facility design-week 9 computerized layout planning

40
1 Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning By Anastasia L. Maukar

Upload: mills

Post on 23-Feb-2016

167 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning. By Anastasia L. Maukar. Computerized Layout Planning. Focus on how computers can aid the facility layout process. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

1

Facility Design-Week 9Computerized Layout Planning

By Anastasia L. Maukar

Page 2: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

2

Computerized Layout Planning

• Focus on how computers can aid the facility layout process.

• Designer must interact with multiple design databases and provide the integration between them to translate information and ensure consistency.

Page 3: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

3

Computerized Layout Planning

• Concentrate on decision aids for block layout planning.– Information required– Common elements– “Classical” layout programs

• Craft, Corelap, Aldep, and Planet– “Newer” layout programs

• M-Craft, LayOpt, FactoryPlan

Page 4: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

4

Computerized Layout Planning

• Information in layout planning– Numeric information

• Space required for an activity• Total flow between two activities

– Logic information • Preferences of the designer, i.e., activity relationship

chart– Graphical information

• Drawing of the block plan

Page 5: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

5

Computerized Layout Planning

• Key element of computerized layout planning is the representation and manipulation of these three types of information.– Graphical representation is most challenging. A

method suitable for display is not suitable for manipulation and vice-versa.

Page 6: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

6

Computerized Layout Tech’

• Computerized Layout Technique– A Layout Construction Procedure: ALDEP,

CORELAP– A Layout Improvement Procedure, CRAFT

• Distance Between Two Departments• Total Distance Traveled• Savings and a Sample Computation• Improvement Procedure• Exact Centroids

Page 7: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

7

• Suppose that we are given some space for some departments. How shall we arrange the departments within the given space?

• We shall assume that the given space is rectangular shaped and every department is either rectangular shaped or composed of rectangular pieces.

• We shall discuss – a layout improvement procedure, CRAFT, that attempts to find

a better layout by pair-wise interchanges when a layout is given and

– a layout construction procedure, ALDEP/CORELAP, that constructs a layout when there is no layout given.

Computerized Layout Technique

Page 8: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

8

ALDEPAutomated Layout Design Program

• ALDEP is a construction procedure.• ALDEP does not need any initial layout. ALDEP

constructs a layout when there is none. • Given

– Size of the facility – The departments– Size of the departments– Proximity relationships (activity relationship chart) and– A sweep width (defined later)

Page 9: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

9

ALDEP

• Use: vertical scanning pattern• 2 disadvantages: scoring method and the fixed values

assigned to the closeness ratings.• The size of the facility and the size of the departments

are expressed in terms of blocks.• Score is determined using the numerical values

assigned to the closeness rating). A = 43 = 64 I = 41 = 4 U = 0E = 42 = 16 O = 40 = 1 X = –45 = –1.024

Page 10: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

10

ALDEP

A: absolutely necessaryE: especially important I: importantO: ordinarily importantU: unimportantX: undesirable

Production area

Office rooms

Storage

Dock area

Locker room

Tool room

A A

A O

O

UO

O

U

U U

U

EX

I

Figure 1. ARC

Page 11: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

11

ALDEP

• The procedure will be explained with an example. Suppose that the facility is 8 blocks (horizontal) 6 block (vertical).

• The departments and the required number of blocks are:– Production area (P) 14 blocks– Office rooms (O) 10– Storage area (S) 8– Dock area (D) 8– Locker room (L) 4– Tool room (T) 4

Page 12: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

12

ALDEP

• The proximity relationships are shown as figure 1.• ALDEP starts to allocate the departments from

the upper left corner of the facility. The first department is chosen at random.

• By starting with a different department, ALDEP can find a different layout for the same problem.

Page 13: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

13

ALDEP

• Let’s start with dock rooms (D). On the upper left corner 8 blocks must be allocated for the dock area.

• The sweep width defines the width in number of blocks. Let sweep width = 2. Then, dock area will be allocated 2 4 = 8 blocks.

D DD DD DD D

Page 14: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

14

ALDEP

• To find the next department to allocate, find the department that has the highest proximity rating with the dock area (D). Storage area (S) has the highest proximity rating A with the dock area.

• So, the storage area will be allocated next. The storage area also needs 8 blocks.

Page 15: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

15

ALDEP• There are only 2 2 = 4 blocks, remaining below dock

area (D). After allocating 4 blocks, the down wall is hit after which further allocation will be made on the adjacent 2 (=sweep width) columns and moving upwards.

D DD DD DD DS S S SS S S S

Page 16: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

16

ALDEP• See carefully that the allocation started from the upper

left corner and started to move downward with an width of 2 (=sweep width) blocks.

• After the down wall is hit, the allocation continues on the adjacent 2 (=sweep width) columns on the right side and starts moving up.

• This zig-zag pattern will continue.

• Next time, when the top wall will be hit, the allocation will continue on the adjacent 2 (=sweep width) columns on the right side and starts moving down.

Page 17: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

17

ALDEP• To find the next department to allocate, find the department that

has the highest proximity rating with storage area. Production area (P) has the highest proximity rating A with the storage area.

• The production area (P) needs 14 blocks.

• After allocating 8 blocks, the top wall is hit and the remaining 6 blocks are allocated on the adjacent 2 (=sweep width) columns moving downward.

D D P P P PD D P P P PD D P P P PD D P PS S S SS S S S

Page 18: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

18

ALDEP• To find the next department to allocate, find the department that

has the highest proximity rating with production area.Tool room (T) has the highest proximity rating A with the production area.

• The tool room needs 4 blocks.

• Next, there is a tie, both locker room (L) and office room (O) has the same proximity rating of U with the tool room.

• Ties are broken at random. So, any of the locker room or the office room can be allocated next.

D D P P P PD D P P P PD D P P P PD D P P T TS S S S T TS S S S

Page 19: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

19

ALDEP• Let’s choose locker room (L) room at random. Then, the last

department must be office room (O). The resulting layout is shown below.

• Note that since the ALDEP chooses the first department at random and since the ties are broken at random, ALDEP can give many solutions to the same problem.

• Using the layout, the adjacency relationships and the proximity ratings, we can find an overall rating of each layout. Then, the layout with the highest overall rating is selected.

D D P P P P O OD D P P P P O OD D P P P P O OD D P P T T O OS S S S T T O OS S S S L L L L

Page 20: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

20

ALDEP

• After a layout is obtained, a score for the layout is computed with the following conversion of proximity relationships:

A = 43 = 64, E = 42 = 16

I = 41 = 4, O = 40 = 1

U = 0, X = -45 = -1024• If two departments are adjacent in the layout then the

weight corresponding to the rating between the two departments is added to the score.

Page 21: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

21

ALDEP

• Let’s compute the overall rating of the layout constructed.

1. Make a list every pair of adjacent departments.

2. For each pair, a letter rating will be obtained from the activity relationship chart (see figure 1)

3. Convert the score into a numeric score using the conversion scheme on the previous slide.

Page 22: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

22

ALDEP

D D P P P P O OD D P P P P O OD D P P P P O OD D P P T T O OS S S S T T O OS S S S L L L L

• Adjacent departments:(D,S) (D,P)(S,P) (S,T)(S,L) (P,T)(P,O) (T,L)(T,O) (L,O)

Page 23: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

23

ALDEPAdjacents Dept

Proximity Ratings

Value Score

(D,S) A 64 128(D,P) I 4 8(S,P) A 64 128(S,T) O 1 2(S,L) U 0 0(P,T) A 64 128(P,O) O 1 2(T,L) U 0 0(T,O) U 0 0

(L,O) X -1024 -2048-763 -1526

Page 24: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

24

• The process is repeated several times and the layout with the highest score is chosen.

• Notice the large negative weight associated with X ratings.

• If the departments which cannot be next to each other, are adjacent in a layout, then the layout score reduces significantly.

• This is important because ALDEP also uses a cut-off score (if not specified by the user this cut-off is zero) to eliminate any layout which has a layout score less than the cut-off score.

ALDEP

Page 25: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

25

CORELAP

• Uses Relationship Chart as input (REL)

• Requires users to assign weights to the alphabetic ratings in the REL chart . (Closeness Ratings)

• Computes the total closeness ratings (TCR) for each department by summing all the CR associated with that department.

• Values selected for ratings are important

Page 26: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

CORELAPImportance of Closeness

Value

A

E

I

O

U

X

Closeness Linecode

Numericalweights

Absolutely necessary

Especially important

Important

Ordinary closeness OK

Unimportant

Undesirable

32

26

8

4

2

-32

Page 27: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

27

CORELAP - STEPS

1. Selection Procedure

2. Placement and Evaluation Procedure

Page 28: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

28

CORELAP – STEP 1

• First department:

Where:

• Second department: – X-relation “last placed department”– A-relation with first. If none E-relation with

first, etcetera

iiTCRmax

m

1jiji )][V(rTCR

Page 29: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

29

CORELAP – Tie Breaker Rules

• Highest TCR • Largest Area • Lowest Dept. Number (random)

Page 30: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

30

CORELAP – STEP 2

• Department areas are converted into grid squares.

• CORELAP does not take the building shape into account.

• The final shape of the facility created by CORELAP depends on the placement of departments it has selected.

Page 31: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

31

CORELAP – STEP 2

• Place the first department in the center of the layout• Subsequent department is placed abutting already

placed departments in the position that gives the best placement rating

• After the layout is completed CORELAP calculates a numerical score for the layout

dCR iji ij

ijeLayoutScor

Page 32: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

32

CORELAP – STEP 2

1st

8

1

2 3

7 6

5

4

2nd

Page 33: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

33

Example of Dept Placements

2

4

13

(b)

650

2

4

1

3

(c)

850

2

4

13

3 4 2

3

2

3

3

(a)800

Contoh: Dept. 1, 2, 3 sudah diletakkan di layout dan dept. 4 akan diletakkan. Weighted Rating: (assigned by the user)A = 600 E = 200 I = 50 O = 10 U = 0 X = –200

1 - 4: A

2 – 4: E

3 – 4: I

Page 34: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

34

Procedure to Place Departments

• Assume that a department is

placed in the middle (position

0). Then, if another department

is placed in position 1, 3, 5 or 7,

it is “fully adjacent” with the

first one. It is placed in position

2, 4, 6 or 8, it is “partially

adjacent”.

8 7 6

5

432

1 08 7 6

1 Pusat 5

2 3 4

Page 35: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

35

Procedure to Place Departments

8 7 6

5

432

1 0

• For each position, Weighted Placement (WP) is the sum of the numerical values for all pairs of adjacent departments.

• The placement of departments is based on the following steps:

1. The first department selected is placed in the middle.

2. The placement of a department is determined by evaluating all

possible locations around the current layout in counterclockwise

order beginning at the “western edge”.

3. The new department is located based on the greatest WP

value.

Page 36: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

36

Example - CORELAPCV values:V(A) = 125V(E) = 25V(I) = 5V(O) = 1V(U) = 0V(X) = -125

Partial adjacency: = 0.5

1. Receiving

2. Shipping

3. Raw Materials Storage

4. Finished Goods Storage

5. Manufacturing

6. Work-In-Process Storage

7. Assembly

8. Offices

9. Maintenance

A A

E O

U U

A O

E

E

E

A

A

X

X

A U

U

A

O

O

A

O

A

O

U

E

A

U

E

U

E

A U

O

A

1. Receiving

2. Shipping

3. Raw Materials Storage

4. Finished Goods Storage

5. Manufacturing

6. Work-In-Process Storage

7. Assembly

8. Offices

9. Maintenance

Page 37: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

37

Table of TCR Values

Department SummaryDept.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A E I O U XTCR Order

123456789

- A A E O U U A O A - E A U O U E A A E - E A U U E A E A E - E O A E U U O A E - A A O A U O U O A - A O O U U U A A A - X A A E E E O O X - X O U A U A O A X -

3 1 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 1 3 0 3 3 0 0 2 0 2 4 0 1 1 0 4 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 4 2 0 4 0 0 0 3 1 1 3 0 2 0 2 3 0 0 2 2 1

402301450351527254625452502

(5)(7)(4)(6)(2)(8)(1)(9)(3)

Page 38: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

38

Example (cont.)

7

125

125

125 125

62.5 62.5

62.562.5

7 125

62.5 62.5

62.5187.5

5125

62.5 187.5

187.5 187.5

7 0

62.5 0

5

187.5

187.5

9187.5

62.5 125 62.5

0

62.5125

7 0

125.5 0

5

1.59126.5

0.5 1 0.5

0

163.5

3125

62.5

62.5

Page 39: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

39

Example (cont.)

7 1255137.59

25 0

100

337.5

37.5

12.5

112.5 12.5

62.5

62.5137.537.5

31

7125

59

125

12.5

87.5

137.5

12.5

62.5 125

62.5

0025

4125 62.5

75

9

1

125

31

0

1

1 1.5

125

188

4

1.5 0.5

21

0.5

0.5

63.5

62.562.5

Page 40: Facility Design-Week 9 Computerized Layout Planning

40

Example (cont.)

75

9

75

-60.5

3112.5

1

87.5 -62.5

-112

4

-37.5 12.5

225

12.5

12.5

-37.5

-61.525.5 612.5

0.5 10.5 0.5

75

9

3

1 42

6

8