february 2006 the importance of subcontract management to program success
TRANSCRIPT
February 2006
The Importance of Subcontract
Management to Program Success
2
We’re drowning in information and starving for knowledge.
-Rutherford D. Rodgers
3
Topics
• The Relationship• Flow downs • Source Selection• Subcontracting
Process
4
Contractual Relationships
• Subcontract/PO establishes relationship between prime and subcontractor
• Protects the rights of primes and the Government
5
Contractual Relationships
6
Contractual Relationships
• Subcontract Management tools used in Program Management:– Advance Notification– Consent to Subcontract– Debarment Process– Small Business
Subcontracting Programs
7
Risk Management Tools
• Sarbanes-Oxley Act
• Make or Buy Program (FAR Part 15)
• Competition in Subcontracting (FAR 52.244-5)
8
Risk Management Tools
• Prime Contract– Terms and Conditions– Statement of Work
• Subcontract Process– RFP– SOW– Selection of Subcontract
Type– Flow downs
• Lowdown Clauses– Truth in Negotiations (FAR
Part 15)– Cost Accounting Standards
(FAR Appendix A)– Right to Audit Clause (FAR
52.215-2)
9
Risk Management Tools
• Proposal Analyses (FAR Part 15)
• Subcontracting for Commercial Items (FAR 52.244-6)
• Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR) (FAR Part 44)
10
CPSR – The Customer’s Review
• Measures How Efficiently and Effectively a Contractor Spends Government funds and;
• Evaluates Compliance With Government Subcontracting Policies, Regulations, and Laws.
11
CPSR – The Customer’s Review
• Subcontractor’s Government business volume exceeds $25 million (excluding competitive FFP, competitive FFP/EPA contracts/subcontracts, and commercial item acquisitions)
• Whenever an Administrative Contracting Officer or Procuring Contracting Officer specifies
12
CPSR Risk Assessment: Basis for Selection
• CPSR Approval History• Identified by PCO or ACO• Increased Sales to
Government• Growth• Pre-Award Surveys• Major Programs/High Visibility• Other Audits• Self Assessment Activities
13
CPSR: Identification of Risk Factors
• Signs of a Weak Purchasing System Identified During Self Assessments:– Inadequate Procurement Lead
Time– Violation of Public Laws– No or Poorly Written or
Implemented Policies – No or Weak File Documentation– Lack of Upper Management
Commitment to Compliance with Procurement Regulations
14
Opportunities for Success or Failure
• 98% of firms will not pass their initial CPSR!
15
Impact of an Unsuccessful CPSR on Contractors: Losing The Competitive Marketing Advantage!
• Source Selection Implications
• Past Performance Implications
• Losing A Competitive Proposal
• Loss of Revenue
16
Impact of an Unsuccessful CPSR on Contractors: Long-Term External Compliance Oversight Impact
• Defense Contract Audit Agency or Inspector General’s (and Other Audit Agencies) Alerted
• Other Audits Will Follow• Possible Negative Press
17
Impact of an Unsuccessful CPSR on Contractors:
Procedural Burdens with Project Management Impact
• Increase Administrative Contracting Officer Surveillance
• Delay in Placing Orders• Increase Administrative
Expenses• Delayed Billings &
Collections
18
Impact of an Unsuccessful CPSR on Contractors:
Costly Internal Compliance Impact
• Implement Corrective Actions
• Change Processes• Change Culture• Implement Training
Program• Prepare for Follow-Up
Audit
19
Key to Embracing Compliance
• Communication – Purchasing/
Subcontract Admin– Contracts– Program Management– Engineering– Clients
20
Subcontracting Process Timeline
AC
O/P
CO
C
on
sen
t
Neg
oti
ati
on
s
Pri
ce A
naly
sis
& Tech
Evalu
ati
on
Pro
posal
/Qu
ote
RFP
/RFQ
/RFI
Sou
rce
Justi
ficati
on
PR
Deb
arm
en
t V
eri
ficati
on
Cert
ificati
on
s
PO
/Su
bK
21
The Source Selection “T”
Sourcing Factors Pricing Factors
Competitive Sourcing Competitive Pricing
Non-Competitive Sourcing
Competitive Pricing, Price Analysis, or Cost Analysis
22
Single/Sole Source Justification
• Required in accordance with:– FAR 52.244-5 “The
Contractor shall select subcontractors (including suppliers) on a competitive basis to the maximum practical extent consistent with the objectives and requirements of the contract.”
23
Team Sourcing Documentation
• Document the Team Source Selection Decision
• Focus on Team Competitiveness
• Document Sole Source Team Members
FARFAR
24
Price Analysis- Comparison Process
Identify Factors That Effect Comparability
Determine Effect of Identified Factors
Adjust Prices for Comparison
Compare Offered Prices With Adjusted Prices
Select Price for Comparison
Prices for Comparison
•Other Proposed Prices
•Commercial Prices
•Previously-Proposed Prices, Subcontract Prices
•Parametric Estimates
•Independent Estimates
Quantitative Techniques to Adjust
Prices
•Index numbers
•Trend Analysis
•Price-Volume Analysis
•Graphic Analysis
•Learning Curve
25
Negotiations
• Per FAR 15.405 - Unfair Price? Negotiate!!– Price negotiation is
intended to permit the contracting officer (buyer) and the offeror to agree on a fair and reasonable price.
26
Ineffective Negotiations
27
Contract Management’s role
• The Role of Contract Management is Critical:– Contracts must work
with CO’s to pro-actively remove restrictive, unnecessary, or out-of-date clauses from RFP’s and contracts
28
Path Forward
– Educate Process Owners in terms of how certain clauses impact the program:• Cost Accounting Standards• Cost and Pricing Data - only when
required• Consent/Advanced Notification - only
when required• Organizational Conflict of Interests
– If a clause is not required, ask that it be eliminated!