financial statement analysis - · pdf filefinancial statement analysis ... summary of...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Table of Contents
Summary of Findings - Page 2
Financial Ratio Chart - Page 3
Ratio Explanations - Page 4
Summary of Management Discussion and Analysis - Page 5
Common-Sized Balance Sheet - Page 6
Common-Sized Income Statement - Page 7 – 8
Summary of Common-Sized Financial Statements - Page 9
Financial Statements for Under Armour
Income Statement - Page 11
Statement of Changes in Owner’s Equity - Page 12
Balance Sheet - Page 13
Statement of Cash Flows - Page 14
Auditor’s Report - Page 15
First Page of Management Discussion and Analysis - Page 16
Financial Statements for Nike
Income Statement - Page 18
Statement of Changes in Owner’s Equity - Page 19 – 20
Balance Sheet - Page 21
Statement of Cash Flows - Page 22
Auditor’s Report - Page 23
First Page of Management Discussion and Analysis - Page 24
2
Summary of Findings
It is evident that the overall financial stature of Nike is far superior to that of Under
Armour, prompting me to believe in Nike to be the better investment choice. The common-sized
income statement reveals Nike’s heightened ability to generate enormous amounts of revenue
($20,862 million) and ultimately in net income ($2,133 million) compared to that of its inferior
competitor, Under Armour (Revenue being $1,472,684 thousand and net income being $96,919
thousand). The difference in net income is a stunning $2,036,081,000. Though the expenses,
costs, and liabilities are bigger for Nike, it seems only natural for this to occur if its final net
income is higher in comparison to Under Armour’s.
The amount of common stock invested into each Corporation is also very telling of which
seems to be the better choice, in this case, Nike winning once again in numbers. With further
analysis of the financial ratios for the respective corporations, Nike has the upper-hand in Return
on Equity, Profit Margin, and Return on Assets, possibly due to better managing. Nike loses to
Under Armour in ratios dealing with debt, but as I have stated earlier, I believe this only to be
natural as Nike makes more money. It is probably important to note, though, that Under Armour
does indeed have a better Current Ratio, giving it an advantage in acquiring cash to pay off debt
over Nike.
3
Financial Ratios
Ratio Under Armour Nike
Debt/Asset 0.307631553 0.343712495
Debt/Equity 0.444317696 0.523722442
Return on Equity 0.171023771 0.217686381
Profit Margin 0.065811131 0.102243313
Return on Assets 0.121559926 0.145018187
Working Capital (Under Armour in Thousands/ Nike in Millions) 506056 7339
Current Ratio 3.756191213 2.854219303
*Under Armour Values in red for ease of reading
4
Ratio Explanations
Debt/Asset - For every dollar of assets owned by Under Armour, they have $0.31 of debt, while
Nike has $0.34 for each dollar of assets. Under Armour seems to have the advantage here.
Debt/Equity - For every dollar of equity for Under Armour they have $0.44 of debt, whereas
Nike has $0.52 of debt for each dollar of equity. Under Armour once again seems to have an
upper-hand here.
Return on Equity - For every dollar invested in equity Under Armour makes a profit of $0.17
(17%) while Nike makes $0.22 (22%) of profit. Though Nike ends up with higher debt, they
make money than Under Armour from equity.
Profit Margin - For every dollar of sales for Under Armour it made $0.06 of profit while Nike
made $0.10 of profit. Possible reasons of this difference may be due to Under Armour holding
profits down or Nike has lower expenses. Nike seems to make an overall higher profit than
Under Armour.
Return on Assets - For every dollar owned in assets by Under Armour it makes $0.12 while Nike
makes $0.15. Nike seems to make better use of their assets than Under Armour does.
Working Capital - Both companies have enough cash on hand to cover debt due in the next years.
Nike will naturally have to acquire a great amount of working capital to pay its larger debts in
comparison to Under Armour.
Current Ratio - For every dollar of debt due next year Under Armour has $3.76 assets easily
convertible to cash to pay that debt, while Nike has $2.85. Under Armour appears to have more
readily-convertible assets on hand than Nike does.
5
Summary of Management Discussion and Analysis
Under Armour
Management recognizes its growing revenues and claims its effects are due to an increase
in interest for their products, which is a direct result of progressive consumer demand for a
healthier lifestyle. They further this idea by mention of their clothing line which is known
primarily for its ability to “provide better performance by wicking perspiration away from the
skin, helping to regulate body temperature and enhancing comfort.”
It is also noted that Under Armour receives a large amount of their income from
operations in the last two quarters of the year, especially during the fall season, when demand of
their COLDGEAR line is high. The end of the discussion highlights and recognizes a recently
issued accounting standard which they believe “will not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.”
Nike
Nike proclaims its strategy as to “achieve long-term revenue growth by creating
innovative, ‘must have’ products, building deep personal consumer connections with our brands,
and delivering compelling retail presentation and experiences.” Revenues for fiscal 2011 have
increased 10% as compared to fiscal 2010. More specifically, its footwear and apparel revenue
increased 11% and 9%.
Several financial reports for several countries where they span influence are also
presented, North America generating the highest values, Europe coming in second, and China in
third. A separate section highlighting its concerns with foreign currency and exchange is
provided. Like Under Armour, recently adopted and issued accounting standards are mentioned
6
Common-Sized Income Statement
Account
Under Armour (in thousands) %Sales
Nike (in millions) %Sales
Revenue $1,472,684 1 $20,862 1
Total Revenue $1,472,684 1 $20,862 1
Costs and Expense Cost of Sales $759,848 0.515961 $11,354 0.544243
Gross Profit $712,836 0.484039 $9,508 0.455757
Op, Sales, Gen Admin Exp $550,069 0.373515 $6,693 0.320823
Income from Operations before Interest and Taxes $162,767 0.110524 $2,815 0.134934
Net Interest Expense $3,841 0.002608 $4 0.000192
Other Expense $2,064 0.001402 ($33) -0.00158
Earnings before Taxes $156,862 0.106514 $2,844 0.136324
Taxes $59,943 0.040703 $711 0.034081
Net Income $96,919 0.065811 $2,133 0.102243
*Under Armour Values in Red for Ease of Reading
7
Common-Sized Balance Sheet
Account Under Armour (in thousands)
% Total Assets
Nike (in millions)
% Total Assets
Assets Cash and Equiv $175,384 0.190798621 $1,955 0.130350713
Receivables $134,043 0.145824132 $3,138 0.209227897
Inventory $324,409 0.35292153 $2,715 0.181024137
Other $55,827 0.060733673 $3,489 0.232631017
Total Current Assets $689,663 0.750277956 $11,297 0.753233765
LT Assets Land $159,135 0.173121485 $2,115 0.141018803
PPE(net) $159,135 0.173121485 $2,115 0.141018803
Other Assets Intangible Assets $5,535 0.006021475 $487 0.032470996
Deferred Income Taxes $15,885 0.017281144 $894 0.059607948
Other LT Assets $48,992.00 0.053297941 $0 0
Goodwill $205 0.013668489
Total Other Assets $70,412.00 0.076600559 $1,586 0.105747433
Total Assets $919,210.00 1 $14,998 1
Liabilities Payables $100,527 0.109362387 $1,773 0.118215762
Accrued Expenses $69,285 0.075374506 0 0
Accrued Liabilities 0 0 $1,985 0.13235098 Current Maturity of LT Debt $6,882 0.007486864 $200 0.013335111
Other Current Liabilities $6,913 0.007520588 0 0
Total Current Liabilities $183,607 0.199744346 $3,958 0.263901854
Long Term Liabilities Long Term Debt 70,842 0.077068352 $276 0.018402454
Other LT Liabilities $28,329 0.030818855 $921 0.061408188
Total Long Term Liabilities $99,171 0.107887207 $1,197 0.079810641
Total Liabilities $282,778 0.307631553 $5,155 0.343712495
8
*Under Armour Values in Red for Ease of Reading
Stockholder's Equity
Common Stock 17 0.0000184 3 0.0002
Additional Paid-In Capital $268,223 0.291797304 3,944 0.26
Retained Earnings $366,164 0.398346406 $5,801 0.386784905
Other Income $2,028 0.002206242 $95 0.006334178
Total Stockholder's Equity $636,432 0.692368447 $9,843 0.656287505
Total Liabilities and SE $919,210 1 $14,998 1
9
Summary of Common-Sized Financial Statements
As noted earlier in the Summary of Findings earlier in this analysis, Nike is
ultimately the more-profitable business. Nike generates more revenue, gross profit,
earnings before taxes, and net income as the common-sized income statement
reveals. Every form of expense is, without doubt, higher in Nike’s entries in
comparison to Under Armour’s but this feature can be overlooked (though ,of
course, not completely and blindly) due to Nike’s overall level of profitability.
Upon looking at the common-sized balance sheet, several notable
differences can be seen. Under Armour holds a good portion of its assets in cash
and equivalents, which is a rather good trait in the face of liquidity. Nike clearly
owns more land in cash amounts. It may be interesting to note that both businesses
have a large portion of its assets in inventory, which should be a prominent feature
of manufacturers of clothing and sportswear, among other products. Nike has the
overall higher amount of total assets.
Nike has a significant portion of its current liabilities as a percentage of its
assets, making Under Armour in a possibly better position in case of sudden
liquidation. Under Armour also has the lower percentage in assets of its total
liabilities, again making Under Armour in a better position to pay off debt or
liabilities.