eut 440 engineers in society - unimap portalportal.unimap.edu.my/portal/page/portal30/lecture...
TRANSCRIPT
-
• Knowledge Sincerity Excellence
EUT 440
ENGINEERS IN
SOCIETY
IR NABIL
-
i. Physical Hazards
ii. Chemical Hazards
iii. Biological Hazards
iv. Electrical Hazards
v. Radiation Hazards
vi. Psychological Hazards eg. workplace,
space, organizational culture, stress
Types of HAZARDS
-
Methods of Identifying HAZARDS
• Injury and illness records
• Trends & developments in workplace OSH
• Accidents, incidents and near-miss reports
• Feedback from employees (interview, survey)
• Inspection (formal, informal, spot check)
• Workplace audit and health surveillance
• Exposure monitoring (OEL, PEL, WEL, TLV
• Biological monitoring (ED, EC, TD, TC, LD, LC)
• Job Hazard Analysis (formerly known as JSA)
• Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP)
• Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
• Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)
-
Selecting jobs
Simple guidelines to select jobs to be analyzed:
1. Accident frequency2. Accident severity3. Judgment and experience (hazardous jobs)4. Jobs with high turnover5. New jobs6. Non routine jobs7. Routine jobs
-
• OSH Management System includes
- Identifying the hazards (that can cause harm)
- Assessing the risk (chance – high/low it can harm
you, if it can harm, how serious) – Risk Assessment
- Controlling the risk
• Eliminating the hazard, if possible
• Minimizing, if possible• Controlling the hazard
- Checking and Reviewing the risk control
RISK MANAGEMENT
-
RISK MANAGEMENT
• RISK = LIKELIHOOD X SEVERITY
• Category of harm – injury/death, reputation,
financial loss, loss of facilities, imprisonment
• Likelihood – based on frequency of exposure
or incident (case by case)
• Severity- seriousness of the injury, illness,
damage as a result of an accident / incident
-
RISK ASSESSMENT
-
A risk assessment - careful examination what could cause
harm to people, so that you can weigh up whether you have
taken enough precautions or should do more to prevent harm.
Workers and others have a right to be protected from harm
caused by a failure to take reasonable control measures.
The law does not expect you to eliminate or control all risk -
due to limited resources.
But you are required to protect people as far as ‘reasonably
practicable’.
RISK ASSESSMENT
-
• Don’t overcomplicate the process.
• In many organizations, the risks are well known and the
necessary control measures are easy to apply.
• Check that reasonable precautions have been taken to
avoid injury.
• If you run a small organization and you are confident
you understand what’s involved, you can do the
assessment yourself.
RISK ASSESSMENT
-
How to Assess the Risk?
Two approaches
- Qualitative - Subjective• Perception (personal judgment, tech knowledge, generalised data risk)• Likelihood and Consequences
- Likelihood: Very Often, Often, Seldom-- Consequence: Fatal, Major and Minor
- Quantitative - Objective• Historical data (scientific studies and measurements, compare with LV)
• Probability of occurrence (Frequency): Incidents/200,000 MH/Year• Consequence
- Direct and Indirect Cost
-
Level of Risk Assessment
Level 1
• Qualitative
• Quick and easy but result in fairly conservative risk rankings
• Initial pre-screening of risk
Level 2
• Semi-Quantitative (Intermediate method)
• Takes more time to accomplish
• More accuracy and avoid overly conservative risk rankings
Level 3
• Quantitative
• More detailed and more accurate method
• Calculates specific scores e.g. likelihood of failures, injuries etc
-
Risk Assessment Matrix
• Detailed descriptions of the consequences
of concern
• Clearly defined tolerable and intolerable
risk levels
• Clear guidance on what action is necessary
to mitigate
-
eg. Qualitative – risk matrix
Risk Assessment Matrix Hazard Categories
4 3 2 1Frequency of Occurrence
Catastrophic Critical Marginal Negligible
(5) Frequent 20 15 10 5
(4) Probable 16 12 8 4
(3) Occasional 12 9 6 3
(2) Remote 8 6 4 2
(1) Improbable 4 3 2 1
Hazard Risk Index
Risk Classification – WEIGH FACTOR: Risk Criteria:
From 10 to 20 Unacceptable
From 6 to 9 Undesirable
From 3 to 5 Acceptable with review
From 1 to 2 Acceptable without review
-
Qualitative Approach
-
Frequency of Occurrence - definition
DESCRIPTION CATEGORY MISHAP - DEFINITION
Frequent 5 Likely to occur frequently
Probable 4 Will occur several times during thelife of an item
Occasional 3 Likely to occur sometime in the lifeof an item
Remote 2 Unlikely, but may be possible occur
in life of an item
Improbable 1 So unlikely, it can be assumed that
the hazard will not occur
-
DESCRIPTION CATEGORY MISHAP - DEFINITION
Catastrophic 4 Death or system loss
Critical 3 Severe injury, occupationalillness, or system damage
Marginal 2 Minor injury, occupational
illness, or system damage
Negligible 1 Less than minor injury,
occupational illness, or system
damage
Hazard Categories - definition
-
Quantitative Approach
-
Quantitative ApproachFREQUENCY AND SEVERITY RATES
i. Frequency Rate – to determine the frequency of accidents or
injury or severity of injury
The methodologies are similar in all cases, but the bases used
may differ
If A - the event for which the frequency rate is to be computed;
B – numerical base
C – exposure, then:
Frequency Rate = (A * B)/C (B – is the base that differs)
-
Quantitative Approach
Frequency Rate = (A * B)/C (B how it - differs)
1. AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE
(ANSI)
B = 1,000,000 man-hours
2. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS
USE BASE (B) AS 100 FULL-TIME
EMPLOYEES WOULD WORK 200,000
HR/YR ( ie 100 WORKER 40
HR/WEEK/WORKER, 50 WEEKS/YR)
-
Quantitative ApproachIF A PLANT HAD 18 ACCIDENT/YEAR (= A) DURING WHICH EMPLOYEE
WORKED A TOTAL 1,200,000 HOURS (=C)
IF DURING THE SAME PERIOD THERE WERE 6 DISABLING INJURIES
1. AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI)
B = 1,000,000 MAN-HOURS
i. ACCIDENT FREQ RATE = 18 * 1,000,000 = 15.0 PER MILLION MAN-HRS
1,200,000
ii. INJURY FREQ RATE = 6 * 1,000,000 = 5.0 PER MIL MAN-HRS
1,200,000
2. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS (BLS)
B = 200,000 HR/YR
i. ACCIDENT FREQ RATE = 18 * 200,000 = 3.0 PER 200,000 MAN-HRS
1,200,000
ii. INJURY FREQ RATE = 6 * 200,000 = 1.0 PER 200,000 MAN-HRS
1,200,000
-
Quantitative Approach
SO WHEN FREQUENCY RATES
ARE CITED, IT IS NECESSARY
TO KNOW THE BASE
-
Quantitative Approach
ISSUES IN SEVERITY RATE:
SOME INDUSTRY - RATES MAY BE HIGH
BUT INJURY MAY BE MINOR
OTHER INDUSTRY, FEW ACCIDENTS
(LOW RATES) BUT INJURY IF OCCUR
MAY BE SEVERE
-
Quantitative Approach
ANSI USES TIME CHARGES IN DISABLING INJURY SEVERITY
RATE
eg. FATALITY OR PERMANENT TOTAL DISABILITY – TIME
CHARGE = 6000 DAYS (THIS IS BASED ON LIFE
EXPECTANCY OF AN AVERAGE WORKER x THE NUMBER
OF WORKING DAYS/YR)
TIME CHARGES FOR:
LOSS OF EYE = 1,800 DAYS
LOSS OF BOTH EYE = 3,000 DAYS
TABULATED IN ANSI STANDARDS
-
Quantitative ApproachAS IN THE PREVIOUS EXAMPLE (ANSI):
IF 6 DISABLING INJURY RESULTED IN 240 DAYS LOSS:
DISABLING INJURY SEVERITY RATE CAN BE CALCULATED
TOTAL DAYS CHARGE * 1,000,000 = 240 * 1,000,000 = 200.0 DAYS PER
EMPLOYEE HRS OF EXPOSURE 1,200,000 MILLION MAN-HRS
THE AVERAGE SEVERITY PER INJURY CAN ALSO BE CALCULATED – 2 WAYS
AVG DAYS CHARGED = TOTAL DAY LOSS OR CHARGE = 240 = 40
TOTAL NUMBER OF DISABLING INJURY 6
OR
= INJURY SEVERITY RATE = 200 = 40
INJURY FREQUENCY RATE 5
PREVIOUS CALCULATION
-
TO CALCULATE COSTS (USING BLS METHOD)
Example, fall = 10 incidents/200,000 MH/Year; andin average one fall accident costs USD 1000.
- Note: 200,000 = number of hours that 100 employees work in a year, which is 40 hrs per week x 50 weeks x 100
• If a construction site employs 200 workers• The estimate of fall related cost is
-200 x 40 x 50 / 200000 = 2 injuries- Estimated Cost = 2 x 1000 = USD 2,000 / year
Quantitative Approach
-
OUTCOME OF RISK ASSESSMENT
- RISK MATRIX
-
• Safety Management System includes
- Identifying the hazard (that can cause harm)
- Assessing the risk (chance – high/low it can harm
you, if it can harm, how serious) – Risk Assessment
- Controlling the risk
• Eliminating the hazard, if possible
• Minimizing, if possible• Controlling the hazard
- Checking and Reviewing the risk control
RISK MANAGEMENT
-
Risk Control
• The elimination or inactivation of a hazard
in a manner such that the hazard does not
pose a risk to workers who have to enter
into an area or work on equipment in the
course of work.
• Hazards should be controlled at their source
where the problem is created.
• Risk control involves evaluating, selecting
and implementing short-term or long-term
controls.
-
Consideration in Risk Control
• Review measures regularly; modify if
necessary
• Compliance with laws and regulations
• Reflect good management practice
• Consider current state of knowledge
• Include reports or information from
organizations like DOSH, etc.
-
Criteria for Assessing Risk Control• Cost
• Timing
• Leverage
• Administrative efficiency
• Continuity of effects
• Compatibility
• Jurisdictional authority
• Effects on the economy and environment
• Risk creation
• Equity
• Risk reduction potential reaction
• Political acceptability
• Public and pressure group
-
Risk Elimination
• This is the best solution, however sometimes
it is not practicable
Example
- Lead-based paint can cause lung cancer -
Solution: replace the type of the paint with water-
based paint
-
Risk Minimization
• Replace a hazardous substance or work
practice with a less hazardous one.
• Reduce the number of people exposed to the
hazard.
• Reduce the exposure of the hazards through
administrative control e.g. supervision and
training, job rotations, housekeeping and
maintenance programs, hygiene practice.
-
Risk Control
- Welding wear mask
- Vibration wear leather glove
- Chemical wear safety clothes
- Fall wear body harness
- Noise wear earmuff
• Isolate or contain the hazard from workers through
engineering control e.g. re-design, automation system or
mechanization, absorption device, barriers or dilution.
• Change with other types (equipment, procedures or work
practices) although new ‘safer’ hazards may occur.
• Use personal protective equipment when other control
measures are not feasible and where additional protection is
needed.
-
Review and Check
• Check the effectiveness of the safety riskmanagement
• Review new hazards and technology
In order for us to achieve the objectives
of managing the OSH at workplace, we
THEREFORE need to look at a
systematic process.
-
Risk Management Steps (HSE Approach)
-
Require a Systematic Process
The systematic process is HIRARC -
the basis of occupational safety and
health – in MALAYSIA –
Ministry of Human Resources
HIRARC Guidelines
-
45
HIRARC
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION,
RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK
CONTROL
-
WHY WE NEED TO MANAGE HAZARDS – THE RISK
MANAGEMENT?
1. RESPONSIBILITY TO COMPLY WITH LAW
- FACTORY AND MACHINERY ACT 1967
- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT 1994 .
HIRARC
-
Mandatory under the law.
It is one of the general duties as prescribed under the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 (Act 514) for the employer to provide a safe workplaces to their employees and other related person. ……. OSH ACT
-
THE ACTS
-
WHY WE NEED TO MANAGE HAZARDS – THE RISK
MANAGEMENT?
2. TO COMLPY WITH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM STANDARDS
(OHSAS 18001, ISO 14001, others.)
HIRARC
-
WHY WE NEED TO MANAGE HAZARDS – THE RISK MANAGEMENT? ………cont
3. TO ENABLE AN ORGANIZATION TO MANAGE HAZARDS
EFFECTIVELY
- especially when hazard appears to pose significant threat
- to identify all factors that may cause harm to employers & others
- to consider what are the chances of that harm could actually be
falling in the circumstances
- before implementing corrective or preventive measures
4. TO IDENTIFY WHETHER THE CURRENT CONTROL IS
SUFFICIENT AT ALL TIMES
- uncertain existing measures adequate ?.
HIRARC
-
.
HIRARC is a compound word, made up of 3
consecutive activities running one after the other.
The activities consist of Hazard Identification,
Risk Assessment and Risk Control.
HIRARC
-
Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Risk Control.
Hazard identification is the recognising of things which may
cause injury or harm to a person.
Risk assessment is the looking at the possibility of injury or harm
occurring to a person if exposed to a hazard.
Risk control is the introduction of measures which will eliminate
or reduce the risk of a person being exposed to a hazard.
HIRARC
-
HIRARC
-
HIRARC – process flow
-
Thank you