final rpt on a kimberlite explo programme chapleau …

PRODUCING MINES

1 Canadian Johns-Manville Co, Ltd. Reeves mine (Ob 9b}...... asb2 Noranda hxploration Co. Ltd./New JoburKe Explorations Ltd.

New Jobufke mine (Ob 9d).. ... ,..... ,..... ... .., ,., ... ,.,. Au

PAST PRODUCING MINES

3 Halcrow-Swayze mine J Os 'Oaj.,4 Jerome mine (Ob 1Gb)...............................,5 Renabie mine (Na 9c).

6 Smith-Thorne mine/Tionaga mine (Ob I3a)....,..,.,..

THE MAP INDEX

Thrj red lcitors and numbers in the horders provide a location reference system based on that of Map 2310, Ontario Mineral Map, 1974.

MINERAL PRODUCTION AND RESOURCES

The area contains deposits of antimony, apatite, asbestos, barite, copper, gold, iron, lead, molybdenum, niobium and other rare earths, talc, thori jm, uranium, and zinc. Production at the end of 1970 was solely of asbestos, bul by 1973 gold was being produced at the New Joburke Explorations Ltd. property by Noranda Exploration Co. Ltd.

Early exploration included work on the Woman River iron formation in 1910. By the 1960's Stackpool Mining Company Limited indicated reserves o' 5,100,000 Ions of iron ore grading 40^ iron and Kukatush Mining Corporation (Ontario) Limited indicated reserves of 158,000,000 tons of ST.8% acid soluble iron in the Radio Hill iron formation in Penhorwood Township.

The Renabie mine in Leeson Township produced 776,191 oz. Au, 245,146 oz. Ag ovor the period 1947 to July, ",970. Reserves as of 1970 were 157,704 tons grading 0.211 oz./tcn Au. The Jerome mine of Jerome Gold Mines Limited in Osway Township produced 56,973oz. Au and 15,'04oz, Ag between 1941 end 1943. In 1968 when production started at the Canadian Johns-Manville Company Limited, Rcevos mine ore reserves were established at 20,000,OCO tons with an asbestos fibre content of 3 to

Dominion Gulf Company holds claims covering the Nemegosenda Lake carbonatite-alkalic complex, which contains a mineralized zone of 20,000,000 tons grading G.47% Nb20s, By-product production of U, Th, rare earths, zirconium, apatite and magnetite would be possible upon development.

Multi-Minerals Limited holds ground on the lackner Lake carbonatite-alkalic complex, which has three mineralized zones grading as follows: zones No. 3 anci 4-37,000,000 tons of D.198% NbaOs, M .3% a patite and 13.77^ magnetite; zone 6 - 5,02-1,250 tors grading 69.6^ rmgr.elile, 21.9^ apatite and Q.173% NbaO;,; and zone 8 - 80,000,000 tons grading Q.25% Nb2Os.

Several base metal occurrences ere known. The Consolidated Shunsby Mines Limited deposit in Cunningham Township com prises a mineralised zone of 310,095 tons grading T.2% Cu, and 1.3?SZn.

Ailimns MapIMSR S HnarRt-Kariuskasinn Sheet

^.w x

Lake f l PUSKUTA i\

Nf ' E L

MONTCALM E'f

\ 69 LERWICK

Lougheed^ Lakes--——;

7a

Shiners-"?Lake1 ' Shiner!!. J•tr'A^r*—-MafMrf., .a^fl.^....,,..,——4XT^lsvV'^ ^*fc

j1 J . \ "yv ^ o a,aai rr.iyri'.id ; , w-r^ \ ST^X X/^ 5' BARcUte^"v / ^ X a\ BARCLA^cT^,.y^ ,^/ \ ,,f^r^5 if

\V s*\\i V ..^ \Reftbie T S

J J/^

COLLISHAW

GEOLOGICAL RELIABILITY DIAGRAM

A DelailBU rrisppiny, sualas grealer than I" to '/l mileB Sfimt-dRtailrd mapping; r,r.nlpR le^i than 1"' to l mileC Mostly unmepped, but some airborne reconnaissance

JEFFR&"——~

Map 2221Chapleau-FoleyetGeological Compilation Series

HOW TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Published geological maps used as reference material during the preparaiiOT of this map are indicated on Index Maps 2079. 2080 and 2081 of the Division of Mines, Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto and on Index Sheets 41 and 42. Geological Survey of Canada. Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa.

Four uncoloured preliminary geological maps at scale of one inch to two miles were produced following Operation Chapleau, a helicopter supported reconnaissance mapping project covering the nap sheet. These are: P.B72 Missinaibi Lake Sheet, P.673 Horwood Lake Sheet, P.674 Chapleau Shoe! and P.7fi5 Opeepees- way-Rocky Island Lakes Sheet.

Published geological reports covering this sheet are listed in Bulletin 26 and Supplements, Division of Mines, Ministry of Natural Resources and in the Index of Publications, Geological Survey o! Canada.

Aeromagnetic maps covering this sheet may be obtained from the Director, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, or Mines Publications OfficG, Ministry of Natural Rescjrces, Parliament Buildings, Toronto M7A 1W3.

Topographic mops of the area are available aL a scale nf one inch to two miles, 1:250,000 and 1:50,000 from the Lands Publications Office, Mhistry of Natural Resources and the Topographic Survey, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa.

Air photographs at a scalu of one inch to one quarter mile are available from: Photo Library, Administrative Services Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto. Air photographs at a scale of one inch to ore mile are available from National Air Photo graphic Library, Department of Enercy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa.

The name and ownership of many mineral occurrence on ihis sheet are given on Map 2310, Ontario Mineral Map, 1974.

Information on geology and mineral occurrences may be obtained al the offices of the Regional Geologisfs at Timmins and Sault Ste. Marie and al Lhe office of the Resident Geologist in Sudbury.

Mining claim maps and general information on properties may be obtained at the offices of the Min.ng Recorders at Timmins, Sault Ste. Marie and SLdbjry or at the Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto.

Up-tc-date information on currenl developments may he obtained from the annual review of the Division ol Mines and the Annual Report of Regional and Resident Geologists at Timmins, Sault Ste. Marie and Sudbury, published annually.

LEGEND

PHANEROZOIC

CENOZOIC

QUATERNARY

PLEISTOCENE AND RECENT Ti!l, day, sand, gravel.

UNCONFORMITY

MESOZOIC

LATE JURASSIC TO EARLY CRETACEOUS*

J? lamprophyre dikes.

INTRUSIVE CONTACT

PRECAMBRIAN

LATE PRECAMBRIAN

MAFIC TO INTERMEDIATE INTRUSIVE ROCKS*

J ia Hornblende syenite.11b Syenodiorite and diorite.He Hornblende monzonite.lid Porphyritic hornblende diorite,

quartz diorite, and gabbro (plagio clase porphyry).

ne Malic hornfels.

CARBONATITE-ALKALIC COMPLEXES6

Wa Alkalic syenite, pulaskite.JQb Brecciated alkalic syenite anri re

lated rock types.lOc Fenitized rocks.lOd Massive mafic nepheline syenite

(malignite).lOe Massive to foliated nepheline sye

nite and related rocks,Wf Sovite (caidtc-rich carbonatite).10g Magnetite-apatite rock.IQri Urtite, ijolite, melteigite (nepheline-

pyroxene rocks).INTRUSIVE CONTACT

EARLY TO MIDDLE PRECAMBRIAN

MAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

9 Diabase dikes.

INTRUSIVE CONTACT

EARLY P RECAMBRIAN

SHAWMERE ANORTHOSITE COMPLEX

8a Anorthosite lo gabbroic anortnosite.8b Anorthosi'e gabbro.8c Gabbro.8d Brecciated anorthosite lo gabbroic

rocks. Se Gneissic lo ftaser-texfured tons/its

and monzonite.

INTRUSIVE CONTACT

KAPUSKASING STRUCTURAL ZONE ROCKS

7s Meia-igneouK rncKs (metamof-ohosed mafic to intermediate intru sive rocks).

7b Melanocratic granulite (pyroxene-quartz-hornbiende-plagiccfasegranulite),

7c Pelitic and psammitic granuli/es(riyroxene-garnet-quartz-fetdspargranulite),

7d Metasedimentary gneiss, includingintercalations of metavolcanicgneiss (metamorphosed !o uppciamphibolite facies),

7e Arkosic metasedimenls.FAULT CONTACT

FELSIC IGNEOUS AND METAMORPHIC ROCKSC

Felsic Intrusive and Hybrid Rocksc5 Unsubcfivided.d6a Massive to weekly foliated, biotite

and hornblende trondhjemite, gran odiorite, and minor quarlt (fiorite.

6h Gneissic, biotite and hornblendetrondhjemite, granodiorite, and mi nor quartz diorite,

6c Massive to weakly foliated, horn blende and biotite quartz-mon zo nite.

Sd Gneissic biotite and hornblendequar 1 1 -monzonite.

6e Syenitic rocks. 6f Pegmatite, aptite. Sg Augen gneiss. Sh Hornblende granodiorite lo diorite

(In part hybrid rocks). 6/ Porphyritic granitic loci's.

INTRUSIVE OR GRADATIONAL CONTACT

Migmatilic Rocksc5 UnsuMivided.dHa Migmatite with rnetavolcanic paleo-

cf quartz-feldspar -horn blende gneiss; veined with more than 25^ granitic material (neosomef).

Sb Migmatite with metaseciimeritttry paleosome^ of biotite-quartz-feldspar gneiss; veined with more than ?5X g ranitic, material (neosomef).

INTRUSIVE CONTACT

MAFIC AND ULTRAMAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS

4 Unsubdivided**- 4a Diorite and gabbro. 4b Ultramafic rocks and their serpent-

inized equivalents, minor gabbro.INTRUSIVE CONTACT

METASEDIMENTSff

3 Unsubdividedd-3a Gieywacke, arkose, quartzite.Sh Conglomerate.3c Argillaceous, fine-grained metased-

iments. 3d Biotite-Quarlz-fe/dspar schist and

sneiss. 3e Migmstized metasediment* (W-

P'5% granitic material).

METAVOLCANICSP

Telsic to Intermediate Metavolcanics2 Unsubdividedd-?a Rhyolite to dacite Hows and frag

mental rocks.Sb Tuff, banded tuff, and lapilli-tuff.2c Agglomerate, breccia.2d Porphyritic flows, quartz-feldspar

porphyry,

Mafic to Intermediate Metavolcanics

la Basalt to andesite flows end por phyritic flows, massive to foliated.

Ib Basalt to andesite pillow lava.le Mafic pyroclastic rocks,1d Layered amphibolite.Je D iorite, gabbro (coarse-grained

flows or intrusions).1g Migmstiied mafic metavolcanics

(ID-25% granitic material).

IF Ircn formation (associated with 1, P and 3 map units).

S Sulphide mineralization.

3Based on correlation with radiometricali/ dated lam- prophyres at Cora! Rapids on the Abitibi River.

^Relative ages unknown, radiometric ages equivalent; these rock map units appear to be spatially associated with the KzcuskasinQ Structural Zone.

cUnits 5 and 6 distinguished in part en the basis of aeromagnetic data: therefore, outcrops of unit 5 will occur in areas of unit 6 and vice versa.

dRoch identification based on airborne observation.

eMeJanocratic portions of migmatite, consisting of fragments arid inclusions of country rock.

^Leucocratic portion of migmatite.

SAge relationships bclwccn units 1, 2 and3 unknown.

The letter "C" preceding a rock unit number, for example "GJ", indicates interpretation is based upon geophysical data only.

The letter "D" preceding a rock unit number, for example "DI", indicates idenli!icalian from diamond drill core. i

Scale, l inch to 2M miles

N.T.S. reference 410,42 l

S YM BOLS

Geological boundary.

Synclinal a r/'s.

Anticlinal axis.

Fault.

Lineament.

Altitude in feet above mean sea level.

Railway, with station or f/agstop.

Provincial highway.

Other road.

Aircraft landing facilities.

Larger community.

Smaller community.

Producing mine.

Pas! producing mine.

Mineral occurrence.

Mining Division with boundary.

District boundary.

Township boundary, meridian or base line, surveyed.

Township boundary, un-juivcyerl.

Line ot section.

MAP COMPILATION SOURCES

Geology and revised compilation by P.C. Thurston. R.P. Sage and G.M. Siragusa, and assistants. Geological Branch 1970. 1971 and 1974. Original compilation by H.D. Carlson, Resident Geol ogist, Timmins and J.F. Donovan, 1965.

Geology from published maps and assessment /iles of the Division of Mines, Ministry ol Natural Resources; published maps o! the Geological Survey of Canada and unpublished maps of mining companies.

Cattoyraphy by D.W. Robot-on and assistants, Surveys and Mapping Branch, 1975.

Map base compiled from maps ol the Forest Resources inventory, and the Provincial Topographic Series, sheets 4SBJNW, 42BfSW, 428ISE, Division of Lands, Ministry of Natural Resources, with additional in formation from the staff of the Ministry of Natural Resources.

METAL AND MINERAL

Ag.. ap... As... asb.. Au., ba... herh, Bi... Cu..

gf.'!!Mo

REFERENCE

.Silver

.Apatite

. Arsenic

. Asbestos

.Gold.Barite. Berthierite.Bismuth

. Copper

. Iron

.Graphite

. Molybdenum

mo. . ....jNb......,./Ni..,...,./Pb....... . tfl.........tRA ;

RE...... jSb..,..,..,Th.,....,jT\........-,U....,....[Zn.,.,....;

Molybdenite

NickelLeadQuartzRadioactive mineralsRare EarthsAntimony

ThoriumTitaniumUraniumZinc

Zr. ... .Zircon/am

ONTARIO

DIVISION OF MINES

HONOURABLE LEO BERNIER, Minister of Natural ResourcesDR. J. K. REYNOLDS. Deputy Minister ot Natural Resources

G A Jewett. Executive Director Division of Mines E G. Pye D irector. Geological Branch

Map 2221

CHAPLEAU - FOLEYETGeological Compilation Series

ALGOMA, COCHRANE AND SUDBURY DISTRICTS

Scale 1:253,440 or l Inch to 4 Miles20

Metres bOOO 20

SECTION A B

42B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK 010

FINAL REPORT ON A

KIMBERLITE EXPLORATION PROGRAMME,

CHAPLEAU AREA, ONTARIO

SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT FOR

ONTARIO PROSPECTORS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

GRANT NUMBER OP92-269 W. KERR GRANT NUMBER OP92-270 G. COHOON

November, 1992

Gary A. Cohoon

William C. Kerr

42B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK

TABLE OF CONTENTS

010C

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

2.0 LOCATION, ACCESS, AND TOPOGRAPHY

3.0 PROPERTY

4.0 PREVIOUS WORK

5.0 CURRENT PROGRAM

6.0 CONCLUSIONS

7.0 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS

8.0 LIST OF REFERENCES

Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure

Appendix l Appendix 2 Appendix 3 Appendix 4

DrawiDrawiDrawiDrawiDrawiDrawi

Map 1Map 2

ngngngngngng

123456

LIST OF FIGURES

Location MapClaim Map, Sherlock Township Claim Map, Lincoln Township Claim Map, Lincoln Township Claim Map, Murdock Township

LIST OF APPENDICES

AgreementMicroprobe Ternary diagrams Microprobe Analytical Data Diamond Drill Log

LIST OF DRAWINGS

Magnetometer Magnetometer Magnetometer Magnetometer Magnetometer Magnetometer

LIST OF MAPS Compilation Map Current Programme Work Areas,

16

17

19

5789

10

Survey, Survey, Survey, Survey, Survey, Survey,

Claim Cla i m Cla im Cla im Claim Claim

1181558 1181559 1151235 1151234 1181563 1181562

Sample Sites

FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM PAGE 3

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

Work carried out and funded by the current 1992 OPAP

programme (file numbers OP92-269, OP92-270) commenced with

analytical (microprobe) work at the University of Western

Ontario. This work was carried out on garnets identified from the

previous years OPAP program in order to define the geochemical

classification of the garnets according to Dawson and Stephens,

1975, and Gurney, 1985. Over half of the 24 garnets tested fell

within the G-5 field, while one large angular fragment was

corroborated as G-9. Potentially more significant, however, was

the conclusion that the chrome diopside (two grains tested) was

corroborated as having kimberlitic affiliations.

Following this work, linecutting, ground geophysical

surveying and prospecting were carried out on six of the eight

staked groups. One of the claim groups, P1181559 (Sherlock West)

contained a magnetic feature with a strong kimberlite like

expression and was selected for drill testing. Drilling was

carried out in mid August of 1992, consisting of a 200 foot hole,

and a magnetite rich intermediate intrusive was found to be the

causative source. As this rock type was also found in outcrop

while prospecting at the Sherlock East anomaly, it is probable

that all the anomalies in southwest Sherlock township are related

to this rock type.

Following this diamond drilling phase, further sieve

sampling with a coarser mesh, was carried out at a more detailed

spacing to try and define within tighter limits the indicator

train.- realizing that these targets in Sherlock Twp were 10 miles

up-ice from the train established in 1991. .Examination of the

heavy mineral concentrates after analytical processing was

carried out in the late fall of 1992. It was found that samples

of outwash material (eskers) contained generally the same range

of concentrations of indicators as established the previous year,

while no indicator minerals were found in any of the till

samples.


In summary, a reconnaissance programme for kimberlite

has culminated in the drill testing of a magnetic diatreme .

Although the source was not kimberlitic, further work is

recommended to isolate within better limits the source of the

indicator minerals, especially the chrome diopsldes. Drill

testing or bulldozer stripping is also recommended on the Lincoln

north claim group.

2.0 LOCATION, ACCESS, AND TOPOGRAPHY

The centre of the area is located 20 kilometres

northeast of the town of Chapleau, in northern Ontario. A number

of highways bisect the area, including hwys 101, 129, and 667,

arid numerous logging roads branch off from these major routes.

Topography is generally low and rolling in the north of

the work area where the more resistant gneissic rocks

predominate. The south part, especially the south boundary, is

overlain by aeolian sands and flat till sheets. Much of the area

has been logged at some time in the past. Sherlock Township is

characterized by both mature and overmature dense jackpine and

spruce stands in a thin till cover interspersed with large

glacial erratics. Much of this township is affected by windfall

and blowdown making passage difficult at best. The immediate

area bordering the Nemegosenda River is second growth, having

been logged in the distant past probably as a source of railroad

ties for the CN line to the north.

See Figure l, on the following page, for location.

FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM

FIGURE l - LOCATION MAP

PAGE 5

V-' ^^ Ml Maiden y*|N ' 1185' \

j \ KAPUSKASING

v ,\*r,fv,'IV^ j F| X-'-' j^D^FS^ -V^CHKIv j^MI;! .ÂHRLIv

'' .''''AA : ,""""""p^ j/A' ( M-oml-,- ^ C i' ^, : [. a

"^^TW . 'A ' 1 5 (-'-1 rrr~3H~A'wonte.T^'J/"" "'"'l " r" 'l ^x '''' /"i ' :' :; ' (--

y f/ ' N-/ ' ( i '" 1 '.'.! " "'* 1*,-'

™.'^l'r PATTINSON.. Âcouir;.; j

'•Trf-H

.Sg;|yr;l; s j.^/V

\cr(A* ••if-^Vurr*'^' T

; ~ ;^*-\'l397'1358' ,| ^ ' i, ij,, fi AU! l H T\orm 'i '4 "^ HAP1AN (:l'ini l '''"\ . -: ^^^fc^^tv '~~'t l

.'•.' .4 rm-i rt,tf,rivi'••"^^^û? HUFF. SWAY pj .,,|tiom^'

*,ooo


3 . O PROPERTY

PAGE 6

Eight claim groups were staked in late 1991 following

the microscope recognition of the chrome diopside and pyrope

garnet that was found during the 1991 field season. These groups

were staked up-ice of some of the major garnet concentrations.

William C. Kerr of South Porcupine has a 9C^ interest

in 8 claim groups, comprising 32 units, and Gary Cohoon of

Toronto retains a 1C^ interest. A copy of the agreement between

messrs. Kerr and Cohoon may be found in Appendix "l" . The eight

claim groups that have been staked are located in Sherlock,

Murdock, and Lincoln Townships, situated in the Porcupine Mining

Division northeast of Chapleau, Ontario. Table l, below, details

the relevant data pertaining to all the claims subject to this

programme.

TABLE l

CLAIM NUMBER

1181558

1181559

1181561

1151235

1181652

1181560

1181563

1151234

RECORDING DATE

October 18, 1991

October 18, 1991

October 18, 1991

October 18, 1991

October 18, 1991

October 18, 1991

November 6, 1991

October 18, 1991

TOWNSHIP

Sherlock

Sherlock

Sherlock

Sherlock

Murdock

Lincoln

Lincoln

Lincoln

GRID NAME

Sherlock North

Sherlock West

Sherlock N.E.

Sherlock East

Murdock South

Lincoln West

Lincoln East

Lincoln North


The centre of the work area is located at latitude 48 degrees and

15 minutes, longitude 82 degrees and 58 minutes, and is located

within N.T.S. Reference Number Sheets 410 and 42B.

Figures 2 through 5, on the following four pages, detail the

location of the individual claim groups.

FIGURE 2 - SHERLOCK TOWNSHIP

HERiE

CHAPLEAU-

NEMEGOSENOA

RIVER

PROVINOAL '

PARK SCALE::


FIGURE 3 - LINCOLN TOWNSHIP

PAGE 8

l tt

(4 UNITS) '^ - - . J

CHAPLEAU

SCALE: 1 INCH - 40 CHAINS

ACRES HECTARES

rivi-V: fi- " 77" v-^" ;ju f INEMEGOSEIs.-^ ^1^' TOWNSHIP OF

' :: W^;;^:

LIDISTRICT F

SUPBURYMINING DIVISION :

l PORCUPINE ;: '*;;-P:||jl

"r'-'i^-v•-1^•f'* J! j 1.71*

)..'r:., Mt*M :

!?t

4ir?

FTNAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM

FIGURE 4 - LINCOLN TOWNSHIP

PAGE 9

rO r-- NEMEGOSE(

Q-J UJU.o:UJ CL CLOo

TOWNSHIP OF f

LINCOisiDISTRICT OF ';i^|

SUDBURY; I|L MINING D IVISION

PORCUPINE

Ministry Of Surveys andNatural Mappino"i:Resources Branch

jjUtkwwl Topog/aphic SWIM

Plan No.

M 989J VI*"^Vi*/^/

1 II&56:(4 UNITS).

- 'V

r".,


FIGURE 5 - MURDOCK TOWNSHIP

PAGE 10


The enclosed Ontario Department of Mines compilation map

number 2221, herein as Map l, details the boundaries of the 1991

work area, the 1992 area, and the staked claims.

4.0 PREVIOUS WORK

Previous work may be found in a report submitted last year

in fulfilment for OPAP grant OP91-091. In essence,

reconnaissance heavy minerals sampling located concentrations of

pyrope garnet (primarily G-5) and chrome diopside in an apparent

glacial train at the north boundary of the survey area. Eight

claim groups totalling 32 units were staked on the basis of l" to

l mile aeromagnetic anomalies that were present up-ice from the

indicator minerals. Four claims were staked in Sherlock

Township, three claims were staked in Lincoln Township, and one

claim was staked in Murdock Township.

No follow-up was carried out in 1991 due to the lateness of the

season, although a bulk sample was collected and processed from

site WK-37.

5.0 CURRENT PROGRAM

Work began with the microprobe analysis of 24 selected

grains of garnet and two grains of chrome diopside, all

identified from the 1991 work program. This work was carried out

at the University of Western Ontario, and results are detailed

in appendices 2 and 3. Of the garnets, over half the grains had

a G-5 affinity, while the rest were of probable metamorphic

origin, except for several grains from sample WK-31 which were G-9 's.

It is interesting that the G~9 grains were composed of fragments

of Larger grains, while all others (observed and/or tested) were

much smaller - this may imply that the sieve size used for sample

collection may have been too small (0.50-1.25 mm).


Two chrome diopside grains were tested, and the microprobe

results not only confirmed the chrome diopside composition but

established that the diopsides were within the limits of those

diopsides of kimberlitic affinity, according to Reed and

Sinclair, 1991. It was therefore felt that further work to trace

the source of these minerals was justified.

Mobilization to a campsite in central Lincoln Township was

carried out in late May, and linecutting and ground magnetic

surveys were carried out from that camp. The location of all

areas worked this year may be found in Map 2. These surveys were

carried out over six of the eight staked claim groups.

Preliminary ground investigation of the remaining two groups

indicated that magnetic surveying was not warranted based on

geologic evidence.

Essentially on each group a cut and picketed baseline was

put in the approximate centre of the group. Hip chained and

flagged lines were then run off of this baseline and these lines

were used for control for the ground magnetic survey. Base

stations were set up on each grid in order to account for both

the diurnal and instrument drift. On no occasion was the base

station difference more than 40 gammas (nano-teslas) on closing,

which was easily corrected. All linecutting, hip-chaining and

flagging lines, and ground magnetometer work was carried out by

Messrs. Cohoori and Kerr from May 27 to June 13, 1992.

The most promising anomalies were prospected by W. Kerr from

June 19 to June 23. The following details the results of the

magnetic survey.

DWG No l- Sherlock North. Complete coverage was not

possible because of the pond in the centre of the grid, but the

available data has shown that a kimberlite source is unlikely as

the cause of the anomaly. The airborne anomaly was centered on

the lake edge, but ground geophysical data shows that there are

several isolated peaks north and east of the airborne high that


may have been averaged by the airborne system. No further work

is recommended on this zone.

DWG No 2- Sherlock West. The most significant anomaly was

found on this claim group. This response shows a circular

magnetic feature of about 600 gammas above background, with a

relatively uniform magnetic intensity. The anomaly is within a

topographic low. Prospecting was carried out on this grid, and

no outcrop was found anywhere over the surface expression.

However, shallow dipping gneisses formed a semi-circular cliff on

the north, west, and east boundary of the anomaly. A hand

shovelled pit was attempted over the peak of the magnetometer

anomaly, but was abandoned after 7.5 feet in aeolian sand. Drill

testing was recommended. A geophysical report for assessment

purposes on this claim was filed and accepted in August, 1992.

DWG No 3-Sherlock East A linear throughgoing anomaly of

9,000 gammas above background was located, centered on line 3+00

south at 1+50 east. This location is a pronounced topographic

high. Although the nature of the anomaly discounted a

kimberlitic source, prospecting was carried out over the apex of

the anomaly. A twenty foot long trench was cleared with grubhoe

and shovel at 1+50 east to expose a magnetite bearing

intermediate intrusive. Although the contained magnetite exposed

was not deemed strong enough to be the source of the 9,000 gamma

anomaly, it was in the range to discount this anomaly as having a

kimberlitic source.

DWG No 4 Lincoln North The ground geophysical data

discloses a general northeast trending irregular magnetic feature

of about 400 gammas above background. The centre of the anomaly

is slightly east of the centre of the grid, and looks to be

continuing off the property. This claim was prospected, and

although there was a number of outcrops of shallowly dipping

gniesses, no outcrop was apparent over the main part of the

anomaly. Two shallow pits were attempted, ( at 0+50 W on line 6

north, and at 0+40 west on line 3 north) but both were abandoned

after 3.5 feet in hard compact till. Further work is warranted


on this grid, but as the nearest water is over one mile away in a

provincial park, drilling was not contemplated this year. Logging

operations were active this year, and it is possible logging

roads will approach the south boundary this winter. Bulldozer-

backhoe work may be a cost-effective method of testing this

anomaly.

DWG No 5-Lincoln South The magnetometer survey discloses a

7,000 gamma point source magnetic anomaly in the north central

part of the grid, part of a 500 metre linear trend. The clearcut

nature of the claim group exposed a number of outcrops in the

area to the extent that the anomaly was prospected while the

survey was being carried out. Thin bands of cherty iron

formation are responsible for the anomaly, and no further work is

warranted.

DWG No 6-Murdock North This survey identified a linear 400

metre long, 100 metre wide east west trending anomaly of maximum

300 gammas above background. The airborne anomaly was a very

weak 10 gamma point source. No outcrop was noticed during the

survey over the anomalous area. It does not exhibit kimberlitic

features, and no further work is recommended on this zone.

5.1 DIAMOND DRILLING

In late August, a 200 foot hole was drilled to test the

anomaly on Sherlock West, Claim 1181559. The drill was collared

at coordinates 1+75 south, line 3+00 west, and drilled north at

55 degrees. (See appendix 4 for drill log and location sketch.)

The cause of the magnetic anomaly was determined to be a

magnetite rich intermediate intrusive, similar to that observed

in the stripping of Sherlock East, and no kimberlite was seen.

5.2 FURTHER SAMPLING

It was then attempted to try and define any indicator

minerals between the staked anomalies in Sherlock Twp and

the north boundary established in the 1991 survey. 15 samples

were taken, composed equally of till and outwash material. This

material was processed at Lakefield Research in Lakefield,

Ontario, using heavy liquid separation techniques. The coarser


than normal sieve size- 1.25 to 2.75 mm- meant that the mag-

stream separation process could not be used for bulk separation,

and all the sample was processed by heavy liquid methods.

Microscope examination of the residues took place in Timmins.

Results may be found on Map 2. Several conclusions were evident

on completion of this phase of the program;

-where the original material sampled was either esker or outwash,

G-5 type pyrope garnets were found in essentially the same range

of concentrations as found the previous year.

-where till was the sample medium, no indicators were located.

-Virtually no lithic fragments were present in samples from

original outwash material, while the till samples contained up to

7C^ lithics per sample in the coarser size ranges.

-While garnets of all compositions routinely make up to 50^ of

the non-magnetic heavy mineral fraction of original outwash

samples, they generally range to a maximum of only 1(^ in till

samples.

-Till samples are believed to be of local derivation, and may

represent essentially in situ weathering materials rather than

transported materials.

Conclusions from this limited sampling are tenuous given the

complicated glacial history of the area. The lack of garnets in

the till samples is certainly disappointing but may or may not be

significant. However, the lack of chrome diopsides in the till

samples is certainly significant as the indicators found in 1991

apparently have a 10-15 mile range. The nature of the lithic

fragments leads the author to believe that till material has not

been transported a long distance, and the till sample taken may

not represent a large area up-ice. The fact that the indicators

are still present in the outwash material points to a source up-

ice. However, there are large sheets of aeolian sand plains,

which, coupled with the lack of access, would greatly hinder any

follow-up programs that concentrated on surface sampling.


6.0 CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the indicator minerals that were identified

by microscope during the 1991 OPAP program were verified by

microprobe analysis early in the current program. No G-10

garnets were identified, although a number of G-5's and G-9's

were corroborated. A number of chrome diopsides with kimberlitic

affinity were corroborated. Linecutting, ground geophysical

work, and prospecting were carried out on 6 claims, and one

diamond drill hole was performed during this programme.

Following this, 15 further sieved samples were taken to try and

define the limits of the indicator train within a smaller area.

When outwash material was sampled it was found that generally

similar concentrations of indicators were found as were found in

the previous years programs. Till samples contained no

indicators. This could be a function of 1) the superior natural

concentrating abilities of eskers and stream riffles, coupled

with the large cachement area sampled by these features, and also

2) extreme near source cachement area of the till. In any

event, further work is warranted to 1) determine the cause of

the airborne and ground magnetic anomaly on claim 1151234, and

collect further samples, if at all possible given the poor

topographic and access conditions, immediately up-ice and east of

Sherlock Township. The presence of the large Shenango Complex

immediately to the northeast may become more significant,

geologically, in light of these results.

. -. Respectfully submitted, this /(,J day of November, 1992

William C. Kerr

Gary A. Cohoon


CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT:

I currently reside at 1010 Michener Boulevard, South Porcupine,

Ontario, PON IKO.

I am a graduate of the University of New Brunswick, Fredericton,

New Brunswick, with a Bachelor of Science degree, major- Geology,

completed 1975.

I have been actively involved in the Canadian mining industry

since 1972 and have been employed full time as a Geologist since

1975.

I am a member of the Prospectors and Developers Association of

Canada, and a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada.

This report is based upon my own observations while working in

the area during the last five years, and on a study on Ministry

of Northern Development and Mines Assessment records and

published geological maps and reports on the area.

South Porcupine, Ontario

William C. Kerr, B. Se, FGAC November 10, 1992

REPORT QN OPAF PROGRAM PAGE 19

8.0 LIST OP REFERENCES

Atkinson, W.J.

1991: Diamond Exploration Philosophy, Practice, and

Promises: A Review.

Bennett, G., Brown, D.D., George, P.T., and Leahy, E.J.

1967: Operation Kapuskasing; Ontario Department of Mines,

MP 10.

Brown, D.D., Bennett, G., and George, P.T.

1967: The Source of Alluvial Kimberlite Indicator Minerals

in the James Bay Lowland; Ontario Department of Mines,

P 7.

Brummer, J.J.

1978: Diamonds in Canada, Canadian Institute of Mining and

Metallurgy bulletin, pp 64-79.

Card, K.D.

1982: Progress Report on Regional Geological Synthesis,

Central Superior Province; in Current Research, Part

A,Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 82-1A.

Dawson, J.B., and Stephens, W.E.

1975: Statistical Classification of Garnets from Kimberlites

and Associated Xenoliths. Journal of Geology, 1975,

Vol. 83, pp 589-607.

Glover, J.E. and Harris, P.G.

1985: Kimberlite Occurrence and Origin: A Basis for

Conceptual Models in Exploration. The University of

Western Australia, Publication No. 8.

Gurney, J.J.,

1985: A Correlation Between Garnets and Diamonds in

Kimberlites. The University of Western Australia,

Publication no. 8.


Kerr, W. C.,

1992: Summary Report of a Kimberlite Exploration Programme

submitted in fulfilment of a grant from the Ontario

Prospectors Assistance Programme- Grant Number

OP91-094. January 24, 1992,

Kirkley, M.B., Gurney, J.J., and Levinson, A.A.

1992: Age, Origin, and Emplacement of Diamonds: A Review of

Scientific Advances in the Last Decade. Canadian

Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin, Volume 84, No 956,

pp48-57

Lee, H.A.

1965: Investigation of Eskers for Mineral Exploration;

Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 65-14

Mitchell, R. H.

1991: Kimberlites and Lamproites: Primary Sources of

Diamond. Geoscience Canada, Volume 18, November 2, pp

1-16.

Percival, J.A.

1985: The Kapuskasing structure in the Kapuskasing-

Fraserdale Area, Ontario; in Current Research,

Part A, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 85-1A.

Percival, J.A., Green, A.G., and Milkereit, B., Cook, F.A.,

Geis. W., and West, G.F.

1989: Seismic Reflection Profiles Across Deep Continental

Crust Exposed in the Kapuskasing Uplift Structure, in

Nature, Volume 342, No. 6248, pp 416-420.

Reed. L. E., and Sinclair, I.G.

1991: The Search for Kimberlites in the James Bay Lowlands

of Ontario. Canadian Mining and Metallurgical

Bulletin, Volume 84, No 947, pp!32-139.

Satterly, J.

1971: Diamond, USSR and North America, a Target for

Exploration in Ontario; Ontario Department of Mines,

Miscellaneous Paper 48


Thurston, P.C., Siragusa, G.M., and Sage, R.P.

1977: Geology of the Chapleau Area, District of Algoma,

Sudbury, and Cochrane; Ontario Division of Mines,

Geoscience Report 157.

Wolfe, W.J., Lee, H.a., and Hicks, W.D.

1975: Heavy Mineral Indicators in Alluvial and Esker Gravels

of the Moose River Basin, James Bay Lowlands, District

of Cochrane, Ontario Division of Mines, GR 126.


APPENDIX l

EXPLOITS EXPLORAliON CORPORATION

.'\\voru~

P.O. BOX 6165 P.M. S.SOUTH PORCUPINE, ONTARIO

TEL. (705) 235-2405 CANADA PON 1KO


APPENDIX 2

WESTERN-samples 30 fi), 40 (3)

Asf \

r \N

WESTERN-samples 31 (5)

i.

WESTERN-sarnples 32 (1), 34 (2), 36 (1)

A7

\

777 \

Xftrs

WESTERN-3 ample 37 (5)

7A.

,/

\i7*Ax\

WESTERN- sample 37 (5 also)

MgO

N e p e a n VVK —37 —three samplesduplnatn anal;,tiin

Mg O

Af

A

\\

i———i———i———r i———i———i———r

WESTERN-samples 30 (J), 40 (3

f7}iB

X\

\\

fi\

\A A

i———r "i———i———i———r

OLU

EXPLOITS EXPLORATIONGARNET ANALYSES

16 ————————————————————————————————————

14CO

Q-

O

LUO p,o: o-UJ

6-

o-

•- '7

0 2 4 6 8 10 12WEIGHT PERCENT GAO

EXPLOITS EXPLORATIONGARNET ANALYSES

T MGD

LSf \\

\

i i i r


APPENDIX 3

A Vj^

- 10,449 nA

Spec ] TAP Pos-107.210 !O 0,06779-1-7- 0,00055 ( 0.89787 Rel )' ' D- 1.71.62 ( 25416), Bkg- 0,,89 ( 186), P/B- 1.36,300,63X St d dev 20 sec:

3J4 Spec 2 TAP Pos^ 77.355 K^- .18992-i-/- 0.00094 ( 0.93:187 Pel)P-B- 389.27 ( 81350), Bkg^ 3,1.7 ( 068) , P/B^ 121.340.3 5 x Std dev 20 sec

:iN4 Spec 4 I.. I F Pos"146.215 K- 0.00000+7- 7^00000 ( 0.00000 RS ] )c - --0,00 ( -O) , Bkg- 0.17 ( 35), p/B- --0,017-, .9"; at d dev 20 sec

i 13 Spec 3 PET Pos- 88,195 K- 0 .f)001 H-,'- 0,00011 ( 0.00368 Re!)P-H- 0.1.0 ( 21), Bkg- 1.39 C 299), p/B- 0.0?V9.99:; Std dev 20 SBC

•:K--: Spec 4 l... I r- pn--159 ..235 K- 0.00756H-/- 0.00053 ( 0.026^1 Re?1; -'-H- 1.22 ( 256), Bkg- 0,1.6 ( 34), P/B^ 7.46

7..'-: i4",;; 3td dev 26 sec

,,'V: S,.:::.c 3 P El Po-^107.660 K- 0.14910-t-/- 0,,00;ij5 ( 0.86386 Pel) r-;-i~ 136.96 ( 23623), Bkg^ 0..6B ( i4t), P/B-: 202,91

?-.~WZ S td ripv 20 sec :":kg O -f f. X- 5V..9850 Y- 42.3737 /- l 1. .31 630

•'ci 2J 4 T i 3 AI...7 C:R-1 I1N4 FE4 Mfi4 CA3 !9\3 i'-JAJ

7:',F CORRECTION 1.5.00 KV 40.00 Beg I ter :- 2K r Z J LA] f. F] r ZAP.l NHL Atom'X wt^ Norm

7!-K 0 . l l - K '-':

!3P-K oCM-37 0,

.1. i .. i 7 t

(fi ff) f/; ;|

0075

0076c 0000-' 48

087'3-: -'l ,' , -

. -[ 7

0000

•/?02.'

1 768

.1. ,, ':.' .i. Q

1 . 1 6 1:i ,, 0461 . 1 601 .1.941 . 1 c 3l , 0 1 5:i , 050•i. ,03c1 ,C8907775

L ,, y.. C.) ,,i

1 .0-1

l .4:74

:i .02.3'i . 0 1. 2i ,, ?- 1 0

1 ,8061 .0-371 .0511 .9042,603

V..I . i /O

0.9970.9900,9961 ..0007 ,0000,9940,9990,9730.9951. .000

1

1

l

1

1

iiiii,~iii..

. .;,0,.J

.2S6

. 48:7;

. 1 83,308. 1 70". c; 1 9.091. "i 0 r-

.969

.537

v.i ,, v..i ,:. f

0 , 'rt3 4e . 0 1 90,0677; ,,0580 .0670) . e 1 90.078-:0,0220.020----------

.1. 0 ,: f., . ..,

0 , 0 10,,900 .370.00

0.689 ,, 1 98 ,. 8 10 ,00

0,3360.83

,-.. -i- 01O

01

10

1 60

044

, ...-j ,- , 0 J,, 1 2.89.08

27-7-,, 30.'-•'7

,0!7

. 4 1

.BS

..•:. ---!-

01001

i 0i 6

7;0

44

, . .j:"!

. 0 1

, 1. 2A.89. 00274.3071.98,,00, 4 1 A. ^ 7 D,

Total- 99.95

l : : M -: .

' , . . .. .. - '--'' r' '. .iC; AX; 0 AA- ' - . .AAA;A AA? (": .o, '- ' A y,:: s "

i. A3 1 '- 1 .••'/"-••v , o. -A--

0.03V..; -,AA2AA : ; 4 AA 66?

RUN B r: H C OU!..r CPX 14: 6:2628- MAR- 92F i l e : Z A!- CPXBeam- 'L; o, 44 2 nA

KA 3 ::-;pt:c 3 PET Po 5=11 9 .895 hA 0.00004+7- 0 AA004 f 9.00038 Re'1 A--IA::. 0.04 ( 75, 8kg- CA56 ' 118), P 7 B" 0,9699,, 99V -rr! dPV 2! (9 SBC

At. 2 ::r:p t --.::r A : A P Pos^ 90.600 K ~ 0 .00794+7- 0.00016 ( 0,15P89 Rel) A--F- 15.34 ( 320:5), Bkg- ; .12 ( 233), P/K- 13.75

:; r: :--,td dev 2:0 sec

l' F4 Spec 3 l... l! F Po^l.34.785 K^ 0.03494 + 7- 0.00063 ( A A! 0366 Rel)l-'-B^- 3.47 ( 726), Bkg- 0.29 ( 60) , P 7 B- 12.024,.^r:; 3rd dev 20 sec

NA.1 Ape. 2 'TAP Pos-129.425 K- 0.00206+7- 0,00012 i 0,04:121 Kel ) ;'-A- 1.74 ( 364), Bkg- 0,14 ( 30), p/R- 12.0!

A..A6A : ;:A:d r! -/v 20 ;;,-.a,i! - ; - ;:; ,. 4 l 2 nA

JA4 A r ,,v, ; - : j -(/-.p Pos^107.2:i0 K- : 0.06HP9-!-/- 0.000AA ( 0,91250 Re iA--B- 123.60 ( 25738), Rko^ 0.39 ( 185), P7B- 139.030.6 A"; A r. d dev 20 see

A:;-J-! Aper 4 LIP Por-^-lS9 .2W5 K-" 0.00906 + 7- 0.000S--. ' 0,02307A-IA- 1. .31 ( 272), Rkg- 0 ,, 1 6 ( 34.', AAR- 7 ..96

6.7& 1;; ''A:d day 20

,-ipt.^:: 2 'TAP Poi^ 77.355 hA^ 0 . :i 9506 + 7- Z .?i**'^7 : 0.957.1.1 R .399.82 ( 33258), 8kg- 3.19 ( 665), A/R- 12!3ri4

20

i A! 3 :"-:|-,.;v." 3 RA| P C! ~.™ 83 ,, 1 93 K- 0.0A044A/- A AAA i 8 ( .-: ,- 'l 520 Rro'i:'--B- 0 AI-2 i 87), Bkg- 1.38 ( 288), P/B^ 0.30

:.-'9 '; , i ;d ;i(^v 30

rlN-'l A r r - ;i j. r?.. Rev.,: 1 46, 2 16 A- 0 , A ' A/; 6 4 4- /-- i': , 6- : A'// t ^ , . O A 1. 8 j Pr---l::- v .10 ( 22) , Rky- A.6171 ( 3:",; n p .'D- 0. 6?•4,, 0 3 ",: At d dev 20 sec

: . A 3 6 , , . . . , 6 l -' r -] i -- o -, l 0 7 . 6 6 0 K : 0 , i -;- 9 5 4 !- 7 - O , fv :- ' ;'' l i 6 ( -6 , 8 6 ; , : '-: 7 R e ].''•-M-. i';, 6. r;.--, ( 26604 ) ,, O kg~-- ( Mo:-; ( 1.416 ,, l' :'.6; .:- '/f; ; 6.6

F- , •O' OF- J .i:"; hjorrr.:

:,'0- !

; :. r; . \

":,..--|-.

O.A i-:K --KOIA--KX: -l-:

:

:

i;,--

f;i";

t'

0

0)

0

,, i ; X, :

, OOo-:o. -- ' " "'

, .'o : -;0;,, !''005

0X149,,v:,o8-. i 495..0000

.-0021

,, l 7 1 3

:.i

;

1

1

i

1

1

1

0

X- i 'i . i

:.'. ;. . :,

11-\ .-,.-J

•1 '

.1-7-,, - 1 4..009

.079

.036

.970

i.-

:i.i.:i1•i - ;

1•i .,9

.....•••O-;,, '.,' : -'O

-; . . .",

:- . ' ..' ' O'

. ' .,

,. -. ' ! .

, Xi :; 1... -...i ... ;..004 1.003, 8 9 8,635

:':

0f.,', -.

'.

10

0

0

0

1

,, 99X;07 9 "799 7)

07 9 60"i00

.000

.991

.999

.973

.995,, 000

!::.:

;:

111:i•i;.

1

2

,,9;-.0.",206,^ ?

, : , COX1M - -'

.. i 77,, :X 1 3.091. 1 05.959.5 5 R

X:' , 'X '' : ;0.,0C'400- '.X

^ , O 6 00,,X0o0.0620.0190.o:':830.0220,020..................

' 9 ,. ; /,0 . 0."

'- ' i.

vi ,, - ; 0

OoO-; o , o 9 9 , X; 7 S.o;o-0.00

X) . 38

O i , . 0O"i . l 8XooXo•C oXX71 076

j. 0.4 216.320 .000.40

0,

:i 101600

.76 43A 3200

4 MA 8 l DA

Total^ 99395

0.; i do R e si. 1 1 t s

8102'! 102OP203X:R2(J3ri NO

: EOi li'? QOAOo: 21 joiAX'ixTov.a! ^

wt.%53.50

0.09

2 .231. .390 . 0820,26

1 7 . 2822.83

0 , 0 10.54

100.22

Norm w t -i53.380.09

2.221 .390.082. 2 6

1 7 . 2522.78

0 . 0 1

0,34

Mi n en a'l6 Ox y

1. .94030.00240.0951.0.03990 . 00260.06860.93430.88710 n 0003

0.03834.0090

pormul a4 Cat

1 .93600.00240.09490.03990,,00260,06850.93220.88510.0002

0.03825.9S66

.•ON 8x:H!:ojopp CPX i 4:

on*: /AF- CPX Os a m- 10.453 rn-i

K\3 Spec 8 pEO'f Poo-l19.895 K-~ 0 .00000 + 7 - 0,00000 ( 0.00000 Re'!•-'-8-^ -0,03 ( -5), Bkg::::: 0,56 ( 1.1B; n P /B- -0,0499.99"; 3td dev 20

; : .2 Opoo 2 "IAP Po;:-: 90.600 K~ 0,00109 + 7-" 0,00007 ( 0,,02178 Re'!o-B™ 2,,i0 ( 440), Bkg::- 1,12 ( 283), P7B- 1.98o. 8 5 x: St d c! oy 20 sec

••'-4 Sp^r 3 oiP Po:;:.:..: 134.785 K^ 0.01724 + /-- 0.00065 ( 0,oii.967 Re!•-'-B- -i-.01 ( 889), B k g-'- 0-29 ( 60), P/B™ 1.3.38

"0,69";; S lv d clev 20 sec:

o-.. ,:-.r,oc 7 TAP Po ; :::. : :oi29 .425 K- 0.0-193 + X-. 0..00012 ( 0.03958 RfOi••'•••T-. 1,67 ( 350), Bkg^ 0 ,, :i 4 ( 30;,, p/B^ 11.04

O 0790 Old dfcv 30 PPC:0,:Ufi-::: 10.431 f,A

l X'! XOHO-: 1 IAP Pa^'l 07 ,,21 0 !O 0 .07083+7-- 0.^^056 ( 0.938.! 9 :"- : XO'0,0:-;: ( 26512), Birg^ 0,89 ( ioO)., P/3-^ 142., 0 - : :

.-' "l H''-' C .. i 'y:'38^ 2 . l9 '

ft ., 0ft'"'"

667) , l267--:3

•i/-- P ,73ft\", .-.-- 08 ,, j '

167) ,20 s e r

•'. , x .-'084-1- 7-- i?) .ftft/m l. ,3H: ( 238) .

v:.,, : ; . ,;,fti ft,58

vi '.per 4 : ..i F POB- J 59 ,, 283 K- ft,ftft52ft-r-/--- ft,,ftftft46 ' ft . ft :! 3 ! 2 Re i)-B^ 0,:84 i 176), Bkg^ ft ,, 1 6 f 34), P/B^ 5.146, y 9"; S d df-v 20

.-Vi Spe.: :.i ! ; 'F'i !-'o?^ l ft? , 66ft K- ft . ;i . S :l. A 9 -i /~ ft.ftftll/ i ft ~fr~- 1.:39.::?-i ( 29070), Bkg- ©.68 ( 1415,, P/B- ; :.',,59^ S'tcl dev 2ft sec

,:Q U-ff, X- 60.3125 Y^ 42.7522 Z^ l l ,, 1 69ft

,-.'t t; J 4 113 AL2 CR4 MN4 FE4 r!G4 HA3 K\3 NA:l

206.43

•' CORRECTION 15.00 KV

••K 0•:: ft-K ftK ft

•l: ft•'- ft

,i)•K ft•K ft-K ft•i-:: ft:-*

K,, 1. '--''99

.0008

.001. 1

.32783, 0003

,ft:i77.0708,, : :: . 1 7.0000M '..v -. j ..y v'j

•' :. '.".' \3r, J. - J f X

i:: 7. : i1 . ft 1 71 .1601. . 0531 . 1 681 .1931 .1651. . 0 1. 41 .0491 .080

1 . 0390.975

[A]1 .2561 .0421 .4221 .0191 .0121 .010

1 . 504l .0411 .0531 .900

2,, 64 7

[' F jft,, 9980.9980.9910.9961 .0001 .000

0.9940.9990.97.20.9951 .000

r 7 API

1 27751 .2071 .4831 . 1 861 . 2081 .1771 . 5 1 61 .0911 .1051 .9642.579

4 ft. ft ftMDl

0.0270.0340.018

0.0680 . 0580.0620 . 0 1 90.023ft . 0220.020

Deg 17!:: Rr ^AtomX19.840.05ft ,, -: 30.26(Z) . ft 1ft . '799.659.030.00

0.3759.86

Total -

wt "f.25

ftft0

0

21 0:i 6ft0

4399

. 50

.10,, 1 6.62.04.037/4. 'b 6.00

.39

.82,. 95

2Norm w t X

250ftftft2

10

160ft

43

, :-;i i. 1 0

. 1 6A

.62

.84

.03

. MA

.57

. 00

.39An 85DA

'i. d e

82;87..2039203•'B

,:- 8j 8'.'.t 1

20. .-i,--,

, i..- -j, 4; a] -:

R, -J •--i. i 'i t S

w !- X5 'i .55

0 , ! 70 , 3 10.900.052 . 6 1

17 , 8033 , 1 7

ft .00

0.52•- 1.00.08

Norm w t. "i54.51

0 . :! 70 . 30

0.90

0.052.61

17.7923,150.00

0.52

Miner a i6 Ox y

L .9830•:; . ftft-460,013i.ft, ft 2590.00.14

0,079409? 64 70,9023ft .-0000

0,03694 ,, 0 1 1 4

Formal a4 Cat

1 7?763ft,, 0ft 4 60.0130

0.0259(2) . 00 1 40.0792ft,, 962 ftft.89980 .0000

0.03685 . 9830

-. PER REGAL GARNET ANALYSES, EXPLOITS EXPLORATION R. L. BARNETT MARCH 28,1992

J 2J 203J''

0LI

( tj

j

1

I

l

l

K'3

t

A(i

137. 76

.0222.09

.0030.68

1.446.541.81

100.36

5.918 *.082 6.000

3.996 *.002 *.000 3.998

1.527 *4.019 *

.304 *

.191 b. 04124.000 *

ALM 89.04PYRP 6.73GROS 4.23

F/M 2.757F/ FM .734

it39.42

.0522.65

.0425.91

.3910.532.58

101.57

5.933 *.067 6.000

3.949 *.006 *.005 3.960

2.362 *3.261 *

.416 *

.050 6.08924.000 *

87.5011.161.33

1.402.584

339.49

.0422.48

.0325.30

.5310.372.57

100.81

5.974 *.026 6.000

3.982 *.005 *.004 3.990

2.338 *3.201 *

.417 *

.068 6.02424.000 *

86.8511.30

1.84

1.398.583

439.65

.0422.56

.0024.14

.5010.682.57

100.14

6.002 *.000 6.002

4.024 *.005 *.000 4.029

2.410 *3.056 *

.417 *

.064 5.94724.000 *

86.4011.78

1.81

1.295.564

536.33

.1820.13

.0018.0621.42

1.251.98

99.35

5.982 *.018 6.000

3.888 *.022 *.000 3.910.307 *

2.487 *.349 *

2.987 6.13024.000 *

42.706.00

51.30

17.844.947

636.81

.1120.27

.0018.0421.29

1.282.27

100.07

6.006 i.000 6.006

3.897 *.013 *.000 3.911.311 *

2.462 *.397 *

2.942 6.11224.000 *

42.446.84

50.72

17.359.946

736.78

.0820.26

.0018.3821.381.262.17

100.31

5.997 *.003 6.000

3.890 *.010 *.000 3.900.306 *

2.506 *.379 *

2.953 6.14524.000 *

42.936.49

50.58

17.827.947

836.54

.1819.96

.0018.2821.94

1.271.27

99.44

6.016 *.000 6.016

3.873 *.022 *.000 3.895.312 *

2.517 *.224 *

3.060 6.11224.000 *

43.393.86

52.75

17.893.947

. Si""" E WK 30 SINGLE GRAIN CENTRALJ S. c WK-30 CENTRAL AGAINi SAMPLE WK-30 NEAR MARGINJ SAMPLE WK-30 INT REGION

5 SAMPLE WK-40 GRAIN l CENTRE TO MARGIN6 SAMPLE WK-40 GRAIN l CENTRE TO MARGIN7 SAMPLE WK-40 GRAIN l CENTRE TO MARGIN8 SAMPLE WK-40 GRAIN l CENTRE TO MARGIN

iPER RECAL GARNET ANALYSES, EXPLOITS EXPLORATION R. L. BARNETT MARCH 28,1992

M 9

i'iO

•j 3J 3J

'j

. t

'l

1

1L

i;-:

i

H

"J

930.96

.1820.33

.0018.5522.021.232.02

101.29

5.981 *.019 6.000

3.858 *.022 *.000 3.880.297 t

2.511 *.350 *

18 6.17624.000 *

ftLM 42.70PYRP 5.96GROS 51.34

F/M 18.635F/F1 949

1036.49

.1620.74

.0022.8118.951.07

.46100.68

5.953 *.047 6.000

3.940 *.020 *.000 3.960.260 *

3.112 *.080 *

2.619 6.07124.000 *

53.551.38

45.06

22.0259S7

H36.45

.0920.83

.0023.1219.171.07

.32101.05

5.936 *.064 6.000

3.933 *.011 *.000 3.944.260 *

3.149 *.056 *

2.644 6.10824.000 *

53.84.95

45.21

22.3049S7

1236.56

.0421.18

.0021.8319.62

.96

.54100.73

5.948 *.052 6.000

4.009 *.005 *.000 4.014.233 *

2.970 *.094 *

2.704 6.00124.000 *

51.491.63

46.87

24.373q*i

1337.88

.1321.16

.0128.49

1.044.927.02

100.65

5.944 *.056 6.000

3.857 *.015 *.001 3.873

1.151 *3.739 *1.180 *

.138 6.20824.000 *

73.9323.342.73

3.369171

1437.77

.1221.01

.0028.37

1.135.037.18

100.61

5.935 *.065 6.000

3.825 *.014 *.000 3.839

1.178 *3.728 *1.209 *

.150 6.26524.000 *

73.2823.762.96

3.292-i(.~i

1538.03

.1321.44

.0028.02

.975.067.19

100.84

5.940 *.060 6.000

3.886 *.015 *.000 3.901

1.178 *3.660 *1.203 *

.128 6.16924.000 *

73.3224.112.57

3.216It 7

1642.75

.4221.892.487.23

.3021.75

4.60101.42

5.985 *.015 6.000

3.596 *.044 *.275 3.9b

4.539 *.847 *.690 *.036 6.111

24.000 *53.8543.892.26

.1941 l 1

SAMPLE UK-40 GRAIN l CENTRE TO MARGINSAHPLE HK-40 GRAIN 2 CENTRE TO MARGINSAMPLE HK-40 GRAIN 2 CENTRE TO MARGINSAMPLE M-40 GRAIN 2 CENTRE TO MARGIN

13 SAMPLE UK-40 GRAIN 314 SAMPLE HK-40 GRAIN 315 SAMPLE HK-40 GRAIN 316 SAMPLE WK-31 GRAIN l

.'PER RECAL GARNET ANALYSES, EXPLOITS EXPLORATION R. L. BARNETT MARCH 28,1992

17•2 4 2.10J2 .35ii 2 1.84J 3 2.29j 6.93

: .29) 21.87J 4.67l 100.34

i 5.954 *.046 6.000

3.594 *I .037 **. .256 3.887J 4.610 *: .820 *

.-t .708 *.035 6.172

24.000 *ALM 52.47PYRP 45.30GROS 2.22

i, .185F/FM .156

' SAMPLE HK-31 GRAIN•i SAMPLE HK-31 GRAINi S AMPLE HK-31 GRAINi S AMPLE HK-31 GRAIN

JPER RECAL

25J2 36.52J2 .04J3 21.05 j 3 .03'J 30.56j 10.22J 1.62J .43i 100.47

i 5.944 *L .056 6.000

3.982 *; 005 *

j04 3.991.393 *

: 4.160 *.075 *

\ 1 .409 6.03724.000 *

ALM 73.71OVDD 1 77

1842.

.21.2.6.

21.4.

100.

6.003.000

3.582.041.303

4.548.780.706.048

24.000

112it.

633959726240676870

t6.003

tt

3.927ttt

6.082t

50.8446.053.11

.182

.154

1938.21

.0222.25

.0132.061.186.381.11

101.22

5.943.057 6

4.020.002.001 4

1.4794.170.185.155 5

24.0009243

2.

GARNET ANALYSES

2636.

21.

30.10.1.

101.

5.931.069

3.963.004.000.395

4.142.083

1.46124.000

690317006467644832

t6.000

tt

3.967ttt

6.081t

72.851 A t.

2736.71

.0520.90

.0030.1710.741.60.25

100.42

5.976

* 5..000* 4.*

.024* 1.* 4.*.989* 24..45.10.45

925745

, EXPLOITS

* 5..024 6.000

3.985.006.000 3.388

4.107.044

1.481 624.000

72

* 3.*

.991** 2.*.020 3.i 24..9371

2038.23

.0022.12

.0031.901.196.511.14

101.09

951 *049 6.000008 *000 *000 4.008510 *153 *190 *157 6.010000 *

92.294.233.49

2.853.740

21222324

i EXPLORATION

2836.61

.1719.89

.0017.8523.80

.622.13

101.07

980 *020 6.000808 *021 *000 3.829151 *438 *373 *293 6.255000 *

39.95A 1 1

2137

21

31161

99

5.944.056

3.957.004.000

1.5004.183.213.187

24.000

SAMPLESAMPLESAMPLESAMPLE

R.

.63

.03

.56

.00

.67

.40

.37

.26

.92

* 66.000

* 3t

3.960* 1* 3* 1

6.084* 24

91.264.654.09

2.914.745

HK-31 GRAINHK-31 GRAINHK-31 GRAINHK-31 GRAIN

L. BARNETT

2936

19

1724

2101

6.002.000

3.780.026.000.145

2.391.387

3.34924.000

.90

.21

.72

.00

.58

.31

.60

.22

.54

* 66.002

* 3*

3.805** 2t

6.273 3* 24

39.03* 71

2238.74

.0321.25

.0024.81

.474.949.84

100.08

..031 *.000 6.031.899 *.004 *.000 3.902.146 *..230 *.641 *.062 6.080.000 *

65.4733.271.26

2.872.742

2333

MARCH 28,1992

3036.44

.2719.20

.0018.2623.12

.602.00

99.89

.026 *

.000 6.026

.742 *

.034 *

.000 3.775

.148 *

.525 *

.354 *

.238 6.266

.000 *41.28

C. T O

2338.51

.0621.34

.0025.10

.715.109.87

100.69

5.978 *.022 6.000

3.881 *.007 *.000 3.888

1.180 *3.258 *1.642 *.093 6.173

24.000 *65.2632.871.87

2.840.740

3137.76

.0421.72

.0331.371.2B6.651.57

100.42

5.926 *.074 6.000

3.942 *.005 *.004 3.951

1.555 *4.117 *.264 *.170 6.107

24.000 *90.46

e, flfi

2438

21

26

57

101

5.985.015

3.918.002.000

1.2933.4071.307.115

24.000

.70

.02

.58

.00

.34

.88

.61

.89

.02

t6.000

tt

3.921ttt

6.123i

70.5427.072.39

2.723.731

3237

21

31161

100

5.945.055

3.976.001.002

1.5324.114.256.153

24.000

.82

.01

.76

.02

.29

.15

.54

.52

.11

t6.000

**

3.980**t

6.055*

90.95^ t, i

f/M F/FM

14.169.934

SAMPLE WK-31 GRAIN 4, SAMPLE WK-31 GRAIN 4S' ' r UK-31 GRAIN 4St. . L W K-31 GRAIN 5

PER RECAL

14.J80 14.394 37.968 39.464 38.973.934 .935 .974 .975 .975

29 SAMPLE WK-31 GRAIN 530 SAMPLE HK-31 GRAIN 531 SAMPLE WK-3232 SAMPLE WX-32

GARNET ANALYSES, EXPLOITS EXPLORATION R. L. BARNETT MARCH 28,1992

2.756.734

2.784.736

332 38.262 .00j 21.66i .03

31.671.16b. 551.54

100.87

5.973 * 6.027 6.000

3.957 * 3.000 *.004 3.961

1.524 *4.135 * 2.258 *.153 6.070 2

7" ^00 * 24A 90.96PYRP 5.67GROS 3.37

F/M 2.814F/FM .738

SAMPLE WK-32SAMPLE WK-34 GRAIN 1SAMPLE WX-34 GRAIN 1SAMPLE WK-34 GRAIN 1

PER RECAL

412 37.922 .04; 21.69: .00

33.311.475.08 -1,27

100.78

* 5.u^4 6.000

4.004 * 3.005 *.000 4.009

1.193 * 14.390 * 4.214 *

3436

19

201911

99

.016

.000

.871

.006

.000

.295

.822

.348

.682

.000

.44

.05

.90

.00

.44

.18

.20

.97

.18

*6.016

*t

3.877*t*

6.147*

48.225.95

45.83

18.640.949

GARNET

4238

21

33151

101

.984

.016

.982

.002

.000

.217

.403

.214

.04

.02

.57

.00

.47

.46

.19

.27

.02

*6.000

tt

3.984t*t

3536.59

.1120.04

.0020.1619.441.211.62

99.17

6.029 *.000 6.029

3.891 *.014 *.000 3.905.297 *

2.778 *.286 *

2.713 6.07524.000 *

48.094.95

46.96

18.478.949

3636.56

.1020.15

.0020.2719.461.091.70

99.33

6.019.000 6

3.909.012.000 3.267

2.791.300

2.714 624.000

485

46

20.-

*.019tt.921**t.072t

.08

.17

.75

579954

37383940

ANALYSES, EXPLOITS EXPLORATION

4337.27

.0021.14

.0035.443.563.05.83

101.29

5.963 *.037 6.000

3.948 *.000 *.000 3.948.727 *

4.742 *.142 *

4437.38

.0521.12

.0034.963.633.05.89

101.08

5.981.019 6

3.963.006.000 3.727

4.678.153

t.000t*.969**t

3739.31

.0321.97

.0226.57

.8010.011.82

100.53

5.998 * 5.002 6.000

3.947 * 3.003 *.002 3.953

2.276 * 23.390 * 3.298 *.103 6.067

24.000 * 2489.437.852.73

1.535.605

SAMPLE WK-34 GRAINSAMPLE WK-34 GRAINSAMPLE WK-34 GRAINSAMPLE WK-36

R. L. BARNETT

4537.31

.0121.15

.0035.093.522.79.86

100.73

5.992 * 5.008 6.000

3.995 * 3.001 *.000 3.996.668 *

4.713 * 4.14ft *

3839.34

.0522.17

.0426.86

.8310.121.75

101.16

.971 *

.029 6.000

.936 *

.006 *

.005 3.946

.289 *

.409 *

.285 *

.107 6.090

.000 *89.707.492.81

1.536.606

222

MARCH 28,1992

4636.08

.0320.49

.0029.8112.01

.57

.5299.51

.974 *

.026 6.000

.972 *

.004 *

.000 3.976

.141 *

.128 *(W t

3939.

.

22.

26.,

10.1.

100.

5.992.008

3.975.007.005

2.2683.352.298.100

24.000

4735.

20.f

28.12.

,

.

98.

5.955.045

3.963.005.000.139

4.042ftQR

420623043778018374

t6.000

t*

3.986ttt

6.019t

89.387.952.68

1.522.604

4038

21

32151

100

6.029.000

3.989.000.000

1.2134.326.219.200

24.000

.31

.00

.51

.00

.87

.50

.17

.30

.66

t6.029

tt

3.989**t

5.958t

91.174.624.21

3.732.789

48680438009663565580

l6.000

lt

3.968tti

35

20

2912

99

5.962.038

3.955.005.004.146

4.133i\ m

.88

.04

.39

.03

.74

.09

.59

.49

.25

t6.000

t*

3.964tt*

. 1 70

24.000ALMPYRPGROS

F/M1

J . 7 7 1

*

91.454.47

4.09

3.843.794

. 1 7 J O.UiO

24.000 *91.514.454.04

3.778.791

.tOi U.U71

24.000 *88.362.658.99

7.183.878

.1 7i U.UjU

24.000 *87.892.879.24

7.108.877

.1 / 7 U.VVU

24.000 *88.262.778.97

7.774.886

1 . UO** U . VI J

24.000 *69.911.56

28.53

41.317.976

i . ; uj u . uu j

24.000 *68.211.66

30.13

41.832.977

l . i \JL u . yuu

24.000 *69.791.47

28.74

39.927.976

SAMPLE HK-36SAMPLE UK-36SAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN lSAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN l

45 SAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN l46 SAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN 247 SAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN 248 SAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN 2

'PER RECAL GARNET ANALYSES, EXPLOITS EXPLORATION R. L. BARNETT MARCH 28,1992

4939.70

L1 .01•l 2 2.06•:l . 03

25.83 ..64

10.302.02

100.59

6.026 *.000 6.026

3.946 *.001 *.004 3.950'30 *J9 *.329 *.082 6.020

24.000 *ALM 88.37PYRP 8.90GROS 2.23

F/M 1.442F/FM .591

SAMPLE WK-37 GRAINSAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN

. SAMPLE WK-37 GRAINSAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN

PER RECAL

572 38.70

.04l 22.01l M

27.95.60

8.642.45

100.48

5.960 *.040 6.000

3.954 *flflt t

5039.62

.0222.49

.0226.31

.6610.222.06

101.40

5.978 *.022 6.000

3.977 *.002 *.002 3.981

2.298 *3.320 *.333 *.084 6.036

24.000 *88.838.912.26

1.481.597

3334

GARNET

5838.49

.0321.92

.0129.92

.707.991.13

100.19

5.978 *.022 6.000

3.989 *004 *

5139.46

.0222.24

.1226.24

.7410.132.03

100.98

5.984.016 6

3.958.002.014 3

2.2903.328.330.095 6

24.0008882

1.-

ANALYSES

5938.45

.0022.04

.0030.99

.708.061.20

101.44

5.928.072 6

3.931.000

5239.18

.0022.60

.0029.15

.648.881.17

101.62

* 5.962 *.000 .038 6.000* 4.014 ** .000 *.975 .000 4.014* 2.014 ** 3.709 ** .191 *.042 .082 5.996* 24.000 *

.68 93.14

.79 4.79

.53 2.07

495 1.883599 .653

53545556

, EXPLOITS EXPLORATION

6038.53

.0121.84

.0030.33

.737.861.25

100.55

* 5.976 *.000 .024 6.000* 3.968 ** .001 *

5338.97

.0322.03

.0029.34

.628.831.13

100.95

5.981 * 5.019 6.000

3.965 * 4.003 *.000 3.969

2.020 * 23.766 * 3.186 *.081 6.052

24.000 * 2493.394.612.00

1.904.656

SAMPLE WK-37 GRAINSAMPLE WK-37 GRAINSAMPLE WK-37 GRAINSAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN

R. L. BARNETT

6137.82

.0121.66

.0131.721.616.481.18

100.49

5.941 * 5.059 6.000

3.951 * 3.001 *

5438.89

.0022.30

.0128.84

.688.831.10

100.65

.973 *

.027 6.000

.009 *

.000 *

.001 4.011

.021 *

.704 *

.181 *

.088 5.995

.000 *93.224.562.23

1.876.652

4455

MARCH 28,1992

6237.11

.0021.54

.0330.941.666.161.20

98.64

.934 *

.066 6.000

.993 *

.000 *

5538.62

.0422.12

.0427.99

.778.472.48

100.53

5.949 *.051 6.000

3.964 *.005 *.005 3.974

1.945 *3.606 *.409 *.100 6.060

24.000 *87.619.952.44

1.906.656

6337.04

.0121.32

.0332.351.705.751.24

99.44

5.918 *.082 6.000

3.931 *.00! *

5638.97

.0222.08

.0427.68

.728.732.47

100.71

5.977 *.023 6.000

3.968 *.002 *.005 3.975

1.996 *3.550 *.406 *.094 6.046

24.000 *87.6710.022.31

1.826.646

6437.56

.1420.34

.0033.001.162.106.53

100.83

6.010 *.000 6.010

3.835 *.017 *

j 1.9B3 * 1.850 *i. tOO * 3.886 *

H .404 * .188 *H .086 6.073 .092 6.016

24.000 * 24.000 *ALM 88.01 93.28

9.88 4.51bhuS 2.10 2.21

F./M 1.858 2.151F/FM .650 .683

; SAMPLE HK-37 GRAIN 5i SAMPLE HK-37 GRAIN 69 SAMPLE HK-37 GRAIN 6j SAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN 6

UPER RECAL GARNET

65 6602 37.45 37.3902 .07 .0903 20.57 20.5403 .00 .000 33.01 32.46,0 1.21 1.14.u 2.21 2.110 6.78 6.50H 101.30 100.23

I 5.969 * 6.004 *L 031 6.000 .000 6.004

..833 * 3.887 *1 .008 * .011 *R .000 3.842 .000 3.898

j .525 * .505 *E 4.400 * 4.359 *i 1.158 * 1.118 *

;N .163 fc.247 .155 6.13824.000 * 24.000 *

ALM 76.91 77.39PYRP 20.24 19.85GROS 2.86 2.75

F/H 8.692 8.939F/FH .897 .899

S SAHPLE HK-37 GRAIN 8i SAHPLE HK-37 GRAIN 87 SAMPLE HK-37 GRAIN 9d SAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN 9

1.8523.995.198.091

24.000

* 1.* 3.t

6.137* 24.

93.244.632.13

2.207.688

ANALYSES, EXPLOITS

6738

21

29181

100

5.976.024

3.969.001.001

1.8913.769.228.165

24.000

.68

.01

.93

.01

.17

.26

.21

.38

.65

* 5.6.000

* 3.t

3.971* 1.* 3.*

6.053* 24.

90.555.493.96

2.081.675

817934208096000

ttt

6.055

1.517 * 14.16) * 4.199 *.214 6.097

.468

.137

.206

.225* 24.000 * 24.000

92.844.902.26

2.218.689

61626364

. EXPLORATION

6838.

.

21.

28.1.8.1.

99.

951049976001000888755239174000

160190007932124373

*6.000

tt

3.977*tt

6.056t

90.085.734.18

2.082.676

69707172

90.994.344.68

2.888.743

SAMPLE HK-37 GRAINSAMPLE WK-37 GRAINSAMPLE WK-37 GRAINSAMPLE HK-37 GRAIN

R. L. BARNETT

6938.50

.0121.94

.0028.991.138.071.41

100.05

5.979 * 5.021 6.000

3.993 * 3.001 *.000 3.995

1.868 * 13.765 * 4.235 *.149 6.016

24.000 * 2490.765.663.58

2.095.677

SAMPLE HK-37 GRAINSAMPLE HK-37 GRAINSAMPLE HK-37 GRAINSAMPLE HK-37 GRAIN

7778

MARCH

7037.

21.

31.3.4.1.

100.

.982

.018

.969

.000

.000

.010

.198

.329

.516

.000

9101010

*l*

6.036t

90.584.504.92

2.971.748

28,1992

590026005483269341

*6.000

tt

3.969*tt

6.053*

83.246.5310.24

4.665.823

1.3694.322.212.230

24.000

7137.

21.

31.3.4.1.

100.

5.972.028

3.992.001.000

1.0164.202.317.487

24.000

*t*

6.134t

90.724.454.83

3.325.769

.5014.4161.119.157

24.000

i

t

f

6.193*

77.5719.672.76

9.131.901

72510143005661288626

t6.000

*t

3.993tl*

6.022t

83.946.349.72

4.617.822

37.t

21.t

32.3.4.1.

100.

5.917.083

3.971.000.003

1.0324.257.310.481

24.000

280067020758368280

*

6.000**

3.973t**

6.079t

84.336.139.53

4.594.821


APPENDIX 4

GRID COORDINATES /y

LOCATION

DIAMOND D RILL C ORE LGG SHEET NO.

TESTS DEPTH DIP

BEARING.

DIP AT COLLAR

LOGGED l

SYSTEM OF MEASURE

PROPERTY -

CLAIM NO. P

HOLE NO.

CORE SIZE

STARTED —

TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLEFINISHED

DATE LOGGED:FOOTAGE

FROM TO

DESCRIPTION

"7^?SAMPLE

NO.

ASSAYS

7. CU Vo 2N Nl

CORE LENGTH

FROM TO WIDTH

QQi

VJ

"3-

T

C

' Jd js) -J . (S* U We k cJw.lo.--4 '' C-

ci

Kfrf~Y fv

e^ V\CV^O

(JCONTRACTOR Djl/ Lil *

SHEET NO.

DIAMOND DRILL CORE LOG PROPERTY

HOLE

FOOTAGE

FKOM TODESCRIPTION

SAMPLE NO.

ASSAYS

AU OZ . CU •Z. 2N ".', N l

CORE LENGTH

FROM TOAC

WIC

f+0 i/v/vOcdD J

^

xT ^

- CVv^

\o~-VlOU

-^

Oi^ cL-Uo^ ^y-y cn,

C L H : -

k

HJ

fc^.^. O C- S

SHERLOCK TWP (M. 1114)

BM

CHAPLEAU-

NEMEGOSEND

PROVINCIAL

(D 00 O

QL ^H-

UJ 2O^ LU

PAUL TWP. (M. 1052) WARREN TWP. (M. 1176)

42B07SW0002 OP92-269SHERLOCK 200

LEGENDHIGHWAY AND ROUTE No

OTHER ROADS

TRAILSSURVEYED LINES:

TOWNSHIPS. BASE LINES. ETC.LOTS. MINING CLAIMS. PARCELS. ETC.

UNSURVEYED LINESLOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY -*

UTILITY LINES NON PERENNIAL STREAM FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN RESERVATIONS ORIGINAL SHORELINE MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES TRAVERSE MONUMENT

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT

PATENT, SURFACE A MINING RIGHTS.. SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY.._..MINING RIGHTS ONLY____.

LEASE SURFACE Si M INING RIGHTS..." .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY.___.

" .MINING RIGHTS ONLY.__....

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ..__..._. ORDER-IN-COUNCIL ————-.—.

RESERVATION.______._____.....

CANCELLED ___.......___......-SAND * GRAVEL __.....___........

SYMBOL

9 Q

. OV

^. OG

NOTE: MINING RIGHTS IN PARCELS PATENTED PRIOR TO MAY 6. 1913. VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE BY THE PUBLIC LANDS ACT. R.S.O. 197O. CHAP. 38O. SEC. 63. SUBSEC 1.

NOTES

400' Surface Rights Reservation around all lakes and rivers.

MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS WITHDRAWN UNDER SECTION 42 OF THE MINING ACT R.S.O. 1970 ORDER NO. W86/70 DATED SEPT. 22,1970.

RESERVE

TOURIST C flMps

SCALE: 1 INCH ~ 40 CHAINS

FEETO 1000 WOO 40OO OOOO aooo

O 3OO METRES

1000 (1 KM)

2OOO(2 KM)

ACRES HECTARES

TOWNSHIP OF

LINCOLNDISTRICT OF

SUDBURYMINING DIVISION

PORCUPINE

Ministryof Surveys andNatural MappingResources B ranch

Ontario

Datt 25/27 1980

National Topographic Strict

Plan No.

M.989

fTL-2*70

o eg

Kapuskosing Twp.-M.96! Lougheed Twp.-M.996

Mb K

CHAPLEAU NEMEGOSENDA

CHAPLEAU NEMEGOSENDA

RIVER PROVINaAL

PARK

Lincoln Twp.- M.989

MAGNETIC INCLINATION

9- WEST

CM

O OC. O 'C O)

V^T

THE TOWNShHP OF

SHERLOCKDISTRICT OF

SUDBURY

PORCUPINEMINING' DIVISION

SCALE: 1-INCH 4O CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLED

4- REMOTE TOURIST CAMPS

*c.

NOTES

4OO* Surface Rights Reservation around atl lakes and rtvers.

© MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS WITHDRAWN UNDER SECTION 42 OF THE MINJNG ACTv R.S.O. I970. ORDER NO. W86/70 DATED SEPT. 22. 1970.

aw

///fffiPLAN NO.- M.III4

ONTARIO -

MINISTRY OPNATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH *

\

)

TRIM LINE

eh01on O

o o

Ol/) uo10

PAUL TP. M-1052

SANDY TP. M-109042B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK

MAGNETI DECLINATy WES

1OoN

Q.

CO

UJ

L

*" " NOTES

400' surface rights reservation along the shores of all ^ lakes and rivers.

Lumber

S7. 02. /B.

LEGEND

nij

PATENTED LANDPATENTED FOR SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

.LEASELICENSE OF OCCUPATION CROWN LAND SALES LOCATED LAND CANCELLED MINING RIGHTS ONLY SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY HIGHWAY 4 ROUTE NO. ROADS TRAILS RAILWAYS POWER LINES MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES

r *

'used only; with summer resort locations or when space Is limited

TOWNSHIP OF

' MURDOCKDISTRICT OFSUDBURY

PORCUPINEMINING DIVISION

SCALE : 1 INCH 40 CHAINS (1/2 MILE)DR. R.W.N.

DATE JUNE 22,72. PLAN NO. M-2220ONTARIO

MINISTRY Of NATURAL RESOURCES*- ' /*-

SURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

OP72.-T-

t

01C/1 01O

o o

l \

Sample number

CLAIM BLOCK

r o me diopside grains

13ryrope grans

Sample location

42B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK 230

WORK AREAS, SAMPLE S IJTIS -COMPILATION

PORCUPINE MINING DISTRICT, ONTARIO

Date

Scale

MAP No.

Revised

Oct., 92

1:100,000

2

y- - -|7

y'

1992 OPAP PROGRAMME - W. K

NTS:

Longitude:

Latitude :

Drawn by:

42B\SE

82 56'35

48 18'10

W. Kerr

ERR f G. COHOOM

42B

07SW

0002

OP9

2-26

9 SH

ERLO

CK

240

P

S O

1 f y

o

3 P -r! r,

c?- o o c 1

m *

H 90 H I-H O r* •4 w f o z lg qg D *4 fi m C 90 S K 1 ^|

* H yj 90 tff

G*

Q 8 z

o l—*

(K h— B 3 O ^ H; t* i** Ol

t* 0 * c 3 ? ^J

m tt n M

o c Xt z o * l—

* f 0) rr f* o- C o. A ** A. oo ro H*

O O

in n O) i— A H*

a * Is)

^ en o

o r o 9 A e a A •* OB

N) en "^ c^ ut

0 0) rr t O O rr i ^ VD to z ea •tte

N)

CO M R

j

13 O JB O s- l-t Z n 2 Z i-t Z Q 0 i-i ea H) 79 1-4 O

H ^J

X 50 hH 0

M X 90 r o QXN Z O 90 H X Q 93 n a CO x H 90 r R p^ ^j|

0 z CO x fr-l

•o

-

CP

o

8

N

A

0*00 BL

\r\ eio-oinvOL-

42B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK 250

LINCOLN SOUTH GRID, LINCOLN TOWNSHIP


Date

Scale

Dwg No .

Claim no.

Oct., 92

1:2,500

5

1151234

NTS:

Longitude :

Latitude:

Drawn by:

42BXSE

82 56 '20

48 12*48

W. Kerr

VERTICAL FIELD MAGNETIC SURVEY- W. KERR @ G. COHOON

42B

07S

W00

02 O

P92

-269

SH

ER

LOC

K

tO O

2 4 p P {ft

V p T)

*" P

P 0

< p] 30 •* t-t n > r •q t-l n r 0 z > o z n H M O CO G 30 <

P)

K 1 * * ?5 rq 90 90 f® O o o x o o z

o 1— '

4* 3 3 O ' I-"

H-4

OD

l-1

Ul

ON fo O rt fit C 3 cr *-c

-

fi 1 ?? A r-t rt

O C •A Z O m f (K rr i— rt C a t* ~"~* A OD

O IO ^ o M

M O iu ^^ A \ M • * Is)

^ en o o n 0 3 A h— rr C o- n 00 M (J1

(Jl * CO o

O su cr D O O rr . x o to z H CO ~ — J* hJ to s CO n

13 O 93 O C 13 i— i

Z PI Z Z *— ( z o o 1—*

CO H 30 H O -9 ^ O Z -3 > SO o

•x. c 90 0 O O J* CO O G -3 X 0 30 Ht

OH

Z c 90 O O n 95 H O 4 Z 0)

*— * •o

260

— 4

*00 W

— 2

*OO

W

- 2

*00

E

D --

L 9*91 N

l———l—\ L 9 *00 N

DON

i^ L5*OON

L 4'OON

IJ p ^IN IR rJ

iC^ 1*9p 8 s g i5 13 i* i* g 12 i?V - _____^———,——i——r——r

cJ

L 3*00N

L 2-00

olo•\i S ifl \S |ft |3 15 li It li-J. L 1 * 00 N

,o \o p loh^

1

|0 ^

A* 00 W

|0 ,0 U) lv'

lui 'w,o A |0 AO 10 \T 0 tO

HO W VI rj jj—T ——— 1 ——— 1 ————————

2iOOW

|0 \S-b fe T.1

1

1 0 n n .P ' li P \5

0.0 .0 fi* U lo) FJcj r*-) *^ (\i1 — 1 —— i — rCf ————— i —— r—

ft* tt— 1 —— 1 —— 1 —

D O

i r -T- tj1 2*OOE

0*00 BL

L OOON

R vr-vc* -

42B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK 270

x rv- LINCOLN NORTH GRID, SHERLOCK TOWNSHIP


Date

Scale

Dwg No .

Claim no.

j !

Oct., 92 j NTS: l

1:2,500

4

1181563

1

Longitude: !

Latitude: i

Drawn by: j

42BXSE

82 56'35

48 IS'IO

W. Kerr i

VERTICAL FIELD MAGNETIC SURVEY- W. KERR @ G. COHOON

1.00W , 1*50E 3*00 E

D----- /L. L 0*OOS

L1*OOS

L 2*00 S

'Ms s /* *l l l ' l l l

L 1-DOS

L 7*00 S

N

A

000 BL

\T xo

* t

lr\4ervaL -

42B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK 280

SHERLOCK EAST (JRID, SHERLOCK TOWNSHIP

PORCUPINE i.INING DISTRICT, ONTARIO

Date

Scale

Dwg No .

Claim no.

. Oct., 92

1:2,500

3

1151235———————————

NTS:

Longitude: ;—————— 2. ————————— f—

Latitude: j

Drawn by: |

42BXSE

82 54'01

48 20'20

W. Kerr

VERTICAL FIELD MAGNETIC SURVEY- W. KERR @ C. COHOON

o

-300 N

-200 N

-100 N

-O

500 S-

600 S-

- 100 S

200 S

-300 S

-400 S

-500 S

\ 559

Oo r--

o oCO

oin

-N-

MAGNETIC FIELD- 50- 250

CONTOURS

READINGS IN GAMMAS

MAGNETOMETER - SCINTREX MF-1

CLAIM POST -

42B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK

50

290

SCALE 1 : 2 50050 (metres) 100 150 200

VERTICAL HELD MAGNETIC SURVEYby

B. KERR ft G. COHOON

SHERLOCK WEST GRIDSHERLOCK HP., ONTARIO

DATE : June 1992 DRAWN : Geosearch Consultants Ltd.

final rpt on a kimberlite explo programme chapleau …

Documents