epp contribution to (stratospheric and)
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
EPP contribution to (stratospheric and) tropospheric variationsAnnika SeppäläFinnish Meteorological InstituteAcademy of Finland
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012
![Page 2: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
So far...
• Energetic Particle Precipitation (EPP) initial effects on middle atmosphere chemistry relatively well known. We have also learned more about indirect effects on stratospheric chemistry, thanks to satellite observations.
• EPP effects on dynamics and lower altitudes less clear.
• Mesospheric dynamical changes from SPE. Jackman et al., 2007.
• What about the stratosphere and troposphere?
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012
![Page 3: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
SH: High EPP - Low EPPNH: High EPP - Low EPP
Seppälä et al., 2009.
EPP and tropospheric temperatures (Surface Air Temperature)
>40 years of re-analysis data
!"# $%$ ""% &'(
!)*+!)!,*+!,!-*+!-!.*+!.!/*+//*+..*+--*+,,*+)
!01234!!" #$% &!' ("(
!)!*+)!*!,+)!,!-+)!-!.+)!.!/+)//+)..+)--+),,+)**+))
!01234!!" #$% &!' ("(
!)!*+)!*!,+)!,!-+)!-!.+)!.!/+)//+)..+)--+),,+)**+))
!01234
Local polar effect during winter season, not a global effect. Links to Northern Annular Mode in NH?
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012
![Page 4: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
So far...
• Energetic Particle Precipitation (EPP) initial effects on middle atmosphere chemistry relatively well known. We have also learned more about indirect effects on stratospheric chemistry, thanks to satellite observations.
• EPP effects on dynamics and lower altitudes less clear.
• Mesospheric dynamical changes from SPE. Jackman et al., 2007.
• What about the stratosphere and troposphere?
• Connection between solar wind/geomagnetic activity/EPP and the NAM/NAO/AO? Boberg and Lundstedt, 2002, Thejll et al., 2003, Lu et al., 2008, Seppälä et al., 2009, Baumgaertner et al., 2011.
• How does the signal propagate from ~mesospheric altitudes to the troposphere? What happens in the stratosphere?
• I will try to put some of these pieces together.
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012
![Page 5: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
EPP and chemistry
Altit
ude
[km
]
2002−2003
Oct NovDec Jan Feb
30
40
50
60
70
2003−2004
Oct NovDec Jan Feb
2004−2005
Oct NovDec Jan Feb
Altit
ude
[km
]
Oct NovDec Jan Feb30
40
50
60
Oct NovDec Jan Feb Oct NovDec Jan Feb
2005−2006
OctNovDecJanFeb
024681012141618202224262830
NO
2 Mix
ing
ratio
[ppb
v]
OctNovDecJanFeb0.51 1.52 2.53 3.54 4.55 5.56
O3 M
ixin
g ra
tio [p
pmv]
O3
NO
xLong lived changes during winter and progressing into
spring.
Seppälä et al., 2007.
Randall et al., 2005.
Chemical changes limited to the mesosphere and stratosphere, above
about 30km. How is the troposphere influenced?
If the NOx reaches the stratosphere before spring, effects on stratospheric ozone significant.
Possibility for effects until summer? Is this the pathway to
influencing troposphere?
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012
![Page 6: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Middle atmosphere dynamics
Strong windsacting as a
transport barrier. Isolates polar air forming the Polar vortex. Maintains NOx in the polar region, transport
downward.
Active dynamics and atmospheric coupling taking
place in the winter pole.
Poles - access regions for EPP.
Location of chemical changes.
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012
![Page 7: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
EPP and dynamics
• Assumption: EPP leads to reduction on stratospheric ozone in the SPRING.
• From chemistry: Less O3, less long wave heating from O3 → Cooling.
• Statistical study by Lu et al: Opposite.
London, 1980.
Lu et al., 2008.
SPRING
Similar spring time zonal mean zonal wind results from WACCM presented by Kvissel et al., 2012.
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012
![Page 8: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
London, 1980.
EPP and dynamics
• Assumption: EPP leads to reduction on stratospheric ozone in the SPRING.
• From chemistry: Less O3, less long wave heating from O3 → Cooling.
• Statistical study by Lu et al.: Opposite seen.
Lu et al., 2008.
SPRING
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012
EPP influence on stratosphere and troposphere dynamics, probably not from an in situ chemical
effect.Back to the drawing board!
Similar spring time zonal mean zonal wind results from WACCM presented by Kvissel et al., 2012.
![Page 9: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
EPP and dynamicsWhat have we learned from models?
Mean DJF Change
Less ozone
Less cooling from O3
= heating
Decreased circulation = cooling
• ✓ EPP impact on chemistry understood.
• Model experiments: Chemistry-General Circulation Models forced with EPP-NOx source. (Rozanov et al., 2005, Baumgaertner et al., 2011)
• Both show similar surface temperature results to re-analysis data during WINTER.
• Baumgaertner et al. (2011): Ozone loss → Reduction in long wave radiative cooling in WINTER polar upper stratosphere-mesosphere → Positive WINTER temperature anomaly.
‣ Decreased mean meridional circulation → Cooling the polar stratosphere.
• Chemistry coupling to dynamics already during winter? What is the pathway? What about HOx?
WINTER
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012 Baumgaertner et al., 2011
![Page 10: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Recap
• EPP can reduce polar O3 in mesosphere and stratosphere.
• O3 heating effects:
• Heating in short wave (UV from Sun). SPRING
• Cooling in long wave (Terrestrial outgoing radiation). WINTER
• LESS O3 would lead to a warm anomaly if less long wave cooling, and cold anomaly if less short wave heating.
• WINTER ✓
• SPRING ✗
• → Springtime dynamical effect NOT directly from ozone.
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012
![Page 11: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
EPP and dynamics: A closer look
• 50 years of ERA re-analysis data
• Monthly means of zonal mean zonal wind, temperature and Eliassen-Palm flux.
• All data divided into High EPP and low EPP based on the Ap index.
• Looking at deviations from the dataset mean.
EP HAp
5 ·105 m 3s − 2
11 2
#16
U HAp
NOVP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
1
123
T HAp EP LAp
5 ·105 m 3s − 2
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
11
11
#15
U LAp 21
1
T LAp
1
1
2
34
#16
DECP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
1
11
2
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
11
#15
1
1
1
2
3
45678
#17
JANP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
32
1
1 23456
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
1
2345678
#15
43
21
1
1
23456
#17
FEBP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
321
1
1
2345
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
32
1
12
#15
1
1234
Latitude 20 40 60 80
1 11
#17
Latitude
MARP [hPa]
20 40 60 80
1
10
100
1000
1
1234
5
Latitude 20 40 60 80
Latitude 20 40 60 80
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
2
1
1
#15
Latitude 20 40 60 80
12
Latitude20 40 60 80
Seppälä et al., in review, 2012.A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012
50km
0km
![Page 12: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
EP HAp
5 ·105 m 3s − 2
11 2
#16
U HAp
NOVP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
1
123
T HAp EP LAp
5 ·105 m 3s − 2
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
11
11
#15
U LAp 21
1
T LAp
1
1
2
34
#16
DECP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
1
11
2
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
11
#15
1
1
1
2
3
45678
#17
JANP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
32
1
1 23456
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
1
2345678
#15
43
21
1
1
23456
#17
FEBP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
321
1
1
2345
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
32
1
12
#15
1
1234
Latitude 20 40 60 80
1 11
#17
Latitude
MARP [hPa]
20 40 60 80
1
10
100
1000
1
1234
5
Latitude 20 40 60 80
Latitude 20 40 60 80
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
2
1
1
#15
Latitude 20 40 60 80
12
Latitude20 40 60 80
DJF mean change
The results agree fairly well with previous studies for
the polar region.
Baumgaertner et al., 2011
Lu et al., 2008.
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012Seppälä et al., in review, 2012.
50km
0km
![Page 13: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
EP HAp
5 ·105 m 3s − 2
11 2
#16
U HAp
NOVP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
1
123
T HAp EP LAp
5 ·105 m 3s − 2
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
11
11
#15
U LAp 21
1
T LAp
1
1
2
34
#16
DECP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
1
11
2
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
11
#15
1
1
1
2
3
45678
#17
JANP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
32
1
1 23456
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
1
2345678
#15
43
21
1
1
23456
#17
FEBP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
321
1
1
2345
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
32
1
12
#15
1
1234
Latitude 20 40 60 80
1 11
#17
Latitude
MARP [hPa]
20 40 60 80
1
10
100
1000
1
1234
5
Latitude 20 40 60 80
Latitude 20 40 60 80
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
2
1
1
#15
Latitude 20 40 60 80
12
Latitude20 40 60 80
EPP and dynamicsWave forcing
• Eliassen-Palm flux (EP flux), a measure of wave activity (energy transfer).
• Arrows: Direction of wave propagation
• Contours: Zonal flow acceleration or deceleration from wave breaking.
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012 Seppälä et al., in review, 2012.
50km
0km
![Page 14: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
EP HAp
5 ·105 m 3s − 2
11 2
#16
U HAp
NOVP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
1
123
T HAp EP LAp
5 ·105 m 3s − 2
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
11
11
#15
U LAp 21
1
T LAp
1
1
2
34
#16
DECP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
1
11
2
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
11
#15
1
1
1
2
3
45678
#17
JANP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
32
1
1 23456
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
1
2345678
#15
43
21
1
1
23456
#17
FEBP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
321
1
1
2345
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
32
1
12
#15
1
1234
Latitude 20 40 60 80
1 11
#17
Latitude
MARP [hPa]
20 40 60 80
1
10
100
1000
1
1234
5
Latitude 20 40 60 80
Latitude 20 40 60 80
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
2
1
1
#15
Latitude 20 40 60 80
12
Latitude20 40 60 80
EPP and dynamicsU, T, EP
• Dec-Feb: More waves are reflected towards the equator and away from the polar region under high EPP.
• Less waves disturbing the polar vortex → stronger vortex, until Mar.
• Winds and temperatures show downward movement with time. Waves play a significant role in transferring the EPP signal from the stratosphere to the troposphere.
• Coupling through wave-mean flow interaction important just like for solar irradiance influences.
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012 Seppälä et al., in review, 2012.
50km
0km
![Page 15: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
!"# $%$ ""% &'(
!)*+!)!,*+!,!-*+!-!.*+!.!/*+//*+..*+--*+,,*+)
!01234
How are the surface level temperatures modulated?
EP HAp
5 ·105 m 3s − 2
11 2
#16
U HAp
NOVP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
1
123
T HAp EP LAp
5 ·105 m 3s − 2
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
11
11
#15
U LAp 21
1
T LAp
1
1
2
34
#16
DECP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
1
11
2
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
11
#15
1
1
1
2
3
45678
#17
JANP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
32
1
1 23456
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
1
2345678
#15
43
21
1
1
23456
#17
FEBP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
321
1
1
2345
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
32
1
12
#15
1
1234
Latitude 20 40 60 80
1 11
#17
Latitude
MARP [hPa]
20 40 60 80
1
10
100
1000
1
1234
5
Latitude 20 40 60 80
Latitude 20 40 60 80
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
2
1
1
#15
Latitude 20 40 60 80
12
Latitude20 40 60 80
From Here To Here?
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012
![Page 16: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
How are the surface level temperatures modulated?
EP HAp
5 ·105 m 3s − 2
11 2
#16
U HAp
NOVP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
1
123
T HAp EP LAp
5 ·105 m 3s − 2
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
11
11
#15
U LAp 21
1
T LAp
1
1
2
34
#16
DECP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
1
11
2
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
11
#15
1
1
1
2
3
45678
#17
JANP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
32
1
1 23456
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
1
2345678
#15
43
21
1
1
23456
#17
FEBP [hPa]
1
10
100
1000
321
1
1
2345
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
32
1
12
#15
1
1234
Latitude 20 40 60 80
1 11
#17
Latitude
MARP [hPa]
20 40 60 80
1
10
100
1000
1
1234
5
Latitude 20 40 60 80
Latitude 20 40 60 80
0
15
30
50
Alt[km]
2
1
1
#15
Latitude 20 40 60 80
12
Latitude20 40 60 80
!"# $%$ ""% &'(
!)*+!)!,*+!,!-*+!-!.*+!.!/*+//*+..*+--*+,,*+)
!01234
Stronger Polar Vortex Northern Annular Mode (NAM/NAO/AO)
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012
The Northern Annular Mode (NAM) is an internal mode of variability in the atmosphere, which reflects the strength of the
polar vortex. Stronger polar vortex drives positive NAM anomalies. The high EPP temperature pattern is typical to
positive NAM.
![Page 17: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
!!" #$% &!' ("(
!)!*+)!*!,+)!,!-+)!-!.+)!.!/+)//+)..+)--+),,+)**+))
!01234
Interhemispheric differences. NH vs. SH
• Focus on the NH. What about the SH?
• More stable polar vortex in SH.
• Better conditions for descent from mesosphere.
• Dynamics more difficult to influence?
• Shorter timeseries of observations, only since 1979.
• Nevertheless, SH tropospheric temperatures show variations, both in model simulations and re-analysis!
• Effects show up earlier than in NH.
• Same mechanism or different mechanism?
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012
![Page 18: EPP contribution to (stratospheric and)](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022012102/616a01f511a7b741a34dcbe5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Conclusions
• EPP effects middle atmosphere chemistry during winter (both HOx and NOx).
• Transition from chemical control to dynamical control in the stratosphere.
• From December to March anomalously strong polar vortex and more planetary wave reflection towards the equator.
• Also, for those interested: EPP effect on wave propagation more likely during high solar irradiance periods or westerly QBO. More details in the paper.
• Strong polar vortex leads to positive NAM anomalies, reflecting on surface temperatures.
• We are still working towards fully understanding the EPP coupling to dynamics, there are lots of connections to SOLARIS work.
A. Seppälä, HEPPA-SOLARIS Workshop, Boulder, Oct 2012
Thank you for your attention pre-ice breaker!