financial ratios - bwl.uni-mannheim.de · leading ratios, use analysts’ forecasts in the...

12
Bachelor thesis tutorial Financial Ratios Ernst Maug University of Mannheim http://cf.bwl.uni-mannheim.de [email protected] Tel: +49 (621) 181-1951

Upload: others

Post on 28-Sep-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Bachelor thesis tutorialFinancial Ratios

    Ernst MaugUniversity of Mannheim

    http://[email protected]: +49 (621) 181-1951

    http://cf.bwl.uni-mannheim.de/mailto:[email protected]

  • © 2015 E. Maug Corporate Finance I 2

    Valuation with multiples

    Many practitioners use multiples to value companies. Example: Price-Earnings ratio (P/E) Procedure:

    - Select set of comparable companies- Compute average P/E-ratio of comparables- Multiply earnings of company to be valued with average P/E of comparables- Done!

    Advantages: easy, no estimation of value drivers Problems: lots!

  • © 2015 E. Maug Corporate Finance I 3

    Popular multiples used for valuation

    Ratios for firm value (= debt + equity):- Value-to-sales ratio- Value-to-cash-flow ratio- Value-to-EBIT ratio- Value-to-EBITDA ratio- Market-to-book ratio (value over total assets)- Tobin's q (market value over replacement value)

    Ratios for equity value:- P/E ratio (price over net income)- Market-to-book ratio (price over book value of equity)

    Numerator and denominator should match!

  • © 2015 E. Maug Corporate Finance I 5

    Valuing a Company Using P/E-Multiples

    The three steps of using P/E multiples company valuation:1. Find sample of comparable companies2. Compute average of their P/E ratios3. Multiply earnings by average P/E from step 2

    Example: Daimler- Comparables: BMW, VW, Toyota, Renault, Fiat, (PSA)

    For calculations see Financial Ratios – Multiples.xls, tab “Valuation”.

    Averaging method Average Value ErrorMean 25.48 163.04 € 165%Median 10.74 68.71 € 12%Harmonic mean 12.57 80.44 € 31%Geometric mean 15.85 101.43 € 65%Actual values Daimler 9.61 61.53 € 0%

    VorführenderPräsentationsnotizenNote:This practice is called pricing by “comparables.”In order for this to work, consider the following DCF models:

    Now, if

    then pricing by comparables is the same as the DCF model.

    Data

    CompanyDaimlerBMWVWToyotaPSARenaultFiat

    Market Cap (mil)65,827 €56,956 €80,585 €158,424 €8,027 €17,335 €9,643 €

    P/E Ratio9.6110.719.0611.20neg.10.7485.67

    Latest earings per share6.40 €8.10 €18.69 €4.14 €neg.5.46 €0.09 €

    Latest dividend2.25 €2.60 €4.00 €1.16 €1.10 €1.72 €0.09 €

    Date of last dividend4/10/145/16/145/14/14n.a.in 20105/12/14in 2010

    Shares outstanding (mil)1,0706564763,4187832961,251

    Free float79,42%49,28%12,27%n.a.64,19%62,55%62,07%

    Stock price (24.09.2014)61.53 €86.79 €169.40 €46.35 €10.25 €58.62 €7.71 €

    Dividend per share (exp.)2.38 €2.89 €4.89 €1.18 €- 0 €1.92 €0.02 €

    Dividend yield (exp.)3.87%3.33%2.89%2.55%0.00%3.28%0.26%

    Total dividend (mil)2,546 €1,897 €2,326 €4,033 €- 0 €568 €25 €

    Valuation

    Averaging methodAverageValueError

    Mean25.48163.04 €165%

    Median10.7468.71 €12%

    Harmonic mean12.5780.44 €31%

    Geometric mean15.85101.43 €65%

    Actual values Daimler9.6161.53 €0%

    ComparablePE-ratio

    BMW10.71

    VW9.06

    Toyota11.20

    Renault10.74

    Fiat85.67

    PSAneg.

  • © 2015 E. Maug Corporate Finance I 9

    Lessons for the selection of comparables

    Multiples valuation avoids the estimation of cash flows, sales forecasts, margins, growth rates, payout ratios.

    Instead uses market assessment of all valuations combined Implicit assumption: comparable companies have:

    - Similar growth rates- Similar stage (fast growth / slow growth)- Similar margins- Similar cost of capital or cost of equity (leverage!)- Similar payout ratios

  • © 2015 E. Maug Corporate Finance I 10

    Popular financial ratios used for valuation

    Which numbers are used?- Always: current market prices in the numerator- For trailing ratios, use the latest historical number in the denominator.- For leading ratios, use analysts’ forecasts in the denominator.

    Some ratios are heavily influenced by accounting choices:- P/E ratio, EBIT ratio, EBITDA ratio- To get around this problem:

    Re-adjust earnings for special items Use ratios based on financial numbers "further up in the income statement",

    e.g. value-to-sales ratio.

  • © 2015 E. Maug Corporate Finance I 13

    Empirical evidence: Which ratios are successful?

    Liu, Nissim and Thomas (Journal of Accounting Research, 2002) perform a horse-race of different ratios:

    - For each firm, they use all firms from the same industry as comparables and calculate the average multiple.

    - Then they multiply this average multiple with the corresponding accounting number of the firm to be valued.

    - Finally, they compare the obtained value estimate with the firm’s market capitalization.

    Their findings are:- Multiples derived from earnings forecasts have the lowest pricing errors.- Multiples with historical earnings come second.- Cash flow and book value of equity are tied for third.- Sales perform worst.

  • © 2015 E. Maug Corporate Finance I 14

    Repeated for - 26,613 firm-year observations between 1982 and 1999 - for 19 different types of multiples.- Measure of accuracy: Absolute difference between estimated value and market

    value Their findings are:

    - Multiples derived from earnings forecasts have the lowest pricing errors.- Multiples with historical earnings come second.- Cash flow and book value of equity are tied for third.- Sales perform worst.

  • © 2015 E. Maug Corporate Finance I 15

    Empirical evidence: Which ratios are successful?

    Other finding: Harmonic mean results in lower errors than arithmetic mean or median.

    - Harmonic mean:

    ( )−

    =

    =

    ∑1

    1

    1

    n

    h ii

    m n x

    - Arithmetic mean:

    =

    = ∑1

    1 na i

    im x

    n

    - These results are consistent across years and industries.

  • © 2015 E. Maug Corporate Finance I 16

    Dittmann, Maug (WP 2005) also include median and geometric mean:

    =

    ==∏ 1/1

    i n ng ii

    m x ( ){ }=

    =

    = =

    1

    1exp ln exp lni n

    i a ii

    x m xn

    Analyze percentage errors and log errors:

    Benchmark against „dummy procedures“:- Set market value = book value, or equal to $1

    -2

    -1.5

    -1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    -100

    %-9

    3%-8

    6%-7

    9%-7

    2%-6

    5%-5

    8%-5

    1%-4

    4%-3

    7%-3

    0%-2

    3%-1

    6% -9%

    -2% 5% 12%

    19%

    26%

    33%

    40%

    47%

    Percentage error

    Loga

    rithm

    ic e

    rror

    i

    i

    i

    iiP MV

    MVeMV

    MVMVe^

    ln,^

    log =−

    =

    Diagramm1

    -1

    -0.99

    -0.98

    -0.97

    -0.96

    -0.95

    -0.94

    -0.93

    -0.92

    -0.91

    -0.9

    -0.89

    -0.88

    -0.87

    -0.86

    -0.85

    -0.84

    -0.83

    -0.82

    -0.81

    -0.8

    -0.79

    -0.78

    -0.77

    -0.76

    -0.75

    -0.74

    -0.73

    -0.72

    -0.71

    -0.7

    -0.69

    -0.68

    -0.67

    -0.66

    -0.65

    -0.64

    -0.63

    -0.62

    -0.61

    -0.6

    -0.59

    -0.58

    -0.57

    -0.56

    -0.55

    -0.54

    -0.53

    -0.52

    -0.51

    -0.5

    -0.49

    -0.48

    -0.47

    -0.46

    -0.45

    -0.44

    -0.43

    -0.42

    -0.41

    -0.4

    -0.39

    -0.38

    -0.37

    -0.36

    -0.35

    -0.34

    -0.33

    -0.32

    -0.31

    -0.3

    -0.29

    -0.28

    -0.27

    -0.26

    -0.25

    -0.24

    -0.23

    -0.22

    -0.21

    -0.2

    -0.19

    -0.18

    -0.17

    -0.16

    -0.15

    -0.14

    -0.13

    -0.12

    -0.11

    -0.1

    -0.09

    -0.08

    -0.07

    -0.06

    -0.05

    -0.04

    -0.03

    -0.02

    -0.01

    7.52869988573934E-16

    0.01

    0.02

    0.03

    0.04

    0.05

    0.06

    0.07

    0.08

    0.09

    0.1

    0.11

    0.12

    0.13

    0.14

    0.15

    0.16

    0.17

    0.18

    0.19

    0.2

    0.21

    0.22

    0.23

    0.24

    0.25

    0.26

    0.27

    0.28

    0.29

    0.3

    0.31

    0.32

    0.33

    0.34

    0.35

    0.36

    0.37

    0.38

    0.39

    0.4

    0.41

    0.42

    0.43

    0.44

    0.45

    0.46

    0.47

    0.48

    0.49

    0.5

    Percentage error

    Logarithmic error

    -13.815510558

    -4.605070191

    -3.9119730067

    -3.5065245645

    -3.2188508252

    -2.9957122738

    -2.8133940502

    -2.6592457513

    -2.5257161444

    -2.4079344976

    -2.302575093

    -2.2072658223

    -2.1202552029

    -2.0402131362

    -1.9661057135

    -1.8971133182

    -1.8325752138

    -1.7719509596

    -1.7147928726

    -1.6607259437

    -1.6094329124

    -1.5606429864

    -1.5141231872

    -1.4696716222

    -1.427112189

    -1.3862903611

    -1.3470698018

    -1.3093296163

    -1.2729621044

    -1.2378709077

    -1.203969471

    -1.1711797557

    -1.1394311582

    -1.1086595942

    -1.0788067202

    -1.0498192674

    -1.0216484698

    -0.9942495706

    -0.9675813947

    -0.9416059758

    -0.9162882319

    -0.8915956803

    -0.8674981868

    -0.8439677447

    -0.8209782793

    -0.798505474

    -0.7765266156

    -0.7550204566

    -0.7339670917

    -0.7133478471

    -0.6931451806

    -0.6733425925

    -0.6539245443

    -0.6348763856

    -0.6161842876

    -0.5978351826

    -0.5798167095

    -0.5621171638

    -0.5447254513

    -0.5276310472

    -0.5108239571

    -0.4942946825

    -0.478034188

    -0.4620338723

    -0.4462855401

    -0.4307813776

    -0.4155139288

    -0.4004760741

    -0.3856610102

    -0.3710622321

    -0.3566735154

    -0.3424889005

    -0.3285026781

    -0.314709375

    -0.3011037414

    -0.2876807391

    -0.2744355299

    -0.2613634654

    -0.2484600772

    -0.2357210677

    -0.2231423013

    -0.2107197967

    -0.1984497192

    -0.1863283734

    -0.1743521967

    -0.162517753

    -0.1508217269

    -0.1392609179

    -0.1278322351

    -0.1165326927

    -0.1053594045

    -0.0943095806

    -0.083380522

    -0.0725696176

    -0.0618743399

    -0.0512922418

    -0.0408209529

    -0.0304581766

    -0.0202016869

    -0.0100493258

    0.000001

    0.009951321

    0.0198036077

    0.0295597731

    0.0392216747

    0.0487911165

    0.0582698515

    0.0676595831

    0.0769619671

    0.0861786137

    0.0953110889

    0.1043609162

    0.1133295782

    0.1222185177

    0.1310291396

    0.1397628119

    0.1484208672

    0.1570046035

    0.1655152859

    0.1739541475

    0.1823223901

    0.1906211861

    0.1988516784

    0.2070149824

    0.2151121861

    0.2231443513

    0.2311125146

    0.2390176879

    0.2468608592

    0.2546429936

    0.2623650337

    0.2700279006

    0.2776324942

    0.2851796941

    0.2926703602

    0.3001053332

    0.307485435

    0.3148114698

    0.3220842238

    0.3293044666

    0.3364729509

    0.3435904136

    0.3506575758

    0.3576751436

    0.364643808

    0.3715642461

    0.3784371207

    0.3852630811

    0.3920427635

    0.3987767911

    0.4054657748

    Tabelle1

    No.TagInhaltAnwendungenQuelle

    1MontagValue drivers36Who is who, cash flow calculationsCF1 - 02

    2Cost of capital3268CF1 - 03

    3DienstagDCF31Warren BuffetCF1 - 04

    4Capital structure & APV3667CF1 - 12

    5MittwochResidual income27Excel Übung: NetscapeCF1 - 06Alternative: BHP-Rio

    6Financial ratios15CF1 - 06Additionally: Case on financial ratios

    7International valuation2769CF3 - 12

    8DonnerstagEvent studies34Rexford StudiosCF1 - 10

    9Leasing1549KM - 9

    10FreitagRisk management23Thyssen KruppCF3 - 11

    11IPOs2548CF1 - 08

    30118.8125

    AssignmentGreat Eastern Toys

    Yell group

    Tabelle2

    ErrorLog error

    -100%-13.815510558

    -99%-4.605070191

    -98%-3.9119730067

    -97%-3.5065245645

    -96%-3.2188508252

    -95%-2.9957122738

    -94%-2.8133940502

    -93%-2.6592457513

    -92%-2.5257161444

    -91%-2.4079344976

    -90%-2.302575093

    -89%-2.2072658223

    -88%-2.1202552029

    -87%-2.0402131362

    -86%-1.9661057135

    -85%-1.8971133182

    -84%-1.8325752138

    -83%-1.7719509596

    -82%-1.7147928726

    -81%-1.6607259437

    -80%-1.6094329124

    -79%-1.5606429864

    -78%-1.5141231872

    -77%-1.4696716222

    -76%-1.427112189

    -75%-1.3862903611

    -74%-1.3470698018

    -73%-1.3093296163

    -72%-1.2729621044

    -71%-1.2378709077

    -70%-1.203969471

    -69%-1.1711797557

    -68%-1.1394311582

    -67%-1.1086595942

    -66%-1.0788067202

    -65%-1.0498192674

    -64%-1.0216484698

    -63%-0.9942495706

    -62%-0.9675813947

    -61%-0.9416059758

    -60%-0.9162882319

    -59%-0.8915956803

    -58%-0.8674981868

    -57%-0.8439677447

    -56%-0.8209782793

    -55%-0.798505474

    -54%-0.7765266156

    -53%-0.7550204566

    -52%-0.7339670917

    -51%-0.7133478471

    -50%-0.6931451806

    -49%-0.6733425925

    -48%-0.6539245443

    -47%-0.6348763856

    -46%-0.6161842876

    -45%-0.5978351826

    -44%-0.5798167095

    -43%-0.5621171638

    -42%-0.5447254513

    -41%-0.5276310472

    -40%-0.5108239571

    -39%-0.4942946825

    -38%-0.478034188

    -37%-0.4620338723

    -36%-0.4462855401

    -35%-0.4307813776

    -34%-0.4155139288

    -33%-0.4004760741

    -32%-0.3856610102

    -31%-0.3710622321

    -30%-0.3566735154

    -29%-0.3424889005

    -28%-0.3285026781

    -27%-0.314709375

    -26%-0.3011037414

    -25%-0.2876807391

    -24%-0.2744355299

    -23%-0.2613634654

    -22%-0.2484600772

    -21%-0.2357210677

    -20%-0.2231423013

    -19%-0.2107197967

    -18%-0.1984497192

    -17%-0.1863283734

    -16%-0.1743521967

    -15%-0.162517753

    -14%-0.1508217269

    -13%-0.1392609179

    -12%-0.1278322351

    -11%-0.1165326927

    -10%-0.1053594045

    -9%-0.0943095806

    -8%-0.083380522

    -7%-0.0725696176

    -6%-0.0618743399

    -5%-0.0512922418

    -4%-0.0408209529

    -3%-0.0304581766

    -2%-0.0202016869

    -1%-0.0100493258

    0%0.000001

    1%0.009951321

    2%0.0198036077

    3%0.0295597731

    4%0.0392216747

    5%0.0487911165

    6%0.0582698515

    7%0.0676595831

    8%0.0769619671

    9%0.0861786137

    10%0.0953110889

    11%0.1043609162

    12%0.1133295782

    13%0.1222185177

    14%0.1310291396

    15%0.1397628119

    16%0.1484208672

    17%0.1570046035

    18%0.1655152859

    19%0.1739541475

    20%0.1823223901

    21%0.1906211861

    22%0.1988516784

    23%0.2070149824

    24%0.2151121861

    25%0.2231443513

    26%0.2311125146

    27%0.2390176879

    28%0.2468608592

    29%0.2546429936

    30%0.2623650337

    31%0.2700279006

    32%0.2776324942

    33%0.2851796941

    34%0.2926703602

    35%0.3001053332

    36%0.307485435

    37%0.3148114698

    38%0.3220842238

    39%0.3293044666

    40%0.3364729509

    41%0.3435904136

    42%0.3506575758

    43%0.3576751436

    44%0.364643808

    45%0.3715642461

    46%0.3784371207

    47%0.3852630811

    48%0.3920427635

    49%0.3987767911

    50%0.4054657748

    Tabelle2

    Percentage error

    Logarithmic error

    Tabelle3

  • © 2015 E. Maug Corporate Finance I 17

    Empirical evidence (2):

    Results of empirical analysis and simulations of Dittmann, Maug (WP 2005):- Harmonic mean is biased downward, about as much as arithmetic mean is biased

    upward.- Geometric mean and median are both good.

  • © 2015 E. Maug Corporate Finance I 18

    Conclusion

    Multiples provide a short-cut. Rely on comparability:

    - Companies from the same industry- Really companies with similar value drivers!

    Averaging methods matter! Recommended reading: Titman and Martin, Valuation: the Art and Science of

    Corporate Investment Decisions, Chapter 6.

    Bachelor thesis tutorial�Financial RatiosValuation with multiplesPopular multiples used for valuationValuing a Company Using P/E-MultiplesLessons for the selection of comparablesPopular financial ratios used for valuationEmpirical evidence: �Which ratios are successful?Foliennummer 14Empirical evidence: �Which ratios are successful?Foliennummer 16Empirical evidence (2):Conclusion