fill development in practice in asian low-lying urban …hara/poster_hawaii.pdfongoing case study...
TRANSCRIPT
Ongoing case study cities
Onsite fill development
Offsite aggregate/soil mining
Mineral flow characteristics
Planning issues/problems
Tokyo Metropolitan Area(insular alluvial plain)
Average material input: 3.3×104 m3 km−2 y−1
(Takeuchi and Yoshioka 1982)
Average material output: 3.8×107 m3 y−1 (sand only)
(Asahi et al. 1993)
Aggregate flow: 20-30kmSoil flow: from underground construction site into adjoining fill sites
(Sudo 2001)
Illegal waste flow and dumping
Exhaustion of aggregate resources
Weak linkage between fill material flow control and land-use planning
Bangkok Metropolitan Region(continental delta)
Average material input: 5.7×103 m3 km−2 y−1
(Hara et al. 2008)
Average material output: 5.5×107 m3 y−1 (sand only)
(Hara et al. 2008)
Aggregate flow: 100< kmSoil flow: between adjoining parcels (fill-pond combination)
(Hara et al. 2008)
Poorly environmentally managed sand mining
Almost no control at the nodes of fill flow network
Weak linkage between fill development and zoning in consideration of floods
Metro Manila and its vicinity(insular alluvial plain)
Average material input: 5.0×103 m3 km−2 y−1
(Hara et al. 200?)
Average material output: 6.6×106 m3 y−1 (lahar only)
(Hara et al. 200?)
Aggregate flow: 10-60kmBulk material: from renewal site into fill development sites
(Hara et al. 200?)
Unsanitary landfilling
Case-by-case basis bulk material flow
Emergent poor-drainage district surrounded with fill corridor
Fill development in practice in Asian low-lying urban-rural areasYuji HARA
Transdisciplinary Initiative for Global Sustainability (TIGS), The University of Tokyo
Project outline
In low-lying monsoonal areas of Asia, people traditionally settled on natural levees or upland landforms, which are relatively safe from natural disasters such as extreme floods and large earthquakes. As populations have grown and become concentrated in cities, urban land uses have gradually expanded into more vulnerable natural landforms, such as floodplains and back marshes in which were treated as rice fields. Such an urban land development in low-lying flood-prone areas has been materialized by landfill techniques. Fill practice for development has various forms in its quantitative and qualitative methods, which is also subject to availability of material. Investigation into spatial patterns, process and driving forces of fill development is necessary to consider land-use planning.
List of publications in international journalsHara, Y., Takeuchi, K., Palijon, A.M. & Murakami, A. (200?): Landfill development in the urban fringe of Metro Manila. GeoJournal (under revision).Hara, Y., Thaitakoo, D. & Takeuchi, K. (2008): Landform transformation on the urban fringe of Bangkok: The need to review land-use planning processes with consideration of the flow of fill materials to developing areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 84, 74-91.Hara, Y., Takeuchi, K. & Okubo, S. (2005): Urbanization linked with past agricultural landuse patterns in the urban fringe of a deltaic Asian mega-city: A case study in Bangkok. Landscape and Urban Planning 73, 16–28.
Future outlook
There is still a gap between spatial planning and practice in our daily living space. How should we implement science-basis “beautiful”masterplan in practice? This is frequently asked in Asian low-lying urban-rural fringe area where strong private landholding is longstanding. Field investigation into lateral land uses and inherent vertical landform transformation can help to bridge such a gap. The accumulation of case studies from this perspective among Asian low-lying urban regions enables us to categorize fill development process and patterns, and to develop effective land-use planning strategy in consideration of control on fill practice. This study might be also significant in the context of sea level rise due to global warming.
Temple
Detached houses
Secondary road
1500m
Khlong Bangkok Noi
Main road Secondary road Secondary road Main roadSecondary road
5m
0
1987 Land use
2000 Land use
Orchard
Detached houses
Wasteland
Vacant land
Khlong houses
Slum-type housing
Detached houses
Khlong houses
Orchard
Detached houses
ApartmentsTempleKhlong houses
Khlong houses
ApartmentsKhlong houses
Khlong houses
Townhouse
Townhouse
Apartments Apartments
-5m
Clay fill (CL, 5Y5/1)
Water body
Sand fill (S, 10YR6/6)
Crushed rockConcrete plank
Material (texture, color)
1952 1967 1979
1987 1995 2002
1952 1967 1979
1987 1995 2002
RR RDTH CO SC FA
DH VAKH TMOR SH WL
Land use
5
4
3
2
1
0
Elev
atio
n (m
)
1.56 1.76 1.811.381.06Average (m)
ab
c c c
By water By landCrushed rock flowSand flowClay flow
By water By landCrushed rock flowSand flowClay flow
Rice dominant areaOrchard dominant area
Past agricultural land-use pattern
Rice dominant areaOrchard dominant area
Past agricultural land-use pattern
Source pit area
1986 Land use
2004 Land use
5m
0
-5m
500m
Rice field
Swamp
Vege table patch
Vege table patch
Detached houses
Detached houses
P.Rosales Street
Slum-type housing
Slum-type housing
Slum-type hous ing Detac hed houses
Detac hed houses
1966 Land useRice fieldDe tac hed houses
Forest Detac hed houses
Clay f ill (HC, 2.5Y3/3)
Water body
Sand fill (S, 5Y5/1)
Crushed rock
Construct ion waste (broken concrete etc. )
Material (texture, color)
A B
1986 Land use
2004 Land use
5m
0
-5m
500m
Rice field
Swamp
Vege table patch
Vege table patch
Detached houses
Detached houses
P.Rosales Street
Slum-type housing
Slum-type housing
Slum-type hous ing Detac hed houses
Detac hed houses
1966 Land useRice fieldDe tac hed houses
Forest Detac hed houses
Clay f ill (HC, 2.5Y3/3)
Water body
Sand fill (S, 5Y5/1)
Crushed rock
Construct ion waste (broken concrete etc. )
Material (texture, color)
A B
1986 Land use
2004 Land use
5m
0
-5m
500m
Rice field
Swamp
Vege table patch
Vege table patch
Detached houses
Detached houses
P.Rosales Street
Slum-type housing
Slum-type housing
Slum-type hous ing Detac hed houses
Detac hed houses
1966 Land useRice fieldDe tac hed houses
Forest Detac hed houses
Clay f ill (HC, 2.5Y3/3)
Water body
Sand fill (S, 5Y5/1)
Crushed rock
Construct ion waste (broken concrete etc. )
Material (texture, color)
A B
1966 1986 20041966 1986 20041966 1986 2004
Urban fringe area
Upland Low-lying area
Hilly area
Volcanic mountainous areaBy truckCrushed rock flowSand flowClay flowConstruction waste flow
Urban fringe area
Upland Low-lying area
Urban fringe area
Upland Low-lying area
Hilly areaHilly area
Volcanic mountainous areaVolcanic mountainous areaBy truckCrushed rock flowSand flowClay flowConstruction waste flow
By truckCrushed rock flowSand flowClay flowConstruction waste flow
Contact: [email protected]