evolution & creationism

39
Evolution & Creationism Mike Phillips Geology Professor

Upload: xaria

Post on 10-Feb-2016

47 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Evolution & Creationism. Mike Phillips Geology Professor. Disclaimer (Georgia). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evolution & Creationism

Evolution & CreationismMike Phillips

Geology Professor

Page 2: Evolution & Creationism

Disclaimer (Georgia)This textbook contains material on

evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered.

Page 3: Evolution & Creationism

Tests for a scientific explanationWas the explanation derived from

observation?Does the explanation rely on natural

cause? Is it supported by natural data?Can the explanation be changed or

negated in the light of new information?

Page 4: Evolution & Creationism

Why give science precedence? It works! Examples

Germ theory: explains why we get sickPlate tectonics theory: explains earthquakes & volcanoes & predicts economic depositsGravity theory: allows safe space travelNatural selection theory: agricultural development, improved medical practice (laboratory experimentation & germ control), enhanced pest control

Page 5: Evolution & Creationism

Organic Evolution changes in life through time development of complex life forms development of a variety of life forms

factual observationfossil recordcomparative anatomygenetics

Page 6: Evolution & Creationism

Natural Selectionmechanism responsible for evolutionworks through mutation and

selectionsurvival of the

fittest for a nicheluckiestcombination

Page 7: Evolution & Creationism

Natural SelectionEvidence

population ecologygeneticsdomestic breedingexperimentation

Page 8: Evolution & Creationism

Religious ConcernsTheological conflict

natural cause vs. special causeRelationship of humans and animalsDifficult to observeOnly a “theory”

Page 9: Evolution & Creationism

Where does the Bible fit? Purpose of Bible

ethical philosophynot a science text

“Gap” problemBible doesn’t always match up with natureBible missing most of modern science, medicine, and technology

Many interpretations One inspired source among many

Page 10: Evolution & Creationism

Science & religion(some perspectives) Nature is God’s will, no need to investigate. If it’s in the Bible, that’s how it is (was); all

scientific explanations must conform to the Bible. Nature operates according to God’s laws, what

science cannot explain is where God has intervened.

Nature operates according to God’s laws, God never intervenes.

Nature operates according to natural laws. (no comment on God)

Nature operates according to natural laws. (there is no God)

Page 11: Evolution & Creationism

The Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics International Council on Biblical Inerrancy Summit II: Chicago, November 10-13, 1982 Developed set of affirmations and denials

regarding Biblical inerrency cited by many creationists as a

foundational document

Page 12: Evolution & Creationism

The Chicago Statement:Article XX We affirm that since God is the author of all truth,

all truths, biblical and extrabiblical, are consistent and cohere, and that the Bible speaks truth when it touches on matters pertaining to nature, history, or anything else. We further affirm that in some cases extrabiblical data have value for clarifying what Scripture teaches, and for prompting correction of faulty interpretations.

We deny that extrabiblical views ever disprove the teaching of Scripture or hold priority over it.

Page 13: Evolution & Creationism

The Chicago Statement :Article XXIWe affirm the harmony of special

with general revelation and therefore of biblical teaching with the facts of nature.

We deny that any genuine scientific facts are inconsistent with the true meaning of any passage of Scripture.

Page 14: Evolution & Creationism

The Chicago Statement :Article XXIIWe affirm that Genesis 1-11 is

factual, as is the rest of the book. We deny that the teachings of

Genesis 1-11 are mythical and that scientific hypotheses about earth history or the origin of humanity may be invoked to overthrow what Scripture teaches about creation.

Page 15: Evolution & Creationism

The Flat Earth International Flat Earth Research

Society Charles K. Johnson, president (deceased)grew to 2000-3000 members by 1995articles– http://www.simegen.com/pipermail/simegen-

l/Week-of-Mon-20010402/002100.html– http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/fe-scidi.htm

Page 16: Evolution & Creationism

From Science Digest (July 1980)

Johnson's beliefs are firmly grounded in the Bible. Many verses of the Old Testament imply that the earth is flat, but there's more to it than that. According to the New Testament, Jesus ascended up into heaven.

"The whole point of the Copernican theory is to get rid of Jesus by saying there is no up and no down," declares Johnson. "The spinning ball thing just makes the whole Bible a big joke."

Page 17: Evolution & Creationism

GeocentrismThe Biblical Astronomer

Dr. Gerardus D. Bouw http://www.geocentricity.com/(but the Earth is not Flat)– http://www.geocentricity.com/flatearth.htm

The Fixed EarthMarshall Hallhttp://www.fixedearth.com/

Page 18: Evolution & Creationism

Biblical Astronomer Credo The Biblical Astronomer was originally founded

in 1971 as the Tychonian Society, on the premise that the only absolutely trustworthy information about the origin and purpose of all that exists and happens is given by God, our Creator and Redeemer, in his infallible, preserved word, the Holy Bible. All scientific endeavor which does not accept this revelation from on high without any reservations, literary, philosophical or whatever, we reject as already condemned in its unfounded first assumptions.

Page 19: Evolution & Creationism

Biblical Astronomer Credo We believe that the creation was

completed in six twenty-four hour days and that the world is not older than about six thousand years. We maintain that the Bible teaches us of an earth that neither rotates daily nor revolves yearly about the sun; that it is at rest with respect to the throne of him who called it into existence; and that hence it is absolutely at rest in the universe.

Page 20: Evolution & Creationism

Young Earth Creationism Institute for Creation Research

http://www.icr.orgAnswers in Genesis

http://www.answersingenesis.org/Creation Research Society

http://www.creationresearch.org/The Biblical Creation Society

http://www.biblicalcreation.org.uk/

Page 21: Evolution & Creationism

ICR Tenets of Scientific Creationism“A Christ-Focused Creation Ministry”1. The physical universe of space,

time, matter, and energy has not always existed, but was supernaturally created by a transcendent personal Creator who alone has existed from eternity.

Page 22: Evolution & Creationism

ICR Tenets of Scientific Creationism2. The phenomenon of biological life

did not develop by natural processes from inanimate systems but was specially and supernaturally created by the Creator.

Page 23: Evolution & Creationism

ICR Tenets of Scientific Creationism 4. The first human beings did not evolve

from an animal ancestry, but were specially created in fully human form from the start. Furthermore, the "spiritual" nature of man (self-image, moral consciousness, abstract reasoning, language, will, religious nature, etc.) is itself a supernaturally created entity distinct from mere biological life.

Page 24: Evolution & Creationism

ICR Tenets of Scientific Creationism 6. Processes today operate primarily within fixed

natural laws and relatively uniform process rates but, since these were themselves originally created and are daily maintained by their Creator, there is always the possibility of miraculous intervention in these laws or processes by their Creator. Evidences for such intervention should be scrutinized critically, however, because there must be clear and adequate reason for any such action on the part of the Creator.

Page 25: Evolution & Creationism

ICR Tenets of Scientific Creationism 7. The universe and life have somehow

been impaired since the completion of creation, so that imperfections in structure, disease, aging, extinctions, and other such phenomena are the result of "negative" changes in properties and processes occurring in an originally-perfect created order.

Page 26: Evolution & Creationism

ICR Tenets of Scientific Creationism 8. Since the universe and its primary components

were created perfect for their purposes in the beginning by a competent and volitional Creator, and since the Creator does remain active in this now-decaying creation, there do exist ultimate purposes and meanings in the universe. Teleological considerations, therefore, are appropriate in scientific studies whenever they are consistent with the actual data of observation, and it is reasonable to assume that the creation presently awaits the consummation of the Creator's purpose.

Page 27: Evolution & Creationism

ICR Tenets of Scientific Creationism 9. Although people are finite and

scientific data concerning origins are always circumstantial and incomplete, the human mind (if open to the possibility of creation) is able to explore the manifestations of that Creator rationally and scientifically, and to reach an intelligent decision regarding one's place in the Creator's plan.

Page 28: Evolution & Creationism

Answers in GenesisBelieving in a relatively 'young Earth'

(i.e., only a few thousands of years old, which we accept) is a consequence of accepting the authority of the Word of God as an infallible revelation from our omniscient Creator.

Page 29: Evolution & Creationism

CRS Statement of Belief All members must subscribe to the

following statement of belief: 1. The Bible is the written Word of God,

and because it is inspired throughout, all its assertions are historically and scientifically true in the original autographs. To the student of nature this means that the account of origins in Genesis is a factual presentation of simple historical truths.

Page 30: Evolution & Creationism

BCS Creation Manifesto While the Bible is not a scientific textbook, it

makes some clear statements which have a direct bearing on the study of various areas of science, which provide both frameworks and baselines for the study of those subjects. The disciplines and issues dealt with in this section are of crucial and central importance (though many others could be cited), and failure to incorporate them into the relevant disciplines will result in failure to fully understand the subject, and failure to glorify God in that area of His creation.

Page 31: Evolution & Creationism

Old Earth Creationism & Intelligent DesignReasons to Believe

http://www.reasons.org/index.shtml International Society for Complexity,

Information, and Design http://www.iscid.org/

The Discovery Institutehttp://www.discovery.org/

Intelligent Design Networkhttp://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/

Page 32: Evolution & Creationism

Origins(a Christian Leadership University web site)

“For Christians, the date of creation is not a primary issue of faith and should not be regarded as such, because the Bible does not specifically state a date of creation.”

“Some scientists in the Intelligent Design community of scholars are "young earth creationists," and many are not. However, all of these scholars recognize that the first priority is to concentrate on breaking the domination over science held by naturalistic philosophy--the view that materialism/atheism is the only rational perspective.”

Page 33: Evolution & Creationism

Irreducible Complexity A functional system is irreducibly complex if it

contains a multipart subsystem (i.e., a set of two or more interrelated parts) that cannot be simplified without destroying the system’s basic function.

Irreducible complexity differs sharply from another form of complexity that may be called cumulative complexity. A system is cumulatively complex if the parts of the system can be arranged sequentially so that the successive removal of parts never leads to the complete loss of function.

Page 34: Evolution & Creationism

Irreducible Complexity To determine whether a system is

irreducibly complex employs two approaches

An empirical analysis of the system that by removing parts (individually and in groups) and then by rearranging and adapting remaining parts determines whether the basic function can be recovered among those remaining parts.A conceptual analysis of the system, and specifically of those parts whose removal renders the basic function unrecoverable, to demonstrate that no system with (substantially) fewer parts exhibits the basic function.

Page 35: Evolution & Creationism

Tests for a scientific explanationWas the explanation derived from

observation?Does the explanation rely on natural

cause? Is it supported by natural data?Can the explanation be changed or

negated in the light of new information?

Page 36: Evolution & Creationism

Is it science?Evolution Creationism

derived from observation

yes no

natural cause yes nosupported by natural data

yes no

change with new data

yes no

Page 37: Evolution & Creationism

Is it science?Evolution ID

derived from observation

yes selective

natural cause yes nosupported by natural data

yes no

change with new data

yes no

Page 38: Evolution & Creationism

The ControversiesScientific: details of process and

mechanismReligious

natural vs supernatural causeinterpretation of religious texts

Political

Page 39: Evolution & Creationism

Helpful Resources National Center for Science Education

http://www.natcenscied.org/ evolution: science and belief: Intelligent Design? 

http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/nhmag.html Religious Tolerance.org

http://www.religioustolerance.org/evolutio.htm Talk.Origins

http://www.talkorigins.org/