evolution of end-to-end: why the internet is not like any other network

29
http://www.internetsociety.org Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network Leslie Daigle, moderator. Chief Internet Technology Officer The Internet Society

Upload: internet-technology-matters-internet-society

Post on 25-Dec-2014

275 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

In 2004, the IAB published RFC3724, "Future of End-to-End." The document reviews the important aspects of "smart endpoints, dumb network," and articulates some perspectives on how Internet engineering was evolving to address those key aspects. Ten years later, evolution has continued -- and the Internet's deployment and evolution are taking new directions in the face of growing awareness of the threat of pervasive monitoring of network traffic. How do we define the end-to-end principle today and is it still an important piece of ensuring a robust, reliable and trusted Internet in 2020? Each of three panelists will present their predictions for the state of one of the three facets (network, endpoints, infrastructure/middle) in 2020, followed by questions and interactive discussion. Panelists are Harald Alvestrand, Fred Baker, and Andrew Sullivan. The Internet Society's Leslie Daigle will moderate.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

http://www.internetsociety.org

Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

Leslie Daigle, moderator.

Chief Internet Technology Officer

The Internet Society

Page 2: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

The Internet Society

We are…

2

Not at the IETF

!  Taking discussion up a level

!  Taking any identified work items to the appropriate IETF WGs

�On the air�

!  Streaming

!  Recording

Stopping at 12:45pm so you can all get back to the IETF…

Page 3: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

The Internet Society

Agenda outline

3

Overview of the panel

Panelists’ predictions

Panel discussion

Open mic

Page 4: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

http://www.internetsociety.org

Panel overview

Page 5: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

The Internet Society

From the IAB’s RFC3724 (2004)

One of the key architectural guidelines of the Internet is the end-to-end principle in the papers by Saltzer, Reed, and Clark [...]. The end-to-end principle was originally articulated as a question of where best not to put functions in a communication system.

Yet, in the ensuing years, it has evolved to address concerns of maintaining openness, increasing reliability and robustness, and preserving the properties of user choice and ease of new service development as discussed by Blumenthal and Clark in [...]; concerns that were not part of the original articulation of the end-to-end principle.”

Page 6: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

The Internet Society

Current realities

We still want to build an Internet that features:

!  “increasing reliability and robustness, and preserving the properties of user choice and ease of new service development “

Significant challenges to that include

!  Business evolution

!  Reactions to the revelations of pervasive monitoring –  “Encrypt everything everywhere always” –  Localization of data based on physical geography

6

Page 7: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

The Internet Society

At the heart of the matter

[How] Does the end-to-end principle matter in today’s Internet and going forward?

7

Page 8: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

The Internet Society

The Panel

Leslie Daigle (Moderator)

Fred Baker – network

Andrew Sullivan – infrastructure

Harald Alvestrand – endpoint

8

Page 9: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

http://www.internetsociety.org

Panelists� predictions

Page 10: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

http://www.internetsociety.org

Fred Baker Network

10

Page 11: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

End$to$End$principle$•  Mul$ple'statements'in'the'same'paper:'

•  “The$principle,$called$the$end2to2end$argument,$suggests$that$func8ons$placed$at$low$levels$of$a$system$may$be$redundant$or$of$li=le$value$when$compared$with$the$cost$of$providing$them$at$that$low$level.”$–  General'statement'of'the'end5to5end'argument'or'principle'

•  “The$func8on$in$ques8on$can$completely$and$correctly$be$implemented$only$with$the$knowledge$and$help$of$the$applica8on$standing$at$the$end$points$of$the$communica8on$system.$Therefore,$providing$that$ques8oned$func8on$as$a$feature$of$the$communica8on$system$itself$is$not$possible.”$–  This'formula$on'applies'in'cases'in'which'end'system'applica$on'

knowledge'and'help'is'required'to'implement'func$onality'

Page 12: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

The$Stupid$Smart$Predictable$Network$•  My'understanding'of'the'End'to'End'principle:'–  One'could'describe'it'as'a'“principle'of'least'surprise”'or'a'“plea'for'simplicity”.'

–  A"lower"layer"should"do"what"an"upper"layer"expects.""•  Operate'correctly'per'the'protocol'•  Recursive!'•  Second5guessing'layers'above,'and'introducing'state,'creates'unintended'consequences'for'operators'and'users.'

–  Lower'layer'performance'enhancements,'implemented'by'including'equivalent'func$onality'in'two'layers,'are'explicitly'allowed;''•  They%should%measurably%enhance%performance…%

Page 13: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

Examples$of$things$the$predictable$network$does:$

•  When$handed$a$packet$des8ned$to$a$unicast$or$anycast$address,$it$delivers$the$packet$to$the$address$unchanged$–  It,'however,'intelligently'determines'the'route,'something'the'

applica$on'does'not'do'–  If'it'has'mul$ple'reasonable'routes,'it'uses'them'effec$vely'without'

applica$on'interven$on'

•  It$may$route$traffic$in$a$manner$that$enhances$the$opera8on$and$profit$of$its$administrator$–  Example:'BGP'rou$ng'may'op$mize'the'cost'to'an'administra$on'–  Example:'a'load'balancer'may'balance'load'among'many'hosts'

•  It$operates$transparently$–  When'a'predictable'network'does'something'unusual'with'a'session'or'

packet,'it'tells'the'sender'

Page 14: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

Examples$of$things$the$predictable$network$does$not$do$

•  Behave$contrary$to$predic8on,'and'in'so'doing'cause'a'user'or'operator'to'have'to'diagnose'its'behavior'–  When'asked,'in'DNS,'for'the'address'of'party'A,'return'the'address'of'

party'B.'

–  When'given'a'packet'intended'for'delivery'to'party'A,'deliver'it'to'another'party'

–  When'given'a'packet'containing'a'quantum'of'data,'deliver'a'packet'containing'an'unintended'quantum'of'data'

•  Note$that$intermi=ent$behavior$is$contrary$to$predic8on$–  While'it'may'change'its'behavior'(such'as'a'route),'it'doesn’t'oscillate'

Page 15: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

The$network$in$2020$•  Simplicity$Principle$

–  “Complexity'is'the'primary'mechanism'which'impedes'efficient'scaling,'and'as'a'result'is'the'primary'driver'of'increases'in'both'capital'expenditures'(CAPEX)'and'opera$onal'expenditures'(OPEX).”''

–  RFC'3439,'quo$ng'Mike'O’Dell'

–  Complexity'is'also'an'enemy'to'security'–'more'things'to'analyze'

•  I$see$some$operators$moving$in$the$direc8on$of$drama8cally$simplifying$their$networks$–  Their'arguments'have'to'do'with'reducing'opera$onal'expense'

–  IPv4'networks'tend'to'be'more'complex'and'less'predictable''than'IPv6,'due'to'NAT'

–  Drama$c'simplifica$on'leads'to'drama$cally'improved'predictability'

•  I$do$not$see$operators,$or$their$vendors,$making$the$network$less$able$to$deliver$value$either$to$its$users$or$its$administra8ons$

Page 16: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

http://www.internetsociety.org

Andrew Sullivan Infrastructure

Page 17: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

Isn’t this just the network?

!  Distinguish bits flowing on the wire + basic routing with everything else

!  Infrastructure specialization is unlikely to go away !  Capital expenditure & economies of scale !  “Core business” concerns !  Cattle not pets

1

Page 18: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

A great compromise

“You got it buddy: the large print giveth, and the small print taketh away” (Tom Waits,

“Step Right Up”) !  Infrastructure providers rely on something like

Fred’s “predictable network” !  Infrastructure providers have to alter their

behaviour depending on the user !  They’re all doing this at once

2

Page 19: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

Know your customer in 2020

!  Technologies that give hints will be embraced !  Identify certain properties of network user !  Correlate user across different services !  Not very end-to-endy

!  Technologies that are invasive with be eschewed !  Customers hate intrusion !  Corner cases == support costs == no profit !  End-to-endy

3

Page 20: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

Wishful thinking

!  Protocol development provides exactly enough hint to do good, and not enough to do harm.

!  The cracks in “network neutrality” don’t become a complete breach.

4

Page 21: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

http://www.internetsociety.org

Harald Alvestrand Endpoint

Page 22: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

:KDW�LV�7KH�(QGSRLQW"

Ɣ 7KH�3ODWIRUPż 3&��WDEOHW��SKRQH��GHYLFHż %HKROGHQ�WR�PDQ\�PDVWHUV"

Ɣ 7KH�&XVWRPHUż 7KH�VRXUFH�RI�DOO�PHDQLQJ��NLQG�RI�ż 2IWHQ�QHJOHFWHG�

Ɣ 7KH�8VHU

&RXOG�WDON�DERXW�WKHVH�IRUHYHU��:RQ¶W�,QVWHDG��VHOHFW�D�SDUWLFXODU�SHUVSHFWLYH�

Page 23: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

,I�,�$P�DQ�$SSOLFDWLRQ

Ɣ ,�NQRZ�P\�XVHUVż LQ�PDQ\�ZD\V��VKDSHV�DQG�IRUPV

Ɣ ,�NQRZ�P\�SXUSRVHƔ ,�NQRZ�P\�EDFNHQG�UHVRXUFHV

ż ZKLFK�PD\�LQFOXGH�PDQ\�IRUPV�RI�³VHUYLFHV´Ɣ ,�WRXFK�P\�SODWIRUP

ż ,W¶V�ZKHUH�,�UXQƔ ,�GRQ¶W�NQRZ�WKH�QHWZRUN�

Page 24: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

7KH�1HWZRUN�LV�1RW�0\�)ULHQG

Ɣ 1HWZRUNV�DUH�FRQWUROOHG�E\�QRW�PHż ,63Vż /DVW�0LOH�SURYLGHUVż (QWHUSULVHV

Ɣ 1RQH�RI�WKHVH�KDYH�P\�ZHOO�EHLQJ�DW�KHDUWƔ 1RQH�RI�WKHVH�GHSHQG��LQ�HDFK�LQVWDQFH��RQ�PH�GRLQJ�

ZHOOƔ 1RQH�RI�WKHVH�DUH�WKLQJV�,�FDQ�WRXFK�GLUHFWO\

Page 25: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

7KH�1HWZRUN�,V�0\�%URWKHU

Ɣ ,�GHSHQG�RQ�QHWZRUN�LQIUDVWUXFWXUH�WR�JDLQ�FXVWRPHUV

Ɣ ,�GHSHQG�RQ�WKH�QHWZRUN�WR�UHDFK�P\�FXVWRPHUV

Ɣ ,�FDQ¶W�KLGH�IURP�WKH�QHWZRUNƔ ,�GRQ¶W�KDYH�D�OLIH�ZLWKRXW�WKH�QHWZRUNƔ ,�KDYH�WR�WUXVW�WKH�QHWZRUNƔ ,�GRQ¶W�ZDQW�WR�WUXVW�WKH�QHWZRUN

Page 26: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

:KDW�GRHV�(QG�7R�(QG�PHDQ�WR�PH"

Ɣ (QG�WR�(QG�PHDQV�IURP�³PH´�WR�³PH´�Ɣ 7UXVW�H[LVWV�EHWZHHQ�WKH�HQGSRLQWV�Ɣ 7UXVW�LV�H[WHQGHG�WR�WKH�VWXII�EHWZHHQ���WR�

WKH�PLQLPXP�H[WHQW�SRVVLEOH�Ɣ 0\�FKRLFH�RI�LQWHUIDFH�OD\HU�GLFWDWHV�ZKHUH�

³HQGSRLQW´�FRQQHFWV�WR�³QHWZRUN´�Ɣ ,�ZLOO�GR�ZKDW�LW�WDNHV�WR�PDNH�WKLQJV�ZRUN�

Page 27: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

,I�,�&RXOG�:LVK

Ɣ &RQVLVWHQF\ż 'RQ¶W�PDNH�PH�JXHVV�ZKDW�ZLOO�KDSSHQż /HW�PH�DGDSW�LQ�RQH�ZD\��3/($6(�

Ɣ 5HOLDELOLW\ż 'R�WKH�VDPH�WKLQJ�HYHU\�WLPH

Ɣ 6LPSOLFLW\

1HWZRUN��\RX�DUH�QRW�P\�IULHQG�6WRS�³KHOSLQJ´�PH�

Page 28: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

http://www.internetsociety.org

General discussion

Page 29: Evolution of end-to-end: why the Internet is not like any other network

The Internet Society

At the heart of the matter

[How] Does the end-to-end principle matter in today’s Internet and going forward?

14