fair market value: what rural providers need to know
DESCRIPTION
PYA Principal Tynan Olechny and Senior Manager Annapoorani Bhat provided important information for rural providers related to fair market value and commercial reasonableness considerations during a National Rural Health Association webinar, “Valuations: What Rural Providers Need to Know."TRANSCRIPT
Page 1
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Valuations: What Rural Providers Need to Know
Tynan Olechny, MBA/MPH, AVA
Annapoorani Bhat, ASA
Page 2
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Agenda
1
2
3
4
Overview of Healthcare Regulatory Considerations
Special Considerations for Rural Healthcare Providers
Fair Market Value (FMV) and Commercial Reasonableness (CR) Defined
5 FMV Enforcement Cases
Key Industry Trends
Page 3
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Key Industry Trends
Page 4
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Times Are Changing…• Overall theme is consolidation and
integration.
• Significant trend of hospital/physician alignment.
• Increased focus on reducing healthcare costs while also improving quality of patient care.
• Changes in healthcare delivery system from healthcare reform package.
• Continued government focus on fraud and abuse.
Page 5
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Rural Health Differentiators• About 10% of physicians practice in rural areas, yet rural areas account for
about 25% of the patient population.
– There are 2,157 Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs) in rural and frontier areas of all states and US territories compared to 910 in urban areas.
• Rural patients tend to be poorer, are less likely to have insurance coverage, and are more likely to have a chronic illness than patients in urban areas.
• Medicare payments to rural hospitals are much lower than to hospitals in urban areas for the same services.
• Rural hospitals tend to be much smaller, with lower patient volume than those in urban areas, but are still faced with providing the same broad range of services and high-quality care.
• More than 470 rural hospitals have closed within the past 25 years.
Source: National Rural Health Association; American Hospital Association.
Page 6
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Key Rural Health Issues• Insufficient patient volumes to cover high-fixed costs
– Problem: Maintaining healthcare access for rural residents comes with a high price tag, but low patient volumes do not generate sufficient revenues for providers to cover those costs.
– Band-Aid: Special Medicare and Medicaid payment enhancements to rural providers to cover the gap.
– Pain Point: Potential elimination of payment enhancements.
– Cure: Providers across multiple communities within a region work collaboratively to spread costs while maintaining services by strategically allocating resources.
– Prescription: Inclusive governance structure to foster trust relationships among providers: no trust, no spread.
Page 7
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Key Rural Health Issues
• Insufficient patient population over which to spread risk
– Problem: Rural providers are unable to pursue risk-based contracts because there is insufficient patient population over which to spread risks.
– Band-Aid: Exclude rural providers from value-based contracting opportunities.
– Pain Point: Growing pressure from payers to purchase value instead of volume; demand from rural communities for quality and efficiency.
– Cure: Providers serving multiple rural primary care service areas form network to aggregate populations for contracting purposes.
– Prescription: Sufficient clinical integration among network providers to survive antitrust scrutiny: no integration, no aggregation.
Page 8
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Trends in Rural Areas• Professional Service Agreement (PSA)
– Rural hospitals contract with physicians from urban areas to hold clinics and perform procedures.
• Medical Directorships
– Provide clinical and administrative leadership to a specific service line of the hospital.
• Clinical Co-management Arrangements
– Align physicians and hospital to achieve greater efficiencies and improve patient outcomes.
Key Concept: FMV is critical to determination of payment for transactions between physicians and hospitals.
Page 9
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Overview of Healthcare Regulatory Considerations
Page 10
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
• Regulatory concerns affecting physician-hospital transactions, such as employment, can be daunting.
• Physicians are constrained by laws not applicable to other industries.
• Primary legal concerns are Stark Law, Anti-Kickback Statute, and False Claims Act.
• Transactions with 501(c)(3) hospitals bring heightened scrutiny from OIG and IRS.
Bottom Line: Physicians cannot receive compensation based on their referrals when reimbursed by federal (or state) healthcare dollars.
Key Regulatory Considerations
Page 11
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Stark Law
• Also called the “Physician Self-Referral Law.”
• Prohibits a physician from making referrals for designated health services to entities in which the physician (or a family member) has a financial relationship.
• Designated Health Services (DHS):
Currently 12 health services
Includes hospital inpatient and outpatient services, as well as clinical lab, physical and occupational therapy, radiology, certain imaging, DME, home health, and various other services and supplies
Page 12
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Stark Law (continued)
• Is a “strict liability” law
• Contains various “exceptions”
- Rural provider exception applies to physician ownership interests
• Enforced by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), although Department of Justice adjudicates false claims arising from violations of the Stark Law
Page 13
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS)
• Prohibits the payment or receipt of remuneration to induce or reward referrals for Medicare or Medicaid services.
• Criminal statute that requires proof of “intent,” i.e., knowingly and willfully paying for referrals.
• If one purpose of the payment is to induce referrals, then AKS is violated, even if there are other legitimate business reasons for the payment.
• Contains various “safe harbors.”
• Enforced by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) and the Department of Justice (DOJ).
Page 14
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
False Claims ActImposes liability on any person who submits a claim to the federal government that the person knows (or should know) is false.
Civil statute.
Often “piggy-backed” with the AKS and Stark.
Subject to qui tam (“whistle-blower”) suits.
Page 15
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
IRS 501(c)(3) Anti-Inurement Rules501(c)(3) tax exempt entities must avoid “excess benefit” transactions.
Transactions must be at FMV and must be consistent with the entity’s charitable mission.
Violations can result in loss of tax exempt status.
Rules
Page 16
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Penalties for Violations of Key Healthcare Regulations
Penalties for violation can include:
• Denial of payment.
• Refund of payment.
• Civil monetary penalty up to $15,000 per claim.
• Civil monetary penalty up to $100,000 for each “scheme” designed to circumvent the law.
• Civil monetary penalty of up to three times the amount of claims.
• Possible criminal penalties, including jail time.
• Exclusion from the Medicare or Medicaid program.
Page 17
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Fair Market Value and Commercial Reasonableness Defined
Page 18
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
What is Fair Market Value?
$
Willing Seller
Willing Buyer
$“Ground Rules”• Arm’s length transaction
• Bona fide bargaining
• Neither is under compulsion
• Reasonable knowledge of relevant facts
Page 19
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
• Determined from the perspective of hypothetical buyers and sellers without the ability to refer business to one another.
• No consideration for synergies. However, such synergies often exist!
• The financial terms of the transaction must make economic sense based on the services being provided.
• Determination of FMV involves both quantitative and qualitative analyses.
Fair Market Value – Key Concepts
Page 20
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Importance of FMV Opinions• Many regulatory exceptions require employment
arrangements to be at fair market value.
• FMV opinions ensure transactions are compliant with key regulatory considerations and serve to protect hospital and physicians from government scrutiny.
• Nearly two-thirds (65%) of organizations have established governance policies regarding physician compensation arrangements that may require an external review for FMV.
Of these, more than half (53%) conduct an external FMV review of physician compensation levels annually.
Source: Sullivan, Cotter and Associates, Inc. 2013 Physician Compensation and Productivity Survey.
Page 21
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
What Are the Key Steps and Factors in the FMV Process?
• A comprehensive understanding of all aspects surrounding the proposed arrangement.
• Examples include:– Hospital staffing needs/full-time
equivalents (FTEs) required– Physician/practice specialty– Community-specific factors– Exclusivity of services– Coverage details– Billing specifics
Step 1:
Ascertain Key Facts
Surrounding the
Arrangement
Step 1:
Ascertain Key Facts
Surrounding the
Arrangement
Page 22
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
What Are the Key Steps and Factors in the FMV Process?
• Physician experience
• Provider productivity
• Market comparables
• Quality measures
• Reimbursement trends
• Payer mix
• Practice performance
• Supply/demand
• Compensation trends
• HPSA and MUA/P designation
Step 2:
Determine Factors that May Impact
FMV
Step 2:
Determine Factors that May Impact
FMV
Page 23
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
What Are the Key Steps and Factors in the FMV Process?
• Medical Group Management Association
• Sullivan, Cotter & Associates, Inc.
• Hospital & Healthcare Compensation Service
• American Medical Group Association
• The Delta Companies
• Merritt Hawkins & Associates
• Modern Healthcare
• Other “Objective” Survey Benchmarks
Step 3:
Identify Multiple
Objective Data Sources for
Benchmarking
Step 3:
Identify Multiple
Objective Data Sources for
Benchmarking
Page 24
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
What Are the Key Steps and Factors in the FMV Process?
• Compensation survey data
• Cost to replace/build
• Locum tenens
• Market comparable analysis
• Productivity analyses
• Time studies
• Compensation per wRVU
• Collections per wRVU
• Other relevant analyses
Step 4:
Identify Analyses for Determining
FMV Compensation
Step 4:
Identify Analyses for Determining
FMV Compensation
Page 25
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
What is Commercial Reasonableness?• Defined by the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) as an arrangement which appears to be “a sensible, prudent business agreement from the perspective of the particular parties involves, even in the absence of any potential referrals.”
• Many Stark exceptions require payment to be commercially reasonable.
Key Concept: In the absence of a referral relationship, is the arrangement one that makes “good business sense?”
Page 26
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Example Factors in Determining CR• Is each component of the proposed arrangement (as well as
the entire arrangement): A reasonable necessity that is essential to the functioning of the entities
involved? Reasonably necessary to accomplish a rational business purpose?
• Does any specialized training and/or experience of the provider exist that should be taken into account?
• Are the particular nature of the duties and the corresponding amount of accountability under the proposed arrangement clearly defined and reasonable?
• Are patient demand, the number of hospital patients, and/or the community need sufficient to justify the services?
Page 27
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
FAIR MARKET VALUE
COMMERCIAL REASONABLENESS
Overall Arrangement
“WHY?”
SENSE CENTS
Range of Dollars Only
“HOW MUCH?”
Scope
Key Question
Differentiating Between FMV and CR
Page 28
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Special Considerations for Rural Healthcare Providers
Page 29
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
When To Obtain a Third-Party Valuation
• FMV opinions can be expensive due to the time spent in research and discussion of difficult issues.
• May not make practical business sense for rural healthcare providers to obtain an FMV opinion for every proposed arrangement.
Key Concept: Seek outside assistance on riskier or more complex arrangements.
Page 30
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Evaluating Risk
• Is the arrangement commercially reasonable?
• Are you offering to pay at the median or at the 90th percentile of national survey benchmarks?
• Are there multiple components to the compensation arrangement? Could the physician be getting paid twice for the same services?
• Is there potential for a productivity or other bonus to push total compensation above the 90th percentile?
Page 31
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Proceeding Without an FMV Opinion• Though an FMV opinion will be your best defense if the
arrangement is ever called into question, rural healthcare providers may choose not to obtain a formal report for various reasons. Without an FMV report, it’s still important to:
– Document your clear, objective methodology in determining compensation for arrangement
– Establish and document appropriate need for services
– Document any other important factors – i.e. location in a Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) or Medically Underserved Area/Population (MUA/P), or recruiting difficulties
Page 32
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
FMV Enforcement Cases
Page 33
Prepared for National Rural Health Association
Contact Information:
(404) 266-9876
www.pyapc.com
Thank You!