· evidences results eci ca- costs. thatl and w del ion l t (1 1) l + 1 l t 1 w t 1 b w 2 ˆ w...

364
Macroeconomics M1 2015–2016 Patrick FEVE Address: Toulouse School of Economics, Universit´ e de Toulouse 1, Aile Jean-Jacques Laffont, MF508, 21 All´ ee de Brienne, 31000, Toulouse, France. email: [email protected] Affiliation: Toulouse School of Economics (University of Toulouse I–Capitole, GREMAQ, IDEI and IUF)

Upload: others

Post on 23-May-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Macr

oeco

nom

ics

M1

2015–2016

Pat

rick

FE

VE

Ad

dre

ss:

Tou

lou

seS

choo

lof

Eco

nom

ics,

Un

iver

site

de

Tou

lou

se1,

Aile

Jean

-Jac

ques

Laff

ont,

MF

508,

21A

llee

de

Bri

enn

e,31

000,

Tou

lou

se,

Fra

nce

.

emai

l:p

atri

ck.f

eve@

tse-

fr.e

u

Affi

liati

on:

Tou

lou

seS

choo

lof

Eco

nom

ics

(Un

iver

sity

ofT

oulo

use

I–C

apit

ole,

GR

EM

AQ

,ID

EI

and

IUF

)

Page 2:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Ver

yP

relim

inar

y(a

nd

Inco

mp

lete

)N

otes

Man

yT

ypos

.

Slid

eson

my

web

pag

eat

TS

E

http://www.tse-fr.eu/fr/people/patrick-feve

Page 3:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Intr

oduct

ion

Ob

ject

ives

of

this

cours

e:

•N

ota

cou

rse

inD

ynam

icP

rogr

amm

ing;

Not

aco

urs

ein

Tim

eS

erie

sE

con

omet

-

rics

;N

ota

cou

rse

inT

heo

reti

cal

Mac

roec

onom

ics;

Not

aco

urs

ein

Com

pu

ta-

tion

alE

con

omic

s;Ju

sta

Sim

ple

Mix

ofb

oth

!!!

•O

rgan

izat

ion

ofth

eM

acro

cou

rse

inM

1:on

ecl

ass

”Ad

van

ced

Mac

rofo

rth

e

doc

tora

ltra

ck”

(Rob

ert

Ulb

rich

),on

ecl

ass

of”A

dva

nce

dM

acro

”(P

atri

ckF

eve)

.

•10

tuto

rial

s.

•T

his

cou

rse

isn

ot(t

oom

uch

!!)te

chn

ical

(mor

ead

van

ced

cou

rses

inM

1M

acro

-

Doc

tora

lan

dM

2M

acro

1an

d2

cou

rses

inth

ed

octo

ral

trac

kof

TS

E).

Page 4:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

•T

he

dyn

amic

opti

miz

atio

np

rob

lem

san

dth

ed

ynam

icge

ner

aleq

uili

bri

um

mod

-

els

are

con

sid

ered

inth

eir

sim

ple

stfo

rms.

•T

his

cou

rse

trie

sto

cove

rth

em

ajo

rfie

lds

ofm

oder

nm

acro

econ

omic

s(D

ynam

ic

Sto

chas

tic

Gen

eral

Equ

ilib

riu

mm

odel

s,la

bel

edn

owD

SG

Em

odel

s).

Page 5:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Org

aniz

ati

on

of

this

cours

e:

Th

ree

mai

nch

apte

rs(i

fw

eh

ave

enou

ghti

me!

!)

Chap

1:

Tw

oP

eri

od

Equilib

rium

Models

1.1

:A

nexch

an

ge

Eco

nom

y

•T

he

mod

el

•E

quili

bri

um

•C

entr

alp

lan

ner

pro

ble

m

•D

iscu

ssio

n

1.2

:A

Pro

du

ctio

nE

con

om

y

•T

he

mod

el

•E

quili

bri

um

•C

entr

alp

lan

ner

pro

ble

m

•D

iscu

ssio

n

Page 6:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Chap

2:

Models

and

Meth

ods

inM

acr

oeco

nom

icD

y-

nam

ics

2.1

:T

he

Perm

an

ent

Inco

me

Mod

el

•T

he

det

erm

inis

tic

case

•T

he

stoc

has

tic

case

2.2

:T

he

Dyn

am

icL

ab

or

Dem

an

dM

od

el

•T

he

det

erm

inis

tic

case

•T

he

stoc

has

tic

case

Page 7:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Chap

3:

Busi

ness

Cycl

eM

odels

3.1

:T

wo

Sim

ple

DS

GE

Mod

els

I-

Hab

itForm

ati

on

ina

Sim

ple

Equ

ilib

riu

mM

od

el

•T

he

mod

el

•S

olu

tion

•Q

uan

tita

tive

imp

licat

ion

s

II-

AS

toch

ast

icG

row

thM

od

el

•T

he

mod

el

•S

olu

tion

•Q

uan

tita

tive

imp

licat

ion

s

Page 8:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

3.2

:R

BC

Mod

els

I-

AR

BC

Mod

el

wit

hC

om

ple

teD

ep

reci

ati

on

•T

he

mod

el

•S

olu

tion

•Q

uan

tita

tive

imp

licat

ion

s

II-

Ap

roto

typ

ical

RB

CM

od

el

(Op

tion

al)

•T

he

mod

el

•S

olu

tion

•Q

uan

tita

tive

imp

licat

ion

s

3.3

:B

eyon

dth

eR

BC

Mod

el

(Op

tion

al)

inP

rogre

ss

Page 9:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Rule

sof

the

gam

eof

this

cours

e:

•T

his

cou

rse

doe

sn

otre

quir

edad

dit

ion

alm

ater

ials

,i.

e.th

isco

urs

eis

alm

ost

self

cont

ain

ed.

•B

IBL

IOG

RA

PH

Y:

Dav

idR

omer

Ad

van

ced

Mac

roec

onom

ics

4th

Ed

itio

n,

Mc-

Gra

wH

ill,

2012

(see

chap

ters

5,7,

8,9,

12)

•A

pp

licat

ion

san

dex

erci

ses

are

cont

ain

edin

the

hom

ewor

ks:

slig

htm

odifi

cati

ons

(sim

ple

ran

d/o

rex

ten

sion

s)of

the

mod

els

exp

oun

ded

inth

eco

urs

e.

•A

mid

–ter

mex

amin

atio

n(T

wo

exer

cise

son

mac

roec

onom

icd

ynam

ics)

:40

%

•A

final

exam

inat

ion

:T

wo

exer

cise

son

mac

roec

onom

icd

ynam

ics:

60%

.

Page 10:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

equ

anti

tati

veap

pro

ach

toE

con

omic

Dyn

amic

s

1.F

orm

ula

tea

dyn

amic

(det

erm

inis

tic

orst

och

asti

c)m

odel

(par

tial

equ

ilib

riu

m–

hou

seh

old

s,fir

ms

–or

gen

eral

equ

ilib

riu

m):

obje

ctiv

es,

con

stra

ints

,ex

ogen

ous

dri

vin

gfo

rces

.

2.D

eter

min

eth

eop

tim

ald

ecis

ion

sto

the

asso

ciat

edd

ynam

icop

tim

izat

ion

pro

b-

lem

.

3.C

olle

ctal

lth

ere

leva

nteq

uat

ion

sth

atfu

llych

arac

teri

zeth

ein

tert

emp

oral

equ

i-

libri

um

.

4.S

olve

the

mod

elan

alyt

ical

ly(i

nth

isco

urs

e)or

num

eric

ally

ifto

oco

mp

lica

ted

(not

inth

isco

urs

e,se

em

yre

mar

kb

elow

).

5.E

stim

ate

and

test

the

mod

elfr

omac

tual

dat

a.If

the

mod

elfa

ils

(poo

rfit

of

the

dat

a),

goto

step

1an

dre

do

the

exer

cise

.If

not

,go

toth

en

ext

step

.

Page 11:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

6.S

imu

late

the

mod

elto

eval

uat

eit

sd

ynam

ics

pro

per

ties

7.C

ond

uct

cou

nter

fact

ual

and

pol

icy

exp

erim

ents

(fisc

alan

d/o

rm

onet

ary

pol

icy

shoc

ks;

chan

gein

inst

itu

tion

san

dre

gula

tion

,...

)

Page 12:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

isco

urs

eon

lyd

eliv

ers

anal

ytic

alre

sult

sfr

om(v

ery

orm

ayb

eto

o)si

mp

led

ynam

ic

(det

erm

inis

tic

and

stoc

has

tic)

mod

els.

Mor

ere

alis

tic

case

sca

nb

eso

lved

inth

esa

me

way

bu

tth

eyn

eed

com

pu

ter

inte

nsi

ve

tech

niq

ues

inor

der

toge

tso

luti

ons,

esti

mat

ion

san

dsi

mu

lati

ons.

Th

ere

exis

tsn

owa

bu

nch

ofso

ftw

ares

than

can

be

use

dto

solv

ean

dsi

mu

late

dyn

amic

stoc

has

tic

gen

eral

(or

par

tial

)eq

uili

bri

um

mod

els.

See

DY

NA

RE

(fre

e

dow

nlo

adu

nd

erM

AT

LA

Bp

rogr

amm

ing)

amon

gm

any

oth

ers

(to

obta

init

,ju

st

wri

teth

en

ame

”DY

NA

RE

”inGoogle

.It

wil

lap

pea

rfir

st.)

,b

ut

we

pre

fer

tow

ork

wit

hsi

mp

ler

mod

els

bef

ore

any

imp

lem

enta

tion

sw

ith

this

use

ful

free

soft

war

e).

Ifyo

uar

eve

ryin

tere

stin

gin

this

soft

war

ean

dth

ew

ays

toim

ple

men

tou

rm

odel

econ

omie

sin

this

setu

p,

do

not

hes

itat

eto

ask

me

the

cod

es!

Warn

ing!!

!T

his

not

esm

ayco

ntai

nm

any

(Mat

hem

atic

alan

dE

ngl

ish

)ty

pos

!!!

Page 13:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Chap

2:

AT

wo

Peri

od

Equilib

rium

Model

2.1

:A

nexch

ange

Eco

nom

y

•T

he

mod

el

•E

quili

bri

um

•C

entr

alp

lan

ner

pro

ble

m

•D

iscu

ssio

n

2.2

:A

Pro

duct

ion

Eco

nom

y

•T

he

mod

el

Page 14:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

•E

quili

bri

um

•C

entr

alp

lan

ner

pro

ble

m

•D

iscu

ssio

n

Page 15:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Chap

2:

AT

wo

Peri

od

Equilib

rium

Model

2.1

:A

nexch

ange

Eco

nom

y

The

Model

Ave

rysi

mp

lese

tup

two

per

iod

s

asi

ngl

e(r

epre

sent

ativ

e)co

nsu

mer

An

exch

ange

(en

dow

men

t)ec

onom

y

Old

idea

(Irv

ing

Fis

her

):th

eal

loca

tion

ofgo

ods

over

tim

e⇔

allo

ca-

Page 16:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

tion

ofre

sou

rces

tod

iffer

ent

good

sat

agi

ven

tim

e

So

good

sat

diff

eren

td

ates

are

con

sid

ered

asd

iffer

ent

com

mod

itie

s.

Page 17:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Ele

men

tsof

the

Exc

han

geE

con

omy:

1)T

wo

com

mod

itie

s,d

enot

edC

1an

dC

2.

2)E

nd

owm

ents

ofth

ese

com

mod

itie

s:Y

1an

dY

2

An

imp

orta

ntp

oint

:Y

isnon

stora

ble

3)P

refe

ren

ces

ofth

ere

pre

sent

ativ

eco

nsu

mer

rep

rese

nted

byth

efo

l-

low

ing

uti

lity

fun

ctio

n

U(C

1,C

2)

Page 18:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

We

will

spec

ify

this

uti

lity

fun

ctio

nla

tter

Page 19:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

eel

emen

ts1)

and

2)ch

arac

teri

zeth

efe

asib

leal

loca

tion

s

C1≤Y

1an

dC

2≤Y

2

Inad

dit

ion

,w

ear

ein

ad

eter

min

isti

cca

se.

Th

eag

ent

per

fect

lykn

ows

the

quan

titi

esin

seco

nd

per

iod

.

Tw

oim

por

tant

ques

tion

sof

inte

rest

:

i)H

owth

eco

nsu

mer

allo

cate

sco

nsu

mp

tion

over

tim

e?

ii)W

hat

are

the

det

erm

inan

tsof

pri

ces

and

quan

titi

es?

Page 20:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

com

peti

tive

Equilib

rium

We

will

char

acte

rize

the

equ

ilib

riu

mal

loca

tion

sin

aco

mp

etit

ive

setu

p

(pri

ces

are

give

n)

We

den

oteP

1an

dP

2th

ep

rice

tod

ayan

dto

mor

row

,re

spec

tive

ly.

Th

ein

tert

emp

oral

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

tis

give

nby

P1C

1+P

2C2≤P

1Y1

+P

2Y2

Inth

isec

onom

y,th

ep

rice

sP

1an

dP

2ad

just

such

that

Ct

=Yt∀t

=1,

2

Page 21:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Definit

ion

of

the

com

peti

tive

equilib

rium

Aco

mp

etit

ive

equ

ilib

riu

mis

asy

stem

ofp

rice

s{P

1,P

2}an

dal

loca

-

tion

s{C

1,C

2}su

chth

at:

1.T

he

(rep

rese

ntat

ive)

con

sum

erm

axim

izes

the

uti

lity

U(C

1,C

2)

sub

ject

toth

eb

ud

get

con

stra

int

P1C

1+P

2C2≤P

1Y1

+P

2Y2

forP

1an

dP

2gi

ven

.

Page 22:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

2.S

up

ply

ofgo

ods

equ

als

dem

and

ofgo

ods

each

per

iod

:

C1

=Y

1,

C2

=Y

2

Page 23:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Applica

tion

Let

us

assu

me

the

follo

win

gu

tilit

yfu

nct

ion

U(C

1,C

2)=

log(C

1)+β

log(C

2)

Th

islo

g–u

tilit

yis

sep

arab

le(m

ore

gen

eral

,n

otse

par

able

,H

abit

for-

mat

ion

inco

nsu

mp

tion

,se

eb

elow

)

Th

ep

aram

eterβ>

0is

asu

bje

ctiv

ed

isco

unt

fact

or.

β=

1

1+θ

wh

ereθ>

0is

the

sub

ject

ive

ofp

refe

ren

cefo

rth

ep

rese

nt.

Page 24:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

eh

ouse

hol

dp

rob

lem m

axC

1,C

2

log(C

1)+β

log(C

2)

sub

ject

toth

ein

tert

emp

oral

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

t

P1C

1+P

2C2

=P

1Y1

+P

2Y2

Page 25:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Solu

tion:

first

we

rep

lace

the

inte

rtem

por

alb

ud

get

con

stra

int

C2

=P

1

P2Y

1+Y

2−P

1

P2C

1

into

the

obje

ctiv

e

log(C

1)+β

log

( P 1 P2Y

1+Y

2−P

1

P2C

1)an

dth

enm

axim

ize

wit

hre

spec

ttoC

1.

FO

C

1 C1−βP

1

P2

1 C2

=0

Page 26:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

oreq

uiv

alen

tly

β/C

2

1/C

1=P

2

P1

i.e.

the

mar

gin

alra

teof

sub

stit

uti

onof

con

sum

pti

onb

etw

een

two

per

iod

sis

equ

alto

the

rela

tive

pri

ce.

Page 27:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Now

,u

seth

isop

tim

alit

yco

nd

itio

nto

exp

ressC

2:

C2

=βP

1

P2C

1

(rm

k:if

the

equ

ilib

riu

mis

such

thatβP

1P

2=

1,p

erfe

ctco

nsu

mp

tion

smoo

thin

g)

Now

,re

pla

ceC

2in

toth

eb

ud

get

con

stra

int

P1C

1+P

2C2

=P

1Y1

+P

2Y2

Page 28:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

P1C

1(1

)=P

1Y1

+P

2Y2

Thu

s,w

eob

tain

C1

=1

1+β

( Y1

+P

2

P1Y

2)N

ow,

usi

ng

the

opti

mal

ity

con

dit

ion

,w

ed

edu

ceC

2

C2

1+β

( P 1 P2Y

1+Y

2)T

he

exp

ress

ion

sfo

rC

1an

dC

2d

eter

min

eth

etw

od

eman

dfu

nct

ion

s.

Page 29:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Now

usi

ng

thes

etw

od

eman

dfu

nct

ion

san

dm

arke

tcl

eari

ng

con

di-

tion

ofgo

odm

arke

tin

each

per

iodY

1=C

1an

dY

2=C

2(S

up

-

ply

=D

eman

d),

we

can

ded

uce

the

(rel

ativ

e)eq

uili

bri

um

pri

ces

Y1

=1

1+β

( Y1

+P

2

P1Y

2)⇔

P2

P1

=βY

1

Y2

Not

eth

atw

eob

tain

exac

tly

the

sam

eeq

uili

bri

um

pri

ceif

we

use

the

con

dit

ion

Y2

1+β

( P 1 P2Y

1+Y

2)

Page 30:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Rm

k1:

Th

ele

vel

ofco

nsu

mp

tion

each

per

iod

isd

irec

tly

ded

uce

d

from

the

reso

urc

eco

nst

rain

t(Ct

=Yt,t

=1,

2).

Th

isis

bec

ause

the

good

isp

eris

hab

le(i

tca

nn

otb

est

ored

orin

vest

ed,

we

will

inve

stig

ate

this

case

bel

ow).

So,

why

con

sid

erin

gan

inte

rtem

por

alm

odel

rath

erth

ana

rep

eate

d

stat

icm

odel

?(i

.e.

max

uti

lity

inp

erio

d1,

max

uti

lity

inp

erio

d2)

.

Th

isis

bec

ause

the

mod

elal

low

sto

det

erm

ine

first

the

inte

rtem

por

al

allo

cati

ons

forP

1an

dP

2gi

ven

atth

eh

ouse

hol

dle

vel

and

seco

nd

,

give

nth

eeq

uili

bri

um

con

dit

ion

son

good

mar

ket,

ital

low

sto

det

er-

Page 31:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

min

eth

ep

rice

s.

Infa

ct,

for

agi

ven

spec

ifica

tion

ofu

tilit

y,th

isis

am

odel

ofin

tert

em-

por

alp

rice

sd

eter

min

atio

n(r

eal

inte

rest

rate

oras

set

pri

ces)

.

Am

ore

gen

eral

mod

elw

ith

ast

orag

ete

chn

olog

y(p

hysi

cal

cap

ital

)

will

pro

du

cesi

mila

rre

sult

s(t

he

com

pu

tati

onof

quan

titi

esis

mor

e

com

plic

ated

,se

eb

elow

).

Page 32:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Rm

k2:

Th

em

odel

can

not

det

erm

ineP

1an

dP

2se

par

atel

y.(t

he

two

dem

and

fun

ctio

ns

give

the

sam

ere

lati

vep

rice

s).

Th

em

odel

only

det

erm

ines

the

rela

tive

pri

cesP

1/P

2(o

rP

2/P

1).

To

see

this

,m

ult

iply

bot

hP

1an

dP

2by

asc

ale

fact

orλ>

0:

P1

=λP

1P

2=λP

2

You

will

obta

inth

esa

me

allo

cati

onfo

rC

1an

dC

2an

dth

esa

me

equ

ilib

riu

m.

So,

we

can

free

lych

oose

one

pri

cear

bit

rari

ly,

sayP

1=

1(t

he

nu-

mer

aire

)

Page 33:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

ism

ean

sth

atth

ese

con

dp

rice

ism

easu

red

inte

rms

ofu

nit

ofth

e

first

good

.

SoP

2/P

1=P

2is

the

inte

rtem

por

alp

urc

has

ing

pow

erof

the

con

-

sum

er.

On

eu

nit

ofco

nsu

mp

tion

tom

orro

wco

stsP

2u

nit

ofco

nsu

mp

-

tion

tod

ay.

Fin

ally

,th

eal

loca

tion{C

1=Y

1;C

2=Y

2}an

dth

ep

rice

s{P

1=

1;P

2=β

(Y1/Y

2)}

con

stit

ute

aco

mpe

titi

veeq

uil

ibri

um

ofth

eec

on-

omy.

Page 34:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

Centr

al

Pla

nner

Pro

ble

m

Inth

isec

onom

y(w

ith

out

dis

tort

ion

s),t

he

two

wel

fare

theo

rem

sap

ply

.

1)th

eco

mp

etit

ive

allo

cati

ons

(C1,C

2)ar

eth

ose

obta

ined

bya

cent

ral

pla

nn

er

2)T

he

opti

mal

allo

cati

ons

can

be

sup

por

ted

asa

com

pet

itiv

eeq

ui-

libri

um

(wit

ha

pro

per

syst

emof

pri

ces)

Th

ece

ntra

lp

lan

ner

mu

stso

lve

max

C1,C

2

log(C

1)+β

log(C

2)

Page 35:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

sub

ject

toth

etw

ob

ud

get

con

stra

ints

C1≤Y

1C

2≤Y

2

Not

eth

atth

ere

ish

ere

no

pri

ce,

bec

ause

the

cent

ral

pla

nn

erfu

lly

inte

rnal

izes

all

the

mar

ket

con

dit

ion

s.

Page 36:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

eso

luti

on

C1

=Y

1an

dC

2=Y

2

So

we

obta

inth

esa

me

allo

cati

ons.

Now

defi

ne

the

mar

gin

alu

tili

ties

∂U

∂C

1=

1 C1

,∂U

∂C

2=

β C2

Nex

tco

mp

ute

the

mar

gin

alra

teof

sub

stit

uti

on

∂U

∂C

2∂U

∂C

1

=βY

1

Y2

Page 37:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Ina

com

pet

itiv

eeq

uili

bri

um

,w

eh

ave

∂U

∂C

2∂U

∂C

1

=βY

1

Y2≡P

2

P1

So

the

two

wel

fare

theo

rem

sap

ply

.

Page 38:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Dis

cuss

ion

1-

The

real

inte

rest

rate

For

the

mom

ent,

we

hav

eco

nsi

der

edtw

op

rice

sP

1an

dP

2,b

ut

the

mod

elca

nb

eu

sed

tod

eter

min

eot

her

form

ofin

tert

emp

oral

pri

ces,

i.e.

the

real

inte

rest

rate

.

Wit

ha

slig

htm

odifi

cati

on,

we

can

det

erm

ine

the

equ

ilib

riu

mre

al

inte

rest

rate

.

Fir

stP

erio

dL

etu

sd

efin

eh

owth

eh

ouse

hol

dca

nsa

ve

Page 39:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

S=Y

1−C

1

wh

ereS

den

otes

savi

ng

(S>

0)or

bor

row

ing

(S<

0).

Sec

ond

Per

iod

Con

sum

eth

ed

isp

osab

lein

com

e(1

+r)S

+Y

2,

C2

=(1

+r)S

+Y

2

wh

erer

den

otes

the

real

inte

rest

rate

.

Page 40:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Now

,m

axim

ize

the

inte

rtem

por

alu

tilit

y

max

C1,C

2

log(C

1)+β

log(C

2)

wit

hre

spec

tto

the

con

stra

intsC

1=Y

1−S

andC

2=

(1+r)S

+Y

2.

Not

eth

atw

eca

nge

tth

ein

tert

emp

oral

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

tfr

omtw

o

abov

eco

nst

rain

ts

C2

=(1

+r)

(Y1−C

1)+Y

2

Page 41:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Now

,su

bst

itu

teth

isco

nst

rain

tin

toth

eob

ject

ive

max C1

log(C

1)+β

log(

(1+r)

(Y1−C

1)+Y

2)

and

max

imiz

ew

ith

resp

ect

toC

1.

Page 42:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

FO

C

1 C1−β

(1+r)

1 C2

=0

oreq

uiv

alen

tly

1 C1

(1+r)

1 C2

Th

isis

the

Eule

requati

on

onco

nsu

mp

tion

.

Now

,u

seth

eeq

uili

bri

um

con

dit

ion

s(d

eman

dof

good

s=su

pp

lyof

Page 43:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

good

s)

C1

=Y

1,

C2

=Y

2

Not

eth

atat

equ

ilib

riu

m,

savi

ng

iseq

ual

toze

ro(S

=0)

.

Page 44:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

isal

low

sto

det

erm

ine

the

equ

ilib

riu

mre

alin

tere

stra

te

1

1+r

=βY

1

Y2

Inth

ep

revi

ous

mod

elve

rsio

n,

we

obta

ined

P2

P1

=βY

1

Y2

So,

we

ded

uce

1+r

=P

1

P2

Wit

hth

en

orm

aliz

atio

nP

1=

1,

Page 45:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

1+r

=1 P2

Page 46:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Rm

k:

IfY

1=Y

2,w

eh

ave 1

1+r

=β≡

1

1+θ

so

r=θ

Tw

om

ain

det

erm

inan

tsfo

rr:

1)p

refe

ren

ces

(βorθ)

2)en

dow

men

ts

(Y1

andY

2)

Page 47:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

2-S

toch

ast

icendow

ments

We

hav

eas

sum

edp

erfe

ctfo

resi

ght

ina

det

erm

inis

tic

setu

p.

Wh

ath

app

ens

ifY

isst

och

asti

c?

Inth

isca

se,

the

con

sum

erm

ust

exp

ect

futu

reY

and

thu

sfu

ture

con

sum

pti

on.

Am

odifi

cati

onof

our

setu

p:

Per

iod

1

Page 48:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Sav

ing

A=Y

1−C

1

Per

iod

2

C2

=Y

2+

(1+r)A

Page 49:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

To

sim

plif

y,su

pp

ose

that

ther

eis

no

un

cert

aint

yon

the

retu

rnr

(a

finan

cial

cont

ract

sth

atd

eliv

erth

esa

me

retu

rnw

hat

ever

the

stat

eof

the

nat

ure

).S

o,r

isgi

ven

.

Y1

andY

2ar

en

owst

och

asti

cla

bor

inco

mes

inp

erio

d1

and

2.

Th

eE

ule

req

uat

ion

onco

nsu

mp

tion

bec

omes

1 C1

=βE

1

( (1+r)

1 C2

)w

her

eE

1is

the

exp

ecta

tion

con

dit

ion

alon

the

info

rmat

ion

set

in

per

iod

1,i.e

.w

hen

agen

tsm

ust

take

thei

rd

ecis

ion

s.

Page 50:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Ass

um

eth

atβ

(1+r)

=1.

Th

eE

ule

req

uat

ion

rew

rite

s

1 C1

=E

1

( 1 C2

)B

yth

eJe

nse

nin

equ

alit

y(L

etf

(x)

aco

nvex

fun

ctio

nan

dx

ara

nd

om

vari

able

,th

enE

(f(x

))≥f

(E(x

))or

sim

ply

show

itfr

oma

figu

re),

we

hav

e

E1

( 1 C2

) ≥(

1

E1(C

2)

)T

his

imp

lies

that

the

con

sum

pti

onw

illlo

wer

wit

hst

och

asti

cin

com

e,

i.e.

con

sum

ers

try

tosa

vem

ore

(cal

led

as“p

reca

uti

onar

y”sa

vin

g).

Page 51:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

3-

Lab

or

supply

We

omit

anim

por

tant

vari

able

for

the

hou

seh

old

:la

bor

sup

ply

We

hav

eas

sum

edth

atla

bor

isin

elas

tic.

Her

e,w

ere

lax

this

assu

mp

tion

(all

owin

gfo

rel

asti

cla

bor

sup

ply

)in

atw

o–p

erio

dm

odel

(par

tial

equ

ilib

riu

m).

Tw

oop

pos

ite

forc

esth

atd

ive

lab

orsu

pp

ly:

sub

stit

uti

oneff

ect

and

wea

lth

effec

t.

Th

esu

bst

itu

tion

effec

t:L

abor

sup

ply

incr

ease

saf

ter

anin

crea

sein

Page 52:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

real

wag

e.

Wea

lth

effec

t:L

abor

sup

ply

dec

reas

esaf

ter

anin

crea

sein

real

wag

e.

Page 53:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Uti

lity

fun

ctio

n

U(C

1,C

2,N

1,N

2)=

log(C

1)+β

log(C

2)+

log(

1−N

1)+β

log(

1−N

2)

wh

ereN

1an

dN

2re

pre

sent

lab

orsu

pp

lyin

per

iod

1an

d2,

resp

ec-

tive

ly.

Tim

een

dow

men

tis

nor

mal

ized

toon

e.

Th

ein

tert

emp

oral

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

t

C1

+C

2

R≤W

1N1

+W

2N2

R

Page 54:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

wh

ereR

=1

+r>

1an

dr

isth

ere

alin

tere

stra

te.

Now

,fo

rmth

eL

agra

ngi

an

L=U

(C1,C

2,N

1,N

2)−λ

( C1

+C

2

R−W

1N1−W

2N2

R

)w

her

eλ≥

0is

the

Lag

ran

gem

ult

ipli

er.

Page 55:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Max

imiz

eth

isL

agra

ngi

anw

ith

resp

ect

toC

1,C

2,N

1an

dN

2

FO

Cs

1/C

1−λ

=0

β/C

2−λ/R

=0

−1/

(1−N

1)+λW

1=

0

Page 56:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

−β/(

1−N

2)+λW

2/R

=0

and

the

excl

usi

onre

stri

ctio

n

λ

( C1

+C

2

R−W

1N1−W

2N2

R

) =0

Not

eth

atλ>

0(b

ecau

seλ

=1/C

1)an

dth

enth

ein

tert

emp

oral

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

tb

ind

s

Page 57:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

C1

+C

2

R=W

1N1

+W

2N2

R

Page 58:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

We

imp

oseβR

=1.

We

then

ded

uce

C2

=C

1

N1

=1−C

1/W

1

N2

=1−C

1/W

2

Page 59:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Nex

tsu

bst

itu

teC

2,N

1an

dN

2in

toth

eb

ud

get

con

stra

int.

We

obta

in

C1

=R

2(1

+R

)(W1

+W

2/R

)(=C

2)

N1

=1−

R

2(1

+R

)(1+

(1/R

)(W

2/W

1))

N2

=1−

R

2(1

+R

)((W

1/W

2)+

(1/R

))

Page 60:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

IfW

1/W

2,th

enN

1in

crea

ses

andN

2d

ecre

ases

(th

esu

bst

itu

tion

effec

t

dom

inat

esth

ew

ealt

heff

ect)

.

Page 61:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Perm

anent

vers

us

transi

tory

changes

inre

al

wage

Per

man

ent

chan

ge

LetW

1=µW

1an

dW

2=µW

2w

ithµ>

1(a

per

man

ent

incr

ease

).

We

see

thatN

1an

dN

2ar

eu

naff

ecte

d.

At

the

sam

eti

me

the

con

sum

pti

onin

crea

ses

alo

t(s

eeth

ep

erm

anen

t

inco

me

mod

el)

Th

isri

sein

con

sum

pti

onca

nb

esu

stai

ned

byth

ein

crea

ses

inth

ere

al

wag

e(t

he

wea

lth

effec

tp

erfe

ctly

can

cels

out

the

sub

stit

uti

oneff

ect)

Page 62:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Tra

nsi

tory

chan

ge

LetW

1=µW

1an

dW

2=W

2w

ithµ>

1(a

tran

sito

ryin

crea

se).

So,N

1in

crea

ses

andN

2d

ecre

ases

.A

tth

esa

me

tim

e,co

nsu

mp

tion

incr

ease

sve

rylit

tle

bec

ause

the

incr

ease

inre

alw

age

isp

erce

ived

as

tran

sito

ry.

Page 63:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

4-

Ric

ard

ian

equiv

ale

nce

For

the

mom

ent,

we

hav

eig

nor

edth

ego

vern

men

t.

We

use

asi

mp

leex

ten

sion

ofou

rex

chan

geec

onom

y.

Ou

rob

ject

ive

are

i)w

ew

ant

tod

escr

ibe

how

the

defi

nit

ion

ofth

eec

onom

yis

affec

ted

byth

ein

trod

uct

ion

ofgo

vern

men

tsp

end

ing

and

taxe

s.

ii)w

ew

ant

toex

plo

reth

eeff

ect

ofgo

vern

men

tp

olic

yon

pri

ces

and

quan

titi

es.

Page 64:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

gove

rnm

ent

Th

ego

vern

men

td

oes

two

thin

gs:

1)th

ego

vern

men

tco

nsu

mes

quan

titi

es{G

1,G

2}of

good

sin

each

per

iod

;

2)th

ego

vern

men

tco

llect

slu

mp

-su

mta

xes{T

1,T

2}fr

omco

nsu

mer

tofin

ance

its

own

con

sum

pti

ons.

Gov

ern

men

tco

nsu

mp

tion

and

taxe

sin

per

iodt

(t=

1,2)

are

mea

-

sure

din

un

itof

the

dat

et

good

.

Page 65:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Tax

esan

dsp

end

ing

dec

isio

ns

are

rela

ted

thro

ugh

the

gove

rnm

ent’

s

(int

erte

mp

oral

)b

ud

get

con

stra

int.

P1G

1+P

2G2

=P

1T1

+P

2T2

Th

ep

rese

ntva

lue

ofta

xes

equ

als

the

pre

sent

valu

eof

gove

rnm

ent

spen

din

g(r

emin

dth

atP

2/P

1=

1/(1

+r)

)

Page 66:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

An

imp

orta

ntas

sum

pti

on:

the

gove

rnm

ent

spen

din

gh

asn

oeff

ect

on

uti

lity

(an

din

ap

rod

uct

ion

econ

omy,

no

effec

ton

pro

du

ctio

n,

i.e.

un

pro

du

ctiv

ego

vern

men

tsp

end

ing,

pu

rely

was

tefu

l)

Page 67:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

con

sum

er

Sam

eas

bef

ore,

bu

tth

ein

tert

emp

oral

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

tb

ecom

es

P1C

1+P

2C2

=P

1(Y

1−T

1)+P

2(Y

2−T

2)

bec

ause

the

con

sum

erm

ust

now

pay

taxe

sin

each

per

iod

.

Defi

nit

ion

ofth

eco

mpe

titi

veeq

uil

ibri

um

Aco

mp

etit

ive

equ

ilib

riu

mco

nsi

sts

ofp

rice

s{P

1,P

2},

pri

vate

dec

i-

sion

s{C

1,C

2}an

dgo

vern

men

tp

olic

ies{G

1,G

2,T

1,T

2}su

chth

at:

Page 68:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

•T

he

con

sum

erm

axim

izes

uti

lity

,gi

ven

pri

ces

and

taxe

s,su

bje

ctto

the

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

t;

•T

he

gove

rnm

ent’

sd

ecis

ion

ssa

tisf

yit

sb

ud

get

con

stra

int;

•S

up

ply

=D

eman

dfo

rea

chgo

od:

C1

+G

1=Y

1C

2+G

2=Y

2

Page 69:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

An

illu

stra

tion

En

dow

men

ts:{Y

1,Y

2}

Uti

lity:

maxC

1,C

2lo

g(C

1)+β

log(C

2)

Gov

ern

men

tsp

end

ing:{G

1,G

2}ar

egi

ven

Con

sum

er

Rep

lace

the

new

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

t

C2

=P

1

P2(Y

1−T

1)+

(Y2−T

2)−P

1

P2C

1

into

the

obje

ctiv

e.N

ext,

max

imiz

eth

eu

tilit

yw

ith

resp

ect

toC

1(f

or

Page 70:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

P1,P

2,T

1an

dT−

2gi

ven

).T

his

yiel

ds

1 C1−βP

1

P2

1 C2

=0

Sam

eeq

uat

ion

asb

efor

e.

Page 71:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Equ

ilib

riu

m

C1

=Y

1−G

1C

2=Y

2−G

2

Not

ice

that

dC

1

dG

1=dC

2

dG

2=−

1

Per

fect

crow

din

gou

tof

pri

vate

con

sum

pti

onby

pu

bli

csp

end

ing

,

bec

ause

the

end

owm

ent

are

give

nan

din

vari

ant

toG

.

Page 72:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Rm

kp

rod

uct

ive

gove

rnm

ent

spen

din

g

Exa

mp

le:

pu

blic

exp

end

itu

res

onin

fras

tru

ctu

re(r

oad

,p

ort,

com

mu

-

nic

atio

nsy

stem

s),

rese

arch

,b

asic

pro

visi

onof

edu

cati

onan

dh

ealt

h.

Asi

mp

lere

pre

sent

atio

n

Y1

=Y

1+ηG

1Y

2=Y

2+ηG

2

wh

ereη≥

0.

Wit

hth

issl

ight

mod

ifica

tion

,w

eob

tain

C1

=Y

1+

(η−

1)G

1≥Y

1−G

1C

2=Y

2+

(η−

1)G

2≥Y

2−G

2

Page 73:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

and

dC

1

dG

1=dC

2

dG

2=η−

1

Wh

enη>

0n

op

erfe

ctcr

owd

ing–

out

effec

t,ifη

issu

ffici

entl

yla

rge,

crow

din

g–in

.E

nd

ofth

ere

mar

k.

Page 74:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Now

,fr

omC

1an

dC

2,w

eca

nd

eter

min

eth

ein

tert

emp

oral

pri

ces

P2

P1

=βC

1

C2≡βY

1−G

1

Y2−G

2

Not

eth

atn

eith

erp

rice

s,n

orqu

anti

ties

dep

end

son

taxe

san

dth

eir

tim

ing.

Tax

esar

ead

just

edin

ord

erto

sati

sfy

the

gove

rnm

ent’

s

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

t.W

eh

ave

the

follo

win

gm

ain

resu

lt.

Resu

lt(R

icard

ian

Equiv

ale

nce

)If

pri

ces{P

1,P

2},

pri

vate

de-

cisi

ons{C

1,C

2}an

dgo

vern

men

tp

olic

ies{G

1,G

2,T

1,T

2}co

nst

itu

te

aco

mp

etit

ive

equ

ilib

riu

m,

then

an

ewta

xp

olic

y{T

1,T

2}sa

tisf

yin

g

P1G

1+P

2G2

=P

1T1

+P

2T2

Page 75:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

will

con

stit

ute

aco

mp

etit

ive

equ

ilib

riu

mw

ith

the

sam

epri

ces,

pri

vate

deci

sions

and

govern

ment

spendin

g.

Page 76:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Pro

of:

Fir

stn

ote

thatP

1G1

+P

2G2

=G

isco

nst

ant

and

doe

s

not

vary

acro

ssth

etw

oeq

uili

bri

asi

nce

the

pri

ces

and

gove

rnm

ent

spen

din

gar

eth

esa

me

inea

cheq

uili

bri

um

.T

he

con

sum

er’s

inte

rtem

-

por

alb

ud

get

con

stra

int

only

dep

end

onth

ep

rese

ntva

lue

ofta

xes

P1T

1+P

2T2,

notT

1an

dT

2se

par

atel

y.F

rom

the

gove

rnm

ent

bu

d-

get

con

stra

int,

the

pre

sent

valu

esof

taxe

sar

eeq

ual

toG

and

isth

us

con

stan

t.S

o,th

eco

nsu

mer

’sb

ud

get

con

stra

int

rem

ain

su

naff

ecte

d,

and

soth

eop

tim

ald

ecis

ion

onC

1an

dC

2.T

hen

the

inte

rtem

por

al

pri

ces

are

the

sam

e.T

his

com

ple

tes

the

pro

of.�

Page 77:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Bec

ause

the

tim

ing

ofta

xes

hav

en

oeff

ect

oneq

uili

bri

um

pri

ces

and

quan

titi

es,

deb

tfin

anci

ng

orta

xfin

anci

ng

are

equ

ival

ent

(Ric

ard

ian

equ

ival

ence

)in

this

econ

omy.

Th

ed

ebt

ofth

ego

vern

men

tin

per

iod

1

B=G

1−T

1

Th

ep

revi

ous

resu

ltsa

ysth

atfo

ran

yle

vel

ofd

ebtB

will

pro

du

ceth

e

sam

eeq

uili

bri

um

.

IfB

incr

ease

,th

enw

en

eed

toin

crea

seta

xes

tom

orro

wto

sati

sfy

the

inte

rtem

por

algo

vern

men

tb

ud

get

con

stra

int

Page 78:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

T2

=G

2+P

1

P2B≡

(1+r)B

Page 79:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Aim

port

ant

poin

tT

his

resu

ltd

oes

not

mea

nth

eth

ego

vern

men

t’

dec

isio

ns

hav

en

oeff

ect

onth

eec

onom

y(s

eeth

ed

iscu

ssio

nab

ove)

.It

just

stat

esth

atth

eti

min

gof

taxa

tion

doe

sn

otm

atte

r.

Depart

ure

sfr

om

Ric

ard

ian

Equiv

ale

nce

•S

hor

t–liv

edco

nsu

mer

.

•D

isto

rtio

nar

yta

xati

on.

•Im

per

fect

finan

cial

mar

ket.

Page 80:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

2.2

:A

Pro

duct

ion

Eco

nom

y

•T

he

mod

el

•E

quili

bri

um

•C

entr

alp

lan

ner

pro

ble

m

•D

iscu

ssio

n

Page 81:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Inth

ep

revi

ous

setu

pof

anen

dow

men

tec

onom

y,th

ere

alin

tere

stra

te

only

dep

end

son

pre

fere

nce

san

den

dow

men

ts.

Th

isis

bec

ause

the

agen

tsh

ave

no

opp

ortu

nit

yto

pro

du

cego

ods.

We

con

sid

ern

owth

atag

ents

can

hav

eac

cess

toa

tech

nol

ogy

that

allo

ws

totr

ansf

orm

curr

ent

con

sum

pti

onin

tofu

ture

con

sum

pti

on.

The

Model

Th

eag

ent

can

now

inve

stin

phy

sica

lca

pit

al.

Per

iod

1T

he

agen

tin

vest

sK

un

its

ofp

hysi

cal

cap

ital

.

Page 82:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Per

iod

2A

tth

eb

egin

nin

gof

the

per

iod

,F

(K)

un

its

ofgo

ods

are

pro

du

ced

from

theK

un

its.

Nex

t,th

eK

isfu

llyd

estr

oyed

(fu

lld

epre

ciat

ion

).

So,

agen

tsre

ceiv

eF

(K)

inp

erio

d2.

Page 83:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Ass

um

pti

ons

onth

ep

rod

uct

ionF

(K):

i)F

(0)

=0

ii)F′ >

0an

dF′′<

0(i

ncr

easi

ng

and

con

cave

)

iii)

Inad

aco

nd

itio

ns:F′ (

0)=∞

andF′ (∞

)=

0.

Wit

hth

ein

vest

men

tin

phy

sica

lca

pit

alan

dth

ep

rod

uct

ion

tech

nol

-

ogy,

we

can

now

con

sid

era

new

acto

rin

the

econ

omy:

AF

irm

.

Th

efir

mca

nb

uy

(or

rent

)th

eca

pit

alfr

omth

eco

nsu

mer

ata

pri

ce,

den

otedQ

,p

eru

nit

ofca

pit

alan

dth

enca

nu

seit

top

rod

uce

extr

a

Page 84:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

outp

utF

(K)

inp

erio

d2.

The

Fir

m’s

deci

sion

Th

efir

mch

oose

sop

tim

ally

the

leve

lofK

inp

erio

d2

such

that

she

max

imiz

esth

ep

rofit

:

Π=P

2F(K

)−QK

Page 85:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

Consu

mer’

sdeci

sion

Th

ere

pre

sent

ativ

eco

nsu

mer

own

sth

eca

pit

alan

dth

efir

m.

Th

en

ewb

ud

get

con

stra

int

LetX

isth

eam

ount

ofca

pit

alre

nted

toth

efir

man

the

pro

fit

that

she

rece

ives

from

own

ing

the

firm

.

Th

eco

nsu

mer

’sd

ecis

ion

isto

choo

seC

1,C

2an

dX

tom

axim

ize

the

inte

rtem

por

alu

tilit

y

U(C

1,C

2)

Page 86:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

un

der

the

(new

)in

tert

emp

oral

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

t

P1C

1+P

2C2≤P

1(Y

1−X

)+P

2Y2

+QX

Page 87:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

com

peti

tive

equilib

rium

Defi

nit

ion

ofth

eeq

uil

ibri

um

Aco

mp

etit

ive

equ

ilib

riu

mis

ap

rice

syst

em{P

1,P

2,Q}

and

allo

ca-

tion

s{C

1,C

2,X,K}

such

that

i)T

he

con

sum

mer

max

imiz

esth

ein

tert

emp

oral

uti

lity

give

np

rice

s

and

sub

ject

toth

ein

tert

emp

oral

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

t.

ii)T

he

firm

max

imiz

esp

rofit

give

np

rice

san

dth

ete

chn

olog

y.

Page 88:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

iii)

Su

pp

ly=

Dem

and

for

each

good

s

C1

+K

=Y

1(g

ood

mar

ket

inp

erio

d1)

C2

=Y

2+F

(K)

(goo

dm

arke

tin

per

iod

2)

X=K

(cap

ital

mar

ket)

Page 89:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Applica

tion

Uti

lity

fun

ctio

n

U(C

1,C

2)=

log(C

1)+β

log(C

2)

En

dow

men

ts

Y1

=Y

Y2

=0

(th

ep

rod

uct

ion

allo

ws

toco

nsu

me

tom

orro

ww

ith

out

end

owm

ent)

F(K

)=Kα

(+fu

lld

epre

ciat

ion

ofp

hysi

cal

cap

ital

)

Page 90:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

con

sum

er

max

C1,C

2,X

log(C

1)+β

log(C

2)

un

der

the

inte

rtem

por

alb

ud

get

con

stra

int.

Fir

st,

sub

stit

ute

the

con

-

stra

int

C2

=P

1

P2Y−( P 1 P

2−Q P

2

) X+

Π P2−P

1

P2C

1

FO

Cs

Page 91:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

wit

hre

spec

ttoC

1

1 C1−βP

1

P2

1 C2

=0⇔

1 C1

=βP

1

P2

1 C2

(Eu

ler

equ

atio

n)

wit

hre

spec

ttoX −β

1 C2

P1

P2

1 C2

Q P2

=0⇔

P1

=Q

Page 92:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

firm

max K

ΠP

2Kα−QK

FO

C(M

argi

nal

pro

du

ctiv

ity

ofca

pit

alis

equ

alto

its

real

un

itco

st)

αKα−

1=Q P

2

Cap

ital

dem

and

K=

( Q αP

2

) 1/(α−

1)

Page 93:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Equ

ilib

riu

m

Goo

dm

arke

tin

per

iod

1

C1

=Y−K

Goo

dm

arke

tin

per

iod

2

C2

=Kα

Cap

ital

mar

ket

(+th

eco

nd

itio

nQ

=P

1)

X=K

=

( P 1 αP

2

) 1/(α−

1)

Fro

mth

eE

ule

req

uat

ion

onco

nsu

mp

tion

,w

ed

eter

min

eth

ere

lati

ve

Page 94:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

pri

ce

P2

P1

=βC

1

C2≡βY−K

Fro

mth

efir

m’s

opti

mal

ity

con

dit

ion

,w

eh

ave

P2

P1

=K

αKα

We

ded

uce

βY−K

=K

αKα⇔

αβ

(Y−K

)=K

and

we

obta

inth

ele

vel

ofth

ep

hysi

cal

cap

ital

K=ωY

Page 95:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

wh

ere

ω=

αβ

1+αβ∈

(0,1

)

We

then

ded

uce

the

con

sum

pti

ons

inp

erio

d1

and

2

C1

=(1−ω

)YC

2=

(ωY

Not

eth

atth

eco

nsu

mer

doe

sn

otco

nsu

me

all

the

end

owm

ent

infir

st

per

iod

,b

ut

choo

seto

save

(in

the

form

ofp

hysi

cal

cap

ital

).

Th

esa

vin

gis

then

use

toco

nsu

me

tom

orro

w(w

ith

any

end

owm

ent

inp

erio

d2)

,ac

cord

ing

toth

ete

chn

olog

y(K

α)

Page 96:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

ep

aram

eterω

can

be

inte

rpre

ted

asth

esa

vin

gra

te(ω

=Y

1/K

).

Th

em

odel

pro

vid

esm

icro

-fou

nd

atio

ns

for

this

par

amet

er.

Itd

epen

ds

ontw

o“d

eep

”p

aram

eter

sre

flect

ing

the

pre

fere

nce

s(β

)

and

the

tech

nol

ogy

(α).

Th

esa

vin

gis

anin

crea

sin

gfu

nct

ion

ofβ

andα

:

∂ω

∂α

(1+αβ

)2∂ω

∂β

(1+αβ

)2

Mor

ep

atie

ntag

ents

(βla

rger

)sa

vem

ore.

Mor

eeffi

cien

tte

chn

olog

y

Page 97:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

(αla

rger

)cr

eate

sin

cent

ives

toin

vest

.

Fin

ally

,fr

omC

1an

dC

2,w

eca

nd

eter

min

eth

ere

lati

vep

rice

s

P2

P1

=βC

1

C2≡β

(1−ω

)Y

(ωY

Not

eth

atw

eca

nd

efin

eas

pre

viou

sly

the

real

inte

rest

rate

usi

ng

the

rela

tion

P2

P1

1

1+r

Page 98:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

centr

al

pla

nner

max

C1,C

2

U(C

1,C

2)

un

der

the

two

con

stra

ints

C1

+K≤Y

1C

2≤Y

2+F

(K)

oreq

uiv

alen

tly

C2≤Y

2+F

(Y1−C

1)

App

lica

tion

:U

sin

gth

eab

ove

assu

mp

tion

,th

isp

rob

lem

bec

omes

Page 99:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

max

C1,C

2,K

log(C

1)+β

log(C

2)

Aft

erre

pla

cem

ent

ofth

eco

nst

rain

tin

toth

eob

ject

ive,

we

obta

in

max K

log(Y−K

)+β

log(Kα

)⇔

max K

log(Y−K

)+αβ

log(K

)

FO

C

−1

Y−K

+αβ

1 K=

0

Th

isyi

eld

s K=ωY

C1

=(1−ω

)YC

2=

(ωY

Th

esa

me

allo

cati

onth

anth

eon

eof

the

com

pet

itiv

eeq

uili

bri

um

.

Page 100:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Chap

2:

Models

and

Meth

ods

inM

acr

oeco

nom

icD

y-

nam

ics

We

use

two

use

fulm

odel

sto

intr

odu

cem

eth

ods

and

con

cep

tsof

mod

-

ern

mac

rod

ynam

ics.

2.1

:T

he

Perm

anent

Inco

me

Model

•T

he

det

erm

inis

tic

case

•T

he

stoc

has

tic

case

2.2

:T

he

Dynam

icL

ab

or

Dem

and

Model

Page 101:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

•T

he

det

erm

inis

tic

case

•T

he

stoc

has

tic

case

We

do

not

con

sid

erh

ere

two

oth

eru

sefu

lm

odel

s:

Am

odel

of(p

hysi

cal)

cap

ital

/inv

estm

ent

dec

isio

ns

wit

had

just

men

t

cost

s(s

eeth

eex

erci

se)

Am

odel

ofd

ynam

icla

bor

sup

ply

(see

the

nex

tch

apte

rin

asi

mp

le

two-

per

iod

mod

el)

Page 102:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Chap

2:

Models

and

Meth

ods

inM

acr

oeco

nom

icD

y-

nam

ics

2.1

:T

he

Perm

anent

Inco

me

Model

•T

he

det

erm

inis

tic

case

•T

he

stoc

has

tic

case

Th

eK

eyn

esia

nco

nsu

mp

tion

fun

ctio

n(k

eyfu

nct

ion

inth

eK

eyn

esia

n

mod

el,

i.e.

the

valu

eof

the

gove

rnm

ent

spen

din

gm

ult

iplie

r)

Ct

=Co

+cYt

Page 103:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Ct

isth

ere

alco

nsu

mp

tion

andYt

the

real

(aft

erta

x)in

com

e.

Co

den

otes

ap

osit

ive

con

stan

tan

dc∈

(0,1

)is

the

mar

gin

alp

rop

en-

sity

toco

nsu

me.

[In

sert

afig

ure

]

Page 104:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Em

pir

ical

stu

die

s(a

fter

the

WW

II)

hav

equ

esti

oned

the

emp

iric

al

rele

van

ceof

this

fun

ctio

n(f

orex

.,w

ith

alo

ng

dat

asa

mp

le,

esti

ma-

tion

resu

lts

sugg

estc'

1)+

Th

eore

tica

lex

ten

sion

s:re

lati

vein

com

e

app

roac

hes

,in

clu

din

gre

fere

nce

inco

me

and

ratc

het

effec

t(s

eeD

ues

en-

ber

ryin

50’)

,an

db

asic

form

ula

tion

sof

hab

itp

ersi

sten

ce(s

eeB

row

n

in19

54).

Mor

ere

cent

ly,

the

per

man

ent

inco

me

mod

elal

low

sto

dis

con

nec

tth

e

curr

ent

con

sum

pti

onfr

omth

ecu

rren

tla

bor

inco

me.

Page 105:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Her

e,th

ep

erm

anen

tin

com

em

odel

wit

han

infin

ite

hor

izon

,fo

llow

-

ing

Hal

l(1

978)

and

all

the

rece

ntd

evel

opm

ents

onth

eco

nsu

mp

tion

fun

ctio

ns.

Sim

ple

rfo

rms:

atw

op

erio

dm

odel

ofco

nsu

mp

tion

(alr

ead

yd

one

in

Mic

roco

urs

esan

din

par

tial

equ

ilib

riu

m;

we

will

inve

stig

ate

bel

owa

sim

ple

two–

per

iod

setu

p,

bu

tin

age

ner

aleq

uili

bri

um

setu

p)

Un

der

stan

din

gin

tert

emp

oral

con

sum

pti

ond

ecis

ion

sis

esse

ntia

lin

mod

ern

Mac

roec

onom

icD

ynam

ics.

Her

e,w

eu

sea

(too

!!an

dp

rob

ably

not

real

isti

c)si

mp

lean

dtr

acta

ble

setu

pfr

omw

hic

hw

eca

nob

tain

anal

ytic

also

luti

ons

(an

dth

enw

eca

n

Page 106:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

anal

yze

them

exte

nsi

vely

)

Page 107:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

Dete

rmin

isti

cC

ase

Th

ese

tup

A(r

epre

sent

ativ

e)h

ouse

hol

d(o

rco

nsu

mer

)w

illse

ekto

max

imiz

e

(eve

ryp

erio

d)

the

follo

win

gob

ject

ive

fun

ctio

n

∞ ∑ i=0

βi U

(Ct+i)

un

der

ase

quen

ceof

(in

stan

tan

eou

s)b

ud

get

con

stra

int

Page 108:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

At+

1=

(1+r)At

+Yt−Ct∀t

wh

ereU

(Ct)

isth

ein

stan

tan

eou

su

tilit

yfu

nct

ion

(sp

ecifi

edb

elow

).

Rm

k:th

eu

tilit

yfu

nct

ion

inp

erio

dt

only

dep

end

son

the

curr

ent

con

sum

pti

on(e

xten

sion

:n

on-s

epar

able

uti

lity

fun

ctio

n,

ex.

hab

it

form

atio

nin

con

sum

pti

on)

Page 109:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

β∈

(0,1

)is

the

sub

ject

ive

dis

cou

ntra

te(p

refe

ren

ces)

rth

ere

al(c

onst

ant)

inte

rest

rate

(we

assu

mer>

0),

give

n

At

isth

ele

vel

of(r

eal)

finan

cial

wea

lth

Yt

isth

ere

al(n

etof

taxa

tion

)la

bor

inco

me,

her

esu

pp

osed

tob

e

know

nin

each

per

iod

(we

will

con

sid

erla

tter

the

stoc

has

tic

case

)

Ct

isth

ere

alco

nsu

mp

tion

Page 110:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Sta

tus

ofth

eva

riab

les

At

isa

stat

e(o

rp

re-d

eter

min

ed)

vari

able

,w

hic

hsu

mm

ariz

esth

ep

ast

dec

isio

ns

onco

nsu

mp

tion

,gi

ven

the

(pre

sent

and

pas

t)re

aliz

atio

ns

ofth

ela

bor

inco

me.

Yt

isan

exog

enou

sva

riab

le

Rm

k1:

no

dec

isio

non

lab

orsu

pp

ly,

orla

bor

isco

nst

ant.

Ifn

ot,

solu

tion

ism

ore

com

plic

ated

.

Rm

k2:

the

elas

tici

tyof

lab

orsu

pp

lyis

sub

ject

toem

pir

ical

cont

ro-

vers

ies

(mac

rost

ud

ies,

larg

e;m

icro

stu

die

s,ve

rysm

all)

Ct

isth

eco

ntro

lva

riab

le

Page 111:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

An

Imp

ort

ant

Pro

pert

yC

ontr

ollin

gCt

iseq

uiv

alen

tto

cont

rol-

lingAt+

1.

Pro

of

dir

ectl

yd

edu

ced

from

the

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

t

At+

1+Ct

=(1

+r)At

+Yt

and

the

abov

em

enti

oned

stat

us

ofth

eva

riab

les.

Conse

quence

We

can

rep

lace

the

con

stra

int

into

the

obje

ctiv

ein

ord

erto

sim

ply

get

the

opti

mal

dec

isio

non

con

sum

pti

on.

Page 112:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Rm

kN

ote

that

we

can

form

ula

teth

ep

rob

lem

ina

sim

ple

recu

rsiv

e

way

.L

etV t

the

valu

eof

this

dyn

amic

pro

ble

min

per

iodt

V t=

∞ ∑ i=0

βi U

(Ct+i)≡U

(Ct)

+βU

(Ct+

1)+β

2 U(Ct+

2)+...

now

,rew

rite

this

valu

ein

per

iodt+

1(j

ust

man

ipu

late

the

tim

ein

dex

)

V t+

1=

∞ ∑ i=0

βi U

(Ct+

1+i)≡U

(Ct+

1)+βU

(Ct+

2)+β

2 U(Ct+

3)+...

Now

mu

ltip

lyV t

+1

byβ

βV t

+1

∞ ∑ i=0

βi U

(Ct+

1+i)≡βU

(Ct+

1)+β

2 U(Ct+

2)+β

3 U(Ct+

3)+...

and

then

sub

trac

tβV t

+1

fromV t

V t−βV t

+1

=U

(Ct)⇔V t

=U

(Ct)

+βV t

+1

Page 113:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

So,

the

valu

eof

this

inte

rtem

por

ald

ecis

ion

pro

ble

mto

day

iseq

ual

to

the

curr

ent

uti

lity

plu

sth

ed

isco

unt

edva

lue

tom

orro

w.

Giv

enth

eop

tim

ald

ecis

ion

onco

nsu

mp

tion

Ct,

we

can

obta

inea

s-

ilyco

mp

ute

the

wel

fare

fun

ctio

nof

the

con

sum

er(u

sefu

lto

eval

uat

e

the

wel

fare

imp

licat

ion

ofva

riou

sec

onom

icp

olic

y,fo

rex

amp

lefis

cal

pol

icy)

Page 114:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Tw

oeq

uiv

alen

tE

con

omie

s

i)A

Sm

all

Op

en

Eco

nom

y

Th

eeq

uili

bri

um

onth

ego

odm

arke

t

Yt

=Ct

+I t

+Gt

+Xt−IMt

wh

ereYt,Ct,I t

,Gt,Xt

andIMt

den

ote

outp

ut,

con

sum

pti

on,

in-

vest

men

t,go

vern

men

tsp

end

ing,

exp

orts

and

imp

orts

,re

spec

tive

ly

(all

vari

able

sar

eex

pre

ssed

inre

alte

rms)

.

Page 115:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

ecu

rren

tac

cou

nteq

uat

ion

Bt+

1=

(1+r)Bt

+TBt

wh

ereBt

isth

en

etw

ealt

hof

the

dom

esti

cec

onom

yw

ith

resp

ect

to

the

rest

ofth

ew

orld

.T

he

(con

stan

t)re

alin

tere

stra

te(r>

0)is

give

n(b

yth

ere

stof

the

wor

ld).

Let

us

defi

neTBt

the

trad

eb

alan

ce(o

rn

etex

por

ts)

TBt

=Xt−IMt

Page 116:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

No

rela

tive

pri

ce(a

sin

gle

hom

ogen

ous

good

isp

rod

uce

db

oth

hom

e

and

abro

ad)

Com

bin

ing

the

pre

viou

seq

uat

ion

syi

eld

s

Bt+

1=

(1+r)Bt

+(Yt−I t−Gt)−Ct

wh

ereYt−I t−Gt

isas

sum

edto

be

exog

enou

s

Equ

ival

ence

:A=B

andY

isn

owd

efin

edas

net

ofp

riva

tein

vest

men

t

and

pu

blic

spen

din

g(Yt−I t−Gt)

Page 117:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

ii)

AG

row

thM

odel

Equ

ilib

riu

mon

the

good

mar

ket

Yt

=Ct

+I t

wh

ereYt,Ct

andI t

den

ote

outp

ut,

con

sum

pti

onan

din

vest

men

t,

resp

ecti

vely

.

Law

ofm

otio

nof

phy

sica

lca

pit

alKt

Kt+

1=

(1−δ)Kt

+I t

Page 118:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

wh

ereδ∈

[0,1

]is

aco

nst

ant

dep

reci

atio

nra

te.

Th

ete

chn

olog

y

Yt

=Zt

+aKt

wh

ereZt

rep

rese

ntch

ange

sin

the

pro

du

ctio

n,

ind

epen

den

tly

from

the

leve

lofKt.a>

0is

asc

ale

par

amet

er(s

eeth

eex

erci

sean

dch

ap.

2).

Not

eth

atth

eca

pit

alst

ock

tod

ayis

pre

-det

erm

ined

and

inve

stm

ent

dec

isio

nto

day

will

bec

ome

pro

du

ctiv

eto

mor

row

.

Page 119:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Ifw

eco

mb

ine

the

thre

eeq

uat

ion

sab

ove,

we

get:

Kt+

1=

(1−δ

+a

)Kt

+Zt−Ct

Equ

ival

ence

:A

=K

,r

=a−δ

(th

ere

alin

tere

stra

teis

equ

alth

e

mar

gin

alp

rod

uct

ivit

yof

cap

ital

min

us

the

dep

reci

atio

nra

te,

i.e.

the

real

retu

rnof

phy

sica

lca

pit

al)

andYt

=Zt.

Page 120:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Opti

mality

Condit

ion

We

assu

me

that

the

uti

lity

take

sth

efo

llow

ing

form

U(Ct)

0Ct−α

1 2C

2 t

wh

ereα

0,α

1>

0.

Th

em

argi

nal

uti

lity

islin

ear

and

dec

reas

ing

inC

U′ (Ct)

0−α

1Ct

(U′′

=−α

1<

0)

To

sim

ply

get

the

opti

mal

dec

isio

non

con

sum

pti

on,

rep

lace

the

con

-

stra

int

into

the

obje

ctiv

e

Page 121:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

∞ ∑ i=0

βi U

(Ct+i)

=U

(Ct)

+βU

(Ct+

1)+β

2 U(Ct+

2)+...

wh

ere

Ct

=(1

+r)At

+Yt−At+

1

Ct+

1=

(1+r)At+

1+Yt+

1−At+

2

Ct+

2=

(1+r)At+

2+Yt+

2−At+

3

and

soon

.

Page 122:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Don

’tfo

rget

:co

ntro

llin

gCt⇔

cont

rolli

ngAt+

1ev

ery

per

iod

(in

-

crea

sin

gcu

rren

tco

nsu

mp

tion

iseq

uiv

alen

tto

red

uce

savi

ng!

)

U(Ct)

+βU

(Ct+

1)+β

2 U(Ct+

2)+...

=U

((1

+r)At+Yt−At+

1)+

βU

((1

+r)At+

1+Yt+

1−At+

2)

2 U((

1+r)At+

2+Yt+

2−At+

3)+....

Page 123:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

enm

axim

ize

the

obje

ctiv

ew

ith

resp

ect

toAt+

1.T

his

will

give

you

the

opti

mal

con

sum

pti

on/s

avin

gd

ecis

ion

inp

erio

dt.

You

can

alw

ays

red

oth

eex

erci

sefo

rot

her

per

iod

s(s

eeth

ed

iscu

ssio

n

bel

ow).

Page 124:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Fir

stO

rder

Con

dit

ion

(den

oted

FO

C,

her

eaft

er)

inp

erio

dt.

−U′ (Ct)

(1+r)U′ (Ct+

1)=

0

Th

iseq

uat

ion

isca

lled

the

Eule

requati

on

onco

nsu

mp

tion

.

Th

isd

ecis

ion

isin

tert

emp

oral

bec

ause

incr

easi

ng

con

sum

pti

onto

day

will

red

uce

savi

ng

and

then

con

sum

pti

onto

mor

row

.

Th

eag

ent

will

thu

sfa

cea

trad

e–off

(int

erte

mp

oral

sub

stit

uti

on)

be-

twee

nco

nsu

mp

tion

tod

ayan

dco

nsu

mp

tion

tom

orro

w.

Page 125:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Equ

ival

entl

y

U′ (Ct)

(1+r)U′ (Ct+

1)⇔

U′ (Ct)

U′ (Ct+

1)=β

(1+r)

Th

em

argi

nal

rate

ofsu

bst

itu

tion

ofco

nsu

mp

tion

bet

wee

np

erio

dt

and

per

iodt

+1

iseq

ual

toth

ed

isco

unt

edre

alin

tere

stra

te(r

elat

ive

pri

ce).

Page 126:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Rm

k:th

isop

tim

alit

yco

nd

itio

nis

sati

sfied

ever

yp

erio

d(i

fw

ere

do

this

opti

miz

atio

np

rob

lem

atot

her

per

iod

st

+h

).

U′ (Ct+h)

(1+r)U′ (Ct+h

+1)

forh

=0,

1,....

So,

up

the

tim

ein

dex

,th

eop

tim

alp

lan

for

con

sum

p-

tion

rem

ain

sth

esa

me.

Th

eco

nsu

mp

tion

dec

isio

nis

thu

sti

me

con

sist

ent.

Inot

her

wor

ds,

give

nth

est

ruct

ure

ofth

eth

eore

tica

lm

odel

,th

ere

isn

oin

cent

ive

for

the

con

sum

erto

mod

ify

thei

rop

tim

alp

lan

sov

er

tim

e.

Page 127:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Now

,w

eas

sum

e

β(1

+r)

=1

Su

bje

ctiv

ed

isco

unt

fact

or=

Ob

ject

ive

dis

cou

ntra

te

To

see

this

,le

=1/

(1+θ)

,w

her

eθ>

0is

the

sub

ject

ive

rate

of

tim

ep

refe

ren

ce;

θ(o

)is

ad

eep

par

amet

erre

pre

sent

ing

ake

yin

tert

emp

oral

beh

av-

ior:θ

larg

e(β

smal

l)m

ean

san

imp

atie

ntag

ent,

wh

erea

smal

l(β

clos

eto

one)

mea

ns

ap

atie

ntag

ent.

Page 128:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Itfo

llow

sth

at

β(1

+r)

=1⇔

r=θ

Now

,w

eu

seth

em

argi

nal

uti

lity

U′ (Ct)

0−α

1Ct

and

we

sub

stit

ute

this

mar

gin

alu

tilit

yin

toth

eE

ule

req

uat

ion

α0−α

1Ct

(1+r)

(α0−α

1Ct+

1)

Page 129:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Bec

auser

=θ,

this

Eu

ler

equ

atio

nre

du

ces

to

Ct

=Ct+

1

Th

eop

tim

ald

ecis

ion

for

the

(rep

rese

ntat

ive)

hou

seh

old

isto

mai

ntai

n

(per

fect

smoo

thin

g)co

nst

ant

its

con

sum

pti

onov

erti

me.

Aga

in,

this

opti

mal

dec

isio

nis

sati

sfied

ever

yp

erio

d

Ct+h

=Ct+h

+1

forh

=0,

1,....

Th

isco

nsu

mp

tion

dec

isio

nis

thu

sti

me

con

sist

ent.

Page 130:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

eE

ule

req

uat

ion

defi

nes

the

stru

ctu

ral

form

ofth

em

odel

,b

ut

this

isn

otth

eso

luti

on.

Definit

ion:

The

solu

tion

ofany

dynam

icm

odelexpre

sses

the

contr

ol

vari

able

(s)

as

a(l

inear)

funct

ion

of

the

state

vari

able

(s)

and

the

exogenous

vari

able

(s).

Inou

rca

se,

the

solu

tion

for

the

con

sum

pti

onw

illb

eof

the

follo

win

g

linea

rfo

rm

Ct

1At

2Yt

wh

ere

the

par

amet

ersφ

1an

2ar

ed

eter

min

edby

the

mod

el’s

pro

p-

Page 131:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

erti

esan

da

fun

ctio

nof

the

stru

ctu

ral

par

amet

ers

(see

our

com

pu

ta-

tion

sb

elow

).

Page 132:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Com

puta

tion

of

the

solu

tion

(forw

ard

subst

ituti

ons)

⇒F

rom

the

inst

anta

neo

us

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

tto

the

inte

rtem

por

al

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

t

Let

us

star

tfr

omth

ein

stan

tan

eou

sb

ud

get

con

stra

int

inp

erio

dt:

At+

1=

(1+r)At

+Yt−Ct

Bec

auser>

0an

dth

us

1+r>

1,th

efir

stor

der

diff

eren

ceeq

uat

ion

isu

nst

able

bac

kwar

d(c

urr

ent

wea

lth

asa

fun

ctio

nof

pas

tw

ealt

h).

Bu

tit

isst

able

forw

ard

(cu

rren

tw

ealt

has

afu

nct

ion

offu

ture

wea

lth

)

Page 133:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

[In

sert

figu

res

that

illu

stra

teth

isp

rop

erty

]

At

=1

1+rAt+

1+

1

1+rCt−

1

1+rYt

Now

,w

rite

this

equ

atio

nin

per

iodt

+1

At+

1=

1

1+rAt+

2+

1

1+rCt+

1−

1

1+rYt+

1

and

then

sub

stit

ute

this

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

tin

per

iodt

+1

into

the

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

tin

per

iodt

Page 134:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

At

=1

(1+r)

2At+

2+1

(1+r)

2Ct+

1−1

(1+r)

2Ct+

1+1

1+rCt−

1

1+rYt

Aga

in,

wri

teth

eb

ud

get

con

stra

int

inp

erio

dt+

2an

dth

ensu

bst

itu

te

this

exp

ress

ion

intoAt,

....

and

cont

inu

e.

Page 135:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

isyi

eld

s

At

=limT→∞

1

(1+r)TAt+T

+1

1+r

limT→∞

T−

1 ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)i(Ct+i−Yt+i)

Now

,im

pos

eth

e“t

ran

sver

salit

y”co

nd

itio

n

limT→∞

1

(1+r)TAt+T

=0

mea

nin

gte

chn

ical

lyth

atth

ew

ealt

hca

nn

otex

plo

de

atso

me

rate

that

exce

edsr.

Page 136:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Wit

hth

isre

stri

ctio

non

At,

the

inte

rtem

por

alb

ud

get

con

stra

int

be-

com

es

At

=1

1+r

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)i(Ct+i−Yt+i)

oreq

uiv

alen

tly

At

+Ht

=1

1+r

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)iCt+i

wh

ereHt

defi

nes

the

non

–fin

anci

alw

ealt

h(o

r“h

um

an”

wea

lth

),i.e

.

Page 137:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

all

that

you

can

det

erm

inis

tica

lly

earn

du

rin

gyo

ur

(in

finit

e)p

arti

ci-

pat

ion

onth

ela

bor

mar

ket.

Ht

=1

1+r

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)iYt+i

Page 138:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

To

obta

inth

eco

nsu

mp

tion

fun

ctio

n,

we

first

nee

dto

com

pu

te

1

1+r

( Ct

+1

1+rCt+

1+

1

(1+r)

2Ct+

2+...)

Fro

mth

eE

ule

req

uat

ion

onco

nsu

mp

tion

,w

ekn

owth

atth

eop

tim

al

dec

isio

nsa

tisfi

es

Ct+h

=Ct+h

+1

forh

=0,

1,2,....

Page 139:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Itfo

llow

sth

at

Ct

=Ct+

1=Ct+

2=...

Ifw

ere

pla

ceth

isin

toth

eab

ove

equ

atio

n,

we

obta

in

1

1+r

( Ct

+1

1+rCt+

1+

1

(1+r)

2Ct+

2+...) =

1

1+rCt

( 1+

1

1+r

+1

(1+r)

2+...)

Page 140:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Bec

auser>

0,th

en1/

(1+r)<

0,so

the

sequ

ence

( 1+

1

1+r

+1

(1+r)

2+...) =

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)i

conv

erge

sto

afin

ite

num

ber

.

Page 141:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

We

hav

e

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)i

=1

1−

11+r

≡1

+r

r

We

obta

in

1

1+r

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)iCt+i

=Ct r

Now

,if

we

rep

lace

this

exp

ress

ion

into

Page 142:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

At

+Ht

=1

1+r

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)iCt+i

we

get

Ct

=r

(At

+Ht)

Th

eco

nsu

mp

tion

fun

ctio

nd

efin

esa

linea

rre

lati

onb

etw

een

the

cur-

rent

con

sum

pti

onan

dth

efin

anci

alan

dhu

man

wea

lth

.

Ver

yd

iffer

ent

from

the

Key

nes

ian

con

sum

pti

onfu

nct

ion

that

ex-

Page 143:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

pre

sses

the

curr

ent

con

sum

pti

onas

alin

ear

fun

ctio

nof

the

curr

ent

inco

me)

.

Page 144:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

eva

riab

leHt

defi

nes

the

non

–fin

anci

al(o

rhu

man

)w

ealt

h.

Itre

pre

sent

sal

lth

ein

com

eth

atan

agen

tca

nob

tain

from

its

lab

or

inco

me

over

its

(in

finit

e)lif

etim

e.

Her

e,w

eas

sum

ep

erfe

ctfo

resi

ght

(th

ed

eter

min

isti

cca

se),

soth

e

agen

tp

erfe

ctly

know

sth

ese

quen

ce

Yt,

Yt+

1,Yt+

2,...

For

sim

plic

ity,

assu

me

that

the

lab

orin

com

eis

con

stan

t

Page 145:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Yt

=Y∀t

Pu

ttin

gth

isin

toth

en

on–fi

nan

cial

wea

lth

Ht

=1

1+r

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)iYt+i,

we

obta

in

Ht

=1

1+rYt

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)i

=1

1+rYt1

+r

r≡Yt r

Page 146:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Now

,u

sin

gth

isex

pre

ssio

n,

we

can

ded

uce

the

con

sum

pti

onfu

nct

ion

Ct

=r

(At

+Ht)≡rA

t+Yt

Th

ecu

rren

tco

nsu

mp

tionCt

isa

linea

rfu

nct

ion

ofcu

rren

tin

com

eYt

+fin

anci

alre

venu

esrA

t.

Page 147:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Now

,re

pla

ceth

isex

pre

ssio

nin

toth

ein

stan

tan

eou

sb

ud

get

con

stra

int

At+

1=

(1+r)At

+Yt−Ct⇔

At+

1=At

Th

eco

nsu

mp

tion

let

the

leve

lof

the

finan

cial

wea

lth

con

stan

t.

Inth

isec

onom

y,th

eop

tim

ald

ecis

ion

onco

nsu

mp

tion

allo

ws

tosm

ooth

the

con

sum

pti

onan

dto

let

con

stan

tth

efin

anci

alw

ealt

h.

Page 148:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Rm

k:

An

oth

erw

ayto

com

pu

teth

eso

luti

onis

the

met

hod

ofu

nde

-

term

ined

coeffi

cien

ts.

Th

eb

asic

idea

isto

iden

tify

the

form

ula

for

the

par

amet

ersφ

1an

d

φ2

inth

ep

ostu

late

deq

uat

ion

Ct

1At

2Yt

that

sati

sfied

bot

hth

eE

ule

req

uat

ion

onco

nsu

mp

tion

(op

tim

ald

e-

cisi

ons)

and

the

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

t(r

estr

icti

ons

onth

ein

tert

emp

oral

allo

cati

onof

con

sum

pti

on).

Page 149:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Fir

stre

pla

ceth

ep

ostu

late

deq

uat

ion

into

the

Eu

ler

equ

atio

non

con

-

sum

pti

on

φ1A

t+1

2Yt+

1=φ

1At

2Yt

we

know

that

Yt

=Y

∀t

Page 150:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

en,

φ1A

t+1

2Y=φ

1At

2Y=⇔

At+

1=At

Now

use

the

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

t

At+

1=

(1+r)At

+Yt−Ct

and

sub

stit

ute

the

pos

tula

ted

equ

atio

nfo

rCt

(1+r)At

+Yt−Ct

=At⇔

(1+r)At

+Yt−φ

1At−φ

2Yt

=At

Page 151:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Iden

tify

the

term

s (1+r)−φ

1=

1,

1−φ

2=

0

Th

isgi

ves

us

the

two

par

amet

ersφ

1=r

andφ

2=

1.

Page 152:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

Sto

chast

icC

ase

Th

ese

tup

A(r

epre

sent

ativ

e)h

ouse

hol

dw

illse

ekto

max

imiz

e(e

very

per

iod

)

Et

∞ ∑ i=0

βi U

(Ct+i)

un

der

ase

quen

ceof

(in

stan

tan

eou

s)b

ud

get

con

stra

int

(as

bef

ore)

At+

1=

(1+r)At

+Yt−Ct

Page 153:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

est

atu

san

dth

ed

efin

itio

nof

the

vari

able

sar

eth

esa

me

asb

efor

e,

bu

tn

owth

eva

riab

leYt

isst

och

asti

c(f

orex

amp

le,

stoc

has

tic

afte

r

tax

real

wag

e).

Th

eag

ent

know

sth

est

och

asti

cp

roce

ssof

this

vari

able

(sh

ekn

ows

the

pro

bab

ility

dis

trib

uti

onofYt)

.

Th

eop

erat

orEt

den

otes

the

con

dit

ion

alex

pec

tati

onop

erat

or.

Opti

mality

condit

ion

Th

esa

me

asb

efor

e,u

pto

the

con

dit

ion

alex

pec

tati

onop

erat

orEt.

Page 154:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Rm

kR

atio

nal

Exp

ecta

tion

s:

Her

e,w

eas

sum

era

tion

alex

pec

tati

ons

Wh

atar

era

tion

alex

pec

tati

ons?

Exp

ecta

tion

slie

atth

eco

reof

econ

omic

dyn

amic

s(i

nd

ivid

ual

beh

av-

ior,

bu

tm

ost

imp

orta

ntly

equ

ilib

riu

mp

rop

erti

es).

Lon

gtr

adit

ion

inec

onom

ics,

sin

ceK

eyn

es,

bu

tp

ut

forw

ard

byth

e

new

clas

sica

lec

onom

y(L

uca

s,P

resc

ott,

Sar

gent

inth

e70

’an

d80

’).

Th

ete

rm“r

atio

nal

exp

ecta

tion

s”is

mos

tcl

osel

yas

soci

ated

toR

ober

t

Page 155:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Lu

cas

(Nob

elL

aure

ate,

Un

iver

sity

ofC

hic

ago)

,b

ut

the

rati

onal

ity

of

exp

ecta

tion

sd

eep

lyex

amin

edb

efor

e(s

eeM

uth

,19

60)

Page 156:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

We

con

sid

erth

efo

llow

ing

defi

nit

ion

.

Def

Age

nts

form

ula

teex

pect

atio

ns

insu

cha

way

that

thei

rsu

b-

ject

ive

prob

abil

ity

dist

ribu

tion

ofec

onom

icva

riab

les

(con

diti

onal

onth

eav

aila

ble

info

rmat

ion

)co

inci

des

wit

hth

eob

ject

ive

prob

-

abil

ity

dist

ribu

tion

ofth

esa

me

vari

able

(acc

ordi

ng

toa

mea

sure

ofth

est

ate

ofn

atu

re)

inan

equ

ilib

riu

m.

Exp

ect

ati

ons

should

be

consi

stent

wit

hth

em

odelV

Solv

ing

the

modelis

findin

gan

exp

ect

ati

on

funct

ion

(see

belo

ww

hen

we

will

solv

eth

em

odel.)

Page 157:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Wit

hth

isd

efin

itio

n(a

nd

som

ere

stri

ctio

ns

onth

em

odel

,i.e

.re

cur-

sive

rep

rese

ntat

ion

),w

eas

sum

eth

atag

ents

know

the

mod

elan

dth

e

pro

bab

ility

dis

trib

uti

onof

exog

enou

sva

riab

les

(or

shoc

ks)

that

hit

the

econ

omy.

Page 158:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Et≡E

(./It)

wh

ereI t

den

otes

the

info

rmat

ion

set

inp

erio

dt,

i.e.

wh

enth

eco

nsu

mer

(or

firm

)ag

ent

mak

esit

sd

ecis

ion

onco

nsu

mp

tion

s

(or

lab

or/c

apit

ald

eman

d).

Her

e,I t

incl

ud

esal

lth

eh

isto

ries

ofC

andY

,i.e

.{C

t,Ct−

1,....

;Yt,Yt−

1,...}

.

EtCt+

1is

thu

sth

elin

ear

pro

ject

ion

of

Ct+

1on{C

t,Ct−

1,....

;Yt,Yt−

1,...}

Page 159:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Pro

pert

ies

of

rati

onal

exp

ect

ati

ons

Pro

pert

y1:

No

syst

emat

icb

ias.

Let

the

exp

ecta

tion

erro

rεc t

+1

=

Ct+

1−EtCt+

1.T

his

erro

rte

rmsa

tisfi

es:

Etεc t+

1=

0

Pro

of:

Str

aigh

tfor

war

d(u

sin

gEt(A

+B

)=EtA

+EtB

andEtEtA

=

EtA

):

Etεc t+

1=Et(Ct+

1−EtCt+

1)=EtCt+

1−EtEtCt+

1

=EtCt+

1−EtCt+

1=

0

Page 160:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Pro

pert

y2:

Exp

ecta

tion

erro

rsd

on

otex

hib

itan

yse

rial

corr

ela-

tion

.

Pro

of:

Str

aigh

tfor

war

du

sin

gth

eco

nd

itio

nal

auto

–cov

aria

nce

fun

c-

tion

(see

the

pre

viou

sch

apte

rfo

ra

form

ald

efin

itio

nof

this

fun

ctio

n):

Covt(εc t

+1,εc t

)=Et(εc t

+1εc t)−Et(εc t

+1)Et(εc t

)

=Et(εc t

+1)εc t−Et(εc t

+1)εc t

=0

Page 161:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

An

exam

ple

:an

AR

(1)

pro

cess

forYt

(see

bel

owth

esp

ecifi

cati

on

ofla

bor

inco

me

wag

es)

Yt

=ρYt−

1+εy t

Th

ein

form

atio

nse

tin

per

iodt

isgi

ven

byal

lth

ere

aliz

atio

ns

ofth

e

ran

dom

vari

ableY

from

per

iodt

(all

the

his

tory

atp

erio

dt

ofth

e

vari

ableY

),i.e

.

I t={Y

t,Yt−

1,...}

Page 162:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Fro

mth

isd

efin

itio

n,

we

get

EtYt+

1=E

(ρYt

+εy t

)=ρEtYt

+Etεy t+

1=ρYt

+Etεy t+

1

Sin

ceεy t+

1is

anin

nov

atio

n,

itis

orth

ogon

alto

the

info

rmat

ion

set

and

thu

sEtεy t+

1=

0.

Itfo

llow

sth

at

EtYt+

1=ρYt

Page 163:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

eex

pec

tati

oner

rors

εy t+1

=Yt+

1−EtYt+

1=Yt+

1−ρYt

thu

ssa

tisfi

es

Etεy t+

1=

0

Th

isp

rop

erty

ofra

tion

alex

pec

tati

ons

coin

cid

esw

ith

the

opti

mal

fore

-

cast

ofan

econ

omet

rici

anw

ho

use

the

obse

rvat

ion

san

dth

eA

R(1

)

pro

cess

tofo

rmu

late

anop

tim

alfo

reca

stofY

(on

est

ep–a

hea

d)

Page 164:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

We

now

gob

ack

toou

rst

och

asti

cse

tup

Et

∞ ∑ i=0

βi U

(Ct+i)

=Et

( U(Ct)

+βU

(Ct+

1)+β

2 U(Ct+

2)+...)

wh

ere

Ct

=(1

+r)At

+Yt−At+

1

Ct+

1=

(1+r)At+

1+Yt+

1−At+

2

Page 165:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Ct+

2=

(1+r)At+

2+Yt+

2−At+

3

Aga

in,

don

’tfo

rget

:co

ntro

llin

gCt⇔

cont

rolli

ngAt+

1ev

ery

per

iod

(in

crea

sin

gcu

rren

tco

nsu

mp

tion

iseq

uiv

alen

tto

red

uce

savi

ng!

)

Et

( U(Ct)

+βU

(Ct+

1)+β

2 U(Ct+

2)+...) =

Et(U

((1+r)At+Yt−At+

1)

+βU

((1

+r)At+

1+Yt+

1−At+

2)

Page 166:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

2 U((

1+r)At+

2+Yt+

2−At+

3)+....

)

Page 167:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

enm

axim

ize

the

obje

ctiv

ew

ith

resp

ect

toAt+

1.

Rm

k:b

ecau

seAt

isp

re-d

eter

min

edan

dYt

iskn

own

inp

erio

dt

(an

d

r>

0is

con

stan

t),

the

leve

lof

finan

cial

wea

lth

inp

erio

dt

+1

is

know

n!

Et( −U

′ (Ct)

(1+r)U′ (Ct+

1)) =

0

Th

isis

the

Eule

requati

on

onco

nsu

mp

tion

,b

ut

now

inex

pec

ta-

tion

s.W

eas

sum

eth

esa

me

uti

lity

fun

ctio

nas

bef

ore

and

we

imp

ose

the

sam

ere

stri

ctio

(1+r)

=1.

Th

isyi

eld

s

Page 168:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Et(−Ct

+Ct+

1)=

0

By

the

linea

rity

(in

con

sum

pti

on)

ofth

eE

ule

req

uat

ion

Et(−Ct

+Ct+

1)=−EtCt

+EtCt+

1

and

usi

ng

the

fact

that

the

curr

ent

con

sum

pti

onis

know

nin

per

iodt

(EtCt

=Ct)

,w

ed

edu

ceCt

=EtCt+

1

Page 169:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

oreq

uiv

alen

tly

Et∆Ct+

1=

0

wh

ere

∆Ct+

1=Ct+

1−Ct.

We

can

also

wri

te

Ct+

1=Ct

+εc t

+1

wh

ere

the

ran

dom

vari

ableεc t

+1

sati

sfies

Etεc t+

1=

0

Page 170:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Imp

ort

ant

Quanti

tati

ve

Implica

tions

1)T

he

curr

ent

con

sum

pti

onis

anop

tim

alp

red

icto

rof

futu

reco

n-

sum

pti

on.

2)T

he

chan

gein

con

sum

pti

onis

un

pre

dic

tab

lean

dd

oes

not

dis

pla

y

seri

alco

rrel

atio

n.

3)T

he

con

sum

pti

onfo

llow

sa

ran

dom

wal

k.

Th

ese

quan

tita

tive

imp

licat

ion

sca

nb

ete

sted

easi

lyfr

omac

tual

dat

a

(see

the

dis

cuss

ion

bel

ow)

Page 171:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Aga

in,

we

mu

stso

lve

the

mod

el,

i.e.

we

mu

std

eriv

eth

eco

nsu

mp

tion

fun

ctio

n.

We

star

tfr

omth

ein

stan

tan

eou

sb

ud

get

con

stra

int

inp

erio

dt

At+

1=

(1+r)At

+Yt−Ct

All

the

vari

able

sar

ekn

own

inp

erio

dt.

Th

ism

ean

sth

atif

we

app

lyth

eco

nd

itio

nal

exp

ecta

tion

oper

ator

,w

e

get

the

sam

efo

rmu

lati

on.

Page 172:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Aga

in,

we

form

ula

tea

forw

ard

rep

rese

ntat

ion

ofth

isco

nst

rain

t

At

=1

1+rAt+

1+

1

1+rCt−

1

1+rYt

Page 173:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Now

,w

rite

this

equ

atio

nin

per

iodt

+1

At+

1=

1

1+rAt+

2+

1

1+rCt+

1−

1

1+rYt+

1

Th

ele

vel

ofw

ealt

hin

per

iodt

+1

iskn

own

inp

erio

dt,

bu

tth

e

vari

able

sCt+

1,Yt+

1an

dAt+

2ar

eu

nkn

own

.

Th

isis

bec

ause

the

inco

me

isa

stoc

has

tic

vari

able

and

thu

sag

ent

mu

stfo

rmu

late

(rat

ion

al)

exp

ecta

tion

sab

out

the

futu

rere

aliz

atio

ns

ofth

isva

riab

le.

Th

en,

we

app

lyth

eco

nd

itio

nal

exp

ecta

tion

Et

onth

isb

ud

get

con

-

Page 174:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

stra

int

At+

1=

1

1+rEtAt+

2+

1

1+rEtCt+

1−

1

1+rEtYt+

1

and

then

sub

stit

ute

this

exp

ecte

db

ud

get

con

stra

int

inp

erio

dt

+1

into

the

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

tin

per

iodt

At

=1

(1+r)

2EtAt+

2+1

(1+r)

2EtCt+

1−1

(1+r)

2EtCt+

1+1

1+rCt−

1

1+rYt

Aga

in,

wri

teth

eb

ud

get

con

stra

int

inp

erio

dt

+2,

take

exp

ecta

tion

s

Page 175:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

con

dit

ion

alon

the

info

rmat

ion

set

inp

erio

dt

and

then

sub

stit

ute

this

exp

ress

ion

intoAt,

....

and

cont

inu

e.

Page 176:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

isyi

eld

s

At

=limT→∞Et

1

(1+r)TAt+T

+1

1+r

limT→∞Et

T−

1 ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)i(Ct+i−Yt+i)

Now

,im

pos

eth

e“t

ran

sver

salit

y”co

nd

itio

n(i

nex

pec

tati

ons)

limT→∞Et

1

(1+r)TAt+T

=0

mea

nin

gte

chn

ical

lyth

atth

ew

ealt

hca

nn

otex

plo

de

inex

pec

tati

ons

atso

me

rate

that

exce

edsr.

Page 177:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

ein

tert

emp

oral

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

tis

give

nby

At

=1

1+rEt

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)i(Ct+i−Yt+i)

oreq

uiv

alen

tly

At

+Ht

=1

1+rEt

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)iCt+i

wh

ereHt

defi

nes

the

non

–fin

anci

alw

ealt

h(o

r“h

um

an”

wea

lth

),i.e

.

all

that

you

can

exp

ect

toea

rnd

uri

ng

you

r(i

nfin

ite)

par

tici

pat

ion

on

Page 178:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

the

lab

orm

arke

t.

Ht

=1

1+rEt

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)iYt+i

To

obta

inth

eco

nsu

mp

tion

fun

ctio

n,

we

first

nee

dto

com

pu

te

1

1+rEt

( Ct

+1

1+rCt+

1+

1

(1+r)

2Ct+

2+...)

Page 179:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Fro

mth

eE

ule

req

uat

ion

onco

nsu

mp

tion

,w

ekn

owth

atth

eop

tim

al

dec

isio

nsa

tisfi

es

Ct+h

=Et+hCt+h

+1

forh

=0,

1,2,....

Mor

ep

reci

sely

,w

eh

ave

EtCt+

1=Ct

Page 180:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Et+

1Ct+

2=Ct+

1

Et+

2Ct+

3=Ct+

2

and

soon

.N

owu

se,

the

seco

nd

Eu

ler

equ

atio

n(E

ule

req

uat

ion

in

per

iodt

+1)

Et+

1Ct+

2=Ct+

1

Page 181:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

and

app

lyth

eco

nd

itio

nal

exp

ecta

tion

sop

erat

orEt

EtEt+

1Ct+

2=EtCt+

1

Page 182:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

By

defi

nit

ion

ofra

tion

alex

pec

tati

ons,

the

diff

eren

ceb

etw

een

the

in-

form

atio

nse

tin

per

iodt

andt

+1

isu

np

red

icta

ble

,so

EtEt+

1Ct+

2=EtCt+

2

We

then

ded

uce

EtCt+

2=EtCt+

1=Ct

Ifw

ep

erfo

rmth

esa

me

exer

cise

onth

eth

ird

Eu

ler

equ

atio

n,

we

get

EtCt+

3=EtCt+

2=EtCt+

1=Ct

Page 183:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Mor

ege

ner

ally

,w

eh

ave

EtCt+h

=EtCt+h−

1=...

=EtCt+

1=Ct

for

som

ep

osit

ive

inte

gerh

.

Page 184:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Fro

mth

eab

ove

com

pu

tati

ons,

we

can

easi

lyd

eter

min

e

1

1+rEt

( Ct

+1

1+rCt+

1+

1

(1+r)

2Ct+

2+...) =

1

1+rCt

( 1+

1

1+r

+1

(1+r)

2+...)

Bec

auser>

0,th

en1/

(1+r)<

0,so

the

sequ

ence

( 1+

1

1+r

+1

(1+r)

2+...) =

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)i

conv

erge

sto

afin

ite

num

ber

.

Page 185:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

We

hav

e

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)i

=1

1−

11+r

≡1

+r

r

We

obta

in

1

1+rEt

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)iCt+i

=Ct r

Page 186:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Now

,if

we

rep

lace

this

exp

ress

ion

into

At

+Ht

=1

1+rEt

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)iCt+i

we

get

Ct

=r

(At

+Ht)

We

mu

stn

owd

eter

min

eth

en

on–fi

nan

cial

wea

lthHt.

To

do

that

,w

en

eed

tosp

ecif

ya

stoc

has

tic

pro

cess

forYt.

Th

isst

och

asti

cp

roce

ssis

per

fect

lykn

own

byth

eco

nsu

mer

.

Page 187:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

We

assu

me

thatYt

isd

eter

min

edby

the

follo

win

gp

roce

ss

Yt

=Y

+Yt

wh

ereY

isa

know

np

osit

ive

con

stan

t(t

he

det

erm

inis

tic

per

man

ent

com

pon

ent)

and

the

stoc

has

tic

(pos

sib

lyh

igh

lyp

ersi

sten

t)co

mp

onen

t

isgi

ven

by

Yt

=ρYt−

1+εy t

Page 188:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

wh

ereρ∈

[0,1

].T

he

ran

dom

term

sati

sfies

Etεy t+

1=

0

Th

en

on–fi

nan

cial

wea

lth

isgi

ven

by

Ht

=1

1+rEt

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)iYt+i,

So,

we

nee

dto

com

pu

te EtYt,EtYt+

1,EtYt+

2,...

Page 189:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Fro

mth

eab

ove

pro

cess

forYt,

we

ded

uce

EtYt

=Yt≡Y

+Yt

EtYt+

1=Et( Y+

Yt+

1) =Y

+EtYt+

1

=Y

+Et(ρYt

+εy t+

1)=Y

+ρYt

+Etεy t+

1

=Y

+ρYt

Page 190:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

EtYt+

2=Et( Y+

Yt+

2) =Y

+EtYt+

2

=Y

+Et(ρYt+

1+εy t+

2)=Y

+ρEtYt+

1+Etεy t+

2

=Y

2 Yt

and

we

cont

inu

e...

Page 191:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

en

on–fi

nan

cial

wea

lth

isth

end

edu

ced

Ht

=1

1+rY

∞ ∑ i=0

1

(1+r)i

+1

1+rYt

∞ ∑ i=0

ρi

(1+r)i

Sin

ceρ∈

[0,1

]an

dr>

0,it

follo

ws

that

ρ

(1+r)<

1

and

the

sequ

ence

ρi

(1+r)i

isco

nver

gent

.

We

obta

in

Ht

=Y r

+1

1+r−ρYt

Page 192:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Fro

mth

isex

pre

ssio

n,

we

see

that

the

pro

cess

forYt

mat

ters

alo

tfo

r

the

non

–fin

anci

alw

ealt

h.

Th

isis

bec

ause

agen

tsu

seth

est

och

asti

cp

roce

ssto

mak

eth

eir

fore

cast

abou

tth

eir

futu

rein

com

e.

Th

ism

ean

sth

atn

on–fi

nan

cial

wea

lth

isn

otin

vari

ant

toth

ep

aram

-

eter

sof

the

pro

cess

.

Page 193:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Usi

ngHt,

we

can

ded

uce

the

con

sum

pti

onfu

nct

ion

Ct

=rA

t+Y

+r

1+r−ρYt

Rm

k:

Th

eu

nde

term

ined

coeffi

cien

tsin

ast

och

asti

cse

tup

.

Th

eb

asic

idea

isto

iden

tify

the

form

ula

for

the

par

amet

ersφ

0,φ

1

andφ

2in

the

pos

tula

ted

(lin

ear)

equ

atio

n

Ct

0+φ

1At

2Yt

Page 194:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

that

sati

sfied

bot

hth

eE

ule

req

uat

ion

onco

nsu

mp

tion

(op

tim

ald

e-

cisi

ons)

and

the

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

t(r

estr

icti

ons

onth

ein

tert

emp

oral

allo

cati

onof

con

sum

pti

on).

Fir

stre

pla

ceth

ep

ostu

late

deq

uat

ion

into

the

Eu

ler

equ

atio

non

con

-

sum

pti

on

φ0

1EtAt+

1+φ

2EtYt+

1=φ

0+φ

1At

2Yt

Page 195:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

We

know

that

EtAt+

1=At+

1b

ecau

seA

isp

re-d

eter

min

ed

and

Yt+

1=ρYt

Th

en,

φ1A

t+1

2ρYt

1At

2ρYt

Page 196:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Now

use

the

bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

t

At+

1=

(1+r)At

+Y

+Yt−Ct

and

sub

stit

ute

the

pos

tula

ted

equ

atio

nfo

rCt

φ1(

1+r)At

1Y+φ

1Yt−φ

1Ct

1At

2Yt

φ1(

1+r)At

1Y+φ

1Yt−φ

1φ0−φ

2 1At−φ

1φ2Yt

1At

2Yt

Page 197:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Iden

tify

the

term

s

φ1(

1+r)−φ

2 1=φ

1Y−φ

1φ0

=0

φ1−φ

1φ2

2ρ=φ

2

Th

isgi

ves

us

the

thre

ep

aram

eter

0=Y

1=r

andφ

2=r/

(1+

r−ρ

).

Page 198:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

Lu

cas

Cri

tiqu

e

Lu

cas

(197

6)cl

aim

sth

atst

and

ard

mac

roec

onom

etri

cm

odel

sca

nn

ot

be

use

dfo

rp

olic

yev

alu

atio

n,

bec

ause

that

the

con

sum

pti

onfu

nct

ion

(am

ong

oth

erp

riva

teb

ehav

iors

)ar

en

otin

vari

ant

top

olic

yp

aram

e-

ters

.

Inot

her

wor

ds,

thes

em

acro

econ

omet

ric

mod

els

wro

ngl

yas

sum

eth

at

the

par

amet

ers

ofth

eco

nsu

mp

tion

fun

ctio

nd

oes

not

chan

gew

hen

agen

tsm

odif

yth

eir

exp

ecta

tion

saf

ter

ap

olic

ych

ange

.

To

see

this

,su

pp

ose

that

the

econ

omet

rici

anw

ron

gly

assu

mes

that

Page 199:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

the

con

sum

pti

onfu

nct

ion

ofth

efo

rm:

Ct

=c 0

+c 1Yt

+c 2At

Th

issp

ecifi

cati

onis

rich

erth

anth

est

and

ard

keyn

esia

nco

nsu

mp

tion

fun

ctio

n,

bec

ause

itin

clu

des

som

ew

ealt

heff

ects

.

Bu

t,th

issp

ecifi

cati

onas

sum

esth

atth

ep

aram

eterc 1

isp

olic

yin

vari

-

ant.

Page 200:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Fro

mth

em

odel

’sso

luti

on,

this

par

amet

eris

give

nby

∂Ct

∂Yt

=r

1+r−ρ

Th

isp

aram

eter

isn

otin

vari

ant

toρ

,th

ep

aram

eter

sth

atgo

vern

sth

e

exp

ecta

tion

sab

out

futu

rein

com

e.

Page 201:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

To

illu

stra

teth

isla

ckof

inva

rian

ce,

assu

me

pu

retr

ansi

tory

inco

me

shoc

k(ρ

=0)

∂Ct

∂Yt

=r

1+r

Th

ese

nsi

tivi

tyof

con

sum

pti

onto

inco

me

isve

rysm

all

(r=

0.01

per

quar

ter,

sose

nsi

tivi

tyar

oun

d1%

).

Th

isis

bec

ause

agen

tsex

pec

tson

lytr

ansi

tory

chan

ges

inth

ela

bor

inco

me.

Bec

ause

they

wan

tto

smoo

thth

eir

con

sum

pti

onov

erti

me,

they

al-

Page 202:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

mos

td

isco

nn

ect

thei

rco

nsu

mp

tion

from

tran

sito

ryin

com

es.

Ass

um

en

owp

erm

anen

tin

com

esh

ocks

(ρ=

1).

Th

ese

nsi

tivi

tyis

now

∂Ct

∂Yt

=1

So,

the

resp

onse

isn

owon

e-to

-on

e,b

ecau

seag

ents

exp

ect

now

per

-

man

ent

chan

ges.

Page 203:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Model’Solu

tion

Ifw

ere

pla

ceth

eco

nsu

mp

tion

fun

ctio

nin

toth

ein

stan

tan

eou

sb

ud

get

con

stra

int

inp

erio

dt,

we

obta

in

At+

1=At

+1−ρ

1+r−ρYt

Inp

erio

dt−

1,w

eal

soh

ave

At

=At−

1+

1−ρ

1+r−ρYt−

1

Page 204:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Now

,d

efin

e∆At

=At−A−

1an

dta

keth

efir

std

iffer

ence

ofth

e

con

sum

pti

onfu

nct

ion ∆Ct

=∆At

+r

1+r−ρ

∆Yt

=1−ρ

1+r−ρYt−

1+

r

1+r−ρ

∆Yt

=r

1+r−ρYt−

1+r−ρYt−

1

∆Ct

=r

1+r−ρεy t

Page 205:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

So

the

con

sum

pti

onfu

nct

ion

rew

rite

s(a

ran

dom

wal

k)

Ct

=Ct−

1+

r

1+r−ρεy t

Not

eth

atw

hen

com

pu

tin

gth

eco

nsu

mp

tion

fun

ctio

n,

we

det

erm

ine

the

rela

tion

ship

bet

wee

nan

inn

ovat

ion

onco

nsu

mp

tion

εc tan

dan

inn

ovat

ion

onst

och

asti

cin

com

eεy t

εc t=

r

1+r−ρεy t

Page 206:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Fro

mth

eab

ove

equ

atio

n,

we

can

det

erm

ine

the

dyn

amic

resp

onse

s

ofco

nsu

mp

tion

toan

un

exp

ecte

dsh

ock

tost

och

asti

cla

bor

inco

me.

Th

isis

give

nby

the

follo

win

gex

pre

ssio

n(I

RF

for

Imp

uls

eR

esp

onse

Fu

nct

ion

):

IRFc(h

)=∂Ct+h

∂εy t

forh

=0,

1,2,...

[In

sert

afig

ure

]

Page 207:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

We

ded

uce

IRFc(

0)=

r

1+r−ρ,IRFc(

1)=

r

1+r−ρ,IRFc(

2)=

r

1+r−ρ,

Th

eIR

Fis

anin

crea

sin

gfu

nct

ion

ofρ

,co

nsu

mp

tion

ism

ore

sen

siti

ve

toan

inn

ovat

ion

tola

bor

inco

me.

ASp

eci

al

Case

Un

itro

otin

the

inco

me

pro

cess

(ρ=

1),s

up

por

ted

byth

eac

tual

dat

a

Page 208:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

inin

du

stri

aliz

edco

unt

ries

. Yt

=Yt−

1+εy t

So,

the

chan

gein

lab

orin

com

e∆Yt

isgi

ven

by

∆Yt

=εy t

We

ded

uce

from

the

abov

efo

rmu

la

Ct

=rA

t+Yt

At+

1=At

∆Ct

=∆Yt

Page 209:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Qu

anti

tati

veim

plic

atio

ns

1)V

olat

ility

σ(∆Ct)

(∆Yt)

Inth

eac

tual

dat

a(i

nin

du

stri

aliz

edco

unt

ries

,w

her

eC

ism

easu

red

asth

esu

mof

non

–du

rab

lego

ods

and

serv

ices

)

σ(∆Ct)

=0.

7σ(∆Yt)

“Exc

ess

Sm

ooth

nes

sP

uzz

le”

(Dea

ton

,19

87)

2)P

ersi

sten

ce

∆Ct

=εy t

Page 210:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Con

sum

pti

onch

ange

sd

on

otd

isp

lay

seri

alco

rrel

atio

n.

Inth

ed

ata,

Corr(

∆Ct,

∆Ct−

1)'

0.3

So

con

sum

pti

onch

ange

sar

ep

red

icta

ble

.O

ther

emp

iric

alst

ud

ies

hav

e

show

nth

ata

set

ofre

leva

ntva

riab

les

(pas

tco

nsu

mp

tion

,p

asin

com

e)

hel

pto

pre

dic

tfu

ture

con

sum

pti

on.

Page 211:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Ext

ensi

ons

-H

abit

per

sist

ence

inco

nsu

mp

tion

-B

orro

win

gco

nst

rain

t

Page 212:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

2.2

:T

he

Dyn

am

icL

ab

or

Dem

an

dM

od

el

Sta

nd

ard

theo

ryon

lyco

nsi

der

shor

t–ru

nan

dlo

ng–

run

lab

ord

eman

d

wit

hou

tan

yex

plic

itad

just

men

tp

roce

ssb

etw

een

thes

etw

osi

tuat

ion

s.

Th

eth

eory

ofla

bor

dem

and

wit

had

just

men

tco

sts

offer

san

opp

or-

tun

ity

tofil

lth

ega

pb

etw

een

thes

estw

osi

tuat

ion

s.

Quest

ion:

Why

adju

stm

ent

cost

son

lab

or??

Poss

ible

Expla

nati

ons:

Page 213:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Cos

tof

adju

stin

gem

plo

ymen

t

∆Lt

=Ht−Ft

wh

ereHt

den

otes

hir

ings

andFt

den

otes

firin

gs.

•H

irin

gco

sts:

trai

nin

gco

sts,

re–o

rgan

izat

ion

cost

s

•F

irin

gco

sts:

legi

slat

ion

(em

plo

ymen

tp

rote

ctio

n)

Em

pir

ical

stu

die

ssu

gges

t

•In

US

,h

irin

gco

sts

are

hig

han

dou

tstr

ipth

eco

stof

sep

arat

ion

•In

cou

ntri

esw

her

est

ron

gle

gal

mea

sure

sar

ein

pla

ceto

ensu

re

Page 214:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

job

secu

rity

(man

yco

unt

ries

ofco

ntin

enta

lE

uro

pe)

,th

eco

sts

of

sep

arat

ion

far

outs

trip

recr

uit

men

tco

sts.

Page 215:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

theore

tica

lse

tup:

ad

ynam

icla

bor

dem

and

mod

el

Pos

sib

lefo

rms

ofad

just

men

tco

sts.

Tw

ove

rsio

ns:

•D

eter

min

isti

cse

tup

.

•S

toch

asti

cse

tup

.

The

Cost

sof

Lab

or

Adju

stm

ents

Qu

adra

tic

Cos

ts

Page 216:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Let

us

con

sid

erth

efir

stsp

ecifi

cati

on

C(Lt,Lt−

1)=b 2

(Lt−Lt−

1−a

)2

wh

erea,b>

0.

Ad

vant

age:

this

fun

ctio

nin

trod

uce

san

asym

met

ryb

etw

een

the

cost

ofp

osit

ive

and

neg

ativ

eva

riat

ion

sin

emp

loym

ents

,si

ncea>

0.

Lim

it:

wh

enL

isco

nst

ant,

ther

eex

ists

stri

ctly

pos

itiv

eco

sts

ofad

-

just

ing

emp

loym

ent

(!!!)

,si

ncea>

0.

Page 217:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

To

elim

inat

eth

isp

rob

lem

,se

ta

=0

inth

ep

revi

ous

spec

ifica

tion

C(Lt,Lt−

1)=b 2

(Lt−Lt−

1−a

)2

wh

erea>

0.

Bu

tn

ow,

cost

sar

eco

nvex

and

sym

metr

ic.

Page 218:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Asy

mm

etri

cC

onve

xC

osts

:

C(Lt,Lt−

1)=−

1+

exp

(Lt−Lt−

1)−a

(Lt−Lt−

1)+b 2

(Lt−Lt−

1)2

Dep

end

ing

onth

eva

lue

ofa

,th

em

argi

nal

cost

ofan

incr

ease

in

emp

loym

ent

isgr

eate

r(o

rsm

alle

r)th

anth

atof

are

du

ctio

n.

Wh

ena

=0,

we

retr

ieve

the

quad

rati

cca

se.

Not

eth

atw

henL

isco

nst

ant,

the

cost

ofad

just

men

tis

zero

.

An

oth

erfo

rm:

C(Lt,Lt−

1)=b h 2

(Lt−Lt−

1)2

ifLt−Lt−

1≥

0

Page 219:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

and

C(Lt,Lt−

1)=b f 2

(Lt−Lt−

1)2

ifLt−Lt−

1≤

0

wh

ereb h,bf>

0

Page 220:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Lin

ear

Cos

ts:

C(Lt,Lt−

1)=b h

(Lt−Lt−

1)ifLt−Lt−

1≥

0

and

C(Lt,Lt−

1)=−b f

(Lt−Lt−

1)ifLt−Lt−

1≤

0

wh

ereb h,bf>

0

Th

ep

aram

eterb h

rep

rese

nts

the

un

itco

stof

ah

irin

gan

db f

isth

e

un

itco

stof

firin

g.

Th

ead

just

men

tof

emp

loym

ent

isas

ymm

etri

csi

nceb h6=b f

Page 221:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Fix

edC

osts

:

Fir

ms

face

ast

rict

lyp

osit

ive

cost

wh

en

Lt−Lt−

16=

0,

bu

tth

eyar

en

otsu

bje

ctto

any

cost

if

Lt−Lt−

1=

0

Page 222:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

Dete

rmin

isti

cSetu

p

Th

eva

lue

ofth

efir

mV t

isth

ed

isco

unt

edsu

mof

inst

anta

neo

us

pro

fits

V t=

∞ ∑ i=0

( 1

1+r

) i Πt+i

wh

erer>

0is

aco

nst

ant

real

inte

rest

rate

and

the

inst

anta

neo

us

pro

fitis

give

nby

Πt

=Yt−WtLt−C(Lt,Lt−

1)

wh

ereWt

isth

ere

alw

age

(th

ep

rice

ofYt

isu

sed

asa

nu

mer

aire

.

Rm

k:

As

bef

ore,

we

can

defi

ne

the

valu

eof

the

firm

ina

recu

rsiv

e

Page 223:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

way

.

V t=

Πt

+

( 1

1+r

) V t+1

Page 224:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

ead

just

men

tco

stfu

nct

ion

isgi

ven

by

C(Lt,Lt−

1)=b 2

(Lt−Lt−

1)2

wh

ereb≥

0is

the

adju

stm

ent

cost

par

amet

er.

Wt

isas

sum

edto

be

per

fect

lykn

own

(no

shoc

ks)

Page 225:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

ep

rod

uct

ion

fun

ctio

nis

give

nby

Yt

0Lt−α

1 2L

2 t

wh

ereα

0,α

1>

0.T

he

pro

du

ctio

nfu

nct

ion

sati

sfies

∂Y

∂Y

0−α

1Lt>

0

⇔Lt<

(α0/α

1)(w

eas

sum

eth

atth

isre

stri

ctio

nh

old

s)

∂2 Y

∂Y

2=−α

1<

0

Dec

reas

ing

retu

rnto

scal

e.

Ifα

1=

0,co

nst

ant

retu

rnto

scal

ean

dth

em

argi

nal

lab

orp

rod

uct

ivit

y

isin

dep

end

ent

from

the

leve

lof

outp

ut

(or

emp

loym

ent)

.

Page 226:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Inte

rtem

pora

ldeci

sions

Th

ed

ecis

ion

onLt

tod

ayaff

ect

pro

fits

tod

ay:

pro

du

ctio

n(F

(Lt)

),

lab

orco

st(W

t),

cost

ofad

just

men

t((b/

2)(Lt−Lt−

1)2 )

Th

ed

ecis

ion

onLt

tod

ayaff

ect

pro

fits

tom

orro

w:

cost

ofad

just

men

t

((b/

2)(Lt+

1−Lt)

2 )

So,

choi

ces

onLt

are

inte

rdep

end

ent.

Ifb

=0,

the

valu

eof

the

firm

isth

ed

isco

unt

edsu

mof

ind

epen

den

t

Page 227:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

pro

fitfu

nct

ion

s(a

sequ

ence

ofst

atic

con

dit

ion

s)

Lt

0−Wt

α1

Page 228:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Sta

tus

of

the

vari

able

s

•Wt

isan

exogenous

det

erm

inis

tic

vari

able

.

•Lt−

1is

ap

re-d

eter

min

edva

riab

le

•{W

t,Lt−

1}ar

eth

est

ate

vari

able

s(t

he

solu

tion

will

be

ali

nea

r

fun

ctio

nof

thes

estw

ova

riab

les)

•Lt

isa

the

choi

ceva

riab

le.

Page 229:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

FO

C(w

rtLt)

∂V t∂Lt

=0

∂Π

∂Lt

+

( 1

1+r

) ∂Πt+

1

∂Lt

=0

α0−α

1Lt−Wt−b(Lt−Lt−

1)+βb(Lt+

1−Lt)

=0

Page 230:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

wh

ereβ

=1/

(1+r)∈

(0,1

).

Page 231:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Rm

kIfα

1=

0(c

onst

ant

retu

rnto

scal

e,se

eth

eex

erci

sein

tuto

rial

clas

s),

the

FO

Cre

du

ces

to

α0−Wt−bN

Ht

+βbN

Ht+

1=

0

wh

ereNHt

=∆Lt

are

the

net

hir

ings

.∆Lt>

0(¡

0)→

NHt>

0

(¡0)

.

We

stu

dy

the

caseα

1>

0

Page 232:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

LetL

the

stea

dy

stat

eva

lue

ofLt

andLt

=Lt−L

.

Th

est

ead

y–st

ate

ofL

solv

es:

α0−α

1L−W−b(L−L

)+βb(L−L

)=

0

wh

ich

red

uce

sto

α0−α

1L−W

=0

So,

Page 233:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

L=

(α0−W

)/α

1

the

“lon

g–ru

n”

lab

ord

eman

d.

We

hav

e

∂L

∂W

=−

1 α1<

0

Ap

erm

anen

tin

crea

sein

the

real

wag

e(t

he

real

cost

ofla

bor

)re

du

ce

lon

g-ru

nem

plo

ymen

t.

Page 234:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Wit

hou

rd

efin

itio

nofLt,

the

FO

Cre

wri

tes

−α

1Lt−Wt−b(Lt−Lt−

1)+βb(Lt+

1−Lt)

=0

or

βbL

t+1−

(α1

+b

+βb)Lt

+bL

t−1

=Wt

Lt+

1−

(α1

+b

+βb)

βb

Lt

+1 βLt−

1=

1 βbW

t

Page 235:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

ese

con

dor

der

diff

eren

ceeq

uat

ion

adm

its

the

follo

win

gm

ult

ivar

i-

ate

auto

regr

essi

vere

pre

sent

atio

n[ L

t+1

Lt

] =

[ (α1+b+βb)

βb

−1 β

10

][Lt

Lt−

1

] +

[ 1 βb

0

00

] [ Wt

0

]N

ow,

con

cent

rate

only

onth

ed

ynam

icp

rop

erti

esofLt

and

ign

ore

Wt

(or

setWt

=0,

i.e.Wt

isal

way

sat

its

stea

dy–

stat

eva

lue)

Page 236:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

[ Lt+

1

Lt

] =A

[ Lt

Lt−

1

]w

her

e

A=

[ (α1+b+βb)

βb

−1 β

10

]T

ost

ud

yth

ed

ynam

icp

rop

erti

esof

the

mod

el,

we

mu

stch

arac

teri

ze

the

eige

nval

ues

ofA

.

Th

ese

are

obta

ined

from

det

(A−λI 2

)=

0

Page 237:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Inou

rn

otat

ion

s∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣(α

1+b+βb)

βb

−λ−

1 β1

−λ

∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣=0

Th

isgi

ves

λ2−λT

+D

=0

wh

ereT

=trace

(A)

andD

=det

(A).

Giv

enA

,w

eob

tain

T=

(α1

+b

+βb)

βb

and

D=

1 β

Page 238:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

We

can

now

defi

ne

the

char

acte

rist

iceq

uat

ion

P(λ

)=λ

2−λT

+D≡

(λ−λ

1)(λ−λ

2)

Letλ

=0.

We

hav

e

P(0

)=D≡

1 β>

1

We

also

know

that

P(0

)=λ

1λ2

At

leas

ton

ero

ot(s

ayλ

2)is

grea

ter

than

one.

Let

us

defi

neP

(1).

We

obta

in

Page 239:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

P(1

)=

1−T

+D≡

1−

(α1

+b

+βb)

βb

+1 β

Page 240:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Itfo

llow

sth

at

P(1

)=−α

1

βb<

0

We

know

that

P(1

)=

(1−λ

1)(1−λ

2)

AsP

(1)<

0,w

ed

edu

ceλ

1<

1an

2>

1.

Page 241:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Pro

pert

yT

he

lab

ord

eman

dm

odel

wit

had

just

men

tco

sts

dis

pla

ys

asa

dd

lep

ath

pro

per

ty,

i.e.

itex

ists

au

niq

ue

pat

hto

war

dth

est

ead

y–

stat

e.

Com

puta

tion

of

the

solu

tion

We

know

thatλ

1<

1an

2>

1

and

her

ew

eas

sum

eWt

=0.

Now

,co

nsi

der

the

bac

ksh

ift

oper

atorB

,su

chth

at

BLt

=Lt−

1

Page 242:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

eF

OC

wri

tes Lt+

1−

(α1

+b

+βb)

βb

Lt

+1 βLt−

1=

0

oreq

uiv

alen

tly Lt+

1

( 1−

(α1

+b

+βb)

βb

B+

1 βB

2) =0

Page 243:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Usi

ng

the

char

acte

rist

icp

olyn

omia

l,w

eob

tain

Lt+

1(1−λ

1B)(

1−λ

2B)

=0

We

ded

uce

( ˜ Lt+

1(1−λ

2B)) =

0

wh

ere

˜ Lt+

1=

(1−λ

1B)Lt+

1=Lt+

1−λ

1Lt

Page 244:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

eab

ove

equ

atio

nre

wri

tes

˜ Lt+

1−λ

2˜ Lt

=0

˜ Lt+

1=λ

2˜ Lt

˜ Lt

=1 λ2Et˜ Lt+

1

Sin

ceλ

2>

1,w

eh

ave

1/λ

2<

1.S

oth

em

odel

mu

stb

eso

lved

forw

ard

,i.e

.by

succ

essi

veit

erat

ion

son

the

futu

re.

Page 245:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Aft

erim

pos

ing

the

“tra

nsv

ersa

lity”

con

dit

ion

limT→∞

( 1 λ2

) T ˜ Lt+T

=0

we

ded

uce

˜ Lt

=0

Now

,u

sin

gth

ed

efin

itio

nofLt,

we

get

Lt

1Lt−

1

Now

usi

ng

the

defi

nit

ion

ofLt,

we

ded

uce

Lt

=(1−λ

1)L

1Lt−

1

Page 246:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

or

Lt

=(1−λ

1)(α

0−W

)

α1

1Lt−

1

Page 247:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

So,

the

lab

ord

eman

dca

nd

epar

tfr

omit

slo

ng–

run

(”fr

icti

onle

ss”)

valu

e,d

ue

toth

eco

sts

ofad

just

ing

emp

loym

ent

bet

wee

ntw

op

erio

ds.

Th

esp

eed

ofad

just

men

tto

war

dL

will

dep

end

onth

ead

just

men

t

cost

sp

aram

eter

.

Forb

smal

l,th

eco

stis

smal

lto

o,an

dth

ed

iscr

epan

cyb

etw

eenL

and

Lis

not

per

sist

ent.

Con

vers

ely,

wh

enb

isla

rge,

the

adju

stm

ent

pro

cess

tow

ard

the

lon

g

run

valu

eof

emp

loym

ent

can

be

very

per

sist

ent.

Page 248:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

Eff

ect

of

on

incr

ease

inW

Let

us

sup

pos

etw

ore

alw

agesW

1an

dW

2,

W1<W

2

Itfo

llow

sth

at

L1>L

2

Now

,w

ew

ant

toev

alu

ate

the

tran

siti

onp

ath

forLt

from

L1

toL

2.

We

star

tw

ithLt

=L

1.N

owu

sin

gth

eso

luti

onfo

rLt

wit

hth

en

ew

real

wag

e,w

ed

edu

ce

Lt+

1=

(1−λ

1)L

2+λ

1Lt≡

(1−λ

1)L

2+λ

1L1

Page 249:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

On

ep

erio

daf

ter

Lt+

2=

(1−λ

1)L

2+λ

1Lt+

1≡

(1−λ

1)L

2+λ

1((1−λ

1)L

2+λ

1L1)

At

the

limit

(wh

enh→∞

),w

eob

tain

limh→∞Lt+h

=limh→∞λh 1L

1+

(1−λ

1)L

2limh→∞

h ∑ i=0

λh 1

Sin

ceλ

1<

1,w

eh

ave

limh→∞λh 1L

1=

0

and

limh→∞

h ∑ i=0

λh 1

=1

1−λ

1

Page 250:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

We

ded

uce

limh→∞Lt+h

=L

2

Th

ela

bor

mon

oton

ical

lyco

nver

geto

war

dit

sn

ewst

ead

y–st

ate.

[IN

SE

RT

AF

IGU

RE

]

Page 251:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

Sto

chast

icSetu

p

Th

eva

lue

ofth

efir

mV t

isth

eex

pec

ted

dis

cou

nted

sum

ofp

rofit

.

V t=Et

∞ ∑ i=1

( 1

1+r

) i Πt+i

wh

ereEt

isth

eco

nd

itio

nal

exp

ecta

tion

sop

erat

or.

r>

0(t

he

con

stan

tre

alin

tere

stra

te)

and

the

inst

anta

neo

us

pro

fitis

give

nby

Πt

=Yt−WtLt−b 2

(Lt−Lt−

1)2

wh

ereWt

isth

ere

alw

age

(th

ep

rice

ofYt

isu

sed

asa

nu

mer

aire

and

b≥

0is

the

adju

stm

ent

cost

par

amet

er.

Page 252:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

ep

rod

uct

ion

fun

ctio

nis

give

nby

Yt

0Lt−α

1 2L

2 t

wh

ereα

0,α

1>

0.

Rm

k1

Pro

per

ties

ofth

ep

rod

uct

ion

fun

ctio

n

∂Y

∂Y

0−α

1Lt>

0

⇔Lt<

(α0/α

1)(w

eas

sum

eth

atth

isre

stri

ctio

nh

old

sfo

ral

lth

e

stat

esof

the

nat

ure

)

∂2 Y

∂Y

2=−α

1<

0

Dec

reas

ing

retu

rnto

scal

e.Ifα

1=

0,co

nst

ant

retu

rnto

scal

ean

dth

e

Page 253:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

mar

gin

alla

bor

pro

du

ctiv

ity

isin

dep

end

ent

from

the

leve

lof

outp

ut

(or

emp

loym

ent)

.

Page 254:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Rm

k2

Sh

ocks

Her

e,w

eas

sum

eth

aton

lyre

alw

age

isa

ran

dom

vari

able

.W

ith

-

out

diffi

cult

yw

eca

nal

soin

clu

de

aT

FP

shoc

kin

toth

ep

rod

uct

ion

fun

ctio

n

Yt

0,tLt−α

1 2L

2 t

wh

ereα

0,t

isn

owa

ran

dom

vari

able

We

spec

ify

ast

och

asti

cp

roce

ssfo

rWt.

We

assu

me

thatWt

can

be

dec

omp

osed

into

two

elem

ents

:on

eis

det

erm

inis

tic,

one

isst

och

asti

c

Wt

=W

+Wt

Wd

eter

min

isti

c,Wt

stoc

has

tic.

Page 255:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

est

och

asti

cco

mp

onen

tWt

follo

ws

anA

uto

regr

essi

vep

roce

ssof

ord

eron

e(A

R(1

)):

Wt

=ρwWt−

1+σε,wε w

,t

wh

ereρw∈

[0,1

],σε,w>

0an

dε w

,tis

iidw

ith

zero

mea

nan

du

nit

vari

ance

.

Inad

dit

ion

,it

veri

fies:

Etεw,t

+1

=0

Page 256:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Rm

k3

Aga

in,

we

assu

me

her

era

tion

alex

pec

tati

ons

Rm

k4

Inte

rtem

por

ald

ecis

ion

s

Th

ed

ecis

ion

onLt

tod

ayaff

ect

pro

fits

tod

ay:

pro

du

ctio

n(F

(L))

,

lab

orco

st(W

),co

stof

adju

stm

ent

((b/

2)(Lt−Lt−

1)2 )

Th

ed

ecis

ion

onLt

tod

ayaff

ect

pro

fits

tom

orro

w:

cost

ofad

just

men

t

((b/

2)(Lt+

1−Lt)

2 )

So,

choi

ces

onLt

are

inte

rdep

end

ent.

Bu

t,b

ecau

seWt

isst

och

asti

c,th

iscr

eate

sa

dec

isio

nab

out

anex

-

Page 257:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

pec

ted

vari

ableEtLt+

1

Ifb

=0,

the

valu

eof

the

firm

isth

ed

isco

unt

edsu

mof

ind

epen

den

t

pro

fitfu

nct

ion

s(a

sequ

ence

ofst

atic

con

dit

ion

s)

Page 258:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Rm

k5

Sta

tus

ofth

eva

riab

les

•Wt

isan

exogenous

stoc

has

tic

vari

able

.

•Lt−

1is

ap

re-d

eter

min

edva

riab

le

•{W

t,Lt−

1}ar

eth

est

ate

vari

able

s(t

he

solu

tion

will

be

ali

nea

r

fun

ctio

nof

thes

estw

ova

riab

les)

•Lt

isa

the

choi

ceva

riab

le.

Page 259:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

FO

C(w

rtLt)

∂V t∂Lt

=0

∂Π

∂Lt

+

( 1

1+r

) Et∂

Πt+

1

∂Lt

=0

α0−α

1Lt−Wt−b(Lt−Lt−

1)+βbE

t(Lt+

1−Lt)

=0

wh

ereβ

=1/

(1+r)in

(0,1

)

Page 260:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Rm

kIfα

1=

0(c

rs),

the

FO

Cre

du

ces

to

α0−Wt−bN

Ht

+βbE

tNHt+

1=

0

wh

ereNHt

=∆Lt

are

the

net

hir

ings

.∆Lt>

0(¡

0)→

NHt>

0

(¡0)

.S

eeth

eH

omew

ork.

Her

e,w

eso

lve

the

mod

elin

the

mor

ege

ner

alca

sew

her

1>

0

Page 261:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Sec

ond

ord

erd

iffer

ence

equ

atio

nw

ith

stoc

has

tic

real

wag

e

βbE

tLt+

1−

(βb

+b

1)Lt

+bL

t−1

=(W

t−α

0)

Div

ide

byβb

EtLt+

1−

(βb

+b

1)

βb

Lt

+1 βLt−

1=

(Wt−α

0)

βb

As

inth

ep

revi

ous

sect

ion

,d

efin

ela

bor

and

real

wag

eat

det

erm

inis

tic

stea

dy

stat

e(W

t=W

).

Fro

mth

eab

ove

equ

atio

n,

we

imm

edia

tely

obta

in

L=α

0−W

α1

Page 262:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

enea

chva

riab

lein

the

FO

Cca

nb

eex

pre

ssed

ind

evia

tion

from

thei

rst

ead

y–st

ate

valu

es:

EtLt+

1−

(βb

+b

1)

βb

Lt

+1 βLt−

1=

1 βbW

t

Not

ice

that

Wt

=Wt−W≡Wt

Now

,co

nsi

der

agai

nth

eb

acks

hif

top

erat

orB

,su

chth

at

BLt

=Lt−

1

Page 263:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

isal

low

sto

rew

rite

Et

( Lt+

1

( 1−

(βb

+b

1)

βb

B+

1 βB

2))=

1 βbW

t

Th

ed

ynam

ics

ofla

bor

adju

stm

ent

isex

actl

yth

esa

me

asin

the

de-

term

inis

tic

case

.

Page 264:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

So,

we

hav

eon

ero

otla

rger

than

un

ity

(sayλ

2>

1)an

dth

ese

con

d

bet

wee

n0

and

1(s

ayλ

1∈

[0,1

)).

Up

toth

esh

ockWt

and

con

dit

ion

alex

pec

tati

ons,

the

mod

elis

very

sim

ilar

toth

eon

eob

tain

edin

the

det

erm

inis

tic

case

.

Now

rew

rite

the

exp

ecta

tion

s

Et

( ˜ Lt+

1(1−λ

2B)) =

1 βbW

t

wh

ere

Page 265:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

˜ Lt+

1=

(1−λ

1B)Lt+

1=Lt+

1−λ

1Lt

Th

eab

ove

equ

atio

nre

wri

tes

Et

( ˜ Lt+

1−λ

2˜ Lt) =

1 βbW

t

Et˜ Lt+

1=λ

2˜ Lt

+1 βbW

t

Page 266:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

˜ Lt

=1 λ2Et˜ Lt+

1−

1 βb

1 λ2Wt

Sin

ceλ

2>

1,w

eh

ave

1/λ

2<

1.S

oth

em

odel

mu

stb

eso

lved

forw

ard

,i.e

.by

succ

essi

veit

erat

ion

son

the

futu

re.

Page 267:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Wri

teth

iseq

uat

ion

int+

1(t

ake

care

,d

on’t

forg

etto

adju

stth

eti

me

ind

exon

the

avai

lab

lein

form

atio

nse

t!)

˜ Lt+

1=

1 λ2Et+

1˜ Lt+

2−

1 βb

1 λ2Wt+

1

and

then

sub

stit

ute

this

equ

atio

nin

toth

ep

revi

ous

one

˜ Lt

=

( 1 λ2

) 2 EtEt+

1˜ Lt+

2−

1 βb

1 λ2Wt−

1 βb

( 1 λ2

) 2 EtW

t+1

and

cont

inu

e....

.(r

emar

kth

atEtEt+

1=Et

orEtEt+

1Et+q

=Et)

Page 268:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

At

the

limit

we

obta

in

˜ Lt

=limT→∞

( 1 λ2

) T Et˜ Lt+T−

1 βb

limT→∞Et

1 λ2

T ∑ i=0

( 1 λ2

) i Wt+i

Page 269:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

or

˜ Lt

=−

1 βbE

t1 λ2

∞ ∑ i=0

( 1 λ2

) i Wt+i

asw

eim

pos

eth

e”t

ran

sver

salit

y”co

nd

itio

n

limT→∞

( 1 λ2

) T Et˜ Lt+T

=0

To

solv

eth

iseq

uat

ion

,w

em

ust

com

pu

teth

esu

cces

sive

exp

ecta

tion

s

EtW

t,EtW

t+1,EtW

t+2,EtW

t+3,....

Page 270:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Now

,w

eu

seth

est

och

asti

cp

roce

ssfo

rWt

EtW

t=Wt

EtW

t+1

=ρwWt

EtW

t+2

2 wWt

EtW

t+3

3 wWt

and

cont

inu

e...

Page 271:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Aft

er,

dis

cou

ntea

chex

pec

tati

on

i=

0:

1×EtW

t=Wt

i=

1:

( 1 λ2

) ×EtW

t+1

=

( ρ w λ2

) Wt

i=

2:

( 1 λ2

) 2 ×EtW

t+2

=

( ρ w λ2

) 2 Wt

....

i=q

:

( 1 λ2

) q ×EtW

t+q

=

( ρ w λ2

) q Wt

Th

enco

llect

thes

eco

mp

uta

tion

s

Page 272:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

˜ Lt

=−

1 βb

1 λ2Wt

∞ ∑ i=0

( ρ w λ2

) i

Page 273:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Sin

ce

( ρ w λ2

) <1

Th

ese

ries

isco

nver

gent

and

its

sum

isgi

ven

by

∞ ∑ i=0

( ρ w λ2

) i =1

1−ρw λ2

≡λ

2

λ2−ρw>

0

Now

,re

pla

ceth

emin

˜ Lt

˜ Lt

=−

1 βb

1 λ2

λ2

λ2−ρwWt

Page 274:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

issi

mp

lifies

˜ Lt

=−

1 βb

Wt

λ2−ρw

Page 275:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Now

usi

ng

the

defi

nit

ion

of˜ Lt,

we

ded

uce

Lt

1Lt−

1−

1 βb

Wt

λ2−ρw

and

the

defi

nit

ion

ofLt

andWt

Lt

=(1−λ

1)L

1Lt−

1−

1 βb

Wt−W

λ2−ρw

wh

ere

Wt−W

=Wt

Wt

=ρwWt−

1+σε,wε w

,t

wh

ereρw∈

[0,1

],σε,w>

0an

dε w

,tis

iidw

ith

zero

mea

nan

du

nit

vari

ance

.

Page 276:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Inad

dit

ion

,L

isth

elo

ng–

run

(”fr

icti

onle

ss”)

lab

ord

eman

d:

L=α

0−W

α1

Sim

ilar

toth

ed

eter

min

isti

cca

se,

bu

tn

owit

incl

ud

esa

ran

dom

vari

-

able

,Wt

that

rep

rese

nts

the

exce

ssre

alw

age

(wit

hre

spec

tto

the

lon

g–ru

nre

alw

age)

.

Wh

enit

take

sla

rge

and

per

sist

ent

valu

es,

the

lab

ord

eman

dw

ill

dec

reas

ep

ersi

sten

tly.

Page 277:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Anoth

er

Imp

ort

ant

Asp

ect

Th

eL

UC

AS

CR

ITIQ

UE

(AG

AIN

!!)

Th

ela

bor

dem

and

equ

atio

n

Lt

=(1−λ

1)L

1Lt−

1−

1 βb

Wt−W

λ2−ρw

isn

otin

vari

ant

toth

efo

rmof

the

stoc

has

tic

pro

cessWt,

i.e.

itis

very

sen

siti

vetoρw

.

Ifch

ange

sin

the

real

wag

esar

etr

ansi

toryρw

=0,

the

red

uce

dfo

rm

for

lab

ord

eman

dis

Lt

=(1−λ

1)L

1Lt−

1−

1 βb

Wt−W

λ2

Wh

enth

ese

chan

ges

are

very

per

sist

ent

(ρw'

1),

the

lab

ord

eman

d

Page 278:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

rew

rite

s

Lt

=(1−λ

1)L

1Lt−

1−

1 βb

Wt−W

λ2−

1

Itis

easy

tove

rify

1 λ2<

1

λ2−

1

So,

lab

ord

eman

dis

less

sen

siti

veto

real

wag

e,w

hen

thei

rch

ange

s

are

per

ceiv

edas

tran

sito

ry(c

omp

ared

tove

ryp

ersi

sten

t).

Page 279:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Com

puta

tion

of

Dynam

icR

esp

onse

s:

Th

eIR

Fs

(Im

pu

lse

Res

pon

seF

un

ctio

n)

are

give

nby

∂Lt+h

∂ε w

,t

forh≥

0is

the

hor

izon

ofth

ere

spon

se.

Let

us

con

sid

er

Lt

=(1−λ

1)L

1Lt−

1+µWt

wh

ereµ

isgi

ven

by

µ=−

1 βb

1

λ2−ρw

Page 280:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

We

nor

mal

izeσε,w

toon

e.

h=

0

∂Lt

∂ε w

,t=µ∂Wt

∂ε w

,t=µ

h=

1

∂Lt+

1

∂ε w

,t=∂Lt+

1

∂Lt

∂Lt

∂ε w

,t+µ∂Wt+

1

∂Wt

∂Wt

∂ε w

,t

∂Lt+

1

∂ε w

,t=λ

1µ+ρwµ

(λ1

+ρw

)

Page 281:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Rm

k:

the

resp

onse

wh

enh

=1

can

be

grea

ter

than

onim

pac

t

(h=

0)w

hen

λ1

+ρw>

1

For

anyh

,th

ech

ain

rule

diff

eren

ciat

ion

∂Lt+h

∂ε w

,t=

∂Lt+h

∂Lt+h−

1···∂Lt

∂ε w

,t+µ∂Wt+h

∂Wt+h−

1···∂Wt

∂ε w

,t

[IN

SE

RT

AF

IGU

RE

WIT

HA

HU

MP

–SH

AP

ED

RE

-

SP

ON

SE

]

Page 282:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Em

pir

ical

Evid

en

ces

Sum

mary

of

the

resu

lts

For

conv

enie

nce

,m

ost

ofem

pir

ical

wor

ksu

ses

aqu

adra

tic

spec

ifica

-

tion

for

adju

stm

ent

cost

s.

Ass

um

ing

thatL

andW

are

obse

rvab

le,

the

par

amet

ers

ofth

em

odel

are

obta

ined

from

the

equ

atio

n

Lt

=(1−λ

1)L

1Lt−

1−Wt−

1 βbW

λ2−ρw

wh

ereλ

1an

2ar

efu

nct

ion

sof

the

”dee

p”

par

amet

ersβ

,b

andα

1

andL

isa

fun

ctio

nofL

0an

1.

Page 283:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

At

the

sam

eti

me,

the

pro

cess

ofWt

isgi

ven

by

Wt−W

=Wt

Wt

=ρwWt−

1+σε,wε w

,t

Th

eec

onom

etri

cian

mu

stac

cou

ntfo

rth

ecr

oss

equ

atio

nre

stri

ctio

ns

bet

wee

nth

eeq

uat

ion

ofL

and

the

equ

atio

nofW

(see

the

par

amet

er

ρw

).

Th

iseq

uat

ion

ofL

isob

tain

edaf

ter

solv

ing

the

mod

el(c

omp

uta

tion

ofth

ere

du

ced

form

).

To

obta

inth

isre

du

ced

form

,it

isn

eces

sary

tosp

ecif

yth

ep

roce

ssof

W.

Page 284:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

An

oth

erap

pro

ach

,u

sin

gth

eF

OC

ofth

efir

m

Et( βbL

t+1−

(βb

+b

1)Lt

+bL

t−1−

(Wt−α

0))

=0

LetZt

ase

tof

inst

rum

enta

lva

riab

les

Zt

={L

t,Lt−

1,...,Lt−q,Wt,Wt−

1,...,Wt−q,Cste}

asu

bse

tof

the

info

rmat

ion

set

use

dby

the

firm

.T

he

FO

Cca

nb

e

rew

ritt

en

E[(βbL

t+1−

(βb

+b

1)Lt

+bL

t−1−

(Wt−α

0))|Zt]

=0

Th

issu

gges

tsth

atth

em

odel

’sp

aram

eter

sca

nb

ees

tim

ated

usi

ng

an

IVes

tim

ator

(GM

M,

Han

sen

(198

2)).

Page 285:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

isap

pro

ach

can

be

gen

eral

ized

tom

ore

com

ple

xad

just

men

tco

sts

fun

ctio

ns.

Page 286:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

•T

he

quad

rati

cad

just

edco

sts

fun

ctio

nis

less

and

less

sup

por

ted

by

the

dat

a(s

ymm

etry

and

conv

exit

y).

•D

ata

favo

ras

ymm

etri

c,p

iece

wis

elin

ear

and

fixed

cost

sap

pro

ach

es.

•T

he

spee

dof

adju

stm

ent

ofla

bor

dem

and

isre

lati

vely

hig

hin

US

.

•T

he

resu

ltis

not

affec

ted

ifw

eco

nsi

der

mu

ltip

lein

pu

ts.

•F

irm

sad

just

hou

rsof

wor

km

ore

rap

idly

than

the

num

ber

ofw

ork-

ers

(ad

just

men

tco

sts

are

hig

her

for

wor

kers

than

for

hou

rs)

•E

mp

loym

ent

mor

era

pid

lyin

US

than

anyw

her

eel

se.

Page 287:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

•M

ore

rap

idad

just

men

tin

Eu

rop

eth

anin

Jap

an.

Page 288:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Adiffi

cult

yId

enti

ficat

ion

ofad

just

men

tco

sts

par

amet

er.

Rem

ind

that

the

solu

tion

take

sth

efo

rm

Lt

1Lt−

1+µWt

wh

ereµ

=−

1 βb

2−ρw

.

For

sim

plic

ity,

nor

mal

ize

the

par

amet

erµ

=1.

Th

isyi

eld

s Lt

=(λ

1+ρw

)Lt−

1−

(λ1ρw

)Lt−

2+σε,wε w

,t

Su

pp

ose

that

the

econ

omet

rici

and

oes

not

obse

rve

the

real

wag

eWt

Page 289:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

bu

ton

lyth

ela

bor

inp

ut.

Th

e(u

nco

nst

rain

ed)

red

uce

dfo

rmis

give

nby

Lt

1Lt−

1+β

2Lt−

2+ut

Letβ

1an

2th

ees

tim

ated

valu

esofβ

1an

2.

Fro

m

β1

1+ρw

β2

=−λ

1ρw

we

ded

uce

λ1

1±√ β

2 1+

4β2

2ρw

1−λ

1

Page 290:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Tw

oop

pos

ite

con

clu

sion

s:

•λ

1la

rge

andρw

smal

l:la

rge

adju

stm

ent

cost

san

dsm

allp

ersi

sten

ce

ofsh

ocks

.

•λ

1sm

alla

ndρw

larg

e:sm

alla

dju

stm

ent

cost

san

dla

rge

per

sist

ence

ofsh

ocks

.

Page 291:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Su

mm

ary

an

dC

on

clu

sion

•T

her

eex

ists

sub

stan

tial

cost

sof

adju

stin

gem

plo

ymen

t(h

irin

gve

r-

sus

firin

gco

sts,

US

vers

us

cont

inen

tal

Eu

rop

e)

•W

hen

adju

stm

ent

cost

sar

equ

adra

tic,

the

firm

grad

ual

lyad

just

s

the

lab

orin

pu

t.

•In

the

stoc

has

tic

case

,th

ere

du

ced

form

onem

plo

ymen

tis

not

inva

rian

tto

the

spec

ifica

tion

ofth

eex

ogen

ous

real

wag

es.

Page 292:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Chap

3:

Busi

ness

Cycl

eM

odels

3.1

:T

wo

Sim

ple

DS

GE

Mod

els

I-

Hab

itForm

ati

on

ina

Sim

ple

Equ

ilib

riu

mM

od

el

•T

he

mod

el

•S

olu

tion

•Q

uan

tita

tive

imp

licat

ion

s

•T

akin

gth

em

odel

toth

ed

ata

II-

AS

toch

ast

icG

row

thM

od

el

•T

he

mod

el

•S

olu

tion

•Q

uan

tita

tive

imp

licat

ion

s

•T

akin

gth

em

odel

toth

ed

ata

3.2

:R

BC

Mod

els

Page 293:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

I-

AR

BC

Mod

el

wit

hC

om

ple

teD

ep

reci

ati

on

•T

he

mod

el

•S

olu

tion

•Q

uan

tita

tive

imp

licat

ion

s

•T

akin

gth

em

odel

toth

ed

ata

II-

Ap

roto

typ

ical

RB

CM

od

el

(Op

tion

al)

•T

he

mod

el

•S

olu

tion

•Q

uan

tita

tive

imp

licat

ion

s

•T

akin

gth

em

odel

toth

ed

ata

3.3

:B

eyon

dth

eR

BC

Mod

el

(Op

tion

al)

Page 294:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

3.1

:T

wo

Sim

ple

DSG

EM

odels

I-

Habit

Form

ati

on

ina

Sim

ple

Equilib

rium

Model

Hab

itP

ersi

sten

cein

con

sum

pti

on

An

oth

erfo

rmof

hab

itp

ersi

sten

ce:

leis

ure

(Eic

hen

bau

m,

Han

se,

Sin

-

glet

on(1

988)

,W

enn

(199

8),

...)

Tw

om

odel

s:

A)

Hab

itp

ersi

sten

cein

the

per

man

ent

inco

me

mod

el:

Hom

ewor

k

B)

Hab

itp

ersi

sten

cein

asi

mp

leD

SG

Em

odel

Page 295:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

B)

Hab

itp

ersi

sten

cein

asi

mp

leD

SG

Em

odel

Asi

mp

leD

SG

Em

odel

wit

hou

tca

pit

alac

cum

ula

tion

Equ

ilib

riu

mon

the

good

mar

ket Yt

=Ct

Pro

du

ctio

nec

onom

y.

Tec

hn

olog

yu

sed

byfir

ms

(CR

Sw

ith

lab

oras

the

sole

vari

able

inp

ut)

Yt

=Ztht

wh

ereZt

isa

tech

nol

ogy

(TF

P)

per

turb

atio

n(t

he

only

one

we

con

-

Page 296:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

sid

erin

this

sim

ple

econ

omy)

Op

tim

alit

yco

nd

itio

nfo

rth

ere

pre

sent

ativ

eco

mp

etit

ive

firm

:

Zt

=wt

wh

erewt

isth

ere

alw

age.

Hou

seh

old

pro

ble

m

Et

∞ ∑ i=0

log(Ct−bC

t−1)−ht

Page 297:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Com

ments

:

-lo

gu

tilit

yin

con

sum

pti

on

-h

abit

per

sist

ence

inco

nsu

mp

tion

(b≥

0)

-lin

ear

uti

lity

inle

isu

re(o

rla

bor

sup

ply

)

Meanin

gof

habit

pers

iste

nce

Mar

gin

alu

tilit

yin

per

iodt

∂U

∂Ct

=1

Ct−bC

t−1

Th

em

argi

nal

uti

lity

isd

ecre

asin

ginCt

bu

tin

crea

sin

ginCt−

1p

ro-

vid

edb>

0.T

his

crea

tes

inte

rtem

por

alco

mp

lem

enta

rity

inco

n-

Page 298:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

sum

pti

ond

ecis

ion

.

Inot

her

wor

ds,

ifth

eco

nsu

mer

wan

tsto

mai

ntai

nit

su

tilit

y,fo

ra

give

nva

lue

ofit

sp

ast

con

sum

pti

on,

he

mu

stch

oose

ah

igh

valu

eof

con

sum

pti

onto

day

.

So

hig

her

con

sum

pti

onye

ster

day

tran

slat

esin

toev

enm

ore

hig

her

con

sum

pti

onto

day

.

Page 299:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Bu

dge

tco

nst

rain

t

Ct

=wtht

+Πt

wh

ere

Πt

are

the

pro

fits

rece

ived

from

the

firm

s(r

mk:

ateq

uili

bri

um

thes

ep

rofit

sar

eze

ro)

Tw

oco

ntro

ls:C

andh

Now

,re

pla

ceth

eb

ud

get

con

stra

int

into

the

obje

ctiv

eVh

isth

eon

ly

one

cont

rol

Etlo

g(wtht−bw

t−1ht−

1)−ht+β

(log

(wt+

1ht+

1−bw

tht)−ht+

1)+....

Page 300:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

FO

C

wt

Ct−bC

t−1−βbE

twt

Ct+

1−bC

t=

1

wt

(1

Ct−bC

t−1−βbE

t1

Ct+

1−bC

t) =1

1

Ct−bC

t−1−βbE

t1

Ct+

1−bC

t=

1 Zt

Non

–lin

ear

forw

ard

look

ing

equ

atio

nw

ith

rati

onal

exp

ecta

tion

s.

Diffi

cult

(not

imp

ossi

ble

,in

this

sim

ple

setu

p)

toco

mp

ute

the

solu

-

tion

.

Page 301:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

An

sim

ple

appro

xim

ati

on:

Log

–lin

ear

app

roxi

mat

ion

(ext

ensi

vely

use

dfo

rm

ore

com

ple

xm

odel

s

inth

eD

SG

Elit

erat

ure

)

Let

the

follo

win

gfu

nct

ion y

=f

(x1,x

2,...,xn

)

Lin

ear

app

roxi

mat

ion

:

y=f

(x1,x

2,...,xn

)+

n ∑ i=1

∂y

∂xi∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ x=x

(xi−xi)

Page 302:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

wh

ere

y=f

(x1,x

2,...,xn

)

Th

isre

wri

tes

y−y

=

n ∑ i=1

∂y

∂xi∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ x=x

(xi−xi)

Now

div

ide

bot

hsi

de

byy

:

y−y

y=

n ∑ i=1

∂y

∂xi∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ x=x

1 y(xi−xi)

oreq

uiv

alen

tly

y−y

y=

n ∑ i=1

∂y

∂xi∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ x=x

xi y

xi−xi

xi

Page 303:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

elo

g–lin

ear

app

roxi

mat

ion

ofy

isth

engi

ven

by

y=

n ∑ i=1

∂y

∂xi∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ x=x

xi yxi

wh

ere

y=

(y−y

)/y'

log(y

)−

log(y

)

and

xi

=(xi−xi)/xi'

log(xi)−

log(xi)

Page 304:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Exa

mp

les:

1)P

rod

uct

ion

fun

ctio

n

y t=z thα t

Yis

the

outp

ut,Zt

the

TF

Pan

dht

the

lab

orin

pu

t.

Th

elo

g–lin

ear

app

roxi

mat

ion

y t=hα

(z/y

)zt

+zαhα−

1 (h/y

)ht

Fro

my

=zh

α,

this

red

uce

sto

:

y t=z t

+αht

Page 305:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

2)E

quili

bri

um

con

dit

ion

Clo

sed

econ

omy

y t=c t

+i t

+g t

Th

elo

g–lin

ear

app

roxi

mat

ion

y t=c yc t

+i yi t

+g yg t

c/y

,i/y

andg/y

rep

rese

ntth

eav

erag

esh

ares

(c/y

+i/y

+g/y

=1

byco

nst

ruct

ion

)or

stea

dy–

stat

eva

lues

inth

em

odel

’sla

ngu

age.

Page 306:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

3)E

ule

req

uat

ion

onco

nsu

mp

tion

log

uti

lity

and

stoc

has

tic

retu

rns

(see

asse

tp

rici

ng

mod

els)

1 Ct

=βEtRt+

11

Ct+

1

wh

ereR

isth

egr

oss

retu

rnon

asse

tsb

etw

een

per

iod

st

andt

+1.

Ste

ady

stat

e

βR

=1

Log

–lin

eari

zati

on:

−Ct

=EtRt+

1−EtCt+

1

Page 307:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

or

Ct

=−EtRt+

1+EtCt+

1

Page 308:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Applica

tion

toth

em

odel

wit

hhabit

:

1

Ct−bC

t−1−βbE

t1

Ct+

1−bC

t=

1 Zt

Det

erm

inis

tic

stea

dy–

stat

e

1−βb

C(1−b)

=1 Z

Var

iab

led

efin

itio

n

Page 309:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Xt

=1

Ct−bC

t−1

wit

hst

ead

yst

ate

X=

1

C(1−b)

Th

em

odel

bec

omes

Xt

=βbE

tXt+

1+

1 Zt

Page 310:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Log

–lin

eari

zati

on

Xt

=βbE

tXt+

1−

(1−βb)Zt

Page 311:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

For

war

dsu

bst

itu

tion

s

Xt

=−

(1−βb)Et

∞ ∑ i=0

(βb)i Zt+i

Log

–nor

mal

tech

nol

ogy

shoc

ks

Zt

=ρzZ−

1+εz t

wh

ere

E(εz t)

=0

V(εz t)

2 z

Page 312:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Itfo

llow

sth

at

Xt

=−

1−βb

1−βbρzZt

Page 313:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Now

,w

eco

mp

ute

the

log–

linea

riza

tion

ofX

Xt

=−

1

1−bC

t+

b

1−bC

t−1

Aft

ersu

bst

itu

tion

,w

eob

tain

Ct

=bC

t−1

+(1−b)

(1−βb)

1−βbρz

Zt

So,

the

con

sum

pti

onfo

llow

san

AR

(2)

pro

cess

bec

auseZ

follo

ws

an

AR

(1)

pro

cess

Page 314:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

(1−bB

)(1−ρzB

)Ct

=(1−b)

(1−βb)

1−βbρz

εz t

wh

ereB

isth

eb

acks

hif

top

erat

or,

i.e.BCt

=Ct−

1.

Page 315:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Fro

mth

isre

du

ced

form

,w

eca

nco

mp

ute

mom

ents

(vol

atil

ity,

AC

Fs)

and

IRF

s

The

Luca

sC

riti

que

Again

and

Again

:a

chan

geinρz

will

affec

tth

ere

du

ced

form

!

The

behavio

rof

hours

:W

eh

ave

Yt

=Ct

=Zt

+ht

Aft

era

sub

stit

uti

onin

toth

eco

nsu

mp

tion

fun

ctio

n,

one

gets

Page 316:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Zt

+ht

=b(Zt−

1+ht−

1)+

(1−b)

(1−βb)

1−βbρz

Zt

For

ave

ryp

ersi

sten

tte

chn

olog

ysh

ock

(ρz

1),

we

hav

e

ht

=bht−

1−bεz t

Th

ete

chn

olog

ysh

ocks

has

an

egat

ive

and

per

sist

ent

effec

ton

hou

rs

(b>

0).

Page 317:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Inth

isca

se,

the

IRF

sar

e:

IRF

(0)

=−b,IRF

(1)

=−b2,...,IRF

(h)

=−bh

+1

Why

?:C

onsu

mp

tion

is”s

tick

y”d

ue

toh

abit

per

sist

ence

.

Ap

erm

anen

tin

crea

sein

the

real

wag

ele

ads

top

ut

the

extr

are

sou

rces

onle

isu

re(t

he

inco

me

effec

tsd

omin

ate

the

sub

stit

uti

oneff

ect)

.

So,

ap

erfe

ctly

com

pet

itiv

em

odel

ofth

eb

usi

nes

scy

cle

can

pro

du

ce

ad

ecre

ase

inh

ours

(du

eto

stro

ng

lab

orsu

pp

lyeff

ects

)

Inco

ntra

dic

tion

wit

hG

ali

(199

)w

ho

clai

med

that

the

stan

dar

dn

ea-

Page 318:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

clas

sica

lm

odel

can

not

exp

lain

edth

isfe

atu

re(f

oun

din

the

dat

a).

Con

vers

ely,

aK

eyn

esia

nm

odel

can

rep

licat

eth

is.

Rea

son

?S

imp

le.

Inth

esh

ort–

run

,th

ele

vel

ofou

tpu

tis

det

erm

ined

byth

ele

vel

ofd

eman

d.

Su

pp

ose

ap

osit

ive

tech

nol

ogy

shoc

kZt

Yt

=Ztht

Th

eou

tpu

tYt

doe

sn

otch

ange

inth

esh

ort

run

.

Page 319:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

So,

anin

crea

seinZ

red

uce

sth

ele

vel

ofh

,b

ecau

seth

esa

me

quan

tity

Yca

nb

ep

rod

uce

dw

ith

less

lab

orin

pu

t.(S

eeth

efig

ure

)

Page 320:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

The

case

of

random

walk

tech

nolo

gy

shock

sw

ith

dri

ft:

∆Zt

=γz

+εz t

wh

ereγz>

1is

the

gros

sgr

owth

rate

ofte

chn

ical

pro

gres

s(a

nd

thu

s

grow

thra

teof

the

econ

omy

alon

gth

eb

alan

ced

grow

thp

ath

γz

=γy

=γc

Not

ice

that

hou

rsd

on

otd

isp

lay

this

tren

dp

atte

rn(h

ours

are

first

Page 321:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

ord

eran

dse

con

d–o

rder

stat

ion

ary)

.

Thu

s,a

stat

ion

ary

vers

ion

ofth

isec

onom

yw

ould

be

obta

ined

by

defl

atin

gth

eeq

uili

bri

um

con

dit

ion

sbyZ

.

All

vari

able

sar

eth

end

efin

edin

dev

iati

onfr

omth

est

och

asti

ctr

end

Z.

See

the

com

puta

tion

of

the

solu

tion

ina

more

genera

l

case

wit

hca

pit

al

acc

um

ula

tion.

Page 322:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

II-

Sto

chast

icA

KM

odel

Are

pre

sent

ativ

eh

ouse

hol

dw

illse

ekto

max

imiz

e

Et

∞ ∑ i=0

log(C

+i)

(no

leis

ure

choi

ces)

un

der

the

con

stra

ints

Cap

ital

accu

mu

lati

on

Kt+

1=

(1−δ)Kt

+I t

Agg

rega

tere

sou

rces

con

stra

int

Page 323:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Yt

=Ct

+I t

Tec

hn

olog

y

Yt

=ZtK

t

Page 324:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Kis

the

sole

inp

ut;

con

stan

tre

turn

tosc

ale

inth

ere

pro

du

cib

lefa

ctor

.

Zt

isa

TF

Psh

ock.

Pu

ttin

gth

ese

thre

eeq

uat

ion

sto

geth

eryi

eld

s

Kt+

1=

(1−δ)Kt

+ZtK

t−Ct

or

Kt+

1=

(1−δ

+Zt)Kt−Ct

Her

ew

ed

on

otim

pos

efu

lld

epre

ciat

ion

,i.e

.δ∈

[0,1

).

Page 325:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Aft

ersu

bst

itu

tion

ofth

isco

nst

rain

tin

toth

eob

ject

ive,

the

FO

Cis

give

nby

1 Ct

=βEt(

1−δ

+Zt+

1)1

Ct+

1

Her

e(1−δ+Zt)

rep

rese

ntth

ere

alin

tere

stra

te(m

argi

nal

pro

du

ctiv

ity

ofca

pit

aln

etof

dep

reci

atio

n)

Page 326:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Solv

ing

the

model:

Kt

isp

red

eter

min

edan

dth

usEtK

t+1

=Et(

(1−δ)Kt+ZtK

t−Ct)

=

Kt+

1.

Now

div

ide

and

mu

ltip

lyby

Kt+

1th

eri

ght–

han

dsi

de

ofth

eE

ule

r

equ

atio

n.

Th

isim

plie

s

1 Ct

=βEt(

1−δ

+Zt+

1)Kt+

1

Kt+

1

1

Ct+

1

Page 327:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

enu

mer

ator

is

(1−δ

+Zt+

1)Kt+

1=

(1−δ)Kt+

1+Zt+

1Kt+

1=

(1−δ)Kt+

1+Yt+

1

Now

,use

the

equ

ilib

riu

mco

nd

itio

non

the

good

mar

ket

inp

erio

dt+

1

Yt+

1=Ct+

1+I t

+1

and

the

law

ofm

otio

non

the

cap

ital

stoc

k

Kt+

2=

(1−δ)Kt+

1+I t

+1

Page 328:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Kt+

2=

(1−δ)Kt+

1+Yt+

1−Ct+

1⇔

Kt+

2+Ct+

1=

(1−δ)Kt+

1+Yt+

1

Th

isyi

eld

s

Kt+

1

Ct

=βEtC

t+1

+Kt+

2

Ct+

1

or

Kt+

1

Ct

=βEt

( 1+Kt+

2

Ct+

1

)

Page 329:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

LetXt

=Kt+

1Ct

,th

eE

ule

req

uat

ion

rew

rite

s

Xt

=βEt(

1+Xt+

1)

Sin

ceβ∈

(0,1

),th

eso

luti

onis

obta

ined

byfo

rwar

dsu

bst

itu

tion

s:

Xt

1−β

Th

isyi

eld

s

Page 330:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Ct

=1−β

βKt+

1

Now

,su

bst

itu

teth

iseq

uat

ion

into

the

law

ofm

otio

nof

cap

ital

Kt+

1=

(1−δ

+Zt)Kt−Ct

Th

isyi

eld

s

Kt+

1=β

(1−δ

+Zt)Kt

Page 331:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

All

the

oth

erag

greg

ate

vari

able

sca

nb

eth

end

edu

ced

.

Page 332:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Outp

ut

Dynam

ics

We

hav

e

Yt

=ZtK

t

So

Yt

Yt−

1=

Zt

Zt−

1

Kt

Kt−

1

Now

,u

sin

gth

ep

roce

ssofK

,it

com

es

Yt

Yt−

1=

Zt

Zt−

(1−δ

+Zt−

1)

Page 333:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Tak

ing

logs

(low

erle

tter

s),

we

hav

e

∆y t

=∆z t

+lo

g(β

)+

log(

1−δ

+Zt−

1)

Non

–lin

ear

inZ

(exc

ept

wh

enδ

=1)

,so

no

exp

licit

solu

tion

for

the

mom

ents

.Com

plic

ated

likel

ihoo

dfu

nct

ion

.

Con

vers

ely,

the

mod

elis

easy

tosi

mu

late

and

thu

sm

omen

tsca

nb

e

obta

ined

bysi

mu

lati

on.

An

oth

erap

pro

ach

:co

mp

ute

anap

pro

xim

ate

solu

tion

byli

nea

riza

tion

Page 334:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

ofth

em

odel

(see

the

pre

viou

sm

odel

).

Page 335:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

3.2

:R

BC

Models

I-

RB

CM

odel

wit

hco

mple

tedepre

ciati

on

We

con

sid

eran

econ

omy

wit

ha

rep

rese

ntat

ive

hou

seh

old

and

are

p-

rese

ntat

ive

firm

.T

he

firm

pro

du

ces

anh

omog

enou

sgo

odw

ith

the

follo

win

gp

rod

uct

ion

fun

ctio

n

Yt

=ZtK

1−α

thα t

wit

hα∈

(0,1

).Kt

isth

eca

pit

alst

ock

andht

den

otes

the

lab

or

inp

ut.Zt

isa

ran

dom

vari

able

that

rep

rese

nts

chan

ges

inT

otal

Fac

tor

Page 336:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Pro

du

ctiv

ity

(TF

P).

Th

eca

pit

alst

ock

evol

ves

acco

rdin

gto

Kt+

1=

(1−δ)Kt

+I t

wh

ereδ

isth

ed

epre

ciat

ion

rate

.I t

den

otes

inve

stm

ent.

Her

e,w

e

assu

me

com

ple

ted

epre

ciat

ion

(δ=

1)

Kt+

1=I t

Th

ere

pre

sent

ativ

eh

ouse

hol

dco

nsu

mesCt

and

wor

ksht

ever

yp

erio

d.

Th

eh

ouse

hol

dse

eks

tom

axim

ize

Et

∞ ∑ i=0

βi( l

og(Ct+i)−V

(ht+i)

)

Page 337:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

V(.

)is

aco

nvex

fun

ctio

n.β∈

(0,1

)is

the

dis

cou

ntfa

ctor

and

Et

den

otes

the

con

dit

ion

alex

pec

tati

ons

oper

ator

.T

he

equ

ilib

riu

m

con

dit

ion

onth

ego

odm

arke

tis

give

nby

Yt

=Ct

+I t

Page 338:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

ed

ynam

icop

tim

izat

ion

pro

ble

m

Pre

-det

erm

ined

vari

able

:Kt

Ch

oice

vari

able

:Ct

andht

Rm

k:C

ontr

ollin

gCt

iseq

uiv

alen

tto

cont

rolKt+

1

maxEt

∞ ∑ i=0

βi( l

og(Ct+i)−V

(ht+i)

)

sub

ject

to

Page 339:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Kt+

1=I t

Yt

=Ct

+I t

Yt

=ZtK

1−α

thα t

Com

bin

ing

the

thre

eeq

uat

ion

syi

eld

s

Kt+

1=ZtK

1−α

thα t−Ct

Now

,re

pla

ceth

eco

nst

rain

t

Ct

=ZtK

1−α

thα t−Kt+

1

Page 340:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

into

the

obje

ctiv

e

Et

∞ ∑ i=0

βi( lo

g(Zt+iK

1−α

t+ihα t+i−Kt+i+

1)−V

(ht+i))

and

max

imiz

eth

isfu

nct

ion

wit

hre

spec

ttoKt+

1an

dht.

On

eob

tain

s

−1 Ct

+αβEt

[( Yt+

1

Kt+

1

)(1

Ct+

1

)] =0

oreq

uiv

alen

tly

1 Ct

=αβEt

[( Yt+

1

Kt+

1

)(1

Ct+

1

)]T

hus

isth

eE

ule

req

uat

ion

onco

nsu

mp

tion

(in

aD

SG

Em

odel

)

V′ (ht)

=1 Ct(1−α

)Yt

ht

Page 341:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Th

isre

pre

sent

the

mar

gin

alra

teof

sub

stit

uti

onb

etw

een

lab

orsu

pp

ly

and

con

sum

pti

on.

Reso

luti

on

For

war

dsu

bst

itu

tion

s

Wit

hco

mp

lete

dep

reci

atio

n,

the

phy

sica

lca

pit

alev

olve

sac

cord

ing

to

Kt+

1=I t

Su

bst

itu

tein

toth

eth

eE

ule

req

uat

ion

onco

nsu

mp

tion

1 Ct

=αβEt

[( Yt+

1

I t

)(1

Ct+

1

)]

Page 342:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

I tis

know

nin

per

iodt.

So,

we

can

mov

eou

tth

ein

vest

men

tfr

omth

e

righ

th

and

sid

eof

the

Eu

ler

equ

atio

n

I t Ct

=αβEt

[ Y t+1

Ct+

1

]F

rom

the

equ

ilib

riu

mco

nd

itio

non

the

good

mar

ket

inp

erio

dt

+1

Yt+

1=Ct+

1+I t

+1

we

obta

in

I t Ct

=αβEt

[ C t+1

+I t

+1

Ct+

1

]or

I t Ct

=αβEt

[ 1+I t

+1

Ct+

1

]

Page 343:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

For

war

dsu

bst

itu

tion

s(αβ<

1)

Sol

uti

on

I t Ct

=αβ

1−αβ

I t=

αβ

1−αβCt

Usi

ng

the

equ

ilib

riu

mco

nd

itio

non

the

good

mar

ket

Yt

=Ct

+I t⇒

Yt

=Ct

1−αβ⇔

Ct

Yt

=1−αβ

(con

stan

t)

Page 344:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

I t Yt

=αβ

(con

stan

tsa

vin

gra

te)

Lab

or

V′ (ht)

=1 Ct(1−α

)Yt

ht⇔

htV′ (ht)

=(1−α

)Yt

Ct

So,

lab

oris

con

stan

t(w

ed

enot

eh

).

Fro

mth

ela

wof

mot

ion

onp

hysi

cal

cap

ital

Kt+

1=Yt−Ct⇔

αβYt

Page 345:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

and

the

pro

du

ctio

nfu

nct

ion Yt

=ZtK

1−α

thα

we

obta

in

Kt+

1=αβZtK

1−α

thα

Page 346:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Analy

zing

the

dynam

icpro

pert

ies

Now

,ta

keth

iseq

uat

ion

inlo

gs(a

llva

riab

les

are

pos

itiv

e)

kt+

1=c k

+z t

+αkt

wh

erec k

isa

con

stan

tte

rmth

atd

epen

ds

onth

ed

eep

par

amet

ers

of

the

mod

el.

Th

eeq

uat

ion

for

outp

ut

(in

logs

)is

y t=c y

+z t

+αkt

wh

erec y

isa

con

stan

t.

Page 347:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

For

sim

plic

ity

(wit

hou

tlo

ssof

gen

eral

ity)

,se

tth

istw

oco

nst

ant

term

s

toze

ro.

Now

,in

trod

uce

the

bac

ksh

ift

oper

atorB

,i.e

.

Bkt+

1=kt

orBkt

=kt−

1orBy t

=y t−

1

kt+

1=z t

+αkt⇔

kt+

1=z t

+αBkt+

1

⇔(1−αB

)kt+

1=z t⇔

kt+

1=

z t1−αB

Page 348:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

⇔kt

=z t−

1

1−αB

Now

,in

sert

this

equ

atio

nin

toth

eou

tpu

t(i

nlo

g)eq

uat

ion

y t=z t

z t−

1

1−αB⇔

(1−αB

)yt

=(1−αB

)zt

+αz t−

1

y t=αy t−

1+z t

Now

assu

me

thatz t

isan

iidsh

ock

(pu

rely

tran

sito

ry)

z t=εz t

Imp

uls

ere

spon

seof

outp

ut

(in

log,

soth

isis

anel

asti

city

)to

ate

ch-

Page 349:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

nol

ogy

inn

ovat

ionεz t

inp

erio

dt.

IRFy(h

)=∂y t

+h

∂εz t

wit

hh

=0,

1,2,....

Fro

mth

eab

ove

equ

atio

n,

we

obta

in

IRFy(h

)=αh

[IN

SE

RT

FIG

UR

E]

Rm

k1:

the

resp

onse

ofco

nsu

mp

tion

and

inve

stm

ent

(in

logs

)ar

e

exac

tly

the

sam

e.

Page 350:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

So,

atr

ansi

tory

tech

nol

ogy

imp

rove

men

th

asa

lon

gla

stin

gp

osit

ive

effec

ton

real

vari

able

s.

Rm

k2:

no

effec

ton

lab

or.

Rm

k3:

Th

eL

uca

scr

itiq

ue

doe

sn

otap

ply

her

e.T

he

solu

tion

(Im

ean

the

red

uce

dfo

rmp

aram

eter

s)is

not

affec

ted

byth

ep

aram

eter

sth

at

sum

mar

ize

the

stoc

has

tic

pro

cess

ofz t

.

Page 351:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

II-

RB

CM

odel

wit

hL

inear

Uti

lity

inL

eis

ure

For

sim

plic

ity,

the

mod

elin

clu

des

only

ara

nd

omw

alk

inp

rod

uct

ivit

y

(Zt)

.

Sim

ilar

resu

lts

are

obta

ined

wit

ha

stat

ion

ary

lab

orw

edge

shoc

k.

Th

ein

tert

emp

oral

exp

ecte

du

tilit

yfu

nct

ion

ofth

ere

pre

sent

ativ

eh

ouse

-

hol

dis

give

nby

Et

∞ ∑ i=0

log(C

+i)−χV

(Ht)

Page 352:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

wh

ereχ>

0,β∈

(0,1

)d

enot

esth

ed

isco

unt

fact

oran

dEt

isth

e

exp

ecta

tion

oper

ator

con

dit

ion

alon

the

info

rmat

ion

set

avai

lab

leas

ofti

met.

Ct

isth

eco

nsu

mp

tion

att

andHt

rep

rese

nts

the

hou

seh

old

’sla

bor

sup

ply

.

Th

ere

pre

sent

ativ

efir

mu

ses

cap

italKt

and

lab

orHt

top

rod

uce

the

hom

ogen

eou

sfin

algo

odYt.

Th

ete

chn

olog

yis

rep

rese

nted

byth

efo

llow

ing

con

stan

tre

turn

s–to

scal

eC

obb

–Dou

glas

pro

du

ctio

nfu

nct

ion

Page 353:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Yt

=Kα t

( ZtH

t)1−α,

wh

ereα∈

(0,1

).Zt

isas

sum

edto

follo

wan

exog

enou

sp

roce

ssof

the

form

∆lo

g(Zt)

=σzε z,t,

wh

ereε z,t

isii

dw

ith

zero

mea

nan

du

nit

vari

ance

.

Th

eca

pit

alst

ock

evol

ves

acco

rdin

gto

the

law

ofm

otio

n

Page 354:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Kt+

1=

(1−δ)Kt

+I t,

wh

ereδ∈

(0,1

)is

the

con

stan

td

epre

ciat

ion

rate

.

Fin

ally

,th

efin

algo

odca

nb

eei

ther

con

sum

edor

inve

sted

Yt

=Ct

+I t.

FO

Cs

+E

quili

bri

um

con

dit

ion

s+

Exo

gen

ous

vari

able

1 Ct

=βEt

( 1−δ

+αYt+

1

Kt+

1

) 1

Ct+

1

Page 355:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

V′ (Ht)

1=

1 Ct(1−α

)Yt

Ht

Kt+

1=

(1−δ)Kt

+Kα t

( ZtH

t)1−α−Ct

∆lo

g(Zt)

=σzε z,t,

Inth

ism

odel

,th

ete

chn

olog

ysh

ockZt

ind

uce

sa

stoc

has

tic

tren

din

to

outp

ut,

con

sum

pti

on,

inve

stm

ent

and

cap

ital

.

Page 356:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Acc

ord

ingl

y,to

obta

ina

stat

ion

ary

equ

ilib

riu

m,

thes

eva

riab

les

mu

st

be

det

ren

ded

asfo

llow

s

y t=Yt

Zt,

c t=Ct

Zt,

i t=I t Zt,

kt+

1=Kt+

1

Zt.

Wit

hth

ese

tran

sfor

mat

ion

s,th

eap

pro

xim

ate

solu

tion

ofth

em

odel

isco

mp

ute

dfr

oma

log–

linea

riza

tion

ofth

est

atio

nar

yeq

uil

ibri

um

con

dit

ion

sar

oun

dth

isd

eter

min

isti

cst

ead

yst

ate.

Her

ew

eas

sum

e

V′ (Ht)

=1

Page 357:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

i.e.

the

uti

lity

islin

ear.

⇒M

ore

deta

ils

(FO

C,

stati

onary

vers

ion

of

the

model,

Ste

ady–st

ate

,lo

g–lineari

zati

on)

Th

elo

g–lin

eari

zati

onof

equ

ilib

riu

mco

nd

itio

ns

arou

nd

the

det

erm

in-

isti

cst

ead

yst

ate

yiel

ds

Page 358:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

k t+1=

(1−δ)

( k t−σzε z,t

)+y k y t−

c k c t

(1)

ht

= y t−

c t(2

)

y t=α

( k t−σzε z,t

)+

(1−α

) h t(3

)

Etct+

1= c t+

αβy kEt( y t+1

− k t+1

−σzε z,t

+1)

(4)

wh

erey/k

=(1−β

(1−δ)

)/(αβ

)an

dc/k

=y/k−δ.

Aft

ersu

bst

i-

tuti

onof

(2)

into

(3),

one

gets

Page 359:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

y t− k t=

−σzε z,t−

1−α

α c t

Now

,u

sin

gth

eab

ove

exp

ress

ion

,(1

)an

d(4

)re

wri

te

Etct+

1=ϕ c t

wit

1−β

(1−α

)(1−δ)∈

(0,1

)(5

)

k t+1=ν 1 k t−

ν 1σzε z,t−ν 2 c t

wit

hν 1

=1 βϕ>

1an

dν 2

=1−β

(1−δ(

1−α

2 ))

α2 β

(6)

Page 360:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Asν 1>

1,(6

)m

ust

be

solv

edfo

rwar

d

k t=σzε z,t

+

( ν 2 ν 1

) limT→∞Et

T ∑ i=0

( 1 ν 1

) i c t+i+

lim

T→∞Et

( 1 ν 1

) T kt+T

Exc

lud

ing

exp

losi

vep

ath

es,

i.e.

limT→∞Et(1/ν

1)T k t+T

=0,

and

usi

ng

(5),

one

gets

the

dec

isio

nru

leon

con

sum

pti

on:

c t=( ν 1−ϕ

ν 2

)( kt−σzε z,t

)(7

)

Page 361:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Aft

ersu

bst

itu

tin

g(7

)in

to(6

),th

ed

ynam

ics

ofca

pit

alis

give

nby

:

k t+1=ϕ

( k t−σzε z,t

)(8

)

Th

ep

ersi

sten

cep

rop

erti

esof

the

mod

elis

thu

sgo

vern

edby

the

pa-

ram

eterϕ∈

(0,1

).

Th

ed

ecis

ion

rule

sof

the

oth

er(d

eflat

ed)

vari

able

sar

esi

mil

arto

equ

a-

tion

(7).

Th

eco

nsu

mp

tion

toou

tpu

tra

tio

isgi

ven

by

Page 362:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

c t− y t=

ν cy

( k t−σzε z,t

)=ν cy

( −ϕ

1−ϕLσzε z,t−

1−σzε z,t

)=−ν cy

( σ zε z,t

1−ϕL

)w

her

eν cy

(ν1−ϕ−ν 2

)/ν 2

isp

osit

ive.

Th

ela

tter

exp

ress

ion

show

sth

atth

eco

nsu

mp

tion

toou

tpu

tra

tio

follo

ws

exac

tly

the

sam

est

och

asti

cp

roce

ss(a

nau

tore

gres

sive

pro

cess

ofor

der

one)

asth

ed

eflat

edca

pit

allo

g(Kt/Zt−

1)in

equ

atio

n(8

).

Page 363:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

Fro

mth

eab

ove

exp

ress

ion

,w

eca

nd

irec

tly

ded

uce

the

beh

avio

rof

hou

rs:

(1−ϕL

)ht

=ν cyσzε z,t

(9)

Hou

rsw

orke

din

crea

seaf

ter

ate

chn

olog

yim

pro

vem

ent

and

dis

pla

ys

am

onot

onic

dyn

amic

resp

onse

.

Page 364:  · Evidences results eci ca- costs. thatL and W del ion L t (1 1) L + 1 L t 1 W t 1 b W 2 ˆ w where 1 and 2 parameters, b and 1 and L of L, 0 and 1

3.3

:B

eyond

the

RB

CM

odel

(Opti

onal)

Inpro

gre

ss