field development planning

Upload: shek-gh

Post on 06-Apr-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    1/49

    Field development planning

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    2/49

    Field development planning

    FDP

    enable the rapid evaluation of a large numberof development options

    handle many interfaces between the differentelements of a field development effectively

    improve confidence in and consistency of the

    results enable rapid and rigorous evaluation of

    sensitivities to a concept

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    3/49

    FDP activity

    It comprises a number of linked activities drilling

    substructures

    subsea topsides

    pipelines

    onshore terminals onshore plants

    onshore gathering systems

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    4/49

    Drilling

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    5/49

    Reverse engineering

    Normal workflow

    Know surface location

    Know target location

    Know reservoir trajectory requirement

    Design well

    FDP workflow

    Possibly know target locations Possibly know reservoir trajectory requirement

    THEN IT ALL CHANGES ANYWAY

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    6/49

    Well Profile Design

    There are still an infinite number of waysto join a surface location with a downholetarget

    Even if up is not an option

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    7/49

    Client requirement

    Define a scope of work

    Define well placement requirements

    Reservoir exposure

    Reservoir placement

    Target penetration

    All of the above with a stated accuracy

    Survey programme at reasonable cost

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    8/49

    Client requirement

    Design multi-well exit

    Join the top to the bottom in the best way

    What is the best way? Depends on production requirement

    Linkage to WBS

    Tools available

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    9/49

    Well Profile 2D

    This works a profile in TVD and on asingle azimuth

    Dimension 1 is TVD

    Dimension 2 is reach

    For example the following slide has someprofiles for a target displacement of 1000m

    at a 1750m tvd

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    10/49

    Well Profile 2D

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1 400 1600 1800 2000 2 200

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    2d-30deg2d-10deg 2d-60deg2d-45deg 2d-75deg2d-90deg

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    11/49

    Key points in a well design

    1. Rig floor

    2. Tie-in

    3. Wellhead

    4. MSL5. Seabed or groundlevel

    6. WRP

    7. All casing depths

    8. KOP9. BUR

    10. EOB

    11.Grid azimuth

    12.Lead angle

    13. Tangent angle

    14.Measured depth15. True vertical depth

    16.Displacement

    17. Closure

    18. VSD19. Target location(s)

    20. TD

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    12/49

    Special key points

    1. 2nd KOP

    2. 2nd BUR

    3. EO 2ndB

    4. DOP

    5. DOR

    6. EOD

    7. TR

    8. BR

    There are some differentways of describing alocation

    Geographic co-ordinates Grid co-ordinates

    Rectangular co-ordinates

    Polar co-ordinates

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    13/49

    Slant (departure > R)

    Given: Wellhead coordinates Target coordinates Target TVD, V3

    To determine: KOP vertical depth, V1 Build up rate, BUR

    KOP Kick-off point. V1 TVD of straight section/surface

    to KOP. V2 TVD of end of build up. V2 - V1 TVD of Build up section

    with BUR corresponding to radiusof curvature R.

    V3 - V2 TVD of Tangent section tototal depth.

    D1 Displacement at end of buildup.

    D2 Total horizontal displacementof target.

    Maximum inclination of well.

    13

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    14/49

    Slant (R > departure)

    Given: Wellhead coordinates

    Target coordinates Target TVD, V3

    To determine: KOP vertical depth, V1

    Build up rate, BUR KOP Kick-off point.

    V1 TVD of straight section/surface toKOP.

    V2 TVD of end of build up. V2 -V1 TVD of Build up section with

    BUR corresponding to radius of curvature R.

    V3 - V2 TVD of Tangent section tototal depth.

    D1 Displacement at end of build up. D2 Total horizontal displacement of

    target. Maximum inclination of well.

    14

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    15/49

    S-shaped (R1 + R2) < total target displacement

    Given: Wellhead coordinates Target coordinates Target TVD, V5

    To determine: KOP vertical depth, V1

    Build up rate, BUR

    Drop off rate, DOR Vertical depth at end of drop, V4

    KOP Kick-off point.

    V1 TVD of straight section/surface to KOP. V2 TVD of end of build up. V3 TVD of start of drop.

    V4 TVD of end of drop. V2 - V1 TVD of Build up section with BUR

    corresponding to radius of curvature R1.

    V3 - V2 TVD of Tangent section. V4 - V3 TVD of drop section D1 Displacement at end of build up.

    D2 Displacement at end of tangent D3 Total horizontal displacement of target. Maximum inclination of well.

    15

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    16/49

    S-shaped (R1 + R2) > total target displacement

    Given: Wellhead coordinates Target coordinates Target TVD, V5

    To determine: KOP vertical depth, V1

    Build up rate, BUR

    Drop off rate, DOR Vertical depth at end of drop, V4

    KOP Kick-off point.

    V1 VD of straight section/surface to KOP. V2 VD of end of build up. V3 VD of start of drop.

    V4 VD of end of drop. V2 - V1 TVD of Build up section with BUR

    corresponding to radius of curvature R1.

    V3 -V2 TVD of Tangent section. V4 -V3 TVD of drop section. D1 Displacement at end of build up.

    D2 Displacement at end of tangent. D3 Total horizontal displacement of target. Maximum inclination of well.

    16

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    17/49

    Well Profile 3D

    This works a profile out in full 3 dimensionalspace Dimension 1 is TVD

    Dimension 2 is North Dimension 3 is East

    Using minimum curvature to design wells bysection

    Lead angles

    Dogleg limitations by formation

    Tangent section requirements

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    18/49

    Well Profile 3D

    Azimuthal changes

    Same dogleg severity

    Lead angles needed

    Increasing MDs

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    19/49

    Well Profile wavy

    vs

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    2000

    -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000 4200 4400

    vs disp

    tvd

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    20/49

    Well Profile snake

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000 4200 4400 4600

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 4000 4200 4400 4600

    -1000

    -800

    -600

    -400

    -200

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    -1000

    -800

    -600

    -400

    -200

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    90deg 3000m horizontal snake

    1500 +1000

    Target 1500

    1500 +2000

    1500 +3000

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    21/49

    S/Sn/W 3D view

    Straight horizontal

    No dogleg

    Snaky horizontal Azimuth seeking

    Wavy horizontal

    Inclination seeking

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    22/49

    FDP

    The unknown is the surface location

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    23/49

    Optimised Surface Location

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    24/49

    Techniques

    Drilling radius

    Extremities

    Averages

    RMS

    Software

    MEM considerations

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    25/49

    Drilling Radius - considerations

    Rig specific Rig capabilities and

    capacities

    Pull

    Rotate

    Pump

    Well profile derived KOP

    DLS

    TD tvd

    Well trajectorycomplexity

    Drilling Mechanics

    Well purpose limited

    Drillability

    Completeabiltiy

    Workover potential

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    26/49

    Radius use

    Well Grid

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

    East

    North

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    27/49

    Radius use

    Well Grid

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

    East

    North

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    28/49

    FDPJ wells max 60 inclination

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    29/49

    Maximum Hole angle considered@ 60

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    30/49

    Radius use

    Well Grid

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

    East

    North

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    31/49

    FDPJ wells max 75 inclination

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    32/49

    Maximum Hole angle considered@ 75

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    33/49

    FDPS wells max 60 inclination

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    34/49

    Maximum Hole angle considered@ 60S well

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    35/49

    Cost minimisation using drillingradius

    If all targets fit within a single radius then thedrillsite location is going to be pretty close tooptimal.

    When > 1 site is required then there is no attemptmade to minimise drilled distance and/or cost

    Profiles for all wells inside the drilling diameterneed to be separately calculated

    This method can handle J and S wells; providedthe radius is determined for both as each has its

    drilling difficulties.

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    36/49

    Extremities

    Well Target locations

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

    East (m)

    North(m)

    3000m North, 3400m East

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    37/49

    Averages

    Well Target locations

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

    East (m)

    North(m)

    2787m North, 3503m East

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    38/49

    RMS

    Well Target locations

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

    East (m)

    North(m)

    3309m North, 4009m East

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    39/49

    Software solution and shortcoming

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    40/49

    Optimised for cost

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    41/49

    Horizontal Designer wells

    Horizontal Well Locations

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    10000

    0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

    East

    North

    well 1

    well 2

    well 3

    well 4

    well 5well 6

    well 7

    well 8

    well 9

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    42/49

    Horizontal and designer wells

    Best process Single location

    Size the longest well and match to Rig capability

    If, which is more than likely, the longest well is

    beyond the Rig, then we have to introduce asecond surface location

    Same process repeats until we get all wells in a drillableorder

    Here also we might consider a preferred direction of

    wellbore to make the initial selection point or, look at the more realistic well profile and keep the

    heel point at the shallowest TVDthis dictate the heel-toe order and thus the best surface location

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    43/49

    Single surface location - example

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    44/49

    Single surface location - example

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    45/49

    All wells aligned

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    46/49

    2 surface location solution

    T k ll ll l 60

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    47/49

    To keep all well tangent angle 60or less

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    48/49

    Deliverables

    Well profile only for input to:

    Separate engineering applications

    Integrated application to produce:

    High level engineering statement of requirements

    Times

    Costs

    Risks and probability of success

    Outline drilling forecasting

  • 8/3/2019 Field Development Planning

    49/49

    End of Module