explaining korean problem - division and engagement - june 14, 2006 hcu peace studies sung chull kim...

36
Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute [email protected]

Upload: andra-pearson

Post on 01-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Explaining Korean Problem- Division and Engagement -

June 14, 2006HCU Peace Studies

Sung Chull KimHiroshima Peace [email protected]

Page 2: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Preliminary questions

Why was Korea divided? What is the impact of division of Korea?

Why does South Korea try to engage with North Korea?

What does the two Koreas mean to Northeast Asia, particularly Japan?

(see table of content, p. 36)

Page 3: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

The Korean peninsula

Page 4: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Flags of ROK and DPRK

Page 5: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Two Koreas in Northeast Asia: Facts

Country

Space

(1,000 km2)

Population

(Million) Capital

GDP

(Million US dollars)

GDP/capita

(US dollars)

Japan 378 130.0 Tokyo 4,326,400 34,010

China 9,597 1,300.0 Beijing 1,130,984 890

North Korea 121 22.6 Pyongyang 22,260* 1,000*

South Korea 99 47.4 Seoul 447,698 9,400

Page 6: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Division and its impact (sum) “Division of Korea” “Korean peninsula as the last remaining Cold War zone”

Division of Korea and Korean War - division by international agreement (Germany, Korea, and Vietnam) - experience of war (Korea and Vietnam)

Divergent development path and competition in the Cold War era - North: socialist and autarchic economy, father-son monolithic power - South: export-oriented market economy, dependence on US,

democratization

WMD development by North Korea in the Post-Cold War era - end of regime competition between two Koreas - two nuclear developments (1994-1994 and 2002-present)

Page 7: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Koreans celebrating the liberation (1945)

Page 8: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Division of Korea (documentary) For the comments, see separate sheet.

Page 9: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

State Building in the North Soviet influence for the early establishment of leadership - Selection of the leader: Kim Il Sung - Why Kim? (1) no experience of engagement in the

factional division in communist movement in Korea in 1920s and 1930s; (2) Soviet’s familiarity with Kim who served in the Far Eastern Russia army

- Soviet helped Kim by blocking of entry of armed forces from foreign territory, especially from China

In addition to Soviet influence, there were other factors for the rapid formation of state, centered around Kim Il Sung

- existence of segments of communists in Korea during the Japanese colonial rule

- ideological similarity among the factions after arrest of nationalists

Page 10: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

North Korean leader, Kim Il Sung (1945)

Page 11: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

State Building in the South

Strong US influence and support for Rhee Syngman, but relatively confrontational process in the state formation

- Despite no allowance of political organizations by the Military Government led by US forces, there were severe confrontations among political factions of different ideological orientations.

- The factions included communists, nationalists, Shanghai interim government leaders, and social democrats.

- With the oppression made by the Military Government, the communist escaped to the North, and interim government faction and social democrats were driven out from the political scene.

- In the end, Rhee Syngman prevailed in politics.

Page 12: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

South Korean leader, Rhee Syngman (1948)

Page 13: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Origins of Korean War (1950-53) Theories on the origin of the war - Kim Il Sung’s initiative - Stalin’s rollback strategy - internal war between two conflicting communities (North and South

Koreas)

The Korean War, mixture of domestic and international factors. - Rhee Syngman's “unification through marching to the North” vs. Kim

Il Sung’s “complete domination based on democratic base in the North”

- Severe military conflicts around the 38th parallel since June 1949. - It was not all-out struggle, but the war started a year ago. - international support by the Soviet union and China, on the one

hand, and the United States, on the other hand.

Page 14: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Consequences of the Korean War Total death toll reached around 2,500,000 - 1,316,579 North Korean soldiers and civilians - 595,000 South Korean soldiers and civilians - 36,940 US soldiers - 500,000 Chinese soldiers

The human disaster of the Korean War outnumbered that of the Vietnam War (death toll 1,900,000).

Unlike the nominal goal of “unification,” presented by the two Koreas, the Korean War contributed to the consolidation of the division.

- increase in armed forces: 600,000 in the South vs. 1,100,000 in the North

- emergence of dictatorship: Rhee and Park in the South vs. Kim and his son, Kim Jong-il, in the North

- divergent path of development: South’s reliance on the United States vs. North’s self-reliance

Page 15: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Korean War (1950-53)

Page 16: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Autocratic Rule in the South

Rhee Syngman’s autocratic rule - In the midst of Korean War, Rhee adopted the

direct presidential election in 1952. - Two years later, he illicitly passed a

constitutional amendment permitting lifelong presidency.

- In 1960, the election fraud connected with his campaign for a fourth presidential term brought about a massive demonstration. He resigned and fled to Hawaii, where he lived in exile.

Page 17: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Autocratic rule in the South, continue Park Chung-hee’s authoritarian rule - Park took power through military coup in May 1961. - During the period of military government between 1961

and 1963, Park introduced the law banning political activities of the old politicians and established Korean Central Intelligence Agency (KCIA) and the Economic Planning Board. These two organizations became the pillars of power and legitimacy.

- After promulgation of Yushin in October 1972, Park strengthened the authoritarian rule over the society through presidential measures, weakening of power of the legislative body, and press censorship.

- Yushin collapsed with the assassination of president Park by his associate, KCIA director, Kim Jae-kyu on October 26, 1979.

Page 18: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Park Chung-hee after military coup (1961)

Page 19: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Monolithic rule in the North The Korean War (1950-1953) and its aftermath contributed to Kim Il

Sung’s consolidation of power base. - Kim defeated South-origin communists right after the war broke out. - He expelled Soviet and Chinese factions from the party in the mid-

1950s. The tool for the monolithic rule was Juche ideology. Juche means

self-reliance or independence. The emergence of Kim Jong-il is attributable to his political skills as

well as the preparation of power succession for twenty years. - Kim Jong-il successfully presented himself as the authoritative

interpreter of the Juche ideology. He promulgated his father Kim Il Sung’ idea as Kimilsungism. Also he publicized Ten Principles for the Establishment of the Monolithic Idea in 1974.

- Kim Jong-il became a party secretary in charge of the Organization Department as well as of Department of Propaganda and Agitation in 1973. He began to be deeply involved in the personnel affairs.

Page 20: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Power Structure after Kim Il Sung’s death president - In the preface of the new constitution of 1998, Kim Il Sung is named

as “eternal president” of North Korea. - The office of state president was abolished.

National Defense Committee (NDC) - The NDC became “the highest guiding organ of the military and the

managing organ of the military affairs.” - The Chairman of the NDC, Kim Jong-il, is in firm control of all the

armed forces and in charge of all political economic matters as well.

status of military - Kim, in December 1996, was quoted as saying that: “The party’s

morale is so degraded that party cadres would benefit from getting an ideological education from political officers of the military.”

- Also military’s role in the economic affairs is distinctive, especially in the fields of construction and agriculture, as well as in military industry.

Page 21: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Inter-Korean relations: from confrontation to engagement Confrontation, 1950s-1960s - anti-communism vs. military adventurism

Competition, 1970s-1980s - July 4th Joint Declaration - regime competition accompanied by several conflicts

Gradual engagement, 1990s-present - Basic Agreement in 1991 - 1st nuclear crisis in 1993-4 - Kim Dae-jung’s Sunshine Policy for engagement with the

North - 2nd nuclear crisis since 2002

Page 22: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Inter-Korean relations: confrontation in 1950s-1960s

South Korea The military regime, led by ex-general Park Chung-hee, took an

intense anti-communism policy for obtaining legitimacy from the United States.

- Law for Anti-Communism passed in 1961 - The law prohibits not only association with communists but also aids

to them. This is a kind of special law of the existing National Security Law that defines general anti-national activities.

North Korea In the process of the consolidation of Kim’s power and the

implementation of self-reliance policy, the status of military rose, and in turn, this resulted in an adventurism provoking to the South.

- North Korean armed spy (special forces) infiltrations in 1968 targeting Blue House, South Korean presidential house.

Page 23: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Pueblo Incident (1968)

Inter-Korean confrontation heightened by the abduction of US spy ship, Pueblo, in January 1968

- The crew members were detained in North Korea for 11 months and returned in December 1968.

Page 24: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Inter-Korean relations: competition in 1970s-1980s regime competition instead of confrontation, because of changes in

international environment and domestic needs - July 4th Joint Declaration for inter-Korean reconciliation

Background (1): international environment changes - changes in security environment in East Asia, particularly because of

rapprochement of US-China and Japan-China relations - Feb. 1972, president Nixon visited China, Shanghai Joint Communiqué - Sept. 1972, Prime Minister Tanaka visited China, Tanaka-Cho Enlai Joint

Declaration

Background (2): domestic power consolidation and stability - in North Korea, preparation for father-to-son power transfer - “Kimilsungism” by Kim Jong-il in 1974 - in South Korea, Park’s ambition of prolonging his power - Yushin (literally meaning renovation) in October 1972

Page 25: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

July 4th Joint Declaration in 1972 The declaration was the culmination of inter-Korean reconciliatory

gestures in this phase of regime competition.

Main points1. principle of unification: independence, peace, grand national

integration2. end of denunciation and military provocation, and attempts for

prevention of military conflict3. multi-dimensional exchanges between two Koreas4. facilitating of Red Cross meetings5. establishment of hot line between Pyongyang and Seoul6. operation of North-South Coordination Committee7. swear for the full implementation of the agreements in front of all

nation people

Page 26: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Inter-Korean regime competition accompanied by severe conflicts

Page 27: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Gradual engagement, 1990-present Two Koreas joined UN at the same time in Sept. 1991. - The first formal international recognition of two states in Korean

Peninsula. - This was one of the most meaningful events that happened in the

post-Cold War era.

Basic Agreement between two Koreas in Dec. 1991 - This agreement was followed by Joint Declaration of the

Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula in Feb. 1992.

1st nuclear crisis in 1993-4 - Despite the two agreements between two Koreas, the disclosure of

North Korea’s nuclear weapon development represented that Korean peninsula was still in the age of Cold War.

- Geneva Agreed Framework, signed by US and North Korea in Oct. 1994, for freezing the nuclear facilities ended the crisis.

Page 28: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Inter-Korean relations, 1989-1992

Page 29: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

1994 and 2000

Page 30: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Engagement with the North: Kim and Roh Kim Dae-jung’s “Sunshine Policy” 1998-2003 - “buying peace with economy,” or “investment in the peace” - collusive coalition between government and Hyundai cooperation for

the 2000 summit

Roh Moo-hyun’s “Peace and Prosperity Policy” 2003-present - institutionalization of economic exchanges (investment guarantee,

double-taxation exemption, dispute arbitration, payment through South and North Korean banks)

- construction of Kaesong Industrial Complex since 2000 - factories started to produce products since 2004

2nd nuclear crisis in 2002-present - North Korea’s confession of developing of HEU project to US

Assistant Secretary of the State Department James Kelly in Oct. 2002

- 4th Six-Party Talks adopted Joint Declaration (dismantlement of North Korean nuclear development, denuclearization of Korean peninsula, economic assistance, U.S.-North Korea normalization)

Page 31: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Trend of inter-Korean trade

Page 32: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Trend of inter-Korean visits

Page 33: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Kaesong-Seoul

Page 34: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Kaesong Industrial Complex

The first major industrial complex that was constructed by South Korean companies in North Korean territory

Total 65.7 km2

About 6,400 North Korean workers are employed by Korean factries, as of March 5, 2006.

For the operation of factories, South Korean managing staff commutes the industrial complex by crossing the border (DMZ).

Page 35: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Conclusion

The division of Korea and the establishment of two Koreas have become the central source of contradictions in the region, as well as the source of confrontation between two Koreas.- The division resulted in the war (the biggest one after the WWII); The Korean peninsula had been the locus of East-West confrontation in the region. (US, Japan, and South Korea vs. Russia, China, and North Korea)

The Korean peninsula is the last remaining island of the Cold War: See U.S.-North Korea and Japan-North Korea relations.

It is necessary to find a solution to the division by peaceful coexistence between two Koreas. - The peaceful coexistence between two Koreas requires North Korea’s dismantlement of nuclear weapons program and also needs the development of the relationship between the U.S. and North Korea. There are limitations in the South Korea’s economic engagement policy toward North Korea. - The development of the U.S.-North Korea relationship will facilitate the normalized relationship between Japan and North Korea and will contribute to the solution of pending issues, including adduction issue.

There is a vision for regional cooperation through the peaceful Korean peninsula. - in transportation (Trans-Siberian and Trans-Korean linkage to Japan) and energy (oil and gas: Eastern Pipeline).

Page 36: Explaining Korean Problem - Division and Engagement - June 14, 2006 HCU Peace Studies Sung Chull Kim Hiroshima Peace Institute sckim@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp

Table of content 3-5: introduction 6-8: division and its impacts 9-12: two Koreas 13-20: the Korean War and its impacts 21-20: inter-Korean relationship 30-34: South Korea’s engagement

policy 35: conclusion