erlc webinar series fall 2009

70
ERLC Webinar Series ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009 Fall 2009 A Repair Kit for Grading - 15 Fixes for Broken Grades Webinar Session 1 With Ken O’Connor

Upload: melva

Post on 20-Jan-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009. A Repair Kit for Grading - 15 Fixes for Broken Grades Webinar Session 1 With Ken O’Connor. Presented by Ken O’Connor Assess for Success Consulting [email protected] www.oconnorgrading.com. Outcomes/Objectives Participants will: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

ERLC Webinar SeriesERLC Webinar SeriesFall 2009Fall 2009

A Repair Kit for Grading -15 Fixes for Broken Grades

Webinar Session 1With Ken O’Connor

Page 2: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Presented by

Ken O’Connor

Assess for Success Consulting

[email protected]

www.oconnorgrading.com

Page 3: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009
Page 4: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009
Page 5: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009
Page 6: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Outcomes/Objectives

Participants will:• recognize the need to critically examine established grading practices;• appreciate the complexity of grading;• know the meaning of key terms;• identify the purposes of grading;• know how to fix broken grades; and• analyze the value of fixes for grading.

6

Page 7: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009
Page 8: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

8

Page 9: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“Terms (are) frequently used interchangeably, although they (should) have distinct meanings.”

McTighe, J., and Ferrara, S., “Assessing Learning in the Classroom”, Journal of Quality Learning, December 1995, 11

9

Page 10: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

What Do These Terms Mean?

the number (or letter) reported at the end of a period of time as a summary

statement of student performance

GRADE(S) (grading)

the number (or letter) "score" given toany student test or performance

MARK(S)/SCORE(S) (marking/scoring)

7/ 410 3 2

1

A 91 4 EB 78 3 GC 64 2 SD 57 1 N F 42

10

Page 11: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

The Essential Question

How confident are you that the grades students get in your school are:

ConsistentAccurateMeaningful, andSupportive of learning?

If grades do not meet these four conditions of quality they are “broken,” i.e., ineffective. 11

Page 12: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Enduring Understandings

1. There are no right grades only justifiable grades.

2. Nothing really changes till the grade book and the report card both change.

12

Page 13: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Policy+

Principles+

Practicality=

Implementation 13

Page 14: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“The real voyage of discovery consists not of seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes.”

Marcel Proust

14

Page 15: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“Why . . . Would anyone want to change current grading practices?

The answer is quite simple: grades are so imprecise that they are almost meaningless.”

Marzano, R. J., Transforming Classroom Grading,ASCD, Alexandria, VA, 2000, 1 15

Page 16: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“ . . . (grading) practices are not the result of careful thought or sound evidence, . . . rather, they are used because teachers experienced these practices as students and, having little training or experience with other options, continue their use.”

Guskey, Thomas R. (Editor), Communicating Student Learning: The 1996 ASCD Yearbook, ASCD, Alexandria, VA, 1996, 20 16

Page 17: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“The grading box is alive and well, and in some schools and classrooms, it is impenetrable. Fair does not mean equal; yet, when it comes to grading, we insist that it does.”

Patterson, William “Breaking Out of Our Boxes,” Kappan,April 2003, 572 17

Page 18: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

What does FAIR mean ?

“All students are given an equal opportunity to demonstrate what they know and can do as part of the assessment process.

Adaptations to assessment materials and procedures are available for students including but not restricted to students with learning disabilities, to allow them to demonstrate their knowledge and skills, provided that the adaptations do not jeopardize the integrity or content of the assessment.”

Adapted from Manitoba Education and Training at http://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/metks4/curricul/assess/aepolprod/purpos~2.html

18

Page 19: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Purposes for Grading

A Communicate the achievement status of students to parents, (students), and others.

B Provide information that students can use for self-evaluation.

C Select, identify, or group students for certain educational paths or programs.

D Provide incentives to learn.

E Evaluate the effectiveness of instructional programs

Guskey, Thomas R. (Editor), Communicating Student Learning: The 1996 ASCD Yearbook, ASCD, Alexandria, VA, 1996, 17 19

Page 20: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“the primary purpose for grading . . . should be to communicate with students and parents about their achievement of learning goals. . . .

20

Page 21: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Secondary purposes for grading include providing teachers with information for instructional planning, . . .

and providing teachers, administrators, parents, and students with information for placement of students. (5)

21

Page 22: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“It is very difficult for one measure to serve different purposes equally well.” (21)

“The main difficulty driving grading issues both historically and currently is that grades are pressed to serve a variety of conflicting purposes.” (31)

Brookhart, S., Grading, Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall, Columbus, OH, 2004 22

Page 23: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“the primary purpose of . . . grades . . . (is) to communicate student achievement to students, parents, school administrators, post-secondary institutions and employers.”

Bailey, J. and McTighe, J., “Reporting Achievement at the Secondary School Level: What and How?”, in Thomas R. Guskey, (Ed.) Communicating Student Learning: ASCD Yearbook 1996, ASCD, Alexandria, VA, 1996, 120

23

Page 24: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Grading Issues

•Achievement (only)•Evidence (quality)•Calculation•Learning (support)

24

Page 25: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Grades are broken when they -

• include ingredients that distort achievement

• arise from low quality or poorly organized evidence

• are derived from inappropriate number crunching,

• do not support the learning process.

25

Page 26: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Fixes for ingredients that distort achievement

1.Don’t include student behaviors (effort, participation, adherence to class rules, etc) in grades; include only achievement.

2. Don’t reduce marks on ‘work’ submitted late; provide support for the learner.

3. Don’t give points for extra credit or use bonus points; seek only evidence that more work has resulted in a higher level of achievement.

26

Page 27: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Fixes for ingredients that distort achievement

4. Don’t punish academic dishonesty with reduced grades; apply other consequences and reassess to determine actual level of achievement.

5. Don’t consider attendance in grade determination; report absences separately. 6. Don’t include group scores in grades; use only individual achievement evidence.

27

Page 28: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Fixes for low quality or poorly organized evidence

7. Don’t organize information in grading records by assessment methods or simply summarize into a single grade; organize and report evidence by standards/learning goals.

8. Don’t assign grades using inappropriate or unclear performance standards; provide clear descriptions of achievement expectations.

28

Page 29: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Fixes for low quality or poorly organized evidence

9. Don’t assign grades based on student’s achievement compared to other students; compare each student’s performance to preset standards.

10. Don’t rely on evidence gathered from assessments that fail to meet standards of quality; rely only on quality assessments.

29

Page 30: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Fixes for inappropriate number crunching

11. Don’t rely on the mean; consider other measures of central tendency and use professional judgment.

12. Don’t include zeros in grade determination when evidence is missing or as punishment; use alternatives, such as reassessing to determine real achievement or use “I” for Incomplete or Insufficient evidence.

30

Page 31: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Fixes to support the learning process

13. Don’t use information from formative assessments and practice to determine grades; use only summative evidence.

14. Don’t summarize evidence accumulated over time when learning is developmental and will grow with time and repeated opportunities; in those instances emphasize more recent achievement.

15. Don’t leave students out of the grading process. Involve students - they can - and should - play key roles in assessment and grading that promote achievement.

31

Page 32: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

For each Fix •What do you think? - PMI

• Where are you/school/district now?

• Where do you want to go – you/school /district?

32

Page 33: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Fixes for ingredients that distort achievement

1.Don’t include student behaviors (effort, participation, adherence to class rules, etc) in grades; include only achievement.

2.Don’t reduce marks on ‘work’ submitted late; provide support for the learner.

3. Don’t give points for extra credit or use bonus points; seek only evidence that more work has resulted in a higher level of achievement. 33

Page 34: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Fixes for ingredients that distort achievement

4. Don’t punish academic dishonesty with reduced grades; apply other consequences and reassess to determine actual level of achievement.

5. Don’t consider attendance in grade determination; report absences separately.

6. Don’t include group scores in grades; use only individual achievement evidence. 34

Page 35: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

35

Fix #1

Don’t include student behaviors (effort, participation, adherence to class rules, etc) in grades; include only achievement.

Page 36: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“. . . grades often reflect a combination of achievement, progress, and other factors.

. . . this tendency to collapse several independent elements into a single grade may blur their meaning.”

Bailey, J. and McTighe, J., “Reporting Achievement at the Secondary School Level: What and How?”, in T. R. Guskey, (Ed.) Communicating Student Learning: ASCD Yearbook 1996, ASCD, Alexandria, VA, 1996, 121 36

Fix #1

Page 37: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“Nick Olson was fed up; . . . fed up with acing exams but getting C’s at the end of the trimester because he refused to do the worksheets assigned in order to help students study so they could ace exams.”

Burkett, E., Another Planet: A Year in the Life of a Suburban High School, Perennial, New York, 2002, 124

37

Fix #1

Page 38: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“Reports on student progress and achievement should contain . . . information that indicates academic progress and achievement for each course or subject area

separate from . . .

punctuality, attitude, behaviour, effort, attendance, and work habits;”

Manitoba Education and Training, Reporting on Student Progress and Achievement: A Policy Handbook for Teachers, Administrators and Parents. Winnipeg, 1997, 13

38

Fix #1

Page 39: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Guskey and Bailey, Developing Grading and Reporting Systems for Student Learning, Corwin, 2001, 82

Fix #1

39

“By . . . offering separate grades for different aspects of performance, educators can provide better and far more useful information (than single grades that include achievement and behaviors).

Page 40: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

ProductAssessment Tasks

e.g. • performances• presentations

• tests/quizzes/examination• culminating demonstration

Sum total of everything students do in school/classroom

Assessment tasks,e.g. • performances

• presentations• tests/quiz• culminating demonstration

ProductAssessment taskse.g. • performances

• presentations• tests/quizzes/examinations• culminating demonstrations

Assessment of students using observation over timeProcess

e.g. • learning logs• journals• portfolios• teacher observations/anecdotal notes

Select a representative sampling of what students do

Report Card

Grading Variables

Attitude/Learning Skills/Effort• enjoys learning• questions/investigates

class participation•• works independently• completes assignments• completes research/projects• cooperates with others• respects others• resolves conflicts• attendance, punctuality

ACHIEVEMENT• reflects and sets goals

O’Connor, K., How to Grade for Learning, Third Edition, Corwin, 2009, 42

40

Reporting Variables(Desirable Behaviors) (Learning Outcomes,

Standards, etc)

Fix #1

Page 41: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

41

Fix #1

Page 42: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Junior High

42

Fix #1

Page 43: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

43

Fix #1

Page 44: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Shorewood, WI. Standards-Based Expanded Format Report Card

O’Connor, K., How to Grade for Learning, Third Edition, Corwin, 2009, 222-223

222-223

44

Fix #1

Page 45: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

45

Page 46: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Learning SkillsWorks Independently, Teamwork, Organization,Work Habits/Homework, Initiative

AchievementReport Period, Percentage Grade, Course Median,Credit Earned

CommentsStrengths, Areas for Improvement, Next Steps

AttendanceClasses Missed/Total Classes, Times Late 46

Fix #1

Page 47: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Theresetta Catholic School

Grading Practice Foundations A student’s mark will not include the teacher’s assessment of their behavior, attitude or effort. The mark on the student’s report card will indicate the success the student has had in achieving the prescribed curriculum outcomes for a specific Program of Studies. Effort, participation, attitude and other personal and social characteristics are important parts of a student’s education and growth. These will be reported separately on the report cards and through other contact with the parents and students.

Factors We Will Not Use To Determine an Achievement Grade Include: Attendance, behavior, attitude, class average, Bell Curves or other formulae for distribution of marks. . . . Students will be given a grade based on their achievement of curriculum outcomes.

We will report work habits and behavior by: Designing future report cards with sufficient space to report on Effort (Participation and Quality of work on assignments and test preparation) and Behaviour (Working in Groups and Following Rules.)

Source: Theresetta Catholic School. East Central Catholic Schools, Wainwright, Alberta, Canada. Pending permission.

47

Fix #1

Page 48: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

For Fix #1 •What do you think? – PMI

A strongly agreeB agreeC neutral/not sureD disagreeE strongly disagree

48a

Page 49: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

For Fix #1• Where are you/school/district now?

Implementation:

A completeB almost completeC partialD limitedE none

48b

Page 50: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

For Fix #1• Where do you want to go - you/school /district?

Implementation

A completeB almost completeC partialD limitedE none

48c

Page 51: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Fix #2

Don’t reduce marks on “work” submitted late; provide support for the learner.

49

Page 52: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“Those who experience... success gain the confidence needed to risk trying…. Students who experience failure lose confidence in themselves, stop trying, and... fail even more frequently. As it turns out, confidence is the key to student success in all learning situations.”

Stiggins, R., Student-Involved Classroom Assessment, Merrill

Prentice Hall, 2001, 43 50

Fix #2

Page 53: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Keys to Creating a Learning Community

P – Am I sending POSITIVE messages?

C – Am I offering CHOICES?

R – Am I encouraging REFLECTION

From:- www.MarvinMarshall.com51

Fix #2

Page 54: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“the most effective ways to changebehaviors are: 1. using noncoercion 2. prompting the person to self-assess, and 3. if authority is necessary have the student own the consequence.

When a consequence is imposed the student feels the victim. When the consequence is elicited, the student owns it and grows from the decision.”

Marvin Marshall, Promoting Responsibility Newsletter, Vol. 1, No. 4, November 2001, 9

Fix #2

52

Page 55: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“the most effective ways to change behaviors are: 1. using noncoercion 2. prompting the person to self-assess, and 3. if authority is necessary have the student own the consequence.

When a consequence is imposed the student feels the victim. When the consequence is elicited, the student owns it and grows from the decision.”

Marvin Marshall, Promoting Responsibility Newsletter, Vol. 1, No. 4, November 2001, 9

A strongly agreeB agreeC neutral/not sureD disagreeE strongly disagree

Fix #2

52b

Page 56: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“There is no reward in punishment.”

Barth, R., Lessons Learned

Fix #2

53

Page 57: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“Focus efforts on motivation, encouragement, and building student’s self esteem. Encouragement from teachers communicates to students internal values such as courage, effort, and understanding, all of which enhance intrinsic feelings of self-worth….

Educators must help students learn to see themselves as significant and teach them the language that helps them separate what they do from who they really are.”

Gathercoal, F., Judicious Discipline,Caddo Gap Press, San Francisco, 1997, 36-3754

Fix #2

Page 58: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Enhance the Likelihood Of Intrinsic MotivationFrom a list of 8-

1.Provide meaningful choices as often as possible while adhering to rigorous curricular standards.

2.Provide frequent, specific, non-judgmental feedback focussed on progress and growth.

3.Protect each student from embarrassment while holding to high standards and expectations for her/him.

Rogers, Ludington and Graham, Motivation and Learning, Peak Learning Systems, Evergreen, CO, 1998

55

Fix #2

Page 59: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Avoid These Classic De-motivatorsFrom a list of 16-

1.Competitive situations in which lack of success is probable or feared.

2.Exclusion from decisions about goals, means, and standards.

3.Insincere listening, recognition and praise.

Rogers, Ludington and Graham, Motivation and Learning, Peak Learning Systems, Evergreen, CO, 1998

56

Page 60: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

57

Fix #2

Page 61: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

58

Fix #2

Page 62: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

“Warm demanders first establish a caring relationship that convinces students that the teacher believes in them and has their best interests at heart. . . .

On the basis of this relationship, warm demanders relentlessly insist that all students perform required academic work and treat the teacher and their peers with respect.”

Abstract of Bondy, E, and D. D. Ross. "The Teacher as Warm Demander," Educational Leadership, September 2008. Available on line at www.ascd.org/

Fix #2

59

Page 63: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Fix #2Getting Work In On Time

1.Set clear and reasonable timelines with some student input.

2.Ensure that the expectations for the task/ assignment are clearly established and understood.

3.Support the students who will predictably struggle with the task without intervention

4.Find out why other students’ work is late and assist them.

How to Grade for Learning: Linking Grades to Standards, Third Edition, Corwin. 2009.102

60

Page 64: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Getting Work In On Time

5. Establish the consequences for late work, e.g.,

• After school follow-up

• Make-up responsibility within a supervised setting

• Parent contact

• Notation in the mark book for each assignment which is late

•“Grades” on a learning skills/ work habits section of the report card

• Comments on the report card that reflects chronic lateness

Fix #2

How to Grade for Learning: Linking Grades to Standards, Third Edition, Corwin. 2009.102

61

Page 65: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Getting Work In On Time

6. Provide the opportunity for students to extend timelines: 

•Student must communicate with the teacher in advance of the due date

•Student must choose situations carefully as this extension may only be used once/twice per term/semester

Fix #2

How to Grade for Learning: Linking Grades to Standards, Third Edition, Corwin. 2009.102

62

Page 66: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Firm Due Dates

1. Few days prior to due date - “full court press”

2. Day after due date some or all of:

• completing the work under supervision -

activity period, lunchtime, after school,

• Saturday morning work session

• removal from extra-curricular activities

• Last resorts - removal from class

- in-school suspensionSource: Branksome Hall

Fix #2

63

Page 67: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

Dealing with Late Work

1. Behaviour/Learning Skill

2. Clarity

3. Communication

4. Support/Consequences

64

Fix #2

Page 68: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

For Fix #2 •What do you think? - PMI

A strongly agreeB agreeC neutral/not sureD disagreeE strongly disagree

65a

Page 69: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

For Fix #2 Where are you/school/district now?

Implementation

A completeB almost completeC partialD limitedE none

65b

Page 70: ERLC Webinar Series Fall 2009

For Fix #2Where do you want to go – you/school /district?

Implementation

A completeB almost completeC partialD limitedE none 65c