evaluation of the nhtsa thor finite … of the nhtsa thor finite element model. matthew b. panzer ,...
TRANSCRIPT
EVALUATION OF THE NHTSA THOR FINITE ELEMENT MODELMatthew B. Panzer, Sebastian Guidice, Jeff R. CrandallUniversity of Virginia, Center for Applied Biomechanics
Center for Applied Biomechanics
SAE INTERNATIONAL
NHTSA THOR finite element model overview
Paper # (if applicable) 2
Safety design
Parametric analysis
Crash reconstruction
Restraint optimization
Crashworthinessevaluation
Academic researchers
Restraint manufacturers
Vehicle manufacturers
Government researchers
Computational methods are cheaper and faster than full testing
No licensing costs, available to everyone
Application
Advantages
User Groups
SAE INTERNATIONAL
THOR FE model development has paralleled the dummy developmentMultiple groups working/developing the model over the year
UVA oversight of the latest revision of the modelImplementation of the latest design alterationsSimplification and streamlining the modelImprovement of model stability
NHTSA THOR finite element model overview
Paper # (if applicable) 3
SAE INTERNATIONAL
NHTSA THOR finite element model overview
Paper # (if applicable) 4
Current model featuresMod-Kit/Metric design buildSD3 shoulder and armFull instrumentationInteractive occupant positioning treeCertification suiteModular design with controlled IDs• Head• Neck • Thorax• Arm• Pelvis• Leg• Shoe
SAE INTERNATIONAL
NHTSA THOR finite element model overview
Paper # (if applicable) 5
Instrumentation outputsLocations and orientations consistent with physical dummy4 accelerometers
• Output in NODOUT files (local)21 load cells
• Output in ELOUT files (local)5 potentiometers
• Output in NODOUT files (local)6 IR-TRACCs
• Output in NODOUT files (local)• IR-TRACC output already in transformed state
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Evaluation procedures
Current THOR Certification tests
Gold Standard 1 frontal sled test
NHTSA THOR finite element model overview
Paper # (if applicable) 6
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Head impact evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 7
Simulation parameters:• Impactor mass: 23.4 kg• Impactor velocity: 2.0 m/s
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
x 10-3
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Time (s)
X-F
orce
(N) C
FC60
0
THOR Head Impact Evaluation (Probe Force)
DO9799THOR FE
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Face impact (bar) evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 8
Simulation parameters:• Impactor mass: 32 kg• Impactor velocity: 3.6 m/s
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000THOR Face-Bar Evaluation (Probe Force)
Time (s)
X-F
orce
(N) C
FC18
0
DO9799THOR FE
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Face impact (disc) evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 9
Simulation parameters:• Impactor mass: 13 kg• Impactor velocity: 6.7 m/s
0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.01-1000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
Time (s)
X-F
orce
(N) C
FC18
0
THOR Face-Disk Evaluation (Probe Force)
DO9799THOR FE
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Dynamic neck flexion (pendulum) evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 10
Simulation parameters:• Dynamic pendulum test• Test velocity: 3.8 m/s
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2
-1200
-1000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
Time (s)
Forc
e (N
) CFC
1000
Neck Rear Cable Force During Flexion
DO9799 Fz
THOR FE Fy
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Time (s)
Rot
atio
nal D
ispl
acem
ent (
deg)
CFC
180
OC Joint Rotational Displacement During Flexion
DO9799 θy
THOR FE θy
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
Time (s)
Forc
e (N
) CFC
60
Upper Neck Load Cell Force During Flexion
DO9799 Fz
THOR FE Faxial
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
Time (S)
Mom
ent (
N-m
) CFC
60
Upper Neck Load Cell S-Moment During Flexion
DO9799 My
THOR FE Ms
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Dynamic neck extension (pendulum) evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 11
Simulation parameters:• Dynamic pendulum test• Test velocity: 3.7 m/s
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2
-2000
-1500
-1000
-500
0
Time (s)
Forc
e (N
) CFC
1000
Front Cable Force During Extension
DO9799 Fz
THOR FE Fy
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Time (s)
Rot
atio
nal D
ispl
acem
ent (
deg)
CFC
180
OC Joint Rotational Displacement During Extension
DO9799 θy
THOR FE θy
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2
-2500
-2000
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
Time (s)
Forc
e (N
) CFC
60
Upper Neck Load Cell Force During Extension
DO9799 Fz
THOR FE Faxial
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
Time (S)
Mom
ent (
N-m
) CFC
60
Upper Neck Load Cell S-Moment During Extension
DO9799 My
THOR FE Ms
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Dynamic neck lateral bending (pendulum) evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 12
Simulation parameters:• Dynamic pendulum test• Test velocity: 2.9 m/s
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Time (s)
Forc
e (N
) CFC
60
Upper Neck Load Cell Force During Lateral Flexion
DO9799 Fz
THOR FE Faxial
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
Time (S)
Mom
ent (
N-m
) CFC
60
Upper Neck Load Cell T-Moment During Lateral Flexion
DO9799 Mx
THOR FE Mt
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Chest impact (upper) evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 13
Simulation parameters:• Impactor mass: 23.4• Impactor velocity: 4.3 m/s
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.080
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Time (s)
X-F
orce
(N) C
FC18
0
THOR Upper Thorax Evaluation (Probe Force)
DO9799THOR FE
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Chest impact (upper) stability assessment
Paper # (if applicable) 14
Simulation parameters:• Impactor mass: 23.4• Impactor velocity: 6.7 m/s
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Chest impact (lower oblique) evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 15
Simulation parameters:• Impactor mass: 23.4 kg• Impactor velocity: 6.7 m/s
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.070
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Time (s)
X-F
orce
(N) C
FC18
0
THOR Lower Left Oblique Thorax Evaluation (Probe Force)
DO9799THOR FE
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Abdomen impact (lower) evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 16
Simulation parameters:• Impactor mass: 32 kg• Impactor velocity: 6.1 m/s
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.070
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
THOR Lower Abdomen Evaluation (Probe Force)
Time (s)
X-F
orce
(N) C
FC18
0
DO9799THOR FE
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Abdomen impact (upper) evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 17
Simulation parameters:• Impactor mass: 18 kg• Impactor velocity: 8.0 m/s
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.070
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
Time (s)
X-F
orce
(N) C
FC18
0
THOR Upper Abdomen Evaluation (Probe Force)
DO9799THOR FE
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Femur impact evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 18
Simulation parameters:• Impactor mass: 5.0 kg• Impactor velocity: 2.6 m/s
0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.01
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Time (s)
X-F
orce
(N) C
FC60
0
THOR Left Femur Evaluation (Probe Force)
DO9799THOR FE
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Gold Standard 1 Evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 19
0 50 100 150 200 250-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Time (ms)
Acc
eler
atio
n (G
's)
Sled Acceleration
S0157THOR FE
Simulation parameters:• Subject restrained by a standard three-point shoulder/lap belt• Lower extremity restrained by knee bolster and foot rest• THOR Metric dummy with SD3 shoulder test S0157 performed at the UVA (05/2013)
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Gold Standard 1 Evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 20
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Gold Standard 1 Evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 21
0 50 100 150 200 250
0
200
400
Right Lap Belt Force
For
ce (
N)
Time (ms)
0 50 100 150 200 2500
2000
4000
6000
Lower Shoulder Belt Force
For
ce (
N)
Time (ms)
0 50 100 150 200 2500
2000400060008000
Upper Shoulder Belt Force
For
ce (
N)
Time (ms)
S0157Model
Belt force
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Gold Standard 1 Evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 22
Full body kinematic traces
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Gold Standard 1 Evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 23
Full body kinematic traces
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Gold Standard 1 Evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 24
0 50 100 150 200 250-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Time (ms)
Acc
eler
atio
n C
FC10
00 (G
's) Head CG X-Acceleration
0 50 100 150 200 250-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Time (ms)
Acc
eler
atio
n C
FC10
00 (G
's) Head CG Y-Acceleration
0 50 100 150 200 250-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Time (ms)
Acc
eler
atio
n (G
's) C
FC10
00
Head CG Z-Acceleration
Head CGS0157Model
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Gold Standard 1 Evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 25
0 50 100 150 200 250-40
-20
0
20
Time (ms)
Acc
eler
atio
n C
FC18
0 (G
's) T1 X-Acceleration
0 50 100 150 200 250-40
-20
0
20
Time (ms)
Acc
eler
atio
n C
FC18
0 (G
's) T1 Y-Acceleration
0 50 100 150 200 250-40
-20
0
20
Time (ms)
Acc
eler
atio
n C
FC18
0 (G
's) T1 Z-Acceleration
T1S0157Model
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Gold Standard 1 Evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 26
0 50 100 150 200 250-40
-20
0
20
Time (ms)
Acc
eler
atio
n C
FC18
0 (G
's)
Pelvis X-Acceleration
0 50 100 150 200 250-40
-20
0
20
Time (ms)
Acc
eler
atio
n C
FC18
0 (G
's)
Pelvis Y-Acceleration
0 50 100 150 200 250-40
-20
0
20
Time (ms)
Acc
eler
atio
n C
FC18
0 (G
's)
Pelvis Z-Acceleration
PelvisS0157Model
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Gold Standard 1 Evaluation
Paper # (if applicable) 27
0 50 100 150 200 250-6000
-5000
-4000
-3000
-2000
-1000
0
Time (ms)
Forc
e C
FC60
0 (N
)
Right Femur Axial Force
0 50 100 150 200 250-6000
-5000
-4000
-3000
-2000
-1000
0
Time (ms)
Forc
e C
FC60
0 (N
)
Left Femur Axial Force
FemurS0157Model
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Summary of current model
Paper # (if applicable) 28
Model stabilityTop priority focusNo issues in all “certification” and Gold Standard 1 simulationsStability in vehicle crash simulation needs assessment
Model fidelitySecondary priority focusResponse is generally good (average CORA score 0.75)Neck extension needs most improvement (average CORA is 0.57)Some materials are stiffer for stability; materials not tunedGold Standard 1 belt model may be too restricting
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Summary of current model
Paper # (if applicable) 29
Current version of THOR FE model (v2.1) will be hosted on NHTSA website for public download, and will include:User manualCertification suite model filesGold Standard 1 model files
Target release date: Jan 30, 2015
SAE INTERNATIONAL
Acknowledgements
Paper # (if applicable) 30
NHTSADTNH22-09-H-00247
Chalmers University of Technology (SD3 Shoulder) Johan DavidssonKristian Holmqvist
Virginia Tech (Head & Neck)Costin UntariouJacob Putnam
Livermore Software Technology CorpChristoph MaurathDilip Bhalsod
And many of the THOR FE model users who provided feedback!
SAE INTERNATIONAL Paper # (if applicable) 31
Questions?
Thank you…
[email protected] Center for Applied Biomechanics