faculty of education| institute of vocational education ... · pdf file− requirements...
TRANSCRIPT
Engineering Pedagogy at Universities in Saxony
- Insights into a research and further education project of
Dresden University of Technology and University of Applied Sciences
Zittau/Görlitz
Dr. cand. Marcel Köhler, Dipl.-Berufspäd. Bangkok, 06.11.2014
Faculty of Education| Institute of Vocational Education and Vocational Didactics | Professorship of Didactics of Vocational Education
Outline
1. E-Didact – Project background
2. Structure of the curriculum
3. Module I.3: Communication in engineering education
4. Unterstanding and communication in written examinations as key aspect of module I.3
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 2 of 18
1. E-Didact – Project background [1]
Matter 1: − Requirements for future engineers with regard to social-communicative
activity in modern structures of production and service and design of teaching and learning processes to the development of adequate qualifications − Target group of teaching: engineering students
Matter 2: − Design of a needs-based engineering education
Especially: design of technical and technological-specific teaching and learning in academic engineering education → Engineering Pedagogy − Target group of teaching: engineering university teachers
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 3 of 18
Project background | Curriculum | Module I.3 | Understanding and communication
1. E-Didact – Project background [2]
Starting point in Germany/Saxony
• Skills shortage, demographic trend (more older than younger people)
• Decreasing numbers of graduates in engineering study courses
• Modern academic teaching demands changes in teaching arrangements to allow more autonomous learning activities in didactic teaching and learning designs
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 4 of 18
Project background | Curriculum | Module I.3 | Understanding and communication
1. E-Didact – Project background [3]
Project aim
• The aim of the project was to
- develop
- implement
- test
a tailormade science-based study course to both meet market
requirements and to develop competencies by designing
teaching and learning processes for academic engineering
education
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 5 of 18
Project background | Curriculum | Module I.3 | Understanding and communication
1. E-Didact – Project background [4]
Identified qualification requirements • For teaching staff with university didactical education
The use of special types of teaching and learning in engineering education
Special problems in designing examination processes Developing an open and positive feedback culture Evaluating courses
• For teaching staff without university didactical education
Didactic basics in planning, performing and analyzing academic education processes
Selecting and designing of didactic media Designing of communicative processes Control and evaluation of learning results Using didactic methods in study courses Structuring of study courses
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 6 of 18
Project background | Curriculum | Module I.3 | Understanding and communication
2. Structure of the curriculum
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 7 of 18
Units :I.1 Planning of learning and
teaching processesI.2 Selection and design of mediaI.3 Communication in
engineering educationI.4 Control and evaluation of learning results
Units:III.8 Determining of employment-oriented
study objectivesIII.9 Determining of appropriate study
content
Module level II(Arrangements of
academic teaching and learning)
Units:II.5 Design of lectures and seminarsII.6 Design of exercises and laboratory
internshipsII.7 Design of engineering internships
and research colloquia
Module level III(Structuring of study
programs)
Module level I(Fundamentals of design of teaching
and learning processes)
Units:IV.10 Case studiesIV.11 Observation and evaluation IV.12 Concluding colloquium
Module level IV(Coaching)
3. Module I.3: Communication in engineering education [1]
Aim of the module • Participants are qualified to
1. design teaching relevant communication processes and 2. communicate with their students purposful and adequately under
consideration of: - scientific knowledge about communication - personality traits of communication partners
5 Units • Unit 1 - Basics in designing communicative processes • Unit 2 - Teaching relevant monological communicative procedures • Unit 3 - Teaching relevant dialogical communicative procedures • Unit 4 – Conflict management • Unit 5 – Basics in intercultural communication
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in
engineering education slide 8 of 18
Project background | Curriculum | Module I.3 | Understanding and communication
3. Module I.3: Communication in engineering education [2]
Teaching relevant monological communicative procedures • Participants are qualified to characterize spezific communicative procedures.
They are able to structure monological communicative procedures and perform them adequately.
VS.
Teaching relevant dialogical communicative procedures • Participants are qualified to analyze written argumentations considering their
characteristics and truth. They are able to structure their choice of words and argue in conversations under consideration of specific communicative design elements.
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 9 of 18
Project background | Curriculum | Module I.3 | Understanding and communication
3. Module I.3: Communication in engineering education [3]
Content of the unit • Process structures in dialogs, characteristics and performance spectrum of
specific teaching relevant communication procedures • Didactic principles in monological communication procedures • Communication in written examinations
• General design elements of lectures • Planning of speeches and presentations • External and internal structure of lectures • Pathes of cognition • Verbal, paraverbal und nonverbal design elements of lectures and
presentations • Interaction of teacher and students
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 10 of 18
Project background | Curriculum | Module I.3 | Understanding and communication
4. Unterstanding and Communication in written examinations as key aspect of module I.3 [1]
Starting point • Changed demands in tasks in examinations in engineering
education
• Tasks in examinations become more and more complex and require competence to solve problems
• Imbalance of different cognitive levels in control and evaluation of learning results often ask too much of students – poor marks in examinations
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 11 of 18
Project background | Curriculum | Module I.3 | Understanding and communication
4. Unterstanding and Communication in written examinations as key aspect of module I.3 [2]
Fundamental thoughts • Learning without language is impossible
• Teacher uses language for:
• initiate • regulate learning processes and • get feedback about learning status
• Teaching and learning in engineering education can be
defined as a language based relationship of teacher and student
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 12 of 18
Project background | Curriculum | Module I.3 | Understanding and communication
4. Unterstanding and Communication in written examinations as key aspect of module I.3 [3]
Fundamental thoughts • Understanding of oral and written information in engineering
education is fundamental for learning process, especially for:
Acquiring and structuring knowledge Controllling and evaluating learning results …
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 13 of 18
Project background | Curriculum | Module I.3 | Understanding and communication
4. Unterstanding and Communication in written examinations as key aspect of module I.3 [4]
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 14 of 18
K (A) E (A) K (B)E (B)
K (A) Set of linguistic signs, which A usesE (A) Set of linguistic signs, whose meanings A knowsK (B) Set of linguistic signs, which B usesE (B) Set of linguistic signs, whose meanings B knowsE (A+B) Set of linguistic signs, whose meanings A and B knowE (A+B)* Set of linguistic signs, which A and B know and which get an identical meaning by A and B
sender encode medium decode receiver
encodedecodefeedback
E (A+B) E (A+B)*
Model of commuinication acc. to Shannon und Weaver, 1976
Project background | Curriculum | Module I.3 | Understanding and communication
4. Unterstanding and Communication in written examinations as key aspect of module I.3 [5]
Intention • Enhance transparency of examination processes and a more
adequate design of tasks in written examinations in engineering education
Approach
• Explication of operators used in written tasks during lectures (verbs, which prompt a specific act)
• Teaching the meaning of operators to improve a common understanding for teacher and students
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 15 of 18
Project background | Curriculum | Module I.3 | Understanding and communication
4. Unterstanding and Communication in written examinations as key aspect of module I.3 [6]
Didactic orders as instrument improve a common understanding
• Teacher initiates specific acts with didactic orders
• Didactic orders are verbal initatives given by teacher
which have different grades of intensity and prompt students to act with a learning relevant object in an expected or defined way. Didactic orders contain verbal encoded information which have been planned with regards to phases of instruction. They are used to prompt an expected specific act during learning process.
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 16 of 18
Project background | Curriculum | Module I.3 | Understanding and communication
4. Unterstanding and Communication in written examinations as key aspect of module I.3 [7]
• Operator are frequently used in didactic orders
• Operators represent different cognitive levels (to reproduce, produce and solve problems/transform knowledge)
• Clarity of operators is necessary to improve a common understanding of tasks in examinations and get valid learning results
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 17 of 18
Project background | Curriculum | Module I.3 | Understanding and communication
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
slide 18 of 18
Thank you for your attention!
Literature • Hortsch, H. (2005): Didaktik der Berufsbildung. Merkblätter; Dresden (Hochschulskript).
• Hortsch, H./ Kersten, S./ Köhler, M. (Hrsg.) (2012): Renaissance der Ingenieurpädagogik –
Entwicklungslinien im Europäischen Raum. Dresden.
• Hortsch, H./ Reese, U. (2012): Historische Aspekte Ingenieurpädagogischer Lehre und Forschung an der TU Dresden.; Dresden.
• Kersten, S. (2012): Die Entwicklung sozial-kommunikativer Kompetenz in der Ingenieurpädagogik; Dresden.
• Köhler, M./ Umlauft, T. (2012): Entwurf eines Curriculums für die hochschuldidaktische Qualifizierung akademischer Lehrkräfte in den Ingenieurwissenschaften. In: Internationale Wissenschaftliche Konferenz Mittweida; Mittweida.
• Köhler, M./ Umlauft, T./ Kersten, S./ Simmert, H. (2013): Projekt „Ingenieurdidaktik an Sächsischen Hochschulen ‚e-Didact“ - Dresdner Beiträge zur Berufspädagogik 33. Dresden.
• Malek, R. (1977): Didaktische Aufforderungen als Bindeglieder zwischen Lehrfunktionen und Lernfunktionen sowie ihre Abfolge in Laborpraktika des Maschineningenieurwesens für die Grundlagenausbildung sozialistischer Diplomingenieure.; Dresden.
• Segeth, W. (1974): Aufforderung als Denkform; Berlin.
• Shannon, C./ Weaver, W. (1976): Mathematische Grundlagen der Informationstheorie; München, Wien.
• Umlauft, T./ Köhler, M. (2012): Das Projekt „E-Didact – Ingenieurpädagogik an Sächsischen Hochschulen“ – Projektstand und curriculare Konsequenzen aus der empirischen Bedarfserhebung.; Dresden.
• Voss, K. (1975): Zur Aufforderung als Denkform; In: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie; Band 23, Ausgabe 2; Berlin; S. 314-317.
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
Appendix [1]
Completed order (acc. to Segeth 1974, p. 73): • Conditions
• Refrain an operation • Concrete conditions to perform or refrain from an operation • Perform or refrain from an operation consider existing specific conditions
• Operations • Practical operations • Cognitive operations • Operations with mathematical signs
• Pursued objectives • Material objectives • Ideal objectives • Objectives aims in the shape of mathematical signs
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
Appendix [2]
Bangkok, 06.11.2014 Communication in engineering education
Component of order
Type of order
x = existent - = not existent
Condition Operation Objective
1. Task x x x
2. Incomplete task - x x
3. Problem x - x
4. Guidance x x -
5. Instruction - x -
6. Question - - x