financial and production context highway simplification study q & a bruce a. van note deputy...

• Financial and Production Context

• Highway Simplification Study

• Q & A

Bruce A. Van NoteDeputy Commissioner

Study Kickoff AgendaStudy Kickoff Agenda

Common QuestionCommon Question

You have all that gas tax, You have all that gas tax, bond , and stimulus bond , and stimulus

money . . .money . . .

where’s it all going?where’s it all going?

ContextContext

Context: FinancialContext: Financial

MaineDOTSources of All Funds - High Level

$1,183 Million for 2 Years (FY10-11)PL 2009, c 413 & 414

(reduced by estimated statewide admin cuts)

Highway Fund, $470.7M, 39%

TransCap 10 year cash, $42.0M, 4%Federal Funds, $365.0M, 31%

All Bonding, $254.8M, 22%

Other, $50.7M, 4%


MaineDOT Only - All Funds - 2 Years (FY10-11)Sources of All Funds - More Detail (Highway, Federal, Bond, etc)

PL 2009, c 413 & 414$1,183 Mi l l ion (reduced by est. statewide admin cuts)

Highway Fund - state cash, $470.7M, 40%

TransCap 10 year cash, $42.0M, 4%Federal Cash - HW&B (Flexible & HPP),

$335.8M, 28%

Federal - Other, $29.2M, 2%

GO Bonds, $69.8M, 6%

GARVEE Bond, $50.0M, 4%

Bridge TransCap Bond, $105.0M, 9%

Highway TransCap Bond, $30.0M, 3%

STAR, $13.0M, 1%

Local, $24.7M, 2%

Other, $13.0M, 1%


MaineDOT Only - All Funds - 2 Years (FY10-11)Uses of All Funds - More Detail


Multimodal, $115.3M, 10%URIP - Local Capital, $45.0M, 4%

Administration, $24.1M, 2%

Maintenance and Operations, $277.4M, 23%

Highway and Bridge Capital, $720.2M, 61%


MaineDOT Only - All Funds - 2 Years (FY10-11)Uses of All Funds - More Detail


HW&B Capital - Personal Services, $97.8M, 8%

HW&B Capital - from Highw ay Fund (Cash),

$4.2M, 0%

HW&B Capital - All Other, $151.6M, 13%

Administration, $24.1M, 2%

URIP - Local Capital, $45.0M, 4%

M&O All Other, $96.6M, 8%

M&O Personal Services, $179.4M, 15%

HW&B Light Capital -, $9.0M, 1%

HW&B Capital - Capital, $457.6M, 39%

Ferry & Ports, $19.2M, 2%

Transit PS & AO, $32.1M, 3%

Transit Capital, $8.0M, 1%

Air PS & AO, $3.4M, 0%

Air Capital, $0.6M, 0%

Rail, $3.5M, 0%

Dow neaster Support, $20M, 2%

Multimodal Capital, $28.2M, 2%

Callahan, $0.5M, 0%

Context: Legislative Action on Context: Legislative Action on Capital FundingCapital Funding

SUMMARYSUMMARY

• Capital funding came in as planned, but is Capital funding came in as planned, but is down big from last biennium.down big from last biennium.

• It comes with more strings attached. More It comes with more strings attached. More long term (10 yr+) capital funding long term (10 yr+) capital funding (bonding, TransCAP cash).(bonding, TransCAP cash).

• Much less light capital funding (10 yr-) Much less light capital funding (10 yr-) (MST, etc).(MST, etc).

Context:Context:Capital Funding: Plan vs. ActualCapital Funding: Plan vs. Actual

Transportation Need in Context:MaineDOT Highway & Bridge Capital Funding & Need

42

20

55 50

5050

105 105

83.8 74.4

34

21.2

315.4 318.2

20.2 10.9

155

25

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Planned

$698,434,762 $701,742,553

Actual

Context:Context:Capital Funding TrendsCapital Funding Trends

Transportation Need in Context:MaineDOT Highway & Bridge Capital Funding & Need

Unmet Need Unmet Need Unmet

Need

Unmet Need

Unmet Need

UnmetNeed

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

10 Year Unmet Need: $3+ Billion (est.) FY10 to FY19

FY 2004-2005 FY 2006-2007 FY 2008-2009 FY 2010-2011 FY 2012-2013 FY 2014-2015 FY 2016-2017 FY 2018-2019

Context:Context:Resulting Capital Work Resulting Capital Work

AdjustmentsAdjustments This Year’s MST cut from 406 to 254 miles, This Year’s MST cut from 406 to 254 miles, – 37%– 37%

Next Year’s MST cut from 580 to 0 miles, Next Year’s MST cut from 580 to 0 miles, – 100%– 100%

Rescoping / estimating of PPP Program: Reduction Rescoping / estimating of PPP Program: Reduction of $7Mof $7M

Multimodal Program cut by $37.5M.Multimodal Program cut by $37.5M.

The rest of the 2010-11 CWP should proceed as The rest of the 2010-11 CWP should proceed as planned.planned.

FY are based on delivery which is considered to be advertise for bid.

Highway & Bridge Capital Program by Project Type

$198

$83

$176 $207

$181

$152

$253

$103

$104

$73

$133

$96

$16

$38

$44

$9

$39

$29

$71

$62

$68

$44

$64

$58

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

FY04-FY05 FY06-FY07 FY08-FY09 FY10-FY11

Multimodal

Operational & Safety

MST

Pavement Preservation

Highway Construction

Bridge

Context:Context:Capital Funding By Work TypeCapital Funding By Work Type

Bridge Dollars / # Bridges Trend

$198

$82

$176

$207, +18%

93

55

94

126, +34%

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250


Mill

ion

s

FY04-FY05 Includes Penobscot Narrow s Bridge

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Bri

dg

es

$

# Bridges


Includes $28M Accelerated Bridge (Yellow Handout)

Context:Context:Production TrendsProduction Trends


Highway Construction Dollars / MilesTrend

$181

$253

$155$103, -60%

172

126150

34, -77%

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300


Mill

ion

s

FY08-FY09 Includes both I-295 SB and I-295 NB

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Mil

es

$

Miles


Highway Operations, Safety & Other Dollars / # Projects Trend

$42

$30

$71 $62, +13%

143

101

154, -4%160

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

$80


Mill

ion

s

Includes intersection/ramp improvements, signals, signing, striping, and misc safety improvements

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Mil

es

$

# Projects



Pavement Preservation / Rehabilitation Dollars/Miles Trend

$72

$133

$96, -22%$101

657

584

254, -57%

352

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

$140


Millio

ns

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Mil

es

$

Miles




Maintenance Surface Treatment Dollars / Miles Trend

$16

$38

$44

$9, -80%

718

865 878

254, -71%

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

$30

$35

$40

$45

$50


Mil

lio

ns

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

Mil

es

$

Miles


Financial and Production Financial and Production Context:Context:

The Bottom LineThe Bottom Line•The transportation world has

changed.

•Funding limitations will necessitate prioritization of efforts.

•We should talk about prioritization and roles before it happens.

•There are opportunities to work together better, if we talk.

• Complexity rules!

• Two classification systems

• Roles shared / unclear

• Finger pointing - poor service

• Renter problem

Highway Simplification StudyHighway Simplification StudyWhy?Why?

• Federal funding and rules

• Resulting standards

• Local Yankee ingenuity

• Prioritization required

• Conversation needed

Highway Simplification StudyHighway Simplification StudyWhy?Why?

• This is not 1981!

• No predetermined result

• MMA fully engaged

• One possibility discussed - Major / minor collectors

Highway Simplification StudyHighway Simplification StudyWhat?What?

• Improvement standards

• Gradual transition, if at all

• Funding (URIP) changes?

• Remove capital requirement?

Highway Simplification StudyHighway Simplification StudyWhat?What?

• Lots of it – open and inclusive

• 3 – 12 months

• Sounding Board, 50+

• Policy Working Group – 15+

• Technical Subcommittees

Highway Simplification StudyHighway Simplification StudyProcessProcess

• MMA Legislative Policy Com.

• Commissioner – Governor

• Legislation

Highway Simplification StudyHighway Simplification StudyProcessProcess

• Process just starting

• Open, up-front process

• If questions or rumors, ask

• Partnership always required

Highway Simplification StudyHighway Simplification StudyThe Bottom LineThe Bottom Line

Comments?

Concerns?

Questions?

Highway Simplification StudyHighway Simplification Study

financial and production context highway simplification study q & a bruce a. van note deputy...

Documents

bond funds

funds high levelpl

years fy10

statewide admin cuts10

transit capital

air capital

highway fund budget

multimodal capital