evaluation of the nhtsa thor finite element model

34
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model Matthew B. Panzer, PhD Sebastian Giudice, BS Jeff Crandall, PhD NHTSA THOR Public Meeting January 20 th , 2015 Washington, DC

Upload: others

Post on 09-May-2022

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model Matthew B. Panzer, PhD

Sebastian Giudice, BS Jeff Crandall, PhD

NHTSA THOR Public Meeting January 20th, 2015 Washington, DC

Page 2: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

NHTSA THOR Model Overview

2

Safety design

Parametric analysis

Crash reconstruction

Restraint optimization

Crashworthiness evaluation

Academic researchers

Restraint manufacturers

Vehicle manufacturers

Government researchers

Computational methods are cheaper and faster than full testing

No licensing costs, available to everyone

Application

Advantages

User Groups

Page 3: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

NHTSA THOR Model Overview

• Current model features • Mod-Kit/Metric design build • SD3 shoulder and arm • Full instrumentation • Interactive occupant positioning tree • Certification suite • Modular design with controlled IDs

• Head • Neck • Thorax • Arm • Pelvis • Leg • Shoe

3

Page 4: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Instrumentation

• Instrumentation outputs • Locations and orientations consistent with physical dummy • 4 accelerometers

• Output in NODOUT files (local)

• 21 load cells • Output in ELOUT files (local)

• 5 potentiometers • Output in NODOUT files (local)

• 6 IR-TRACCs • Output in NODOUT files (local) • IR-TRACC output already in transformed state

4

Page 5: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Head Impact Evaluation

5

Simulation parameters: • Impactor mass: 23.4 kg • Impactor velocity: 2.0 m/s

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

x 10-3

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Time (s)

X-F

orce

(N) C

FC60

0

THOR Head Impact Evaluation (Probe Force)

DO9799THOR FE

Page 6: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Face Impact Evaluation (Bar)

6

Simulation parameters: • Impactor mass: 32 kg • Impactor velocity: 3.6 m/s

0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000THOR Face-Bar Evaluation (Probe Force)

Time (s)

X-F

orce

(N) C

FC18

0

DO9799THOR FE

Page 7: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Face Impact Evaluation (Disk)

7

Simulation parameters: • Impactor mass: 13 kg • Impactor velocity: 6.7 m/s

0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.01-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

Time (s)

X-F

orce

(N) C

FC18

0

THOR Face-Disk Evaluation (Probe Force)

DO9799THOR FE

Page 8: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Neck Evaluation (Flexion)

8

Simulation parameters: • Dynamic pendulum test • Test velocity: 3.8 m/s

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2

-1200

-1000

-800

-600

-400

-200

0

Time (s)

Forc

e (N

) CFC

1000

Neck Rear Cable Force During Flexion

DO9799 Fz

THOR FE Fy

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

Time (s)

Rot

atio

nal D

ispl

acem

ent (

deg)

CFC

180

OC Joint Rotational Displacement During Flexion

DO9799 θy

THOR FE θy

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2

-1000

-500

0

500

1000

Time (s)

Forc

e (N

) CFC

60

Upper Neck Load Cell Force During Flexion

DO9799 Fz

THOR FE Faxial

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

Time (S)

Mom

ent (

N-m

) CFC

60

Upper Neck Load Cell S-Moment During Flexion

DO9799 My

THOR FE Ms

Page 9: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Neck Evaluation (Extension)

9

Simulation parameters: • Dynamic pendulum test • Test velocity: 3.7 m/s

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2

-2000

-1500

-1000

-500

0

Time (s)

Forc

e (N

) CFC

1000

Front Cable Force During Extension

DO9799 Fz

THOR FE Fy

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-10

-5

0

5

10

15

Time (s)

Rot

atio

nal D

ispl

acem

ent (

deg)

CFC

180

OC Joint Rotational Displacement During Extension

DO9799 θy

THOR FE θy

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2

-2500

-2000

-1500

-1000

-500

0

500

1000

Time (s)

Forc

e (N

) CFC

60

Upper Neck Load Cell Force During Extension

DO9799 Fz

THOR FE Faxial

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

Time (S)

Mom

ent (

N-m

) CFC

60

Upper Neck Load Cell S-Moment During Extension

DO9799 My

THOR FE Ms

Page 10: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Neck Evaluation (Lateral)

10

Simulation parameters: • Dynamic pendulum test • Test velocity: 2.9 m/s

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Time (s)

Forc

e (N

) CFC

60

Upper Neck Load Cell Force During Lateral Flexion

DO9799 Fz

THOR FE Faxial

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

Time (S)

Mom

ent (

N-m

) CFC

60

Upper Neck Load Cell T-Moment During Lateral Flexion

DO9799 Mx

THOR FE Mt

Page 11: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Thorax Impact Evaluation (Upper)

11

Simulation parameters: • Impactor mass: 23.4 • Impactor velocity: 4.3 m/s

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.080

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Time (s)

X-F

orce

(N) C

FC18

0

THOR Upper Thorax Evaluation (Probe Force)

DO9799THOR FE

Page 12: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Thorax Impact Evaluation (Upper)

12

Simulation parameters: • Impactor mass: 23.4 • Impactor velocity: 6.7 m/s

Page 13: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Thorax Evaluation (Lower Oblique)

13

Simulation parameters: • Impactor mass: 23.4 kg • Impactor velocity: 6.7 m/s

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.070

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Time (s)

X-F

orce

(N) C

FC18

0

THOR Lower Left Oblique Thorax Evaluation (Probe Force)

DO9799THOR FE

Page 14: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Abdomen Impact Evaluation (Lower)

14

Simulation parameters: • Impactor mass: 32 kg • Impactor velocity: 6.1 m/s

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.070

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

THOR Lower Abdomen Evaluation (Probe Force)

Time (s)

X-F

orce

(N) C

FC18

0

DO9799THOR FE

Page 15: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Abdomen Impact Evaluation (Upper)

15

Simulation parameters: • Impactor mass: 18 kg • Impactor velocity: 8.0 m/s

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.070

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

Time (s)

X-F

orce

(N) C

FC18

0

THOR Upper Abdomen Evaluation (Probe Force)

DO9799THOR FE

Page 16: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Knee Impact Evaluation

16

Simulation parameters: • Impactor mass: 5.0 kg • Impactor velocity: 2.6 m/s

0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.01

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Time (s)

X-F

orce

(N) C

FC60

0

THOR Left Femur Evaluation (Probe Force)

DO9799THOR FE

Page 17: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Heel Impact Evaluation

17

Simulation parameters: • Impactor mass: 5.0 kg • Impactor velocity: 4.0 m/s

0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.010

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Time (s)

X-F

orce

(N) C

FC60

0

THOR Left Leg Evaluation (Probe Force) - Heel Impact

THOR FE

Page 18: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Dynamic Dorsiflexion Evaluation

18

Simulation parameters: • Impactor mass: 5.0 kg • Impactor velocity: 5.0 m/s

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

x 10-3

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Time (s)

X-F

orce

(N) C

FC60

0

THOR Left Leg Evaluation (Probe Force) - Dynamic Dorsiflexion

THOR FE

Page 19: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Gold Standard 1 Evaluation

19

0 50 100 150 200 250-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Time (ms)

Acc

eler

atio

n (G

's)

Sled Acceleration

S0157THOR FE

Simulation parameters: • Subject restrained by a standard three-point shoulder/lap belt • Lower extremity restrained by knee bolster and foot rest • THOR Metric dummy with SD3 shoulder test S0157 performed at the UVA (May, 2013)

Page 20: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Gold Standard 1 Evaluation

20

Page 21: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Gold Standard 1 Evaluation

21

0 50 100 150 200 250

0

200

400

Right Lap Belt Force

Forc

e (

N)

Time (ms)

0 50 100 150 200 2500

2000

4000

6000

Lower Shoulder Belt Force

Forc

e (

N)

Time (ms)

0 50 100 150 200 2500

2000400060008000

Upper Shoulder Belt Force

Forc

e (

N)

Time (ms)

S0157 Model

Belt force

Page 22: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Gold Standard 1 Evaluation

22

L2

L4

Pelvis S0157 Model

Head CG

T1

T8

Full body kinematic traces

Page 23: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Gold Standard 1 Evaluation

23

Head CG

L Shoulder

R Shoulder S0157 Model

Full body kinematic traces

Page 24: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Gold Standard 1 Evaluation

24

0 50 100 150 200 250-40

-20

0

20

40

60

Time (ms)

Acc

eler

atio

n C

FC10

00 (G

's) Head CG X-Acceleration

0 50 100 150 200 250-40

-20

0

20

40

60

Time (ms)

Acc

eler

atio

n C

FC10

00 (G

's) Head CG Y-Acceleration

0 50 100 150 200 250-40

-20

0

20

40

60

Time (ms)

Acc

eler

atio

n (G

's) C

FC10

00

Head CG Z-Acceleration

S0157 Model

Head CG

Page 25: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Gold Standard 1 Evaluation

25

0 50 100 150 200 250-3000

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

Time (ms)

Forc

e C

FC18

0 (N

)

Neck LOLC X-Axis Force

0 50 100 150 200 250

-50

0

50

100

Time (ms)

Mom

ent C

FC18

0 (N

m)

Neck LOLC Moment About the X-Axis

0 50 100 150 200 250-3000

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

Time (ms)

Forc

e C

FC18

0 (N

)

Neck LOLC Y-Axis Force

0 50 100 150 200 250

-50

0

50

100

Time (ms)M

omen

t CFC

180

(Nm

)

Neck LOLC Moment About the Y-Axis

0 50 100 150 200 250-3000

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

Time (ms)

Forc

e C

FC18

0 (N

)

Neck LOLC Z-Axis Force

0 50 100 150 200 250

-50

0

50

100

Time (ms)

Mom

ent C

FC18

0 (N

m)

Neck LOLC Moment About the Z-Axis

S0157 Model

Lower Neck

Page 26: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Gold Standard 1 Evaluation

26

0 50 100 150 200 250-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

Time (ms)

Forc

e C

FC18

0 (N

)

Neck UPLC X-Axis Force

0 50 100 150 200 250-20

0

20

40

60

Time (ms)

Mom

ent C

FC18

0 (N

m)

Neck UPLC Moment About the X-Axis

0 50 100 150 200 250-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

Time (ms)

Forc

e C

FC18

0 (N

)

Neck UPLC Y-Axis Force

0 50 100 150 200 250-20

0

20

40

60

Time (ms)M

omen

t CFC

180

(Nm

)

Neck UPLC Moment About the Y-Axis

0 50 100 150 200 250-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

Time (ms)

Forc

e C

FC18

0 (N

)

Neck UPLC Z-Axis Force

0 50 100 150 200 250-20

0

20

40

60

Time (ms)

Mom

ent C

FC18

0 (N

m)

Neck UPLC Moment About the Z-Axis

S0157 Model

Upper Neck

Page 27: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Gold Standard 1 Evaluation

27

0 50 100 150 200 250-40

-20

0

20

Time (ms)

Acc

eler

atio

n C

FC18

0 (G

's) T1 X-Acceleration

0 50 100 150 200 250-40

-20

0

20

Time (ms)

Acc

eler

atio

n C

FC18

0 (G

's) T1 Y-Acceleration

0 50 100 150 200 250-40

-20

0

20

Time (ms)

Acc

eler

atio

n C

FC18

0 (G

's) T1 Z-Acceleration

S0157 Model

T1

Page 28: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Gold Standard 1 Evaluation

28

0 50 100 150 200 250-40

-20

0

20

Time (ms)

Acc

eler

atio

n C

FC18

0 (G

's) T12 X-Acceleration

0 50 100 150 200 250-40

-20

0

20

Time (ms)

Acc

eler

atio

n C

FC18

0 (G

's) T12 Y-Acceleration

0 50 100 150 200 250-40

-20

0

20

Time (ms)

Acc

eler

atio

n C

FC18

0 (G

's) T12 Z-Acceleration

S0157 Model

T12

Page 29: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Gold Standard 1 Evaluation

29

0 50 100 150 200 250-40

-20

0

20

Time (ms)

Acc

eler

atio

n C

FC18

0 (G

's)

Pelvis X-Acceleration

0 50 100 150 200 250-40

-20

0

20

Time (ms)

Acc

eler

atio

n C

FC18

0 (G

's)

Pelvis Y-Acceleration

0 50 100 150 200 250-40

-20

0

20

Time (ms)

Acc

eler

atio

n C

FC18

0 (G

's)

Pelvis Z-Acceleration

S0157 Model

Pelvis

Page 30: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Gold Standard 1 Evaluation

30

0 50 100 150 200 250-6000

-5000

-4000

-3000

-2000

-1000

0

Time (ms)

Forc

e C

FC60

0 (N

)

Right Femur Axial Force

0 50 100 150 200 250-6000

-5000

-4000

-3000

-2000

-1000

0

Time (ms)

Forc

e C

FC60

0 (N

)

Left Femur Axial Force

S0157 Model

Femur

Page 31: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Summary of current model

• Model stability • Top priority focus • No issues in all “certification” and Gold Standard 1 simulations • Stability in vehicle crash simulation needs assessment

• Model fidelity

• Secondary priority focus • Response is generally good (average CORA score 0.75) • Neck extension needs most improvement (average CORA is 0.57) • Some materials are stiffer for stability; materials not tuned • Gold Standard 1 belt model may be too restricting

31

Page 32: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Summary of current model

• Current version of THOR FE model (v2.1) will be hosted on NHTSA website for public download, and will include:

• User manual • Certification suite model files • Gold Standard 1 model files

• Release date: Jan 30, 2015

32

Page 33: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Acknowledgments

• NHTSA • DTNH22-09-H-00247

• Chalmers University of Technology (SD3 Shoulder) • Johan Davidsson • Kristian Holmqvist

• Virginia Tech (Neck) • Costin Untariou • Jacob Putnam

• Livermore Software Technology Corp • Christoph Maurath • Dilip Bhalsod

• And many of the THOR FE model users who provided feedback!

33

Page 34: Evaluation of the NHTSA THOR finite element model

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

Questions?