eut 440 engineers in society - unimap portalportal.unimap.edu.my/portal/page/portal30/lecture...

55
Knowledge Sincerity Excellence EUT 440 ENGINEERS IN SOCIETY IR NABIL

Upload: others

Post on 22-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • • Knowledge Sincerity Excellence

    EUT 440

    ENGINEERS IN

    SOCIETY

    IR NABIL

  • i. Physical Hazards

    ii. Chemical Hazards

    iii. Biological Hazards

    iv. Electrical Hazards

    v. Radiation Hazards

    vi. Psychological Hazards eg. workplace,

    space, organizational culture, stress

    Types of HAZARDS

  • Methods of Identifying HAZARDS

    • Injury and illness records

    • Trends & developments in workplace OSH

    • Accidents, incidents and near-miss reports

    • Feedback from employees (interview, survey)

    • Inspection (formal, informal, spot check)

    • Workplace audit and health surveillance

    • Exposure monitoring (OEL, PEL, WEL, TLV

    • Biological monitoring (ED, EC, TD, TC, LD, LC)

    • Job Hazard Analysis (formerly known as JSA)

    • Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP)

    • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)

    • Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)

  • Selecting jobs

    Simple guidelines to select jobs to be analyzed:

    1. Accident frequency2. Accident severity3. Judgment and experience (hazardous jobs)4. Jobs with high turnover5. New jobs6. Non routine jobs7. Routine jobs

  • • OSH Management System includes

    - Identifying the hazards (that can cause harm)

    - Assessing the risk (chance – high/low it can harm

    you, if it can harm, how serious) – Risk Assessment

    - Controlling the risk

    • Eliminating the hazard, if possible

    • Minimizing, if possible• Controlling the hazard

    - Checking and Reviewing the risk control

    RISK MANAGEMENT

  • RISK MANAGEMENT

    • RISK = LIKELIHOOD X SEVERITY

    • Category of harm – injury/death, reputation,

    financial loss, loss of facilities, imprisonment

    • Likelihood – based on frequency of exposure

    or incident (case by case)

    • Severity- seriousness of the injury, illness,

    damage as a result of an accident / incident

  • RISK ASSESSMENT

  • A risk assessment - careful examination what could cause

    harm to people, so that you can weigh up whether you have

    taken enough precautions or should do more to prevent harm.

    Workers and others have a right to be protected from harm

    caused by a failure to take reasonable control measures.

    The law does not expect you to eliminate or control all risk -

    due to limited resources.

    But you are required to protect people as far as ‘reasonably

    practicable’.

    RISK ASSESSMENT

  • • Don’t overcomplicate the process.

    • In many organizations, the risks are well known and the

    necessary control measures are easy to apply.

    • Check that reasonable precautions have been taken to

    avoid injury.

    • If you run a small organization and you are confident

    you understand what’s involved, you can do the

    assessment yourself.

    RISK ASSESSMENT

  • How to Assess the Risk?

    Two approaches

    - Qualitative - Subjective• Perception (personal judgment, tech knowledge, generalised data risk)• Likelihood and Consequences

    - Likelihood: Very Often, Often, Seldom-- Consequence: Fatal, Major and Minor

    - Quantitative - Objective• Historical data (scientific studies and measurements, compare with LV)

    • Probability of occurrence (Frequency): Incidents/200,000 MH/Year• Consequence

    - Direct and Indirect Cost

  • Level of Risk Assessment

    Level 1

    • Qualitative

    • Quick and easy but result in fairly conservative risk rankings

    • Initial pre-screening of risk

    Level 2

    • Semi-Quantitative (Intermediate method)

    • Takes more time to accomplish

    • More accuracy and avoid overly conservative risk rankings

    Level 3

    • Quantitative

    • More detailed and more accurate method

    • Calculates specific scores e.g. likelihood of failures, injuries etc

  • Risk Assessment Matrix

    • Detailed descriptions of the consequences

    of concern

    • Clearly defined tolerable and intolerable

    risk levels

    • Clear guidance on what action is necessary

    to mitigate

  • eg. Qualitative – risk matrix

    Risk Assessment Matrix Hazard Categories

    4 3 2 1Frequency of Occurrence

    Catastrophic Critical Marginal Negligible

    (5) Frequent 20 15 10 5

    (4) Probable 16 12 8 4

    (3) Occasional 12 9 6 3

    (2) Remote 8 6 4 2

    (1) Improbable 4 3 2 1

    Hazard Risk Index

    Risk Classification – WEIGH FACTOR: Risk Criteria:

    From 10 to 20 Unacceptable

    From 6 to 9 Undesirable

    From 3 to 5 Acceptable with review

    From 1 to 2 Acceptable without review

  • Qualitative Approach

  • Frequency of Occurrence - definition

    DESCRIPTION CATEGORY MISHAP - DEFINITION

    Frequent 5 Likely to occur frequently

    Probable 4 Will occur several times during thelife of an item

    Occasional 3 Likely to occur sometime in the lifeof an item

    Remote 2 Unlikely, but may be possible occur

    in life of an item

    Improbable 1 So unlikely, it can be assumed that

    the hazard will not occur

  • DESCRIPTION CATEGORY MISHAP - DEFINITION

    Catastrophic 4 Death or system loss

    Critical 3 Severe injury, occupationalillness, or system damage

    Marginal 2 Minor injury, occupational

    illness, or system damage

    Negligible 1 Less than minor injury,

    occupational illness, or system

    damage

    Hazard Categories - definition

  • Quantitative Approach

  • Quantitative ApproachFREQUENCY AND SEVERITY RATES

    i. Frequency Rate – to determine the frequency of accidents or

    injury or severity of injury

    The methodologies are similar in all cases, but the bases used

    may differ

    If A - the event for which the frequency rate is to be computed;

    B – numerical base

    C – exposure, then:

    Frequency Rate = (A * B)/C (B – is the base that differs)

  • Quantitative Approach

    Frequency Rate = (A * B)/C (B how it - differs)

    1. AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE

    (ANSI)

    B = 1,000,000 man-hours

    2. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS

    USE BASE (B) AS 100 FULL-TIME

    EMPLOYEES WOULD WORK 200,000

    HR/YR ( ie 100 WORKER 40

    HR/WEEK/WORKER, 50 WEEKS/YR)

  • Quantitative ApproachIF A PLANT HAD 18 ACCIDENT/YEAR (= A) DURING WHICH EMPLOYEE

    WORKED A TOTAL 1,200,000 HOURS (=C)

    IF DURING THE SAME PERIOD THERE WERE 6 DISABLING INJURIES

    1. AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI)

    B = 1,000,000 MAN-HOURS

    i. ACCIDENT FREQ RATE = 18 * 1,000,000 = 15.0 PER MILLION MAN-HRS

    1,200,000

    ii. INJURY FREQ RATE = 6 * 1,000,000 = 5.0 PER MIL MAN-HRS

    1,200,000

    2. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS (BLS)

    B = 200,000 HR/YR

    i. ACCIDENT FREQ RATE = 18 * 200,000 = 3.0 PER 200,000 MAN-HRS

    1,200,000

    ii. INJURY FREQ RATE = 6 * 200,000 = 1.0 PER 200,000 MAN-HRS

    1,200,000

  • Quantitative Approach

    SO WHEN FREQUENCY RATES

    ARE CITED, IT IS NECESSARY

    TO KNOW THE BASE

  • Quantitative Approach

    ISSUES IN SEVERITY RATE:

    SOME INDUSTRY - RATES MAY BE HIGH

    BUT INJURY MAY BE MINOR

    OTHER INDUSTRY, FEW ACCIDENTS

    (LOW RATES) BUT INJURY IF OCCUR

    MAY BE SEVERE

  • Quantitative Approach

    ANSI USES TIME CHARGES IN DISABLING INJURY SEVERITY

    RATE

    eg. FATALITY OR PERMANENT TOTAL DISABILITY – TIME

    CHARGE = 6000 DAYS (THIS IS BASED ON LIFE

    EXPECTANCY OF AN AVERAGE WORKER x THE NUMBER

    OF WORKING DAYS/YR)

    TIME CHARGES FOR:

    LOSS OF EYE = 1,800 DAYS

    LOSS OF BOTH EYE = 3,000 DAYS

    TABULATED IN ANSI STANDARDS

  • Quantitative ApproachAS IN THE PREVIOUS EXAMPLE (ANSI):

    IF 6 DISABLING INJURY RESULTED IN 240 DAYS LOSS:

    DISABLING INJURY SEVERITY RATE CAN BE CALCULATED

    TOTAL DAYS CHARGE * 1,000,000 = 240 * 1,000,000 = 200.0 DAYS PER

    EMPLOYEE HRS OF EXPOSURE 1,200,000 MILLION MAN-HRS

    THE AVERAGE SEVERITY PER INJURY CAN ALSO BE CALCULATED – 2 WAYS

    AVG DAYS CHARGED = TOTAL DAY LOSS OR CHARGE = 240 = 40

    TOTAL NUMBER OF DISABLING INJURY 6

    OR

    = INJURY SEVERITY RATE = 200 = 40

    INJURY FREQUENCY RATE 5

    PREVIOUS CALCULATION

  • TO CALCULATE COSTS (USING BLS METHOD)

    Example, fall = 10 incidents/200,000 MH/Year; andin average one fall accident costs USD 1000.

    - Note: 200,000 = number of hours that 100 employees work in a year, which is 40 hrs per week x 50 weeks x 100

    • If a construction site employs 200 workers• The estimate of fall related cost is

    -200 x 40 x 50 / 200000 = 2 injuries- Estimated Cost = 2 x 1000 = USD 2,000 / year

    Quantitative Approach

  • OUTCOME OF RISK ASSESSMENT

    - RISK MATRIX

  • • Safety Management System includes

    - Identifying the hazard (that can cause harm)

    - Assessing the risk (chance – high/low it can harm

    you, if it can harm, how serious) – Risk Assessment

    - Controlling the risk

    • Eliminating the hazard, if possible

    • Minimizing, if possible• Controlling the hazard

    - Checking and Reviewing the risk control

    RISK MANAGEMENT

  • Risk Control

    • The elimination or inactivation of a hazard

    in a manner such that the hazard does not

    pose a risk to workers who have to enter

    into an area or work on equipment in the

    course of work.

    • Hazards should be controlled at their source

    where the problem is created.

    • Risk control involves evaluating, selecting

    and implementing short-term or long-term

    controls.

  • Consideration in Risk Control

    • Review measures regularly; modify if

    necessary

    • Compliance with laws and regulations

    • Reflect good management practice

    • Consider current state of knowledge

    • Include reports or information from

    organizations like DOSH, etc.

  • Criteria for Assessing Risk Control• Cost

    • Timing

    • Leverage

    • Administrative efficiency

    • Continuity of effects

    • Compatibility

    • Jurisdictional authority

    • Effects on the economy and environment

    • Risk creation

    • Equity

    • Risk reduction potential reaction

    • Political acceptability

    • Public and pressure group

  • Risk Elimination

    • This is the best solution, however sometimes

    it is not practicable

    Example

    - Lead-based paint can cause lung cancer -

    Solution: replace the type of the paint with water-

    based paint

  • Risk Minimization

    • Replace a hazardous substance or work

    practice with a less hazardous one.

    • Reduce the number of people exposed to the

    hazard.

    • Reduce the exposure of the hazards through

    administrative control e.g. supervision and

    training, job rotations, housekeeping and

    maintenance programs, hygiene practice.

  • Risk Control

    - Welding wear mask

    - Vibration wear leather glove

    - Chemical wear safety clothes

    - Fall wear body harness

    - Noise wear earmuff

    • Isolate or contain the hazard from workers through

    engineering control e.g. re-design, automation system or

    mechanization, absorption device, barriers or dilution.

    • Change with other types (equipment, procedures or work

    practices) although new ‘safer’ hazards may occur.

    • Use personal protective equipment when other control

    measures are not feasible and where additional protection is

    needed.

  • Review and Check

    • Check the effectiveness of the safety riskmanagement

    • Review new hazards and technology

    In order for us to achieve the objectives

    of managing the OSH at workplace, we

    THEREFORE need to look at a

    systematic process.

  • Risk Management Steps (HSE Approach)

  • Require a Systematic Process

    The systematic process is HIRARC -

    the basis of occupational safety and

    health – in MALAYSIA –

    Ministry of Human Resources

    HIRARC Guidelines

  • 45

    HIRARC

    HAZARD IDENTIFICATION,

    RISK ASSESSMENT & RISK

    CONTROL

  • WHY WE NEED TO MANAGE HAZARDS – THE RISK

    MANAGEMENT?

    1. RESPONSIBILITY TO COMPLY WITH LAW

    - FACTORY AND MACHINERY ACT 1967

    - OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT 1994 .

    HIRARC

  • Mandatory under the law.

    It is one of the general duties as prescribed under the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 (Act 514) for the employer to provide a safe workplaces to their employees and other related person. ……. OSH ACT

  • THE ACTS

  • WHY WE NEED TO MANAGE HAZARDS – THE RISK

    MANAGEMENT?

    2. TO COMLPY WITH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM STANDARDS

    (OHSAS 18001, ISO 14001, others.)

    HIRARC

  • WHY WE NEED TO MANAGE HAZARDS – THE RISK MANAGEMENT? ………cont

    3. TO ENABLE AN ORGANIZATION TO MANAGE HAZARDS

    EFFECTIVELY

    - especially when hazard appears to pose significant threat

    - to identify all factors that may cause harm to employers & others

    - to consider what are the chances of that harm could actually be

    falling in the circumstances

    - before implementing corrective or preventive measures

    4. TO IDENTIFY WHETHER THE CURRENT CONTROL IS

    SUFFICIENT AT ALL TIMES

    - uncertain existing measures adequate ?.

    HIRARC

  • .

    HIRARC is a compound word, made up of 3

    consecutive activities running one after the other.

    The activities consist of Hazard Identification,

    Risk Assessment and Risk Control.

    HIRARC

  • Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Risk Control.

    Hazard identification is the recognising of things which may

    cause injury or harm to a person.

    Risk assessment is the looking at the possibility of injury or harm

    occurring to a person if exposed to a hazard.

    Risk control is the introduction of measures which will eliminate

    or reduce the risk of a person being exposed to a hazard.

    HIRARC

  • HIRARC

  • HIRARC – process flow

  • Thank you