experimental and quasi- experimental designs chapters 9 & 10

32
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Upload: eustace-colin-wilkinson

Post on 24-Dec-2015

262 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs

Chapters 9 & 10

Page 2: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Research Design It is the outline, plan, or strategy

for the procedures you will use to address your research question.

Page 3: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Research Designs – What are some limitations of these?

1. One-group after design Treatment Response

measure

2. One-group before-after design Response Measure 1 Treatment Compare Response Measure 2

Page 4: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Research Designs – What are some limitation of these?

N onequ iva len t posttest-on ly design

R esp on se M easu reC og n it ive F u n c tion in ga t 6 -m on th s fo llow -u p

C ard iac B yp ass &R evascu la riza tion

R esp on se M easu reC og n it ive F u n c tion in ga t 6 -m on th s fo llow -u p

C ard iac R evascu la riza tion

Page 5: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

What are the requirements of true research designs?

Page 6: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Requirements of True Research Design

Design is adequate to answer the research question (i.e., test the hypothesis).

Control for extraneous variables Results are generalizable.

Page 7: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Why Pre-testing Your Participants Increased sensitivity of the study Ceiling effect Initial position Initial comparability Evidence of change

Page 8: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

What are the limitations of this design?

True R esearch D esign

R andom ized to :

R esp on seM easu re

D ec is ion a l R eg re t &D is tress

A n xie tyM an ag em en t

R esp on seM easu re

D ec is ion a l R eg re t &D is tress

U su a l C are

Page 9: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Factorial Design Two or more independent variables

are studied in order to determine their independent and interactive effects on the dependent variable.

Page 10: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Interaction Effect The effect of one factor

(independent variable) depends on the level of the other factor (other independent variable).

Page 11: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Main Effects & Interactions

Sad

ness

Sad

ness

Lightness Lightness

Seasonal Affect Disorder

Non-Seasonal Affect Disorder

High High

High HighLow Low

Page 12: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Advantages of Factorial Designs

More than one hypothesis can be tested.

Potentially confounding variables can be built into the design as factors.

Enables interaction effects to be tested.

Page 13: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Within Participant After-Only Design

Same research participants in all experimental treatment conditions.

Repeated measures design. Overcomes concerns about creating

equivalence between groups. Requires fewer participants. Most serious limitation is the

confounding influence of a sequence effect.

Page 14: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Combining Within and Between Participant Designs Factorial design based on a mixed

model. Can include as many independent

variables as is necessary.

Page 15: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Combining Within and Between Participant Designs

Before - After D esign

P os t-trea tm en tM easu re

E xp erim en ta lG rou p

P os t-trea tm en tM easu re

C on tro lG rou p

R an d om ized to :

P re -trea tm en tM easu res

P artic ip an tsS e lec ted

RepeatedMeasure

Between-SubjectFactor

May want to match beforerandomizing

Page 16: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Factorial DesignD oes s tress m anagem en t w ork s im ilarly in m edicated and

un m edicated hypertens ives?

P os t m easu rea t 6 -m on th s

B eta B locker &S tress m an ag em en t

P os t m easu rea t 6 -m on th s

B eta B locker, n oS tress m an ag em en t

P os t m easu rea t 6 -m on th s

P laceb o &S tress m an ag em en t

P os t m easu rea t 6 -m on th s

P laceb o , n oS tress m an ag em en t

U n m ed ica ted h yp erten s ivesR an d om ized to :

• Main effect for beta blocker

• Main effect for stress management• Interaction effect for drug and stress management

Page 17: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Main & Interaction Effects

8084889296

100104108112

Pre Post

Drug & Stress Man. Drug, No Stress Man.Placebo & Stress Man. Placebo, No Stress Man.

8084889296

100104108112

Pre Post

Drug & Stress Man. Drug, No Stress Man.Placebo & Stress Man. Placebo, No Stress Man.

Main Effect Interaction Effect

Page 18: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Selecting the Appropriate Design

The design must be one that addresses your research question.

What control techniques can and should you apply to help you arrive at an unambiguous answer.

Between or within-in design or mixed model.

Page 19: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Quasi-Experimental Design

Page 20: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Quasi-Experimental Does not meet all of the requirements

necessary for controlling the influence of extraneous variables. Most common criteria not met is random

assignment. While you cannot infer cause and effect,

well designed quasi-experiments enable you to demonstrate that rival interpretations are implausible.

Page 21: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Non -Equivalent Control Group Design: Typical Rival Hypotheses

Increasing treatment effect I outcome

A selection-maturation effect

Page 22: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Increasing Treatment Effect I Outcome

Pre-test Post-test

Control Group

Experimental Group

Page 23: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Increasing Treatment and Control Group Outcomes Both groups’ scores increase over

time but one group changes to a greater extent than the other group. Effect could be due to a treatment

effect or to a selection-maturation interaction.

Page 24: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

HADS Depression

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Experimental Control

Time 1Time 2Time 3

ANOVA – time and time by group effect, depressiondecreased in both groups but levelled off in controlGroup at follow-up while continuing to decrease in experimental.

Page 25: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Increasing Treatment Effect II Outcome

Pre-test Post-test

Control Group

Experimental Group

Page 26: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Cross-Over Effects

Pre-test Post-test

Control Group

Experimental Group

Page 27: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Time Series Analyses Useful when you cannot randomize

participants and where it is possible to obtain a series of assessments of the dependent variable at pre-treatment and post-treatment.

Page 28: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Time Series AnalysisTreatmentApplied

Page 29: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Classic Studies: Effect of Reduced Speeding on Traffic Accidents in Connecticut

In 1955 there were a record number of traffic accidents ( n = 324) so the Governor (Abraham Ribicoff) introduced a law to reduce the speed limit.

In 1956 there were 284 traffic accidents, a reduction of 12.3%.

Governor concluded that his intervention worked but the effects could just as easily been due to regression to the mean.

Page 30: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Classic Studies: Effect of Reduced Speeding on Traffic Accidents in Connecticut

Campbell and Ross (1968) used interrupted time series design to test if the reduced trend in traffic accidents was plausible.

Compared traffic accident trend in Connecticut with control States.

Page 31: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Classic Studies: Effect of Reduced Speeding on Traffic Accidents in Connecticut

‘51 ‘52 ‘53 ‘54 ‘55 ‘56 ‘57 ‘58 ‘59

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

••

••

Control State

Connecticut

Page 32: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs Chapters 9 & 10

Class Exercise Specify your research question Your scientific hypothesis Specify your design Break into groups of 5