epileptogenic effects of radiographic contrast agents · 200 mosm -so · 40 -30 -20 ' 10 0...

4
R. Nick Bryan 1 Daniel Johnston 2 Received July 10, 1981; accep ted after revi- sion September 24, 1981 . This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service grant NS14907. Presented al the annual meeting of th e Ameri- can Society of Neuroradiology, Los Angeles, March 1980. , Department of Radiology, Baylor College 01 Medicine, Houston. TX 77030. Addre ss repri nt requests to R. N. Bryan. M.S. NB703, Meth od ist Hospital. 6565 Bertner, Houston, TX 77030. 2 Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030. AJNR 3:117-120 , March / April 1982 0195-6 108 / 82 / 0302-0117 $00.00 © American Roentgen Ray Society Epileptogenic Effects of Radiographic Contrast Agents: Experimental Study 117 Electrical activity in cells directly exposed to water-soluble radiographic contrast agents was investigated by intracellular recordings from neurons of the abdominal ganglia of Ap/ysia. Measurements of membrane resting potential , membrane conduct- ance , synaptic and action potential configurat i on , and spontaneous electrical activity were performed . Test solutions included sodium diatrizoate , meglumine iothalamate , metrizamide , and control solutions. Solutions (100 and 200 mOsm) of these agents did not significantly alter resting membrane potential , membrane conductance , action potential frequency or configuration , or excitatory postsynaptic potentials . Inhibitory postsynaptic potentials were suppressed by contrast agents . These results suggest that contrast agents affect at least some neurons by disinhibition . Imaging of the cerebrosp inal fluid spaces and adj acent br a in s urf aces req uir es co ntras t enhance ment, particularly in the pos t erior fossa and spin e. Rece nt developments in water-soluble r adiograph ic contrast media have permitted their s ub stitution f or o il y co ntr ast mat er ial and air in many cases. Unf ortunately, even the newest wa t er-soluble co ntr ast mate ri als have signifi ca nt side eff ec ts, some appare ntly related to direct neur otox icity. Older water-soluble co ntr ast age nts have long been known to be extre mely t oxic when th ey are direct ly applied to the cen tr al nervo us system (CNS). In fact, with older age nt s, the CNS was the critical organ in pharm aco log ic terms [1 , 2]. This direct neurotoxicity is primarily reflected by abnorma l elec trical ac tivity such as elect r oencep halo grap hi c (EEG) s pik es and gr oss ly evidenc ed as motor se izur es. The newer, nonionic, water -soluble co ntras t agents have marked ly diminished ep il ep t oge ni c eff ects , but motor se izures remain an occasio nal clini ca l problem [3]. Ment al dysfunction reflec ted by short-term memory loss, co nfusion, and diso ri entat ion is a more frequ e nt problem with non io ni c agents [4]. The ce llular basis for the clinical sy mpt oms and the altered elec tri ca l act ivity of the bra in is essentially unknown . Numerous studies show alteration of EEG patterns with spike ac tivity [5-7], but more speci fi c neuroph ysiolo gic changes have seldom been studied. Spinal root elec trical ac tivity is de pr essed by hyper to ni c solutions of io ni c contrast age nts [8] , but not by isoto nic conce ntr ati ons [9]. Sp inal long-trac t el ec tri ca l ac tivity is gene ra ll y d epresse d or unaltered [10-1 2]. The spinal mono- syn ap tic r eflexes are little aff ec ted by co nt rast age nt s, but some polysynaptic act ivity is marked ly increased [11]. Certain s pina l inhibit ory pathway s have been sh own to be depr essed [9]. The latter study [9] suggests a more spec i fi c ce ntr al synapt ic eff ec t of co ntr ast age nts which produ ce ep il ep togenic ac tivity by dis in- hibit io n. While these studies are more spec ific than EEG r eco rds, no single unit or intr ace llul ar studies on neuron s exposed to radiographic co ntr as t age nt s have previou sly been pe rform ed. To furth er el ucidate the spec ific ne ur ot ox ic eff ec ts of co ntrast age nt s, this study involves intr acellu lar el ec trical r eco rdings during exposure of ne uron s to var ious co ntr ast age nt s.

Upload: others

Post on 12-Mar-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Epileptogenic Effects of Radiographic Contrast Agents · 200 mOsm -so · 40 -30 -20 ' 10 0 " 0 nA INHIBITORY POST SYNAPTIC POTENTIALS Meg. lolholomole 100 mOsm Meg. lolholomole 200

R. Nick Bryan 1

Daniel Johnston2

Received July 10 , 198 1; accepted after revi­sion September 24 , 1981 .

This work was supported by U.S. Public Hea lth Service grant NS14907.

Presented al the annual meeting of the Ameri ­can Society of Neuroradiology, Los Angeles, March 1980.

, Department of Rad iology, Baylor College 0 1 Medicine, Houston . TX 77030 . Address repri nt requests to R. N. Bryan. M.S. NB703, Method ist Hospita l. 6565 Bertn er, Houston, TX 77030.

2 Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medic ine, Houston, TX 77030.

AJNR 3:117-120, March / April 1982 0 195-6 108 / 82 / 0302-0117 $00.00 © American Roentgen Ray Society

Epileptogenic Effects of Radiographic Contrast Agents: Experimental Study

117

Electrical activity in cells directly exposed to water-soluble radiographic contrast agents was investigated by intracellular recordings from neurons of the abdominal ganglia of Ap/ysia. Measurements of membrane resting potential , membrane conduct­ance , synaptic and action potential configuration , and spontaneous electrical activity were performed. Test solutions included sodium diatrizoate, meglumine iothalamate, metrizamide, and control solutions. Solutions (100 and 200 mOsm) of these agents did not significantly alter resting membrane potential , membrane conductance , action potential frequency or configuration , or excitatory postsynaptic potentials. Inhibitory postsynaptic potentials were suppressed by contrast agents. These results suggest that contrast agents affect at least some neurons by disinhibition.

Imag ing of the cerebrospinal fluid spaces and ad jacent brain surfaces req uires contrast enhancement , particularly in the posterior fossa and spine. Recent developments in water-soluble radiograph ic contrast med ia have permitted their substitution for oil y contrast material and air in many cases. Unfortunate ly , even the newest water-soluble contrast materi als have significant side effects, some apparently related to direct neurotox ic ity . Older water-so luble contrast agents have long been known to be extremely toxic when they are directly applied to the central nervous system (CNS). In fact, with older agents, the CNS was the c rit ica l organ in pharmacolog ic terms [1 , 2].

This direct neurotox ic ity is primarily reflec ted by abnormal elec tri ca l activity such as electroencephalographic (EEG) spikes and grossly evidenced as motor se izures. The newer, nonionic, water-so luble contrast agents have marked ly diminished epileptogenic effects , but motor seizures remain an occasional c linical problem [3]. Mental dysfunction ref lected by short-term memory loss, confusion, and d isori entation is a more frequent problem with non ionic agents [4].

The ce llular basis for the c lin ica l symptoms and the altered electri ca l activity of the brain is essentially unknown . Numerous studies show alteration of EEG patterns with spike activity [5-7], but more speci fi c neurophys iologic changes have seldom been studied.

Spinal root e lectri ca l activity is depressed by hypertonic solutions of ionic contrast agents [8] , but not by isotonic concentrati ons [9]. Spinal long-trac t electri cal activity is generall y depressed or unaltered [10-1 2]. The spinal mono­synapti c reflexes are little affec ted by contrast agents, but some po lysynaptic activity is marked ly increased [11]. Certain spinal inhibitory pathways have been shown to be depressed [9]. The latter study [9] suggests a more spec ifi c central synaptic effect of contrast agents which produce ep ileptog enic activity by disin­hibition. Whil e these studies are more spec if ic than EEG records, no sing le unit or intracellular stud ies on neurons exposed to rad iog raphic contrast agents have previously been performed. To further el uc id ate the spec ific neurotox ic effects of contrast agents, thi s study involves intracellu lar electri ca l recording s du ring exposure of neurons to various contrast agents.

Page 2: Epileptogenic Effects of Radiographic Contrast Agents · 200 mOsm -so · 40 -30 -20 ' 10 0 " 0 nA INHIBITORY POST SYNAPTIC POTENTIALS Meg. lolholomole 100 mOsm Meg. lolholomole 200

118 BRYAN AND JOHNSTON AJNR :3, Marchi April 1982

Materials and Methods

The abdominal ganglia of Aplysia ca /ifornica, a marine mollusc , were removed and placed in a c irculating seawater bath to which various solutions could be added. Selected neurons [13] were then impaled with potassium-acetate-fill ed glass mic roelectrodes with tips of less than 1 /lm . In the giant cell R2, two electrodes were placed intracellularly . In other ce lls, only on e electrode was used. Intracellular elec trica l ac tivity was monitored by a high impedence preamplifier and fed to a differential amplifier for oscilloscope or strip-chart disptay (fig . 1). Intracellular recordings allowed mea­surements of membrane resting potential and membrane resistance , spontaneous spike frequency and configuration , and electrical characteri sti cs of spontaneou s postsynaptic potentials.

In some preparation s, connectives (nerves) to the ganglia were stimulated with a constant current suction elec trode to produce orthodromic postsynaptic potentials and action potentials. This allowed measurement of thresholds and waveforms of the synaptic and action potentials.

Th e test solutions used to bathe the ganglia included seawater (1 ,000 mOsm), and solutions of seawater plus 10% by volume 100 mOsm NaCI ; 1,500 mOsm NaCI; 1 ,500 mOsm sucrose ; 100, 200, and 300 mOsm sodium diatrizoate; meglumine iothalamate; and metrizamide. All solutions had a final total osmolarity of 950-1 ,150 mOsm. The contrast solutions then had iodine levels of 6-18 mg / ml. The ganglia were exposed to the test solution s for 20-60 min and th en rinsed with fresh seawater for a comparable period of time.

Results

Membrane resting potential was evaluated in 20 cells, including 11 silent and nine spontaneously active cells. No chang e in membrane resting potential was produced by any solution (fig. 2) . This was further substantiated by the double electrode-current injection method of evaluating membrane resistance, performed on five cells , all R2 . No change in

Bath drain

Oscilloscope

High impedance ~ preamplifier

"0 0

current source Chart recorder

Fig. 1 .-Preparation of experiment. Resected abdominal ganglia o f Ap/y­sia are placed in small chamber in which they are continuously bathed in various ci rculati ng test so lut ions. Specific neurons (such as R2) are then impaled with one or two glass microelectrodes. One electrode is coupled by high impedence preamplifier to osci lloscope differential amplifier for display of int racellular poten tia ls. If second elec trode is used , it is coupled to DC curren t source by high impedence preampli fier . Second electrode is then used to alter transmembrane poteOl tial by current passage, which is displayed on osc illoscope or strip chart recorder. In addition, vari ous connec tives (nerves) are placed in suc tion elec trodes for orthod romic stimulation.

MEMBRANE RESTING POTENTIAL

_50mvlllll

.HZO NA MEG. DIATRIZOATE 10THALAMATE

METRIZAMIDE METRIZAMIDE

100 mOlm 100 mOlm 100 mOlm ZOO mOlm

10 mV L ..... 100 sec.

Fig . 2. -Representative recording s from cell R2 o f abdominal ganglion of Aplysia. Each recording was made 30 min after application o f test solution at stated concentrati ons. No change in membrane resting potential.

membrane resistance was obtained by comparison of the current-voltage curves of membrane resistance , and no displacement of the curves indicative of membrane resting potential change was noted (fig . 3).

Spike configuration, both spontaneous and induced by orthodromic stimulation , was evaluated in 12 cells. No al­terations in the spikes were seen as determined by mea­surements of spike amplitude, duration , and overall wave­form (fig. 4).

Spontaneous spike activity was evaluated in 11 silent cells, mainly R2. No alterations (i.e ., increase in sponta­neous firing rate) were noted. Spontaneous firing pattern was also evaluated in nine intrinsically spiking cells. These cells included L 11 , R15, and those from the L2-6 complex. In these cells , no consistent change was seen . In seven experiments, the spike activity was unchanged; in five ex­periments , there was a slight increase in spike rate (4 / sec to 6 / sec) ; and in five experiments, a mild decrease in spike rate was noted (3 .5 / sec to 1.5/ sec). There was no con­sistent relation between the minor alterations in spike activ­ity and the various test solutions, including contrast agents.

Excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSP) were evaluated in si x cells , all R2 by stimulation of the left connective. In three experiments with metrizamide, no change was seen, while in one there was a slight (2-3 mV) depression in amplitude. In si x experiments with meglumine iothalamate , no change was seen; in one experiment , there was slight diminution in amplitude of the EPSP (2 mV); in two other experiments, there was a slight increase in EPSP amplitude (3 mV). In no experiment was there any alteration in duration of the postsynaptic potential (fig. 5). In no experiment was the EPSP increased to spike threshold .

In three cells , all L 11 , spontaneous and orthodromic inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSP) were evaluated . In all cases, there was a diminution in amplitude and frequency of spontaneous IPSP by both ionic and nonionic agents , but more so by the nonionic agent metrizamide (fig . 6). Likewise, the orthodromic IPSP elicited by stimulation of the left con­nective was blocked by the contrast agents; however, not by the control solutions of NaCI or sucrose (fig . 7). This alteration of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials was unasso­ciated with alteration in membrane resting potential.

Page 3: Epileptogenic Effects of Radiographic Contrast Agents · 200 mOsm -so · 40 -30 -20 ' 10 0 " 0 nA INHIBITORY POST SYNAPTIC POTENTIALS Meg. lolholomole 100 mOsm Meg. lolholomole 200

AJNR :3, Marchi April 1982 EPILEPTOGENIC EFFECTS OF CONTRAST AGENTS 11 9

Fig . 3. - Passive membrane resisl­ance. Inlracellular transmembrane po­lenl ial (mV) is plotted on ordinate as function of intracellular cu rrent (nA) passed Ihrough separate elect rode, dis­played on abscissa. Slopes of cu rve in­dicale membrane resistance and revea l no change after 30 min exposure to var­ious contrast agen ts. Dual electrode re­cordings from R2 . OmV = -57 mV RP.

mV

+ 10

- 25

+ 10

- 5 +~~ mV - 10

- IS

sH2 0

- 20 - 25

Noel 100 mOsm

- so - 40 - 30 -20 - 10 0 +10

n A

SPIKE CONFIGURATION

MEG. 10THAL . METRIZAMIDE

nL- :_L ---k-~_l...--.._

Fig . 4. - Spike configu ration, recording from R2 . Orthodromic spikes elicited by stimUlat ion of left connective showed no alteration in configuration after exposure to meg lumine iotha lamate and metrizamide. Variations in afterpotentials not consistent , related to spontaneous baseline alterations. Calibration 10 mV 110 msec.

EXC ITATOR Y POST SYNAPTIC POTENT IALS

STiM. .H2 0 MEG 10THAL. METRIZAMIDE 5T R.(VI 100 mOsm 100 mOsm

1.0 J'-- -r-

Jl

3.0 j ...... -- ~r-- -- ./

8.0 .~ . . ~ .~----

Fig . 5.-lntracellular recordings of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSP) from R2 after st imulation of left connective. Stimulus strengths are at 2, 5, and 15 times threshold (last is supramaximal) . Mi ld diminution in amplitude of EPSP after exposure to meg lumine iothalamate and met rizamide. Calibration 10 mV 1 10 msec.

Discussion

Our results indicate that water-so luble rad iog raphic con­trast agents do not greatl y alter a vari ety of electrical phe­nomena in neurons of the abdominal gang lia of Ap/ysia, except for inhibitory postsynaptic potentials , which they consistently depress. The most sensitive neuronal activity

mV

+ 10

- 25

+ 10 +5

-5 o~ mV - 10

- IS - 20 MEG 10THALAMATE

-25 100 mOlm

-so - 40 -30 -20 - 10 0 +10

nA

Fig . 5. - lntracellular recordings o f spontaneous inhibitory postsyn­aptic potentials (lPSP) from L 11 . Re­cordings on left are at resting poten­tia l; those on righ t are hyperpolar­ized to block spontaneous spike. Meglumine iothalamate slightly di­min ishes both frequency and ampli­tude of IPSP, while metrizamide completely blocks IPSP.

10msec

+10 +:;

-5 mV

MErRI Z AMIDE

-2S 100 mOs m

+ 10 +S

0 -S

mV

METR IZ AMIOE 200 mOsm

- so · 40 - 30 -20 ' 10 0 " 0 nA

INHIBITORY POST

SYNAPTIC POTENTIALS

Meg. lolholomole 100 mOsm

Meg. lolholomole 200 mOsm

~ Melr izomi oe 100 mOsm

MetrizamiDe 200 mOsm

c

Fig . 7.-0rthodromic IPSP in cell L 11 from slim ulati on of left connec ti ve . A, Control recording . B, Blockage o f IPSP aft er 15 min exposure 10 100 mOsm metrizamide. C, Reversa l o f blockage after 15 min of seawater rin se. Stimulus artifact (arrows).

to the effects of radiographic contrast agents seems to be inhibitory postsynaptic potentia ls. This would imply that at least part of the epi leptogen ic properties of these drugs is due to disinhibition rather than a direct exc itatory effect. This is compatib le with previous experimental results in the cat spina l cord [9]. Although these are limited data, they

Page 4: Epileptogenic Effects of Radiographic Contrast Agents · 200 mOsm -so · 40 -30 -20 ' 10 0 " 0 nA INHIBITORY POST SYNAPTIC POTENTIALS Meg. lolholomole 100 mOsm Meg. lolholomole 200

120 BRYAN AND JOHNSTON AJNR:3, March i Apri l 1982

suggest that these contrast agents may affect neurons sim­ilarly to other known convulsant agents, such as picrotoxin which also seems to produce epileptogenic effects by dim­inution of inhibitory synaptic activity [14]. In our study rela­tively low concentrations of the contrast agents altered inhibitory postsynaptic activity and thi s effect is independent of osmolarity . The normal fluid osmolarity of these animals is about 1,000 mOsm and the total osmolarity of the test so lutions in these experiments was 950-1,1 50 mOsm. Con­trol so lutions of NaCI and sucrose have no significant effect on IPSP (or any of the other parameters measured).

These observations imply that contrast agents directly affec t speci fi c synaptic activity and that their neuronal ef­fects are not due to their hypertoni c ity or generalized alter­ati on of membrane properties, such as resting potential. The exact mechanism of the decreased inhibitory synaptic po­tentials cannot be determined from these ex periments, but alterations in synapti c C1 mechanisms is a possibi lity. Why the non ionic agents should have a greater effect than the clinica lly more to xic ionic drugs is unclear, but may relate to an overall depressant activity of nonionic compounds re­cently demonstrated in mammalian hippocampus (N. Bryan and N. Hershkowitz, unpublished data) and seen in clinical EEGs.

Since the effects of these drugs on neurons involves a rather spec ific chemical activity, it seems that future modi­fications of these agents should be directed toward chemica l structure relating to synaptic activity rather than to dec reas­ing osmolarity or even lipid so lubility . It may, in fact, be fortuitous that the newer nonionic drugs have less neurotox­icity than their ionic predecessors. The chem ical changes result ing in diminution of osmolarity and lipid solubi lity may have limited their access to neuronal membrane surfaces, but more importantly , may have altered their effect on inhib­itory synapses.

One must ad mit that while these drugs do have what may be an appropriate effect (i .e., disinhibition) on the neurons of thi s invertebrate animal preparation , there is an important difference between the deg ree of these effects of Aplysia neurons and neurons of mammali an systems. These drugs produce frank " convul sive" activity in va ri ous mammalian preparations inc luding cat cortex and spinal cord, rabbit cortex, and rat cortex and hippocampus (N. Bryan and N. Hershkowitz, unpublished data). In none of the Aplysia neurons that we investi gated was there ever rapid repetiti ve neuronal spiking or " burst " activi ty, which is generally taken to be " epileptogenic ." Certainly , other convulsants such as picrotoxin, strychnine, and Metrazol produce more obvious neuronal spike activity in Aplysia neurons. It is unc lear why contrast agents do not produce such dramatic effects. Two possibilities are significant spec ies difference in neuronal sensitivity to the drugs and / or a significant binding of these drugs to the membranous capsule that surrounds the neu­rons in the abdominal ganglia of Aplysia. Further experi -

ments, both in this preparation and other epi lepsy models, wi ll be necessary to c larify this discrepancy.

While these experiments are relatively limited , they do offer the first information of what may be some of the spec ific cellular mechanisms of neurotoxicity of water-so luble con­trast agents. This type of approach seems important, not only in determining the factors of neurotoxic ity of these drugs, but also in evaluating future comp'ounds for improved clinical usefulness.

REFERENCES

1. Gonsette RE . The neu rophysiolog ic action of contrast med ia. Acta Radiol [Oiagn] (Stockh) 1972; 13: 889-904

2. Melartin E, Tuohimaa PJ , Oabb R. Neurotox ic ity of iothala­mates and diatrizoates. I. Significance of concentrati on and ca tion. Invest Radio/1970 ;5: 13-2 1

3. Strother CM. Adverse reactions. In: Sackett JF, Strother CM , eds. New techniques in myelography. New York : Harper & Row, 1979 : 195-202

4 . Bertoni JM , Schwartzman RJ, Van Horn G, Partin J. Asterixis and encephalopathy foll owing metrizamide myelograph y: in­vestigations into possible mechanisms and review of th e liter­ature. Ann Neuro /1981 ;9: 366-370

5. Grepe A, Wid en L. Neurotoxic effect of intracranial sub­arachnoid application of metrizamide and meg lumine iocar­mate. An experimental in ves tigation in dogs in neurolept anal­gesia. Acta Radiol [Suppl] (Stockh) 1973;335: 1 02-118

6. Oltedal S, Kayed K. Epileptogenic effects of water-soluble contrast media: an experimental invest igation in rabbits. Acta Radiol [Suppl] (Stockh) 1973;335: 45-55

7. Ropper AH, Chiappa KH, Young RR. The effect of metrizamide on the electroencephalog ram: a prospective study in 6 1 pa­tients. Ann Neuro/1979;6 : 222 - 226

8. Harvey JP Jr, Freiberger RF, Werner G. Clinical and experi­mental observations with methiodal, an absorbable mye lo­graph ic con trast agent. C/in Pharmacol Ther 1961 ;2: 610-614

9. Bryan RN , Oauth GW, Gilman S, Hilal SK . Effects of radio­graphic contrast agents on spinal cord physiology. Invest Ra­dio/ 1981 ; 16 : 234-239

10. Allen WE III , VanGilder JC, Collins WF III. Evaluation of the neurotox ic ity of water-soluble myelographic contrast agents by electrophysiolog ical monitors. Radiology 1976; 118: 89-95

11 . Hilal SK, Oauth GW, Burger LC , Gilman S. Effect of isoton ic contrast agents on spinal re flexes in th e cat. Radiology 1977; 122 : 149-155

12. Oltedal SI, Sawhney BB . Effect of water-soluble contrast med ia on corti ca ll y evoked potentials in the cat. Acta Radiol [Oiagn ] (Stockh) 1973;335: 133-142

13. Frazier WT, Kandel ER, Kupfermann I, Waziri R, Coggeshall RE. Morphological and functional properties of identified neu­rons in the abdominal ganglion of Aplysia ca lifornica . J Neu­rophysio /1967 ;30 : 1288-1351

14. Carpenter ~O , McCreery MJ, Woodbury CM, Yarowsky PJ . Modu lation of endogenous discharge in neuron R15 through specif ic receptors for several neurotransmitters. In : Chalazon­itis N, Boisson M, eds . Abnormal neuronal discharges. New York : Raven, 1978 : 189- 203