experiential peacebuilding - entry in oxford international encyclopedia of peace
DESCRIPTION
ÂTRANSCRIPT
Experiential PeacebuildingOxford International Encyclopedia for Peace 2009J. Todd Walters
J. Todd Walters- [email protected] — 1 of 2
Experiential Peacebuilding is an interactive process
that harnesses the unique qualities of outdoor activities
and combines them with proven experiential learning
techniques to foster positive intergroup experiences
within a neutral environment. This framework serves
as a platform upon which to build peacebuilding skills
trainings. A wide variety of outdoor experiential activities
can be customized into various types of peacebuilding
experiences based upon distinct group objectives. The
basic framework is derived from the Action Learning
Cycle which has participants: do something, reflect upon
what they did, use their analysis to come up with a new
plan, and test it out. Facilitated debriefs help to focus
the reflection process, and draw out the peacebuilding
lessons. Examples include three different types:
day long excursions, extended wilderness expeditions,
and ropes/challenge course initiatives. Different activities
have different strengths, promoting different aspects
of peacebuilding, and lending themselves to different
skills trainings.
A day long white water rafting excursion requires
participants to cooperate, communicate and trust each
other to safely navigate the rapids, with the debrief
focused on exploring the metaphor “we are all in the
same boat”. An extended wilderness expedition into
remote backcountry provides more time with which to
achieve greater depth in the relationships developed,
the trust built, the dialogues that occurred, and the
skills honed through practical trainings and the ability
to practice them. A ropes/challenge course presents
participants with initiatives that foster communication,
active listening, collaborative problem solving, and
the leadership/followership dynamic. All programs are
designed to increase in intensity over time, and reinforce
lessons learned though facilitated debrief discussions.
Experiential learning consists of interactive activities
that stimulate the mind, body emotions and attitudes
of individual participants. This unique methodology
combines intellectual, physiological, emotional and
psychological aspects of learning – creating an experience
that taps into multiple layers of consciousness and
memory – giving it greater potential to stimulate positive
transformation. Shawn Dunning identifies this form of
memory as “kinesthetic encoding” – “when a concept is
connected to something that we physically experienced,
the potential for internalizing the given concept is
much greater.” After the experience itself come the
tasks of reflecting upon that experience and discussing
the lessons it highlighted within the group, while also
considering how best to transfer that knowledge from
the environment in which is was cultivated back to
ones’ everyday environment, so that it can be applied
to other aspects of life. Inevitably, when those lessons
are brought back into a familiar environment they are
confronted by the habits, prejudices, and entrenched
mindsets which were left behind. This “reentry shock”
must be overcome in order to ensure the transference
of lessons learned successfully. One method to address
this is a post-program, participant-developed, jointly-
beneficial community service project, which creates
space for course participants to maintain their newly
developed relationships and transfer the lessons learned,
attitudes changed, and stereotypes broken down, to
other members of their community. They serve as living
examples of people with the courage and skills to bridge
the divide between their conflicted communities.
The outdoor environment has a profound effect on the
atmosphere within which the peacebuilding activities
occur, as well as the attitudes participants bring to the
activities. The natural environment does not discriminate,
it is non-judgmental, and it acts as a common
denominator. Lisa Schirch notes that, “Participants gain
knowledge through interaction with their environment.
Thus, peacebuilders need to create a space that can
symbolically support the work of bringing people
together. The physical context in which peacebuilding
takes place should convey a message about what can
and should take place within that space.” The awe-
inspiring places in nature serve as symbolic and ritualized
space where the peacebuilding processes can be
maximized. Contrast this to traditional peacebuilding
trainings in classrooms or resort conference rooms
and it is easy to see the difference between a dialogue
circle that occurs on a mountain peak after all members
have helped each other reach the summit, and one that
overlooks the hotel pool.
Lisa Schirch in her chapter “Ritual Reconciliation”
acknowledges the power of experiential education and
the role it plays in peacebuilding, “If individuals learn by
doing, reconciliation could begin by enacting the desired
transformed state of coexistence. It may be helpful
for individuals in conflict to enact physically what they
cannot verbally acknowledge at first.” In an increasingly
fragmented global society, this can be one of many
peacebuilding tools that facilitates the transformation of
relationships between divided societies at the individual
and community levels.
Experiential PeacebuildingOxford International Encyclopedia for Peace 2009J. Todd Walters
J. Todd Walters- [email protected] — 2 of 2
References
Bauman, Peter A. “Outward Bound Peace Missions.” A proposal
requesting support from Outward Bounds’ Board of Directors.
May 2004.
Carius, Alexander. “Environmental Peacebuilding: Conditions for
Success.” ECSP Report 12. 2007.
Crocker, Chester A., Fen Olsen Hampson, and Pamela Aall, eds.
Grasping the Nettle: Analyzing Cases of Intractable Conflict.
Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2005.
Dunning, Shawn. A Call for Adventure Based Conflict Resolution.
Master’s Thesis, George Mason International Conflict Analysis
and Resolution program, 2004.
Jeong, Ho-won. “Peacebuilding in Post-Conflict Societies:
Strategy and Process.” Journal of Peace Research. 43(4),
495–496. 2006.
Kreisberg, Louis. “Mediation and the Transformation of the Israeli
Palestinian Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research. 38, no. 3: 373-
392. 2001.
Lederach, J.P “Reconciliation: The building of relationship,”
Building Peace: sustainable reconciliation in divided societies.
Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press. 1997
Pedler, Mike. Action Learning in Practice. Aldershots, England.
Gower Publishing. 1997.
Schirch, Lisa. Ritual and Symbol in Peacebuilding, Bloomfield, CT:
Kumarian Press, 2005.
Shapiro, Ilana. “Theories of Change.” Beyond Intractability. Eds.
Guy Burgess and Heidi
Burgess. Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado,
Boulder. Posted: January 2005 http://www.beyondintractability.
org/essay/theories_of_change/.
Walters, J. Todd. “Outdoor Experiential Education: A New
Tool for Peacebuilding.” Master’s Thesis, American University
International Peace & Conflict Resolution program, 2006.