July 14th, 2015

EU-LATIN AMERICA COOPERATION ON REGIONAL INNOVATION

STRATEGIES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF REGIONAL POLICY

Final Report - Annexes

Authored by:

Innopro Global Services, S.L. ALIAS Allied to grow S.L,

info@innoproconsulting.com +34 933 028 727

2

Authored by:

Innopro Global Services S.L. Alias, Allied to grow, S.L. Authors:

Miquel Barceló

Enric Fuster

Natalia Marrugat

Andrea Ordenes

Aleix Pujolar

David Sánchez

Ismael Abel

Neus Hernández

Emma Santarremigia Disclaimer © European Union, 2015 The information, opinions and views set out in this report are those of INNOPRO GLOBAL SERVICES, S.L. and ALIAS ALLIED TO GROW, S.L. and other players (when indicated) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. .

3

9 ANNEXES ................................................................................................................... 4

9.1 ANNEX 1. COUNTRIES’ REGIONAL DATA ....................................................................................................... 4

9.2 ANNEX 2. CHARACTERISATION OF THE REGIONAL INNOVATION STRATEGIES – RIS ................................................ 12

9.3 ANNEX 3. SIMILARITY BETWEEN POLOS REGIONS AND EU REGIONS, MEASURED BY THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THEIR

SPECIALIZATION VECTORS ................................................................................................................................. 21

9.4 ANNEX 4. STAKEHOLDERS PER SECTOR ....................................................................................................... 44

9.5 ANNEX 5: MULTILATERAL AND MULTILEVEL COOPERATION SHARED PRIORITIES BETWEEN AMERICAN REGIONS............ 59

9.6 ANNEX 6: DOCUMENTATION PROCESS TABLES .............................................................................................. 62

9.7 ANNEX 7: SECTORS AND SUBSECTORS OF EYE@RIS3 S3 PLATFORM ................................................................. 83

4

9 Annexes

9.1 Annex 1. Countries’ Regional Data

9.1.1 Argentina

5

9.1.2 Brazil

6

9.1.3 Chile

7

9.1.4 Colombia

8

9.1.5 Costa Rica

9.1.6 Ecuador

9

9.1.7 Mexico

10

9.1.8 Peru

11

9.1.9 Uruguay

12

9.2 Annex 2. Characterisation of the Regional Innovation Strategies – RIS

9.2.1 Brazil

In Brazil the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI) developed a Plan named Action Plan of

Science, Technology and Innovation for National Development (PACTI). 1 To aim the objectives the plan

develops several strategic actions.

The main objectives of the plan are:

1. Expansion and Consolidation of the National System of STI

2. Promotion of Innovation in Enterprises

3. RD&I in Strategic Areas

4. CT&I for Social Development

On the other hand at the state level main political and regulatory functions are addressed by ministries and

state councils of science and technology. The National Council of State Secretaries of STI (CONSECTI) and the

Brazilian National Council of Research Support State Foundations (CONFAP) includes these ministries or

equivalent bodies with the aim to strengthen dialogue between the states and the federal government.

In each state there is located a Research Support State Foundation (FAP). Several State Foundations, jointly

with the correspondent state science secretaries promoted the elaboration of a Plan regarding science,

technology and innovation for all their regions. Two documents of this sort were developed, both in line with

the objectives of the National Strategy for STI (PACTI) as a framework for each regional document:

Plano de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação para o desenvolvimento sustentável do Nordeste Brasileiro

PCTI/NE. The document was elaborated at 2014 responding to the request of science and technology

regional secretaries and the presidents of the research support foundations. The Minister supported

the initiative, and requested an external body, the Management and Strategic Studies Center (CGEE),2

to develop it. The process of PCTI/NE elaboration started in mid-2013. The states included in the

process were: Piaui, Cearà, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraiba, Pernambuco, Alagoas, Sergipe and Bahía.

Similarly the Foundation Presidents and State Secretaries of Amazónia Legal promoted another Plan,

named Plano de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação para o Desenvolvimento da Amazônia Legal

PCTI/Amazônia. The process of PCTI/Amazônia elaboration started in 2013. The states included in the

process were: Acre, Amazonas, Roraima, Rondonia, Amapà, Parà, Tocantins, Maranhâo.

In addition some states have developed a state-focused plan. Those are:

1 Plano de Ação 2007 – 2010 Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação para o Desenvolvimento Nacional 2 Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos

13

Plano de ação em Ciência Tecnologia e Inovação do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte: 2011–2020. Being

the third SCI Plan made within the state of Rio Norte, all its predecessors were planned for a 10 years

scope. The methodology adopted for the preparation of the Plan was based on the participation of

relevant actors of the State of CTI system and the responsibles of implementing it. The process started

in March 2010.

Plano Estadual de Ciencia, tecnología e inovaçao do Acre PECTI Acre. The initiative was promoted by

the State Foundation of Technology for Acre (FUNTAC) and started in 2001.

Plano Estadual de Ciência,Tecnologia e Inovação do Estado de Alagoas 2023. It is a result of a collective

process of discussion and definition with local actors representatives of the academic community,

business sector and government. The plan promotes STI actions to strengthen strategic sectors, mostly

structured under existing technological poles.

Plano Estadual de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação para o Desenvolvimento Sustentado do Ceará: Plano

de Ação 2011 – 2020. Which covers a time period of 10 years. It intends to play an important role

guiding projects and actions for the local innovation system. All the local systems were asked to

participate over 2 years of elaboration of the documents.

Summary

States/Documents

PCTIs PECTIs

Acre PCTI/Amazônia PECTI Acre

Amazonas PCTI/Amazônia

Roraima PCTI/Amazônia

Rondonia PCTI/Amazônia

Amapà PCTI/Amazônia

Parà PCTI/Amazônia

Tocantins PCTI/Amazônia

Maranhâo PCTI/Amazônia

Piaui PCTI/NE

Cearà PCTI/NE PECTI

Rio Grande do Norte PCTI/NE PACTI do Rio Grande do Norte

Paraiba PCTI/NE

Pernambuco PCTI/NE

Alagoas PCTI/NE PECTI Alagoas

Sergipe PCTI/NE

Bahía PCTI/NE

Mato Grosso PCTI/Amazônia

Minas Gerais PCTI/NE

Espírito Santo PCTI/NE

Figure 1: Abstract of the main priorisation criteria in the Regional Innovation Agendas in Mexico

14

The participatory process included rounds of expert consultations and regional actors involving academic

institutions, entrepreneurs and regionally based enterprises. To complement the process in some cases

technical support was required. Finally each Plan was approved by MITCI.

Each plan pretends to bring principles, guidelines and guiding actions of an effective STI policy. The structure,

in a general way, includes:

1. Diagnosis of existing Regional Innovation System. Reflecting weaknesses, limitations, strengths and

internal heterogeneity.

2. Expression of objectives and ultimate goals of the plan. Including axes and planning scales which also

describes prioritising economic sectors.

3. Elements of programming.

4. Management and governance of regional Plan.

9.2.2 Chile

The Regional Innovation Strategies of Chile emerged from a joint initiative with the EU, called RED Project. The

main objective of Project RED is the construction of Regional Innovation Strategies with RIS, Regional

Innovation Strategies methodology, which was led by the local governors and advised on site by European

experts in the field.

Regional Innovation Strategies were conducted from the Department of Regional and Administrative

Development, SUBDERE, under the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme EU-Chile. Initially, 7 regions

were included within the Programme scope, although three regions were incorporated later.

The initiative grew out of a collaboration project with the European Union, coordinated by the International

Cooperation Agency, AGCI, the Chilean Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and implemented by the Department of

Regional and Administrative Development, SUBDERE, under the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme

EU-Chile, develop cooperation initiative between the years 2008-2013.

A cross-national unit was established to safeguard the process, the National and Inter Directory (owned by

Miguel Flores - Secretary SUBDERE). The National Project Director was Mario Varela. Coordinating Board with

Partner Institutions (CONICYT, CORFO INNOVA, MINECON) European and national experts RIS - FIC. Lenia

Planas was the head of the technical coordination of the project, supervising cooperative areas located in

regions and support areas responsible for giving visibility to the project and communication.

9.2.2.1 Objectives

The general objective of the RED project was to contribute to deepen the process of regionalization and

decentralization in the current innovation system, improving the efficiency of public investment and the

contribution of regional development and competitiveness. For that purpose:

15

Expertise in professional and institutional conditions for governance and management in existing

regional innovation system were enabled.

In the first phase at least 3 Regions designed Regional Innovation Strategies fulfilling objectives for

decentralization of investment.

A network of collaboration was established to work among Chilean regions, and between European

regions

The specific objectives of RED Project were:

5. To generate regional capacities to promote innovation in each region

6. To increase decentralization and

7. To improve the country's competitiveness in a globalized world

9.2.2.2 Calendar

There was a first group of regions that made the Regional Innovation Strategy between 2011-2012. These

regions are: Antofagasta, Coquimbo, O'Higgins and Santiago Metropolitano. All other regions developed their

Regional Innovation Strategies in 2013.

DATE ACTIVITY PROGRAM

November 2010 Official Start of the Project. Signing of agreement AGCI - SUBDERE

December 2010 Tripartite Agreements signed SUBDERE-GORE-Executing Agency RIS Studies

(Antofagasta, Coquimbo, O´Higgins, Santiago Metropolitano)

January 2011 Constitution of National and Interregional Directory

March 2011 Contracting of European Expert and National Expert

April 2011 - European experts visits Regions

- Starting the Media and Visibility Plan

May 2011 Start conversations with the EU RIS Project with the Candidate Regions.

June 2011 - Start of the Web Platform

- Preparation of materials in regions for diagnostic analysis

- Short-term experts for technology consulting

- Start of the regular meetings of the National Meeting and Interregional Project

Team.

- Evaluation of RIS / FIC 2011 and beginning the work process to define a first

proposal for 2012

July 2011 Visit of policymakers to Europe

July 2011 Event: National Launch of Project RED (Santiago)

July 2011 European recruitment consultants RIS

Aug 2011 RED launches project in each one of the Regions

Aug.- Nov. 2011 Beginning of Jobs IIS Studies (Offer Request) from consultants

Sept. 11- Mar. 12 Signature of cooperation agreements with European regions

16

Dec. 2011 Completing work Diagnosis and workshops

Jan. – Sep. 2011 Hiring 25 professionals in the regions to support innovation policies

Jan. 2012 Diagnosis approval by the Board and CORE

Feb. - Mar. 2012 Start Analysis Strategy (RIS)

April 2012 Approval of the Strategy CORE, and its relationship with FIC

May 2012 Definition of pilot projects in the Strategy (RIS)

June - July 2012 Operation of the pilot projects RIS

June 2012 Event: Closing the program. Innovation Forum and launch of the Strategy (RIS)

Figure 2: Regional Innovation Strategy Chronogram

9.2.2.3 Process

The RIS methodology is achieved by the following steps. It is also necessary to have the contribution from a

broad political support and a general consensus from the regional actors.

1. A diagnosis of existing Regional Innovation System, which aims at the characterization of the demand

and supply of innovation, the regional assets, a level of innovation maturity, and the current level of

co-operation and interaction between the diverse agents (businesses, R&D and policy makers) in the

system.

2. The strategy consists on prioritising economic sectors and the establishment of an action plan with

concrete measures to be launched in the region.

3. Pilot Projects.

9.2.3 Colombia

In Colombia the Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation, COLCIENCIAS, together

with the Colombian Observatory of Science and Technology OCyT, have supported the Government of each

region in the process of building the regional Strategy Plans. The Strategy Plans become tool for the territories

to enhance their capacity to innovate. All regions have relied on the view of an interdisciplinary group of

experts from different education institutions. Moreover, in some cases, there has been an active participation

of members of the quadruple helix. The Strategy Plans have been elaborated and since 2012. As of April 17th,

2015, twenty-seven (27) strategy plans have been published. Each region has made emphasize in one or other

characteristics and as a whole, the regions show a wide range focus of their specialization.

9.2.3.1 Objectives

The Strategy Plans were mainly established to draw a route that would be a tool for the territories to enhance

their capacity to innovate. With an horizon of 10 years ahead, the Strategy Plans aim at accomplish relevant

advances in the way research, technology, innovation politics and institutions interact in the promotion of a

dialogue among the agents, with the objective to facilitate their cooperation and mutual understanding.

17

9.2.3.2 Calendar

The Strategy Plans have been elaborated and since 2012.

9.2.3.3 Process

The Strategy Plans in Colombia show mostly the characterization of the economy of the region. Some of the

Strategy Plans show a more detailed information about the capacities of the region than other. In spite of this,

all the Strategic Plans include:

Analysis of the main capacities

Industrial structure

Competitiveness

Main technology gaps

Science, Technology and Innovation indicators

A detailed analysis of the legal framework (some regions)

Nevertheless, each region has made emphasize in one or other characteristics and as a whole, the regions show

a wide range focus of their specialization. Moreover, in Colombia some regions are economically and

technologically more advanced than other. This , together with the diversity of the land (some regions like

Cauca have up to three areas orographically opposed: the Pacific coast, the Amazonian and the Cordilleras)

results in a very diverse productive tissue and makes is more difficult to provide a closer approach to

specialization.

9.2.3.4 Next steps

In some cases, the RIS do not define specialization sectors, and rely only on horizontal approaches (e.g.

Entrepreneurial Programs, Industrial Parks).

9.2.4 Mexico

The development of State and Regional Innovation Agendas in Mexico has been an initiative of the National

Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT)3 along with relevant stakeholders. The process has been based

on a participatory and consensus that has involved key actors from the quadruple helix – the interplay between

industry, university (academy and research), public sector and civil society. CONACYT has developed 32 state

3 CONACYT took as a starting point the prioritization already made in the previous economic development strategies:

Science and Technology Law (LCYTA) 2007, IDSCEA Creation Law, State Government Six Year Plan 2010-2016, Economic

Development Sector Plan 2010-2016, Science and Technology State Plan 2009-2020, and the objectives of the Special

Programme for Science, Technology and Innovation (PECITI), whose two axes were the regional strengthening and the

linkage between industry sector and the academia, and the National Development Plan Federal Government.

18

Agendas and three Regional Innovation Agendas. As of April 17th, 2015, fifteen (15) Agendas have been

published. The scorecard of the drafting of the Agendas has considered three levels:

1. Management Committee. Decision-making. Integrated by government agencies.

2. Advisory Groups (one for each of the Specialization areas). Advising the Management Committee in

the vision and selection of the specialization areas. Integrated by members of the quadruple helix.

3. Sectorial Tables. Responsible to define the specific strategy of each area of specialization, as well as

the priority and complementary projects for the Agenda. Integrated by members of the quadruple

helix.

One of the pillars of the Agendas is the decentralization of scientific and technological activities and capacity

building at all levels of management. Under this scheme during 2014, multiple meetings were convened in each

of the 32 states with advisory groups of experts in science, technology and innovation. At these meetings, key

stakeholders from the quadruple helix – industry, university, public sector and civil society – were involved in

a participatory process in the creation of the State and Regional Innovation Agendas.

Moreover, consultancy firms such as the Spanish IDOM Consulting and Indra, the Mexican CamBio Tec,

integrated by an international network of technology management practitioners, or the binational nonprofit

The United States-Mexico Foundation for Science, FUMEC, have acted as facilitators on the drafting of the

Agendas

9.2.4.1 Objectives

The objectives of the agendas has mainly been to improve the position of Mexico in the World Innovation Index

of 2014, where Mexico was ranked in 66 out of 143 countries. This index was based on the role of the people

and teams in the process of innovation as an engine of economic growth.

Moreover, it is intended that the Agendas become a support to achieve a larger investment of from the private

sector in technology development and innovation, to strengthen the infrastructure, promote the insertion of

key technologies and create synergies among sectors and region that lead to an increase in competitiveness

and promote greater living conditions for the population.

9.2.4.2 Calendar

The agendas were published in the period ranging from the end of 2013 to the end of 2014.

9.2.4.3 Process

The methodology of the Smart Specialisation Strategies from the European Union has been applied in the

elaboration of the Agendas. The starting point for the elaboration of the Innovation Agendas was the existing

planning initiatives in matters of economic development or innovation. A series of workshops and interviews,

as well as several analysis at a state, federal and international level were conducted.

The elaboration of the Agendas has followed a structured analysis process based on six steps:

19

1. Analysis of state context and its relationship to the existing capabilities of innovation, identifying the

competitive advantages and excellence potential of each entity.

2. Generation of a shared vision of the future of the states in terms of smart specialization.

3. Selection of a limited number of areas of expertise to focus the efforts of the Agenda

4. Definition of the strategic framework for each area of specialization

5. Sector objectives

6. Niche specialization

7. Lines of action

8. Identification and definition of portfolio of priority projects that contribute to the accomplishment

of the priorities chosen

9. Integration of monitoring and evaluation mechanisms

It has been identified that in most cases a calendar including the following structure was created. The example

presented below corresponds to the Aguascalientes agenda.

Initially the Advisory group in involved in the process of drafting strategic concepts, a pre selection of

specialization areas and their validation. Afterwards, the sectorial tables are included to participate in

workshops that consisted of an analysis of approximately eighteen prioritization criteria in three different

categories: socio- economic, scientific- technological and market criteria. As a result, the candidate

priorizations areas were chosen and were afterwards validated.

Example of the chronogram of governance activities in Aguascalientes department:

Figure 3. Chronogram of governance activities in Aguascalientes4

4 Source: Aguascalientess Regional Innovation Agenda

20

The valuation of each of the criteria allowed to provide an objective view of the positioning of each of the

candidate areas along the three axes:

Priorisation criteria

Socio-economic criteria

Contribution to GDP

GDP Evolution

Specialization

Competitiveness (growth over sector in Mexico)

Levels of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and export

Value added (creation of high quality employment)

Quality of life (education, poverty, health, etc.)

Other differential advantages of the state

Presence of tractor companies

Technical and scientific criteria

Participation in R+D programs

Support evolution (increase in support in the last years)

Existence of capacities in scientific-technological agents

Adaptation of capacities to global tendencies

Market criteria

Attractiveness of the sector in the international environment

Attractiveness of the sector for the specific case of Mexico (country positioning)

Relevance of innovation as a competitive advantage of the sector

Potential spill over on the sectors present in the state

Figure 4. Abstract of the main priorisation criteria in the Regional Innovation Agendas in Mexico5

Regarding the Strategy Level of Formalization, we have assigned the rating of 2 to all the agendas. This level

refers that there is a regional strategy and that this regional strategy includes the participation of the entities

involved, the instruments used and the agents related to its execution.

Even though it is stated in the agendas that an estimated budget has been taken into account in the preliminary

definition phase, this budget is not defined in any of the agendas. However, most of the agendas indicate the

potential sources of funding for the priority projects.

9.2.4.4 Next steps

The Agenda scorecard is one of the key instruments that allows a constant monitor of the progress sheet route

raised. Following the indicators that will allow an annual monitor of the progress the areas of expertise, the

projects, the Management Committee (regulation, decision making) and the Advisory Groups (tracking and

impulse for priority projects, re-planning the strategy).

5 Own source

21

9.3 Annex 3. Similarity between POLOS regions and EU regions, measured

by the distance between their specialization vectors

9.3.1 Brazil

9.3.1.1 Acre

Region Code Acre

Ipeiros EL21 0,37

Região Autónoma dos Açores PT20 0,42

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,44

Algarve PT15 0,46

Peloponnisos EL25 0,46

Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki EL11 0,48

Sterea Ellada EL24 0,48

Vestfold NO033 0,48

Extremadura ES43 0,48

Thessalia EL14 0,48

Veneto ITH3 0,48

Basilicata ITF5 0,49

Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen ITH1 0,49

Dytiki Makedonia EL13 0,49

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,49

9.3.1.2 Alagoas

Region Code Alagoas

Etelä-Karjala FI1C5 0,31

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,34

Nord - Pas-de-Calais FR30 0,35

Dytiki Makedonia EL13 0,38

Hungary HU 0,38

Ipeiros EL21 0,39

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,40

Comunidad Foral de Navarra ES22 0,40

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,40

Poland PL 0,41

Cataluña ES51 0,41

22

Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen ITH1 0,41

Sardegna ITG2 0,42

Vojvodina RS1 0,42

Thüringen DEG 0,42

9.3.1.3 Amazonia Legal

Region Code Amazonia Legal

Sweden SE 0,56

Pomorskie PL63 0,58

Poland PL 0,58

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,59

Slaskie PL22 0,59

Flemish Region BE2 0,60

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,61

País Vasco ES21 0,61

Satakunta FI196 0,61

Aquitaine FR61 0,61

Aragón ES24 0,61

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,61

Brandenburg DE4 0,62

Galicia ES11 0,62

Finnmark NO073 0,62

9.3.1.4 Nordeste Brasileiro - Slaskie

Region Code Nordeste Brasileiro

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,26

Slaskie PL22 0,28

Wales UKL 0,29

Aquitaine FR61 0,30

Comunidad Foral de Navarra ES22 0,30

Ireland IE 0,30

Poland PL 0,30

England UKZ 0,31

Saarland DEC 0,31

Nord - Pas-de-Calais FR30 0,32

Denmark DK 0,33

23

Scotland UKM 0,33

Región de Murcia ES62 0,33

Baden-Württemberg DE1 0,33

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,33

9.3.1.5 Ceará

Region Code Ceará

Wales UKL 0,35

Réunion FR94 0,35

Galicia ES11 0,36

Comunidad Foral de Navarra ES22 0,37

Poland PL 0,39

Ipeiros EL21 0,39

Sardegna ITG2 0,40

Cantabria ES13 0,40

Aquitaine FR61 0,40

Región de Murcia ES62 0,40

Centre FR24 0,40

Pays de la Loire FR51 0,40

Västerbottens län SE331 0,40

Alsace FR42 0,40

Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen ITH1 0,40

24

9.3.2 Chile

9.3.2.1 Antofagasta

Region Code Antofagasta

Ipeiros EL21 0,26

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,31

Réunion FR94 0,31

Sicilia ITG1 0,34

Galicia ES11 0,36

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,37

Região Autónoma dos Açores PT20 0,40

Cantabria ES13 0,40

Región de Murcia ES62 0,40

Malta MT 0,40

Ionia Nisia EL22 0,40

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,40

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,41

Puglia ITF4 0,42

Canarias ES70 0,42

9.3.2.2 Araucania

Region Code Araucania

Ipeiros EL21 0,34

Algarve PT15 0,40

Dytiki Makedonia EL13 0,41

Galicia ES11 0,43

Hungary HU 0,44

Basilicata ITF5 0,44

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,45

Bretagne FR52 0,45

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,45

Extremadura ES43 0,45

Thessalia EL14 0,45

Região Autónoma dos Açores PT20 0,46

Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki EL11 0,46

Sterea Ellada EL24 0,46

Kalmar län SE213 0,46

25

9.3.2.3 Arica y Parinacota

Region Code Arica y

Parinacota

Ipeiros EL21 0,38

Região Autónoma dos Açores PT20 0,38

Réunion FR94 0,38

Puglia ITF4 0,39

Galicia ES11 0,39

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,40

Ionia Nisia EL22 0,40

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,40

Sicilia ITG1 0,41

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,41

Malta MT 0,41

Bretagne FR52 0,43

Canarias ES70 0,44

Região Autónoma da Madeira PT30 0,45

Cantabria ES13 0,45

9.3.2.4 Aysen

Region Code Aysen

Ipeiros EL21 0,32

Região Autónoma dos Açores PT20 0,36

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,38

Galicia ES11 0,42

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,43

Algarve PT15 0,45

Hungary HU 0,46

Dytiki Makedonia EL13 0,47

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,47

Canarias ES70 0,47

Alentejo PT18 0,47

Extremadura ES43 0,48

Thessalia EL14 0,48

Pays de la Loire FR51 0,48

Bretagne FR52 0,48

26

9.3.2.5 Bio Bio

Region Code Bio Bio

Ipeiros EL21 0,27

Galicia ES11 0,32

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,33

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,35

Extremadura ES43 0,35

Nord - Pas-de-Calais FR30 0,36

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,36

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,37

Cantabria ES13 0,37

Hungary HU 0,37

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,37

Malta MT 0,37

Bretagne FR52 0,37

Réunion FR94 0,37

Pomorskie PL63 0,37

9.3.2.6 Coquimbo

Region Code Coquimbo

Réunion FR94 0,40

Ipeiros EL21 0,47

Galicia ES11 0,47

Corse FR83 0,50

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,50

Región de Murcia ES62 0,50

Cantabria ES13 0,50

Centre FR24 0,50

Satakunta FI196 0,50

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,50

Alsace FR42 0,50

Sicilia ITG1 0,50

Languedoc-Roussillon FR81 0,50

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,51

Denmark DK 0,53

27

9.3.2.7 O’Higgins

Region Code O'Higgins

Região Autónoma dos Açores PT20 0,43

Peloponnisos EL25 0,43

Ipeiros EL21 0,49

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,50

Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki EL11 0,52

Sterea Ellada EL24 0,52

Extremadura ES43 0,56

Thessalia EL14 0,56

Algarve PT15 0,58

Weser-Ems DE94 0,60

Kalmar län SE213 0,60

Vestfold NO033 0,60

Dytiki Makedonia EL13 0,60

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,61

Canarias ES70 0,61

9.3.2.8 Valparaíso

Region Code Valparaiso

Región de Murcia ES62 0,306

Denmark DK 0,306

Aragón ES24 0,333

Mecklenburg-Vorpommern DE8 0,339

Catalonia ES51 0,347

Nordjylland DK05 0,347

Sachsen-Anhalt DEE 0,347

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,354

Scotland UKM 0,354

Satakunta FI196 0,354

Nord - Pas-de-Calais FR30 0,354

Ipeiros EL21 0,354

Pomorskie PL63 0,363

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,368

Brandenburg DE4 0,389

28

9.3.3 Colombia

9.3.3.1 Antioquia

Region Code Antioquia

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,27

Flemish Region BE2 0,31

Ireland IE 0,31

Brandenburg DE4 0,32

Poland PL 0,32

Slaskie PL22 0,32

Västerbottens län SE331 0,33

Galicia ES11 0,34

Satakunta FI196 0,34

Bremen DE5 0,34

Sweden SE 0,34

Pomorskie PL63 0,35

Bratislavský kraj SK01 0,35

País Vasco ES21 0,35

Centro (PT) PT16 0,36

9.3.3.2 Arauca

Region Code Arauca

Ipeiros EL21 0,61

Peloponnisos EL25 0,61

Algarve PT15 0,65

Região Autónoma dos Açores PT20 0,68

Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki EL11 0,68

Weser-Ems DE94 0,68

Sterea Ellada EL24 0,68

Kalmar län SE213 0,68

Vestfold NO033 0,68

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,71

Hungary HU 0,71

Extremadura ES43 0,71

Provincia Autonoma di Trento ITH2 0,71

Thessalia EL14 0,71

Veneto ITH3 0,71

29

9.3.3.3 Bolívar

Region Code Bolivar

Ipeiros EL21 0,31

Nordjylland DK05 0,35

Región de Murcia ES62 0,35

Pomorskie PL63 0,37

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,37

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,39

Hungary HU 0,39

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,39

Basilicata ITF5 0,39

Campania ITF3 0,39

Sardegna ITG2 0,40

Algarve PT15 0,40

Galicia ES11 0,40

Alentejo PT18 0,40

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,40

9.3.3.4 Bocayá

Region Code Boyacá

Hallands län SE231 0,29

Voreio Aigaio EL41 0,40

Sicilia ITG1 0,41

Cyprus CY 0,41

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,42

Nordjylland DK05 0,44

Región de Murcia ES62 0,46

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,46

Scotland UKM 0,46

Sjælland DK02 0,47

Syddanmark DK03 0,47

Kriti EL43 0,47

Podlaskie PL34 0,48

Friesland (NL) NL12 0,49

Ipeiros EL21 0,50

30

9.3.3.5 Casanare

Region Code Casanare

Peloponnisos EL25 0,45

Ipeiros EL21 0,47

Região Autónoma dos Açores PT20 0,52

Sterea Ellada EL24 0,52

Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki EL11 0,52

Vestfold NO033 0,52

Algarve PT15 0,53

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,55

Extremadura ES43 0,55

Thessalia EL14 0,55

Weser-Ems DE94 0,58

Kalmar län SE213 0,58

Dytiki Makedonia EL13 0,58

Hungary HU 0,59

Provincia Autonoma di Trento ITH2 0,59

9.3.3.6 Cesar

Region Code Cesar

Peloponnisos EL25 0,42

Região Autónoma dos Açores PT20 0,59

Sterea Ellada EL24 0,59

Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki EL11 0,59

Ipeiros EL21 0,64

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,66

Extremadura ES43 0,66

Thessalia EL14 0,66

Vestfold NO033 0,69

Weser-Ems DE94 0,69

Kalmar län SE213 0,69

Algarve PT15 0,69

Dytiki Makedonia EL13 0,72

Provincia Autonoma di Trento ITH2 0,73

Veneto ITH3 0,73

31

9.3.3.7 Córdoba

Region Code Cordoba

Aragón ES24 0,32

Región de Murcia ES62 0,35

Centre FR24 0,35

Scotland UKM 0,35

Rhône-Alpes FR71 0,35

Poland PL 0,37

Canarias ES70 0,38

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,38

Comunidad Foral de Navarra ES22 0,38

Réunion FR94 0,39

Ipeiros EL21 0,39

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,40

Malta MT 0,40

Região Autónoma da Madeira PT30 0,40

Friesland (NL) NL12 0,40

9.3.3.8 Cundinamarca

Region Code Cundinamarca

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,33

Molise ITF2 0,36

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,36

Aragón ES24 0,37

Brandenburg DE4 0,38

Bretagne FR52 0,38

Western Netherlands NL3 0,38

Galicia ES11 0,38

Nord - Pas-de-Calais FR30 0,38

Pomorskie PL63 0,38

Kentriki Makedonia EL12 0,39

Bremen DE5 0,39

Ireland IE 0,39

Norte PT11 0,39

Friesland (NL) NL12 0,39

32

9.3.3.9 Huila

Region Code Huila

Réunion FR94 0,34

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,35

Região Autónoma da Madeira PT30 0,35

Galicia ES11 0,39

Canarias ES70 0,41

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,41

Scotland UKM 0,41

Cantabria ES13 0,41

Sicilia ITG1 0,41

Puglia ITF4 0,43

Ipeiros EL21 0,44

Gävleborgs län SE313 0,44

Aragón ES24 0,44

Slaskie PL22 0,44

Pomorskie PL63 0,44

9.3.3.10 La Guajira

Region Code La Guajira

Região Autónoma dos Açores PT20 0,33

Peloponnisos EL25 0,37

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,44

Ipeiros EL21 0,47

Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki EL11 0,49

Sterea Ellada EL24 0,49

Extremadura ES43 0,54

Thessalia EL14 0,54

Canarias ES70 0,56

Algarve PT15 0,57

Dytiki Makedonia EL13 0,58

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,60

Galicia ES11 0,61

Weser-Ems DE94 0,61

Kalmar län SE213 0,61

33

9.3.3.11 Magdalena

Region Code Magdalena

Região Autónoma dos Açores PT20 0,42

Peloponnisos EL25 0,44

Ipeiros EL21 0,44

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,47

Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki EL11 0,50

Sterea Ellada EL24 0,50

Extremadura ES43 0,52

Thessalia EL14 0,52

Algarve PT15 0,54

Dytiki Makedonia EL13 0,55

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,56

Weser-Ems DE94 0,57

Kalmar län SE213 0,57

Vestfold NO033 0,57

Canarias ES70 0,57

9.3.3.12 Meta

Region Code Meta

Poland PL 0,27

Comunidad Foral de Navarra ES22 0,27

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,27

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,30

Aquitaine FR61 0,30

Galicia ES11 0,31

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,31

Slaskie PL22 0,31

Pays de la Loire FR51 0,32

Etelä-Karjala FI1C5 0,32

Pomorskie PL63 0,33

Cantabria ES13 0,33

Región de Murcia ES62 0,33

Midi-Pyrénées FR62 0,33

Ireland IE 0,34

34

9.3.3.13 Nariño

Region Code Nariño

Peloponnisos EL25 0,48

Ipeiros EL21 0,48

Região Autónoma dos Açores PT20 0,53

Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki EL11 0,53

Sterea Ellada EL24 0,53

Algarve PT15 0,55

Extremadura ES43 0,56

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,56

Thessalia EL14 0,56

Weser-Ems DE94 0,57

Kalmar län SE213 0,57

Vestfold NO033 0,57

Basilicata ITF5 0,58

Dytiki Makedonia EL13 0,58

Provincia Autonoma di Trento ITH2 0,59

9.3.3.14 Putumayo

Region Code Putumayo

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,37

Galicia ES11 0,37

Brandenburg DE4 0,39

Flemish Region BE2 0,40

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,40

Alentejo PT18 0,41

Germany DE 0,41

Campania ITF3 0,41

Basilicata ITF5 0,41

Podkarpackie PL32 0,42

Ipeiros EL21 0,42

Bayern DE2 0,42

Ireland IE 0,43

Berlin DE3 0,43

Bremen DE5 0,43

35

9.3.3.15 Quindio

Region Code Quindio

Ipeiros EL21 0,40

Basilicata ITF5 0,42

Pays de la Loire FR51 0,46

Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen ITH1 0,46

Dytiki Makedonia EL13 0,46

Algarve PT15 0,47

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,47

Galicia ES11 0,48

Hungary HU 0,48

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,48

Extremadura ES43 0,48

Thessalia EL14 0,48

Canarias ES70 0,48

Aragón ES24 0,48

Bretagne FR52 0,48

9.3.3.16 San Andrés y Providencia

Region Code San Andres y Providencia

Galicia ES11 0,29

Scotland UKM 0,32

Réunion FR94 0,32

Lisboa PT17 0,33

Nord - Pas-de-Calais FR30 0,33

Aragón ES24 0,34

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,35

Comunidad Foral de Navarra ES22 0,35

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,35

Cantabria ES13 0,35

Malta MT 0,35

Região Autónoma da Madeira PT30 0,35

Slaskie PL22 0,36

Brandenburg DE4 0,36

Saarland DEC 0,36

36

9.3.3.17 Tolima

Region Code Tolima

Podlaskie PL34 0,38

Região Autónoma da Madeira PT30 0,38

Aragón ES24 0,39

Albania AL 0,42

Galicia ES11 0,42

Comunidad Foral de Navarra ES22 0,42

Poland PL 0,42

Languedoc-Roussillon FR81 0,42

Ipeiros EL21 0,43

Región de Murcia ES62 0,43

Scotland UKM 0,43

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,43

Pomorskie PL63 0,44

Brandenburg DE4 0,44

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,44

9.3.3.18 Valle del Cauca

Region Code Valle del

Cauca

Galicia ES11 0,31

Ipeiros EL21 0,31

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,33

Pomorskie PL63 0,34

Aquitaine FR61 0,34

Pays de la Loire FR51 0,35

Hungary HU 0,36

Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen ITH1 0,36

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,36

Alentejo PT18 0,37

Ireland IE 0,37

Baden-Württemberg DE1 0,37

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,37

Western Netherlands NL3 0,37

Nord - Pas-de-Calais FR30 0,37

37

9.3.4 Mexico

9.3.4.1 Aguascalientes

Region Code Aguascalientes

Pays de la Loire FR51 0,35

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,37

Galicia ES11 0,37

England UKZ 0,38

Baden-Württemberg DE1 0,38

Aquitaine FR61 0,38

Cantabria ES13 0,39

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,39

Pomorskie PL63 0,39

Wales UKL 0,39

Sardegna ITG2 0,40

Provincia Autonoma di Trento ITH2 0,40

Nord - Pas-de-Calais FR30 0,40

Poland PL 0,41

Bretagne FR52 0,41

9.3.4.2 Baja California

Region Code Baja California

England UKZ 0,30

Galicia ES11 0,31

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,31

Sardegna ITG2 0,31

Pays de la Loire FR51 0,32

Cantabria ES13 0,32

Wales UKL 0,34

Aquitaine FR61 0,34

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,35

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,35

Saarland DEC 0,35

Basilicata ITF5 0,35

Campania ITF3 0,35

Baden-Württemberg DE1 0,35

Slaskie PL22 0,35

38

9.3.4.3 Distrito Federal (DF)

Region Code DF

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,66

Etelä-Karjala FI1C5 0,66

Poland PL 0,69

Kalmar län SE213 0,71

Attiki EL30 0,71

Jämtlands län SE322 0,71

Región de Murcia ES62 0,71

Hungary HU 0,71

Satakunta FI196 0,71

Vojvodina RS1 0,71

Pohjois-Savo FI1D2 0,71

Centre FR24 0,71

Thüringen DEG 0,71

Keski-Pohjanmaa FI1D5 0,71

Aragón ES24 0,71

9.3.4.4 Durango

Region Code Durango

Ipeiros EL21 0,29

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,32

Pays de la Loire FR51 0,33

Pomorskie PL63 0,34

Satakunta FI196 0,34

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,34

Bretagne FR52 0,35

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,35

Extremadura ES43 0,35

Slaskie PL22 0,35

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,36

Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen ITH1 0,36

Galicia ES11 0,36

Región de Murcia ES62 0,36

Aquitaine FR61 0,36

39

9.3.4.5 Jalisco

Region Code Jalisco

Ireland IE 0,31

Poland PL 0,32

Hungary HU 0,34

Sardegna ITG2 0,35

Nord - Pas-de-Calais FR30 0,36

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,36

Wales UKL 0,36

Pomorskie PL63 0,36

Galicia ES11 0,37

Slaskie PL22 0,37

Aragón ES24 0,37

Malta MT 0,38

Andalucía ES61 0,38

Västerbottens län SE331 0,38

Albania AL 0,38

9.3.4.6 Michoacan

Region Code Michoacan

Northern Netherlands NL1 0,40

Opolskie PL52 0,40

Satakunta FI196 0,41

Sjælland DK02 0,42

Mecklenburg-Vorpommern DE8 0,42

Lithuania LT 0,42

Aquitaine FR61 0,42

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,43

Nordjylland DK05 0,43

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,44

Hallands län SE231 0,44

Kent UKJ4 0,44

Extremadura ES43 0,44

Umbria ITI2 0,44

Ireland IE 0,44

40

9.3.4.7 Nayarit

Region Code Nayarit

Peloponnisos EL25 0,27

Hedmark NO021 0,33

Oppland NO022 0,33

Extremadura ES43 0,38

Canarias ES70 0,38

Região Autónoma dos Açores PT20 0,41

Anatoliki Makedonia, Thraki EL11 0,41

Sterea Ellada EL24 0,41

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,46

Thessalia EL14 0,46

Algarve PT15 0,46

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,47

Ipeiros EL21 0,49

Voreio Aigaio EL41 0,51

Kainuu FI1D4 0,51

9.3.4.8 Nuevo León

Region Code Nuevo Leon

Poland PL 0,30

Comunidad Foral de Navarra ES22 0,35

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,35

País Vasco ES21 0,35

Pays de la Loire FR51 0,36

Saarland DEC 0,36

Rhône-Alpes FR71 0,36

Slaskie PL22 0,36

Principado de Asturias ES12 0,36

Sardegna ITG2 0,37

Auvergne FR72 0,37

Bourgogne FR26 0,37

Galicia ES11 0,37

Bremen DE5 0,37

Dolnoslaskie PL51 0,37

41

9.3.4.9 Puebla

Region Code Puebla

Rheinland-Pfalz DEB 0,31

Västmanlands län SE125 0,35

Comunidad Valenciana ES52 0,36

Brandenburg DE4 0,36

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,37

Marche ITI3 0,37

Bremen DE5 0,37

Flemish Region BE2 0,37

Galicia ES11 0,37

Berlin DE3 0,37

Centro (PT) PT16 0,37

Bayern DE2 0,38

Cataluña ES51 0,39

Hessen DE7 0,39

Région Wallonne BE3 0,39

9.3.4.10 San Luis Potosi

Region Code San Luis Potosi

Stockholm SE11 0,41

Sjælland DK02 0,53

Weser-Ems DE94 0,53

England UKZ 0,55

Hallands län SE231 0,58

Kent UKJ4 0,58

Västmanlands län SE125 0,58

Umbria ITI2 0,58

Pohjois-Karjala FI1D3 0,58

Nordjylland DK05 0,60

Northern Netherlands NL1 0,61

Sardegna ITG2 0,61

Picardie FR22 0,61

Opolskie PL52 0,61

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,61

42

9.3.4.11 Sinaloa

Region Code Sinaloa

Ipeiros EL21 0,31

Dytiki Ellada EL23 0,31

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,33

Región de Murcia ES62 0,33

Sicilia ITG1 0,33

Nordjylland DK05 0,34

Satakunta FI196 0,34

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,35

Hallands län SE231 0,37

Scotland UKM 0,37

Cyprus CY 0,37

Mecklenburg-Vorpommern DE8 0,37

Lithuania LT 0,37

Pomorskie PL63 0,38

Aragón ES24 0,39

9.3.4.12 Tlaxcala

Region Code Tlaxcala

Piemonte ITC1 0,32

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,37

Cantabria ES13 0,37

Kujawsko-Pomorskie PL61 0,38

Región de Murcia ES62 0,40

Poitou-Charentes FR53 0,40

Kentriki Makedonia EL12 0,40

Nord - Pas-de-Calais FR30 0,41

Norte PT11 0,41

Pomorskie PL63 0,41

Etelä-Karjala FI1C5 0,42

Pohjois-Savo FI1D2 0,42

Picardie FR22 0,42

Comunidad de Madrid ES30 0,43

Aquitaine FR61 0,43

43

9.3.4.13 Veracruz

Region Code Veracruz

Ipeiros EL21 0,39

Notio Aigaio EL42 0,43

Weser-Ems DE94 0,45

Sterea Ellada EL24 0,45

Basse-Normandie FR25 0,45

Extremadura ES43 0,47

Provincia Autonoma di Trento ITH2 0,47

Thessalia EL14 0,47

Pays de la Loire FR51 0,47

Sardegna ITG2 0,48

Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano/Bozen ITH1 0,49

Dytiki Makedonia EL13 0,49

Basilicata ITF5 0,49

Campania ITF3 0,49

Galicia ES11 0,50

9.3.4.14 Zacatecas

Region Code Zacatecas

Sjælland DK02 0,38

Nordjylland DK05 0,41

Hallands län SE231 0,41

Kent UKJ4 0,41

Umbria ITI2 0,41

Castilla-La Mancha ES42 0,42

Región de Murcia ES62 0,42

Romania RO 0,42

Opolskie PL52 0,43

Northern Netherlands NL1 0,43

Lithuania LT 0,44

Sicilia ITG1 0,44

Mecklenburg-Vorpommern DE8 0,44

Cyprus CY 0,44

Satakunta FI196 0,45

44

9.4 Annex 4. Stakeholders per Sector

9.4.1 Brazil

9.4.1.1 Amazonia Legal-Sweden

Stakeholders per Sector

Manufacturing & industry LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Rede Nacional de Política

Industrial

Tillväxtverket

Stakeholder 1 BIONORTE - Rede de

Biotecnologia e Biodiversidade

da Amazônia Legal

SwedenBio

Stakeholder 2 Centro de Biotecnologia do Acre Biomaterials Research Centre -

University of Gothenburg

Stakeholder 3 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas

da Amazônia

(INPA)

Formas - Swedish Research

Council for Environment,

Agricultural Sciences and Spatial

Planning

Mining & quarrying LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Albrás/Alunorte - Alumar

(Consórcio de Alumínio do

Maranhão)

Geological Survey of Sweden

Stakeholder 1 Vale Luleå University of Technology

Stakeholder 2 Centro de PD&I da indústria

extrativa mineral da Região

Amazônica (PA)

Vinnova

Stakeholder 3 Polo Industrial Manaus Swedish Mining Association

Stakeholder 4 Instituto Federal de Educação,

Ciência e Tecnologia de

Rondônia

Bergforsk

45

9.4.1.2 Brazilian Northeast- Slaskie

Stakeholders per Sector

Energy production &

distribution

LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Centro de Tecnologias

Estratégicas do Nordeste

(CETENE)

The National Energy

Conservation Agency

Stakeholder 1 RIDESA Lower Silesian Ecoenergy

Cluster EEI

Stakeholder 2 Centro de Tecnologias de Gás e

Energias Renováveis-

CTGAAS/RN

Watt company

Stakeholder 3 Centro de Oceanografia do

Atlântico Tropical

Energa

Manufacturing & industry LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Unidade de Produção e

Pesquisa de Radiofármacos –

UPRA

Institute for Industrial Design

Stakeholder 1 Parque Tecnológico de

Fármacos e Biotecnologia -

Pernambuco

Maco Pharma

Stakeholder 2 Renorbio Akwawit-Brasco

Stakeholder 3 GRANBIO - Unidade de

produção de etanol de segunda

geração com base m

Biotecnologia Avançada

Bioxen

Information & communication

technologies

LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Sociedade Brasileira de

Computação - SBC

Silesian Centre of Information

Society (SCSI)

Stakeholder 1 Porto Digital EduKlaster

Stakeholder 2 Tecnocentro – Parque

Tecnológico da Bahia

Alternative IT Cluster

Stakeholder 3 Marshal Office of the Silesian

Voivodship

Human health & social work

activities

LATAM EUROPE

46

Leadership Centro de Tecnologias

Inovadoras em Tecnologia da

Informação da Fiocruz@Parque

Tecnológico da Bahia

Instytut Techniki i Aparatury

Medycznej Akademii

Medycznej ITAM w Zabrzu

Stakeholder 1 Centro de Desenvolvimento de

novos radiofármacos

Silesian Centre for Heart

Diseases

Stakeholder 2 INCTTOX Maria Skłodowska-Curie

Institute

Stakeholder 3 Polo de Tecnologia da

Informação e Biotecnologia da

Região sul@Parque Tecnológico

de Ilhéus

9.4.2 Chile

9.4.2.1 Antofagasta-Sicily

Stakeholders per Sector

Agriculture, forestry & fishing

LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Fundación para la Innovación

Agraria (FIA)

Assessorato regionale

dell'Agricoltura, dello Sviluppo

Rurale e della Pesca

Stakeholder 1 Secretaria Regional Ministerial

de Agricultura

Istituto per l’Ambiente Marino

Costiero - IAMC CNR

Stakeholder 2 Centro de Desarrollo Acuícola

para Taltal -CEATAL

Osservatorio Mediterraneo

della Pesca

Stakeholder 3 Spin-off DT Biomedico e il DT

Amar

Stakeholder 4 CNR IBIM

Energy production &

distribution

LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Observatorio Regional de

Desarrollo Sustentable de

Antofagasta (ORDSA)

CNR ITAE

Stakeholder 1 Centro Desarrollo Energético

Antofagasta

SIENERGIA Portalle Siciliano

dell'Energía

Stakeholder 2 Plataforma Solar Antofagasta Istituto di Tecnologie Avanzate

per l’Energia

47

Stakeholder 3 Centro de Desarrollo Energético

de Antofagasta (CDEA) -

Facultad de Ingeniería de la

Universidad de Antofagasta

3SUN

Stakeholder 4 Parque científico y tecnológico

de la Región de Atacama.

Universidad Católica del Norte

Tourism, restaurants &

recreation

LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Cámara de Comercio Servicios

y Turismo de Antofagasta

Assessore regionale del

turismo, dello sport e dello

spettacolo

Stakeholder 1 Corporación de Cultura y

Turismo de Calama

IBAM – Istituto per i Beni

archeologi e monumentali

Stakeholder 2 Fundación de Cultura y Turismo

de San Pedro de Atacama

ISMN – Istituto Materiali Nano-

strutturati

Stakeholder 3 Fondazione Symbola

9.4.2.2 Bio-Bio- Basse Normandie

Stakeholders per Sector

Agriculture, forestry & fishing LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Instituto De Investigaciones

Agropecuarias

IRQUA (Institut régional de la

qualité agro-alimentaire de la

Normandie)

Stakeholder 1 Centro de Innovación y

Transferencia Tecnológica

Agropecuaria. UCSC.

BOREA Unité Mixte

CNRS/UNICAEN

Stakeholder 2 SEREMI de Agricultura Syndicat Mixte pour

l’Equipement du Littoral (SMEL)

Stakeholder 3 Station Marine de Luc sur Mer

Energy production &

distribution

LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Centro Nacional para la

Innovación y Fomento de las

Energías Sustentables (CIFES) –

Ministerio Energía

Ouest Normandie Énergies

Marines

48

Stakeholder 1 Universidad de Concepción EDF

Stakeholder 2 AREVA

Stakeholder 3 Hutchinson

Stakeholder 4 Chantier Allais

ICT LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Secretaría Regional Ministerial

de Transportes y

Telecomunicaciones de la Zona

Sur

NFC

Stakeholder 1 Centro Avanzado de Simulación

de Procesos. UBB.

Campus EffiSicence

Stakeholder 2 IncubaUdeC – Plataforma de

emprendimientos tecnológicos

Plateforme Monétique de

l’ENSICAEN

Stakeholder 3 GREYC

Stakeholder 4 Centre Interdisciplinaire de

Réalité Virtuelle (CIREVE)

9.4.2.3 Valparaiso-Catalonia

Stakeholders per Sector

Creative, cultural arts &

entertainment

LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Proyecto Industrias Creativas

(CORFO)

Agència Catalana de Turisme –

Generalitat De Catalunya

Stakeholder 1 Departamento de Fomento de

las Artes y las Industrias

Creativas - Consejo Nacional de

la Cultura y las Artes

Associació Catalana Clúster de la

Indústria de l'esport - INDESCAT

Stakeholder 2 Corporación Valparaíso Films Fundació Barcelona Media

Stakeholder 3 Agrupación de oficinas de

arquitectura Plan C

Turisme de Barcelona

Stakeholder 4 Plataforma de artes escénicas

Escenalborde

Energy production &

distribution

LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Centro de Energías Renovables

del Ministerio de Energía-Corfo

Institut Català d’Energia

49

Stakeholder 1 Núcleo Biotecnología Cuaruma

– Universidad Católica

Vaplaraíso

Fundació CTM Centre

Tecnològic

Stakeholder 2 Centro de Innovación Energética

(CIE) – Universidad Técnica

Federico Santa María

Fundació Institut de Recerca en

Energia de Catalunya - IREC

Stakeholder 3 Fundació Centre Tecnològic de

la Química de Catalunya

Manufacturing & industry LATAM EUROPE

Leadership 3IE - UTFSM Acció - Tecnio

Stakeholder 1 Asociación de Empresas de la V

Región, ASIVA

Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia

Agroalimentària - IRTA

Stakeholder 2 Centro Regional de Estudios en

Alimentos Saludables (CREAS)

Campus de l'Alimentació de

Torribera - UB

Stakeholder 3 Conservera Pentzke S.A. Universitat de Lleida

Transporting & storage LATAM EUROPE

Leadership CHRYSALIS Institut de Recerca en Energia

de Catalunya (IREC)

Stakeholder 1 ZEAL Puerto de Valparaíso Idiada Automotive Technology

SA

Stakeholder 2 Escuela de Ingeniería Industrial.

Universidad Católica de

Valparaíso

Cercle Tecnològic de Catalunya

(CTECNO)

50

9.4.3 Colombia

9.4.3.1 Antioquía - Flemish Region

Stakeholders per Sector

Energy and energy efficiency LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Clúster Energia Eléctrica VITO (European independent

research and technology

organisation)

Stakeholder 1 Centro de Investigación e

Innovación en Energía - CIIEN

Imec

Stakeholder 2 Universidad Nacional de

Colombia Sede Medellín

Flanders Cleantech Association

Stakeholder 3 Flanders’ Maritime Cluster

ICT LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Clúster de Tecnología,

Información y Comunicación

Imec

Stakeholder 1 Alianza Regional en Tecnologías

de la Información y la

Comunicación Aplicadas -

ARTICA

iMinds

Stakeholder 2 Corporación Intersoftware

VITO

Agroindustry and food

biotechnology

LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Red de Centros de Desarrollo

Tecnológico especializado en

Biotecnología

Flanders’ Food

Stakeholder 1 BIOINTROPIC (alianza

estratégica)

VIB (Life Sciences Research

Institute)

Stakeholder 2 Grupo de Investigaciones

Agroindustriales – GRAIN

(Universidad Pontificia

Bolivariana)

VITO

51

Advanced materials industry LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Centro de Excelencia en Nuevos

Materiales - CENM

Flanders Make

Stakeholder 1 Instituto de Capacitación e

Investigación del Plástico y del

caucho

Flanders’ Mechatronics

Technology Centre - FMTC

Stakeholder 2 CIDICO

VITO

Stakeholder 3 Clúster Construcción Medellín y

Antioquía

Imec

9.4.3.2 Bolivar-Nordjylland

Stakeholders per Sector

Transporting and storage LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Federación Colombiana de

Logística - FEDELOG

The Transport Innovation

Network - TINV

Stakeholder 1 Sociedad Portuaria Regional de

Cartagena SA

Brains Buisness ICT North

Denmark

Stakeholder 2 CONTECAR SA Aalborg University

Stakeholder 3 Federación Colombiana de

Transportadores de Carga -

COLFECAR

Tourism LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Corporación de Turismo de

Cartagena

Visit Nordjylland

Stakeholder 1 Cámara de Comercio de

Cartagena

Innovationsnetvaerk for

oplevelsesØkonomi

Stakeholder 2 Universidad del Sinú Interactive Denmark

Stakeholder 3 Universidad Tecnológica de

Bolívar

Aalborg University

Stakeholder 4 Universidad de Cartagena

Heavy industry (naval) LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Clúster Náutico The Danish Maritime Cluster -

DKMK

52

Stakeholder 1 Camára de Comercio de

Cartagena

Green Ship of the Future

Stakeholder 2 Universidad Tecnológica de

Bolívar

Maritime Center for Operations

- MARCOD

Stakeholder 3 Aalborg University

9.4.3.3 Valle del Cauca- Galicia

Stakeholders per Sector

Meat production and the wider

food industry

LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Clúster Proteina Blanca Clúster de la Carne de Galicia

Stakeholder 1 Clúster Macrosnacks Clúster Alimentario de Galicia -

CLUSAGA

Stakeholder 2 Clúster Fruta Fresca Clúster Alimentación Ecolóxica

de Galicia - AEG

Stakeholder 3 Comité Intergremial

Empresarial Valle del Cauca -

CIEV

Centro Tecnológico de la

Carne (CETECA)

Stakeholder 4 Universidad del Valle Universidad de Santiago de

Compostela

Fishing and Aquaculture LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Secretaría de medio ambiente,

agricultura, seguridad

alimenticia y pesca

CONXEMAR

Stakeholder 1 Piscifactoria El Diviso Ltda. Clúster de la Acuicultura de

Galicia - CETGA

Stakeholder 2 Comité Universidad Empresa

Estado - CUEEV

Clúster del Sector Pesquero

Extractivo y Productor -

CLUPESCA

Stakeholder 3 Universidad del Pacífico Centro Tecnológico de la

Pesca de Celeiro - CETPEC

Stakeholder 4 Centro Tecnológico de

Acuicultura

Biomass/Biofuels LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Clúster Bioenergía Clúster da Madeira de Galicia

53

Stakeholder 1 Asocaña Centro de Innovación y Servicios

Tecnológicos da Madera de

Galicia - CIS-Madera

Stakeholder 2 Clúster de Energía Eléctrica del

suroccidente Colombiano

Clúster Galego do Autoconsumo

Enerxético - AGAEN

Stakeholder 3 Red Universitaria para la

Innovación en el Valle del Cauca

- RUPIV

Instituto Energético de Galicia -

INEGA

Stakeholder 4 Comité Universidad Empresa

Estado - CUEEV

Asociación Española de

Valorización Energética de la

Biomasa - AVEBIOM

Human health LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Clúster Bienestar y cuidado

personal + Clúster Excelencia

Clínica

Clúster de la Salud de Galicia

Stakeholder 1 Cámara de Comercio de Cali Clúster de Biotecnología de

Galicia

Stakeholder 2 Red Universitaria para la

Innovación en el Valle del Cauca

- RUPIV

Clúster de las Aguas minerales y

termales de Galicia

Stakeholder 3 Comité Universidad Empresa

Estado - CUEEV

Universidad de Santiago de

Compostela

Software and ICTs LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Clúster TIC del Pacífico

Colombiano - PacifiTIC

Clúster TIC Galicia

Stakeholder 1 MinTIC Centro de Investigación en

Tecnologías de la Información y

la Comunicación - CITIC

Stakeholder 2 ACOPI Valle del Cauca Centro Tecnolóxico de

Supercomputación de Galicia

(CESGA)

Stakeholder 3 Red Universitaria para la

Innovación en el Valle del Cauca

- RUPIV

CIS Galicia

Stakeholder 4 IP Total Software SA AIMEN Centro Tecnológico

Textiles LATAM EUROPE

54

Leadership Clúster Textil y Confección Clúster Textil y Moda -

COINTEGA

Stakeholder 1 Instituto para la exportación y la

moda - Inexmoda

Asociación de Industrias de

Punto e Confección de Lugo,

Ourense e Pontevedra -

AIPCLOP

Stakeholder 2 Cámara Colombiana de la

Confección y Afines

Asociación de Empresarios de

Confección A Coruña

Stakeholder 3 Supertex SA

Automotive industry LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Centro Tecnológico de la

Industria Automotríz - TECNNA

Clúster de las Empresas de

Automoción de Galicia - CEAGA

Stakeholder 1 Universidad del Valle Centro Tecnológico de

Automoción de Galicia

Stakeholder 2

Asociación Colombiana de

Fabricantes de Autopartes -

ACOLFA

GKN Driveline Vigo

Stakeholder 3 Universidad de Vigo

55

9.4.4 Mexico

9.4.4.1 Jalisco-Ireland

Stakeholders per Sector

Organic food LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Camára de la Industria

Alimenticia de Jalisco - CIAJ

Teagasc – The Agriculture and

Food Development Authority

Stakeholder 1 Clúster Alimenticio de Zapopan Department of Agriculture,

Food and the Marine - DAFM

Stakeholder 2 Centro de Investigaciones en

Comportamiento Alimentario y

Nutrición (CICAN)

Centro Universitario del Sur -

Universidad de Guadalajara

Higher Education Authority

Stakeholder 3 Environmental Protection

Agency

Internet of Things LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Consejo Estatal de Ciencia y

Tecnología de Jalisco -

COECYTJAL

Department of

Communications, Energy and

Natural Resources

Stakeholder 1 Consejo Nacional de Clústeres

de Software & Tecnologías de la

Información CANIETI - CNCS

Centre for Telecommunications

Value-Chain Research - CTVR

Stakeholder 2 Instituto Jalisciense de

Tecnologías de la Información -

IJALTI

Telecommunications Software

& Systems Group - TSSG

Big Data LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Consejo Estatal de Ciencia y

Tecnología de Jalisco -

COECYTJAL

Irish Software Association

Stakeholder 1 Consejo Nacional de Clústeres

de Software & Tecnologías de la

Información CANIETI - CNCS

LERO - Irish Software

Engineering Research Centre

Stakeholder 2 Instituto Jalisciense de

Tecnologías de la Información -

IJALTI

Insight (Reserach insititute for

Data Analytics)

Stakeholder 3 Centre for Applied Data

Analytics Research - CeADAR

56

Tourism LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Secretaría de Turismo y

Comercio Valle del Cauca

Clúster Turismo de Galicia

Stakeholder 1 Fondo Nacional de Turismo -

FONTUR

Axencia de Turismo de Galicia

Stakeholder 2 Proexport Confederación de Empresarios

de Hostelería de Galicia -

Cehosga

Stakeholder 3 Ministerio de Comercio,

Industria y Turismo - MinCIT

Asociación Gallega de Turismo

Rural - Agatur

Stakeholder 4 Universidad de Vigo

9.4.4.2 Michoacan-Northern Netherlands

Stakeholders per Sector

Agrofood LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Centro de Innovación y

Desarrollo Agroalimentario de

Michoacán - CIDAM

Dutch Biorefinery Cluster - DBC

Stakeholder 1 Secretaría de Agricultura,

Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural,

Pesca y Alimentación - SAGARPA

Carbohydrate Competence

Center

Stakeholder 2 Si o Si Alimentos University of Groningen

Stakeholder 3 Centro Interdisciplinario de

Investigación para el Desarrollo

Integral – CIIDI Unidad

Michoacán

Renewable Energies LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Clúster de Geotermia y Energías

Renovables – CLUSTER-GEO

Energy Valley Cluster

Stakeholder 1 Centro Mexicano de Innovación

en Energía Geotérmica - CEMIE-

Geo

Norther Netherlands Offshore

Wind – NNOW cluster

Stakeholder 2 Instituto de Investigaciones

Eléctricas - IIE

WETSUS (Centre of Excellence

for Sustainable Water

Technology)

Stakeholder 3 ENERI (Arancia SA) University of Groningen

57

9.4.4.3 Puebla- Rheinland-Pfalz

Stakeholders per Sector

Advanced Manufacturing

(Heavy and Automotive

Industry)

LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Camára Nacional de la Industria

de Transformación –

CANACINTRA PUEBLA

Rheinland-Pfalz Ministerium

für Wirtschaft, Klimaschutz,

Energie und Landesplanung

Stakeholder 1 Volkswagen de México (Cluster

automotriz)

Commercial Vehicle Cluster -

CVC

Stakeholder 2 Centro de Servicios de Alta

Tecnología (CESAT) de la

Universidad Autónoma del

Estado de Puebla

Daimler AG

Stakeholder 3 Centro de Innovación y

Competitividad Empresarial

(CICE) de la Benemérita

Universidad Autónoma del

Estado de Puebla

Automotive Quality Saar

innovation cluster - Fraunhofer

Innovation Cluster

Stakeholder 4 University of Kaiserlautern

Textiles LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Cámara de la Industria Textil

Puebla-Tlaxcala - CITEX

Verband der Textil-und

Bekleidungsindustrie (Hessen,

Rheinland-Pfalz und Saarland

e.V.) - (Asociación de Industria

Textil e Industria de la Moda)

Stakeholder 1 Delegación de la Cámara de la

Industria del Vestido - CANAIVE

Forschungskuratorium Textil

e.V. (Textile Research Council)

Stakeholder 2 Camára Nacional de la Industria

de Transformación –

CANACINTRA PUEBLA

Arbeitgeberverband der

Bekleidungsindustrie

Aschaffenburg und

Unterfranken e.V. (Asocicación

de Empleadores de la Industria

del Vestido)

58

Chemical LATAM EUROPE

Leadership Camára Nacional de la Industria

de Transformación –

CANACINTRA PUEBLA

Rheinland-Pfalz Ministerium

für Wirtschaft, Klimaschutz,

Energie und Landesplanung

Stakeholder 1 Parque de Investigación e

Innovación Tecnológica de

Monterrey (PIIT) – Cluster de

Nanotecnología

Badische Anilin- und Soda-

Fabrik – BASF SE

Stakeholder 2 Universidad de las Américas

Puebla - UDLAP

Boehringer Ingelheim

Stakeholder 3 Rheinland-Pfalz Cluster for

Individualized Immune

Intervention

Stakeholder 4 Joh. A. Benckiser GmbH

59

9.5 Annex 5: Multilateral and multilevel cooperation shared priorities

between American Regions

The acronym EU-LAC SP stands for European-Latin American and the Caribbean Shared Priorities

Modernisation and added value in Agriculture and the Food Industry

Regions that have selected this priority

LATAM EUROPE

Acre Brazil There are more than 120 European regions that have

selected agriculture and/or the food industry as a sectoral

priority in 26 countries (including some outside the EU)

Alagoas Brazil

Ceará Brazil

Río Grande del Norte Brazil Meta Colombia

Nordeste Brasileiro Brazil Nariño Colombia

Antofagasta Chile Putumayo Colombia

Coquimbo Chile Quindio Colombia

Valparaiso Chile San Andres y Providencia Colombia

O'Higgins Chile Tolima Colombia

Bio Bio Chile Valle del Cauca Colombia

Araucania Chile Aguascalientes Mexico

Aysen Chile Baja California Mexico

Arica y Parinacota Chile Durango Mexico

Antioquia Colombia Jalisco Mexico

Arauca Colombia Michoacan Mexico

Bolivar Colombia Nayarit Mexico

Boyacá Colombia Nuevo Leon Mexico

Casanare Colombia San Luis Potosi Mexico

Cesar Colombia Sinaloa Mexico

Cordoba Colombia San Luis Potosi Mexico

Cundinamarca Colombia Sinaloa Mexico

Huila Colombia Tlaxcala Mexico

La Guajira Colombia Veracruz Mexico

Magdalena Colombia Zacatecas Mexico

Fishing and Aquaculture

Regions that have selected this priority

LATAM EUROPE

Antofagasta Chile Ipeiros Greece

Coquimbo Chile Ionia Nisia Greece

O'Higgins Chile Dytiki Ellada Greece

Bio Bio Chile Notio Aigaio Greece

Aysen Chile Galicia Spain

Arica y Parinacota Chile Cantabria Spain

60

Huila Colombia Canarias Spain

La Guajira Colombia Basse-Normandie France

Magdalena Colombia Réunion France

San Andres y Providencia Colombia Puglia Italy

Valle del Cauca Colombia Sicilia Italy

Baja California Mexico Malta Malta

Sinaloa Mexico Nordland Norway

Veracruz Mexico Lisboa Portugal

Acre Brazil Região Autónoma dos Açores Portugal

Ceará Brazil Região Autónoma da Madeira Portugal

Río Grande del Norte Brazil

Mining and raw materials

Regions that have selected this priority

LATAM EUROPE

Antofagasta Chile Andalucía Spain

O'Higgins Chile Pohjois-Karjala Finland

Aysen Chile Lappi Finland

Arica y Parinacota Chile Finnmark Norway

Antioquia Colombia Sweden Sweden

Cordoba Colombia

Huila Colombia

Putumayo Colombia

Tolima Colombia

Durango Mexico

Zacatecas Mexico

Amapa Brazil

Amazonas Brazil

Ceará Brazil

Río Grande del Norte Brazil

Rondonia Brazil

Amazonia Legal Brazil

ICT and the digital economy

Regions that have selected this priority

LATAM EUROPE

Coquimbo Chile There are more than 110 European regions that have

selected ICT as a sectoral priority in 27 countries (including

some outside the EU)

Valparaiso Chile

Bio Bio Chile

Antioquia Colombia Nayarit Mexico

Meta Colombia Nuevo Leon Mexico

Quindio Colombia Sinaloa Mexico

San Andres y Providencia Colombia Zacatecas Mexico

61

Valle del Cauca Colombia Alagoas Brazil

Aguascalientes Mexico Río Grande del Norte Brazil

Baja California Mexico Nordeste Brasileiro Brazil

Durango Mexico Amazonia Legal Brazil

Jalisco Mexico Alagoas Brazil

Michoacan Mexico

62

9.6 Annex 6: Documentation process tables

9.6.1 Argentina

Summary of documentation process by Country

Argentina

1. Web sites consulted: Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva

http://www.mincyt.gob.ar/

Mapa de indicadores CTI del MINCYT por provincias

http://indicadorescti.mincyt.gob.ar/MAP/Maps.swf?prefix=ract&n=0 Plan Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnologíae Innovación Productiva Argentina Innovadora 22020, Síntesis Ejecutiva. http://www.argentinainnovadora2020.mincyt.gob.ar/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/sintesis_2013_web.pdf Additional information http://www.industria.gob.ar/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/sistemas-productivos-locales.pdf http://www.industria.gob.ar/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Naclerio01_en-A4_Agosto.pdf http://indicadorescti.mincyt.gob.ar/MAP/Maps.swf?prefix=ract&n=0

2. Reviewed documents

Country Author/Institution Title Year

Argentina Buenos Aires Provincia Panorama productivo de la provincia

de Buenos Aires

2013

3. Contacts:

Mg. Silvina Mochi

Subsecretaría de Políticas en Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva

Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva

smochi@mincyt.gob.ar

4. Process: Given that there was no evidence of RIS, we decided to contact the Ministry of Science, Technology and

Productive Innovation to confirm our information. We got the contact information of Ms. Silvina Mochi,

who is the Sub secretary of Policy on Science, Technology and Productive Innovation. Ms. Mochi advised

us to treat Argentina as a whole in matters of innovation policy since all its programs were approached

from a national point of view, except some initiatives which were out of the scope of a regional innovation

policy. Once Ms. Mochi confirmed our information, it was decided to consider only four regions for the

report, the ones that contributed the most to the GDP or had economic potential: Buenos Aires City,

Buenos Aires Province, Mendoza and Cordoba.

63

9.6.2 Brazil

Summary of documentation process by Country

Brazil

1. Web sites consulted: Network of Indicators of Science and Technology –LatinAmerican and Inter-american- (RICyT)

http://sisob.lcc.uma.es/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=61&Itemid=69

Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics: http://www.ibge.gov.br/english/ and

http://brasilemsintese.ibge.gov.br/populacao/populacao-por-sexo-segundo-as-unidades-da-federacao

and http://www.ibge.gov.br/estadosat/perfil.php?sigla=am

Ministry of National Integration

http://www.integracao.gov.br/

Observatory of regional development

http://odr.mi.gov.br/

Cesar Project

www.proyectocesar.eu

ALFA III Programme. European Comission

https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/regions/latin-america/alfa_en

Observatório Brasileiro de Arranjos Produtivos Locais (APLs)

http://portalapl.ibict.br/

http://portalapl.ibict.br/apls/index.html

CONFAP. Consejo Nacional de las Fundaciones de Apoyo a la Investigacion. Brazilian National Council

of State Research and Innovation Support Foundations

http://confap.org.br/news/en/

INEI. Instituto Nacional de Emprendedurismo e Innovación. Instituto Nacional de Empreendedorismo

e Inovaçao

http://inei.org.br/

http://www.inei.org.br/produtos-e-servicos/solucoes-inovadoras-inei-produtos-servicos

FINEP. Financiadora de Estudios y Proyectos

http://www.finep.gov.br/pagina.asp?pag=institucional_empresa

64

SEBRAE. Servicio Brasileño de Apoyo a las Pequeñas y Medianas Empresas

http://www.sebrae.com.br/sites/PortalSebrae/Programas/Agentes-Locais-de-

Inova%C3%A7%C3%A3o:-receba-o-Sebrae-na-sua-empresa

Research Network on Local Productive and Innovative Systems, links de:

http://www.redesist.ie.ufrj.br/ev-redesist/our-links

http://www.redesist.ie.ufrj.br/ev-activities/lps-s-maps

http://www.redesist.ie.ufrj.br/ev-redesist/staff

information system on local productive and innovative systems (APLS)

http://www.sinal.redesist.ie.ufrj.br/ev/index.php

http://portalapl.ibict.br/menu/itens_menu/gtp_apl/gtp_apl.html

Other

http://www.cepal.org/es/comunicados/paises-de-america-latina-acuerdan-plataforma-de-

cooperacion-regional-en-ciencia

http://www.mct.gov.br/

http://www.mct.gov.br/index.php/content/view/73411/II_Promocao_da_Inovacao_Tecnologica_nas_

Empresas.html

http://www.portalinovacao.mct.gov.br/pi/#/pi

http://www.portalinovacao.mct.gov.br/pi/#/pi/conteudo$NDYxMw

http://www.vale.com/brasil/PT/aboutvale/Paginas/default.aspx

http://www.fapac.ac.gov.br/wps/wcm/connect/31ad96804d35916d9fd0ffb0cb707d13/pect_funtac.p

df?MOD=AJPERES

http://www.fapac.ac.gov.br/wps/wcm/connect/31ad96804d35916d9fd0ffb0cb707d13/pect_funtac.p

df?MOD=AJPERES

http://www.altillo.com/pt/universidades/brasil/estado/paraiba.asp

http://www.e-papers.com.br/autor.asp?codigo_autor=99&codigo_produto=663

2. Reviewed documents:

Country Author/Institution Title Year

1 BRASIL Botelho, A and

Almeida, M. / Revista

Sociedade e Estado

Desconstruindo a política científica no Brasil:

evolução da descentralização da política de apoio à

pesquisa e inovação

2012

2 BRASIL Lemarchand,

Guillermo A. (editor) /

UNESCO Montevideo

Sistemas nacionales de ciencia, tecnología e

innovación en América Latina y el Caribe - Estudios y

documentos de política científica en ALC, Vol. 1

2010

3 BRASIL Llisterri, J.J. and

Pietrobelli, C. / Banco

Los Sistemas Regionales de Innovación en América

Latina

2011

65

Interamericano de

Desarrollo

4 BRASIL VVAA EU-LAC Foundation – Polos de competitividad

project. Cluster competitiveness and

internationalisation.

2015

5 BRASIL Silvana Perente and

Leonardo Piccinetti

Governance and APL in Brazil, Final Report,.

2012

BRASIL Altec Aportes de los sistemas de innovación regionales

para construcción del sistema nacional de

innovación en Brasil. Contribuiçoes dos sistemas

regionais de inovaçao para a construçao do sistema

nacional de inovaçao no Brasil

2013

Other downdable documents

http://www.seplancti.am.gov.br/arquivos/download/arqeditor/APLs-e-a-bioeconomia-regional.pdf

http://www.ead.fea.usp.br/semead/12semead/resultado/trabalhosPDF/850.pdf

http://www.altec2013.org/programme_pdf/210.pdf

http://www.escoladegoverno.pr.gov.br/arquivos/File/Material_%20CONSAD/paineis_II_congresso_con

sad/painel_57/sistema_de_inovacao_em_manaus.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/cooperate/international/pdf/eulacris_summary_pt.pdf

3. Contacts: Mr. Fernando Jiménez. INGENIO CSIC-UPV.

Mr. Guilherme Vaccaro. UNISINOS.

Mrs. Giovana Della International Relations and Foreign Trade. FIERGS.

Federation of Industries Rio Grande do Sul. Pasqua giovana@fiergs.org.br

Mrs. Daniella Mariano de Souza Rocha. Cluster specialist at the Ministry of Development,

Industry and Foreign Trade daniella.rocha@mdic.gov.br

4. Process Regarding Brazil reading of secondary sources on the characterization of Regional Innovation Systems in

Brazil led to the conclusion that Brazil has a high degree of administrative decentralization but not due to a

national standard. This allows each state to develop its own policies on innovation. Brazil is one of the leading

countries in Latin America in terms of scientific production and research and Universities play a leading role

within the Regional Innovation Systems. This feature makes it difficult to apply the same methodology as in

the other countries to identify and select areas of collaboration. To overcome this situation it was decided

to contact Mr. Jiménez, who could facilitate contact local experts, as Mr.Vaccaro.

Qualitative analysis from secondary sources and consultation with local experts led us to choose the most

advanced states where universities have an important role in the articulation of technological

66

development, Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Santa Catarina and Minas Gerais paper (Ismael). We are currently

waiting for conversations with Mr. Vaccaro to proceed with the identification of stakeholders.

9.6.3 Chile

Summary of documentation process by Country

Chile

1. Web sites consulted: Network of Indicators of Science and Technology –LatinAmerican and Inter-american- (RICyT)

http://sisob.lcc.uma.es/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=61&Itemid=69

National Institute of Statistics – Chile

http://www.ine.cl/

Colaboration Project EU-Chile

http://cooperacionue.agci.cl/

http://www.asiva.cl/

http://issuu.com/consejodelacultura/docs/mapeo_industrias_creativas?e=1246619/6178468#search

http://www.corfo.cl/sobre-corfo/estructura-corporativa/comites-corfo

2. Reviewed documents:

Country Author/Institution Title Year

1 CHILE Red Sur

Consultores

Estrategia regional De innovación de la Región de

Antofagasta

2012

2 CHILE INFYDE ID Estrategia Regional de Innovación RIS La Araucanía.

ETAPA I: Diagnóstico Estratégico del Sistema Regional

de Innovación

2014

3 CHILE INFYDE ID Estrategia Regional de Innovación

RIS La Araucanía

2014

4 CHILE INAP Consultores Estrategia Regional de Innovación Región de Arica y

Parinacota 2012-2015

2012

5 CHILE FUNDECYTPCTEX Estrategia Regional de Innovación 2014-2020 Región

Aysén del General Carlos Ibáñez del Campo

2014

6 CHILE ALIAS Diseño y establecimiento de la Estrategia Regional de

Innovación y acciones afines en Biobío - Estrategia

Regional de Innovación Región del Biobío

2011

7 CHILE INFYDE ID Informe 1 Diagnóstico del Sistema Regional de

Innovación Región de Coquimbo

2012

67

8 CHILE INFYDE ID Estrategia Regional de Innovación Región de Coquimbo -

Chile

2012

9 CHILE INFYDE ID Proyecto RIS – Los Lagos Estrategia Regional de

Innovación Región de Los Lagos Chile 2014-2019

2014

10 CHILE FUNDECYT Estrategia Regional de Innovación 2012 – 2015 Región

del Libertador General Bernardo O'Higgins

2012

11 CHILE Varios Estrategia Regional de Innovación Región Metropolitana

de

Santiago 2012 - 2016

2013

12 CHILE Consejo Nacional

de la Cultura y las

Artes. Región de

Valparaíso

Caracterización y anàlisis regional de las industrias

creativas.

2013

13 CHILE Varios Propuesta Estrategia Regional de Innovación de

Tarapacá 2012 - 2018

2012

14 CHILE ALIAS Informe II Propuesta de Estrategia Regional de

Innovación, Región de Valparaíso

2014

3. Contacts: Contacts through Department of Regional Development and Administrative (SUBDERE) under

the Ministry of Interior and Public Security of the Government of Chile, is the agency that

promotes innovation initiatives.

4. Process Information was sought on the RED Project and Eris developed until now.

Eris regions were selected prioritizing those with more formalized strategies using the following score:

0= No strategy

1= There are only a few initiatives but nothing structured within a plan.

2= There are priority sectors but no information on how the approach is made

3=Exists regional strategy

4= There are regional strategy with participation, instruments and implementing agents.

5= There are regional strategy with participation, instruments and enforcement officers plus

designated budget

9.6.4 Colombia

Summary of documentation process by Country

Colombia

1. Web sites consulted: COLCIENCIAS

http://www.colciencias.gov.co/

68

Antioquia

http://www.camaramedellin.com.co/site/Cluster-y-Competitividad/Comunidad-Cluster/Cluster-

Energia-Electrica.aspx

http://www.ciien.org/

http://www.camaramedellin.com.co/site/

http://scienti1.colciencias.gov.co:8080/gruplac/jsp/visualiza/visualizagr.jsp?nro=00000000002513

http://www.upb.edu.co/portal/page?_pageid=1054,29808438&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL

http://minas.medellin.unal.edu.co/formacion/especializaciones/especializacion-en-mercados-de-

energia

http://www.clustertic.co/site/DescubraelemClusteremTIC/Qu%C3%A9esiClusteriTIC.aspx

http://www.eafit.edu.co/EafitCn/Noticias/tecnologia_informacion_creatividad_claves_artica.htm

http://www.intersoftware.org.co/

http://openbio.co/index.php/acerca-de/biointropic

http://www.udea.edu.co/portal/page/portal/bActualidad/Principal_UdeA/UdeANoticias/Historial/

historial2014/UdeAMedios/BIOinTropic%20nace%20en%20Medell%C3%ADn%20promoviendo%20l

os%20negocios%20biotecnol%C3%B3gicos

http://www.icipc.org/icipc_new_2/

http://webcidico.wix.com/cidico

http://www.camaramedellin.com.co/site/Cluster-y-Competitividad/Comunidad-Cluster/Cluster-

Construccion.aspx

Bolivar

http://www.cccartagena.org.co/index.php

http://www.redclustercolombia.com/

http://www.redclustercolombia.com/clusters-en-colombia/iniciativa/49

http://cartagenanautica.com/noticias/

http://www.unicartagena.edu.co/

http://www.unitecnologica.edu.co/

www.unisinucartagena.edu.co

www.cartagenadeindias.travel

www.colfecar.org.co/

www.cisne.puertocartagena.com/

www.fedelog.org

Valle del Cauca

http://www.crcvalle.org.co/

http://www.eldiviso.com/

http://www.valledelcauca.gov.co/

http://www.asocana.org/publico/info.aspx

http://www.ccc.org.co/revista-accion-ccc/19997/bioenergia.html

69

http://www.elpais.com.co/elpais/economia/noticias/para-2017-valle-cauca-generarian-con-

biomasa-360-megavatios-energia

http://www.elpais.com.co/elpais/economia/noticias/consolida-cadena-productos-cosmeticos-

valle-cauca

http://acopivalle.com.co/quienes-somos/

http://www.pacifitic.org/index.php/es/

http://ceso.gers.co/

http://www.redclustercolombia.com/clusters-en-colombia/mapa-de-clusters

http://www.eltiempo.com/economia/sectores/perspectivas-economicas-de-colombia/15045475

http://www.tecnna.org.co/tecnna/

http://www.eltiempo.com/colombia/cali/industria-automotriz-en-el-valle-del-cauca/15734737

www.acolfa.org.co

http://www.inexmoda.org.co/

http://www.rupiv.com/

http://www.fontur.com.co/inicio

http://www.mincit.gov.co/index.php

www.valledelcauca.gov.co/turismo

http://www.ccc.org.co/

http://www.cueev.com/

2. Reviewed documents:

Country Author/Institution Title Year

Colombia Gobierno de Antioquia Activa ANTIOQUIA. PLAN

DEPARTAMENTAL CT+I

2011

Colombia Camara de Comercio de Medellín

para Antioquía

Antioquia 2020: Estrategia de

competitividad para Medellín, el área

metropolitana del Valle de Aburrá y

Antioquía

2006

Colombia Departamento Administrativo de

Ciencia, tecnologia e innovación.

Plan estratégico departamental de

ciencia, tecnología e innovación.

PEDCTI. Arauca. 2022

2013

Colombia Departamento Administrativo de

Ciencia, tecnologia e innovación.

Plan estratégico departamental de

ciencia, tecnologia e innovación.

PEDCTI. Bocaya. 2022

2012

Colombia Comisión distrital de ciencia,

tecnología e innovación

Plan de ciencia, tecnología e

innovación D.C. 2007-2019

2007

Colombia Comisión regional de

competitividad de Cartagena y

Bolívar

Plan regional de competitividad

Cartagena y Bolívar 2008-2032

2010

70

Colombia VVAA. Universidad Tecnológica de

Bolívar. Universidad de Cartagena.

2010-2032. Plan estratégico y

prospectivo de innovación y

desarrollo científico y tecnológico del

departamentos de Bolívar

2011

Colombia Gobernación de Caldas La estrategia del plan de desarrollo 2013

Colombia VVAA. Grupos de interés

departamentales.

Plan Departamental de CT+I del

Caquetá

2011

Colombia Gobernación de Caquetá Plan de desarrollo 2012-2015 2012

Colombia VVAA. Plan estratégico departamental de

Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación.

PEDCTI. Casanare

2012

Colombia Gobernación del Cauca. Plan estratégico departamental de

ciencia, teconología e innovación del

Cauca.

2012

Colombia Gobernación del Cesar.

Universidad nacional de Colombia.

Plan estratégico regional de ciencia,

tecnología e innovación-PERCTI-

2011

Colombia VVAA Plan estratégico departamental de

ciencia, teconologia e innovación de

Córdoba.

2012

Colombia VVAA. Universidad nacional de

Colombia.

Plan estratégico departamental de

ciencia, tecnología e Innovación de

Cundinamarca

2013

Colombia VVAA. Universidad nacional de

Colombia - Sede Amazonia

Plan estratégico, departamental de

ciencia, tecnología e innovación.

PEDCTI. Departamento de Guainía

2014

Colombia Colciencias. Gobernación de

Guaviare. Universidad nacional de

Colombia - Sede Amazonia

Plan estratégico departamental de

ciencia, tecnología e innovación-

PEDCTI. Departamento de Guaviare

2013

Colombia GRUGETEC - INNCOM, en

colaboración con el Departamento

Administrativo de Planeación -

CODECYT-Huila

Plan estratégico de ciencia,

tecnología e innovación. Sistema

departamental de ciencia, tecnología

e innovación. CODECYT - Huila.

2010

Colombia Gobernación de La Guajira -

Tecnos

PLAN CTEI DEPTO DE LA GUAJIRA

2013 - 2018

2012

Colombia Prof. Dr. Leonardo Pineda

Prof. Emérito Dr. Carlos Scheel

Plan estratégico departamental de

ciencia, tecnología e innovación del

Magdalena - PEDCTI. 2013-2023

2013

Colombia VVAA. Departamento

Administrativo de Ciencia,

Tecnología e Innovación.

Gobernación del Meta. Corpometa.

Plan Estratégico Departamental de

Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación del

Meta - PEDCTI.

2012

71

Universidad Externado de

Colombia.

Colombia Ministerio de Tecnologías de la

Información y las Comunicaciones.

Vive digital. Departamento

Administrativo de Ciencia,

Tecnología e Innovación.

Plan Nacional de Ciencia e

Innovación para el desarrollo de los

sectores ELECTRONICA,

TECNOLOGIAS DE LA INFORMACION

Y LAS COMUNICACIONES (ETIC)

2013

Colombia VVAA. Gobernación de Nariño,

COLCIENCIAS. Cámara de comercio

de Pasto.

Plan estratégico departamental en

CTel de Nariño

2012

Colombia Prof. Dr. Leonardo Pineda

Prof. Emérito Dr. Carlos Scheel

Plan Estratégico Departamental de

Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación-

PEDCTI 2014-2024: “Norte de

Santander Polo de Desarrollo

Tecnológico e innovación en energia”

2014

Colombia VVAA. COLCIENCIAS, Gobernación

del Putumayo, Instituto de

Prospectiva, Innovación y Gestión

del Conocimiento Universidad del

Valle. HYLEA LTDA Consultores

ambientales.

Plan Estratégico Departamental de

Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación del

Putumayo.

2013

Colombia Departamento nacional de

planeación

Agenda interna para la productividad

y la competitividad. Documento

regional. QUINDÍO.

2007

Colombia Departamento administrativo de

Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación.

Gobernación de Quindío.

Observatorio Colombiano de

Ciencia y Tecnología.

Plan Estratégico Departamental de

Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación.

PEDCTI Quindío 2022 Eje de ciencia,

tecnología e innovación regional en

el Paisaje Cultural Cafetero

2013

Colombia VVAA. CODECYT. Convenio 350.

Gobernación de Risaralda. Alcaldía

de Pereira. Área metropolitana de

Centro Occidente. Universidad

Tecnológica de Pereira. Cámara de

Comercio de Dosquebradas.

Colciencias.

Plan departamental de ciencia,

tecnología e innovación Risaralda

2010

Colombia Consejo departamental de ciencia,

tecnología e innovación.

Gobernación del Archipiélago de

San Andrés, Providencia y Santa

Catalina. Grupo In-Nova.

Plan estratégico departamental de

ciencia, tecnología e innovación del

archipiélago de San Andrés,

Providencia y Santa Catalina 2012-

2027

2012

72

Colombia VVAA. BID. Colciencias.

Departamento de Santander. SEtic.

Plan estratégico departamental de

ciencia, tecnología e innovación

PEDCTI Santander 2020.

2013

Colombia MBA Rafael Cabrera Pedraza Plan estrategico de ciencia,

tecnologia e innovación PECTIT 2020.

Estrategia de desarrollo para el

departamento del Tolima.

2013

Colombia VVAA. Colciencias. Gobernación del

Valle del Cauca. Centro nacional de

productividad. Universidad del

Valle.

Plan estratégico regional de ciencia,

tecnología e innovación del Valle del

Cauca

2011

Colombia Universidad Nacional de Colombia,

sede Amazonia, Instituto

Amazónico de Investigaciones -

IMANI

Plan Estratégico Departamental de

Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación

(PEDCTI). Departamento del Vaupés.

2014

Colombia Cámara de Comercio de Cali Expogestión Pacífico. Valle del Cauca 2014

3. Contacts: No contacts were made since all information was available.

4. Process The process with Colombia was much easier because most of the Departments had published their

Strategic Departmental plan of Science, Technology and Innovation (PEDCTI for its acronym in English).

The documents were downloaded to be revised and evaluated based on the following criteria:

0= There is no strategy or no initiatives at all.

1= There is only some initiatives but nothing structured within a plan

2= There are prioritized sectors bur no information about how they will be approached

3= There is a regional strategy

4= There is a regional strategy with participation of different stakeholders, instruments and execution

agents.

5= There is a regional strategy with participation of different stakeholders, instruments and execution

agents + designated budget

Initially, 4 Colombian regions were selected to be worked with: Cundinamarca (including the Bogota

Capital District, Antioquia, Arauca and Quindio. Ultimatelly, we have decided to work with all regions that

have a PEDCTI.

73

9.6.5 Costa Rica

Summary of documentation process by Country

Costa Rica

1. Web sites consulted: Network of Indicators of Science and Technology –Latin American and Inter-american-

(RICyT)

http://sisob.lcc.uma.es/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=61&Itemid=69.

Plan Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovación 2015-2021, MICITT

http://pdf.crealink.ca/doc/intergraphicdesigns-micitt/plan-nacional-2015-

2021/2015022301/#284

2. Reviewed documents:

Country Author/Institution Title Year

1

COSTA

RICA

AECID

Oficina Técnica de la Agencia

Española de Cooperación

Internacional para el Desarrollo en

Costa Rica

Marco de Asociación País - COSTA

RICA 2011-2015

2012

2 COSTA

RICA

Ministerio de Planificación

Nacional y Política Económica

(MIDEPLAN)

Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2015-

2018. “Alberto Cañas Escalante”

2014

3 COSTA

RICA

Ministerio de Planificación

Nacional y Política Económica

(MIDEPLAN)

Región Brunca Plan De Desarrollo

2030.

2014

4 COSTA

RICA

Ministerio de Planificación

Nacional y Política Económica

(MIDEPLAN)

Región Huétar Caribe Plan De

Desarrollo 2030.

2014

5 COSTA

RICA

Ministerio de Planificación

Nacional y Política Económica

(MIDEPLAN)

Región Chorotega Plan De Desarrollo

2030.

2014

6 COSTA

RICA

Ministerio de Planificación

Nacional y Política Económica

(MIDEPLAN)

Región Central Plan De Desarrollo

2030.

2014

7 COSTA

RICA

Ministerio de Planificación

Nacional y Política Económica

(MIDEPLAN)

Región Huétar Norte Plan De

Desarrollo 2030.

2014

8 COSTA

RICA

Ministerio de Planificación

Nacional y Política Económica

(MIDEPLAN)

Región Pacífico Central Plan De

Desarrollo 2030.

2014

3. Contacts:

74

Oscar Quesada

Economist

Ministry of Economy of Costa Rica

oquesada@meic.go.cr

4. Process Regarding Costa Rica, macroeconomic data can be found at national level, while there is a degree of

uncertainty when assessing regional data (e.g. the Central Region is an approach of its GDP). In addition,

there is some imbalance between the regions since the Central Region estimates its GDP in 74.1% of

the national total according with the percentage of resident population 63.1%.

Through secondary sources about development policy, specifically the National Development Plan

prepared by the Government of Costa Rica. Evidences of decentralization can be found in the Plan for

the period 2011-2015, which was first outlined on regionalized strategy and on sectoral strategies.

Moreover, as the area of competitiveness does exist some decentralization initiative as there are

Advice Regional Competitiveness regions: Top of Guanacaste, Brunca, Caribbean and North.

9.6.6 Ecuador

Summary of documentation process by Country

Ecuador

1. Web sites consulted: SECRETARÍA DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR, CIENCIA, TECNOLOGÍA E INNOVACIÓN

www.educacionsuperior.gob.ec

Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia y Tecnología

www.educacionsuperior.gob.ec

Alianza para el emprendimiento e innovación

http://aei.ec/

2. Reviewed documents:

Country Author/Institution Title Year

Ecuador Prefectura de la provincia de

Pichincha

Plan de desarrollo y ordenamiento

territorial de la provincia de

Pichincha 2025

2012

Ecuador Gobierno provincial del Guayas Plan de desarrollo de la provincia

del Guayas 2012-2021

2011

Ecuador Carlos Guaipatin y Liora Schwartz.

Banco Interamericano de

Desarrollo (BID). División de

Competitividad e Innovación (CTI).

Ecuador. Análisis del Sistema

Nacional de Innovación.

2014

75

Ecuador Vicepresidencia de la República de

Ecuador

Estrategia Nacional para el Cambio

de la Matriz Productiva

2014

3. Contacts: Juan Francisco Ballén

Viceministro de Políticas y servicios de comercio exterior

Ministerio de Comercio Exterior

juan.ballen@comercioexterior.gob.ec

Ryan J. Cobey

Asesor Ministerial

Ministerio de Comercio Exterior

ryan.cobey@comercioexterior.gob.ec

Mg. Ma. Dolores Bermeo

Subsecretaria de Innovación y Transferencia de Tecnología (Anterior)

SECRETARÍA DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR, CIENCIA, TECNOLOGÍA E INNOVACIÓN

m.bermeo@senescyt.gob.ec

Diego Fernando Vega Cevallos

Director de Cooperación Internacional.

SECRETARÍA DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR, CIENCIA, TECNOLOGÍA E INNOVACIÓN

dvega@senescyt.gob.ec

Alejandra Villacís

Subsecretaria de Innovación y Transferencia de Tecnología.

SECRETARÍA DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR, CIENCIA, TECNOLOGÍA E INNOVACIÓN

avillacisc@senescyt.gob.ec

4. Process The process with Ecuador was somehow complicated because there was almost no regional

information available. We unsuccessfully tried contacting the correct authority several times but due

to a cabinet change, this process was slowed down. Fortunately, we were able to reach the new Sub

secretary of Innovation and Technology transfer, who confirmed out suspicion that there are no

regional programs in place and that she recommends that we treat Ecuador as one region. Based on

the information provided by Ms. Villacís, we decided that since the country is so centralized, it would

be better to treat it as a whole and not by regions. She also gave us the contact information of Mr.

Juan Carlos Parra, who is the Technical Secretary who is in charge of preparing the Plan for change in

the Productive Matrix, which would be a sectorial innovation strategy at a national level. We are

trying to contact Mr. Parra to see if we can have access to that document.

76

9.6.7 Mexico

Summary of documentation process by Country

Mexico

Web sites consulted:

http://www.economia.gob.mx/

http://www.agendasinnovacion.mx/

http://www.conacyt.mx/

JALISCO

http://www.jalisco.gob.mx/es/gobierno/organismos/1859

http://www.ciaj.org.mx/

http://www.informador.com.mx/jalisco/2014/545828/6/zapopan-define-terreno-para-cluster-

alimenticio.htm

http://ijalti.org.mx/

http://www.cusur.udg.mx/es/cican/doctorado

http://www.cncs.mx/j/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=22&Itemid=444&lang

=es

MICHOACAN

http://panoramaagrario.com/2014/02/michoacan-con-alto-potencial-para-la-agroindustria-

sedeco/

http://www.sagarpa.gob.mx/Paginas/default.aspx

http://www.avocadopowder.com/siosi/index.html

http://www.ciidirmich.ipn.mx/Paginas/Inicio.aspx

http://piensageotermia.com/archives/17250

http://www.cemiegeo.org/doarsal.php?doarsal=inicio

www.iie.org.mx/

http://www.arancia.com.mx/

http://www.eneri.com.mx/

PUEBLA

http://www.canacintra.org.mx/

http://www.excelsior.com.mx/nacional/2015/03/09/1012492

http://eleconomista.com.mx/industrias/2015/03/09/cluster-automotriz-puebla-sera-cada-vez-

mas-fuerte-promexico

http://www.upaep.mx/

http://www.buap.mx/

http://www.citexmexico.com/es/

77

http://www.canaive.org.mx/

http://www.canacintra.org.mx/principal/

http://www.udlap.mx/inicio.aspx

http://www.piit.com.mx/parque/

1. Reviewed documents:

Country Author/Institution Title Year

Mexico Clúster GEO Documento resumen Cluser Geo

Energias gerotérmica y renovables

-

2. Contacts: Elsa Margarita de Lourdes Blum Valenzuela

Directora de Coordinación Regional

eblum@conacyt.mx

3. Process

For Mexico we initially found Promotion state programs for Science and Innovation but they were not

specialized by production sectors. Afterwards, we realized the initiation of the publications of State

Innovation Agendas. These agendas are the equivalent of a RIS document.

Given that the agendas for the states that contribute the most to the national economy were not available

yet, we contacted Dr. Blum to ask her about the publication dates of these documents. Fortunately, Dr. Blum

already had access to the documents and facilitated them to us (to be treated with the most care possible,

given that they are yet to be published). Since now all states that have a RIS strategy will be evaluated, we

re in the process of acquiring the other published documents and requesting any other documents that Dr.

Blum may have that she could give us access to.

78

9.6.8 Peru

Summary of documentation process by Country

Perú

1. Web sites consulted: Network of Indicators of Science and Technology –LatinAmerican and Inter-american- (RICyT):

http://sisob.lcc.uma.es/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=61&Itemid=69

National Institute of Statistics and Informatics (INEI) – National Bureau of National:

http://www.inei.gob.pe/

Accounts. National Institute of Statistics and Information – National Population Census and

Housing:

http://www.ine.es/en/welcome.shtml

National Institute of Statistics and Informatics (INEI) – Regional Information System for decision

making

http://webinei.inei.gob.pe:8080/SIRTOD/#

National Council for Science, Technology and Technical Innovation (CONCyTEC) – Regional virtual

observatory SINACYT:

http://portal.concytec.gob.pe/

Thechnology Innovation Agendas Call

http://www.fincyt.gob.pe/site/1-innovacionint/703-agendas-de-innovacion-tecnologica

2. Reviewed documents:

Country Author/Institution Title Year

1

PERU European Comission Estudio sobre Sistemas Regionales de Innovación en el Perú: GRANDA ALVA, G. Estudio sobre Sistemas Regionales de Innovación en el Perú: Lecciones de Política, Universidad del Pacífico, Lima, Perú. 2014

2014

2 PERU CIES-GRADE: Consorcio de

Investigación Económica y Social

- Grupo de Análisis para el

Desarrollo

Balance y prioridades de investigación

en políticas públicas en el Perú 2007-

2011: ciencia, tecnología e innovación

2012

3 PERU

79

Contacts:

1. Dr. Alejandro Flores – University of the Pacific 2. Eng. José Rosas. - General Manager Chamber of Commerce of Lima. 3. Mr. Roberto Meléndez - CEO of ITP. Technological Institute of Production 4. Ms. Rosa Asca - General Manager of National Society of Industries 5. Mr. Javier Roca Fabián - Director General of International Economic Affairs, Competition and

Productivity. 6. Mrs. Cristina Fabiola Sanchez-Rocha, Ministry of Production of the Republic of Peru,

csanchez@produce.gob.pe

7. Process In August 2013 the Peruvian authorities began a process in collaboration with the European

Commission-DG-Regional to conduct a study of regional innovation systems. The initiative had the

institutional support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Peru and the regional governments of Cuzco

and Tacna, which were taken as pilot regions for the strategic assessment of the existing Regional

Innovation Systems. Although the study's findings reflect a weak relationship between the actors of

regional innovation, initiative gave favorable indications that bear fruit in the development of Eris and

subsequent joint projects with the Commission.

Against this background it was decided to contact Dr. Flores, who participated in the study

mentioned. In order to confirm the development of Eris and, if so, provide details on its development

phase. Process information was obtained, verifying that the pilot regions were instructed in the RIS

methodology and studied how Chile had conducted their Eris. However they concluded that the

process was not extrapolated to Peru since the regions lack the necessary decentralization, among

other circumstances, and therefore not expected to begin developing Eris short term. However, the

meetings held in Peru provided a guide to those regions with the greatest potential for collaboration

with the EU. This information, coupled with another set of macroeconomic criteria and prioritization

of sectors consistent with the objectives of the commission (excluding for example Cuzco, the most

touristic), led to select regions: Lima, La Libertad, Tacna, and Arequipa.

80

9.6.9 Uruguay

Summary of documentation process by Country

Uruguay

1. Web sites consulted: Network of Indicators of Science and Technology –LatinAmerican and Inter-american- (RICyT):

http://sisob.lcc.uma.es/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=61&Itemid=69

National Institute of Statistics of Uruguay: http://www.ine.gub.uy/

Local Development Programme ART Uruguay: http://arturuguay.org.uy/

2. Reviewed documents:

Country Author/Institution Title Year

1 URUGUAY Unidad de Evaluación y

Monitoreo / ANII

Indicadores de Ciencia, Tecnología e

Innovación Uruguay 2013

2013

2 URUGUAY Banco Central del

Uruguay, Instituto

Nacional de Estadística,

Oficina de Planeamiento

y Presupuesto

Uruguay 2008. Producto Interno Bruto

Regional. Síntesis Metodológica y Resultados.

2008

3 URUGUAY PNUD Uruguay El futuro en foco. Cuadernos sobre Desarrollo

Humano. Desarrollo económico y

disparidades territoriales en Uruguay

2014

4 URUGUAY Ministerio de Industria,

Energía y Minería

(MIEM), el Ministerio de

Desarrollo Social

(MIDES), Instituto de

Economía (IECON)

Mapeo de capacidades territoriales y

especialización productiva. Oportunidades de

intervención para el desarrollo local con

inclusión.

2013

3. Contacts: No contacts are done yet.

4. Process Through the analysis of secondary sources is concluded that there is insufficient decentralization in

innovation to undertake the study based on regions.

81

9.6.10 General

Summary of documentation process. General

1. Web sites consulted: General

http://aei.ec/

http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/map

https://www.biotechnologie.de/BIO/Navigation/EN/Background/countries-in-

fokus,did=66602.html

Poland

http://www.paiz.gov.pl/sectors/biotechnology

http://gospodarka.silesia-region.pl/en/med.php

Sweden

http://www.reglab.se/innovation/?cat=18

http://www.sgu.se/en/about-sgu/

http://brc.org.gu.se/English

http://bioeconomy.dk/Sweden_Strategy_Biobased_Economy.pdf/view

Catalonia

http://accio.gencat.cat/cat/empresa-ACC1O/agencia/

http://accio.gencat.cat/cat/innovacio-tecnologica/comunitats-ris3cat/dinamitzacio.jsp

2. Reviewed documents:

Author/Institution Title Year

Policy Summary from the

Swedish

Entrepreneurship Forum

Swedish Economic Forum Report 2010

Ismeri Europa / DG

Regio.

Regional Innovation Systems in Latin America: Policy Lessons –

Final Report

2010

USDA Foreign

Agricultural Service

Global Agricultural Information Networks. GAIN Report 2011

Jean Bossuyt – ECDPM. Overview of the Decentralisation Process in Latin America:

Main Achievements, trends and future challenges

2013

Giuseppe Polizzano, Sicily

Region

Sicily...towards a RIS3 strategy 2013

82

Government Offices of

Sweden

Sweden’s Mineral Strategy 2013

Behre-Dolbear Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment:“Where Not to

Invest

2014

Innovation for

Development in Latin

America OECD Publishing

Latin American Economic Outlook 2015: Education, Skills and

Innovation for Development

2015

Other downdable documents

Sweden:

http://entreprenorskapsforum.se/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/PS_SEF-2010_Eng_Web.pdf

http://www.government.se/content/1/c6/21/89/86/30eccfae.pdf

http://www.hedmarkdalarna.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Innovationspolitik-i-Sverige-

Maria-Linqvist.pdf

http://www.sipstrim.se/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Agenda-STRIM-LTU-Vinnova.pdf

http://entreprenorskapsforum.se/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/PS_SEF-2010_Eng_Web.pdf

Poland:

http://www.pi.gov.pl/PARPFiles/file/klastry/Polskie_klastry/Katalogi/katalog_ENG_PI.pdf

Sicily:

http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/10157/187136/RIS3_PPT_Sicily.pdf

83

9.7 Annex 7: Sectors and subsectors of Eye@RIS3 S3 Platform

Agriculture, forestry & fishing

Agricultural services

Crop & animal production, hunting & related service activities

Fishing & aquaculture

Forestry & logging

Construction

Civil engineering

Construction of buildings

Specialised construction activities

Creative, cultural arts &

entertainment

Amusement & recreation activities

Creative, arts & entertainment activities

Libraries, archives, museums & other cultural activities

Gambling and betting activities

Sports activities

Energy production & distribution

Energy distribution

Power generation/renewable sources

Human health & social work

activities

Human health activities (medical services)

Residential care activities

Social work activities without accommodation

Information & communication

technologies (ICT)

Computer programming, consultancy & related activities

Information service activities

Motion picture, video & television programme production, sound recording & music publishing activities

Programming & broadcasting activities

Telecommunications

Manufacturing & industry

Basic metals & of fabricated metal products

Basic pharmaceutical products & pharmaceutical preparations

Biotechnology

Chemicals & chemical products

Computer, electronic & optical products

Electrical equipment

Food, beverage & tobacco products

Furniture

Handicrafts

Machinery & equipment n.e.c.

Mining support service activities

Motor vehicles & other transport equipments

Nanotechnology & engineering

Other manufacturing

Other non-metallic mineral products

Repair & installation of machinery & equipment

Rubber & plastic products

84

Manufacturing & industry

Textiles, wearing apparel & leather & related products

Coke and refined petroleum products

Printing and reproduction of recorded media

Wood & paper (except for furniture)

Mining & quarrying

Extraction of crude petroleum and natural gas

Mining of coal and lignite

Mining of metal ores

Mining support service activities

Other mining and quarrying

Public administration,

security & defence

Defence

Public administration, justice, judicial, public order,fire service and safety activities

Services

Activities auxiliary to financial services & insurance activities

Activities of head offices & management consultancy activities

Advertising & market research

Architectural & engineering activities, technical testing & analysis

Education

Employment activities

Financial service activities, except insurance & pension funding

Insurance, reinsurance & pension funding, execpt compulsory social security

Legal & accounting activities

Office administrative, office support & other business support activities

Rental & leasing activities

Scientific research and development

Security & investigation activities

Services to buildings and landscape activities

Travel agency, tour operator & other reservation service & related activities

Other professional, scientific & technicak activities

Tourism, restaurants &

recreation

Accomodation (hotel, camping)

Rental and leasing activities

Restaurants and catering industry

Travel agency, tour operator & other reservation service & related activities

Transporting & storage

Air transport and related services

Postal and courier activities

Retail transport and related services

Road transport and related services

Warehousing and support activities for transportation (logistics storage)

Water transport and related services

Water supply, sewerage, waste management &

Sewerage

Water collection, treatment and disposal activities, materials recovery and remediation activities

85

remediation activities Water collection, treatment and supply

Wholesale & retail trade

Retail trade

Wholesale trade

www.innoproconsulting.com

Ronda Universitat, 33 1r-1a-B 08007 BCN

93 302 87 27 – info@innoproconsulting.com