financial services committee qcongtt~~ of tbt 'cftnlttb ~tatt5 · 137 cannon house o'flce...

2
137 CANNON HOUSE O'flCE BUILOING WASHINGTON, DC 20516 SCOTT GARRETT 6"J1f DISlRtCT. NEW JEHSl:Y (202) 225-4465 F""', 1202} 226--9048 FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEE 286 H.....STOW.. ROAD MEMBER SUITE 104 of tbt 'Cftnlttb CAPITAL M"ftKETS, GL'" f1ooc. NJ 07452 GOVERNMENT SPONSORIO ENTERPRISES (201) 444-5454 SUOCOMMrnEE of. FA><: 1201} 444-5488 FJHANCIA.. INSnl'UTlONS ANO CONSUA1[ft CREDIT SUBCOMMITteE 93 MAIN ma.ubittntol1, J)o.: 20515-3005 N.WTOI<. NJ 07880 BUDGET COMMITTEE [9731390-2000 F",,: 1973) 300-1051 QoylGnrroU April 2010 ':; 0 :;:tJ :::_J c= ,r. The Honorable Mary L. Schapiro -0 (ij::c -O:;p. Chaitman 0-- I'.> ol!\ ::: :.0 u.s. Securities and Exchange COlmmssion '.:J :I: Ol, ",;> N 100 F NE 7-:·· ·<tN 6""': " =t: i T 1 DC 20549-1090 (Tl(/) ;. ...., 'I: ':! .-c.... c :..c N C') Dear Chairman Schapiro: +"" -., By many the markets for retail and institutional equity investors are as healthy as they have ever been. While I appreciate the Commission's recent efforts to undertake a comprehensive review of our nation's equity market structure, I want to ensure that this analysis stm1s from the vantage point of preserving or enhancing that which makes our equities trading mm'kets strong, and that change is not pursued purely or largely in response to extemal political pressures. As an independent, non-partisan agency the SecUlities and Exchange Commission has been entrusted with the responsibility to make its decisions based on prudent and disciplined analysis. It is a great responsibility and requires an adherence to a balanced and data- ch'iven, empirical approach to ensw'e that regulatory efforts focus on the most productive areas, Conceiving of a problem is not enough; empirical evidence needs to support the basis for l'egulatory A balanced empirical analysis must ensure that the basis for regulatory change properly accounts for the impact of such change on other areas of the marketplace. This requires balance in the framing of the issues and collection of the as well as the underlying analysis. The Equities Market Structure Concept Release published in January is a well drafted and thoughtful discussion document that accurately identifies many of the areas that have concemed investors and gained media attention within the last couple of years. It is concerning, that requests for comments respecting the interests oflong-tenn and shOlt-term investors seem to focus on a perceived conflict between such groups, with little to no reference to the clitical inter- dependency between these groups in the overall equities market structure. I am hopeful thatthe tone of such requests are not reflective of the Securities and Exchange Commission's analytical framework and would urge the Commission to consider that should it determine that additional . rule-making be the most successful outcome would be one that benefits this synergistic relationship as a whole. While it is critical to ensure faimess in our equities marketplace, the Commission must carefully balance the multitude of considerations (such as the effects on

Upload: others

Post on 09-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEE qcongtt~~ of tbt 'Cftnlttb ~tatt5 · 137 cannon house o'flce builoing washington, dc 20516 . scott garrett . 6"j1f dislrtct. new jehsl:y . f""', (202)

137 CANNON HOUSE O'flCE BUILOING WASHINGTON, DC 20516

SCOTT GARRETT 6"J1f DISlRtCT. NEW JEHSl:Y (202) 225-4465

F""', 1202} 226--9048 FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEE

286 H.....STOW.. ROAD RANKlt~O MEMBER

SUITE 104qcongtt~~ of tbt 'Cftnlttb ~tatt5CAPITAL M"ftKETS, l~u1tl\Hcr,~D GL'" f1ooc. NJ 07452GOVERNMENT SPONSORIO ENTERPRISES (201) 444-5454

SUOCOMMrnEE ~OU~t of. i\tpre~etltntibt~ FA><: 1201} 444-5488 FJHANCIA.. INSnl'UTlONS ANO CONSUA1[ft

CREDIT SUBCOMMITteE 93 MAIN ST~EETma.ubittntol1, J)o.: 20515-3005 N.WTOI<. NJ 07880 BUDGET COMMITTEE [9731390-2000

F",,: 1973) 300-1051

~.oll'ift QoylGnrroUApril ~2~ 2010

':; ~0

:;:tJ ~

:::_J c= ,r. ~., ~

The Honorable Mary L. Schapiro -0(ij::c -O:;p. ~ fg~

Chaitman 0-­ I'.> ol!\::: :.0u.s. Securities and Exchange COlmmssion '.:J :I: Ol,",;> N

100 F Street~ NE 7-:·· ·<tN 6""': "=t: iT 1

Washington~DC 20549-1090 (Tl(/) ;....., 'I: ':! .-c.... c

:..c N C')Dear Chairman Schapiro: +""-., ~

By many measurements~ the markets for retail and institutional equity investors are as healthy as they have ever been. While I appreciate the Commission's recent efforts to undertake a comprehensive review ofour nation's equity market structure, I want to ensure that this analysis stm1s from the vantage point ofpreserving or enhancing that which makes our equities trading mm'kets strong, and that change is not pursued purely or largely in response to extemal political pressures.

As an independent, non-partisan agency~ the SecUlities and Exchange Commission has been entrusted with the responsibility to make its decisions based on objective~prudent and disciplined analysis. It is a great responsibility and requires an adherence to a balanced and data­ch'iven, empirical approach to ensw'e that regulatory efforts focus on the most productive areas, Conceiving of a problem is not enough; empirical evidence needs to support the basis for l'egulatory chan~e.

A balanced empirical analysis must ensure that the basis for regulatory change properly accounts for the impact ofsuch change on other areas of the marketplace. This requires balance in the framing of the issues and collection of the data~ as well as the underlying analysis.

The Equities Market Structure Concept Release published in January is a well drafted and thoughtful discussion document that accurately identifies many ofthe areas that have concemed investors and gained media attention within the last couple ofyears. It is concerning, however~

that requests for comments respecting the interests oflong-tenn and shOlt-term investors seem to focus on a perceived conflict between such groups, with little to no reference to the clitical inter­dependency between these groups in the overall equities market structure. I am hopeful thatthe tone ofsuch requests are not reflective ofthe Securities and Exchange Commission's analytical framework and would urge the Commission to consider that should it determine that additional . rule-making be required~ the most successful outcome would be one that benefits this synergistic relationship as a whole. While it is critical to ensure faimess in our equities marketplace, the Commission must carefully balance the multitude ofconsiderations (such as the effects on

Page 2: FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEE qcongtt~~ of tbt 'Cftnlttb ~tatt5 · 137 cannon house o'flce builoing washington, dc 20516 . scott garrett . 6"j1f dislrtct. new jehsl:y . f""', (202)

market efficiency,liquidity and transparency) in conducting a cost-benefit analysis of any proposed regulation.

In closing, I support the Commission's efforts to ensure that our nation's regu~ations are responsive to equities marketplace developments, and appreciate the magnitude of the task it has undertaken. Because ofthe impact of this undertaking on the nation's capital markets, I urge the Commission to act in a prudent, balanced, deliberative fashion and to base its decisions on empirical data that not only supports the basis for change, but also the benefits to OUl' capital markets. In drawing conclusions from such data, I urge the Commission to use great caution with respect to altering the delicate balance that exists in the marketplace so as to minimize the risk of disrupting market efficiencies and liquidity to the detriment of the very retail investors sought to be advantaged.

Thank you for your consideration ofmy views.

Sincerely,

~A-af-Scott GalTett Member ofCongress