fhwa pavement surface pavement surface characteristics …
TRANSCRIPT
ipip LCO
N)
LCO
N)
Lead
ersh
Lead
ersh
atio
n (F
AL
atio
n (F
AL
FHWA Pavement Surface Pavement Surface Characteristics ProgramCharacteristics Program
s A
rea
Ls
Are
a L
Coo
rdin
aC
oord
ina Characteristics ProgramCharacteristics Program
And Research UpdateAnd Research Update
Focu
Focu
and
Can
d C
20th Annual Road Profilers User’s Group RPUGRPUG
October 27, 2008B b O thBob Orthmeyer
ipip LCO
N)
LCO
N)
Focus Area Leadershipd C di i (FALCON) T
Lead
ersh
Lead
ersh
atio
n (F
AL
atio
n (F
AL
and Coordination (FALCON) Teams
P t D i & A l i
s A
rea
Ls
Are
a L
Coo
rdin
aC
oord
ina 1. Pavement Design & Analysis
2. Materials & Construction T h l
Focu
Focu
and
Can
d C Technology
3. Pavement Management & P tiPreservation
4. Pavement Surface Ch t i tiCharacteristics
5. Construction Quality Assurance6 E i t l St d hi6. Environmental Stewardship
ipip LCO
N)
LCO
N)
FALCON T 4Le
ader
shLe
ader
shat
ion
(FA
Lat
ion
(FA
L FALCON Team 4Pavement Surface CharacteristicsPavement Surface Characteristics
s A
rea
Ls
Are
a L
Coo
rdin
aC
oord
ina Pavement Surface CharacteristicsPavement Surface Characteristics
Where the public meets the roadWhere the public meets the road
Focu
Focu
and
Can
d C
Co-Chairs: Larry WiserBob Orthmeyery
Secretary: Joe Gregory
Focus Area Purpose/Scopep pVision: Safe, smooth, and quiet pavements.Mission:anan Mission:
To provide insight and applications that assist FHWA leadership in assuring that pavement c
Pla
c Pl
a
surfaces meet and/or exceed our client’s expectations.
Scopeegic
egic
ScopeThe PSC FALCON Team will provide a multi-year strategic plan that coordinates the activities within FHWA that are concentrated in deliveringtrat
etr
ate
within FHWA that are concentrated in delivering an effective pavement surface characteristics program.
StSt
FALCON 4 Team MembersRole Name Unit
ananLeadership Pete Stephanos HIPT John Bukowski HIPT Cheryl Richter HRDI
Mark Swanlund HIPTLiaisons
c Pl
ac
Pla Mark Swanlund HIPT
Jim Sorenson HIAM
Tom Harman PMTST
Liaisons
Aramis Lopez HRDI
egic
egic Bob Orthmeyer PMTSTCo-Chairs
Larry Wiser HRDI
Secretary Joe Gregory HIAM
Mike Moravec HIPT Members
trat
etr
ate Tom Van HIAM
Tom Drenthe FLHD Luis Rodriguez PMTST Dennis Sixbey HRDI
StSt
Dennis Sixbey HRDIJim Sherwood HRDI Brad Hibbs NC Div Gary Goff ND Div Vacant HSAVacant HSA
Robert Rozycki HPPI
Marketing Kathleen Bergeron HIHL Bill Bolles HIF
National Performance ObjectivesPlan
Plan
4.1 – SmoothnessPavements are designed, constructed and maintained to meet users’
t ti l ti t id litic P
ic P
expectations relative to ride quality.
4.2 – FrictionPavements are designed, constructed and maintained to reduceat
egat
eg
Pavements are designed, constructed and maintained to reduce friction-related crashes.
4.3 – NoiseStra
Stra
Highway agencies use quiet pavement systems in noise-sensitive areas.
4 4 – Splash and SprayWA
SW
A S
4.4 – Splash and SprayPavements are designed, constructed and maintained to reduce the potential for splash and spray.FH
WFH
WFF
Performance Measures4.1 – Smoothness
Good Ride Qualityanan Good Ride QualityPercent of VMT on NHS with IRI less than 95 in/mi.
- From HPMS
Acceptable Ride Qualityc Pl
ac
Pla
Acceptable Ride QualityPercent of VMT on NHS with IRI less than 170 in/mi.
- From HPMS
egic
egic
Ride Quality ImprovementPercent of states meeting the national targets that have maintained conditions or shown improving trends over a 3-year
i dtrat
etr
ate
period.- From HPMSStSt
Performance Measures4.1 – Smoothness (Con’t)
Ride Technology Deploymentanan Ride Technology DeploymentNumber of states that are using technologies/methods to improve smoothness.
Number of Agenciesc Pl
ac
Pla
- Number of Agencies - Extent of National Highway Network
Ride Quality Consideration Factoregic
egic
de Qua y Co s de a o ac oExtent to which highway agencies consider ride quality in the pavement design, construction, management, and maintenance processes.tr
ate
trat
e
- Rating by agency (self assessment)- Number of AgenciesStSt
Performance Measures4.2 – Friction
Friction Improvement Consideration FactorE t t t hi h hi h i id f i ti i thanan Extent to which highway agencies consider friction in the pavement design, construction, management, and maintenance processes.
- Rating by agency (self assessment)c Pl
ac
Pla
g y g y ( )- Number of Agencies
Friction Related Crash RateFriction-related crash rate (related to wet-weather andeg
iceg
ic
Friction related crash rate (related to wet weather and pavement).
- Number of agencies- Extent of National Highway Networktr
ate
trat
e
Friction QualityA measure that indicates the quality of friction, nationally.
- Start with interstate
StSt
- Add NHS
Performance Measures4.3 – Noise
Quiet Pavement System Consideration Factoranan yExtent to which highway agencies consider quiet pavement systems in the pavement design, construction, management, and maintenance processes for noise-sensitive areasc
Pla
c Pl
a
sensitive areas.• Quiet pavement systems (initially defined by states in
the self-assessments)• Noise-sensitive areas (defined by states in the self-eg
iceg
ic
• Noise-sensitive areas (defined by states in the self-assessments)
• Define “quiet pavement systems”
trat
etr
ate
- Rating by agency (self assessment)- Number of AgenciesStSt
Performance Measures4.4 – Splash and Spray
Splash/Spray Consideration Factoranan Splash/Spray Consideration FactorExtent to which highway agencies consider splash and spray in the pavement design, construction, management, and maintenance processes.
Rating by agency (self assessment)c Pl
ac
Pla
- Rating by agency (self assessment)- Number of Agencies
Rutting Conditionegic
egic
Average rutting depth per sample unit.- From HPMS
Splash/Spray Conditiontrat
etr
ate
Sp as /Sp ay Co d oA measure that indicates the splash and spray, nationally.
- Start with interstate- Add NHS
StSt
National StrategiesgDevelop, promote, and deploy assessment capabilities and technologies to improve highway anan systems.
Demonstrate the benefits of using pavement surface h t i ti hi h t fc
Pla
c Pl
a
characteristics as a highway system performance indicator.
Develop and implement policy guidance to align withegic
egic
Develop and implement policy guidance to align with quality assurance, environmental policy, and safety policy.tr
ate
trat
e
Develop a national management program.StSt
Funded FY08 Activitiesm4.001 – Smoothness Provisional Standards Refinement/Deploymentgr
am
Standards Refinement/Deployment
4.002 – Smoothness Measurement T h lPr
og
Technology
4.003 – Functional Performance /08 P
4.003 Functional Performance / Satisfaction Indicator Development
4 005 Ad d T t /Hi h F i tiY 20
4.005 – Advanced Texture/High Friction Demonstration ProjectFY
FY08 Activities (cont.)m ( )4.006 – Friction/Texture Test Equipment L Pgr
am
Loan Program
4.007 – Sound Intensity Test MethodProg
4.007 Sound Intensity Test Method Refinement/Validation
4 008 I t t d T t N i M d l08 P
4.008 – Integrated Texture-Noise Model Development
Y 20
4.009 – Traffic Noise Model (TNM) Pavement Effects Project
FY
Pavement Effects Project
FY08 Activities (cont.)m ( )4.010 – ProVAL Deployment and E h tgr
am
Enhancement
4.011 – Splash/Spray PotentialProg
4.011 Splash/Spray Potential Assessment Tool Development
4 012 R fi t f S th08 P
4.012 – Refinement of Smoothness Requirements for WIM Systems
Y 20
FY
FALCON CoordinationState, Academia, and Industry activities
Concrete Pavement (CP) Roadmap T k 4 “O ti i d S fTrack 4 – “Optimized Surface Characteristics for Safe, Quiet, and S th C t P t ”Smooth Concrete Pavements”
N ti l A h lt P t R dNational Asphalt Pavement Roadmap Program 7 – “Surface Characteristics”
FALCON CoordinationTPF 5(063) “Improving the Quality of Pavement Profiler Measurement”Pavement Profiler Measurement
TPF 5(135) “Tire/Pavement Noise Research ( )Consortium”
TPF 5(139) “PCC S f Ch t i tiTPF 5(139) “PCC Surface Characteristics: Tire -Pavement Noise Program Part 3 -Innovative Solutions /Current Practices”Innovative Solutions /Current Practices
TPF 5(141) “Pavement Surface Properties ( ) pConsortium: A Research Program”
FALCON ToolkitSmoothness
ProVAL workshops (www.roadprofile.com)ProVAL workshops (www.roadprofile.com)ASTM E2560-07: Standard Specification for Data Format for Pavement ProfileNHI 131100 “Pavement Smoothness”AASHTO Provisional Standard PP49 & PP50 I l t ti C t tPP50 Implementation Contract
NoiseNoise 101 workshopAASHTO Provisional Standard on Tire/Pavement Noise MeasurementTire/Pavement Noise Measurement
FALCON ToolkitFriction/Texture
Equipment loan program: GriptesterEquipment loan program: Griptester, Circular Texture Meter – CTM, Dynamic Friction Tester – DFTDraft Technical Advisory on Skid-Crash Reduction Program under development
2007 Pavement Condition on the National Highway System (NHS)National Average = 56.7%, Target 57% in 2009Good/Very Good (IRI of <95”/mile)
> National Average> 1-10% below National Average> 10% below National Average
59.6%WA
80.8%65 5%
66.2%ME
69.1%NH
74.5%VT
70.5%OR
64.7%ID
MT
66.8%WY
65.5%ND
62.0%SD
57.0%MN
48 2%
48.6%WI
45.0%MI
35.0%NY
52.0%
ME
74.2%MA
51.0%RI
37.4%CA
65.9%NV
53.5%UT 45.5%
CO
50.1%NE
79.6%KS
48.2%IA
73.2%MO
33.4%IL
62.5%IN
68.5%KY
76.5%OH
52.0%PA
69.4%WV 56.7%
VA
57.7%
46.9%CT20.6%
NJ
55.2%DE
69.9%MD
0.0%DC
81.9%AZ 83.7%
NM
59.4%OK
43.6%TX
61.9%AR
46.2%LA
84.1%TN
59.9%MS
82.1%AL
57.7%NC
67.8%SC
94.2%GA
53.1%AK
TX LA
92.0%FL
Source: HPMSCompiled By: Office of Pavement TechnologyFederal Highway AdministrationMarch 2008
14.3%HI
3.1%PR
Inertial Profiler
Questions?
Robert Orthmeyer, Resource [email protected](708) 283-3533