f. gianotti, fcc-hh ws, 26/5/2014 fcc study status & summary of fcc week 2015 frank zimmermann...
TRANSCRIPT
F. Gianotti, FCC-hh WS, 26/5/2014
FCC Study Status & Summary of FCC Week 2015
Frank ZimmermannBE/ABP Group Meeting
CERN, 21 May 2015
Work supported by the European Commission under Capacities 7th Framework Programme projest EuCARD-2, Grant Agreement 312453, and the HORIZON 2020 project EuroCirCol, Grant Agreement 654305
gratefully acknowledging input from Michael Benedikt & Johannes Gutleber
FCC study – scope & goal• Accelerator & Infrastructure
• FCC-hh: 100 TeV pp collider as long-term goal - defines infrastructure needs
• FCC-ee: e+e- collider, potential intermediate step• FCC-he: integration aspects of pe collisions• key technologies• infrastructure in Geneva region
• Physics & Experiments• physics opportunities, detector concepts, data services
• Cost, implementation and governance models
Conceptual Design Report by end of 2018 in time for next European Strategy Update Goal:
CERN Circular Colliders + FCC
3
Constr. Physics LEP
Construction PhysicsProtoDesign LHC
Construction PhysicsDesign HL-LHC
PhysicsConstructionProtoDesignFuture Collider
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
20 years
Study time line towards CDR
4
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Explore options“weak interaction”
Report
Study plan, scope definition
FCC Week 2018 contents of CDR
CDR ready
FCC Week 2015: work towards baseline
conceptual study of baseline “strong interact.”
FCC Week 17 & ReviewCost model, LHC results study re-scoping?
Elaboration,consolidation
FCC Week 2016Progress review
Key Parameters FCC-hh
5
Parameter FCC-hh LHC
Energy [TeV] 100 c.m. 14 c.m.
Dipole field [T] 16 8.33
# IP 2 main, +2 4
Luminosity/IPmain [cm-2s-1] 5 - 25 x 1034 1 x 1034
Stored energy/beam [GJ] 8.4 0.39
Synchrotron rad. [W/m/aperture] 28.4 0.17
Bunch spacing [ns] 25 (5) 25
• Two parameter sets for two operation phases:
Phase 1 (baseline): 5 x 1034 cm-2s-1 (peak),250 fb-1/year (averaged) 2500 fb-1 within 10 years (~HL LHC total luminosity)
Phase 2 (ultimate): ~2.5 x 1035 cm-2s-1 (peak),1000 fb-1/year (averaged)
15,000 fb-1 within 15 years
FCC-hh Luminosity Goals
Yielding total luminosity O(20,000) fb-1 over ~25 years of operation
OK for physics
fresh in arXiv
phase 1: b*=1.1 m, DQtot=0.01, tta=5 h
phase 2: b*=0.3 m, DQtot=0.03, tta=4 h
for both phases:
beam current 0.5 A unchanged!
total synchrotron radiation power ~5 MW.
radiation damping: t~1 h
FCC-hh luminosity evolution 24 h
phase 1: b*=1.1 m, DQtot=0.01, tta=5 h phase 2: b*=0.3 m, DQtot=0.03, tta=4 h
FCC-hh int. luminosity per day
Key Parameters FCC-eeParameter FCC-ee LEP2
Energy/beam [GeV] 45 120 175 105
Bunches/beam 13000- 60000
500- 1400
51- 98 4
Beam current [mA] 1450 30 6.6 3
Luminosity/IP x 1034 cm-2s-1 21 - 280 5 - 11 1.5 - 2.6 0.0012
Energy loss/turn [GeV] 0.03 1.67 7.55 3.34
Synchrotron Power [MW] 100 22
RF Voltage [GV] 0.2-2.5 3.6-5.5 11 3.5
Dependency: crab-waist vs. baseline optics and 2 vs. 4 IPs
FCC-ee: Luminosity vs. Energy
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4001
10
100
1000
c.m. energy [GeV]
tota
l lu
min
osi
ty [
10
34
cm
-2s-
1]
Z W ZH t t
Baseline 2 IPBaseline 4 IP
Crab waist 2 IP
Crab waist 4 IP
H?
with mono-chromatization
by* evolution over 40 years
yearb* [m]
SuperKEKB
FCC-ee
PETRA
SPEAR
PEP, BEPC, LEP
CESR
DORISTRISTAN
DAFNE
CESR-c, PEP-II
KEKB
BEPC-II
6 mm
1 mm
0.3 mm
entering a new regime for ring colliders –SuperKEKB will pave the way towards b*≤1 mm
Geology Studies – Example 93 km
• 90 – 100 km fits geological situation well,better than a smaller ring size
• LHC suitable as potential injector
A key to New Physics
EuroCirCol EU Horizon 2020 Grant
• Core aspects of hadron collider design: arc & IR optics design• Feasibility study of key technologies:
16 T magnet program, cryogenic beam vacuum system
15
EC contributes with funding to FCC-hh study
Evaluation Results
16
1 5 / 1 5
Q u o t e s
• Science is excellent• Project is ambitious andshows innovation potential
• Objectives are clear andapproach is credible
• Will have impact on other disciplines and industry
• Key element of European Strategy on Particle Physics
Recognition of FCC Study by European Commission
EC Funded Scope
A r c D e s i g n
Lead: CEAA. Chancé
Co-Lead: CERND. Schulte
E I R D e s i g n
Lead: JAIA. Seryi
Co-Lead: CERND. Schulte
Cryo Beam Vacuum
Lead: CELLSF. Perez
Co-Lead: CERNP. Chiggiato
High Field Magnet
Lead: CERNL. Bottura
Co-Lead: n.n.16
Tesla
EuroCirCol Consortium + Associates
18
J a p a nK E K
F i n l a n dT U T
F r a n c eC E A , C N R S
I t a l yI N F N
G e r m a n yK I T , T U D
S w i t z e r l a n dE P F L , U N I G E
N e t h e r l a n d sU T
S p a i nA L B A , C I E M A T
C E R N
U n i t e d K i n g d o mS T F C , U N I L I V , U O X F
CERN IEIOTUT FinlandCEA France
CNRS France
KIT GermanyTUD GermanyINFN ItalyUT Netherlands
ALBA Spain
CIEMAT Spain
STFC United KingdomUNILIV United KingdomUOXF United Kingdom
KEK Japan
EPFL SwitzerlandUNIGE SwitzerlandNHFML-FSU USABNL USAFNAL USALBNL USA
Consortium Beneficiaries, signing the Grant Agreement
The FCC Collaboration
• A consortium of partners based on a
Memorandum Of Understanding (MoU)
• Working together on a
best effort basis
• Self governed
• Incremental & open to
academia and industry
• Specific contributions
detailed in Addendum19
Collaboration Status• 55 institutes• 20 countries• EC participation
20
55 FCC collaboration members & CERN as host institute,
status 28 April 2015ALBA/CELLS, SpainAnkara U., TurkeyU Bern, SwitzerlandBINP, RussiaCASE (SUNY/BNL), USACBPF, Brazil CEA Grenoble, FranceCEA Saclay, FranceCIEMAT, SpainCNRS, FranceCockcroft Institute, UK U Colima, Mexico CSIC/IFIC, SpainTU Darmstadt, GermanyDESY, Germany TU Dresden, GermanyDuke U, USAEPFL, Switzerland
GWNU, KoreaU Geneva, SwitzerlandGoethe U Frankfurt, GermanyGSI, GermanyHellenic Open U, GreeceHEPHY, AustriaU Houston, USAIFJ PAN Krakow, PolandINFN, ItalyINP Minsk, BelarusU Iowa, USAIPM, IranUC Irvine, USAIstanbul Aydin U., TurkeyJAI, UKJINR Dubna, RussiaFZ Jülich, GermanyKAIST, Korea
KEK, JapanKIAS, KoreaKing’s College London, UKKIT Karlsruhe, GermanyKorea U Sejong, KoreaMEPhI, RussiaMIT, USANBI, DenmarkNorthern Illinois U., USANC PHEP Minsk, BelarusU. Liverpool, UKU Oxford, UKPSI, Switzerland Sapienza/Roma, ItalyUC Santa Barbara, USAU Silesia, PolandTU Tampere, FinlandU Twente, NetherlandsWroclaw UT, Poland
Study Coordination Group - evolving
22
A. Ball, (F. Gianotti ,)J. Incandela, M.
Mangano, W. Riegler
Hadron ColliderPhysics &
Experiments
A. Blondel,J. Ellis, C. Grojean,
P. Janot
Lepton ColliderPhysics &
Experiments
M. Klein,O. Bruning
ep Physics, Experiment, IP
Integration
B. Goddard
Hadron Injectors
D. Schulte,M. Syphers
Hadron Collider
Y. Papaphilippou
Lepton Injectors
F. Zimmermann,J. Wenninger,U. Wienands
Lepton Collider
L. Bottura,E. Jensen, L. Tavian
Accelerator Technologies R&D
P. Lebrun,P. Collier
Infrastructures & Operation
P. Lebrun,F. Sonnemann
Costing &Planning
JM. Jimenez
SpecialTechnologies
M. BenediktF. Zimmermann
Study Lead
First FCC Week
Conference
Washington DC
23-27 March 2015
http://cern.ch/fccw2015
++...
1st FCC Week Washington DC, March 2015
FCC Week 2015
“head shots” from Bob Palmer (BNL)
FCC Week 2015 STATISTICS
US, 120
CH (10) +CERN (93) ,103
DE, 20
CN, 16
UK, 16
IT, 12
FR, 11
RU, 11
JP, 10ES, 6
PL, 5Other, 10
340Registrants
21 Countries
128Institutes
FCC kickoff & FCC week 2015 – both had about 340 participants
• US congressman Bill Foster: “don’t be shy to stand up for the unique nature of your field and don’t be afraid of big numbers!”
• special session devoted to US (LARP, SRF, high field magnets, particle physics strategy)
• industrial exhibition and “industry fast-track” session focused on Nb3Sn and HTS conductor development
• James Siegrist (DOE) pointed way for aligning the US high-field R&D effort with FCC goals; implementation plan to be composed in near future
• first US demonstrator magnet could be ready in 2016• Lenoid Rivkin was confirmed as FCC collaboration
board chair until the end of 2018
a few highlights from the FCC week
Outlook till end 2015• freeze baselines, parameters and concepts
• colliders, injectors and infrastructures
• series of (mini-)reviews in June and September/October:
- geology, FCC-ee optics, FCC-hh injection energy
• put Nb3Sn/16 T magnet program on solid feet
• alignment with US DOE high-field magnet program
• define and launch selected technology R&D programmes
• e.g. cryo-beam vacuum system for FCC-hh
• reinforce physics and detector simulations
• pursue MDI ( e.g. FCC-ee SR effects) and experiment studies
• further enlarge global FCC collaboration28
FCC Week 2016
Rome, Apri l 2016
FCC study is counting on the
help and support from the
ABP group!