fifth biennial getting in touch with literacy conference november 9, 2001 philadelphia, pa
DESCRIPTION
Fifth Biennial Getting in Touch With Literacy Conference November 9, 2001 Philadelphia, PA. A Descriptive Study of Standards and Criteria for Competence in Braille Literacy Within Teacher Preparation Programs in the United States & Canada - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Fifth Biennial Getting in Touch With Literacy ConferenceNovember 9, 2001 Philadelphia, PA
A Descriptive Study of Standards and Criteria for Competence in Braille Literacy Within Teacher Preparation Programs in the
United States & Canada
Sheila Steiner Amato, Ed.D.
2
Literacy is:
An issue of national concern Involves reading, writing, math, computer skills, culture (Rex, 1989) Technology skills (Koenig, 1992) Necessary to function on the job and in society (National Institute for
Literacy, 1993) Demonstrated at various levels throughout one’s lifetime (Koenig,
1992) The means to a limitless array of activities and encounters (Schroeder,
1989) The means to a better quality of life (National Institute for Literacy,
1993)
3
Braille literacy can:
Make it possible for a person who is blind to participate equally in society (Nemeth, 1988) and in the cultural and political life of the community (Stephens, 1989)
Open the way to information by tearing down barriers of myth and ignorance (Schroeder, 1989)
Determine the degree of independent functioning on the job (Johnson, 1989)
Enable individuals who are blind to read and write for themselves
4
By the numbers...
In 1989
70% of working age people who are blind were unemployed or underemployed (Schroeder, 1989)
Of the 30% who are employed, 85% read braille (Spungin, 1989)
In 2000
74% of working age people who are blind are unemployed or underemployed (Maurer, 2000)
Of the 26% who are employed, 85% read braille (Maurer, 2000)
5
However… there is evidence of a nationwide decline in braille literacy
In 1968
40% of children who were blind or visually impaired could read braille
45% read large print
9% could read neither
In 1999
less than 10% of children who were blind or visually impaired could read braille
more than 40% could read neither
(APH, 1999)
6
Consumer services have placed partial blame for the decline in braille literacy on:
Teacher incompetence in using and teaching braille (Allman & Lewis, 1997)
Teachers’ lack of proficiency in braille (Mullen, 1990)
Teachers’ poor attitudes (Mullen, 1990)Inadequate preparation of teachers by the
university teacher preparation programs (Spungin, 1989)
7
The catalyst … WHY????
The National Literary Braille Competency Test (NLBCT) was developed by the National Library Service for the Blind/The Library of Congress
Purpose: to allow teachers of children and adults who are blind to demonstrate their competency in writing braille with the braillewriter and the slate and stylus, their ability to proofread braille, and their knowledge of braille code rules
Administered to 396 candidates between May, 1994 and June 1999 (Stark, 2000)
The discovery that there is a 25% passing rate for teachers who take the National Literary Braille Competency Test
8
Issue of concern for:
Students of university teacher training programs ~ and staff who teach them
Their future students or clients Braille consumers National organizations using these statistics to
support their contention that teacher training programs were graduating less-than-competent teachers (NFB, 1995)
9
Questionnaire Standards and Criteria for Competence in Braille Literacy was designed by the investigator Descriptional survey design Purpose: to examine the issue of teacher competence in
braille literacy and the specific role played in the achievement of braille literacy by university teacher preparation programs in blindness and visual impairment
Thank you!Some of the questions designed for a previously completed Teachers
College doctoral dissertation that investigated Braille Training and Teacher Attitudes: Implications for Personnel Preparation, 1993 were either used in their entirety or modified with the written permission of the author, Dr. Stuart Wittenstein.
10
Pilot instrument
Pilot version of initial questionnaire draft was distributed to 13 individuals in fields of:blindness & visual impairmentregular educationspecial educationliteracy & readingstatistics & measurementteacher trainingand a consumer who uses braille revisions made were based on their feedback
11
Final document Standards and Criteria for Competence in Braille Literacy
Section 1 - course format Section 2 - course content Section 3 – course expected outcomes Section 4 - grading and determining the level of
competence Section 5 - opinion poll Section 6 - demographic information for the
respondents
12
Programs Surveyed
The list of programs was gleaned from “Colleges and Universities in the United States and Canada Offering Programs for Teachers of Visually Impaired Children Recognized by AER” (http://www.afb.org)
Cross reference done with the National Plan for Training Personnel (NPTP) (Council for Exceptional Children, 1999)
13
By the numbers:
Surveyed 39 institutions that offer programs in Blindness & Visual Impairment
Represent 21 states from within the United States Represent 3 Canadian Provinces Include undergraduate, graduate (Master’s &
Doctoral) and post-graduate programs
14
Rate of Response
Responses were received from 34 programs (87.2%). Thus, it is possible to say that these results are truly representative of teacher education programs in blindness & visual impairment throughout the United States and Canada
Caveat~Caveat~
These data should not be interpreted as a means to judge the quality of the programs, nor to claim superiority or inferiority of practice or the instructor.
15
Major Findings of the
Demographics of Respondents 55.5% institutions offer only graduate programs in BVI 46.6% of university level braille courses are taught by
adjunct instructors or graduate faculty 39.9% have tenure or are in tenure-track positions 43 instructors have:
known braille for a mean of 26.4 years taught a total of 5,356 students during the past 25 years 69.0% received their braille training as part of a university
graduate program 65.1% hold no certification unique to braille (as distinguished
from certification as a teacher of students who are blind/visually impaired
16
Results in a nutshell
Widespread diversity and lack of consistency within university level braille courses in terms of:format of instructioncontent and instructional materialsexpected student outcomesstandards and criteria for competence in braille
literacy
17
Research Question 1: What is the format of instruction offered in braille as a method of written communication in university level teacher preparation programs in BVI?
75.6% incorporate the term “Braille” as part of their course title 31.1% offer only one semester of braille, the other programs offer
either 2 or 3 semesters of braille. 93.0% have freedom and latitude to create their own syllabus within a
general framework 48.9% programs (primarily graduate programs) follow a “traditional”
university semester of meeting once a week for approximately 15 weeks
75.6% meet for a time period between 1-3 hours per class session 46.7% use distance learning as an integral part of their braille course 68.9% report average class size range is 6-15 students
18
Research Question 2: What topics and instructional materials are included in the university level braille course syllabus?
20.0% of programs do not include instruction in the Nemeth Code for Mathematics and Science Notation in their teacher preparation programs
48.9% of class time spent in direct instruction 37.8% of class time spent in combination with
direct instruction, drill & practice, use of instructional videos, web-based research, braille games, quizzes, exams, and student presentation of lessons
Texts used: 48.9% use Instructional Manual for Braille Transcribing, 3rd.edition 42.2% use New Programmed Instruction in Braille 42.2% use Learning the Nemeth Braille Code 53.3% use Instructional Strategies for Braille Literacy (non-code)
19
Research Question 3: What are the expected student outcomes in terms of the acquisition and demonstration of braille-related skills and knowledge for these courses?
All require demonstration of braille transcription by use of a braillewriter
All require translation of braille into print 93.3% read braille visually 82.9% transcribe braille by using a slate & stylus 77.8% transcribe mathematics by using the Nemeth Code 73.4% instruction in braille reading methods 15.6%-62.2% other skills and knowledge: teacher made materials,
creation of lesson plans, presentation of sample lessons, evaluation of curricula, access technology, observation of braille user, observation of master braille teacher, identification of resources
38.6% expect less than 5 hours/week out-of-class study 45.5% expect between 6-15 hours/week out-of-class study
20
Research Question 4: What are the standards and criteria for competence in the braille code as employed by university level teacher preparation programs?
59.1% count total number of errors per assignment (which may vary in length and/or complexity)
40.9% provide the option for the student to redo/resubmit an assignment that is not passing
38.6% require the student to redo/resubmit an assignment that is not passing 56.8% allow students to use “open books/open notes” when taking exams 38.6% permit use of a standard dictionary, but allow no braille code reference
materials during exams 40.0% minimum grade for competence is B range 42.2% minimum grade for competence is C range 72.7% will receive grade of “incomplete” if not competent at end of course 56.8% will be required to repeat the course 38.6% will receive grade of “F”
21
Research Question 4 continued:
75.0% of instructors indicated that their students were required to pass a teacher-made braille competency test in order to receive a passing grade for the course.
52.3% indicated that their students were required to pass a comprehensive exam at the end of their educational program, in which braille was included
22
Research Question 5: What opinions do teachers of university braille courses hold about key issues in braille literacy?
Entry Level* Competence in Braille Skills 57.8% transcribe, read, and proofread literary braille by
braillewriter and slate & stylus
40.0% transcribe math into Nemeth code, proficiency in music code, foreign language code, rules of formatting, braille access technology, curricula, instructional strategies and teaching practice
* Entry level into the field
23
Research Question 5: What opinions do teachers of university level braille courses hold about key issues in braille literacy?
Graduate Competence in the Literary Code, Nemeth Code, and in Teaching Braille
48.9% rate students as definitely capable of handling almost any literary braille code transcription independently
22.2% rate students as definitely capable of handling almost any Nemeth code transcription independently
57.8% rate students as definitely capable of handling almost any braille related teaching situation independently
24
Research Question 5: What opinions do teachers of university braille courses hold about key issues in braille literacy?
Requirement for Refresher or In-Service Braille Training 97.9% indicated that refresher courses or in-service courses should be
required, either at regular intervals, or when the teacher feels it is necessary to refresh one’s skills
40.5% believe it is the responsibility of teacher preparation programs to provide refresher courses or in-service braille training
Comments about Teacher Competence in Braille 73.8% believe that competence at time of graduation is a function of
continuing braille practice 28.6% believe there is a need for further professional development, the
opportunity to practice skills, and the availability of braille refresher courses and in-service training
25
Research Question 5: What opinions do teachers of university level braille courses hold about key issues in braille training?
Significant Factors in the Development of Braille Skills
26.2% attitude and motivation
37.7% multiple factors: attitude & motivation, number of hours spent in practice and drill, the instructor, previous experience with braille, natural talent
26
Research Question 5: What opinions do teachers of university level braille courses hold about key issues in braille training?
A Decline Or A Resurgence Of Braille Literacy For People Who Are Blind?
54.8% believe there is a resurgence due to state and federal legislation, required learning media assessments, states putting more money in to train teachers, computer production, refreshable braille displays, refresher courses and conferences, new textbooks, the quest for higher standards and accountability, and more positive attitudes towards braille
11.9% believe there is a decline due to large student caseloads, age of onset of visual impairment, inability to find quality higher level braille textbooks - especially in math and science, the amount of auditory material presently available, and lack of national standards
27
Research Question 5: What opinions do teachers of university level braille courses hold about key issues in braille training?
Comments About University Level Braille Training Standards
31.0% standards are not high enough to produce competent teachers
23.8% students are amazingly competent for their short exposure to braille
11.9% we need to teach students how to teach braille; knowing the code is not enough
9.5% we need to establish national standards for braille training
28
Limitations of the Study
Inclusion of all established programs in blindness & visual impairment
Personal bias of participants Self-reported data Anonymity Exit skills of new teachers trained under different
models of personnel preparation
29
Implications for Personnel Preparation
Recommendation that programs provide 2 semesters of braille Inclusion of Nemeth code to enable teachers to transcribe higher level
math and science Program model which provides time for assimilation and practice of
newly learned skills Need for further research regarding effectiveness of distance learning
for braille instruction Commitment to provide ongoing inservice and refresher courses in
braille Use of a psychometrically stable instrument in terms of content and
construct validity with established reliability as a valid assessment of entry level braille skills prior to awarding a degree or teaching license
Establishment of a high minimum national standard for competence in braille literacy
30
Implications for Future Research
Need for documentation of skills of those who will teach children
Need for reevaluation, standardization and field testing of university curricula in terms of content and criteria
Exploration of use of distance learning as an effective means of service presentation for braille courses
31
For further information...
Sheila Amato, Ed.D.
72 Aster St.
Massapequa Park, NY 11762
(516) 541-2296 (home)