hilger 2013 The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler

Expenditures in the United States 2011 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-134 188p httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovAssetseconomicspublicationsAnglerExpenditureReport2011pdfThe20Economic20Contribution20of20Marine20Angler20Expenditures20in20the20United20States202011pdf

bull Lovell J Sabrina James Hilger Scott Steinback and Clifford Hutt 2016 The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures on Durable Goods in the United States 2014 US Dept of Commerce US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-165 72p httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovAssetseconomicsdurable-expendituresdocumentsTM165_Durable_Goods_2014pdf

THE MARINE ECONOMY

bull rdquoCounty Business Patterns Data Seriesrdquo Obtained September 26 2017 US Census Bureau httpswwwcensusgovprograms-surveyscbphtml

bull rdquoGross Domestic Product by Staterdquo Obtained September 26 2017 Bureau of Economic Analysis httpwwwbeagoviTableiTablecfmreqid=70ampstep=1ampisuri=1ampacrdn=2reqid=70ampstep=1ampisuri=1

bull rdquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo Obtained September 26 2017 Bureau of Labor Statistics httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm

bull rdquoNonemployer Statisticsrdquo Obtained September 26 2017 US Census Bureau httpswwwcensusgovprograms-surveysnonemployer-statisticshtml

Publications

Herring catch Photo NOAA Northeast Fisheries Science Center

200

Publications

Selected publications by NOAA Fisheries Economics and Social Sciences Program staff are grouped by geographic region of focus and then organized under the following categories

Climate Change ResearchCoastal amp Marine Recreation ResearchCommercial Fisheries Economics ResearchSpatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchOcean Policy amp Management ResearchOther Marine Environmental Research

Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchHabitat Economics ResearchSeafood Marketing amp Trade ResearchSociocultural ResearchUS Territories amp International Fisheries ResearchProtected Resources Economics Research

United StatesUNITED STATES | Climate Change ResearchHimes-Cornell A and M Orbach 2013 Impacts of Climate Change on Human Uses of the Ocean Oceans and Marine Resources in a Changing Climate Technical Input to the 2013 National Climate Assessment Griffis R and J Howard eds Washington DC Island Press pp 64-118

Himes-Cornell A S Allen G Auad M Boatman P Clay M Dalton S Herrick D Kotowicz P Little C Lopez P Loring P Niemeier K Norman L Pfeiffer M Plummer M Rust M Singer and C Speirs 2013 Impacts of Climate Change on Human uses of the Ocean and Ocean Services Section 4 Oceans and Marine Resources in a Changing Climate Technical Input to the 2013 National Climate Assessment US Global Change Research Program Washington DC pp 73-137

Howard J E Babij R Griffis B Helmuth A Himes-Cornell P Niemier M Orbach L Petes S Allen G Auad R Beard M Boatman N Bond T Boyer D Brown P Clay K Crane S Cross M Dalton J Diamond R Diaz Q Dortch E Duffy D Fauquier W Fisher M Graham B Halpern L Hansen B Hayum S Herrick AHollowed D Hutchins E Jewett D Jin N Knowlton D Kotowicz T Kristiansen P Little C Lopez P LoringR Lumpkin A Mace K Mengerink J Ru Morrison Jason Murray K Norman J Orsquodonnell J Overland RParsons N Pettigrew L Pfeiffer E Pidgeon M Plummer J Polovina J Quintrell T Rowles J Runge MRust E Sanford U Send M Singer C Speir D Stanitski C Thornber C Wilson and Y Xue 2013 Oceansand Marine Resources in a Changing Climate Oceanography and Marine Biology An Annual Review 51 71-192

Ocean and Coastal Indicator Technical Team (R Griffis L Mcgilvray D Cahoon T Clay E Curchitser K Curtis J Devivo B Duncan S Gill J Grear B Halpern J Hare A Himes-Cornell J Howard R Johnston MKenney D Legler E Lindstrom T OrsquoBrien S Rumrill E Thunberg T Webler J West R Wood S Zador SBusch and E Fly) 2013 Research priorities to advance the oceans and coasts climate indicators system Reportto the National Climate Assessment Indicator System Working Group Project information available at httpwwwglobalchangegovwhat-we-doassessmentindicators-system

Babij E P Niemeier B Hayum A Himes-Cornell A Hollowed P Little M Orbach and E Pidgeon 2012 International Implications of Climate Change Section 5 in Oceans and Marine Resources in a Changing Climate Technical Input to the 2013 National Climate Assessment US Global Change Research Program Washington DC pp 138-162

201

Publications

Haynie A and L Pfeiffer 2012 Why Economics Matters for Understanding the Effects of Climate Change on Fisheries ICES Journal of Marine Science DOI 101093icesjmsfss021

McIlgorm A S Hanna G Knapp P Flocrsquoh F Millerd and M Pan 2010 How will climate change alter fishery governance Insights from seven international case studies Marine Policy 34(1) 170-177

Dalton M B OrsquoNeill A Prskawetz L Jiang and J Pitkin 2008 Population aging and future carbon emissions in the United States Energy Economics 30(2) 642-675

Hannesson R M Barange and S Herrick eds 2006 Climate Change and the Economics of the Worldrsquos Fisheries UK Edward Elgar 310p

Dalton M 2002 Synthesizing trends of the twentieth century population and climate change Climatic Change 55 409-412

UNITED STATES | Coastal amp Marine Recreation Research Marvasti A 2013 Estimating Outdoor Recreation Demand A Revealed Preference Approach Ocean and Coastal Management 71(1) 170-175

UNITED STATES | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchHolland D E Thunberg J Agar S Crosson C Demarest S Kasperski L Perruso E Steiner J Stephen A Strelcheck and M Travis 2015 US Catch Share Markets A Review of Data Availability and Impediments to Transparent Markets Marine Policy 57(2015) 103ndash110

Kroetz K J Sanchirico and D Lew 2015 Efficiency Costs of Social Objectives in Tradable Permit Programs Forthcoming in the Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists

Collier T A Mamula and J Ruggiero 2014 Estimation of multi-output production functions in commercial fisheries Omega 42(1) 157-165

Holland D E Thunberg J Agar S Crosson C Demarest S Kasperski L Perruso E Steiner J Stephen A Strelcheck and M Travis 2014 US Catch Share Markets A Review of Characteristics and Data Availability US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-145 67p

Kasperski S 2014 Optimal Multi-Species Harvesting in Ecologically and Economically Interdependent Fisheries Environmental and Resource Economics DOI 101007s10640-014-9805-9

Walden J J Agar R Felthoven A Harley S Kasperski J Lee T Lee A Mamula J Stephen A Strelcheck and E Thunberg 2014 Productivity Change in US Catch Share Fisheries US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-146

Crosson S T Yandle and B Stoffle 2013 Renegotiating property rights in the Florida golden crab fishery International Journal of the Commons 7(2) 521-548

Fissel B B Gilbert and J LaRiviere 2013 Technology Adoption and Diffusion with Uncertainty in a Commons Economic Letters 120(2) 297-301

202

Publications

Lee M-Y and E Thunberg 2013 An Inverse Demand System for New England Groundfish Welfare Analysis of the Transition to Catch Share Management American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95(5) 1178-1195

Schnier K and R Felthoven 2013 Production Efficiency and Exit in Rights-Based Fisheries Land Economics 89(3) 538-557

Abbott J and A Haynie 2012 What are we Protecting Fisher behavior and the unintended consequences of spatial closures as a fishery management tool Ecological Applications 22(3) 762-777

Hospital J and C Beavers 2012 Economic and Social Characteristics of Bottomfish Fishing in the Main Hawaiian Islands US Dept of Commerce Administrative Report H-12-01

Lian C 2012 West Coast Open Access Groundfish and Salmon Troller Survey Protocol and Results for 2005 and 2006 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-116

Fell H and A Haynie 2011 Estimating Time-varying Bargaining Power A Fishery Application Economic Inquiry 49(3) 685-696 DOI 101111j1465-7295200900275x

Walden J and D Tomberlin 2010 Estimating Fishing Vessel Capacity A Comparison of Nonparametric Frontier Approaches Marine Resource Economics 25(1) 23-36

Smith M C Roheim L Crowder B Halpern M Turnipseed J Anderson F Asche L Bourilln A Guttormsen A Khan L Liguori A McNevin M OConnor D Squires P Tyedmers C Brownstein K Carden D Klinger R Sagarin and K Selkoe 2010 Sustainability and Global Seafood Science 327(5967) 784-786

Squires D Y Jeon R Grafton and J Kirkley 2010 Controlling Excess Capacity in Common-Pool Resource Industries The Transition from Input to Output Controls Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 54(3) 361-377

Herrick S J Norton R Hannesson U Sumaila M Ahmed and J Pena-Torres 2010 Global production and economics of small pelagic fish Climate Change and Small Pelagic Fish Checkley DM J Alheit Y Oozeki and C Roy eds pp 256-274 New York Cambridge University Press

Holland D 2010 Markets Pooling and Insurance for Managing Bycatch in Fisheries Ecological Economics 70(1) 121-133

Squires D 2010 Fisheries Buybacks A Review and Guidelines Fish and Fisheries 11(4) 366-387

Grafton R R Hilborn D Squires and M Williams 2010 Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management At the Crossroads Chapter 1 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management RQ Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait and M Williams eds pp 1-19 Oxford Oxford University Press

Squires D T Groves R Grafton R Curtis J Joseph and R Allen 2010 Fisheries Buybacks Chapter 37 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management RQ Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait and M Williams eds pp 507-519 Oxford Oxford University Press

Walden J J Kirkley and R Fre 2010 Measuring and managing fishing capacity Chapter 40 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management RQ Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait and M Williams eds pp 546-554 Oxford Oxford University Press

203

Publications

Smith C and P Clay 2010 Measuring Subjective and Objective Well-Being Examples from Five Commercial Fisheries Human Organization 69(2) 158-168

Holland D and G Herrera 2010 The Benefits and Risks of Increased Spatial Resolution in Management of Fishery Metapopulations Under Uncertainty Natural Resource Modeling 23(4) 494-520

Felthoven R K Schnier and W Horrace 2009 Estimating Heterogeneous Primal Capacity and Capacity Utilization Measures in a Multi-Species Fishery Journal of Productivity Analysis 32 173-189

Grafton R R Hilborn L Ridgeway D Squires M Williams S Garcia T Groves R Hilborn J Joseph K Kelleher TKompas G Libecap C Lundin M Makino T Matthiasson R McLoughlin A Parma G San Marin B Satia C-CSchmidt M Tait and L Zhang 2008 Positioning Fisheries in a Changing World Marine Policy 32(4) 630-634

Milazzo M J Terry and J Walden 2008 Excess Harvesting Capacity in US Fisheries A Report to Congress US Dept of Commerce National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service 101p Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovmsa2007docs042808_312_b_6_reportpdf

Terry J J Walden and J Kirkley 2008 National Assessment of Excess Harvesting Capacity in Federally Managed Commercial Fisheries US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-93 366p Available at httpsponwrnoaagovtmspo93pdf

Kirkley J J Walden and J Waters 2007 Buyback programs goals objectives and industry restructuring in fisheries Fisheries Buybacks R Curtis and D Squires eds pp 227-237 Blackwell Publishing

Kirkley J J Walden and J Ward 2007 The status of USArsquos commercial fisheries and management and crystal-balling the future International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 7(23) 119-136

Terry J 2007 An assessment of the use of capacity analysis in US federal fishery management Marine Resource Economics 22 99-103

Curtis R and D Squires eds 2007 Fisheries Buybacks pp 288 Oxford Blackwell Publishing

Grafton R R Arnason T Bjoslashrndal D Campbell H Campbell C W Clark R Connor D Dupont R Hannesson R Hilborn J Kirkley T Kompas D Lane G Munro S Pascoe D Squires S Steinshamn B Turris and Q Weninger 2006 Incentive-based approaches to sustainable fisheries Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63(3) 699-710

Branch T R Hilborn A Haynie G Fay L Flynn J Griffiths K Marshall J Randall J Scheuerell E Ward and M Young 2006 Fleet dynamics and Fishermen Behavior Lessons for Fisheries Managers Canadian Journal ofFisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63(7) 1647-1668

Kerstens K N Vestergaard and D Squires 2006 A short-run Johansen industry model for common-pool resources planning a fisheryrsquos industrial capacity to curb overfishing European Review of Agricultural Economics 33(3) 1-29

Kerstens K D Squires and N Vestergaard 2006 Methodological reflections on the short-run Johansen industry model in relation to capacity management Marine Resource Economics 20(4) 425-443

204

Publications

Seung C and E Waters 2006 A Review of Regional Economic Models for Fisheries Management in the US Marine Resource Economics 21(1) 101-124

Grafton Q J Kirkley T Kompas and D Squires 2006 Economics for Fisheries Management Aldershot England Ashgate Publishing 165p

Kirkley J J Ward J Nance F Patella K Brewster-Geisz C Rogers E Thunberg J Walden W Daspit B Stenberg S Freese J Hastie S Holiman and M Travis 2006 Reducing Capacity in US Managed Fisheries US Dept ofCommerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-76 45p Available at httpsponwrnoaagovtmtm76pdf

Seung C and E Waters 2005 A Review of Regional Economic Models for Alaska fisheries Alaska Fisheries Science Center Processed Report 2005-01

Edwards S 2005 Ownership of multi-attribute fishery resources in Large Marine Ecosystems Sustaining Large Marine Ecosystems The Human Dimension T Hennessey and J Sutinen eds pp 137-154 New York Elsevier

Edwards S J Link and B Rountree 2004 Portfolio management of wild fish stocks Ecological Economics 49(3) 317-329

Agar J and J Sutinen 2004 Rebuilding strategies for multispecies fisheries a stylized bioeconomic model Environmental and Resource Economics 29(1) 1-29

Felthoven R and C Morrison Paul 2004 Directions for Productivity Measurement in Fisheries Marine Policy 28 161-169

Ward J P Mace and E Thunberg 2004 The relationship of fish harvesting capacity to excess capacity and overcapacity Marine Resource Economics 19(4) 525-529

Felthoven R 2004 Methods for Estimating Fishing Capacity with Routinely Collected Data A Comparison Review of International Fisheries Law and Policy 1(2) 125-137

Edwards S 2003 Property rights to multi-attribute fishery resources Ecological Economics 44(2-3) 309-323

Kitts A and S Edwards 2003 Cooperatives in fisheries realizing the potential of the Fishermenrsquos Collective Marketing Act Marine Policy 27 357-366

Curtis R and C Sarmiento 2002 Identification of economies of scope in a stochastic production environment Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 50(3) 257-267

Grafton R and D Squires 2002 A property-rights perspective of efficiency privatizing the commons Efficiency in the Public Sector KJ Fox ed pp 83-100 Boston Massachusetts Dordrecht and London

Kirkley J C Morrison Paul and D Squires 2002 Capacity and capacity utilization in common-pool resource industries definition measurement and a comparison of approaches Environmental and Resource Economics 22(1-2) 71-97

Ward J T Brainerd S Freese P Mace M Milazzo D Squires J Terry EM Thunberg M Travis and J Walden 2001 Report of the National Task Force for Defining and Measuring Fishing Capacity National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Science and Technology Silver Spring Maryland

205

Publications

Ward J T Brainerd M Milazzo E Thunberg A Kitts J Walden M Travis J Terry T Lee D Holland J Hastie D Squires S Herrick M Hamilton K Brewster-Geisz and R Lent 2001 Identifying Harvest Capacity and Overcapacity in Federally Managed Fisheries A Preliminary and Qualitative Report National Marine Fisheries Service Offices of Science and Technology and Sustainable Fisheries Silver Spring Maryland 118p

Walden J and J Kirkley 2000 Measuring Technical Efficiency and Capacity in Fisheries by Data Envelopment Analysis Using the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) A Workbook US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NE-160 15p Available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagovst5commercialcapacity_toolboxdocumentsgams_workbookpdf

UNITED STATES | Habitat Economics ResearchHolland D J Sanchirico R Johnston and D Joglekar 2010 Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Based Management Applications to Marine and Coastal Environments pp 240 Washington DC RFF Press

UNITED STATES | Ocean Policy amp Management Research Queirolo L In progress When Rationalization Programs Leave Small Fishery-Dependent Communities Out Innovative Management Structures May Offer a Way Back In People and the Sea VIII Geopolitics of the Oceans Centre for Maritime Research Universiteit van Amsterdam Netherlands (2015)

Seung C 2014 Estimating effects of exogenous output changes An application of multi-regional social accounting matrix (MRSAM) method to natural resource management Regional Science Policy and Practice 6(2) 177-193

Crosson S 2013 The impact of empowering scientific advisory committees to constrain catch limits in US fisheries Science and Public Policy 40(2) 261-273

Fell H and A Haynie 2013 Spatial Competition with Changing Market Institutions Journal of Applied Econometrics 28(4) 702-719

UNITED STATES | Other Marine Environmental ResearchLipton D D Lew K Wallmo P Wiley and A Dvarskas 2014 The Evolution of Non-Market Valuation of US Coastal and Marine Resources Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics 2014 (6) DOI httpcbemiisedujocevol2014iss16

Marvasti A 2013 The role of price expectations and legal uncertainties in ocean mineral exploration activities Resources Policy 38(1) 68-74

Lovell S and L Drake 2009 Tiny stowaways analyzing the economic benefits of a US Environmental Protection Agency permit regulating ballast water discharges Environmental Management 43(3) 546-555

Marvasti A 2000 Resource Characteristics Extraction Costs and Discovery of a New Resource Base Environmental and Resource Economics 17(4) 397-410

UNITED STATES | Protected Resources Economics ResearchJohnston R D Jarvis K Wallmo and D Lew 2015 Characterizing Large Scale Spatial Pattern in Nonuse Willingness to Pay An Application to Threatened and Endangered Marine Species Forthcoming in Land Economics

206

Publications

Pienaar E D Lew and K Wallmo 2015 The Importance of Survey Content Testing for the Context Dependency of the New Ecological Paradigm Scale Social Science Research 51 338-349

Pienaar E D Lew and K Wallmo 2013 Are Environmental Attitudes Influenced by Survey Context An Investigation of the Context Dependency of the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale Social Science Research 42(6) 1542-1554

Magnusson G K Bisack and H Milliken 2012 The Cost-effectiveness of Gear Research Relative to a Closure Pound Nets and Sea Turtles as an Example Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 12-01

Wallmo K and D Lew 2012 The Value of Recovering Threatened and Endangered Marine Species A Multi-Species Choice Experiment Conservation Biology 26(5) 830-839

Lew D and K Wallmo 2011 External Tests of Embedding and Scope in Stated Preference Choice Experiments An Application to Endangered Species Valuation Environmental and Resource Economics 48(1) 1-23 DOI 101007s10640-010-9394-1

Wallmo K and D Lew 2011 Valuing Improvements to Threatened and Endangered Marine Species An Application of Stated Preference Choice Experiments Journal of Environmental Management 92 1793-1801

Tomberlin D 2010 Endangered seabird habitat management as a partially observable Markov decision process Marine Resource Economics 25(1) 93-104

Dutton P H Gjertsen and D Squires 2010 Conservation of the Leatherback Sea Turtle in the Pacific Chapter 14 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management RQ Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait andM Williams eds pp 195-204 Oxford Oxford University Press

Janisse C D Squires J Seminoff and P Dutton 2010 Conservation Investments and Mitigation The California Drift Gillnet Fishery and Pacific Sea Turtles Chapter 17 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management R Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait and M Williams eds pp 231-240 Oxford Oxford University Press

Dutton P and D Squires 2008 Reconciling Biodiversity with Fishing A Holistic Strategy for Pacific Sea Turtle Recovery Ocean Development and International Law 39(2) 200-222

UNITED STATES | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchLarson D and D Lew 2014 The Opportunity Cost of Travel Time as a Noisy Wage Fraction American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96(2) 420-437

Lovell S and D Carter 2014 The use of sampling weights in regression models of recreational fishing-site choice Fishery Bulletin 112 243-252

Carter D and C Liese 2012 The Economic Value of Catching and Keeping or Releasing Saltwater Sport Fish in the Southeast USA North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32(4) 613-25

Kuriyama K W Hanemann and J Hilger 2010 A latent segmentation approach to a Kuhn-Tucker model An application to recreation demand Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 60(3) 209-220

Steinback S K Wallmo and P Clay 2009 Saltwater sport fishing in the US for food and income statistical estimates and policy implications Marine Policy 33 49-57

207

Publications

Gentner B and S Steinback 2008 The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2006 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-94 p301 Available at httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovst5publicationAnglerExpenditureReportAnglerExpendituresReport_ALLpdf

Gentner B 2007 Sensitivity of angler benefit estimates from a model of recreational demand to the definition of the substitute sites considered by the angler Fishery Bulletin 105 161-167

Johnston R M Ranson E Besedin and E Helm 2006 What determines willingness to pay per fish A meta-analysis of recreational fishing values Marine Resource Economics 21(1) 1-32

Olson J 2005 Re-placing the space of community a story of cultural politics policies and fisheries management Anthropological Quarterly 78(1) 233-254

Sepez J 2005 Introduction to traditional environmental knowledge in federal natural resource management agencies Practicing Anthropology 27(1) 1-48

Leeworthy V J Bowker J Hospital and E Stone 2005 Projected Participation in Marine Recreation 2005 amp 2010 Silver Spring Maryland Special Projects NOS 164pp

Kline J R Alig B Garber-Yonts 2004 Forestland Social Values and Open Space Preservation Journal of Forestry 102(8) 39-45

Steinback S B Gentner and J Castle 2004 The Economic Importance of Marine Angler Expenditures in the US NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 2 169p

Sepez J 2002 Treaty rights and the right to culture Native American subsistence issues in US law Cultural Dynamics 14(2) 143-159

Gentner B and A Lowther 2002 Evaluating marine sport fisheries in the USA Recreational Fisheries Ecological and Economic and Social Evaluation TJ Pitcher and CE Hollingsworth eds pp 186-206 Oxford Blackwell Science

Hicks R A Gautam D Van Voorhees M Osborn and B Gentner 2000 Thalassorama an introduction to the NMFS Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey with an emphasis on economic valuation Marine Resource Economics 14(2) 375-385

UNITED STATES | Seafood Marketing amp Trade ResearchBrinson A M-Y Lee and B Rountree 2011 Direct marketing strategies The rise of community supported fishery programs Marine Policy 35 542-548

Kirkley J J Ward C Moore C Hayes B Hooker and JWalden 2008 International Trade in Seafood and Related Products An Assessment of US trade Patterns NOAA NMFS Office of Constituent Services

UNITED STATES | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchClay P and A Himes-Cornell 2014 Bringing Social Science into US National Climate Policy Anthroplogy News April 2014

Felthoven R and S Kasperski 2013 Socioeconomic Indicators for United States Fisheries and Fishing Communities PICES Press 21(2) 20-23

208

Publications

Jepson M and L Colburn 2013 Development of Social Indicators of Fishing Community Vulnerability and Resilience in the US Southeast and Northeast Regions US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-129 64p

Colburn L and M Jepson 2012 Social Indicators of Gentrification Pressure in Fishing Communities A Context for Social Impact Assessment Coastal Management 40(3) 289-300

Abbott-Jamieson S 2010 Voices from the Fisheries projects combine oral history interviews and place-based education to create learning opportunities for students Current Journal of Marine Education 26(1) 20-24

Abbott-Jamieson S and P Clay 2010 The Long Voyage to Including Sociocultural Analysis in NOAAs National Marine Fisheries Service Marine Fisheries Review 72(2)14-33

Clay P and J Olson 2008 Defining fishing communities vulnerability and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Human Ecology Review 15(2) 143-160

Ingles P and J Sepez 2007 Anthropologyrsquos contributions to fisheries management National Association of Practicing Anthropologists Bulletin 28(1) 1-12

Abbott-Jamieson S 2007 Using oral history techniques in a NOAA Fisheries Service (NMFS) education and outreach project pressing local fisheries knowledge linking generations and improving environmental literacy National Association of Practicing Anthropologists Bulletin 28(1) 136-147

Clay P and J Olson 2007 Defining fishing communities issues in theory and practice National Association of Practicing Anthropologists Bulletin 28(1) 27-42

Colburn L S Abbott-Jamieson and P Clay 2006 Anthropological applications in the management of federally managed fisheries context institutional history and prospectus Human Organization 65(3) 231-239

Allen S and A Gough 2006 Monitoring environmental justice impacts Vietnamese-American longline fishermen adapt to the Hawaii swordfish fishery closure Human Organization 65(3) 319-328

UNITED STATES | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchMeiyappan P M Dalton B OrsquoNeill and A Jain 2014 Spatial modeling of agricultural land use change at global scale Ecological Modelling 291 152-174

Mason J R Kosaka A Mamula and C Speir 2012 Effort changes around a marine reserve The case of the California Rockfish Conservation Area Marine Policy 36(5) 1054-1063

Schnier K and R Felthoven 2011 Accounting for Spatial Heterogeneity and Autocorrelation in Spatial Discrete Choice Models Implications for Behavioral Predictions Land Economics 3 382-402

Wallmo K and S Edwards 2007 Estimating Public Values for Marine Protected Areas in the Northeast A Latent Class Modeling Approach US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-84 72p Available at httpsponwrnoaagovtmtm84pdf

Holland D J Sanchirico R Curtis and R Hicks 2004 An introduction to spatial modeling in fisheries economics Marine Resource Economics 19(1) 1-6

209

Publications

Curtis R and K McConnell 2004 Incorporating information and expectations in fishermenrsquos spatial decisions Marine Resource Economics 19 131-143

UNITED STATES | US Territories amp International Fisheries ResearchAnderson J C Anderson J Chu J Meredith F Asche G Sylvia M Smith D Anggraeni R Arthur A Guttormsen M Schmid W Akpalu F Alfredsson H Eggert J Flores M Freeman D Holland G Knapp M Kobayashi SLarkin K MacLauchlin K Schnier M Soboil S Tveteras H Uchida D Valderrama and T Ward 2015 The FisheryPerformance Indicators A Management Tool for the Triple Bottom Line Forthcoming in PLOS One

Woods P C Bouchard D Holland A Punt G and Marteinsdoacutettir 2015 Catch-quota balancing mechanisms in the Icelandic multi-species demersal fishery are all species equal Marine Policy 55 1-10

Woods P D Holland A Punt and G Marteinsdoacutettir 2015 How a catch-quota balancing system can go wrong an evaluation of the species quota transformation provisions in the Icelandic multi-species demersal fishery ICES Journal of Marine Science DOI 101093icesjmsfsv001

Chan V R Clarke and D Squires 2014 Full Retention in Tuna Fisheries Benefits Costs and Unintended Consequences Marine Policy 45 213-221

Gjertsen H D Squires P Dutton and T Eguchi 2014 Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Conservation Strategies An Application to the Pacific Leatherback Turtle Conservation Biology 28(1) 140-149

Kronbak L D Squires and N Vestergaard 2014 Recent Developments in Fisheries Economics Research International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 7(1) 67-108

Mengerink K C Van Dover M Baker E Escobar-Briones K Gjerde J Koslow E Ramierez-Llodara A Lara-Lopez D Squires T Sutton A Sweetman and L Levin 2014 A Call for Deep Ocean Stewardship Science 344 696-698

Smith M F Asch L Bennear E Havice A Read and D Squires 2014 Will a Catch Share for Whales Improve Social Welfare Ecological Applications 24(1) 15-23

Squires D 2014 Biodiversity Conservation in Asia Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 1(1) 144-159

Squires D and M Maunder 2014 Synthesis of Workshop Results Pros and cons of effort based management Chapter 2 in Squires D M Maunder N Vestergaard V Restrepo R Metzner S Herrick R Hannesson I del Valle and P Andersen eds Effort Rights in Fisheries Management General principles and case studies from around the world FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings P34 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Squires D M Maunder N Vestergaard V Restrepo R Metzner S Herrick R Hannesson I del Valle and P Andersen 2014 Effort Rights in Fisheries Management General principles and case studies from around the world Chapter 1 in Squires D M Maunder N Vestergaard V Restrepo R Metzner S Herrick R Hannesson I del Valle and P Andersen eds Effort Rights in Fisheries Management General principles and case studies from around the world FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings P34 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Squires D M Maunder N Vestergaard V Restrepo R Metzner S Herrick R Hannesson I del Valle and P Anderson eds 2014 Effort Rights in Fisheries Management General Principles and Case Studies from Around the World 2014 FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings P34 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

210

Publications

Squires D M Maunder S Herrick M Helvey and R Clarke 2014 Effort Rights-Based Management 2014 Chapter 3 in Squires D M Maunder N Vestergaard V Restrepo R Metzner S Herrick R Hannesson I del Valle and P Andersen eds Effort Rights in Fisheries Management General principles and case studies from around the world FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings P34 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Squires D V Chan and R Clarke 2014 Subsidies Public Goods and External Benefits in Fisheries Marine Policy 45 222-227

Grafton R and D Squires 2013 Theory and Practice of Water and Fisheries In J Shogren ed Encyclopaedia of Energy Natural Resource and Environmental Economics Elsevier Publishing Vol 2 pp 31-38

Guillotreau P D Squires J Sun and G Compean 2013 Local Regional and Global Markets What Drives the Fisheries In A Hobday R Brill L Dagorn eds Tunas and Their Fisheries Safeguarding Sustainability in the 21st Century Wiley-Blackwell

Squires D and N Vestergaard 2013 Technical Change and the Commons Review of Economics and Statistics 95(5) 1769-1787

Squires D and N Vestergaard 2013 Technical Change in Fisheries Marine Policy 42 286-292

Squires D R Allen and V Restreppo 2013 Rights-Based Management in International Tuna Fisheries FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No 571 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Wolff F-C P Guillotreau and D Squires 2013 The Firmrsquos Management in Production Management Firm and Time Effects in an Indian Ocean Tuna fishery American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95(3) 547-567

Grafton R and D Squires 2012 Theory and Practice of Fisheries and Water Economics in J Shogren ed Encyclopedia of Energy Natural Resources and Environmental Economics Elsevier

Valdes-Pizzini M and J Agar 2012 Papa-dem (puertorriquenos) crucenos y britanicos (garrets) el etnopaisaje de la diaspora de los pescadores en la Isla de Santa Cruz en las Islas Virgenes Estadounidenses (lVE) Op Cit Revista del Centro de Investigaciones Historicas 20 143-179

Dalzell P P Dutton K Simonds and D Squires 2011 Introduction to the Conservation of Pacific Sea Turtles Chapter 1 in P Dutton D Squires and M Ahmed eds 2010 Conservation of Pacific Sea Turtles Honolulu University of Hawaii Press

Dutton P and D Squires 2011 A Holistic Strategy for Pacific Sea Turtle Conservation Chapter 3 in P Dutton D Squires and M Ahmed eds 2011 Conservation of Pacific Sea TurtlesHonolulu University of Hawaii Press

Dutton P D Squires and M Ahmed eds 2011 Conservation of Pacific Sea Turtles Honolulu University of Hawaii Press

Yeo B D Squires K Ibrahim H Gjertsen S Kamil T Groves M Hong and C Tan 2011 Can Coastal Fisheries Bear the Cost of Sea Turtle Conservation Evidence from the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia Chapter 16 in P Dutton D Squires and M Ahmed eds 2011 Conservation of Pacific Sea Turtles Honolulu University of Hawaii Press

211

Publications

Squires D 2010 Review of Bjorndal et al Advances in Fisheries Economics in Fish and Fisheries

Joseph J D Squires W Bayliff and T Groves 2010 Addressing the Problem of Excess Fishing Capacity in Tuna Fisheries Chapter 2 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 11-38 Wiley-Blackwell

Squires D J Joseph and T Groves 2010 Buybacks in Transnational Fisheries Chapter 11 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 181-194 Wiley-Blackwell

Hallman B S Barrett R Clarke J Joseph and D Squires 2010 Limited Access in Transnational Tuna Fisheries Chapter 12 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 195-214 Wiley-Blackwell

Gjertsen H M Hall and D Squires 2010 Incentives to Address Bycatch Issues Chapter 15 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 225-250 Wiley-Blackwell

Allen R J Joseph D Squires and E Stryjewski 2010 Introduction Chapter 1 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 3-10 Wiley-Blackwell

Squires D 2010 Property and use Rights in Fisheries Chapter 3 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 39-64 Wiley-Blackwell

Allen R W Bayliff J Joseph and D Squires 2010 Rights-Based Management in Transnational Tuna Fisheries Chapter 4 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 65-86 Wiley-Blackwell

Allen R W Bayliff J Joseph and D Squires 2010 The Benefits and Costs of Transformation of Open Access on the High Seas Chapter 5 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 87-98 Wiley-Blackwell

Allen J J Joseph and D Squires 2010 Managing World Tuna Fisheries with Emphasis on Rights-Based Management Chapter 55 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management RQ Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait and M Williams eds pp 698-712 Oxford Oxford University Press

Hannesson R K Salvanes and D Squires 2010 The Lofoten Fishery over Hundred Years Land Economics 86(4) 746-765

Allen R J Joseph and D Squires eds 2010 Conservation and Management of Pacific Tunas Ames Iowa Wiley-Blackwell Publishing 392p

Brinson A D Die P Bannerman and Y Diatta 2009 Socioeconomic performance of West African fleets that target Atlantic billfish Fisheries Research 99 55-62

Jeon Y R Allen J Joseph T Groves and D Squires 2009 Rights-Based Transnational Fishery Management and Its Implementation to Korean Tuna Fishery Korean Journal of Law and Economics 6(2) 223-254

212

Publications

Liese C 2009 Fishery Management for Artisanal Reef Fisheries in Developing Countries A Holistic Economic Approach Proceedings of the 11th International Coral Reef Symposium Ft Lauderdale Florida 2008(July) 1116-1120

Squires D C Reid and Y Jeon 2008 Productivity growth in natural resource industries and the environment an application to the Korean tuna purse-seine fleet in the Pacific International Economic Journal 22(1) 81-94

Jeon Y C Reid and D Squires 2008 Is there a global market for tuna Policy implications for tropical tuna fisheries Ocean Development and International Law 39(1) 32-50

Liese C M Smith and R Kramer 2007 Open access in a spatially delineated artisanal fishery the case of Minahasa Indonesia Environment and Development Economics 12(1) 123-143

Ahmed M P Boonchuwongse W Dechboon and D Squires 2007 Overfishing in the Gulf of Thailand policy challenges and bioeconomic analysis Environment and Development Economics 12(1) 145-172

Miller M D McClellan J Wiener and B Stoffle 2007 Comment apparent rapid fisheries escalation at a remote Caribbean island Environmental Conservation 34(2) 1-3

Squires D J Kirkley J Joseph T Groves and C Reid 2007 Relating Estimates of Fishing Capacity Obtained from Data Envelopment Analysis to Traditional Measures of Fishing Capacity FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp 141-152 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Squires D J Joseph and T Groves 2007 Buybacks in Fisheries FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp 193-218 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Reid C and D Squires 2007 Measuring Fishing Capacity in Tuna Fisheries Data Envelopment Analysis Industry Surveys and Data Collection FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp 87-98 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Squires D T Groves J Kirkley C Reid and J Joseph 2007 Relating DEA Estimates of Capacity Utilization to Traditional Measures of Fishing Capacity FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp 87-98 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Scott T J Kirkley R Rinaldo and D Squires 2007 Assessing Capacity in the US Northwest Atlantic Pelagic Longline Fishery for Highly Migratory Species with Undesirable Outputs FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp 99-106 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Joseph J D Squires W Bayliff and T Groves 2007 Requirements and Alternatives for the Limitation of Fishing Capacity in Tuna Purse-Seine Fleets FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp153-192 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Stoffle B and R Stoffle 2007 At the searsquos edge elders and children in the littorals of Barbados and the Bahamas Human Ecology 35(5) 547-558

213

Publications

Yeo B D Squires K Ibrahim H Gjertsen S Syed Mohd Kamil R Zulkifi T Groves M Hong and C Tan 2007 Fisher Profiles and Perceptions of Sea Turtle-Fishery Interactions Case Study of East Coast Peninsular Malaysia The WorldFish Center Discussion Series No 6 69p Penang Malaysia The WorldFish Center

Jeon Y O Ishak K Kuperan D Squires and I Susilowati 2006 Developing country fisheries and technical efficiency the Java Sea purse seine fishery Applied Economics 38(13) 1541-1552

Bisack KD and J Sutinen 2006 A New Zealand ITQ Fishery With an In-Season Stock Externality Marine Resource Economics 21(3) 231-249

Reid C J Kirkley D Squires and J Ye 2005 Analysis of the Fishing Capacity of the Global Tuna Purse Seine Fleet Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity Conservation And Socio Economics 2 117-156

Vestergaard N D Squires F Jensen and J Andersen 2003 Technical efficiency of the Danish trawl fleet are the industrial vessels better than others Danish Journal of Economics 141 225-242

Squires D O Ishak Y Jeon J Kirkley K Kuperan and I Susilowati 2003 Excess capacity and sustainable development in Java Sea fisheries Environment and Development Economics 8(1) 105-127

Squires D R Grafton F Alam and O Ishak 2003 Technical efficiency of the Malaysian artisanal gill net fishery Environment and Development Economics 8 481-504

Vestergaard N D Squires and J Kirkley 2003 Measures of Capacity in a Multispecies Danish Fishery FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 445 Measuring capacity in fisheries S Pascoe and D Greboval eds pp 169-180 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations of the United Nations

Kirkley J D Squires M Alam and O Ishak 2003 Capacity and Offshore Fisheries Development The Malaysian Purse Seine Fishery FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 445 Measuring capacity in fisheries S Pascoe and D Greboval eds pp 193-212 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations of the United Nations

Kirkley J R Fre S Grosskkopf K McConnell D Squires and I Strand 2003 Assessing Capacity and Capacity Utilization in Fisheries When Data Are Limited FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 445 Measuring capacity in fisheries S Pascoe and D Greboval eds pp 213-232 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations of the United Nations

Squires D Y Jeon R Grafton and J Kirkley 2003 Tradable Property Rights and Overcapacity Organization of the United Nations 181-192 FAO Technical Paper 445 Measuring capacity in fisheries S Pascoe and D Greboval eds pp 181-192 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations of the United Nations

Vestergaard N D Squires and J Kirkley 2003 Measuring capacity and capacity utilization in fisheries the case of the Danish gill-net fleet Fisheries Research 60 357-368

Alam F O Ishak and D Squires 2002 Sustainable fisheries development in the tropics trawlers and license limitation in Malaysia Applied Economics 34(3) 325-337

Kuperan K O Ishak Y Jeon J Kirkley D Squires and I Susilowati 2002 A fishing capacity and fishing skill in developing country fisheries the Kedah Malaysia trawl fishery Marine Resource Economics 16(4) 293-313

214

Publications

Dupont D R Grafton J Kirkley and D Squires 2002 Capacity utilization measures and excess capacity in multi-product privatized fisheries Resource and Energy Economics 24(3) 193-210

Kremen C J Niles M Dalton G Daily P Ehrlich J Fay D Grewal and R Guillery 2000 Economics of rain forest conservation across scales Science 288(5472) 1828-1832

North PacificNORTH PACIFIC | Climate Change Research Punt A D Poljak M Dalton and R Foy 2014 Evaluating the impact of ocean acidification on fishery yields and profits The example of red king crab in Bristol Bay Ecological Modelling 285 39-53

Haynie A and L Pfeiffer 2013 Climatic and economic drivers of the Bering Sea pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) fishery Implications for the future Canadian Journal of Aquatic and Fisheries Science 70(6) 841-853 101139cjfas-2012-0265

C Carothers K Criddle C Chambers P Cullenberg J Fall A Himes-Cornell J Johnsen N Kimball CMenzies and E Springer (eds) 2012 Fishing People of the North Cultures Economies and ManagementResponding to Change Alaska Sea Grant University of AlaskamdashFairbanks

NORTH PACIFIC | Coastal amp Marine Recreation ResearchWolf P R Gimblett L Kennedy R Itami and B Garber-Yonts 2008 Monitoring and Simulating Recreation and Subsistence use in Prince William Sound Alaska Monitoring Simulation and Management of Visitor Landscapes R Gimblett and H Skov-Petersen eds Tucson AZ University of Arizona Press

NORTH PACIFIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchAbbott J A Haynie and M Reimer 2015 Hidden Flexibility Institutions Incentives and the Margins of Selectivity in Fishing Land Economics 91(1) 169ndash195

Call I and D Lew 2015 Tradable Permit Programs What are the Lessons for the New Alaska Halibut Catch Sharing Plan Marine Policy 52 125-137

Fissel B 2015 Methods for the Alaska Groundfish First-Wholesale Price Projections US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-[NTIS pending]

Seung C 2015 Untangling Economic Impacts for Alaska Fisheries A Structural Path Analysis Forthcoming in Marine Resource Economics

Abbott J A Haynie and M Reimer 2014 Targeting Ability Under Rights-Based Management The Amendment 80 Bering SeaAleutian Islands Groundfish Fishery Forthcoming in Land Economics

Felthoven R J Lee and K Schnier 2014 Cooperative Formation and Peer Effects in Fisheries Marine Resource Economics 29(2) 133-156

215

Publications

Fissel B 2014 Economic Indices for the North Pacific Groundfish Fisheries Calculation and Visualization US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-279 59p

Haynie A 2014 Estimating the Value of a Fishing Right An Analysis of Changing Usage and Value in the Western Alaska Community Development Quota (CDQ) Program Fisheries Science 80(2) 181-191

Peterson M F Mueter K Criddle and A Haynie 2014 Costs incurred by Alaskan sablefish Pacific halibut and Greenland turbot longliners due to killer whale depredation PLOS ONE 9(2) e88906 DOI 101371journalpone0088906

Seung C 2014 Measuring Spillover Effects of Shocks to Alaska Economy An Interregional Social Accounting Matrix (IRSAM) Model Approach Economic Systems Research 26(2) 224-238 DOI 101080095353142013803039

Seung C E Waters and J Leonard 2014 Economic Impacts of Alaska Fisheries A Multiregional Computable General Equilibrium (MRCGE) Analysis Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies DOI 101111rurd12026

Torres M and R Felthoven 2014 Productivity Growth and Product Choice in Catch Share Fisheries the Case of the Alaska Pollock Marine Policy 50 Part A 280-289 DOI 101016jmarpol201407008

Waters E C Seung M Hartley and M Dalton 2014 Measuring the Multiregional Economic Contribution of an Alaska Fishing Fleet with Linkages to International Markets Marine Policy 50 Part A 238-248

Kasperski S and D Holland 2013 Income Diversification and Risk for Fishermen Proceedings of the National Academies of Science 110(6) 2076-2081

Seung C and E Waters 2013 Calculating Impacts of Exogenous Output Changes Application of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) Model to Alaska Fisheries The Annals of Regional Science 51(2) 553-573

Pfeiffer L and A Haynie 2012 The Effect of Decreasing Seasonal Sea-Ice Cover on the Winter Bering Sea Pollock Fishery ICES Journal of Marine Science DOI 101093icesjmsfss097

Punt A M Siddeek B Garber-Yonts M Dalton L Rugolo D Stram B Turnock and J Zheng 2012 Evaluating the impact of buffers to account for scientific uncertainty when setting TACs Application to red king crab in Bristol Bay Alaska ICES Journal of Marine Science 69(4) 624ndash634 DOI 101093icesjmsfss047

Seung C and C Zhang 2012 Developing Socioeconomic Indicators for Fisheries off Alaska a Multi-Attribute Utility Function Approach Fisheries Research 112 117-126

Lazrus H J Sepez R Felthoven and J Lee 2011 Post-Rationalization Restructuring of Commercial Crew Member Opportunities in Bering Sea and Aleutian Island Crab Fisheries US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-217

Morrison Paul C R Felthoven and M Torres 2010 Economic Performance in Fisheries Modeling Measurement and Management Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 54(3) 343-360

Seung C and E Waters 2010 Evaluating Supply-Side and Demand-Side Shocks for Fisheries a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model for Alaska Economic Systems Research 22(1) 87-109

216

Publications

Seung C 2010 Estimating Economic Information for Fisheries using Unequal Probability Sampling Fisheries Research 105(2) 134-140

Haynie A and D Layton 2010 An Expected Profit Model for Monetizing Fishing Location Choices Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59(2) 165-176

Waters E and C Seung 2010 Impacts of Recent Shocks to Alaska Fisheries A Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model Analysis Marine Resource Economics 25(2) 155-183

Abbott J B Garber-Yonts and J Wilen 2010 Employment and Renumeration Effects of IFQs in the Bering SeaAleutian Islands Crab Fisheries Marine Resource Economics 25(4) 33-354

Haynie A R Hicks and K Schnier 2009 Common Property Information and Cooperation Commercial Fishing in the Bering Sea Ecological Economics 69(2) 406-413

Morrison Paul C M Torres and R Felthoven 2009 Fishing Revenue Productivity and Product Choice in the Alaskan Pollock Fishery Environmental and Resource Economics 44 457-474

Seung C and E Waters 2009 Measuring the Economic Linkage of Alaska Fisheries A Supply-Driven Social Accounting Matrix (SDSAM) Approach Fisheries Research 97 17-23

Felthoven R C Morrison Paul and M Torres 2009 Measuring Productivity Change and its Components for Fisheries The Case of the Alaskan Pollock Fishery 1994-2002 Natural Resource Modeling 22(1) 105-136

Layton D and S Lee 2006 Embracing model uncertainty strategies for response pooling and model averaging Environmental and Resource Economics 34(1) 51-85

Felthoven R and C Morrison Paul 2004 Multi-output non-frontier primal measures of capacity and capacity utilization American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(3) 615-629

Felthoven R T Hiatt and J Terry 2004 Measuring fishing capacity and utilization with commonly available data an application to Alaskan fisheries Marine Fisheries Review 64(4) 29-39

Felthoven R C Morrison Paul V Ball and R Nehring 2002 Costs of Production and Environmental Risk Resource-Factor Substitution in US Agriculture Agricultural Productivity Measurement and Sources of Growth VE Ball and GW Norton eds pp 293-310 Boston Kluwer Academic Press

Felthoven R 2002 Effects of the American Fisheries Act on Capacity Utilization and Technical Efficiency Marine Resource Economics 17(3) 181-205

Felthoven R T Hiatt and J Terry 2002 Quantitative Estimates of Fishing Capacity Capacity Utilization and Fishery Utilization for Alaskan Commercial Fisheries 2001 National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Fisheries Science Center

NORTH PACIFIC | Ocean Policy amp Management ResearchSanchirico J D Lew A Haynie D Kling and D Layton 2013 Conservation Values in Marine Ecosystem-Based Management Marine Policy 38 523-530

217

Publications

NORTH PACIFIC | Other Marine Environmental ResearchJohnson K P Bettinger J Kline T Spies M Lennette G Lettman B Garber-Yonts and T Larsen 2006 Simulating Forest Structure Timber Production and Socio-Economic Effects in a Multi-Owner Province Ecological Applications 17(1) 34-47

Spies T K Johnson K Burnett J Ohmann B Mccomb G Reeves P Bettinger J Kline and B Garber-Yonts 2006 Cumulative Ecological and Socio-Economic Effects of Forest Policies in Coastal Oregon Ecological Applications 17(1) 5-17

Garber-Yonts B 2004 The Economics of Amenities and Migration in the Pacific Northwest Review of Selected Literature with Implications for National Forest Management US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland OR General Technical Report PNW-GTR-617 48p

Morrison Paul C V Ball R Felthoven A Grube and R Nehring 2002 Effective Costs and Chemicals use in US Agricultural Production Benefits of using the Environment as a Free Input American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(4) 897-901

NORTH PACIFIC | Protected Resources Economics ResearchLew D D Layton and R Rowe 2010 Valuing Enhancements to Endangered Species Protection Under Alternative Baseline Futures The Case of the Steller Sea Lion Marine Resource Economics 25(2) 133-54

NORTH PACIFIC | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchLew D G Sampson A Himes-Cornell and J Lee 2015 Costs Earnings and Employment in the Alaska Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Sector 2011-2013 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-2738 134p

Lew D and C Seung 2014 On the Statistical Significance of Regional Economic Impacts from Changes in Recreational Fishing Harvest Limits in Southern Alaska Marine Resource Economics 29(3) 241-257

Lew D and D Larson 2014 Is a Fish in Hand Worth Two in the Sea Evidence from a Stated Preference Study Fisheries Research 157 124-135

Larson D and D Lew 2013 How Do Harvest Rates Affect Angler Trip Patterns Marine Resource Economics 28(2) 155-173

Seung C and D Lew 2013 Accounting for Variation in Exogenous Shocks in Economic Impact Modeling The Annals of Regional Science DOI 101007s00168-012-0550-0

Lew D and D Larson 2012 Economic Values for Saltwater Sport Fishing in Alaska A Stated Preference Analysis North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32(4) 745-759

Lew D and D Larson 2011 A Repeated Mixed Logit Approach to Valuing a Local Sport Fishery The Case of Southeast Alaska Salmon Land Economics 87 712-729

Lew D and C Seung 2010 The Economic Impact Of Saltwater Sportfishing Harvest Restrictions In Alaska An Empirical Analysis Of Non-Resident Anglers North American Journal Of Fisheries Management 30 538-551

Lew D J Lee and D Larson 2010 Saltwater Sport Fishing In Alaska A Summary and Description of the Alaska Saltwater Sport Fishing Economic Survey 2007 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-214 229p

218

Publications

NORTH PACIFIC | Seafood Marketing amp Trade ResearchCarothers C D Lew and J Sepez 2010 Fishing Rights and Small Communities Alaska Halibut IFQ Transfer Patterns Ocean and Coastal Management 53(9) 518-523

Seung C 2008 Estimating dynamic impacts of seafood industry in Alaska Marine Resource Economics 23(1) 87-104

Seung C and E Waters 2006 The role of the Alaska seafood industry a social accounting matrix (SAM) model approach to economic base analysis The Annals of Regional Science 40(2) 335-360

NORTH PACIFIC | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchHimes-Cornell A and K Hoelting 2015 Resilience strategies in the face of short and long term change Outmigration and fisheries regulation in Alaska fishing communities Ecology and Society 20(2) 9

Himes-Cornell A and S Kasperski 2015 Using indicators to assess the vulnerability and resiliency of Alaskan fishing communities to climate change Fisheries Research 162 1-11

Lew D A Himes-Cornell and J Lee 2015 Weighting and Data Imputation for Missing Data in Fisheries Economic and Social Survey Marine Resource Economics 30(2) 219-230

Himes-Cornell A and K Kent 2014 Involving Fishing Communities in Data Collection A Summary and Description of the Alaska Community Survey 2011 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC 284 171p

Himes-Cornell A and K Kent 2014 Involving Fishing Communities in Data Collection A Summary and Description of the Alaska Community Survey 2010 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC 280 170p

Kasperski S and A Himes-Cornell 2014 Indicators of Fishing Engagement and Reliance of Alaskan Fishing Communities AFSC Quarterly Report Feature (January-February-March 2014) 7p

Package-Ward C and A Himes-Cornell 2014 Utilizing oral histories to understand the social networks of Oregon fishermen in Alaska Human Organization 73(3) 277-288

Himes-Cornell A K Hoelting C Maguire L Munger-Little J Lee J Fisk R Felthoven and P Little 2013 Community Profiles of North Pacific Fisheries Alaska 2nd edition US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-259 (1-12)

Himes-Cornell A C Package and A Durland 2011 Improving Community Profiles for the North Pacific Fisheries NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-230

Lew D and A Himes-Cornell 2011 A Guide to Designing Testing and Implementing AFSC Economic and Social Surveys US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-228 43p

Vaccaro I L Zanotti and J Sepez 2009 Commons and Markets Opportunities for Development of Local Sustainability Environmental Politics 18(4) 522-538

Sepez J 2008 Historical Ecology of Makah Subsistence Foraging Patterns Journal of Ethnobiology 28(1) 110-133

219

Publications

Etnier M and J Sepez 2008 Changing Patterns of Sea Mammal Exploitation among the Makah Pp Time and Change Archaeology and Anthropological Perspectives on the Long-Term in Hunter-Gatherer Societies R Layton H Maschner and D Papagianni eds pp 143-158 Woodbridge CT Oxbow Press

Sepez J K Norman and R Felthoven 2007 A quantitative model for ranking and selecting communities most involved in commercial fisheries National Association of Practicing Anthropologists Bulletin 28(1) 43-56

Sepez J C Package P Malcolm and A Poole 2007 Unalaska Alaska Memory and Denial in the Globalization of the Aleutian Landscape Polar Geography 30(3) 193-209

Norman K J Sepez H Lazrus N Milne C Package S Russell K Grant R Petersen J Primo M Styles B Tilt and I Vaccaro 2007 Community Profiles for West Coast and North Pacific Fisheries-Washington Oregon California and other US States US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-85 602p Available at httpwwwnwfscnoaagovresearchdivisionssdcommunityprofilesCaliforniaSanta_Rosa_CApdf

Poole A and J Sepez 2006 Distribution and abundance of human populations in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 2005 North Pacific Groundfish Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Reports for 2006 Economic Status of the Groundfish Fisheries Off Alaska 2006 T Hiatt ed pp 255-276 Seattle Alaska Fisheries Science Center

Sepez J K Norman A Poole and B Tilt 2006 Fish scales scale and method in social science research for North Pacific and West Coast fishing communities Human Organization 65(3) 280-293

Sepez J and H Lazrus 2005 Traditional Environmental Knowledge in Federal Natural Resource Management Agencies Practicing Anthropology 27(1) 1-48

Lazrus H and J Sepez 2005 The NOAA Fisheries Alaska Native Traditional Knowledge Database Practicing Anthropology 27(1) 33-37

Sepez J B Tilt C Package H Lazrus and I Vaccaro 2005 Community Profiles for North Pacific Fisheries-Alaska US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-160 552p

Package C and J Sepez 2004 Fishing communities of the North Pacific social science research at the Alaska Fisheries Science Center AFSC Quarterly Report April-May-June 2004 11p Available at httpwwwafscnoaagovQuarterlyamj2004amj04featpdf

Sepez J 2003 Makah Dictionary of American History 3rd Edition Charles Scribnerrsquos Sons New York

PacificPACIFIC | Coastal amp Marine Recreation ResearchPolasky S E Nelson J Camm B Csuti P Fackler E Lonsdorf C Montgomery D White J Arthur B Garber-Yonts R Haight J Kagan A Starfield and C Tobalske 2008 Where to Put Things Spatial Land Management to Sustain Biodiversity and Economic Returns Biological Conservation 141(6) 1505-1524

220

Publications

Lew D and D Larson 2005 Valuing recreation and amenities at San Diego County beaches Coastal Management 33(1) 71-86

Garber-Yonts B 2005 Conceptualizing and Measuring Demand for Recreation on National Forests A Review and Synthesis General Technical Report PNW-GTR-64540 US Department of Agriculture US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland OR

Garber-Yonts B J Kerkvliet and R Johnson 2004 Public Values for Biodiversity Conservation Policies in the Oregon Coast Range Forest Science 50(5) 589-602

Harris T C Seung T Darden and W Riggs 2002 Rangeland fires in Northern Nevada an application of computable general equilibrium modeling Western Economics Forum 1(2) 3-10

PACIFIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchRose K J Fiechter E Curchitser K Hedstrom M Bernal SCreekmore A Haynie S Ito S Lluch-Cota B Megrey C Edwards D Checkley T Koslow S McClatchie F Werner A MacCall and V Agostini 2015 Demonstration of afully coupled end-to-end model for small pelagic fish using sardine and anchovy in the California Current Forthcomingin Progress in Oceanography Available online httpwwwsciencedirectcomsciencearticlepiiS0079661115000233

Collier T A Mamula and J Ruggiero 2014 Estimation of a Multi-Output Production Functions in Commercial Fisheries Omega The International Journal of Management Science 42(1) 157165

Speir C C Pomeroy and J Sutinen 2014 Port Level Fishing Dynamics Assessing Changes in the Distribution of Fishing Activity over Time Marine Policy 46 171-191

Mamula A and J Walden 2013 Proceedings of the National Marine Fisheries Service Productivity Workshop (Santa Cruz June 11-12 2012) US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-503

Thomson C 2010 Data requirements for integrating socioeconomic considerations into regulatory analysis examples from California commercial fisheries In RM Starr et al (eds) Managing Data-Poor Fisheries Case Studies Models and Solutions California Sea Grant College Program Publication No T-070

Tomberlin D and G Holloway 2010 Bayesian hierarchical estimation of technical efficiency in a fishery Applied Economics Letters 17(2) 201-204

Grafton R R Hannesson B Shallard D Sykes and J Terry 2010 The Economics of Allocation in Tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 155-162 Wiley-Blackwell

Hannesson R and S Herrick 2010 The value of Pacific sardine as forage fish Marine Policy 34(5) 935-942

Lian C 2010 West Coast limited entry groundfish trawl cost earnings survey protocols and results for 2004 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-107 35p Available at httpwwwnwfscnoaagovassets257569_11092010_161408_CostEarningsSurveyTM107WebFinalpdf

Hannesson R S Herrick and J Field 2009 Ecological and economic considerations in the conservation and management of the Pacific sardine (Sardinops sagax) Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66(5) 859-868

221

Publications

Lian C R Singh and Q Weninger 2010 Fleet Restructuring Rent Generation and the Design of Individual Fishing Quota Programs Empirical Evidence from the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Marine Resource Economics 24 329-359

Norton J S Herrick and J Mason 2009 Fisheries abundance cycles in ecosystem and economic management of California fish and invertebrate resources The future of fisheries science in North America RJ Beamish and BJ Rothschild eds pp 227-244 Springer BV

Hannesson R and S Herrick 2008 Catch strategies for the pacific sardine California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI) Reports 49 222-231

Herrick S J Norton J Mason and C Bessey 2007 Management application of an empirical model of sardine-climate regime shifts Marine Policy 31 71-80

Thomson C D VenTresca and D Colpo 2007 Logbook Pilot Program for Californiarsquos Nearshore Groundfish Fishery Results and Lessons Learned US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-NMFS-SWFSC-408

Herrick S K Hill and C Reiss 2006 An optimal harvest policy for the recently renewed United States Pacific sardine fishery Climate Change and the Economics of the Worldrsquos Fisheries R Hannesson M Barange and S Herrick eds pp 126-150 United Kingdon Edward Elgar

Squires D Y Jeon T Kim and R Clarke 2006 Price linkages in Pacific tuna markets implications for the South Pacific tuna treaty and the Western and Central Pacific region Environment and Development Economics 11(6) 747-767

Plummer M 2006 The grand unified theory of natural resource economics a special case Explorations in Environmental amp Natural Resource Economics Essays in Honor of Gardner M Brown DF Layton and R Halvorsen eds pp 150-160 United Kingdom Edward Elgar

Holloway G and D Tomberlin 2006 Bayesian ranking and selection of fishing boat efficiencies Marine Resource Economics 21(4) 415-432

Squires D J Joseph and T Groves 2006 Tuna resource management buybacks in transnational fisheries Pacific Economic Bulletin 21(3) 63-74

Reid C J Kirkley D Squires and J Ye 2005 An analysis of the fishing capacity of the global tuna purse seine fleet FAO Fisheries Proceedings 2 Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity Conservation and Socio-economics pp 117-156 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Holloway G D Tomberlin and X Irz 2005 Hierarchical analysis of production efficiency in a coastal trawl fishery Sustaining Large Marine Ecosystems The Human Dimension TM Hennessey and JG Sutinen eds pp 159-185 Amsterdam Elsevier BV

Haraden J S Herrick D Squires and C Tisdell 2004 Economic benefits of dolphins in the United States Eastern Tropical Pacific purse seine tuna industry Environmental and Resource Economics 28 451-468

Dalton M and S Ralston 2004 The California Rockfish Conservation Area and groundfish trawlers at Moss Landing Harbor Marine Resource Economics 19(1) 67-83

222

Publications

Kirkley J P Morrison J Catherine and D Squires 2004 Deterministic and stochastic capacity estimation for fishery capacity reduction Marine Resource Economics 19(3) 271-294

Kirkley J D Squires F Alam and H Ishak 2003 Excess capacity and asymmetric information in developing country fisheries the Malaysian purse seine fishery American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(3) 647-662

Fox K R Grafton J Kirkley and D Squires 2003 Property rights productivity and profits in a common-pool resource Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46(1) 156-177

Reid C D Squires Y Jeon L Clarke and R Clarke 2003 Fishing capacity of tuna purse seine vessels in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean Marine Policy 27(6) 449-469

Thomson C 2001 Human ecosystem dimension Californiarsquos Living Marine Resources A Status Report T Larinto ed pp 47-66 Monterey California Department of Fish and Game

Dalton M 2001 El Nino expectations and fishing effort in Monterey Bay California Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42(3) 336-359

Viswanathan K I Omar Y Jeon J Kirkley D Squires and I Susilowati 2001 Fishing skill in developing country fisheries the Kedah Malaysia trawl fishery Marine Resource Economics 16(4) 293-314

Grafton R Squires D and K Fox 2000 Private property and economic efficiency a study of a common-pool resource Journal of Law and Economics 43(2) 679-713

Campbell H S Herrick and D Squires 2000 The role of research in fisheries management the conservation of dolphins in the Eastern Tropical Pacific and the exploitation of southern bluefin tuna in the Southern Ocean Ocean Development and International Law 31(4) 347-375

PACIFIC | Habitat Economics ResearchSpeir C A Mamula and D Ladd In press Effects of Water Supply on Labor Demand and Agricultural Production in Californiarsquos San Joaquin Valley Forthcoming in Water Economics and Policy

Thomson C 2012 Resighini Rancheria Tribe Fishery Socioeconomics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C 2012 Hoopa Valley Tribe Fishery Socioeconomics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C 2012 Karuk Tribe Fishery Socioeconomics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C 2012 Klamath Tribes Fishery Socioeconomics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C 2012 Commercial Fishing Economics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

223

Publications

Thomson C 2012 Yurok Tribe Fishery Socioeconomics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C and A Mamula 2012 Ocean Sport Fishing Economics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C and C Speir 2011 Inriver Sport Fishing Economics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Plummer M 2009 Assessing benefit transfer for the valuation of ecosystem services Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(1) 38-45

Benson S H Dewar P Dutton C Fahy C Heberer D Squires and S Stohs 2009 Swordfish and Leatherback use of Temperate Habitat (SLUTH) Administrative Report LJ-09-06

Schneidler M and M Plummer 2009 Human Well-being Indicators Background and Applications for the Puget Sound Partnership Northwest Fisheries Science Center Processed Report 38p+Appendix Available at httpsitesgooglecomsitepspartnershipdocumentsHome

Thomson C and C Pinkerton 2008 Habitat Restoration Cost References for Salmon Recovery Planning US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-425

Plummer M 2007 Welcome to the data-poor real world incorporating benefit-cost principles into environmental policymaking Research in Law and Economics 23 103-130

Hildner K and C Thomson 2007 Using the California Habitat Restoration Project Database to estimate habitat restoration costs for ESA-listed salmonids US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-403

Hildner K and C Thomson 2007 Salmon Habitat Restoration Cost Modeling Results and Lessons Learned US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-404

Tomberlin D and V Bosetti 2006 An Iterative Finite Difference Approach to Project Valuation under Multiple Interacting Options US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-389 16p Available at httpswfscnoaagovpublicationsTMSWFSCNOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-389PDF

OrsquoHanley J and D Tomberlin 2005 Optimizing the removal of small fish passage barriers Environmental Modeling and Assessment 10(2) 85-98

Plummer M 2005 The economic evaluation of stream and watershed restoration projects Methods for Monitoring Stream and Watershed Restoration P Roni ed pp 310-330 Bethesda American Fisheries Society

Ise J and S Abbott-Jamieson 2005 Students gather local fisheries knowledge as part of a NOAA Fisheries education and outreach project Practicing Anthropology 27(1) 29-32

PACIFIC | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchField J Punt A Methot R and C Thomson 2006 Does MPA mean major problem for assessments Considering the consequences of place-based management systems Fish and Fisheries 7 284-302

224

Publications

Dalton M and S Ralston 2006 Empirical Evaluation of Regional Scale Marine Reserves and the Groundfish Trawl Fishery California Sea Grant College Program Research Completion Reports Paper MA06 01 Available at httpnsglgsourieducasgcasgt06010pdf

PACIFIC | Ocean Policy amp Management ResearchWells B T Wainwright C Thomson T Williams N Mantua L Crozier S Breslow and K Fresh 2014 CCIEA Phase III Report 2014 Ecosystem Components Protected Species ndash Pacific Salmon Available at httpwwwnoaagovieaAssetsieacaliforniaReportpdf8Salmon_2013pdf

Khanna M and C Speir 2013 Motivations for Proactive Environmental Management Sustainability 5 2664-2692 DOI 103390su5062664

Norman K D Holland and S Kasperski 2013 Resilient and Economically Viable Coastal Communities In Levin P B Wells and M Sheer (eds) California Current Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Phase II Report Available at httpwwwnoaagovieaCCIEA-Reportindexhtml

Squires D 2009 Opportunities in social science research The Future of Fisheries Science in North America R Beamish and B Rothschild eds pp 637-696 Netherlands Springer American Institute of Fisheries Research Biologists

PACIFIC | Other Marine Environmental ResearchHarvey C Bartz J Davies T Francis T Good A Guerry M Hanson K Holsman J Miller M Plummer J Reum L Rhodes C Rice J Samhouri G Williams N Yoder P Levin and M Ruckelshaus 2010 A mass-balance model for evaluating food web structure and community-scale indicators in the central basin of Puget Sound US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-106 180p Available at httpwwwnwfscnoaagovassets257363_08042010_120050_MassBalanceModelTM106WebFinalpdf

PACIFIC | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchHilger J and J Englin 2009 Utility theoretic semi-logarithmic incomplete demand systems in a natural experiment Forest fire impacts on recreational values and use Resource and Energy Economics Volume 31(4) 287-298

Lew D and D Larson 2008 Valuing a beach day with a repeated nested logit model of participation site choice and stochastic time value Marine Resource Economics 23(3) 233-252

Layton D and S Lee 2006 From ratings to rankings the econometric analysis of stated preference ratings data Explorations in Environmental amp Natural Resource Economics Essays in Honor of Gardner M Brown DF Layton and R Halvorsen eds pp 224-244 United Kingdom Edward Elgar

Lew D and D Larson 2005 Accounting for stochastic shadow values of time in discrete-choice recreation demand models Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50(2) 341-361

Larson D and D Lew 2005 Measuring the utility of ancillary travel revealed preferences in recreation site demand and trips taken Transportation Research 39(2-3) 237-55

Gentner B S Steinback and M Price 2001 Marine Angler Expenditures in the Pacific Coast Region 2000 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-49 57p Available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagovst5RecEconPublicationsNMFS_F_SPO_49revpdf

225

Publications

PACIFIC | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchBreslow S D Holland P Levin K Norman M Poe C Thomson R Barnea P Dalton N Dolsak C Greene K Hoelting S Kasperski R Kosaka D Ladd A Mamula S Miller B Sojka C Speir S Steinbeck and N Tolimieri 2014 Human Dimensions of the CCIEA In Levin P B Wells and M Sheer (eds) California Current Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Phase III Report 2013 Available from httpwwwnoaagovieaAssetsieacaliforniaReportpdf10Human20Dimensions_2013pdf

Holland D and S Kasperski 2014 Fishery Income Diversification and Risk for Fishermen and Fishing Communities of the US West Coast and Alaska ndash Updated to 2012 Appendix HD1 Appendix to Human Dimensions of the CCIEA In Levin P B Wells and M Sheer (Eds) California Current Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Phase III Report 2013 Available from httpwwwnoaagovieaAssetsieacaliforniaReportpdf11Human20dimensions20Appendix_2013pdf

Pomeroy C C Thomson and M Stevens 2010 Californiarsquos North Coast Fishing Communities Historical Perspective and Recent Trends California Sea Grant College Program Publication No T-072

Vaccaro I and K Norman 2008 Social sciences and landscape analysis opportunities for the improvement of conservation policy design Journal of Environmental Management 88(2) 360-371

Sepez J K Norman A Poole and B Tilt 2005 Fish Scales Scale and Method in Social Science Research for North Pacific and West Coast Fishing Communities Human Organization 65(3) 280-293

PACIFIC | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas Research Wallmo K and R Kosaka 2014 Public Preferences for Marine Protected Areas Off the US West Coast The Significance of Restrictions and Size on Economic Value US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-144

J Mason R Kosaka A Mamula and C Speir 2012 Effort Changes Around a Marine Reserve The Case of the California Rockfish Conservation Area Marine Policy 36(5) 1054-1063

Western PacificWESTERN PACIFIC | Coastal amp Marine Recreation ResearchHu W K Boehle L Cox and M Pan 2009 Economic Values of Dolphin Excursions in Hawaii A Stated Choice Analysis Marine Resource Economics 24 61-76

WESTERN PACIFIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchRichmond L D Kotowicz and J Hospital 2015 Monitoring socioeconomic impacts of Hawaiʻirsquos 2010 bigeye tuna closure Complexities of local management in a global fishery Ocean and Coastal Management 106 87-96 DOI 101016jocecoaman201501015

Hospital J and C Beavers 2014 Catch shares and the main Hawaiian Islands bottomfish fishery Linking fishery conditions and fisher perceptions Marine Policy 44 9-17 DOI 101016jmarpol201308006

Arita S M Pan J Hospital and P Leung 2013 The distributive economic impacts of Hawaiirsquos commercial fishery a SAM analysis Fisheries Research 145 82-89 DOI 101016jfishres201302005

226

Publications

Hospital J and M Pan 2009 Demand for Hawaii bottomfish revisited incorporating economics into total allowable catch management US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-PIFSC-20 19p + Appendix Available at httpwwwpifscnoaagovtechNOAA_Tech_Memo_PIFSC_20pdf

Pan M and A Griesemer 2006 Economic Analysis of Bottomfish Fishing Vessels Operating in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands in 2003 Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center Administrative Report H-06-03 12p

Cai J P Leung M Pan and S Pooley 2005 Economic linkage impacts of Hawaiirsquos longline fishing regulations Fisheries Research 74(1-3) 232-242

Cai J P Leung M Pan and S Pooley 2005 Linkage of Fisheries Sector to Hawaiirsquos Economy and Economic Impacts of Longline Fishing Regulations SOEST Publication 05-01 JIMAR Contribution 05-355 24p

OrsquoMalley J and S Pooley 2002 A Description and Economic Analysis of Large American Samoa Longline Vessels SOEST Publication 02-2 JIMAR Contribution 02-345 24p

OrsquoMalley J and S Pooley 2002 Economic and Operational Characteristics of the Hawaii-based Longline Fleet in 2000 SOEST Publication 03-01 JIMAR Contribution 03-348 31p

Pan M P Leung and S Pooley 2001 A decision support model for fisheries management in Hawaii a multilevel and multiobjective programming approach North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21 293-309

Curtis R and R Hicks 2000 The cost of sea turtle preservation the case of Hawaiirsquos pelagic longliners American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(5) 1191-1197

Pan M P Leung F Ji S Nakamoto and S Pooley 2000 A Multilevel and Multiobjective Programming Model for the Hawaii Fishery Model Documentation and Application Results JIMAR Contribution 99-324 University of Hawaii

Kawamoto K and S Pooley 2000 Annual Report of the 1998 Western Pacific Lobster Fishery (with preliminary 1999 data) Southwest Fish Sci Cent Admin Rep H-00-02 38p Available at httpwwwpifscnoaagovadminrpts2000-presentSWFC_Admin_Report_00-02pdf

WESTERN PACIFIC | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchPan M A Griesemer and R Mamiit 2006 Economic assessment of open fishing tournament in Hawaiʻi Newsletter Volume 11 Number 2 Pelagic Fisheries Program University of Hawaii

Curran D P Dalzell J Schultz J OrsquoMalley and S Pooley 2006 Recreational Metadata Using Tournament Data to Describe a Poorly Documented Pelagic Fishery SOEST Publication 06-03 JIMAR Contribution 06-363 40p

Leeworthy V P Wiley and J Hospital 2004 Importance-satisfaction Ratings Five-year Comparison SPA amp ER use and Socioeconomic and Ecological Monitoring Comparison of Results 1995-96 to 2000-01 Silver Spring Maryland Special Projects NOS 59p

WESTERN PACIFIC | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchAllen S and A Gough 2007 Filipino crew community in Hawaiʻi-based longline fishing fleet National Association of Practicing Anthropologists Bulletin 28(1) 87-98

227

Publications

Allen S and A Gough 2007 Hawaii Longline Fishermenrsquos Experiences with the Observer Program US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-PIFSC-8 39p Available at httpwwwpifscnoaagovtechNOAA_Tech_Memo_PIFSC_8pdf

Allen S and A Gough 2006 A Sociocultural Assessment of Filipino Crew Members Working in the Hawaii-based Longline Fleet US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-PIFSC-6 54p Available at httpwwwpifscnoaagovtechNOAA_Tech_Memo_PIFSC_6pdf

New EnglandNEW ENGLAND | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchHolland D P Pinto da Silva and A Kitts 2015 Social Capital and Economic Performance of New England Groundfish Harvest Cooperatives An Evolving Story Forthcoming in Marine Resource Economics

Olson J 2010 Seeding nature ceding culture Redefining the boundaries of the marine commons through spatial management and GIS Geoforum 41(2) 293-303

Holland D and J Wiersma 2010 Free form property rights for fisheries The decentralized design of rights-based management through groundfish sectors in New England Marine Policy 34(5) 1076-1081

Lee M 2010 Economic tradeoffs in the Gulf of Maine ecosystem Herring and whale-watching Marine Policy 34 156-162

Holland D and GE Herrera 2009 Uncertainty in the Management of Fisheries Contradictory Implications and a New Approach Marine Resource Economics 24(3) 289-299

Thunberg E 2009 Trends in Selected Northeast Region Marine Industries US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS NE 211 107p Available at httpwwwnefscnoaagovpublicationstmtm211

Rountree B A Kitts and P Pinto da Silva 2008 Complexities of collaboration in fisheries management the Northeast US tilefish fishery FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No 504 Case Studies in Fisheries Self-governance R Townsend R Shotton and H Uchida eds pp 135-147 Rome FAO

Steinback S R Allen and E Thunberg 2008 The benefits of rationalization the case of the American lobster fishery Marine Resource Economics 23(1) 37-63

Bisack K 2008 Integrating Porpoise and Cod Management A comparison of Days-at-Sea ITQs and Closures Marine Resource Economics 23(4) 361-378

Jin D E Thunberg and P Hoaglund 2008 Economic impact of the 2005 red tide event on commercial shellfish fisheries in New England Ocean and Coastal Management 51(5) 420-429

Thunberg E A Kitts and J Walden 2007 A case study of New England groundfish fishing capacity reduction Fishery Buybacks D Squires and R Curtis eds pp 239-248 Blackwell Publishing

228

Publications

Kitts A P Pinto da Silva and B Rountree 2007 Evolution and outcomes of collaborative management institutions in the NE US tilefish fishery Marine Policy 31 192-200

Thunberg E 2007 Demographic and Economic Trends in the Northeastern United States Lobster (Homarus americanus) Fishery 1970-2005 US Dept of Commerce Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 07-17 National Marine Fisheries Service Woods Hole MA

Fare R J Kirkley and J Walden 2007 Estimating Capacity and Efficiency in Fisheries with Undesirable Outputs VIMS Marine Resource Report No 2007-6 Available at httpwwwvimseduGreylitVIMSmrr07-6pdf

Fare R J Kirkley and J Walden 2006 Adjusting technical efficiency to reflect discarding the case of the US Georges Bank multi-species otter trawl fishery Fisheries Research 78(2006) 257-265

Bisack K and J Sutinen 2006 Harbor porpoise bycatch ITQs or timearea closures in the New England gillnet fishery Land Economics 82(1) 85-102

Jin D P Hoagland and E Thunberg 2006 An analysis of the relationship between fish harvesting and processing sectors in New England Marine Resource Economics 21(1) 47-62

Walden J 2006 Estimating vessel efficiency using a bootstrapped data envelopment analysis model Marine Resource Economics 21(2) 181-192

Jin D and E Thunberg 2005 An analysis of fishing vessel accidents in fishing areas off the Northeastern United States Safety Science 43(8) 523-540

Edwards S J Link and B Rountree 2005 Portfolio management of fish communities in Large Marine Ecosystems Sustaining Large Marine Ecosystems The Human Dimension TM Hennessey and JG Sutinen eds pp 181-200 Amsterdam Elsevier BV

Thunberg E T Helser and R Mayo 2002 Bioeconomic analysis of alternative selection patterns in the United States Atlantic silver hake fishery Marine Resource Economics 13(1) 51-74

Kitts A E Thunberg and J Robertson 2000 Willingness to participate and bids in a fishing vessel buyout program a case study of New England groundfish Marine Resource Economics 15(3) 221-232

Steinback S and E Thunberg 2000 A Method of Analyzing Trip Limits in Northeast Fisheries A Case Study of the Spiny Dogfish Fishery Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 00-06

NEW ENGLAND | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchWallmo K and S Edwards 2008 Estimating Non-market Values of Marine Protected Areas A Latent Class Modeling Approach Marine Resource Economics 23(3) 301-323

Edwards S 2008 Ocean zoning first possession and Coasean contracts Marine Policy 32(1) 46-54

229

Publications

NEW ENGLAND | Ocean Policy amp Management ResearchSutinen J P Clay C Dyer S Edwards J Gates T Grigalunas T Hennessy L Juda A Kitts P Logan J Poggie Jr B Rountree S Steinback E Thunberg H Upton and J Walden 2005 A framework for monitoring and assessing socioeconomics and governance of large marine ecosystems Sustaining Large Marine Ecosystems The Human Dimension TM Hennessey and JG Sutinen eds pp 27-83 Amsterdam Elsevier BV

NEW ENGLAND | Other Marine Environmental ResearchPortman M Di Jin and E Thunberg 2009 Waterfront land use change and marine resource conditions the case of New Bedford and Fairhaven Massachusetts Ecological Economics 68 2354-2362

Steinback S 2004 Using ready-made regional input-output models to estimate backward-linkage effects of exogenous output shocks Review of Regional Studies 34(1) 57-71

NEW ENGLAND | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchThunberg E and C Fulcher 2006 Testing the stability of recreational fishing participation probabilities North American Journal of Fisheries Management 26 636-644

Salz R D Loomis M Ross and S Steinback 2002 A Baseline Socio-economic Study of Massachusettsrsquo Marine Recreational Fisheries US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NE-165 129p Available at httpwwwnefscnoaagovpublicationstmtm165tm165pdf

NEW ENGLAND | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchJohnston R D Holland and S Tuler 2010 New England Fishing Communities Prospects and Uncertainties Communities and Banking 21(2) 3-5Tuler S J Agyeman and P Pinto da Silva 2008 Improving the social sustainability of fisheries management by assessing stakeholder vulnerability Human Ecology Review 15(2) 171-184

Pinto da Silva P and M Hall-Arber eds 2008 Weathering the storms vulnerability and resilience in the Northeast fishing industry Special issue of Human Ecology Review 15(2) 141-142

Olson J 2006 Changing property spatializing difference the sea scallop fishery in New Bedford Massachusetts Human Organization 65(3) 307-318

Pinto da Silva P and A Kitts 2006 Collaborative fisheries management in the Northeast US emerging initiatives and future directions Marine Policy 30(6) 832-841

Pinto da Silva P 2006 Fishermen at the frontlines of conservation The Common Property Resource Digest March 2006 issue

Pinto da Silva P and C Fulcher 2005 Human dimensions of marine fisheries Using GIS to illustrate land-sea connections in the Northeast US herring fishery Marine Fisheries Review 67(4) 19-25

NEW ENGLAND | US Territories amp International Fisheries ResearchPascoe S J Innes D Holland M Fina O Theacutebaud R Townsend J Sanchirico R Arnason C Wilcox and T Hutton 2010 Use of incentive-based management systems to limit bycatch and discarding International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 4(1) 123-161

230

Publications

Mid-AtlanticMID-ATLANTIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchSteinback S and E Thunberg 2006 Northeast region commercial fishing input-output model US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NE-188 54p Available at httpwwwnefscnoaagovpublicationstmtm188tm188pdf

Edwards S 2005 Rents for the taking a contemporary history of property rights formation in the US Atlantic sea scallop fishery Evolving Property Rights in Marine Fisheries D Leal ed pp 111-126 New York Rowman amp Littlefield Publishers

Edwards S 2005 Accounting for rents in the US Atlantic sea scallop fishery Marine Resource Economics 20(1) 61-76

Hoagland P D Jin E Thunberg and S Steinback 2005 Economic activity associated with the Northeast Shelf Large Marine Ecosystem application of an input-output approach Chapter 7 Sustaining Large Marine Ecosystems The Human Dimension TM Hennessey and JG Sutinen eds pp 157-179 Amsterdam Elsevier BV

Walden J J Kirkley and A Kitts 2003 A limited economics assessment of the Northeast groundfish fishery buyout program Land Economics 79(3) 426-439Link J J Brodziak S Edwards W Overholtz D Mountain J Jossi T Smith and M Fogarty 2002 Marine ecosystem assessment in a fisheries management context Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59 1429-1440

Jin D H Kite-Powell E Thunberg A Solow and W Talley 2002 A model of fishing vessel accident probability Journal of Safety Research 33 497-510

Edwards S 2002 Rent-seeking and property rights formation in the US Atlantic sea scallop fishery Marine Resource Economics 16 263-275

Kirkley J R Fare S Grosskopf T McConnell D Squires and I Strand 2001 Assessing efficiency and capacity in fisheries when data are limited North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21(3) 482-497

MID-ATLANTIC | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchKasperski S and R Weiland 2010 When Is It Optimal To Delay Harvesting The Role of Ecological Services In The Northern Chesapeake Bay Oyster Fishery Marine Resource Economics 24(4) 361-385

MID-ATLANTIC | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchWallmo K and B Gentner 2008 Catch-and-release fishing a comparison of intended and actual behavior of marine anglers North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28(5) 1459-1471

Massey D S Newbold and B Gentner 2006 Valuing water quality changes using a bioeconomic model of a coastal recreational fishery Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52(1) 482-500

Massey M S Newbold and B Gentner 2005 The effects of water quality on coastal recreation flounder fishing NCEE Working Paper Series No 05-03 National Center for Environmental Economics (NCEE) Environmental Protection Agency

Thunberg E and J Milon 2002 Projecting recreational fishing participation Recreational Fisheries Ecological Economic and Social Evaluation T J Pitcher and C Hollingworth eds pp 63-73 United Kingdon Blackwell Science

231

Publications

Steinback S and B Gentner 2001 Marine Angler Expenditures in the Northeast Region 1998 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-4

MID-ATLANTIC | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchOlson J and P Clay 2001 An Overview of the Social and Economic Survey Administered During Round II of the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Disaster Assistance Program US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NE-164 80p Available at httpwwwnefscnoaagovpublicationstmtm164tm164pdf

South AtlanticSOUTH ATLANTIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchCrosson S 2015 Anticipating exit from North Carolinarsquos commercial fisheries Forthcoming in Society and Natural Resources

Shideler G D Carter C Liese and J Serafy 2015 Lifting the goliath grouper harvest ban Angler perspectives and willingness to pay Fisheries Research 161(Jan) 156-165

Yandle T and S Crosson 2015 Whatever Happened to the Wreckfish Fishery An Evaluation of the Oldest Finfish ITQ Program in the United States Marine Resource Economics 30(2) 193-217

Fleming C F Tonioli and J Agar 2014 A review of principal coastal economic sectors within the southeast United States and US Caribbean NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-669 44 p DOI 107289V5J10135

Tokitch B C Meindl A Hoare and M Jepson 2012 Stakeholder Perceptions of the Northern Gulf of Mexico Grouper and Tilefish Individual Fishing Quota Program Marine Policy 36 34ndash41

Walter J E Orbesen C Liese and J Serafy 2012 Can Circle Hooks Improve Western Atlantic Sailfish Istiophorus Platypterus Populations Bulletin of Marine Science 88(3) 755-770

Crosson S 2011 Resistance to Alternative Management in Fisheries Economic and Cultural Considerations of North Carolinarsquos Commercial fishers Politics and the Life Sciences 30(2) 31-42

Matos-Caraballo D and J Agar 2011 Census of Active Commercial Fishermen in Puerto Rico 2008 Marine Fisheries Review 73(1) 13-27

Tonioli F and J Agar 2011 Synopsis of Puerto Rican Commercial Fisheries NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-622 47p

Crosson S 2010 Trends in the South Atlantic Golden Crab Fishery US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-608 24p

Perrusso L R Weldon and S Larkin 2005 Predicting optimal targeting strategies in multispecies fisheries a portfolio approach Marine Resource Economics 20(1) 25-45

232

Publications

Thunberg E 2004 Buyback programs for overcapitalized fisheries approaches experiences and impacts for Southeast fisheries discussion Journal of Agricultural amp Applied Economics 36(2) 347-349

Porter R M Wendt M Travis and I Strand 2001 Cost-earnings Study of the Atlantic-based US Pelagic Longline Fleet SOEST Publication 01-02 JIMAR Contribution 01-337 102p

Waters J R Rhodes and R Wiggers 2001 Description of Economic Data Collected with Random Sample of Commercial Reef Fish Boats in the Florida Keys US Dept of Commerce NOAA Technical Report NMFS-154 45p

SOUTH ATLANTIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchFleming C F Toniolo and J Agar 2014 A review of principal coastal economic sectors within the southeast United States and US Caribbean NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-669 44p DOI 107289V5J10135

SOUTH ATLANTIC | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchLiese C and D Carter 2011 Collecting Economic Data from the For-Hire Fishing Sector Lessons from a Cost and Earnings Survey of the Southeast US Charter Boat Industry 14p In Beard T D Jr A J Loftus and R Arlinghaus (eds) The Angler and the Environment American Fisheries Society Bethesda MD

Marvasti A 2010 A Welfare Estimation of Beach Recreation with Aggregate Data Applied Economics 42(1-3) 291-96

Carter D and D Letson 2009 Structural vector error correction modeling of integrated sport fishery data Marine Resource Economics 24(1) 19-41

Carter D C Rivero S Aguilar and K Kleisner 2008 South Florida Sportfishing Geodatabase (SFSGEO) design document US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-578 27p Available at httpwwwsefscnoaagovsfsgeodesignpdf

SOUTH ATLANTIC | Sociocultural ResearchStoffle B J Contillo C Grace and D Snodgrass 2011 The Socio-Economic Importance of Fishing in St Thomas USVI An Examination of Fishing Community Designation NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-623 47p

SOUTH ATLANTIC | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchCarter D 2003 Protected areas in marine resource management another look at the economics and research issues Ocean and Coastal Management 46(5) 439-456

Gulf of MexicoGULF OF MEXICO | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchKarnaukas M M Schirripa J Craig G Cook C Kelble J Agar B Black D Enfield D Lindo-Atichati B Muhling K Purcell P Richards and C Wang 2015 Evidence of climate-driven ecosystem reorganization in the Gulf of Mexico Forthcoming in Global Change Biology

Agar J and D Carter 2014 Are the 2012 allocations of gag red and black grouper in the Gulf of Mexico economically efficient US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-660 40p

233

Publications

Agar J and D Carter 2014 Is the 2012 allocation of red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico economically efficient US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-659 32p

Agar J J Stephen A Strelcheck and A Diagne 2014 The Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper IFQ Program The First Five Years Marine Resource Economics 29(2) 177-198

Marvasti A 2014 Crew Injuries and Fatalities Employment Estimates and Casualty Rates in the Gulf of Mexico Commercial Fisheries NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-656 17p

Solis D J del Corral L Perruso and J Agar 2014 Evaluating the impact of individual fishing quotas (IFQs) on the technical efficiency and composition of the US Gulf of Mexico red snapper commercial fishing fleet Food Policy 46 74-83

Solis D J del Corral L Perruso and J Agar 2014 Individual fishing quotas and fishing capacity in the US Gulf of Mexico red snapper fishery Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 58 1-23

Solis D L Perruso J del Corral B Stoffle and D Letson 2013 Measuring the initial economic effects of hurricanes on commercial fish production the US Gulf of Mexico grouper (Serranidae) fishery Natural Hazards 66(2) 271-289

Liese C and M Travis 2010 The Annual Economic Survey of Federal Gulf Shrimp Permit Holders Implementation and Descriptive Results for 2008 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-601 99p Available at httpwwwsefscnoaagovdocsShrimpEconTM601pdf

Liese C M Travis and J Waters 2009 The Annual Economic Survey of Federal Gulf Shrimp Permit Holders Implementation and Descriptive Results for 2007 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-590 97p Available at httpwwwsefscnoaagovdocsShrimpEconTM590pdf

Liese C M Travis D Pina and J Waters 2009 The Annual Economic Survey of Federal Gulf Shrimp Permit Holders Report on the Design Implementation and Descriptive Results for 2006 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-584 91p Available at httpaquaticcommonsorg21061tm_584pdf

Nance J W Keithly Jr C Caillouet Jr J Cole W Gaidry B Gallaway W Griffin R Hart and M Travis 2008 Estimation of Effort Maximum Sustainable Yield and Maximum Economic Yield in the Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-570 71p

Keithly W H Diop R Kazmierczak and M Travis 2006 The Impacts of Imports Particularly Farm-Raised Product on the Southeast US Shrimp Processing Sector Report to the Gulf and South Atlantic Fisheries Foundation 50p

Travis M and W Griffin 2004 Update on the Economic Status of the Gulf of Mexico Commercial Shrimp Fishery SERO-ECON-04-01 National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Regional Office St Petersburg Florida 10p

Weninger Q and J Waters 2003 Economic benefits of management reform in the Northern Gulf of Mexico reef fish fishery Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46(2) 207-230

Waters J 2001 Quota management in the commercial red snapper fishery Marine Resource Economics 16(1) 65-78

Travis M 2000 Data and Modeling Issues in the Gulf of Mexicorsquos Shrimp Fishery SERO-ECON-00-14 National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Regional Office St Petersburg Florida 17p

234

Publications

GULF OF MEXICO | Habitat Economics ResearchMinello T L Rozas P Caldwell and C Liese 2012 A Comparison of Salt Marsh Construction Costs with the Value of Exported Shrimp Production Wetlands 32(5) 791-799

GULF OF MEXICO | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchCarter D and C Liese 2010 Hedonic Valuation of Sportfishing Harvest Marine Resource Economics 25(4) 391-407

Carter D J Agar and J Waters 2008 Economic Framework for Fishery Allocation Decisions with an Application to the Gulf of Mexico Red Grouper US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-576 95p Available at httpwwwsefscnoaagovdocstm576pdf

Oh C-O Ditton R B Gentner and R Reichers 2005 A stated preference choice approach to understanding angler preferences for management options Human Dimensions of Wildlife 10(3) 173-186

GULF OF MEXICO | Sociocultural Fisheries Research Blount B S Jacob P Weeks and M Jepson 2015 Testing Cognitive Ethnography Mixed-Methods in Developing Indicators of Well-Being in Fishing Communities Human Organization 74(1)

Jacob S P Weeks B Blount and M Jepson 2013 Development and Evaluation of Social Indicators of Vulnerability and Resiliency for Fishing Communities in the Gulf of Mexico Marine Policy 37(1) 86-95

Jacob S P Weeks B Blount and M Jepson 2010 Exploring Fishing Dependence in Gulf Coast Communities Marine Policy 34(6) 1307-1314

Ingles P 2008 Sunken boats tangled nets and disrupted lives impacts of Hurricane Katrina on two coastal areas of Louisiana Mitigating Impacts of Natural Disasters on Fisheries Ecosystems KD McLaughlin ed American Fisheries Society Bethesda Maryland

CaribbeanCARIBBEAN | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchAgar J J Waters M Valdes-Pizzini M Shivlani T Murray J Kirkley and D Suman 2008 US Caribbean Fish Trap Fishery Socioeconomic Study Bulletin of Marine Science 82(3) 315-331

CARIBBEAN | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchKarras C and J Agar 2009 Cruzan fisherrsquos perspectives on the performance of the Buck Island Reef National Monument and the red hind seasonal closure Ocean and Coastal Management 52 578-585

CARIBBEAN | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchValds-Pizzini M J Agar K Kitner C Garca-Quijano M Tust and F Forrestal 2010 Cruzan Fisheries A rapid assessment of the historical social cultural and economic processes that shaped coastal communitiesrsquo dependence and engagement in fishing in the island of St Croix US Virgin Islands NOAA Series on US Caribbean Fishing Communities NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-597 144p

235

Publications

Tonioli F and J Agar 2009 Extending the Bajo de Sico Puerto Rico Seasonal Closure An Examination of Small-scale Fishermenrsquos Perceptions of Possible Socio-economic Impacts on Fishing Practices Families and Community Marine Fisheries Review 71(2) 15-23

Pollnac R S Abbott-Jamieson C Smith M Miller P Clay and B Oles 2008 Toward a Model for Fisheries Social Impact Assessment Marine Fisheries Review 68(1-4) 1-18

CARIBBEAN | US Territories amp International Fisheries ResearchAgar J M Shivlani J Waters M Valdes-Pizzini T Murray J Kirkley and D Suman 2005 US Caribbean Fish Trap Fishery Costs and Earnings Study US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-534 127p Available at httpwwwsefscnoaagovdocsTrap_May2006pdf

Resources

Tuna tails Photo NOAA FisheriesBrad McHale

238

Resources

UNITED STATESFederal Agenciesbull Economics amp Social Analysis Division Office of Science amp Technology NOAA Fisheries

wwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsbull Office of Science amp Technology NOAA Fisheries

httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovaboutoffice-science-and-technologybull Marine Recreational Information Program

httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovtopicrecreational-fishing-databull Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs US Department of State

wwwstategoveoesocnsfish

NORTH PACIFICFederal Agenciesbull Economic amp Social Sciences Research Alaska Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

httpwwwafscnoaagovREFMSocioeconomicsdefaultphpbull Alaska Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwafscnoaagovbull Alaska Regional Office NOAA Fisheries | httpsalaskafisheriesnoaagovbull Alaska Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | httpwwwfwsgovalaskabull District 17 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD17State Agenciesbull Alaska Department of Fish amp Game | wwwadfgstateakusCouncils amp Commissionsbull North Pacific Fishery Management Council | wwwnpfmcorgbull Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwpsmfcorgbull Fisheries Economics Data Program Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwpsmfcorgefinbull International Pacific Halibut Commission | wwwiphcint

PACIFICFederal Agenciesbull Economics Groundfish Analysis Program Northwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

httpwwwnwfscnoaagovresearchdivisionsframeconomicbull Human Dimensions Program Northwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

wwwnwfscnoaagovresearchdivisionscbdhumandimbull Northwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwnwfscnoaagovbull West Coast Regional Office NOAA Fisheries | wwwwestcoastfisheriesnoaagovbull Socioeconomics Research Southwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

httpsswfscnoaagovtextblockaspxid=1038ampParentMenuId=109bull Southwest Fisheries Science Center | httpsswfscnoaagovbull Pacific Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovpacificbull California amp Nevada US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovcnobull District 13 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD13State Agenciesbull California Department of Fish amp Game | wwwwildlifecagovbull Oregon Department of Fish amp Wildlife | wwwdfwstateorusbull Washington Department of Fish amp Wildlife | httpwdfwwagov

239

Resources

Councils amp Commissionsbull Pacific Fishery Management Council | wwwpcouncilorgbull Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwpsmfcorgbull Fisheries Economics Data Program - Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwpsmfcorgefinbull International Pacific Halibut Commission | wwwiphcint

WESTERN PACIFICFederal Agenciesbull Socioeconomics amp Planning Group Office of the Director Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

wwwpifscnoaagovsocioeconomicsbull Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwpifscnoaagovbull Pacific Islands Regional Office NOAA Fisheries | wwwfpirnoaagovbull Pacific Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovpacificbull District 14 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmild14State Agenciesbull Hawaiʻi Department of Land amp Natural Resources | wwwhawaiigovdlnrbull Guam Office of the Governor | httpgovernorguamgovbull Department of Marine amp Wildlife Resources American Samoa Office of the Governor

httpswwwamericansamoagovdepartment-of-marine-wildlifebull Division of Fish amp Wildlife Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands | httpwwwcnmi-dfwcomCouncils amp Commissionsbull Western Pacific Fishery Management Council | wwwwpcouncilorg

NEW ENGLANDFederal Agenciesbull Social Sciences Branch Northeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwnefscnoaagovreadsocialscibull Northeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwnefscnoaagovbull Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office NOAA Fisheries | wwwgreateratlanticfisheriesnoaagovbull Northeast Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovnortheastbull District 1 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD1State Agenciesbull Maine Department of Marine Resources | wwwmainegovdmrbull Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management | wwwdemrigovbull Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries | wwwmassgoveealand-use-habitatsmarine-fisheriesbull Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection | wwwctgovdepsitebull New Hampshire Fish amp Game Department | wwwwildlifestatenhusCouncils amp Commissionsbull New England Fishery Management Council | wwwnefmcorgbull Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwasmfcorg

240

Resources

MID-ATLANTICFederal Agenciesbull Social Sciences Branch Northeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwnefscnoaagovreadsocialscibull Northeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwnefscnoaagovbull Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office NOAA Fisheries | wwwgreateratlanticfisheriesnoaagovbull Northeast Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovnortheastbull District 5 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD5State Agenciesbull Bureau of Marine Resources New York Department of Environmental Conservation

wwwdecnygovabout796htmlbull New Jersey Division of Fish amp Wildlife | wwwstatenjusdepfgwbull Pennsylvania Fish amp Boat Commission | httpfishandboatcombull Delaware Division of Fish amp Wildlife | wwwfwdelawaregovbull Fisheries Service Maryland Department of Natural Resources | wwwdnrstatemdusfisheriesbull Virginia Marine Resources Commission | wwwmrcstatevausCouncils amp Commissionsbull Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council | wwwmafmcorgbull Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwasmfcorg

SOUTH ATLANTICFederal Agenciesbull Social Science Research Group Southeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

wwwsefscnoaagovsocialsciencejspbull Southeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwsefscnoaagovbull Southeast Regional Office NOAA Fisheries | httpseronmfsnoaagovbull Southeast Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovsoutheastbull Southwest Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovsouthwestbull District 7 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD7State Agenciesbull Division of Marine Fisheries North Carolina Department of Environment amp Natural Resources

httpportalncdenrorgwebmfbull Marine Resources Division South Carolina Department of Natural Resources | wwwdnrscgovbull Coastal Resources Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources | httpscoastalgadnrorgbull Florida Fish amp Wildlife Conservation Commission | httpmyfwccomCouncils amp Commissionsbull South Atlantic Fishery Management Council | wwwsafmcnetbull Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwasmfcorg

241

Resources

GULF OF MEXICOFederal Agenciesbull Social Science Research Group Southeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

wwwsefscnoaagovsocialsciencejspbull Southeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwsefscnoaagovbull Southeast Regional Office NOAA Fisheries | httpseronmfsnoaagovbull Southeast Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovsoutheastbull Southwest Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovsouthwestbull District 8 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD8State Agenciesbull Florida Fish amp Wildlife Conservation Commission | httpmyfwccombull Marine Resources Division Alabama Department of Conservation amp Natural Resources

wwwoutdooralabamacombull Mississippi Department of Marine Resources | wwwdmrstatemsusbull Louisiana Department of Wildlife amp Fisheries | wwwwlflouisianagovbull Texas Parks amp Wildlife Department | wwwtpwdstatetxusCouncils amp Commissionsbull Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council | wwwgulfcouncilorgbull Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwgsmfcorg

PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONSbull North American Association of Fisheries Economists | httporegonstateedudeptIIFETNAAFEHomehtmlbull International Institute of Fisheries Economics amp Trade | httporegonstateedudeptiifet

OTHER ORGANIZATIONS amp INFORMATIONbull Organisation for Economic Co-operation amp Development | httpwwwoecdorgbull Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

httpwwwfaoorgfisherycaptureenbull Marine Stewardship Council | wwwmscorg

Glossary

Fishing in Florida Photo NOAA FisheriesAyeisha Brinson

244

Glossary

Angler1 ndash A person catching fish or shellfish with no intent to sell including people releasing the catch Also known as a recreational fisherman

Annual Payroll2 ndash Includes all forms of compensation such as salaries wages reported tips commissions bonuses vacation allowances sick-leave pay employee contributions to qualified pension plans and the value of taxable fringe benefits For corporations it includes amounts paid to officers and executives for unincorporated businesses it does not include profit or other compensation of proprietors or partners Payroll is reported before deductions for Social Security income tax insurance union dues etc

Annual Receipts3 ndash Includes gross receipts sales commissions and income from trades and businesses as reported on annual business income tax returns Business income consists of all payments received for services rendered by nonemployer businesses such as payments received as independent agents and contractors The composition of nonemployer receipts may differ from receipts data published for employer establishments For ex-ample for wholesale agents and brokers without payroll (nonemployers) the receipts item contains commissions or earnings In contrast for wholesale agents and brokers with payroll (employers) the sales and receipts item published in the Economic Census represents the value of the goods involved in the transactions

Buyback Program4 ndash A management tool available to fishery managers intended to ease fishing-related pressure on marine resources Fishing vessels are purchased by the government or by the fishing industry itself Then they are removed from a specific fishery where fish stocks or stock complexes are considered overfished or subject to overfishing

Bycatch1 ndash Species other than the primary target species that are caught incidental to the harvest of the primary species Bycatch may be retained or discarded discards may occur for regulatory or economic reasons

Catch1 ndash 1 To undertake any activity that results in taking fish out of its environment dead or alive or to bring fish on board a vessel dead or alive 2 The total number (or weight) of fish caught by fishing operations Catch should include all fish killed by the act of fishing not just those landed 3 The component of fish encountering fishing gear which is retained by the gear Catch is usually expressed in terms of wet weight It refers sometimes to the total amount caught and sometimes only to the amount landed The fish that are not landed but returned to the sea are called discards or bycatch For this report recreational catch refers to the total number of individual fish released (thrown back into the sea) and harvested (not thrown back into the sea) by recreational fishermen (anglers)

Catch Share Program5 ndash This is a generic term used to describe a fishery management program that allocates a specific portion of the total fishery catch to individuals cooperatives communities or other entities including sectors The term encompasses more specific programs defined in legislation such as Limited Access Privilege Pro-grams (LAPPs) and Individual Fishing Quotas (IFQs) Note that a catch share allocated to a sector is different from a general sectoral allocation or distribution to an entire segment of a fishery (such as a recreational sector alloca-tion or a longline gear sector allocation) The two differ because the recipient of the catch share is responsible for terminating fishing activity when their specific share is reached

Coastal County6 ndash A coastal county meets one of the following criteria 1) at least 15 percent of a countyrsquos total land area is located within the nationrsquos coastal watershed 2) a portion of or an entire county accounts for at least 15 percent of a coastal cataloging unit Any US county that meets these criteria is classified as coastal

Coastal County Angler ndash For this report a coastal county angler refers to a recreational fishermen who lives within a given state and within a coastal county of that state

245

Glossary

Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ)7 ndash For this report the CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of a statersquos distribution of employment in commercial fishing industries compared with the distribution of commercial fishing industries in the US The CFLQ is calculated using the rdquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics US Department of Labor

Community Development Quota Program (CDQ)1 ndash A program in western Alaska under which a per-centage of the total allowable catch (TAC) of Bering Sea commercial fisheries is allocated to specific communities Communities eligible for this program must be located within 50 miles of the Bering Sea coast or on an island within the Bering Sea meet criteria established by the State of Alaska be a village certified by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act and consist of residents who conduct more than half of their current commercial or subsistence fishing in the Bering Sea or waters surrounding the Aleutian Islands Currently 75 percent of the TAC in the pollock halibut sablefish crab and groundfish fisheries is allocated to the CDQ Program

Dedicated Access Privileges (DAPs)8 ndash As defined by the US Commission on Ocean Policy a DAP pro-gram assigns an individual or other entity access to a predetermined portion of the annual catch in a particular fishery In some cases the privilege is transferable and may be bought and sold creating a market The term en-compasses a range of tools including access privileges assigned to individuals (that is individual transferable quo-tas) and to groups or communities (for example community development quotas cooperatives and area-based quotas) DAP programs are sometimes known as rights-based management and are of 10 synonymous with Limited Access Privilege Programs (see rdquoLimited Access Privilege Programrdquo) However rdquorights-based managementrdquo implies granting an individual the rdquorightrdquo to fish With the exception of certain tribes US fishermen do not have inalienable rights to fish because the fishery resources of the US belong to all people of the US Under current law fishermen are granted a rdquoprivilegerdquo to fish subject to certain conditions

Discards1 ndash To release or return a fish or other species to the sea dead or alive whether or not such fish or other species are brought fully on board a fishing vessel Estimates of discards can be made in a variety of ways including samples from observers and logbook records Fish (or parts of fish) can be discarded for a variety of rea-sons such as having physical damage being a non-target species for the trip and compliance with management regulations like minimum size limits or quotas

Durable Equipment Expenditures or Durable Goods Expenditures9 ndash For this report this term refers to expenses related to equipment used for recreational fishing activities These expenses include the purchase of semi-durable goods (tackle rods reels line etc) durable goods (motor boats and accessories non-motorized boats boating electronics mooring boat storage boat insurance and vehicles or homes) and angling accessories and multi-purpose items (magazines club dues saltwater angling-specific clothing and camping gear)

Ecolabel or Ecolabelling Scheme10 ndash In fisheries ecolabelling schemes entitle a fishery product to bear a distinctive logo or statement that certifies that the fish has been harvested in compliance with specified conserva-tion and sustainability standards The logo or statement is intended to facilitate informed decisions by purchasers whose choices may promote and stimulate the sustainable use of fishery resources

246

Glossary

Economic Impact Model1112 ndash Economic impact models capture how sales in a sector generate economic impacts directly in the sector in which the sale was made The sales then ripple throughout the state and national economies as each dollar spent generates additional sales by other firms and consumers The NOAA Fisheries Com-mercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model uses an IMPLAN platform to estimate the economic impacts associated with the harvesting of fish by US commercial fishermen and other major components of the US seafood industry As used here the term fish refers to the entire range of finfish shellfish and other life (that is sea urchins seaweed kelp and worms) from marine and freshwaters that are included in the landings data maintained by the Na-tional Marine Fisheries Service The NOAA Fisheries Recreational Economic Impact Model which also uses an IMPLAN platform estimates the economic impacts generated by expenditures made by saltwater anglers

Economic Impacts1112 ndash For this report the economic impacts of the commercial fishing sector and seafood industry refer to the employment (full-time and part-time jobs) personal income and output (sales by US busi-nesses) generated by the commercial harvest sector and other major components of the US seafood industry These components include processors and dealers wholesalers and distributors grocers and restaurants Economic impacts of recreational fishing activities refer to the amount of sales generated the number of jobs supported and the contribution to gross domestic product (GDP) by state (also known as value-added impacts) from expenditures related to recreational fishing

Effort1 ndash For this report effort refers to the number of fishing trips taken by recreational fishermen (anglers) The term can also refer to the amount of time and fishing power used to harvest fish in commercial fisheries including gear size boat size and horsepower

Employee Compensation13 ndash This is related to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by State and is an estimate of the sum of employee wages and salaries and supplements to wages and salaries Wages and salaries are mea-sured on an accrual or rdquowhen earnedrdquo basis which may be different from the measure of wages and salaries measured on a disbursement or rdquowhen paidrdquo basis Wages and salaries and supplements of Federal military and civilian government employees stationed abroad are excluded from the measure of GDP by state

Employer Establishments14 ndash Businesses with payroll and paid employees with a single physical location at which business is conducted or services or industrial operations are performed An employee establishment is not necessarily identical to a company or enterprise which may consist of one or more establishments When two or more activities are carried on at a single location under a single ownership all activities generally are grouped to-gether as a single establishment The entire establishment is classified on the basis of its major activity and all data are included in that classification

Endangered Species15 ndash As defined by the Endangered Species Act (ESA) an endangered species is any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range See also rdquoThreatened Speciesrdquo

Endangered Species Act (ESA)15 ndash The ESA was signed on December 28 1973 and provides for the con-servation of species that are endangered or threatened throughout all or a significant portion of their range and the conservation of the ecosystems on which they depend The ESA replaced the Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 Congress has amended the ESA several times

Expenditures9 ndash For this report expenditures are related to recreational fishing activities and described as be-ing one of two types 1) expenditures related to a specific fishing trip or 2) durable equipment expenditures

Ex-Vessel10 ndash Refers to activities that occur when a commercial fishing boat lands or unloads a catch For exam-ple the price for the catch that a captain receives at the point of landing is an ex-vessel price

247

Glossary

Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)1 ndash The EEZ is the area that extends 200 nautical miles from the seaward boundaries of the coastal states The seaward boundary for most states is 3 nautical miles with the exceptions of Texas Puerto Rico and the Gulf Coast of Florida which is 9 nautical miles The US claims and exercises sover-eign rights and exclusive fishery management authority over all fish and continental shelf resources through this 200-nautical-mile boundary

Fish Stock1 ndash A fish stock refers to the living resources in the community or population from which catches are taken in a fishery The term ldquofish stockrdquo usually implies that the particular population is more or less isolated from other stocks of the same species and hence self-sustaining In a particular fishery the fish stock may be one or several species of fish Here it also includes commercial invertebrates and plants

Fishery Management Council (FMC) or Regional Fishery Management Council4 ndash A regional fish-eries management body established by the Magnuson-Stevens Act to manage fishery resources in eight designated regions of the United States

Fishery Management Plan (FMP)4 ndash 1 A document prepared under supervision of the appropriate fishery management council (FMC) for the management of stocks of fish judged to require management The plan must gen-erally be formally approved An FMP includes data analyses and management measures 2 A plan containing con-servation and management measures for fishery resources and other provisions required by the Magnuson-Ste-vens Act developed by fishery management councils or the Secretary of Commerce

Fishing Cooperatives4 ndash A market-based fisheries management tool where access to fisheries resources is limited to a specific group of fishermen See also rdquoCatch Share Programrdquo

Fishing Day ndash For this report a fishing day refers to a partial or full day spent in recreational fishing and can be different from a fishing trip For example one fishing trip can consist of more than 1 fishing day This term is used in the Alaska recreational fishing tables

Fishing Effort10 ndash The amount of fishing gear of a specific type used on the fishing grounds over a given unit of time For example hours trawled per day number of hooks set per day or number of hauls of a beach seine per day When two or more kinds of gear are used the respective efforts must be adjusted to some standard type before being added For recreational fishing activities fishing effort refers to the number of participants (that is recreational fishermen or anglers) who engage in recreational fishing activities

Fishing Mode ndash For this report fishing mode refers to the type of recreational fishing a recreational fisherman (angler) engages in such as fishing from shore a private or rental boat or a for-hire boat

Fishing Trip ndash For this report a fishing trip refers to a recreational fishing excursion and can be different from a fishing day For example one fishing trip can consist of more than 1 fishing day Fishing trips are classified as occurring in one of three fishing modes 1) a shore-based fishing trip 2) by a private or rental boat or 3) on a for-hire fishing boat

For-Hire Mode ndash For this report this fishing mode refers to trips taken by a recreational fishermen (anglers) on a party (also referred to as a headboat) or charter boat

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by State or Gross State Product (GSP)13 - Previously known as the Gross State Product the GDP by state is the value added in production by the labor and capital located in a state GDP for a state is derived as the sum of the GDP originating in all industries in the state

248

Glossary

Harvest1 ndash The total number of weight or fish caught and kept from an area over a period of time Note that landings catch and harvest are different For recreational fishing activities harvest refers to the number of indi-vidual fish not thrown back into the sea by a recreational fisherman (angler) However in Hawaiʻi and the Gulf states harvest includes fish thrown back dead See also rdquoCatchrdquo and rdquoReleaserdquo

Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ)1 ndash A type of limited entry an allocation to an individual (a person or a legal entity for example a vessel owner or company) of a right (privilege) to harvest a certain amount of fish in a cer-tain period of time It is also of 10 expressed as an individual share of an aggregate quota or total allowable catch (TAC) See also rdquoIndividual Transferable Quotardquo and rdquoCatch Share Programrdquo

Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ)1 ndash A type of individual fishing quota (IFQ) allocated to individual fish-ermen or vessel owners that can be transferred (sold or leased) to others See also rdquoIndividual Fishing Quotardquo

Industry Sector ndash For this report fishing- and marine-related industries were combined into industry sectors Two industry sectors were included in this report 1) seafood sales and processing and 2) transport support and marine operations Fishing and marine-related industries were chosen from the County Business Patterns Data Series based on data availability and perceived relevance to fishing or marine activities These industries were then combined into one of these two industry sectors

Key Species or Species Groups ndash For this report up to 10 species or species groups were chosen as rdquokeyrdquo species or species groups due to their regional importance to commercial and recreational fisheries The regional importance of these key species or species groups was chosen based on their economic andor historical signifi-cance to a state or region

Landings1 ndash 1 The number or poundage of fish unloaded by commercial fishermen or brought to shore by rec-reational fishermen for personal use Landings are reported at the locations at which fish are brought to shore 2 The part of the catch that is selected and kept during the sorting procedures on board vessels and successively discharged at dockside

Limited Access Privilege Program (LAPP) or Limited Access Privilege System4 ndash As defined in the Magnuson-Stevens Act LAPPs limit participation in a fishery to those satisfying certain eligibility criteria or require-ments contained in a fishery management plan (FMP) or associated regulation A limited access privilege is a federal permit issued as part of a limited access system to harvest a quantity of fish expressed by a unit or units representing a portion of the total allowable catch (TAC) of the fishery that may be received or held for exclusive use by a person A LAPP includes an individual fishing quota (IFQ) or individual tradable quota (ITQ) but does not include community de-velopment quotas (CDQs) LAPPs are sometimes known as Dedicated Access Privileges (DAPs) However unlike LAPPs DAPs generally encompass CDQs as well as IFQs (see rdquoDedicated Access Privilegesrdquo) LAPPs are a type of catch share program See also rdquoCatch Share Programrdquo

License Limitation Program or Limited Entry Program1 ndash A management tool available to fishery man-agers where the number of commercial fishermen or vessels licensed to participate in a fishery is legally restricted A management agency of 10 uses this management tool to limit entry into a fishery

Limited Entry Program ndash Also known as a license limitation program see rdquoLicense Limitation Programrdquo

249

Glossary

Location Quotient7 ndash Location Quotients (LQs) are ratios that allow an arearsquos distribution of employment by industry to be compared to a reference or base arearsquos distribution The reference area is usually the US but it can also be a state or metropolitan area The reference or base industry is usually the all-industry total The follow-ing discussion assumes the defaults are used LQs also allow areas to be easily compared with each other If an LQ is equal to 1 then the industry has the same share of its area employment as it does in the reference area An LQ greater than 1 indicates an industry with a greater share of the local area employment than in the reference area

For example (assuming the US as the reference area) Las Vegas will have an LQ greater than 1 in the Leisure and Hospitality industry because this industry makes up a larger share of the Las Vegas employment total than it does for the country as a whole LQs are calculated by first dividing local industry employment by the all-industry total of local employment Next reference area industry employment is divided by the all-industry total for the reference area Finally the local ratio is divided by the reference area ratio

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act or Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA)1

Federal legislation responsible for establishing the Regional Fishery Management Councils (FMCs) and the manda-tory and discretionary guidelines for federal fishery management plans (FMPs) This legislation was originally en-acted in 1976 as the Fishery Management and Conservation Act Its name was changed to the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act in 1980 and in 1996 it was renamed the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conserva-tion and Management Act

Market-based Management4 ndash Market-based management is an umbrella term that encompasses approach-es that provide economic incentives to protect fisheries from overharvest These approaches contrast with con-ventional fisheries management approaches such as buyback programs and license limitation programs (see rdquoBuyback Programrdquo and rdquoLicense Limitation Programrdquo) One example of a market-based management approach for fisheries is a limited access privilege program (LAPP see rdquoLimited Access Privilege Programrdquo) that includes an individual fishing quota A LAPP provides individual fishermen an exclusive market-based share of a harvest quota or total allowable catch (TAC) of a fishery

Marine Coastal County ndash For this report a marine coastal county is a coastal county that is adjacent to an ocean coastline See also rdquoCoastal Countyrdquo

Marine Economy ndash For this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fish-ing- and marine-related industries located in a coastal state Fishing- and marine-related industries were chosen from industries defined in the County Business Patterns Data Series provided by the US Census Bureau Indus-tries listed in this report were chosen based on that industryrsquos direct contribution to fishing and marine activities and whether data was available for that industry Information such as the number of establishments number of employees and annual payroll for these fishing and marine-related industries was used to determine their relative levels of economic activity in a state These industries were categorized into one of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing and 2) transport support and marine operations See also rdquoIndustry Sectorrdquo

Non-Coastal County Angler ndash For this report a non-coastal county angler refers to a recreational fisherman who lives within a given state but not in a coastal county of that state

Nonemployer Firms3 ndash A nonemployer business is one that has no paid employees has annual business re-ceipts of $1000 or more ($1 or more in the construction industries) and is subject to federal income taxes Most nonemployers are self-employed individuals operating very small unincorporated businesses that may or may not be the ownerrsquos principal source of income

250

Glossary

Non-Resident ndash For this report a non-resident in the US table refers to a recreational fisherman (angler) who resides outside the US a non-resident in the regional and state tables refers to an angler who did not reside in the state where they fished

Out-of-state Angler ndash For this report an out-of-state angler is a recreational fisherman (angler) who does not reside within a given coastal state

Overcapacity16 ndash When the harvesting capability within a given fishery exceeds the level of harvest allowed for that fishery

Overcapitalization10 ndash When the amount of harvesting capacity in a fishery exceeds the amount needed to harvest the desired amount of fish at least cost

Overfished1 ndash 1 An overfished stock or stock complex rdquowhose size is sufficiently small that a change in man-agement practices is required to achieve an appropriate level and rate of rebuildingrdquo A stock or stock complex is considered overfished when its population size falls below the minimum stock size threshold (MSST) A rebuilding plan is required for stocks that are deemed overfished 2 A stock is considered overfished when exploited beyond an explicit limit past which its abundance is considered ldquotoo lowrdquo to ensure safe reproduction In many fisheries the term is used when biomass has been estimated to be below a biological reference point that is used as the signpost defining an rdquooverfished conditionrdquo

Overfishing1 ndash 1 According to the National Standard Guidelines rdquooverfishing occurs whenever a stock or stock complex is subjected to a rate or level of fishing mortality that jeopardizes the capacity of a stock or stock com-plex to produce maximum sustainable yield (MSY) on a continuing basisrdquo Overfishing is occurring if the maximum fishing mortality threshold (MFMT) is exceeded for 1 year or more 2 In general the action of exerting fishing pressure (fishing intensity) beyond the agreed optimum level A reduction of fishing pressure would in the medi-um term lead to an increase in the total catch

Protected Species17 ndash Refers to any species that is protected by either the Endangered Species Act (ESA) or the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) and that is under the jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries This total includes all threatened endangered and candidate species as well as all cetaceans and pinnipeds excluding walruses

Regional Fishery Management Council or Fishery Management Council (FMC)4 ndash The Magnu-son-Stevens Act established eight Regional FMCs around the United States Each council consists of voting and non-vot-ing members who represent various federal state and tribal governments fishing industry groups (commercial andor recreational) and non-fishing groups (such as environmental organizations and academic institutions) Each council is tasked with creating fishery management plans for important fisheries within their regions

Release ndash For this report release refers to the number of individual fish caught by a recreational fisherman (an-gler) that are then returned to the sea (dead or alive) In Hawaiʻi and the Atlantic and Gulf states release does not include fish returned to the sea that are dead See also rdquoCatchrdquo and rdquoHarvestrdquo

Resident ndash For this report a resident in the US table refers to a recreational fisherman (angler) who resides inside the US a resident in the regional and state tables refers to an angler who resides in the state where they fished

Sector Allocation Program17 ndash A fisheries management tool where a group of fishermen are allocated a quota or share of a total allowable catch (TAC) in accordance with an approved plan This program is considered a type of catch share program See also rdquoCatch Share Programrdquo

251

Glossary

Species1 ndash A group of animals or plants having common characteristics that are able to breed together to produce fertile (capable of reproducing) offspring and maintain their rdquoseparatenessrdquo from other groups

Species Group1 ndash Group of species considered together of 10 because they are difficult to differentiate without detailed examination (very similar species) or because data for the separate species are not available (for example in fishery statistics or commercial categories)

Threatened Species13 ndash As defined by the Endangered Species Act (ESA) a threatened species is any species that is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range See also rdquoEndangered Speciesrdquo

Trip Expenditures ndash For this report trip expenditures refer to expenses incurred by recreational fishermen (an-glers) on a fishing trip Trip expenditures are described for residents (individuals who reside in a coastal or non-coast-al county within a given state a US resident) and non-residents (individuals who do not reside within the US)

Value-Added1 ndash A firmrsquos sales minus the cost of the goods and services it purchases from other industries to pro-duce its outputs GLOSSARY NOTES 1 NOAA Fisheries Glossary October 2005 K Blackhart DG Stanton and AM Shimada eds Revised edition June 2006 National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration US Department of Commerce NOAA Technical MemorandumNMFS-FSPO-69 Available at httpwwwstnmfsgovst4documentsF_Glossarypdf [accessed September 19 2014]2 ldquoCBP Definitionsrdquo County Business Patterns US Census Bureau US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwcensusgoveconcbpdefi-nitionshtm [accessed September 19 2014]3 ldquoNonemployer Definitionsrdquo Nonemployer Statistics US Census Bureau US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwcensusgovepcdnonemployerviewdefinehtml [accessed September 19 2014]4 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act as amended through January 12 2007 (PL 94-265 as amended through PL109-479) Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovmsa2007docsact_draftpdf [accessed September 19 2014]5 NOAA Catch Share Policy Office of Policy National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) National Oceanic amp AtmosphericAdministration US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovsfamanagementcatch_sharesaboutdocumentsnoaa_cs_policypdf [accessed September 22 2014]6 rdquoCoastal Countiesrdquo US Census Bureau US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwcensusgovgeolandviewlv6helpcoastal_ctyhtml [accessed September 19 2014]7 Location Quotient Calculator Bureau of Labor Statistics US Department of Labor Available at httpdatablsgovhelpdeflqhtmlocation_quotient_application [accessed September 19 2014]8 Pages 288-289 in An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century Final Report 2004 US Commission on Ocean Policy Washington DC Available athttpwwwoceancommissiongov [accessed September 19 2014]9 P 4 in The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2006 2008 B Gentner and S Steinback NationalMarine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration US Department of Commerce NOAA Technical Memoran-dum NMFS-FSPO-94 Available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagovst5publicationmarine_anglerhtml [accessed September 19 2014]10 rdquoFisheries Term Portalrdquo FAO Fisheries Department United Nations Food amp Agriculture Organization Available at httpwwwfaoorgfaotermcollec-tionfisheriesen [accessed September 19 2014]11 The NMFS Commercial Fishing and Seafood Industry InputOutput Model (CFSI IO Model) August 2009 J Kirkley Virginia Institute of MarineScience Available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2006pdf [accessed September 19 2014]12 Pages 11-12 in ldquoThe Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2006rdquo November 2008 B Gentner and SSteinback National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration US Dept of Commerce NOAATechnical Memorandum NMFS-FSPO-94 301p Available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresma-rine-angler-2006 [accessed September 19 2014]13 rdquoRegional Definitionsrdquo Regional Economic Accounts Bureau of Economic Analysis US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwbeagovregionaldefinitions [accessed September 19 2014]14 ldquoEconomic Census Definitionsrdquo US Census Bureau Available at httpwwwcensusgoveconcensushelpsectordefinitionshtml [accessed Sep-tember 22 2014]15 Endangered Species Act of 1973 (PL 93-205 as amended through PL 100-707) Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovprlawsesa [accessed September 22 2014]16 rdquoStatus of US Fisheriesrdquo Office of Sustainable Fisheries National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) National Oceanic amp AtmosphericAdministration US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovsfastatusoffisheriesSOSmainhtm [accessed September 22 2014]16 P 4 in ldquoAn Assessment of Excess Harvesting Capacity in Federally Managed Commercial Fisheriesrdquo US Dept of Commerce NOAA Technical Memo-randum NMFSFSPO-93 366p Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovmsa2007docs042808_312_b_6_reportpdf [accessed September 22 2014]

Commercial fishing vessels in Ocean City Maryland Photo Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management CouncilJason Didden

  • Fisheries Economics of the United States 2016
  • Preface
  • National Overview
  • National Overview Tables
  • North Pacific Region
  • Alaska Tables
  • Pacific Region
  • Pacific Region Tables
  • California Tables
  • Oregon Tables
  • Washington Tables
  • Western Pacific Region
  • Hawaii Tables
  • New England Region
  • New England Region Tables
  • Connecticut Tables
  • Maine Tables
  • Massachusetts Tables
  • New Hampshire Tables
  • Rhode Island Tables
  • Mid-Atlantic Region
  • Mid-Atlantic Region Tables
  • Delaware Tables
  • Maryland Tables
  • New Jersey Tables
  • New York Tables
  • Virginia Tables
  • South Atlantic Region
  • South Atlantic Region Tables
  • East Florida Tables
  • Georgia Tables
  • North Carolina Tables
  • South Carolina Tables
  • Gulf of Mexico Region
  • Gulf of Mexico Region Tables
  • Alabama Tables
  • West Florida Tables
  • Louisiana Tables
  • Mississippi Tables
  • Texas Tables
  • Data Sources
  • Publications
  • Resources
  • Glossary

Fisheries Economics of the United States2016Economics and Social Analysis Division Office of Science and TechnologyNOAA Fisheries (NMFS)1315 East-West Highway 12th floorSilver Spring MD 20910

NOAA TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NMFS-FSPO-187A DECEMBER 2018

US Department of CommerceWilbur Ross Jr Secretary of Commerce

National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationRDML Timothy Gallaudet Acting NOAA Administrator

National Marine Fisheries ServiceChris Oliver Assistant Administrator for Fisheries

ii

NOAA Fisheries PublicationsEach year NOAA Fisheries produces three annual reports covering different aspects of the status of United States marine fisheries

Status of Stocks is an annual report to Congress on the status of US fisheries and is required by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act This report which is published each spring summarizes the number of stocks on the overfished overfishing and rebuilt lists for US federally managed fish stocks and stock complexes The report also shows trends over time discusses the value and contributions of our partners and highlights how management actions taken by NOAA Fisheries have improved the status of US federally managed stocks For example the 2017 report shows that the number of stocks on the overfished list just reached a new all-time lows httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationalpopulation-assessmentsfishery-stock-status-updates2018-quarterly-updates

Fisheries of the United States published each fall has been produced in its various forms for more than 100 years It is the NOAA Fisheries yearbook of fishery statistics for the United States It provides a snapshot of data primarily at the national level on US recreational catch and commercial fisheries landings and value In addition data are reported on US aquaculture production the US fishery processing industry imports and exports of fishery-related products and domestic supply and per capita consumption of fishery products The focus is not on economic analysis although value of landings processed products and foreign trade are included httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationalcommercial-fishingfisheries-united-states

Fisheries Economics of the United States published each fall provides a detailed look at the economic performance of commercial and recreational fisheries and other marine-related sectors on a state regional and national basis The economic impact of commercial and recreational fishing activities in the US is also reported in terms of employment sales and value-added impacts The report provides management highlights for each region that include a summary of stock status updates on catch share programs and other selected management issues httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationalcommercial-fishingfisheries-economics-united-states

Suggested CitationNational Marine Fisheries Service 2018 Fisheries Economics of the United States 2016 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-187a 243 p

An earlier version of this report FSPO-187 was published online in December 2018 This revised version includes updates to the acknowledgments section and the data sources section

Supplementary material An addendum published online in September 2019 provides updates to the recreational impacts and expenditures tables of this report The revised tables reflect changes to the number of trips in Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) states updates to the average expenditures based on new survey data and a new economic impact model for every state This addendum is available at httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovresourcedocumentfisheries-economics-united-states-report-2016

A copy of this report may be obtained fromEconomics and Social Analysis DivisionOffice of Science and TechnologyNOAA Fisheries (NMFS)1315 East-West Highway 12th floorSilver Spring MD 20910

Or online athttpswwwfisheriesnoaagovcontentfisheries-economics-united-states-2016

iii

ContentsPreface v Key Terminology vi

National Overview 1United States Summary 2 United States Tables 17

North Pacific Region 21North Pacific Summary 22Alaska Tables 31

Pacific Region 35Pacific Summary 36 Pacific Tables 43 California Tables 47 Oregon Tables 51 Washington Tables 55

Western Pacific Region 59Western Pacific Summary 60 Hawaiʻi Tables 67

New England Region 71New England Summary 72 New England Tables 79Connecticut Tables 83 Maine Tables 87Massachusetts Tables 91 New Hampshire Tables 95 Rhode Island Tables 99

Mid-Atlantic Region 103Mid-Atlantic Summary 104 Mid-Atlantic Tables 111Delaware Tables 115 Maryland Tables 119 New Jersey Tables 123 New York Tables 127 Virginia Tables 131

South Atlantic Region 135South Atlantic Summary 136 South Atlantic Tables 143 East Florida Tables 147 Georgia Tables 151 North Carolina Tables 155 South Carolina Tables 159

Gulf of Mexico Region 163Gulf of Mexico Summary 164 Gulf of Mexico Tables 171 Alabama Tables 175 West Florida Tables 179 Louisiana Tables 183 Mississippi Tables 187 Texas Tables 191

Data Sources 195Publications 199Resources 237Glossary 243

v

The hand of a person who has spent their life on the water Photo South Atlantic Fishery Management CouncilCameron J Rhodes

PrefaceFisheries Economics of the United States 2016 Fisheries Economics of the United States 2016 is the eleventh volume in this annual series which is intended to provide the public with easily accessible economic information about the nationrsquos commercial and recreational fishing activities and fishing-related industries

This yearrsquos report covers the years 2007 to 2016 and provides descriptive statistics for the following catego-ries economic impacts of the commercial fishing and seafood industry commercial fisheries landings rev-enue and price trends saltwater angler expenditures and economic impacts of marine recreational fishing recreational fishing catch effort and participation rates and employer and non-employer establishment payroll employees and annual receipt information for fishing-related industries

The report also provides management highlights for each region that include a summary of stock status updates on catch share programs and other selected management issues Economic performance indicators for catch share programs are reported

Sources of DataInformation in this report came from many sources Commercial landings revenue and price data as well as recreational fishing effort and participation data were primarily obtained from the Fisheries Statistics Division Office of Science and Technology NOAA Fish-eries Other data sources included the NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center Alaska Department of Fish and Game California Department of Fish and Game Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Washing-ton Department of Fish and Wildlife the Pacific Coast Fisheries Information Network (PacFIN) Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and Western Pacific Fisheries Information Network (WPacFIN) Economic impacts from the commercial fishing and seafood industry and recreational fishing sectors are from two separate na-tional IMPLAN models of the Economics and Sociocultur-al Analysis Division Office of Science and Technology NOAA Fisheries Fishing-related industry information was obtained from the US Census Bureau Bureau of

Economic Analysis and Bureau of Labor Statistics

AcknowledgmentsMany people participated in the production of this report Cameron Speir and Cara Mayo are the editors of this report series Rita Curtis Sabrina Lovell Kate Quigley and Cara Mayo were primary authors and analysts on this edition of Fisheries Economics of the United States Key collaborators include Jami Larson Lauren Dolinger Few Karen Greene Laura Johansen Jean Lee Michael Lewis Michael Liddel Alan Lowther Emily Markowitz and Eric Thunberg The reportrsquos design and layout was done by Avi Litwack Jacqui Fenner and Cara Mayo

NOAA Fisheries staff in the regional fisheries science centers and regional offices provided expertise Alan Haynie Justin Hospital Christopher Liese Michael Tra-vis and Stephen Holiman Other colleagues who pro-vided information and expertise included Mike Brown (California Department of Fish and Wildlife) and Jason Edwards and Rob Ames (Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission)

Address all comments and questions to Kathryn Cuff | KathrynCuffnoaagov

Economics and Sociocultural Analysis DivisionOffice of Science and TechnologyNOAA Fisheries (NMFS)1315 East-West Highway 12th floorSilver Spring MD 20910-3282Phone 301-427-8121Fax 301-713-4137

v

vi

Commercial FisheriesWhat Does the Term MeanCommercial fisheries in this report refers to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit It does not include saltwater anglers that fish for sport or subsistence fishermen It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key species and species groups

Metrics Definitions1

Economic ImpactsThe employment personal income and output generated by the commercial harvest sector and other major components of the US seafood industry

Landings RevenueThe price that fishermen are paid for their catch

LandingsThe poundage or number of fish unloaded by commercial fishermen or brought to shore

Ex-vessel PricesThe price received by a captain at the point of landing for the catch

Frequently Asked Questions

What are fish caught with in commercial fishingFish can be caught using a variety of gear including potts and traps trawls and seines gillnets dredges and hooks and lines

What happens to seafood caught by commercial fishermenFish caught by commercial fishermen are first processed and packaged Then they are sold to various establishments for consumption such as restaurants and supermarkets They can also be used as animal food and for medical purposes (such as fish oil pills)

Does the United States get seafood from anywhere elseNot all fish are caught by US commercial fishermen A large percent of the seafood the US receives is imported

1 For full definitions see the Glossary at the back of this publication

vii

Recreational FisheriesWhat Does the Term MeanRecreational fisheries or recreational fishing refer to fishing for pleasure rather than selling the fish for profit (ie commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section of Fisheries Economics of the US reports on angler trips participation expenditures and economic impacts and catch of key species and species groups Only saltwater or marine recreational fishing is included in FEUS

Metrics Definitions

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe employment sales and personal income generated by expenditures on fishing trips and fishing-related durable goods (ie equipment used for recreational fishing)

Fishing Trips EffortThe number of fishing trips taken by recreational fishermen (anglers)

ParticipationThe number of anglers who fish in a given state or region Anglers can be from in-state or out-of-state and from a coastal county or non-coastal county

Harvest and ReleaseThe total number or fish either 1) caught and kept (harvested) or 2) caught and released by recreational anglers from an area over a period of time Total catch is the sum of the number of fish harvested and released

Frequently Asked Questions

How do anglers affect the fishing economyWhen anglers participate in fishing activities they support sales and employment in recreational fishing and other types of businesses Anglers buy fishing equipment from bait and tackle shops rent or buy boats or pay to have others take them on charter boats to fish They may also pay for food and drink at local restaurants purchase gas for their boat and stay in hotels for overnight fishing trips

What do anglers spend their money onDurable goods such as fishing tackle and boat vehicle and second home expenses Trips which can be taken in one of three modes as for-hire (charter or party boat) private (or rental boat) and shore (fishing from shore) Some examples of trip expenditures include fuel bait ice and charter or guide fees

What do anglers do with their catchSome anglers catch fish to eat (ie harvest) while others practice catch and release In recreational fishing anglers do not sell the fish they catch for profit

viii

Marine EconomyWhat Does the Term MeanThe ldquoMarine Economyrdquo in this report refers to the economic activity generated by sectors of the economy that depend directly on oceans (or Great Lakes) We report on two industry sectors within the marine economy 1) seafood sales and processing and 2) transport support and marine operations Information such as the number of establishments number of employees and annual payroll for these fishing and marine-related industries is used to determine their relative levels of economic activity in a state

Metrics Definitions

Seafood Sales and ProcessingThese sectors are a direct representation of the Establishments Employees Sales and Payroll for seafood processors wholesalers and retailers that buy fish from commercial fishermen and distribute to consumers

Transport Support and Marine OperationsThe various sectors that contribute to the overall marine economy that may or may not support the fishing economy

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the marine economy include commercial and recreational fisheriesYes commercial and recreational fisheries contribute to the overall marine economy

What marine economy sectors featured in the report are related to commercial and recreational fisheriesThe seafood product preparation amp packaging wholesale and retail seafood sales sectors are major parts of the commercial fishing industry The Marinas Navigational Services Port amp Harbor operations and Ship amp Boat Building sectors provide goods and services used in both commercial and recreational fisheries

Why does the report include sectors that are independent of the fishing economyInformation on sectors that are independent of the fishing economy like freight transportation provides context for how national and regional economies are affected by the use of ocean resources

National Overview

Surf fishing on Chincoteague Island Virginia Photo Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management CouncilMary Sabo

2

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe authority to manage federal fisheries in the United States was granted to the Secretary of Commerce by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (PL 94-265 as amended by PL 109-479) NOAA Fisheries is the federal agency with delegated authority from the Secretary of Commerce to oversee fishing activities in federal waters Federal fisheries are generally defined as fishing activities that take place in the US Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ between 3 and 200 nautical miles from the coastline) Generally individual states retain management authority over fishing activities within three nautical miles of their coasts

Nationwide 46 fishery management plans (FMPs) provide a framework for managing the harvest of 474 fish stocks and stock complexes These plans aim to manage the harvest of fish in US and shared waters using sound scientific research to maximize fishing opportunity while ensuring the sustainability of fisheries and fishing communities Regional Fishery Management Councils (FMCs) develop FMPs in eight regions nationwide North Pacific Pacific Western Pacific New England Mid-Atlantic South Atlantic Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean1 After an FMP is developed the Secretary of Commerce in consultation with NOAA Fisheries must approve it before it is implemented

Regional Fishery Management Councils

bull North Pacificbull Pacificbull Western Pacificbull New England

bull Mid-Atlanticbull South Atlanticbull Gulf of Mexicobull Caribbean

Fishery management plans must specify objective and measurable criteria to determine when a stock is overfished or subject to overfishing Enough information exists to determine the overfishing status for 316 (or 67) of the 474 stocks and stock complexes Of these 316 30 stocks are subject to overfishing (or 9 of stocks with known status) The overfished status of 235 (or 50) of the 474 stocks and stock complexes is known Of these 235 stocks 38 (or 16 of stocks with

known status) are categorized as overfished2

Transboundary and International FisheriesNOAA Fisheries is also actively involved in negotiating conservation and management measures including total allowable catch levels fishery allocations and monitoring and control schemes for internationally shared fisheries resources Shared fisheries resources include those in areas where the EEZ of the US overlaps with other nations (transboundary areas) and in areas beyond the US EEZ ie international waters or the high seas The Gulf of Alaska and the Gulf of Maine are examples of these transboundary areas An area in the Bering Sea outside the EEZs of Canada Japan and Russia called the Donut Hole is an example of international waters Loss of sea ice will create new transboundary areas and international waters in the Arctic

Regional Fishery Management Organizations (RFMOs) are multinational organizations with interests in internationally shared fish stocks and associated fishing activities Primary objectives of these RFMOs are to research assess and adopt measures for the conservation and coordinated management of target species such as bigeye tuna Some RFMOs also collect data and evaluate and adopt measures for the conservation and scientific assessment of non-target species also known as bycatch Non-target species include seabirds marine mammals sea turtles and fish species caught incidentally while fishing for target species The commitment to conserving and protecting all species associated with or affected by fishing activities is outlined in the Food and Agriculture Organizationrsquos (FAOrsquos) Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries established in 1995

Another issue of particular concern for NOAA Fisheries is illegal unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing activities (see Policy Updates) IUU fishing generally refers to fishing that violates national laws or internationally agreed conservation and management measures in effect in oceans around the world IUU fishing can include fishing without a license or quota for certain species unauthorized transshipments to cargo

1 Fishery management plans and fishery ecosystem plans for each region covered in this report are listed in their respective sections The four FMPs developed by the Caribbean Fishery Management Council and the Atlantic Highly Migratory Species FMP developed by NOAA Fisheries are not included in this report2 Source NOAA Fisheries Office of Sustainable Fisheries Status of Stocks 2016 httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovfeature-storystatus-stocks-2016

3

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

vessels failing to report catches or making false reports keeping undersized fish or fish that are otherwise protected by regulations fishing in closed areas or during closed seasons and using prohibited fishing gear

Experts estimate that global economic losses from IUU fishing range from $10 billion to $235 billion annually representing between 11 and 26 million tons of fish3

Regional Fishery Management OrganizationsNOAA Fisheries participates in eight RFMOs globally Each RMFO is listed by ocean basin below4

Pacificbull Pacific Salmon Commissionbull International Pacific Halibut Commissionbull Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commissionbull Western and Central Pacific Fishery

Commission

Atlanticbull International Commission for the

Conservation of Atlantic Tunasbull North Atlantic Salmon Conservation

Organizationbull Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization

Antarcticbull Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic

Marine Living Resources

NOAA Fisheries is actively collaborating with other federal agencies as part of the National Ocean Council Committee on IUU Fishing and Seafood Fraud This network of agencies works together to implement measures outlined in an action plan developed by the Presidential Task Force on Combatting IUU Fishing and Seafood Fraud The plan includes actions that will strengthen enforcement create and expand partnerships with state and local governments industry and non-governmental organizations and create a risk-based traceability program to track seafood from harvest to entry into US commerce The plan also highlights ways in which the United States will work with our foreign partners to strengthen international governance enhance cooperation and build capacity to combat IUU fishing and seafood fraud

Saltwater Recreational Fisheries Policy In February 2015 NOAA Fisheries established a formal National Saltwater Recreational Fisheries Policy to broadly guide future actions and better integrate recreational fishing with NOAA Fisheriesrsquo mission The policy focuses on six guiding principles 1) support ecosystem conservation and enhancement 2) promote public access to quality recreational fishing opportunities 3) coordinate with state and federal management entities4) advance innovative solutions to evolving sciencemanagement and environmental challenges 5) providescientifically sound and trusted social cultural economicand ecological information and 6) communicate andengage with the recreational fishing public

Threatened and Endangered SpeciesNOAA Fisheries is also the lead agency for the conservation and protection of marine and anadromous species that fall within the purview of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Currently there are 161 threatened and endangered marine species under the ESA (see Table 1)

Table 1 Endangered and Threatened Species under NOAA Fisheries Jurisdiction5

Species Group Number of SpeciesMarine and Anadromous Fish 74Marine Mammals 33Sea Turtles 26Marine Invertebrates 27Plants 1Total Threatened andEndangered Marine Species 161

In addition to threatened and endangered marine and anadromous species NOAA Fisheries also helps identify candidate and proposed species Candidate species are actively being considered for listing as endangered or threatened under the ESA These species also include those for which NOAA Fisheries has initiated a status review that it has announced in the Federal Register Proposed species are candidate species that were found to warrant listing as either threatened or endangered These species were officially proposed as such in a Federal Register notice after the completion of a status review and consideration of other protective measures

3 Agnew DJ Pearce J Pramod G Peatman T Watson R Beddington JR et al (2009) Estimating the Worldwide Extent of Illegal Fishing PLoS ONE 4(2) e4570 doi101371journalpone00045704 Source httpwwwnmfsnoaagoviaagreementsregional_agreementsintlagreehtml 5 See NOAA Fisheries Office of Protected Resources (httpwwwnmfsnoaagovprspeciesesa) for current and proposed ESA species listings

4

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

Currently 12 candidate species and three proposed species are under consideration for listing

NOAA Fisheries is also responsible for protecting marine mammals under the Marine Mammal Protection Act6 In authorizing this act in 1972 Congress recognized that marine mammal species or stocks may be in danger of extinction or depletion as a result of human activities marine mammal species or stocks should not be allowed to fall below their optimum sustainable population levels measures should be taken to replenish marine mammal species or stocks there is inadequate knowledge of the marine mammal ecology and population dynamics and marine mammals have proven to be resources of great international significance NOAA Fisheries engages in activities such as preventing the harassment capture or killing of marine mammals preparing marine mammal stock assessments and studying interactions between marine mammals and fisheries

Essential Fish HabitatsSustainable commercial and recreational fisheries depend on healthy habitats These habitats include rivers estuaries and the open ocean where marine and anadromous species feed grow and reproduce Consideration of these habitat areas is part of an ecosystem-based management approach for managing fisheries in a more sustainable and holistic manner Since 1996 federal fishery management plans are required to identify and describe essential fish habitat (EFH) for all federally managed species Habitat areas that are necessary for a fish speciesrsquo growth reproduction and development are considered EFH To the extent practicable NOAA Fisheries and the FMCs must minimize adverse effects to EFH caused by fishing

Though not required Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) can be identified to help focus EFH conservation efforts The HAPC designation alone does not confer additional protection to or place restrictions on an area but helps to focus EFH conservation management and research priorities HAPC designation is a valuable way to acknowledge areas where detailed information exists on ecological function and habitat vulnerability indicating a greater need for conservation and management To

date approximately 100 HAPCs have been designated including specific coral seamount and spawning areas A recent effort undertaken by NOAA Fisheries was the creation of a Habitat Assessment Improvement Plan7 The goal of this plan is to advance NOAA Fisheriesrsquo ability to identify EFH and HAPCs and provide the information needed to assess impacts to EFH

Catch Share Programs Market-based management tools are used by fishery managers to reduce over-capitalization increase the economic viability of fisheries and promote individual accountability for harvest and harvesting practices Catch share programs are one of these tools and encompass a range of management strategies that share a common feature A secure share of fish is dedicated to individual fishermen cooperatives fishing communities and other entities for their exclusive use In 2010 the NOAA catch share policy was released to encourage well-designed catch share programs to help maintain or rebuild fisheries8 The policy also aims to sustain fishermen communities and vibrant working waterfronts including the cultural and resource-access traditions that have been part of this country since its founding

Currently there are 16 federal catch share programs nationwide These programs include limited access privilege programs (LAPPs) individual fishing quota programs (IFQs) individual transferable quota programs (ITQs) fishing community development quota programs (CDQs) fishing cooperatives and fishing sectors9 Implementation dates of these programs span three decades with five programs established in the 1990s and six established since 2010 (see Table 2) Ten programs manage a single species or in some cases two species but as separate management units the other six programs manage multiple species Six of the programs operate in the Alaska Region

In 2010 NOAA Fisheries initiated an effort to track catch share program performance10 Findings from the initial report show that existing catch share programs have ended the race to fish (in their respective fisheries) resulting in longer fishing seasons safer working conditions and improved management performance The

6 The US Fish and Wildlife Service protects walrus manatees otters and polar bears7 The Habitat Assessment Improvement Plan is available at httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovst4documentshabitatAssesmentImprovement-Plan_052110PDF8 See httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationallaws-and-policiescatch-shares9 See Section 303A of the Magnuson-Stevens Act for more information on LAPP requirements10 See httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriescommercialcatch-share-programindex

5

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

report also shows that existing catch share programs have resulted in reduced fishing capacity to better match stock sizemdash a management objective in the majority of catch share programs evaluated Economic performance for the vessels remaining in the program improved as measured by such metrics as revenue per vessel and average price

Updated information on selected performance indicators is provided in Table 3 Briefly results show that inflation-

adjusted revenue from catch share species increased in 10 of the 15 programs andor sub-components of the programs since their implementation In addition the number of active vessels decreased in all but one program (Central GOA Rockfish) while inflation-adjusted revenue per active vessel increased in all programs since their implementation Further results show that no stocks exceeded the annual catch limit (ACL) in 2015

Table 2 Existing Catch Share Programs in Federal Fisheries

Region Program Year Implemented

Mid-Atlantic Mid-Atlantic Surfclam amp Ocean Quahog ITQ 1990Mid-Atlantic Golden Tilefish IFQ 2009

New England Northeast Multispecies Sectors 2010Northeast General Category Atlantic Sea Scallop IFQ 2010

North Pacific

Western Alaska Community Development Quota 1992Alaska Halibut and Sablefish IFQ 1995American Fisheries Act (AFA) Pollock Cooperatives 1999Bering Sea and Aleutian Island (BSAI) Crab Rationalization 2005Central Gulf of Alaska (GOA) Rockfish (pilot implemented in 2007) 2012Non-Pollock Trawl CatcherProcessor Groundfish Cooperatives (Amendment 80) 2008

South Atlantic South Atlantic Wreckfish ITQ 1992

Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper IFQ 2007Grouper-Tilefish IFQ 2010

Pacific Pacific Coast Sablefish Permit Stacking 2001Pacific Groundfish Trawl Rationalization Program (Whiting and Non-Whiting trawl) 2011

Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Individual Bluefin Quota Program 2016

Table 3 Economic Performance Indicators for US Federal Catch Share Programs (2015 dollars)11

Management Context Participation Economic Benefits

ACL Exceeded Active Vessels Total Revenue fromCatch Share Species Revenue per Active Vessel

Baseline 2015 Baseline 2015 Baseline 2015 Baseline 2015Gulf of MexicoGrouper-Tilefish Y N 630 446 $22771411 $27854557 $36145 $62454Red Snapper Y N 482 415 $13958514 $28884023 $28960 $69600

Mid-AtlanticGolden Tilefish - N 14 11 $4707700 $5028563 $336264 $457142Ocean Quahog N N 67 16 $29406847 $21858000 $438908 $1366125Surfclam - N 137 37 $39625107 $28589183 $289234 $772681

New EnglandGeneral Category Scallop - - 271 150 $28366002 $31591134 $104672 $210608Multispecies Sectors Y N 417 206 $86215431 $52666418 $206751 $255662

North PacificAlaska Halibut Y N 3432 874 $93232899 $102001633 $27168 $116707 Alaska Sablefish Y N 1139 306 $93929829 $74449319 $82467 $243298 AFA Pollock Cooperatives Y N 147 99 $253467523 $368407672 $1720368 $3721290 BSAI Crab Rationalization Y N 264 80 $186746805 $244176102 $706482 $3052201 Amendment 80 N N 22 18 $92131777 $105158733 $4187808 $5842152 Central GOA Rockfish Y N 42 51 $5729012 $10982900 $136405 $215351

PacificPacific Sablefish - N 135 89 $6701698 $7904987 $49642 $88820Whiting and Non-Whiting Directed - N 124 94 $39979907 $39930830 $322419 $424796

11 The South Atlantic Wreckfish ITQ is not included due to confidentiality restrictions The Western Alaska CDQ program was excluded because it is the onlyCDQ and thus fundamentally different from the other programs In addition note that some programs did not have a catch quota prior to the catch shareprogram For these programs ldquo-rdquo indicates that the question of whether the ACL was exceeded is not applicable

6

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

Policy UpdatesIn December 2016 NOAA Fisheries issued the final rule establishing the Seafood Import Monitoring Program to further curb illegal unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing practices and to identify misrepresented seafood imports before they enter the US market The program requires that importers report information and maintain records about the harvest landing and chain of custody of imported fish and fish products for certain priority species identified as especially vulnerable to IUU fishing and seafood fraud The data collected under this program will allow these priority species of seafood to be traced from the point of entry into US commerce back to the point of harvest or production to verify whether it was lawfully harvested or produced For 11 of the 13 speciesspecies groups covered in the final rule the rule went into effect January 1 2018 shrimp and abalone compliance will be mandatory by December 31 2018

Other Market-Based Management ToolsVessel or permit buyback programs are another market-based tool used by fishery managers Under these programs the government purchases fishing vessels or permits Doing so permanently decreases the number of participants in the fishery and eases fishing-related pressure on marine resources Recent buyback programs include BSAI Crab Pacific Coast Groundfish Longline CP Non-Pol-lock Groundfish Southeast Alaska Purse Seine Salmon and AFA Pollock

License limitation programs (LLPs) also known as limited entry programs are another management tool available to fishery managers In these programs the number of fishing vessels allowed to harvest a specific fish stock or stock complex is limited to fishermen or vessels with permission to fish LLPs have been implemented in almost all federally managed commercial fisheries and in every region except the Caribbean

Ecolabels are market-based tools offered by third-party entities An ecolabeling program entitles a fishery product to bear a distinctive logo or statement that certifies the fishery resource was harvested in compliance with specified conservation and sustainability standards It allows the buyer to potentially influence the sustainable harvest of fishery resources through the purchase of such

ecolabeled seafood products at a price premium

The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) has one of the most recognizable ecolabeling programs in the world Currently nearly 300 fisheries worldwide meet MSC sustainability standards 19 of which are US fisheries (see Table 4) Fisheries obtaining MSC certification for the first time in 2016 include the US Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog fishery and the Gulf of Maine Lobster fishery

Table 4 US Fisheries with MSC Certification12

Region Fishery Certified

North Pacific

Alaska flatfish - Bering Sea amp Aleutian Islands 2010

Alaska flatfish - Gulf of Alaska 2010Alaska Pacific cod - Bering Sea amp Aleutian Islands 2010

Alaska Pacific cod - Gulf of Alaska 2010Alaska pollock - Bering Sea amp Aleutian Islands 2010

Alaska pollock - Gulf of Alaska 2010American Western Fish Boat Owners Association albacore tuna North Pacific

2010

US North Pacific halibut 2006US North Pacific sablefish 2006Alaska salmon 2000

Pacific

American Albacore Fishing Association Pacific albacore tuna - north

2007

American Albacore Fishing Association Pacific albacore tuna - south

2007

Pacific hake mid-water trawl 2009US West Coast limited entry groundfish trawl 2014

Gulf Louisiana blue crab 2012

North-east

US Atlantic spiny dogfish 2012US North Atlantic swordfish 2013US Atlantic sea scallop 2013US Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog 2016

Gulf of Maine Lobster 2016

NATIONAL OVERVIEWIn 2016 commercial and recreational fisheries throughout the United States generated approximately 17 million jobs in the US economy In addition commercial and recreational fishing together generated $2122 billion in sales impacts $642 billion in income

12 For more information about these fisheries and the Marine Stewardship Council certification process see httpswwwmscorg

7

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

impacts and $995 billion in value-added impacts throughout the economy Florida had the largest employment impacts from the combined fishing industry with approximately 173000 jobs Florida also had the largest sales impacts from the combined fishing industry ($278 billion) the largest income impacts ($73 billion) and the largest value-added impacts ($122 billion)

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fishing refers to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key US Commercial Species

bull American lobsterbull Blue crabbull Menhadenbull Pacific halibutbull Pacific salmon

bull Sablefishbull Sea scallopbull Shrimpbull Tunasbull Walleye pollock

Regional HighlightsAt the national level this report includes landings revenue landings and prices for 10 key species or species groups which were selected so that each region has at least one species in the top 10 Results show that commercial fishermen in Alaska caught the most salmon (5877 million pounds) and earned $4073 million for their catch in 2016 Tuna was caught in large numbers in Hawailsquoi (235 million pounds) and generated $885 million in landings revenue Maine fishermen contributed the most to American lobster landings (132 million pounds) and earned $5379 million for their catch in 2016 In Massachusetts sea scallopers harvested 229 million pounds of scallop and earned $2814 million for their catch More blue crab was caught in Louisiana (401 million pounds) than in any other state earning more than $494 million Louisiana

also accounted for the greatest quantity of menhaden landed in 2016 with fishermen landing 11 billion pounds worth $1321 million in dockside revenue Sea scallop garnered the highest average ex-vessel price per pound ($12) among the key species and species groups in 2016 with state-specific prices ranging from $951 in New York to $1281 in Maine

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers13

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the

13 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)

8

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 the seafood industry supported 12 million full- and part-time jobs and generated $1443 billion in sales $399 billion in income and $608 billion in value-added impacts nationwide (Table 5) The retail sector generated the largest employment impacts across sectors (583000 jobs) the largest income impacts ($136 billion) and the largest value-added

impacts ($185 billion) The importers sector generated the largest sales impacts ($576 billion)

The largest state-level employment impacts generated by the seafood industry occurred in California (125000 jobs) followed by Massachusetts (87000 jobs) and Florida (77000 jobs) see Graph 1 The highest income impacts were generated in California ($49 billion) followed by Florida and Washington The highest sales impacts were generated by the seafood industry in California ($228 billion) followed by Florida and Massachusetts The highest value-added impacts were generated in California ($81 billion) followed by Florida and Washington (Table 6)

Table 5 US Seafood Industry Economic Impacts Trends ($ billions)2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Jobs 1270141 1350627 1394833 1179848 1190092Sales $14070 $14220 $15330 $14419 $14429Income $3870 $3980 $4200 $3974 $3990Value Added $5900 $6030 $6410 $6057 $6076Total Revenue $529 $555 $553 $522 $534

Table 6 Sales Income and Value-Added Impacts Generated by the US Seafood Industry 2016 ($ millions)

State Sales Income Value Added

US $144293 $39905 $60758California $22776 $4912 $8141Florida $16874 $3172 $5659Washington $7464 $2004 $3048Massachusetts $7663 $1999 $3045Alaska $3895 $1654 $2074New Jersey $6226 $1413 $2282New York $4412 $950 $1567Maine $2582 $856 $1236Louisiana $2022 $752 $1023Texas $2091 $597 $899Virginia $1435 $464 $660Oregon $1190 $416 $584New Hampshire $1511 $348 $558Georgia $1554 $344 $567Maryland $1241 $335 $504Rhode Island $1375 $335 $529North Carolina $985 $276 $411Hawairsquoi $867 $269 $392Alabama $555 $220 $288Mississippi $218 $87 $113Connecticut $387 $83 $137South Carolina $118 $39 $55Delaware $136 $26 $44

Graph 1 Jobs supported by the US Seafood Industry (With and Without Imports) 2016

0 30000 60000 90000 120000 150000

DESCCTMSHINHGANCRIAL

MDORVATXNYLANJMEAKWAFL

MACA

Jobs Without Imports

Jobs With Imports

9

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

Landings TrendsWhile nationally landings revenue ticked up 2 percent from 2015 to 2016 there was considerably more variation among the key speciesspecies groups Most notably Pacific salmon (down $948 million) and walleye pollock (down $498 million) had the largest declines in landings revenue while American lobster and sea scallops (both up $460 million) had the largest increases in landings revenue Salmon landings revenue declined due to a sharp decline in landings in 2016 (down 46) relative to 2015 This was largely due to the decline in pink salmon landings which fell 488 million pounds from 2015 levels While pink salmon landings are typically lower in ldquoeven yearsrdquo due to their biennial cycle in 2016 the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) pink salmon harvests came in far below forecasted levels The walleye pollock landings revenue decline (down 11 or $498 million) was directly attributable to lower ex-vessel prices in both the Bering SeandashAleutian Islands and Gulf of Alaska

New Englandrsquos American lobster fishery continued its strong performance driven by record abundance levels of Gulf of Maine lobsters that have allowed landings to almost double (up 99) since 2007 The increase in New England and Mid-Atlantic sea scallop fisheries landings revenue (up $171 million and $294 million respectively) over 2015 levels was similarly driven by an increase in landings

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the United States totaled $53 billion

in 2016 (Table 7) This represented a 28 increase in nominal value from 2007 levels (an 11 increase in realterms after adjusting for inflation) and a year-over-year increase of 2 from 2015 (Graph 2) Finfish landings revenue accounted for 43 of all landings revenue American lobster had the highest landings revenue in 2016

Table 7 Commercial Fisheries Landings Revenue by Region 2016 ($ millions)

Region LandingsRevenue Region Landings

Revenue US $533710 Pacific $68890North Pacific $160960 Mid-Atlantic $55030New England $132590 South Atlantic $19090Gulf of Mexico $91210 Western Pacific $11810

From 2007 to 2016 menhaden (96 71 in real terms) American lobster (81 58 in real terms) and tunas (64 44 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while Pacific halibut (-45 -52 in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 tunas (12) sea scallop (11) and American lobster (7) had the largest revenue increases while Pacific salmon (-17) and walleye pollock (-11) had the largest revenue decreases

Alaska earned the greatest share of landings revenue in 2016 ($16 billion) contributing 30 of the national total (Table 7) Maine ($574 million or 19 of US shellfish revenue) and Massachusetts ($4516 million or 15 of US shellfish revenue) earned the most ex-vessel revenue from shellfish landings

Graph 2 US Commercial Fisheries Landings Revenue 2007-2016 (nominal values $ billions)

$3

$4

$5

$6

2016201520142013201220112010200920082007

10

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Menhaden (96 71 in real terms)bull American lobster (81 58 in real terms)bull Tunas (64 44 in real terms)From 2015bull Tunas (12)bull Sea scallop (11)bull American lobster (7)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Pacific halibut (-45 -52 in real terms)From 2015bull Pacific salmon (-17)bull Walleye pollock (-11)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull American lobster (96)bull Menhaden (18)bull Tunas (10)From 2015bull Sea scallop (11)bull American lobster (8)bull Menhaden(7)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Pacific halibut (-64)bull Pacific salmon (-38)bull Sea scallop (-31)From 2015bull Pacific salmon (-46)bull Shrimp (-15)bull Sablefish (-3)

LandingsLandings volume in the United States totaled 96 billion pounds in 2016 (Table 8) This represented a 3 increase from 2007 levels and a year-over-year decrease of 2 from 2015 see Graph 3 Finfish landings

accounted for 88 of all landed weight Walleye pollock had the highest landings volume in 2016

From 2007 to 2016 American lobster (96) menhaden (18) and tunas (10) had the largest landings increases while Pacific halibut (-64) Pacific salmon (-38) and sea scallop (-31) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 sea scallop (11) American lobster (8) and menhaden (7) had the largest landings increases while Pacific salmon (-46) shrimp (-15) and sablefish (-3) had the largest landings decreases

Alaska accounted for the greatest share of landings volume in 2016 (56 billion pounds) contributing 59 of the national total (see Table 8) Louisiana (1633 million pounds or 14 of US shellfish landings) and Maine (1507 million pounds 13) had the highest shellfish landings by volume

Table 8 Commercial Fisheries Landings by Region 2016 (millions of pounds)Region Landings Region Landings US 960200 Mid-Atlantic 59750North Pacific 563099 New England 59500Gulf of Mexico 174450 South Atlantic 10630Pacific 93780 Western Pacific 3510

PricesOf all key species or species groups sea scallop ($12 per pound) had the highest national ex-vessel price Menhaden ($010 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price of all key species nationally

From 2007 to 2016 large price increases were observed for sea scallop (82 67 in real terms) menhaden (67 52 in real terms) and Pacific salmon (59 39 in real terms) while walleye pollock (-9 -5 in real terms) and American lobster (-8 -22 in real terms) had the largest decreases in price From 2015 to 2016 large year-over-year price increases were observed for Pacific salmon (53) shrimp (19) and tunas (15) while walleye pollock (-25) menhaden (-9) and sea scallop (-3) had the largest annual percentage decreases in price from 2015 to 2016

11

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

Graph 3 US Commercial Fisheries Landings 2007-2016 (billions of pounds)

6

8

10

2016201520142013201220112010200920082007

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on angler participation trips economic impacts and expenditures and catch of key speciesspecies groups14

Key US Recreational Species

bull Atlantic croakerand spot

bull Little tunny andAltlantic bonito

bull Pacific halibutbull Rockfishes and

scorpionfishes

bull Pacific salmonbull Seatroutbull Sharksbull Striped bassbull Summer flounderbull Tunas

Regional HighlightsAt the national level the report includes fishing trips participation and the harvest and release numbers of 10 key species or species groups which were selected so that each region has at least one species in the top 10 Results show that in 2016 recreational anglers in West Florida took the most trips (132 million trips) and spent the most on trips ($6463 million) North Carolina spent the second most on trips ($4467 million) West Florida also had the most recreational anglers participate in fishing in their state with 37 million anglers

West Florida caught the most seatrouts (119 million fish) Virginia caught the most Atlantic croaker and spot (56 million fish) and New Jersey caught the most summer flounder (69 million fish) Alaska caught the most Pacific halibut (643000 fish) and more striped bass (51 million fish) was caught in Maryland than in any other state

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures1516 Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures were estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing It includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a

14 Except where noted Atlantic and Gulf recreational catch and effort estimates are based upon the MRIP APAIS and CHTS (httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovrecreational-fisheriesSurveyssurvey-details) and not the revised MRIP estimates (httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovleadership-messagenoaa-fisheries-releases-revised-mrip-recreational-catch-and-effort-estimates) released in 201815 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable goods expenditure im-pacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were gen-erated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011) 16 Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contri-bution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-ex-pendituresmarine-angler-2011) and IMPLAN version 31100112

12

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities supported 472000 jobs across the United States in 2016 (see Table 9) Recreational fishing also generated about $679 billion in sales impacts $243 billion in income impacts and $387 billion in value-added impacts Impacts from durable equipment expenditures (eg rods and reels fishing-related equipment boats vehicles and second homes) accounted for 86 of total job impacts 85 of sales impacts 87 of income impacts and 87 of value added impacts Of the three fishing trip modes private-boat-based fishing trips had the greatest economic impact accounting for 5 of employment 6 of sales 4 of income impacts and 5 of value-added impacts

Table 9 Recreational Economic Impacts Trends for the United States ($ billions)

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Number of Jobs 425321 420191 438590 439242 472020Sales $5880 $5810 $6060 $6344 $6791 Income $2140 $2110 $2200 $2268 $2433 Value Added $3440 $3400 $3550 $3608 $3869 Total Trips (millions) 711 721 690 617 633

The greatest employment impacts from saltwater recreational fishing were generated in West Florida followed by East Florida and California (see Graph 4) The highest sales impacts were generated in West Florida followed by East Florida and California (see Table 10)

Graph 4 Jobs supported by the US Recreational Fishing Industry 2016

0 20000 40000 60000 80000NHHIMEGADEORCTRI

WAAKSCMSVAMDMANYLANJTXALNCCA

E FLW FL

Jobs

Table 10 Sales Income and Value-Added Impacts Generated by the Recreational Fishing Industry 2016 ($ millions)State Sales Income Value AddedUS National Total $67912 $24334 $38693 West Florida $6827 $2575 $4112 East Florida $4084 $1540 $2466 California $2123 $819 $1305 Texas $2000 $746 $1237 New Jersey $1752 $746 $1168 North Carolina $1699 $656 $1021 Louisiana $1630 $608 $1003 Alabama $1436 $616 $1030 New York $1127 $488 $770 Massachusetts $1071 $496 $716 Maryland $785 $327 $513 Mississippi $638 $211 $345 Virginia $584 $239 $379 Washington $542 $209 $340 Alaska $539 $195 $316 South Carolina $498 $181 $292 Connecticut $430 $186 $292 Rhode Island $412 $176 $270 Oregon $297 $132 $192 Delaware $168 $67 $110 Georgia $161 $67 $106 Hawaii $105 $33 $55 Maine $99 $37 $59 New Hampshire $48 $22 $31

13

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

In 2016 expenditures for fishing trips and durable equipment in the United States totaled $308 billion

Approximately $43 billion of these expenditures were related to trip expenses Total trip expenditures were composed of expenses on trips in the private boat (42) shore (32) and for-hire (26) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $266 billion in 2016 with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($154 billion) see Graph 5

Fishing TripsNationwide anglers took approximately 633 million saltwater fishing trips around the country (see Table 11)17 This number represents a 28 decrease from 2007 and a 3 increase from 2015 (see Graph 6) Forty-nine percent of fishing trips were taken via the private boat mode West Florida anglers took the most fishing trips (132 million trips) followed by those in East Florida and North Carolina (Table 12)

Table 11 Recreational Fishing Trips by Region 2016 (millions of fishing trips)Region TripsUS Total 633Guld of Mexico 195 South Atlantic 168 Mid-Atlantic 140 New England 61Pacific 52Hawairsquoi 10

Table 12 Recreational Fishing Trips by State 2016 (thousands of trips)State Trips State TripsWest Florida 13219 South Carolina 1909East Florida 8827 Connecticut 1644North Carolina 5411 Mississippi 1512New Jersey 4306 Rhode Island 1159New York 4294 Hawairsquoi 1024California 3532 Washington 1008Alabama 2567 Delaware 910Massachusetts 2384 Georgia 696Maryland 2383 Oregon 684Louisiana 2242 Maine 573Virginia 2108 New Hampshire 293

Graph 5 Recreational Fishing Trip and Durable Expenditures 2016 ($ billions)

Other Equipment$19Second Home Expenses$21Vehicle Expenses$35

Fishing Tackle$37

Trips$43

Boat Expenses$154

Graph 6 Recreational Fishing Trips 2007-2016 (millions of angler trips)

60

80

100

2016201520142013201220112010200920082007

Trips 2007-2016 (millions of anglers)

17 Trip estimates include Puerto Rico but do not include Alaska or Texas Hawaiʻi trip estimates are available only for the shore and private boat mode

14

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

ParticipationNationwide 98 million recreational saltwater anglers fished in their home states in 201618 This number represented a 29 decrease from 2007 and a 9 increase from 2015 Coastal county residents made up 86 of this total while non-coastal county residents made up 14 West Florida had the highest participation of anglers (37 million) followed by North Carolina and East Florida

Harvest and ReleaseIn 2016 drum (seatrouts) (364 million fish) drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (193 million fish) and summer flounder (142 million fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen in the United States19 From 2007 to 2016 rockfishes and scorpionfishes (44) had the largest increase in catch while drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (-60) Pacific salmon (-44) and Pacific halibut (-37) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 little tunny and Atlantic bonito (45) striped bass (37) and drum (seatrouts) (30) had the largest increases in catch while Pacific salmon (-37) tunas (Thunnus species) (-25) and drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (-24) had the largest decreases

Harvest and Release Largest Increases

From 2007bull Rockfishes amp scorpionfishes (44)From 2015bull Little tunny amp Atlantic bonito (45)bull Striped bass (37)bull Drum (seatrouts) (30)

Harvest and Release Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Drum (Atlantic croaker amp spot) (-60)bull Pacific salmon (-44)bull Pacific halibut (-37)From 2015bull Pacific salmon (-37)bull Tunas (Thunnus species) (-25)bull Drum (Atlantic croaker amp spot) (-24)

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The national marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments)

These sectors include several different marine-related industries Note that Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 2015 Percentage changes in inflation-adjusted (real dollar) terms are calculated using the annual Gross Domestic Product implicit price deflator published by the US Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis20

The Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) measures the proportional size of this sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy21 The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average

In 2015 77 million employee establishments operated throughout the entire US economy (including marine and non-marine related establishments)22 These establishments employed 1241 million workers and had a total annual payroll of $63 trillion The nationrsquos gross domestic product was approximately $179 trillion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 there were 2108 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 62 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $1636 million (a 64 increase in real terms from 2007) More of these non-employer

18 Participation estimates include Puerto Rico but do not include Alaska Texas or Hawairsquoi19 Harvest and release estimates do not include Puerto Rico or Alaska For Hawailsquoi these estimates are available only for shore and private boat mode 20 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS IndustryrdquohttpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)21 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017) 22 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)

15

National O

verviewensp|enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

firms were located in Florida (300) New York (183) Texas (178) and California (169) than in any other state There were 618 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 10 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 30708 workers (a 7 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of about $1 billion (this remained unchanged in real terms from 2007) Alaska (109) and Washington (85) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 2471 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood (a 5 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $2067 million (a 21 decrease in real terms from 2007) More of these non-employer firms were located in Florida (355) and California (221) than in any other state There were 2059 employer firms in the retail seafood sales sector (a 2 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 11443 workers (a 10 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $2927 million (a 24 increase in real terms from 2007) New York (409) Florida (181) and California (170) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 2132 employer firms in the wholesale seafood sales sector (a 13 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 22060 workers (a 9 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $9993 million (a 4 decrease in real terms from 2007) California (349) New York (275) and Florida (242) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Transport Support and Marine OperationsCoastal and Great Lakes Freight Transportation There were 593 employer firms providing coastal and Great Lakes freight transportation (a 3 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 19983 workers (an 11 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of about $2 billion (this remained unchanged in real terms from 2007) Louisiana (116) Alaska (74) and New York (73) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Deep Sea Freight Transportation There were 350 employer firms providing deep sea freight transportation (an 18 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 8014 workers (a 29 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $6716 million in 2015 Florida (76) California (56) and Texas (35) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Deep Sea Passenger Transportation There were 61 employer firms in the deep sea passenger transportation sector (a 34 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 15157 workers and had a total annual payroll of $1 billion Florida (32) California (6) and Washington (6) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Marinas There were 3881 employer firms classified as marinas in 2015 (a 5 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 26999 workers (a 6 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of about $1 billion (a 3 decrease in real terms from 2007) Florida (466) New York (429) and California (258) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Marine Cargo Handling There were 492 employer firms providing marine cargo handling services in 2015 (an 11 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 66414 workers (a 6 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of about $4 billion (a 12 increase in real terms from 2007) Florida (69) California (67) and Texas (56) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Navigational Services to Shipping There were 889 employer firms providing navigational services to shipping in 2015 (a 7 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 11864 workers (a 9 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $9233 million (an 8 increase in real terms from 2007) Florida (196) Louisiana (142) and Texas (91) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Port and Harbor Operations There were 337 employer firms in the port and harbor operations

16

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

National Overview | United States Summary

sector in 2015 (a 51 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 7855 workers (a 20 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $4342 million (a 21 increase in real terms from 2007) Florida (55) California (30) and Texas (25) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Ship and Boat Building There were 1541 employer firms in the ship and boat building sector in 2015 (a 13 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 143287 workers (a 4 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of about $8 billion (an 11 increase in real terms from 2007) Florida (278) Washington (143) and Louisiana (109) had the greatest number of these employer establishments

Tables | National Overview

18

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

United States | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the United States Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)

With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 1190092 144293187 39904566 60758157 711409 53110090 19407193 27553434

Commercial Harvesters 166952 14231679 4698535 7334409 166952 14231679 4698535 7334409Seafood Processors amp Dealers 200543 30837015 9731961 13528514 54238 8340003 2632051 3658845

Importers 186295 57572994 9227170 17550769 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 53765 8192076 2691973 3851846 25204 3840327 1261959 1805690

Retail 582536 33459425 13554926 18492619 465015 26698081 10814648 14754491

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (millions of dollars) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 4182 4436 3839 4515 5390 5285 5553 5529 5219 5337Finfish amp Other 2048 2301 1789 2161 2606 2544 2669 2431 2360 2300Shellfish 2135 2135 2051 2354 2785 2742 2884 3098 2859 3038

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 369 325 311 404 423 431 463 564 621 667Blue crab 149 161 163 205 184 193 193 215 220 219Menhaden 93 91 90 93 133 126 125 114 180 181Pacific halibut 227 217 140 207 213 152 117 115 118 125Pacific salmon 451 484 445 614 716 637 835 690 543 448 Sablefish 116 128 130 139 197 154 110 119 123 124 Sea scallop 386 370 376 456 585 559 467 424 440 486Shrimp 430 445 379 409 538 510 597 702 512 522Tunas 94 107 96 108 136 164 146 134 137 154Walleye pollock 392 435 328 334 473 510 462 466 457 407

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (millions of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 9306 8347 7889 8027 9888 9475 9742 9511 9750 9602Finfish amp Other 8228 7292 6618 6719 8516 8148 8466 8244 8608 8475Shellfish 1078 1056 1270 1308 1372 1328 1275 1267 1142 1127

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 81 88 101 118 126 150 150 147 147 159Blue crab 157 162 176 199 202 185 135 140 161 160Menhaden 1484 1344 1407 1259 1899 1598 1341 1232 1632 1748Pacific halibut 70 67 60 56 43 34 30 23 24 25Pacific salmon 971 726 764 848 839 683 1111 754 1122 606 Sablefish 48 46 45 42 43 43 39 35 35 34Sea scallop 58 53 58 58 59 57 41 34 36 40Shrimp 274 249 305 249 312 309 293 326 342 292Tunas 51 48 49 48 50 59 56 58 57 56Walleye pollock 3068 2278 1869 1947 2811 2872 3003 3146 3263 3355

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

American lobster 455 371 309 344 335 287 308 383 423 420Blue crab 095 099 093 103 091 105 143 153 136 137Menhaden 006 007 006 007 007 008 009 009 011 010Pacific halibut 325 325 235 367 498 448 392 497 488 503Pacific salmon 046 067 058 072 085 093 075 092 048 074Sablefish 242 278 289 331 458 357 281 341 350 366Sea scallop 660 693 648 792 989 982 1139 1252 1232 1200Shrimp 157 179 124 164 172 165 204 216 150 178Tunas 185 223 196 225 274 275 262 231 240 276Walleye pollock 011 019 014 014 014 016 015 013 016 012

19

National O

verview |enspN

orthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspN

ewenspEnglandensp|enspM

id-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspG

ulfenspofenspMexico

United States | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts byFishing Mode

For-Hire 19890 2893120 1000008 1550124Private Boat 23523 3868886 1095035 1933559Shore 22588 3164227 962607 1661185

Total Durable Expenditures 406019 57985702 21276476 33548301Total Impacts 472020 67911935 24334126 38693169

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)1

Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 1113595Private Boat 1769038Shore 1375153Total 4257786

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 3679848Other Equipment 1908759Boat Expenses 15398019Vehicle Expenses 3473756Second Home Expenses 2102010Total Durable Expenditures 26562392

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 30820178

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)23

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 12251 10550 9515 9496 9082 9561 9509 9232 7721 8427Non-Coastal 1607 1526 1488 1499 1380 1468 1461 1460 1301 1419Total Anglers 13858 12076 11004 10994 10462 11028 10970 10692 9022 9846

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016For-Hire 4091 3317 3232 2603 3210 3219 3883 4171 4139 3216Private 46497 45008 38292 38054 35492 34870 34293 32815 29459 31169Shore 37024 37233 33633 32135 31694 32976 33882 32049 28108 28955Total Trips 87611 85558 75156 72792 70395 71064 72058 69035 61706 63339

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)5

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Drum (Atlantic H 26566 24014 15766 13355 13319 11950 17597 17615 13162 8381croaker amp spot) R 21370 24973 20371 15979 18093 18618 25484 16047 12441 10959

Drum (seatrouts)6HR

1756028961

2107532339

2018925795

1673623823

2223228643

2087431542

1755526965

961115212

1164816324

1438921971

Little tunny amp H 292 201 233 185 282 386 345 384 428 414Atlantic bonito R 1221 722 806 599 702 855 651 1137 517 956

Pacific halibutHR

585438

516359

440321

398304

394311

388324

454324

408251

420271

400244

Pacific salmonHR

1013567

651358

789458

660286

750367

667281

996497

972303

944452

596283

Rockfishes amp H 2664 2162 2439 2448 3116 3677 4160 4380 4215 3830scorpionfishes R 624 537 534 617 698 773 1025 986 931 891

Sharks7HR

3085184

1815006

1724203

2094181

1843100

1573923

2524538

2044133

1313713

1393434

Striped bassHR

242516186

232512677

19618094

19686347

22196120

14945369

21958638

17727365

12618543

153211863

Summer H 3109 2362 1830 1511 1848 2278 2532 2460 1624 2029flounder R 17628 20548 22297 22227 19722 14257 13584 16512 10535 12148Tunas (Thunnus H 730 801 524 590 440 726 723 709 833 567species) R 97 93 57 54 70 53 33 62 67 107

1 All anglers reported in this table are US residents2 Participation estimates do not include Puerto Rico Alaska Texas or Hawairsquoi 3 Includes Louisiana resident participation estimated from historical Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) data and a state creel survey 4 Effort estimates do not include Alaska or Texas Hawairsquoi effort estimates are available only for the shore and private boat modes 5 Harvest and release estimates do not include Puerto Rico or Alaska 6 Drum (seatrouts) include spotted seatrout silver seatrout sand seatrout weakfish and other species in the Cynoscion genus7 Sharks do not include spiny dogfish

20

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

wensp|enspNorthenspPacificensp|enspPacificensp|enspWesternenspPacificensp|enspNewenspEnglandensp|enspMid-Atlanticensp|enspSouthenspAtlanticensp|enspGulfenspofenspMexico

United States | Marine Economy

2015 United States Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms

(millions)

Establishments(millions)

Employees(millions)

AnnualPayroll

($ trillions)

Employee Compensation

($ trillions)

Gross Domestic Product

($ trillions)

CommercialLocation

Quotient2

Totals 2433 766 12409 625 970 1793 1

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 1303 1308 1395 1617 1757 1766 1812 1947 2108Receipts 88230 89670 95219 104990 110745 115167 128927 146626 163625

Seafood salesretail

Firms 2610 2522 2455 2513 2514 2657 2497 2557 2471Receipts 231776 233002 207139 199810 212679 217702 205555 203459 206676

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 685 663 645 638 620 589 604 640 618Employees 33169 33323 30894 31789 31261 30988 31390 32180 30708

Payroll 1196086 1161637 1091727 1116305 1200263 1196207 1228826 1311910 1354572

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 2438 2063 2099 2183 2287 1954 2098 2100 2132Employees 24232 20116 19290 19386 20622 20030 20367 21155 22060

Payroll 924654 782178 758332 798794 848454 867179 884645 910527 999264

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 2094 2044 1967 1982 1972 1957 1995 2015 2059Employees 10380 9732 9439 9857 10006 10293 10631 11037 11443

Payroll 209404 205423 211264 219045 222508 237619 253490 271732 292726

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp Great Lakes freighttransportation

Establishments 573 513 513 547 549 496 497 598 593Employees 22568 21019 20919 17528 18590 19099 18659 20884 19983

Payroll 1552467 1694613 1470159 1288001 1400267 1467709 1512053 1835024 1746612

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 427 365 376 372 378 375 305 332 350Employees 11308 10231 11180 10288 10362 12375 8704 8646 8014

Payroll 855683 852063 863363 867797 921990 1073529 703003 683281 671624Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 92 71 78 56 55 58 62 56 61Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 15157

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1246384

MarinasEstablishments 4085 3972 3891 3937 3896 3782 3844 3811 3881

Employees 28788 28686 26643 26657 26557 25764 26373 26709 26999Payroll 945355 954032 905488 927499 953497 913140 951123 995248 1036253

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 552 532 541 507 545 343 458 482 492Employees 62941 63736 56386 57275 59517 43824 66301 69830 66414

Payroll 3428126 3272723 2776791 3026861 3159964 2601146 4086182 4406525 4334958Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 830 868 846 847 836 850 847 881 889Employees 12997 13419 12689 13529 13441 12532 12485 12148 11864

Payroll 756552 847938 826384 937980 893889 838959 929419 907763 923303

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 223 268 258 287 255 525 383 351 337Employees 6573 5608 5100 4844 4933 25396 7000 6769 7855

Payroll 318608 282671 250358 290467 306882 1345857 420664 399502 434209

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 1771 1782 1615 1540 1497 1560 1514 1524 1541Employees 148864 157512 137759 127691 127522 136365 135287 138687 143287

Payroll 6405570 7269306 6674187 6529523 6845322 7543402 7556373 7882846 8030983

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

North Pacific Regionbull Alaska

Holding king crabs Photo NOAAMaria Shawback

22

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Pacific Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe North Pacific Region includes the fisheries in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) off the state of Alaska Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (NPFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under six fishery management plans (FMPs)

North Pacific Region FMPs

bull Bering SeaAleutian Islands(BSAI)groundfish

bull Gulf of Alaska(GOA) groundfish

bull BSAI king andtanner crabs

bull Alaska scallopbull Salmon in the EEZbull Arctic

Of the stocks or stock complexes covered in these FMPs only the blue king crab-Pribilof Islands stock is listed as overfished and subject to overfishing

Catch Share programsThe North Pacific Region has six catch share programs more than any other region These are the 1) Western Alaska Community Development Quota (CDQ) Program 2) Alaska Halibut and Sablefish Individual Fishing Quota(IFQ) Program 3) American Fisheries Act (AFA) PollockCooperatives 4) Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI)Crab Rationalization Program 5) Bering Sea and AleutianIslands (BSAI) Non-Pollock Trawl CatcherProcessorGroundfish Cooperatives (Amendment 80) and 6)Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program The landingsrevenues for these programs totaled $8549 million in2015 exceeding the total landings revenue of any otherstate Following are descriptions of these catch shareprograms and their performance

Western Alaska Community Development Quota (CDQ) Program The program was originally implemented in 1992 as part of a restructuring of the BSAI groundfish fishery Under this program a percentage of the total allowable catch for groundfish prohibited species halibut and crab is apportioned to 65 eligible villages in Western Alaska that are organized into six CDQ groups The program has the following goals 1) provide eligible Western Alaska villages with the opportunity to participate and invest in fisheries in

the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area 2) support economic development in Western Alaska3) alleviate poverty and provide economic and socialbenefits to residents and 4) achieve a sustainable anddiversified local economy

Alaska Halibut and Sablefish IFQ Program The program was implemented in 1995 The primary objectives of this IFQ program include the following 1) eliminate gear conflicts 2) address safety concerns and 3) improve product quality The performance results ofthe halibut fishery show that relative to its baseline period(3-year period prior to implementation) the followingindicators decreased 2015 quota landings and numberof active vessels However inflation-adjusted halibutrevenue and revenue per vessel increased The 2015performance results for the sablefish fishery show thatquota landings inflation-adjusted revenue and numberof active vessels decreased while inflation-adjustedrevenue per vessel increased

American Fisheries Act (AFA) Pollock Cooperatives The program was established in 1999 and 2000 with the goals of settling allocation disputes between inshore (catcher vessels) offshore (catcherprocessors) and mothership sectors and ending the race for fish Key performance indicators of this program show that relative to its baseline the 2015 quota landings inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per vessel increased while the number of active vessels decreased

In 2017 the council approved two catch share program reviews the AFA Program Review and the Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program Review In February 2017 the council reviewed and accepted the AFA Program Review as final with one addition a section describing the revenue collected by the state for AFA fishing activity using the Alaska Fisheries Business tax and the Fisheries Resource Landing tax how those revenues may have changed over time and how they were distributed to communities In October 2017 the council reviewed the Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program review and allocation policy review and accepted both as complete and final NOAA Fisheries and industry participants identified housekeeping issues and NOAA Fisheries intends to incorporate those into the reauthorization of the program starting in 2018

23

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

North Pacific Region | Regional Summary

Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) Crab Rationalization Program The program was implemented for the 2005ndash2006 crab fishing season to address the race to harvest high bycatch and discard mortality and product quality issues The program also aims to balance the interests of those who depend on crab fisheries This program includes share allocations to harvesters and processors Processor quota was incorporated to preserve the viability of processing facilities in dependent communities and in particular to maintain competitive conditions in ex-vessel markets The CDQ and Adak Community allocations regional landings and processing requirements and several community protection measures protect community interests The key 2015 performance indicators of this program show that relative to its baseline quota landings and number of active vessels decreased However inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per active vessel increased

In June 2016 the council approved a 10-year review of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab Rationalization Program One key finding of the review was that total allowable catch (TAC) had never been exceeded evidence that resource conservation has improved In addition the program has led to decreased deadloss and greater accountability as deadloss is deducted from IFQ holdings The program was also successful at reducing harvest capacity which sharply decreased from 256 vessels in the 200405 season to 91 vessels in the 200607 season (currently there are 72 vessels in the fishery) Consolidation also occurred in the processor sector eg 11 processing plants processed Bristol Bay red king crab in 2005 down from 17 plants in 2004 The program also improved vessel safety an important achievement for the fishery once recognized as the most hazardous in the nation The review resulted in council initiation of a discussion paper focused on the arbitration system

BSAI Non-Pollock Trawl CatcherProcessor Groundfish Cooperatives The program commonly referred to as the Amendment 80 Program was implemented in 2008 to create economic incentives that would improve retention of all fish caught The cooperatives also seek to reduce bycatch by commercial

fishing vessels using trawl gear in the non-pollock groundfish fisheries Key 2015 performance indicators of this program show that relative to its baseline there was an increase in quota landings inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per vessel However the number of active vessels declined

Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program The program was initially established as a two-year (2007ndash2008) pilot program by the US Congress and was later extended to five years NOAA Fisheries implemented this catch share program in 2012 The objectives of this program are to reduce bycatch and discards encourage conservation-minded practices improve product quality and value and provide stability to the processing labor force Results show that in 2015 the quota landings number of active vessels inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per active vessel increased relative to the baseline

Policy UpdatesIn October 2015 Alaska Department of Fish and Game reduced the Bering Sea snow crab quota by 40 to 406 million pounds for the 20152016 fishing year This reduction was deemed necessary due to the 56 decline in biomass from 2014 to 2015 to 46410 metric tons which is below the 20-year average While the 2015 assessment noted strong future recruitment potential in the fishery the 2016 assessment resulted in a 50 reduction in the 20162017 quota from the previous fishing year (2157 million pounds which would be the fisheryrsquos lowest harvest since the 19691970 season) The recent decline in snow crab mature biomass is similar to other crab stocks in the Bering Sea and is correlated to a substantial increase in ocean temperature and decreases in sea ice extent relative to the short- and long-term averages for environmental conditions in the region

In February 2016 NOAA Fisheries implemented a cost-recovery fee program for the Western Alaska CDQ Program for groundfish and three limited access privilege programs (LAPPs) The three LAPPS with new cost recovery programs are AFA pollock Aleutian Islands pollock and the Amendment 80 fisheries) The cost-recovery fees recover the actual costs directly related to

24

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Pacific Region | Regional Summary

the management data collection efforts and enforcement of the programs However the fees cannot exceed 3 of the annual ex-vessel value of fish harvested by a program that is subject to the cost-recovery fee

In late 2016 the council approved a plan to allow guided recreational halibut fishermen to purchase commercial halibut individual fishing quota through the newly established Recreational Quota Entity (RQE) Program The RQE Program is distinct from the Guided Angler Fish program implemented in 2014 which allows halibut anglers to lease commercial quota A recent study found that while the charter (guided) operators leased very little quota relative to the guided angler fish (GAF) program limits GAF transfers reached up to 50 of quota transfers in some small boat IFQ sub-markets1 Under the 2016 plan the RQE can hold up to 10 of Area 2C (Southeast Alaska) and 12 of Area 3C (Southcentral Alaska) which could potentially make it the single largest Alaska halibut quota holder The RQE program should be effective in late 2018

Also in late 2016 the council took final action to establish electronic monitoring as a part of the North Pacific Observer Program Under this action regulations were implemented to allow electronic monitoring to be used for catch estimation Electronic monitoring was effective in 2017

In early 2017 the council took final action to approve a regulatory amendment that would allow CDQ groups to lease Area 4B 4C and 4D halibut IFQ in years where the catch limits are below certain thresholds In Area 4B this option would become available to the groups if the catch limit was 1 million pounds or lower This option would be available for Area 4C and 4D when the catch limit in Area 4CDE was at or below 15 million pounds Leased IFQ would be available to vessels less than or equal to 51 feet length overall subject to the groupsrsquo internal management This action would not convert IFQ to CDQ The council also added some restrictive provisions into this amendment in order to mitigate adverse impacts on other IFQ stakeholders and the quota share (QS) market Specifically the council adopted an option intended to prevent individuals from buying QS with the sole intention of leasing it This

provision would not allow an individual to lease IFQ within the first three years after they have acquired it Also in an effort to discourage the reliance on the leasing of Area 4 QS a QS holder may not lease halibut IFQ on a consecutive basis for more than two years In any year that CDQ groups use this additional opportunity the groups would be required to submit a report specifying the criteria used to select IFQ holders leasing to a CDQ group the criteria used to determine who can receive leased IFQ and the amount and type of IFQ leased This action is expected to be in effect in late 2018

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key North Pacific Commercial Species

bull Atka mackerelbull Crabbull Flatfishbull Pacific codbull Pacific halibut

bull Pacific herringbull Rockfishbull Sablefishbull Salmonbull Walleye pollock

The North Pacific groundfish fishery is different from most other United States fisheries in that a large portion of the fishery is processed at sea and therefore no landings revenues are reported The landings revenue for the species landed and processed at sea is estimated by using prices obtained from the shore-side sector These species include Atka mackerel flatfish Pacific cod rockfish sablefish and walleye pollock When data from the shore-side sector are inadequate historical information about the relationship between the ex-vessel price and the wholesale price of finished products is used to estimate ex-vessel prices and revenue for portions of the fishery mostly processed at sea

1 Kroetz Kailin and Lew Daniel and Sanchirico James N Recreational Leasing of Alaska Commercial Halibut Quota The First Two Years of the Guided Angler Fish Provision (September 30 2016) Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 16-39

25

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers2

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 Alaskarsquos commercial fishing and seafood industry generated $39 billion in sales impacts $17 billion in income impacts $21 billion in value-added impacts and 47200 full- and part-time jobs The commercial harvesters sector generated the largest employment impacts (33400) sales impacts ($27 billion) income impacts ($12 billion) and value-added impacts ($14 billion) across sectors

Landings TrendsAmong the Alaska key species pollock (down $49 million) crab (down $60 million) and Pacific salmon (down $88 million) had the largest one-year declines from 2015 to 2016 Alaska pollock landings revenue ($407 million in 2016) fell 108 relative to the previous year despite landings being at their highest level since 2006 The landings revenue decline was directly attributable to lower ex-vessel prices in both the Bering SeaAleutian Islands (BSAI $375 million) and Gulf of Alaska (GOA $32 million)3 Pollock ex-vessel prices fell in both the BSAI and GOA and while retained catch increased (particularly in the GOA) the net effect was a decrease in landings revenue of 92 in the BSAI and 26 in the GOA A decrease in the price of head-and-gut (HampG) products and low roe yields due to small-sized pollocks were factors in ex-vessel price decline Despite the year-over-year decline in landings revenue 2016 landings revenues were above the 10-year average

In contrast to ex-vessel value pollock first-wholesale value increased 62 in the BSAI to $135 billion and decreased 02 in the GOA to $1052 million The difference in performance between the ex-vessel and first-wholesale sectors can be attributed to higher prices on more highly processed value-added products such as surimi and deep-skin fillets and higher prices for roe due to reduced supply The fillet market faced challenges throughout 2016 including insolvency of a major international pollock trader and competition from low Russian pollock prices The surimi market which has been a strong performer in recent years continued to grow in 2016 albeit at a more modest pace 6 in the BSAI and 5 in the GOA as the supply of raw surimi material continues to be constrained in Japan The 2016 first-wholesale value in the pollock fishery was also above its 10-year average

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

North Pacific Region | Regional Summary

2 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)3 Alaska pollock trends are summarized or quoted verbatim from the Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report for the Groundfish Fisheries of the Gulf of Alaska and Bering SeaAleutian Islands Area Economic Status of the Groundfish Fisheries off Alaska 2016

26

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Pacific Region | Regional Summary

Crab landings revenue was down in 2016 relative to 2015 largely due to the 40 reduction in the snow crab TAC as described above Production declines occurred however in nearly all crab fisheries for example Dungeness crab landings fell 23 and king crab landings fell 17 year-over-year Prices for these species were however near record highs After adjusting for inflation the price of king crab ($717 per pound) and the price of Dungeness crab ($309 per pound) were at their highest since 1999 and 1997 respectively

Salmon landings also declined sharply in 2016 (down 46) relative to 2015 This was largely due to the decline in pink salmon landings which fell 488 million pounds from 2015 levels While pink salmon landings are typically lower in ldquoeven yearsrdquo due to their biennial cycle in 2016 the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) pink salmon harvests came in far below forecasted levels In January 2017 the Department of Commerce declared a fishery disaster for GOA pink salmon citing ldquosudden and unexpected large decreases in fish stock biomass due to unusual ocean and climate conditionsrdquo4 Overall pink salmon landings were down 76 from 2015 and down 62 from the 10-year average Chinook and chum salmon landings each had a sizable decline in landings (down 18 and 14 respectively) from 2015 to 2016 Due to reduced inventory for pink salmon and lower overall supply of salmon (global capture fishery production was down 16)5 the average price per pound of salmon was up 75 in 2016 relative to the previous year

Landings RevenueIn 2016 Alaska landings revenue totaled $16 billion a 3 decrease from 2007 (a 15 decrease in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 10 decrease from 2015 Finfish landings revenue accounted for 86 of all landings revenue in the region In 2016 salmon ($4073 million) walleye pollock ($4071 million) and crab ($2188 million) dominated Alaskan landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 Atka mackerel (75 53 in real terms) rockfish (59 39 in real terms) and crab (25 9 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while Pacific herring (-64 -68 in real terms) Pacific halibut (-46 -53 in real terms) and Pacific cod (-8 -19 in real terms) had the largest

revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 flatfish (15) Pacific halibut (6) and Pacific cod (2) had the largest revenue increases while Pacific herring (-24) crab (-23) and salmon (-18) had the largest revenue decreases

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Atka mackerel (75 53 in real terms)bull Rockfish (59 39 in real terms)bull Crab (25 9 in real terms)From 2015bull Flatfish (15)bull Pacific halibut (6)bull Pacific cod (2)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Pacific herring (-64 -68 in real terms)bull Pacific halibut (-46 -53 in real terms)bull Pacific cod (-8 -19 in real terms)From 2015bull Pacific herring (-24)bull Crab (-23)bull Salmon (-18)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Rockfish (69)bull Pacific cod (44)bull Flatfish (24)From 2015bull Atka mackerel (3)bull Rockfish (3)bull Walleye pollock (3)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Pacific halibut (-65)bull Sablefish (-40)bull Salmon (-38)From 2015bull Salmon (-46)bull Crab (-29)bull Pacific herring (-24)

4 See httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovmedia-releasecommerce-secretary-declares-fisheries-disasters-nine-west-coast-species5 See FAO Global Capture Production 1950-2016 at httpwwwfaoorgfisherystatisticsglobal-capture-productionqueryen

27

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

North Pacific Region | Regional Summary

LandingsIn 2016 North Pacific Region commercial fishermen landed over 56 billion pounds of finfish and shellfish a 4 increase from 2007 and a 7 decrease from 2015 Walleye pollock contributed the most to landings accounting for 60 of total volume

From 2007 to 2016 rockfish (69) Pacific cod (44) and flatfish (24) had the largest landings increases while Pacific halibut (-65) sablefish (-40) and salmon (-38) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 Atka mackerel (3) rockfish (3) and walleye pollock (3) had the largest landings increases while salmon (-46) crab (-29) and Pacific herring (-24) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 Pacific halibut ($503 per pound) received the highest North Pacific Region ex-vessel price Landings of Pacific herring ($010 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price

From 2007 to 2016 Atka mackerel (86 62 in real terms) salmon (75 53 in real terms) and sablefish (60 40 in real terms) had the largest price increases while Pacific herring (-53 -60 in real terms) Pacific cod (-35 -43 in real terms) and flatfish (-28 -37 in real terms) had the largest price decreases From 2015 to 2016 salmon (75) crab (34) and sablefish (9) had the largest price increases while walleye pollock (-25) and Pacific cod (-4) had the largest price decreases

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups

Key North Pacific Recreational Species

bull Chinook salmonbull Chum salmonbull Coho salmonbull Greenlings

(lingcod)

bull Pacific halibutbull Pink salmonbull Razor clamsbull Rockfishbull Sockeye salmon

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities6 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

In 2016 economic impacts from recreational fishing activities in Alaska generated 4865 jobs $5394 million in sales $1951 million in income and $3155 million in value-added impacts Impacts from durable equipment expenditures (eg rods and reels fishing-related

6 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

28

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Pacific Region | Regional Summary

equipment boats vehicles and second homes) accounted for 30 of employment 20 of sales 23 of income and 21 of value-added impacts Of the three fishing trip modes for-hire fishing trips had the greatest economic impact accounting for 38 of employment impacts

Expenditures for fishing trips and durable equipment across Alaska in 2016 totaled over $412 million Approximately $299 million of these expenditures were related to trip expenses with a large portion coming from trips in the for-hire (48) and private boat (47) sectors In 2016 durable goods expenditures totaled more than $113 million with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($518 million)

Days FishedThe state of Alaska records recreational fishing effort in terms of the number of days fished rather than the number of fishing trips Anglers who fished in Alaska spent approximately 863648 days fishing in 2016 This number represented an 18 decrease from the days spent fishing in 2007 From 2015 to 2016 there was an 11 decrease in the number of days fished

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Pacific cod (84)bull Rockfish species (34)From 2015bull Razor clams (107)bull Rockfish species (6)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Razor clams (-79)bull Shark species (-78)bull Lingcod (-57)From 2015bull Coho salmon (-47)bull Pacific cod (-35)bull Pink salmon (-27)

ParticipationIn 2016 about 293000 recreational saltwater anglers

fished in Alaska This number represented a 12 decrease from 2007 and a 4 decrease from 2015 These anglers are categorized as either residents of coastalnon-coastal counties in Alaska (39) or out-of-state anglers (61)

Harvest and ReleaseOf Alaskarsquos key species and species groups Pacific halibut (643000 fish) rockfish species (504000 fish) and coho salmon (305000 fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 Pacific cod (84) and rockfish species (34) had the largest increases in catch while razor clams (-79) shark species (-78) and lingcod (-57) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 razor clams (107) and rockfish species (6) had the largest increases in catch while coho salmon (-47) Pacific cod (-35) and pink salmon (-27) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries78

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ)9 The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average The Bureau of Labor Statistics did not disclose CFLQ data for Alaska for 2015

7 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)8 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)9 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

29

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

North Pacific Region | Regional Summary

In 2015 20907 employer establishments operated throughout the entire Alaskan economy (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed about 268000 workers and had a total annual payroll of $156 billion The gross state product of Alaska was approximately $534 billion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 Alaska had 30 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 9 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $41 million (a 97 increase in real terms from 2007) There were 109 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 4 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 8472 workers (a 30 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $3569 million

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 11 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in Alaska (an 8 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $761000 (a 50 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 15 employer firms in the retail seafood sales sector (a 114 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 64 workers and had a total annual payroll of $25 million

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 37 employer firms in the wholesale seafood sales sector (a 46 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 94 workers and had a total annual payroll of $73 million

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of Alaskarsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons It is clear however that these sectors play an important role in the regional economy For example in 2015 the coastal and Great Lakes freight transportation sector in Alaska accounted for $892 million in payroll

Tables | Alaska

32

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oAlaska | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Alaska Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 47151 3895150 1653458 2074342 46942 3855070 1644526 2059974

Commercial Harvesters 33414 2724805 1154017 1448489 33414 2724805 1154017 1448489Seafood Processors amp Dealers 10726 967808 422333 523622 10659 961779 419696 520358

Importers 99 30442 4879 9280 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 335 39282 13450 17563 317 37166 12726 16617

Retail 2578 132814 58780 75388 2552 131319 58087 74511

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 1653205 1871763 1443124 1737518 2170704 2132501 2018139 1910778 1784980 1609630Finfish amp Other 1464901 1612011 1243109 1498581 1862213 1813059 1778006 1662309 1496651 1380040Shellfish 188304 259752 200015 238937 308492 319443 240134 248469 288328 229590

Key SpeciesAtka mackerel 17599 21636 29669 30197 30371 30567 16874 24555 30293 30759 Crab 175587 248781 184700 221857 290342 308927 230139 237813 278865 218762 Flatfish 77900 99800 71800 80700 113000 127100 103100 94500 71100 81800 Pacific cod 213964 246145 120217 141376 182407 216581 180369 206731 193792 197213 Pacific halibut 217399 208983 134603 200454 205211 144801 111483 106674 110709 117066 Pacific herring 14817 22912 29294 23026 12305 19430 16280 11492 7040 5364 Rockfish 17400 17000 12600 19200 29300 33500 27700 30200 28800 27700 Sablefish 95674 101049 95200 103097 151734 125730 90016 94611 93983 92843 Salmon 416866 456536 419676 564696 662141 589046 757270 619135 494784 407259 Walleye pollock 391763 435092 328186 333666 472737 510480 461609 465817 456315 407116

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 5408420 4604863 4128898 4408396 5413956 5392685 5832979 5703903 6069071 5630998Finfish amp Other 5330051 4497908 4032927 4322836 5328134 5276459 5741926 5612863 5963794 5557727Shellfish 78369 106955 95971 85560 85822 116226 91053 91040 105277 73271

Key SpeciesAtka mackerel 126962 127030 156888 145205 112594 103994 51425 69512 117678 121285Crab 70699 99454 89530 79574 80457 111914 87089 85106 97230 68607Flatfish 423340 599585 506166 563817 649451 646680 659799 663865 510860 522934Pacific cod 491020 494975 491073 538741 663100 716882 681407 716564 697174 707150Pacific halibut 67242 64639 57749 54857 41291 32422 28696 21616 22850 23262Pacific herring 67137 83787 86951 108116 98600 75058 85076 96789 68461 51822Rockfish 86569 89761 83987 100068 106287 114581 122950 133320 141854 145970Sablefish 36103 32540 28960 27026 28847 31427 30150 25679 23845 21775Salmon 946377 706018 730292 816778 797151 658394 1053839 715927 1095633 587697Walleye pollock 3068211 2277527 1869214 1947453 2810726 2872187 3003183 3145639 3262568 3355059

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atka mackerel 014 017 019 021 027 029 032 036 026 026Crab 238 242 201 237 309 246 264 279 235 319Flatfish 018 016 014 014 017 019 016 013 013 013Pacific cod 037 049 020 027 025 024 028 022 025 024Pacific halibut 323 323 233 365 497 447 389 493 485 503Pacific herring 022 027 034 021 012 026 019 012 010 010Rockfish 020 019 017 022 032 029 022 024 021 021Sablefish 245 283 301 360 484 382 273 340 362 393Salmon 040 058 051 067 077 072 067 080 040 070Walleye pollock 011 019 014 014 014 016 015 013 016 012

33

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Alaska | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Alaska Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)1

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts byFishing Mode

For-Hire 1857 238118 89312 132960Private Boat 1295 163384 51722 97917Shore 253 28338 9709 16879

Total Durable Expenditures 1460 109549 44341 67703Total State Economic Impacts 4865 539389 195084 315459

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 144052Private Boat 141703Shore 13156Total 298911

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Chinook salmon

H 110 71 89 78 85 63 81 111 111 101R 110 80 96 66 95 62 120 94 116 87

Coho salmon

H 506 404 418 350 386 263 493 390 479 263R 122 89 94 74 88 50 122 60 99 41

Pink salmon

H 133 88 117 82 72 78 113 69 110 103R 281 152 224 121 135 141 203 118 204 126

Sockeye salmon

H 32 29 34 28 31 28 40 35 33 34R 21 10 10 6 10 8 13 12 9 7

Chum salmon

H 18 12 22 11 21 11 25 12 13 10R 34 28 34 19 38 20 39 19 25 22

Pacific halibut

H 585 516 440 398 394 388 454 408 420 400R 438 359 321 304 311 324 324 251 271 244

Rockfish species

H 198 226 209 224 211 230 256 335 332 347R 178 171 149 151 122 121 121 148 143 157

LingcodH 42 37 32 32 33 33 34 32 28 26R 70 65 46 39 36 36 33 29 27 23

Pacific codH 20 25 36 37 48 42 38 61 58 44R 27 39 63 81 76 50 48 73 75 43

Shark species

H 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0R 75 52 33 29 14 13 11 28 20 16

Razor clams

H 389 593 556 357 436 324 291 90 39 77R 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 24717Other Equipment 32640Boat Expenses 51807Vehicle Expenses 4241Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 113405

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 412316

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler fishing days)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Days Fished 1053 935 914 811 812 808 980 960 975 864

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)23

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Out-of-State 205 190 158 159 159 159 176 169 180 180CoastalNon-Coastal 127 119 127 122 117 109 121 118 125 113Total Anglers 332 309 284 281 276 268 298 287 305 293

1 Data reported in this table include saltwater fishing activities only2 Information reported in this table is from the Sport Fish Division of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADFampG) and includes saltwater fishing activities only3 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

34

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oAlaska | Marine Economy

2015 Alaska State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 55818 (02) 20907 (03) 267999 (02) 1564 (03) 2795 (03) 5338 (03) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 33 31 32 28 26 25 35 31 30Receipts 1837 1455 1693 2482 2882 2708 3268 2472 4091

Seafood salesretail

Firms 12 13 16 23 15 15 11 17 11Receipts 1358 1431 1350 1595 903 1626 1458 1539 761

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 114 122 121 119 122 116 115 108 109Employees 6506 7707 7572 8074 8578 8289 8638 9115 8472

Payroll 262127 254894 255403 268208 296851 297284 308961 337171 356855

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 68 57 54 52 48 47 43 43 37Employees 167 143 ds ds 159 143 102 120 94

Payroll 8528 8389 8445 9141 9985 10943 7205 7024 7306

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 7 9 10 10 10 15 14 14 15Employees ds 37 44 ds ds ds ds ds 64

Payroll ds 1839 1824 1986 2487 2019 2337 2687 2498

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 46 49 50 55 63 47 53 72 74Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1067

Payroll 27357 33888 33132 ds ds ds 82692 89020 89281

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 3 3 3 3 1 2 3 6 5Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 6 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1Employees ds ds ds NA ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds NA ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 13 14 13 14 14 13 12 11 11

Employees 48 66 56 ds ds ds ds ds 30Payroll 1763 2303 2181 1932 2053 1613 1449 ds 1423

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 17 12 13 13 14 8 9 9 9Employees 677 ds ds ds ds 334 ds ds 437

Payroll 35345 ds ds ds ds 26481 ds ds 32326Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 31 25 23 25 22 21 22 25 24Employees ds 296 312 303 321 97 103 138 140

Payroll 25058 23233 25630 27543 27156 9938 10805 13015 13596

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 7 8 9 8 18 13 12 11Employees ds ds ds ds ds 582 ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds 1790 25545 ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 16 17 21 22 23 23 20 27 23Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 335 344

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 15845 17748

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this state than thenational average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Pacific Regionbull Californiabull Oregonbull Washington

Commercial boat Photo Pacific Fishery Management Council

36

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oPacific Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe Pacific Region includes California Oregon and Washington Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the Pacific Fishery Management Council (PFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under four fishery management plans (FMPs)

Pacific Region FMPs

bull Coastal pelagic species

bull Pacific coast salmon

bull Pacific coast groundfish

bull West Coast highly migratory species

Three of the stocks or stock complexes covered in these FMPs were listed as overfished in 2016 Pacific ocean perch yelloweye rockfish and Pacific bluefin tuna Three stockscomplexes were subject to overfishing in 2016 coho salmon (Puget Sound Hood Canal) Pacific bluefin tuna (Pacific) and swordfish (Eastern Pacific) Also in 2016 three stocks of Chinook salmon (Columbia River Basin Upper River Summer Washington Coast Willapa Bay Fall Natural and Washington Coast Grays Harbor Fall) and one stock of coho salmon (Washington Coast Hoh which is prosecuted by both US and international fleets) were removed from the overfishing list

Conservative management techniques are employed in the Pacific Regionrsquos fisheries For example the Pacific groundfish and salmon fisheries are subject to weak stock management where access to the surplus of healthier stocks that can be harvested is often restricted to protect weaker stocks with which they commingle in the ocean These weaker stocks include seven rebuilding groundfish stocks salmon (listed under the Endangered Species Act) and other non-listed stocks that constrain the fishery

Salmon management is further complicated by the need to ensure equal allocation of harvest among diverse user groups and coordination with other entities that have jurisdiction over various aspects of salmon management Decades of habitat modification hatchery practices harvest and growing competition for water have affected the viability of salmon stocks and made them more vulnerable to adverse environmental conditions These

conditions include the prolonged drought and adverse ocean conditions experienced in recent years Low returns of salmon to the Klamath River in 2006 and to the Sacramento River in 2008 and 2009 resulted in unprecedented closures of ocean and in-river fisheries leading to federal disaster relief for affected entities

Coastal pelagic species (CPS) are highly variable environmentally sensitive stocks that provide food for marine mammals birds and fish These species include Pacific sardine northern anchovy Pacific and jack mackerel and market squid Of these species Pacific sardine is the most commonly targeted CPS finfish and is managed according to an innovative harvest control rule allowable harvest varies with sea surface temperature Because the geographic range of sardine tends to expand with abundance harvest allocation between the California and Pacific Northwest fisheries is an ongoing and dynamic issue The annual guideline for sardine harvest is allocated coast-wide on a seasonal basis Recent decreases in harvest guideline limits have contributed to the development of an intense derby fishery

Catch limits for Pacific halibut a transboundary fish stock are set in January by the International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) This bilateral commission between the United States and Canada determines total allowable catch levels (TACs) for Pacific halibut that will be caught in the United States and Canadian exclusive economic zones (EEZs) After catch levels are determined the PFMC develops a catch-sharing plan for tribal and non-tribal (ie commercial and recreational) fisheries in the federal waters of California Oregon and Washington Pacific Halibut is targeted only with hook gear but there are allocations to the trawl sector for bycatch including individual bycatch quotas in the Pacific groundfish trawl IFQ

The Highly Migratory Species (HMS) FMP includes tunas billfish and pelagic sharks as managed species The albacore surface hook-and-line fishery is by far the most economically important commercial HMS fishery followed by the drift gillnet fishery for swordfish and thresher shark HMS is also a very important component of the catch for the Pacific Regionrsquos commercial passenger fishing vessel fleet and the private recreational boat fleet

37

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Pacific Region | Regional Summary

Catch Share ProgramsThe Pacific Region has two catch share programs 1) the Pacific Sablefish Permit Stacking Program and 2) the Pacific Groundfish Trawl Rationalization Program The landings revenues for these programs totaled more than $47 million in 2015 Following are descriptions of these catch share programs and their performance

Pacific Sablefish Permit Stacking Program This program was implemented in 2001 and allows vessels to stack multiple vessel permits on a single vessel The goal of this approach is to improve economic efficiency through rationalization of the fixed gear fleet increase benefits for fishing communities promote equity lessen reallocation effects of previous harvest regulations promote safety and improve product quality and value Results for this program show that in 2015 the number of active vessels and landings decreased compared with the baseline period (average of the 3-year period prior to the start of the program) while inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per vessel increased during 2015

A recent study1 of this fleet demonstrated that after the catch share program was implemented the probability of fishermen taking a fishing trip in high wind conditions decreased 82 This provides evidence that institutional changes can significantly reduce risk-taking behavior and result in safer fisheries

Pacific Trawl Rationalization Program This program was implemented by the PFMC in January 2011 It involves individual fishing quotas (IFQs) for non-whiting groundfish and whiting trawlers delivering to shoreside plants and cooperatives for whiting mothership and catcher processor sectors Program objectives are to provide a mechanism for total catch accounting provide a viable profitable and efficient groundfish fishery promote practices that reduce bycatch and discard mortality while minimizing ecological impacts increase operational flexibility minimize adverse effects from the IFQ program on fishing communities and other fisheries promote measurable economic and employment benefits through the seafood catching processing distribution and support sectors of the industry provide quality product for the consumer and increase safety in the fishery

As required by law the council is reviewing the trawl catch share program five years after implementation According to findings from the draft public review the economic performance of the program has been strong Net revenue per active catcher vessel increased 65 relative to the pre-catch share period (2009-2010) for the non-whiting groundfish fishery and 400 for the whiting fishery Meanwhile motherships experienced a 62 increase and catcher-processors experienced a 7 decrease in net revenue

Results for this program show that in 2015 landings inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per vessel increased compared to the baseline period However the number of active vessels decreased during this period There was no change in inflation-adjusted revenue Expanded observer coverage and dockside monitoring which were implemented with the catch share program coupled with long-term adherence to catch targets and improved stock assessment models have to varying degrees also contributed to improved fishery performance For example in the first three years of catch shares the total catch of rebuilding stocks (of which twomdashcanary rockfish and petrale solemdashare now declared rebuilt) was 50 lower than in the previous three years

Policy UpdatesIn September 2016 the council decided to manage darkblotched rockfish and Pacific ocean perch (POP) caught as bycatch by the at-sea whiting sectors using set-asides instead of total catch limits Exceeding a set-aside does not result in an automatic fishery closure and thus mitigates the risk of the Pacific whiting at-sea sectors not attaining their respective Pacific whiting allocations due to the incidental catch of these two species Importantly this action does not increase the risk of exceeding darkblotched rockfish or POP ACLs because NMFS was given in-season authority to automatically close the fishery if species-specific set-aside amounts plus buffer amounts were expected to be exceeded The final rule was published on January 8 2018

In April 20162 the PFMC recommended closing the directed non-tribal Pacific sardine fishery for the 2016-2017 season due to the estimated biomass (106137 metric tons) falling below the 150000 metric tons

1 Pfeiffer Lisa and Trevor Gratz The effect of rights-based fisheries management on risk taking and fishing safety (March 8 2016) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (10) 2615-2620 DOI 101073pnas15094561132 httpswwwdfwstateorusagencycommissionminutes1606_JuneExhibit20I_Attachment201_Agenda20Item20Summarypdf

38

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oPacific Region | Regional Summary

required for the directed commercial fishery to open This decision continued the closure implemented for the 2015-2016 season Although the directed commercial fishery remains closed the PFMC allowed up to 8000 metric tons of sardine to be harvested to account for small amounts taken as incidental catch in other fisheries live bait harvest tribal harvest and research

At the April 2017 meeting the PFMC recommended closing the directed commercial sardine fishery for the third year in a row based on the severely depleted biomass which declined 18 from the previous year The Pacific sardine biomass which is prone to significant natural fluctuation due to large-scale changes in oceanic temperature declined over 90 between 2006 and 2017 from approximately 1 million metric tons to 86586 metric tons

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key Pacific Region Commercial Species

bull Albacore tunabull Crabbull Flatfishbull Hakebull Other shellfish

bull Rockfishbull Sablefishbull Salmonbull Shrimpbull Squid

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending

generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers3

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 commercial fishing in California generated the largest employment impacts in the region 124800 jobs Income impacts ($49 billion) sales impacts ($228 billion) and value-added impacts ($81 billion) were also largest in California The importers sector in California generated the highest employment impacts of any

3 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)

39

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Pacific Region | Regional Summary

state-level sector 55100 jobs The importers sector in California also generated the highest state-level income impacts ($27 billion) sales impacts ($17 billion) and value-added impacts in the region ($52 billion)

Landings TrendsLandings revenue increased in the Pacific Region (up $1312 million or 24) from 2015 to 2016 largely due to the increase in crab landings revenue ($1117 million) during this period A fishery disaster had been declared for the Dungeness crab fishery in California and for the Quileute tribe in Washington State for the 2015 to 2016 season because of the closures that were implemented due to high levels of domoic acid a neurotoxin As these fisheries re-opened landings bounced back to their highest level since 2013

Whiting was another bright spot for the West Coast region with 2016 landings and landings revenue up 67 and 93 respectively relative to 2015 While the 2016 whiting total allowable catch was unchanged from 2015 the major difference in performance between the two years was a higher utilization rate of the TAC The 2015 utilization rate (474) of the whiting TAC was the fisheriesrsquo lowest in the last decade Reasons cited by industry for the 2015 performance included the unusual dispersed distribution of the fish later in the season after the at-sea fleet returned from Alaska possibly due to anomalously warm ocean conditions as well as less-favorable market conditions4

Squid landings revenue also bounced back to a degree in 2016 (up $158 million) but only because global supply shortages due to the strong El Nintildeo event from 2015 to 2016 caused prices to surge 60 in California Squid landings were essentially flat relative to 2015 landings Prior to the most recent El Nintildeo event squid had been Californiarsquos largest fishery by value and volume in 2014 and had represented 80 of US squid landings and 64 of US squid revenues in recent years In 2016 California represented only 58 and 40 of US squid landings and landings revenue respectively Similarly revenues from albacore landings on the West Coast were up 28 relative to 2015 despite a 7 drop in landings Tight inventories drove albacore prices up 39 in 2016

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Shrimp (178 143 in real terms)bull Crab (79 56 in real terms)bull Albacore tuna (75 53 in real terms)From 2015bull Crab (106)bull Hake (93)bull Squid (65)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull There were no decreases from 2007 (in

nominal dollar values)From 2015bull Shrimp (-45)bull Salmon (-16)bull Rockfish (-10)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Shrimp (108)bull Rockfish (41)bull Hake (23)From 2015bull Crab (177)bull Hake (67)bull Other shellfish (31)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Salmon (-25)bull Squid (-23)bull Flatfish (-22)From 2015bull Shrimp (-48)bull Salmon (-28)bull Rockfish (-12)

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the Pacific Region totaled $6889 million in 2016 This number represented a 50 increase from 2007 (a 31 increase in real terms after adjusting

4 httpswwwfederalregistergovdocuments201605162016-11329magnuson-stevens-act-provisions-fisheries-off-west-coast-states-pacific-coast-groundfish-fishery

40

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oPacific Region | Regional Summary

for inflation) and a 24 increase from 2015 Landings revenue was highest in Washington ($2875 million) followed by California ($2161 million) Shellfish landings revenue made up 67 of total revenue in the region Crab ($2167 million) and other shellfish ($1565 million) had the highest landings revenue in the Pacific Region in 2016 Together they accounted for 54 of total landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 shrimp (178 143 in real terms) crab (79 56 in real terms) and albacore tuna (75 53 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases There were no decreases in revenue from 2007 to 2016 (in nominal dollar values) From 2015 to 2016 crab (106) hake (93) and squid (65) had the largest revenue increases while shrimp (-45) salmon (-16) and rockfish (-10) had the largest revenue decreases

LandingsIn 2016 Pacific Region commercial fishermen landed 9378 million pounds of finfish and shellfish a 15 decrease from 2007 and a 26 increase from 2015 Hake had the highest landings volume in the Pacific Region accounting for 60 of landed weight

From 2007 to 2016 shrimp (108) rockfish (41) and hake (23) had the largest landings increases while salmon (-25) squid (-23) and flatfish (-22) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 crab (177) hake (67) and other shellfish (31) had the largest landings increases while shrimp (-48) salmon (-28) and rockfish (-12) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 other shellfish ($1012 per pound) received the highest Pacific Region ex-vessel price Landings of hake ($008 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price From 2007 to 2016 albacore tuna (93 69 in real terms) squid (79 56 in real terms) and salmon (57 37 in real terms) had the largest price increases while rockfish (-10 -22 in real terms) had the largest price decreases From 2015 to 2016 squid (58) albacore tuna (39) and salmon (17) had the largest price increases while crab (-25) and other shellfish (-13) had the largest price decreases

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups

Key Pacific Region Recreational Species

bull Albacore amp other tunas

bull Barracuda bass amp bonito

bull Croakersbull Flatfish

bull Greenlingsbull Rockfishes amp

scorpionfishesbull Salmonbull Sculpinsbull Surfperches

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities5 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietors income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses

5 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

41

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Pacific Region | Regional Summary

a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

The greatest employment impacts from expenditures on saltwater recreational fishing in the Pacific Region were generated in California (17100 jobs) followed by Washington (4600 jobs) The largest sales impacts were observed in California ($21 billion) followed by Washington ($5421 million) The biggest income impacts were generated in California ($8194 million) followed by Washington ($2094 million) The greatest value-added impacts were in California ($13 billion) followed by Washington ($3396 million)

Recreational fishing expenditures (on both fishing trips and durable equipment purchases) across the Pacific Region in 2016 totaled about $23 billion Trip expenditures totaled more than $526 million with a large portion coming from trips in the shore (35) and for-hire (33) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $18 billion with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($8802 million)

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Greenlings (98)bull Rockfishes amp scorpionfishes (45)bull Surfperches (2)From 2015bull Croakers (29)bull Barracuda bass amp bonito (19)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Croakers (-72)bull Salmon (-61)bull Sculpins (-7)From 2015bull Albacore amp other tunas (-61)bull Salmon (-58)bull Surfperches (-31)

Fishing TripsIn 2016 recreational fishermen took 52 million fishing

trips in the Pacific Region This number represented a 16 decrease from 2007 and an 11 decrease from 2015 The largest proportions of trips were taken in the shore mode (60) and private boat mode (26) States with the highest number of recorded trips in the Pacific Region were California (35 million trips) and Washington (1 million trips)

ParticipationIn 2016 there were 12 million recreational anglers who fished in the Pacific Region This number represented a 26 decrease from 2007 and an 8 decrease from 2015 These anglers were Pacific Region residents from either a coastal county (71) or non-coastal county (29)

Harvest and ReleaseOf the Pacific Regions key species and species groups rockfishes and scorpionfishes (42 million fish) barracuda bass and bonito (195 million fish) and surfperches (18 million fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 greenlings (98) rockfishes and scorpionfishes (45) and surfperches (2) had the largest increases in catch while croakers (-72) salmon (-61) and sculpins (-7) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 croakers (29) and barracuda bass and bonito (19) had the largest increases in catch while albacore and other tunas (-61) salmon (-58) and surfperches (-31) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries 67

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a states economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy8 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient

6 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)7 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)8 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

42

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oPacific Region | Regional Summary

(CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average

The Bureau of Labor Statistics suppressed the CFLQ value for Washington for 2015 Of the remaining states Oregon had the highest CFLQ at 352 California had a CFLQ value of 061

In 2015 12 million employer establishments operated throughout the entire Pacific Region (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed about 184 million workers and had a total annual payroll of $11 trillion The combined gross state product of Washington Oregon and California was approximately $32 trillion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 the Pacific Region had 240 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 30 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $176 million (this remained unchanged in real terms from 2007) There were 153 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 9 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 8330 workers (this remained unchanged from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $4264 million (this remained unchanged in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of seafood product preparation and packaging establishments was located in California (217) followed by Washington (144) and Oregon (32)

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 271 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the three states that make up the Pacific Region (a 2 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $208 million (an 18 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 234 employer firms in

the retail sales of seafood sector (an 8 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 1668 workers (an 18 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $443 million (a 21 increase in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of retail seafood establishments was located in California (391) followed by Washington (74) and Oregon (40)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 491 employer firms in the wholesale sales of seafood sector in the Pacific Region in 2015 (a 10 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 5443 workers and had a total annual payroll of $2654 million The greatest number of wholesale seafood establishments was located in California (349) followed by Washington (118) and Oregon (24)

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of the Pacific Regions economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons However these sectors play an important role in the regional economy For example the ship and boat building sector accounted for $9444 million in payroll in 2015

43

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Pacific Region | Regional Summary

Tables | Pacific Region

44

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oPacific Region | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Pacific Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Landings Revenue Jobs Sales Income Value

Added Jobs Sales Income Value Added

California 216139 124803 22776152 4911619 8141191 14900 1225433 459683 632590Oregon 151707 16162 1190017 415939 583687 14100 817764 339604 454934Washington 287543 55325 7463634 2003817 3047760 21345 1547501 638452 865335

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 459772 500447 501938 566579 729785 674465 814834 776098 557669 688918Finfish amp Other 177529 218718 170610 206161 267963 252144 282370 265357 203535 227249Shellfish 282243 281729 331327 360418 461821 422321 532464 510742 354134 461669

Key SpeciesAlbacore tuna 21612 28845 27541 28780 43347 45827 41930 32792 29387 37744Crab 121136 107107 123865 132843 182085 176880 249579 199222 105053 216733Flatfish 16266 18016 16716 12828 13377 13492 17417 15664 16751 17791Hake (whiting) 32603 58492 14104 27316 52869 47054 61321 58630 24109 46639Other shellfish 114639 122905 133940 134460 172541 141221 166551 177487 137035 156483Rockfish 7541 9257 8974 9226 9446 9421 9872 9820 10531 9526Sablefish 20984 27279 34481 35977 44873 28108 19559 24178 28719 31346Salmon 34508 27548 25549 49534 54267 48197 77754 71416 48157 40453Shrimp 17298 25132 16594 21941 40638 40326 42614 61100 87556 48139Squid 29169 26585 56928 71173 66557 63894 73720 72932 24491 40315

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 1109222 1091673 899043 1065499 1176780 1070065 1255594 1208811 747113 937751Finfish amp Other 903860 908242 583273 652515 758522 721080 850058 816757 526113 719615Shellfish 205362 183431 315771 412984 418258 348985 405537 392053 221000 218136

Key SpeciesAlbacore tuna 25483 24507 27055 25477 24284 30638 28471 27247 24821 23010Crab 51888 45075 59158 61668 66518 52860 87157 52133 22745 62945Flatfish 33828 37852 41192 33785 25959 24779 29106 24188 24861 26508Hake (whiting) 454533 531277 253053 355216 496363 347171 505614 574921 333290 558047Other shellfish 17513 17357 17513 16446 17072 14819 16509 17107 11805 15466Rockfish 7447 9469 10458 11038 9910 10406 10794 10720 11913 10489Sablefish 11630 12978 15822 15055 14139 11580 9159 9633 11377 11799Salmon 25050 19503 34132 31107 42224 24619 56892 37187 26134 18757Shrimp 26497 35799 33456 46191 66686 66319 71505 93150 105324 55017Squid 109464 85200 205643 288678 267983 214988 230365 229664 81127 84708

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Albacore tuna 085 118 102 113 178 150 147 120 118 164Crab 233 238 209 215 274 335 286 382 462 344Flatfish 048 048 041 038 052 054 060 065 067 067Hake (whiting) 007 011 006 008 011 014 012 010 007 008Other shellfish 655 708 765 818 1011 953 1009 1038 1161 1012Rockfish 101 098 086 084 095 091 091 092 088 091Sablefish 180 210 218 239 317 243 214 251 252 266Salmon 138 141 075 159 129 196 137 192 184 216Shrimp 065 070 050 048 061 061 060 066 083 087Squid 027 031 028 025 025 030 032 032 030 048

45

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Pacific Region | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Pacific Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars trips)Trips Jobs Sales Income Value Added

California 3532 17050 2123040 819382 1305411Oregon 684 3048 296940 131937 192078Washington 1008 4597 542066 209416 339605

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip Expenditures Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFor-HirePrivate BoatShoreTotal

Total State Trip and Durable

176426164271186120526817

Goods Expenditures

Fishing TackleOther EquipmentBoat ExpensesVehicle ExpensesSecond Home ExpensesTotal Durable Expenditures

426331215139880157252846

393617784082305225

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 1216 1082 1384 1167 1052 1358 1321 1235 935 833Non-Coastal 370 320 379 381 342 378 426 428 344 340Out-of-State NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 1587 1402 1763 1548 1394 1736 1748 1664 1279 1173

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 517 415 442 457 681 689 753 1085 881 759Private 1860 1517 2114 1727 1833 1971 2070 1991 1876 1341Shore 3818 3859 4345 3770 3791 4973 4859 4351 3131 3124Total Trips 6195 5791 6901 5954 6305 7633 7682 7427 5888 5224

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Albacore amp other tunas

H 113 59 90 80 54 151 108 188 272 109R 2 2 2 0 0 2 1 4 8 1

Barracuda bass amp bonito

H 534 411 387 389 425 354 153 384 367 276R 1488 1127 1236 998 747 792 1173 1727 1277 1674

CroakersH 758 355 499 248 132 302 201 168 110 151R 301 242 290 270 93 185 229 148 123 148

FlatfishesH 258 368 367 416 607 559 711 992 404 357R 325 351 250 277 221 295 453 341 241 200

GreenlingsH 188 164 178 194 276 309 362 393 458 419R 156 137 172 199 288 294 268 261 255 261

Rockfishes amp scorpionfishes

H 2467 1935 2230 2223 2904 3448 3904 4045 3884 3483R 446 367 386 466 576 652 903 838 788 734

Salmon13H 213 47 108 111 154 224 244 356 198 83R NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

SculpinsH 49 68 59 52 95 70 66 60 62 58R 208 218 198 199 234 226 300 200 187 180

SurfperchesH 875 937 788 721 1075 1279 1060 1244 1477 1072R 850 714 670 383 874 1144 979 1162 1072 681

1 NA = data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but whether an angler is a resident of a region is not specified2 In this table rsquo0rsquo = 0-999 fish3 Salmon harvest estimates exclude release mortality

Tables | California

48

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oCalifornia | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the California Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 124803 22776152 4911619 8141191 14900 1225433 459683 632590

Commercial Harvesters 4093 431853 146717 215772 4093 431853 146717 215772Seafood Processors amp Dealers 4586 526972 195405 259284 1707 196155 72736 96514

Importers 55117 17033566 2729954 5192577 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 11051 1750326 567718 793142 582 92256 29923 41805

Retail 49956 3033436 1271825 1680416 8518 505169 210306 278500

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 127580 120861 159253 187263 222160 243963 266488 253768 129143 216139

Finfish amp Other 51037 48671 47738 45558 59289 57103 66416 61163 54526 50101Shellfish 76543 72190 111515 141704 162871 186860 200071 192605 74617 166038

Key SpeciesCrab 28626 24227 32508 43016 53762 88207 91851 70563 20467 85620Pacific sardine 8218 7575 5544 4366 4398 4249 1510 2003 343 95Rockfish 4924 5781 5330 5453 5644 5170 5748 5604 5797 5400Sablefish 4873 6224 9765 11491 15121 8988 7047 8945 8870 8804Salmon 7835 6 NA 1215 5096 12850 22957 12127 8058 5277Sea urchins 5400 6550 7806 7413 8102 8320 9832 9057 6879 7269Shrimp 4064 5696 5462 4951 8598 8492 9520 11791 13769 11107Spiny lobster 6916 8008 7934 11386 12972 13749 13842 18238 15806 13731Squid 29131 26477 56877 71165 66546 63886 73701 72903 24458 39194Swordfish 3127 2365 1932 2203 3350 2090 2699 3049 3628 3717

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 384826 323884 376053 439440 409837 353875 364790 361290 186418 176403

Finfish amp Other 259139 224763 148478 120700 108999 102261 90128 98771 89788 59908Shellfish 125687 99121 227575 318740 300838 251614 274661 262518 96630 116495

Key SpeciesCrab 12393 9845 16660 23352 22206 27589 33094 20888 5412 28135Pacific sardine 178480 126945 82842 73814 60993 50660 15636 17112 3724 913Rockfish 3136 3933 3984 3949 3450 3457 3862 3555 3239 2530Sablefish 3240 3507 5089 5501 5646 3916 3291 3960 4033 3858Salmon 1743 1 NA 255 1133 2862 4337 2558 1339 709Sea urchins 11131 10283 12205 11230 11465 11443 12945 11833 8106 5885Shrimp 2015 3011 3596 4522 8217 7255 9712 9873 9443 4818Spiny lobster 663 741 706 716 751 876 764 951 768 680Squid 109150 84071 205278 288497 267890 214867 230061 229466 80968 81751Swordfish 1210 1168 898 815 1365 887 1174 1252 1358 1364

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Crab 231 246 195 184 242 320 278 338 378 304Pacific sardine 005 006 007 006 007 008 010 012 009 010Rockfish 157 147 134 138 164 150 149 158 179 213Sablefish 150 177 192 209 268 229 214 226 220 228Salmon 450 416 NA 476 450 449 529 474 602 744Sea urchins 049 064 064 066 071 073 076 077 085 124Shrimp 202 189 152 109 105 117 098 119 146 231Spiny lobster 1044 108 1124 1591 1727 1569 1811 1917 2059 2019Squid 027 031 028 025 025 030 032 032 030 048Swordfish 258 203 215 270 246 236 230 244 267 272

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

49

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

California | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of California Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impactsby Fishing Mode

For-Hire 1818 258084 97532 147866Private Boat 554 92377 28333 49784Shore 1608 224305 73732 128216

Total Durable Expenditures 13070 1548274 619785 979545Total State Economic Impacts 17050 2123040 819382 1305411

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip Expenditures EquipmentFor-Hire 136408 Fishing TacklePrivate Boat 61998 Other EquipmentShore 148056 Boat ExpensesTotal 346462 Vehicle Expenses

Second Home ExpensesTotal Durable Expenditures

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures

Durable Goods Expenditures327770163085528338168135

011873271533789

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 913 812 992 863 722 1024 964 893 591 576Non-Coastal 215 177 220 230 190 222 264 263 182 189Out-of-State 82 206 221 183 215 87 94 121 96 77Total Anglers 1210 1195 1433 1277 1127 1334 1322 1277 869 842

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 373 305 308 334 554 557 613 929 727 632Private 843 640 681 690 683 800 786 785 676 522Shore 3072 3113 3599 3024 3045 4227 4113 3605 2385 2378Total Trips 4288 4058 4588 4048 4282 5584 5512 5319 3788 3532

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)14

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Albacore amp other tunas

H 28 13 23 11 9 37 32 65 158 24R 2 2 2 lt 1 lt 1 2 1 4 8 lt 1

Barracuda bass amp bonito2

H 534 411 387 389 425 354 153 384 367 276R 1488 1127 1236 998 747 792 1173 1727 1277 1674

CroakersH 758 355 499 248 132 302 201 168 110 151R 301 242 290 270 93 185 229 148 123 148

FlatfishesH 185 298 300 351 541 490 640 921 333 280R 279 303 199 231 175 248 405 294 193 153

GreenlingsH 70 48 63 60 123 143 176 229 286 250R 74 53 84 92 169 183 160 169 153 156

Rockfishes amp scorpionfishes2

H 1919 1445 1670 1639 2379 2871 3229 3326 3000 2650R 396 311 320 383 506 583 823 752 674 635

Salmon3H 48 lt 1 lt 1 15 50 124 116 75 38 38R NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

SculpinsH 19 37 27 19 62 39 37 32 34 30R 58 69 50 47 82 74 147 48 35 29

SurfperchesH 623 685 537 470 823 1027 809 992 1226 817R 690 554 510 223 714 984 819 1002 912 520

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish2 This species may not be equivalent to species with similar names listed in the commercial tables3 Salmon harvest estimates exclude release mortality4 NA = not available

50

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oCalifornia | Marine Economy

2015 California State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 3117591 (128) 908120 (118) 14325377 (115) 85695 (137) 132114 (136) 249162 (139) 061

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 121 139 159 184 187 151 157 164 169Receipts 10842 11460 10852 9695 9788 9283 9866 11112 12978

Seafood salesretail

Firms 222 210 202 203 209 236 218 227 221Receipts 19703 19892 17095 19021 18006 18238 18581 17055 17896

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 49 45 47 48 48 41 44 53 48Employees 2229 2024 2167 1820 1842 1668 1871 1799 1661

Payroll 75886 65215 69529 62480 60411 52977 57603 60762 59829

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 300 278 289 314 404 275 320 341 349Employees 4429 3321 3183 3223 3505 3441 3671 3912 4170

Payroll 159672 132139 128813 137810 149302 173959 181698 175927 201903

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 182 161 153 158 157 149 155 167 170Employees 1004 932 976 985 1088 1043 1119 1124 1208

Payroll 21224 20585 21785 22718 25168 24221 26702 28044 28437

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 29 28 30 25 21 22 24 30 34Employees ds ds ds 554 395 ds ds ds 851

Payroll ds ds ds 30431 24708 ds ds ds 70978

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 51 43 41 54 51 45 34 43 56Employees 1643 ds ds 2562 2464 2431 2073 2467 2554

Payroll 116628 ds ds 236235 256962 236423 218054 187383 235546Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 13 5 5 3 2 2 4 5 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 276 277 276 270 269 251 250 249 258

Employees 2680 2652 2514 2390 2401 2237 2199 2332 2439Payroll 80216 85315 78890 80631 82958 71777 72737 79840 84427

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 56 61 62 63 71 38 64 64 67Employees 22395 22086 17428 18449 18812 18759 ds ds 18859

Payroll 1484308 1453281 1211572 1273268 1333805 1351874 ds ds 1761284Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 39 40 39 41 45 35 36 37 38Employees 858 815 804 765 760 800 805 634 587

Payroll 63610 65225 61720 58899 62065 61166 67665 59927 60228

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 18 17 19 21 19 59 31 33 30Employees 443 256 345 435 508 ds 651 535 570

Payroll 30001 23316 26889 37560 41688 ds 52401 33599 40887

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 136 136 123 117 108 120 113 108 103Employees 9250 11630 10483 9720 9165 12681 12651 9814 11379

Payroll 433846 477300 460239 448338 434449 544819 537438 534787 583717

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Tables | Oregon

52

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oOregon | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Oregon Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 16162 1190017 415939 583687 14100 817764 339604 454934

Commercial Harvesters 4795 287124 119939 168205 4795 287124 119939 168205Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1522 144852 55632 72687 1431 136197 52308 68344

Importers 979 302502 48482 92216 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 572 76670 26009 34885 399 53458 18135 24323

Retail 8293 378870 165878 215695 7475 340985 149223 194063

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 97298 103042 106959 106378 148354 128222 179215 158080 113990 151707

Finfish amp Other 47589 56912 52750 58730 76718 72329 81445 78214 60860 64925Shellfish 49709 46130 54210 47648 71636 55893 97770 79866 53130 86782

Key SpeciesAlbacore tuna 9468 10666 10191 12425 18766 15168 16085 11023 9212 12502Crab 38208 29168 42413 32757 44696 29189 71208 48149 11935 55737Flatfish 7930 9163 8468 6861 6779 7315 9854 8651 9765 10716Hake (whiting) 6501 6830 3783 5414 16518 14611 20405 18274 7146 8601Oysters 1847 2748 4506 3317 1869 1661 1798 1774 NA 3615Pacific sardine 4551 5665 5291 5252 3192 8979 6299 3522 813 0Rockfish 2002 2610 2500 2520 2473 2661 3023 3246 3744 3589Sablefish 9494 13737 15919 15069 17351 11530 7595 8076 12807 15086Salmon 4647 4166 3546 7698 6737 6950 12422 20115 11864 8311Shrimp 9488 14056 6994 11313 24901 24848 24430 29605 40634 25245

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 253543 195688 199458 201974 274533 296091 339589 291655 194575 209486

Finfish amp Other 216134 155837 154147 153588 208445 237822 265454 227318 138601 153909Shellfish 37410 39851 45310 48386 66088 58269 74136 64337 55974 55578

Key SpeciesAlbacore tuna 10468 8876 10082 10703 9682 9938 10209 8767 7574 7250Crab 17007 13875 21848 15817 17240 8681 26016 11910 2284 15702Flatfish 19697 23842 26047 22226 15957 15322 18965 15955 16722 18640Hake (whiting) 81481 55511 53466 57017 142092 102651 160098 161589 88728 98003Oysters 197 162 1127 829 467 415 449 443 NA 743Pacific sardine 90037 49298 45902 44743 23479 91459 57022 16938 4688 2Rockfish 2905 3820 4207 4533 3819 3918 4745 5293 6628 6324Sablefish 5349 6514 7219 6269 5074 4739 3840 3293 5002 5502Salmon 1370 1860 2311 2765 2386 1918 3505 6373 3142 1838Shrimp 20027 25433 22085 31516 48276 49054 47535 51835 53457 35344

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Albacore tuna 090 120 101 116 194 153 158 126 122 172Crab 225 210 194 207 259 336 274 404 522 355Flatfish 040 038 033 031 042 048 052 054 058 057Hake (whiting) 008 012 007 009 012 014 013 011 008 009Oysters 940 1696 400 400 400 400 400 400 NA 487Pacific sardine 005 011 012 012 014 010 011 021 017 018Rockfish 069 068 059 056 065 068 064 061 056 057Sablefish 178 211 221 240 342 243 198 245 256 274Salmon 339 224 153 278 282 362 354 316 378 452Shrimp 047 055 032 036 052 051 051 057 076 071

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

53

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Oregon | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Oregon Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts byFishing Mode

For-Hire 264 31161 11928 16950Private Boat 394 37694 14070 22495Shore 153 14523 5327 8628

Total Durable Expenditures 2237 213562 100612 144005Total State Economic Impacts 3048 296940 131937 192078

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 19024Private Boat 43426Shore 15352Total 77801

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 45798Other Equipment 25522Boat Expenses 77351Vehicle Expenses 60103Second Home Expenses 3936Total Durable Expenditures 212711

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 290512

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 86 79 85 82 82 86 89 92 90 86Non-Coastal 130 121 129 125 125 129 134 137 135 129Out-of-State 15 14 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 15Total Anglers 232 213 229 223 222 230 239 246 241 230

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 61 48 55 51 51 58 64 68 71 63Private 401 357 402 385 380 402 424 440 416 388Shore 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 233Total Trips 695 638 690 669 664 693 721 741 720 684

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)12

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

BaitfishesH 221 221 221 223 221 220 220 221 221 220R 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125

FlatfishesH 22 20 16 14 15 17 18 15 17 18R 6 8 9 5 5 5 6 5 5 6

GreenlingsH 94 92 90 99 108 120 142 119 130 114R 67 70 72 82 88 85 90 74 85 84

RockfishesH 280 266 317 332 251 278 361 376 516 443

22 30 36 44 34 33 42 42 75 56

Salmon3 H 68 14 91 23 24 35 45 118 38 13R NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

SculpinsH 15 16 16 16 16 15 14 12 13 13R 58 58 58 61 61 61 63 60 60 61

SturgeonH 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12R 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25

SurfperchesH 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118R 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish2 NA = not available3 Salmon estimates exclude release mortality

54

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oOregon | Marine Economy

2015 Oregon State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 269901 (11) 112393 (15) 1498727 (12) 7101 (11) 11227 (12) 21652 (12) 352

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms ds 19 15 15 16 14 11 11 12Receipts ds 957 466 510 467 346 319 484 1088

Seafood salesretail

Firms 11 16 12 15 16 11 ds 16 15Receipts 1210 2101 1140 1907 1896 1600 ds 1036 841

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 22 23 20 21 22 18 19 20 20Employees 819 850 812 806 805 934 907 980 916

Payroll 27394 27616 26202 27007 32438 31970 37265 39290 41181

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 18 18 19 22 27 21 19 22 24Employees ds ds ds ds ds 180 189 192 196

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds 7602 8065 8601 9121

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 23 21 23 21 20 18 20 23 25Employees 171 178 151 162 163 126 147 170 181

Payroll 3185 3370 3515 3651 3613 2851 4238 4440 4951

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 13 8 9 8 8 8 7 8 8Employees 476 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 437

Payroll 25206 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 40746

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 5 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Employees ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 38 37 33 30 33 32 34 34 36

Employees 138 106 109 102 102 119 104 113 119Payroll 3754 2178 2602 2290 2382 3034 3148 3584 3643

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 9 13 13 12 13 5 8 7 7Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 17 20 17 18 18 20 15 15 15Employees 183 200 189 144 152 176 81 67 74

Payroll 11331 11808 10154 9577 9592 12219 6534 3958 3998

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 1 1 3 3 10 5 5 5Employees ds ds ds ds ds 90 ds ds 49

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds 6512 ds ds 3437

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 40 41 35 34 34 33 32 30 29Employees 1441 1692 1886 980 1179 1504 1406 ds 1506

Payroll 47950 74583 90446 42004 55068 77718 79913 ds 94956

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Washington

56

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oWashington | Commercial Fisheries2016 Economic Impacts of the Washington Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)

With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 55325 7463634 2003817 3047760 21345 1547501 638452 865335

Commercial Harvesters 6195 573085 242998 343112 6195 573085 242998 343112Seafood Processors amp Dealers 14355 1528504 574083 759711 2340 249115 93564 123818

Importers 13057 4035021 646689 1230051 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 2317 333504 111737 152447 765 110120 36895 50337

Retail 19401 993521 428309 562439 12046 615181 264996 348069

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 216119 232841 227773 255332 329785 275585 335450 329109 299952 287543Finfish amp Other 60137 69445 62173 84269 102481 96026 100844 90855 73583 78694Shellfish 155981 163396 165600 171063 227305 179560 234606 238254 226368 208849

Key SpeciesClams 56428 64142 72647 73625 88774 69445 83788 83643 75342 82882Crab 54302 53712 48944 57070 83627 59485 86520 80509 72651 75376Hake (whiting) 7121 7249 2334 4105 7183 5882 7452 5431 2563 4509Halibut 8842 7525 4879 5764 6740 6122 4929 6985 6199 6896Mussels 3820 5293 4851 4318 4740 6065 9253 6830 7704 6452Oysters 37437 34794 34993 30370 43021 37576 46378 47555 37507 32353Sablefish 6608 7312 8796 9402 12378 7578 4888 7098 7020 7456Salmon 22026 23376 22003 40622 42434 28398 42376 39174 28235 26866Shrimp 3746 5380 4139 5677 7140 6986 8664 19704 33152 11786Tuna albacore 10439 17225 16390 14575 22253 28440 24745 21177 19961 24769

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 194449 173176 163937 189486 210282 213578 263639 191391 153568 168136Finfish amp Other 152221 128825 121060 143705 159034 174597 207194 126364 85300 122279Shellfish 42228 44351 42877 45782 51248 38982 56445 65027 68268 45856

Key SpeciesClams 3363 4071 4267 3876 4038 3677 3978 4320 4262 3355Crab 22487 21355 20651 22500 27072 16590 28046 19335 15048 19109Hake (whiting) 91272 67159 36378 58900 73494 38524 58696 49654 32977 77808Halibut 2428 2055 1731 1371 1301 1295 1065 1284 1157 1370Mussels 475 593 568 589 547 559 734 579 600 2790Oysters 11189 10258 9386 8650 9389 8143 9420 9329 5911 5748Sablefish 3035 2954 3514 3277 3410 2916 2006 2345 2317 2391Salmon 21938 17641 31821 28086 38706 19839 49050 28256 21654 16211Shrimp 4455 7355 7775 10153 10193 10009 14259 31441 42423 14855Tuna albacore 13129 14801 16112 13148 13209 19275 17552 18039 17133 15500

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Clams 1678 1576 1703 1899 2198 1889 2106 1936 1768 2470Crab 241 252 237 254 309 359 308 416 483 394Hake (whiting) 008 011 006 007 010 015 013 011 008 006Halibut 364 366 282 420 518 473 463 544 536 503Mussels 805 893 854 733 866 1085 1260 1179 1285 231Oysters 335 339 373 351 458 461 492 510 634 563Sablefish 218 248 250 287 363 260 244 303 303 312Salmon 100 133 069 145 110 143 086 139 130 166Shrimp 084 073 053 056 070 070 061 063 078 079Tuna albacore 080 116 102 111 168 148 141 117 117 160

57

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Washington | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Washington Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impactsby Fishing Mode

For-Hire 242 35333 13478 20196Private Boat 442 71852 20302 35897Shore 206 28890 9153 15626

Total Durable Expenditures 3707 405991 166483 267886Total State Economic Impacts 4597 542066 209416 339605

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 20994Private Boat 58847Shore 22712Total 102554

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 52763Other Equipment 26532Boat Expenses 274468Vehicle Expenses 24608Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 378370

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 480924

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 217 191 307 222 248 248 268 250 253 172Non-Coastal 26 22 30 25 27 27 28 28 28 21Out-of-State 20 17 24 19 21 21 22 22 22 17Total Anglers 262 230 361 266 296 295 318 300 303 210

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 83 62 79 72 76 74 76 88 83 64Private 616 520 1031 652 770 769 860 766 784 431Shore 513 513 513 513 513 513 513 513 513 513Total Trips 1212 1095 1623 1237 1359 1356 1449 1367 1380 1008

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)14

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Baitfishes H 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486 2486

R 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126Flatfishes H 51 50 51 50 51 52 53 55 54 59

R 40 40 42 41 41 41 42 42 42 42Greenlings H 24 24 26 35 46 46 44 45 42 56

R 14 14 16 25 31 25 19 18 17 21Rockfishes2 H 222 179 198 208 229 253 268 298 322 345

R 12 9 13 22 18 18 21 26 23 25Salmon3 H 97 34 16 73 80 65 83 163 123 33

R NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASculpins H 16 15 16 16 17 16 16 16 16 16

R 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91Sharks amp Skates H 5 8 5 4 2 3 3 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1

R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 3Sturgeon34 H NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

R NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASurfperches H 133 134 133 133 133 134 134 134 133 137

R 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 123

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish2 This species may not be equivalent to species with similar names listed in the commercial tables3 Data on sturgeon harvest not available for 2007-2016 Salmon harvest estimates exclude release mortality4 NA = not available

58

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oWashington | Marine Economy

2015 Washington State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 430670 (18) 182913 (24) 2602408 (21) 14926 (24) 23574 (24) 44642 (25) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 63 44 47 39 37 42 42 51 59Receipts 4698 5167 5022 4228 3859 4377 4094 5270 3555

Seafood salesretail

Firms 32 33 42 30 34 42 41 36 35Receipts 1458 1807 2462 1273 2370 1871 3017 2559 2071

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 98 96 86 93 90 90 86 90 85Employees 5249 5893 4860 5296 5387 6118 6224 5945 5753

Payroll 275662 306213 232543 254592 293112 326827 315379 329739 325389

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 127 107 108 105 107 101 116 119 118Employees 1086 996 1103 970 911 1085 999 1098 1077

Payroll 46085 48251 48044 45871 45543 51508 49683 52761 54339

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 50 44 43 47 44 40 35 33 39Employees 244 247 239 282 253 256 266 276 279

Payroll 8001 7947 8324 9098 7786 8210 9069 9938 10865

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 37 24 24 30 28 28 35 38 35Employees 1903 2222 2245 1731 1684 1557 2186 2020 1879

Payroll 136543 168832 168783 130398 132068 126401 170003 163075 162635

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 30 21 25 20 14 12 8 8 8Employees 227 263 305 209 ds ds 200 204 194

Payroll 19692 24843 28897 24711 ds 14014 14892 14991 13981Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 3 4 5 4 2 2 5 4 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1412 1277

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 54346 73134

MarinasEstablishments 114 116 110 117 114 100 110 106 102

Employees 485 573 570 560 517 479 529 530 588Payroll 15623 18931 18811 18783 18364 18038 18914 20348 21944

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 28 25 27 26 32 13 30 29 30Employees 4913 4821 2953 ds 3910 ds ds ds 3966

Payroll 334601 334193 239490 ds 323286 ds ds ds 424469Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 61 76 69 79 78 72 73 71 68Employees 950 1213 1168 1225 1207 ds ds 1297 1176

Payroll 72912 100542 102934 102766 94781 ds ds 101251 88363

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 6 11 11 9 9 48 28 27 23Employees 129 111 118 74 75 1509 181 304 250

Payroll 4631 6359 6437 4662 4937 85042 11894 16449 14278

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 167 169 162 152 135 141 138 131 143Employees 7742 8067 6710 5406 5232 5294 5387 5060 4653

Payroll 354084 402253 312240 284759 276402 290400 273825 262730 265732

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Western Pacific Regionbull Hawaiʻi

Fish flags highlight catch for the day (Lahaina Maui Hawaiʻi) Photo NOAA FisheriesCourtney Beavers

60

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe US Pacific Islands Region includes the state of Hawairsquoi the territories of American Samoa and Guam the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) and the Pacific Remote Island Areas Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (WPFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under five fishery ecosystem plans (FEPs) These plans focus on place-based rather than species- or fishery-based management

Western Pacific Fishery Ecosystem Plans

bull American Samoabull Hawaiʻibull Mariana Archipela-

go (Guam and the CNMI)

bull Pacific Remote Island Areas

bull Western Pacific Pelagics

Because fishery data are limited in most of these areas only information for the Hawairsquoi and Western Pacific Pelagics fisheries is reported here No catch share programs operate in this region

Hawaiʻi FEP NOAA Fisheries the WPFMC and the State of Hawairsquoi collaborate to manage fisheries across the Hawairsquoi Archipelago The major fisheries in Hawairsquoi include trolling for pelagic species such as tuna marlin wahoo and mahimahi deepwater hook-and-line bottom fishing and various forms of net fishing that target nearshore pelagic and reef fish species Under this FEP the Hancock Seamount groundfish complex is currently overfished This fishery has been closed since 1986

Western Pacific Pelagics FEP The management species covered under this FEP include tunas billfishes sharks squids and an assortment of other species These species include mahimahi wahoo moonfish and pomfret caught by the Hawairsquoi longline fishery as well as smaller boats that use diverse gear including trolling handline and traditional fishing methods Of these species bigeye tuna Pacific bluefin tuna swordfish and the Central Western Pacific striped marlin stock are considered subject to overfishing The Central Western Pacific striped marlin stock and Pacific bluefin tuna stock are also listed as overfished

In addition to management by the WPFMC and NOAA Fisheries pelagic fish such as bigeye and yellowfin tunas are managed by two regional fishery management organizations (RFMOs) The Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) has authority to manage pelagic fisheries in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean while the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) manages pelagic fisheries in the Eastern Pacific Ocean Fish species and fisheries under the purview of both RFMOs migrate across national boundaries and between RFMO areas requiring coordinated management Since 2009 the annual bigeye tuna catch limit has been recommended by the WCPFC and implemented by NOAA Fisheries for the US longline fleet in the Western and Central Pacific The IATTC establishes the harvest limit for bigeye tuna for US longline vessels longer than 24 meters in the Eastern Tropical Pacific

Policy UpdatesThe Hawairsquoi-based pelagic longline fleet accounts for most of the US longline catch of bigeye tuna in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean Under the authority of the WCPFC Implementation Act the 2016 bigeye catch limit for US longline vessels was set at 3554 metric tons less any overage from 2015 Under this same rule US purse seine vessels fishing in the convention area between the latitudes of 20 degrees north and 20 degrees south were required to have a WCPFC observer on board unless the fishing took place entirely within a single nationrsquos jurisdiction outside the United States Although US purse seine vessels are exempt from this requirement on trips in which fishing occurs in the waters of a single foreign nation those foreign nations generally require US purse seine vessels to carry observers if fishing in their waters The rule also established restrictions on US purse seine vesselsrsquo use of fish aggregating devices (FADs)

On February 3 2016 NOAA Fisheries published a final rule allowing large federally permitted US longline vessels to fish in certain areas of the American Samoa Large Vessel Prohibited Area (LVPA) The LVPA was established in 2002 to prevent the potential for gear conflicts and catch competition between large and small fishing vessels However by 2016 the American Samoa

61

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

pelagic fisheries had changed so that the conditions that led to the establishment of the LVPA appeared no longer to exist The final rule allowed fishing in an additional 16817 square nautical miles of federal waters On March 20 2017 however a US federal judge in American Samoa v National Marine Fisheries Service 16-cv-00095 (DHaw) issued an order vacating the regulations at 50 CFR 665818(b) thus barring large federally permitted US longline vessels from fishing within the LVPA

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key Western Pacific Commercial Species

bull Lobstersbull Mahimahibull Marlinbull Moonfishbull Pomfret

bull Scadbull Snappersbull Swordfishbull Tunasbull Wahoo

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales

made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers1

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 the commercial fishing and seafood industry in Hawairsquoi generated $8671 million in sales impacts $2693 million in income impacts $3918 million in value-added impacts and 9900 full-and part-time jobs The retail sector generated the largest employment impacts across sectors (4100 jobs) The importers sector generated the largest sales impacts ($3184 million) while the retail sector generated the largest income impacts ($1007 million) and the largest value-added impacts ($1312 million)

Landings TrendsHawairsquoi recorded its second highest commercial fisheries landings revenue (both nominally and after adjusting for inflation) on record in 2016 ($1181 million) only slightly bested by 2012 landings revenue Landings

1 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)

62

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

revenue increased (up $147 million or 14) from 2015 to 2016 largely due to the increase in tuna landings revenue (up $69 million or 8) but with broad gains in landings revenue across most key speciesspecies groups Mahimahi marlins scads snappers and wahoo were all up $1 million or more during this period From 2015 to 2016 yellowfin tuna landings revenue increased $5 million while bigeye tuna landings revenue increased $16 million The deep-set longline fishery which set a record number of hooks (511 million hooks) in 2016 accounted for most of this increase2

In recent years Hawairsquoirsquos landings and landings revenue trends largely reflect the growth of the tuna fishery From 2007 to 2016 bigeye tuna dominated Hawairsquoirsquos landings revenue accounting for 55 or more of state landings revenue Overall bigeye tuna landings increased 37 during this period driving landings revenue up 72 (51 in real terms after adjusting for inflation) Yellowfin tuna on average accounted for 10 of state landings revenue from 2007 to 2016 an increase in landings (up 44) that coupled with significantly higher prices (up 36 nominally 19 after adjusting for inflation) led to an almost doubling of yellowfin landings revenue (up 94 nominally 72 in real terms) Overall Hawairsquoi accounted for 57 of US tuna landings revenue in 2016 slightly higher than the average annual rate for the 2007 to 2016 period (54)

Landings RevenueIn 2016 landings revenue totaled about $1181 million a 56 increase from 2007 (a 36 increase in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 14 increase from 2015 Finfish landings revenue accounted for more than 99 of all landings revenue in the region In 2016 tunas ($885 million) swordfish ($48 million) and mahimahi (dolphin) ($45 million) dominated landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 pomfret (140 109 in real terms) marlin (100 75 in real terms) and tunas (73 51 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while lobsters (-69 -73 in real terms) and swordfish (-38 -46 in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 scad (989) snappers (102) and wahoo (41) had the largest revenue increases There

were no revenue decreases from 2015 to 2016

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Pomfret (140 109 in real terms)bull Marlin (100 75 in real terms)bull Tunas (73 51 in real terms)From 2015bull Scad (989)bull Snappers (102)bull Wahoo (41)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Lobsters (-69 -73 in real terms)bull Swordfish (-38 -46 in real terms)From 2015There were no revenue decreases from 2015 to 2016

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Pomfret (97)bull Marlin (69)bull Wahoo (60)From 2015bull Scad (923)bull Snappers (113)bull Wahoo (15)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Lobsters (-58)bull Swordfish (-55)bull Scad (-20)From 2015bull Swordfish (-20)bull Pomfret (-13)bull Marlin (-11)

LandingsIn 2016 Western Pacific Region commercial fishermen landed about 351 million pounds of finfish and shellfish in

2 Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report Pacific Island Pelagic Fisheries 2016

63

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

the state of Hawairsquoi This represents a 21 increase from 2007 and a 1 increase from 2015 Tunas contributed the most to landings accounting for 67 of total landings

From 2007 to 2016 pomfret (97) marlin (69) and wahoo (60) had the largest landings increases while lobsters (-58) swordfish (-55) and scad (-20) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 scad (923) snappers (113) and wahoo (15) had the largest landings increases while swordfish (-20) pomfret (-13) and marlin (-11) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 lobsters ($856 per pound) received the highest ex-vessel price in Hawairsquoi Landings of marlin ($175 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price From 2007 to 2016 mahimahi (dolphin) (51 32 in real terms) swordfish (38 21 in real terms) and snappers (35 18 in real terms) had the largest price increases while lobsters (-28 -37 in real terms) and wahoo (-2 -14 in real terms) had the largest price decreases From 2015 to 2016 marlin (52) pomfret (40) and swordfish (30) had the largest price increases while snappers (-5) had the largest price decrease

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups

Key Western Pacific Recreational Species

bull Blue marlinbull Dolphinfishbull Goatfishesbull Trevallys and other

jacksbull Bigeye and

mackerel scad

bull Skipjack tunabull Smallmouth

bonefishbull Snappersbull Wahoobull Yellowfin tuna

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities3 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

Note that no information is available for durable goods expenditures related to recreational fishing in Hawairsquoi

In 2016 economic impacts from recreational fishing activities in Hawairsquoi generated 854 jobs $1054 million in sales $333 million in income and $547 million in value-added impacts Of the three fishing trip modes trips in the for-hire fishing trips sector had the greatest economic impact accounting for 45 of employment impacts Expenditures for fishing trips in Hawairsquoi in 2016 totaled over $82 million A large portion of these trip expenditures came from trips in the shore (37) and for-hire (35) sectors

3 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

64

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

Fishing Trips In 2016 recreational fishermen took 1 million saltwater fishing trips in the state of Hawairsquoi This number represented a 60 decrease from 2007 and a 28 decrease from 2015 Of all fishing trips 77 were taken from the shore sector

Participation Participation estimates for Hawairsquoi are not available after 2006

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Smallmouth bonefish (7)From 2015bull Snappers (4)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Yellowfin tuna (-69)bull Dolphinfish (mahimahi) (-68)bull Skipjack tuna (-61)From 2015bull Goatfishes (-75)bull Yellowfin tuna (-71)bull Skipjack tuna (-67)

Harvest and Release Of Hawairsquoirsquos key species and species groups scads (bigeye and mackerel) (693000 fish) goatfishes (261000 fish) and jacks (trevallys and other jacks) (234000 fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 smallmouth bonefish (7) had the largest increase in catch while yellowfin tuna (-69) dolphinfish (mahimahi) (-68) and skipjack tuna (-61) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 snappers (4) had the largest increase in catch while goatfishes (-75) yellowfin tuna (-71) and skipjack tuna (-67) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the

economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries45

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy6 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average The Bureau of Labor Statistics did not disclose CFLQ data for Hawairsquoi for 2015

In 2015 31915 employer establishments operated throughout the entire Hawailsquoian economy (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed about 524000 workers and had a total annual payroll of $221 billion The gross state product of Hawairsquoi was approximately $81 billion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 Hawailsquoi had 12 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 20 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $13 million (a 10 increase in real terms from 2007) There were two employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 100 increase from 2007) The Census Bureau suppressed data on employment and annual payroll for this sector in Hawairsquoi

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 39 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the state of Hawairsquoi (a 5 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $41 million (an

4 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)5 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)6 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

65

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Western Pacific Region | Regional Summary

18 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 25 employer firms in the retail seafood sales sector (this remained unchanged from 2007) These establishments employed 293 workers (a 25 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $74 million (a 9 decrease in real terms from 2007)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 30 employer firms in the wholesale seafood sales sector (a 17 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 639 workers (a 16 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $245 million (a 14 increase in real terms from 2007)

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of Hawairsquoirsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons These sectors however are economically important in the regional economy For example the marine cargo handling sector accounted for $834 million in payroll in 2015 in Hawairsquoi

Tables | Hawaiʻi

68

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Hawaiʻi | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Hawaiʻi Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 9916 867111 269335 391841 7790 469772 186129 252787

Commercial Harvesters 3691 205769 75140 108000 3691 205769 75140 108000Seafood Processors amp Dealers 580 56661 22429 28927 427 41737 16521 21308

Importers 1030 318378 51026 97056 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 540 57050 20009 26618 324 34210 11998 15961

Retail 4075 229252 100730 131241 3348 188055 82469 107518

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 75690 84877 71202 84044 91565 112300 107979 101249 103399 118134Finfish amp Other 75426 84556 70856 83700 91274 111865 107413 100754 103341 117832Shellfish 264 321 347 343 291 435 567 495 58 302

Key SpeciesLobsters 93 120 136 117 104 98 95 105 NA 28Mahimahi (dolphin) 3483 3174 2853 3303 4314 5309 4130 4412 3427 4512Marlin 2028 2072 2142 1756 2375 2888 2802 3197 3015 4064Moonfish (opah) 2171 2198 2409 2591 2853 3163 3203 2910 3151 NAPomfret 1461 1662 1381 1549 1449 2097 2576 2466 2874 3502Scad 1094 889 1198 1251 964 1181 1147 1128 108 1173Snappers 1690 1715 1860 1681 1415 1738 2003 2223 1124 2272Swordfish 7730 7177 7336 7303 6669 6693 4493 5405 4629 4813Tunas 51171 60863 47710 59775 66628 83298 81819 73657 81576 88467Wahoo 2085 2225 1673 1746 1806 2330 2375 2800 2328 3279

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 28934 30652 26906 28069 29289 31048 32447 33474 34623 35051

Finfish amp Other 28890 30599 26849 28007 29240 30968 32346 33387 34612 34999Shellfish 44 52 57 62 49 79 101 86 11 52

Key SpeciesLobsters 8 10 11 9 10 8 9 10 NA 3Mahimahi (dolphin) 1388 1250 1287 1518 1423 1746 1515 1689 1132 1193Marlin 1375 1952 1677 1221 1826 1459 1935 2318 2616 2327Moonfish (opah) 1226 1313 1884 1824 1564 1549 2072 2004 2067 NAPomfret 593 671 627 593 427 731 1142 1243 1339 1166Scad 461 318 405 460 323 383 361 356 36 368Snappers 381 378 391 342 269 308 357 369 178 380Swordfish 3643 3835 3881 3153 2592 2381 1674 2480 2044 1640Tunas 17594 18295 14594 16706 18519 20147 20900 20296 22932 23507Wahoo 715 849 605 600 564 652 744 1056 993 1144

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Lobsters 1184 1214 1237 1236 1039 1184 1071 1021 NA 856Mahimahi (dolphin) 251 254 222 218 303 304 273 261 303 378Marlin 147 106 128 144 130 198 145 138 115 175Moonfish (opah) 177 167 128 142 182 204 155 145 152 NAPomfret 246 248 220 261 339 287 225 198 215 300Scad 237 280 295 272 298 308 318 317 299 319Snappers 444 454 476 492 526 565 560 603 631 598Swordfish 212 187 189 232 257 281 268 218 226 293Tunas 291 333 327 358 360 413 391 363 356 376Wahoo 292 262 277 291 320 357 319 265 234 287

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

69

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Hawaiʻi | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Hawaiʻi Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)1

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 384 45734 16617 26852Private Boat 157 24579 6212 10309Shore 313 35088 10427 17575

Total Durable Expenditures NA NA NA NATotal State Economic Impacts 854 105401 33256 54736

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)1

Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 29411Private Boat 22508Shore 30942Total 82862

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle NAOther Equipment NABoat Expenses NAVehicle Expenses NASecond Home Expenses NATotal Durable Expenditures NA

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 82862

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2 3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 1216 1082 1384 1167 1052 1358 1321 1235 935 833Non-Coastal 370 320 379 381 342 378 426 428 344 340Out-of-State NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 1587 1402 1763 1548 1394 1736 1748 1664 1279 1173

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Private 475 564 441 484 224 325 297 324 273 235Shore 2102 1966 1722 1907 1158 1195 1216 1051 1158 790Total Trips 2577 2531 2163 2390 1382 1519 1513 1374 1431 1024

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue marlin H 2 11 3 1 2 3 4 3 5 2R lt 1 0 lt 1 0 0 0 0 lt 1 0 0

Dolphinfish (mahimahi)

H 136 184 103 164 63 163 94 92 78 44R lt 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 lt 1 0 lt 1

Goatfishes5 H 298 468 712 270 173 158 873 537 1052 246R 9 6 7 18 13 13 3 22 15 16

Jacks (trevallys and other jacks)6

H 169 277 123 140 99 110 144 156 170 112R 130 120 85 126 59 129 126 263 319 122

Scads (bigeye and mackerel)

H 1089 402 1102 840 662 608 889 899 1245 690R 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 lt 1 4

Skipjack tuna H 228 568 230 289 125 197 380 199 268 88R 5 2 0 0 lt 1 0 0 0 lt 1 2

Smallmouth bonefish

H 20 50 37 55 13 27 23 29 26 26R 13 4 2 13 2 8 10 20 17 9

Snappers7 H 104 138 147 340 113 195 152 220 119 119R 40 7 24 25 14 15 10 3 9 14

Wahoo H 57 78 61 41 15 32 37 43 55 45R lt 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1

Yellowfin tuna H 273 461 198 302 141 182 150 220 292 85R 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 lt 1 1 lt 1

1 NA = not available2 Participation (number of anglers) data are not available for 2007 through 20163 Data are not available because all Hawairsquoi residents are considered coastal county residents4 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish5 Goatfishes include yellowstripe yellowfin pfulgers bandtail doublebar diespot whitesaddle manybar blue and rsquoGoastfish familygenusrsquo6 Trevallys amp other jacks includes bluefin trevally giant trevally bigeye trevally black trevally African pompano greater amberjack island jack and other species in the jack family7 Snappers include bluestip blacktail ruby longtailed pink VonSiebolds Binghams green jobfish ironjaw and smalltooth jobfish

70

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Hawaiʻi | Marine Economy

2015 Hawailsquoi State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 102544 (04) 31915 (04) 523677 (04) 2207 (04) 4467 (05) 8060 (04) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 10 9 7 11 14 14 16 14 12Receipts 1023 1020 712 741 866 965 821 1048 1271

Seafood salesretail

Firms 41 37 35 37 39 42 40 38 39Receipts 4353 4394 3666 4124 3558 4086 3764 3727 4053

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 36 37 38 37 40 33 32 30 30Employees 550 695 538 531 538 483 542 567 639

Payroll 18932 20665 19347 19290 19416 19413 20039 21369 24477

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 25 25 25 24 25 24 25 26 25Employees 393 173 158 177 187 303 318 305 293

Payroll 7209 3674 3559 3533 3521 6493 7366 7142 7410

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 11 5 5 2 2 5 5 6 7Employees 557 478 475 ds ds 431 ds ds 452

Payroll 36635 34544 34367 ds ds 34538 ds ds 36675

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 1Employees NA ds NA ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll NA ds NA ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 11 9 10 13 13 9 11 9 9

Employees 167 156 164 189 208 162 166 153 120Payroll 4151 4317 4368 5362 5237 3779 4003 3304 3412

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 8 11 11 14 14 11 10 10 11Employees 1048 1098 1075 1236 1278 664 709 700 782

Payroll 87770 89104 87833 109059 109134 54309 61651 66034 83408Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 8 11 11 11 8 8 9 9 11Employees ds 105 120 90 105 97 100 80 70

Payroll 3340 5846 5258 5113 5310 5567 6518 5416 4463

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds 3218 2031 ds ds ds ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 13 14 13 15 15 18 18 14 14Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 660

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 46560

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

New England Regionbull Connecticutbull Mainebull Massachusettsbull New Hampshirebull Rhode Island

Black sea bass Photo NOAA FisheriesScott Steinback

72

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New England Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe New England Region includes Connecticut Maine Massachusetts New Hampshire and Rhode Island Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under nine fishery management plans (FMPs) Two of these FMPs monkfish and spiny dogfish are developed in conjunction with the Mid-Atlantic Fisheries Management Council (MAFMC) The MAFMC is the lead council for the Spiny Dogfish FMP the NEFMC is the lead for the Monkfish FMP

New England Regional FMPs

bull Northeast multi-species

bull Sea scallopsbull Monkfish (with

the MAFMC)bull Atlantic herringbull Small mesh

multi-species

bull Spiny dogfish (with the MAFMC)

bull Red crabbull Northeast skate

complexbull Atlantic salmon

Fourteen of the stocks or stock complexes covered in these FMPs were listed as overfished in 2016 Atlantic cod (two stocks) Atlantic halibut Atlantic salmon Atlantic wolffish ocean pout thorny skate windowpane flounder winter flounder (two stocks) witch flounder and yellowtail flounder (three stocks) Seven stocks or stock complexes are currently subject to overfishing Atlantic cod (two stocks) witch flounder yellowtail flounder (three stocks) and winter flounder (Georges Bank stock)

Catch Share ProgramsTwo catch share programs operate in the New England Region 1) Northeast Multi-Species Sectors and 2) Northeast General Category Atlantic Sea Scallop Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program Following are descriptions of these catch share programs and their performance

Northeast Multi-Species Sectors This program was developed between 2004 and 2006 and included two pilot sectors that operated with an allocation of Georges Bank cod The program was expanded in 2010 to 17 sectors and approximately 55 of eligible limited-access permit holders joined a sector At the same time annual catch limits were implemented for the first time

and sharply reduced the available quota for fishermen The key performance indicators of this program show that compared with the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) the following 2015 metrics decreased quotas landings number of active vessels and inflation-adjusted revenue for catch share species On the other hand inflation-adjusted revenue per vessel increased during this period

Northeast General Category Atlantic Sea Scallop IFQ Program This program began in 2010 with two primary objectives 1) Control capacity and mortality in the General Category Scallop fishery and 2) Allow better and more timely integration of sea scallop assessment results in management The key performance indicators of this program show that 2015 inflation-adjusted revenue and revenue per vessel increased However landings quota and the number of active vessels decreased compared with the baseline period

Policy UpdatesIn May 2016 NOAA Fisheries implemented Framework 27 which specifies measures for fishing year 2016 and includes fishing year 2017 measures that will go into place as a default should the next specifications-setting framework be delayed beyond the start of fishing year 2017 This action also includes two set-asides An annual research set-aside (RSA) of 125 million pounds was established for 2016 and 2017 to fund scallop research and to compensate participating vessels through the sale of scallops harvested under research set-aside projects In addition the action set aside 1 of the annual biological catch for the industry-funded observer program to help defray the cost of scallop vessels that carry an observer The observer set-aside for fishing years 2016 and 2017 is 084 million pounds

In November 2016 NOAA Fisheries implemented Amendment 19 to the Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery Management Plan The amendment adjusts the start of the scallop fishing year from March 1 to April 1 This change will help reduce potential economic and biological consequences from late implementation of specifications and reduce the overall administrative burden associated with late implementation As a result of this change NOAA Fisheries will be able to implement simple

73

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New England Region | Regional Summary

specifications actions at the start of the fishing year on a more consistent basis

In August 2016 NOAA Fisheries approved two out of three actions set out in Framework Adjustment 9 to the Monkfish Fishery Management Plan This plan eliminates the monkfish possession limit for monkfish Category C- and D-permitted vessels fishing in the Northern Fishery Management Area under both a Northeast multispecies and monkfish days-at-sea allocation The new measure is designed to help increase monkfish landings and better achieve the annual catch target The plan also implements a measure that allows a Category C or D vessel fishing under both a Northeast multispecies and a monkfish days-at-sea allocation in the Southern Fishery Management Area to use 65-inch (165-cm) roundfish gillnets Under the rule a monkfish-permitted vessel fishing on a monkfish-only days-at-sea allocation in the Mid-Atlantic Exemption Area may now use 5-inch (127-cm) roundfish gillnets In addition monkfish-permitted vessels fishing on a monkfish-only days-at-sea limit in either the SNE Dogfish Gillnet Exemption Area or the Southern New England Monkfish and Skate Gillnet Exemption Area may retain both monkfish and dogfish on the same trip when declared into either area Finally this measure limits a vessel to using 50 roundfish gillnets in the SNE Dogfish and the Mid-Atlantic Exemption Areas

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key New England Region Commercial Species

bull American lobsterbull Atlantic herringbull Atlantic mackerelbull Cod and haddockbull Flounders

bull Goosefishbull Quahog clambull Sea scallopbull Softshell clambull Squid

Economic Impacts The premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers1

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 commercial fishing in Massachusetts generated

1 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)

74

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New England Region | Regional Summary

the largest employment impacts in the New England Region 87200 jobs Income impacts ($2 billion) sales impacts ($77 billion) and value-added impacts ($3 billion) were also largest in Massachusetts The retail sector in Massachusetts generated the highest employment impacts of any state-level sector 53300 jobs The importers sector in Massachusetts generated the highest state-level income impacts ($6436 million) sales impacts ($4 billion) and value-added impacts ($12 billion) in the region

Landings TrendsNew England landings revenue was up $854 million in 2016 from the previous year with lobster (up $46 million) sea scallops (up $171 million) and squid (up $174 million) comprising the majority of this increase The lobster fishery New Englandrsquos largest fishery in terms of landings revenue continued its strong performance with revenues up 84 since 2007 due to landings almost doubling (up 99) during this period Although 2016 prices were slightly lower than in 2007 (down 7) and 2015 (down 15) strong demand has kept prices well above the 10-year average (up 16) The higher landings trend is due to record abundance levels of Gulf of Maine lobsters which have comprised between 85-90 of landings in recent years Indeed average annual landings in the past five years are more than three times the average annual landings for the previous 60 years On average Maine has accounted for 80 of New Englandrsquos lobster landings revenue since 2007

Sea scallop landings declined 30 over this 10-year period primarily due to a 35 reduction in the catch limit that was implemented in 2012 to protect young sea scallops and prevent localized overfishing Significantly higher prices (up 83 from 2007 but unchanged from 2015) have helped to offset the reduction in landings For 2016 the increase in landings revenue was driven by higher harvest levels (up 6 relative to 2015)

Rhode Island is the center of the New England squid fishery which comprised 36 of Rhode Islandrsquos total landings revenue in 2016 Overall squid landings in New England increased 66 from 2015 to 2016 Prices were also up (4) year-over-year due to the 30 decrease in global production which has been attributed to the

strong El Nintildeo event in 2016 Illex squid prices which are determined in the international market increased 65 during this period in large part due to global supply shortages

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Bluefin tuna (361 303 in real terms)bull Squid (135 106 in real terms)bull American lobster (84 61 in real terms)From 2015bull Squid (72)bull Bluefin tuna (24)bull Atlantic herring (17)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Quahog clam (-60 -65 in real terms)bull Cod and haddock (-51 -57 in real terms)bull Atlantic mackerel (-50 -57 in real terms)From 2015bull Atlantic mackerel (-11)bull Flounders (-5)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Bluefin tuna (455)bull American lobster (99)bull Squid (48)From 2015bull Squid (66)bull Atlantic mackerel (14)bull Bluefin tuna (11)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Atlantic mackerel (-78)bull Quahog clam (-71)bull Flounders (-45)From 2015bull Flounders (-28)bull Atlantic herring (-22)bull Quahog clam (-7)

75

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New England Region | Regional Summary

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the New England Region totaled $13 billion in 2016 This number represented a 48 increase from 2007 (a 29 increase in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 7 increase from 2015 Landings revenue was highest in Maine ($633 million) followed by Massachusetts ($5508 million) Shellfish landings revenue made up 86 of total revenue in the region American lobster ($6635 million) and sea scallop ($3039 million) had the highest landings revenue in the New England Region in 2016 Together they accounted for 73 of total landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 bluefin tuna (361 303 in real terms) squid (135 106 in real terms) and American lobster (84 61 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while quahog clam (-60 -65 in real terms) cod and haddock (-51 -57 in real terms) and Atlantic mackerel (-50 -57 in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 squid (72) bluefin tuna (24) and Atlantic herring (17) had the largest revenue increases while Atlantic mackerel (-11) and flounders (-5) had the largest revenue decreases LandingsIn 2016 New England Region commercial fishermen landed about 595 million pounds of finfish and shellfish a 2 increase from 2007 and a 1 decrease from 2015 American lobster had the highest landings volume in the New England Region accounting for 27 of landed weight

From 2007 to 2016 bluefin tuna (455) American lobster (99) and squid (48) had the largest landings increases while Atlantic mackerel (-78) quahog clam (-71) and flounders (-45) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 squid (66) Atlantic mackerel (14) and bluefin tuna (11) had the largest landings increases while flounders (-28) Atlantic herring (-22) and quahog clam (-7) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 sea scallop ($1227 per pound) received the highest New England Region ex-vessel price Landings of Atlantic herring ($021 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price

From 2007 to 2016 Atlantic mackerel (120 93 in real terms) sea scallop (83 60 in real terms) and Atlantic herring (78 56 in real terms) had the largest price increases while bluefin tuna (-17 -27 in real terms) cod and haddock (-14 -25 in real terms) and goosefish (-11 -23 in real terms) had the largest price decreases From 2015 to 2016 Atlantic herring (50) flounders (31) and quahog clam (14) had the largest price increases while Atlantic mackerel (-22) goosefish (-2) and American lobster (-1) had the largest price decreases

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups2

Key New England Recreational Species

bull Atlantic codbull Atlantic mackerelbull Bluefin tunabull Bluefishbull Little tuny

bull Scupbull Striped bassbull Summer flounderbull Winter flounderbull Tautog

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities3 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity

2 Except where noted Atlantic and Gulf recreational catch and effort estimates are based upon the MRIP APAIS and CHTS (httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovrecreational-fisheriesSurveyssurvey-details) and not the revised MRIP estimates (httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovleadership-messagenoaa-fisheries-releases-revised-mrip-recreational-catch-and-effort-estimates) released in 20183 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpswwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

76

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New England Region | Regional Summary

such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

The greatest employment impacts from expenditures on saltwater recreational fishing in the New England Region were generated in Massachusetts (10000 jobs) followed by Rhode Island (4200 jobs) The largest sales impacts were observed in Massachusetts ($11 billion) followed by Connecticut ($4302 million) The biggest income impacts were generated in Massachusetts ($4955 million) followed by Connecticut ($1864 million) The greatest value-added impacts were in Massachusetts ($7157 million) followed by Connecticut ($2918 million)

Recreational fishing expenditures (on both fishing trips and durable equipment purchases) across the New England Region in 2016 totaled about $19 billion Trip expenditures totaled more than $2628 million with a large portion coming from trips in the private boat (54) and shore (28) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $17 billion with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($1 billion)

Fishing TripsIn 2016 recreational fishermen took 61 million fishing trips in the New England Region This number represented a 35 decrease from 2007 and a 20 increase from 2015 The largest proportions of trips were taken in the private boat mode (55) and shore mode (42) States with the highest number of recorded trips were Massachusetts (24 million trips) and Connecticut (16 million trips)

ParticipationIn 2016 there were 12 million recreational anglers who fished in the New England Region This number represented a 26 decrease from 2007 and an 18 increase from 2015 These anglers were New England Region residents from either a coastal county (92) or a non-coastal county (8)

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Little tunny (524)bull Atlantic mackerel (226)bull Winter flounder (103)From 2015bull Little tunny (205)bull Atlantic cod (103)bull Summer flounder (60)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Bluefish (-61)bull Striped bass (-51)bull Bluefin tuna (-43)From 2015There were no decreases from 2015 to 2016

Harvest and ReleaseOf New Englandrsquos key species and species groups Atlantic mackerel (65 million fish) porgies (scup) (65 million fish) and striped bass (44 million fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 little tunny (524) Atlantic mackerel (226) and winter flounder (103) had the largest increases in catch while bluefish (-61) striped bass (-51) and bluefin tuna (-43) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 little tunny (205) Atlantic cod (103) and summer flounder (60) had the largest increases in catch There were no decreases in catch from 2015 to 2016

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine

77

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New England Region | Regional Summary

4 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)5 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)6 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries45

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy6 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average

The Bureau of Labor Statistics suppressed the CFLQ value for Connecticut Massachusetts and New Hampshire for 2015 Of the remaining states Maine had the highest CFLQ at 2007 Rhode Island had a CFLQ value of 39

In 2015 371314 employer establishments operated throughout the entire New England Region (including marine- and non-marine- related establishments) These establishments employed about 62 million workers and had a total annual payroll of about $359 billion The combined gross state product of Connecticut Maine Massachusetts New Hampshire and Rhode Island was approximately $932 billion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 the New England Region had 105 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 3 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $125 million (a 2 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 85 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (an 11 decrease from 2007) The Census Bureau suppressed employment and payroll data for one or more states in the New England Region for this

sector in 2015 The greatest number of seafood product preparation and packaging establishments was located in Massachusetts (79) followed by Maine (64) and Connecticut (26)

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 145 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the five states that make up the New England Region (a 16 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $158 million (a 30 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 235 employer firms in the retail sales of seafood sector (a 7 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 1278 workers (a 1 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $419 million (an 11 increase in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of retail seafood establishments was located in Massachusetts (158) followed by Maine (110) and Connecticut (53)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 332 employer firms in the wholesale sales of seafood sector in the New England Region in 2015 (a 16 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 3432 workers and had a total annual payroll of $1776 million The greatest number of wholesale seafood establishments was located in Maine (146) followed by Massachusetts (129) and Rhode Island (28)

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of the New England Regionrsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons It is clear however that these sectors play an important role in the regional economy For example the ship and boatbuilding sector in Massachusetts Maine New Hampshire and Rhode Island accounted for a total of $5006 million in payroll in 2015

Tables | New England Region

80

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New England Region | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the New England Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Landings Value Value Jobs Sales Income Jobs Sales IncomeRevenue Added AddedConnecticut 15087 2306 387244 83307 137449 808 53328 18277 25482Maine 633014 41960 2581806 855773 1236431 40246 2300020 795211 1136921Massachusetts 550755 87201 7662911 1998842 3045410 55384 2318125 851027 1161180New Hampshire 33215 9922 1511091 348439 558040 2577 160077 59239 81009Rhode Island 93872 10828 1375375 334588 528970 5193 332575 120271 168541

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 895381 808816 787206 960090 1103010 1192900 1163328 1195545 1240539 1325943

Finfish amp Other 178819 190526 176399 189803 212059 243355 204318 193491 182234 188670Shellfish 716562 618290 610806 770288 890951 949546 959010 1002054 1058305 1137273

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 359783 317909 305195 397768 417931 425562 458779 560618 617448 663457Atlantic herring 18591 20507 24459 20692 24759 28545 31388 27947 24286 28515Atlantic mackerel 6000 5265 7892 3459 295 3480 1738 3111 3332 2975Bluefin tuna 2077 2993 4448 8470 9258 8394 3649 6114 7723 9583Cod amp haddock 39326 47166 38745 49710 48775 29972 16350 20681 19042 19373Flounders 33658 30654 27286 27685 30851 35155 32092 30609 28103 26564Goosefish 21209 19945 14321 14064 19792 19693 13576 14094 14628 15042Quahog clam 30026 8901 9002 9713 8314 9276 9383 10121 11285 11922Sea scallop 237299 203124 209168 265493 352632 389501 366007 296983 286785 303899Squid 17711 19848 16696 14788 22887 18187 15547 21411 24263 41673

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 584849 602950 648988 580145 612952 665778 634766 646106 599125 594999Finfish amp Other 376334 400732 422141 334220 357225 380850 358155 376330 333534 297386Shellfish 208514 202219 226848 245925 255728 284928 276610 269776 265592 297613

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 79435 86229 99199 116024 125167 148906 149116 146454 146095 157942Atlantic herring 156602 167709 210784 140789 174338 190532 203763 197908 171823 134696Atlantic mackerel 50760 38359 39398 16904 913 9680 9049 12934 10016 11418Bluefin tuna 300 447 772 1201 1085 915 523 971 1502 1663Cod amp haddock 24856 33122 32470 39261 30108 14800 9072 15133 15257 14237Flounders 16093 15501 16232 14531 17913 18353 16320 14270 12304 8865Goosefish 19968 17757 14256 12378 14700 16422 14321 14552 15272 15981Quahog clam 4630 1468 1628 1790 1513 1570 1594 1584 1464 1355Sea scallop 35390 28867 31604 32884 35285 39209 32103 23482 23296 24770Squid 26421 28615 28014 21722 27907 16153 14575 28781 23698 39224

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

American lobster 453 369 308 343 334 286 308 383 423 420Atlantic herring 012 012 012 015 014 015 015 014 014 021Atlantic mackerel 012 014 020 020 032 036 019 024 033 026Bluefin tuna 693 669 576 705 854 918 698 629 514 576Cod amp haddock 158 142 119 127 162 203 180 137 125 136Flounders 209 198 168 191 172 192 197 215 228 300Goosefish 106 112 100 114 135 120 095 097 096 094Quahog clam 649 606 553 543 550 591 589 639 771 880Sea scallop 671 704 662 807 999 993 1140 1265 1231 1227Squid 067 069 060 068 082 113 107 074 102 106

81

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New England Region | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the New England Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars trips)Trips Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Connecticut 1644 3974 430216 186430 291827Maine 573 1097 98666 37412 59185Massachusetts 2384 9957 1070935 495481 715659New Hampshire 293 473 47954 21470 30575Rhode Island 1159 4173 412071 176221 270081

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 47916Private Boat 141993Shore 72851Total 262760

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 380822Other Equipment 136449Boat Expenses 1024515Vehicle Expenses 134455Second Home Expenses 1574Total Durable Expenditures 1677814

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1940574

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 1408 1389 1222 1317 1156 1171 1043 1080 924 1104Non-Coastal 205 187 165 169 131 144 100 99 95 94Out-of-State NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 1614 1576 1387 1486 1288 1316 1143 1179 1018 1198

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 518 512 464 321 367 345 516 487 354 226Private 4820 4894 3374 3967 3161 3132 3459 3226 2677 3312Shore 3951 3735 3321 2926 2532 2687 2313 2939 2004 2516Total Trips 9289 9141 7160 7213 6060 6164 6287 6652 5036 6054

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic cod

H 305 385 391 509 530 337 392 264 22 112R 966 954 833 1071 915 472 642 667 509 969

Atlantic mackerel

H 1886 3358 2464 3471 5335 3276 3712 3263 5138 5767R 116 452 343 381 535 484 283 1420 1002 770

Bluefin tuna

H 11 9 9 1 2 9 0 8 3 8R 10 2 5 0 5 4 0 0 6 4

BluefishH 1512 1461 674 1183 658 1503 1682 863 680 657R 2906 2995 1435 1848 1931 1951 1954 2753 913 1087

Little tunny

H 5 0 1 2 0 11 1 9 51 36R 65 16 16 20 44 103 14 427 92 399

Porgies (scup)

H 3049 1944 1498 2411 2286 2953 3800 3171 2216 2268R 2802 4048 3278 3586 2376 3530 3091 3275 2199 4253

Striped bass

H 595 602 547 527 458 530 697 492 292 254R 8366 7713 4164 2771 2041 1780 3796 2655 3010 4170

Summer flounder

H 426 582 167 199 267 241 429 417 336 360R 1045 2112 908 818 1252 939 1456 1393 910 1633

Winter flounder

H 51 180 112 105 100 56 44 96 57 40R 44 71 102 85 60 27 24 56 65 153

Wrasses (tautog)

H 569 305 196 359 78 323 298 487 264 276R 1425 514 395 562 385 909 966 2213 749 1335

1 NA = data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but does not specify whether an angler resides in a region2 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

Tables | Connecticut

84

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Connecticut | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Connecticut Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 2306 387244 83307 137449 808 53328 18277 25482

Commercial Harvesters 403 26755 7338 11307 403 26755 7338 11307Seafood Processors amp Dealers 100 11559 4414 5706 50 5791 2212 2859

Importers 916 283114 45374 86305 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 139 24734 8096 10877 16 2811 920 1236

Retail 748 41083 18085 23253 339 17970 7807 10080

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 42053 17206 15007 17626 20032 21132 14632 14144 15422 15087Finfish amp Other 3270 3962 3108 5229 4817 5467 5123 4428 5040 4718Shellfish 38782 13243 11899 12397 15215 15665 9509 9716 10382 10369

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 3222 2102 1763 1894 943 1057 577 608 1073 1316Goosefish 512 551 591 564 976 1040 1022 510 680 467Other flounders 232 172 87 42 33 65 184 89 164 253Red hake 110 181 137 76 89 88 115 104 112 108Scups or Porgies 311 383 196 272 408 837 705 573 820 773Sea scallop 8605 10032 8952 9458 13007 12005 7219 7219 7039 5881Silver hake 1115 1436 1011 1341 1617 1380 1301 1586 1164 914Squid loligo 744 546 260 473 694 1861 1257 1354 1631 2012Summer flounder 648 680 649 850 1005 940 902 921 1078 806Whelks and Conchs 312 453 796 449 159 616 295 336 487 992

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 10050 7131 6568 6698 7403 8940 7957 7523 9390 12370Finfish amp Other 3845 4520 4155 4409 5218 5756 5875 5221 7110 9602Shellfish 6205 2611 2414 2288 2186 3184 2082 2302 2280 2768

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 569 426 412 442 199 248 127 127 205 259Goosefish 460 424 546 358 630 765 967 493 605 431Other flounders 140 88 58 26 27 40 142 60 86 109Red hake 266 284 310 176 158 185 173 167 146 162Scups or Porgies 256 282 204 324 644 907 1195 811 983 932Sea scallop 1313 1407 1386 1260 1318 1231 640 609 577 530Silver hake 1565 2178 1881 1973 2041 1848 1647 2037 1320 943Squid loligo 811 523 256 366 498 1518 1098 1318 1317 1671Summer flounder 205 221 251 308 401 316 284 253 287 191Whelks and Conchs 117 174 229 113 28 91 81 98 81 211

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

American lobster 567 493 427 429 474 426 453 478 523 509Goosefish 111 130 108 158 155 136 106 104 112 108Other flounders 166 196 150 160 123 160 129 149 191 233Red hake 041 064 044 043 056 047 066 062 077 067Scups or Porgies 122 136 096 084 063 092 059 071 083 083Sea scallop 655 713 646 751 987 975 1129 1185 1220 1109Silver hake 071 066 054 068 079 075 079 078 088 097Squid loligo 092 104 101 129 139 123 115 103 124 120Summer flounder 316 308 259 276 250 298 318 363 376 422Whelks and Conchs 266 261 347 398 563 675 365 343 604 471

85

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Connecticut | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Connecticut Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 63 10270 4764 6443Private Boat 204 21457 9119 13792Shore 91 7411 3204 4564

Total Durable Expenditures 3616 391078 169343 267028Total State Economic Impacts 3974 430216 186430 291827

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 5889Private Boat 28496Shore 7433Total 41818

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 75576Other Equipment 20370Boat Expenses 225694Vehicle Expenses 16369Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 338010

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 379828

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 302 381 438 402 420 397 198 209 252 297Non-Coastal NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAOut-of-State 61 123 93 112 98 67 43 64 57 88Total Anglers 363 504 531 514 518 464 240 273 309 385

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 63 74 43 41 46 27 63 62 80 38Private 1097 1292 711 871 863 825 830 865 671 1021Shore 559 609 665 614 399 475 316 437 590 585Total Trips 1719 1975 1419 1526 1309 1326 1210 1365 1341 1644

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic cod

H 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 20R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12

BluefishH 451 623 262 591 307 480 893 288 365 311R 888 1144 295 715 997 679 727 425 401 340

Hickory shad

H 35 0 0 1 16 39 8 73 0 4R 4 5 lt 1 0 0 0 1 67 lt 1 5

Little tunny

H 0 0 0 1 0 lt 1 0 1 0 lt 1R lt 1 0 9 8 14 57 0 13 1 32

Porgies (scup)

H 925 549 289 1088 933 868 937 561 477 824R 1006 974 1204 1192 539 1049 1218 1413 764 1787

Striped bass

H 119 108 61 93 63 65 140 84 75 49R 985 3105 1161 671 612 265 775 310 667 621

Summer flounder

H 112 146 45 35 47 63 270 120 93 218R 297 991 428 373 345 306 866 638 408 1105

White perch

H 0 7 60 0 0 10 0 14 lt 1 4R 18 52 72 0 lt 1 48 2 7 lt 1 2

Winter flounder

H 0 0 12 14 19 9 0 lt 1 12 lt 1R 15 0 7 12 lt 1 7 4 lt 1 31 lt 1

Wrasses (tautog)

H 353 167 86 116 26 194 104 318 126 165R 745 250 112 257 36 599 453 1668 272 933

1 NA = data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but does not specify whether an angler resides in a region2 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

86

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Connecticut | Marine Economy

2015 Connecticut State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 269845 (11) 89232 (12) 1503102 (12) 9256 (15) 13755 (14) 25631 (14) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms ds 18 17 17 14 13 25 26 25Receipts ds 2375 2550 1518 1066 882 3058 3969 2692

Seafood salesretail

Firms 26 25 23 25 21 21 20 18 19Receipts 4436 3247 2142 2473 2165 1388 1543 1655 1813

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1Employees ds 59 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds 1040 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 20 24 25 23 24 16 17 19 20Employees 183 185 212 216 212 187 178 172 211

Payroll 8347 8551 8842 9219 9224 8237 7920 8174 20558

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 36 35 36 39 37 37 36 35 34Employees 177 203 205 204 171 233 218 244 230

Payroll 5252 5248 5551 5563 4824 6349 6344 7380 7533

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 4 5 5 6 5 10 9 9 9Employees ds ds ds ds 95 256 ds ds 216

Payroll ds ds ds 8148 7856 32789 ds ds 27698

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 14 12 12 10 11 14 11 11 11Employees 228 243 222 225 225 297 184 ds 164

Payroll 48110 46595 45045 29407 41302 37711 28513 26891 26880Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 124 125 126 129 128 130 130 128 125

Employees 1224 1352 1261 1284 1283 1257 1265 1174 1153Payroll 50809 60016 58065 58877 59851 60803 63211 59054 59526

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 5 4 3 3 3 0 1 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds NA ds ds ds

Payroll 5925 ds ds ds ds NA ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 6 6 6 6 5 2 2 4 3Employees ds ds 5 ds 5 ds ds 3 2

Payroll 432 338 696 242 898 ds ds 185 159

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 4 8 8 6 5 4 5 5 5Employees ds 179 166 122 34 ds ds ds 22

Payroll ds 6136 5787 2162 848 1414 ds ds 1142

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 22 15 13 12 11 8 7 9 8Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Maine

88

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Maine | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Maine Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 41960 2581806 855773 1236431 40246 2300020 795211 1136921

Commercial Harvesters 18927 1214883 332762 543832 18927 1214883 332762 543832Seafood Processors amp Dealers 3157 246437 98941 126425 2888 225457 90518 115662

Importers 710 219310 35149 66855 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 1285 136984 49138 63941 1126 120068 43070 56045

Retail 17881 764192 339784 435378 17304 739612 328861 421383

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 344022 308233 292315 380435 411983 450926 476423 547333 591356 633014Finfish amp Other 37507 37440 30367 30196 43816 77546 72857 50692 49092 59005Shellfish 306515 270793 261948 350240 368168 373380 403566 496641 542264 574009

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 280634 245146 237519 318304 334577 341861 370207 459183 501194 537872Atlantic herring 9173 8396 7867 8643 14404 14490 15514 16212 13534 19422Bloodworms 6051 5913 6196 5893 5847 5191 5644 6085 6335 6168Blue mussel 1934 1627 2203 2071 1969 1919 2341 2153 2458 2400Cod amp haddock 3728 5257 1752 1528 1666 1362 976 1267 1069 886Goosefish 2402 1478 526 393 578 1059 773 566 616 456Ocean quahog clam 3194 2195 1821 1721 2117 1737 1378 1238 1311 1299Pollock 2160 2321 2047 1503 1929 2527 2562 2878 1965 1663Sea urchins 4367 5410 5866 5490 5113 5024 5781 5325 4950 6616Softshell clam 12574 12826 11686 12960 15852 15655 18102 20232 22847 16219

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 186324 186696 188388 200876 249496 263421 266413 265182 242662 247946Finfish amp Other 99230 98951 82505 79375 122944 121322 120555 127687 104291 97245Shellfish 87094 87745 105883 121501 126552 142099 145859 137495 138371 150701

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 63959 69863 81179 96246 104923 127237 127756 124218 122402 131954Atlantic herring 74817 67731 64606 57557 97116 92506 98859 103530 86485 78156Bloodworms 549 537 574 534 526 457 470 448 401 387Blue mussel 2643 2289 2760 2582 2810 2399 2282 2270 2401 1743Cod amp haddock 2345 2455 1401 876 842 549 418 685 658 489Goosefish 2376 1178 603 404 533 1075 874 633 740 542Ocean quahog clam 1011 669 556 549 645 698 557 438 416 367Pollock 4245 4064 3040 1640 2325 2666 2227 2319 1381 1049Sea urchins 2761 2900 3487 2592 2407 1904 1988 1981 1775 2058Softshell clam 1948 1998 1902 2077 2365 2257 2297 2080 1892 1569

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

American lobster 439 351 293 331 319 269 290 370 409 408Atlantic herring 012 012 012 015 015 016 016 016 016 025Bloodworms 1102 1101 1079 1103 1112 1136 1200 1359 158 1596Blue mussel 073 071 080 080 070 080 103 095 102 138Cod amp haddock 159 214 125 174 198 248 233 185 162 181Goosefish 101 125 087 097 109 099 088 089 083 084Ocean quahog clam 316 328 327 313 328 249 247 282 315 354Pollock 051 057 067 092 083 095 115 124 142 158Sea urchins 158 187 168 212 212 264 291 269 279 322Softshell clam 646 642 614 624 670 693 788 973 1208 1034

89

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Maine | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Maine Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 57 5764 1959 2989Private Boat 65 7351 2044 3371Shore 110 10080 3262 5519

Total Durable Expenditures 865 75471 30147 47306Total State Economic Impacts 1097 98666 37412 59185

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 3504Private Boat 7172Shore 7730Total 18406

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 20480Other Equipment 7679Boat Expenses 39871Vehicle Expenses 332Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 68361

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 86767

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 174 121 117 122 85 116 102 79 67 114Non-Coastal 13 9 12 9 7 6 4 5 4 13Out-of-State 260 180 324 159 107 126 129 129 74 110Total Anglers 447 310 453 290 198 248 235 213 145 237

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 33 26 26 23 22 20 29 24 21 15Private 460 408 334 327 265 212 313 188 192 293Shore 531 421 544 366 240 405 254 327 201 265Total Trips 1024 854 904 716 527 637 596 539 414 573

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American shad

H 0 lt 1 lt 1 0 0 0 0 lt 1 1 2R 4 5 18 9 4 18 lt 1 0 14 7

Atlantic cod

H 19 41 45 14 39 26 61 22 3 2R 73 50 36 45 99 80 75 50 100 77

Atlantic mackerel

H 806 837 1111 1093 1544 1028 709 706 883 1754R 80 265 194 177 304 163 62 1165 136 307

Blue sharkH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0R lt 1 0 lt 1 0 9 2 13 10 11 lt 1

Bluefin tuna

H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0R 0 lt 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

BluefishH 49 30 3 14 lt 1 4 20 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1R 74 56 26 10 8 126 22 0 0 lt 1

HaddockH 12 20 10 4 12 4 6 3 26 27R 11 2 1 3 4 8 47 55 72 100

PollockH 50 68 61 58 57 49 141 136 66 29R 23 135 35 105 135 88 296 178 109 94

Striped bass

H 54 59 62 17 18 12 23 21 5 11R 1115 465 264 194 143 214 422 277 214 676

Winter flounder

H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0R 0 1 5 0 0 0 lt 1 4 0 14

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

90

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Maine | Marine Economy

2015 Maine State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 111777 (05) 40801 (05) 500549 (04) 2041 (03) 3355 (03) 5733 (03) 2007

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 65 64 63 59 51 51 36 37 32Receipts 7177 4261 6605 4480 3077 3294 2757 4142 2583

Seafood salesretail

Firms 55 46 48 47 48 46 49 57 50Receipts 5905 4035 4882 5835 4608 4492 4200 4664 5848

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 27 29 25 27 28 29 28 30 32Employees 536 490 545 594 500 492 376 546 552

Payroll 9351 9288 10427 12851 10353 12011 11797 18713 18506

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 170 168 164 164 152 136 150 142 146Employees 1015 1210 1126 1153 1109 1047 1340 1047 1123

Payroll 32005 36185 37687 39915 38412 40734 46782 40392 42337

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 50 45 49 51 51 48 51 54 60Employees 181 148 152 176 177 215 243 235 237

Payroll 4635 4148 4481 5126 5108 6902 7618 7558 9601

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 3 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 3Employees ds ds 22 28 ds ds ds ds 17

Payroll ds 1058 1037 1067 1105 ds ds ds 1071

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0Employees NA ds ds ds NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll NA ds ds ds NA NA NA NA NADeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0Employees ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 86 87 89 86 84 80 79 79 80

Employees 464 411 376 395 349 428 403 435 430Payroll 18600 15206 14654 14699 15426 17102 17476 19694 20400

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 15 15 14 13 13 13 14 14 13Employees 105 138 93 68 63 65 86 75 77

Payroll 6737 6148 5369 4928 4776 4730 5660 5243 4752

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 2 1 1 1 6 3 3 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds 2 ds 4

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds 130 113 142

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 94 90 82 75 76 76 79 84 84Employees 6751 6930 ds ds ds ds ds ds 6654

Payroll 345036 354899 ds ds ds ds ds ds 418591

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Massachusetts

92

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Massachusetts | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Massachusetts Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 87201 7662911 1998842 3045410 55384 2318125 851027 1161180

Commercial Harvesters 11490 1008163 317973 467913 11490 1008163 317973 467913Seafood Processors amp Dealers 6698 966228 368384 478963 1586 228715 87200 113375

Importers 12994 4015577 643573 1224124 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 2762 488166 159524 216451 1003 177294 57937 78612

Retail 53257 1184777 509387 657960 41306 903952 387917 501281

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 420004 399822 400473 478691 571583 616466 565739 523410 524112 550755

Finfish amp Other 109089 121567 113973 126262 132388 126152 93961 103615 99325 99112Shellfish 310915 278254 286500 352430 439195 490314 471779 419795 424787 451643

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 51258 45418 42731 50330 53302 53357 61662 68376 78290 82007Atlantic herring 8265 11342 15062 10251 8802 11529 10750 9432 8787 7559Atlantic mackerel 4736 4265 4528 1487 137 654 1223 2421 1926 2426Clams all other 15680 15255 16745 17966 19154 37294 28311 26484 27502 39140Cod amp haddock 32043 38696 33684 45210 43397 26123 14083 18440 17577 17919Eastern oyster 4559 5496 6432 8225 9066 12071 13896 19575 22742 22631Flounders 22095 20924 19645 19975 22025 25058 20612 17949 17340 17203Goosefish 14380 14035 9902 9922 13431 13596 8870 10028 10251 11294Ocean quahog clam 10100 9575 10710 8981 7995 NA 10229 9814 9063 NASea scallop 218292 189891 197280 252253 330944 364864 334205 271373 264933 281445

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 304774 326632 356105 283025 264991 296037 262256 272601 260347 244218

Finfish amp Other 227208 255603 278908 200844 179757 193481 163944 181680 169307 147519Shellfish 77566 71029 77197 82181 85233 102556 98312 90921 91040 96699

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 10145 10600 11782 12760 13373 14485 15260 15323 16451 17687Atlantic herring 73268 94266 133531 71922 66970 81781 74992 77873 70888 46969Atlantic mackerel 46240 35406 30199 12156 515 4131 7279 10755 6935 9894Clams all other 4135 4376 6552 10242 13352 35053 22495 20725 20088 33499Cod amp haddock 20298 28537 28515 36461 27164 13164 8123 13977 14393 13445Eastern oyster 123 138 159 215 231 310 329 444 593 613Flounders 10977 11609 12405 11159 13692 14250 11517 9018 8294 5974Goosefish 13597 12680 10015 8887 10143 11583 9498 10533 11084 12474Ocean quahog clam 20158 18126 18691 15646 12479 NA 14476 13422 13340 NASea scallop 32540 27011 29782 31156 33092 36725 29287 21392 21515 22867

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American lobster 505 428 363 394 399 368 404 446 476 464Atlantic herring 011 012 011 014 013 014 014 012 012 016Atlantic mackerel 010 012 015 012 027 016 017 023 028 025Clams all other 379 349 256 175 143 106 126 128 137 117Cod amp haddock 158 136 118 124 160 198 173 132 122 133Eastern oyster 3700 3977 4036 3830 3925 3896 4228 4412 3832 369Flounders 201 180 158 179 161 176 179 199 209 288Goosefish 106 111 099 112 132 117 093 095 092 091Ocean quahog clam 050 053 057 057 064 NA 071 073 068 NASea scallop 671 703 662 810 1000 993 1141 1269 1231 1231

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

93

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Massachusetts | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Massachusetts Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 350 43788 18509 25541 Private Boat 588 66670 28719 42310 Shore 521 54729 22551 35522

Total Durable Expenditures 8498 905748 425702 612286Total State Economic Impacts 9957 1070935 495481 715659

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 26142Private Boat 85474Shore 45193Total 156809

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 192074Other Equipment 79020Boat Expenses 538561Vehicle Expenses 95299Second Home Expenses 795Total Durable Expenditures 905748

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1062557

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 664 655 489 586 490 502 546 582 428 476Non-Coastal 179 170 144 152 115 130 77 82 85 73Out-of-State 465 469 421 433 293 309 275 532 199 289Total Anglers 1309 1293 1054 1171 897 941 898 1196 711 837

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 234 255 240 154 189 203 259 243 116 93Private 2440 2338 1760 2148 1319 1471 1621 1568 1223 1440Shore 1947 1929 1451 1186 1305 1151 1058 1586 842 850Total Trips 4622 4522 3450 3489 2813 2825 2939 3397 2181 2384

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic bonito

H 4 7 5 1 5 5 0 18 8 2R 12 9 lt 1 3 0 lt 1 lt 1 8 6 5

Atlantic cod

H 231 261 214 413 360 229 216 185 2 29R 658 672 581 884 542 240 411 479 137 616

Atlantic mackerel

H 952 2024 471 2083 1649 1132 2274 1926 4019 3219R 27 152 68 186 42 161 178 225 815 336

BluefishH 683 519 343 474 225 337 447 438 245 273R 1240 1302 953 1028 598 714 580 2213 254 461

HaddockH 293 233 155 143 52 89 105 115 56 371R 56 158 36 33 12 68 310 403 113 848

Porgies (scup)

H 1770 762 1069 925 785 1587 2043 1634 1197 867R 1183 1687 1741 1858 1174 1806 1257 1283 822 1061

Striped bass

H 315 378 344 341 256 378 299 277 171 132R 5331 3649 2283 1671 973 990 1691 1826 1546 2225

Summer flounder

H 138 232 50 45 58 76 31 113 79 55R 135 273 96 215 183 250 62 337 90 145

Winter flounder

H 41 169 87 86 69 46 44 92 43 33R 19 62 84 67 58 18 17 46 30 132

Wrasses (tautog)

H 91 34 25 46 33 25 58 100 40 24R 413 77 96 118 210 96 231 423 185 119

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

94

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Massachusetts | Marine Economy

2015 Massachusett State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 502274 (21) 175225 (23) 3167329 (26) 19803 (32) 28694 (3) 48810 (27) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 24 26 22 27 36 25 28 33 38Receipts 908 1250 1943 2082 2433 1699 1857 2356 4474

Seafood salesretail

Firms 57 64 64 61 66 65 51 56 52Receipts 4421 7982 7686 6287 7640 5213 3842 5782 5154

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 52 44 44 44 44 39 40 42 41Employees 2684 2355 2396 2159 2214 1638 1755 1819 1948

Payroll 113580 109747 119282 107635 112399 74541 87153 99445 108090

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 160 141 144 149 141 140 142 130 129Employees 1803 1442 1542 1591 2013 1841 1910 1859 1808

Payroll 81863 68898 70864 83467 94105 100801 104637 101512 102009

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 126 118 115 112 106 114 114 114 106Employees 737 549 542 584 576 576 708 647 641

Payroll 19267 15017 15261 16495 16037 15776 18304 19516 20201

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 14 14 12 12 10 14 8 12 12Employees 283 169 166 ds ds ds 22 25 36

Payroll 18620 11701 10011 ds ds 3266 1352 1478 2766

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 12 8 10 8 7 9 8 9 8Employees ds 361 ds 313 381 ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds 38908 35473 36069 38797 ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0Employees ds NA ds NA NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA ds NA NA NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 173 175 177 175 176 172 178 177 178

Employees 1154 1138 1188 1150 1125 977 1054 1161 1076Payroll 51705 53694 56663 57002 58251 48657 55053 57797 63422

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 5 3 2 2 2 4 3 3 2Employees 69 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll 2867 2271 ds ds ds ds ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 9 8 11 9 9 8 11 9 8Employees 65 75 71 150 139 120 94 83 88

Payroll 4540 4355 4342 9413 6980 5965 6578 6645 7311

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 3 4 4 8 6 5 3 1 1Employees 69 63 66 86 95 35 ds ds ds

Payroll 647 1289 1323 2662 3035 1519 ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 49 43 38 37 37 40 41 43 39Employees 588 603 579 535 445 446 463 623 576

Payroll 26445 28402 20685 20196 22066 23195 23615 31451 31153

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | New Hampshire

96

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New Hampshire | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the New Hampshire Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 9922 1511091 348439 558040 2577 160077 59239 81009

Commercial Harvesters 890 58255 16465 25569 890 58255 16465 25569Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1060 128231 50387 64971 204 24709 9709 12519

Importers 3395 1049319 168173 319878 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 638 90836 32020 42138 79 11272 3974 5229

Retail 3940 184450 81394 105484 1404 65841 29092 37692

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 17021 17471 17754 20599 23483 23241 20163 24313 27816 33215

Finfish amp Other 4151 4824 5569 5122 6147 5579 2908 2932 2732 2425Shellfish 12870 12647 12186 15477 17336 17662 17256 21381 25084 30790

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 12517 12267 11919 14836 16343 17169 16601 20741 24546 30372Atlantic cod 1972 2311 2587 2187 2500 1750 546 571 93 109Atlantic herring 147 134 271 375 208 349 216 NA 584 NAGoosefish 375 290 280 212 207 153 186 NA 351 338Haddock 123 89 68 29 35 95 22 18 8 14Hake 244 167 215 237 445 474 374 NA 263 271Pollock 902 1093 1283 839 1355 1224 1135 860 356 207Sea scallop 30 16 4 3 26 143 287 346 399 286Shrimp NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 23Spiny dogfish NA 419 557 293 451 420 96 NA NA NA

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 8430 10464 13886 11809 12315 12148 8254 9115 11094 7926

Finfish amp Other 5174 7180 10093 7026 7144 7546 3995 4302 6148 1961Shellfish 3256 3284 3793 4783 5171 4603 4259 4813 4946 5965

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 2469 2567 2985 3648 3919 4229 3818 4373 4722 5782Atlantic cod 1168 1479 1984 1227 1286 726 230 263 45 55Atlantic herring 936 1198 3120 2830 1514 2391 1579 NA 3999 NAGoosefish 325 250 250 172 153 126 162 NA 314 331Haddock 61 53 45 18 19 45 10 10 6 9Hake 313 222 423 322 587 1135 393 NA 309 329Pollock 2025 2456 2017 1042 1732 1049 983 629 270 98Sea scallop 4 2 1 0 3 12 25 27 31 23Shrimp NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4Spiny dogfish NA 1370 2073 1214 1646 1789 515 NA NA NA

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American lobster 507 478 399 407 417 406 435 474 520 525Atlantic cod 169 156 130 178 194 241 238 217 209 197Atlantic herring 016 011 009 013 014 015 014 NA 015 NAGoosefish 115 116 112 123 136 121 115 NA 112 102Haddock 201 170 152 157 191 213 216 174 141 155Hake 078 075 051 074 076 042 095 NA 085 082Pollock 045 045 064 081 078 117 115 137 132 212Sea scallop 826 768 722 884 1035 1168 1154 1271 1288 1238Shrimp NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 585Spiny dogfish NA 031 027 024 027 023 019 NA NA NA

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

97

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New Hampshire | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of New Hampshire Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 59 6924 2646 3728Private Boat 44 4581 2004 2838Shore 28 2515 1015 1553

Total Durable Expenditures 342 33934 15805 22456Total State Economic Impacts 473 47954 21470 30575

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 4161Private Boat 6224Shore 2187Total 12572

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 48330

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 97 63 67 46 56 58 68 50 54 69Non-Coastal 13 8 9 7 10 9 19 11 6 8Out-of-State 63 46 58 33 30 54 66 58 54 57Total Anglers 172 118 134 86 96 121 153 120 115 134

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 114 90 98 61 71 55 116 105 86 34Private 233 139 147 90 178 163 107 113 79 145Shore 155 103 155 92 48 81 89 34 57 114Total Trips 502 333 401 243 297 299 313 252 221 293

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atlantic codH 53 81 128 80 127 64 115 44 1 5R 235 232 209 130 259 150 156 132 260 229

Atlantic mackerel

H 128 497 882 295 2142 1116 707 628 233 793R 9 35 81 18 188 160 14 29 47 127

Bluefin tunaH 0 lt 1 lt 1 0 0 lt 1 0 0 0 0R 0 0 lt 1 lt 1 2 0 0 0 0 0

BluefishH 34 6 lt 1 2 2 9 0 lt 1 2 lt 1R 18 3 2 lt 1 1 5 lt 1 2 0 0

HaddockH 97 90 100 48 76 74 72 76 140 119R 44 18 28 11 20 114 258 424 322 271

PollockH 70 52 40 52 101 65 118 101 93 69R 17 20 50 75 104 147 237 154 320 134

Striped bassH 6 5 9 6 33 14 17 6 2 4R 257 77 57 52 99 64 82 79 56 234

Winter flounder

H 9 11 10 2 12 lt 1 0 4 3 6R 7 6 5 5 1 1 3 5 4 7

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 13200Other Equipment 4065Boat Expenses 16746Vehicle Expenses 1747Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 35758

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

98

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

New Hampshire | Marine Economy

2015 New Hampshire State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 103345 (04) 37669 (05) 576424 (05) 2808 (04) 4244 (04) 7427 (04) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 5 ds ds 3 7 7 6 6 4Receipts 927 ds ds 687 856 1166 1239 1019 1411

Seafood salesretail

Firms 11 17 14 11 11 12 15 15 9Receipts 1540 1894 1870 1502 2152 2096 1861 2419 1722

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 7 7 8 8 8 8 7 6 8Employees ds ds 115 292 231 229 225 ds 182

Payroll ds ds 3234 10971 12010 12181 13751 ds 11160

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 8 8 8 8 7 8 9 8 9Employees 92 101 88 80 84 99 113 106 108

Payroll 3360 4142 4268 4171 4123 5738 4562 4271 4543

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 15 14 14 12 16 9 9 9 9Employees 93 83 95 102 88 48 45 ds 57

Payroll 2077 2011 2299 2296 1934 870 966 1699 1659

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0Employees ds NA NA NA NA ds NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA NA NA NA ds NA NA NA

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds NADeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Employees NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 35 37 37 35 34 31 35 35 35

Employees 171 173 146 135 139 131 155 144 153Payroll 7774 8114 7022 6920 7090 6927 8031 8043 8788

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Employees ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NANavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 18

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1920

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 1Employees NA NA NA NA NA ds ds ds ds

Payroll NA NA NA NA NA ds ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 8 9 8 7 7 7 7 8 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 181

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 9800

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Rhode Island

100

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Rhode Island | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Rhode Island Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 10828 1375375 334588 528970 5193 332575 120271 168541

Commercial Harvesters 2316 161929 48839 76197 2316 161929 48839 76197Seafood Processors amp Dealers 535 62563 24243 31504 326 38108 14767 19190

Importers 2755 851288 136435 259510 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 586 78598 27849 36644 133 17778 6299 8288

Retail 4636 220998 97221 125116 2419 114760 50366 64866

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 72282 66085 61657 62739 75929 81136 86371 86344 81833 93872Finfish amp Other 24802 22732 23383 22995 24891 28611 29470 31824 26044 23411Shellfish 47480 43353 38274 39744 51038 52525 56901 54521 55788 70462

Key SpeciesAll other flounders 3585 2171 1455 593 806 1025 2124 2945 1771 1462American lobster 12151 12976 11264 12404 12765 12119 9732 11709 12345 11889Atlantic herring 982 631 1260 1423 1343 2174 4907 2303 1373 1525Atlantic mackerel 1182 882 3301 1886 100 2804 339 309 1074 448Goosefish 3540 3590 3022 2973 4600 3844 2725 2990 2730 2486Quahog clam 4010 3273 2849 3293 3920 5169 5033 5099 5449 5609Scups or porgies 2767 2324 2640 2833 3312 3904 3666 4118 4278 4056Sea scallop 8963 2170 2342 2156 6834 9191 18639 10273 7885 9242Squid 15339 17687 15249 12590 20380 12744 13208 17718 20288 33938Summer flounder 4346 4485 4502 5534 6408 6937 6751 7298 6107 5475

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 75271 72027 84041 77738 78747 85232 89886 91684 75633 82539Finfish amp Other 40878 34478 46479 42566 42162 52745 63787 57440 46678 41058Shellfish 34393 37549 37562 35172 36585 32487 26099 34245 28955 41480

Key SpeciesAll other flounders 1871 1144 1027 358 615 664 1368 2158 1057 766American lobster 2293 2772 2840 2929 2754 2706 2156 2413 2316 2260Atlantic herring 7537 4504 9528 8479 8729 13839 28330 16505 10431 9539Atlantic mackerel 4242 2385 9057 4356 162 5497 714 539 1906 1143Goosefish 3209 3225 2841 2556 3242 2873 2818 2893 2529 2201Quahog clam 610 556 511 599 666 903 818 764 683 659Scups or porgies 3932 2151 3619 4299 6335 6309 7346 6949 6794 6815Sea scallop 1357 310 356 267 690 944 1646 841 661 799Squid 23718 26417 26452 19799 25996 11689 12609 24938 20495 32914Summer flounder 1516 1473 1794 2289 2824 2409 2193 2056 1716 1305

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

All other flounders 192 190 142 166 131 154 155 136 168 191American lobster 530 468 397 424 464 448 451 485 533 526Atlantic herring 013 014 013 017 015 016 017 014 013 016Atlantic mackerel 028 037 036 043 062 051 047 057 056 039Goosefish 110 111 106 116 142 134 097 103 108 113Quahog clam 657 588 558 550 589 572 615 667 798 851Scups or porgies 070 108 073 066 052 062 050 059 063 060Sea scallop 661 700 658 807 990 973 1132 1221 1193 1157Squid 065 067 058 064 078 109 105 071 099 103Summer flounder 287 304 251 242 227 288 308 355 356 420

101

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Rhode Island | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Rhode Island Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 113 13793 5244 7604Private Boat 117 12243 4885 7840Shore 81 8587 3433 5535

Total Durable Expenditures 3862 377448 162659 249102Total State Economic Impacts 4173 412071 176221 270081

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 8220Private Boat 14627Shore 10308Total 33155

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 79492Other Equipment 25315Boat Expenses 203643Vehicle Expenses 20708Second Home Expenses 779Total Durable Expenditures 329937

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 363092

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 171 169 111 161 105 99 129 160 123 149Non-Coastal NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAOut-of-State 229 297 209 225 190 169 255 304 175 243Total Anglers 401 465 320 387 296 268 383 464 298 392

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 74 67 56 41 39 40 48 52 52 45Private 590 716 423 531 536 461 587 491 513 412Shore 759 673 507 667 539 575 595 556 314 701Total Trips 1423 1456 986 1239 1114 1077 1229 1099 879 1159

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic bonito

H 5 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 0 lt 1 4 2 lt 1 0R 4 1 0 0 0 0 4 6 2 lt 1

Atlantic cod

H lt 1 2 4 2 4 16 lt 1 13 16 55R lt 1 lt 1 7 12 14 1 lt 1 5 12 35

Black seabass

H 44 52 36 160 50 103 75 214 234 255R 118 128 134 212 221 766 684 859 752 1162

BluefishH 295 282 65 103 124 673 323 136 67 73R 686 491 160 94 328 427 625 114 258 286

Porgies (scup)

H 353 633 140 398 568 498 820 976 542 577R 613 1386 333 536 662 675 616 579 614 1405

Striped bass

H 101 51 71 70 89 62 217 104 40 58R 678 416 399 183 214 247 826 163 527 414

Summer flounder

H 176 204 72 118 161 103 128 185 164 87R 612 848 382 230 724 382 528 417 413 382

Winter flounder

H lt 1 lt 1 4 2 0 0 0 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1R 3 1 1 lt 1 lt 1 1 0 lt 1 0 lt 1

Wrasses (tautog)

H 125 104 85 197 19 104 136 69 98 87R 267 187 187 187 139 214 281 122 292 282

Yellowfin tuna

H 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 lt 1 4 lt 1R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0

1 NA = not applicable because all Rhode Island residents are considered coastal county residents2 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

102

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf of

Mex

ico

Rhode Island | Marine Economy

2015 Rhode Islandrsquos State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 75223 (03) 28387 (04) 425748 (03) 197 (03) 3185 (03) 5565 (03) 39

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 8 7 9 6 9 10 8 8 6Receipts 2291 1376 1045 907 1168 1441 1393 1418 1381

Seafood salesretail

Firms 23 19 16 17 25 20 22 16 15Receipts 3536 2748 2821 2769 3033 2536 2501 1331 1259

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 6 8 7 5 4 3 3 3 3Employees 196 270 275 193 178 ds ds ds 71

Payroll 6876 6354 5821 6096 5544 ds ds ds 2243

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 35 29 34 32 34 32 31 28 28Employees 224 226 202 204 230 278 182 188 182

Payroll 11447 10505 9534 9815 10264 13064 8412 8763 8140

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 27 23 24 26 23 24 24 27 26Employees 109 94 127 113 109 111 113 114 113

Payroll 2207 2027 2398 2309 2232 2388 2610 2608 2925

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 18

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1574

MarinasEstablishments 68 73 70 72 71 67 71 65 72

Employees 463 476 459 428 460 424 466 449 409Payroll 22029 23204 21372 22227 22618 20811 24214 24876 25206

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 2 5 5 5 5 4 4 3 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 7 8 8 8 8 7 7 6 6Employees ds ds ds ds 107 ds ds ds 69

Payroll ds 5904 3728 3955 4002 3272 ds ds 4209

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 2 1 1 1 5 2 3 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 18

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 951

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 37 39 33 29 30 37 33 33 33Employees 1374 1342 1085 954 916 717 768 939 902

Payroll 55788 54225 41246 40004 33316 32070 34483 42200 41096

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Mid-Atlantic Regionbull Delawarebull Marylandbull New Jerseybull New Yorkbull Virginia

Black sea bass catch on party boat near Ocean City Maryland Photo Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management CouncilMary Sabo

104

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe Mid-Atlantic Region includes Delaware Maryland New Jersey New York and Virginia Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under seven fishery management plans (FMPs) Two of these FMPs are developed in conjunction with the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC) The MAFMC is the lead council for the Spiny Dogfish FMP the NEFMC is the lead for the Monkfish FMP

Mid-Atlantic Region FMPs

bull Atlantic mackerel squid and butterfish

bull Atlantic bluefishbull Spiny dogfish (with

the NEFMC)bull Summer flounder

scup and black sea bass

bull Surfclam and ocean quahog

bull Golden tilefishbull Monkfish (with the

NEFMC)

Summer flounder was listed as experiencing overfishing in 2016

Catch Share ProgramsTwo catch share programs operate in the Mid-Atlantic 1) Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ) Program and 2) Golden Tilefish Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program Following is a description of these catch share programs and their performance Each program is described separately because the surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries are prosecuted as independent fisheries despite being in the same ITQ program

Atlantic Surfclam ITQ Program This program was implemented in 1990 to conserve the surfclam resource and stabilize harvest rates simplify regulatory requirements to minimize public and private management costs promote economic efficiency by bringing harvest capacity in line with processing and biological capacity and create a management approach that is flexible and adaptive to short-term events or circumstances The key performance indicators of

this program show that compared with the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) the 2015 quota and inflation-adjusted revenue per vessel increased However landings the number of active vessels and inflation-adjusted total revenue decreased

Atlantic Ocean Quahog ITQ Program This program was implemented in 1990 to conserve the quahog resource and stabilize harvest rates simplify regulatory requirements to minimize public and private management costs promote economic efficiency by bringing harvest capacity in line with processing and biological capacity and create a management approach that is flexible and adaptive to short-term events or circumstances The key performance indicators of this program show that relative to the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) the 2015 inflation-adjusted revenue per vessel increased However quota landings number of active vessels and inflation-adjusted total revenue decreased

Golden Tilefish IFQ Program This program was implemented in 2009 to reduce over-capacity and eliminate problems associated with the race to fish golden tilefish This IFQ program is unique because many key events occurred outside the traditional management process Prior to the implementation of the IFQ program fishermen crafted internal agreements that promoted cooperation Their cooperative processes helped fishing businesses stay viable under new regulations which laid the foundation for implementing the IFQ program The key performance indicators of this program show that relative to the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) the 2015 inflation-adjusted revenue and inflation-adjusted revenue per vessel increased However landings quota and the number of active vessels decreased

Policy UpdatesIn 2016 Amendment 16 to the Atlantic mackerel squid and butterfish FMP established the Frank R Lautenberg Deep-Sea Coral Protection Area The action prohibits the use of bottom-tending commercial fishing gear within the designated deep-sea coral area to protect deep-sea corals and deep-sea coral habitats in the Mid-Atlantic Vessels can transit the deep-sea coral area protection

105

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Mid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

area provided the vessels bring bottom-tending fishing gear onboard and reel bottom-tending trawl gear onto the net reel Exemptions for some fishing activities apply This rule went into effect on January 13 2017

In April 2016 the council approved an amendment for golden tilefish The amendment made changes to how discards are deducted from quota made changes to certain reporting requirements prohibited vessels from fishing more than one golden tilefish IFQ allocation at a time required golden tilefish to be landed with the head attached and required that for incidental permit holders golden tilefish not make up more than 25 of the total of all combined species landed

Also in April 2016 the council approved measures to establish management of blueline tilefish in federal waters off the Mid-Atlantic and New England coasts Since June 2015 the portion of the fishery north of North Carolina has been managed under emergency measures that include a commercial trip limit The amendment established a separate blueline tilefish management unit in federal waters north of the North CarolinaVirginia border extending up to the boundary with Canada

In August 2016 final action was taken on an amendment to require electronic submission of vessel trip reports by for-hire vessels with federal permits for council-managed species While electronic submission has been an option since 2011 for some for-hire fisheries the first mobile app-based system for submitting electronically was approved by NOAA Fisheries in 2016 The council voted to require the electronic submission of vessel trip reports and to change the submission time frame to 48 hours instead of monthly

COMMERCIAL FISHERIES In this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries

section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key Mid-Atlantic Region Commercial Species

bull American lobsterbull Atlantic surfclambull Blue crabbull Eastern oysterbull Menhaden

bull Quahog clambull Sea scallopbull Squidbull Striped bassbull Summer flounder

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers1

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total

1 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp SeafoodIndustry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)

106

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 commercial fishing in New Jersey generated the largest employment impacts in the Mid-Atlantic Region 37100 jobs Income impacts ($14 billion) sales impacts ($62 billion) and value-added impacts ($23 billion) were also largest in New Jersey The retail sector in New York generated the highest employment impacts of any state-level sector 16700 jobs The importers sector in New Jersey generated the highest state-level income impacts ($6729 million) sales impacts ($42 billion) and value-added impacts ($13 billion) in the region

Landings TrendsLandings revenue increased $366 million (7) in the Mid-Atlantic Region from 2015 to 2016 with all states experiencing gains with the exception of New York (down 7) New Jersey (up 16) accounted for the majority of this increase ($268 million) while Delaware had the highest growth rate (up 47 or $33 million) In New Jersey the landings revenue increase was primarily due to an increase in landings in a high-value fishery ndash sea scallop harvest was up 34 driving landings revenue up $254 million Region-wide sea scallop landings revenue was up $294 million (20) due to higher landings (up 28)

Other species with sizable increases in landings revenue from 2015 to 2016 included blue crab (up 19 or $187 million) and squid (up 81 or $69 million) The blue crab fishery is the most important fishery in terms of value for Maryland and Delaware and is the second-most-valuable fishery in Virginia Combined these three states comprise 90 and 93 of regional blue crab landings and landings revenue respectively Landings revenue increased in all three states from 2015 to 2016 Delaware was up by $34 million (75) Maryland by

$87 million (17) and Virginia by $78 million (23)

New Jersey and New York account for almost all of the Mid-Atlantic squid landings In a year when global squid production fell 30 year-over-year Mid-Atlantic squid landings almost doubled (up 94)2 While this regional surge in supply depressed overall squid prices (down 7) illex squid prices which are determined in the international market increased 119

Oysters was the only Mid-Atlantic key species with a sizable decrease in landings and landings revenue (down 22 and 25 respectively) from 2015 to 2016 Although 2016 was down relative to the previous year both landings and landings revenue exceeded the 10-year average by 45 and 62 respectively due to surging aquaculture production in Virginia during this time period

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the Mid-Atlantic Region totaled $5503 million in 2016 This number represented a 30 increase from 2007 (a 14 increase in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 7 increase from 2015 Landings revenue was highest in Virginia ($2047 million) followed by New Jersey ($193 million) Shellfish landings revenue made up 80 of total revenue in the region Sea scallop ($1801 million) and blue crab ($1175 million) had the highest landings revenue in the Mid-Atlantic Region in 2016 Together they accounted for 54 of total landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 Eastern oyster (381 320 in real terms) squid (107 81 in real terms) and quahog clam (91 67 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while Atlantic surfclam (-65 -70 in real terms) and American lobster (-64 -69 in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 squid (81) sea scallop (20) and blue crab (19) had the largest revenue increases while Eastern oyster (-25) Atlantic surfclam (-17) and menhaden (-10) had the largest revenue decreases

Landings In 2016 Mid-Atlantic Region commercial fishermen landed 5975 million pounds of finfish and shellfish a 20 decrease from 2007 and an 8 decrease from 2015

2 The decline in global squid production has been attributed to the strong El Nintildeo event in 2015ndash2016

107

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Mid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

Menhaden had the highest landings volume in the Mid-Atlantic Region accounting for 63 of landed weightCommercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Eastern oyster (381 320 in real terms)bull Squid (107 81 in real terms)bull Quahog clam (91 67 in real terms)From 2015bull Squid (81)bull Sea scallop (20)bull Blue crab (19)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Atlantic surfclam (-65 -70 in real terms)bull American lobster (-64 -69 in real terms)From 2015bull Eastern oyster (-25)bull Atlantic surfclam (-17)bull Menhaden (-10)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Eastern oyster (99)bull Squid (80)bull Quahog clam (51)From 2015bull Squid (94)bull Sea scallop (27)bull Quahog clam (20)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Atlantic surfclam (-66)bull American lobster (-62)bull Striped bass (-32)From 2015bull Summer flounder (-28)bull Eastern oyster (-22)bull Atlantic surfclam (-18)

From 2007 to 2016 Eastern oyster (99) squid (80) and quahog clam (51) had the largest landings increases while Atlantic surfclam (-66) American lobster (-62) and striped bass (-32) had the largest

landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 squid (94) sea scallop (27) and quahog clam (20) had the largest landings increases while summer flounder (-28) Eastern oyster (-22) and Atlantic surfclam (-18) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 sea scallop ($1158 per pound) received the highest Mid-Atlantic Region ex-vessel price Landings of menhaden ($010 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price From 2007 to 2016 Eastern oyster (142 111 in real terms) striped bass (99 74 in real terms) and sea scallop (79 57 in real terms) had the largest price increases while American lobster (-5 -17 in real terms) had the largest price decrease From 2015 to 2016 summer flounder (29) striped bass (17) and blue crab (9) had the largest price increases while quahog clam (-7) squid (-7) and sea scallop (-6) had the largest price decreases

RECREATIONAL FISHERIES In this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups3

Key Mid-Atlantic Region Recreational Species

bull Atlantic croakerbull Black sea bassbull Bluefishbull Scupbull Spot

bull Striped bassbull Summer flounderbull Tautogbull Weakfish drumbull Winter flounder

Economic Impacts and Expenditures The contribution of recreational fishing activities4 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean

3 Except where noted Atlantic and Gulf recreational catch and effort estimates are based upon the MRIP APAIS and CHTS (httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovrecreational-fisheriesSurveyssurvey-details) and not the revised MRIP estimates (httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovleadership-messagenoaa-fish-eries-releases-revised-mrip-recreational-catch-and-effort-estimates) released in 20184 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpswwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecre-ationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 avail-able at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

108

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

The greatest employment impacts from expenditures on saltwater recreational fishing in the Mid-Atlantic Region were generated in New Jersey (15400 jobs) followed by New York (10400 jobs) The largest sales impacts were observed in New Jersey ($18 billion) followed by New York ($11 billion) The biggest income impacts were generated in New Jersey ($7462 million) followed by New York ($488 million) The greatest value-added impacts were in New Jersey ($12 billion) followed by New York ($7702 million)

Recreational fishing expenditures (on both fishing trips and durable equipment purchases) across the Mid-Atlantic Region in 2016 totaled about $39 billion Trip expenditures totaled more than $6709 million with a large portion coming from trips in the private boat (59) and shore (27) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $33 billion with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($19 billion) Fishing TripsIn 2016 recreational fishermen took 14 million fishing

trips in the Mid-Atlantic Region This number represented a 37 decrease from 2007 and a 13 increase from 2015 The largest proportions of trips were taken in the private boat mode (55) and shore mode (41) States with the highest number of recorded trips were New Jersey (43 million trips) and New York (43 million trips)

ParticipationIn 2016 there were 24 million recreational anglers who fished in the Mid-Atlantic Region This number represented a 30 decrease from 2007 and a 21 increase from 2015 These anglers were Mid-Atlantic Region residents from either a coastal county (93) or non-coastal county (7)

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Porgies (scup) (33)bull Black sea bass (21)bull Wrasses (tautog) (8)From 2015bull Winter flounder (97)bull Wrasses (tautog) (51)bull Black sea bass (47)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Drum (spot) (-86)bull Drum (Atlantic croaker) (-68)bull Winter flounder (-63)From 2015bull Drum (Atlantic croaker) (-22)bull Drum (weakfish) (-2)

Harvest and ReleaseOf the Mid-Atlantic Regionrsquos key species and species groups summer flounder (122 million fish) black sea bass (93 million fish) and striped bass (86 million fish) were most frequently caught by recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 porgies (scup) (33) black sea bass (21) and wrasses (tautog) (8) had the largest increases in catch while drum (spot) (-86) drum (Atlantic croaker) (-68) and winter flounder (-63) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 winter flounder (97) wrasses (tautog) (51) and black sea

109

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Mid-Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

bass (47) had the largest increases in catch while drum (Atlantic croaker) (-22) and drum (weakfish) (-2) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMY For this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries56

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy7 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average The Bureau of Labor Statistics suppressed the CFLQ value for Delaware for 2015 Of the remaining states in the Mid-Atlantic Region New Jersey had the highest CFLQ at 087

In 2015 11 million employer establishments operated throughout the entire Mid-Atlantic Region (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed over 17 million workers and had a total annual payroll of $1 trillion The combined gross state product of Delaware Maryland New Jersey New York and Virginia was approximately $29 trillion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 the Mid-Atlantic Region had 360 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 71 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $255 million (a 53 increase

in real terms from 2007) There were 67 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 20 decrease from 2007) The greatest number of seafood product preparation and packaging establishments was located in New York (200) followed by Virginia (102) and Maryland (70)

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 420 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the five states that make up the Mid-Atlantic Region (a 24 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $371 million (a 38 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 676 employer firms in the retail sales of seafood sector (a 2 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 3463 workers (a 14 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $894 million (a 28 increase in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of retail seafood establishments was located in New York (581) followed by New Jersey (185) and Maryland (166)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 477 employer firms in the wholesale sales of seafood sector in the Mid-Atlantic Region in 2015 (a 12 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 3943 workers and had a total annual payroll of $186 million The greatest number of wholesale seafood establishments was located in New York (275) followed by New Jersey (78) and Virginia (65)

Transport Support and Marine Operations Data for the transport support and marine operations sector of the Mid-Atlantic Regionrsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons These sectors however play an important role in the regional economy For example the regionrsquos ship and boatbuilding sector accounted for over $2 billion in payroll in 2015 The marine cargo handling sector in Delaware Maryland New Jersey and New York totaled $5793 million in payroll in 2015

5 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)6 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)7 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

Tables | Mid-Atlantic Region

112

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMid-Atlantic Region | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Mid-Atlantic Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Landings Value Value Jobs Sales Income Jobs Sales IncomeRevenue Added AddedDelaware 10097 711 135690 25669 44201 389 49444 10472 16794Maryland 94814 12084 1241437 334891 503948 7794 455214 167654 228300New Jersey 193011 37127 6226130 1412545 2282101 8244 737544 245105 351891New York 47731 33081 4411529 949879 1567277 3400 175363 60931 85227Virginia 204690 18220 1434996 463734 660196 15852 972185 371324 502628

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 423232 452636 435847 521140 552315 510297 435977 476778 513724 550343Finfish amp Other 103372 91280 101445 111451 119630 130357 124379 119146 117041 108192Shellfish 319861 361356 334403 409690 432685 379941 311598 357633 396682 442150

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 8744 7213 5989 6265 4692 5271 4063 3731 3195 3132Atlantic surfclam 32479 30019 26426 19940 18737 16501 13688 12792 13581 11212Blue crab 69498 80912 80019 127737 101630 101942 86787 88992 98759 117454Eastern oyster 9039 11205 9356 12038 13043 20231 37230 54577 57914 43459Menhaden 29918 24457 28581 40315 39666 40043 33780 33332 40358 36243Quahog clam 23601 35853 23022 28880 27607 29502 35902 38153 40377 45021Sea scallop 147053 165916 161814 184288 227443 168921 100411 125680 150716 180147Squid 7443 7724 7158 12031 20646 17819 12078 8294 8529 15443Striped bass 10993 10671 11459 9450 10520 14622 19792 16553 13181 14837Summer flounder 10855 9693 9980 12849 15614 17194 17131 13195 14576 13478

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 749980 687788 694960 812857 797355 759928 582307 595351 650684 597535Finfish amp Other 555560 481567 489221 578227 574674 568026 444182 455886 506475 437180Shellfish 194420 206221 205739 234630 222681 191901 138125 139464 144209 160355

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 1604 1520 1576 1549 1086 1271 980 818 632 602Atlantic surfclam 53952 48099 41692 30946 30272 26535 22788 21430 22452 18328Blue crab 65070 67975 76097 119286 104414 88964 55424 54407 67949 74064Eastern oyster 2388 1778 1438 1770 2038 2749 4311 5456 6067 4750Menhaden 472086 397537 395469 499578 496829 492532 366343 379997 436568 375201Quahog clam 4115 5246 3255 3685 3551 3730 4586 5016 5154 6203Sea scallop 22793 24355 25646 23998 23385 17627 8855 10256 12202 15557Squid 8607 8241 8310 26822 33333 26069 14549 8142 7970 15454Striped bass 5477 5693 5852 5582 5461 5589 4709 5045 3853 3719Summer flounder 4725 4260 5137 6384 8672 7795 8010 4901 5031 3610

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

American lobster 545 475 380 404 432 415 414 456 506 520Atlantic surfclam 060 062 063 064 062 062 060 060 060 061Blue crab 107 119 105 107 097 115 157 164 145 159Eastern oyster 379 630 651 680 640 736 864 1000 955 915Menhaden 006 006 007 008 008 008 009 009 009 010Quahog clam 574 683 707 784 777 791 783 761 783 726Sea scallop 645 681 631 768 973 958 1134 1225 1235 1158Squid 086 094 086 045 062 068 083 102 107 100Striped bass 201 187 196 169 193 262 420 328 342 399Summer flounder 230 228 194 201 180 221 214 269 290 373

113

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Mid-Atlantic Region | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Mid-Atlantic Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars trips)Trips Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Delaware 910 1658 168169 67446 110381Maryland 2383 7608 784528 327372 512722New Jersey 4306 15363 1751578 746203 1167991New York 4294 10404 1127261 488015 770189Virginia 2108 5893 583806 239344 378694

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 91613Private Boat 398542Shore 180755Total 670909

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 835169Other Equipment 290995Boat Expenses 1925349Vehicle Expenses 199636Second Home Expenses 14542Total Durable Expenditures 3265692

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 3936601

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 3234 2823 2437 2598 2244 2093 2080 2111 1860 2238Non-Coastal 212 197 187 178 145 175 139 130 124 169Out-of-State NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 3446 3020 2623 2776 2389 2268 2219 2241 1984 2407

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 1690 1143 1111 873 1050 951 1365 1258 1316 624Private 12371 11566 9708 9366 8512 7676 6851 7633 6082 7682Shore 8125 8005 6196 6346 6413 5805 6000 5455 5022 5695Total Trips 22186 20714 17015 16585 15976 14432 14216 14346 12420 14001

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bassH 1302 926 1335 1317 532 1134 786 1049 1306 1460R 6403 8475 6273 6458 3203 7666 5110 4997 5026 7842

BluefishH 4947 3515 2933 2560 2467 2640 2167 3210 1635 1928R 8011 7211 4457 3936 4242 4269 2463 4049 2612 2985

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 8583 9978 7308 6019 3993 4788 6571 5165 4406 3244R 11025 12910 9405 6232 5390 8429 10516 5638 3567 3001

Drum (spot)H 11998 6557 4346 3698 4032 2849 5791 5444 1402 1536R 3940 4490 2238 2575 2610 2642 5798 1845 839 729

Drum (weakfish)

H 332 372 38 15 8 157 49 21 38 22R 1037 1987 180 459 469 955 211 217 509 517

Porgies (scup)H 1699 1543 1637 2736 770 714 1242 1228 1991 1570R 2500 3171 2292 2413 1041 1628 1967 1765 2260 4006

Striped bassH 1775 1683 1387 1407 1653 951 1478 1271 944 1271R 7730 4787 3802 3467 3781 3410 4706 4609 5414 7334

Summer flounder

H 2543 1724 1564 1226 1513 1968 2048 1995 1245 1650R 16577 18433 21371 21400 18466 13317 12128 15117 9621 10510

Winter flounder

H 108 44 76 56 92 44 6 37 6 46R 43 32 138 102 126 36 33 20 23 10

Wrasses (tautog)

H 728 669 692 761 352 165 236 547 278 403R 2202 1979 1911 2317 1531 1110 1219 1852 1823 2763

1 NA = data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but does not specify whether an angler resides in a region

Tables | Delaware

116

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oDelaware | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Delaware Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 711 135690 25669 44201 389 49444 10472 16794

Commercial Harvesters 190 18499 4402 5960 190 18499 4402 5960Seafood Processors amp Dealers 43 8539 1502 2888 36 7162 1260 2423

Importers 237 73132 11721 22294 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 63 9472 3602 4294 24 3618 1376 1640

Retail 178 26049 4442 8764 138 20165 3434 6771

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 7931 6900 7543 7845 7092 8464 7422 7220 6846 10097

Finfish amp Other 1303 1092 1004 1047 1248 1012 1493 1219 1075 1070Shellfish 6628 5808 6538 6798 5844 7452 5929 6001 5771 9027

Key SpeciesAmerican eel 292 190 134 206 274 159 244 156 127 130Black sea bass 198 156 25 8 2 0 2 NA 304 7Blue crab 5329 4605 5435 5957 4819 6664 4576 4379 4498 7856Eastern oyster 490 410 334 404 347 345 407 420 358 462Quahog clam 181 127 117 110 143 123 177 133 97 65Sea scallop NA 256 173 NA NA NA NA NA NA NASpot 57 40 49 50 66 16 64 104 3 23Striped bass 300 403 327 400 412 470 766 496 465 505Weakfish 31 18 5 4 2 56 16 7 3 8Whelks 540 352 389 272 361 83 414 577 436 333

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 5346 4706 5011 5214 4921 5640 4048 3727 3529 4980

Finfish amp Other 899 630 773 718 881 628 774 853 658 519Shellfish 4448 4076 4238 4496 4040 5012 3274 2874 2871 4461

Key SpeciesAmerican eel 131 80 60 69 91 54 83 62 45 45Black sea bass 73 61 6 3 4 0 4 NA 112 2Blue crab 3799 3508 3414 4110 3502 4571 2488 2000 2124 3928Eastern oyster 80 67 67 71 62 60 71 73 61 73Quahog clam 44 36 31 30 39 32 43 41 30 17Sea scallop NA 38 25 NA NA NA NA NA NA NASpot 62 32 61 60 82 18 73 107 3 14Striped bass 143 189 184 185 185 190 187 167 144 137Weakfish 25 11 3 2 1 29 9 4 1 5Whelks 288 217 313 138 131 29 156 229 177 126

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American eel 222 238 224 300 303 293 294 250 283 293Black sea bass 273 257 431 263 050 085 050 NA 273 450Blue crab 140 131 159 145 138 146 184 219 212 200Eastern oyster 614 609 497 567 556 576 571 571 585 635Quahog clam 409 357 379 369 372 384 407 325 326 380Sea scallop NA 681 680 NA NA NA NA NA NA NASpot 092 124 081 084 081 089 088 097 093 165Striped bass 209 213 177 216 222 247 409 298 323 370Weakfish 127 175 193 156 201 195 185 187 192 181Whelks 188 162 124 197 276 289 266 251 246 263

1 NA = these data are confidential therefore not disclosable

117

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Delaware | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Delaware Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 20 2666 1003 1480Private Boat 99 11581 2921 5394Shore 277 25987 7737 13995

Total Durable Expenditures 1262 127935 55785 89512Total State Economic Impacts 1658 168169 67446 110381

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 1678Private Boat 11500Shore 22756Total 35934

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 41297Other Equipment 13820Boat Expenses 79480Vehicle Expenses 7711Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 142308

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 178242

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 150 134 114 128 129 111 82 93 67 104Non-Coastal NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAOut-of-State 224 182 173 165 190 151 97 146 84 168Total Anglers 374 315 287 293 318 262 179 239 151 272

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 71 55 44 21 18 20 37 40 38 13Private 721 528 487 408 511 481 349 363 195 312Shore 459 444 379 391 397 374 378 464 262 585Total Trips 1251 1028 911 819 926 875 765 867 495 910

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic mackerel

H 0 0 0 0 0 0 lt 1 0 lt 1 0R 0 0 2 0 0 lt 1 lt 1 0 0 lt 1

Black sea bassH 93 23 37 21 43 40 37 24 23 24R 584 464 293 231 211 204 249 229 167 289

BluefishH 153 69 98 32 46 36 25 128 59 42R 538 167 167 57 128 118 70 324 132 151

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 359 369 452 75 92 88 232 413 145 8R 673 602 538 229 89 447 770 665 119 171

Drum (weakfish)

H 4 4 6 lt 1 lt 1 4 8 3 lt 1 lt 1R 23 61 4 13 7 85 22 23 16 26

Striped bassH 8 27 20 16 18 25 20 9 3 2R 249 261 146 65 110 110 83 185 44 116

Summer flounder

H 108 35 87 54 67 45 58 93 51 90R 1072 605 964 619 616 253 238 292 156 285

White perchH 34 40 64 187 112 70 119 106 34 4R 191 243 121 397 272 187 369 65 106 19

Wrasses (tautog)

H 100 102 120 57 45 47 38 50 7 30R 267 164 224 196 88 107 99 77 27 163

Yellowfin tunaH lt 1 1 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 1 lt 1 lt 1R 0 0 lt 1 0 lt 1 0 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 0

1 Data is not available because all Delaware residents are considered coastal county residents2 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 ish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

118

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oDelaware | Marine Economy

2015 Delaware State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 59078 (02) 24852 (03) 397385 (03) 2131 (03) 3063 (03) 6886 (04) ds

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms ds 3 NA ds ds ds ds ds dsReceipts ds 27 NA ds ds ds ds ds ds

Seafood salesretail

Firms 12 9 10 9 9 11 8 13 11Receipts 1025 418 813 1107 1226 1333 520 452 479

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 3 6 7 7 7 7 9 8 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 54

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds 3020 2381 2404

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 19 18 16 15 18 16 17 17 14Employees 105 ds 50 47 49 ds 60 52 36

Payroll 2997 1498 1348 1414 1493 1545 1396 1261 1224

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 1Employees ds ds ds ds NA NA NA NA ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds NA NA NA NA ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 0 4 4 5 2 1 1 2 4Employees NA ds ds 120 ds ds ds ds 98

Payroll NA ds ds 10768 ds ds ds ds 8771Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 1Employees NA NA NA ds NA NA ds ds ds

Payroll NA NA NA ds NA NA ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 17 19 16 19 17 18 19 18 18

Employees 88 65 ds 65 ds 67 64 95 86Payroll 2540 1738 1877 2342 3106 1963 2196 2293 2527

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3Employees 527 629 ds 434 511 ds 565 541 577

Payroll 19027 19204 16952 16835 19203 ds 20698 22789 23370Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 8 9 8 8 8 8 8 10 10Employees 76 79 85 76 78 ds 82 92 81

Payroll 4961 5360 5672 5176 5096 3111 5330 5350 5938

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 2 2 3 3 4 3 2 2Employees ds ds ds 29 44 ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds 1182 1512 ds ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 1 2 2 2 3 4 4 6 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds 50 61 55 57

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds 2313 2516 2174 2168

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Maryland

120

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMaryland | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Maryland Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 12084 1241437 334891 503948 7794 455214 167654 228300

Commercial Harvesters 3115 167264 47699 74435 3115 167264 47699 74435Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1310 129799 50582 64590 706 69971 27267 34819

Importers 1977 611003 97925 186261 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 544 80243 27277 36218 223 32895 11182 14847

Retail 5137 253128 111409 142444 3750 185085 81507 104199

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 65329 73196 75893 103825 82567 85069 75860 91051 88839 94814Finfish amp Other 12252 11264 11691 13012 13126 15724 17217 18846 16293 16042Shellfish 53077 61933 64202 90813 69441 69345 58643 72205 72546 78772

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 335 442 415 482 482 663 450 492 360 146Black sea bass 454 445 451 590 507 421 702 834 859 898Blue crab 41690 50115 52049 79055 60326 60467 49956 52848 52026 60677Clams or bivalves 5074 5436 4403 5400 4173 2259 362 1253 1915 3563Eastern oyster 3146 2277 3849 4385 3691 5710 7357 15687 15093 12265Menhaden 1379 915 884 729 685 1669 861 1380 1253 987Sea scallop 2809 3758 3160 1188 551 202 8 1328 3077 1783Striped bass 5333 5232 5180 5425 5623 6933 9931 8092 6357 7102Summer flounder 546 578 551 541 463 380 519 598 770 624White perch 619 776 942 1154 1493 1430 1029 1360 1317 1221

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 61585 63534 66819 101739 76258 75416 43374 49922 54248 56316Finfish amp Other 21644 18732 20038 27229 18582 27350 16904 21201 21580 17917Shellfish 39942 44802 46781 74510 57675 48066 26470 28721 32667 38399

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 576 778 550 589 804 1041 855 504 358 162Black sea bass 171 159 126 203 167 141 219 252 263 272Blue crab 30778 34872 38801 66262 51163 43737 24179 24690 28674 34861Clams or bivalves 7947 8600 6292 6971 5412 2962 609 1955 1983 2224Eastern oyster 317 249 498 432 356 618 788 1196 1191 887Menhaden 13751 9615 9419 15467 8016 16383 7298 8363 8989 6098Sea scallop 450 569 521 153 58 20 1 110 248 149Striped bass 2640 2655 2812 2510 2343 2541 2018 2353 1752 1709Summer flounder 229 208 214 261 259 165 178 192 244 159White perch 973 858 1301 1700 2059 1956 1244 1516 1698 1851

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atlantic croaker 058 057 075 082 060 064 053 098 101 090Black sea bass 266 279 359 290 304 299 320 331 327 330Blue crab 135 144 134 119 118 138 207 214 181 174Clams or bivalves 064 063 070 077 077 076 059 064 097 160Eastern oyster 992 913 773 1015 1037 924 934 1311 1267 1383Menhaden 010 010 009 005 009 010 012 017 014 016Sea scallop 625 660 606 777 953 1023 1227 1211 124 1194Striped bass 202 197 184 216 240 273 492 344 363 415Summer flounder 239 278 258 207 178 230 292 311 316 393White perch 064 090 072 068 073 073 083 090 078 066

121

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Maryland | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Maryland Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 395 41511 15987 23622Private Boat 468 47234 17255 26957Shore 461 42382 15513 25445

Total Durable Expenditures 6284 653401 278617 436698Total State Economic Impacts 7608 784528 327372 512722

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 27564Private Boat 58098Shore 38494Total 124156

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 142447Other Equipment 65672Boat Expenses 398169Vehicle Expenses 48903Second Home Expenses 3479Total Durable Expenditures 658670

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 782826

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 850 643 514 552 415 374 404 413 364 453Non-Coastal 78 50 43 54 49 40 36 41 31 23Out-of-State 528 507 327 462 372 258 329 338 352 352Total Anglers 1456 1200 884 1068 836 672 769 792 748 829

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 270 194 203 139 161 151 154 211 180 128Private 2352 1891 1608 1643 1453 1281 1576 1388 1477 1450Shore 1082 1273 1082 1150 1206 817 1005 874 662 805Total Trips 3704 3358 2893 2932 2819 2249 2735 2473 2319 2383

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bassH 39 26 33 36 47 33 30 68 58 80R 577 674 454 669 353 290 350 501 302 404

BluefishH 676 551 591 273 259 114 54 160 102 113R 1172 1631 670 161 408 138 259 142 194 136

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 873 620 1335 1137 554 979 1140 1080 815 188R 1258 2127 1138 1011 366 1731 2937 1146 627 245

Drum (spot)H 3615 1892 2064 1164 913 766 936 1254 524 467R 1619 1738 633 1155 297 920 2622 566 243 230

Striped bassH 765 415 502 458 445 262 477 583 406 596R 3065 1339 1423 1509 1128 2207 2387 2415 3118 4511

Summer flounder

H 104 58 65 25 15 23 53 80 44 22R 1018 923 816 1225 473 214 280 631 244 382

Weakfish drum

H 7 2 4 5 lt 1 11 2 1 3 1R 64 37 8 163 18 25 10 5 118 81

White perchH 2890 1511 551 2613 1572 1534 2258 808 710 1945R 5424 3853 1137 2891 2348 4143 6295 2164 2125 2344

Wrasses (tautog)

H 43 19 38 57 12 5 4 lt 1 3 2R 178 151 133 361 76 110 53 2 79 80

Yellowfin tunaH 4 lt 1 5 1 lt 1 0 2 10 5 11R lt 1 0 2 lt 1 0 0 4 1 0 13

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 ish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

122

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMaryland | Marine Economy

2015 Maryland State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 473516 (19) 137204 (18) 2239817 (18) 1185 (19) 20255 (21) 36624 (2) 048

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 56 56 42 43 55 67 49 60 53Receipts 3940 3310 2268 2138 2374 3030 3158 3230 3133

Seafood salesretail

Firms 99 84 94 85 86 96 95 87 87Receipts 10493 9010 8819 6177 7396 6454 6147 8437 8104

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 22 22 19 18 17 16 16 17 17Employees 1296 1003 245 273 264 266 309 284 288

Payroll 32386 39328 13049 12652 12773 13587 12455 13131 13631

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 62 60 61 63 57 60 58 58 53Employees 978 851 777 795 775 724 636 630 605

Payroll 50353 42296 39055 39067 38971 34194 30119 31503 33739

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 102 94 87 87 88 87 87 83 79Employees 613 590 485 526 562 575 574 562 539

Payroll 14777 11510 11499 11810 12883 13027 13623 13907 15033

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 8 6 7 8 6 4 4 8 6Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds 538 ds ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 14 13 15 15 16 14 10 11 11Employees 244 250 255 390 329 245 139 135 118

Payroll 14905 19765 20722 24185 25071 17938 10041 11600 11097Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 3 2 1 0 0 1 0 0Employees ds ds ds ds NA NA ds NA NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds NA NA ds NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 183 179 176 175 172 159 170 166 172

Employees 1326 1383 1289 1275 1294 1276 1328 1366 1380Payroll 48752 45965 45483 43508 43330 43531 45540 47443 50633

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 15 15 16 17 17 6 12 12 12Employees 1791 1572 1599 2742 1924 ds 1519 1132 1140

Payroll 85328 48382 46727 95182 86680 ds 60500 60962 81751Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 8 9 11 10 11 10 11 10 11Employees 157 92 77 84 84 ds 245 131 125

Payroll 4882 3968 3807 4015 4259 ds 17066 6345 6411

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 8 3 4 5 5 22 16 17 15Employees 323 ds ds ds ds 1875 962 1220 1349

Payroll 13427 ds ds ds ds 93001 44436 57543 55375

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 48 46 38 35 35 34 31 35 36Employees 874 677 416 ds 633 378 371 449 456

Payroll 29500 22363 16238 ds 36675 14619 16822 18130 20599

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | New Jersey

124

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNew Jersey | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the New Jersey Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 37127 6226130 1412545 2282101 8244 737544 245105 351891

Commercial Harvesters 2935 384655 101056 163908 2935 384655 101056 163908Seafood Processors amp Dealers 5099 529766 200633 261867 753 78228 29627 38669

Importers 13585 4198321 672861 1279832 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 2172 388025 124711 169583 217 38701 12439 16914

Retail 13337 725362 313284 406911 4339 235959 101984 132401

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 151509 168508 151539 178572 220377 187707 132860 149301 166181 193011Finfish amp Other 24234 19936 24074 23031 26808 28639 25951 24911 29095 26218Shellfish 127275 148572 127465 155540 193569 159068 106909 124390 137086 166794

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 4056 3215 2278 2895 3039 3938 2797 2380 2249 1892Atlantic herring 562 548 1507 422 415 147 401 615 308 292Atlantic mackerel 668 1568 1539 848 53 589 18 12 546 79Blue crab 5471 7284 184 12030 9422 10009 8111 4145 8704 7696Eastern oyster NA 2547 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAGoosefish 4486 4005 3018 2752 3654 3301 2453 2428 2364 2470Ocean quahog amp surfclams 26547 30838 27496 23889 25301 25453 22962 11455 10889 9970Quahog clam 968 6254 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASea scallop 77359 91317 90150 109118 142505 110560 65190 87746 97856 123266Summer flounder 3988 3461 3376 4552 5461 5434 4899 4862 5059 5389

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 153848 162308 162029 162164 187539 180505 119912 125114 148419 123565Finfish amp Other 65166 62821 73623 74881 94678 104174 61790 64901 94220 62297Shellfish 88683 99487 88406 87282 92861 76331 58122 60213 54198 61268

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 680 633 585 689 687 919 660 526 445 351Atlantic herring 6038 6539 13692 4140 2385 1114 2344 4087 3428 2798Atlantic mackerel 5384 9426 10255 4692 107 2017 46 17 2188 306Blue crab 4636 5816 257 9461 9600 7393 4391 3233 7247 6910Eastern oyster NA 550 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAGoosefish 4231 3698 2692 2024 2274 2212 2231 2172 1903 1885Ocean quahog amp surfclams 44791 51597 45306 38538 41281 38921 35960 19447 18283 16492Quahog clam 240 1516 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASea scallop 11808 13282 14045 14171 14545 11379 5640 7133 7847 10481Summer flounder 1697 1541 1799 2165 2831 2269 2004 1826 1682 1286

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American lobster 596 508 389 420 442 428 423 452 505 538Atlantic herring 009 008 011 010 017 013 017 015 009 010Atlantic mackerel 012 017 015 018 050 029 040 073 025 026Blue crab 118 125 072 127 098 135 185 128 120 111Eastern oyster NA 463 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAGoosefish 106 108 112 136 161 149 110 112 124 131Ocean quahog amp surfclams 059 060 061 062 061 065 064 059 060 060Quahog clam 404 412 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NASea scallop 655 688 642 770 980 972 1156 1230 1247 1176Summer flounder 235 225 188 210 193 239 244 266 301 419

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

125

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New Jersey | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of New Jersey Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 221 33359 14459 20176Private Boat 1138 154152 54285 87574Shore 594 71915 26791 43350

Total Durable Expenditures 13410 1492152 650668 1016891Total State Economic Impacts 15363 1751578 746203 1167991

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 19646Private Boat 138129Shore 59141Total 216915

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 302804Other Equipment 90772Boat Expenses 711797Vehicle Expenses 76099Second Home Expenses 3715Total Durable Expenditures 1185188

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1402103

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 890 765 656 776 687 662 581 607 515 507Non-Coastal 19 26 35 36 23 27 20 17 24 32Out-of-State 518 456 454 449 357 431 330 566 448 378Total Anglers 1427 1246 1145 1261 1067 1121 931 1189 987 916

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 605 449 434 320 383 369 550 514 466 183Private 3614 3595 2671 3265 2446 2580 1914 2508 1877 2347Shore 2979 2857 2234 2278 2334 2072 1900 1846 1945 1776Total Trips 7198 6901 5339 5863 5163 5020 4364 4868 4287 4306

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Black sea bass

H 725 580 583 687 148 735 345 468 310 294R 2423 4432 3138 3870 1302 3818 2546 2243 2053 2454

Bluefin tuna

H 7 3 14 6 2 lt 1 9 5 lt 1 2R lt 1 1 2 7 6 0 0 lt 1 lt 1 4

Bluefish H 1654 1028 814 910 1150 1190 792 1343 827 924R 2735 1477 1476 1886 1911 1996 884 1853 1055 1675

Drum (weakfish)

H 230 298 12 2 3 114 31 7 30 7R 613 1436 79 103 100 732 94 80 246 136

Red hake H 1 152 240 124 206 58 82 177 19 29R 0 20 23 24 13 15 55 13 6 7

Striped bass

H 290 309 283 320 393 169 401 226 284 271R 1789 1309 801 690 884 406 1073 1051 859 794

Summer flounder

H 1067 762 825 552 737 1130 1232 1175 497 755R 6192 8959 10414 10565 8096 6981 6427 9513 4677 6114

Winter flounder

H 97 3 7 24 28 lt 1 5 13 lt 1 19R 28 15 27 38 25 2 29 9 22 7

Wrasses (tautog)

H 300 173 127 375 137 38 111 170 157 83R 1290 902 856 1063 843 510 461 778 683 693

Yellowfin tuna

H 58 7 7 25 17 69 95 7 7 17R 0 1 16 lt 1 lt 1 9 7 0 9 12

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 ish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

126

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNew Jersey | Marine Economy

2015 New Jersey State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 653271 (27) 230961 (3) 3558619 (29) 20907 (33) 30841 (32) 56436 (31) 087

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 25 22 33 47 29 35 48 45 39Receipts 2399 1851 3670 3613 3447 3565 4981 5736 3603

Seafood salesretail

Firms 90 92 86 66 68 77 74 74 70Receipts 11320 11196 11131 8265 8049 8972 8257 7135 7711

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 16 14 13 11 12 11 13 13 15Employees 628 566 661 482 518 404 671 647 715

Payroll 18403 18703 22025 17427 17940 13747 22764 21933 25929

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 101 81 83 90 91 82 80 78 78Employees 978 856 858 848 935 1058 765 795 784

Payroll 41994 37462 37348 38065 40103 44033 37405 36773 39900

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 124 118 106 108 109 114 114 108 115Employees 472 368 332 332 332 382 419 434 446

Payroll 10352 9372 9126 9094 9264 11561 11657 12520 12591

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 23 18 19 18 20 16 16 13 13Employees 778 645 594 600 508 402 367 365 414

Payroll 56017 48911 41925 44246 40587 32007 32431 33308 37888

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 31 27 26 26 26 25 20 21 24Employees 566 1115 1045 ds ds 390 225 212 193

Payroll 44133 75848 66547 78898 81936 27481 12263 11271 11522Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 2 2 3 2 2 2 0 2 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds NA ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds NA ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 216 211 214 212 206 210 206 190 196

Employees 1045 916 784 781 773 811 787 737 776Payroll 41624 39596 35811 35475 34675 35760 37606 36583 38469

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 23 21 22 21 22 15 20 21 20Employees 4781 4244 3479 3292 3744 2582 6912 6082 5005

Payroll 350690 278189 230886 260894 273636 203148 538991 563746 521401Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 26 20 19 16 17 18 18 18 20Employees 227 191 133 75 110 96 106 92 88

Payroll 11403 7776 6638 6125 5619 5983 6057 5597 6914

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 8 6 6 11 7 25 18 18 17Employees 271 143 54 124 163 ds ds ds 106

Payroll 12197 12446 5548 10463 16933 139276 5995 6334 6305

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 31 30 25 24 23 21 24 24 23Employees 2305 2019 1188 1056 864 901 917 1080 1329

Payroll 91460 79309 42909 37920 39810 36334 41886 50459 59130

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = data not available

Tables | New York

128

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNew York | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the New York Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 33081 4411529 949879 1567277 3400 175363 60931 85227

Commercial Harvesters 1591 85636 24618 37859 1591 85636 24618 37859Seafood Processors amp Dealers 709 114261 43444 56508 119 19233 7313 9512

Importers 10815 3342329 535672 1018888 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 3235 261688 88467 119283 117 9480 3205 4321

Retail 16730 607617 257679 334739 1572 61015 25796 33536

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 60314 57429 48856 47717 48303 54524 56809 56316 51372 47731Finfish amp Other 19936 18534 17331 18575 20087 23515 23271 19688 19261 19067Shellfish 40378 38896 31525 29142 28215 31009 33537 36628 32112 28665

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 4623 3821 3468 3165 1398 999 938 985 710 1035Atlantic surfclam 5932 5670 5858 3929 545 2783 2410 1338 1530 1242Eastern oyster 2627 2870 1428 2046 2174 2227 4149 9372 6196 NALoligo squid 5157 5290 4167 4516 7250 8648 5949 5448 5413 7795Quahog clam 14224 13185 8397 7774 6905 9218 13475 11777 12244 11914Scups or porgies 2348 1710 1887 2112 2551 3536 2971 2313 3138 2905Sea scallop 3872 5050 5018 3778 4960 4083 2602 2963 978 3783Softshell clam 1628 1076 700 709 351 332 848 982 1427 NASummer flounder 3131 2933 3087 3550 3732 3653 3197 2997 3043 2524Tilefishes 3843 3343 3262 4077 4525 4260 4676 4255 3656 2985

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 35785 34175 34304 33267 32010 35864 33366 27377 27002 29152

Finfish amp Other 15696 14686 15867 18275 18442 18864 18369 15645 15660 15450Shellfish 20089 19489 18438 14992 13567 17000 14997 11732 11343 13702

Key SpeciesAmerican lobster 912 850 932 814 344 275 248 223 147 218Atlantic surfclam 9161 8753 8799 5857 809 4117 3452 1983 2266 1836Eastern oyster 124 135 64 81 98 108 204 422 241 NALoligo squid 5437 5469 4098 3900 5630 7838 4985 5138 4259 6275Quahog clam 1592 1476 1410 1216 1131 1299 1932 1781 1898 2166Scups or porgies 2325 1214 1850 2690 3729 4307 4574 3175 4050 3506Sea scallop 619 782 918 508 522 430 256 262 87 398Softshell clam 198 131 114 116 57 54 138 160 194 NASummer flounder 942 856 1142 1364 1517 1238 1033 833 830 603Tilefishes 1393 1199 1435 1586 1521 1413 1468 1383 936 745

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016American lobster 507 449 372 389 406 363 378 442 482 474Atlantic surfclam 065 065 067 067 067 068 070 067 068 068Eastern oyster 2121 2121 2223 2541 2223 2058 2032 2223 2570 NALoligo squid 095 097 102 116 129 110 119 106 127 124Quahog clam 894 893 596 639 610 710 697 661 645 550Scups or porgies 101 141 102 079 068 082 065 073 077 083Sea scallop 625 646 547 744 950 950 1018 1133 1121 951Softshell clam 823 824 613 613 613 613 613 613 735 NASummer flounder 333 343 270 260 246 295 309 360 367 419Tilefishes 276 279 227 257 297 301 318 308 390 401

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

129

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

New York | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of New York Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 450 63405 26298 36650Private Boat 781 78747 29530 48514Shore 292 24997 9322 15200

Total Durable Expenditures 8881 960112 422865 669825Total State Economic Impacts 10404 1127261 488015 770189

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 38058Private Boat 117183Shore 29688Total 184929

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 221233Other Equipment 75713Boat Expenses 527516Vehicle Expenses 41535Second Home Expenses 529Total Durable Expenditures 866527

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1051456

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 881 817 638 646 497 533 595 657 555 780Non-Coastal 39 32 21 24 18 30 8 19 10 29Out-of-State 147 118 58 69 46 53 93 155 53 113Total Anglers 1067 967 717 740 561 616 695 830 618 922

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 684 388 381 348 458 366 565 439 567 261Private 3315 3199 2819 2351 2320 1908 1711 2165 1407 2321Shore 2522 2341 1625 1675 1389 1492 1597 1351 1261 1712Total Trips 6521 5928 4824 4374 4168 3766 3873 3955 3235 4294

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Atlantic herring2

H 214 69 4 79 76 174 222 188 1462 268R 230 50 0 17 lt 1 0 59 15 25 15

Black sea bass

H 410 260 566 543 274 322 353 469 877 1033R 1549 1655 1236 1163 893 2471 1372 1447 2234 4043

BluefishH 2151 1484 1293 1026 927 1150 1108 1424 509 686R 2650 3224 1793 1471 1598 1809 1030 1543 1055 845

Drum (weakfish)

H 4 40 0 3 lt 1 5 7 lt 1 lt 1 2R 109 25 3 3 55 11 6 lt 1 4 2

Porgies (scup)

H 1596 1451 1460 1990 715 592 1096 1182 1957 1255R 1964 2838 2124 1864 998 1235 1865 1730 2136 3707

Shortfin mako shark

H lt 1 lt 1 0 1 0 lt 1 0 11 7 lt 1R 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 11 9 9

Striped bass

H 474 686 356 538 675 425 491 392 154 290R 1678 1346 1073 1069 1506 586 990 703 592 1107

Summer flounder

H 866 609 299 334 376 509 518 508 492 712R 5272 5521 5564 6571 7295 5013 4667 4041 3929 3553

Winter flounder

H 11 41 69 31 65 43 1 24 5 28R 15 17 110 63 101 33 3 11 1 3

Wrasses (tautog)

H 224 319 346 146 111 62 77 300 99 271R 387 728 665 567 487 365 590 939 1018 1766

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 ish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish2 This species may not be equivalent to species with similar names listed in the commercial tables

130

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNew York | Marine Economy

2015 New York State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 1674297 (69) 540298 (7) 7998994 (64) 51308 (82) 78066 (81) 144561 (81) 013

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 68 73 101 115 142 133 150 181 183Receipts 3516 3383 4896 6784 7380 8279 9946 10681 12890

Seafood salesretail

Firms 266 247 196 214 183 205 197 188 172Receipts 23157 23983 19753 18999 16286 16714 15923 14369 13299

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 15 17 15 15 18 17 17 17 17Employees 294 379 ds 272 299 265 280 ds 310

Payroll 18723 18570 15227 16976 21372 25666 22776 22687 24100

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 291 231 246 263 291 243 264 270 275Employees 2058 1627 1741 1798 1876 1839 1937 2051 2056

Payroll 84361 72233 68345 72442 76970 78324 84346 87511 93859

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 372 368 386 394 391 385 399 401 409Employees 1575 1470 1509 1586 1660 1674 1796 2054 2163

Payroll 28497 30741 31640 32001 35664 38721 45049 51605 53952

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 50 50 48 65 62 42 59 72 73Employees 1746 1759 2299 1654 1708 ds ds ds 1551

Payroll 125570 160735 198352 136577 154087 ds ds ds 185742

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 34 29 32 30 31 23 20 23 22Employees ds 732 782 704 752 214 ds ds 174

Payroll 65632 108744 89313 98499 88354 31229 22691 19387 26452Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 4 3 4 2 1 2 3 2 2Employees 7 ds 8 ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll 240 316 126 ds ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 411 419 418 429 431 415 424 427 429

Employees 2070 2263 2099 2052 2033 1868 1907 1986 1930Payroll 88862 100910 96640 94654 96408 87124 93212 95900 99181

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 12 10 9 13 12 6 9 12 11Employees ds ds ds 1086 1019 ds 922 835 577

Payroll ds ds ds 68555 66439 ds 60079 52523 52731Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 36 32 37 37 35 53 33 36 33Employees 578 386 312 598 596 712 687 722 695

Payroll 40976 23294 19126 50119 54406 63334 68141 74395 73699

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 5 3 4 8 9 18 15 15 14Employees ds ds ds ds 33 1294 196 168 230

Payroll ds ds ds 568 1493 105325 12358 10342 13774

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 53 49 47 41 43 49 45 42 42Employees 643 688 585 575 552 560 ds ds 487

Payroll 26653 30462 28880 26771 25998 24599 24338 28028 25591

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Tables | Virginia

132

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oVirginia | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Virginia Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 18220 1434996 463734 660196 15852 972185 371324 502628

Commercial Harvesters 4867 350620 112172 166798 4867 350620 112172 166798Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1592 156599 60928 78634 1540 151541 58961 76095

Importers 1251 386636 61966 117864 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 764 103879 35911 47860 523 71120 24586 32767

Retail 9747 437263 192757 249039 8921 398904 175605 226968

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 138149 146602 152017 183181 193976 174534 163027 172891 200485 204690Finfish amp Other 45646 40455 47345 55784 58360 61467 56447 54482 51318 45796Shellfish 92503 106147 104672 127397 135616 113067 106580 118409 149167 158894

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 4445 5269 6940 6025 4571 7532 6247 4186 4150 3173Black sea bass 663 759 569 928 1003 1401 1716 1365 1607 1938Blue crab 15793 18013 21169 29133 26274 24561 23991 27047 33104 40862Goosefish 781 951 631 594 752 1218 920 654 516 401Menhaden 25317 21271 23578 34476 32995 31107 25343 26046 28209 25856Oysters 2775 3101 3745 5202 6832 11949 25318 29099 36267 30732Sea Scallop 63013 65534 63312 70204 79427 54076 32610 33643 48806 51315Spot 3232 1171 3411 975 3431 769 2406 5763 2471 414Striped bass 3831 3378 4219 3635 4497 5542 5702 6390 4735 4968Summer flounder 3184 2719 2959 4202 5956 7725 8513 4733 5699 4933

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 493415 423066 426798 510474 496629 462503 381607 389211 417487 383523Finfish amp Other 452156 384698 378921 457124 442091 417011 346345 353287 374357 340998Shellfish 41259 38367 47877 53350 54538 45492 35262 35924 43130 42525

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 10588 11214 8576 7873 5569 6942 6325 4814 4582 3999Black sea bass 189 215 164 264 275 392 496 388 422 512Blue crab 25141 23243 32756 38490 39656 33144 24258 24205 29682 28135Goosefish 847 972 743 596 604 907 846 587 445 365Menhaden 420481 353895 351392 433241 414159 390318 317950 326817 353934 323146Oysters 1867 776 809 1187 1522 1963 3248 3765 4574 3790Sea Scallop 9916 9685 10137 9167 8260 5798 2958 2752 4020 4529Spot 4328 1977 3910 1024 3742 613 2085 3983 1576 281Striped bass 1962 2196 2109 2139 2077 2175 1680 1995 1441 1334Summer flounder 1856 1654 1980 2592 4065 4122 4794 2049 2274 1561

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atlantic croaker 042 047 081 077 082 109 099 087 091 079Black sea bass 350 352 346 352 365 357 346 352 380 379Blue crab 063 077 065 076 066 074 099 112 112 145Goosefish 092 098 085 100 125 134 109 111 116 110Menhaden 006 006 007 008 008 008 008 008 008 008Oysters 149 400 463 438 449 609 780 773 793 811Sea Scallop 635 677 625 766 962 933 1102 1223 1214 1133Spot 075 059 087 095 092 125 115 145 157 147Striped bass 195 154 200 170 216 255 339 320 329 373Summer flounder 172 164 149 162 147 187 178 231 251 316

133

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Virginia | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Virginia Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 58 6837 2581 3850Private Boat 612 61041 21280 35638Shore 381 33958 12700 21197

Total Durable Expenditures 4842 481970 202783 318009Total State Economic Impacts 5893 583806 239344 378694

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 4667Private Boat 73632Shore 30676Total 108975

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 127388Other Equipment 45018Boat Expenses 208387Vehicle Expenses 25388Second Home Expenses 6819Total Durable Expenditures 412999

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 521974

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 463 464 515 496 516 412 419 341 359 394Non-Coastal 76 89 87 63 56 78 74 53 59 86Out-of-State 297 338 305 279 320 193 267 206 203 244Total Anglers 836 891 907 838 892 684 760 600 620 724

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 60 57 48 45 30 45 59 53 65 39Private 2369 2353 2124 1700 1782 1426 1302 1209 1126 1252Shore 1083 1089 876 852 1086 1051 1120 920 892 817Total Trips 3511 3499 3048 2597 2899 2522 2480 2182 2083 2108

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bass H 36 38 115 30 19 4 21 19 39 29R 1271 1251 1153 525 444 883 593 578 270 652

Cobia H 10 5 17 7 4 1 11 6 21 27R 3 3 13 9 9 9 16 15 25 33

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 6945 8388 5327 4744 3306 3454 4307 3408 3330 3045R 8504 7807 7621 4824 4873 5100 6011 3622 2744 2544

Drum (spot) H 8203 4398 2147 1670 2967 1350 4265 3832 867 1058R 2157 1488 1458 1156 2245 1146 2214 1185 509 490

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 159 104 23 17 248 126 55 47 9 67R 363 367 171 550 1215 429 291 404 482 1653

Drum (weakfish)

H 87 28 16 4 4 22 2 9 4 11R 229 428 85 177 288 102 79 109 125 272

Red drum H 46 21 39 11 0 28 124 54 8 4R 111 237 178 29 61 2503 220 116 26 50

Striped bassH 238 245 226 74 122 70 89 61 96 111R 949 532 359 134 154 102 172 255 801 805

Summer flounder

H 397 260 289 260 318 260 186 139 159 72R 3023 2425 3613 2420 1987 857 515 640 615 177

Wrasses (tautog)

H 61 56 60 127 46 14 6 26 12 17R 80 34 34 129 36 17 16 56 16 61

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 ish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

134

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oVirginia | Marine Economy

2015 Virginia State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 560597 (23) 197384 (26) 3198718 (26) 16579 (27) 28014 (29) 48172 (27) 065

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 62 74 69 56 73 76 84 83 85Receipts 4845 5020 4053 3698 3792 4691 4276 5720 5849

Seafood salesretail

Firms 84 80 82 82 78 87 94 90 80Receipts 7265 8273 6642 6951 7819 8373 7612 7084 7489

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 30 26 25 23 18 19 18 20 17Employees 955 490 941 961 899 919 781 804 790

Payroll 34520 11366 30600 30460 33285 32955 30682 29763 31614

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 83 69 72 76 62 64 70 65 65Employees 734 621 519 518 469 492 483 448 444

Payroll 25365 17667 15620 17901 15733 14271 14719 14769 16089

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 73 68 62 59 58 51 55 57 59Employees 282 251 271 265 277 280 254 224 279

Payroll 5227 5170 5401 5480 5453 5563 5526 5537 6641

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 15 10 9 7 7 12 11 12 10Employees 565 ds ds ds ds ds 177 152 186

Payroll 30704 ds ds ds ds ds 10077 9264 11951

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 20 18 16 17 21 19 12 12 12Employees 1611 409 ds 421 492 ds ds ds 254

Payroll 148502 32473 19241 35917 42018 ds ds ds 33057Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 126 119 118 115 110 105 113 107 108

Employees 992 964 829 868 818 673 840 814 818Payroll 26186 24326 24631 24182 23379 18874 24468 24436 25146

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 15 12 12 7 11 6 8 8 8Employees 1085 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll 56696 ds ds 41280 41262 ds ds ds dsNavigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 18 23 25 26 21 20 18 20 20Employees 216 375 384 411 419 428 303 322 302

Payroll 11700 21014 22177 22910 22132 25732 20283 21348 20746

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 10 8 6 7 6 13 14 15 14Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1922

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 132983

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 52 59 53 56 51 59 54 56 54Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 30622

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 1955354

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

South Atlantic Regionbull East Floridabull Georgiabull North Carolinabull South Carolina

Returning to port during the Virginia Beach Billfish Tournament Photo South Atlantic Fishery Management CouncilCameron J Rhodes

136

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

o

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe South Atlantic Region includes East Florida Georgia North Carolina and South Carolina Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (SAFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under eight fishery management plans (FMPs) The coastal migratory pelagic resources and spiny lobster FMPs are managed jointly with the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (GMFMC) The SAFMC in cooperation with the Mid-Atlantic and New England Fishery Management Councils developed a dolphin wahoo FMP for the Atlantic

South Atlantic Region FMPs

bull Coastal migratory pelagic resources (with GMFMC)

bull Coral coral reef and livehardbot-tom habitat

bull Dolphinwahoo

bull Golden crabbull Pelagic sargassum

habitatbull Shrimpbull Snapper grouperbull Spiny lobster

(with GMFMC)

Red porgy red snapper snowy grouper and Southeast Florida hogfish were listed as overfished in 2016 Six stocks or stock complexes are currently subject to overfishing red snapper speckled hind Warsaw grouper Southeast Florida hogfish blueline tilefish and tilefish (Southern Atlantic coast)

Catch Share ProgramsSouth Atlantic Wreckfish Individual Transferable Quota Program This program was implemented in 1992 and is the only catch share program in the South Atlantic Region This program was developed to create incentives for the conservation of wreckfish to provide a management regime that promotes stability and facilitates long-range planning and investment by harvesters and dealers to promote management regimes that minimize gear and area conflicts among fishermen to minimize the tendency for over-capitalization in the harvesting and processingdistribution sectors and to provide a reasonable opportunity for fishermen to make adequate returns from commercial fishing by limiting entry into the program NOAA Fisheries continues to collect data on this program to develop standard performance indicators

that measure its basic economic performance

Policy UpdatesIn 2016 a System Management Plan was approved for eight deepwater Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) established through the Snapper Grouper FMP in 2009 The council developed this plan to serve as the framework for resource protection research and monitoring outreach administration and evaluation of the MPAs The System Management Plan includes action items to assist in achieving the goals and objectives as well as potential metrics for evaluating the management effectiveness of the Marine Protected Areas Eventually the plan will be expanded to encompass all of the councilrsquos managed areas with sections for Marine Protected Areas Spawning Special Management Zones other Special Management Zones and Coral Habitat Areas of Particular Concern

Under Amendment 36 of the Snapper Group FMP NOAA Fisheries approved the designation of five offshore areas as Spawning Special Management Zones in June 2017 to help protect spawning fish and unique habitat associated with spawning activities in the South Atlantic Spawning Special Management Zones are expected to protect important spawning habitat and associated species of fish by limiting specific fishing and anchoring activity within the sites The action includes a sunset provision that would require the areas be reauthorized after a period of 10 years based on their effectiveness The five areas ranging in size from 3 to 5 square miles off North Carolina South Carolina and Florida are the first Spawning Special Management Zones designated in federal waters off the South Atlantic coast

Also in June 2017 following a recent stock assessment the council approved measures that will allow increases in the harvest of spiny lobster in both the South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico The action would increase the acceptable biological catch from 732 million pounds to 96 million pounds The amendment would also prohibit the use of traps for recreational harvest of spiny lobster

South Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

137

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

South Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key South Atlantic Commercial Species

bull Blue crabbull Clamsbull Floundersbull Groupersbull King mackerels

bull Oystersbull Shrimpbull Snappersbull Swordfishbull Tunas

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region

Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is

defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers12

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 commercial fishing in Florida generated the largest employment impacts in the South Atlantic Region 76700 jobs Income impacts ($32 billion) sales impacts ($169 billion) and value-added impacts ($57 billion) were also largest in Florida The importers sector in Florida generated the highest employment impacts of any state-level sector 39200 jobs The importers sector in Florida also generated the highest state-level income impacts ($19 billion) sales impacts ($121 billion) and value-added impacts ($37 billion) in the region

Landings TrendsSouth Atlantic landings revenue was up $61 million in 2016 relative to the previous year Gains from shrimp landings revenue (up $66 million) and numerous finfish species more than offset declines in blue crab (down $98 million) and clams (down $31 million) The shrimp fishery generates the highest landings revenue of all South Atlantic fisheries Shrimp fishery performance was driven largely by a banner year for North Carolina shrimp trawlers which had their highest level of production since 1953 and after adjusting for inflation their highest landings revenue since 2000 Mild weather in the fall of 2016 that extended the fishing season was among the reasons cited for the 68 increase in North Carolina shrimp landings revenue from 2015 to 2016

The blue crab fishery is the second most important

1 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp SeafoodIndustry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)2 Commercial economic impacts data were not available for East Florida data for the entire state of Florida are reported here

138

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oSouth Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

fishery in the South Atlantic Region in terms of landings revenue Reduced landings coupled with lower prices both regionally and nationally resulted in a 21 decline in landings revenue from 2015 to 2016 The precipitous decline was prompted in part by new management measures implemented in 2016 in North Carolina to improve the condition of its blue crab stock While showing some improvement from the 2014 stock assessment the 2015 assessment continued to show decreased recruitment and adult abundance

Oyster landings increased more than seven-fold from 2007-2016 largely due to expanding South Carolina production In recent years South Carolina has accounted for almost 90 of oyster production in the South Atlantic Region As this industry took off South Carolina implemented a moratorium in April 2014 on importing oyster seed from all points north of South Carolina due to a concern over disease transfer By 2016 all seed orders by South Carolina oyster farmers were filled with seed produced in-state using South Carolina broodstock3

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the South Atlantic Region totaled $1909 million in 2016 This number represented a 25 increase from 2007 (a 9 increase in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 3 increase from 2015 Landings revenue was highest in North Carolina ($941 million) followed by East Florida ($646 million) Shellfish landings revenue made up 61 of total revenue in the region Shrimp ($57 million) and blue crab ($366 million) had the highest landings revenue in the South Atlantic Region in 2016 Together they accounted for 49 of total landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 oysters (76 54 in real terms) shrimp (30 14 in real terms) and blue crab (9 -5 in real terms) had the largest revenue increaseswhile groupers (-53 -59 in real terms) snappers(-16 -27 in real terms) and tunas (-12 -23in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From2015 to 2016 shrimp (13) king mackerels (11)and oysters (1) had the largest revenue increaseswhile clams (-44) blue crab (-21) and tunas(-15) had the largest revenue decreases

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Oysters (76 54 in real terms)bull Shrimp (30 14 in real terms)bull Blue crab (9 -5 in real terms) From 2015bull Shrimp (13)bull King mackerels (11)bull Oysters (1)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Groupers (-53 -59 in real terms)bull Snappers (-16 -27 in real terms)bull Tunas (-12 -23 in real terms) From 2015bull Clams (-44)bull Blue crab (-21)bull Tunas (-15)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Oysters (608)bull Shrimp (13)bull Blue crab (1)From 2015bull King mackerels (15)bull Shrimp (4)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Groupers (-68)bull Flounders (-37)bull Snappers (-31) From 2015bull Clams (-28)bull Flounders (-26)bull Swordfish (-21)

LandingsIn 2016 South Atlantic Region commercial fishermen landed 1063 million pounds of finfish and shellfish a 1 increase from 2007 and a 6 decrease from 2015 Blue crab had the highest landings volume in the South Atlantic Region accounting for 32 of landed weight

3 httpwwwscseagrantorgpdf_filesFY16-17-Impacts-and-Accomplishments-SFApdf

139

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

South Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

From 2007 to 2016 oysters (608) shrimp (13) and blue crab (1) had the largest landings increases while groupers (-68) flounders (-37) and snappers (-31) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 king mackerels (15) and shrimp (4) had the largest landings increases while clams (-28) flounders (-26) and swordfish (-21) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 clams ($777 per pound) received the highest South Atlantic Region ex-vessel price Landings of blue crab ($106 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price From 2007 to 2016 flounders (65 57 in real terms) groupers (45 39 in real terms) and king mackerels (30 26 in real terms) had the largest price increases while oysters (-75 -66 in real terms) and tunas (-4 -4 in real terms) had the largest price decreases From 2015 to 2016 flounders (25) swordfish (12) and shrimp (8) had the largest price increases while clams (-22) tunas (-14) and blue crab (-8) had the largest price decreases

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups4

Key South Atlantic Recreational Species

bull Atlantic croakerand spot

bull Black sea bassbull Bluefishbull Dolphinfishbull King mackerel

bull Sharksbull Sheepshead porgybull Red drumbull Spanish mackerelbull Spotted seatrout

Economic Impacts and Expenditures The contribution of recreational fishing activities5 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures

are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

The greatest employment impacts from expenditures on saltwater recreational fishing in the South Atlantic Region were generated in East Florida (36100 jobs) followed by North Carolina (16800 jobs) The largest sales impacts were observed in East Florida ($41 billion) followed by North Carolina ($17 billion) The biggest income impacts were generated in East Florida ($15 billion) followed by North Carolina ($6558 million) The greatest value-added impacts were in East Florida ($25 billion) followed by North Carolina ($1 billion)

Recreational fishing expenditures (on both fishing trips and durable equipment purchases) across the South Atlantic Region in 2016 totaled about $54 billion Trip expenditures totaled nearly $982 million with a large portion coming from trips in the shore (49) and private boat (32) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $44 billion with the largest portion coming

4 Except where noted Atlantic and Gulf recreational catch and effort estimates are based upon the MRIP APAIS and CHTS (httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovrecreational-fisheriesSurveyssurvey-details) and not the revised MRIP estimates (httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovleadership-messagenoaa-fisheries-releases-revised-mrip-recreational-catch-and-effort-estimates) released in 20185 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpswwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

140

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oSouth Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

from boat expenses ($26 billion)

Fishing TripsIn 2016 recreational fishermen took 168 million fishing trips in the South Atlantic Region This number represented a 23 decrease from 2007 and a 2 increase from 2015 The largest proportions of trips were taken in the shore mode (55) and private boat mode (42) East Florida (88 million trips) and North Carolina (54 million trips) had the highest number of recorded trips

ParticipationIn 2016 there were 23 million recreational anglers who fished in the South Atlantic Region This number represented a 36 decrease from 2007 and a 5 increase from 2015 These anglers were South Atlantic Region residents from either a coastal county (80) or non-coastal county (20)

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Red drum (37)bull Porgies (sheepshead) (30)bull Black sea bass (4)From 2015bull King mackerel (42)bull Porgies (sheepshead) (29)bull Spanish mackerel (27)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull King mackerel (-75)bull Dolphinfish (-57)bull Sharks (-28)From 2015bull Dolphinfish (-48)bull Drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (-38)bull Sharks (-22)

Harvest and ReleaseOf the South Atlanticrsquos key species and species groups drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (74 million fish) drum (spotted seatrout) (56 million fish) and bluefish (5 million fish) were most frequently caught by recreational

fishermen From 2007 to 2016 red drum (37) porgies (sheepshead) (30) and black sea bass (4) had the largest increases in catch while king mackerel (-75) dolphinfish (-57) and sharks (-28) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 king mackerel (42) porgies (sheepshead) (29) and Spanish mackerel (27) had the largest increases in catch while dolphinfish (-48) drum (Atlantic croaker and spot) (-38) and sharks (-22) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries Note that when discussing the marine economy in the South Atlantic Region all statistics include the entire state of Florida and not just East Florida678

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy9 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average Florida had the highest CFLQ in the South Atlantic Region in 2015 at 097

In 2015 11 million employer establishments operated throughout the entire South Atlantic Region (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed about 168 million workers and had a total annual payroll of $743 billion The combined gross state product of Florida Georgia North Carolina and

6 Marine Economy information was not available for East Florida information for the entire state of Florida is provided here7 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)8 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS IndustryrdquohttpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)9 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

141

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

South Atlantic Region | Regional Summary

South Carolina was approximately $21 trillion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 the South Atlantic Region had 485 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 95 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $353 million (a 103 increase in real terms from 2007) There were 51 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 4 decrease from 2007) The Census Bureau suppressed employment and payroll data in this sector for one or more states in the South Atlantic Region in 2015 The greatest number of seafood product preparation and packaging establishments was located in Florida (327) followed by Georgia (93) and North Carolina (88)

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 642 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the four states that make up the South Atlantic Region (a 2 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $561 million (a 10 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 396 employer firms in the retail sales of seafood sector (a 10 increase from 2007) These establishments employed 1825 workers (a 13 increase from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $442 million (a 28 increase in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of retail seafood establishments was located in Florida (536) followed by North Carolina (225) and Georgia (154)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 340 employer firms in the wholesale sales of seafood sector in the South Atlantic Region in 2015 (a 16 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 4089 workers and had a total annual payroll of $1603 million The greatest number of wholesale seafood establishments was located in Florida (242) followed by North Carolina (59) and Georgia (23)

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of the South Atlantic Regionrsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons It is clear however that these sectors play an important role in the

regional economy For example the deep sea passenger transportation sector in Florida alone accounted for $967 million in payroll in 2015 The ship and boat building sector for the entire South Atlantic Region totaled $7797 million in payroll in 2015

Tables | South Atlantic Region

144

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oSouth Atlantic Region | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the South Atlantic Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Landings Value Value Jobs Sales Income Jobs Sales IncomeRevenue Added AddedFlorida 64593 76749 16873652 3171513 5658897 11083 1081344 284434 437467Georgia 11488 9983 1554347 343991 566586 1349 69592 27316 37213North Carolina 94050 10156 984700 275651 410851 6105 332945 135957 180719South Carolina 20784 1478 118153 38818 55055 1209 71612 29332 39034

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 152400 165632 147205 165447 171306 171214 162637 188919 184776 190915Finfish amp Other 61335 60797 63112 65922 66499 64757 62875 69564 63261 74295Shellfish 91065 104835 84093 99525 104807 106456 99763 119355 121515 116620

Key SpeciesBlue crab 33634 39986 37703 36080 33862 37608 44131 46734 46416 36606Clams 4039 3862 3516 3809 3396 2873 2940 3973 7029 3948Flounders 11802 11230 10389 11118 9528 8011 7529 13509 13204 12209Groupers 6060 5287 4348 3878 3786 3433 3375 3475 3198 2824King mackerels 6872 7695 8088 7585 6580 5559 5214 5829 5637 6252Oysters 3806 4028 4603 7175 6850 5133 6076 7207 6641 6689Shrimp 43807 51064 33078 46146 53652 54921 38770 50698 50423 56993Snappers 3922 4554 4024 3497 3757 3838 3763 3998 3528 3285Swordfish 4298 3661 4821 7519 9400 9895 8690 5915 5075 4474Tunas 4894 4672 4869 3681 5096 6926 5849 6049 5104 4322

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 105285 116527 113479 119494 123657 113530 98737 111059 113345 106336Finfish amp Other 46613 43948 51117 52569 53824 39673 37338 50244 38348 35489Shellfish 58672 72580 62362 66925 69833 73858 61398 60815 74998 70847

Key SpeciesBlue crab 34045 44970 38959 38840 42127 40388 32762 34228 40445 34486Clams 663 628 611 641 569 512 446 614 705 508Flounders 4939 5151 5362 5109 4355 2961 2889 4739 4181 3090Groupers 1820 1580 1295 1105 949 856 783 762 676 587King mackerels 3736 4352 4858 4247 3048 2456 1899 2380 2267 2615Oysters 776 857 938 1439 1233 6074 6464 6057 5782 5493Shrimp 21235 23341 20109 23203 22940 22361 13842 15816 22983 23955Snappers 1354 1515 1373 1196 1246 1227 1171 1181 1034 940Swordfish 1417 1307 1800 2288 2611 2850 2540 1762 1699 1336Tunas 2310 1658 1945 1805 2209 2442 2306 2557 2169 2126

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue crab 099 089 097 093 080 093 135 137 115 106Clams 609 615 576 594 597 561 659 647 998 777Flounders 239 218 194 218 219 271 261 285 316 395Groupers 333 335 336 351 399 401 431 456 473 481King mackerels 184 177 166 179 216 226 275 245 249 239Oysters 491 470 491 499 555 084 094 119 115 122Shrimp 206 219 164 199 234 246 280 321 219 238Snappers 290 301 293 292 302 313 321 338 341 350Swordfish 303 280 268 329 360 347 342 336 299 335Tunas 212 282 250 204 231 284 254 237 235 203

145

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

South Atlantic Region | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the South Atlantic Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars trips)Trips Jobs Sales Income Value Added

East Florida 8827 36066 4084156 1540223 2466383Georgia 696 1642 160818 66636 106409North Carolina 5411 16811 1699040 655798 1020499South Carolina 1909 5117 497748 181326 292141

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 191544Private Boat 309468Shore 480634Total 981645

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 1026335Other Equipment 435279Boat Expenses 2618108Vehicle Expenses 313426Second Home Expenses 42561Total Durable Expenditures 4435707

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 5417352

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 3157 2330 1922 1933 1893 2135 2092 2189 1753 1873Non-Coastal 493 560 462 536 450 502 396 530 475 472Out-of-State NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 3650 2890 2384 2470 2343 2637 2488 2719 2229 2345

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 503 415 391 368 372 348 336 414 499 493Private 11536 10910 8923 9514 8663 8775 7878 7836 7301 7085Shore 9956 10469 9371 9185 8637 8669 8402 9395 8739 9266Total Trips 21995 21794 18684 19066 17673 17793 16616 17646 16539 16844

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bassH 435 347 271 509 337 293 246 338 213 188R 2863 2568 1906 2595 3031 4374 2865 4967 3351 3253

BluefishH 1914 1688 1587 2348 1936 1380 1895 1802 1683 1716R 4089 3085 2559 4268 3457 2367 3680 3412 3221 3284

DolphinfishH 1079 1025 728 825 824 802 522 575 923 583R 394 188 98 127 355 126 167 244 296 49

Drum (Atlantic croaker and spot)

H 4575 5514 2817 1946 3074 2796 3314 4255 5991 2275R 3775 4181 4868 3334 4183 3560 5786 6278 5849 5106

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 1547 1633 1411 932 859 1690 1069 876 521 1085R 5554 5166 4169 5772 4890 6519 4289 4524 4565 4466

King mackerelH 818 484 420 234 153 149 99 128 142 225R 301 169 97 75 47 27 23 67 52 51

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 638 694 626 705 664 523 593 736 448 645R 545 692 509 496 517 629 746 945 743 895

Red drumH 414 463 276 607 494 458 633 589 419 569R 1838 2414 1870 3320 2137 2966 3068 2957 2168 2520

Sharks2H 50 37 38 30 26 18 40 50 22 41R 2317 2757 2312 2739 1645 1948 3367 2514 2162 1655

Spanish mackerel

H 1061 1315 1124 1072 868 820 1055 863 604 878R 606 886 519 605 396 424 679 486 402 401

1 NA = data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but does not specifiy whether an angler residesin a region2 Sharks include species within the requiem shark family blacktip sharks Atlantic sharpnose sharks and unidentified sharks

Tables | East Florida

148

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oEast Florida | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Florida Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)1

With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 76749 16873652 3171513 5658897 11083 1081344 284434 437467

Commercial Harvesters 7158 520252 163093 217024 7158 520252 163093 217024Seafood Processors amp Dealers 4442 801532 155120 304952 580 112172 21709 42677

Importers 39207 12116639 1941923 3693682 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 9586 1226678 481589 599160 482 61714 24229 30144

Retail 16356 2208551 429788 844078 2862 387205 75404 147621

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 42767 47856 40992 51151 60643 57766 48669 55949 52000 64593Finfish amp Other 19768 21131 23164 25756 26344 26061 24139 25212 24115 35509Shellfish 23000 26726 17828 25395 34300 31705 24530 30737 27885 29084

Key SpeciesBlue crab 4924 4333 2376 3415 4155 4747 3785 3118 3369 3244Clams 391 510 415 331 220 138 28 61 58 31Groupers 1062 848 662 620 613 893 734 799 879 684King mackerel 4833 6036 6563 6911 5500 4685 4320 4583 4804 5309Lobsters 2488 3312 1089 2825 3207 1720 3437 5150 3736 2826Sharks 726 636 949 757 677 458 491 548 643 347Shrimp 13821 17225 12455 17071 24361 21903 14125 18306 16400 16019Snappers 1279 1905 2383 1454 1673 1604 1769 2188 1658 1322Spanish mackerel 2332 1827 2004 2414 2686 2448 2650 2652 2171 2533Swordfish 2529 2339 2385 3677 4005 4838 3287 2560 2532 2228

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 25196 26307 27501 29713 31244 28579 21415 24573 25160 26445Finfish amp Other 13893 14111 16105 17137 16051 14241 12553 13592 12602 13672Shellfish 11303 12196 11396 12576 15193 14338 8862 10981 12558 12773

Key SpeciesBlue crab 4063 3342 1640 2553 3226 3440 2211 1500 1639 1579Clams 41 55 54 42 22 17 5 8 8 3Groupers 315 239 188 167 154 222 174 179 187 142King mackerel 2631 3299 4064 3905 2633 2143 1547 1811 1859 2160Lobsters 361 506 298 481 514 302 486 543 481 369Sharks 818 776 1109 781 716 631 657 662 706 367Shrimp 6174 7619 8662 8743 10528 8869 5044 5805 7105 5972Snappers 461 635 805 510 564 523 572 661 497 393Spanish mackerel 3264 2263 2629 3553 3433 2586 2246 2585 1808 2460Swordfish 772 791 838 1028 1067 1343 831 698 716 592

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue crab 121 130 145 134 129 138 171 208 205 205Clams 952 929 773 790 984 817 600 758 749 980Groupers 337 355 352 372 399 402 421 446 471 480King mackerel 184 183 161 177 209 219 279 253 258 246Lobsters 690 655 365 587 623 569 707 948 776 766Sharks 089 082 086 097 095 073 075 083 091 095Shrimp 224 226 144 195 231 247 280 315 231 268Snappers 278 300 296 285 297 307 309 331 334 337Spanish mackerel 071 081 076 068 078 095 118 103 120 103Swordfish 328 296 285 358 375 360 396 367 354 377

1 Information reported in this table is for the state of Florida not East Florida

149

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

East Florida | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of East Florida Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 1430 172872 61464 95631Private Boat 1345 140979 47642 82849Shore 1213 119962 41321 72738

Total Durable Expenditures 32078 3650343 1389796 2215165Total State Economic Impacts 36066 4084156 1540223 2466383

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 96793Private Boat 149818Shore 100052Total 346662

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 630517Other Equipment 275233Boat Expenses 1709364Vehicle Expenses 205568Second Home Expenses 15638Total Durable Expenditures 2836319

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 3182981

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 2168 1317 1099 1033 1109 1181 1263 1334 1001 1059Non-Coastal NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAOut-of-State 1008 703 643 629 553 514 540 807 819 674Total Anglers 3176 2021 1741 1662 1662 1695 1803 2141 1821 1733

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 169 137 149 118 124 144 156 193 255 248Private 7157 6452 5394 5706 5298 5028 4643 4951 4133 4217Shore 5277 4651 4577 4393 4735 4219 4183 4500 4246 4362Total Trips 12603 11240 10120 10218 10156 9390 8981 9644 8634 8827

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

BluefishH 471 377 623 787 556 278 409 526 433 294R 932 499 681 1621 912 1111 1492 1457 1063 1157

DolphinfishH 513 661 328 248 346 434 298 370 481 293R 373 185 77 118 347 105 163 240 266 47

Drum (kingfish)

H 854 949 409 721 936 825 971 1212 495 746R 1099 552 609 935 807 1102 1115 1252 1395 1000

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 278 182 172 251 287 427 336 308 164 353R 3094 2830 1642 2937 2141 3026 1939 2400 1997 1660

Gray snapperH 689 352 224 161 187 209 640 611 427 755R 2073 1552 1707 498 678 1549 1991 2054 1669 2663

Jack (Florida pompano)

H 126 272 90 263 106 180 110 92 91 57R 164 360 81 160 297 278 184 313 175 287

King mackerelH 515 349 291 183 133 114 73 99 101 168R 227 125 52 58 45 21 16 51 44 24

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 255 237 227 352 287 267 253 573 306 518R 307 465 354 336 357 475 472 704 563 689

Red drumH 161 159 80 176 180 238 298 276 227 369R 759 890 522 1414 1051 799 1542 1649 1094 1197

Spanish mackerel

H 456 503 369 512 406 247 534 382 82 374R 198 364 150 282 147 89 365 208 86 143

1 NA = Data are not available because all East Florida residents are considered coastal county residents

150

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oEast Florida | Marine Economy

2015 East Florida State Economy ( of national total)13

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 1948357 (8) 532830 (7) 7777990 (63) 33707 (54) 49239 (51) 88386 (49) 097

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 173 202 217 280 294 307 300 315 300Receipts 10497 11065 12473 14635 14618 17557 17214 22329 21841

Seafood salesretail

Firms 319 331 316 361 362 383 338 346 355Receipts 27557 26087 25667 27964 29037 30765 25332 26433 29033

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 20 23 25 27 24 27 25 27 27Employees 1748 1637 1143 1269 1095 1608 1374 1419 1429

Payroll 58233 53455 46235 45772 42612 51735 50003 50556 58246

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 267 229 215 229 250 226 234 233 242Employees 2308 1913 1762 1747 1913 1957 1878 1974 2055

Payroll 85019 75203 72159 70889 77115 75945 79266 83964 90247

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 169 168 158 145 145 151 165 166 181Employees 989 991 885 865 849 945 909 1037 1137

Payroll 20595 21604 21182 20783 20158 21577 23476 25844 29066

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 47 42 42 50 54 60 47 62 57Employees 1242 1106 972 709 753 1381 1050 1743 1815

Payroll 94429 50115 37774 50217 53341 100402 82078 175366 173004

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 69 57 58 61 65 75 69 77 76Employees 3190 2486 2801 2279 2374 3345 2485 2015 2154

Payroll 208144 169055 180139 159025 177386 231887 140564 131069 137786Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 34 31 33 29 29 39 31 28 32Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 10510

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 967938

MarinasEstablishments 493 442 428 430 411 432 444 464 466

Employees 4935 5024 4665 4439 4657 4918 5076 5421 5472Payroll 148592 151677 132955 133017 142997 148573 145265 168185 171354

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 53 56 59 55 64 43 58 61 69Employees 6585 8052 7288 7547 7484 4598 6258 6992 7834

Payroll 173788 192473 185309 191560 195458 86461 188997 179024 208186Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 145 147 145 145 150 151 180 190 196Employees 1484 894 829 980 1047 853 1390 878 861

Payroll 61470 56917 60641 76853 75561 68366 130893 74185 72483

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 29 40 32 34 32 66 61 56 55Employees 459 712 527 470 377 2082 555 588 987

Payroll 12872 24668 19006 20525 16879 72554 25439 20647 32032

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 296 297 261 248 246 258 259 263 278Employees 12332 12419 8221 7363 7909 8621 8813 9608 10913

Payroll 469382 442096 296537 302909 325942 374831 390853 448514 488050

1 All data presented on this page are for the entire state of Florida not just East Florida2 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20154 ds = these data are suppressed

Tables | Georgia

152

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGeorgia | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Georgia Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 9983 1554347 343991 566586 1349 69592 27316 37213

Commercial Harvesters 472 19841 6808 9784 472 19841 6808 9784Seafood Processors amp Dealers 844 74101 28558 37696 142 12468 4805 6343

Importers 3731 1153174 184818 351538 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 793 108635 37465 52650 29 3930 1355 1905

Retail 4142 198596 86342 114918 707 33353 14348 19181

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 11331 13081 11761 13731 16179 16637 11581 16065 16677 11488

Finfish amp Other 625 623 626 279 448 180 512 473 52 28Shellfish 10706 12458 11135 13452 15732 16457 11069 15591 16625 11460

Key SpeciesBlue crab 3767 3910 3839 2648 3341 4259 3974 3770 4240 3703Clams 290 383 473 430 605 603 564 999 1885 1308Groupers 183 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAShrimp 6446 7877 6608 10103 11398 11045 5773 10469 9759 5983Snails (conchs) 1 6 11 27 39 27 1 3 2 NASnappers 269 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 7908 8930 7424 7220 12795 10746 11452 10366 7824 6182

Finfish amp Other 304 267 306 168 4828 113 155 4729 38 16Shellfish 7603 8663 7118 7053 7967 10633 11297 5636 7786 6166

Key SpeciesBlue crab 4421 4227 3598 2329 3427 4265 3216 2667 2934 3069Clams 49 54 76 81 107 91 86 168 275 170Groupers 54 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAShrimp 2797 3132 3324 4553 4355 3928 1901 2751 3652 2120Snails (conchs) 1 5 11 18 30 18 1 2 1 NASnappers 93 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Blue crab 085 092 107 114 097 1 124 141 145 121Clams 589 703 624 530 568 660 657 596 686 772Groupers 337 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAShrimp 230 251 199 222 262 281 304 381 267 282Snails (conchs) 125 131 100 150 130 152 165 151 261 NASnappers 289 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

153

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Georgia | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Georgia Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 92 11240 4193 6143Private Boat 119 11379 3934 6561Shore 148 13749 4739 7940

Total Durable Expenditures 1283 124450 53770 85765Total State Economic Impacts 1642 160818 66636 106409

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 5947Private Boat 13201Shore 11391Total 30540

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 40029Other Equipment 12504Boat Expenses 46469Vehicle Expenses 22650Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 121652

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 152192

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 149 190 146 145 146 134 99 125 81 110Non-Coastal 115 154 91 136 131 96 72 115 80 89Out-of-State 45 98 45 61 78 74 53 70 70 49Total Anglers 308 441 282 342 355 303 225 310 231 248

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 31 17 16 7 16 20 21 31 34 26Private 577 731 516 530 620 496 387 340 255 344Shore 421 456 311 335 335 376 283 456 301 326Total Trips 1029 1204 842 873 970 892 690 827 590 696

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black drumH 51 92 16 70 11 19 18 15 8 24R 35 66 23 40 5 20 10 8 13 16

Black sea bassH 34 99 18 13 44 15 81 37 41 9R 292 581 113 163 227 134 294 528 232 82

BluefishH 11 7 2 13 3 6 3 20 6 3R 103 116 72 108 70 52 7 120 74 23

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 45 38 82 36 44 38 55 64 111 54R 229 294 435 264 262 167 298 471 210 152

Drum (southern kingfish)

H 575 697 587 585 873 377 396 441 451 305R 625 873 559 465 668 604 287 244 210 262

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 577 642 507 384 290 527 238 256 163 253R 1039 721 915 742 552 1029 321 774 398 552

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 58 65 52 105 138 59 42 21 22 43R 84 98 33 39 45 29 38 18 21 16

Red drumH 113 133 69 195 107 46 74 93 48 75R 226 314 168 484 214 90 199 290 168 160

Sharks2H 9 11 7 4 6 4 6 lt 1 1 7

R 592 541 345 284 342 366 265 314 166 257Southern flounder

H 92 49 34 36 29 18 19 14 24 18R lt 1 1 10 3 12 5 7 9 18 6

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish2 Sharks include species within the requiem shark family blacktip sharks Atlantic sharpnose sharks and unidentified sharks

154

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGeorgia | Marine Economy

2015 Georgia State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient3

Totals 848952 (35) 224593 (29) 3692490 (3) 17484 (28) 27559 (28) 50152 (28) 005

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 34 45 51 52 61 71 60 62 87Receipts 2187 3489 3817 5458 5540 4974 4378 5471 6265

Seafood salesretail

Firms 87 101 98 96 89 97 77 103 84Receipts 8671 6922 5701 6474 8646 8233 6932 9338 8379

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 6 7 6 6 5 6 5 7 6Employees ds ds ds 1056 1022 854 945 895 854

Payroll ds ds ds 37343 39433 32928 35987 37122 37368

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 42 30 33 36 28 18 28 24 23Employees 688 565 532 514 562 468 469 792 701

Payroll 31033 20122 18628 20075 20660 15459 17326 24726 26254

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 44 48 42 48 51 54 60 62 70Employees 179 160 162 176 176 214 210 229 248

Payroll 2633 2433 2447 2502 2566 3425 3390 3745 4539

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 6 6 5 4 4 3 4 7 8Employees 33 28 ds ds ds ds ds ds 66

Payroll 1883 2040 1700 ds ds ds ds ds 4356

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 13 14 13 14 12 12 7 9 9Employees 132 156 29 ds 51 236 28 63 64

Payroll 10090 11275 2192 2465 4833 11238 2311 3856 4421Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2Employees ds NA NA NA ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds NA NA NA ds ds ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 68 60 58 62 63 63 59 65 67

Employees 569 527 541 631 580 636 644 586 639Payroll 12701 15571 15736 17428 16986 17921 17768 18604 20210

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 17 17 18 17 20 10 19 19 18Employees 2501 2660 3707 2971 4655 ds 2986 3561 4956

Payroll 110857 97869 87410 84675 108674 ds 120985 124394 117785Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 11 11 9 8 8 10 8 7 9Employees 217 182 ds ds ds ds ds ds 203

Payroll 11141 10193 12185 11237 ds ds ds ds 12202

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 4 5 5 4 2 13 7 4 4Employees 98 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 68

Payroll 3108 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 2961

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 21 20 14 12 15 14 15 16 17Employees 2225 2159 ds ds ds ds ds ds 3150

Payroll 68646 69096 ds ds ds ds ds ds 110951

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | North Carolina

156

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Carolina | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the North Carolina Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 10156 984700 275651 410851 6105 332945 135957 180719

Commercial Harvesters 2500 160050 62995 86364 2500 160050 62995 86364Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1166 87099 33865 43760 481 35959 13981 18066

Importers 1631 504063 80786 153660 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 473 57041 20005 26405 141 16972 5952 7856

Retail 4386 176447 78000 100660 2983 119965 53029 68432

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 82285 86822 77196 79361 71183 72571 79104 94105 94711 94050Finfish amp Other 36199 34430 33984 33147 31278 31017 29820 37035 32395 32700Shellfish 46086 52392 43212 46214 39905 41554 49284 57070 62316 61350

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 2714 3142 3004 3491 3164 2136 1724 1866 1646 2216Black sea bass 1195 1156 1401 953 628 688 869 1414 1367 1343Blue crab 21432 27555 27429 26425 21282 22807 30006 34027 33980 24116Clams 2660 2435 2086 2359 1933 2131 2349 2913 5086 2609Flounders 11335 10886 10124 10845 8890 7421 7059 13072 12916 11853Groupers 2394 2274 1879 1734 1463 1421 1247 1265 1120 1103King mackerel 1967 1632 1500 650 1062 831 877 1204 801 869Shrimp 17905 19251 8528 10804 10886 13333 12947 14145 16834 28242Snappers 1601 1784 1073 963 1004 900 917 865 803 942Tunas 4046 3393 2922 1193 2437 4398 3207 3631 2883 3194

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 62871 71209 68955 71994 67487 56670 50191 61958 65942 59936Finfish amp Other 30422 27630 32323 32491 29725 22714 21996 29450 23290 19899Shellfish 32450 43580 36632 39503 37762 33956 28194 32508 42652 40037

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 7271 5792 6135 7312 5054 3107 1928 2630 1819 2092Black sea bass 473 485 615 401 272 256 330 529 468 423Blue crab 21425 32917 29707 30683 30035 26786 22203 26231 32127 25463Clams 438 400 359 366 302 404 356 438 422 335Flounders 4754 5009 5256 5001 4102 2736 2728 4589 4082 2970Groupers 828 785 638 561 409 382 311 299 261 256King mackerel 1059 1037 778 329 408 297 345 550 391 420Shrimp 9537 9427 5408 5955 5140 6141 4860 4691 9097 13192Snappers 550 603 374 320 326 279 276 251 232 275Tunas 1836 1041 1028 703 1056 1482 1283 1653 1320 1448

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atlantic croaker 037 054 049 048 063 069 089 071 091 106Black sea bass 253 239 228 238 231 269 264 267 292 318Blue crab 100 084 092 086 071 085 135 130 106 095Clams 608 609 582 644 639 528 661 665 1206 778Flounders 238 217 193 217 217 271 259 285 316 399Groupers 289 289 295 309 358 372 401 422 430 430King mackerel 186 157 193 198 260 279 254 219 205 207Shrimp 188 204 158 181 212 217 266 302 185 214Snappers 291 296 287 301 308 322 332 344 347 342Tunas 220 326 284 170 231 297 250 220 218 221

157

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

North Carolina | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of North Carolina Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 762 85734 31143 45817Private Boat 1202 111300 39105 62592Shore 4151 361064 127533 208080

Total Durable Expenditures 10696 1140942 458017 704010Total State Economic Impacts 16811 1699040 655798 1020499

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 51307Private Boat 115696Shore 279678Total 446680

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 272244Other Equipment 110838Boat Expenses 697609Vehicle Expenses 63785Second Home Expenses 26923Total Durable Expenditures 1171398

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1618078

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 564 587 446 544 490 614 564 549 479 541Non-Coastal 265 303 259 296 254 283 240 301 239 281Out-of-State 1079 1079 976 1073 755 764 601 805 830 1066Total Anglers 1908 1970 1681 1914 1499 1661 1405 1656 1548 1889

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 218 192 146 165 152 160 111 97 114 141Private 2671 2461 2005 2199 1899 2061 2101 1707 2041 1792Shore 3445 4246 3158 3313 2690 3082 2756 3150 2491 3478Total Trips 6333 6898 5309 5678 4740 5303 4968 4954 4646 5411

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bassH 110 57 107 139 95 76 49 75 69 58R 951 559 667 1104 1063 2085 1368 1334 1429 1836

BluefishH 1257 1177 828 1104 1152 889 1184 1084 978 1179R 2377 2136 1553 2221 1924 1036 1872 1538 1427 1792

DolphinfishH 533 358 367 499 472 327 212 185 434 262R 5 2 3 5 8 3 3 4 30 lt 1

Drum (Atlantic croaker and spot)

H 3540 2161 1425 1313 1454 1073 1876 2654 1553 882R 2805 2741 3135 2469 2799 2014 3299 3605 3186 2646

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 532 654 609 195 216 501 369 234 87 389R 849 881 1214 1685 1916 1647 1427 961 1776 1772

Flounder (lefteye and summer)

H 190 71 99 144 93 105 91 145 81 31R 1091 1690 1213 1586 988 1397 1529 1060 926 1022

King mackerel H 269 105 91 37 14 27 23 23 34 55R 44 25 12 6 lt 1 3 5 10 7 24

Spanish mackerel

H 495 744 678 484 367 491 497 398 388 424R 258 449 313 294 171 235 289 241 216 188

Striped bass H 49 36 12 34 107 8 20 8 17 4R 82 174 122 108 296 176 124 95 115 357

Yellowfin tuna H 102 26 29 23 25 57 45 27 24 60R lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 lt 1 4 1 4 2 10

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish

158

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oNorth Carolina | Marine Economy

2015 North Carolina State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 706538 (29) 223209 (29) 3670284 (3) 16494 (26) 26388 (27) 49974 (28) 006

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 30 ds 34 40 50 46 58 63 72Receipts 1813 ds 1297 1652 2705 1630 4605 4599 4715

Seafood salesretail

Firms 150 114 140 126 144 136 127 137 134Receipts 14999 10918 12188 9057 10386 11990 12175 13430 12705

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 22 18 16 16 14 12 13 14 16Employees ds 232 170 171 ds ds 135 128 128

Payroll 12659 5373 4461 4749 4830 5084 4563 4720 6582

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 71 65 66 66 64 59 59 56 59Employees 597 559 584 590 603 793 849 966 1187

Payroll 15655 16843 17383 18348 19344 23949 26687 30292 38462

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 86 90 77 82 84 88 86 93 91Employees 241 219 243 247 244 289 254 278 255

Payroll 4170 4143 4494 5017 5250 5860 5872 6263 6681

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 6 4 6 4 5 6 5 5 6Employees 54 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll 2061 ds 2366 ds ds ds ds ds ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 6 5 6 10 8 7 8 8 6Employees ds ds 9 ds ds 25 ds ds ds

Payroll 510 533 617 ds ds 1579 ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0Employees ds NA ds NA ds NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA ds NA ds NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 96 107 105 102 104 102 99 100 105

Employees 522 656 501 536 524 531 501 541 579Payroll 14922 17164 15858 16238 16187 15975 16369 16774 18672

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 13 13 12 11 14 6 9 9 9Employees 652 760 914 600 ds ds ds ds 797

Payroll 25164 23328 20707 20755 ds ds ds ds 14767Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 14 10 11 13 11 8 10 13 13Employees 102 87 96 94 86 90 77 78 78

Payroll 3773 3668 4313 3968 4041 3203 3583 3844 4350

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 3 3 2 4 3 9 5 2 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds 46 ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds 1579 ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 78 77 64 60 57 60 52 52 62Employees ds 4281 1983 1501 1515 1760 1059 1153 1422

Payroll ds 138243 68004 64807 66929 74843 49462 50102 65388

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | South Carolina

160

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oSouth Carolina | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the South Carolina Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 1478 118153 38818 55055 1209 71612 29332 39034

Commercial Harvesters 441 34441 13550 18648 441 34441 13550 18648Seafood Processors amp Dealers 101 8582 3357 4317 89 7590 2969 3818

Importers 124 38394 6153 11704 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 55 6222 2186 2871 31 3569 1254 1647

Retail 757 30515 13572 17515 647 26013 11559 14921

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 16017 17872 17256 21205 23300 24239 23284 22800 21387 20784

Finfish amp Other 4744 4614 5338 6740 8429 7499 8403 6844 6699 6058Shellfish 11274 13259 11918 14465 14871 16740 14880 15956 14688 14726

Key SpeciesBlack sea bass 236 257 362 213 182 296 459 328 246 149Blue crab 3511 4187 4059 3593 5084 5794 6365 5819 4827 5543Clams 697 535 542 688 638 NA NA NA NA NAGroupers 2421 2165 1808 1524 1710 1119 1394 1412 1199 1037Oysters 1375 1739 1738 1858 1975 2153 2403 2242 2252 2318Sharks 78 78 56 123 166 95 52 60 43 47Shrimp 5634 6712 5487 8168 7008 8640 5925 7778 7430 6749Snappers 773 864 568 1079 1080 1334 1078 945 1067 1021Swordfish NA 187 1116 1944 2777 2048 2467 1245 1266 1043Tilefish 5 66 9 25 8 128 379 506 536 503

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 9310 10081 9599 10567 12131 17535 15679 14163 14419 13773

Finfish amp Other 1994 1940 2384 2774 3220 2604 2633 2473 2417 1901Shellfish 7316 8141 7215 7793 8911 14930 13046 11690 12002 11871

Key SpeciesBlack sea bass 114 132 168 98 100 114 172 125 81 47Blue crab 4137 4484 4014 3275 5439 5897 5132 3831 3745 4375Clams 135 119 123 152 137 NA NA NA NA NAGroupers 624 556 469 378 386 252 298 284 229 188Oysters 285 324 309 332 337 5538 5805 5244 5061 4780Sharks 105 110 63 87 108 93 42 42 27 29Shrimp 2727 3162 2716 3951 2918 3422 2037 2569 3129 2671Snappers 250 277 194 365 356 425 322 269 305 272Swordfish NA 71 459 630 741 603 651 369 389 299Tilefish 4 28 5 15 4 46 150 187 170 132

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Black sea bass 207 194 215 216 182 259 266 262 304 318Blue crab 085 093 101 110 093 098 124 152 129 127Clams 517 451 442 454 465 NA NA NA NA NAGroupers 388 390 385 404 442 445 468 497 524 552Oysters 482 536 563 560 585 039 041 043 045 048Sharks 074 071 089 142 153 102 123 144 159 162Shrimp 207 212 202 207 240 252 291 303 237 253Snappers 309 312 292 295 303 314 334 352 350 376Swordfish NA 264 243 309 375 339 379 337 325 349Tilefish 136 230 200 171 184 278 253 271 315 382

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

161

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

South Carolina | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of South Carolina Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 571 58758 20698 31797Private Boat 308 25617 8457 14116Shore 1188 102134 33925 59974

Total Durable Expenditures 3050 311239 118246 186254Total State Economic Impacts 5117 497748 181326 292141

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 37497Private Boat 30753Shore 89513Total 157763

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 83545Other Equipment 36704Boat Expenses 164666Vehicle Expenses 21423Second Home Expenses 0Total Durable Expenditures 306338

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 464101

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 277 236 231 210 148 207 166 181 192 163Non-Coastal 113 103 112 104 66 123 84 114 157 102Out-of-State 551 604 554 494 264 406 602 569 684 510Total Anglers 941 942 898 809 478 736 852 864 1033 775

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 85 69 80 77 81 25 48 94 96 77Private 1132 1266 1008 1078 847 1189 748 838 873 732Shore 813 1116 1325 1143 879 992 1181 1289 1701 1100Total Trips 2030 2451 2413 2298 1806 2206 1977 2221 2670 1909

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black sea bassH 126 90 37 216 57 92 24 108 42 21R 921 864 470 640 660 811 381 1593 896 616

BluefishH 175 127 135 444 225 206 298 172 265 240R 677 333 252 318 551 169 309 298 657 311

Drum (Atlantic croaker and spot)

H 643 2798 828 369 946 1029 832 615 3477 739R 376 394 841 354 463 359 1751 1207 1758 1361

Drum (southern kingfish)

H 699 823 1056 389 610 778 1195 698 462 399R 540 613 690 0 68 145 0 7 3 13

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 161 155 124 101 66 235 126 78 106 91R 572 734 399 407 280 817 601 389 393 481

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 109 216 222 102 172 77 25 80 44 42R 21 60 24 58 93 45 81 150 124 115

Red drumH 72 119 70 173 162 121 97 104 107 63R 437 552 751 786 664 544 673 636 571 338

Sharks2H 10 10 23 11 12 5 15 21 6 6R 418 475 804 1170 389 673 1164 845 898 409

Southern flounder

H 77 102 88 108 101 92 62 59 59 58R 106 102 75 lt 1 17 35 0 0 0 lt 1

Spanish mackerel

H 95 53 74 70 87 80 22 81 133 78R 97 68 56 28 67 98 25 36 100 70

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish 2 Sharks include species within the requiem shark family blacktip sharks Atlantic sharpnose sharks and unidentified sharks

162

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oSouth Carolina | Marine Economy

2015 South Carolina State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 319046 (13) 103973 (14) 1662251 (13) 6612 (11) 11317 (12) 20183 (11) 008

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 12 15 21 23 32 35 30 28 26Receipts 857 1155 1794 1386 1326 1868 1657 2690 2438

Seafood salesretail

Firms 75 64 77 78 87 67 67 73 69Receipts 3876 4650 4709 3978 5535 4818 3765 4845 6007

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 5 2 2 2 1 0 0 4 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds NA NA ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds NA NA ds ds

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 26 20 15 16 12 15 16 12 16Employees 220 108 111 120 101 125 134 148 146

Payroll 6186 3770 3676 3868 3760 4506 4849 5329 5327

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 60 64 57 56 61 60 56 56 54Employees 210 292 261 260 245 228 222 224 185

Payroll 3155 4871 4901 4580 4231 3670 3713 3633 3883

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4Employees 60 ds ds ds ds 40 ds ds ds

Payroll 2352 ds ds ds ds 2625 ds ds ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 6 4 8 7 6 6 4 1 1Employees 67 ds ds 20 ds ds 21 ds ds

Payroll 3419 659 ds 758 722 ds 633 ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 7 6 2 2 1 0 0 0Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 72 68 69 73 75 70 77 70 70

Employees 469 588 533 537 543 595 650 661 633Payroll 11498 13753 12642 13786 15805 15408 16147 17212 16996

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 15 17 14 12 14 10 13 14 15Employees 1419 1282 1953 1731 1717 715 ds 1902 2467

Payroll 75967 56812 43170 39625 49172 30381 ds 66803 59595Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 6 8 8 7 8 10 8 9 9Employees 152 227 208 222 217 247 221 219 236

Payroll 7369 11916 12522 12591 11922 16625 13820 14513 16311

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 3 3 2 2 5 7 2 3 4Employees 113 ds ds ds ds 676 ds ds ds

Payroll 7058 ds ds ds ds 29332 ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 41 46 41 39 41 39 37 37 34Employees 2962 3001 1929 1922 1943 1980 2262 2225 2690

Payroll 102531 97743 73988 74945 85568 90942 96081 98324 115262

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Gulf of Mexico Regionbull Alabamabull West Floridabull Louisianabull Mississippibull Texas

Offloading a commercial harvest of reef fish Photo Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management CouncilAva Lasseter

164

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

MANAGEMENT CONTEXTThe Gulf of Mexico Region includes Alabama Louisiana Mississippi Texas and West Florida Federal fisheries in this region are managed by the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (GMFMC) and NOAA Fisheries under seven fishery management plans (FMPs) The coastal migratory pelagic resources and spiny lobster fisheries are managed jointly with the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (SAFMC)

FMPs in the Gulf of Mexico Region

bull Aquaculturebull Coastal migratory

pelagic resources (with SAFMC)

bull Corals

bull Red drumbull Reef fishbull Shrimpbull Spiny lobster

(with SAFMC)

Three stocks or stock complexes in the Gulf of Mexico Region were identified as overfished in 2016 gray triggerfish greater amberjack and red snapper

Catch Share ProgramsTwo catch share programs have been implemented in the Gulf of Mexico the Red Snapper Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program and the GrouperndashTilefish IFQ Program Following are descriptions of these catch share programs and their performance

Red Snapper IFQ Program This program was implemented in 2007 to reduce overcapacity and mitigate derby fishing conditions in the red snapper segment of the commercial reef fish fishery The key performance indicators of this program show that relative to the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) the 2015 quota landings inflation-adjusted total revenue and inflation-adjusted total revenue per vessel increased In contrast the number of active vessels has decreased since the implementation of the IFQ Program

Grouper-Tilefish IFQ Program This program was implemented in 2010 to reduce overcapacity increase harvesting efficiency and eliminate the race to fish in the grouper-tilefish segment of the commercial reef fish fishery The key performance indicators of this program

generally show that relative to the baseline period (the 3-year period prior to implementation) 2015 landings inflation-adjusted total revenue and inflation-adjusted revenue per active vessel increased However overall quota and the number of active vessels decreased during this period

Policy UpdatesIn May 2016 NOAA Fisheries implemented Amendment 28 to the FMP for reef fish resources of the Gulf of Mexico The amendment changed the allocation of the red snapper annual catch limit (ACL) between the commercial and recreational sectors from 5149 to 485515 respectively After a court order rejected the change NOAA Fisheries in June 2017 returned the allocation to its previous levels Sector ACLs annual catch targets (ACTs) and the commercial quota were also adjusted to their pre-Amendment 28 levels

In October 2016 new regulations increased the Gulf of Mexico red grouper allowable catch limit from 603 pounds gutted weight to 819 pounds gutted weight Similarly the quotaannual catch target for Gulf of Mexico red grouper was raised for the commercial sector from 572 million to 778 million pounds gutted weight The new regulations increased the red grouper allowable catch limit for the recreational sector from 19 to 258 and increased the recreational sectorrsquos red grouper annual catch target from 173 million to 237 million pounds gutted weight

The increase to the commercial allocation was not distributed until the 2017 fishing season to ensure that the 2016 gag commercial ACL was not exceeded as a result of the red grouper commercial ACL increase The increase in the recreational ACL was expected to allow the recreational sector to remain open for the entire 2017 fishing year by avoiding the implementation of an in-season accountability measure Also in 2016 NOAA Fisheries issued notices prohibiting the recreational harvest of gray triggerfish and greater amberjack from August 1 through December 31 and prohibiting the commercial harvest of greater amberjack from July 17 through December 31 as a result of meeting or exceeding their respective ACTs

165

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Gulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

In addition recreational harvest of gray triggerfish was prohibited in the Gulf of Mexico Exclusive Economic Zone for 2017 due to a harvest overage during the 2016 recreational fishing season The harvest overage reduced the annual catch target to 0 pounds Gulf of Mexico gray triggerfish are currently overfished and under a rebuilding plan that expires at the end of 2017 The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council is expected to establish a new gray triggerfish rebuilding plan and modify management measures in 2018

COMMERCIAL FISHERIESIn this report commercial fisheries refer to fishing operations that sell their catch for profit The term does not include subsistence fishermen or saltwater anglers who fish for sport It also excludes the for-hire sector which earns its revenue from selling recreational fishing trips to saltwater anglers The commercial fisheries section reports on economic impacts landings revenue landings and ex-vessel prices of key speciesspecies groups

Key Gulf of Mexico Region Commercial Species

bull Blue crabbull Crawfishbull Groupersbull Menhadenbull Mullets

bull Oystersbull Red snapperbull Shrimpbull Stone crabbull Tunas

Economic ImpactsThe premise behind economic impact modeling is that every dollar spent in a regional economy (direct impact) is either saved or re-spent on additional goods or services If those dollars are re-spent on other goods and services in the regional economy this spending generates additional economic activity in the region Four different measures are commonly used to show how commercial fisheries landings affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as commercial fishing The category includes both the direct sales of fish landed and sales made between businesses and households resulting from the original sale Income includes personal income

(wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the sales of seafood or purchases of inputs to commercial fishing The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in numbers of jobs Note that these categories are not additive The United States seafood industry is defined here as the commercial fishing sector seafood processors and dealers seafood wholesalers and distributors importers and seafood retailers12

This report provides estimates of total economic impacts for the nation and for each of the 23 coastal states Total economic impacts for each state and the nation represent the sum of direct impacts indirect impacts (in this case the impact from suppliers to the seafood industry) and induced impacts (spending by employees on personal and household expenditures where employees of both the seafood industry and its full supply chain are included) That is the total economic impact estimates reported here measure jobs sales value-added and income impacts from the seafood industry as well as the economic activity generated throughout each regionrsquos broader economy from this industry

In 2016 commercial fishing in Florida generated the largest employment impacts in the Gulf of Mexico Region 76700 jobs Income impacts ($32 billion) sales impacts ($169 billion) and value-added impacts ($57 billion) were also largest in Florida

The importers sector in Florida generated the highest employment impacts of any state-level sector 39200 jobs The importers sector in Florida also generated the highest state-level income impacts ($19 billion) sales impacts ($121 billion) and value-added impacts ($37 billion) in the region

Landings TrendsGulf of Mexico landings revenue rose $255 million from 2015 to 2016 largely due to the increase in shrimp landings revenue which was up $411 million (11)

1 The NMFS Commercial Fishing Industry InputOutput Model was used to generate the impact estimates (see NMFS Commercial Fishing amp SeafoodIndustry InputOutput Model available at wwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf)2 Separate commercial economic impacts were not available for West Florida Impacts for the entire state of Florida are reported here

166

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

and which more than offset declines in blue crab (down 13 -$99 million) oyster (down 9 -$89 million) and spiny lobster (down 11 -$47 million ) The shrimp fishery is the most important fishery in terms of landings revenue in the region and in each Gulf state White shrimp landings revenue increased $508 million year-over-year due to the combined effect of higher landings and prices (up 28 and 4 respectively) Brown shrimp landings declined 24 from 2015 to 2016 which had been predicted by NOAA Fisheries3 High rainfall in Texas and Louisiana in spring 2016 led to large freshwater discharges into the estuaries In Texas the resulting flooding forced young shrimp out of the nursery habitat needed for growth and survival and into the mouths of the bays Extremely low levels of dissolved oxygen in Texas and western Louisianarsquos shallow coastal water also impacted harvest predictionsMenhaden the second most valuable fishery in the region was another bright spot in 2016 Landings (up 15 from 2015) were at their highest level since 2011 and after adjusting for inflation landings revenue was at its highest level since 1984 Demand for menhaden was strong in 2016 in part due to the fact that the global production of sardines and anchovies which are also used for fishmeal and fish oil fell to their lowest levels since 19914

Oyster landings revenue was down in 2016 which was not surprising given that 2015 represented a banner year for Louisiana oystermen with inflation-adjusted landings revenue at an all-time high Louisiana has comprised almost 70 of the Gulfrsquos oyster harvest in recent years while Louisiana harvest was down relative to 2015 the 2016 harvest was on par with the 5-year average (less than 1 difference)

Landings RevenueLandings revenue in the Gulf Region totaled $9121 million in 2016 This number represented a 32 increase from 2007 (a 15 increase in real terms after adjusting for inflation) and a 3 increase from 2015 Landings revenue was highest in Louisiana ($4261 million) followed by West Florida ($1967 million) Shellfish landings revenue made up 71 of total revenue in the region Shrimp ($4129 million) and menhaden ($1433 million) had the highest landings

revenue in the Gulf of Mexico Region in 2016 Together they accounted for 61 of total landings revenue

From 2007 to 2016 red snapper (176 141 in real terms) menhaden (131 102 in real terms) and spiny lobster (61 40 in real terms) had the largest revenue increases while tunas (-45 -52 in real terms) had the largest revenue decreases From 2015 to 2016 crawfish (73) tunas (29) and shrimp (11) had the largest revenue increases while blue crab (-13) spiny lobster (-11) and oysters (-9) had the largest revenue decreases

LandingsIn 2016 Gulf Region commercial fishermen landed 17 billion pounds of finfish and shellfish a 24 increase from 2007 and an 11 increase from 2015 Menhaden had the highest landings volume in the Gulf of Mexico Region accounting for 78 of landed weight

From 2007 to 2016 red snapper (115) spiny lobster (41) and menhaden (36) had the largest landings increases while tunas (-50) oysters (-29) and crawfish (-14) had the largest landings decreases From 2015 to 2016 crawfish (149) tunas (27) and menhaden (15) had the largest landings increases while spiny lobster (-12) oysters (-7) and red snapper (-4) had the largest landings decreases

PricesIn 2016 spiny lobster ($818 per pound) received the highest Gulf of Mexico Region ex-vessel price Landings of menhaden ($011 per pound) had the lowest ex-vessel price

From 2007 to 2016 oysters (83 60 in real terms) menhaden (70 49 in real terms) and blue crab (59 39 in real terms) had the largest price increases There were no price decreases from 2007 to 2016 From 2015 to 2016 shrimp (11) mullets (6) and groupers (2) had the largest price increases while crawfish (-30) blue crab (-11) and menhaden (-10) had the largest price decreases

3 httpseronmfsnoaagovnews_roompress_releases201608_noaa_prehtml4 FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Global Production Statistics httpwwwfaoorgfigisservletTabLandAreatb_ds=Productionamptb_mode=TABLEamptb_act=SELECTamptb_grp=COUNTRYamplang=en

167

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Gulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

Commercial Revenue Largest Increases

From 2007bull Red snapper (176 141 in real terms)bull Menhaden (131 102 in real terms)bull Spiny lobster (61 40 in real terms)From 2015bull Crawfish (73)bull Tunas (29)bull Shrimp (11)

Commercial Revenue Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Tunas (-45 -52 in real terms)From 2015bull Blue crab (-13)bull Spiny lobster (-11)bull Oysters (-9)

Commercial Landings Largest Increases

From 2007bull Red snapper (115)bull Spiny lobster (41)bull Menhaden (36)From 2015bull Crawfish (149)bull Tunas (27)bull Menhaden (15)

Commercial Landings Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Tunas (-50)bull Oysters (-29)bull Crawfish (-14)From 2015bull Spiny lobster (-12)bull Oysters (-7)bull Red snapper (-4)

RECREATIONAL FISHERIESIn this report recreational fishing refers to fishing for

fun rather than to resell fish (commercial fishing) or for subsistence The recreational fisheries section reports on economic impacts and expenditures angler participation trips and catch of key speciesspecies groups5

Key Gulf of Mexico Region Recreational Species

bull Atlantic croakerbull Gulf and southern

kingfishbull Red drumbull Red snapperbull Sand and silver

seatrout

bull Sheepshead porgybull Southern flounderbull Spanish mackerel bull Spotted seatroutbull Striped mullet

Economic Impacts and ExpendituresThe contribution of recreational fishing activities6 in the United States is reported in terms of economic impacts from angler expenditures Total annual trip expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean trip expenditures by the estimated number of adult trips in each trip mode (for-hire private boat and shore) Total annual durable expenditures are estimated by multiplying mean durable expenditures by the estimated annual number of adult participants in a given state

Four different measures are commonly used to show how angler expenditures affect the economy in a region (state or nationwide) sales income value-added and employment The term sales refers to the gross value of all sales by regional businesses affected by an activity such as recreational fishing The category includes both the direct sales made by the angler and sales made between businesses and households resulting from that original sale by the angler Income includes personal income (wages and salaries) and proprietorsrsquo income (income from self-employment) Value-added is the contribution made to the gross domestic product in a region Employment is specified on the basis of full-time and part-time jobs supported directly or indirectly by the purchases made by anglers The first three measures are calculated in terms of dollars whereas employment impacts are measured in number of jobs Note that these categories are not additive NOAA

5 Except where noted Atlantic and Gulf recreational catch and effort estimates are based upon the MRIP APAIS and CHTS (httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovrecreational-fisheriesSurveyssurvey-details) and not the revised MRIP estimates (httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovleadership-messagenoaa-fisheries-releases-revised-mrip-recreational-catch-and-effort-estimates) released in 20186 Trip expenditure estimates were generated from the 2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Durable good expenditure impacts were generated from the 2014 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey (see httpswwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsfisheriesrecreationalMarine-Angler-Durable-Expenditures2014-durable-expenditures-survey) Economic impacts from recreational fishing activities were generated using the NMFS Recreational Economic Impact Model (see The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2011 available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresmarine-angler-2011)

168

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

Fisheries uses a regional impact modeling software called IMPLAN to estimate these four types of impacts

The greatest employment impacts from expenditures on saltwater recreational fishing in the Gulf of Mexico Region were generated in West Florida (60200 jobs) followed by Alabama (16100 jobs) The largest sales impacts were observed in West Florida ($68 billion) followed by Texas ($2 billion) The biggest income impacts were generated in West Florida ($26 billion) followed by Texas ($746 million) The greatest value-added impacts were in West Florida ($41 billion) followed by Texas ($12 billion)

Recreational fishing expenditures (on both fishing trips and durable equipment purchases) across the Gulf of Mexico Region in 2016 totaled about $11 billion Trip expenditures totaled more than $14 billion with a large portion coming from trips in the private boat (41) and for-hire (30) sectors Durable goods expenditures totaled $96 billion with the largest portion coming from boat expenses ($55 billion)

Fishing TripsIn 2016 recreational fishermen took 195 million fishing trips in the Gulf of Mexico Region This number represented a 20 decrease from 2007 and a 1 decrease from 2015 The largest proportions of trips were taken in the private boat mode (57) and shore mode (37) West Florida (132 million trips) and Alabama (26 million trips) had the highest number of recorded trips

ParticipationIn 2016 there were 27 million recreational anglers who fished in the Gulf of Mexico Region This number represented a 24 decrease from 2007 and an 8 increase from 2015 These anglers were Gulf of Mexico Region residents from either a coastal county (87) or non-coastal county (13)

Harvest and ReleaseOf the Gulf of Mexicorsquos key species and species groups drum (spotted seatrout) (23 million fish) red drum (49 million fish) and drum (sand and silver seatrouts) (43 million fish) were most frequently caught by

Recreational Catch Largest Increases

From 2007bull Striped mullet (85)bull Drum (Gulf and southern kingfish) (1)From 2015bull Red snapper (78)bull Drum (Gulf and southern kingfish) (41)bull Drum (spotted seatrout) (37)

Recreational Catch Largest Decreases

From 2007bull Red drum (-47)bull Southern flounder (-46)bull Drum (spotted seatrout) (-26)From 2015bull Porgies (sheepshead) (-31)bull Red drum (-20)bull Drum (Atlantic Croaker) (-4)

recreational fishermen From 2007 to 2016 striped mullet (85) and drum (Gulf and southern kingfish) (1) had the largest increases in catch while red drum (-47) southern flounder (-46) and drum (spotted seatrout) (-26) had the largest decreases From 2015 to 2016 red snapper (78) drum (Gulf and southern kingfish) (41) and drum (spotted seatrout) (37) had the largest increases in catch while porgies (sheepshead) (-31) red drum (-20) and drum (Atlantic Croaker) (-4) had the largest decreases

MARINE ECONOMYFor this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fishing and marine-related industries in a coastal state The state marine economy consists of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing (employer establishments and non-employer firms) and 2) transport support and marine operations (employer establishments) These sectors include several different marine-related industries Note that when discussing the marine economy in the Gulf of Mexico Region all statistics include the entire state of Florida and not just West Florida789

169

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Gulf of Mexico Region | Regional Summary

To measure the size of the commercial fishing sector in a statersquos economy relative to the size of the commercial fishing sector in the national economy10 researchers use an index called the Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) The CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of regional employment in the commercial fishing sector relative to the percentage of national employment in the commercial fishing sector The US CFLQ is 1 If a state CFLQ is less than 1 then less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average If a state CFLQ is greater than 1 then more commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average Louisiana had the highest CFLQ in the Gulf region in 2015 at 233

In 2015 14 million employer establishments operated within the five states included in the Gulf of Mexico Region (including marine- and non-marine-related establishments) These establishments employed over 22 million workers and had a total annual payroll of $1 trillion The combined gross state product of Alabama Florida Louisiana Mississippi and Texas was approximately $3 trillion in 2015

Seafood Sales and ProcessingSeafood Product Preparation and Packaging In 2015 the Gulf of Mexico Region had 654 non-employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (a 64 increase from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $474 million (a 75 increase in real terms from 2007) There were 132 employer firms in the seafood product preparation and packaging sector (this remained unchanged from 2007) These establishments employed 6781 workers (a 22 decrease from 2007) and had a total annual payroll of $2387 million (a 4 decrease in real terms from 2007) The greatest number of seafood product preparation and packaging establishments was located in Florida (327) followed by Texas (207) and Louisiana (153)

Seafood Sales Retail In 2015 there were 801 non-employer firms engaged in retail sales of seafood in the five states that make up the Gulf of Mexico Region (a 2 decrease from 2007) Annual receipts for these firms totaled about $699 million (a 17 decrease in real terms from 2007) There were 373 employer firms

in the retail sales of seafood sector (a 2 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 2494 workers and had a total annual payroll of $566 million The greatest number of retail seafood establishments was located in Florida (536) followed by Louisiana (259) and Texas (240)

Seafood Sales Wholesale There were 478 employer firms in the wholesale sales of seafood sector in the Gulf of Mexico Region in 2015 (a 12 decrease from 2007) These establishments employed 4211 workers and had a total annual payroll of $1652 million The greatest number of wholesale seafood establishments was located in Florida (242) followed by Louisiana (111) and Texas (90)

Transport Support and Marine OperationsData for the transport support and marine operations sector of the Gulf of Mexico Regionrsquos economy were largely suppressed for confidentiality reasons It is clear however that these sectors play an important role in the regional economy For example the ship and boatbuilding sector accounted for $2 billion in payroll in 2015

7 Marine Economy information was not available for West Florida information for the entire state of Florida is provided in this report8 Unless otherwise stated data are from the US Census Bureau httpcensusgov (accessed September 26 2017)9 US Bureau of Economic Analysis ldquoTable 115 Gross Domestic Productrdquo and ldquoTable SA6N Compensation of Employees by NAICS Industryrdquo httpwwwbeagoviTableindex_nipacfm (accessed September 26 2017)10 US Bureau of Labor Statistics ldquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm (accessed September 26 2017)

Tables | Gulf of Mexico Region

172

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oGulf of Mexico Region | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Landings Value Value Jobs Sales Income Jobs Sales IncomeRevenue Added AddedAlabama 6459 12058 555373 219712 287906 11911 535846 214883 280529Florida 196706 76749 16873652 3171513 5658897 11083 1081344 284434 437467Louisiana 426116 36102 2021911 751727 1023361 35024 1836128 713007 958966Mississippi 28969 4586 217948 87253 112697 4578 216661 86981 112250Texas 195668 21507 2091002 597409 898617 16352 1079847 394235 552041

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 690211 663848 636427 624629 811905 784869 941557 1059780 886519 912050Finfish amp Other 146525 147115 142425 117831 184721 188283 200892 200092 251733 262150Shellfish 543686 516732 494003 506797 627184 596586 740665 859688 634786 649901

Key SpeciesBlue crab 46028 39813 45484 41264 48794 53708 61804 79458 74525 64632Crawfish 9034 9507 15547 13971 9914 8325 16490 16088 6851 11877Groupers 21488 24108 18435 14270 20326 24657 24628 30435 27671 28694Menhaden 62110 64376 60606 51750 92855 85890 90643 80402 138511 143339Mullets 5543 6099 6105 5221 10368 7557 13222 11626 7568 7825Oysters 69542 60464 73464 55085 65273 76042 76450 93007 99324 90399Red snapper 9570 7972 7984 10202 11413 13681 20621 23158 27437 26450Shrimp 367060 366808 327608 339228 441384 412209 513055 587267 371845 412947Spiny lobster 24527 19141 12203 32747 35610 21128 46744 53415 44055 39367Tunas 10535 6170 8180 2688 5516 10657 7308 6334 4502 5790

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 1404307 1278879 1435665 1072068 1792550 1489595 1346244 1245301 1567151 1744452Finfish amp Other 1071825 994813 1071919 810889 1472911 1177685 1043696 931158 1259884 1437436Shellfish 332482 284066 363746 261179 319640 311910 302548 314143 307267 307017

Key SpeciesBlue crab 57964 49258 61277 41240 55606 55444 46941 51664 52609 51298Crawfish 15848 15735 19312 14557 9599 6853 19676 13055 5461 13573Groupers 7723 8941 7008 5075 7175 8325 7613 8991 7815 7936Menhaden 1005325 927517 1002579 753442 1398654 1102539 971308 848599 1188984 1364030Mullets 8933 10609 11303 8963 14233 10772 13482 15101 10784 10545Oysters 22518 20723 22829 15824 18742 21192 19257 17957 17134 15975Red snapper 2998 2370 2503 3259 3567 4042 5306 5739 6741 6457Shrimp 225163 188806 250572 178902 221469 219216 206839 215903 212273 211787Spiny lobster 3402 2975 3960 5286 5302 3634 5600 5038 5450 4811Tunas 3426 1786 2836 1322 1588 3070 2094 1760 1343 1706

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue crab 079 081 074 100 088 097 132 154 142 126Crawfish 057 060 081 096 103 121 084 123 125 088Groupers 278 270 263 281 283 296 324 339 354 362Menhaden 006 007 006 007 007 008 009 009 012 011Mullets 062 057 054 058 073 070 098 077 070 074Oysters 309 292 322 348 348 359 397 518 580 566Red snapper 319 336 319 313 320 339 389 403 407 410Shrimp 163 194 131 190 199 188 248 272 175 195Spiny lobster 721 643 308 620 672 581 835 106 808 818Tunas 307 345 288 203 347 347 349 360 335 339

173

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Gulf of Mexico Region | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars trips)

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)12

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 3235 2926 2550 2480 2737 2803 2973 2616 2250 2379Non-Coastal 326 262 296 235 311 268 400 273 262 345Out-of-State3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NATotal Anglers 3562 3188 2846 2715 3048 3071 3373 2890 2512 2724

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016For-Hire 852 819 822 580 735 884 907 927 1086 1115Private 14980 15195 13443 12685 12911 12782 13510 11547 10952 11170Shore 8457 8776 8332 7783 8930 9506 10817 8582 7686 7255Total Trips 24289 24790 22597 21047 22576 23172 25233 21056 19724 19540

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)5

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 1408 1936 1291 1634 2208 1462 1883 2681 1349 1288R 2616 3149 3856 3828 5899 3920 3269 2239 2167 2085

Drum (Gulf and southern kingfish)

H 1136 1305 1065 1421 939 918 1622 707 1173 1406R 842 728 576 624 539 536 474 358 248 595

Drum (sand and silver seatrouts)

H 3184 3556 4314 4701 5960 5056 3013 2674 3162 3112R 1911 1990 2444 1806 2540 2476 1851 482 675 1156

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 12104 15042 14147 10871 14719 13593 12762 5818 7800 9932R 18850 21017 17364 14565 19119 20215 19527 8932 9067 13104

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 1244 1615 1607 1195 2273 1596 1355 1391 1327 1060R 1222 1487 1339 1739 1633 1516 1672 1579 1562 925

Red drumH 3135 3560 2893 3516 3891 3013 4138 2115 2250 2049R 6222 7016 5525 6467 6449 6329 7701 3480 3912 2881

Red snapperH 1268 719 827 367 557 625 1289 559 805 1001R 3258 2111 2146 1436 1521 1425 2824 1786 1543 3175

Southern flounderH 701 538 691 802 858 836 1102 486 419 459R 240 122 193 220 222 310 339 73 83 49

Spanish mackerelH 1338 1899 1508 1577 1542 1841 3355 1722 1780 1997R 2104 2041 1636 2476 1942 1442 4159 2779 1200 962

Striped mulletH 1150 1259 742 1666 1902 2356 2984 2366 1949 2114R 157 146 225 126 313 204 195 293 68 300

Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 432633Private Boat 590553Shore 410695Total 1433882

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 2025330Other Equipment 885813Boat Expenses 5543627Vehicle Expenses 983006Second Home Expenses 130943Total Durable Expenditures 9568717

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 11002599

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Trips Jobs Sales Income Value AddedAlabama 2567 16114 1436429 616372 1029958West Florida 13219 60179 6827238 2575065 4111852Louisiana 2242 14142 1629917 608048 1003379Mississippi 1512 5351 637880 211438 344605Texas 1187 16030 2000004 746008 1237327

1 The Marine Recreational Program (MRIP) does not collect angler participation data for Texas2 Includes Louisiana resident participation estimated from historical MRIP data (2006-2013) and a state creel survey (2014-2015) 3 Data are not available because out-of-state resident information is collected for individual states but whether an angler is a resident of a region is not specified4 The Marine Recreational Program (MRIP) does not collect effort data for Texas5 Data on the number of fish released in Texas are not collected by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) and therefore not reported in this table

Tables | Alabama

176

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oAlabama | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Alabama Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 12058 555373 219712 287906 11911 535846 214883 280529

Commercial Harvesters 1977 106619 31624 47088 1977 106619 31624 47088Seafood Processors amp Dealers 2030 143433 56183 71397 1933 136560 53491 67975

Importers 40 12251 1963 3735 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 183 9641 3380 4353 181 9560 3351 4317

Retail 7829 283429 126561 161333 7820 283106 126417 161149

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 48845 44503 39624 26335 50910 46527 56832 70497 50940 64592Finfish amp Other 3686 4358 3662 2748 4072 5183 4680 4572 5023 4927Shellfish 45160 40145 35962 23587 46838 41344 52153 65925 45917 59665

Key SpeciesBlue crab 1711 1533 961 732 1128 1044 1036 1319 1225 1788Flounders 261 214 197 97 222 185 58 53 66 56Menhaden 71 59 42 15 58 84 104 147 154 164Mullets 984 1030 765 594 687 1206 1178 1046 761 514Oysters 2698 243 77 390 1322 1253 786 441 290 590Red snapper 213 239 263 329 314 316 401 697 1443 1423Sharks 250 403 275 111 381 330 247 219 262 256Shrimp 40742 38355 34894 22463 44361 39040 50321 64149 44399 57271Spanish mackerel 453 664 301 499 582 1149 940 472 705 833Vermillion snapper 323 507 841 384 622 393 88 387 247 242

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 29434 24612 29199 14063 26119 26335 23421 25790 26565 29355Finfish amp Other 4857 5577 4478 3441 4966 6596 5831 5276 5095 5115Shellfish 24578 19035 24721 10622 21153 19739 17590 20514 21470 24240

Key SpeciesBlue crab 2557 1799 1458 927 1617 1325 1025 1184 1300 1919Flounders 133 107 97 48 111 83 25 23 26 19Menhaden 470 268 190 81 364 521 496 700 695 804Mullets 1798 2017 1814 1202 1262 1946 1793 1829 1385 944Oysters 769 71 23 68 296 265 133 58 34 52Red snapper 59 61 65 83 78 78 108 180 356 320Sharks 315 424 328 140 450 495 343 272 392 401Shrimp 21247 17154 23215 9625 19224 18137 16418 19257 20132 22256Spanish mackerel 580 921 418 733 839 1377 972 431 617 859Vermillion snapper 129 199 346 148 224 132 28 124 74 76

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue crab 067 085 066 079 07 079 101 111 094 093Flounders 197 201 204 205 2 221 235 224 251 286Menhaden 015 022 022 018 016 016 021 021 022 02Mullets 055 051 042 049 054 062 066 057 055 054Oysters 351 341 333 575 447 472 591 76 862 1144Red snapper 362 393 404 397 404 405 37 386 405 445Sharks 079 095 084 079 085 067 072 081 067 064Shrimp 192 224 15 233 231 215 306 333 221 257Spanish mackerel 078 072 072 068 069 083 097 109 114 097Vermillion snapper 25 255 243 259 278 297 312 311 333 319

177

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Alabama | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 528 59410 21180 31020Private Boat 512 48766 14659 25245Shore 1100 92952 30450 51589

Total Durable Expenditures 13974 1235301 550083 922104Total State Economic Impacts 16114 1436429 616372 1029958

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 37554Private Boat 47904Shore 76315Total 161773

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 315526Other Equipment 103942Boat Expenses 1097700Vehicle Expenses 48043Second Home Expenses 24625Total Durable Expenditures 1589834

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1751607

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 253 192 205 195 295 254 279 220 225 274Non-Coastal 169 116 151 140 177 131 224 123 151 176Out-of-State 291 237 209 220 435 339 549 510 455 465Total Anglers 712 545 566 554 907 723 1052 853 831 915

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 75 56 56 34 75 59 90 87 98 103Private 985 946 885 840 1206 1035 1006 714 918 958Shore 901 702 772 812 1202 1211 1767 1368 1308 1505Total Trips 1961 1704 1713 1686 2483 2305 2862 2169 2324 2567

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Bluefish H 26 16 14 30 75 56 163 36 17 120R 175 54 46 80 167 197 639 518 192 740

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 463 1163 250 918 886 345 391 1105 539 334R 924 1371 1821 1861 2593 1206 886 1393 1401 638

Drum (kingfishes)1

H 476 668 593 633 626 227 929 322 350 436R 289 257 284 309 341 97 260 156 131 259

Drum (sand seatrout)

H 704 1216 1428 2069 2346 1415 486 524 881 1062R 481 409 752 835 743 480 294 246 317 567

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 359 269 318 610 826 773 539 242 522 679R 488 844 757 454 1301 1126 761 254 907 1499

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 320 289 166 218 480 313 285 121 316 94R 30 159 48 51 146 48 46 18 168 35

Red drum H 84 88 62 123 143 124 188 90 161 157R 136 227 110 151 150 305 425 318 254 304

Red snapper H 217 107 138 42 217 152 450 132 297 340R 851 340 394 288 488 194 857 758 610 1490

Southern flounder

H 96 93 139 243 163 155 84 29 50 28R 38 38 22 65 60 53 43 18 26 7

Spanish mackerel

H 92 111 76 255 334 516 1313 128 707 679R 21 32 60 101 128 148 1130 53 275 114

1 Kingfishes include southern kingfish and Gulf kingfish

178

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oAlabama | Marine Economy

2015 Alabama State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 318136 (13) 98540 (13) 1634391 (13) 6737 (11) 11025 (11) 19998 (11) 047

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 47 33 41 68 67 47 58 57 49Receipts 1547 1894 1809 3314 4354 1965 3069 3446 2901

Seafood salesretail

Firms 61 57 67 71 58 68 66 55 46Receipts 4279 5632 5484 5197 4759 7073 5520 4351 3274

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 23 23 22 21 16 17 22 23 20Employees 1510 1450 1086 1128 882 778 989 963 961

Payroll 32774 29277 24900 22824 21922 19730 22641 23973 25951

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 31 29 28 23 25 16 18 18 21Employees 395 494 339 332 321 306 281 388 378

Payroll 6202 8751 5893 5119 6547 6221 6861 9321 10034

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 33 33 31 34 32 32 28 31 32Employees ds ds 130 132 120 189 219 200 234

Payroll 1809 1710 2044 2016 1888 2990 3267 3330 3706

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 8 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 4Employees 48 ds ds ds 215 ds ds 45 ds

Payroll 3266 ds ds ds 13117 ds ds 2617 ds

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 5 7 7 5 6 5 5 2 2Employees 46 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll 3553 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 2 3 2 2 1 0 0 0Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 52 56 55 54 53 57 54 54 57

Employees 364 316 278 609 ds 329 332 343 387Payroll 9382 9170 8418 12149 12196 10253 9659 9804 11182

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 19 20 19 19 19 10 13 13 14Employees 491 756 658 548 536 ds 554 778 666

Payroll 21076 33244 27272 32143 34998 ds 34481 37273 37154Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 16 17 16 16 16 14 12 16 14Employees 338 287 294 276 283 241 208 124 121

Payroll 17554 16712 15383 14737 14981 8808 14761 6902 6922

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 2 4 5 5 3 6 3 2 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds 101 4 ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds 5788 160 ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 42 42 40 32 35 37 38 37 41Employees 3570 4435 3913 2598 3176 4936 5948 5904 6049

Payroll 172380 188543 159065 151813 166116 251063 303016 311296 342082

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | West Florida

180

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oWest Florida | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Florida1 Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 76749 16873652 3171513 5658897 11083 1081344 284434 437467

Commercial Harvesters 7158 520252 163093 217024 7158 520252 163093 217024Seafood Processors amp Dealers 4442 801532 155120 304952 580 112172 21709 42677

Importers 39207 12116639 1941923 3693682 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 9586 1226678 481589 599160 482 61714 24229 30144

Retail 16356 2208551 429788 844078 2862 387205 75404 147621

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 132162 123850 117324 139046 166015 143886 182172 212961 215678 196706

Finfish amp Other 46828 51698 49976 41321 59580 60710 67994 74935 67107 69389Shellfish 85334 72152 67349 97725 106434 83176 114178 138026 148572 127317

Key SpeciesBlue crab 5769 3289 4195 6706 7719 5142 6454 7385 8487 6127Gag 4348 4913 2759 2079 1439 2437 2799 2889 2782 4659Lobsters 24546 19175 12206 32752 35616 21136 46749 53418 44056 39371Mullets 3663 4172 5069 4188 8630 5050 11081 9387 6148 6336Oyster 6631 5519 6968 6298 8582 9706 5783 4178 4722 4266Quahog clam 914 1825 1524 1002 921 753 921 NA NA NARed grouper 11024 13591 10488 8992 15087 16737 16219 21217 18931 17836Red snapper 3066 2951 2980 4552 5417 6141 8073 8111 9997 8599Shrimp 20976 23265 24446 27554 28456 22161 29164 42690 53175 46958Stone crab 26213 19019 17806 23335 24430 23934 24710 27911 35758 28106

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 59784 60380 66387 63678 78459 63648 63231 81775 81626 75378

Finfish amp Other 31146 35740 39000 32251 42392 39077 38003 49090 37202 39929Shellfish 28638 24640 27386 31428 36067 24570 25227 32685 44424 35449

Key SpeciesBlue crab 6110 2660 3371 5759 6833 4157 4463 4456 4871 3515Gag 1339 1478 825 572 369 612 676 689 642 1073Lobsters 3405 2981 3961 5287 5303 3635 5601 5040 5451 4812Mullets 5619 6980 9167 7262 11410 7249 10879 11943 8595 8472Oyster 2959 2526 2877 2165 3100 3316 1298 757 844 722Quahog clam 116 279 255 156 137 128 183 NA NA NARed grouper 4352 5628 4387 3488 5635 6141 5412 6629 5664 5290Red snapper 919 849 863 1317 1538 1698 2181 2104 2642 2324Shrimp 8628 9942 11451 12892 11975 7958 9676 11946 18944 16864Stone crab 5884 6163 5382 5100 5460 5202 3767 1944 2758 2838

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Blue crab 094 124 124 116 113 124 145 166 174 174Gag 325 332 334 363 390 398 414 419 433 434Lobsters 721 643 308 619 672 581 835 1060 808 818Mullets 065 060 055 058 076 070 102 079 072 075Oyster 224 219 242 291 277 293 446 552 560 590Quahog clam 790 653 597 643 674 586 503 NA NA NARed grouper 253 241 239 258 268 273 300 320 334 337Red snapper 334 347 345 346 352 362 370 386 378 370Shrimp 243 234 213 214 238 278 301 357 281 278Stone crab 445 309 331 458 447 460 656 1436 1296 990

1 Information reported in this table is for the entire state of Florida not just West Florida2 NA = These data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

181

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

West Florida | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 4211 499717 179975 275706Private Boat 2502 260148 89392 154162Shore 1333 130653 45408 79359

Total Durable Expenditures 52133 5936720 2260290 3602625Total State Economic Impacts 60179 6827238 2575065 4111852

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 273518Private Boat 267642Shore 105111Total 646271

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 1129797Other Equipment 470826Boat Expenses 2687489Vehicle Expenses 274063Second Home Expenses 50660Total Durable Expenditures 4612836

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 5259107

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 1934 1820 1551 1538 1592 1718 1813 1649 1414 1393Non-Coastal1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NAOut-of-State 2151 2029 1671 1470 1624 2141 2538 2716 2399 2306Total Anglers 4085 3849 3222 3008 3216 3859 4351 4365 3813 3699

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 612 571 573 461 536 699 684 694 786 807Private 10005 10145 8623 8160 7520 7865 8328 8115 6997 7363Shore 6319 6782 6482 5645 5845 6216 6937 6370 5643 5049Total Trips 16936 17497 15677 14266 13901 14780 15949 15179 13425 13219

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Common snook H 35 25 14 0 lt 1 lt 1 33 14 21 27R 1591 1595 1924 600 747 1040 1547 1578 2119 2366

Drum (sand and silver seatrouts)

H 1120 746 893 410 865 1415 706 578 396 187R 598 584 460 210 294 742 239 122 206 187

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 1514 1543 1371 1115 1475 1626 1406 1340 1295 1547R 10059 9584 7672 8470 11382 10920 7759 7936 7342 10023

Gag H 285 434 203 232 98 132 213 105 96 86R 2676 4077 2724 2018 1158 981 1170 818 483 745

Gray snapper H 1047 1393 1176 560 419 948 1482 1933 1449 1507R 4289 5690 3014 1858 2240 3126 5136 7519 5706 4647

King mackerel H 271 184 453 172 127 180 205 306 252 258R 85 155 138 81 47 62 87 118 73 105

Mullets3 H 613 1238 656 966 857 1549 1641 1480 1096 1490R 183 143 191 73 106 88 224 319 204 434

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 591 557 681 455 607 628 524 895 589 581R 894 855 808 1246 1275 1177 1084 1535 902 865

Red drum H 412 457 225 240 287 414 364 389 504 395R 2558 2561 1440 1992 2895 2299 2197 2647 3428 2292

Spanish mackerel H 1205 1754 1392 1284 1155 1215 1970 1566 1033 1204R 2065 1988 1546 2360 1780 1219 3017 2724 920 823

1 Data is not available because all West Florida residents are considered coastal county residents2 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish3 Mullets encompass species within the mullet genus including striped mullets

182

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oWest Florida | Marine Economy

2015 West Florida State Economy ( of national total)12

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient3

Totals 1948357 (8) 532830 (7) 7777990 (63) 33707 (54) 49239 (51) 88386 (49) 097

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 173 202 217 280 294 307 300 315 300Receipts 10497 11065 12473 14635 14618 17557 17214 22329 21841

Seafood salesretail

Firms 319 331 316 361 362 383 338 346 355Receipts 27557 26087 25667 27964 29037 30765 25332 26433 29033

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 20 23 25 27 24 27 25 27 27Employees 1748 1637 1143 1269 1095 1608 1374 1419 1429

Payroll 58233 53455 46235 45772 42612 51735 50003 50556 58246

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 267 229 215 229 250 226 234 233 242Employees 2308 1913 1762 1747 1913 1957 1878 1974 2055

Payroll 85019 75203 72159 70889 77115 75945 79266 83964 90247

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 169 168 158 145 145 151 165 166 181Employees 989 991 885 865 849 945 909 1037 1137

Payroll 20595 21604 21182 20783 20158 21577 23476 25844 29066

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 47 42 42 50 54 60 47 62 57Employees 1242 1106 972 709 753 1381 1050 1743 1815

Payroll 94429 50115 37774 50217 53341 100402 82078 175366 173004

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 69 57 58 61 65 75 69 77 76Employees 3190 2486 2801 2279 2374 3345 2485 2015 2154

Payroll 208144 169055 180139 159025 177386 231887 140564 131069 137786Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 34 31 33 29 29 39 31 28 32Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 10510

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 967938

MarinasEstablishments 493 442 428 430 411 432 444 464 466

Employees 4935 5024 4665 4439 4657 4918 5076 5421 5472Payroll 148592 151677 132955 133017 142997 148573 145265 168185 171354

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 53 56 59 55 64 43 58 61 69Employees 6585 8052 7288 7547 7484 4598 6258 6992 7834

Payroll 173788 192473 185309 191560 195458 86461 188997 179024 208186Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 145 147 145 145 150 151 180 190 196Employees 1484 894 829 980 1047 853 1390 878 861

Payroll 61470 56917 60641 76853 75561 68366 130893 74185 72483

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 29 40 32 34 32 66 61 56 55Employees 459 712 527 470 377 2082 555 588 987

Payroll 12872 24668 19006 20525 16879 72554 25439 20647 32032

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 296 297 261 248 246 258 259 263 278Employees 12332 12419 8221 7363 7909 8621 8813 9608 10913

Payroll 469382 442096 296537 302909 325942 374831 390853 448514 488050

1 All data presented on this page are for the entire state of Florida not just West Florida 2 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20153 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Tables | Louisiana

184

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oLouisiana | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Louisiana Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 36102 2021911 751727 1023361 35024 1836128 713007 958966

Commercial Harvesters 14635 794582 272048 397100 14635 794582 272048 397100Seafood Processors amp Dealers 2111 198996 77186 98454 2033 191662 74342 94826

Importers 483 149370 23939 45535 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 1065 129730 44195 57208 978 119105 40576 52523

Retail 17807 749233 334358 425063 17377 730778 326041 414517

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Revenue 289288 275701 286993 233559 324123 329754 399064 487718 373393 426116Finfish amp Other 65201 64118 62632 56912 102097 88989 103919 98773 109672 158548Shellfish 224087 211582 224361 176647 222026 240766 295145 388945 263720 267567

Key SpeciesBlue crab 35044 32203 37301 30325 36784 43921 51568 66706 58069 49408Crawfish 9034 9507 15547 13971 9914 8325 16490 16088 6851 11877King mackerel 1298 1307 1184 1149 1594 1475 1517 2414 2006 2152Menhaden 41368 45768 42555 43331 82881 63374 80262 72844 85322 132105Mullets 690 749 73 185 775 976 626 893 418 720Oysters 40148 39009 50950 24986 41652 42186 44872 67482 85090 68540Red snapper 2529 2038 2185 2311 2261 2551 4824 6427 6610 5948Shrimp 139842 130854 120555 107362 133670 146318 182210 238665 113700 137735Tunas 8334 4409 6338 1649 3369 7893 4595 4276 2743 4414Vermillion snapper 991 819 806 399 517 670 474 700 633 925

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Total Landings 999343 919017 1007474 793377 1311040 1044376 993879 872507 1070077 1255333Finfish amp Other 814647 759440 806845 665677 1153921 878405 823989 687557 917426 1092079Shellfish 184696 159577 200629 127700 157119 165971 169890 184950 152652 163253

Key SpeciesBlue crab 45107 41714 53057 30752 43893 46327 39193 43219 41308 40100Crawfish 15848 15735 19312 14557 9599 6853 19676 13055 5461 13573King mackerel 879 789 927 691 1002 969 788 1167 1047 996Menhaden 789621 738092 785575 648561 1131287 853012 800101 663693 893789 1068690Mullets 1375 1503 189 362 1385 1385 609 1186 692 1005Oysters 12858 12840 15006 6874 11156 11368 11364 12692 14488 12053Red snapper 807 589 667 828 918 1028 1216 1489 1591 1444Shrimp 110860 89285 113250 75515 92469 101406 99655 115982 91390 97522Tunas 2476 1248 2009 490 932 2152 1241 1142 661 1211Vermillion snapper 517 409 412 186 234 291 174 242 213 335

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Blue crab 078 077 070 099 084 095 132 154 141 123Crawfish 057 060 081 096 103 121 084 123 125 088King mackerel 148 166 128 166 159 152 193 207 192 216Menhaden 005 006 005 007 007 007 010 011 010 012Mullets 050 050 039 051 056 070 103 075 060 072Oysters 312 304 340 363 373 371 395 532 587 569Red snapper 313 346 328 279 246 248 397 432 415 412Shrimp 126 147 106 142 145 144 183 206 124 141Tunas 337 353 316 337 362 367 370 374 415 365Vermillion snapper 192 200 195 215 221 230 273 289 297 276

185

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Louisiana | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 657 91711 35617 52914Private Boat 694 93278 24446 45273Shore 287 35654 9419 17411

Total Durable Expenditures 12504 1409274 538566 887781Total State Economic Impacts 14142 1629917 608048 1003379

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 53884Private Boat 73854Shore 29712Total 157451

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 242851Other Equipment 120737Boat Expenses 987716Vehicle Expenses 184993Second Home Expenses 15767Total Durable Expenditures 1552064

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1709515

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Coastal 853 795 669 609 690 651 709 NA NA NANon-Coastal 124 120 108 67 86 77 109 NA NA NAOut-of-State 157 170 139 120 183 165 262 NA NA NATotal Anglers 1134 1084 916 796 959 893 1080 NA NA NA

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016For-Hire 144 179 183 79 113 115 122 131 160 179Private 3156 3508 3176 3055 3342 2891 3190 2096 2264 2063Shore 889 933 769 729 1122 1131 1349 NA NA NATotal Trips 4188 4620 4128 3862 4576 4137 4661 2227 2424 2242

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Black drum H 386 543 519 398 468 424 454 217 220 138R 729 1117 974 1033 1085 881 1638 NA NA NA

Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 683 357 471 229 606 520 829 235 209 150R 1006 1187 1100 1268 2319 1675 1797 NA NA NA

Drum (sand seatrout)

H 888 1085 879 1065 1187 895 755 532 368 354R 541 825 854 514 1032 679 990 NA NA NA

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 8930 11705 10557 7857 10440 9608 9004 3231 4291 5326R 7394 9580 7975 5054 5803 6776 9709 NA NA NA

Drum(southern kingfish)

H 67 74 103 41 16 110 15 4 20 6R 28 118 59 47 25 40 65 NA NA NA

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 271 706 703 430 869 397 368 262 257 225R 287 448 473 439 188 237 477 NA NA NA

Red drum H 2308 2673 2237 2812 3023 2011 3169 1283 1242 1045R 3455 4075 3733 4111 3195 2871 4676 NA NA NA

Red snapper H 160 84 97 7 31 101 83 128 171 145R 285 262 195 7 108 131 224 NA NA NA

Southern flounder

H 349 235 286 327 399 331 685 209 217 222R 67 37 50 72 61 98 134 NA NA NA

Yellowfin tuna H 8 17 3 lt 1 13 25 11 14 23 28R lt 1 7 0 0 4 3 2 NA NA NA

1 Louisiana data not available for 2014-20162 Effort for 2014-2016 is estimated using data from a state creel survey and does not capture shore-based effort separately from private boat effort3 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish4 Harvest and release totals for 2014-2016 are estimated using data from a state creel survey

186

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oLouisiana | Marine Economy

2015 Louisiana State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 357815 (15) 105575 (14) 1724973 (14) 7668 (12) 12055 (12) 23807 (13) 233

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 85 77 68 120 94 78 99 111 115Receipts 6523 7365 5308 10358 9308 8492 9136 8632 10086

Seafood salesretail

Firms 196 182 173 197 192 184 173 177 169Receipts 20932 25900 17622 16001 18758 16804 17538 17383 17870

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 41 36 38 34 33 35 36 37 38Employees 1253 991 1301 1209 1006 1117 964 943 1015

Payroll 41391 32382 37657 35770 46440 51237 49339 50881 63909

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 119 98 98 97 94 103 106 109 111Employees 954 739 702 683 767 862 846 672 865

Payroll 21604 15858 17261 15554 18427 22296 23235 24107 25837

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 101 107 106 101 100 97 94 90 90Employees 781 681 703 527 590 704 643 562 612

Payroll 11827 11141 11564 11214 11090 13042 11213 10421 11802

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 138 123 117 125 125 105 102 124 116Employees 7680 6506 6077 5610 5834 6422 5317 6275 5212

Payroll 527290 549388 391914 405796 417362 497165 458589 556693 396625

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 22 18 21 16 17 18 11 19 21Employees 685 1095 1192 93 93 ds 95 ds 451

Payroll 39843 87479 91760 6147 5608 ds 5435 ds 21706Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 3 2 2 1 3 2 4 4 3Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds 3 ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds 363 ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 50 43 43 43 45 44 41 39 36

Employees 378 274 244 314 329 257 250 229 194Payroll 17794 9581 8989 14716 10771 9209 8693 7276 4683

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 49 39 44 41 42 37 44 49 45Employees 2978 2010 2193 2511 2526 2016 2834 3106 3418

Payroll 128207 85484 92883 105063 108491 93896 174054 212786 175092Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 128 145 137 138 138 136 133 137 142Employees 2508 2884 2893 3176 3396 2545 2533 2816 2862

Payroll 141757 183381 175271 224533 208306 162094 169795 206318 218379

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 14 22 17 21 20 46 18 14 15Employees 467 517 440 431 461 1205 443 ds 399

Payroll 31734 37181 33907 38776 38745 80780 37122 ds 37866

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 112 117 109 109 109 116 110 117 109Employees 12808 12815 12521 11737 11722 10933 7413 8512 8470

Payroll 503199 619606 613188 600259 639047 631098 416319 479243 401977

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed

Tables | Mississippi

188

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMississippi | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Mississipi Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 4586 217948 87253 112697 4578 216661 86981 112250

Commercial Harvesters 841 46904 14225 20823 841 46904 14225 20823Seafood Processors amp Dealers 708 59308 23463 29400 707 59216 23427 29355

Importers 3 1020 163 311 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 60 6243 2203 2775 60 6172 2178 2744

Retail 2973 104473 47199 59387 2970 104368 47151 59328

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 39340 43696 37956 21895 30291 49337 34970 26014 68535 28969

Finfish amp Other 21359 19233 18667 8963 10527 23172 10938 8102 53743 11830Shellfish 17981 24464 19289 12932 19764 26165 24032 17912 14792 17139

Key SpeciesBlue crab 741 447 573 366 318 724 416 997 1209 895Flounders 58 40 58 64 118 101 45 55 76 75Menhaden 20658 18534 17987 8378 9871 22394 10230 7358 52962 10973Mullets 35 32 30 31 56 63 61 25 12 22Oysters 819 6858 6094 4268 928 1596 1544 1685 969 1088Red snapper NA NA 158 NA 168 226 NA 307 NA NAShrimp 16418 17146 12612 8293 18514 23846 22072 15229 12613 15156

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 227834 201822 230255 111229 278075 263640 180600 190555 307035 307565

Finfish amp Other 216375 190191 217461 105274 267407 249382 171000 184393 294723 294641Shellfish 11459 11631 12794 5955 10668 14259 9599 6162 12312 12923

Key SpeciesBlue crab 737 450 545 366 370 782 359 570 798 773Flounders 25 17 25 28 55 43 19 21 29 27Menhaden 215182 189118 216709 104729 266774 248824 170500 183950 294233 294189Mullets 70 57 62 59 93 99 95 39 21 40Oysters 299 2606 2189 1453 247 425 336 321 182 245Red snapper NA NA 57 NA 86 115 NA 170 NA NAShrimp 10421 8570 10054 4135 10048 13051 8903 5270 11332 11905

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Blue crab 101 099 105 100 086 093 116 175 151 116Flounders 238 236 234 233 214 233 238 266 261 283Menhaden 010 010 008 008 004 009 006 004 018 004Mullets 050 057 048 052 061 064 064 064 056 055Oysters 274 263 278 294 375 375 459 525 532 444Red snapper NA NA 275 NA 196 197 NA 181 NA NAShrimp 158 200 125 201 184 183 248 289 111 127

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

189

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Mississippi | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 91 10531 3625 5225Private Boat 215 24227 6300 10518Shore 100 9514 2667 4454

Total Durable Expenditures 4945 593608 198846 324408Total State Economic Impacts 5351 637880 211438 344605

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 6250Private Boat 27039Shore 9768Total 43057

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 85603Other Equipment 43333Boat Expenses 277687Vehicle Expenses 81652Second Home Expenses 291Total Durable Expenditures 488566

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 531623

Recreational Anglers by Residential Area (thousands of anglers)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Coastal 196 119 125 137 160 179 171 171 195 156Non-Coastal 34 26 36 29 48 60 67 62 48 83Out-of-State 55 48 50 50 60 91 101 94 114 106Total Anglers 284 194 212 216 268 331 339 328 357 345

Recreational Fishing Effort by Mode (thousands of angler trips)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

For-Hire 21 13 11 7 11 11 11 16 42 25Private 834 596 759 629 843 991 986 621 773 786Shore 349 359 310 597 761 948 764 843 736 701Total Trips 1204 969 1079 1233 1615 1950 1761 1481 1551 1512

Harvest (H) amp Release (R) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Drum (Atlantic croaker)

H 72 182 340 209 453 317 330 820 328 582R 264 388 715 422 606 695 330 375 710 1258

Drum (kingfishes)2

H 161 180 126 174 177 234 519 190 550 655R 48 57 61 47 36 157 94 32 54 121

Drum (sand and silver seatrouts)

H 296 351 1003 986 1336 1151 916 891 1406 1373R 230 166 378 246 472 574 327 113 152 402

Drum (spotted seatrout)

H 385 608 1090 556 841 776 1016 415 867 1356R 909 1008 960 586 633 1394 1298 743 818 1581

Porgies (sheepshead)

H 17 17 22 43 260 115 93 75 113 54R 11 25 9 3 24 54 65 27 492 26

Red drum H 43 77 84 77 91 140 148 106 100 165R 73 153 241 213 208 853 403 515 229 286

Red snapper H 2 9 15 1 7 27 35 6 7 45R 9 103 55 25 lt 1 2 95 42 194 165

Sharks3 H 5 3 21 70 35 16 89 6 13 5R 43 31 36 87 38 104 75 44 12 76

Southern flounder

H 121 109 209 196 182 227 215 168 64 93R 31 45 120 79 99 153 159 54 57 38

Striped mullet H 66 79 119 188 491 396 647 602 712 465R 14 4 4 13 83 108 19 5 43 6

1 In this table rsquolt1rsquo = 0-999 fish and rsquo1rsquo = 1000-1499 fish 2 Kingfishes include southern kingfish and Gulf kingfish3 Sharks include species within the requiem shark family blacktip sharks Atlantic sharpnose sharks and unidentified sharks

190

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oMississippi | Marine Economy

2015 Mississippi State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 209279 (09) 58662 (08) 926391 (07) 3395 (05) 5745 (06) 10587 (06) 104

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms ds 17 16 30 25 27 ds 21 12Receipts ds 1055 753 1937 2108 930 ds 1932 1539

Seafood salesretail

Firms 57 48 56 69 51 50 54 42 53Receipts 4126 3437 4206 3421 3505 3957 3855 3129 4053

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 22 20 20 20 18 18 19 19 18Employees 3022 3062 2796 2849 2464 2368 2284 2289 2370

Payroll 60633 61723 61926 61731 52502 55407 59212 57324 60906

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 25 18 16 18 18 17 14 14 14Employees 106 61 113 ds 64 102 ds ds 39

Payroll 3285 3088 2836 2542 2532 4412 1546 1587 1800

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 15 18 14 15 17 13 13 10 8Employees ds 50 46 50 58 ds ds ds 96

Payroll ds 699 841 810 838 1902 ds ds 2672

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 4 5 5 4 4 4 6 4 4Employees ds 119 114 ds 127 ds 230 277 259

Payroll 7585 8351 7730 8058 7233 ds 17080 16365 17353

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1Employees ds NA ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds NA ds ds ds ds ds ds dsDeep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Employees ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Payroll ds NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

MarinasEstablishments 19 17 13 18 19 16 16 18 17

Employees ds 111 172 183 189 204 154 193 197Payroll 2145 2794 3479 4163 5137 5361 3972 4960 5047

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 5 7 8 7 7 2 4 5 5Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 241

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 10390Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 9 8 7 8 6 7 6 7 7Employees ds ds ds 141 ds ds ds ds 57

Payroll 1754 ds ds 6982 ds ds ds ds 2698

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 1Employees ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds ds

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 23 24 20 20 20 18 19 18 18Employees 14578 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 14722

Payroll 615837 ds ds ds ds ds ds ds 892317

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Tables | Texas

192

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oTexas | Commercial Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of the Texas Seafood Industry (thousands of dollars)With Imports Without Imports

Jobs Sales Income Value Added Jobs Sales Income Value

AddedTotal Impacts 21507 2091002 597409 898617 16352 1079847 394235 552041

Commercial Harvesters 4446 411184 122134 193538 4446 411184 122134 193538Seafood Processors amp Dealers 1466 134823 50719 66799 1336 122801 46197 60842

Importers 2682 828853 132839 252671 0 0 0 0Seafood Wholesalers amp Distributors 1035 153639 51263 70990 490 72696 24256 33589

Retail 11877 562503 240453 314620 10081 473167 201649 264071

Total Landings Revenue amp Landings Revenue of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of dollars)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Revenue 180575 176098 154530 203795 240566 215365 268519 262589 177973 195668Finfish amp Other 9452 7709 7488 7888 8445 10231 13361 13709 16188 17455Shellfish 171123 168389 147043 195907 232121 205134 255158 248880 161785 178213

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 450 446 484 531 622 743 819 681 NA NABlack drum 1660 1363 1377 1573 1448 1491 1699 1981 2074 2266Blue crab 2763 2342 2454 3134 2845 2878 2331 3050 5534 6414Flounders 62 144 91 62 205 175 73 97 187 236Groupers 474 606 695 389 572 774 1168 1156 1483 1601Oysters 19246 8835 9376 19144 12789 21302 23465 19221 8254 15915Red snapper 3762 2744 2398 3009 3254 4448 7324 7617 9387 10480Shrimp 149084 157187 135100 173556 216382 180844 229289 226535 147957 155829Tunas NA 94 139 4 2 5 7 14 3 NAVermilion snapper 1554 1430 1233 1337 1274 1434 659 604 920 572

Total Landings amp Landings of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of pounds)1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Total Landings 87912 73048 102351 89721 98857 91596 85113 74674 81848 76822

Finfish amp Other 4800 3866 4134 4247 4224 4225 4872 4842 5438 5671Shellfish 83111 69182 98216 85475 94633 87371 80241 69832 76410 71151

Key SpeciesAtlantic croaker 62 59 63 67 79 89 96 78 NA NABlack drum 1687 1468 1610 1729 1795 1623 1689 1747 1879 1973Blue crab 3454 2635 2844 3436 2893 2853 1902 2234 4331 4990Flounders 24 58 32 26 75 60 20 25 51 63Groupers 161 188 227 156 199 227 306 281 355 375Oysters 5633 2679 2733 5265 3943 5817 6126 4129 1587 2903Red snapper 1213 870 851 1031 948 1123 1800 1797 2152 2369Shrimp 74007 63855 92602 76734 87753 78665 72186 63448 70475 63240Tunas NA 22 45 1 1 3 3 6 1 NAVermilion snapper 672 592 561 539 465 511 234 203 307 188

Average Annual Price of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (dollars per pound)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Atlantic croaker 729 758 764 798 784 831 855 877 NA NABlack drum 098 093 086 091 081 092 101 113 110 115Blue crab 080 089 086 091 098 101 123 137 128 129Flounders 255 248 284 237 275 294 355 389 365 373Groupers 295 322 306 249 287 341 381 412 418 427Oysters 342 330 343 364 324 366 383 466 520 548Red snapper 310 315 282 292 343 396 407 424 436 442Shrimp 201 246 146 226 247 230 318 357 210 246Tunas NA 426 308 319 182 183 210 229 243 NAVermilion snapper 231 242 220 248 274 281 281 298 300 304

1 NA = these data are confidential and therefore not disclosable

193

National O

verview | N

orth Pacific | Pacific | Western Pacific | N

ew England | M

id-Atlantic | South Atlantic | G

ulf of Mexico

Texas | Recreational Fisheries

2016 Economic Impacts of Recreational Fishing Expenditures (thousands of dollars)

Jobs Sales Income Value Added

Trip Impacts by Fishing Mode For-Hire 867 115114 42016 64744Private Boat 2129 274752 82530 149912Shore 2595 300626 93946 169102

Total Durable Expenditures 10439 1309512 527516 853569Total State Economic Impacts 16030 2000004 746008 1237327

2016 Angler Trip amp Durable Goods Expenditures (thousands of dollars)1

Fishing Mode Trip ExpendituresFor-Hire 61427Private Boat 174114Shore 189789Total 425330

Equipment Durable Goods ExpendituresFishing Tackle 251553Other Equipment 146975Boat Expenses 493035Vehicle Expenses 394255Second Home Expenses 39600Total Durable Expenditures 1325417

Total State Trip and Durable Goods Expenditures 1750747

Harvest (H) of Key SpeciesSpecies Groups (thousands of fish)2

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Black drum 66 82 98 165 129 257 150 139 128 138Drum (Atlantic croaker) 95 64 117 125 157 157 152 117 214 126

Drum (sand seatrout) 95 152 111 127 227 177 151 147 110 135

Drum (spotted seatrout) 916 917 810 732 1137 810 796 590 825 1025

King mackerel 11 8 16 6 9 9 10 13 9 12Porgies (sheepshead) 46 46 34 49 57 143 84 39 51 106

Red drum 289 266 285 264 347 323 269 247 241 288Red snapper 45 41 31 33 36 34 48 40 50 31Southern flounder 49 64 47 30 92 96 92 71 85 104

1 The Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) does not collect participation (number of anglers) or effort (number of trips) data for TexasTo calculate trip expenditure estimates effort by fishing mode was estimated based on 2013 data provided by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department(TPWD) These effort estimates were reviewed by the TPWD To calculate angler expenditure estimates (durable equipment expenditures) participationestimates were based on the sum of saltwater licenses sold in Texas plus a proportion of combination licenses sold in Texas A change in the method ofreporting landings occurred in 2007 so data from 2007 is not comparable to earlier years 2 Data collected by the TPWD is reported in this table The data collected by the TPWD differs from the data collected and reported in the MRIP Data onthe number of fish released are not reported by TPWD Please see the TPWD for more information wwwtpwdstatetxusfishboat

194

Nat

iona

l Ove

rvie

w |

Nor

th P

acifi

c |

Paci

fic |

Wes

tern

Pac

ific

| N

ew E

ngla

nd |

Mid

-Atla

ntic

| S

outh

Atla

ntic

| G

ulf

of M

exic

oTexas | Marine Economy

2015 Texas State Economy ( of national total)1

Non-Employer Firms Establishments Employees

AnnualPayroll

($ billions)

Employee Compensation

($ billions)

Gross StateProduct

($ billions)

CommercialFishing

LocationQuotient2

Totals 2150702 (88) 569091 (74) 10239710 (83) 5211 (83) 80268 (83) 161119 (9) 026

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Non-Employer Firms (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Firms 94 85 82 99 119 123 123 128 178Receipts 5386 3466 3858 3224 5734 6675 7484 6706 11051

Seafood salesretail

Firms 182 188 196 184 171 194 173 199 178Receipts 17442 18204 13177 12124 13433 14891 15094 15160 15660

Seafood Sales amp Processing - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Seafood product prep amp packaging

Establishments 26 27 24 22 24 22 30 32 29Employees 1207 1169 1026 1184 1273 1248 1026 1062 1006

Payroll 27813 27045 29006 24961 26425 27737 27638 28643 29729

Seafood saleswholesale

Establishments 104 69 75 77 82 71 75 89 90Employees 970 734 683 715 723 603 729 816 874

Payroll 51597 24498 23650 23879 26356 25309 30370 35553 37315

Seafood salesretail

Establishments 62 60 51 52 50 60 60 59 62Employees 189 206 189 199 ds ds 331 395 415

Payroll 3703 3403 3393 3742 4090 6102 6891 8201 9319

Transport Support amp Marine Operations - Employer Establishments (thousands of dollars)34

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Coastal amp GreatLakes freighttransportation

Establishments 43 42 43 48 48 39 42 48 48Employees 2513 2815 2729 1909 1764 1814 2253 2227 2058

Payroll 131946 251997 200219 161080 177549 174686 207831 215950 208286

Deep sea freighttransportation

Establishments 41 35 36 30 39 40 33 33 35Employees 920 514 802 764 860 742 ds 790 639

Payroll 49761 40764 61309 63408 71515 65818 44902 55106 47119Deep seapassengertransportation

Establishments 4 3 2 1 1 0 2 2 2Employees ds ds ds ds ds NA ds ds ds

Payroll ds ds ds ds ds NA ds ds ds

MarinasEstablishments 141 143 131 148 144 132 124 128 138

Employees 1200 1486 1423 1198 1233 1169 1258 1222 1209Payroll 28359 34039 33803 33968 34928 34711 36461 36776 37054

Marine cargohandling

Establishments 62 55 57 54 55 42 48 53 56Employees 6237 6313 6276 5262 5259 4373 6390 7451 8179

Payroll 186416 196006 167562 166877 153360 130817 272286 327690 324552Navigationalservices toshipping

Establishments 90 99 95 87 91 91 89 93 91Employees 1709 1884 1849 1606 1448 1676 1485 1588 1415

Payroll 125061 137962 137289 132283 113444 124500 130572 139259 144090

Port amp harboroperations

Establishments 15 24 30 29 26 37 27 25 25Employees 98 ds 421 ds 439 1381 630 387 395

Payroll 5163 10538 13778 18627 18842 55470 25229 13544 16436

Ship amp boatbuilding

Establishments 96 102 99 97 91 89 87 88 84Employees 4810 5368 3891 3386 2773 5601 5686 5178 4956

Payroll 210275 235190 158261 147492 153077 310230 297248 306571 283838

1 Census Bureau data for the Marine Economy section of this report are available only through 20152 The US Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ) is 1 A CFLQ greater than 1 indicates that more commercial fishing occurs in this statethan the national average A CFLQ less than 1 indicates that less commercial fishing occurs in this state than the national average3 ds = these data are suppressed4 NA = not applicable

Data Sources

Fish on the line Photo NOAA FisheriesMelanie King

196

Data Sources

MANAGEMENT CONTEXT

bull Excess Harvesting Capacity in US Fisheries A Report to Congress April 28 2008 National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpwwwpcouncilorgbb20080608C2b_SUP_ATT2_0608pdf

bull rdquoStatus of US Fisheriesrdquo Office of Sustainable Fisheries National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationalpopulation-assessmentsstatus-us-fisheries

bull rdquoEndangered Species Act (ESA)rdquo Office of Protected Resources National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationalendangered-species-conservationendangered-species-act

bull rdquoCertified Fisheriesrdquo Marine Stewardship Council wwwmscorgbull rdquoCatch Sharesrdquo Office of Sustainable Fisheries National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric

Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovnationallaws-and-policiescatch-shares

Fishery Management Councils amp Fishery Plansbull Caribbean Fishery Management Council wwwcaribbeanfmccombull Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council wwwgulfcouncilorgbull Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council wwwmafmcorgbull New England Fishery Management Council wwwnefmcorgbull North Pacific Fishery Management Council wwwnpfmcorgbull Pacific Fishery Management Council wwwpcouncilorgbull South Atlantic Fishery Management Council wwwsafmcnetbull Western Pacific Fishery Management Council wwwwpcouncilorg

COMMERCIAL FISHERIES Data for New England Mid-Atlantic South Atlantic Gulf of Mexico North Pacific Pacific and Western Pacific Regionsbull Commercial Landings Database Obtained December 5 2017 Office of Science amp Technology National Marine

Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovtopiccommercial-fishingoverview

Pacific cod flatfish Atka mackerel walleye pollock rockfish and sablefish data North Pacific Regionbull Alaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric

Administration (NOAA Fisheries) Obtained December 5 2017 wwwafscnoaagov

Economic Impacts of the US Commercial Seafood Industrybull A Userrsquos Guide to the National and Coastal State IO Model

httpwwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2007-2009pdf

Additional informationbull rdquoData Caveatsrdquo Office of Science amp Technology National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovcommercial-fisheriescommercial-landingsdata-caveatsindex

bull rdquoNOAA Fisheries Economics amp Social Sciences Programrdquo Office of Science amp Technology National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) wwwstnmfsnoaagovst5indexhtml

197

Data Sources

RECREATIONAL FISHERIES

Data for New England Mid-Atlantic South Atlantic Gulf of Mexico and Western Pacific Regionsbull Recreational Fishery Statistics Queriesrdquo Obtained August 15 2017 Office of Science amp Technology National

Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries) httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovrecreational-fishing-datarecreational-fishing-data-and-statistics-queriesrun-a-data-query

Data for Pacific Regionbull Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Recreational Fisheries Information Network (RecFIN) Obtained

September 12 2017 httpwwwrecfinorg

Data for North Pacific Regionbull Alaska Department of Fish amp Game Obtained October 26 2017 httpwwwadfgstateakus

Data for Texas (Gulf of Mexico Region)bull Texas Parks amp Wildlife Department Obtained June 30 2017 wwwtpwdstatetxusbull Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Obtained June 30 2017 httpwwwwlflouisianagov

Recreational Fishing Expenditures and Impactsbull Lovell Sabrina James Hilger Emily Rollins and Scott Steinback 2019 Marine Angler Trip Expenditures in the

United States 2017 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Draft Reportbull Lovell Sabrina Scott Steinback and James Hilger 2013 The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler

Expenditures in the United States 2011 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-134 188p httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovAssetseconomicspublicationsAnglerExpenditureReport2011pdfThe20Economic20Contribution20of20Marine20Angler20Expenditures20in20the20United20States202011pdf

bull Lovell J Sabrina James Hilger Scott Steinback and Clifford Hutt 2016 The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures on Durable Goods in the United States 2014 US Dept of Commerce US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-165 72p httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovAssetseconomicsdurable-expendituresdocumentsTM165_Durable_Goods_2014pdf

THE MARINE ECONOMY

bull rdquoCounty Business Patterns Data Seriesrdquo Obtained September 26 2017 US Census Bureau httpswwwcensusgovprograms-surveyscbphtml

bull rdquoGross Domestic Product by Staterdquo Obtained September 26 2017 Bureau of Economic Analysis httpwwwbeagoviTableiTablecfmreqid=70ampstep=1ampisuri=1ampacrdn=2reqid=70ampstep=1ampisuri=1

bull rdquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo Obtained September 26 2017 Bureau of Labor Statistics httpsdatablsgovcewdocinfolocation_quotientshtm

bull rdquoNonemployer Statisticsrdquo Obtained September 26 2017 US Census Bureau httpswwwcensusgovprograms-surveysnonemployer-statisticshtml

Publications

Herring catch Photo NOAA Northeast Fisheries Science Center

200

Publications

Selected publications by NOAA Fisheries Economics and Social Sciences Program staff are grouped by geographic region of focus and then organized under the following categories

Climate Change ResearchCoastal amp Marine Recreation ResearchCommercial Fisheries Economics ResearchSpatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchOcean Policy amp Management ResearchOther Marine Environmental Research

Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchHabitat Economics ResearchSeafood Marketing amp Trade ResearchSociocultural ResearchUS Territories amp International Fisheries ResearchProtected Resources Economics Research

United StatesUNITED STATES | Climate Change ResearchHimes-Cornell A and M Orbach 2013 Impacts of Climate Change on Human Uses of the Ocean Oceans and Marine Resources in a Changing Climate Technical Input to the 2013 National Climate Assessment Griffis R and J Howard eds Washington DC Island Press pp 64-118

Himes-Cornell A S Allen G Auad M Boatman P Clay M Dalton S Herrick D Kotowicz P Little C Lopez P Loring P Niemeier K Norman L Pfeiffer M Plummer M Rust M Singer and C Speirs 2013 Impacts of Climate Change on Human uses of the Ocean and Ocean Services Section 4 Oceans and Marine Resources in a Changing Climate Technical Input to the 2013 National Climate Assessment US Global Change Research Program Washington DC pp 73-137

Howard J E Babij R Griffis B Helmuth A Himes-Cornell P Niemier M Orbach L Petes S Allen G Auad R Beard M Boatman N Bond T Boyer D Brown P Clay K Crane S Cross M Dalton J Diamond R Diaz Q Dortch E Duffy D Fauquier W Fisher M Graham B Halpern L Hansen B Hayum S Herrick AHollowed D Hutchins E Jewett D Jin N Knowlton D Kotowicz T Kristiansen P Little C Lopez P LoringR Lumpkin A Mace K Mengerink J Ru Morrison Jason Murray K Norman J Orsquodonnell J Overland RParsons N Pettigrew L Pfeiffer E Pidgeon M Plummer J Polovina J Quintrell T Rowles J Runge MRust E Sanford U Send M Singer C Speir D Stanitski C Thornber C Wilson and Y Xue 2013 Oceansand Marine Resources in a Changing Climate Oceanography and Marine Biology An Annual Review 51 71-192

Ocean and Coastal Indicator Technical Team (R Griffis L Mcgilvray D Cahoon T Clay E Curchitser K Curtis J Devivo B Duncan S Gill J Grear B Halpern J Hare A Himes-Cornell J Howard R Johnston MKenney D Legler E Lindstrom T OrsquoBrien S Rumrill E Thunberg T Webler J West R Wood S Zador SBusch and E Fly) 2013 Research priorities to advance the oceans and coasts climate indicators system Reportto the National Climate Assessment Indicator System Working Group Project information available at httpwwwglobalchangegovwhat-we-doassessmentindicators-system

Babij E P Niemeier B Hayum A Himes-Cornell A Hollowed P Little M Orbach and E Pidgeon 2012 International Implications of Climate Change Section 5 in Oceans and Marine Resources in a Changing Climate Technical Input to the 2013 National Climate Assessment US Global Change Research Program Washington DC pp 138-162

201

Publications

Haynie A and L Pfeiffer 2012 Why Economics Matters for Understanding the Effects of Climate Change on Fisheries ICES Journal of Marine Science DOI 101093icesjmsfss021

McIlgorm A S Hanna G Knapp P Flocrsquoh F Millerd and M Pan 2010 How will climate change alter fishery governance Insights from seven international case studies Marine Policy 34(1) 170-177

Dalton M B OrsquoNeill A Prskawetz L Jiang and J Pitkin 2008 Population aging and future carbon emissions in the United States Energy Economics 30(2) 642-675

Hannesson R M Barange and S Herrick eds 2006 Climate Change and the Economics of the Worldrsquos Fisheries UK Edward Elgar 310p

Dalton M 2002 Synthesizing trends of the twentieth century population and climate change Climatic Change 55 409-412

UNITED STATES | Coastal amp Marine Recreation Research Marvasti A 2013 Estimating Outdoor Recreation Demand A Revealed Preference Approach Ocean and Coastal Management 71(1) 170-175

UNITED STATES | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchHolland D E Thunberg J Agar S Crosson C Demarest S Kasperski L Perruso E Steiner J Stephen A Strelcheck and M Travis 2015 US Catch Share Markets A Review of Data Availability and Impediments to Transparent Markets Marine Policy 57(2015) 103ndash110

Kroetz K J Sanchirico and D Lew 2015 Efficiency Costs of Social Objectives in Tradable Permit Programs Forthcoming in the Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists

Collier T A Mamula and J Ruggiero 2014 Estimation of multi-output production functions in commercial fisheries Omega 42(1) 157-165

Holland D E Thunberg J Agar S Crosson C Demarest S Kasperski L Perruso E Steiner J Stephen A Strelcheck and M Travis 2014 US Catch Share Markets A Review of Characteristics and Data Availability US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-145 67p

Kasperski S 2014 Optimal Multi-Species Harvesting in Ecologically and Economically Interdependent Fisheries Environmental and Resource Economics DOI 101007s10640-014-9805-9

Walden J J Agar R Felthoven A Harley S Kasperski J Lee T Lee A Mamula J Stephen A Strelcheck and E Thunberg 2014 Productivity Change in US Catch Share Fisheries US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-146

Crosson S T Yandle and B Stoffle 2013 Renegotiating property rights in the Florida golden crab fishery International Journal of the Commons 7(2) 521-548

Fissel B B Gilbert and J LaRiviere 2013 Technology Adoption and Diffusion with Uncertainty in a Commons Economic Letters 120(2) 297-301

202

Publications

Lee M-Y and E Thunberg 2013 An Inverse Demand System for New England Groundfish Welfare Analysis of the Transition to Catch Share Management American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95(5) 1178-1195

Schnier K and R Felthoven 2013 Production Efficiency and Exit in Rights-Based Fisheries Land Economics 89(3) 538-557

Abbott J and A Haynie 2012 What are we Protecting Fisher behavior and the unintended consequences of spatial closures as a fishery management tool Ecological Applications 22(3) 762-777

Hospital J and C Beavers 2012 Economic and Social Characteristics of Bottomfish Fishing in the Main Hawaiian Islands US Dept of Commerce Administrative Report H-12-01

Lian C 2012 West Coast Open Access Groundfish and Salmon Troller Survey Protocol and Results for 2005 and 2006 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-116

Fell H and A Haynie 2011 Estimating Time-varying Bargaining Power A Fishery Application Economic Inquiry 49(3) 685-696 DOI 101111j1465-7295200900275x

Walden J and D Tomberlin 2010 Estimating Fishing Vessel Capacity A Comparison of Nonparametric Frontier Approaches Marine Resource Economics 25(1) 23-36

Smith M C Roheim L Crowder B Halpern M Turnipseed J Anderson F Asche L Bourilln A Guttormsen A Khan L Liguori A McNevin M OConnor D Squires P Tyedmers C Brownstein K Carden D Klinger R Sagarin and K Selkoe 2010 Sustainability and Global Seafood Science 327(5967) 784-786

Squires D Y Jeon R Grafton and J Kirkley 2010 Controlling Excess Capacity in Common-Pool Resource Industries The Transition from Input to Output Controls Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 54(3) 361-377

Herrick S J Norton R Hannesson U Sumaila M Ahmed and J Pena-Torres 2010 Global production and economics of small pelagic fish Climate Change and Small Pelagic Fish Checkley DM J Alheit Y Oozeki and C Roy eds pp 256-274 New York Cambridge University Press

Holland D 2010 Markets Pooling and Insurance for Managing Bycatch in Fisheries Ecological Economics 70(1) 121-133

Squires D 2010 Fisheries Buybacks A Review and Guidelines Fish and Fisheries 11(4) 366-387

Grafton R R Hilborn D Squires and M Williams 2010 Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management At the Crossroads Chapter 1 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management RQ Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait and M Williams eds pp 1-19 Oxford Oxford University Press

Squires D T Groves R Grafton R Curtis J Joseph and R Allen 2010 Fisheries Buybacks Chapter 37 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management RQ Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait and M Williams eds pp 507-519 Oxford Oxford University Press

Walden J J Kirkley and R Fre 2010 Measuring and managing fishing capacity Chapter 40 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management RQ Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait and M Williams eds pp 546-554 Oxford Oxford University Press

203

Publications

Smith C and P Clay 2010 Measuring Subjective and Objective Well-Being Examples from Five Commercial Fisheries Human Organization 69(2) 158-168

Holland D and G Herrera 2010 The Benefits and Risks of Increased Spatial Resolution in Management of Fishery Metapopulations Under Uncertainty Natural Resource Modeling 23(4) 494-520

Felthoven R K Schnier and W Horrace 2009 Estimating Heterogeneous Primal Capacity and Capacity Utilization Measures in a Multi-Species Fishery Journal of Productivity Analysis 32 173-189

Grafton R R Hilborn L Ridgeway D Squires M Williams S Garcia T Groves R Hilborn J Joseph K Kelleher TKompas G Libecap C Lundin M Makino T Matthiasson R McLoughlin A Parma G San Marin B Satia C-CSchmidt M Tait and L Zhang 2008 Positioning Fisheries in a Changing World Marine Policy 32(4) 630-634

Milazzo M J Terry and J Walden 2008 Excess Harvesting Capacity in US Fisheries A Report to Congress US Dept of Commerce National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service 101p Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovmsa2007docs042808_312_b_6_reportpdf

Terry J J Walden and J Kirkley 2008 National Assessment of Excess Harvesting Capacity in Federally Managed Commercial Fisheries US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-93 366p Available at httpsponwrnoaagovtmspo93pdf

Kirkley J J Walden and J Waters 2007 Buyback programs goals objectives and industry restructuring in fisheries Fisheries Buybacks R Curtis and D Squires eds pp 227-237 Blackwell Publishing

Kirkley J J Walden and J Ward 2007 The status of USArsquos commercial fisheries and management and crystal-balling the future International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 7(23) 119-136

Terry J 2007 An assessment of the use of capacity analysis in US federal fishery management Marine Resource Economics 22 99-103

Curtis R and D Squires eds 2007 Fisheries Buybacks pp 288 Oxford Blackwell Publishing

Grafton R R Arnason T Bjoslashrndal D Campbell H Campbell C W Clark R Connor D Dupont R Hannesson R Hilborn J Kirkley T Kompas D Lane G Munro S Pascoe D Squires S Steinshamn B Turris and Q Weninger 2006 Incentive-based approaches to sustainable fisheries Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63(3) 699-710

Branch T R Hilborn A Haynie G Fay L Flynn J Griffiths K Marshall J Randall J Scheuerell E Ward and M Young 2006 Fleet dynamics and Fishermen Behavior Lessons for Fisheries Managers Canadian Journal ofFisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63(7) 1647-1668

Kerstens K N Vestergaard and D Squires 2006 A short-run Johansen industry model for common-pool resources planning a fisheryrsquos industrial capacity to curb overfishing European Review of Agricultural Economics 33(3) 1-29

Kerstens K D Squires and N Vestergaard 2006 Methodological reflections on the short-run Johansen industry model in relation to capacity management Marine Resource Economics 20(4) 425-443

204

Publications

Seung C and E Waters 2006 A Review of Regional Economic Models for Fisheries Management in the US Marine Resource Economics 21(1) 101-124

Grafton Q J Kirkley T Kompas and D Squires 2006 Economics for Fisheries Management Aldershot England Ashgate Publishing 165p

Kirkley J J Ward J Nance F Patella K Brewster-Geisz C Rogers E Thunberg J Walden W Daspit B Stenberg S Freese J Hastie S Holiman and M Travis 2006 Reducing Capacity in US Managed Fisheries US Dept ofCommerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-76 45p Available at httpsponwrnoaagovtmtm76pdf

Seung C and E Waters 2005 A Review of Regional Economic Models for Alaska fisheries Alaska Fisheries Science Center Processed Report 2005-01

Edwards S 2005 Ownership of multi-attribute fishery resources in Large Marine Ecosystems Sustaining Large Marine Ecosystems The Human Dimension T Hennessey and J Sutinen eds pp 137-154 New York Elsevier

Edwards S J Link and B Rountree 2004 Portfolio management of wild fish stocks Ecological Economics 49(3) 317-329

Agar J and J Sutinen 2004 Rebuilding strategies for multispecies fisheries a stylized bioeconomic model Environmental and Resource Economics 29(1) 1-29

Felthoven R and C Morrison Paul 2004 Directions for Productivity Measurement in Fisheries Marine Policy 28 161-169

Ward J P Mace and E Thunberg 2004 The relationship of fish harvesting capacity to excess capacity and overcapacity Marine Resource Economics 19(4) 525-529

Felthoven R 2004 Methods for Estimating Fishing Capacity with Routinely Collected Data A Comparison Review of International Fisheries Law and Policy 1(2) 125-137

Edwards S 2003 Property rights to multi-attribute fishery resources Ecological Economics 44(2-3) 309-323

Kitts A and S Edwards 2003 Cooperatives in fisheries realizing the potential of the Fishermenrsquos Collective Marketing Act Marine Policy 27 357-366

Curtis R and C Sarmiento 2002 Identification of economies of scope in a stochastic production environment Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 50(3) 257-267

Grafton R and D Squires 2002 A property-rights perspective of efficiency privatizing the commons Efficiency in the Public Sector KJ Fox ed pp 83-100 Boston Massachusetts Dordrecht and London

Kirkley J C Morrison Paul and D Squires 2002 Capacity and capacity utilization in common-pool resource industries definition measurement and a comparison of approaches Environmental and Resource Economics 22(1-2) 71-97

Ward J T Brainerd S Freese P Mace M Milazzo D Squires J Terry EM Thunberg M Travis and J Walden 2001 Report of the National Task Force for Defining and Measuring Fishing Capacity National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Science and Technology Silver Spring Maryland

205

Publications

Ward J T Brainerd M Milazzo E Thunberg A Kitts J Walden M Travis J Terry T Lee D Holland J Hastie D Squires S Herrick M Hamilton K Brewster-Geisz and R Lent 2001 Identifying Harvest Capacity and Overcapacity in Federally Managed Fisheries A Preliminary and Qualitative Report National Marine Fisheries Service Offices of Science and Technology and Sustainable Fisheries Silver Spring Maryland 118p

Walden J and J Kirkley 2000 Measuring Technical Efficiency and Capacity in Fisheries by Data Envelopment Analysis Using the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) A Workbook US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NE-160 15p Available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagovst5commercialcapacity_toolboxdocumentsgams_workbookpdf

UNITED STATES | Habitat Economics ResearchHolland D J Sanchirico R Johnston and D Joglekar 2010 Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Based Management Applications to Marine and Coastal Environments pp 240 Washington DC RFF Press

UNITED STATES | Ocean Policy amp Management Research Queirolo L In progress When Rationalization Programs Leave Small Fishery-Dependent Communities Out Innovative Management Structures May Offer a Way Back In People and the Sea VIII Geopolitics of the Oceans Centre for Maritime Research Universiteit van Amsterdam Netherlands (2015)

Seung C 2014 Estimating effects of exogenous output changes An application of multi-regional social accounting matrix (MRSAM) method to natural resource management Regional Science Policy and Practice 6(2) 177-193

Crosson S 2013 The impact of empowering scientific advisory committees to constrain catch limits in US fisheries Science and Public Policy 40(2) 261-273

Fell H and A Haynie 2013 Spatial Competition with Changing Market Institutions Journal of Applied Econometrics 28(4) 702-719

UNITED STATES | Other Marine Environmental ResearchLipton D D Lew K Wallmo P Wiley and A Dvarskas 2014 The Evolution of Non-Market Valuation of US Coastal and Marine Resources Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics 2014 (6) DOI httpcbemiisedujocevol2014iss16

Marvasti A 2013 The role of price expectations and legal uncertainties in ocean mineral exploration activities Resources Policy 38(1) 68-74

Lovell S and L Drake 2009 Tiny stowaways analyzing the economic benefits of a US Environmental Protection Agency permit regulating ballast water discharges Environmental Management 43(3) 546-555

Marvasti A 2000 Resource Characteristics Extraction Costs and Discovery of a New Resource Base Environmental and Resource Economics 17(4) 397-410

UNITED STATES | Protected Resources Economics ResearchJohnston R D Jarvis K Wallmo and D Lew 2015 Characterizing Large Scale Spatial Pattern in Nonuse Willingness to Pay An Application to Threatened and Endangered Marine Species Forthcoming in Land Economics

206

Publications

Pienaar E D Lew and K Wallmo 2015 The Importance of Survey Content Testing for the Context Dependency of the New Ecological Paradigm Scale Social Science Research 51 338-349

Pienaar E D Lew and K Wallmo 2013 Are Environmental Attitudes Influenced by Survey Context An Investigation of the Context Dependency of the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale Social Science Research 42(6) 1542-1554

Magnusson G K Bisack and H Milliken 2012 The Cost-effectiveness of Gear Research Relative to a Closure Pound Nets and Sea Turtles as an Example Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 12-01

Wallmo K and D Lew 2012 The Value of Recovering Threatened and Endangered Marine Species A Multi-Species Choice Experiment Conservation Biology 26(5) 830-839

Lew D and K Wallmo 2011 External Tests of Embedding and Scope in Stated Preference Choice Experiments An Application to Endangered Species Valuation Environmental and Resource Economics 48(1) 1-23 DOI 101007s10640-010-9394-1

Wallmo K and D Lew 2011 Valuing Improvements to Threatened and Endangered Marine Species An Application of Stated Preference Choice Experiments Journal of Environmental Management 92 1793-1801

Tomberlin D 2010 Endangered seabird habitat management as a partially observable Markov decision process Marine Resource Economics 25(1) 93-104

Dutton P H Gjertsen and D Squires 2010 Conservation of the Leatherback Sea Turtle in the Pacific Chapter 14 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management RQ Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait andM Williams eds pp 195-204 Oxford Oxford University Press

Janisse C D Squires J Seminoff and P Dutton 2010 Conservation Investments and Mitigation The California Drift Gillnet Fishery and Pacific Sea Turtles Chapter 17 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management R Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait and M Williams eds pp 231-240 Oxford Oxford University Press

Dutton P and D Squires 2008 Reconciling Biodiversity with Fishing A Holistic Strategy for Pacific Sea Turtle Recovery Ocean Development and International Law 39(2) 200-222

UNITED STATES | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchLarson D and D Lew 2014 The Opportunity Cost of Travel Time as a Noisy Wage Fraction American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96(2) 420-437

Lovell S and D Carter 2014 The use of sampling weights in regression models of recreational fishing-site choice Fishery Bulletin 112 243-252

Carter D and C Liese 2012 The Economic Value of Catching and Keeping or Releasing Saltwater Sport Fish in the Southeast USA North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32(4) 613-25

Kuriyama K W Hanemann and J Hilger 2010 A latent segmentation approach to a Kuhn-Tucker model An application to recreation demand Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 60(3) 209-220

Steinback S K Wallmo and P Clay 2009 Saltwater sport fishing in the US for food and income statistical estimates and policy implications Marine Policy 33 49-57

207

Publications

Gentner B and S Steinback 2008 The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2006 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-94 p301 Available at httpswwwstnmfsnoaagovst5publicationAnglerExpenditureReportAnglerExpendituresReport_ALLpdf

Gentner B 2007 Sensitivity of angler benefit estimates from a model of recreational demand to the definition of the substitute sites considered by the angler Fishery Bulletin 105 161-167

Johnston R M Ranson E Besedin and E Helm 2006 What determines willingness to pay per fish A meta-analysis of recreational fishing values Marine Resource Economics 21(1) 1-32

Olson J 2005 Re-placing the space of community a story of cultural politics policies and fisheries management Anthropological Quarterly 78(1) 233-254

Sepez J 2005 Introduction to traditional environmental knowledge in federal natural resource management agencies Practicing Anthropology 27(1) 1-48

Leeworthy V J Bowker J Hospital and E Stone 2005 Projected Participation in Marine Recreation 2005 amp 2010 Silver Spring Maryland Special Projects NOS 164pp

Kline J R Alig B Garber-Yonts 2004 Forestland Social Values and Open Space Preservation Journal of Forestry 102(8) 39-45

Steinback S B Gentner and J Castle 2004 The Economic Importance of Marine Angler Expenditures in the US NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 2 169p

Sepez J 2002 Treaty rights and the right to culture Native American subsistence issues in US law Cultural Dynamics 14(2) 143-159

Gentner B and A Lowther 2002 Evaluating marine sport fisheries in the USA Recreational Fisheries Ecological and Economic and Social Evaluation TJ Pitcher and CE Hollingsworth eds pp 186-206 Oxford Blackwell Science

Hicks R A Gautam D Van Voorhees M Osborn and B Gentner 2000 Thalassorama an introduction to the NMFS Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey with an emphasis on economic valuation Marine Resource Economics 14(2) 375-385

UNITED STATES | Seafood Marketing amp Trade ResearchBrinson A M-Y Lee and B Rountree 2011 Direct marketing strategies The rise of community supported fishery programs Marine Policy 35 542-548

Kirkley J J Ward C Moore C Hayes B Hooker and JWalden 2008 International Trade in Seafood and Related Products An Assessment of US trade Patterns NOAA NMFS Office of Constituent Services

UNITED STATES | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchClay P and A Himes-Cornell 2014 Bringing Social Science into US National Climate Policy Anthroplogy News April 2014

Felthoven R and S Kasperski 2013 Socioeconomic Indicators for United States Fisheries and Fishing Communities PICES Press 21(2) 20-23

208

Publications

Jepson M and L Colburn 2013 Development of Social Indicators of Fishing Community Vulnerability and Resilience in the US Southeast and Northeast Regions US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-129 64p

Colburn L and M Jepson 2012 Social Indicators of Gentrification Pressure in Fishing Communities A Context for Social Impact Assessment Coastal Management 40(3) 289-300

Abbott-Jamieson S 2010 Voices from the Fisheries projects combine oral history interviews and place-based education to create learning opportunities for students Current Journal of Marine Education 26(1) 20-24

Abbott-Jamieson S and P Clay 2010 The Long Voyage to Including Sociocultural Analysis in NOAAs National Marine Fisheries Service Marine Fisheries Review 72(2)14-33

Clay P and J Olson 2008 Defining fishing communities vulnerability and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Human Ecology Review 15(2) 143-160

Ingles P and J Sepez 2007 Anthropologyrsquos contributions to fisheries management National Association of Practicing Anthropologists Bulletin 28(1) 1-12

Abbott-Jamieson S 2007 Using oral history techniques in a NOAA Fisheries Service (NMFS) education and outreach project pressing local fisheries knowledge linking generations and improving environmental literacy National Association of Practicing Anthropologists Bulletin 28(1) 136-147

Clay P and J Olson 2007 Defining fishing communities issues in theory and practice National Association of Practicing Anthropologists Bulletin 28(1) 27-42

Colburn L S Abbott-Jamieson and P Clay 2006 Anthropological applications in the management of federally managed fisheries context institutional history and prospectus Human Organization 65(3) 231-239

Allen S and A Gough 2006 Monitoring environmental justice impacts Vietnamese-American longline fishermen adapt to the Hawaii swordfish fishery closure Human Organization 65(3) 319-328

UNITED STATES | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchMeiyappan P M Dalton B OrsquoNeill and A Jain 2014 Spatial modeling of agricultural land use change at global scale Ecological Modelling 291 152-174

Mason J R Kosaka A Mamula and C Speir 2012 Effort changes around a marine reserve The case of the California Rockfish Conservation Area Marine Policy 36(5) 1054-1063

Schnier K and R Felthoven 2011 Accounting for Spatial Heterogeneity and Autocorrelation in Spatial Discrete Choice Models Implications for Behavioral Predictions Land Economics 3 382-402

Wallmo K and S Edwards 2007 Estimating Public Values for Marine Protected Areas in the Northeast A Latent Class Modeling Approach US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-84 72p Available at httpsponwrnoaagovtmtm84pdf

Holland D J Sanchirico R Curtis and R Hicks 2004 An introduction to spatial modeling in fisheries economics Marine Resource Economics 19(1) 1-6

209

Publications

Curtis R and K McConnell 2004 Incorporating information and expectations in fishermenrsquos spatial decisions Marine Resource Economics 19 131-143

UNITED STATES | US Territories amp International Fisheries ResearchAnderson J C Anderson J Chu J Meredith F Asche G Sylvia M Smith D Anggraeni R Arthur A Guttormsen M Schmid W Akpalu F Alfredsson H Eggert J Flores M Freeman D Holland G Knapp M Kobayashi SLarkin K MacLauchlin K Schnier M Soboil S Tveteras H Uchida D Valderrama and T Ward 2015 The FisheryPerformance Indicators A Management Tool for the Triple Bottom Line Forthcoming in PLOS One

Woods P C Bouchard D Holland A Punt G and Marteinsdoacutettir 2015 Catch-quota balancing mechanisms in the Icelandic multi-species demersal fishery are all species equal Marine Policy 55 1-10

Woods P D Holland A Punt and G Marteinsdoacutettir 2015 How a catch-quota balancing system can go wrong an evaluation of the species quota transformation provisions in the Icelandic multi-species demersal fishery ICES Journal of Marine Science DOI 101093icesjmsfsv001

Chan V R Clarke and D Squires 2014 Full Retention in Tuna Fisheries Benefits Costs and Unintended Consequences Marine Policy 45 213-221

Gjertsen H D Squires P Dutton and T Eguchi 2014 Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Conservation Strategies An Application to the Pacific Leatherback Turtle Conservation Biology 28(1) 140-149

Kronbak L D Squires and N Vestergaard 2014 Recent Developments in Fisheries Economics Research International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 7(1) 67-108

Mengerink K C Van Dover M Baker E Escobar-Briones K Gjerde J Koslow E Ramierez-Llodara A Lara-Lopez D Squires T Sutton A Sweetman and L Levin 2014 A Call for Deep Ocean Stewardship Science 344 696-698

Smith M F Asch L Bennear E Havice A Read and D Squires 2014 Will a Catch Share for Whales Improve Social Welfare Ecological Applications 24(1) 15-23

Squires D 2014 Biodiversity Conservation in Asia Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies 1(1) 144-159

Squires D and M Maunder 2014 Synthesis of Workshop Results Pros and cons of effort based management Chapter 2 in Squires D M Maunder N Vestergaard V Restrepo R Metzner S Herrick R Hannesson I del Valle and P Andersen eds Effort Rights in Fisheries Management General principles and case studies from around the world FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings P34 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Squires D M Maunder N Vestergaard V Restrepo R Metzner S Herrick R Hannesson I del Valle and P Andersen 2014 Effort Rights in Fisheries Management General principles and case studies from around the world Chapter 1 in Squires D M Maunder N Vestergaard V Restrepo R Metzner S Herrick R Hannesson I del Valle and P Andersen eds Effort Rights in Fisheries Management General principles and case studies from around the world FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings P34 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Squires D M Maunder N Vestergaard V Restrepo R Metzner S Herrick R Hannesson I del Valle and P Anderson eds 2014 Effort Rights in Fisheries Management General Principles and Case Studies from Around the World 2014 FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings P34 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

210

Publications

Squires D M Maunder S Herrick M Helvey and R Clarke 2014 Effort Rights-Based Management 2014 Chapter 3 in Squires D M Maunder N Vestergaard V Restrepo R Metzner S Herrick R Hannesson I del Valle and P Andersen eds Effort Rights in Fisheries Management General principles and case studies from around the world FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings P34 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Squires D V Chan and R Clarke 2014 Subsidies Public Goods and External Benefits in Fisheries Marine Policy 45 222-227

Grafton R and D Squires 2013 Theory and Practice of Water and Fisheries In J Shogren ed Encyclopaedia of Energy Natural Resource and Environmental Economics Elsevier Publishing Vol 2 pp 31-38

Guillotreau P D Squires J Sun and G Compean 2013 Local Regional and Global Markets What Drives the Fisheries In A Hobday R Brill L Dagorn eds Tunas and Their Fisheries Safeguarding Sustainability in the 21st Century Wiley-Blackwell

Squires D and N Vestergaard 2013 Technical Change and the Commons Review of Economics and Statistics 95(5) 1769-1787

Squires D and N Vestergaard 2013 Technical Change in Fisheries Marine Policy 42 286-292

Squires D R Allen and V Restreppo 2013 Rights-Based Management in International Tuna Fisheries FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No 571 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Wolff F-C P Guillotreau and D Squires 2013 The Firmrsquos Management in Production Management Firm and Time Effects in an Indian Ocean Tuna fishery American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95(3) 547-567

Grafton R and D Squires 2012 Theory and Practice of Fisheries and Water Economics in J Shogren ed Encyclopedia of Energy Natural Resources and Environmental Economics Elsevier

Valdes-Pizzini M and J Agar 2012 Papa-dem (puertorriquenos) crucenos y britanicos (garrets) el etnopaisaje de la diaspora de los pescadores en la Isla de Santa Cruz en las Islas Virgenes Estadounidenses (lVE) Op Cit Revista del Centro de Investigaciones Historicas 20 143-179

Dalzell P P Dutton K Simonds and D Squires 2011 Introduction to the Conservation of Pacific Sea Turtles Chapter 1 in P Dutton D Squires and M Ahmed eds 2010 Conservation of Pacific Sea Turtles Honolulu University of Hawaii Press

Dutton P and D Squires 2011 A Holistic Strategy for Pacific Sea Turtle Conservation Chapter 3 in P Dutton D Squires and M Ahmed eds 2011 Conservation of Pacific Sea TurtlesHonolulu University of Hawaii Press

Dutton P D Squires and M Ahmed eds 2011 Conservation of Pacific Sea Turtles Honolulu University of Hawaii Press

Yeo B D Squires K Ibrahim H Gjertsen S Kamil T Groves M Hong and C Tan 2011 Can Coastal Fisheries Bear the Cost of Sea Turtle Conservation Evidence from the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia Chapter 16 in P Dutton D Squires and M Ahmed eds 2011 Conservation of Pacific Sea Turtles Honolulu University of Hawaii Press

211

Publications

Squires D 2010 Review of Bjorndal et al Advances in Fisheries Economics in Fish and Fisheries

Joseph J D Squires W Bayliff and T Groves 2010 Addressing the Problem of Excess Fishing Capacity in Tuna Fisheries Chapter 2 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 11-38 Wiley-Blackwell

Squires D J Joseph and T Groves 2010 Buybacks in Transnational Fisheries Chapter 11 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 181-194 Wiley-Blackwell

Hallman B S Barrett R Clarke J Joseph and D Squires 2010 Limited Access in Transnational Tuna Fisheries Chapter 12 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 195-214 Wiley-Blackwell

Gjertsen H M Hall and D Squires 2010 Incentives to Address Bycatch Issues Chapter 15 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 225-250 Wiley-Blackwell

Allen R J Joseph D Squires and E Stryjewski 2010 Introduction Chapter 1 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 3-10 Wiley-Blackwell

Squires D 2010 Property and use Rights in Fisheries Chapter 3 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 39-64 Wiley-Blackwell

Allen R W Bayliff J Joseph and D Squires 2010 Rights-Based Management in Transnational Tuna Fisheries Chapter 4 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 65-86 Wiley-Blackwell

Allen R W Bayliff J Joseph and D Squires 2010 The Benefits and Costs of Transformation of Open Access on the High Seas Chapter 5 Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 87-98 Wiley-Blackwell

Allen J J Joseph and D Squires 2010 Managing World Tuna Fisheries with Emphasis on Rights-Based Management Chapter 55 Handbook of Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management RQ Grafton R Hilborn D Squires M Tait and M Williams eds pp 698-712 Oxford Oxford University Press

Hannesson R K Salvanes and D Squires 2010 The Lofoten Fishery over Hundred Years Land Economics 86(4) 746-765

Allen R J Joseph and D Squires eds 2010 Conservation and Management of Pacific Tunas Ames Iowa Wiley-Blackwell Publishing 392p

Brinson A D Die P Bannerman and Y Diatta 2009 Socioeconomic performance of West African fleets that target Atlantic billfish Fisheries Research 99 55-62

Jeon Y R Allen J Joseph T Groves and D Squires 2009 Rights-Based Transnational Fishery Management and Its Implementation to Korean Tuna Fishery Korean Journal of Law and Economics 6(2) 223-254

212

Publications

Liese C 2009 Fishery Management for Artisanal Reef Fisheries in Developing Countries A Holistic Economic Approach Proceedings of the 11th International Coral Reef Symposium Ft Lauderdale Florida 2008(July) 1116-1120

Squires D C Reid and Y Jeon 2008 Productivity growth in natural resource industries and the environment an application to the Korean tuna purse-seine fleet in the Pacific International Economic Journal 22(1) 81-94

Jeon Y C Reid and D Squires 2008 Is there a global market for tuna Policy implications for tropical tuna fisheries Ocean Development and International Law 39(1) 32-50

Liese C M Smith and R Kramer 2007 Open access in a spatially delineated artisanal fishery the case of Minahasa Indonesia Environment and Development Economics 12(1) 123-143

Ahmed M P Boonchuwongse W Dechboon and D Squires 2007 Overfishing in the Gulf of Thailand policy challenges and bioeconomic analysis Environment and Development Economics 12(1) 145-172

Miller M D McClellan J Wiener and B Stoffle 2007 Comment apparent rapid fisheries escalation at a remote Caribbean island Environmental Conservation 34(2) 1-3

Squires D J Kirkley J Joseph T Groves and C Reid 2007 Relating Estimates of Fishing Capacity Obtained from Data Envelopment Analysis to Traditional Measures of Fishing Capacity FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp 141-152 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Squires D J Joseph and T Groves 2007 Buybacks in Fisheries FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp 193-218 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Reid C and D Squires 2007 Measuring Fishing Capacity in Tuna Fisheries Data Envelopment Analysis Industry Surveys and Data Collection FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp 87-98 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Squires D T Groves J Kirkley C Reid and J Joseph 2007 Relating DEA Estimates of Capacity Utilization to Traditional Measures of Fishing Capacity FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp 87-98 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Scott T J Kirkley R Rinaldo and D Squires 2007 Assessing Capacity in the US Northwest Atlantic Pelagic Longline Fishery for Highly Migratory Species with Undesirable Outputs FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp 99-106 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Joseph J D Squires W Bayliff and T Groves 2007 Requirements and Alternatives for the Limitation of Fishing Capacity in Tuna Purse-Seine Fleets FAO Fisheries Proceeding 8 Methodological Workshop on the Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity WH Bayliff and J Majkowski eds pp153-192 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Stoffle B and R Stoffle 2007 At the searsquos edge elders and children in the littorals of Barbados and the Bahamas Human Ecology 35(5) 547-558

213

Publications

Yeo B D Squires K Ibrahim H Gjertsen S Syed Mohd Kamil R Zulkifi T Groves M Hong and C Tan 2007 Fisher Profiles and Perceptions of Sea Turtle-Fishery Interactions Case Study of East Coast Peninsular Malaysia The WorldFish Center Discussion Series No 6 69p Penang Malaysia The WorldFish Center

Jeon Y O Ishak K Kuperan D Squires and I Susilowati 2006 Developing country fisheries and technical efficiency the Java Sea purse seine fishery Applied Economics 38(13) 1541-1552

Bisack KD and J Sutinen 2006 A New Zealand ITQ Fishery With an In-Season Stock Externality Marine Resource Economics 21(3) 231-249

Reid C J Kirkley D Squires and J Ye 2005 Analysis of the Fishing Capacity of the Global Tuna Purse Seine Fleet Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity Conservation And Socio Economics 2 117-156

Vestergaard N D Squires F Jensen and J Andersen 2003 Technical efficiency of the Danish trawl fleet are the industrial vessels better than others Danish Journal of Economics 141 225-242

Squires D O Ishak Y Jeon J Kirkley K Kuperan and I Susilowati 2003 Excess capacity and sustainable development in Java Sea fisheries Environment and Development Economics 8(1) 105-127

Squires D R Grafton F Alam and O Ishak 2003 Technical efficiency of the Malaysian artisanal gill net fishery Environment and Development Economics 8 481-504

Vestergaard N D Squires and J Kirkley 2003 Measures of Capacity in a Multispecies Danish Fishery FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 445 Measuring capacity in fisheries S Pascoe and D Greboval eds pp 169-180 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations of the United Nations

Kirkley J D Squires M Alam and O Ishak 2003 Capacity and Offshore Fisheries Development The Malaysian Purse Seine Fishery FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 445 Measuring capacity in fisheries S Pascoe and D Greboval eds pp 193-212 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations of the United Nations

Kirkley J R Fre S Grosskkopf K McConnell D Squires and I Strand 2003 Assessing Capacity and Capacity Utilization in Fisheries When Data Are Limited FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 445 Measuring capacity in fisheries S Pascoe and D Greboval eds pp 213-232 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations of the United Nations

Squires D Y Jeon R Grafton and J Kirkley 2003 Tradable Property Rights and Overcapacity Organization of the United Nations 181-192 FAO Technical Paper 445 Measuring capacity in fisheries S Pascoe and D Greboval eds pp 181-192 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations of the United Nations

Vestergaard N D Squires and J Kirkley 2003 Measuring capacity and capacity utilization in fisheries the case of the Danish gill-net fleet Fisheries Research 60 357-368

Alam F O Ishak and D Squires 2002 Sustainable fisheries development in the tropics trawlers and license limitation in Malaysia Applied Economics 34(3) 325-337

Kuperan K O Ishak Y Jeon J Kirkley D Squires and I Susilowati 2002 A fishing capacity and fishing skill in developing country fisheries the Kedah Malaysia trawl fishery Marine Resource Economics 16(4) 293-313

214

Publications

Dupont D R Grafton J Kirkley and D Squires 2002 Capacity utilization measures and excess capacity in multi-product privatized fisheries Resource and Energy Economics 24(3) 193-210

Kremen C J Niles M Dalton G Daily P Ehrlich J Fay D Grewal and R Guillery 2000 Economics of rain forest conservation across scales Science 288(5472) 1828-1832

North PacificNORTH PACIFIC | Climate Change Research Punt A D Poljak M Dalton and R Foy 2014 Evaluating the impact of ocean acidification on fishery yields and profits The example of red king crab in Bristol Bay Ecological Modelling 285 39-53

Haynie A and L Pfeiffer 2013 Climatic and economic drivers of the Bering Sea pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) fishery Implications for the future Canadian Journal of Aquatic and Fisheries Science 70(6) 841-853 101139cjfas-2012-0265

C Carothers K Criddle C Chambers P Cullenberg J Fall A Himes-Cornell J Johnsen N Kimball CMenzies and E Springer (eds) 2012 Fishing People of the North Cultures Economies and ManagementResponding to Change Alaska Sea Grant University of AlaskamdashFairbanks

NORTH PACIFIC | Coastal amp Marine Recreation ResearchWolf P R Gimblett L Kennedy R Itami and B Garber-Yonts 2008 Monitoring and Simulating Recreation and Subsistence use in Prince William Sound Alaska Monitoring Simulation and Management of Visitor Landscapes R Gimblett and H Skov-Petersen eds Tucson AZ University of Arizona Press

NORTH PACIFIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchAbbott J A Haynie and M Reimer 2015 Hidden Flexibility Institutions Incentives and the Margins of Selectivity in Fishing Land Economics 91(1) 169ndash195

Call I and D Lew 2015 Tradable Permit Programs What are the Lessons for the New Alaska Halibut Catch Sharing Plan Marine Policy 52 125-137

Fissel B 2015 Methods for the Alaska Groundfish First-Wholesale Price Projections US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-[NTIS pending]

Seung C 2015 Untangling Economic Impacts for Alaska Fisheries A Structural Path Analysis Forthcoming in Marine Resource Economics

Abbott J A Haynie and M Reimer 2014 Targeting Ability Under Rights-Based Management The Amendment 80 Bering SeaAleutian Islands Groundfish Fishery Forthcoming in Land Economics

Felthoven R J Lee and K Schnier 2014 Cooperative Formation and Peer Effects in Fisheries Marine Resource Economics 29(2) 133-156

215

Publications

Fissel B 2014 Economic Indices for the North Pacific Groundfish Fisheries Calculation and Visualization US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-279 59p

Haynie A 2014 Estimating the Value of a Fishing Right An Analysis of Changing Usage and Value in the Western Alaska Community Development Quota (CDQ) Program Fisheries Science 80(2) 181-191

Peterson M F Mueter K Criddle and A Haynie 2014 Costs incurred by Alaskan sablefish Pacific halibut and Greenland turbot longliners due to killer whale depredation PLOS ONE 9(2) e88906 DOI 101371journalpone0088906

Seung C 2014 Measuring Spillover Effects of Shocks to Alaska Economy An Interregional Social Accounting Matrix (IRSAM) Model Approach Economic Systems Research 26(2) 224-238 DOI 101080095353142013803039

Seung C E Waters and J Leonard 2014 Economic Impacts of Alaska Fisheries A Multiregional Computable General Equilibrium (MRCGE) Analysis Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies DOI 101111rurd12026

Torres M and R Felthoven 2014 Productivity Growth and Product Choice in Catch Share Fisheries the Case of the Alaska Pollock Marine Policy 50 Part A 280-289 DOI 101016jmarpol201407008

Waters E C Seung M Hartley and M Dalton 2014 Measuring the Multiregional Economic Contribution of an Alaska Fishing Fleet with Linkages to International Markets Marine Policy 50 Part A 238-248

Kasperski S and D Holland 2013 Income Diversification and Risk for Fishermen Proceedings of the National Academies of Science 110(6) 2076-2081

Seung C and E Waters 2013 Calculating Impacts of Exogenous Output Changes Application of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) Model to Alaska Fisheries The Annals of Regional Science 51(2) 553-573

Pfeiffer L and A Haynie 2012 The Effect of Decreasing Seasonal Sea-Ice Cover on the Winter Bering Sea Pollock Fishery ICES Journal of Marine Science DOI 101093icesjmsfss097

Punt A M Siddeek B Garber-Yonts M Dalton L Rugolo D Stram B Turnock and J Zheng 2012 Evaluating the impact of buffers to account for scientific uncertainty when setting TACs Application to red king crab in Bristol Bay Alaska ICES Journal of Marine Science 69(4) 624ndash634 DOI 101093icesjmsfss047

Seung C and C Zhang 2012 Developing Socioeconomic Indicators for Fisheries off Alaska a Multi-Attribute Utility Function Approach Fisheries Research 112 117-126

Lazrus H J Sepez R Felthoven and J Lee 2011 Post-Rationalization Restructuring of Commercial Crew Member Opportunities in Bering Sea and Aleutian Island Crab Fisheries US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-217

Morrison Paul C R Felthoven and M Torres 2010 Economic Performance in Fisheries Modeling Measurement and Management Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 54(3) 343-360

Seung C and E Waters 2010 Evaluating Supply-Side and Demand-Side Shocks for Fisheries a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model for Alaska Economic Systems Research 22(1) 87-109

216

Publications

Seung C 2010 Estimating Economic Information for Fisheries using Unequal Probability Sampling Fisheries Research 105(2) 134-140

Haynie A and D Layton 2010 An Expected Profit Model for Monetizing Fishing Location Choices Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59(2) 165-176

Waters E and C Seung 2010 Impacts of Recent Shocks to Alaska Fisheries A Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model Analysis Marine Resource Economics 25(2) 155-183

Abbott J B Garber-Yonts and J Wilen 2010 Employment and Renumeration Effects of IFQs in the Bering SeaAleutian Islands Crab Fisheries Marine Resource Economics 25(4) 33-354

Haynie A R Hicks and K Schnier 2009 Common Property Information and Cooperation Commercial Fishing in the Bering Sea Ecological Economics 69(2) 406-413

Morrison Paul C M Torres and R Felthoven 2009 Fishing Revenue Productivity and Product Choice in the Alaskan Pollock Fishery Environmental and Resource Economics 44 457-474

Seung C and E Waters 2009 Measuring the Economic Linkage of Alaska Fisheries A Supply-Driven Social Accounting Matrix (SDSAM) Approach Fisheries Research 97 17-23

Felthoven R C Morrison Paul and M Torres 2009 Measuring Productivity Change and its Components for Fisheries The Case of the Alaskan Pollock Fishery 1994-2002 Natural Resource Modeling 22(1) 105-136

Layton D and S Lee 2006 Embracing model uncertainty strategies for response pooling and model averaging Environmental and Resource Economics 34(1) 51-85

Felthoven R and C Morrison Paul 2004 Multi-output non-frontier primal measures of capacity and capacity utilization American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(3) 615-629

Felthoven R T Hiatt and J Terry 2004 Measuring fishing capacity and utilization with commonly available data an application to Alaskan fisheries Marine Fisheries Review 64(4) 29-39

Felthoven R C Morrison Paul V Ball and R Nehring 2002 Costs of Production and Environmental Risk Resource-Factor Substitution in US Agriculture Agricultural Productivity Measurement and Sources of Growth VE Ball and GW Norton eds pp 293-310 Boston Kluwer Academic Press

Felthoven R 2002 Effects of the American Fisheries Act on Capacity Utilization and Technical Efficiency Marine Resource Economics 17(3) 181-205

Felthoven R T Hiatt and J Terry 2002 Quantitative Estimates of Fishing Capacity Capacity Utilization and Fishery Utilization for Alaskan Commercial Fisheries 2001 National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Fisheries Science Center

NORTH PACIFIC | Ocean Policy amp Management ResearchSanchirico J D Lew A Haynie D Kling and D Layton 2013 Conservation Values in Marine Ecosystem-Based Management Marine Policy 38 523-530

217

Publications

NORTH PACIFIC | Other Marine Environmental ResearchJohnson K P Bettinger J Kline T Spies M Lennette G Lettman B Garber-Yonts and T Larsen 2006 Simulating Forest Structure Timber Production and Socio-Economic Effects in a Multi-Owner Province Ecological Applications 17(1) 34-47

Spies T K Johnson K Burnett J Ohmann B Mccomb G Reeves P Bettinger J Kline and B Garber-Yonts 2006 Cumulative Ecological and Socio-Economic Effects of Forest Policies in Coastal Oregon Ecological Applications 17(1) 5-17

Garber-Yonts B 2004 The Economics of Amenities and Migration in the Pacific Northwest Review of Selected Literature with Implications for National Forest Management US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland OR General Technical Report PNW-GTR-617 48p

Morrison Paul C V Ball R Felthoven A Grube and R Nehring 2002 Effective Costs and Chemicals use in US Agricultural Production Benefits of using the Environment as a Free Input American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(4) 897-901

NORTH PACIFIC | Protected Resources Economics ResearchLew D D Layton and R Rowe 2010 Valuing Enhancements to Endangered Species Protection Under Alternative Baseline Futures The Case of the Steller Sea Lion Marine Resource Economics 25(2) 133-54

NORTH PACIFIC | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchLew D G Sampson A Himes-Cornell and J Lee 2015 Costs Earnings and Employment in the Alaska Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Sector 2011-2013 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-2738 134p

Lew D and C Seung 2014 On the Statistical Significance of Regional Economic Impacts from Changes in Recreational Fishing Harvest Limits in Southern Alaska Marine Resource Economics 29(3) 241-257

Lew D and D Larson 2014 Is a Fish in Hand Worth Two in the Sea Evidence from a Stated Preference Study Fisheries Research 157 124-135

Larson D and D Lew 2013 How Do Harvest Rates Affect Angler Trip Patterns Marine Resource Economics 28(2) 155-173

Seung C and D Lew 2013 Accounting for Variation in Exogenous Shocks in Economic Impact Modeling The Annals of Regional Science DOI 101007s00168-012-0550-0

Lew D and D Larson 2012 Economic Values for Saltwater Sport Fishing in Alaska A Stated Preference Analysis North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32(4) 745-759

Lew D and D Larson 2011 A Repeated Mixed Logit Approach to Valuing a Local Sport Fishery The Case of Southeast Alaska Salmon Land Economics 87 712-729

Lew D and C Seung 2010 The Economic Impact Of Saltwater Sportfishing Harvest Restrictions In Alaska An Empirical Analysis Of Non-Resident Anglers North American Journal Of Fisheries Management 30 538-551

Lew D J Lee and D Larson 2010 Saltwater Sport Fishing In Alaska A Summary and Description of the Alaska Saltwater Sport Fishing Economic Survey 2007 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-214 229p

218

Publications

NORTH PACIFIC | Seafood Marketing amp Trade ResearchCarothers C D Lew and J Sepez 2010 Fishing Rights and Small Communities Alaska Halibut IFQ Transfer Patterns Ocean and Coastal Management 53(9) 518-523

Seung C 2008 Estimating dynamic impacts of seafood industry in Alaska Marine Resource Economics 23(1) 87-104

Seung C and E Waters 2006 The role of the Alaska seafood industry a social accounting matrix (SAM) model approach to economic base analysis The Annals of Regional Science 40(2) 335-360

NORTH PACIFIC | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchHimes-Cornell A and K Hoelting 2015 Resilience strategies in the face of short and long term change Outmigration and fisheries regulation in Alaska fishing communities Ecology and Society 20(2) 9

Himes-Cornell A and S Kasperski 2015 Using indicators to assess the vulnerability and resiliency of Alaskan fishing communities to climate change Fisheries Research 162 1-11

Lew D A Himes-Cornell and J Lee 2015 Weighting and Data Imputation for Missing Data in Fisheries Economic and Social Survey Marine Resource Economics 30(2) 219-230

Himes-Cornell A and K Kent 2014 Involving Fishing Communities in Data Collection A Summary and Description of the Alaska Community Survey 2011 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC 284 171p

Himes-Cornell A and K Kent 2014 Involving Fishing Communities in Data Collection A Summary and Description of the Alaska Community Survey 2010 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC 280 170p

Kasperski S and A Himes-Cornell 2014 Indicators of Fishing Engagement and Reliance of Alaskan Fishing Communities AFSC Quarterly Report Feature (January-February-March 2014) 7p

Package-Ward C and A Himes-Cornell 2014 Utilizing oral histories to understand the social networks of Oregon fishermen in Alaska Human Organization 73(3) 277-288

Himes-Cornell A K Hoelting C Maguire L Munger-Little J Lee J Fisk R Felthoven and P Little 2013 Community Profiles of North Pacific Fisheries Alaska 2nd edition US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-259 (1-12)

Himes-Cornell A C Package and A Durland 2011 Improving Community Profiles for the North Pacific Fisheries NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-230

Lew D and A Himes-Cornell 2011 A Guide to Designing Testing and Implementing AFSC Economic and Social Surveys US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-228 43p

Vaccaro I L Zanotti and J Sepez 2009 Commons and Markets Opportunities for Development of Local Sustainability Environmental Politics 18(4) 522-538

Sepez J 2008 Historical Ecology of Makah Subsistence Foraging Patterns Journal of Ethnobiology 28(1) 110-133

219

Publications

Etnier M and J Sepez 2008 Changing Patterns of Sea Mammal Exploitation among the Makah Pp Time and Change Archaeology and Anthropological Perspectives on the Long-Term in Hunter-Gatherer Societies R Layton H Maschner and D Papagianni eds pp 143-158 Woodbridge CT Oxbow Press

Sepez J K Norman and R Felthoven 2007 A quantitative model for ranking and selecting communities most involved in commercial fisheries National Association of Practicing Anthropologists Bulletin 28(1) 43-56

Sepez J C Package P Malcolm and A Poole 2007 Unalaska Alaska Memory and Denial in the Globalization of the Aleutian Landscape Polar Geography 30(3) 193-209

Norman K J Sepez H Lazrus N Milne C Package S Russell K Grant R Petersen J Primo M Styles B Tilt and I Vaccaro 2007 Community Profiles for West Coast and North Pacific Fisheries-Washington Oregon California and other US States US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-85 602p Available at httpwwwnwfscnoaagovresearchdivisionssdcommunityprofilesCaliforniaSanta_Rosa_CApdf

Poole A and J Sepez 2006 Distribution and abundance of human populations in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 2005 North Pacific Groundfish Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Reports for 2006 Economic Status of the Groundfish Fisheries Off Alaska 2006 T Hiatt ed pp 255-276 Seattle Alaska Fisheries Science Center

Sepez J K Norman A Poole and B Tilt 2006 Fish scales scale and method in social science research for North Pacific and West Coast fishing communities Human Organization 65(3) 280-293

Sepez J and H Lazrus 2005 Traditional Environmental Knowledge in Federal Natural Resource Management Agencies Practicing Anthropology 27(1) 1-48

Lazrus H and J Sepez 2005 The NOAA Fisheries Alaska Native Traditional Knowledge Database Practicing Anthropology 27(1) 33-37

Sepez J B Tilt C Package H Lazrus and I Vaccaro 2005 Community Profiles for North Pacific Fisheries-Alaska US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-AFSC-160 552p

Package C and J Sepez 2004 Fishing communities of the North Pacific social science research at the Alaska Fisheries Science Center AFSC Quarterly Report April-May-June 2004 11p Available at httpwwwafscnoaagovQuarterlyamj2004amj04featpdf

Sepez J 2003 Makah Dictionary of American History 3rd Edition Charles Scribnerrsquos Sons New York

PacificPACIFIC | Coastal amp Marine Recreation ResearchPolasky S E Nelson J Camm B Csuti P Fackler E Lonsdorf C Montgomery D White J Arthur B Garber-Yonts R Haight J Kagan A Starfield and C Tobalske 2008 Where to Put Things Spatial Land Management to Sustain Biodiversity and Economic Returns Biological Conservation 141(6) 1505-1524

220

Publications

Lew D and D Larson 2005 Valuing recreation and amenities at San Diego County beaches Coastal Management 33(1) 71-86

Garber-Yonts B 2005 Conceptualizing and Measuring Demand for Recreation on National Forests A Review and Synthesis General Technical Report PNW-GTR-64540 US Department of Agriculture US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland OR

Garber-Yonts B J Kerkvliet and R Johnson 2004 Public Values for Biodiversity Conservation Policies in the Oregon Coast Range Forest Science 50(5) 589-602

Harris T C Seung T Darden and W Riggs 2002 Rangeland fires in Northern Nevada an application of computable general equilibrium modeling Western Economics Forum 1(2) 3-10

PACIFIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchRose K J Fiechter E Curchitser K Hedstrom M Bernal SCreekmore A Haynie S Ito S Lluch-Cota B Megrey C Edwards D Checkley T Koslow S McClatchie F Werner A MacCall and V Agostini 2015 Demonstration of afully coupled end-to-end model for small pelagic fish using sardine and anchovy in the California Current Forthcomingin Progress in Oceanography Available online httpwwwsciencedirectcomsciencearticlepiiS0079661115000233

Collier T A Mamula and J Ruggiero 2014 Estimation of a Multi-Output Production Functions in Commercial Fisheries Omega The International Journal of Management Science 42(1) 157165

Speir C C Pomeroy and J Sutinen 2014 Port Level Fishing Dynamics Assessing Changes in the Distribution of Fishing Activity over Time Marine Policy 46 171-191

Mamula A and J Walden 2013 Proceedings of the National Marine Fisheries Service Productivity Workshop (Santa Cruz June 11-12 2012) US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-503

Thomson C 2010 Data requirements for integrating socioeconomic considerations into regulatory analysis examples from California commercial fisheries In RM Starr et al (eds) Managing Data-Poor Fisheries Case Studies Models and Solutions California Sea Grant College Program Publication No T-070

Tomberlin D and G Holloway 2010 Bayesian hierarchical estimation of technical efficiency in a fishery Applied Economics Letters 17(2) 201-204

Grafton R R Hannesson B Shallard D Sykes and J Terry 2010 The Economics of Allocation in Tuna Regional Fisheries Management Organizations Conservation and Management of Transnational Tuna Fisheries R Allen J A Joseph and D Squires eds pp 155-162 Wiley-Blackwell

Hannesson R and S Herrick 2010 The value of Pacific sardine as forage fish Marine Policy 34(5) 935-942

Lian C 2010 West Coast limited entry groundfish trawl cost earnings survey protocols and results for 2004 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-107 35p Available at httpwwwnwfscnoaagovassets257569_11092010_161408_CostEarningsSurveyTM107WebFinalpdf

Hannesson R S Herrick and J Field 2009 Ecological and economic considerations in the conservation and management of the Pacific sardine (Sardinops sagax) Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66(5) 859-868

221

Publications

Lian C R Singh and Q Weninger 2010 Fleet Restructuring Rent Generation and the Design of Individual Fishing Quota Programs Empirical Evidence from the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Marine Resource Economics 24 329-359

Norton J S Herrick and J Mason 2009 Fisheries abundance cycles in ecosystem and economic management of California fish and invertebrate resources The future of fisheries science in North America RJ Beamish and BJ Rothschild eds pp 227-244 Springer BV

Hannesson R and S Herrick 2008 Catch strategies for the pacific sardine California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI) Reports 49 222-231

Herrick S J Norton J Mason and C Bessey 2007 Management application of an empirical model of sardine-climate regime shifts Marine Policy 31 71-80

Thomson C D VenTresca and D Colpo 2007 Logbook Pilot Program for Californiarsquos Nearshore Groundfish Fishery Results and Lessons Learned US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-NMFS-SWFSC-408

Herrick S K Hill and C Reiss 2006 An optimal harvest policy for the recently renewed United States Pacific sardine fishery Climate Change and the Economics of the Worldrsquos Fisheries R Hannesson M Barange and S Herrick eds pp 126-150 United Kingdon Edward Elgar

Squires D Y Jeon T Kim and R Clarke 2006 Price linkages in Pacific tuna markets implications for the South Pacific tuna treaty and the Western and Central Pacific region Environment and Development Economics 11(6) 747-767

Plummer M 2006 The grand unified theory of natural resource economics a special case Explorations in Environmental amp Natural Resource Economics Essays in Honor of Gardner M Brown DF Layton and R Halvorsen eds pp 150-160 United Kingdom Edward Elgar

Holloway G and D Tomberlin 2006 Bayesian ranking and selection of fishing boat efficiencies Marine Resource Economics 21(4) 415-432

Squires D J Joseph and T Groves 2006 Tuna resource management buybacks in transnational fisheries Pacific Economic Bulletin 21(3) 63-74

Reid C J Kirkley D Squires and J Ye 2005 An analysis of the fishing capacity of the global tuna purse seine fleet FAO Fisheries Proceedings 2 Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity Conservation and Socio-economics pp 117-156 Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Holloway G D Tomberlin and X Irz 2005 Hierarchical analysis of production efficiency in a coastal trawl fishery Sustaining Large Marine Ecosystems The Human Dimension TM Hennessey and JG Sutinen eds pp 159-185 Amsterdam Elsevier BV

Haraden J S Herrick D Squires and C Tisdell 2004 Economic benefits of dolphins in the United States Eastern Tropical Pacific purse seine tuna industry Environmental and Resource Economics 28 451-468

Dalton M and S Ralston 2004 The California Rockfish Conservation Area and groundfish trawlers at Moss Landing Harbor Marine Resource Economics 19(1) 67-83

222

Publications

Kirkley J P Morrison J Catherine and D Squires 2004 Deterministic and stochastic capacity estimation for fishery capacity reduction Marine Resource Economics 19(3) 271-294

Kirkley J D Squires F Alam and H Ishak 2003 Excess capacity and asymmetric information in developing country fisheries the Malaysian purse seine fishery American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(3) 647-662

Fox K R Grafton J Kirkley and D Squires 2003 Property rights productivity and profits in a common-pool resource Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46(1) 156-177

Reid C D Squires Y Jeon L Clarke and R Clarke 2003 Fishing capacity of tuna purse seine vessels in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean Marine Policy 27(6) 449-469

Thomson C 2001 Human ecosystem dimension Californiarsquos Living Marine Resources A Status Report T Larinto ed pp 47-66 Monterey California Department of Fish and Game

Dalton M 2001 El Nino expectations and fishing effort in Monterey Bay California Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42(3) 336-359

Viswanathan K I Omar Y Jeon J Kirkley D Squires and I Susilowati 2001 Fishing skill in developing country fisheries the Kedah Malaysia trawl fishery Marine Resource Economics 16(4) 293-314

Grafton R Squires D and K Fox 2000 Private property and economic efficiency a study of a common-pool resource Journal of Law and Economics 43(2) 679-713

Campbell H S Herrick and D Squires 2000 The role of research in fisheries management the conservation of dolphins in the Eastern Tropical Pacific and the exploitation of southern bluefin tuna in the Southern Ocean Ocean Development and International Law 31(4) 347-375

PACIFIC | Habitat Economics ResearchSpeir C A Mamula and D Ladd In press Effects of Water Supply on Labor Demand and Agricultural Production in Californiarsquos San Joaquin Valley Forthcoming in Water Economics and Policy

Thomson C 2012 Resighini Rancheria Tribe Fishery Socioeconomics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C 2012 Hoopa Valley Tribe Fishery Socioeconomics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C 2012 Karuk Tribe Fishery Socioeconomics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C 2012 Klamath Tribes Fishery Socioeconomics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C 2012 Commercial Fishing Economics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

223

Publications

Thomson C 2012 Yurok Tribe Fishery Socioeconomics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C and A Mamula 2012 Ocean Sport Fishing Economics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Thomson C and C Speir 2011 Inriver Sport Fishing Economics Technical Report for the Secretarial Determination on Whether to Remove Four Dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon

Plummer M 2009 Assessing benefit transfer for the valuation of ecosystem services Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(1) 38-45

Benson S H Dewar P Dutton C Fahy C Heberer D Squires and S Stohs 2009 Swordfish and Leatherback use of Temperate Habitat (SLUTH) Administrative Report LJ-09-06

Schneidler M and M Plummer 2009 Human Well-being Indicators Background and Applications for the Puget Sound Partnership Northwest Fisheries Science Center Processed Report 38p+Appendix Available at httpsitesgooglecomsitepspartnershipdocumentsHome

Thomson C and C Pinkerton 2008 Habitat Restoration Cost References for Salmon Recovery Planning US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-425

Plummer M 2007 Welcome to the data-poor real world incorporating benefit-cost principles into environmental policymaking Research in Law and Economics 23 103-130

Hildner K and C Thomson 2007 Using the California Habitat Restoration Project Database to estimate habitat restoration costs for ESA-listed salmonids US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-403

Hildner K and C Thomson 2007 Salmon Habitat Restoration Cost Modeling Results and Lessons Learned US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-404

Tomberlin D and V Bosetti 2006 An Iterative Finite Difference Approach to Project Valuation under Multiple Interacting Options US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-389 16p Available at httpswfscnoaagovpublicationsTMSWFSCNOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-389PDF

OrsquoHanley J and D Tomberlin 2005 Optimizing the removal of small fish passage barriers Environmental Modeling and Assessment 10(2) 85-98

Plummer M 2005 The economic evaluation of stream and watershed restoration projects Methods for Monitoring Stream and Watershed Restoration P Roni ed pp 310-330 Bethesda American Fisheries Society

Ise J and S Abbott-Jamieson 2005 Students gather local fisheries knowledge as part of a NOAA Fisheries education and outreach project Practicing Anthropology 27(1) 29-32

PACIFIC | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchField J Punt A Methot R and C Thomson 2006 Does MPA mean major problem for assessments Considering the consequences of place-based management systems Fish and Fisheries 7 284-302

224

Publications

Dalton M and S Ralston 2006 Empirical Evaluation of Regional Scale Marine Reserves and the Groundfish Trawl Fishery California Sea Grant College Program Research Completion Reports Paper MA06 01 Available at httpnsglgsourieducasgcasgt06010pdf

PACIFIC | Ocean Policy amp Management ResearchWells B T Wainwright C Thomson T Williams N Mantua L Crozier S Breslow and K Fresh 2014 CCIEA Phase III Report 2014 Ecosystem Components Protected Species ndash Pacific Salmon Available at httpwwwnoaagovieaAssetsieacaliforniaReportpdf8Salmon_2013pdf

Khanna M and C Speir 2013 Motivations for Proactive Environmental Management Sustainability 5 2664-2692 DOI 103390su5062664

Norman K D Holland and S Kasperski 2013 Resilient and Economically Viable Coastal Communities In Levin P B Wells and M Sheer (eds) California Current Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Phase II Report Available at httpwwwnoaagovieaCCIEA-Reportindexhtml

Squires D 2009 Opportunities in social science research The Future of Fisheries Science in North America R Beamish and B Rothschild eds pp 637-696 Netherlands Springer American Institute of Fisheries Research Biologists

PACIFIC | Other Marine Environmental ResearchHarvey C Bartz J Davies T Francis T Good A Guerry M Hanson K Holsman J Miller M Plummer J Reum L Rhodes C Rice J Samhouri G Williams N Yoder P Levin and M Ruckelshaus 2010 A mass-balance model for evaluating food web structure and community-scale indicators in the central basin of Puget Sound US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NWFSC-106 180p Available at httpwwwnwfscnoaagovassets257363_08042010_120050_MassBalanceModelTM106WebFinalpdf

PACIFIC | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchHilger J and J Englin 2009 Utility theoretic semi-logarithmic incomplete demand systems in a natural experiment Forest fire impacts on recreational values and use Resource and Energy Economics Volume 31(4) 287-298

Lew D and D Larson 2008 Valuing a beach day with a repeated nested logit model of participation site choice and stochastic time value Marine Resource Economics 23(3) 233-252

Layton D and S Lee 2006 From ratings to rankings the econometric analysis of stated preference ratings data Explorations in Environmental amp Natural Resource Economics Essays in Honor of Gardner M Brown DF Layton and R Halvorsen eds pp 224-244 United Kingdom Edward Elgar

Lew D and D Larson 2005 Accounting for stochastic shadow values of time in discrete-choice recreation demand models Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50(2) 341-361

Larson D and D Lew 2005 Measuring the utility of ancillary travel revealed preferences in recreation site demand and trips taken Transportation Research 39(2-3) 237-55

Gentner B S Steinback and M Price 2001 Marine Angler Expenditures in the Pacific Coast Region 2000 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-49 57p Available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagovst5RecEconPublicationsNMFS_F_SPO_49revpdf

225

Publications

PACIFIC | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchBreslow S D Holland P Levin K Norman M Poe C Thomson R Barnea P Dalton N Dolsak C Greene K Hoelting S Kasperski R Kosaka D Ladd A Mamula S Miller B Sojka C Speir S Steinbeck and N Tolimieri 2014 Human Dimensions of the CCIEA In Levin P B Wells and M Sheer (eds) California Current Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Phase III Report 2013 Available from httpwwwnoaagovieaAssetsieacaliforniaReportpdf10Human20Dimensions_2013pdf

Holland D and S Kasperski 2014 Fishery Income Diversification and Risk for Fishermen and Fishing Communities of the US West Coast and Alaska ndash Updated to 2012 Appendix HD1 Appendix to Human Dimensions of the CCIEA In Levin P B Wells and M Sheer (Eds) California Current Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Phase III Report 2013 Available from httpwwwnoaagovieaAssetsieacaliforniaReportpdf11Human20dimensions20Appendix_2013pdf

Pomeroy C C Thomson and M Stevens 2010 Californiarsquos North Coast Fishing Communities Historical Perspective and Recent Trends California Sea Grant College Program Publication No T-072

Vaccaro I and K Norman 2008 Social sciences and landscape analysis opportunities for the improvement of conservation policy design Journal of Environmental Management 88(2) 360-371

Sepez J K Norman A Poole and B Tilt 2005 Fish Scales Scale and Method in Social Science Research for North Pacific and West Coast Fishing Communities Human Organization 65(3) 280-293

PACIFIC | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas Research Wallmo K and R Kosaka 2014 Public Preferences for Marine Protected Areas Off the US West Coast The Significance of Restrictions and Size on Economic Value US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-144

J Mason R Kosaka A Mamula and C Speir 2012 Effort Changes Around a Marine Reserve The Case of the California Rockfish Conservation Area Marine Policy 36(5) 1054-1063

Western PacificWESTERN PACIFIC | Coastal amp Marine Recreation ResearchHu W K Boehle L Cox and M Pan 2009 Economic Values of Dolphin Excursions in Hawaii A Stated Choice Analysis Marine Resource Economics 24 61-76

WESTERN PACIFIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchRichmond L D Kotowicz and J Hospital 2015 Monitoring socioeconomic impacts of Hawaiʻirsquos 2010 bigeye tuna closure Complexities of local management in a global fishery Ocean and Coastal Management 106 87-96 DOI 101016jocecoaman201501015

Hospital J and C Beavers 2014 Catch shares and the main Hawaiian Islands bottomfish fishery Linking fishery conditions and fisher perceptions Marine Policy 44 9-17 DOI 101016jmarpol201308006

Arita S M Pan J Hospital and P Leung 2013 The distributive economic impacts of Hawaiirsquos commercial fishery a SAM analysis Fisheries Research 145 82-89 DOI 101016jfishres201302005

226

Publications

Hospital J and M Pan 2009 Demand for Hawaii bottomfish revisited incorporating economics into total allowable catch management US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-PIFSC-20 19p + Appendix Available at httpwwwpifscnoaagovtechNOAA_Tech_Memo_PIFSC_20pdf

Pan M and A Griesemer 2006 Economic Analysis of Bottomfish Fishing Vessels Operating in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands in 2003 Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center Administrative Report H-06-03 12p

Cai J P Leung M Pan and S Pooley 2005 Economic linkage impacts of Hawaiirsquos longline fishing regulations Fisheries Research 74(1-3) 232-242

Cai J P Leung M Pan and S Pooley 2005 Linkage of Fisheries Sector to Hawaiirsquos Economy and Economic Impacts of Longline Fishing Regulations SOEST Publication 05-01 JIMAR Contribution 05-355 24p

OrsquoMalley J and S Pooley 2002 A Description and Economic Analysis of Large American Samoa Longline Vessels SOEST Publication 02-2 JIMAR Contribution 02-345 24p

OrsquoMalley J and S Pooley 2002 Economic and Operational Characteristics of the Hawaii-based Longline Fleet in 2000 SOEST Publication 03-01 JIMAR Contribution 03-348 31p

Pan M P Leung and S Pooley 2001 A decision support model for fisheries management in Hawaii a multilevel and multiobjective programming approach North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21 293-309

Curtis R and R Hicks 2000 The cost of sea turtle preservation the case of Hawaiirsquos pelagic longliners American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(5) 1191-1197

Pan M P Leung F Ji S Nakamoto and S Pooley 2000 A Multilevel and Multiobjective Programming Model for the Hawaii Fishery Model Documentation and Application Results JIMAR Contribution 99-324 University of Hawaii

Kawamoto K and S Pooley 2000 Annual Report of the 1998 Western Pacific Lobster Fishery (with preliminary 1999 data) Southwest Fish Sci Cent Admin Rep H-00-02 38p Available at httpwwwpifscnoaagovadminrpts2000-presentSWFC_Admin_Report_00-02pdf

WESTERN PACIFIC | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchPan M A Griesemer and R Mamiit 2006 Economic assessment of open fishing tournament in Hawaiʻi Newsletter Volume 11 Number 2 Pelagic Fisheries Program University of Hawaii

Curran D P Dalzell J Schultz J OrsquoMalley and S Pooley 2006 Recreational Metadata Using Tournament Data to Describe a Poorly Documented Pelagic Fishery SOEST Publication 06-03 JIMAR Contribution 06-363 40p

Leeworthy V P Wiley and J Hospital 2004 Importance-satisfaction Ratings Five-year Comparison SPA amp ER use and Socioeconomic and Ecological Monitoring Comparison of Results 1995-96 to 2000-01 Silver Spring Maryland Special Projects NOS 59p

WESTERN PACIFIC | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchAllen S and A Gough 2007 Filipino crew community in Hawaiʻi-based longline fishing fleet National Association of Practicing Anthropologists Bulletin 28(1) 87-98

227

Publications

Allen S and A Gough 2007 Hawaii Longline Fishermenrsquos Experiences with the Observer Program US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-PIFSC-8 39p Available at httpwwwpifscnoaagovtechNOAA_Tech_Memo_PIFSC_8pdf

Allen S and A Gough 2006 A Sociocultural Assessment of Filipino Crew Members Working in the Hawaii-based Longline Fleet US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-TM-NMFS-PIFSC-6 54p Available at httpwwwpifscnoaagovtechNOAA_Tech_Memo_PIFSC_6pdf

New EnglandNEW ENGLAND | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchHolland D P Pinto da Silva and A Kitts 2015 Social Capital and Economic Performance of New England Groundfish Harvest Cooperatives An Evolving Story Forthcoming in Marine Resource Economics

Olson J 2010 Seeding nature ceding culture Redefining the boundaries of the marine commons through spatial management and GIS Geoforum 41(2) 293-303

Holland D and J Wiersma 2010 Free form property rights for fisheries The decentralized design of rights-based management through groundfish sectors in New England Marine Policy 34(5) 1076-1081

Lee M 2010 Economic tradeoffs in the Gulf of Maine ecosystem Herring and whale-watching Marine Policy 34 156-162

Holland D and GE Herrera 2009 Uncertainty in the Management of Fisheries Contradictory Implications and a New Approach Marine Resource Economics 24(3) 289-299

Thunberg E 2009 Trends in Selected Northeast Region Marine Industries US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS NE 211 107p Available at httpwwwnefscnoaagovpublicationstmtm211

Rountree B A Kitts and P Pinto da Silva 2008 Complexities of collaboration in fisheries management the Northeast US tilefish fishery FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No 504 Case Studies in Fisheries Self-governance R Townsend R Shotton and H Uchida eds pp 135-147 Rome FAO

Steinback S R Allen and E Thunberg 2008 The benefits of rationalization the case of the American lobster fishery Marine Resource Economics 23(1) 37-63

Bisack K 2008 Integrating Porpoise and Cod Management A comparison of Days-at-Sea ITQs and Closures Marine Resource Economics 23(4) 361-378

Jin D E Thunberg and P Hoaglund 2008 Economic impact of the 2005 red tide event on commercial shellfish fisheries in New England Ocean and Coastal Management 51(5) 420-429

Thunberg E A Kitts and J Walden 2007 A case study of New England groundfish fishing capacity reduction Fishery Buybacks D Squires and R Curtis eds pp 239-248 Blackwell Publishing

228

Publications

Kitts A P Pinto da Silva and B Rountree 2007 Evolution and outcomes of collaborative management institutions in the NE US tilefish fishery Marine Policy 31 192-200

Thunberg E 2007 Demographic and Economic Trends in the Northeastern United States Lobster (Homarus americanus) Fishery 1970-2005 US Dept of Commerce Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 07-17 National Marine Fisheries Service Woods Hole MA

Fare R J Kirkley and J Walden 2007 Estimating Capacity and Efficiency in Fisheries with Undesirable Outputs VIMS Marine Resource Report No 2007-6 Available at httpwwwvimseduGreylitVIMSmrr07-6pdf

Fare R J Kirkley and J Walden 2006 Adjusting technical efficiency to reflect discarding the case of the US Georges Bank multi-species otter trawl fishery Fisheries Research 78(2006) 257-265

Bisack K and J Sutinen 2006 Harbor porpoise bycatch ITQs or timearea closures in the New England gillnet fishery Land Economics 82(1) 85-102

Jin D P Hoagland and E Thunberg 2006 An analysis of the relationship between fish harvesting and processing sectors in New England Marine Resource Economics 21(1) 47-62

Walden J 2006 Estimating vessel efficiency using a bootstrapped data envelopment analysis model Marine Resource Economics 21(2) 181-192

Jin D and E Thunberg 2005 An analysis of fishing vessel accidents in fishing areas off the Northeastern United States Safety Science 43(8) 523-540

Edwards S J Link and B Rountree 2005 Portfolio management of fish communities in Large Marine Ecosystems Sustaining Large Marine Ecosystems The Human Dimension TM Hennessey and JG Sutinen eds pp 181-200 Amsterdam Elsevier BV

Thunberg E T Helser and R Mayo 2002 Bioeconomic analysis of alternative selection patterns in the United States Atlantic silver hake fishery Marine Resource Economics 13(1) 51-74

Kitts A E Thunberg and J Robertson 2000 Willingness to participate and bids in a fishing vessel buyout program a case study of New England groundfish Marine Resource Economics 15(3) 221-232

Steinback S and E Thunberg 2000 A Method of Analyzing Trip Limits in Northeast Fisheries A Case Study of the Spiny Dogfish Fishery Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 00-06

NEW ENGLAND | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchWallmo K and S Edwards 2008 Estimating Non-market Values of Marine Protected Areas A Latent Class Modeling Approach Marine Resource Economics 23(3) 301-323

Edwards S 2008 Ocean zoning first possession and Coasean contracts Marine Policy 32(1) 46-54

229

Publications

NEW ENGLAND | Ocean Policy amp Management ResearchSutinen J P Clay C Dyer S Edwards J Gates T Grigalunas T Hennessy L Juda A Kitts P Logan J Poggie Jr B Rountree S Steinback E Thunberg H Upton and J Walden 2005 A framework for monitoring and assessing socioeconomics and governance of large marine ecosystems Sustaining Large Marine Ecosystems The Human Dimension TM Hennessey and JG Sutinen eds pp 27-83 Amsterdam Elsevier BV

NEW ENGLAND | Other Marine Environmental ResearchPortman M Di Jin and E Thunberg 2009 Waterfront land use change and marine resource conditions the case of New Bedford and Fairhaven Massachusetts Ecological Economics 68 2354-2362

Steinback S 2004 Using ready-made regional input-output models to estimate backward-linkage effects of exogenous output shocks Review of Regional Studies 34(1) 57-71

NEW ENGLAND | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchThunberg E and C Fulcher 2006 Testing the stability of recreational fishing participation probabilities North American Journal of Fisheries Management 26 636-644

Salz R D Loomis M Ross and S Steinback 2002 A Baseline Socio-economic Study of Massachusettsrsquo Marine Recreational Fisheries US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NE-165 129p Available at httpwwwnefscnoaagovpublicationstmtm165tm165pdf

NEW ENGLAND | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchJohnston R D Holland and S Tuler 2010 New England Fishing Communities Prospects and Uncertainties Communities and Banking 21(2) 3-5Tuler S J Agyeman and P Pinto da Silva 2008 Improving the social sustainability of fisheries management by assessing stakeholder vulnerability Human Ecology Review 15(2) 171-184

Pinto da Silva P and M Hall-Arber eds 2008 Weathering the storms vulnerability and resilience in the Northeast fishing industry Special issue of Human Ecology Review 15(2) 141-142

Olson J 2006 Changing property spatializing difference the sea scallop fishery in New Bedford Massachusetts Human Organization 65(3) 307-318

Pinto da Silva P and A Kitts 2006 Collaborative fisheries management in the Northeast US emerging initiatives and future directions Marine Policy 30(6) 832-841

Pinto da Silva P 2006 Fishermen at the frontlines of conservation The Common Property Resource Digest March 2006 issue

Pinto da Silva P and C Fulcher 2005 Human dimensions of marine fisheries Using GIS to illustrate land-sea connections in the Northeast US herring fishery Marine Fisheries Review 67(4) 19-25

NEW ENGLAND | US Territories amp International Fisheries ResearchPascoe S J Innes D Holland M Fina O Theacutebaud R Townsend J Sanchirico R Arnason C Wilcox and T Hutton 2010 Use of incentive-based management systems to limit bycatch and discarding International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 4(1) 123-161

230

Publications

Mid-AtlanticMID-ATLANTIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchSteinback S and E Thunberg 2006 Northeast region commercial fishing input-output model US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NE-188 54p Available at httpwwwnefscnoaagovpublicationstmtm188tm188pdf

Edwards S 2005 Rents for the taking a contemporary history of property rights formation in the US Atlantic sea scallop fishery Evolving Property Rights in Marine Fisheries D Leal ed pp 111-126 New York Rowman amp Littlefield Publishers

Edwards S 2005 Accounting for rents in the US Atlantic sea scallop fishery Marine Resource Economics 20(1) 61-76

Hoagland P D Jin E Thunberg and S Steinback 2005 Economic activity associated with the Northeast Shelf Large Marine Ecosystem application of an input-output approach Chapter 7 Sustaining Large Marine Ecosystems The Human Dimension TM Hennessey and JG Sutinen eds pp 157-179 Amsterdam Elsevier BV

Walden J J Kirkley and A Kitts 2003 A limited economics assessment of the Northeast groundfish fishery buyout program Land Economics 79(3) 426-439Link J J Brodziak S Edwards W Overholtz D Mountain J Jossi T Smith and M Fogarty 2002 Marine ecosystem assessment in a fisheries management context Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59 1429-1440

Jin D H Kite-Powell E Thunberg A Solow and W Talley 2002 A model of fishing vessel accident probability Journal of Safety Research 33 497-510

Edwards S 2002 Rent-seeking and property rights formation in the US Atlantic sea scallop fishery Marine Resource Economics 16 263-275

Kirkley J R Fare S Grosskopf T McConnell D Squires and I Strand 2001 Assessing efficiency and capacity in fisheries when data are limited North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21(3) 482-497

MID-ATLANTIC | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchKasperski S and R Weiland 2010 When Is It Optimal To Delay Harvesting The Role of Ecological Services In The Northern Chesapeake Bay Oyster Fishery Marine Resource Economics 24(4) 361-385

MID-ATLANTIC | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchWallmo K and B Gentner 2008 Catch-and-release fishing a comparison of intended and actual behavior of marine anglers North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28(5) 1459-1471

Massey D S Newbold and B Gentner 2006 Valuing water quality changes using a bioeconomic model of a coastal recreational fishery Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52(1) 482-500

Massey M S Newbold and B Gentner 2005 The effects of water quality on coastal recreation flounder fishing NCEE Working Paper Series No 05-03 National Center for Environmental Economics (NCEE) Environmental Protection Agency

Thunberg E and J Milon 2002 Projecting recreational fishing participation Recreational Fisheries Ecological Economic and Social Evaluation T J Pitcher and C Hollingworth eds pp 63-73 United Kingdon Blackwell Science

231

Publications

Steinback S and B Gentner 2001 Marine Angler Expenditures in the Northeast Region 1998 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-FSPO-4

MID-ATLANTIC | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchOlson J and P Clay 2001 An Overview of the Social and Economic Survey Administered During Round II of the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Disaster Assistance Program US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NE-164 80p Available at httpwwwnefscnoaagovpublicationstmtm164tm164pdf

South AtlanticSOUTH ATLANTIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchCrosson S 2015 Anticipating exit from North Carolinarsquos commercial fisheries Forthcoming in Society and Natural Resources

Shideler G D Carter C Liese and J Serafy 2015 Lifting the goliath grouper harvest ban Angler perspectives and willingness to pay Fisheries Research 161(Jan) 156-165

Yandle T and S Crosson 2015 Whatever Happened to the Wreckfish Fishery An Evaluation of the Oldest Finfish ITQ Program in the United States Marine Resource Economics 30(2) 193-217

Fleming C F Tonioli and J Agar 2014 A review of principal coastal economic sectors within the southeast United States and US Caribbean NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-669 44 p DOI 107289V5J10135

Tokitch B C Meindl A Hoare and M Jepson 2012 Stakeholder Perceptions of the Northern Gulf of Mexico Grouper and Tilefish Individual Fishing Quota Program Marine Policy 36 34ndash41

Walter J E Orbesen C Liese and J Serafy 2012 Can Circle Hooks Improve Western Atlantic Sailfish Istiophorus Platypterus Populations Bulletin of Marine Science 88(3) 755-770

Crosson S 2011 Resistance to Alternative Management in Fisheries Economic and Cultural Considerations of North Carolinarsquos Commercial fishers Politics and the Life Sciences 30(2) 31-42

Matos-Caraballo D and J Agar 2011 Census of Active Commercial Fishermen in Puerto Rico 2008 Marine Fisheries Review 73(1) 13-27

Tonioli F and J Agar 2011 Synopsis of Puerto Rican Commercial Fisheries NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-622 47p

Crosson S 2010 Trends in the South Atlantic Golden Crab Fishery US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-608 24p

Perrusso L R Weldon and S Larkin 2005 Predicting optimal targeting strategies in multispecies fisheries a portfolio approach Marine Resource Economics 20(1) 25-45

232

Publications

Thunberg E 2004 Buyback programs for overcapitalized fisheries approaches experiences and impacts for Southeast fisheries discussion Journal of Agricultural amp Applied Economics 36(2) 347-349

Porter R M Wendt M Travis and I Strand 2001 Cost-earnings Study of the Atlantic-based US Pelagic Longline Fleet SOEST Publication 01-02 JIMAR Contribution 01-337 102p

Waters J R Rhodes and R Wiggers 2001 Description of Economic Data Collected with Random Sample of Commercial Reef Fish Boats in the Florida Keys US Dept of Commerce NOAA Technical Report NMFS-154 45p

SOUTH ATLANTIC | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchFleming C F Toniolo and J Agar 2014 A review of principal coastal economic sectors within the southeast United States and US Caribbean NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-669 44p DOI 107289V5J10135

SOUTH ATLANTIC | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchLiese C and D Carter 2011 Collecting Economic Data from the For-Hire Fishing Sector Lessons from a Cost and Earnings Survey of the Southeast US Charter Boat Industry 14p In Beard T D Jr A J Loftus and R Arlinghaus (eds) The Angler and the Environment American Fisheries Society Bethesda MD

Marvasti A 2010 A Welfare Estimation of Beach Recreation with Aggregate Data Applied Economics 42(1-3) 291-96

Carter D and D Letson 2009 Structural vector error correction modeling of integrated sport fishery data Marine Resource Economics 24(1) 19-41

Carter D C Rivero S Aguilar and K Kleisner 2008 South Florida Sportfishing Geodatabase (SFSGEO) design document US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-578 27p Available at httpwwwsefscnoaagovsfsgeodesignpdf

SOUTH ATLANTIC | Sociocultural ResearchStoffle B J Contillo C Grace and D Snodgrass 2011 The Socio-Economic Importance of Fishing in St Thomas USVI An Examination of Fishing Community Designation NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-623 47p

SOUTH ATLANTIC | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchCarter D 2003 Protected areas in marine resource management another look at the economics and research issues Ocean and Coastal Management 46(5) 439-456

Gulf of MexicoGULF OF MEXICO | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchKarnaukas M M Schirripa J Craig G Cook C Kelble J Agar B Black D Enfield D Lindo-Atichati B Muhling K Purcell P Richards and C Wang 2015 Evidence of climate-driven ecosystem reorganization in the Gulf of Mexico Forthcoming in Global Change Biology

Agar J and D Carter 2014 Are the 2012 allocations of gag red and black grouper in the Gulf of Mexico economically efficient US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-660 40p

233

Publications

Agar J and D Carter 2014 Is the 2012 allocation of red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico economically efficient US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-659 32p

Agar J J Stephen A Strelcheck and A Diagne 2014 The Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper IFQ Program The First Five Years Marine Resource Economics 29(2) 177-198

Marvasti A 2014 Crew Injuries and Fatalities Employment Estimates and Casualty Rates in the Gulf of Mexico Commercial Fisheries NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-656 17p

Solis D J del Corral L Perruso and J Agar 2014 Evaluating the impact of individual fishing quotas (IFQs) on the technical efficiency and composition of the US Gulf of Mexico red snapper commercial fishing fleet Food Policy 46 74-83

Solis D J del Corral L Perruso and J Agar 2014 Individual fishing quotas and fishing capacity in the US Gulf of Mexico red snapper fishery Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 58 1-23

Solis D L Perruso J del Corral B Stoffle and D Letson 2013 Measuring the initial economic effects of hurricanes on commercial fish production the US Gulf of Mexico grouper (Serranidae) fishery Natural Hazards 66(2) 271-289

Liese C and M Travis 2010 The Annual Economic Survey of Federal Gulf Shrimp Permit Holders Implementation and Descriptive Results for 2008 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-601 99p Available at httpwwwsefscnoaagovdocsShrimpEconTM601pdf

Liese C M Travis and J Waters 2009 The Annual Economic Survey of Federal Gulf Shrimp Permit Holders Implementation and Descriptive Results for 2007 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-590 97p Available at httpwwwsefscnoaagovdocsShrimpEconTM590pdf

Liese C M Travis D Pina and J Waters 2009 The Annual Economic Survey of Federal Gulf Shrimp Permit Holders Report on the Design Implementation and Descriptive Results for 2006 US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-584 91p Available at httpaquaticcommonsorg21061tm_584pdf

Nance J W Keithly Jr C Caillouet Jr J Cole W Gaidry B Gallaway W Griffin R Hart and M Travis 2008 Estimation of Effort Maximum Sustainable Yield and Maximum Economic Yield in the Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-570 71p

Keithly W H Diop R Kazmierczak and M Travis 2006 The Impacts of Imports Particularly Farm-Raised Product on the Southeast US Shrimp Processing Sector Report to the Gulf and South Atlantic Fisheries Foundation 50p

Travis M and W Griffin 2004 Update on the Economic Status of the Gulf of Mexico Commercial Shrimp Fishery SERO-ECON-04-01 National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Regional Office St Petersburg Florida 10p

Weninger Q and J Waters 2003 Economic benefits of management reform in the Northern Gulf of Mexico reef fish fishery Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46(2) 207-230

Waters J 2001 Quota management in the commercial red snapper fishery Marine Resource Economics 16(1) 65-78

Travis M 2000 Data and Modeling Issues in the Gulf of Mexicorsquos Shrimp Fishery SERO-ECON-00-14 National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Regional Office St Petersburg Florida 17p

234

Publications

GULF OF MEXICO | Habitat Economics ResearchMinello T L Rozas P Caldwell and C Liese 2012 A Comparison of Salt Marsh Construction Costs with the Value of Exported Shrimp Production Wetlands 32(5) 791-799

GULF OF MEXICO | Recreational Fisheries Economics ResearchCarter D and C Liese 2010 Hedonic Valuation of Sportfishing Harvest Marine Resource Economics 25(4) 391-407

Carter D J Agar and J Waters 2008 Economic Framework for Fishery Allocation Decisions with an Application to the Gulf of Mexico Red Grouper US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-576 95p Available at httpwwwsefscnoaagovdocstm576pdf

Oh C-O Ditton R B Gentner and R Reichers 2005 A stated preference choice approach to understanding angler preferences for management options Human Dimensions of Wildlife 10(3) 173-186

GULF OF MEXICO | Sociocultural Fisheries Research Blount B S Jacob P Weeks and M Jepson 2015 Testing Cognitive Ethnography Mixed-Methods in Developing Indicators of Well-Being in Fishing Communities Human Organization 74(1)

Jacob S P Weeks B Blount and M Jepson 2013 Development and Evaluation of Social Indicators of Vulnerability and Resiliency for Fishing Communities in the Gulf of Mexico Marine Policy 37(1) 86-95

Jacob S P Weeks B Blount and M Jepson 2010 Exploring Fishing Dependence in Gulf Coast Communities Marine Policy 34(6) 1307-1314

Ingles P 2008 Sunken boats tangled nets and disrupted lives impacts of Hurricane Katrina on two coastal areas of Louisiana Mitigating Impacts of Natural Disasters on Fisheries Ecosystems KD McLaughlin ed American Fisheries Society Bethesda Maryland

CaribbeanCARIBBEAN | Commercial Fisheries Economics ResearchAgar J J Waters M Valdes-Pizzini M Shivlani T Murray J Kirkley and D Suman 2008 US Caribbean Fish Trap Fishery Socioeconomic Study Bulletin of Marine Science 82(3) 315-331

CARIBBEAN | Spatial Analysis amp Marine Protected Areas ResearchKarras C and J Agar 2009 Cruzan fisherrsquos perspectives on the performance of the Buck Island Reef National Monument and the red hind seasonal closure Ocean and Coastal Management 52 578-585

CARIBBEAN | Sociocultural Fisheries ResearchValds-Pizzini M J Agar K Kitner C Garca-Quijano M Tust and F Forrestal 2010 Cruzan Fisheries A rapid assessment of the historical social cultural and economic processes that shaped coastal communitiesrsquo dependence and engagement in fishing in the island of St Croix US Virgin Islands NOAA Series on US Caribbean Fishing Communities NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-597 144p

235

Publications

Tonioli F and J Agar 2009 Extending the Bajo de Sico Puerto Rico Seasonal Closure An Examination of Small-scale Fishermenrsquos Perceptions of Possible Socio-economic Impacts on Fishing Practices Families and Community Marine Fisheries Review 71(2) 15-23

Pollnac R S Abbott-Jamieson C Smith M Miller P Clay and B Oles 2008 Toward a Model for Fisheries Social Impact Assessment Marine Fisheries Review 68(1-4) 1-18

CARIBBEAN | US Territories amp International Fisheries ResearchAgar J M Shivlani J Waters M Valdes-Pizzini T Murray J Kirkley and D Suman 2005 US Caribbean Fish Trap Fishery Costs and Earnings Study US Dept of Commerce NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-SEFSC-534 127p Available at httpwwwsefscnoaagovdocsTrap_May2006pdf

Resources

Tuna tails Photo NOAA FisheriesBrad McHale

238

Resources

UNITED STATESFederal Agenciesbull Economics amp Social Analysis Division Office of Science amp Technology NOAA Fisheries

wwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicsbull Office of Science amp Technology NOAA Fisheries

httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovaboutoffice-science-and-technologybull Marine Recreational Information Program

httpswwwfisheriesnoaagovtopicrecreational-fishing-databull Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs US Department of State

wwwstategoveoesocnsfish

NORTH PACIFICFederal Agenciesbull Economic amp Social Sciences Research Alaska Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

httpwwwafscnoaagovREFMSocioeconomicsdefaultphpbull Alaska Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwafscnoaagovbull Alaska Regional Office NOAA Fisheries | httpsalaskafisheriesnoaagovbull Alaska Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | httpwwwfwsgovalaskabull District 17 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD17State Agenciesbull Alaska Department of Fish amp Game | wwwadfgstateakusCouncils amp Commissionsbull North Pacific Fishery Management Council | wwwnpfmcorgbull Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwpsmfcorgbull Fisheries Economics Data Program Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwpsmfcorgefinbull International Pacific Halibut Commission | wwwiphcint

PACIFICFederal Agenciesbull Economics Groundfish Analysis Program Northwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

httpwwwnwfscnoaagovresearchdivisionsframeconomicbull Human Dimensions Program Northwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

wwwnwfscnoaagovresearchdivisionscbdhumandimbull Northwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwnwfscnoaagovbull West Coast Regional Office NOAA Fisheries | wwwwestcoastfisheriesnoaagovbull Socioeconomics Research Southwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

httpsswfscnoaagovtextblockaspxid=1038ampParentMenuId=109bull Southwest Fisheries Science Center | httpsswfscnoaagovbull Pacific Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovpacificbull California amp Nevada US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovcnobull District 13 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD13State Agenciesbull California Department of Fish amp Game | wwwwildlifecagovbull Oregon Department of Fish amp Wildlife | wwwdfwstateorusbull Washington Department of Fish amp Wildlife | httpwdfwwagov

239

Resources

Councils amp Commissionsbull Pacific Fishery Management Council | wwwpcouncilorgbull Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwpsmfcorgbull Fisheries Economics Data Program - Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwpsmfcorgefinbull International Pacific Halibut Commission | wwwiphcint

WESTERN PACIFICFederal Agenciesbull Socioeconomics amp Planning Group Office of the Director Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

wwwpifscnoaagovsocioeconomicsbull Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwpifscnoaagovbull Pacific Islands Regional Office NOAA Fisheries | wwwfpirnoaagovbull Pacific Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovpacificbull District 14 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmild14State Agenciesbull Hawaiʻi Department of Land amp Natural Resources | wwwhawaiigovdlnrbull Guam Office of the Governor | httpgovernorguamgovbull Department of Marine amp Wildlife Resources American Samoa Office of the Governor

httpswwwamericansamoagovdepartment-of-marine-wildlifebull Division of Fish amp Wildlife Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands | httpwwwcnmi-dfwcomCouncils amp Commissionsbull Western Pacific Fishery Management Council | wwwwpcouncilorg

NEW ENGLANDFederal Agenciesbull Social Sciences Branch Northeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwnefscnoaagovreadsocialscibull Northeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwnefscnoaagovbull Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office NOAA Fisheries | wwwgreateratlanticfisheriesnoaagovbull Northeast Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovnortheastbull District 1 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD1State Agenciesbull Maine Department of Marine Resources | wwwmainegovdmrbull Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management | wwwdemrigovbull Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries | wwwmassgoveealand-use-habitatsmarine-fisheriesbull Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection | wwwctgovdepsitebull New Hampshire Fish amp Game Department | wwwwildlifestatenhusCouncils amp Commissionsbull New England Fishery Management Council | wwwnefmcorgbull Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwasmfcorg

240

Resources

MID-ATLANTICFederal Agenciesbull Social Sciences Branch Northeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwnefscnoaagovreadsocialscibull Northeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwnefscnoaagovbull Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office NOAA Fisheries | wwwgreateratlanticfisheriesnoaagovbull Northeast Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovnortheastbull District 5 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD5State Agenciesbull Bureau of Marine Resources New York Department of Environmental Conservation

wwwdecnygovabout796htmlbull New Jersey Division of Fish amp Wildlife | wwwstatenjusdepfgwbull Pennsylvania Fish amp Boat Commission | httpfishandboatcombull Delaware Division of Fish amp Wildlife | wwwfwdelawaregovbull Fisheries Service Maryland Department of Natural Resources | wwwdnrstatemdusfisheriesbull Virginia Marine Resources Commission | wwwmrcstatevausCouncils amp Commissionsbull Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council | wwwmafmcorgbull Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwasmfcorg

SOUTH ATLANTICFederal Agenciesbull Social Science Research Group Southeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

wwwsefscnoaagovsocialsciencejspbull Southeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwsefscnoaagovbull Southeast Regional Office NOAA Fisheries | httpseronmfsnoaagovbull Southeast Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovsoutheastbull Southwest Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovsouthwestbull District 7 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD7State Agenciesbull Division of Marine Fisheries North Carolina Department of Environment amp Natural Resources

httpportalncdenrorgwebmfbull Marine Resources Division South Carolina Department of Natural Resources | wwwdnrscgovbull Coastal Resources Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources | httpscoastalgadnrorgbull Florida Fish amp Wildlife Conservation Commission | httpmyfwccomCouncils amp Commissionsbull South Atlantic Fishery Management Council | wwwsafmcnetbull Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwasmfcorg

241

Resources

GULF OF MEXICOFederal Agenciesbull Social Science Research Group Southeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries

wwwsefscnoaagovsocialsciencejspbull Southeast Fisheries Science Center NOAA Fisheries | wwwsefscnoaagovbull Southeast Regional Office NOAA Fisheries | httpseronmfsnoaagovbull Southeast Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovsoutheastbull Southwest Region US Fish amp Wildlife Service | wwwfwsgovsouthwestbull District 8 US Coast Guard | wwwuscgmilD8State Agenciesbull Florida Fish amp Wildlife Conservation Commission | httpmyfwccombull Marine Resources Division Alabama Department of Conservation amp Natural Resources

wwwoutdooralabamacombull Mississippi Department of Marine Resources | wwwdmrstatemsusbull Louisiana Department of Wildlife amp Fisheries | wwwwlflouisianagovbull Texas Parks amp Wildlife Department | wwwtpwdstatetxusCouncils amp Commissionsbull Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council | wwwgulfcouncilorgbull Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission | wwwgsmfcorg

PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONSbull North American Association of Fisheries Economists | httporegonstateedudeptIIFETNAAFEHomehtmlbull International Institute of Fisheries Economics amp Trade | httporegonstateedudeptiifet

OTHER ORGANIZATIONS amp INFORMATIONbull Organisation for Economic Co-operation amp Development | httpwwwoecdorgbull Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

httpwwwfaoorgfisherycaptureenbull Marine Stewardship Council | wwwmscorg

Glossary

Fishing in Florida Photo NOAA FisheriesAyeisha Brinson

244

Glossary

Angler1 ndash A person catching fish or shellfish with no intent to sell including people releasing the catch Also known as a recreational fisherman

Annual Payroll2 ndash Includes all forms of compensation such as salaries wages reported tips commissions bonuses vacation allowances sick-leave pay employee contributions to qualified pension plans and the value of taxable fringe benefits For corporations it includes amounts paid to officers and executives for unincorporated businesses it does not include profit or other compensation of proprietors or partners Payroll is reported before deductions for Social Security income tax insurance union dues etc

Annual Receipts3 ndash Includes gross receipts sales commissions and income from trades and businesses as reported on annual business income tax returns Business income consists of all payments received for services rendered by nonemployer businesses such as payments received as independent agents and contractors The composition of nonemployer receipts may differ from receipts data published for employer establishments For ex-ample for wholesale agents and brokers without payroll (nonemployers) the receipts item contains commissions or earnings In contrast for wholesale agents and brokers with payroll (employers) the sales and receipts item published in the Economic Census represents the value of the goods involved in the transactions

Buyback Program4 ndash A management tool available to fishery managers intended to ease fishing-related pressure on marine resources Fishing vessels are purchased by the government or by the fishing industry itself Then they are removed from a specific fishery where fish stocks or stock complexes are considered overfished or subject to overfishing

Bycatch1 ndash Species other than the primary target species that are caught incidental to the harvest of the primary species Bycatch may be retained or discarded discards may occur for regulatory or economic reasons

Catch1 ndash 1 To undertake any activity that results in taking fish out of its environment dead or alive or to bring fish on board a vessel dead or alive 2 The total number (or weight) of fish caught by fishing operations Catch should include all fish killed by the act of fishing not just those landed 3 The component of fish encountering fishing gear which is retained by the gear Catch is usually expressed in terms of wet weight It refers sometimes to the total amount caught and sometimes only to the amount landed The fish that are not landed but returned to the sea are called discards or bycatch For this report recreational catch refers to the total number of individual fish released (thrown back into the sea) and harvested (not thrown back into the sea) by recreational fishermen (anglers)

Catch Share Program5 ndash This is a generic term used to describe a fishery management program that allocates a specific portion of the total fishery catch to individuals cooperatives communities or other entities including sectors The term encompasses more specific programs defined in legislation such as Limited Access Privilege Pro-grams (LAPPs) and Individual Fishing Quotas (IFQs) Note that a catch share allocated to a sector is different from a general sectoral allocation or distribution to an entire segment of a fishery (such as a recreational sector alloca-tion or a longline gear sector allocation) The two differ because the recipient of the catch share is responsible for terminating fishing activity when their specific share is reached

Coastal County6 ndash A coastal county meets one of the following criteria 1) at least 15 percent of a countyrsquos total land area is located within the nationrsquos coastal watershed 2) a portion of or an entire county accounts for at least 15 percent of a coastal cataloging unit Any US county that meets these criteria is classified as coastal

Coastal County Angler ndash For this report a coastal county angler refers to a recreational fishermen who lives within a given state and within a coastal county of that state

245

Glossary

Commercial Fishing Location Quotient (CFLQ)7 ndash For this report the CFLQ is calculated as the ratio of a statersquos distribution of employment in commercial fishing industries compared with the distribution of commercial fishing industries in the US The CFLQ is calculated using the rdquoLocation Quotient Calculatorrdquo provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics US Department of Labor

Community Development Quota Program (CDQ)1 ndash A program in western Alaska under which a per-centage of the total allowable catch (TAC) of Bering Sea commercial fisheries is allocated to specific communities Communities eligible for this program must be located within 50 miles of the Bering Sea coast or on an island within the Bering Sea meet criteria established by the State of Alaska be a village certified by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act and consist of residents who conduct more than half of their current commercial or subsistence fishing in the Bering Sea or waters surrounding the Aleutian Islands Currently 75 percent of the TAC in the pollock halibut sablefish crab and groundfish fisheries is allocated to the CDQ Program

Dedicated Access Privileges (DAPs)8 ndash As defined by the US Commission on Ocean Policy a DAP pro-gram assigns an individual or other entity access to a predetermined portion of the annual catch in a particular fishery In some cases the privilege is transferable and may be bought and sold creating a market The term en-compasses a range of tools including access privileges assigned to individuals (that is individual transferable quo-tas) and to groups or communities (for example community development quotas cooperatives and area-based quotas) DAP programs are sometimes known as rights-based management and are of 10 synonymous with Limited Access Privilege Programs (see rdquoLimited Access Privilege Programrdquo) However rdquorights-based managementrdquo implies granting an individual the rdquorightrdquo to fish With the exception of certain tribes US fishermen do not have inalienable rights to fish because the fishery resources of the US belong to all people of the US Under current law fishermen are granted a rdquoprivilegerdquo to fish subject to certain conditions

Discards1 ndash To release or return a fish or other species to the sea dead or alive whether or not such fish or other species are brought fully on board a fishing vessel Estimates of discards can be made in a variety of ways including samples from observers and logbook records Fish (or parts of fish) can be discarded for a variety of rea-sons such as having physical damage being a non-target species for the trip and compliance with management regulations like minimum size limits or quotas

Durable Equipment Expenditures or Durable Goods Expenditures9 ndash For this report this term refers to expenses related to equipment used for recreational fishing activities These expenses include the purchase of semi-durable goods (tackle rods reels line etc) durable goods (motor boats and accessories non-motorized boats boating electronics mooring boat storage boat insurance and vehicles or homes) and angling accessories and multi-purpose items (magazines club dues saltwater angling-specific clothing and camping gear)

Ecolabel or Ecolabelling Scheme10 ndash In fisheries ecolabelling schemes entitle a fishery product to bear a distinctive logo or statement that certifies that the fish has been harvested in compliance with specified conserva-tion and sustainability standards The logo or statement is intended to facilitate informed decisions by purchasers whose choices may promote and stimulate the sustainable use of fishery resources

246

Glossary

Economic Impact Model1112 ndash Economic impact models capture how sales in a sector generate economic impacts directly in the sector in which the sale was made The sales then ripple throughout the state and national economies as each dollar spent generates additional sales by other firms and consumers The NOAA Fisheries Com-mercial Fishing amp Seafood Industry InputOutput Model uses an IMPLAN platform to estimate the economic impacts associated with the harvesting of fish by US commercial fishermen and other major components of the US seafood industry As used here the term fish refers to the entire range of finfish shellfish and other life (that is sea urchins seaweed kelp and worms) from marine and freshwaters that are included in the landings data maintained by the Na-tional Marine Fisheries Service The NOAA Fisheries Recreational Economic Impact Model which also uses an IMPLAN platform estimates the economic impacts generated by expenditures made by saltwater anglers

Economic Impacts1112 ndash For this report the economic impacts of the commercial fishing sector and seafood industry refer to the employment (full-time and part-time jobs) personal income and output (sales by US busi-nesses) generated by the commercial harvest sector and other major components of the US seafood industry These components include processors and dealers wholesalers and distributors grocers and restaurants Economic impacts of recreational fishing activities refer to the amount of sales generated the number of jobs supported and the contribution to gross domestic product (GDP) by state (also known as value-added impacts) from expenditures related to recreational fishing

Effort1 ndash For this report effort refers to the number of fishing trips taken by recreational fishermen (anglers) The term can also refer to the amount of time and fishing power used to harvest fish in commercial fisheries including gear size boat size and horsepower

Employee Compensation13 ndash This is related to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by State and is an estimate of the sum of employee wages and salaries and supplements to wages and salaries Wages and salaries are mea-sured on an accrual or rdquowhen earnedrdquo basis which may be different from the measure of wages and salaries measured on a disbursement or rdquowhen paidrdquo basis Wages and salaries and supplements of Federal military and civilian government employees stationed abroad are excluded from the measure of GDP by state

Employer Establishments14 ndash Businesses with payroll and paid employees with a single physical location at which business is conducted or services or industrial operations are performed An employee establishment is not necessarily identical to a company or enterprise which may consist of one or more establishments When two or more activities are carried on at a single location under a single ownership all activities generally are grouped to-gether as a single establishment The entire establishment is classified on the basis of its major activity and all data are included in that classification

Endangered Species15 ndash As defined by the Endangered Species Act (ESA) an endangered species is any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range See also rdquoThreatened Speciesrdquo

Endangered Species Act (ESA)15 ndash The ESA was signed on December 28 1973 and provides for the con-servation of species that are endangered or threatened throughout all or a significant portion of their range and the conservation of the ecosystems on which they depend The ESA replaced the Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 Congress has amended the ESA several times

Expenditures9 ndash For this report expenditures are related to recreational fishing activities and described as be-ing one of two types 1) expenditures related to a specific fishing trip or 2) durable equipment expenditures

Ex-Vessel10 ndash Refers to activities that occur when a commercial fishing boat lands or unloads a catch For exam-ple the price for the catch that a captain receives at the point of landing is an ex-vessel price

247

Glossary

Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)1 ndash The EEZ is the area that extends 200 nautical miles from the seaward boundaries of the coastal states The seaward boundary for most states is 3 nautical miles with the exceptions of Texas Puerto Rico and the Gulf Coast of Florida which is 9 nautical miles The US claims and exercises sover-eign rights and exclusive fishery management authority over all fish and continental shelf resources through this 200-nautical-mile boundary

Fish Stock1 ndash A fish stock refers to the living resources in the community or population from which catches are taken in a fishery The term ldquofish stockrdquo usually implies that the particular population is more or less isolated from other stocks of the same species and hence self-sustaining In a particular fishery the fish stock may be one or several species of fish Here it also includes commercial invertebrates and plants

Fishery Management Council (FMC) or Regional Fishery Management Council4 ndash A regional fish-eries management body established by the Magnuson-Stevens Act to manage fishery resources in eight designated regions of the United States

Fishery Management Plan (FMP)4 ndash 1 A document prepared under supervision of the appropriate fishery management council (FMC) for the management of stocks of fish judged to require management The plan must gen-erally be formally approved An FMP includes data analyses and management measures 2 A plan containing con-servation and management measures for fishery resources and other provisions required by the Magnuson-Ste-vens Act developed by fishery management councils or the Secretary of Commerce

Fishing Cooperatives4 ndash A market-based fisheries management tool where access to fisheries resources is limited to a specific group of fishermen See also rdquoCatch Share Programrdquo

Fishing Day ndash For this report a fishing day refers to a partial or full day spent in recreational fishing and can be different from a fishing trip For example one fishing trip can consist of more than 1 fishing day This term is used in the Alaska recreational fishing tables

Fishing Effort10 ndash The amount of fishing gear of a specific type used on the fishing grounds over a given unit of time For example hours trawled per day number of hooks set per day or number of hauls of a beach seine per day When two or more kinds of gear are used the respective efforts must be adjusted to some standard type before being added For recreational fishing activities fishing effort refers to the number of participants (that is recreational fishermen or anglers) who engage in recreational fishing activities

Fishing Mode ndash For this report fishing mode refers to the type of recreational fishing a recreational fisherman (angler) engages in such as fishing from shore a private or rental boat or a for-hire boat

Fishing Trip ndash For this report a fishing trip refers to a recreational fishing excursion and can be different from a fishing day For example one fishing trip can consist of more than 1 fishing day Fishing trips are classified as occurring in one of three fishing modes 1) a shore-based fishing trip 2) by a private or rental boat or 3) on a for-hire fishing boat

For-Hire Mode ndash For this report this fishing mode refers to trips taken by a recreational fishermen (anglers) on a party (also referred to as a headboat) or charter boat

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by State or Gross State Product (GSP)13 - Previously known as the Gross State Product the GDP by state is the value added in production by the labor and capital located in a state GDP for a state is derived as the sum of the GDP originating in all industries in the state

248

Glossary

Harvest1 ndash The total number of weight or fish caught and kept from an area over a period of time Note that landings catch and harvest are different For recreational fishing activities harvest refers to the number of indi-vidual fish not thrown back into the sea by a recreational fisherman (angler) However in Hawaiʻi and the Gulf states harvest includes fish thrown back dead See also rdquoCatchrdquo and rdquoReleaserdquo

Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ)1 ndash A type of limited entry an allocation to an individual (a person or a legal entity for example a vessel owner or company) of a right (privilege) to harvest a certain amount of fish in a cer-tain period of time It is also of 10 expressed as an individual share of an aggregate quota or total allowable catch (TAC) See also rdquoIndividual Transferable Quotardquo and rdquoCatch Share Programrdquo

Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ)1 ndash A type of individual fishing quota (IFQ) allocated to individual fish-ermen or vessel owners that can be transferred (sold or leased) to others See also rdquoIndividual Fishing Quotardquo

Industry Sector ndash For this report fishing- and marine-related industries were combined into industry sectors Two industry sectors were included in this report 1) seafood sales and processing and 2) transport support and marine operations Fishing and marine-related industries were chosen from the County Business Patterns Data Series based on data availability and perceived relevance to fishing or marine activities These industries were then combined into one of these two industry sectors

Key Species or Species Groups ndash For this report up to 10 species or species groups were chosen as rdquokeyrdquo species or species groups due to their regional importance to commercial and recreational fisheries The regional importance of these key species or species groups was chosen based on their economic andor historical signifi-cance to a state or region

Landings1 ndash 1 The number or poundage of fish unloaded by commercial fishermen or brought to shore by rec-reational fishermen for personal use Landings are reported at the locations at which fish are brought to shore 2 The part of the catch that is selected and kept during the sorting procedures on board vessels and successively discharged at dockside

Limited Access Privilege Program (LAPP) or Limited Access Privilege System4 ndash As defined in the Magnuson-Stevens Act LAPPs limit participation in a fishery to those satisfying certain eligibility criteria or require-ments contained in a fishery management plan (FMP) or associated regulation A limited access privilege is a federal permit issued as part of a limited access system to harvest a quantity of fish expressed by a unit or units representing a portion of the total allowable catch (TAC) of the fishery that may be received or held for exclusive use by a person A LAPP includes an individual fishing quota (IFQ) or individual tradable quota (ITQ) but does not include community de-velopment quotas (CDQs) LAPPs are sometimes known as Dedicated Access Privileges (DAPs) However unlike LAPPs DAPs generally encompass CDQs as well as IFQs (see rdquoDedicated Access Privilegesrdquo) LAPPs are a type of catch share program See also rdquoCatch Share Programrdquo

License Limitation Program or Limited Entry Program1 ndash A management tool available to fishery man-agers where the number of commercial fishermen or vessels licensed to participate in a fishery is legally restricted A management agency of 10 uses this management tool to limit entry into a fishery

Limited Entry Program ndash Also known as a license limitation program see rdquoLicense Limitation Programrdquo

249

Glossary

Location Quotient7 ndash Location Quotients (LQs) are ratios that allow an arearsquos distribution of employment by industry to be compared to a reference or base arearsquos distribution The reference area is usually the US but it can also be a state or metropolitan area The reference or base industry is usually the all-industry total The follow-ing discussion assumes the defaults are used LQs also allow areas to be easily compared with each other If an LQ is equal to 1 then the industry has the same share of its area employment as it does in the reference area An LQ greater than 1 indicates an industry with a greater share of the local area employment than in the reference area

For example (assuming the US as the reference area) Las Vegas will have an LQ greater than 1 in the Leisure and Hospitality industry because this industry makes up a larger share of the Las Vegas employment total than it does for the country as a whole LQs are calculated by first dividing local industry employment by the all-industry total of local employment Next reference area industry employment is divided by the all-industry total for the reference area Finally the local ratio is divided by the reference area ratio

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act or Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA)1

Federal legislation responsible for establishing the Regional Fishery Management Councils (FMCs) and the manda-tory and discretionary guidelines for federal fishery management plans (FMPs) This legislation was originally en-acted in 1976 as the Fishery Management and Conservation Act Its name was changed to the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act in 1980 and in 1996 it was renamed the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conserva-tion and Management Act

Market-based Management4 ndash Market-based management is an umbrella term that encompasses approach-es that provide economic incentives to protect fisheries from overharvest These approaches contrast with con-ventional fisheries management approaches such as buyback programs and license limitation programs (see rdquoBuyback Programrdquo and rdquoLicense Limitation Programrdquo) One example of a market-based management approach for fisheries is a limited access privilege program (LAPP see rdquoLimited Access Privilege Programrdquo) that includes an individual fishing quota A LAPP provides individual fishermen an exclusive market-based share of a harvest quota or total allowable catch (TAC) of a fishery

Marine Coastal County ndash For this report a marine coastal county is a coastal county that is adjacent to an ocean coastline See also rdquoCoastal Countyrdquo

Marine Economy ndash For this report the marine economy refers to the economic activity generated by fish-ing- and marine-related industries located in a coastal state Fishing- and marine-related industries were chosen from industries defined in the County Business Patterns Data Series provided by the US Census Bureau Indus-tries listed in this report were chosen based on that industryrsquos direct contribution to fishing and marine activities and whether data was available for that industry Information such as the number of establishments number of employees and annual payroll for these fishing and marine-related industries was used to determine their relative levels of economic activity in a state These industries were categorized into one of two industry sectors 1) seafood sales and processing and 2) transport support and marine operations See also rdquoIndustry Sectorrdquo

Non-Coastal County Angler ndash For this report a non-coastal county angler refers to a recreational fisherman who lives within a given state but not in a coastal county of that state

Nonemployer Firms3 ndash A nonemployer business is one that has no paid employees has annual business re-ceipts of $1000 or more ($1 or more in the construction industries) and is subject to federal income taxes Most nonemployers are self-employed individuals operating very small unincorporated businesses that may or may not be the ownerrsquos principal source of income

250

Glossary

Non-Resident ndash For this report a non-resident in the US table refers to a recreational fisherman (angler) who resides outside the US a non-resident in the regional and state tables refers to an angler who did not reside in the state where they fished

Out-of-state Angler ndash For this report an out-of-state angler is a recreational fisherman (angler) who does not reside within a given coastal state

Overcapacity16 ndash When the harvesting capability within a given fishery exceeds the level of harvest allowed for that fishery

Overcapitalization10 ndash When the amount of harvesting capacity in a fishery exceeds the amount needed to harvest the desired amount of fish at least cost

Overfished1 ndash 1 An overfished stock or stock complex rdquowhose size is sufficiently small that a change in man-agement practices is required to achieve an appropriate level and rate of rebuildingrdquo A stock or stock complex is considered overfished when its population size falls below the minimum stock size threshold (MSST) A rebuilding plan is required for stocks that are deemed overfished 2 A stock is considered overfished when exploited beyond an explicit limit past which its abundance is considered ldquotoo lowrdquo to ensure safe reproduction In many fisheries the term is used when biomass has been estimated to be below a biological reference point that is used as the signpost defining an rdquooverfished conditionrdquo

Overfishing1 ndash 1 According to the National Standard Guidelines rdquooverfishing occurs whenever a stock or stock complex is subjected to a rate or level of fishing mortality that jeopardizes the capacity of a stock or stock com-plex to produce maximum sustainable yield (MSY) on a continuing basisrdquo Overfishing is occurring if the maximum fishing mortality threshold (MFMT) is exceeded for 1 year or more 2 In general the action of exerting fishing pressure (fishing intensity) beyond the agreed optimum level A reduction of fishing pressure would in the medi-um term lead to an increase in the total catch

Protected Species17 ndash Refers to any species that is protected by either the Endangered Species Act (ESA) or the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) and that is under the jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries This total includes all threatened endangered and candidate species as well as all cetaceans and pinnipeds excluding walruses

Regional Fishery Management Council or Fishery Management Council (FMC)4 ndash The Magnu-son-Stevens Act established eight Regional FMCs around the United States Each council consists of voting and non-vot-ing members who represent various federal state and tribal governments fishing industry groups (commercial andor recreational) and non-fishing groups (such as environmental organizations and academic institutions) Each council is tasked with creating fishery management plans for important fisheries within their regions

Release ndash For this report release refers to the number of individual fish caught by a recreational fisherman (an-gler) that are then returned to the sea (dead or alive) In Hawaiʻi and the Atlantic and Gulf states release does not include fish returned to the sea that are dead See also rdquoCatchrdquo and rdquoHarvestrdquo

Resident ndash For this report a resident in the US table refers to a recreational fisherman (angler) who resides inside the US a resident in the regional and state tables refers to an angler who resides in the state where they fished

Sector Allocation Program17 ndash A fisheries management tool where a group of fishermen are allocated a quota or share of a total allowable catch (TAC) in accordance with an approved plan This program is considered a type of catch share program See also rdquoCatch Share Programrdquo

251

Glossary

Species1 ndash A group of animals or plants having common characteristics that are able to breed together to produce fertile (capable of reproducing) offspring and maintain their rdquoseparatenessrdquo from other groups

Species Group1 ndash Group of species considered together of 10 because they are difficult to differentiate without detailed examination (very similar species) or because data for the separate species are not available (for example in fishery statistics or commercial categories)

Threatened Species13 ndash As defined by the Endangered Species Act (ESA) a threatened species is any species that is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range See also rdquoEndangered Speciesrdquo

Trip Expenditures ndash For this report trip expenditures refer to expenses incurred by recreational fishermen (an-glers) on a fishing trip Trip expenditures are described for residents (individuals who reside in a coastal or non-coast-al county within a given state a US resident) and non-residents (individuals who do not reside within the US)

Value-Added1 ndash A firmrsquos sales minus the cost of the goods and services it purchases from other industries to pro-duce its outputs GLOSSARY NOTES 1 NOAA Fisheries Glossary October 2005 K Blackhart DG Stanton and AM Shimada eds Revised edition June 2006 National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration US Department of Commerce NOAA Technical MemorandumNMFS-FSPO-69 Available at httpwwwstnmfsgovst4documentsF_Glossarypdf [accessed September 19 2014]2 ldquoCBP Definitionsrdquo County Business Patterns US Census Bureau US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwcensusgoveconcbpdefi-nitionshtm [accessed September 19 2014]3 ldquoNonemployer Definitionsrdquo Nonemployer Statistics US Census Bureau US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwcensusgovepcdnonemployerviewdefinehtml [accessed September 19 2014]4 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act as amended through January 12 2007 (PL 94-265 as amended through PL109-479) Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovmsa2007docsact_draftpdf [accessed September 19 2014]5 NOAA Catch Share Policy Office of Policy National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) National Oceanic amp AtmosphericAdministration US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovsfamanagementcatch_sharesaboutdocumentsnoaa_cs_policypdf [accessed September 22 2014]6 rdquoCoastal Countiesrdquo US Census Bureau US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwcensusgovgeolandviewlv6helpcoastal_ctyhtml [accessed September 19 2014]7 Location Quotient Calculator Bureau of Labor Statistics US Department of Labor Available at httpdatablsgovhelpdeflqhtmlocation_quotient_application [accessed September 19 2014]8 Pages 288-289 in An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century Final Report 2004 US Commission on Ocean Policy Washington DC Available athttpwwwoceancommissiongov [accessed September 19 2014]9 P 4 in The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2006 2008 B Gentner and S Steinback NationalMarine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration US Department of Commerce NOAA Technical Memoran-dum NMFS-FSPO-94 Available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagovst5publicationmarine_anglerhtml [accessed September 19 2014]10 rdquoFisheries Term Portalrdquo FAO Fisheries Department United Nations Food amp Agriculture Organization Available at httpwwwfaoorgfaotermcollec-tionfisheriesen [accessed September 19 2014]11 The NMFS Commercial Fishing and Seafood Industry InputOutput Model (CFSI IO Model) August 2009 J Kirkley Virginia Institute of MarineScience Available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagovdocumentscommercial_seafood_impacts_2006pdf [accessed September 19 2014]12 Pages 11-12 in ldquoThe Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States 2006rdquo November 2008 B Gentner and SSteinback National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) National Oceanic amp Atmospheric Administration US Dept of Commerce NOAATechnical Memorandum NMFS-FSPO-94 301p Available at httpwwwstnmfsnoaagoveconomicspublicationsmarine-angler-expendituresma-rine-angler-2006 [accessed September 19 2014]13 rdquoRegional Definitionsrdquo Regional Economic Accounts Bureau of Economic Analysis US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwbeagovregionaldefinitions [accessed September 19 2014]14 ldquoEconomic Census Definitionsrdquo US Census Bureau Available at httpwwwcensusgoveconcensushelpsectordefinitionshtml [accessed Sep-tember 22 2014]15 Endangered Species Act of 1973 (PL 93-205 as amended through PL 100-707) Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovprlawsesa [accessed September 22 2014]16 rdquoStatus of US Fisheriesrdquo Office of Sustainable Fisheries National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries) National Oceanic amp AtmosphericAdministration US Department of Commerce Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovsfastatusoffisheriesSOSmainhtm [accessed September 22 2014]16 P 4 in ldquoAn Assessment of Excess Harvesting Capacity in Federally Managed Commercial Fisheriesrdquo US Dept of Commerce NOAA Technical Memo-randum NMFSFSPO-93 366p Available at httpwwwnmfsnoaagovmsa2007docs042808_312_b_6_reportpdf [accessed September 22 2014]

Commercial fishing vessels in Ocean City Maryland Photo Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management CouncilJason Didden

  • Fisheries Economics of the United States 2016
  • Preface
  • National Overview
  • National Overview Tables
  • North Pacific Region
  • Alaska Tables
  • Pacific Region
  • Pacific Region Tables
  • California Tables
  • Oregon Tables
  • Washington Tables
  • Western Pacific Region
  • Hawaii Tables
  • New England Region
  • New England Region Tables
  • Connecticut Tables
  • Maine Tables
  • Massachusetts Tables
  • New Hampshire Tables
  • Rhode Island Tables
  • Mid-Atlantic Region
  • Mid-Atlantic Region Tables
  • Delaware Tables
  • Maryland Tables
  • New Jersey Tables
  • New York Tables
  • Virginia Tables
  • South Atlantic Region
  • South Atlantic Region Tables
  • East Florida Tables
  • Georgia Tables
  • North Carolina Tables
  • South Carolina Tables
  • Gulf of Mexico Region
  • Gulf of Mexico Region Tables
  • Alabama Tables
  • West Florida Tables
  • Louisiana Tables
  • Mississippi Tables
  • Texas Tables
  • Data Sources
  • Publications
  • Resources
  • Glossary