environment and social assessment report
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT
REPORT
(Sept., 2020)
For
Construction of
Sewerage Network and Sewage
Treatment Plant at
Chhindwara
Sub project of
Madhya Project Urban Development Project
Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company
Limited
Original Assessment done by:
M/s LN Malviya Infra Pvt. Ltd., Bhopal
Revised by Contractor:
M/s Laxmi Civil Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., Kolhapur
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
![Page 2: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... vii
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1
1.1. Project Background ................................................................................................................................ 1
1.2. Context of the Environment and Social Assessment by the contractor ............................................. 1
1.3. Scope of ESA study ................................................................................................................................. 2
1.4. Objectives of ESA Study ........................................................................................................................ 2
1.5. Terms of Reference (ToR) for the ESA process ................................................................................... 2
1.6. Methodology ............................................................................................................................................ 3
1.7. Mitigation and Monitoring..................................................................................................................... 5
2. Project Description ..................................................................................................................................... 6
2.1. Description of Project Area.................................................................................................................... 6
2.2. Existing Water Supply and Sanitation System ..................................................................................... 9
2.3. Need of Project ...................................................................................................................................... 11
2.4. Proposed Project ................................................................................................................................... 12
2.5 Collection Network ............................................................................................................................... 24
3. Legal, Policy and Administrative Framework ....................................................................................... 25
3.1. Regulatory Framework – Environmental ........................................................................................... 25
3.2. World Bank Safeguard Policies ........................................................................................................... 28
4. Baseline Environment Profile .................................................................................................................. 36
4.1. Baseline Study ....................................................................................................................................... 36
4.2. Environmental Profile of Chhindwara Subproject ............................................................................ 36
4.3. Physical Environment ........................................................................................................................... 38
4.4. Baseline of Sludge disposal site ............................................................................................................ 43
4.5. Socio Economic Profile of Chhindwara .............................................................................................. 43
5. Assessment of Anticipated Impacts ......................................................................................................... 48
5.1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 48
5.2. Environmental Impact ......................................................................................................................... 48
5.2.1. General Impacts during Subproject Cycle ................................................................................... 50
5.3. Social Impacts ............................................................................................................................................. 55
5.3.1 Land Requirement .................................................................................................................................... 55
5.3.2. Impact on Livelihood ............................................................................................................... 56
5.3.3. Impact on Existing Utility Services .......................................................................................... 57
5.3.4. Potential impacts Due to Sludge disposal during operation phase ......................................... 58
5.3.5 Impact of COVID-19 with mitigation measures ........................................................................... 58
5.3.6. Labour Influx and child Labor ....................................................................................................... 61
6. Stakeholder and Public Consultation ...................................................................................................... 62
6.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 62
![Page 3: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
ii | P a g e
6.2 Objectives of the Public Consultations................................................................................................ 62
6.3 Key Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 70
6.4 Summary of Incorporation of Public Concerns in the Designs......................................................... 71
7. Environmental and Social Management Plan ........................................................................................ 72
7.2 Monitoring and Evaluation ......................................................................................................................... 99
Total cost of EMP + SMP + Green Belt Development + Environment Monitoring works out to
42,99,725+20,00,000+33,24,234+46,97,000= INR 1,43,21,059/- ........................................................... 102
8. Tribal Vulnerability Identification and Assessment ............................................................................ 103
8.1 Distribution of Scheduled Tribes in Madhya Pradesh in Relation to India .................................. 103
8.2 Presence of Indigenous People. .......................................................................................................... 103
8.3 Public Consultation............................................................................................................................. 105
8.4 Other Vulnerable Population ............................................................................................................. 106
8.5 Strategy for addressing of Tribal and Vulnerable group through participation .......................... 106
8.6 Inclusion of Tribal and Vulnerable Population during Implementation ....................................... 107
9. Contractor’s Role in Grievance Redressal Mechanism ....................................................................... 108
10. Conclusion and Recommendations ................................................................................................... 109
Appendix 1:Screening Checklist of Chhindwara sewerage project .......................................................... 111
Appendix 2: List of Tribal Communities in State of Madhya Pradesh as Provided by Ministry of Tribal
Affairs, Government of India ......................................................................................................................... 115
Appendix 3:List of Schedule Areas in Madhya Pradesh as Specified by the Scheduled Areas under the
fifth Schedule of Indian Constitution ............................................................................................................. 117
Appendix 4: List of Participants with Photographs of various meetings held during the ESA study in
Chhindwara ..................................................................................................................................................... 118
Appendix 5: Land records of proposed STP and SPS land parcel .............................................................. 121
Appendix 6: Public Consultation photographs during execution of project .............................................. 128
Appendix 7: Some of the Congested Roads ................................................................................................... 129
Appendix 8: Photos related to Environmental Management Plan .............................................................. 130
Appendix 9 A :Water Quality Standard as per BIS- IS 10500:2012 ........................................................... 132
Appendix 9 B: WasteWater Test reports Sample-A ..................................................................................... 137
Appendix 9c : Water Quality Test report of receving water Body (STP outfall) ....................................... 143
Appendix 10 : Ambient Air and Noise Pollution Test report ...................................................................... 145
Appendix 11: Land Allotment for Sludge disposal site ................................................................................ 147
Appendix 12: Labour License ........................................................................................................................ 149
Appendix 13: Application for Railway Crossing .......................................................................................... 150
Appendix 14: Letter regarding first and second stage permission from Forest Department. .................. 159
Appendix 15: Letter regarding second stage permission from Forest Department .................................. 160
Appendix 16: Labors Health Checkup Camp ............................................................................................... 165
Appendix 17: Contractor Survey for Project Affected Persons .................................................................. 166
Appendix 18: CTE for Chhindwara STP ...................................................................................................... 167
Appendix 19: Road Crossing .......................................................................................................................... 168
Appendix : 20 Treated Effluent standards as per CPCB Recommended Value under MPUDC ............. 169
![Page 4: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
iii | P a g e
Appendix : 21 Sludge Disposal Plan .............................................................................................................. 170
Appendix 22: SOPs to respond COVID-19 ................................................................................................... 180
Appendix :23 Flushing Arrangement Plan for Chhindwara Sewerage System ........................................ 190
Appendix :24 Labour Management Procedures ........................................................................................... 200
Appendix :25 Grievance Redressal Format for the complaints received ................................................... 203
Appendix 26: Guidelines for the Management of Environmental, Health and Safety in the Project
construction sites ............................................................................................................................................. 204
List of Tables
Table 1.1: Showing changes as per DPR and Approved Design
Table 2. 1: Existing Percentage of Coverage by Services in old CMC area
Table 2. 2: Details of Septage Management
Table 2. 3 Decadal Population Data for Chhindwara City (Census India website, 2011)
Table 2. 4: Summary of The Population Projection (Final Revised)
Table 2. 5: Per Capita Sewage Generation (for Core area and 7 villages)
Table 2. 6: Details of 7 villages
Table 2.7: Sewage Generation in Cluster1
Table 2. 8: Depth wise Diameter of Manhole
Table 2. 9: Design inlet and outlet parameter
Table 2. 10 Action Plan for Greenbelt development
Table 2. 11 List of Plants Identified for Greenbelt and Avenue Plantation as per CPCB
Table 2.12 Estimate for Capital Cost for Green belt development (Cost included in
ESMP Chapter 7, table 7.2)
Table 3.1: Applicable Environmental Regulations for Sewerage Scheme
Table 3.2: World Bank Safeguard Policies applicable for MPUDP
Table 3.3: Comparison of National Environmental Policy and Bank’s Safeguard
Operational Policies
Table 4. 1: Site Environmental Features of Proposed Subproject Components
Table 4. 2: Ambient Air quality of Chhindwara Town
Table 4. 3: Ambient Noise Levels in Chhindwara
Table 4.4: Test result of Wastewater
Table 4. 5: Land Use Pattern
Table 4. 6: Type and Location of Various Markets in Chhindwara
Table 4. 7: Slum Locations in Chhindwara
Table 4. 8: Social Features of Proposed Subproject Components
Table 5.1: Influence Area details of proposed Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
Table 5.2 Congested Roads in Chhindwara Photographs
Table 6.1A: Public Consultation Meetings during ESA Preparation
Table 6 1B: Public Consultation Meetings during Execution of the Project
Table 6.2: Public Consultation Details during Execution
Table 7.1 Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP)
Table 7.2: Cost of Chhindwara ESMP
Table 7.3 Environmental Monitoring Plan
Table 7.4 Cost of Environmental Monitoring Plan
Table 8.1: Social Composition in Chhindwara Town
![Page 5: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
iv | P a g e
Table 8.2: Ward wise detail of Scheduled Tribe population
Table 8.3: Participation of ST/SC population during Public Consultation
List of Figures
Figure 2. 1: Chhindwara Municipal Area
Figure 2. 2: Key Plan for Chhindwara City
Figure 2. 3: Waste Water Discharged Behind the House
Figure 2. 4: Project area for Sewerage (under Chhindwara Municipal Boundary)
Figure 2. 5: Zoning of the Subproject
Figure 2. 6 Google Image showing SPS Location Koladhana
Figure 2. 7 Google Image showing changed STP site at Village Sarra
Figure 2.8 Layout of STP
Figure 2.9 Process flow diagram of STP
Figure 4. 1 Trial Pits for Chhindwara Subproject
Figure 5 1: Influence area of proposed STP land site
![Page 6: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
v | P a g e
Abbreviations
AC – Asbestos Cement
AMRUT – Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation
BOD – Biological Oxygen Demand
CMC – Chhindwara Municipal Corporation
CPCB – Central Pollution Control Board
CPHEEO – Central Public Health and Environment Engineering Organization
D(R)BO – Design, Review, Build and operate
DI – Ductile Iron
DO – Dissolved Oxygen
DPR – Detailed Project Report
DUAD _ Directorate of Urban Administration and Development
DWC – Double walled Corrugated
EA – Environmental assessment
EMP – Environmental Management Plan
ESMF – Environmental and Social Management Framework
ESMP – Environmental and Social Management Plan
GOI – Government of India
GOMP – Government of Madhya Pradesh
HFL – Highest flood level
IPMF – Indigenous Peoples Management Framework
LCS -- Low Cost Sanitation
LPCD – Liter per capita per day
MCm – Million Cubic Meter
MH – Manhole
MOEF&CC – Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change
MPS -- Main Pumping Station
MPUDC – Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited
MPUDP – Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Project
NOC – No Objection Certificate
NOx – Oxides of nitrogen
OHT – Over Head Tank
OP – Operational Policy
PIU – Project Implementation Unit
PMC – Project Management Consultant
PMU – Project Management Unit
PWD – Public Works Department
ROW – Right of way
SA – Social Assessment
![Page 7: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
vi | P a g e
SO2 – Sulphur Dioxide
SMP – Social Management Plan
SPS – Sewage Pumping Station
STP – Sewage Treatment Plant
SPCB – State Pollution Control Board
UDHD – Urban Development and Housing Department
ULB - Urban Local Body
SMP – Social Management Plan
Issue and Revision Record: Chhindwara C-ESA –
Rev.
Originator Checker Approver Observations from Submission
DBOT contractor PMC (Submission
to MPUDC)
MPUDC (Review
& Comments) World Bank World Bank
1 - - - - 01.02.2020
2 - - - 29.05.2020 08.07.2020
3 - - - 13.07.2020 15.07.2020
4 - - - - 16.07.2020
5 22.07.2020
6 07.08.2020 15.08.2020
7 31.08.2020 03.09.2020
14.09.2020 15.09.2020
28.09.2020 29.09.2020
C-ESA Report Approved from World Bank dated 29.09.2020
![Page 8: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
vii | P a g e
Executive Summary 1. Introduction
Madhya Pradesh (MP) is geographically second largest, fifth populous, and eighth most
urbanized state in India. Although MP recorded a higher rate of growth for its urban
compared to rural population in the last decade, its urbanization rate is still below the
national average population but it is projected to catch-up in the next 15 years. As per
Census 2011, MP’s total urban population is 20.1 million (28% of total population)
concentrated in 476 census urban centres.
Rapid urbanization in MP has seen sprouting of new urban settlements across the state,
more often close to the existing cities. The last decade (2001-2011) has seen 20% increases
in the number of urban centers, including 50% increase in census towns, compared to 6%
increase in the previous decade (1991-2001). In the cities MP, household access to piped
water supply ranges between 48-80%; per capita water supply ranges between 35 to 135
lpcd; access to underground sewerage range between nil to 40%; waste collection ranges
between 85-90%; and 60 to 80% of rainwater runoff is effectively drained.
Government of Madhya Pradesh through its Vision Document 2018 has shown its
determination to face the challenges of Urbanization and has undertaken many programs to
support the urban infrastructure. Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Project (MPUDP) is
one of them which envisages financial support from The World Bank for the various sub
projects of Water Supply, Waste Water Management and Heritage Conservation etc.
2. Subproject Description
Chhindwara town is the administrative headquarters of Chhindwara District under the
Jabalpur Administration Division of Madhya Pradesh. It is the largest city in the district.
The population of Chhindwara city was 138,291 (2011 census) and the Municipal area was
about 11.33 sq. km. Vide Urban Administration and Environment Department, Government
of Madhya Pradesh notification 28 F 1-14 /2014/18-3 dated 05.09.2014, the municipal limits
were increased andadjoining 24 villages were merged in it. The area of these 24 villages is
98.94 sq. km and population of these villages (census 2011) is 77,552. Thus, the new
municipal area of Chhindwara town is 110.27 sq. km and population as per 2011 census is
2,15,843. Chhindwara has no sewerage system. The generated effluent from septic tanks
and even raw sewage is flowing directly in the River Kulbehra through open drains and the
tributaries of Kulbehra River.
The intent of the Sewerage sub-project is to ensure a comprehensive, technically and
financially viable system for Sewerage collection and its treatment for the core area of
Chhindwara town i.e. Core city plus the adjoining 7 villages only. The water supply project
at 135 lpcd for old CMC area is commissioned recently. Availability of 135 lpcd with
almost 100% Household connections in the core area has resulted in increased waste water
generation in core area.
Availability of water supply in the remaining area is less than 70 lpcd. The Urban Local
Body has implemented Water Supply augmentation scheme through AMRUT for this
sparsely populated area. Due to topography and sparse distribution of the habitations,
![Page 9: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
viii | P a g e
providing sewerage network in the whole CMC area is technically and financially unviable.
Hence, the DPR envisaged coverage of the core CMC area and 7 villages adjacent to the
city, with sewer network along with Sewage Treatment facility whereas, the sewage
generated in remaining17 villages spread over more than 80% of the CMC area is proposed
to be managed through “Septage Management” system supported with 4 Bio Digesters.
The contract for the Sewerage sub project at Chhindwara has been awarded to M/s Laxmi
Civil Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., Kolhapur on 21st July 2017. The present ESA is
submitted by the contractor whichis based on the designs finalized after detailed review
based on detailed topographical surveys, geo-technical investigations, joint inspection of
sites and network alignment, Enviro-social impact assessment and stakeholder
consultations. Table-1.1 below compares the provisions of DPR versus final designs.
For sewage collection the project area has been divided into two zones based on the basis of
physical barriers and topography. Projected population of Zone 1 in the year 2048 is
115,020 while in Zone 2 it is 175,899. Considering the techno economics of material, pipes
of 150 to 300 mm diameter has been proposed of DWC and above 300 mm and up to 1000
mm of NP-3 concrete pipe. The minimum cover taken is 1.0 m. Total sewer network length
is 302.374 km; out of which more than 90% of the pipes range from 150 mm to 250 mm.
The maximum diameter of pipe is 1000 mm and maximum depth is 4.8 m. Manholes are
provided at every 30 m length, change in alignment and wherever required in the design as
per the requirement of site. Flushing points, where velocity of the sewerage is less than the
self - cleaning velocity have been identified and flushing is proposed. Further the flow up to
SPS at Koladhana shall be through gravity. From SPS it will be pumped to STP at Village
Sarra by 2500 m long pumping main of DI K-9 of 700 mm dia.
The Sludge generated from the STP will be withdrawn from centrifuge in the form of wet
cake and will be collected on the sludge collection yard as sludge drying bed as well as
storage of sludge. The sludge collection bed will be designed with required capacity to
accumulate the sludge for seven days. The physical and chemical characteristic of sludge
will be checked in the Laboratory accredited by NABL. The dewatering of sludge will be
done by the treatment with polyelectrolyte. The sludge will be covered properly and
covering aid to avoid contamination of surrounding environment as well as other
environmental, health and safety precaution will be ensured during sludge transportation
through authorized vehicle to the disposal site at Khasra no. 14/5 at village Salimeta, tehsil
Malikheda Dsitrict Chhindwara. The proposed site is 7.4 km from the STP site which is
temporary arrangement in future it will be developed as sanitary landfill.
Initially as per the final DPR, the proposed location of STP was at Koladhana near Bodri
Nallah in ward no. 33 at Khasra 678 having an area of 1.8 hectares. However, while making
detailed investigations at site, it was found that although the land was free of encumbrances
and encroachments but due to excessive soil cutting by locals in the course of time between
finalization of DPR and start of work, most of the land parcel selected came under
submergence of Bodhri Nallah which carries heavy storm water during rains. After Joint
field verification by the PIU and PMC and studying various options for the STP, alternate
site at Sarra in ward no 35 at Khasra no 126, 128 and 129 having an area of 2.851 hectare
![Page 10: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
ix | P a g e
was selected. The selected site for STP at Sarra is “Shrub Forest” as per revenue records,
under the possession of Forest Department. Fee required by Forest Department has been
deposited by MPUDC for second stage permission from the Forest Department. This is
further added here that the site at Koladhana had ample elevated area available for MPS and
hence, it was decided not to shift the location of Main Pumping Station. Another factor
which helped in arriving at this decision was that with the changed alignment of network,
the IPS at Bail Bazar (proposed in DPR) will be avoided which will further beneficial to the
CMC as the recurring cost of O&M will reduce.
Changes from DPR & approved design are given in table 1.1.
3. Environment and Social Assessment
This report presents the Environmental and Social Assessment (ESA) of Chhindwara
Sewerage subproject under MPUDP. The ESA identifies potential impacts on the natural
environment and the social situation in subproject region during construction and operation
of the sub project. Where potential adverse effects are predicted, mitigations are developed
and its implementation is presented in the Environmental and Social Management Plan
(ESMP) and Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP)/Social Monitoring Plan (SMP).
This project has been identified as Category Ea project in accordance to the ESMF
classification for environmental assessment. This requires an EA report and an
Environmental Management Plan. Also, according to ESMF classification for SA, this sub
project is identified as a Category Sc (appendix 1). It should be noted that these
categorizations refer to categorization of MPUDP subprojects as stated in the ESMF for
MPUDP, and should not be confused with the classification of overall Projects given in OP
4.01 of The World Bank. As per safeguard policies of the World Bank, MPUDP has been
categorized as a Category A project. Public consultations are required to implement the
proposed Environmental and Social Management Plan.
4. Legal, Policy and Administrative Framework
The National and State level environmental laws and the Operational Policies of the World
Bank are applicable to MPUDP projects. The most important laws are Water (Prevention &
Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 with all of its amendments;, Air (Prevention and Control of
Pollution) Act, 1981 etc. and the World Bank OP 4.01 Environmental Assessment, OP 4.04
Natural Habitats, OP 4.11 Physical Cultural Resources and OP 4.36 Forests.
The National and State level Social laws and the Operational Policies of The World Bank
are applicable to MPUDP projects. These include Land Acquisition Act-RTFCTLARR Act
2013; MP Nagariya Kshetra ke Bhumiheen Vyakti (Pattadhruti Adhikaron ka Pradan Kiya
Jana) Adhiniyam, 1984; The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of
Street Vending) Act, 2014; The Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers
(Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 etc. and the World Bank OP/BP 4.12 Involuntary
Resettlement, OP/BP 4.10 Indigenous People.
![Page 11: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
x | P a g e
Table 1.1: Showing changes as per DPR vs Approved Design
S. No. Infrastructure
/ Particulars
AS per DPR
(Location & Lat.-Long.)
As per Approved Design
(Location & Lat.-Long.)
Justification
1 STP ➢ At Koladhana near Bodri Nallah
in ward no. 33 with Khasra No.
678 having an area of 1.8
hectares.
➢ Proposed STP capacity 28.0
MLD.
➢ Proposed site 648.880m GL and
HFL 648.38m
➢ At Sarra in ward no 35
Khasra no126,128 and 129
having an area of 2.851 ha
against requirement 2.422
ha. Lat. 22° 0"53.13',
Lon.78° 56" 22.39'.
➢ STP capacity 28 .0 MLD.
➢ Proposed site 648.38m GL
and HFL 642.021m
➢ Sufficient area available for
STP construction.
Major part of the land identified for STP
(in the DPR) at Koladhana was found
under submergence of Bodri Nallah
flowing adjacent to this site. Therefore,
it was decided to change the site for
STP. After joint verification by PMU,
PIU, IVT, ULB and the contractor,
alternative suitable site at Village Sarra
was identified and selected.
2 SPS Two Sewage Pumping station (SPS)
was proposed in the following sites:
-SPS Zone 1 - SPS-1 is in Khasra
No. 991 at Bail Bazar, Land
available 4.45 ha,
SPS Zone 2- SPS-2 (MPS) near
Bodri Nallah, Koladhana Khasra no
678 Ward no 33 at the same
location of STP site. This is also the
MPS
➢ MPS - ward no. 33 at Khasra
No. 678 near Bodri Nallah,
Koladhana having available
area of 1.8 ha against a
requirement of 0.005 ha.
➢ Designed capacity of MPS is
28 MLD
➢ Average GL of the proposed
site is 648.88m against the
HFL 648.38m
Based on the topographic survey, design
of the network and change of STP site,
the sewage from Zone 1 can be taken
through gravity flow to MPS and hence,
SPS-1 site at Bail Bazar is no more
required. This will decrease the recurring
expenditure (specially expenses on
Energy) during O&M.
5 Population - 138291 (2011) - 138291 (2011) No change
- 190700 (2018) - 190700 (2018)
- 238250 (2033) - 238250 (2033)
- 290918 (2048) - 290918 (2048)
7 Treatment
Technology
- SBR SBR No change
![Page 12: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
xi | P a g e
8 Sewer
Network
length &
Manhole No
- 268.2 Km
- 8268 Nos
- 302.642 Km
-11241 Nos
➢ Sewer Network is increased due to
laying of rider mains on both side of
road (as the road width is more than
7m) in some areas of the town.
➢ Number of manholes are increased
due to increase in length of sewer
network and providing manholes as
per CHPEEO Manual, 2013.
9 Cost
(Capital Cost)
- 180.76 Cr - 173.00 Cr Cost as per contract. GST and price
escalation and variations arising due to
site conditions and change of location as
per contract conditions will be extra.
10 Forest
clearance
Not Required ➢ STP location changed from
Koladhana to Sarra in ward
no 35 Khasra no126,128 and
129 needing an area of 2.851
ha.
➢ Selected Land was forest land
➢ Forest clearance is required as the land
for STP at Sarra is under Forest
Department (Shrub Forest).
➢ First Stage Clearance is received.
Required fee has been deposited for
second stage clearance to the forest
department.
➢ Please refer Appendix 14 and 15.
11 Permissions 5 Railway crossings - 5 railway crossing The railway crossings are based on the
final design of the network.
Permission for 2 crossings received.
Demand note for rest of the 3
crossings has also been received from
Railway Department (Appendix 13).
Permission is in final stage.
1. Railway Crossing no.-1,
987/22 and 988/1:
1. Railway Crossing no.-1,
987/22 and 988/1:
2. Railway Crossing no.-2, 987/6
and 987/7:
2. Railway Crossing no.-2,
987/5 and 987/6:
3. Railway Crossing no.-3, 985/4
and 985/5:
3. Railway Crossing no.-3,
985/4 and 985/5:
4. Railway Crossing no.-4,
1259/4-5:
4. Railway Crossing no.-4,
1259/4-5:
5. Railway Crossing no.-5, 1257/4
and 1257/3
5. Railway Crossing no.-5,
1257/4 and 1257/3
![Page 13: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
xii | P a g e
14 road crossings
at Narsinghpur Road, Ganj Area,
Narsinghpur Road-MH 297,
Narsinghpur Road- MH-559,
Narsinghpur Road- MH-563, Chaar
Fatak, Over Bridge- MH-486, Chaar
Fatak, Over Bridge- MH-2253, Seoni
Road, NGP road Near Stadium, Jail
Chowka, DDC College, Phara Chowka,
Char Dham Chowk, Co-ed College
No Change ➢ PWD roads are handed over to the
ULB, hence no permissions are
required. Please refer Appendix no. 19
13. Influent/
Effluent
parameters
Parameters Units Indicative
raw sewage
quality
Discharge
Standards
pH pH 7-8 6.5-9
BOD Mg/l 220 <10
COD Mg/l 500 <50
TSS Mg/l 375 <20
Total N Mg/l 50 <10
Total P Mg/l 7.0 < 2
No Change Not Applicable
Comparison of Quantity As per BOQ Comparison of Quantity As per Variation % change from DPR % Quantity
Dia in mm Material Length (m) & (%) of total quantity Dia in mm Material
Length (m) & (%) of total quantity
DN 150 mm DWC - HDPE 135,179.10 (50.4) DN 150 mm DWC - HDPE 216,332.00 (71.5) (+) 60% Review of DPR designs by the
contractor, redesign to optimize the designs
based on detailed topographic survey
DN 200 mm DWC - HDPE 99,311.50 (37) DN 200 mm DWC - HDPE 40,801.00(13.5) (-) 59%
DN 250 mm DWC - HDPE - DN 250 mm DWC - HDPE 11,879.00(4.0) New dia
DN 300 mm DWC - HDPE 5,300.90 (2) DN 300 mm DWC - HDPE 7,196.00(2.4) (+) 36%
300 mm dia NP3 RCC 2969.70 (1.1) 300 mm dia NP3 RCC 0.00 (-) 100%
400 mm dia NP3 RCC 5,380.80 (2) 400 mm dia NP3 RCC 8,624.00(2.8) (+) 60%
500 mm dia NP3 RCC 8,710.71(3.2) 500 mm dia NP3 RCC 4,035.00(1.3) (-) 54%
600 mm dia NP3 RCC 3,599.80 (1.4) 600 mm dia NP3 RCC 5,219.00(1.7) (+) 45%
700 mm dia NP3 RCC 785.80 (0.3) 700 mm dia NP3 RCC 2,670.00(1.0) (+) 240%
800 mm dia NP3 RCC 2,853.60 (1.1) 800 mm dia NP3 RCC 3,791.00(1.2) (+) 65%
900 mm dia NP3 RCC 2,297.70 (0.8) 900 mm dia NP3 RCC - (-) 100%
1000 mm dia NP3 RCC 1,811.20(0.7) 1000 mm dia NP3 RCC 1,827.00(0.6) (+) 1%
268,200.81 302,374.00 (+) 13%
![Page 14: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
xii | P a g e
5. Baseline Environment Profile
There are no National Parks, Wild life sanctuaries, Bird sanctuaries within 10 Km radius of
the project area, besides, there are no rare and endangered species observed in the area.
A) Geography:
Chhindwara is one of the largest cities in the Satpura range. It is on a plateau, surrounded
by lush green fields, rivers and by dense forest with diverse flora and fauna. The town is
built around the Bodri Stream (Nallah), which is also considered a tributary of Kulbehra
River.
B) Meteorology:
Chhindwara has a sub-tropical climate. A hot summer and general dryness characterize the
climate of the area, except during the southwest monsoon season. The mean maximum and
mean minimum temperature as recorded in Chhindwara is respectively 44°C and 9.8°C.
The relative humidity generally exceeds 87% in the month of August and the rest of the
year is drier. The mean annual rainfall in the region is 1,183mm.
C) Topography:
The northern part of the Chhindwara city is hilly. Natural Slope of the CMC area is north
to south with the levels with reference to MSL varying from 695 m to 644m. In the eastern
part of the City, the topography is sloped towards the Bodri Nallah and in the southern side
towards Kulbehra River (which flows from South to East of the City).
D) Geology:
Physiographically the Chhindwara district is divided broadly into main geomorphic units-
i) Satpura plateau and ii) Nagpur plateau. The hill ranges lying in the northern part of the
district belong to the Mahadeo hill ranges of the Satpura mountains stretching nearly east
west. These hills form the water divide. The district can be further divided into four parts.
I) Northern hilly region, II). Central high plateau region III). Southern low grounds IV).
Upland trough of Jam and Kanhan rivers. Presence of fluvial units showing occurrences of
alluvium in the flood plains of all major streams and rivers, buried Pedi plains showing
denudational hills of sandstone as seen in western part of the district. Similarly, structural
hills, covered by Gondwana’s, are seen in northern part, denudational hills in southern part
and dissected Deccan plateau in eastern and north-eastern parts of the district the soils in
the district are generally three types Viz., black cotton soil, sandy loam soil and clay loam
soils. Seismicity, the area falls under BIS zone-III as per seismic map of geographical
survey of India.
Air Quality:
Madhya Pradesh pollution control board has two air quality monitoring station in
Chhindwara. The air quality trends reveal that SO2 and NO2 concentration levels are low;
whereas particulate pollution has reached moderate condition.
Water Quality:
The EC value of water sample ranges between 280-1600. Nitrate Value of water samples
![Page 15: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
xiii | P a g e
ranges between 1-243 and fluoride between. 09 to 0.97 in phreatic aquifer. Ground water in
phreatic aquifer is potable but excessive fluoride (1.60-20.00Mg/l) is noticed in deeper
aquifers.
In order to measure the baseline level of existing water quality and probable pollution in the
storm water drain (STP outfall, receiving water body) nearby STP site, Sarra, Biological
oxygen demand (BOD) and Chemical oxygen demand (COD), pH, TSS etc. were tested. The
BOD is 3.4 mg/l, COD 3.4 mg/l, pH 6.9, total suspended solids 28mg/l, total dissolved solid
729 mg/l, total hardness (CACO3) 516 mg/l and turbidity 9.9 NTU were observed. This is
once again reiterated here that this drain is only storm water drain carrying rain water during
rainy period only and remains dry during remaining year.
Flora and Fauna:
Common trees include Shorea robusta (Sal), Sarai, Babul, Diospyros melanoxylon
(Kendu), Boswellia serrata (Salai), Terminalia tomentosa (Asan), Terminalia bellayoica
(Bahera), Terminalia arjuna (Arjun), Pterocarpus marsupium (Paisar), Madhuca indica
(Mahua) are found the project area. The fauna reported in the area are mainly avi fauna
(highest diversity) followed by mammals and reptiles. The commonly reported avifauna
in the study area are Common crow, Myna, Babbler, Pigeon, Cattle, Egrets, Red Vented
bulbul, Sparrow, Indian Roller etc.
6. Assessment of Anticipated Impacts
Anticipated impacts and corresponding mitigation measures are discussed in phases
namely, influence area and general impacts. Based on the magnitude and duration of the
project activities, the nature, duration and extent of impact are assessed. Minor project
impacts have also been identified and basis for their insignificance has been provided.
Wherever relevant, the ESMP also addresses the minor impacts and provides
environmental and social mitigation / environmental enhancement measures. Possible
Environmental and Social Impacts during Design Phase, Construction Phase and Operation
Phase has been identified and mitigations during these phases have been suggested.
Various environmental and social impacts identified include - air pollution due to dust and
noise pollution during construction, disposal of waste produced due to excavation
activities, loss of vegetation, temporary loss of access to residents and temporary disruption
to traffic; etc.
Stakeholder consultations have been done to assess the social impacts of various
construction works specially the network laying since this activity will take place within the
town area comprising of purely residential, commercial and mixed activities and will have a
direct impact on the street vendors. Sites for construction of STP and MPS are away from
habitat. Both the sites are free from encroachments and encumbrances. The alignment of
network has been designed in such a manner that no permanent or temporary resettlement or
relocation is needed. Temporary shifting ( 2 to 3 days) of street vendors in commercial areas
may be caused during pipe laying but the same has been mitigated and measures have been
included in the ESMP. Mitigation measures include shifting of temporary vendors across the
road, placing planks at 50m interval over excavated areas minimizing the blockage of access
to shops and residences by the contractor, avoiding laying of network during weekly market
![Page 16: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
xiv | P a g e
days etc. However, this is clarified here that there is no demolition of any temporary or
permanent structure involved/observed during network laying. There is no loss of
livelihood (permanent or temporary ) is observed. The joint survey has been conducted by
the PIU, PMC & contractor, as per the survey, No potential damage has been observed to
any structure. Therefore, it is not possible to calculate or assess.
In the operation and maintenance phase, main impact will be from the sludge generation
perspective. But these impacts shall be mitigated by the usage of covered trucks and
experienced & trained staff to handle the sludge which will be finally transported to the
sludge disposal site at Khasra No. 14/5, Village Salimeta, Tehsil Mohkheda, District
Chhindwara. Photographs are enclosed at Appendix 8.
7. Stakeholders and Public Consultation
The main objective for the consultation process was to involve the community at the very
early stages so as to identify likely negative impacts and find ways to minimize negative
impacts and enhance positive impacts of the project. Extensive public consultation
meetings at Chhindwara Sewerage Sub Project area were conducted while undertaking e
ESA study and then C-ESA updation.
Public sensitization and meetings were held within the project area from 28thApril 2016 to
30th April 2016 (consultation report already submitted to World Bank with ESA report
prepared by the ESA consultant) and then from 23rd July 2018 to 24th July 2018 by the
contractor with the help of respective PIU, ULB, local administration and the elected
representatives. A total of 13 meetings during ESA preparation phase and 12 consultation
meetings were held during execution as shown in Table 6.1A and 6.1B. Key outputs of
consultations have been taken into consideration and suggested changes in the design and
implementation activities.
Key issues discussed included: absence of sewerage system in the town, sludge and
stagnant pools of water in the entire town is visibly disturbing and leading to pollution and
mosquito menace, causing many health problems; Physical relocation and resettlement
should be minimized and efforts should be made to prevent loss of access to livelihood
activities; safety of children, women and cattle are important aspects for consideration
during civil construction works; restoration of roads after laying of pipe, job opportunity
during construction work as casual labour or at office.
8. Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP)
The ESMP summarizes the key impact elements identified and the remedial measures, the
actions to be taken by various parties and the monitoring activities. The ESMP has been
updated based on the approved design of the contractor. The management plan includes
mitigation measures against air pollution including dust and vehicle emissions, noise
barriers, assuring access to the residents and shops during laying of distribution network,
safety measures such as barricading and signage, ensuring disposing off the excess
excavated material, minimizing and avoiding the loss of flora and fauna, worker's safety
etc. during construction phase. Due care has been taken in the management plan to address
![Page 17: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
xv | P a g e
temporary disruption to neighboring structures during excavation, minimize temporary
shifting of street vendors during network laying and the loss of income due to obstruction
of access to commercial establishment owing to temporary blocking of lanes. Air and
Water Quality Monitoring Protocol has also been given in the management plan. The total
cost of the ESMP has been estimated as INR 1.43Crore. Cost for most of the works such as
air and water monitoring, mitigation against dust, disposal of excess excavated material has
been included in the contract cost. However, provisional sums for unidentified issues that
may crop up during construction phase have been provided in the contract. The
effectiveness of the ESMP shall be monitored and assessed through spot checks. ESHS
audit of the works shall be carried out by the independent third-party audit firms.
Environmental and social risk due to change of land of STP and increase in length of sewer
network have been evaluated and detailed under chapter 5 ”Assesment of anticipated
impacts” and chapter 7 “ESMP”. Change of STP site has led to the requirement of forest
clearance at alternate site at Sarra and compensatory afforestation (to be done by Forest
Department and cost to be borne under this project). First stage clearance from Forest
Department has been obtained and the requisite fees for second stage clearance including
compensatory afforestation and impact mitigation activities has been deposited to the forest
department and also alternative land has been provided by the District Authorities for equal
afforestation. As far as social risks are concerned, there are insignificant risks involved
because this change neither involves any acquisition of private land nor does it adversely
impact any livelihood nor needs any relocation/resettlement. Public consultations were
done for creating public awareness in the project area and this in turn helped to avoid and
mitigate the social risk and impacts arising due to change of site.
9. Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and evaluation process will involve the assessment of the following benchmarks
a) The implementation process of guidelines stipulated in the ESMP
b) Evaluate impact of the project to the environment and social setting of
Chhindwara Town
c) Monitoring of the involvement of the community through public consultations in
decision makings and the implementation of the project
10. Tribal and Vulnerable Population Identification and Assessment of Chhindwara
In Madhya Pradesh certain areas have been declared as scheduled area as specified
by the Scheduled Areas under the fifth Schedule of Indian Constitution. Some areas
of Chhindwara district are declared scheduled area in Schedule V by Government of
Madhya Pradesh. However, this does not include Chhindwara town and the project
area. However, social impact screening and assessment was done for the tribal
population in Chhindwara town and no negative impacts due to the project were
identified on tribal people. On the basis of identification, assessment and prior
informed consultations it was found that OP/BP 4.10 does not trigger as these
![Page 18: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
xvi | P a g e
groups are living in dispersed manner mixed with the general population of the town
and do not form a distinct group in the town, neither do they have any separate
cultural, economic, social, or political institutions. Though tribal have dialect of
their own, however, they are well versed with local Hindi language. No negative
impact on tribal and vulnerable population has been assessed, thus, no separate
IPP/TVDP is prepared.
11. Grievance Redress Mechanism
A grievance redress mechanism is formed at city level which included formulation
of a Grievance Redressal Committee consisting of an Elected Representative
(preferably female), a person who is publicly known and accepted by the locals to
speak on their behalf (to be identified by the Elected Representatives of the CMC),
Community Development officer from PIU and CMC level community organizer.
The proposed GRC has been constituted at PIU level vide order dated 05.07.2018
and is functional.
As most of the grievances may arise due to the construction and O&M activities of
the contractor, role of the contractor in resolving the grievances is specified in
relevant section and is limited to the rectifications required within the time as
stipulated by the GRC mechanism. The Contractor has adequate mechanisms to
ensure that any complaint received by the contractor is recorded, addressed (if it is
within the scope of the contractor to address the same), information forwarded to the
GRC through PIU, etc. and complaint is closed.
12. Conclusion and Recommendations
The environment and social analysis of proposed sub-project for Chhindwara City
concludes that the project has overall positive impacts on the life and health of the
people and overall environment of the town.. There are no archeological and
historical protected/recognised areas/ sites within the project boundary. Neither any
National Park/ Wild life sanctuary/ Bird sanctuaries exist within 10 Km radius of the
project area, nor any rare and endangered species is observed in the area.
There are changes in the final designs and sites with respect to the DPR, however,
Environmental and social risks arising due to these changes, have been identified
and analysed. The type of work remains the same and hence, most of the risks also
remain the same as for the risks identified in the ESA already approved by The
World Bank. The network length has increased by appx 13% of the original
quantity, however, the kind of work included is same for the whole length. The
network laying is within the RoW.
The alternate site at Village Sarra selected for STP has same features as the original
site at Koladhana had i.e. both are near a nallah, however, the Bodari Nallah at
Koladhana carries has much more catchment compared to nallah near the STP site at
Sarra & thus, this site at Village Sarra is safer for construction of STP. The STP site
![Page 19: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
xvii | P a g e
selected at Village Sarra is on Forest Land (Shrub Forest) and needs diversion from
Forest Department for which the process is already started and first stage clearance
is obtained. Fee for second stage permission has been deposited by MPUDC on
dated 10th and 11th February, 2020. This land is away from human settlement & free
from encumbrances & encroachments.
Main Pumping Station will be constructed at its originally selected location at
Koladhana. Alignment for network laying has been decided in such a manner that
all the sewage will flow through gravity to MPS and hence, IPS at Bail Bazar is not
required. This change brings a positive impact from environment, social as well as
economic point of view.
The impact identified are mostly related to construction and operation phase which
will be insignificant.
No land acquisition is required, also no permanent or temporary adverse impacts on
assets and livelihood is anticipated, hence no RAP is required as per ESMF. Only
minor damage to road side chabutarahs (Plateform -a civil structure where local
residens sitout and enjoy their leisure time) may occur during laying of network,
repairing of which is included in contractor’s scope of work and funds required for
such activities are included in the provisional sum under the contract. Loss of
income for certain days to street vendors at certain locations may occur during
construction phase however mitigation measures have been designed in a manner so
that any negative impact on the daily income of the street vendors is avoided. The
mitigation measures include shifting of street vendors across (on the opposite side)
the road and laying network in small stretches of 250m. Mitigation measures to
ensure access to residents and shops have also been proposed.
In Project area, no indigenous people are identified meeting the requirement of
indigenous people’s policy and hence, no separate Indigenous Peoples Development
Plan (IPDP) is required.
![Page 20: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
1 | P a g e
1. Introduction
1.1. Project Background
Madhya Pradesh (MP) is geographically, the second largest, fifth populous, and eighth most
urbanized state in India. As per Census 2011, total urban population of MP is 20.1 million
(28% of total population) concentrated in 476 urban centers as follows: 378 municipal
bodies of which 16 are Municipal Corporations (Nagar Palika Nigams), 98 are Municipal
Councils, 264 Nagar Panchayats, and 98 Census Towns - identified as areas with urban
characteristics, but not formally notified as urban. Of the 16 Municipal Corporations, four
(Indore, Bhopal, Jabalpur, and Gwalior) are million-plus cities.
Rapid urbanization in MP has seen sprouting of new urban settlements across the state,
more often close to existing cities. The last decade (2001-2011) has seen 20% increases in
the number of urban centers, including 50% increase in census towns, compared to 6%
increase in the previous decade (1991-2001). The last decade also saw more than a quarter-
fold increase in population of the four largest urban agglomerations including Bhopal and
Indore. In the cities of MP, households’ access to piped water supply ranges between 48-
80%, per capita; water supply ranges between 35 to 150 lpcd; access to underground
sewerage range between nil to 40%; waste collection ranges between 85-90%, and 60-80%
of rainwater runoff is effectively drained.
The objective of the proposed Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Project (MPUDP)
supported by The World Bank is to enhance the capacity of relevant State-level institutions
to support ULBs in developing and financing urban infrastructure. The proposed
Chhindwara Sewerage Project is one of the subprojects under Madhya Pradesh Urban
Development project (MPUDP) funded by the GoMP and The World Bank.
1.2. Context of the Environment and Social Assessment by the contractor
This report presents an Contractor’s Environmental and Social Assessment (C-ESA) of
Chhindwara Sewerage subproject (conducted by the contractor). This ESA identifies
potential impacts on the natural environment and social aspects in Chhindwara during
construction and operation of the project. Where potential adverse effects are predicted,
mitigation has been developed and its implementation is presented in an Environmental
and Social Management Plan (ESMP) and Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP)/Social
Monitoring Plan (SMP).
This project has been identified as Category Ea project based on the environmental
screening carried out for the project as per the Environmental and Social Management
Framework (ESMF) of MPUDP (Appendix 1). This requires an ESA report and an
Environmental and Social Management Plan. With regard to social safeguards, the project
has been classified as ‘Category Sc, because neither any land acquisition is required, nor
any permanent adverse impacts on assets and livelihood is anticipated, hence no RAP is
required as per ESMF. Only minor damage to road side properties may occur during
![Page 21: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
2 | P a g e
construction phase. Temporary shifting of the street vendors may also be required during
construction phase.
1.3. Scope of ESA study
The Environmental and Social Impact Assessment has been carried out at the planning
stages for the proposed Chhindwara Sewerage scheme to ensure that all adverse social and
environmental impacts are taken into consideration during the design, construction,
operation and decommissioning of the Project. Original ESA was prepared by independent
agency based on the DPR of the scheme and the same has been updated by the DRBO
Contractor. The scope of this C-ESA study covers:
a) Description of the proposed Project;
b) The baseline environmental and social profile of the ESA study area;
c) Provisions of the relevant environmental and social legislations;
d) Alternative analysis
e) Stakeholder consultation and public meetings,
f) Prediction of any adverse impacts to the environment and on assets and income
due to the proposed project.
g) Appropriate mitigation measures; and
h) Provision of an Environmental and Social Management Plan.
1.4. Objectives of ESA Study
The objectives of the ESA study are:
a) To fulfill National and State legal requirements and World Bank Safeguard policies.
b) To obtain background Environmental information of the sites and legal and regulatory
issues associated with the proposed Chhindwara Sewerage project;
c) To assess and predict the potential impacts during site preparation, construction and
operational phases of the proposed Project;
d) To make suggestions of possible alterations to the proposed design, based on the
assessment findings;
e) To propose mitigation measures for the potential adverse environmental and social
impacts and safety risks;
f) To allow for public participation; and prepare an ESA Report including an
Environmental and Social Management and Monitoring Plan.
1.5. Terms of Reference (ToR) for the ESA process
The ToR for this Environmental and Social Impact Assessment is based on the
requirements of OP 4.01 on Environmental Assessment of The World Bank and the
guidance provided in the ESMF for MPUDP. The Scope is given in Section 1.3 above.
a) Description of the nature of the proposed project;
b) Alternative analysis
c) The location of the project including the physical area that may be affected by the
project’s activities;
d) The activities that shall be undertaken during the project construction, O&M phase;
![Page 22: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
3 | P a g e
e) The materials to be used, products and by-products, including waste to be generated by
the project and the methods of their disposal;
f) The potential environmental impacts of the project and the mitigation measures to be
taken during and after implementation of the project;
g) An action plan for the prevention and management of possible accidents during the
project cycle
1.6. Methodology
The ESA study was carried out based on desk review, field assessments and public
consultations with the community who is likely to get benefitted from the project as well as
the potential project affected persons and relevant Government Institutions. In the course of
the assignment, potential impacts at all stages of the project during construction and O&M
in project area is evaluated against applicable environmental and social standards,
regulations and guidelines, the existing environmental conditions and issues and concerns
raised by all project stakeholders. The assessment process incorporates the following key
stages:
1.6.1 Desk Review
A desktop study was conducted to review available published and unpublished reports,
development plans and maps in order to compile relevant baseline biophysical and socio-
economic information about the study area. The biophysical information was compiled on
environmental aspects such as Topography, Climate, Soils, Water Resources, land use and
flora and wildlife resources. On the socio-economic environment, the study compiled
information on aspects such as population, sex ratio, literacy, religious composition of
town, work force participation, share of ST and SC population, Below poverty line people,
density of town, land use, housing gap and commercial activities, poverty etc.
1.6.2 Field Visits
Field visits were conducted in the study area in order to collect site-specific information on
the biophysical and socio-economic environment and to crosscheck the secondary data.
While at the site, environmental data were recorded and potential impacts identified in the
wards having high density.
1.6.3 Stakeholder Consultation
Consultation helps to develop a sense of stakeholder ownership of the project and a
realization amongst all stakeholders that their concerns are taken seriously and that the
issues raised, if relevant, will be addressed in the Environmental and Social Assessment
(ESA) process. All relevant stakeholders have been identified using the most recent and
accurate information available. The consultation process was carried out in two stages:
during the scoping and after preparation of the draft ESA. The consultation process focused
on seeking comment on key issues and concerns, identifying potential impacts and offering
the opportunity for alternatives or objections to be raised by the potentially affected parties;
non-governmental organizations, members of the public and other stakeholders. See
Appendix 5 for a) list of stakeholder’s consultations; and b) a summary of the issues and
concerns raised.
![Page 23: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
4 | P a g e
Public meetings
Public Meetings with the communities were conducted in the project area with the help of
the local administration especially the corporators and ULB officials. The selection of the
wards for the meetings was done on the basis of different categories, localities and level of
problems foreseen. The discussions during these public meetings were centered on key
emerging issues relating to the project as well as the communities. A total of 13 meetings
were held at different locations within the project from 2016-2018.
Key Informant Interviews
One-on-one interviews with government agencies and institutions in the project area were
undertaken. These interviews were conducted to augment and confirm data and
information obtained through secondary sources.
Focus Group Discussions
In total 10 focus group discussions were conducted especially with women in the fringe
areas and in slum areas of Chhindwara town were women facing open defecation
problems/having soak pit latrines. Focus groups were carried out as group meetings with
women residents during which the participants were given the possibility to discuss and
contribute to specific information. The participants in the focus groups were selected based
on their common characteristics from different communities. The focus group discussions
place particular emphasis on group dynamics, when issues of particular concern should be
addressed to explore participants’ problems, attitudes, and suggestions regarding subproject
1.6.4. Impact Assessment and Analysis
Following the identification of all project environmental aspects and potential impacts, the
level of impact that may result from each of the activity-receptor interactions were
assessed. The assessment and analyses methodologies for ESA studies are based on the
following key components of the environment in relation to the proposed Project:
a) Physical/chemical component;
b) Biological/ecological component;
c) Sociological/cultural component; and
d) Economic/operational component.
Environmental and social risk due to change of land of STP and increase in length of sewer
network have been identified and also discussed in detail under Chapter 5 - Assesment of
Anticipated Impacts and Chapter 7- ESMP. The change of STP site has led the requirement
of clearance of Forest Department since the alternate land at Village Sarra is “Shrub
Forest” belonging to Forest Department. First stage clearance has been obtained and the
requisite fees for second stage clearance including plantation and impact mitigation
activities has been deposited to the forest department and also alternative land have been
provided for equal afforestation. As far as social risk is concerned, there are insignificant
![Page 24: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
5 | P a g e
risks involved because this change neither involves any acquisition of private land nor
does it adversely impact any livelihood.
1.7. Mitigation and Monitoring
1.7.1. Mitigation
Mitigation measures are taken into consideration and defined during the impact assessment
process. The results of the mitigation analysis and the mitigation measures included in
mitigation plan of the Environmental& Social Management Plan.
1.7.2. Monitoring
The following monitoring approach is proposed:
a) The monitoring plan has been included in Environmental & Social Management Plan
(ESMP);
b) The PIU and MPUDC shall monitor the implementation of ESMP and track indicators
for IEC activities, grievance redressal, participation of women, scheduled Tribes and
other vulnerable people.
c) Quarterly report shall be prepared
![Page 25: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
6 | P a g e
2. Project Description
2.1. Description of Project Area
2.1.1. Background
Chhindwara town is the administrative headquarters of Chhindwara District under the
Jabalpur Administration Division of Madhya Pradesh. It is the largest city in the district.
The population of Chhindwara city was 138,291 (2011 census) and the Municipal area was
about 11.33 sq. km. Vide Urban Administration and Environment Department, Government
of Madhya Pradesh notification 28 F 1-14 /2014/18-3 dated 05.09.2014, the municipal
limits were increased andadjoining 24 villages were merged in it. The area of these 24
villages is 98.94 sq. km and population of these villages (census 2011) is 77,552. Thus, the
new municipal area of Chhindwara town is 110.27 sq. km and population as per 2011
census is 2,15,843. The figure 2.1 shows the spread of the ULB area.
Chhindwara is well connected with other parts of the country by road and railway. National
Highway 69 passes through Chhindwara. It connects Nagpur (128km) in Maharashtra to
Obedullaganj near Bhopal in Madhya Pradesh (refer Figure 2.2). The city is connected with
other parts of the country primarily through roads. The state highway SH-26 connects
Chhindwara to other prime areas in the state. Through the network of state highways, it is
connected with Bhopal (277km), and Jabalpur (196km). Nagpur at a distance of 130 km
from the city is the nearest airport. Chhindwara is well connected to the National Capital
Delhi and State Capital Bhopal through rail. A proposed broad-gauge line to Nagpur is
expected to improve the connectivity in the region.
The intent of the proposed subproject is to ensure that comprehensive, technically and
financially viable system for Sewerage system for core city and 7 adjacent villages on
priority in Chhindwara Municipal Area.
![Page 26: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
7 | P a g e
Figure 2. 1: Chhindwara Municipal Area
![Page 27: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
8 | P a g e
Figure 2. 2: Key Plan for Chhindwara City
![Page 28: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
9 | P a g e
2.1.2. Objective of the Project
The primary objectives of the proposed subproject of sewerage of town Chhindwara are listed
below:
• To reduce the pollution by treating the waste water (sewage) of the town which is
presently being discharged in raw form into water bodies;
• Prevention of ground water and soil pollution due to infiltration of untreated liquid
waste;
• Improvement in water quality of existing water bodies;
• Improvement in environmental sanitation health and reduction in associated health
hazards to the inhabitants of the subproject towns;
• Improvement in quality of life, human dignity and increased productivity;
• Value addition to the socio-economic condition, and Substantial reduction of water
logging and flooding in sub-project area of Chhindwara
2.2. Existing Water Supply and Sanitation System
2.2.1. Brief Description of Existing Water Supply Schemes
The total potable water demand for the city of Chhindwara is met by surface water sources
and Tube wells. Kanhargaon dam on Kulbehra River being the main source, supplies 90%
of the total demand, balance being procured from bore wells and open and wells. The
existing storage capacity is 9.4 MLD and design capacity of the water treatment plants is
around 18 MLD. Presently, the per capita water supply for the city is 135 lpcd. The
coverage of the population at present is 95 % in the core area and 7 adjacent villages. A
water supply augmentation scheme for Chhindwara municipal township excluding newly
added 17 villages is recently commissioned for total water requirements for the year 2042
(ultimate design period) under Urban Infrastructure Development Scheme for Small and
Medium Towns (UIDSSMT) of Ministry of Urban Development, GOI. The total capacity
of the newly developed Water Supply System is based on 135 lpcd rate of water supply.
The sewerage sub project at Chhindwara is limited to this area only.
CMC envisaged another water supply augmentation scheme under Atal Mission for
Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) for the remaining 17 villages within
Municipal Boundary so as to provide water to its citizen at 135 lpcd. This scheme has been
implemented in the year 2018-19.
2.2.2. Brief Description of Existing Sanitation Facilities and Disposal System
There is no formal existing sewerage scheme in the CMC area. The sewage from the
houses is conveyed to the individual septic tank. The effluent from the septic tank of
individual houses discharges into open channels along the roads and finally drains through
Nallah either to the lakes or to other water bodies. This creates an unhygienic condition in
the area. The sewerage scheme is a dire need of the core area, failing which problems will
be posed to the environment of the town affecting the Public health and the commercial
![Page 29: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
10 | P a g e
activities. Besides, sewage will pollute the ground water as well as surface water.
Toilets
At present 43,560 properties are in CMC area out of which more than 95% properties have
their own toilet in their premises. Approximately 36,000 properties have toilets with septic
tank facility. The effluent from Septic Tank is discharged to road side open drains. Average
size of each septic tank varies from 1.5m x1.0m and 3.0m x1.8m with depth ranging from
2m to2.5 m.
CMC was implementing Low Cost sanitation Scheme (LCS) in City in some of the newly
added areas. Total 3,185 no. of individual toilets is being constructed in city as well as in
slum areas. There are 11 public toilet blocks in the city which have total 107 seats capacity.
Presently, there is no additional requirement of public toilets in CMC area. Table 2.1
presents the basic information at a glance. There are 24 notified slums in the City, and
about 5,065 properties having total population of 20,260 in the slum area.
Table 2. 1: Existing Percentage of Coverage by Services in old CMC area
Sr. No. Description Population Percentage
1 Population 2011 215843
2 Population using Individual toilets 196020 93%
3 Population using public toilets 1070 1%
4 Population in Slum using individual toilets 12288 6%
Details of existing and ongoing sanitation system in town area, slum area and developed
area were collected from CMC and respective villages during site visits.
CMC had identified all the houses within its limits which do not have individual toilets and
had taken up the responsibility of constructing toilets for such families at individual
household level. CMC envisaged a scheme under the State owned ‘Mukhya Mantri Shahri
Swachhata Mission’ which later on was merged with the National Level Mission
"Swachchh Bharat Mission". CMC has already been declared Open Defecation Free ULB.
Sewerage System
At present, the city has no sewerage system; consequently, no sewage treatment plants
(STPs) are there as well. Sewage, as well as effluents from public toilets, etc. were found to
be directly being discharged in storm water drains (figure 2.3).
Septage Management
Chhindwara has traditionally followed a septage management approach; details are
presented in Table 2.2.
![Page 30: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
11 | P a g e
Figure 2. 3: Waste Water Discharged Behind the House
Table 2. 2: Details of Septage Management
S. No. Description Details
1 Existing practice of Septage management, Mechanical
2 No. of Cleaning vehicle 1 Tractor + 1 Mud pump tanker
3 Septic Tank cleaning interval: Once in a year or two year and so on
Once in a year or two
Years 4 No. of Septic Tank in city 18000 approx.
5 No. of septic tank desludged in a day 3 Nos. approx.
6 Desludging Agency (CMC/Private) CMC
7 Existing disposal method (in Nallah or designated disposal site, etc.)
trenching ground or
open dumping 8 Land availability for septage disposal Land is available for
proposed 4 bio-digesters
2.3. Need of Project
To sustain the high rate of growth in the town the sewerage system is an important
component of the infrastructure that needs to be developed on priority. There is also ground
water pollution posing a danger of cross-contamination for the water supply mains. In all
the area raw sewage is discharged into Nallahs and drains which is a danger to public
health and also offends water pollution control regulations. It is therefore necessary to
provide a comprehensive sewerage scheme covering the core area of the CMC (figure 2.4)
and ensuring that the sewage is adequately treated before disposal into water courses.
There is also a need to implement comprehensive Septage Management service for the City
as well as surrounding developed areas and villages.
The census data on decadal population since year 1951 is presented in Table 2.3
![Page 31: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
12 | P a g e
Table 2. 3 Decadal Population Data for Chhindwara City (Census India website, 2011)
Sl.
No. Year Population
Average Decadal
Growth rate (%) CAGR
1 1941 21,916 28 2.50%
2 1951 27,652 26 2.40%
3 1961 37,244 34 3%
4 1971 53,408 43 3.70%
5 1981 75,178 40 3.50%
6 1991 96,858 28 2.60%
7 2001 1,22,247 26 2.40%
8 2011 1,38,291 13 1.24%
As per the estimate made in DPR, the final population growth will be around 2.90 lakhs.
The population projection is summarized in the table 2.4 below:
Table 2. 4: Summary of The Population Projection (Final Revised)
Year 2018 2033 2048
Population Zone-1 79,555 96,485 1,15,020
Population Zone-2 1,11,145 1,41,765 1,75,898
Total 1,90,700 2,38,250 2,90,918
2.4. Proposed Project
2.4.1. Sewage Generation /Loading
The unit wastewater is determined considering the proposed improvements to the Water
Supply System, the usage from ground water sources and an appropriate return factor.
Infiltration is also considered and converted to a unit rate. Overall calculations are
presented in Table 2.5 below.
Table 2. 5: Per Capita Sewage Generation (for Core area and 7 villages)
a) Total per capita water supply 135 Lpcd
b) Sewage generation at 80% of the total water supply 108 Lpcd
c) Add for infiltration (10% of wastewater quantity) 10.8 Lpcd
d) Total unit sewage rate being admitted to system 118.8 Lpcd
Due to topography and sparse distribution of population, whole CMC area cannot be
provided with sewerage system without compromising depths or high numbers of SPS.
Additionally, population density is very low in outer areas that will lead to solid deposition
inside sewers. Hence, only part of the villages that can be connected to city sewerage by
![Page 32: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
13 | P a g e
gravity is considered. Hence, the proposed "Sewerage Network and STP" project of
Chhindwara Municipal Corporation envisages dividing whole town in two clusters 1) Core
city and 7 adjacent villages, and 2) 17 villages merged with CMC in January 2015. In this
proposed sewerage scheme the seven villages were included and 17 villages were
excluded, however, these 17 villages will be considered in later stage. Details of the
villages which were included in the present sewerage scheme is provided in the table 2.6
below and the map is provided below in figure 2.4.
Table 2. 6: Details of 7 villages
SI No Ward Name Ward No
1 Partala 48
2 Khajri 3
3 Kukdajagat 4
4 Kapabhat 10
5 Sivnipranmeti 16
6 Chandangoan 36
7 Lonia Karbal 45
Based on the topography and geographical, the DPR envisaged dividing the whole project
area in two zones. While designing the system, this concept was followed. For sewage
collection, the whole project area is divided into two zones. Design Population of Zone 1 in
the year 2048 is 115,020 and that of Zone 2 is 175,899. However, now the flow from zone
1 to Main Pumping Station at Koladhana will be gravity flow as against the pumping
proposed at DPR stage. It is proposed to set up 28 MLD capacity sewage treatment plant
(STP) at Sarra village.
Figure 2. 4: Project area for Sewerage (within Chhindwara Municipal Boundary)
![Page 33: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
14 | P a g e
2.4.2. Sewer Pipe:
Considering the techno economics of material, pipe up to 300 mm dia. has been taken as
DWC and above 300 mm dia. NP-3 concrete pipe has been taken. The minimum diameter
of pipe taken is 150 mm and cover taken is 1.0 m minimum. Total network length after
finalization of design is 302.374 km which is appx 13% more than the length conceived in
DPR. Out of the total designed length 150 mm diameter pipe is 216.33 km, 200 mm
diameter pipe is 40.80 km, 250 mm pipe is 11.88 km and 300 mm dia pipe is 7.20km
which means approximately 91.5% of the pipe length is upto or below 300mm dia which
requires less width of trench generally not exceeding 1.1m. Pipe of dia > 300mm and upto
1000 mm is appx 26.16 km which is 8.5% of the total length. Thus, the design is done in
such a manner that excessive depths are avoided to the extent possible. The maximum
depth is restricted to 4.8 m. Manhole is provided at every 30 m length and change in
alignment or as per the demand of site. The sewage from SPS will be pumped to STP by
pumping main of 2500m DI K-9 of 700 mm.
Sewage generation in the project boundary is presented in Table 2.7.
Table 2.7: Sewage Generation in Project Area
Sewage Generation (MLD) 2018 2033 2048
Zone 1 9.38 11.38 13.57
Zone 2 13.11 16.73 20.75
Total in Catchment Area 22.50 28.11 34.32
![Page 34: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
15 | P a g e
In this cluster (project boundary) of the CMC, 90 % households have septic tank. Hence
Septage management in houses, which cannot be covered under sewerage system due to
their location or topography, has also been taken in the present project.
2.4.3. Sewage Pumping Station:
Initially, two Sewage Pumping Station were proposed – one at Khasra No. 991 (Bail
Bazar), having area of 4.45 hectares (IPS proposed at 200 sqm only) and the second at
Koladhana (this pumping station is MPS as well). Both the lands are in possession of the
CMC. As per the final optimized design (after joint investigations of PMU Bhopal, PIU
Jabalpur, Independent Verification Team, PMC and CMC), flow of sewage from zone 1 to
MPS at Koladhana will be gravity flow and hence, SPS at Bail Bazar is no more required.
Thus, now only one pumping station (which is also the Main Pumping Station) at
Koladhana is envisaged. the location of proposed STP has been shifted to the Sarra area.
Thus, as per final approved design and drawing only one SPS is to be constructed at
Koladhana near Bodri Nallah in ward no.33.
All the sewage will be collected at SPS at Koladhana from where it will be pumped to STP
by pumping main of DI K-9 of 700 mm and 2.5 km length. Zoning of the project area and
location of the sewage pumping station is below figure 2.5 and 2.6 respectively.
2.4.4. Manholes:
Circular manhole of brick masonry is proposed at all junction, change of diameter, and
change in pipe gradient and on straight run of sewer. The design of manholes is depending
upon the depth and the diameter of the sewer. The spacing is in confirmation of CPHEEO
Manual for Sewerage. Typical manhole cover and frame in Steel fiber reinforced concrete
(SFRC) / reinforced concrete heavy duty is proposed. Use of precast cement Concrete
manholes will also be done in commercially busy areas with the basic objective to cause
minimum inconvenience to the shopkeepers, vendors and consumers/ customers
(installation of precast manhole takes lesser time than construction of brick manhole).
Provision is made in each manhole to receive multiple service connections from adjacent
properties. No provision is made for direct connections to sewer pipeline between
manholes so as to prevent interference and damage to the sewer. Depth wise diameter of
manhole is presented in Table 2.8
Table 2. 8: Depth wise Diameter of Manhole
Manhole Type Dia of pipe in mm Depth (m) Dia of Manhole
Circular Type 150-250 0.91 to 1.65 900 mm
Circular Type 150-900 1.66 to 2.30 1200 mm
Circular Type 150-900 2.31 to above 1500 mm
![Page 35: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
16 | P a g e
Figure 2. 5: Zoning of the Project Area
![Page 36: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
17 | P a g e
Figure 2. 6 Google Image showing SPS Location Koladhana
2.4.5. Property Connection:
Property connections are proposed to be provided in this project and the arrangement
comprises a facility to convey the wastewater including grey and blackwater from the
houses to the sewers line. HDPE pipe is to be used for connecting up to the property
boundary. Provision for pipe cost and road side property chamber has been made in the
contract along with the necessary road restoration charges.
For two or more properties, a roadside chamber shall be constructed close to property
boundary & 110mm Φ HDPE pipe shall be provided from road side chamber to street
Manhole. Openings are provided to Roadside chambers so that the property owner can
make connection to the roadside chamber from his premise. The properties, which are close
to the manhole, will have a separate connection for each property and no roadside chamber
will be provided. As far as possible, the sewer shall be laid at the center of the road for road
width less than four meters. The part of connection including Inspection Chamber inside
the property has to be constructed by the property owner at their own cost.
2.4.6. Site Selection for the Proposed STP
The Sewage Treatment Plant is essential to treat the waste water collected through
Sewerage Network. This is an important component of any Waste Water Management.
![Page 37: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
18 | P a g e
As per the final DPR, the STP was proposed to be constructed at Koladhana near
Bodri Nallah in ward no. 33 at Khasra 678 having an area of 1.8 hectares. But
while doing survey and geotechnical investigations, it was found that major part of
this site for STP at Koladhana was under submergence of Bodri Nallah and hence, it
was decided to change the site for STP. Further a detailed analysis regarding the
land available at Koladhana was done by MPUDC, PMC and the contractor jointly
which is as following:
a. Land requirement for construction of STP is 2.5 ha and total land available at
Koladhana is 1.8ha.
b. Bodri Nallah is dividing this land into 3 small parcels which renders the land
un-useful for construction of STP. To make the land useful, nallah will have to
be diverted and the ground filling will be required to raise its level. This is a
cost extensive job.
c. As the land was open since years and was available as an easy thorough fare, a
cart road has developed by the villagers across the land. Therefore, in case of
construction of STP on this land, alternative arrangement of road for villagers
will be needed.
d. Approx. 0.921 ha of land will be required for diverting the Nallah which will
have to be acquired by the CMC.
e. Substantial amount for construction of retaining wall of the Nallah and/or land
acquisition will be required.
f. As per contract, the available land should accommodate the future augmentation
of STP for the population of 2048.
g. The land piece is not suitable and ample for construction of STP but part of it
can be used for construction of MPS.
In view of the above, it was decided to select alternative site for construction of STP. After
studying various alternatives (in consultation with ULB) for construction of STP, land at
Village Sarra in ward no 35 Khasra no126,128 and 129 having an area of 2.851 hectare
was selected and thus the location of STP is changed from Koladhana to Sarra after a joint
field verification by the contractor’s team, PIU and PMC and final consent of IVT was
obtained. Figure 2.7 shows the alternate site for STP. The layout of the STP is also
enclosed as figure 2.8.
![Page 38: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
19 | P a g e
Figure 2. 7 Google Image showing changed STP site at Village Sarra
Strip plan between Main Pumping Station to Sewage Treatment Plant
![Page 39: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
20 | P a g e
Figure 2. 8 Layout of STP
![Page 40: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
21 | P a g e
2.4.7. Selection of Sewage Treatment Technology:
The DPR proposed to adopt Cyclic Activated Sludge Process (SBR technology) for
treatment of sewage. However, the bid was based on the open technology norm. The
contractor had proposed to use Cyclic Activated Sludge Process (SBR technology).
Design inlet and outlet parameter given below in table 2.9. The process flow
diagram of the proposed technology for STP is given below in fig. 2.9.
Table 2.9 Design inlet and outlet parameter
a) Inlet parameters
Sr. No. PARAMETER Unit Design value
1 pH 7.0- 8.0
2 Total Suspended Solid (TSS) mg/l 1040
3 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) mg/l 130
4 Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) mg/l 220
5 Total Kjeldahi Nitrogen (TKN) mg/l 50
b) Outlet parameters as per design
Sr. No. Parameter Unit
Design value
(As per technical specification in
tender documents)
1 pH 6.5- 9.0
2 TSS mg/l Not more than 10
3 BOD mg/l Not more than 5
4 COD mg/l Not more than 50
5 NH4-N mg/l Not more than 2
6 Total Nitrogen mg/l Not more than 10
7 Fecal Coli form MPN / 100 ml Less than 100
8 Oil & Grease mg/l Not more than 5
![Page 41: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
22 | P a g e
Figure 2.9 Process Flow Diagram of STP
A green belt will be developed with fast growing, tolerant and native plant species which are
specified by Central Pollution Control Board. The action plan for green belt development is
given in Table 2.10 and list of plants suggested for green belt and avenue plantation as per CPCB
guidelines is given in Table 2.11. The tall trees will be planted with 5m interval all along the
boundary and shrubs will be planted in between the trees. Trees with medium height will be
planted all along the roads with 3m interval. Odor controlling species like Osmium sanctum,
Curcuma longa, and Chrysopogonzizanioides etc. will be planted around the processing facilities.
Green belt development plan is given in table 2.12.
![Page 42: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
23 | P a g e
Table 2. 10 Action Plan for Greenbelt development
S. No. Description
1 Area allocated
Along the boundary 930m2 (310m × 3m)
Along the road 160m2 (80m × 2m)
2 No of Plants to be planted
Along the boundary 56 trees and 124 shrubs
Along the road 15 trees
3 Plantation schedule
construction phase- Along the
boundary
56 trees and 124 shrubs
Operation phase- Along the road
and open spaces
15 trees
4 Manpower Requirement Horticulturist-1, Gardner1
Table 2. 11 List of Plants Identified for Greenbelt and Avenue Plantation as per CPCB
Species Maple Oak Poplar Linden Birch
As per CPCB, for absorption of gases, Plant should have following parameters (Ref.
Guidelines for Developing Greenbelts by CPCB)
a) Longer duration of foliage.
b) Freely exposed foliage through.
c) An adequate height of crown.
d) Openness of foliage in canopy.
e) Big leaves (long and laminar surfaces).
f) Large number of stomatal apertures
g) Stomata well exposed (in level with the general epidermal surface).
![Page 43: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
24 | P a g e
Table 2.12 Green belt development (Cost included in ESMP in chapter 7, Table 7.2)
Plantation location Area Number of
rows
Number of
trees
Tentative area
coverage
At the car parking One row 20 45
Between West & South side of DG, HT
PANEL, Transformer, Metering room
almost three layers of plantation will be
covering, west and south side of DG, HT
PANEL, Transformer, Metering room, one
layer of plantation at car parking area
covering both side
Three rows 37 83.25
Plantation area between Front side of primary
unit, both side of 3rd & 4th C-tech basin and
Boundary wall
Three rows 25 56.25
Area in between north and east side of sludge
handling unit and boundary wall
Three rows 28 63
East side of Chlorine contact tank & Building Three rows 12 27
South side of Chlorine contact tank &
Building and Boundary wall
Two rows 1 42.75
West side of Chlorine contact tank &
Building and South side of 4th no no’s C-tech
basin
Three rows 20 45
South side of C-tech Basin and Boundary
wall
One row 25 56.25
Grand Total Area 418.4 sq.m
2.5 Collection Network
The collection network is proposed to be laid in the RoW of existing roads. Due care has
been taken to fix the alignments so as not to do any harm any vegetation or existing
structures.
![Page 44: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
25 | P a g e
3. Legal, Policy and Administrative Framework
3.1. Regulatory Framework – Environmental
Implementation of the subproject will be governed by the National and State of Madhya Pradesh
environmental acts, rules, regulations, and standards. These regulations impose restrictions on
activities to minimize/mitigate likely impacts on the environment. It is the responsibility of the
project executing and implementing agencies to ensure subprojects are consistent with the legal
framework, whether national, state or municipal/local. Compliance is required in all stages of the
subproject including design, construction, and operation and maintenance.
The summary of regulations and mandatory requirements for the subproject is presented in Table
3.1 below.
Table 3.1: Applicable Environmental Regulations for Sewerage Scheme
Law Description
Environment Related
EIA Notification EIA Notification of 2006 and 2009 of Government of India (replacing
the EIA Notification of 1994), set out the requirement for
environmental assessment in India. This states that Environmental
Clearance is required for certain defined activities/projects, and this
must be obtained before any construction work or land preparation
(except land acquisition) may commence. Projects are categorized as
A or B depending on the scale of the project and the nature of its
impacts. Category A projects requires Environmental Clearance from
the National Ministry of Environment and Forest. Category B projects
require Environmental Clearance from the SEIAA.
Requirements of this act are not applicable to this sub-project
Water (Prevention and
Control of Pollution)
Act of 1974, Rules of
1975, and amendments
Control of water pollution is achieved through administering
conditions imposed in consent issued under provision of the Water
(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act of 1974 of Government of
India. These conditions regulate the quality and quantity of effluent,
the location of discharge and the frequency of monitoring of effluents.
Requirements of this act will be applicable to the sub-project and the
treatment plant proposed under the project will require obtain ‘Consent
to Establish’ and ‘Operate’ from the state pollution control board,
under this act. (Appendix 18)
Environment Protection
Act, 1986 and
amendments
Emissions and discharges from the facilities to be created or
refurbished or augmented shall comply with the notified standards.
This is an umbrella act of Government of India and will be applicable
for the project.
Air (Prevention and
Control of Pollution)
Act of 1981, Rules of
1982 and amendments.
The subprojects having potential to emit air pollutants into the
atmosphere have to obtain CTE under Section 21 of the Air
(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act of 1981 from MPPCB
before starting implementation and CTO before commissioning the
project. The occupier of the project/facility has the responsibility to
adopt necessary air pollution.
Requirements of this act will be applicable both during construction
![Page 45: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
26 | P a g e
Law Description
and operation phase of the project.
Forest (Conservation)
Act, 1980 and Forest
Conservation Rules,
2003 as amended
As per Rule 6, every user agency, who wants to use any forest land for
non-forest purposes shall seek approval of the Central Government.
The act will be applicable for the project, since diversion of forest land
is required for the project component of STP.
Ancient Monuments
and Archaeological
Sites and Remains
Rules of 1959
The Rules designate areas within a radius of 100 meters (m) and 300 m
from the “protected property” as “protected area” and “controlled
area” respectively. No development activity (including mining
operations and construction) is permitted in the “protected area” and
all development activities likely to damage the protected property are
not permitted in the “controlled area” without prior permission of the
Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). Protected property includes the
site, remains, and monuments protected by ASI or the State
Department of Archaeology.
While no archeological monuments are located in the project area, the
requirements of this act will be applicable, if any material of cultural
importance is found ‘by chance’ during the implementation of the
project.
Madhya Pradesh State
Water Policy, 2003
Prepared in accordance with the National Water Policy, it states that
“for environmental balance, skillful and planned management of all
types of developmental activities, economic use on equitable basis and
in view of the prime importance of water for all human and other
living beings, an effective and sound water policy is necessary”.
Policy is detailed in 17 sections dealing with different aspects of water
resources. No. 7 deals with Water Allocation Priorities, and according
to which drinking water supply shall have the highest priority followed
by irrigation, power, tourism, etc.
Water Resource Department is nodal department for permitting
different uses of water resources. Policy also states that “clear
provision for reservation of drinking water shall be made in irrigation
projects”
Social Related
The Right to Fair Compensation
andTransparency in
Land Acquisition,
Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Act,
2013 (RTFCTLARR
Act 2013)
The Act provides for enhanced compensation and assistances
measures and adopts a more consultative and participatory approach
in dealing with the Project Affected Persons.
![Page 46: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
27 | P a g e
Law Description
MP Nagariyon
Kshetra ke
Bhumiheen Vyakti
(Pattadhruti
Adhikaron ka Pradan
Kiya Jana)
Adhiniyam, 1984,
popularly known as
the Patta Act.
A separate act has been passed by the state legislature for
regularizing tenure of squatters on government land. GoMP has been
granting leasehold land titles or Pattas to “landless persons” or
residents of squatter settlements in urban areas on the basis of the MP
Nagariyon Kshetra ke Bhumiheen Vyakti (Pattadhruti Adhikaron ka
Pradan Kiya Jana) Adhiniyam, 1984, popularly known as the Patta
Act. The Act applies to all urban areas of MP. The `Patta’ Act was
introduced to grant leasehold rights to the landless persons occupying
urban lands. The Act entitles all landless persons occupying less than
50 sq m of land on a specified cut of date to leasehold rights for
residential use on the same land or on another site.
The Street Vendors (Protection of
Livelihood and
Regulation of Street
Vending) Act, 2014
GOI recently enacted the act that specifically aims to protect the
rights of urban street vendors and to regulate street vending activities.
It provides for Survey of street vendors and protection from eviction
or relocation; issuance of certificate for vending; provides for rights
and obligations of street vendors; development of street vending
plans; organizing of capacity building programmes to enable the
street vendors to exercise the rights contemplated under this Act;
undertake research, education and training programmes to advance
knowledge and understanding of the role of the informal sector in the
economy, in general and the street vendors, in particular and to raise
awareness. Requirements of this act will be applicable during
construction.
The Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional
Forest Dwellers
(Recognition of
Forest Rights) Act,
2006.
An Act to recognise and vest the forest rights and occupation in
forest land in forest dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional
forest dwellers who have been residing in such forests for
generations but whose rights could not be recorded; to provide for a
framework for recording the forests rights so vested and the nature of
evidence required for such recognition and vesting in respect of
forest land. This does not apply to this sub project.
Minimum wages Act
1948 The minimum wage act 1948 is an act to enforce minimum wages to
labourers in all categories and provide for certain other matter
connected there with. This act is applicable in this subproject
Payment of Wages
Act, 1936
This Act applies to wages payable to an employed person in respect
of a wage period if such wages for that wage period do not
exceed 12[twenty four thousand rupees] per month or such other
higher sum which, on the basis of figures of the Consumer
Expenditure Survey published by the National Sample Survey
Organisation, the Central Government may, after every five years,
by notification in the Official Gazette, specify
The Payment of
Bonus Act 1965
The minimum bonus of 8.33% is payable by every industry and
establishment under section 10 of the Act. The
maximum bonus including productivity linked bonus that can
be paid in any accounting year shall not exceed 20% of the
salary/wage of an employee under the section 31 A of the Act
![Page 47: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
28 | P a g e
Law Description
EPF Act 1952 The Employees' Provident Funds & Miscellaneous
Provisions Act, 1952 applies to all states in India except Jammu and
Kashmir. The purpose of a provident fund is to provide financial
security and stability to elderly people on retirement. The employer
is also expected to contribute to its employees retirement fund.
The
Workman Compensati
on Act, 1923
The Workman Compensation Act, 1923 was formed to provide
compensations for workers who acquired/acquire injuries caused by
accidents in the course of employment. Therefore, employers are
obligated to pay compensations to workers who got injuries that led
to disablement or even death in the course of employment
Inter-State Migrant
Workmen (Regulation
of Employment and
Conditions of
Service) Act, 1979
A key piece of legislation governing inter-state migrants in India is
the Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and
Conditions of Service) Act, 1979. The Act was enacted to prevent
the exploitation of inter-state migrant workmen by contractors, and
to ensure fair and decent conditions of employment
Occupational Helath and Safety related
Occupational, Safety,
Helath and Working
Condition Code - 2020
The Occupational, Safety, Helath and Working Condition Code –
2020 seeks to regulate health and safety conditions of labour in any
establishment with 10 or more workers. Its subsumes and replaces
13 labour laws related to OHS and working conditions.
3.2. World Bank Safeguard Policies
The Bank requires environment and social assessment (ESA) of projects proposed for Bank
financing to help ensure that they are environmentally sound and sustainable, and thus to
improve decision making. Table 3.2 presents the key safeguard policies identified under the
MPUDP environment and social management framework (ESMF). Comparison of national
environmental policies and World Bank safeguards operational policies are given in table no.
3.3.
![Page 48: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
29 | P a g e
Table 3.2: World Bank Safeguard Policies applicable for MPUDP
World Bank Safe
Guard Policies
Objective Applicability Safeguard Requirements
OP 4.01
Environmental
Assessment
The objective of this policy is to ensure that Bank
financed projects are environmentally sound and
sustainable.
The environmental issues will be
addressed adequately in advance.
An integrated Environmental
Screening and Environmental
Assessment (EA) with
Environmental Management Plan
(EMP) will be developed to
manage environmental risks and
maximize environmental and
social benefits wherever it is
applicable.
Chhindwara Sewerage
Subproject involve construction
of treatment plant, outfall
sewers, and construction of deep
sewer lines in dense urban areas.
Hence, Categorized as Ea
OP 4.04 Natural
Habitats
The policy recognizes that the conservation of
natural habitats is essential for long-term
sustainable development. The Bank, therefore,
supports the protection, maintenance and
rehabilitation of natural habitats in its project
financing, as well as policy dialogue and
analytical work. The Bank supports and expects
the Borrowers to apply a precautionary approach
to natural resources management to ensure
environmentally sustainable development
This policy may be triggered in the
Project due to activity requiring
forest/ wildlife lands, locating
close to the natural habitats with
the potential to cause significant
adverse impact or degradation of
natural habitats whether directly
(through construction) or
indirectly (through human
activities induced by the project).
ESA and EMP required
OP/BP 4.12
Involuntary
Resettlement
The objective of this policy is to avoid or
minimize involuntary resettlement where feasible,
exploring all viable alternative project designs.
Furthermore, it intends to assist displaced person
in improving their former living standards;
community participation in planning and
implementing resettlement; and to provide
This policy applies to all
components of the project that
result in involuntary resettlement,
regardless of the source of
financing including projects that
are carried out, or planned to be
carried out, contemporaneously
All proposed project sites had
been subjected to screening. No
need for land acquisition, nor
adverse impact on assets and
livelihood resulting in
Involuntary resettlement are
likely. The policy is applicable,
![Page 49: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
30 | P a g e
World Bank Safe
Guard Policies
Objective Applicability Safeguard Requirements
assistance to affected people, regardless of the
legality of title of land.
with the project. but no separate RAP is prepared.
Further, it is to confirmed that
the selected land for the STP
Site Sarra is only required
permission and diversion of land
from forest department to ULB,
Chhindwara.
OP/BP 4.36
Forestry
The objective of this policy is to ensure that Bank
financed projects only preservation and light, non-
extractive use of forest resources and Realize the
potential of forests to reduce poverty in a
sustainable manner, integrate forests effectively
into sustainable economic development, and
protect the vital local and global environmental
services and values of forests.
This policy is applicable since the
forest land is involved at the
proposed project component site
of Sewerage Treatment Plant.
ESMP required.
OP/BP 4.10
Indigenous
People
This policy aims to protect the dignity, right and
cultural uniqueness of indigenous people; to
ensure that they do not suffer due to development;
that they receive social and economic benefits
Some areas of Chhindwara district
falls in Schedule V area (Appendix
3), as per constitution of India, but
the share of scheduled Tribes in
the project area is 10.9% only.
Further, they are scattered all over
the town.
Based on the assessment and
consultation with the key
stakeholders it is confirmed that
the tribal people in the project
area do not exhibit typical
characteristics such as living as a
group; speak separate language
from dominant population,
having separate institutions in
close attachment to the forest
etc. Hence, the policy does not
apply. No separate IPP is
required
![Page 50: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
31 | P a g e
World Bank Safe
Guard Policies
Objective Applicability Safeguard Requirements
OP/BP 4.11
Physical
Cultural
Resources
This policy aims at assisting in the preservation of
cultural property, historical, religious and unique
natural value-this includes remains left by
previous human inhabitants and unique
environment features, as well as in the protection
and enhancement of cultural properties
encountered in Bank- financed project.
This policy may be triggered by
sub-projects where cultural
property, historical, religious and
unique natural value-this includes
remains left by previous human
inhabitants and unique
environment features may be
affected due to project.
This policy is not triggered.
While there are no physical
cultural resources identified in
the sub project area.
General EH & S
Guidelines
World bank
group
The General Environment, Health and Safety
(EHS) Guidelines contain information on cross-
cutting environmental, health, and safety issues
potentially applicable to all projects.
These Guidelines are technical
reference documents with general
and industry-specific examples of
Good International Industry
Practice (GIIP). The Guidelines
contain the performance levels and
measures that are normally
acceptable to World Bank Group
and that are generally considered
to be achievable in new facilities
at reasonable costs by existing
technology.
Guide lines for Water and
Sanitation projects available at
http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/con
nect/e22c050048855ae0875cd76
a6515bb18/Final%2B-
%2BWater%2Band%2BSanitati
on.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
![Page 51: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
32 | P a g e
Table 3.3: Comparison of National Environmental Policy and Bank’s Safeguard Operational Policies
S.
No
Bank’s
Safeguard OPs
Equivalent National Environmental Policy and Regulations Policy Gaps and its redressal
1. OP 4.01
Environmental
Assessment
• Environmental Impact Assessment Notification-2006, 14th
Sep-2006, as amended in 2009 and 2016
• Environmental protection Act, 1986 and subsequent
amendments
• Environmental Impact Assessment Notification-2006, 14th
Sep-2006, as amended in 2009 and 2013
• Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981;
• Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, for
Pollution-Prevention-and-Management;
• The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000
• Municipal Solid Waste (Management & Handling)
Rules, 2000 (MSW Rules)
• Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Trans-
boundary Movement) Rules, 2008.
• Batteries (Management and Handling) Rules, 2001
• The E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2016,
• Plastic waste Management Rules, 2016
• Construction & Demolition, Waste Management Rules,
2016 Right to information Act 2005
• The Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation
of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996
• Contract Labour (Regulation &Abolition) Act 1970,
• Minimum Wages Act 1948, Payment of Wages Act 1936,
• Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act 1986,
The OP 4.01 requires EA for Sewerage
subproject while EIA notification 2006 and
amendments is not applicable in this
sewerage project.
Further, considering IGP notes and Bank’s
internal guidance, the gap exists with
regard to community health and safety
issues.
The project design considers to avoid any
largescale impacts on vegetation, land and
environment due to construction and
outfall of the treated waste water.
It is also ensured to reuse treated waste
water as much as possible and also reuse of
extracted and demolition waste materials in
project construction.
![Page 52: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
33 | P a g e
S.
No
Bank’s
Safeguard OPs
Equivalent National Environmental Policy and Regulations Policy Gaps and its redressal
• Inter-State Migrant workmen’s (Regulation of Employment
& Conditions of Service) Act 1979
• The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land
Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act
30 of 2013) (LARR)
2. OP 4.04 Natural
Habitats
• Biological Diversity Act, 2002,
• Wildlife Protection Act 1972 (WLPA),
Provisions from the acts meets the OP 4.04
requirements.
The proposed subproject is not in protected
area nor wildlife sanctuaries
(Environmental Sensitive areas).
However, MPUDC has adopted more
stringent treated waste water standard to
minimize the impact of receiving water of
the outfall.
3 OP 4.09 Pest
Management
Not applicable
4 OP 4.10
Indigenous
People
Not applicable
5 OP 4.11
Physical
Cultural
Resources
(PCR)
Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains
Act, 1958
Provisions from the act meets the OP 4.11
requirements.
Chance find procedures is included in
ESMP. Impacts on religious structures (not
protected, but social and cultural value)
will be mitigated or managed through
provisions for restoration or reconstruction
![Page 53: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
34 | P a g e
S.
No
Bank’s
Safeguard OPs
Equivalent National Environmental Policy and Regulations Policy Gaps and its redressal
of CPRs in C-ESA.
6 OP 4.12
Involuntary
Resettlement
• The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land
Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
(Act 30 of 2013) (LARR)
• MP Nagariya Kshetra ke Bhumiheen Vyakti (Pattadhruti
Adhikaron ka Pradan Kiya Jana) Adhiniyam, 1984,
popularly known as the Patta Act.
• The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and
Regulation of Street Vending) Act,2014
Gap exists specifically related to aspects
such as identification of non-titleholders as
PAPs; cut off dates for non-titleholders and
valuation of structures with depreciation. It
is clarified that this project does not
involve any involuntary resettlement
(permanent or temporary).
7 OP 4.36 Forest • The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (FCA)
• The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers
(Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
Objectives of the acts are aligned with OP
4.36 requirements.
Chhindwara Subproject involved Forest
land for STP site
Hence, compensatory land has been
provided to the forest Department for
plantation as well as provision has been
made in ESMP for plantation at STP/IPS
site.
8 EHS Guidelines
for
Construction
Materials
Extraction,
April, 2007,
IFC
• Environmental protection Act, 1986 and subsequent
amendments
• Environmental Impact Assessment Notification-2006, 14th
Sep-2006, as amended in 2009 and 2013
• Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981;
• Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, for
Pollution-Prevention-and-Management;
The majority of OPs requirements are
addressed by existing regulations.
However, with regard to resource
efficiency and climate change /GHG
aspects, bridging of gap is most likely after
notification of National Resource
Efficiency Policy, 2019, currently at draft
stage.
Project design considers measures for reuse
![Page 54: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
35 | P a g e
S.
No
Bank’s
Safeguard OPs
Equivalent National Environmental Policy and Regulations Policy Gaps and its redressal
• The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000
• National Resource Efficiency Policy, 2019 (Draft)
• Notification for use of fly ash, 2003 and MoEF&CC
notification dated 25th March 2015
• Municipal Solid Waste (Management & Handling)
Rules, 2000 (MSW Rules)
• Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Trans-
boundary Movement) Rules, 2008.
• Batteries (Management and Handling) Rules, 2001
• Central Motor Vehicle Act 1988 and Central Motor Vehicle
Rules 1989
• The E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2016,
• Plastic waste Management Rules, 2016
• Construction & Demolition, Waste Management Rules,
2016
• The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act
1957
of extracted materials in project
construction.
![Page 55: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
36 | P a g e
4. Baseline Environment Profile
4.1. Baseline Study
The baseline environmental and social status is important to understand the region's
existing physical and biological characteristics along with cultural and social status of the
residing community. Information and data presented in this section is based on field
surveys, stake-holder interaction/consultation and secondary data collection which majorly
include the Detailed Project Report (DPR) of proposed sewerage work, by Nagar Nigam,
Water/ Air/ Noise quality monitoring report of CPCB and Madhya Pradesh State Pollution
Control Board, City census data and others. The information on the baseline environmental
conditions forms the basis to analyze the probable impacts of the proposed project vis-à-vis
the present background environmental quality of the core study area.
4.2. Environmental Profile of Chhindwara Subproject
The subproject components locations are within subproject town. None of the components
of the proposed sub project is located private land. Only the STP is proposed in the Shrub
Forest land under the possession of Forest Department at Sarra village in Chhindwara.
There are neither protected areas, like wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, nor there are any
historically, archeologically protected areas in the vicinity. Towns are densely populated in
the core/old town areas with narrow lanes, and small and closely built houses, while most
of the areas are undeveloped and are still under agricultural use. Commercial areas are
along the main roads, which are generally congested with activities, pedestrians and traffic.
Site environmental Features of proposed Sewerage Scheme components are presented in
Table 4.1.
Table 4. 1: Environmental Features of Proposed Subproject Components sites
S. No
Compo
nents
Detail of Location and Environmental features
1. STP A detailed study was done by the DBO contractor for the construction of STP at
Koladhana near Bodri Nallah in ward no. 33. After detailed investigations, it was
found that the land available at the Koladhana for the construction of STP is not
suitable due to the reasons given in Chapter 2 sub section 2.4.6. After a joint
verification of PMC & IVT, PIU, ULB as well as PMU, the land at Sarra near
Nallah in ward no.35 was selected for the construction of STP. Hence, it is
proposed to set up 28 MLD capacity sewage treatment plant (STP) based on
SBR technology at village Sarra.
The selected land parcel is Shrub Forest land under the possession of Forest
Department. The site has no trees. It is also clarified that the no one (habitation)
is dependent on the selected land parcel. The ULB through District Collector
Chhindwara applied to the Forest Department for diversion of this land.
Diversion and allotment of selected land parcel at Sarra were sought by CMC
vide letter dated 18.06.18. Department of Forest has issued first stage clearance
and has demanded requisite fee vide letter no. 2113 dated 19.07.2019 which has
![Page 56: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
37 | P a g e
been paid by MPUDC dated 10th and 11th Feb., 2020 (Appendix 14 and 15).
Alternative parcel of land of 4.84 Ha as already been allotted by the District
Collector Chhindwara to the Forest Department at Harrai (Village Anjanpur,
BN-175, PHN-48, RNM-Harrai Tehsil, Dist. Chhindwara) bearing Khasra No.
126, 128 and 129.
2. SPS As per the final design of network, SPS at Bail Bazar is no more required as the
sewage from zone 1 will flow through gravity to Main Pumping Station at
Koladhana. .Only one SPS (which is also MPS) of 28 MLD capacity is proposed
at Koladhana near Bodri Nallah in ward no. 33 (Khasra no. 678) Panchnama
has been prepared and the land is received from Revenue Department on
07.01.2018 and is handed over to the contractor.
3 Sewer
network Total length of sewer network is 305.34 km (including pumping main) which
will be laid underground within the RoW of existing roads. Pipes of dia 150mm
to 300mm are of DWC HDPE and those of > 300 mm dia are of NP3 concrete
pipe. Pumping main of DI will be laid from MPS to STP.
![Page 57: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
38 | P a g e
4.3. Physical Environment
4.3.1. Meteorology
Chhindwara has a sub-tropical climate. A hot summer and general dryness characterize the
climate of the area, except during the southwest monsoon season. The year may be divided
into four seasons: Cold season from December to February; Hot season from March to
about the middle of June; period from the middle of June to September is the south-west
monsoon season and October and November form the post monsoon or transition period.
The normal annual rainfall of Chhindwara district is 1139.3 mm. The district receives
maximum rainfall during south-west monsoon period i.e. June to September. About 85.7 %
of the annual rainfall falls during monsoon season. Only 14.3 % of the annual rainfall takes
place between Octobers to May period. Thus, surplus water for ground water recharge is
available only during the southwest monsoon period.
The normal maximum temperature noticed during the month of May is 440 C and minimum
during the month of December 9.80 C. The normal annual mean minimum and maximum
temperatures has been worked out as 18.20 C and 30.60 C respectively.
During the south-west monsoon season, the relative humidity generally exceeds 87%
(August month) and the rest of the year is drier. The driest part of the year is the summer
season, when relative humidity is less than 33%. May is the driest month of the year.
Wind velocity is higher during the pre-monsoon period as compared to post- monsoon
period. The maximum wind velocity, 9.5 km/hr observed during the month of June and
minimum, 3.3 km/hr during the month of November. The average annual wind velocity in is
5.4 km/hr.
4.3.2. Topography
The northern part of the Chhindwara city is hilly. Natural Slope of the CMC area is north to
south with the levels with reference to MSL varying from 695 m to 644 m. In the eastern
part of the City, the topography is sloped towards the Bodri Nallah and in the southern side
towards Kulbehra River (which passes from South to East of the City).
Sewage collection is affected by gravity and therefore accurate topographic survey of the
project area based on street levels is of prime importance to the design of the system and its
subsequent efficient performance. A detailed topographic survey has been carried out for
project area and a contour map has been prepared. The general slope of the town is in south
west direction. The sewerage network and the location of STP are envisaged in accordance
to the general slope of the town. Natural drains or water channels also play an important role
in deciding the alignment of sewerage network. Based on the general slope and natural
drainage pattern, the whole core town and the 7 villages (adjacent to core town and within
municipal limits) was divided in two zones. However, Sewage of Zone 1 will also flow to
![Page 58: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
39 | P a g e
the MPS through gravity.
4.3.3. Geology
Located in the southern region of Madhya Pradesh, Chhindwara lies in the upland trough of
Kulbehra River. The area has sandy loam soil. Archaeans are exposed in parts of
Chhindwara. A few trial pits are shown in Figure 4.1 indicating the soil strata.
Figure 4. 1: Trial Pits for Chhindwara Subproject
![Page 59: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
40 | P a g e
4.3.4. Air Environment:
The data on ambient air quality monitoring and Noise level data is not available as
Chhindwara is monitored by the Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board
(MPPCB).
Therefore, a rapid ambient air quality monitoring was conducted by the support
agency appointed by the MPUDC, so as to establish baseline air quality for the
town. The ambient temperature of the monitoring stations was found to be lie
between 33-34oC and relative humidity 48%. The Ambient Air Quality monitoring
was conducted at 4 locations Seoni Pranmoti, Sarra STP, SPS Koladhana and
Sanchar Colony in the Chhindwara city area. The monitoring was done on March
2019 for 24 hours (Appendix 10). The AAQM monitoring details are present
below table 4.2.
Table 4. 2: Ambient Air quality of Chhindwara Town
S.
No
AAQM Station PM 2.5 (µg/m3) NAAQ
Standards,
µg/m3
60
Maximum Minimum Average
1. Seoni Pranmoti 40.5 39.6 40.3
2. Sarra STP 52.7 51.8 52.4
3. SPS Koladhana 42.3 41.9 42.2
4. Sanchar Colony 34.8 33.2 34.0
PM 10 (µg/m3)
1 Seoni Pranmoti 90.8 91.9 91.3
2 Sarra STP 94.9 93.6 94.8
3. SPS Koladhana 90.6 89.6 90.1
4. Sanchar Colony 84.7 83.5 84.1
SO ᵪ
1 Seoni Pranmoti 12.4
12.98
11.9 12.1
80
2 Sarra STP 16.3 15.8 16.1
3. SPS Koladhana 11.8 12.6 12.1
4. Sanchar Colony 11.5 12.7 12.1
NO ᵪ
1 Seoni Pranmoti 14.6 13.8 14.2
80 2 Sarra STP 14.5 13.9 14.2
3. SPS Koladhana 12.9 11.7 12.3
4. Sanchar Colony 12.9 11.9 12.2 Source: Air Monitoring results
Monitoring results shows that levels of PM2.5, PM10, oxides of Sulphur and
Nitrogen are well within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). It
is very much lower than standards prescribed and it is not expected that
construction would increase dust levels. However as precautionary measure: dust
![Page 60: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
41 | P a g e
barriers, sprinkling will be adopted for high dust emitting construction areas.
4.3.5. Noise Levels
Noise is considered to be one of the aspects of pollution, which also leads to the
degradation of the social environment and also poses health and communication
problems. The impact of noise sources on surrounding community depends on
characteristics of noise the time of day at which noise occurs, the location of the
noise source and the loudness and duration of exposure. The assessment of noise is
carried out by considering various factors like damage to hearing ability,
physiological disturbance, annoyance and general community responses. Noise
Monitoring was done at two locations and is presented in Table 4.3 below.
Table 4. 3: Ambient Noise Levels in Chhindwara
S.
No.
Place Noise Level, dB Permissible Limit, dB
LDay LNight Day Night
1 Market area 42.0 43.0 55 45
2 Sarra STP 52.3 40.2 55 45
3 Koladhana 43.0 45.0 55 45
4 Model Road 52.3 40.2 55 45 Source: Noise
Monitoring results
The day time noise level was monitored in the range of 42.0 dB to 52.3 dB while in
the night time it 40.2 dB to 45 dB (Appendix 10). The noise levels were within the
permissible limits during day and night and in accordance with National Ambient
Noise Level Standards. The sensitive receptors at various components have been
provided in ESMP.
4.3.6. Water Environment:
Water and Wastewater Quality analysis of household sewage discharging into the street
sewers and of the receiving water bodies at major wastewater outfalls has been carried out
(refer Table 4.4). These samples were tested for PH, COD, BOD, Suspended solids and total
Nitrogen Phosphorus (Appendix 9B).
Table 4.4: Test result of Waste water
S. No. Test Parameter Measurement Unit Test Method Test Result
1. pH Value - IS 3025 (part 11): 1983 7.63 a 25°C
2. TSS NTU IS 3025 (part 17) 1984 289
3. COD Mg/l IS 3025 (part 58) 2006 290
4. BOD (at 270 C for
3 days)
Mg/l IS 3025 (part 32)1988 190
5. Total Nitrogen (as
N)
Mg/l IS 3025 (part 34) 1988 35.38
6. Total Phosphorous
(as P)
Mg/l IS 3025 (part 36)2004 5.93
![Page 61: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
42 | P a g e
In order to measure the baseline level of existing water quality and probable pollution in
the storm water drain (STP outfall, receiving water body) nearby STP site, Sarra,
Biological oxygen demand (BOD) and Chemical oxygen demand (COD), pH, TSS etc.
were tested. The BOD is 3.4 mg/l, COD 3.4 mg/l, pH 6.9, total suspended solids 28mg/l,
total dissolved solid 729 mg/l, total hardness (CACO3) 516 mg/l and turbidity 9.9 NTU
were observed (Annexure 9C). This is once again reiterated here that this drain is only
storm water drain carrying rain water during rainy period only and remains dry during
remaining year.
4.3.7. Ground Water Scenario
As per the studies conducted by Central Ground Water Board (Data taken from its website)
Ground water occurs under phreatic and semi-confined to confined conditions. Alluvium,
weathered granites/gneisses, lower Gondwana sandstones, weathered, fractured and jointed
massive basalts and vesicular basalts form the major phreatic aquifers; and weathered,
fractured granites are noticed as main water-bearing zones at deeper levels. It is observed
that the discharge of dug wells tapping alluvium and vesicular basalt ranges between 80
and 235 m3/day respectively and jointed massive basalts and weathered gneisses range
from 44 to 177 m3/day and from 61 to 77 m3/day respectively. Water bearing fractured
zones is encountered between the depths of 71.00 and 176.00 m bgl at deeper levels. The
discharge in weathered, fractured granite at deeper levels ranges from 0.2 to 10.00l/s.
Water level data, including historical data, are essential for not only to know the present
ground water conditions but also for forecasting future trends in response to ground water
reservoir operations. Pre and Post monsoon depths to water level maps are reproduced.
Pre- monsoon: Pre monsoon depth to water levels range from 8 to 20 meter below ground
level (mbgl). The long-term water level trend (2001 to 2010) shows declining trend ranges
from 0.02 to 0.2 m/year (Pre- monsoon). A large-scale withdrawal of ground water for
irrigation purpose is observed.
Post- monsoon: During post monsoon period, water levels ranges from 0 .70 to 15.00
mbgl. Water level fluctuation between pre and post monsoon period ranges from 0.30-
to7.60 m.
The entire Chhindwara district, command and Non-Command areas, falls under Safe
Category, except Chhindwara block which is falling under Semi -Critical category where
stage of ground water development is 93%.
The E-Coli value of water samples ranges between 280-1600. Nitrate value of water
samples ranges between 1-243 and Fluoride between.09-.97 in phreatic aquifer. Ground
water in phreatic aquifer is potable but excessive fluoride (1.60-20.00 Mg/l) is noticed in
deeper aquifers.
4.3.8. Seismicity
The country has been classified into different zones indicating the intensity of damage
frequency of earthquake occurrences. These zoning maps indicate broadly the seismic
coefficient that could generally be adopted for design of buildings in different parts of the
![Page 62: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
43 | P a g e
country. These maps are based on subjective estimates of intensity from available
information on earthquake occurrence, geology and tectonics of the country. Chhindwara
lies in Zone III as per the Bureau of Indian standards, the National Standard Body of India.
This zone is classified as Moderate Damage Risk Zone
4.3.9. Biological Environment
The flora and fauna identified in the project (study) area are commonly found and not
specific to the region. There are no National Parks, Wild life sanctuaries, Bird sanctuaries
within 03 Km. radius of the project site. There is no rare and endangered species in the
project area. The prominent tree species include shrubs of Zizyphussps., latifolia, Azadiracta
indica, Magnifera indica, Lantana camera, Zizyphusmauritiyana, cassia fistula
Shorearobusta, Diospyros melanoxylon, Boswellia serrata, Terminalia tomentosa,
Terminalia bellayoica, Terminalia arjuna, Pterocarpus marsupium, Madhuca indica trees,
etc. The prominent species among the fauna include Ovisaries, Sciuridae, Bubalus bubalis,
Capra aegagrushircus Crow, sparrow and street dog.
4.4. Baseline of Sludge disposal site
For sludge disposal, 2.086 ha piece of land (Khasra No. 14/5) has been identified and
allotted by Chhindwara Municipal Corporation at Salimota village, Mohakheda Thaluq,
Chhindwara . The coordinates of the site are 21.974402 N and 78.919937 E. (Appendix 11)
This is barren land free from any habitations, trees, shrubs and encroachments and is under
the possession of government. Hard strata impermeable layer has been observed at the
proposed site.. The proposed site is well approachable by State Highway no.547
Chhindwara to Narsinghpur. The habitation is way far (approx. 700m) from the proposed
site. The distance from STP to Sludge disposal land is about 7.4 km.
4.5. Socio Economic Profile of Chhindwara
The population of Chhindwara city in 2011 census is approximately 1,38, 291 Chhindwara
Municipal Area is divided into 45 wards for development and administrative purposes. The
![Page 63: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
44 | P a g e
new municipal area of Chhindwara town is 110.27 sq. km. The total households of
Chhindwara city are 37255. The brief of socio-economic profile of Chhindwara is given
below:
Profile Parameter Status/ Relevant Statistics
Town Area 110.27 sqkm (However, the Project Area is
limited to core city and 7 adjacent villages)
Households (Census 2011)/ Average
House hold size 37255/ 5.3
Population Density Average 393 person per hectare (Max density of
3655 in Ward no. 33)
Sex Ratio 950
Share of Scheduled Caste in Population 13.84%
Share of Scheduled Tribe in Population 12.72%
Literacy Rate 79%
4.4.1. Land Use Pattern
The land use pattern as per statutory Development Plan, 2021 of Chhindwara Planning area
(including the then CMC and nearby villages) is given in table 4.5. However, this
Development Plan was notified before the extension of Municipal Limits (i.e year 2015) and
seems irrelevant in view of the area of the extended CMC limits (110.27 sqkm) being much
more than the area under the Development Plan (14.21 sqkm). However, the Planning area
provides the land use pattern in core area (i.e Municipal Limits before the year 2015) and the
adjacent 7 villages which together make the Project Area under MPUDP. The percentage of
residential area in this plan is a clear indication of sparse spatial distribution of population.
Table 4. 5: Land Use Pattern
S no
Land use Area (in hectare) Percentage
Within City Planning area Within City Planning area Total
1 Residential 311.0 119.0 27.4% 41.3% 30.3%
2 Commercial 25.0 21.0 2.2% 7.3% 3.2%
3 Institutional 13.0 15.0 1.1% 5.2% 2.0%
4 Semi Public areas 89.0 86.0 7.9% 29.9% 12.3%
5 Public Utilities 24.0 5.0 2.1% 1.7% 2.0%
6 Entertainment 74.0 2.0 6.5% 0.7% 5.3%
7 Traffic & transportation 154.0 40.0 13.6% 13.9% 13.7%
8 Water bodies etc. 35.0 - 3.1% - 2.5%
9 Agricultural etc. 408.0 - 36.0% - 28.7%
Total 1,133.0 288.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Source: Chhindwara Master Plan
![Page 64: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
45 | P a g e
4.4.2. Commercial Streets of Chhindwara Town
Chhindwara is an important center for the trade in the district. Around 132 villages and
other centers in the District depend predominantly on the city for daily business. The
commercial activities are spread in limited part of Chhindwara in irregular pattern. This is
important to note that these commercial streets are based on the “as and when required”
approach without an integrated City Development perspective. . Presently, there are around
8 small local level markets functioning in the city, which cater to the daily needs of
Chhindwara and adjacent areas. Also, street shopping has developed along some major
roads and in the vacant spaces across various locations in the city. The trade and allied
activities in the City take place mainly in Budhwari Bazaar, Itwari Bazaar, Golgunj, Mata
Mandir and areas near Gunj, which are established along the main roads and the busy roads
in the City. The wholesale and the retail activities take place simultaneously in few areas.
The commercial activities in the City have developed near the old city areas and most of
these activities are unregulated or unorganized. Table 4.6 presents the locations and type of
the markets in the city.
Table 4. 6: Type and Location of Various Markets in Chhindwara
S no Location Type of Market
1
Gunj Area
Grain Market
Cloth Market
Grass Market
Iron
2 Gol Gunj Books & Stationery
Readymade Garments
3 Budhwari Bazaar Grocery & vegetable market
Medicines
4 Choti Bazaar Gold, Silver, jewellery, utensils
5 Bail Bazaar Electrical & Scrap market
6 Near Bus Stand Transport services
7 Near Chota Talab Wood & Furniture
Auto spare parts
8 Near Hospital Unauthorised shops
4.4.3. BPL Population and Identified Slums
of Chhindwara BPL Population
A total of 19,282 households have been identified as BPL households in Chhindwara as in
2010 and there were about 11,271 in the year 2004 (a considerable growth of 71% in the
last six years). Considering 5.1 as average HH size the total 19,282 HHs constitute about
98,338 which is about 72% of the population in the City. However, according to the 2004-
05 estimates of the city, about 52,339 people fall under the category ‘Below Poverty Line’ .
4.4.4. Ward Wise Slum areas
The slums have sprung up in low ill-drained areas, pits, drainage lines, level crossings,
waste lands, scrub lands and nallah in contrast to the surrounding areas. Thirteen wards
![Page 65: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
46 | P a g e
have been identified as the Slum wards in the City. These slums are mainly formed on the
unattended government or revenue land. Slum locations across wards are presented in
Table 4.7.
Table 4. 7: Slum Locations in Chhindwara
S no Locality War
d no Ownership
Year No of
HHs Settlement Notification
1 Indira Nagar 7 Revenue 1985 - 350
2 Rambagh 10 Private 1939 - 40
3 Kailash Nagar- Chunabhatta 10 Govt.
285
4 New Bel Bazaar 2 Govt. 305
5 Sankat mochan
slum 9 Govt. 1995 2000 200
6 NIIT Tekdi 15 Govt. 2001 2004 100
7 Near Warehouse 15 2003 12
8 Basodi Mohalla 17 Govt. 1988 1992 115
9 Basodi Mohalla 16 40
10 Sukludhana Water
Tank
17 Govt. 1990 1995 225
11 Koladhana 30 Govt. 1996 30
12 Koladhana Gondi
Mohalla
30 Govt. 1997 40
13 Slum adjacent to Vivekanand Colony
31 Revenue 1980 1984 45
14 Chapakhana Kumhari Mohalla
23 Revenue
1980 128
15 Karmkar Colony 23 Revenue 265
16 Harijanpura 34 Govt. 40
17 Pataleshwar 19 180
18 Chaudababa 18 Trust 1980 1984 370
19 Shivnagar Colony
near PWD Office 4
1990 1995 150
20 Near Bada Talab 4 Govt./Pvt. 1980 1988 60
21 Gondi Mohalla 11 50
22 DT Burman's Land 38 275
23 Mohan Nagar Nai
Abadi 39 Revenue
50
24 Krishna
Nagar Behind ITI 1 Govt.
65
Total 3,420
There are total 24 slum pockets in Chhindwara city with about 3,420 slum households. Out
of these households only 55% of the households have pattas and ownership of land is with
![Page 66: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
47 | P a g e
only 7% of the households. Only in 4 slum pockets in Chhindwara city all the households
have pattas. More than 30% of the slum pockets are notified in Chhindwara city and almost
all slum areas were notified within a short duration of time from their settlement.
Social Features of Proposed Subproject Components are presented below in table 4.8.
Table 4. 8: Social Features of Proposed Subproject Components
S. No
Components Detail of Location and Social Features
1. STP It is proposed to set up 28 MLD capacity sewage treatment plant (STP)
at village Sarra. SBR technology will be used for STP.
The selected land parcel is Shrub Forest land under the possession of
Forest Department. Second stage clearance for diversion of land is
under process with Forest Department. This land has no trees.
Being government land, no acquisition of land is required. The land is
away from the settlement and is free from any type of encroachment or
encumbrances and hence, no resettlement or any type of loss of income
will be faced.
2. SPS As per the final design of network, SPS at Bail Bazar is no more
required. (Details already given in previous chapters).
MPS of 28 MLD capacity is to be constructed at Koladhana near Bodri
Nallah in ward no. 33 (Khasra no. 678). The land belongs to Revenue
Department & the possession has been given to ULB on 07.01.2018.
Being government land, no acquisition of land is required. The land is
away from the settlement and is free from any type of encroachment or
encumbrances and hence, no resettlement or any type of loss of income
will be faced.
3 Sewer network Sewerage network and pumping main is to be laid (305.34km length)
of 150mm-1000 mm dia. of DWC/ RCC/ DI K-9 pipe will be laid
underground along the RoW.
The excavations and laying of pipeline within RoW need no land
acquisition, however, following possible impacts may be foreseen:
1. The issues of access to residents and shops
2. Temporary shifting of street vendors (on moving carts or sitting
on ground)
3. Breakage of underground utilities
4. Damage to boundary walls or other structures like chabutarahs
while doing excavations
5. Traffic Diversions or restrictions
6. Public Safety from excavations
7. Safety of labour during construction activities
8. Air and Noise Pollution during Construction and O&M
9. Sludge Management during O&M
Detailed analysis and impact assessment as well as the mitigation
measures are given in forthcoming chapters.
![Page 67: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
48 | P a g e
5. Assessment of Anticipated Impacts
5.1. Introduction
This Chapter identifies and discusses both positive and negative impacts associated with the
proposed Project and their mitigation measures. On the basis of screening and field visits and
parameters provided in ESMF for Environment and social, the Chhindwara Sewerage sub project
is categorized as Ea and Sc. The anticipated impacts and corresponding mitigation measures are
discussed in Phases namely: design, construction, operation and decommissioning. Based on the
magnitude and duration of the project activities and the environmental attributes of the receiving
environment presented in earlier chapter on environmental setting, the nature, duration and
extent of impact are assessed. Minor project impacts have also been identified and basis for their
insignificance has been provided. Wherever relevant, the ESMP also addresses the minor
impacts and provides environmental mitigation or environmental enhancement measures.
5.2. Environmental Impact
In the proposed Sewerage Scheme, direct and/or indirect impacts are generated which are rather
short-term as they are felt and manifested during the actual performance of the construction
activities. It is expected that impacts from these types of activities will cease once the contractor
completes the project and demobilizes from the site. Table 5.1 and figure 5.1 shows the influence
area of the proposed sub project components: -
Table 5.1: Influence Area details of proposed Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
S.
No
.
Components Influence
Area
Site selected as per DPR Site selected as per final
design and drawing of DBO
contractor
1. STP 100 m dia • Influence area of STP
covers 100 m dia, but
there is no habitat, no
noticeable aquatic life
and flora & fauna present
in the influence area
• Influence area of STP covers
100 m dia, but there is no
habitat, no noticeable
aquatic life and flora &
fauna present in the
influence area.
• In general, 5 km from the
project boundary has been
considered as Project
Influence Area
• The influence area may be
about 5 km at the
downstream from the outfall
of the STP.
• Detail of construction
impacts explained in section
5.2.2
2. SPS 50 m dia • Influence area of SPS
covers 50 m dia, but
there is no Sensitive area
at the proposed site
• Influence area of SPS
covers 50 m dia, but there
is no Sensitive area at the
proposed site
3. Sewer 1.5 m in • Excavation along the • Excavation along the
![Page 68: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
49 | P a g e
Network each side
of sewer
network
roads, hauling of
construction materials
and operation of
equipment on-site can
cause traffic problems.
Roads in the core/old
town area of
Chhindwara are very
narrow. However, most
of the roads are used by
pedestrians and two
wheelers, and four
wheelers vehicles are
very limited. Potential
impact is negative but
short term and
reversible by mitigation
measures.
• Detail of construction
impacts explained in
section 5.2.2
roads, hauling of
construction materials and
operation of equipment on-
site can cause traffic
problems. Roads in the
core/old town area of
Chhindwara are very
narrow. However, most of
the roads are used by
pedestrians and two
wheelers, and four
wheelers vehicles are very
limited. Potential impact is
negative but short term and
reversible by mitigation
measures.
• Detail of construction
impacts explained in
section 5.2.2
Figure 5-1: Influence area of STP land site
![Page 69: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
50 | P a g e
5.2.1. General Impacts during Subproject Cycle
Environmental and Social Impacts: Pollution abatement projects may prove beneficial for
the environment and society or they may have some adverse impacts as well. Planners and
decision makers have realized the importance of understanding the consequences of any such
projects on both environmental and social aspects, and have started taking steps to avoid any
adverse impacts. Based on the major findings obtained from the field visits and secondary data
analysis, the possible environmental and social issues with reference to the proposed sewer
works in Chhindwara are discussed in these sections. The proposed sub-project consists of
three major activities which include:
• Construction of approximately 302.642 km long sewerage network including all required
trunk/ branch/ lateral sewer.
• Construction of STP at Sarra
• Construction of sewage pumping station at Koladhana
The construction activities would generally include earthworks (excavation, filling, shuttering,
compacting), civil construction (sewer lines, STP, SPS, etc.).
Potential Environmental Impacts: The environmental impact of the proposed project may
be categorized in two phases:
i. During the construction phase which would be temporary and short term;
ii. During the operation phase which would have long term effects
The activities identified for project under each phase are:
A. Construction phase
1. Site clearing and levelling
2. Excavation and Foundation
3. Transportation of construction materials, equipment and machineries
4. Construction of STP Units and related infrastructure
5. Establishment of necessary support infrastructure such as project office, labor camp,
stores, etc.
B. Operation phase
1. Operation of STP
2. Disposal of treated effluent and the sludge
The following impacts are associated with the construction of the proposed sewerage project:
a. Impact on air environment
uring the construction phase it is expected Emissions from the diesel generator(s) and
materials transport through heavy vehicles to the site will be among various sources of air
pollution during construction phase. These emissions are temporary in nature. Bulldozers,
excavators, cranes, DG sets welding machines, trucks trailers etc. for transportation of
materials will also contribute to gaseous emissions through use of diesel as a fuel. Based on the
field observation from the site data and interaction/consultation with stake-holders, it is
![Page 70: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
51 | P a g e
expected that the levels of suspended particulates, carbon mono-oxide (CO), hydrocarbons and
NOx (NO &NO2) is likely to increase during the construction phase mainly because of:
• Excavation, backfilling, compaction activity and movement of vehicles on un-paved roads
(increases dust level)
• Vehicle exhausts from construction machinery and from light and heavy vehicles for
transportation of pipes and construction material like cement, steel, aggregates etc.
• Use of portable diesel generators and other fuel fired machinery.
Interruption of existing installations on the pipeline route: The network laying will cross,
move in or move along existing installations including:
• Property accesses;
• Roads
• Underground utilities e.g. electricity and telephone links; and
• Fences and structures like chabutarahs.
These services are critical and have implications with spillover effects on the social and
economic performance.
Mitigation:
• Formal request for permission to cross, break in and build the sewer network should be
sought from affected stakeholders and the relevant institutions such as MPEB;
• Formal engagement will be done with key land and other property owners neighbouring
the sewer, in case the boundary wall or chabutarahs is expected to be damaged;
• Ensure dissemination of relevant information to each of the affected parties;
• A work plan with clear responsibilities for each party will be developed to ensure smooth
execution of the construction.
Noise generation: Construction of the proposed Project will most likely result in noise
generation by the machines that will be used e.g. excavation equipment and construction
vehicles delivering materials to site. Significance of noise impacts depends on whether the
Project would increase noise levels above the existing ambient levels by introducing new
sources of noise. Noise impacts would be considered significant if the Project would result in
the following:
• Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in
the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies;
• Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground-borne vibration or ground-borne
noise levels;
• A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels (more than 3 dBA) in the project
vicinity above levels existing before the project; and
• A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing before the project.
The Contractor shall put in place measures that will mitigate noise pollution arising during the
construction phase.
![Page 71: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
52 | P a g e
Mitigation:
• Install portable barriers to shield compressors and other small stationary equipment where
necessary;
• Use of quiet equipment (i.e. equipment designed with noise control elements);
• Limit pickup trucks and other small equipment to a minimum idling time and observe a
common-sense approach to vehicle use, and encourage workers to shut off vehicle engines
whenever possible;
• Provision of appropriate personnel protective equipment;
• Construct mainly during the day time; and
• Consider labour based construction methodologies.
Interference with the physical setting: The proposed project could result into the following
impacts to the physical setting:
• Changes in the local topography during site grading, development of treatment systems and
laying of sewers among others;
• Blockage of natural drainage system at valley crossings;
• Excavation for creation of access routes and related structures; and
Mitigation:
• The design is done ensuring that there will be no hinderance to drainage, no change in
topography. The designs do not introduce or cause any physical changes that are not in
harmony with the physical setting of the Project area;
• The structures to be developed are aesthetically acceptable to blend in with the
surrounding;
• The contractor as much as possible, will complete the works in such a way that natural
aesthetics shall be retained at the construction locations;
• Roads will be restored to its original or better
Disposal of soil: Project construction will involve earthworks and excavation. This will result
in the generation of some spoil materials. But there will be little carting away of excavated
material. The soils may affect the surrounding environment if not adequately disposed.
Mitigation:
• Maximize the re-use of excavated materials in the works as far as feasible to ensure that no
permanent spoil dumps are created;
• Properly dispose off the spoil in the identified land allotted by the CMC at Barman Land
Parasia Road, Chhindwara at Khasra no. 11/7 to 11/14. The land is in the possession of
ULB.
• Care is being taken to avoid spoil location in land as well as the spoil is being reused for
other productive purposes.
Solid waste generation: Solid wastes generated from the construction activities are excess
excavated earth (spoils), discarded construction materials, cement bags, wood, steel, oils, fuels
![Page 72: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
53 | P a g e
and other similar items. Domestic solid wastes may also be generated from the workers’ camp.
Improper waste management could cause odor and vermin problems, pollution and flow
obstruction of nearby watercourses and could negatively impact the landscape.
Mitigation:
• Construction waste will be recycled or reused as much as possible to ensure that materials
that would otherwise be disposed off as waste are diverted for productive uses;
• Measures to ensure that construction materials requirements are carefully budgeted and to
ensure that the amount of construction materials left on site after construction is kept
minimal, will be taken;
• Minimization of solid waste during construction of the Project through use of durable,
long-lasting materials that will not need to be replaced often, thereby reducing the amount
of construction waste generated over time;
• Skips and bins will be strategically placed within the labour campsite and construction site,
they will also be covered to prevent access by vermin and to minimize odour. They will be
emptied regularly;
• Measures to ensure that waste materials from the Project are disposed at suitable sites will
be taken. The construction waste such as spoils will be disposed off at designated site
provided by CMC (already explained in earlier sections). These will be include engaging
reputable truckers and conducting appropriate spot checks to verify that disposal is done in
accordance with the requirements of MSW rules;
• The domestic waste from labour camps will be collected by CMC which is already
collecting the domestic waste at Door to Door level.
b. Impact on Land Environment
The proposed project is laying of Sewerage network and construction of Sewage Pumping
Station and Sewage Treatment Plant. During construction, a small amount of vegetation
(mainly shrubs) will be cleared to give way for the sewer, SPS and STP. Normally removal of
vegetation and land clearing is associated with soil erosion, however these issues are localized
and associated with construction phase only. This is further clarified that construction of none
of the components includes removal of vegetative cover and except for some of the shrubs.
Excessive debris, trash or construction remnants (e.g. dirt piles) may create problems related to
drainage, unhygienic conditions and poor aesthetics.
There are no endangered flora & Fauna species in the project area. The sewerage project does
not envisage any destruction or displacement of any endemic floral or faunal species; hence the
impact will be insignificant.
Mitigation:
• The Contractor will ensure proper demarcation of the Project component area to be affected
by the construction works;
• Strict control of construction vehicles to ensure that they operate only within the area to be
disturbed by access routes and other works;
![Page 73: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
54 | P a g e
• Retention of trees and shrubs, where possible on the potential sites for screening of the
visual impact;
• Where the proposed route requires the removal of any vegetation, care will be taken to
minimize the destruction or damage of trees.
• Plantation for trees cut due to construction, if any
• Excess excavated material during network laying will be removed within 2 days of the
backfilling
Workers accidents and hazards: Construction workers are likely to have injuries and hazards
as the construction works unavoidably expose workers to occupational health and safety risks.
Sewer network laying and construction of SPS and STP involve deep excavations and the
workers are likely to be exposed to risk of accidents and injuries resulting from accidental falls
and injuries from hand tools and construction equipment.
Mitigation:
• To reduce the workers accidents and hazards, and the contractor shall be commited to
abide by Site Occupational Health and Safety rules
• Before start of work on site, a brief meeting shall be done daily and all construction
workers should be advised of the dangers associated with construction work and how to
keep themselves safe;
• Workers should be provided with suitable personal protective equipment (PPE);
• Provision of adequate sanitary facilities to workers;
• Train all workers on Safety Health and Environment (SHE) with an aim of improving
awareness;
• Where construction activities interfere with the movement of traffic, the proper and
sufficient signage shall be provided on site and controlled by trained flagmen/flag women
and lit in night, reflectors may also be used to guide the citizen and commuters during
night.
5.2.3 Impacts during operation phase
The impacts of operation stage activities on the various environmental parameters are
examined below:
a) Air Environment
As the STP does not involve any type of unit operations releasing the gaseous emissions,
hence, the impact on ambient air quality is not going to be affected. Odor nuisance however, is
likely to be observed from the STP operations. Although SBR technology does not produce
bad odour (because it is not anaerobic process), however, any odour produced will be managed
through development of green belt around the STP site and specific odor mitigation measures,
as needed.
b) Water environment
Water resources in the project area would be the most positively benefited. The probably
environmental impacts related to water during operation stage may include unpredictable
events such as:
![Page 74: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
55 | P a g e
i. Temporary flooding of adjacent areas due to accidental leakages/bursts and also due to
blockages and backlogging of lines.
ii. Water pollution and possibility of mixing with water supply line due to leakages/
overflows from the sewer lines
iii. Impairment of receiving water quality inefficient sewage treatment process
c) Noise quality
Improper handling and irregular maintenance of operating machines including pumps,
generators, air diffusers, etc. may lead to increased noise pollution during operation activity.
d) Impact on Occupational Health and Safety
As the operation of STP facilities involve handling and use of chemicals such as Lime, Poly
electrolyte, Urea, DAP etc. the safety of workers invites safety considerations. As the workers
will be equipped with necessary personal protective equipment’s (PPE) and will be trained for
safety aspects to be followed during working hours, , the impact will be insignificant as a
whole. The sludge will be disposed off to sludge disposal site Khasra no 14/5, Village,
Salimeta, Tehsil Mohkhed, District Chhindwara, hence there will be no percolation of sewage
(Appendix 11).
5.3. Social Impacts
The locations of STP and SPS have been finalized The land required for the SPS is
Government land and in possession of ULB. The land for STP at Sarra is also a Government
land owned by Forest Department (Shrub Forest) for which fee for diversion has already been
paid. Hence no land acquisition or permanent impact on assets is anticipated. Other likely
impacts are presented in ensuing sections.
Sewer network is to be laid in the RoW of roads which are in possession of CMC and hence,
neither any land acquisition nor any permission from any Statutory or private owner is needed.
However, this is clarified here that there is no demolition of any temporary or permanent
structure involved/observed during network laying. There is no loss of livelihood (permanent
or temporary ) is observed.
5.3.1 Land Requirement
After final design and drawing, it is confirmed that no private land is required for the project,
as construction of proposed infrastructure is to be done on government land. The land required
for STP and SPS as already stated above, belongs to the government and is not being utilised
under farming or any other purposes (Land records for all the proposed infrastructure enclosed
as Appendix 5). Moreover there would be no loss of community assets during the
construction, as noticed during site visits and interaction with the local people. The network
will be laid within RoW and hence, no private land will have to be acquired or purchased for
laying of network as well. Thus, there are no adverse impacts either on general or on any
vulnerable group.
New site selected for STP at Sarra village which is Shrub Forest land as per revenue records
![Page 75: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
56 | P a g e
under the possession of Forest Department. As per the verification of PIU, PMC and IVT there
were no such vegetation and any habitation dependent observed at the selected site. For the
diversion of forest land to the ULB Chhindwara, Forest Act. 1980 provisions are being
followed. The letter for compensatory afforestation has been provided by Collector
Chhindwara to DFO for afforestation in compensation for the selected Shrub Forest land for
STP at Sarra village Chhindwara. The Collector has allotted land Khasra no 53/2 area 4.84
hectare at village Harrai for the requisite plantation of trees. The proposed plantation will be
done by forest department and the monitoring will be done by the department of forest itself.
However, afforestation activity at compensatory land will be ensured by the PIU, Chhindwara.
Refer appendix 14 and 15 for more details.
5.3.2. Impact on Livelihood
The excavation work for laying of network will lead to blockage of access to the residents as
well as shops/ commercial establishments, thus, some trouble in operating their business
during pipe line laying may occur for a very short period of time. Screening and site visits
along the road stretches through which pipes are to be laid reveal that there will be
temporary disruption to ongoing commercial and vending activities. These temporary
disruptions may result in loss of income during construction for certain period of 2 to 3
days. However, On the basis of final survey done by the contractor during September –
October 2019 and verification done by the PIU and PMC during October 2019, it was found
that the no shops/kiosk will be required to shift either temporarily or permanent. A survey to
identify the Project Affected Persons was done by the contractor for which the proforma
used is given at Appendix 17. Street vendors on moving cart or sitting on street will be
required to be shifted whenever the pipeline is being laid on one side of the road. This is
also important to note here that vendors on moving cart and even those who sit on street do
not have a permanent location and they keep on shifting. . No one is permanent or
temporarily impacted by the sub project. The joint survey has been conducted by the PIU,
PMC & contractor, as per the survey, No potential damage has been observed to any
structure.
The network design is done in a such a manner that no kiosk will have to be shifted and hence,
no compensation is required
The work of network laying will be done in small stretches of 250m or less. Planks over the
excavated portions will be provided at every 50m interval. This will enable the access to all the
shopkeepers with minimum inconvenience.
Street vendors will be shifted just opposite to the road (on the other side) within the same area,
and this will enable them to earn their daily livelihood without having any adverse impact on
them. Moreover, works in congested commercial areas will be taken up during weekly holidays.
The weekly market day will be avoided for construction. Congested road in Chhindwara
municipality are as follows in table 5.2 and some of the photographs of the same is enclosed as
Appendix 7
![Page 76: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
57 | P a g e
Table 5.2 Congested Roads in Chhindwara
1 Ward No 30 Manhole No 3483-3484 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- Raaz Takis
2 Ward No 30 Manhole No 356-357 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- New Abadi
3 Ward No 11 Manhole No 965-966 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- Indra Nagar
4 Ward No 5 Manhole No 697-696 Road Width 2 m Location:- Shinva Nagar
5 Ward No 14 Manhole No 898-899 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- Indra Nagar
6 Ward No 31 Manhole No 2656-2657 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- Bada Emamba
7 Ward No 13 Manhole No 1092-1065 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- Sanchar Nagar
8 Ward No 17 Manhole No 594-595 Road Width 5 m Location:- Ganj
9 Ward No 13 Manhole No 1066-1065 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- Sanchar Nagar
10 Ward No 30 Manhole No 2787-2788 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- Ali Nagar
11 Ward No 08 Manhole No 3096-3097 Road Width 2.2 m Location:- Carparthiv
12 Ward No 31 Manhole No 3434-3435 Road Width 1 m Location:- Golganj
13 Ward No 25 Manhole No 3216-3217 Road Width 1 m Location:- Barari Pura
14 Ward No 29 Manhole No 3751-3767 Road Width 1 m Location:- Kumari Mohalla
15 Ward No 23 Manhole No 1765-1766 Road Width 1 m Location:- Dhimri
16 Ward No 20 Manhole No 1830-1831 Road Width 1.5 m Location:- Patahleshwar
17 Ward No 14 Manhole No 1217-1216 Road Width 1.5 m Location:- Lalbag
18 Ward No 10 Manhole No 1065-1066 Road Width 2 m Location:- Jagannath Pura
19 Ward No 33 - - Location:- Subhash Colony
20 Ward No 32 - Road Width 1.5 m Location:- Patel Nagar
21 Ward No 25 Manhole No 3216-3217 Road Width 1.5 m Location:- Bharthi Pura
22 Ward No 06 Manhole No 552-553 Road Width 3 m Location:- Shivnagar
23 Ward No 39 Manhole No 387-388 Road Width 1.5 m Location:- Badwan
24 Ward No 04 Manhole No 444-342 Road Width 1.5 m Location:- Adiwasi
25 Ward No 46 Manhole No 1342-952 Road Width 2.2 m Location:- Mandata
26 Ward No 29 Manhole No 3724-3209 Road Width 1.5 m Location:- Purna Chapparkhana
27 Ward No 33 Manhole No 4002-4015 Road Width 1 m Location:- Subhash Colony
28 Ward No 06 Manhole No 2213-2214 Road Width 1 m Location:- Sagar pesha
29 Ward No 26 Manhole No 3126-3127 Road Width 1 m Location:- Pathaleshwar
30 Ward No 06 Manhole No 2210-2211 Road Width 1 m Location:- Sagar Pesha
5.3.3. Impact on Existing Utility Services
The road excavation activities may damage the underground water pipelines or electricity
poles/cables in the vicinity of the site. This will lead to water supply interruptions, disruption in
![Page 77: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
58 | P a g e
electricity supply and will involve expensive repair costs. Flooding of areas could also occur.
Officials of ULB stated that they may receive some complaints about water line breakage during
the construction phase. With no other alternative source readily available, people may have to
buy water from private tanks till the service is restored to normal. In such case a provision has
been made in ESMP that water will be supplied through tankers by Chhindwara Municipal
Corporation in the disrupted areas and it becomes the responsibility of contractor to restore the
utilities as soon as possible. Core area of Chhindwara town has congested lane, as laying of
sewerage pipes need depth and width, the damage of the public amenities /personally build
temporary religious structure likely to be get effected.
5.3.4. Potential impacts Due to Sludge disposal during operation phase
Sludge handling and disposal may lead to contamination of soil & Water, Occupational
Health and safety on workers and leakage of sludge etc. At the STP sewage sludge will need
to be removed from the active treatment plant periodically. Sludge will be compressed
through centrifuge. Most of the moisture from the sludge is taken out during this process.
Centrifuged sludge will also be allowed to dry out naturally. Design includes arrangements
for recirculation the leachate to the STP process. This ensures about 95% removal of E –
Coli and other harmful bacteria from the effluent. Sludge shall be tested for heavy metals
and other chemicals. It shall be dried on site (area to be specified for this on site). Site shall
be raised, with cutoff drains (drain leachate to be taken back to STP for treatment) & shall
be covered on top (for weather protection). After drying, this shall be sent in covered vehicle
to trenching yard Khasra No. 14/5, detailed sludge disposal plan is enclosed (Appendix 21).
This is the temporary arrangement for disposal of sludge in future it will be developed as
sanitary landfill.
5.3.5 Impact of COVID-19 with mitigation measures
Following mitigation measures will be ensured at the project site to ensure that site is safe during
COVID time:
1. Contractors should ensure that contracted workers have medical insurance, covering
treatment of COVID-19.
2. Expats or transient workers should adhere to national requirements and guidelines with
respect to COVID-19.
3. Expats or transient workers coming from countries/regions with cases of the virus:
➢ Should not return if displaying symptoms
➢ Should self-isolate for 14 days following their return
4. For self-isolation, workers should be provided with a single room that is well-ventilated
(i.e., with open windows and an open door). If a single room is not available for each
worker, adequate space should be provided to maintain a distance of at least 1 m between
workers sharing a room. Workers in isolation should limit their movements in shared
space, for example through timed use of shared spaces (such as kitchens and bathrooms)
with cleaning prior to and after use of the facilities. Visitors should not be allowed until
![Page 78: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
59 | P a g e
the worker has shown no signs and symptoms for 14 days, and the number of staff
involved in caring for those in isolation should eb kept to a minimum.
5. Healthcare professionals and cleaners should visit each day (wearing the appropriate PPE
and observing hygiene requirements and make appropriate arrangements for supplying
food and water to the kitchens for the workers in isolation.
6. Ensure medical facilities are stocked with adequate supplies of medical PPE, as a
minimum:
➢ Gowns, aprons
➢ Medical masks and some respirators (N95 or FFP2)
➢ Gloves (medical, and heavy duty for cleaners)
➢ Eye protection (goggles or face screens)
7. Medical staff at the facilities should be trained and be kept up to date on WHO advice
and recommendations on the specifics of COVID19
8. Display appropriate warning signs (in Hindi and English) across the site; use simple
graphics to convey the message.
9. Have emergency contact numbers displayed across the site.
10. Ensure that all sites are enclosed with fences / compound walls leaving no leeway for
unauthorized entry; if possible, with security personnel
11. The medical staff/management should run awareness campaigns and posters on site
advising workers:
✓ how to avoid disease spread (cough/sneeze in crook of elbow; keep 1m or more away,
sneeze/cough in tissue and immediately through tissue away, avoid spitting, observe
good hygiene)
✓ the need to regularly wash hands with soap and water – many times per day
✓ to self-isolate if they think they may have come in contact with the virus
✓ to self-isolate if they start to display any symptoms, but alert and seek medical advice
12. Wash stations should be provided regularly throughout site, with a supply of clean water,
liquid soap and paper towels (for hand drying), with a waste bin (for used paper towels)
that is regularly emptied.
13. Wash stations should be provided wherever there is a toilet, canteen/food and drinking
water, or sleeping accommodation, at waste stations, at stores and at communal facilities.
Where wash stations cannot be provided (for example at remote locations), alcohol-based
hand rub should be provided.
14. Enhanced cleaning arrangements should be put in place, to include regular and deep
cleaning using disinfectant of catering facilities/canteens/food/drink facilities,
latrines/toilets/showers, communal areas, including door handles, floors and all surfaces
that are touched regularly (ensure cleaning staff have adequate PPE when cleaning
consultation rooms and facilities used to treat infected patients)
15. Other measures (such as working water sprinkling systems at crushers and stock piles,
covered wagons, water suppression or surfacing of haul roads etc.) should be used for
![Page 79: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
60 | P a g e
dust suppression on site before relying upon the use of dust masks (which could
unnecessarily reduce the availability of N95/FFP2 masks for use by medical staff
performing some duties)
16. Ensure that the designs for medical facilities also consider the collection, segregation and
treatment of medical waste.
17. Projects should develop and commit to specific actions to ensure disadvantaged and
vulnerable groups have effective treatment, whether in medical facilities or in the
community.
18. Extra security during the shutdown period in order to keep site secure (onsite security
staff to be deployed if possible / CCTV /or additional locks and alarms).
19. Conduct a walkthrough of the site including site perimeter assessment to look for access
points and make them secure,
20. Close all labor camps, ensure food and sanitation and wash facility for any worker on site
– ensure that Covid 19 guidelines shared by the bank are followed
21. Disinfect regular work site gates, labour camp entry, point contractor office etc.
22. Inform local police and fire force regarding temporary closure of sites and request their
prompt/immediate support in case they receive any calls for support.
23. Submit a report of actions taken for site closure along with photographs (with date and
time) clearly indicated to PIU and MPUDC.
MPUDC requires outbreaks of Covid 19 virus to be reported. As such, it is important that PIU,
PMC, MPUDC and World Bank are informed of an outbreak on a site, and their advice taken on
coordinating any responses with project management protocols. The PIU may keep teams
informed of any concerns or problems associated with providing care to infected workers (if any)
on sub project sites. Detailed SOPis attached at Appendix 22.
COVID 19 -STRATEGIC PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE PLAN
![Page 80: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
61 | P a g e
MPUDC has also issued detailed Standard Operating Process (SOPs) to respond COVID-19 for all
subprojects running under MPUDC, please refer appendix no. 22
5.3.6. Labour Influx and child Labor
The construction of civil works include specialized jobs such as construction of STP for which
the required labour force, associated goods and services cannot be fully supplied locally for a
number of reasons such as worker unavailability and lack of technical skills and capacity. In such
cases, the labour force (total or partial) would need to be brought in from outside the project
area. This rapid migration of labour to the project area may affect the project area negatively in
the terms of additional burden on public infrastructure such as local social and health services,
utilities such as water and electricity, housing and social dynamics and thus impact on local
communities. Other related issues could be increased risk of spread of communicable diseases
and increased rates of illicit behaviour and crime. Some of the adverse environmental impacts
are illegal waste disposal sites, inappropriate Waste water discharges, and camp related noise,
access roads and land use issues. Such adverse impacts may get amplified by local-level low
capacity to manage and absorb the incoming labor force, and specifically when civil works are
carried out in, or near, vulnerable communities and in other high-risk situations. Labour license
has been obtained by the contractor which is enclosed at Appendix 12. Labour health checkup
camp is also being organized by contractor time to time (Appendix 16).
There are multiple and comprehensive Acts and Rules at both state and national level that set out
the provisions for appropriate working conditions and for good labor management. However,
multiplicity of laws and rules sometimes cause confusion in its applicability in a specific context.
Further in case of contracted workers and Primary labour suppliers the enforcement weakens.
Hence, the contractor has developed labour management procedures and mitigation measures in
the C-ESMP.
This Labour Management Plan (Appendix 24) addresses specific activities that will be
undertaken to minimize the impact on the local community, including elements such as
• Communication and awareness plan on national labour and women harassment laws and its
penal implications, leave provisions and other allowances for workers benefit,
• Worker codes of conduct with respect to manual scavenging, engagement with local
residents, child labour, non-discrimination, harassment of co-workers including women
and those belonging to SC and STs and other minority social groups.
• Training programs on COVID-19, HIV/AIDS and other communicable diseases, etc.
• Workers’ Camp Management Plan addressing specific aspects of the establishment and
operation of workers’ camps provided the ULB is unable to cater to the demand for
affordable housing for this additional workforce in terms of rentals, hostels, apartments etc.
• Looking at the availability of labour and other feasibility aspects, no. of labour is restricted to
maximum 70 labors per day and scheduled activities are being performed in both zones.
• Grievance/Complaint handling Mechanism for Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme.
The responsibility for managing these adverse impacts is being clearly reflected as a
contractual obligation of the civil works contractor and supervision consultant, with
appropriate mechanisms for addressing non-compliance.
![Page 81: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
62 | P a g e
6. Stakeholder and Public Consultation 6.1 Background
Public consultation is useful for gathering environmental data, understanding likely
impacts, determining community and individual preferences, selecting project alternatives
and designing viable and sustainable mitigation and compensation plans. Extensive public
consultation meetings for the Chhindwara Sewerage Project took place while undertaking
ESA study. The main objective for the consultation process was to involve the community
at the very early stages so as to identify likely negative impacts and find ways to minimize
negative impacts and enhance positive impacts of the project.
6.2 Objectives of the Public Consultations
The overall goal of the consultation process was to disseminate project information and to
incorporate the views of the project beneficiaries and Project Affected Persons (PAPs) in
the design of the mitigation measures and a management plan. The specific aims of the
consultation process are to:
The main objectives of community consultations were to:
a) To provide clear and accurate information about the project to the beneficiary
community;
b) Obtain the main concerns and perceptions of the population and their representatives
regarding the project;
c) Obtain opinions and suggestions from the likely affected communities on their preferred
mitigation measures; and
d) Identify local leaders with whom further dialogue can be continued in subsequent stages
of the project.
e) Improve project design and, thereby, minimize conflicts and delays in implementation;
f) Facilitate the development of appropriate and acceptable entitlement options;
g) Increase long term project sustainability and ownership
Public sensitization and meetings were held within project area from 28th April 2016 to
30th April 2016 (included in ESA report) and 23rd July 2018 to 24th July 2018 with the
help of respective local administration and the elected representatives. A total of 13
meetings during ESA preparation phase and 12 consultation meetings were held during
execution as shown in Table 6.1A and 6.1B. Key findings of these meetings are presented
in Table 6.2. The attendance lists is presented in Appendix 4. The public consultations
photographs during execution of the project are enclosed as Appendix 6. Representation
of all categories, genders and different income level groups in these meetings was ensured,
the share of female participation in these meetings was 39.16%.
During the series of public consultation, public including local shop keepers showed their
willingness to support/ readiness for the subproject. They discussed existing scenario with
respect to sanitation and sewerage services, absence of sewer networks and its impact on
the life and health of locals etc. Existing Household toilets are mainly based on septic
tanks and the sewer is flowing into the open drains of city. The scheme was and the
Possible interruption in commercial activity, improvement in environment, health and
hygiene etc. were discussed in detail. Mitigation against the dust and traffic management
![Page 82: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
63 | P a g e
during excavation were informed to the local shop keepers. However, the local citizen was
of the view that prior information (2 to 3 days before start of the civil works) may be
given to the people of respective wards.
Project designing and location has also been suitably modified after the public
consultation like STP site has been shifted to Sarra from Koladhana due to the public
feedback during consultation regarding the Koladhana as submergence area.
Table 6.1A: Public Consultation Meetings during ESA Preparation
S. No. Date Venue Number of Participants
Total M F
1. 28-4-2016 Ward No. 01 24 15 09
2. 28-4-2016 Ward No. 03 18 10 08
3. 28-4-2016 Ward No. 04 20 12 08
4. 29-4-2016 Ward No. 08 22 14 08
5. 29-4-2016 Ward No. 12 25 15 10
6. 29-4-2016 Ward No. 17 28 20 08
7. 28-4-2016 Ward No. 24 23 12 11
8. 28-4-2016 Ward No. 34 29 15 14
9. 30-4-2016 Ward No. 38 26 16 10
10. 30-4-2016 Ward No. 41 21 11 10
11. 30-4-2016 Ward No. 45 27 20 07
12 23-07-2018 Ward No. 06 23 18 05
13 24-7-2018 Ward no. 31` 11 09 02
Total 297 187 110
Table 6-1B: Public Consultation Meetings by Contractor
S. No. Date Venue Number of Participants Total M F
1. 10-4-2018 Ward No. 02 24 11 13
2. 10-4-2018 Ward No. 03 17 10 7
3. 10-4-2018 Ward No. 05 15 11 4
4. 10-4-2018 Ward No. 06 22 13 9
5. 10-4-2018 Ward No. 08 17 7 10
6. 11-4-2018 Ward No. 16 20 13 7
7. 11-4-2018 Ward No. 18 17 15 2
8. 11-4-2018 Ward No. 14 16 13 3
9. 12-4-2018 Ward No. 48 17 7 10
10. 12-4-2018 Ward No. 7 16 0 16
11. 12-4-2018 Ward No. 17 17 4 13
12. 12-4-2018 Ward No. 24 14 8 6
Total 212 112 100
![Page 83: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
64 | P a g e
Table 6.2: Public Consultation Details during Execution
S.
No
Ward
no.
Location Date Participants Issues Raised/Discussed Suggestion from
Participants
Mitigation Measures
1 02 at Krishna
nagar
10-04-2018 Local
Residents,
of ward-02
Total -24, M=11,
F=13
Participants
The Sewerage Project Background,
Environmental, Social, traffic safety
issue and benefit from the project
were explained to the Stakeholders.
Ward is not having sewer network.
Existing Household toilets mainly
based on Septic tanks.
The adverse effect of flowing sewer
into the open Nallahs of city.
The Consultants Team raise the issue
for the connection existing toilets
with the sewer line will be laid.
Operation and Maintenance of
Sewerage system for 30yrs
The people welcomed the
project, some showed dis
consent who have their
household toilets based on
septic tanks. The main
suggestion of participants
was:
• The community gave
suggestion regarding
connection with chamber.
They will take sewerage
connection only when they
get sufficient water
throughout the year.
• Community showed
concern on the
sewerage connection
charges.
Suggestion are noted down.
the decision on connection
charges will be taken by local
body representatives /state.
2 Ward
No. 03
Veer
Sawarkar
10.4.18 Local Residents,
And public
representative
of ward03
Total 17,
M=10, F=7
Participants
The Sewerage Project Background,
Environmental, Social, traffic safety
issue and benefit from the project
were explained to the Stakeholders.
Whole ward is not having sewer
network. Existing Household toilets
mainly based on Septic tanks and
adverse effect of flowing sewer into
the open drains of city.
The Consultants Team raise the issue
for the connection existing toilets
with the sewer line will be laid.
For Safety of Local Traffic as well as
to reduce the traffic congestion during
implementation.
Project was welcomed by
the people as this ward is
facing open defecation
problem too.
People were concerned of
connection charges and
monthly tariff for
maintenance of sewer line.
People also demanded for
proper traffic signage for
speed limits for minimizing
the accident
The suggestion was noted
down
Traffic signage is already
included in the scope of work of
the contractor
![Page 84: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
65 | P a g e
S.
No
Ward
no.
Location Date Participants Issues Raised/Discussed Suggestion from
Participants
Mitigation Measures
3 Ward
no. 05
at Shiv
Nagar
Colony
Gali No.
1
10.04. 2018 Local
Residents,
Total -15,
M-11,F=04
participant
The Project Background,
Environmental, Social, traffic safety
issue and benefit from the project
were explained to the Stakeholders.
The Consultants Team raise the issue
for the connection existing toilets
with the sewer line will be laid.
Besides above issues the following
issues discussed with the community
Road Side Water logging due to
implementation. Effect of Noise and
Dust Pollution during construction
and after construction.
Safety of Local traffic and pedestrian
in Built-up Zone
Provision of Drain in Built- up
Section to eliminate the issue of
mixing of storm water into sewer
line create flooding or chook down
condition
• For Safety of Local traffic and
pedestrian in Built-up Zone, footpath
should be provided.
• Adequate provision for minimizing
the Dust and Noise Pollution during
construction
The suggestion was
agreed
4 Ward
no. 06
Shiv Mandir
Shiv Nagar
Colony
10.04. 2018 Local Residents,
And public
representative
of ward013
Total 22,
M=13,F=9
Participants
The Project Background,
Environmental, Social, traffic safety
issue and benefit from the project
were explained to the Stakeholders.
• For Safety of Local Traffic as well
as to reduce the traffic
congestion which interns reduce the
noise and air pollution
• Briefed about the connection to
sewerage network
• People demanded for proper traffic
signage for speed
limits for minimizing the
accident people
• They were concerned on the issue
of open defecation, health problem is
common, but more concerned of
extra charges levied on community
• Some people agreed for paying the
tariff while some did not.
The suggestion was
noted down.
Provision for safety
measures are already
in the contract.
![Page 85: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
66 | P a g e
S.
No
Ward
no.
Location Date Participants Issues Raised/Discussed Suggestion from
Participants
Mitigation Measures
5 Ward
No. 8
Khajuri 10-4-18 Local Residents,
Total-17 M=07,
F=10
Participants
The Project Background,
Environmental, Social, traffic
safety issue and benefit from the
project were explained to the
Stakeholders.
Besides above issues the
following issues discussed with
the community No land
acquisition for project and avoid
damaged to public utilities and
structures coming under the alignment.
• damage restoration remains the
part of contractor
Safety of Local traffic and
pedestrian in Built-up Zone
The main suggestion of
participants was:
Provision of Drain in Built- up
Section to eliminate the issue of
road side water- logging
Community showed
concern, after damage of public
utilities or structure nobody
comes to restore nor even pay
any compensation to major
damages.
The suggestion was agreed and
Incorporated
6 Ward
No.
16
11.04. 2018 Local Residents,
And public
representative
of ward16
Total -20,
M=13,F=07
Participants
The Project Background,
Environmental, Social, traffic
safety issue and benefit from the
project were explained to the
Stakeholders.
Whole ward is not having sewer
network. Existing Household
toilets mainly based on Septic
tanks and adverse effect of
flowing sewer into the open
drains of city.
The Consultants Team raise the
issue for the connection existing
toilets with the sewer line will be
laid.
• For Safety of Local Traffic as
well as to reduce the traffic
congestion during
implementation.
The people welcomed the
project, some showed dis
consent who have their
household toilets based on
septic tanks. The main
suggestion of participants was:
• The community gave
suggestion regarding
connection with chamber. They
will take connection only when
they get sufficient water
throughout the year.
• Community showed concern
on the tariff and connection
charges. The suggestion from
people came that, not to impose
charges immediately after
connection, let the system gets
start properly than people get
convinced and
get ready to pay.
The suggestion was noted
down
and the design to HH
connection is modified
accordingly.
![Page 86: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
67 | P a g e
S.
No
Ward
no.
Location Date Participants Issues Raised/Discussed Suggestion from
Participants
Mitigation Measures
7 Ward
No. 18
11.04. 2018 Local Residents,
shopkeepers
And public
representative
of ward 24
Total 17,
M=15,F=2
Participants
The Project Background,
Environmental, Social, traffic safety
issue and benefit from the project
were explained to the Stakeholders.
Besides above issues the following
issues discussed with the community
No land acquisition for project and
avoid damaged to public utilities and
structures coming under the
alignment.
damage restoration remains the part
of contractor. The Consultants Team
raise the issue for the connections
with sewer network and for proper
operation and maintenance of system
for 30yrs
The main suggestion of
participants was:
Community shown concern, after damage of public utilities or structure nobody comes to neither restore nor even pay any compensation to major damages.
The suggestion was agreed and
Incorporated
.
Design is done in such a
manner so as to avoid damages
to existing structures. Details
of utilities are also obtained
from the concerned
departments as far as possible.
8 ward
no.14
11.04.18 Local
Residents,
Shopkeepers and
Total -16,
M=13,F=03
Participants
The Project Background,
Environmental, Social, traffic safety
issue and benefit from the project
were explained to the Stakeholders.
Whole ward is not having sewer
network. Existing Household toilets
mainly based on Septic tanks and
adverse effect of flowing sewer into
the open drains of city.
The Consultants Team raise the issue
for the connection existing toilets
with the sewer line will be laid.
• The community gave
suggestion regarding
connection with chamber.
They will take connection
only when they get
sufficient water throughout
the year.
Community showed
concern on the tariff and
connection charges. The
suggestion from people
came that, not to impose
charges immediately
after connection, let the
The suggestion was agreed and
Incorporated
.
Design is done in such a
manner so as to avoid damages
to existing structures. Details
of utilities are also obtained
from the concerned
departments as far as possible.
![Page 87: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
68 | P a g e
system gets start properly
than people get convinced
and get ready to pay.
9. Ward
No. 48
Near Ward
Office
12.04. 2018 Local Residents,
Ward Officer
Total-17,
M=07,F=10
Participant
s
The Project Background,
Environmental, Social, traffic safety
issue and benefit from the project
were explained to the Stakeholders.
• For Safety of Local Traffic as well
as to reduce the traffic
congestion which interns reduce the
noise and air pollution
The Consultants Team raise the issue
of septic tank disadvantages and told
about for proper operation and
maintenance of sewer system for
30yrs
• People demanded for
proper traffic signage for
speed limits for minimizing
the accident
• The people showed
concern on the pollution
issue but raise connection
charges and tariff for taking
connection to the sewer
network. Some people
asked
about the tariff /charges of
connection
The suggestion was noted
down. The traffic signage and
safety measures are already a
part of the contract. The same
will be adhered to.
10 Ward
No. 7
12.04.2018 Local Residents,
Total-16,
M=16
Participants
The Project Background,
Environmental, Social, traffic safety
issue and benefit from the project
were explained to the Stakeholders.
Besides above issues the following
issues discussed with the community
No land acquisition for project and
avoid damaged to public utilities and
structures coming under the
alignment.
damage restoration remains the
part of contractor The Consultants
Team raise the issue for the
connections with sewer network
and for proper operation and
maintenance of system for 30yrs
The main suggestion of
participants was:
Provision of Drain in Built-
up Section to eliminate the
issue of road side storm
water-mixing in sewer line
create flooding or chook
down
Community showed
concern that after damage
of public utilities or
structure nobody comes to
restore nor even pay any
compensation to major
damages.
• People asked for
Connection charges to
sewer network
In EMP the compensation for
temporary damage to public
utilities is on the part of
contractor for restoration
Regarding tariff people were
informed about the orders of
DUAD which state that the
Sewage charges will be 60%
of the Water tariff.
![Page 88: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
69 | P a g e
S.
No
Ward
no.
Location Date Participants Issues Raised/Discussed Suggestion from
Participants
Mitigation Measures
11 Ward
No. 17
12.04.2018 Local Residents,
Total-17,
M=04, F=13
Participants
The Sewerage Project Background,
Environmental, Social, traffic safety
issue and benefit from the project
were explained to the Stakeholders.
Whole ward is not having sewer
network. Existing Household toilets
mainly based on Septic tanks and
adverse effect of flowing sewer into
the open drains of city.
The Consultants Team raise the issue
for the connection existing toilets
with the sewer line will be laid.
For Safety of Local Traffic as well as
to reduce the traffic congestion during
implementation.
Project welcomed by the
people as this ward
facing open defecation
problem too. Linkage of
septic tanks with sewer line
is big concern of the
people.
• Peoples also demanded
for proper traffic signage
for speed limits for
minimizing the accident
Already addressed above
12 Ward
No. 24
12.04.2018 Local Residents,
Total-14,
M=08,F=06
Participants
The Sewerage Project Background,
Environmental, Social, traffic safety
issue and benefit from the project
were explained to the Stakeholders.
Whole ward is not having sewer
network. Existing Household toilets
mainly based on Septic tanks and
adverse effect of flowing sewer into
the open drains of city.
The Consultants Team raise the issue
for the connection existing toilets
with the sewer line will be laid.
For Safety of Local Traffic as well as
to reduce the traffic congestion during
implementation.
The main suggestion of
participants was:
Project welcomed by the
people as this ward is
facing open defecation
problem too. Linkage of
septic tanks with sewer line
is big concern of the
people.
Shown concerned of
connection charges and
monthly tariff for
maintenance
• Peoples also demanded
for proper traffic signage
for speed limits for
minimizing the accident
Already addressed above
![Page 89: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
70 | P a g e
6.3 Key Recommendations
Key Recommendations of Stakeholders Consultations are summarized below:
Community showed concern that in the absence of sewerage system in the town, stagnant pools
of sewage can be seen in the entire town which is not only visibly disturbing but also lead to
pollution and mosquito menace, causing many health problems, and hence welcomed the efforts
of ULB.
Physical relocation and resettlement should be minimized. Efforts should be made to prevent
loss of access to livelihood activities. Safety is an important issue especially for children,
women and cattle and therefore utmost safety measures must be provided during civil
construction works. Accidents need to be controlled through various safety measures. The
participants emphasized the provision of diversions and aligning the way in the interest of
community safety and environmental protection, repeatedly.
Special care should be taken if any structure came in the alignment in case of removing or
shifting the sacred trees, temples, mosques and other places of cultural and historical
significance (by following the rituals and customs of community concerned). Septic tanks
coming under road ROW or in encroached part, tanks, and other traditional sources of surface
water may get affected during excavation it has to be restored timely.
Further, it was revealed that the scheme is good from sanitation point of view and they would
like to make use of this scheme for cleanliness of their houses/streets. Most of the households
were found ready for getting sewer connections as presently they are facing lot of problems
due to water logging in the entire locality.
Local people are very much interested in implementation of this scheme in this locality /area
but their major concern was about the pakka road which has already been constructed recently,
will be again destroyed by digging trenches for laying the pipe line. It will create lot of
problems to them in their accessibility.
Outcome of Women’s Participation in Focus Group Discussions
In total 10 focus group discussions were conducted especially with women in the fringe areas
and in slum areas of Chhindwara town. Focus groups were carried out as group meetings with
women residents during which the participants were given the possibility to discuss and
contribute to specific information. Some of their specific concerns are summarized below:
Women discussed many health issues & unhygienic environment for them and their family
members. Women told that they gave consent of construction of individual toilet through
Swachchh Bharat mission. They were also ready to connect it to sewer line.
Some other concerns/issues were raised by the women group such as Women from poor
families indicated that they should be given work opportunities during construction as casual
labor or at project offices, which would help them earn during implementation period.
![Page 90: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
71 | P a g e
Some women suggested that they will operate individual / family enterprise by opening small
tea stalls, shops/eateries to provide meals to the construction officials /temporary labourers
coming from outside. This will enhance their family income as well as their entrepreneurial
skill, which may be useful in future.
6.4 Summary of Incorporation of Public Concerns in the Designs
• Site for STP is changed from Koladhana to Village Sarra.
• One SPS at Bail Bazar is reduced.
• The network design is done in such a manner that maximum depth of excavation in the
town is restricted to 4.8m. This will make the working more feasible (as the working space
required will be less) in narrow streets.
• Excavation needed in more than 70% of the network is only up to 3m.
• Details from various stakeholders (having underground utilities) is being continuously
obtained (an ongoing process with laying of network) so that damage to underground
utilities specially water supply network, is restricted to minimum extent.
• The work of laying network will be done in small stretches of 100 to 250 m and planks at
every 50 m will be kept over the excavated portions so that maximum access is provided to
the houses and shops etc. without affecting their daily routine or income.
![Page 91: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
72 | P a g e
7. Environmental and Social Management Plan Environmental and Social Management Plan to be implemented to mitigate and reduce the
project impact on various environmental and social components during construction as well as
Operation and Maintenance phase are presented below in table 7.1. and Costing of ESMP
Chhindwara are also given in table 7.2
![Page 92: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
73 | P a g e
Table 7.1 Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP)
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
A. Design and Development Phase
Sewerage Accidental
leakages/
bursts
• Due to accidental
burst or leakage
of sewers,
flooding of the
nearby areas
could take place
• Backlogging due
to unexpected
heavy flowrates
Temporary • Designing sewers with adequate capacity and flow
velocity
• Regular inspection and maintenance of the sewers
PMU and
Contractor
Sewage
Pumping
Station
Pumping of
sewage
from
District
SPS1
to STP
• Noise and odour
nuisance to
surrounding
areas.
Permanent • Selection of appropriate location away from
sensitive locations such as schools and hospitals.
However, if appropriate location is not available
then extra precautions can be taken.
Zone-1
Pipe
Dia
MH
to
MH Sensitive receptor
600
1793 1794
Annapurna Mata
Mandir
500 860 861 Kalyani Mata Mandir
400
331 329
Kudthi Visa Oswal
Shwethambar Jain
Mandir
400
326 327
Janpaddurga mandir
PMU and
Contractor
![Page 93: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
74 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
400 823 1063 Bharat Bharati school 400
292 291
Dr.Bhavanhodani PVT
hospital 400 287 292 Jagnnath High school 400
126 127
Pathaleshwar Shiv
Mandir 400 3129 3130 KalBhairav Mandir 400
3132 2337
mahakal mandir
mokshdham
Zone -II
Pipe
Dia
MH
to
MH Sensitive Receptor
400 3217 3218 Hanuman Mandir
800 7412 7414 Shiv Mandir
400 5282 5280
Sunrays public higher
secondary school
• The pumping station is provided with a noise
barrier and adequate green belt around the
pumping station
• Use of less noise generating equipment with
regular maintenance.
• Tree plantation around SPS
• Solid waste should not be kept for more than 24
hours and herbicide should be sprayed.
Sewage
Treatment
Plants
• Treated
water
disposal into
nearby
• Pollution of
receiving water
body (Bodri
Nallah) or land
Temporary • The treated wastewater discharge from the sewage
treatment plant will comply with the standards set
by MPUDC (Appendix 20)
• Selection of best available sewage treatment
Contractor /
PMU
![Page 94: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
75 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
stream
due to
inefficient
treatment or
non-operation of
STP
technology with High BOD removal efficiency.
• Ensuring development and compliance to standard
operation and maintenance practices.
• Provision of effective screening at inlet of STP for
removal of grit, fine particles, plastics and other
suspended solids
• Provision of effective separation and controlled
disposal of digested sludge
STP
Breakdown • Discharge of
untreated sewage
leading river
pollution.
Temporary • Provision of adequate holding capacity adequate
for storage of sewage to prevent flow of untreated
sewage to river.
DBO
Contractor /
PMU
Sludge
disposal • Disposal of
sludge leading to
contamination of
land and water.
Permanent • The settled sludge coming out from the sewage
treatment plant, Septic tanks etc. will be carried
out in to the sludge drying beds proposed in the
vicinity of the STP site. The Sludge shall be dried
and transported to the proposed sludge disposal
site Khasra no. 14/5 (Appendix 11)
B. Construction phase
Sewerage
(laying
of
sewers)
Excavation,
cutting, back
filling and
compaction
operations
• Damage to
underground
utilities like
water, gas line,
electricity and
telephone
conduits, etc.
due to
construction
activities.
Temporary • all the available drawings, notes, and information
on the existing underground lines and structures in
determining the location of the existing facilities
are reviewed.
• Concerned authorities are informed and their
assistance sought to remove, relocate and restore
services of these utilities prior to commencement
of construction.
• All underground utilities encountered in
excavating trenches carefully supported,
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
![Page 95: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
76 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
maintained and protected from injury or
interruption of service until backfill is complete
and settlement has taken place.
• Minimize time for replacement operations; and
appropriate scheduling as necessary especially for
water supply line.
• Damage to road
side private and
community
structure
Temporary • Joint survey of PIU and contractor has been done to
assess the incumbrances and damage to road side
private and community structures, when the alignment
of pipes finalized by the D(R)BO contractor with PIU.
• Provision as per contract for affected/damaged
structure and restoration along with construction in
contract agreement.
• However, this is clarified here that there is no
demolition of any temporary or permanent
structure involved/observed during network laying.
There is no loss of livelihood (permanent or
temporary ) is observed.
• Contractor
• PIU
Disposal of
Asbestos pipe • Impact on Soil
and Environment
Temporary • Old AC pipes are managed in a in a manner that
will minimize the risk of making it friable or
releasing asbestos dust into the environment. It is
hence important follow the following steps in
managing the existing pipe and/ or, while laying
and repairing, removing or replacing asbestos
cement pipe, start by exposing the asbestos cement
pipe with minimal disturbance.
i. Not Damaged Asbestos Cement Pipe (intact and
not deteriorated):
• Contractor
• PIU
![Page 96: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
77 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
1. Place 0.006-inch-thick polyethylene (“poly”)
sheeting under the asbestos cement pipe to
prevent soil contamination.
2. Adequately wet the asbestos cement pipe with
amended water using surfactant or liquid soap
before and during removal to avoid creating
airborne dust.
3. Separate the asbestos cement pipe at the nearest
coupling (bell or compression fitting).
4. Slide the pipe apart at the joints (no saw
cutting) or use other methods that do not cause
the pipe to break, become friable or otherwise
create the potential to release asbestos fibers.
5. Wrap the wet asbestos cement pipe in two
layers of 0.006 polyethylene sheeting, seal
with duct tape and label as per the good
international practices. This can be done in the
trench or adjacent to the trench.
6. If the trench is filled with water and pipe is
damaged, follow the procedure explained
below.
ii. Damaged Asbestos Cement Pipe (deteriorated or
not intact) or when cutting or mechanical breakage
(e.g., with saws, snap or blade cutting, and/or
tapping) is necessary:
1. Place 0.006-inch-thick polyethylene (“poly”)
sheeting under the asbestos cement pipe to
prevent soil contamination.
2. Adequately wet asbestos cement pipe with
![Page 97: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
78 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
amended water where cutting or breaking will
occur.
3. Saw cutting of asbestos cement pipe shall only
be conducted with a HEPA-shrouded vacuum
attachment or wet cutting equipment, unless it is
conducted within a small enclosure that isolates
the area in which the saw cutting is being
conducted to prevent the release of asbestos
fibers to ambient air, .
4. Wrap wet asbestos cement pipe in two layers of
0.006polyethylene sheeting, seal with duct tape
and label. This can be done either in the trench
or adjacent to the trench.
Packaging, Labelling, Disposal and Record Retention
iii. Place properly wrapped and labeled AC pipe as
well as all other containerized AC waste and debris
in a roll-off container(s), or covered trucks, trailers
or vans that are lined with 2 layers of 0.006
polyethylene sheeting.
1. The container shall be an enclosed and sealed
leak-tight container having proper labels
placards as required.
2. If open-top roll-off containers are used, they
must be properly sealed, labeled and secured
inside a locked fenced area when they are not
being loaded to prevent access by unauthorized
personnel, and covered to prevent water
![Page 98: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
79 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
accumulation.
ii. Package, transport and dispose of AC waste in
accordance with local, state, and national
regulations.
iii. Complete waste shipment records must be
retained for 2 years by the contractor of the
facility that generated the AC waste
• Dispose of AC waste at a landfill permitted to
accept AC waste which is at Pithampur near
Indore.
Network
laying • Loss of access to
the residents and
shop keepers.
Temporary • The contractor shall excavate only 250 m in a
stretch and complete the works of laying of
pipeline and backfilling with restoration of surface.
The contractor shall proceed further only after
completion of the said works.
• Construction works at business and market area
must be completed earlier to minimize business
loss. Timings and special adjustments (considering
market timings, festivals, any other local aspect)
shall be discussed and agreed with stakeholders.
• Provisions of walkways and planks at every 60 m
interval over trenches to ensure access will note
Impeded
• Construction works at business and market area
must be completed earlier to minimize business
loss. Timings and special adjustments (considering
• Contractor
• PIU
![Page 99: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
80 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
market timings, festivals, any other local aspect)
shall be discussed and agreed with stakeholders.
Alternate traffic routing to be adopted in
consultation with traffic police authorities.
• Traffic control & flag man will be ensured at
School, hospital areas during sewer network laying
• The joint survey has been conducted by the PIU,
PMC & contractor, as per the survey, No potential
damage has been observed to any structure.
• However, this is clarified here that there is no
demolition of any temporary or permanent
structure involved/observed during network laying.
There is no loss of livelihood (permanent or
temporary ) is observed.
• Accidents/
damages
due to erosion/
sliding of vertical
sides of
excavated
trenches
while
places the pipes
Temporary Maintaining the excavation by Shoring trench
sides by placing sheeting, timber shores,
trench jacks, bracing, sheet piling materials to
resist pressures surrounding the excavation
• Exposed surface are resurfaced and stabilized by
making the sloping sides of trench to the angle of
repose at which the soil will remain safely at rest.
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
• Dust Generation
due to
excavation,
cutting, back
Temporary • Dust is generated due to the disturbance of soil
and roadways. To minimize dust generated
by construction activities the surface is wetted in
all unprotected cleared areas and stockpiles with
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
![Page 100: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
81 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
filling and
compaction
operations
water twice a day, especially during dry and
windy Periods.
• Water tankers carry the water and labour spray on
the dusted land
• Additionally, excavated material transported by
trucks are wetted and covered.
• Noise and
vibration
disturbances to
residents and
businesses
Temporary • Noise is a temporary nuisance caused due to
construction activity. the construction activities
are carried out only during normal working hours
after providing prior intimation to local residents
and shop keepers.
• Construction works near schools and colleges are
carried out during vacations and works near
hospitals are completed on priority basis (in
shorter time period with alternate provision of
traffic, accessibility of exit/entry gates etc.).
• Wherever possible, the less noise generating
equipment are used in all activities.
• Construction noise is not only a nuisance for the
local community, but can also be a health hazard
to construction workers due to prolonged
exposure. The protective equipment like ear
muffs and plugs for operating personnel are used.
• where feasible, a sound barrier is provided in
inhabited areas, particularly if there are sensitive
zones like hospitals, schools etc.
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
• Temporary
flooding due to
excavation
Temporary • The excavated soil material is stored on the higher
lying areas of the site and not in any storm water
run-off channels or any other areas where it is
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
![Page 101: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
82 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
during
monsoons or
blockage of
surface drains
likely to cause erosion or where water would
naturally accumulate causing flooding.
• The areas where excavated soil are stockpiled are
bordered by berms to prevent soil loss caused by
rain.
• Excess soil is transported to dumping location
within 24 hrs. of completion of task in vehicles
which have top cover that will prevent dust
dispersal.
• Increased traffic
inconvenience
(emissions,
congestions,
longer travel
times, blockage
of access)
Temporary • Since some of the roads in the project area are
narrow there will be some traffic congestion,
hence alternate traffic routing is adopted in
consultation with concerned traffic police
authorities.
• Traffic dislocations also have some adverse
impact on trade and commerce, hence works at
business and market area are completed earlier.
• Traffic management plan is adopted to minimize
congestion and negative impacts at schools,
hospitals other CPRs.
• Appendix
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
• Settlement of
backfilled area
after construction
Temporary • The backfilling material is made free from
petroleum products, slag, cinders, ashes and
rubbish, or other material.
• Backfilling activity followed as per the
construction schedule, as recommended by the
DPR, which estimates that a 1 km stretch of
construction work is to be completed in
approximately 3days.
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
![Page 102: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
83 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
• Proper compaction as per the soil condition and
retain the original level/ alignment and grade as it
was before the work commenced.
Spillage of fuel
and oil
Temporary • Store tanks and drums for excess capacity; forbid
pouring into soils or drains; enforce adequate
equipment maintenance procedures
• Excess soil is transported to dumping location in
vehicles which have top cover that will prevent
dust dispersal
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
Sewage
pumping
station
Excavation • Damage to
topsoil due to
excavation
activities.
Temporary • To prevent excessive disturbance of natural
vegetation, the top soil excavated is stored and
utilized for re-vegetation after completion of
work.
• Topsoil and subsoil are placed on opposite sides of
the trench and kept separate throughout
construction and rehabilitation.
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
• Construction
waste
Temporary • All the associated construction waste are
properly managed by storing and disposing off at
identified refusal sites.
• Land for construction waste disposal is identified
at Barman Land, Parasia road, Chhindwara at
Khasra no. 11/7 to 11/14. Which is under the
possession of ULB.
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
• Soil erosion
during
excavation/
filling operation
(while
constructing
Temporary • Proper stock piling of excavated soil and must be
bordered by berms.
• Shoring trench sides by placing sheeting, timber
shores, trench jacks, bracing, piles, or other
materials to resist pressures surrounding the
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
![Page 103: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
84 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
foundation of
structure)
excavation
• Dust Generation
due to
construction
activities
Temporary • Excavated material transported by trucks will be
covered and/or wetted to prevent dust nuisance.
• Suppressing dust generation by spraying water on
stockpiles
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
General:
Air
Environment
due to all
construction
activities
• Air pollution due
to particulate
matter emissions
from excavation,
construction
material
handling,
transportation of
materials
Temporary • Providing curtains (polysheets/ sheets) all
around the site to control dust spreading beyond
the site.
• Sprinkling of water at regular intervals to control
dust especially places where soil is stockpiled.
• Preventive maintenance of construction equipment
and vehicles to meet emission standards
• PMU
• Contractor
• CMC
General: Noise
Environment
due to all
construction
activities
• Noise hazards Temporary • Noise attenuation with sound proof insulation for
noise generation sources like pumps, generators or
using less noise making equipment
• construction equipment and vehicles are properly
maintained to keep them with low noise.
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
General
waste during
construction • Nuisance due to
solid waste
disposal
Temporary • It is ensured that no litter, refuse, wastes, rubbish,
rubble, debris and builders’ wastes generated on
the premises must be collected in rubbish bins and
disposed of weekly at designated sites.
• Toilet facility is provided at construction site and
is maintained properly. Toilets are emptied
regularly at treatment plants and it is ensured that
it prevents the contamination of surface or sub-
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
![Page 104: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
85 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
surface water
• • •
General: safety during
construction • Safety hazards to
labour and public
Temporary • The contact details of the police or security
company and ambulance services nearby to the
site are maintained.
• The handling of equipment and materials is
supervised and adequately instructed.
• the warning signs/ tapes and temporary barriers
and/or danger tape, marking flags, lights and
flagmen around the exposed construction
works warn the public and traffic flow of the
inherent dangers.
• Provision of safety precautions such as helmets,
safety shoes, gloves, dust masks, gumboots, etc.
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
Construction
camps (if
adopted)
• Nuisance due to
absence of
facility of
sanitation and
solid waste
management
Temporary • Labour camps are available for outsider labour
near STP site.
• Following measures are beingundertaken up:
• The camps established away from
environmentally sensitive area such as in close
proximity to a watercourse, on a steep slope or on
erosive soils.
• Camp sites are having adequate provision of
shelter, water supply, sanitation and solid waste
management .
• Solid waste generated from the labour camp and
office is being segregated separately dry and wet
• Contractor
• PMU
• PMC
![Page 105: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
86 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
waste.
• Segregated waste is being collected by the CMC
vehicle which is engaged for SWM.
Occupational
Health and
Safety
Safety and
Health
Hazardous
• Safety hazards to
labour and
public. Workers
are seen to
working without
any PPE even at
height.
Temporary • Comply with the Occupational health and Safety
act of India
• Follow safe practices for working at height or
confined area or underground working for safety
of workers Erect warning signs/ tapes and
temporary barriers and/or danger tape, marking
flags, lights and flagmen around the exposed
construction works warn the public and traffic
flow of the inherent dangers.
• Provide adequate PPE to workers such as helmets,
safety shoes, gloves, dust masks, gumboots, etc. to
workers
• Provide handrails on both sides of walkways close
to deeper tanks and STPs need to be ensured;
• Smaller on and off switches at STP units to be
installed with protection from rain water to
minimize electrical short circuit;
• Monthly reporting of all accidents and immediate
reporting to DBO engineer and owner.
• Detailed guidelines for Occupational Health and
Safety is enclosed as Appendix 26.
• DBO
contractor
C. Operation Phase
Sewer line Leakage/
overflows • Water pollution
and possibility of
mixing with
Permanent (i) Regular monitoring of sewer line and
manholes for visible leakages/ overflows.
(ii) Immediate repair operation for the damaged
• PMU
• Contractor
• CMC
![Page 106: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
87 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
water supply line portion of sewer line.
(iii) De-siltation of blocked sewers/ manholes
with sewage pumping machines-storing and
disposal at appropriate refusal area after
treatment.
(iv) proper covering of manhole and avoid
dumping of solid waste to prevent chocking
of sewer line.
Sewage
pumping
station
• Noise pollution
from operation
activities
Permanent • Proper handling and regular maintenance of
operating machines including pumps, generators,
air diffusers, noise monitoring, etc.
• PMU
• Contractor
• CMC
Flooding due
to rain water
runoff
• Rain water may
flood the STP
area in absence
of adequate
provision of
diverting rain
water flow
towards STP
from periphery
area.
Temporary • Suitable drainage provision shall be made to divert
the rainwater likely to be accumulated from
peripheral
• The entire structure shall be constructed having
plinth level 1.00 m above HFL.
• All electric supply lines, works panels,
chlorine/chemical / material storage are above
HFL
• Contractor
• ULB
Sewage
pumping
station
Solid waste • Contamination of
water resources,
blockage, bad
odour, Health
hazard and
public nuisance
Permanent • Solid waste will not be kept for more than 24
hours.
• Solid waste screened from coarse screen of the
SPS will be collected mechanically.
• Solid waste will be disposed off at identified site
for sludge disposal at Village Salimeta, The.
Mohakheda, dist. Chhindwara. at
• Solid waste disposal arrangement will be
• PMU
• Contractor
• CMC
![Page 107: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
88 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
environment friendly.
•
Sewage
Treatment
Plant
• odour, Health
hazard and
public nuisance
Permanent • Green belt development is ensured in the
premises of STP to restrict of odour (if any)
outside the premises of STP.
• Proper boundary wall to avoid the public nuisance.
• Online monitoring system for sewage will be
ensured to maintained the targeted treated sewage
standards.
• Seasonal Air, Noise and climatic conditions
monitoring is ensured.
• Contractor
• ULB
• PMU
Disposal of
treated waste
water
• Contamination of
water and spoil
Permanent • The treated effluent will be reused for flushing
purpose, Gardens, Horticulture Purpose, STP
green development purpose and road cleaning
purpose and remaining will be disposed off at the
drains which is adjacent to the STP site. A sump
well has already proposed in the design for
collection/store treated sewage at STP site.
• Receiving water body of treated effluent of STP is
basically just a rainstorm drain. Further it is to
clarified that the receiving water body is almost
dry maximum duration in the year. confluence
point of this drain is 'Bodari Nalla' at a distance of
around 1.5 km and next confluence point is at
around 2.5 KM of distance which is Kulbehra
river.
• Standard will be ensured as per stated in Appendix
20.
•
![Page 108: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
89 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
General
Waste Sanitary
conditions at
construction
camps and
site.
• Contamination of
water resources,
blockage of
storm drains, bad
odour, Health
hazard and
public nuisance
Temporary • Regular monitoring of provision of water supply,
excreta and solid waste management.
• Waste is emptied regularly at disposal area until
the work is completed.
• Maintaining proper hygienic environment in and
around camps and site by regular surveillance and
monitoring of waste.
•
• PMU
• Contractor
• CMC
Sludge
disposal • Disposal of
sludge leading to
contamination of
land and water.
Permanent • Sludge disposal plan has been prepared as per
design stage provisions and guidelines and adhere
to the same (enclosed as annex. 21).
• Ensure proper functioning of STP for digestion of
sludge and ensure adequate functioning of
dewatering units for efficient functioning of
System.
• Treated effluent quality test should be done at
least once a month
• The septage from the septic tanks will be collected
using suction vehicles which will be leak proof
and the septage will be dumped in the equitation
tanks for treatment. The suction trucks being used
should be maintained as per the best practices &
standards of maintenance.
• The settled sludge coming out from the sewage
treatment plant, will be carried out in to the sludge
drying beds proposed in the vicinity of the STP
site.
• Sludge is thickened and stabilized before it can be
efficiently disposed of or used as a soil
amendment.
• PMU
• Contractor
• CMC
![Page 109: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
90 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
• Sludge drying bed has proper drainage- water
leachate does not flow into river to contaminate
and it is pumped back into the STP
• Sludge disposal strictly complies with national
standards and internationally accepted
environmental quality criteria.
• The sludge thickeners and sludge drying beds are
proposed
• Efficient Sludge dewatering with minimum land
involvement is adopted.
• Sludge is tested for heavy metals and other
chemicals. It is dried on site. Site is raised, with
cutoff drains (drain leachate is taken back to STP
for treatment) & is covered on top (for weather
protection). After drying, this is sent in covered
vehicle to trenching yard Khasra No. 14/5 at
village Salimeta, The. Mohkhed, Distt.
Chhindwara. This is the temporary arrangement
for disposal of sludge in future it will be
developed as sanitary landfill.
• The thickened Sludge is disposed on the sludge
drying bed adjoining to STP and after this it is
proposed to be transported for final disposal at
designed site. Refer Appendix 21.
• Bucket volumetric capacity will no surpassed and
free board will be kept to the top of the bucket
/wagon side structure.
• Tyre and vehicle surface will be thoroughly
![Page 110: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
91 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
washed before leaving treatment plant.
• Although covering the sludge with canvas may
not be necessary for dried sludge with high solid
content, but it will be provided to avoid
undesirable situation
• Safety locks will be verified every time to avoid
accidental openings during sludge transportation.
Complete check for all container locks will be
carried out within plant yard and before truck
loading starts
• Sludge container will be leak proof and preferably
fitted for sludge transport
• Weather protection will be made for loading in
rainy season
• Transport of liquid sludge through tank truck and
dewatered sludge in dump trucks are the most
commonly used methods During first decade
generation of sludge will be lesser than next
decades. In Centrifuge unit arrangements are
made in a way that sludge cakes fall directly in
the tractor trolly from centrifuge unit. Trucks are
then transported to the disposal site.
General
Safety
Workers
exposed to
toxic gases
in sewers
• The toxic gases
are likely to
contract
Temporary • During cleaning/ maintenance operation, the sewer
line is adequately vented and ensured that no toxic
or hazardous gases are present in the line.
• PMU
• Contractor
• CMC
![Page 111: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
92 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
and
hazardous
materials
In sewage
during
maintenance
work
communicable • Gases present in the sewer line is analyzed for
hazardous/toxic gases before commencing
cleaning operation.
Occupational
Health and
safety
Workers
and staff • Operation and
Maintenance of
STP and sludge
disposal
Permanent • Railing around all process tanks to be installed.
• Implement a confined spaces entry program that is
consistent with applicable national requirements
and internationally accepted standards. Valves to
process tanks should be locked to prevent
accidental flooding during maintenance;
• Maintain work areas to minimize slipping and
tripping hazards;
• Use proper techniques for trenching and shoring;
• Implement fire and explosion prevention measures
in accordance with internationally accepted
standards;
• When installing or repairing mains adjacent to
roadways, implement procedures and traffic
controls, such as:
✓ Establishment of work zones so as to separate
workers from traffic and from equipment as
much as possible
✓ Reduction of allowed vehicle speeds in work
• Contractor
• CMC
![Page 112: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
93 | P a g e
Activity Potential
Negative
Impact/Concern
Duration
of
Impact
Mitigation Measures Responsible
Agency
zones;
✓ Use of high-visibility safety apparel for
workers in the vicinity of traffic
✓ Provision of proper illumination for the work
space, while controlling glare so as not to blind
workers and passing motorists
• Locate all underground utilities before digging.
Table 7. 2: Cost of Chhindwara ESMP
Phase Component
EMP of Mitigation measure Cost included in
the contract
(Yes/no/not
clear)
Cost in Rupees (or
Details provided in
contract)
Remarks
Construction Excavation, Cutting
and filling operations
Review of existing
infrastructure, shoring
trenches, reinstatement/
Resurfacing
Yes Included in Provisional
sum of contract
Damage
utilities public Proper reviewing of
existing drawing s of
utilities, informing concern
authorities and
reinstatement of public
utilities
Yes Included in Provisional
sum of contract
Dust generation Water sprinkling on
excavated material to
suppress dust and provision
of top cover when
No Water tanker: Rs.
Approximately
Rs. 28,80,000
Top cover for
dumper truck: Rs.
According to DPR 80Km stretch in
each zone will be completed in 3
years. This means approximately 75
m will be covered per day.
750 L of water will be consumed
![Page 113: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
94 | P a g e
Phase Component
EMP of Mitigation measure Cost included in
the contract
(Yes/no/not
clear)
Cost in Rupees (or
Details provided in
contract)
Remarks
transported
through vehicles
33750/-
for75musingsprinkleraverage 2450
Per meter cost = Rs. 450/75m = Rs
6/- Total cost for 80 Km= Rs
480000 Keeping a 2-day margin for
construction and reinstatement of
the site2x480000= Rs. 960000/-
excavated earth disposal). Hence 5
trucks* required top cover 30 Sqm*
Cost of Top soil cover at Rs. 75/
Sqm.
9 Noise and
vibrations
Usage of sound
barriers or sheets. No. Rs. 9,29,850/- As per the schedule, the construction
in 2 zones each has to be executed
in 36 months for providing sound
barriers like GI sheets, 4Km out of
80 Km of stretch of sensitive zones
in sewer work is considered
assuming excavation, construction
and backfilling activity will take
place simultaneously at
different stretches. Considering 302
GI sheet of 3’x 8’would cover 75m
length (both sides) of
construction activity daily. (150
sheets are needed of for one side of
150 m stretch, so for 2 sides 300
sheets and 2 more sheets to enclose
one open side of the barricading;
150 m is taken as a safer option as it
will not be possible to shift the
barrier to another site same day)
Hence 302 sheets* Cost of GI sheet
Rs.1000 per sheet (Rs.70-100 per
Kg)* labour cost ( two labour at
avg. rate of Rs. 150 per day) = Rs.
![Page 114: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
95 | P a g e
Phase Component
EMP of Mitigation measure Cost included in
the contract
(Yes/no/not
clear)
Cost in Rupees (or
Details provided in
contract)
Remarks
309950And
for 240 Kms = Rs.9,29,850/-
Temporary flooding or
water logging
Alternate traffic re-routing,
Ensuring storage of
excavated soil material on
the higher lying areas
Yes Included in Provisional
sum of contract
Increased traffic
inconvenience
Traffic re-routing No cost required
except diversion
signage
Included in Provisional
sum of contract
Safety hazards to
workers and
residents
Putting fences or other
barricades to demarcate
the area
No Rs. 16875 Assuming a stretch of 75m per day,
150 rods will be used, @ Rs. 75/-
period.
Labour camps Health hazards and
nuisance due to absence
of facility for sanitation
or solid waste
management
Sanitation No Cost of
construction of pit and
toilet building &
cleaning approximately
Rs. 2,24,000/-
Total no. of labour is estimated
assuming 35% of total project
working for 36 months. The labour
camps is established in Zone 2
which has the proposed major
infrastructure STP and SPS for
appropriate management and
maintenance work. This camp can
accommodate maximum 70 labour.
![Page 115: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
96 | P a g e
Phase Component
EMP of Mitigation measure Cost included in
the contract
(Yes/no/not
clear)
Cost in Rupees (or
Details provided in
contract)
Remarks
However, the contractor has
engaged mostly local labour
A two toilet (male &female) with a
single septic tank has been
constructed for sanitation facility at
labour camps. Septic tank of
capacity 45 m3 will be used. Cost of
one pit is Rs. 1,20,000. Cost of one
toilet building is Rs. 80,000.
Therefore, total cost of toilet
construction at one camp site would
be Rs 2,00,000/-
Cleaning of pit cost Rs 4000/-. and
after 9 months cleaning is needed so
thrice cleaning is needed. So, for
2 pits X 1 camps X 3 times
cleaning the cost will come as
Rs.24000/-
Water Supply No Approximately Rs.
15250/-
As estimated 70 labour will be at
one camp, so approximately
maximum 14 families placed at one
camp at a time. Around 3 standposts
will be needed at camp. One
standpost construction cost is Rs
6250/-. At the rate of 135 LPCD,
10,000 L of water is needed for each
camp. At the rate
of Rs 2.5KL, the cost of water
provisioning would be Rs 25 per
day. Total cost for 36 months would
be Rs 900
Total cost of construction and
provisioning would be Rs 15250
![Page 116: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
97 | P a g e
Phase Component
EMP of Mitigation measure Cost included in
the contract
(Yes/no/not
clear)
Cost in Rupees (or
Details provided in
contract)
Remarks
Dust bins No Approximately Rs.
200000/-
Solid waste generation: Generally,
about 200 grams of solid waste is
generated per 5 persons every day.
Hence two cluster dustbins (one for
biodegradable waste and one for
non-biodegradable waste of 1 cum
size at the rate of Rs. 2000/-) may
handle solid waste generated.
Total (in INR) 42,99,725.00
Social Management Plan Impact (Social) • Mitigation Measures Institutional
Responsibility
Time Frame Budget (in Rupees)
Encroached Structure
(temporary structure
over road ROW)
• Joint survey of PIU and contractor has been done to assess the exact
number of temporary kiosks along the road ROW which may be
affected during network laying.
CMC/ D(R)BO
contactor & PIU
before
construction
commence
No amount
required
Loss of
Income Livelihood • Joint survey of PIU and contractor has been done to assess the exact
number of vendors likely to be affected during network laying.
• All compensations (as per entitlement matrix in ESMF) to be disbursed
before start of excavation in the particular stretch.
• Tentative number of small Trader to be given livelihood assistance (as
per entitlement matrix) = 22, however, provision of planks over the
excavated portion at every 50m and excavations limited to 250m in one
stretch will help in not affecting the income of traders.
• Tentative number of vendors to be given livelihood assistance (as per
collectorate rate) = 43@ no. of days (average 7days)
• Although all care will be taken to shift the vendors across the road on
same area (not affecting their income),
CMC/ D(R)BO
contactor & PIU
Throughout the
construction
period
No amount
required
![Page 117: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
98 | P a g e
Phase Component
EMP of Mitigation measure Cost included in
the contract
(Yes/no/not
clear)
Cost in Rupees (or
Details provided in
contract)
Remarks
Impacts to trees,
plants and standing
crops
• No impact to trees, plants and crops is observed during the joint survey.
CMC/D(R)BO
contractor, PIU
before
construction
phase
No amount
required
Unidentified Impacts • Unforeseen impacts encountered during implementation will be
addressed in accordance with the principles of the policy
CMC/D(R)BO
contractor, PIU
Throughout
construction phase 20,00,000.00
• Total SMP cost INR 20, 00,000.
00/-
• Total EMP and SMP INR 6299725.00
IEC activities • Dissemination of Project information
• Consultation with potentially affected people
• FGDs with likely beneficiaries
• Mobilization for encouraging connection specially among vulnerable
groups
MPUDC/CDO
(PIU)
During
construction and
operation phase
As per
communication
plan under TA
activities
Detail Estimation for Green Development
Item Description Quantity Amount
1 Digging holes in ordinary soil and refilling the same with the excavated earth mixed with manure or sludge in the ratio of
2:1 by volume (2 parts of stacked volume of earth after reduction by 20% : 1 part of stacked volume of manure after
reduction by 8%) flooding with water, dressing including removal of rubbish and surplus earth, if any, with all leads and
lifts (cost of manure, sludge or extra good earth if needed to be paid for separately) :
2.14.1 Holes 1.2 m dia and 1.2 m deep
As per code no 2.14 of Central Public work department
195 46166.25
2 Supplying and stacking sludge at site including royalty and carriage up to 5 km complete (sludge measured in stacks will
be reduced by 8% for payment). As
per code no 2.3 of Central Public work department
195 45932.25
3 Supply and stacking of plant of height 150- 165 cm. in big poly bags of size 25 cm as per direction of the officer-in
charge.
As per code no 7.45 of Central Public work department
195 9750
![Page 118: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
99 | P a g e
Phase Component
EMP of Mitigation measure Cost included in
the contract
(Yes/no/not
clear)
Cost in Rupees (or
Details provided in
contract)
Remarks
4 Spreading of sludge, dump manure and/or good earth in required thickness as per direction of officer-in-charge (cost of
sludge, dump manure and/ or good earth to be paid separately).
As per code no 2.8 of Central Public work department
195 6035.25
5 Complete maintenance of shrubs (Outside garden features), jobs like making of basin at regular interval i/c watering,
weeding, pruning & application of fertilizer etc., (excluding the cost of material which shall be supplied by Per Shrub the
department) and as per direction of officer in charge.
As per code no 2.43 of Central Public work department
195 216450
(10-year O&M)
Total= 33,24,334/-
Grand Total EMP and SMP and Green belt development cost plus the cost given in table 7.4 =
1,43,21,059
7.2 Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring is an important tool in establishing the success or failure of a project in regards to compliance to environmental
safeguards. Evaluation is also important in assessing the achievement of the mitigation measures set out in the Environmental
Management Plan, performance and efficiency of the project in regards to ESMP. Monitoring and evaluation process will involve
the assessment of the following benchmarks:
d) The implementation process of guidelines stipulated in the ESMP
e) Evaluate impact of the project to the environment and social setting of Chhindwara Town
f) Monitoring of the involvement of the community through public consultations in decision makings and the implementation
of the project
Project implementation involves various interventions to achieve the objectives of providing safe, clean and adequate on
sustainable basis and improving health and sanitation conditions in the city. Simultaneously, to protect and improve the
environmental conditions to achieve the goal, various mitigating measures would be taken up. Table 7.3 presents the proposed
environmental monitoring plan while Table 7.4 presents the cost information of the environmental monitoring.
![Page 119: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
100 | P a g e
Table 7. 3 Environmental Monitoring Plan
Env.
Component
Stage Institutional Responsibilities
Parameter Standards Locations Frequency Implementation Supervision
Air
Qu
ali
ty
Con
stru
ct
ion
PM10 μg /m3,
PM2.5 μg/m3,
SO2, NOX,
CO
CPCB
Sewer
Construction
Sites
Once in every
season
Contractor through
approved monitoring
agency/Lab
PMU through
PIU and
Contractor
Op
era-t
ion
PM10 μg /m3,
PM2.5 μg/m3,
SO2, NOX,
CO
Sewer
Operational
facilities
Twice a year
during
operation.
DBO
Contractor
and ULB
Nois
e L
evel
s
Con
stru
ct
ion
Leq dB (A) (Day
and Night)
Average and Peak
values
Ambient Noise
Standard CPCB
Sewer
Construction
Sites
Once in every
season except rainy
season
Contractor through
approved monitoring
agency/Lab
PMU through
PIU and
Contractor
Op
erati
o
n
Leq dB (A) (Day
and Night)
Average and Peak
values
Ambient Noise
Standard CPCB
Sewer
operational
facilities
Quarterly DBO
Contractor
and ULB
Tre
ated
Eff
luen
t
Op
erati
o
n
BOD,COD, pH,
TN, TSS, Total
Phosphorus Total
Coliform
Standard as per
CPCB
Inlet and
Outlet
Monthly Contractor through
approved monitoring
agency/Lab
DBO
Contractor
and ULB
Wate
r Q
ua
lity
of
Rec
ipie
nt
Na
lla/R
iver
Co
nst
ruct
ion
pH, Oil &grease,
Cl, F, NO3, TC,
Fecal Coliform
bacteria, Hardness,
Turbidity, BOD,
COD, DO, Total
Alkalinity
IS:10500
(Appendix 9A)
Near proposed
STP site
Seasonal except
rainy season Contractor through
approved monitoring
agency/Lab
PMU through
PIU and
Contractor
Op
erati
on
pH, Oil & grease,
Cl, F, NO3, TC,
Total Fecal
IS:10500
Near effluent
discharge
point in the
Monthly
Contractor through
approved monitoring
agency/Lab
DBO
Contractor
and ULB
![Page 120: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
101 | P a g e
Coliform bacteria,
Hardness,
Turbidity, BOD,
COD, DO, Total
Alkalinity
(Appendix 9A) river S
oil
C
on
stru
ctio
n
Physical :Texture,
Grain Size,
Gravel, Sand, Silt,
Clay; Chemical
Parameter: pH,
Conductivity,
Calcium,
Magnesium,
Sodium, Nitrogen,
Absorption Ratio
Consider the
following methods:
IS- 2720 (Various
part);Soil
Chemical Analysis
by M.L.
JACKSON. Soil
Test Method by
Ministry of
agriculture
Sewer
Construction
Sites and IPS
Before start of the
construction work Contractor through
approved monitoring
agency/Lab
Contractor
and PMU
Soil
O
per
ati
on
Physical: Texture,
Grain Size,
Gravel, Sand, Silt,
Clay;
Chemical
Parameter: pH,
Conductivity,
Calcium,
Magnesium,
Sodium, Nitrogen,
Absorption Ratio
Consider
the following
methods: IS- 2720
(Various
parts);Soil
Chemical
Analysis by M.L.
JACKSON. Soil
Test Method by
Ministry of
agriculture
Along sewer
construction
sites, IPS
Twice in a year
(Pre- monsoon and
Post monsoon) for
first 5 years,
Contractor through
approved monitoring
agency/Lab
PMU and
PMC
Slu
dge
Op
erati
o
n
Analysis for
concentration of
heavy metals
CPCB
STP site
Monthly
Contractor through
approved monitoring
agency/Lab
PMU and ULB
Table 7. 4 Cost of Environmental Monitoring Plan
Item Location Season Year Total no. of
samples
Unit Cost Total Cost
![Page 121: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
102 | P a g e
Environment Monitoring during Construction Stage
Air quality Monitoring
8 3 3 72 7,000.00 504,000.00
Metrological data 1 4 3 12 5,000.00 60,000.00
Noise / vibration 8 3 3 72 2,000.00 144,000.00
Surface Water
Quality 2 3 2 12 10,000.00 120,000.00
Soil analysis 8 2 3 48 5,500.00 264,000.00
Sub total 10,97,000.00
Environment Monitoring Cost (Operation Stage)
Air quality Monitoring
8 1 5 40 7,000.00 280,000.00
Metrological data 1 1 5 5 5,000.00 25,000.00
Noise / vibration 8 1 5 40 2,000.00 80,000.00
Surface Water
Quality 2 12 (Monthly) 5 120 10,000.00 1,200,000.00
Treated Effluent 2 12 (Monthly) 5 12 10,000.00 1,200,000.00
Soil analysis 4 2 5 40 5,500.00 220,000.00
Sludge analysis 1 12 (Monthly) 5 60 10,000.00 600,000.00
Sub-Total 36,05,000.00
TOTAL for Environmental Monitoring (in INR) 46,97,000.00
Total cost of EMP + SMP + Green Belt Development + Environment Monitoring works out to
42,99,725+20,00,000+33,24,234+46,97,000= INR 1,43,21,059/-
![Page 122: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
103 | P a g e
8. Tribal Vulnerability Identification and Assessment
8.1 Distribution of Scheduled Tribes in Madhya Pradesh in Relation to India
The tribal population of Madhya Pradesh increased to 15,316,784 in 2011 from
12,233,474 in 2001.The decadal growth rate during this period is 25.20 percent. The trends in the population of the Scheduled Tribes by residence (total, Rural and Urban)
for Census Years 1961- 2011 shows that the percentage of Scheduled Tribes Population
in the Rural Areas (11.3 percent) much higher that Urban Population (2.8 percent). In Madhya Pradesh certain areas have been declared as scheduled area as Specified by the
Scheduled Areas under the fifth Schedule of Indian Constitutions2. List of Schedule
Areas and Schedules Tribes in Madhya Pradesh is provided in Appendix 3 and
Appendix 2 respectively. 8.61 percent of the Indian population is classified as ST. In
comparison to the national figure, Madhya Pradesh has 14.7 percent of its populations classified as ST.
Chhindwara Municipal Corporation area is not falling under Scheduled V areas
declared by Government of India.
8.2 Presence of Indigenous People.
The identification of Indigenous people in project area done on the basis of secondary
information:
1. Share of scheduled tribe population in project area as per census 2011and
2. declaration of scheduled V areas by Ministry of Tribal Welfare, GoI.
On the basis of these two information’s the share of scheduled tribe and vulnerable
composition in project area given in Table 8.1 and Chhindwara Municipal Corporation
is not coming under scheduled V area declared by GoI.
Table 8. 1: Social Composition in Chhindwara Town
Social Composition Population Male Female % of total population SC 31381 15926 15455 13.84
ST 28820 14566 14254 12.72
Total Population of
Town
226802
(Source: Census, 2011)
3. The concentration of tribal population in particular areas were identified on the
basis of ward wise population in 48 wards of CMC, detail of population given in
table 8.2.
Table 8. 2: Ward wise detail of Scheduled Tribe population
S.no Ward
no.
Total
HHs
Total
population
of ward
Total
populati
on (ST)
Male Female Total
populat
ion
Male Female
![Page 123: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
104 | P a g e
(SC)
1 01 690 3104 449 222 227 558 296 262
2 02 1286 5914 502 289 213 968 558 410
3 03 739 3292 447 228 219 342 171 171
4 04 900 4081 757 360 397 559 295 264
5 05 857 4066 188 87 101 236 126 110
6 06 668 3008 383 197 186 621 331 290
7 07 923 4307 322 170 152 430 226 204
8 08 625 2907 287 138 149 889 448 441
9 09 607 3462 1014 387 627 176 67 109
10 10 690 3437 363 184 179 627 313 314
11 11 634 3076 143 74 69 151 76 75
12 12 575 2893 57 30 27 51 21 30
13 13 457 2371 11 6 5 6 3 3
14 14 482 2447 59 26 33 81 38 43
15 15 872 4332 294 140 154 587 300 287
16 16 757 3693 406 202 204 956 465 491
17 17 1030 4871 388 191 197 966 478 488
18 18 989 4609 561 293 268 702 365 337
19 19 662 2917 376 185 191 513 245 268
20 20 975 4587 276 134 142 279 149 130
21 21 650 3108 39 19 20 28 15 13
22 22 511 2956 2 1 1 75 30 45
23 23 678 3669 54 24 30 178 84 94
24 24 807 4107 87 43 44 1823 895 928
25 25 585 2583 166 91 75 220 98 122
26 26 857 3929 127 68 59 196 97 99
27 27 676 3601 49 27 22 271 131 140
28 28 429 2425 37 16 21 11 6 5
29 29 659 2980 80 42 38 181 95 86
30 30 730 3234 635 326 309 184 98 86
31 31 674 2780 344 194 150 199 94 105
32 32 552 2351 230 120 110 224 118 106
33 33 1092 4736 275 136 139 508 251 257
34 34 891 3936 182 85 97 534 269 265
35 35 815 3567 319 166 153 591 306 285
36 36 868 3850 138 68 70 392 188 204
37 37 595 3316 114 107 7 45 43 2
![Page 124: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
105 | P a g e
38 38 923 4337 210 78 132 566 261 305
39 39 771 3452 648 328 320 658 321 337
40 40 1618 7338 2544 1303 1241 955 473 482
41 41 582 2646 1138 582 556 430 210 220
42 42 1323 5997 1145 592 553 644 334 310
43 43 3718 16896 2005 1003 1002 2658 1360 1298
44 44 665 3054 813 411 402 994 525 469
45 45 168 830 447 229 218 145 71 74
coming under
ward 1
3388
14989
1617
844
773
3147
1609
1538
Total 40643
190041
20728
10446
10282
25555
12953
12602
15 wards where population of ST is more than SC
30 wards where population of SC is more than ST
Source: Census 2011
The above table reflects that percentage of vulnerable is more than scheduled tribe.
8.3 Public Consultation
During the entire planning phase, an effort has also been made to help people including all
castes & tribes, understand the positive impacts and benefits from the project for them in
terms of better connectivity and linkage with the surrounding areas, reduction in the
problems, minimization of health risks through provisions of good services of quality
supply, underpasses, median control and other design interventions, improvement in the
economy of the people, better access to health, education facilities in the region. The
process has helped in building confidence amongst the Indigenous people of different
wards and mainstreamed them in the process and making them partners in the project. For
consultation the wards were selected on the basis of highest population of SC/ST in CMC.
During consultation process participation of Indigenous people was also ensured. The
number of Tribal and vulnerable people participated in consultation is presented in Table
8.3.
Table 8. 3: Participation of ST/SC population during Public Consultation
WARD no. SC/ST Household
Total M F
02 17 07 10
08 20 15 05
16 19 14 05
17 15 08 07
24 22 12 10
40 27 13 14
43 28 18 10
44 30 25 05
TOTAL 148
![Page 125: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
106 | P a g e
8.3.1 Key Issues identified during Consultations
As stated above, the participation of vulnerable people was also ensured during public
consultations and thus, the key issues identified during consultation with vulnerable
people are same as identified in the stakeholder consultations. The main issues are:
• Few people having individual toilets with septic tanks, they haven't showed
willingness in project as they have view that Sewer connection damage their
tanks in Chhindwara Municipal Corporation.
• People complaint about contaminated water due to leakage in septic tanks of
some houses.
• Those having individual toilets demanded connection to their toilets.
• Safety measured during excavation must be ensured as some working couples
leave their small children at home.
8.3.2 Conclusion
On the basis of social Impact screening, identification, consultations as per characteristics
outlined in OP 4.10 indicated the identities and cultures of Indigenous peoples are
inextricably linked to the lands on which they live and the natural resources on which they
depend. However, both circumstances are not with ST people present in Chhindwara
town, so on the basis of this criteria they are not categorized as Indigenous people.
Hence policy OP 4.10 not triggered for this sub-project.
8.4 Other Vulnerable Population
The scheduled caste, Women headed household, destitute & disabled are being considered
as vulnerable groups. The population of Scheduled caste in Chhindwara comprise of
13.84% of total population.
8.5 Strategy for addressing of Tribal and Vulnerable group through participation
The strategy for addressing concerns relating to tribal and vulnerable groups identified
through participation is presented below. This strategy is to be applied during
implementation of the subproject:
a) Free, prior informed Consultations and information disclosure is to ensure that the
priorities, preferences, and needs of the tribal and vulnerable groups have been taken
into consideration adequately. With that objective in view, a strategy for consultation
with tribal and vulnerable communities and their elected representatives will be
developed so that these are conducted in a participatory manner.
b) Beneficiaries will be actively engaged in the project cycle and feedback of
consultations with tribal and vulnerable people will be reflected in the project
design, followed by disclosure. Their participation in project planning will inform
project design, and they should be convinced of their benefits from the project. The
awareness material prepared will be translated into the local language of the tribal
![Page 126: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
107 | P a g e
and vulnerable people and made available to them.
One project information disclosure (PID) brochure will be prepared, translated into a
language understandable to the tribal people, and distributed among them. Budget
included in ESMP.
c) Project Monitoring Indicators will be designed to monitor project impact as
beneficiaries. The regular participation of groups ensured through the monitoring
Indicators.
8.6 Inclusion of Tribal and Vulnerable Population during Implementation
Implementation comprise of gaining continued support of the tribal and vulnerable
people in the project area, during project implementation.
Free prior informed consultations during implementation stage will be carried out at two
levels
a) consultation with communities for broad support for the project.
b) for participation in capacity building and awareness generation activities for
mainstreaming. (MPUDC is in the process of appointing Non-Government
Organization for this purpose)
![Page 127: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
108 | P a g e
9. Contractor’s Role in Grievance Redressal Mechanism
As per the contract, setting up of Grievance Redressal cell i.e. provision of computer etc.
is within the scope of work of contractor. Complaints will be received in various manner
as under:
• Boxes ( at ULB office, Site office, Bus stand)
• In the office of contractor or ULB or PIU
• Through email and phone ( phone number will be given in GRC box)
• CM helpline
Contractor’s services are aligned to the project GRM and that the Contractor has
adequate mechanisms to ensure that any complaint received by the contractor is recorded,
addressed (if it is within the scope of the contractor to address the same), information
forwarded to the GRC, etc. and complaint is closed. Contractor is obligated to provide
information that is required by the PIU to ensure smooth functioning of the project GRM.
Major type of grievances along with their timelines for resolution are as follows:
Nature of Complaint Duration to attend
Accident Immediate
Site safety traffic signage etc Within 5 hrs to 2 days
Road restoration To be decided in discussion with
PIU/ULB (max. 7 days in case of
pipe is laid or tested)
Utility breakage viz water pipeline,
telephone line, electric line etc
Within 1-2 days
Quality related PIU to decide
Labour related issues Max. 7 days
Others To be decided by PIU depending
upon the severity of grievance.
Sincere efforts will be made to resolve grievances through participatory process with the
community and the respective ULBs, within time limit.
Closure of the Complaint
After the receipt of complaint, the contractor will resolve the grievance within the specified time
limit. However, if the issue is not resolved within time or in case the timeline given is not
adequate in opinion of contractor; he will inform the PIU accordingly. In such case, the
contractor will also consult with PIU to arrive at an agreed timeline. This will also be recorded.
After the completion of work on contractor’s part, he will inform the PIU & PMC official who
will further reconcile with the aggrieved telephonically and record whether the grievance is
satisfactorily resolved.
The format for Grievance Redressal Format for the complaints received has been appended in
Appendix 25.
![Page 128: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
109 | P a g e
10. Conclusion and Recommendations
The Environmental Social Assessment (ESA) Study was carried out based on field assessments
and public consultations with the community who are likely to benefit or to be affected by the
proposed Project and the Proponent in compliance with the World Bank environmental policies
and EIA Notification 2006. The project report of the proposed sub-project for Chhindwara City
after environment and social analysis concludes that the project has overall positive benefits on
the life and environment of the people. There has been no reported land acquisition or
livelihood losses to be caused under this project. As per environmental and social management
framework guidelines of MPUDP, Environmental and Social Assessment, with a Generic
Safeguard Management Plan was conducted for addressing possible issues/ concerns arising
from proposed project.
The sewerage network will provide improved environmental conditions due to the contained
handling of wastes, leading to improved public health conditions and will likely reduce the
average medical expenses of the residents in the project areas. Because of the sewer line
connection, all the waste water will be collected and directed to treatment plant, which only
after treatment will be disposed off to the river, hence decreasing the pollutant load in the river.
Connection to sewer lines will enhance the aesthetic value of the area, as there will be more
cleanliness and no wastewater discharge to open area. This will also lead to appreciation in the
property value. This will eventually lead to increase in standard of living of the people in the
project site.
As per the DPR the Land which was selected for STP was located at Koladhana Near Bodri
Nallah in ward no 33 Khasra No. 678, having an area of 1.8 Ha., but as most part of this land
came under the submergence of Bodri Nallah, and a part of the land was encroached, hence it
was not feasible to construct the STP at Koladhana and after studying the various options for the
STP the location at Sarra in ward no 35, Khasra no 126,128 and 129 having an area of 2.851 ha
was selected and thus the location was finally changed from Koladhana to Sarra.
The DPR envisaged 2 SPS – one at Bail Bazar and one at Koladhana (as MPS). However, after
detailed investigation during Physical survey and the change of site for STP, the SPS at Bail
Bazar is no more required. The Sewage of Zone 1 will flow to MPS through gravity.
There are no environmentally sensitive areas (like wildlife sanctuaries etc.) in or near sub-
project area. However, the proposed STP land is under forest land for which the permission for
diversion of the forest land is sought from the Forest Department which is in advance stage and
the same will be received shortly.( refer Appendix 14 and 15 ) Also there are no archeological
and historical protected areas/ sites within or near the town. There are no permanent adverse
impacts on assets and livelihood anticipated, hence no ARAP is required as per ESMF. Only
minor damage to road side properties and loss of income for certain days and locations during
construction phase may be identified. Such impacts shall be assessed by D(R)BO contractor and
this ESA and SMP will be updated and approved by MPUDC. In Project area, no indigenous
people are identified meeting the requirement of IPMF, so no separate IPP is required. Hence
the impact identified are mostly related to construction and operation phase. However, a
strategy for addressing concerns relating to tribal and vulnerable groups has been identified and
![Page 129: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
110 | P a g e
is to be applied during subproject implementation.
The subproject is unlikely to cause significant adverse impacts because: (i) most of the
individual components involve straightforward construction and operation, so impacts will be
mainly localized; (ii) in most cases the predicted impacts are likely to be associated with the
construction process and are produced because the process is invasive, involving excavation,
obstruction at specific construction locations, and earth movements; and (iii) being located
mainly in the already constructed facilities and built-up area will not cause direct impact on
terrestrial biodiversity values. The potential adverse impacts that are associated with design,
construction, and operation can be mitigated to standard levels without difficulty through proper
engineering design and the incorporation or application of recommended mitigation measures
and procedures.
Therefore, the ESA report has been amended (after draft design and drawing) and submitted by
the DBO contractor.
![Page 130: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
111 | P a g e
Appendix 1:Screening Checklist of Chhindwara sewerage project
![Page 131: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
112 | P a g e
![Page 132: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
113 | P a g e
![Page 133: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
114 | P a g e
![Page 134: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
115 | P a g e
Appendix 2: List of Tribal Communities in State of Madhya Pradesh as
Provided by Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India
1. Agariya
2. Andh
3. Baiga
4. Bhaina
5. Bharia Bhumia, Bhuinhar Bhumia, Bhumiya, Bharia, Paliha, Pando
6. Bhattra
7. Bhil, Bhilala, Barela, Patelia
8. Bhil Mina
9. Bhunjia
10. Biar, Biyar
11. Binjhwar
12. Birhul, Birhor
13. Damor, Damaria
14. Dhanwar
15. Gadaba, Gadba
16. Gond; Arakh, Arrakh, Agaria, Asur, Badi Maria, Bada Maria, Bhatola, Bhimma,
Bhuta, Koilabhuta, Koliabhuti, Bhar, Bisonhorn Maria, Chota Maria, Dandami Maria,
Dhuru, Dhurwa, Dhoba, Dhulia, Dorla, Gaiki, Gatta, Gatti, Gaita, Gond Gowari, Hill
Maria, Kandra,Kalanga, Khatola, Koitar, Koya, Khirwar, Khirwara, Kucha Maria,
Kuchaki Maria, Madia,Maria, Mana, Mannewar, Moghya, Mogia, Monghya, Mudia,
Muria, Nagarchi, Nagwanshi, Ojha, Raj, Sonjhari Jhareka, Thatia, Thotya, Wade Maria,
Vade Maria, Daroi
17. Halba, Halbi
18. Kamar
19. Karku
20. Kawar, Kanwar, Kaur, Cherwa, Rathia, Tanwar, Chattri
21. (Omitted)
22. Khairwar,Kondar
23. Kharia
24. Kondh, Khond, Kandh
25. Kol
26. Kolam
27. Korku, Bopchi, Mouasi, Nihal, Nahul Bondhi, Bondeya
![Page 135: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
116 | P a g e
28. Korwa, Kodaku
29. Majhi
30. Majhwar
31. Mawasi
32. Omitted
33. Munda
34. Nagesia, Nagasia
35. Oraon, Dhanka, Dhangad
36. Panika [in (i) Chhatarpur, Panna, Rewa, Satna, Shahdol, Umaria, Sidhi and
Tikamgarh districts, and (ii) Sevda and Datia tehsils of Datia district]
37. Pao
38. Pardhan, Pathari, Saroti
39. Omitted
40. Pardhi, Bahelia, Bahellia, Chita Pardhi, Langoli Pardhi, Phans Pardhi, Shikari,
Takankar, Takia [In (i) Chhindwara, Mandla, Dindori and Seoni districts, (ii) Baihar
Tahsil of Balaghat District, (iii) Betul, Bhainsdehi and Shahpur tahsils of Betul district,
(iv) Patan tahsil and Sihora and Majholi blocks of Jabalpur district, (v) Katni (Murwara)
and Vijaya Raghogarh tahsils and Bahoriband and Dhemerkheda blocks of Katni
district, (vi) Hoshangabad , Babai, Sohagpur, Pipariya and Bankheditahsils and Kesla
block of Hoshangabad district, (vii) Narsinghpur district, and (viii) Harsud Tahsil of
Khandwa district]
41. Parja
42. Sahariya, Saharia, Seharia, Sehria, Sosia, Sor
43. Saonta,Saunta
44. Saur
45. Sawar, Sawara
46. Sonr
![Page 136: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
117 | P a g e
Appendix 3:List of Schedule Areas in Madhya Pradesh as Specified by
the Scheduled Areas under the fifth Schedule of Indian Constitution
1. Jhabua district
2. Mandla district
3. Dindori district
4. Barwani district
5. Sardarpur, Dhar, Kukshi, Dharampuri, Gandhwani and Manawar tahsils in Dhar
district
6. Bhagwanpura, Segaon, Bhikangaon, Jhirniya, Khargone and Meheshwar tahsils in
Khargone district
7. Khalwa Tribal Development Block of Harsud tahsil and Khaknar Tribal
Development Block of Khaknar tahsil in Khandwa district
8. Sailana and Bajna tahsils in Ratlam district
9. Betul tahsil (excluding Betul Development Block) and Bhainsdehi and
Shahpur tahsils in Betul district 10. Lakhanadone, Ghansaur and Kurai tahsils
in Seoni district
11. Baihar tahsil in Balaghat district
12. Kesla Tribal Development Block of Itarsi tahsil in Hoshangabad district
13. Pushparajgarh, Anuppur, Barhi, Kotma, Jaitpur, Sohagpur and Jaisinghnagar tahsils
of Shahdol district
14. Pali Tribal Development Block in Pali tahsil of Umaria district
15. Kusmi Tribal Development Block in Kusmi tahsil of Sidhi district
16. Karahal Tribal Development Block in Karahal tahsil of Sheopur district
17. Tamia and Jamai tahsils, patwari circle Nos. 10 to 12 and 16 to 19, villages Siregaon
Khurd and Kirwari in patwari circle no. 09, villages Mainawari and Gaulie Parasia of
patwari circle No. 13 in Parasia tahsil, village Bamhani of Patwari circle No. 25 in
Chhindwara tahsil, Harai Tribal Development Block and patwari circle Nos. 28 to
36,41,43,44 and 45B in Amarwara tahsil Bichhua tahsil and patwari circle Nos.
05,08,09,10,11 and 14 in Saunsar tahsil, Patwari circle Nos. 01 to 11 and 13 to 26, and
patwari circle no. 12 (excluding village Bhuli), village Nandpur of patwari circle No. 27,
villages Nikanth and Dhawdikhapa of patwari circle no 28 in Pandurna tahsil of
Chhindwara district.
![Page 137: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
118 | P a g e
Appendix 4: List of Participants with Photographs of various meetings
held during the ESA study in Chhindwara
Ward No. 02 Krishna Nagar
Date 10-04-2018
Ward No. 03- Veer Sawarkar Ward No. 06 Shiv Mandir (Shiv
Nagar Colony)
1 Smt. Anita Suryawanshi Mr Chandrabhan Ugle Smt. Khatija
2 Smt. Rekha Deharia Mr Virendra Deharia Smt. Zahirabi
3 Smt. Annu Bhalavi Mr Ramesh Pawar Smt. Bulsa
4 Smt. Mini Bai Mr Rajkumar Sahu Mr Abdul Mohammad
5 Smt. Seema Gautam Mr Suresh Somkunwar Mr Sameer Khan
6 Smt Sapna khular Mr Meera Nagwanshi Mr Sudhakar Raut
7 Smt Usha Sakre Smt. Anarkali Bai Mr. Abdul Aziz
8 Smt Champa Khushwa Smt. Jamuna Banwanshi Mr. Neesar Ansari
9 Smt. Rammu Bai Smt. KantaGirhari Mr. Imran Khan
10 Smt Geeta Vishwakarma Smt. Bhagwati Unnate Mr. Narayan Malviya
11 Smt Ujra bai Khushwa Smt. KantiDhurve Smt Girja bai Yadav
12 Shri Rajkumar Sakre Smt. Manubai Smt Kiran Malviya
13 Mr Vinod Suryawanshi Smt. Kunti bai Smt. Chhotibai
14 Mr. Netram Vishwakarma Mr. Anshulal Uikey Smt. Shobha Rai
15 Mr. Kailash Bunkar Mr. Krishnakant Sigotia Smt. Meerabai Pal
16 Mr. Vishrami Malviya Mr. Santosh Sahu Smt. Hasina Been
17 Mr. Ravi Bharsiya Mr. Rajaram Uikey Mr. Amit Singh
18 Mr Yogesh Arsiya Mr. Deepak Patel
19 Mr Jeevan Mr. Golu Rajput
20 MrImraat Lal Mr. Ashok Mandre
21 Mr Avinash Bhavbhi Mr. Balkrishna Sahu
22 Mr Mannu Uikey Mr. Atmaram Yadav
23 Smt. Rekhka Verma
24 Smt. Savita bai
Ward No. 05 Shiv Nagar
Colony Gali No. 01
Ward No. 07 Ward No. 14
1 Mr Md. Zibraill Mr. Sarfaz Ahmed Maanu
Bhai (Ex Corporator) Mr. Kamal vishwakarma
2 Mr Ramsingh Verma Mr. Sunil Agarwal Mr. Jitendra Ghrekar
3 Mr Sudhir Yadav Mr. Athar Ahmed Mr. Hemant Parodiya
4 Mr Bhadulal Mr. Haseeb Ansari Mr. Hariom Menu
5 Mr Md. Ramzan Khan Mr. Firoz Mr. Pankaj Barda
6 Smt. Ranjana Thakur Mr Shoiab Sidaqqi Mr. Golu Thakre
7 Smt. Chhayabai Mr. Suresh Yadav Mr. Naseer Mohammad
8 Smt. Santrabai Mr. Nitesh Soni Mr. Mukesh
9 Mr Rahman Mr. Akhliesh Soni Mr. Santram Eitariyia
10 Smt. Seema bai Mr. Hariram Malviya Mr Shivcharan Yadav
11 Mr Prahalad Singh Mr Abdul Safi Mr Gyanand Choudhary
12 Mr Ravendra Sahu Mr. Abdul Naseer Mr. Prahlad Yadav
13 Mr. Phaile Khan Mr. Ajay Nema Mranjay Shrivastava
14 Mr. Ashok Mandre Mr. VaibhavPatel Smt. Kamal Yadav
15 Mr. Gudu Yadav Mr. Akash Thakur Smt. Savita Vaikar
![Page 138: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
119 | P a g e
Ward No. Khajuri Ward No. 16 Ward No. 18
1 Smt. Ramkali Paratani Mr. Brijesh Singh Mr. Hemendra Bisen
2 Mr. Bisen Kumare Mr. Golu Vishwakarma Mr. Karan Rajput
3 Mr. Ghanshyam Mr. Umaprasad Sisodia Mr. Devman Deharia
4 SmtVisthariya Dhurve Mr. Arun Yadav Mr. Shivchand Bisen
5 Mr. Shankarlal Parte Smt. Sarita Verma Mr. P.L. Kumre
6 Mr Rambhorse Smt. Kamla Verma Mr. Amit Suryavanshi
7 Mr. Murari Pagodiya Mr. Dashrath Kolhe Mr. Ghumendra
8 Smt. Shyami Saryam Mr. Ajay Sakare Mr. T. Prasad
9 Smt. Gireesha Parte Smt. Dhankumari Mehra Mr. Yashoda Kumar
10 Mr. Dhanraj Varawa Smt. Geeta Shah Mr. Shaikh Siddqui
11 Smt Monika Dhurve Mr. Brijesh Shah Mr. Ritesh Singh Bisen
12 Smt Seema Smt. Jagrati Sisodia Mr. Ajay Thakre
13 Smt Sarita Makram Smt. Kusum Chourey Mr. Mazid Raza
14 Smt Indu Maskhole Mr. Jairam Sisodia Mr. Sandeep Ukodiya
15 Smt Lakshi Uikey Mr. MomendraSahu Mr. Ramesh Kalare
16 Smt Kajal Dhurve Mr. Arvind Nagore Smt. Sameena Khan
17 Mr. Kishen Partati Mr. Pradeep Suryavanshi Smt. Ashna Raza
18 Mr. Naveen Makserle
19 Mr. Avishek Garg
20 Smt. Seema Choudhari
Ward No.6 Ward No. 17 Ward No. 24
1 Sa1lim Khan Mr Umesh Malvi Mr Yogesh Bele
2 Taushin Khan Mr Mukesh Nirmalkar Mr Nimeechand Goyal
3 Ankit Yadav Smt Tivedhi Yadav Mr Dinesh Choube
4 Krishna Malviya Smt Dhanno Bai Mr Anand Dugh
5 Shakil Khan Mr Aanesh Vishvakarma Mr Mohsin Quesreshi
6 Mo. Moshin Khan Smt Rhesadi Mr Chiku Pal
7 Kalin Khan Smt Asma Ansari Smt Vandna
8 Naphisa Smt Anjuma Quereshi Smt Jyoti Bele
9 Ramjan Khan Smt Bharti Malvi Smt Anjali
10 Shamsher Shah Smt Bimla Malvi Smt Rupali
11 Parvin Begum Smt Vipteya Yadav Smt Laxmi Sahu
12 Ratika Khan Mrs Hakrudareya Smt Perte
13 Rafiqm Khan Smt Chandra Uike Mr Tejas Bele
14 RamkaliVanvewar Smt Anfesha Khan Mr Tikaram Sahu
15 Saira Begum Smt Insam Khan
16 Amina Begum Smt Baby Tanermalkar
17 Jamina Begum Smt Thunermalkar
18 Shakil Khan
19 Keshav Prasad Soni
20 Shahin Bano
![Page 139: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
120 | P a g e
Ward No.48
1 Smt. Ramkali Vishwakarma
2 Smt Chandrakala Kumare
3 Smt. Kaushallya Raysen
4 Smt. Sahiba Quershi
5 Mr. Hari Govinda
6 Mr. Ganesh Raysen
7 Mr. Upendra Singh Thomar
8 Smt. Meena Singh
9 Mr. Damodhar Raysen
10 Smt. Geeta
11 Smt. Mamta Nirmalkar
12 Smt. Anita
13 Smt Varsha Jaiswal
14 Mr. H. N. Parteri
15 Mr. S Parteri
16 Smt Sonia Mukati Patel
17 Smt Rosmi Mukali
![Page 140: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
121 | P a g e
Appendix 5: Land records of proposed STP and SPS land parcel
STP site
![Page 141: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/141.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
122 | P a g e
![Page 142: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/142.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
123 | P a g e
![Page 143: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/143.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
124 | P a g e
![Page 144: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/144.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
125 | P a g e
![Page 145: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/145.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
126 | P a g e
![Page 146: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/146.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
127 | P a g e
SPS Site- Koladhana
![Page 147: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/147.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
128 | P a g e
Appendix 6: Public Consultation photographs during execution of project
Women participation for the proposed construction of
STP
![Page 148: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/148.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
129 | P a g e
Appendix 7: Some of the Congested Roads
Location:-Raaz Takis Location:- New
Abadi
Location:-Indra Nagar Location:- Shinva Nagar
![Page 149: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/149.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
130 | P a g e
Appendix 8: Photos related to Environmental Management Plan
Water Sprinkling on Excavated Materials
![Page 150: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/150.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
131 | P a g e
Sanitation
Drinking Water Facilities
![Page 151: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/151.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
132 | P a g e
Appendix 9 A :Water Quality Standard as per BIS- IS 10500:2012
![Page 152: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/152.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
133 | P a g e
![Page 153: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/153.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
134 | P a g e
![Page 154: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/154.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
135 | P a g e
![Page 155: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/155.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
136 | P a g e
Treated Effluent standards as per CPCB Recommended Value under MPUDC
Comparison table of World Bank, CPCB and NGT guidelines
Pollutants Units Guideline
Value as per
WB
Standard
Guideline Value
as per CPCB Standard- 2017
(Adapted by MPUDC)
Recommended
value by NGT
(30.04.2020)
pH - 6-9 6.5-9 Not recommended
BOD Mg/l 30 10 Less than 10
COD Mg/l 125 50 Not recommended
Total Nitrogen Mg/l 10 10 Less than 10
Total Phosphorous Mg/l 2 2 Less than 2
Total Suspended Solids
Mg/l 50 10 Less than 10
Total Coliform Bacteria
MPN/100ml 400 <230 Less than 230
![Page 156: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/156.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
137 | P a g e
Appendix 9 B: WasteWater Test reports Sample-A
![Page 157: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/157.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
138 | P a g e
Sample-B
![Page 158: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/158.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
139 | P a g e
Sample-C
![Page 159: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/159.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
140 | P a g e
Sample -1
![Page 160: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/160.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
141 | P a g e
Sample-2
![Page 161: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/161.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
142 | P a g e
Sanple-3
![Page 162: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/162.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
143 | P a g e
Appendix 9c : Water Quality Test report of receving water Body (STP outfall)
![Page 163: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/163.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
144 | P a g e
![Page 164: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/164.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
145 | P a g e
Appendix 10 : Ambient Air and Noise Pollution Test report
![Page 165: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/165.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
146 | P a g e
![Page 166: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/166.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
147 | P a g e
Appendix 11: Land Allotment for Sludge disposal site
![Page 167: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/167.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
148 | P a g e
![Page 168: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/168.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
149 | P a g e
Appendix 12: Labour License
![Page 169: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/169.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
150 | P a g e
Appendix 13: Application for Railway Crossing
At present letter regarding Demand Draft has been forwarded by MPUDCL Bhopal to Railway
department.
![Page 170: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/170.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
151 | P a g e
![Page 171: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/171.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
152 | P a g e
![Page 172: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/172.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
153 | P a g e
![Page 173: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/173.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
154 | P a g e
![Page 174: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/174.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
155 | P a g e
![Page 175: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/175.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
156 | P a g e
![Page 176: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/176.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
157 | P a g e
![Page 177: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/177.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
158 | P a g e
![Page 178: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/178.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
159 | P a g e
Appendix 14: Letter regarding first and second stage permission from
Forest Department.
![Page 179: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/179.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
160 | P a g e
Appendix 15: Letter regarding second stage permission from Forest
Department
![Page 180: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/180.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
161 | P a g e
Land allotted for afforestation
![Page 181: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/181.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
162 | P a g e
![Page 182: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/182.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
163 | P a g e
Revised Demand note for second stage clearance
![Page 183: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/183.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
164 | P a g e
Fee deposition for second stage clearance
![Page 184: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/184.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
165 | P a g e
Appendix 16: Labors Health Checkup Camp
![Page 185: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/185.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
166 | P a g e
Appendix 17: Contractor Survey for Project Affected Persons
![Page 186: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/186.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
167 | P a g e
Appendix 18: CTE for Chhindwara STP
![Page 187: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/187.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
168 | P a g e
Appendix 19: Road Crossing
Details of Road Crossing involved in Chhindwara subproject
S.
No.
Zone M.H.
From
M.H.
to
Length Dia of
pipe
Area
1 1 44 43 20m 150 Narsingpur Road, Ganj
Area
2 1 297 326 20m 400 Narsingpur Road
3 1 559 574 20m 150 Narsingpur Road
4 1 563 564 20m 400 Narsingpur Road
5 1 486 487 20m 200 ChaarFatak, Over
Bridge
6 1 2253 2254 20m 400 ChaarFatak, Over
Bridge
7 1 1707 1706 20m 600 Seoni Road
8 1 2180 2182 20m 150
9 2 2050 5049 20m 200 NGP road Near
Stadium
10 2 4126 4079 20m 150 Jail Chowka
11 2 4141 4093 20m 150 DDC College
12 2 4103 4431 20m 150 PharaChowka
13 2 7643 7325 20m 150 Char Dham Chowk
14 2 7638 8207 20m 150 Co-ed College
![Page 188: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/188.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
169 | P a g e
Appendix : 20 Treated Effluent standards as per CPCB
Recommended Value under MPUDC
Comparison table of World Bank, CPCB and NGT guidelines
Pollutants Units Guideline
Value as per
WB
Standard
Guideline Value
as per CPCB Standard- 2017
(Adapted by MPUDC)
Recommended
value by NGT
(30.04.2020)
pH pH 6-9 6.5-9 Not recommended
BOD Mg/l 30 10 Less than 10 COD Mg/l 125 50 Not recommended Total Nitrogen Mg/l 10 10 Less than 10 Total Phosphorous Mg/l 2 2 Less than 2 Total Suspended Solids
Mg/l 50 10 Less than 10
Total Coliform Bacteria
MPN/100ml 400 <230 Less than 230
![Page 189: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/189.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
170 | P a g e
Appendix : 21 Sludge Disposal Plan
Introduction
Sewage sludge consists of by-products of wastewater treatment. It is a mixture of water,
inorganic and organic materials, removed from wastewater coming from various sources
(domestic sewage, industries), storm water run- off from roads and other paved area, through
physical, biological, and/or chemical treatments. Sewage sludge is also referred to as bio-solids.
The unit wastewater is determined considering the proposed improvements to the Water Supply
System, the usage from ground water sources and an appropriate return factor. Infiltration is also
considered and converted to a unit rate. Overall calculations are presented in Table-1.
Table 1 : Per Capita Sewage Generation (for Core area and 7 villages)
Total per capita water supply 135 lpcd
Sewage generation at 80% of the total water supply 108 lpcd
Add for infiltration (10% of wastewater quantity) 10.8 lpcd
Total unit sewage rate being admitted to system 118.8
lpcd
Due to topography and sparse distribution of population, whole Chhindwara Municipal
Corporation (CMC) area cannot be provided with sewerage system without compromising
depths or high numbers of SPS. Additionally, population density is very low in outer areas that
will lead to solid deposition inside sewers. Hence, only part of the villages that can be connected
to city sewerage by gravity is considered. Hence, the proposed "Sewerage Network and STP"
project of Chhindwara Municipal Corporation (CMC) envisages dividing whole town in two
clusters:
Core city and 7 adjacent villages
17 villages merged with CMC in January 2015.
It is proposed to set up 28 MLD capacity sewage treatment plant (STP) in first cluster which is
further divided in two zones based on the topography and from the point of view of techno-
economical collection system and easy maintenance and operation (refer Figure-1). The DPR
envisages construction of Sewage Pumping Station SPS to pump the Sewage collected from
Zone 1 and Zone-2 to the main trunk leading to STP.
![Page 190: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/190.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
171 | P a g e
Figure-1: Zonation of Chhindwara CMC Area
Proposed Sewerage collection, convey & treatment System
For sewage collection the whole considered area has been divided into two zones. Zone 1 design
population in the year 2048 is 115,020 and Zone 2 population is 175,899. Considering the
techno-economics, for pipes up to 300 mm diameter, has been taken as DWC and above 300 mm
NP-3 concrete pipe has been taken. The minimum diameter of pipe taken is 150 mm and with a
minimum cover of 1.0 m. The maximum diameter of pipe is 1000 mm and depth are 4.8 m. The
total network length is 305.142 km. The details are given in Table-2. Detailed flushing plan is
enclosed as appendix 23.
Table-2: Details of Pipeline Network
S. No. Diameter Length (km)
1. 150 mm 215.75
2. 200 mm 40.485
3. 250 mm 12.00
4. 300 mm 7.33
5. 400 to 1000 mm\ 27.07
Total 302.635
At every 30 m length and change in alignment manhole has been proposed. At certain point
where self-cleaning velocity during initial period is much less than desirable 0.6 m/s; flushing
system is proposed to be constructed. where it will flow up to SPS through gravity. From SPS it
will be pumped to STP by pumping main of DI K-9 of 2.5 km. The proposed Sewerage network
in Chhindwara as Shown in Figure-2.
A 28 MLD capacity sewage treatment plant (STP) is shall be construct to ensure that liquid
effluent received during the design period is treated as per standard of CPCB and discharged into
nearby water body. STP should have enquired treatment unit operations comprising of following
units.
Primary Treatment system
Inlet Chamber
Fine screen
![Page 191: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/191.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
172 | P a g e
Grit removal Unit
Sequential batch reactor (SBR) – C-TECH
C-Tech is a CYCLIC ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT process. It provides highest
treatment efficiency possible in a single step biological process.
The C-TECH – System is operated in a batch reactor mode this eliminates all the inefficiencies
of the continuous processes. A batch reactor is a perfect reactor, which ensures 100% treatment.
Two or more modules are provided to ensure continuous treatment. The complete process takes
place in a single reactor, within which all biological treatment steps take place sequentially.
No additional settling unit, secondary clarifier is required
The complete biological operation is divided into cycles. Each cycle is of 3 – 5 hrs duration,
during which all treatment steps take place. The Basin operation stages are depicted in Figure-3.
Figure-3: SBR C-Tech basin operation stages
![Page 192: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/192.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
173 | P a g e
A basic cycle comprises:
Fill-Aeration(F/A)
Settlement (S)
Decanting (D)
These phases in a sequence constitute a cycle, which is then repeated
C hlorination system
Treated sewage from SBR basin flow by gravity into1 unit chlorine contact tank through channel
where chlorine is added for disinfection at suitable dosing rate with 2 numbers of chlorinators
to achieve the desired Fecal Coli-Form Standard.
S ludge Handling Devices
A sludge sump pump is provided to collect sludge generated from SBR and 3 sludge pumps
(2W+ 1 SB) are installed to pump the Sludge. Three numbers of (2W + 1 SB) mechanical dewatering
device are provided to dewater the sludge. Polyelectrolyte is dosed online at the inlet of
centrifuge to enhance sludge dewatering efficiency.
Estimation of Sludge Generation
In Sewage about 99.99% water and 0.01% solid will present. Solid part of sewage is generally
called as sludge, its separation process will be carried out at all stages of treatment, mainly in
Secondary treatment. In physical treatment all floatable particles are separated by screen
chamber and grit particles allow to settle and separated., settled sludge convey to centrifuge
sump. In biological treatment sludge is generated by settlement of activated microorganisms and
nutrients. Partial amount of sludge recirculated in treatment remaining sludge pump in to
centrifuge sump. The details of sludge generation are given in Table-3.
Table-3: Details of Quantity of sludge generation
Actual Oxygen Requirement Calculation
A) Volume of sewage to be treated per day 28 MLD
B) Inlet BOD 220 mg/lit.
C) Outlet BOD 10 mg/lit.
D) BOD Removed= B – C 210 mg/lit.
E) BOD Removed in a day= A X D/ 1000 5880 kg/day
F) Oxygen required for Oxidation of BOD 1.2 kg/kg BOD
G) Oxygen required for oxidation of BOD= E X F 7056 kg/day
Sludge Wasting
A) Specific Sludge Yield considered 0.97 kg/kg BOD
removed
B) BOD Removed 5880 kg/day
C) Excess Sludge to be waste = B X A 5704 kg/day
D) No. of basins provided 4 Nos.
E) Sludge to be wasted = C / D 1426 kg/ day
F) No. of Cycles 8 Cycle/Day/basin
![Page 193: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/193.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
174 | P a g e
G) Sludge to be wasted per cycle per basin = E/ F 178.25 kg/ day
H) Solid consistency in wasted sludge 0.8 %
I) Specific gravity of sludge 1.00
J) Vol. of sludge wasted per cycle per basin 22.28 m3
K) Considering running time of surplus activated sludge
pump per cycle
135 Min.
Sludge Handling System
Quantity of Sludge from SBR basin 5880 kg/day
Solid consistency of waste sludge considered 0.8 %
Specific Gravity of Sludge 1.00
Volume of sludge to be wasted in a day = 735
30.6255
m3/day
m3/hr
Hydraulic Retention Time provided in Sludge Sump 6 hrs.
Volume of Sludge sump required 184 m3
Centrifuge and Centrifuge Feed Pump
Volume of Sludge to be fed to centrifuge in a day 735 m3/day.
No. of Operative hours of centrifuge considered 20 hr./day
Capacity of centrifuge required 36.75 m3/hr.
Polyelectrolyte Dosing
Quantity of Sludge to be dewatered in a day 5880 Kg/day
Polyelectrolyte dosing 2.5 kg/tonne of dry
solids
Quantity of electrolyte required 14.70 kg/day
Design strength of polyelectrolyte solution 0.1 %
Centrate Sump and Pump House
Quantity of sludge to be fed to centrifuge 5880 Kg/day
Solid consistency of waste sludge considered 0.8 %
Volume of Waste sludge to be fed to the centrifuge 735 m3/day.
Solid concentration of dewatered sludge considered 20 %
Volume of dewatered sludge 29.4 m3/day.
Volume of Centrate sump 705.6 m3/day.
Flow rate of Centrate pump 3.5 m3/hr.
No. of working pumps provided 1 No.
No. of standby pumps provided 1 No.
Capacity of each pump required 50 m3/hr.
Sludge Disposal by Landfilling
In contract agreement 4.16 technical specification, Disposal of Sludge page no 308 it is clearly mentioned
to use landfill process for disposal of sludge
![Page 194: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/194.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
175 | P a g e
ESTIMATION OF LANDFILL CAPACITY, LANDFILL HEIGHT, LANDFILL AREA
BASIC DATA
Location : Chhindwara
Waste Generation : 29.4 cum /day
Design Life : Active Period = 30 years
LANDFILL CAPACITY, LANDFILL HEIGHT, LANDFILL AREA
Waste Generation Per Year
= 29.4X365
= 10,371cum
Total Waste Generation in 30 Years
= 321930 cum
Volume of Daily Cover
(on the basis of 15 cm soil cover on top and sides for lift height of 1.5 to 2 m)
= 0.1 x 321930
= 32193 cum.
Volume of Liner and Cover Systems
(Total volume required for components of liner system and of cover system (on the assumption of 1.5m
thick liner system (including leachate collection layer) and 1.0 m thick cover system (including gas
collection layer)
= 0.125 x 321930
= 40,241
(k = 0.25 for 10 m high landfill, 0.125 for 20 m high landfill and 0.08 for 30 m high landfill. This is valid
for landfills where width of landfill is significantly larger than the height)
Volume settleable after 30 years
Volume likely to become available within 30 years due to settlement / biodegradation of waste
= 0.3 X 321930.
= 96579 cum
First Estimate of Landfill Volume
Ci = (321930+ 32193+ 40241 – 96579)
= 297785 cum.
![Page 195: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/195.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
176 | P a g e
Likely Shape of Landfill
Rectangular in plan (length: width = 2:1)
Primarily above ground level, partly below ground level.
Area Restrictions: Nil
Possible Maximum Landfill Height = 20 m
Area Required = (297785)/20
= 14889.25 sqm.
= 85m X 175m
Approximate Plan area = 14875 m2 i.e about 1.488 ha.
Methodology of landfilling
Waste for land filling will be compacted in thin layer using heavy compactors to achieve high density of
the waste. Landfill cell will be covered at the end of each working day with minimum 10 cm of soil, inert
debris or construction materials Prior to commencement of monsoon season, an intermediate cover of 40-
45 cm thickness of soil will be placed on the landfill with proper compaction and grading to prevent
infiltration during monsoon. proper drainage will be constructed to divert runoff away from the active cell
of the landfill. After completion of landfill, a final cover will be designed to minimize infiltration and
erosion.
The specification of final cover is as follows: -
Top cover will have barrier soil layer comprising of 60 cm of clay or amended soil with permeability
coefficient lesser than 1X10-7 cm/sec. On top of the barrier soil layer, there will be drainage layer of
15cm. On top of drainage layer, there will be vegetative layer of 45 cm to support natural plant growth
and minimize erosion.
Transportation
Transport of liquid sludge through tank truck and dewatered sludge in dump trucks are the most
commonly used methods During first decade generation of sludge will be lesser than next decades. In
Centrifuge unit arrangements are made in a way that sludge cakes fall directly in the tractor trolly from
centrifuge unit. Trucks are then transported to the disposal site.
Table-4: Key Aspects to be considered during Sludge Generation
Volume control of hauled
material
Bucket volumetric capacity will no surpassed and free board will be
kept to the top of the bucket /wagon side structure.
Vehicle surface and Tyre
cleaning
Tyre and vehicle surface will be thoroughly washed before leaving
treatment plant.
Covering Although covering the sludge with canvas may not be necessary for
dried sludge with high solid content, but it will be provided to avoid
undesirable situation
Safety locks Safety locks will be verified every time to avoid accidental openings
during sludge transportation. Complete check for all container locks
![Page 196: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/196.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
177 | P a g e
Location of Disposal
The Chhindwara Municipal Corporation has allotted the land for disposal of sludge at Salimota village,
Mohakheda Thaluq, Chhindwara Dist, Madhya Pradesh 48001. The Site Allotment Letter is enclosed
below. The coordinates of the site are 21.974402 N and 78.919937 E. The total area of the site is 2.086
ha and the Khasra no. is 14/5. The distance from STP to Sludge disposal land will be about 7.4 km. The
Route Map is enclosed as Figure-4.Link
https://www.google.com/maps/@21.9906643,78.9499733,6041m/data=!3m1!1e3
Figure-4: Route Map
will be carried out within plant yard and before truck loading starts
Us of bulk trucks Sludge container will be leak proof and preferably fitted for sludge
transport
Loading and transportation Weather protection will be made for loading in rainy season
![Page 197: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/197.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
178 | P a g e
CMO Letter for Allotment of Land for sludge Disposal
![Page 198: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/198.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
179 | P a g e
Site Photographs
![Page 199: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/199.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
180 | P a g e
Appendix 22: SOPs to respond COVID-19
![Page 200: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/200.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
181 | P a g e
![Page 201: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/201.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
182 | P a g e
![Page 202: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/202.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
183 | P a g e
![Page 203: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/203.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
184 | P a g e
![Page 204: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/204.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
185 | P a g e
![Page 205: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/205.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
186 | P a g e
![Page 206: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/206.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
187 | P a g e
![Page 207: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/207.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
188 | P a g e
![Page 208: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/208.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
189 | P a g e
![Page 209: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/209.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
190 | P a g e
Appendix :23 Flushing Arrangement Plan for Chhindwara Sewerage
System
A. Need for Flushing
Self-cleansing velocity is not achieved at initial sewer of Chhindwara, the
major reason is population load on the sewerage system, which is less. In
second stage to overcome self-cleansing velocity problem, the minimum
diameter of sewer pipe is considered as 150 mm and maximum slope is
generally considered as 1 in 200 & 250 in this pipe, which is steeper slope.
Even after steep slope provision self-cleansing velocity is not achieved at
initial sewers, therefore, to overcome this problem flushing points are provided
which are mentioned in the design sheet. It is to mention that as per sewer
design (zone1 and 2) for sewer diameter 250 mm and above, 100% self-
cleansing velocity is achieved.
B. Manhole in which flushing required
The Chhindwara sewerage system is divided in two zones and as per approved
design of Chhindwara sewerage system, manhole in which flushing is required
is mentioned in design sheet. In Zone – 1, out of 3230 manholes flushing is
proposed in 273 manholes and in Zone – 2, out of 8380 manholes flushing is
proposed in 1222 manholes. Total number of Manholes required flushing as
per design are 1495, After detailed survey of all 1495 manholes at site level it
is found that about 1252 Manholes, Property Chambers are connecting more
than one septic tank and achieves required self-cleansing velocity therefore
remain 243 Manholes mentioned in Appendix c&d, self-cleansing velocity
achieved by using of Mobile tankers and STP effluent as the source of water
supply.
The Chhindwara sewer system is designed in tree structure and on header
where velocity is less flushing is provided. Example - For Zone - 2 flushing is
provided on Manhole no. 1, 16 and 19 and all falls in Manhole no 4 so till
manhole no 4 effectively three flushing are done. This is general case in
complete Chhindwara sewerage system. As per IS-4111 Part 2, the
approximate quantity of water for different diameter of pipes is given over the
length of 75 to 90 meters. The quantity of flushing water with slope and
diameter is provided in CPHEEO manual for which length b/w two
consecutive flushing points in simultaneous conduits is not provided.
C. Quantity of Water for Flushing
As per CPHEEO manual, the quantity of water needed for flushing is tabulated below
Quantity of water needed for flushing
![Page 210: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/210.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
191 | P a g e
Quantity of Water in Liters
Slope 200 mm 250 mm 300 mm
1 in 200 2300 2500 3000
1 in 130 1500 1800 2300
1 in 100 1300 1500 2000
1 in 50 500 800 1000
1 in 33 400 500 700
As Chhindwara sewer system is designed for minimum 150 mm diameter of
sewer therefore as per above table about 2000 lit water per manhole will be
required for flushing of manhole. The flushing shall be done once in the 24
hours.
D. Proposal for Flushing
The clause of agreement for flushing arrangement is written as follows –
“7. Flushing Arrangements: -
7.1 Where it is not practicable to obtain gradient in the sewers, steep enough to
give self-cleansing velocity, especially at the top ends of branch sewers which
receive very little flow initially, it will have to be flushed occasionally at
suitable points to keep it reasonably clean from deposition and clogging. In this
regard, the contractor shall consider one or a combination of options such as
(a) construction of special flushing tank (manually operated or automatic
flushing tanks) at suitable points in sewer line, (b) controlled admission of a
limited amount of surface water in sewer line at required point, (c) construction
of flushing manholes at suitable points, (d) use of mobile water tankers to flush
at suitable points following pre-determined schedule considering the growth of
connections and flow, and (e) sewer cleaning equipment, and submit
methodology for keeping the sewers reasonably clean. Sewage treated to the
effluent standards prescribed can also be utilized for transportation by tankers
or using it by other means for flushing purposes. The contractor shall identify
suitable points in the sewerage system pursuant to the methodology submitted
in the technical submission and the number of points keeping in view the
Performance Standards (Fourth Schedule of OMSA) as acceptable to the
owner.”
As per above clause, point (a) construction of flushing tanks is not feasible as
the structure will be placed above ground and majorly the road is narrow at
flushing point locations this will obstruct the traffic and secondly these for
filling of flushing tanks separate pipe line / tankers will be required. Point (b)
surface water will not be available throughout the year the same may be
available for monsoon period only. Point (c) Flushing manholes are also not
suitable as per explanation given for point (a). Point (d) this point is considered
for arrangement of flushing which is explained below
![Page 211: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/211.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
192 | P a g e
We are submitting our proposal for flushing arrangement -
1. If, Septic tank effluent connect to manhole, no flushing proposed as flow
achieved with less velocity also.
The working septic tanks are identified by physical survey and are mentioned
in the sheet enclosed as Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 for Zone 1 & 2.
Flushing is not proposed in these manholes as solids are less in septic tank
overflow so self-cleansing will be achieved with less velocity.
As per Appendix in Zone -1, 223 number manhole and in zone 2, 1047
number manholes receive the septic tank flow therefore flushing arrangement
is not proposed in the same.
2. If, septic tank is not present then, as per s. no. (d) use of mobile water tankers
to flush at suitable points following pre-determined schedule considering the
growth of connections and flow.
The methodology will be as mentioned in the CPHEEO manual by
positioning a butterfly valve at the head sewer mouth in the manhole and is
kept open by an extended handle, which can be operated from ground level
when the manhole cover is opened. After opening the manhole cover, the
valve is closed by a quarter turn and the manhole is filled with water. After
filling, the valve is opened to enable flushing.
As per Appendix, in Zone -1 and Zone – 2 total 243 manholes are considered
for mobile tanker flushing.
Flushing water required per day for flushing for 243 manholes is worked out as
486 KLD (0.486 MLD) (243 x 2000 lit)
E. Water for Flushing
i. Waste water generated at city area is collected and convey to STP,
influent is treated as per standard method to achieve CPCB norms. Required
quantity of effluent will be used for the flushing of each manhole.
ii. Quantity of Water requirement from STP 243X2000 =486 KLD.
F. Plan for Truck Operation
The tanker of 8000 lit will be filled in average of 20 min and tanker of 6000 lit
will be filled in about 15 min. The detailed plan for truck has been worked out
as per location of flushing point to STP. The average running of truck for
flushing of 3 to 4 manholes will not be greater than the 4 km.
As per above description, on an average Time required for truck to fill,
flush 3-4 manholes in 1.5 hours of time therefore,
![Page 212: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/212.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
193 | P a g e
Each truck will cover 20 flushing points in 5 trip per day therefore it can
achieve single shift.
i.e 8 hours.
G. Capital and Operational Cost
Capital Cost
For Truck Purchase Rs. 900000 per
truck
13 1,17,00,000/- Appendix – a
B/F Valve for
Manhole
Rs. 10000 per
Manhole
243 24,30,000/- Appendix –b
Others Lump-
sum
4,00,000/-
Rs. In
Lac
145.30000/-
H. O&M Cost
Water Cost Treated Effluent
from STP
0
2 person per truck / day (one shift)
(regular Maintenance staff of zone and
STP will be used for this activity)
Rs. 400 per person for 13 tanker 10,400
Fuel
0.4 lit per trip (average considered 10
km /lit. 4km run per trip)
Rs. 70/lit for 13 tanker 1,820
Power required for pump running
(5HP Pump) min 8hr/day
Rs. 8 / unit Approx. 40 unit /day
320
Total O&M cost per day = 12,540
Total O&M cost per Month = 3,76,200
Regular Maintenance of Tanker and
others
Lumpsum / year 3,00,000
Total O&M cost per
Year
48,14,400
Rs. In Lac 48.14lac
![Page 213: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/213.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
194 | P a g e
Date : 20/08/2018
To,
HARSHAL JADHAV
LAXMI CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT LTD
PUNE
Dear Sir/Madam,
We are authorized dealer for John Deere for Pune & Mumbai. We are very thankful to you for showing interest in buying John
Deere Tractors. Further to our discussion on this subject, we are sending
you the quotation. Tractor 5036D (HP 36)
QUOTATION:
1) JD 5036D (36 HP)
PARTICULAR Product Specification Price ( Rs )
Basic Billing- Ex Showroom -
John Deer 5036D (36 HP)
6,95,000 /-
All Accessories Included
RTO & Insurance Included
CGST 6% Included
SGST 6% Included
CGST 9% Included
SGST 9% Included
Total 6,95,000/-
Tipping Trailer 2 wheel
PARTICULAR Product Specification Price (Rs) Basic Billing-
Ex Showroom Size: height 46" x
width 58" x length 10
feet, double chassis,
9mm thick, 10-gauge
plate with ladder &
filter. Exel 69" water
proof with color
paint.
2,05,000/-
CGST 9% Included /-
SGST 9% Included /-
TOTAL 2,05,000/-
![Page 214: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/214.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
195 | P a g e
Terms and Conditions:
• The tractor is readily available. This quotation and the above rates are valid till
31 AUG 2018.
• Delivery period 7 To 10 days Booking amount is 100%
• Three years warranty and 8 services free (Only Labour Charges Free)
• Commercial RTO & Insurance Extra at actual
Other information about the tractor company and the dealership M/s Kamal Motors is a leading tractor dealer for John Deere Tractors at Pune.
The company is known for rugged and technically advanced quality products. Our
service-oriented approach has helped us to be the most promising player in the
tractor industry in India. The market share in Maharashtra has surged threefold in
last three years. John Deere is a pioneer in tractor manufacturing in the world and
the Indian plant is located in Pune (Sanaswadi). You can learn more about our
company and the John Deere’s products at our website www.kamalmotors.in and
www.johndeere.co.in .
You are welcome to contact Mr Pandit Dudhale 91-9922909241 for any further
queries about the John Deere tractors/ farm implements, discount/ cash discount
and the tractor exchange scheme.
We eagerly await your response.
Thanks, and regards.
Mr. Pandit Dudhale Kamal Motors (Authorized Dealer For John Deere India Pvt. Ltd.)
Kamal Bagh, Wagholi, Tal. Haveli, Dist. Pune-412207
Email : [email protected]
Mob : +91-9922909241/9922927542
![Page 215: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/215.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
196 | P a g e
![Page 216: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/216.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
197 | P a g e
![Page 217: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/217.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
198 | P a g e
![Page 218: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/218.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
199 | P a g e
![Page 219: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/219.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
200 | P a g e
Appendix :24 Labour Management Procedures
1. INTRODUCTION
The Labour Management Procedures (LMP) is developed to manage and mitigate potential
risks under the Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Project, funded by the World Bank. The
LMP sets out the Project’s approach to meeting state and central government requirements as
well as the objectives of the World Bank’s Environmental and Social Framework.
2. OVERVIEW OF LABOUR USE ON THE SUB PROJECT CHINDWARA
Number of Project Workers: Maximum total number of 70 labour is to be engaged in a day at all
project sites combined including Sewerage Treatment Plant, IPS and sewerage network.
Characteristics of Project labour: Labour Management Plan and procedure applies to all project
workers, weather full time/ Part time, temporary, seasonal or migrant workers. Given the nature
of the project workforce (mostly semiskilled construction labour) and characteristics of the
labour force market in MP, it is likely that the workforce, especially the lower-skilled workers,
are predominantly male. The majority of Labour are locally hired with the exception of a few
skilled workers. Provisions are made for training and Capacity development and hire as many as
possible from local communities where the activities are taking place.
Timing of Labour Requirements: The workers will generally be required full time for the
project duration. Civil Works contract workers will be as per the requirement . Duration of the
engagement of labour will be based on the duration of respective sub-components of the project
or full project tenure.
3. ASSESSMENT OF KEY POTENTIAL LABOUR RISKS
Potential Labour Risks:
Labour risks associated with contracted workers at subproject level: Subprojects is being
implemented by M/S Laxmi Civil Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and most contracted workers are
being hired locally. All contractors are having written agreement for subletting the activities in
line with objective of MP UDP .
Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) risks are low to moderate in the Sewerage Treatment
Plant, and Underground Drainage of Chhindwara . Since the majority of contracted workers are
unskilled and untrained local population, however, risk remains that some incidence may occur
that lead to injuries.
Employment risks: Workers are being hired by the contractor, either directly as project staff
or indirectly as part of contracts with Consultants or service providers. The practice shows that
civil works subcontractors do practice a Labour contract with a lump-sum payment for a certain
type of service or scope of work.
(Remark: Detailed guidelines on OHS are being enclosed as Appendix 26 of C-ESA report) 4. BRIEF OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL LEGISLATION
Following acts are applicable:- • Minimum Wages Act 1948 • Payment of Wages Act, 1936 • The Payment of Bonus Act 1965 • Employees provident fund Act 1952
![Page 220: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/220.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
201 | P a g e
• The Workman Compensation Act, 1923 • Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of
Service) Act, 1979 • MP Building and other constriction workers Act (Regulation of Employment and Conditions
of Service) 1996. • Sexual Harassment of women at workplace Act, 2013 • Child Labour (Prohibition and regulation) Act,1986 • The contract Labour (regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970
Remark: The Chapter no. 3rd of C-ESA may be referred for more detail information regarding the labour
laws and policies applicable in the project.
5. RESPONSIBLE STAFF
Project Manager of Contractor’s Team are accountable and responsible for all the workers
associated with the project. Social and Environmental specialists of Contractor‘s , Project
Manager of Project Implementation Unit‘s and Team of Project Management Consultants are
jointly responsible for the following : • Implement this labour management procedure. • Ensure that civil works contractors comply with these labour management procedures, and
also prepare occupational health and safety plans before mobilizing to the field. • Ensure the contracts with the contractors are developed in line with the provisions of this
LMP and the project’s ESMF/ESMP. • Monitor contractors and subcontractors’ implementation of labour management procedures. • Monitor compliance with occupational health and safety standards at all workplaces in line
with state and National government labour legislation. • Monitor and implement training on LMP and OHS for project workers. • Ensure that the grievance redress mechanism for project workers is established and
implemented and that workers are informed of its purpose and how to use it. • Have a system for regular monitoring and reporting on labour and occupational safety and
health performance. • Occupational health and safety (OHS) , Training of workers (Tool Box Etc.) are being dealt
by Health and safety officer /Environmental of contractor. 6. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
• As specified in the labour Code, employment of project workers are based on the principles of non- discrimination and equal opportunity. There will be no discrimination with respect to any aspects of the employment relationship, including recruitment, compensation, working conditions and terms of employment, access to training, promotion or termination of employment. The following measures are being followed by contractors and implement and monitored by the PIU’s & PMC Social Safeguards Specialists, to ensure fair treatment of all labour:
• Recruitment procedures will be transparent, public and non-discriminatory, and open with respect to ethnicity, religion, sexuality, disability or gender.
• Applications for employment will only be considered if submitted via the official application procedures established by the contractors.
• Clear job descriptions will be provided in advance of recruitment and will explain the skills required for each post.
• All workers will have written contracts describing terms and conditions of work and will have the contents explained to them. Workers will sign the employment contract.
• Unskilled labour will be preferentially recruited from the surrounding communities.
![Page 221: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/221.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
202 | P a g e
• The contracted workers will not be required to pay any hiring fees. If any hiring fees are to be incurred, these will be paid by the Employer.
• Depending on the origin of the employer and employee, employment terms and conditions will be communicated in two languages, in the state language and the language that is understandable to both parties.
• In addition to written documentation, an oral explanation of conditions and terms of employment will be provided to workers who may have difficulty understanding the documentation.
• All workers will be 18 years old or above for civil works. • Work hours are set 8 hours a day, 48 hours a week, with a weekly rest day for engaged
labours. 7. AGE OF EMPLOYMENT
• Contractor will ensure that no construction workers under 18 years are employed. • Contractors will be required to verify and identify the age of all workers through proper
documentary evidence. The penalty procedure are being followed if underage workers are found working on the project
8. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
• The employment terms and conditions applying to contractor’s team members are being set out in this document. These internal labour rules will apply to all who are assigned to work on the project.
• Labour wages, hours and other applied provisions are as per the standard labour law and policies. Work hours are set 8 hours a day, 48 hours a week, with a weekly rest day for engaged labours.
9. GRIEVANCE MECHANISM
• A grievance mechanism is a procedure that provides a clear and transparent framework for addressing grievances related to the recruitment process and in the workplace. This typically takes the form of an internal procedure for complaints as well as external process, followed by consideration and management response and feedback system.
• A common grievance mechanism (GM) is already developed by MPUDC for stakeholders including all types of workers to raise workplace concerns. GM is accessible to all labour, worker, employees and community through various means (written, telephone, fax, social media and online through CM Helpline etc). Grievance logbook is maintained in site office.
10. CONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT
• Construction and other contracts include provisions related to labour and occupational health and safety as provided in the World Bank Standard Documents and state/Central Government Legislation.
• Contractor will manage and monitor the performance of contractors in relation to contracted workers, focusing on compliance by contractors with their contractual agreements (obligations, representations, and warranties) and labour management procedures. This includes inspections, and/or spot checks of project locations and work sites as well as of labour management records and reports compiled by contractors. Contractors’ labour management records are being maintained by contractor and reviewed and monitored by PIU and PMC.
![Page 222: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/222.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
203 | P a g e
Appendix :25 Grievance Redressal Format for the complaints received
(To be completed by the concerned PIU/ Contractor)
Name of town & Package No.
Project Name
Name of Project Manager & Concerned PIU
Name of Contractor & his Project Manager
Name of Complainant & his status (citizen/
official of ULB or any other organization/
others)
Number (given in the register) of the
complaint
Nature of Complaint (Safety issue/ utility
breakage/ accident/ quality related/
restoration/ damage to structure / others)
Date of Complaint
Date of Complaint informed to contractor
Time required/ given to contractor for
resolution (in case of safety &/or accidents,
the time given shall be immediate but not
exceeding 5 hours)
Complaint attended Date of Start
Action Taken
Date of closing of
complaint
Whether the complaint is attended in time Yes / No
If the complaint is not attended in time,
whether the complainant was informed. If
yes, when and how. If not, why
Signature of the contractor’s representative
Reconciliation from the complainant Date
Reconciliation Done by
(Name)
Statement of aggrieved
(Satisfied / Not Satisfied)
Name & Signature of PMC representative
Name & Signature of PIU representative
![Page 223: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/223.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
204 | P a g e
Appendix 26: Guidelines for the Management of Environmental, Health and Safety
in the Project construction sites
Background
Madhya Pradesh is geographically the second largest, fifth populous, and eighth most
urbanized state in India. Rapid urbanization in MP has seen sprouting of new urban
settlements across the state, more often close to existing cities. To respond to the
challenges of urbanization, State government undertook an ambitious program with the
support of World Bank called Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Programme
(MPUDP). This program focused on accessing urban sector central schemes, and setting-
up three state missions to respond to the needs of towns not covered under the central
schemes. Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company (MPUDC) is implementing the
MPUDP in the state.
Construction work can be particularly hazardous and accident prone. Personal protective
equipment, fire safety, electrical safety, confined space entry, emergency preparedness,
biological safety, chemical safety, hazardous waste disposal, vehicle safety and other
precautions are essential for safe construction work.
In this context, the Project Monitoring Unit of MPUDP decided to develop a detailed
guideline to ensure the quality standards for effective management of Environment,
Health and Safety issues in the implementation of World Bank supported MPUDP. All
contractors in projects are responsible for implementing the guidelines in their respective
projects.
These guidelines are not intended to be a step‐by‐step procedure for each activity. It is a
guideline document that outlines general activities, procedures, and requirements for all
the projects throughout the construction phase of the sub projects. These procedures must
always be read and implemented in conjunction with the related Contract Conditions. The
construction works shall be undertaken in accordance with Environmental, Health and
Safety guidelines under the World Bank supported subproject.
The guidelines are organized are as follows;
1. Personal Protective Equipment’s
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) provides additional protection to workers exposed to
workplace hazards in conjunction with other facility controls and safety systems. The contractor
shall provide required PPEs to workmen to protect against safety and/or health hazards.
Primarily PPEs are required for the following protection:
✓ Head Protection (Safety helmets)
✓ Foot Protection (Safety footwear, Gumboot, etc.)
✓ Body Protection (High visibility clothing (waistcoat/jacket), Apron, etc.)
✓ Personal fall protection (Full body harness, Rope‐gap fall arrester, etc.)
✓ Eye Protection (Goggles, Welders glasses, etc.)
✓ Hand Protection (Gloves, Finger coats, etc.)
✓ Respiratory Protection. (Nose mask, SCBAs, etc.)
![Page 224: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/224.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
205 | P a g e
✓ Hearing Protection (Ear plugs, Ear muffs, etc.)
• Site EHS officer should be maintained record of issue and replacement PPE.
• Store in charge must maintain 10 % extra PPE of total requirement available in the
store.
• To employee and workers must issue the PPEs without any charge. Workers/Sub-
contractor should deposit the PPE after completion of their work or no longer use.
• EHS officer should train workers for the use of PPE.
• PPE compliances should be checked during routine inspection, Safety audit etc.
• Safety shoes and helmet are mandatory PPE during construction work. All employees
must wear helmet and safety shoes in all construction project area. No one should be
permitted to enter the site without helmet and safety shoes.
• Occasional visitors should be provided helmet from security main gate during
construction project round. Safety shoes cannot be insisted upon for such occasional
visitors who are on construction project round. Normal shoes can be considered
adequate for such occasional visitors.
• Safety helmets should be worn with chin straps in accordance with the following color
code:
• All Site-based personnel and visitors to Site must ensure that suitable PPE is worn at
all times while on the construction site. Additional PPE must be kept an appropriate to
the location.
• Proper maintenance of PPE, including cleaning when dirty and replacement when
damaged or worn out. Proper use of PPE should be part of the recurrent training
programs for employees
2. Health and Safety
• All the contractor must prepare Environmental, Health and Safety Plan for their
respective project construction site under World Bank Project.
• Smoking and eating should be prohibited throughout the workplace except in
designated areas.
• Adequate internal and external lighting should be provided by all Contractors at all
workspaces.
• All portable electrical equipment should not exceed 220 volts with effective Safety
Trip system excluding portable welding sets.
• Only qualified electrician is authorized for any electrical connection, disconnection
and maintenance work.
• Instructions given on safety signs must be adhered to at all times.
• Safety sign, Posters and barricades should not be replaced or remove without
permission from the EHS officer/ nominated person for EHS.
• Fire extinguishers must not be removed from their designated places except for
extinguishing. Location of fire extinguisher must be clearly marked and known to all.
• Any person working on or near operational plant or equipment must be competent and
trained in such work.
• Do not allow to touch any hazardous chemicals or unknown item at site except
concerned person.
![Page 225: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/225.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
206 | P a g e
• Work place should be kept neat & clean. Wastage/Debris should be collected at
identified areas after the completion of work on daily basis.
• Access should be free from any obstruction at site.
• Only authorized person should be allowed to sit along with driver on the machinery (if
required).
• During heavy rain, improper lighting, heavy wind blowing at site, nobody should be
allowed to work at height.
• Horse playing, Fighting, Gambling and possession or used of firearms, ammunition,
alcoholic beverages and illegal drugs should be prohibited at work site. Any person
found in possession of or under the influence of controlled substance or alcohol will be
immediately removed from site.
• Report all injuries to Project in charge immediately, no matter how slight they may be.
• Security personnel should be deployed at security posts\ gates and around affected
area.
• No Alcoholic beverages or illegal drugs are permitted on work site. The contractor
should ensure that personnel is made aware of and fully comply with this prohibition
• Security guards must be ensured no such persons or workers be allowed to the work
site during non-working hours, especially if they drunk.
• Un authorized person should not be allowed in the work site without permission from
the concerned authority.
• All workmen should be screened before engaging them on the job. Physical fitness of
the person to certain jobs like working at height or other dangerous locations to be
ensured before engaging the person on work. The final decision rests with the site
management to reject any person on the ground of physical fitness.
• Workmen under 18 years of age should not be employed at site. No children should be
permitted inside the working area.
• Crèche should be provided in workmen colony if female workers is engaged, At
construction sites where 20 or more women are ordinarily employed, a hut for children
under the age of 6 years shall be provided.
• Contractor should ensure adequate supervision at workplace to the workers.
supervisors should ensure that all persons working under them should not create any
hazards to self or to co-workers.
• Nobody is allowed to work without wearing safety helmet. Chinstrap of safety helmet
should be always on.
• Usage of eye protection equipment should be ensured when workmen are engaged for
grinding, shipping, welding and gas-cutting. For other jobs as and when site safety
coordinator insists eye protection has to be provided.
• All the dangerous moving parts of the portable / fixed machinery being used should be
adequately guarded.
• Other than the electricians with red helmet no one is allowed to carry out electrical
connections, repairs on electrical equipment or other jobs related thereto.
• Power supply should be taken through Earth Leakage Circuit Breakers (ELCB) of
30mA Sensitivity.
![Page 226: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/226.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
207 | P a g e
• Inserting of bare wires for tapping the power from electrical sockets is completely
prohibited at the project site.
• All major, minor accidents and near misses to be reported to Project Manager / Site
Safety coordinator to enable the management to take necessary steps to avoid the
recurrence.
• Adequate firefighting equipment should be made available at workplace and persons
are to be trained in firefighting techniques with the co-ordination of Site Safety
Coordinator.
• All the unsafe conditions, unsafe acts identified by contractors, reported by site
supervisors should be noted down and / or safety personnel to be corrected on priority
basis.
• Littering at site is prohibited so that the work area is clean.
• Do not allow to spill any chemical / fuel / substances on ground, which may pollute
the environment
• Full body harness should be tied to safe anchoring point.
3. Working at Height
• No one should be allowed to work at or more than two meters height without wearing
safety belt and anchoring the lanyard of safety belt to firm support preferably at
shoulder level. The full body harness with double lanyard should be worn by worker
working above 2 meters.
• Ladders being used at site should be adequately secured at bottom and top.
• Material should not be thrown from heights. If required the area should be barricaded
and one person should be posted outside the barricade for preventing the trespassers
from entering the area.
• All scaffoldings / work-platforms should be strong enough to take the expected load.
The width of the working platform and fall protection arrangements should be
maintained as per recommendation of Site Safety coordinator.
• Female workmen are not allowed to work on height & high-risk areas.
• The horizontal life line with adequate strength should be provided or used for the
intended purpose only.
• The Contractor shall ensure that work is not carried out at height where it is reasonably
practicable to carry out the work safely otherwise than at height.
4. Barricades
• The Contractor shall ensure the general construction area is protected; barricades must
be erected before any excavation, extended as the excavation progresses and
maintained until the project is completed.
• The Contractor shall furnish, erect, and maintain all the necessary signs, barricades,
lighting, fencing, bridging, and flaggers that conform to the requirements set forth by
OSHA.
• All the project construction sites should be fenced and barricaded with appropriate
standards as prescribed in OSHA (WTP/STP, OHTs, IPSs, MPSs store etc.).
✓ Stairways
✓ Hatches
✓ Chutes/open trenches
![Page 227: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/227.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
208 | P a g e
✓ Street openings – manholes.
✓ Elevated platforms
✓ Areas with moving machinery
✓ Excavation sites
✓ Construction sites
✓ Temporary wall or floor openings
• The following list provides guidelines for using barriers and guards:
✓ When necessary, reroute pedestrian and vehicular traffic to completely avoid a
construction site.
✓ Guard any permanent ground opening into which a person could fall with a
guardrail, load-bearing cover, or other physical barrier.
✓ Ensure that temporary floor openings, such as pits and open manholes, are guarded
by secure, removable guardrails. If guardrails are not available, have someone
guard the opening.
✓ Ensure that all stairways, ladderways, hatchways, or chute floor openings have
handrails or hinged covers.
✓ Ensure that enclosed stairways with four or more steps have at least one railing,
and that open stairways with four or more steps have two railings.
✓ Ensure that all platforms and walkways that are elevated or located next to moving
machinery are equipped with handrails, guardrails, and toe boards.
✓ Barricade any wall openings through which a person or tools could fall. Use gates,
doors, guardrails, or other physical barriers to block the opening.
✓ Mark and guard any excavation that is deeper than 12 inches.
✓ Mark and/or guard potholes and sidewalk damage as appropriate.
✓ Protect smoke detectors with some type of cover when construction work, such as
dust or fume producing activities, may affect smoke detectors.
✓ Barriers such as guardrails, hole cover, or other must be provided with suitable
signage.
• A warning barricade should be kept five (5) feet back from the edge of any excavation,
hole, platform or roof. A protective barricade may be placed closer, Barricades should
be erected before a hole is cut and extended as the excavation progresses.
• Wherever construction debris is dropped without the use of an enclosed chute.
• Work areas for electrical equipment with exposed energized parts.
• The swing radius of the rotating superstructure of cranes or other equipment.
• Wherever equipment is left unattended near a roadway at night.
• Construction areas in energized electrical substations.
• Barricade signs should be fully informative, legible and visibility displayed (during
day & night both).
• Where barricades cannot be installed, safety nets should be installed close to the level
of terrace at which danger of fall exists.
• Barricades can be removed after restoration/filling the cut outs/ trenches.
• Where secured foot hold is impracticable, safety belt with secure anchorage
arrangement should be provided. A life line with sufficient strength should be
provided all around the building to which the workers exposed to the risk of falling tie
the hooks of their safety belts.
![Page 228: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/228.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
209 | P a g e
5. Stacking
• Construction materials should not be allowed to stored/scattered in the towns as per
their convenience.
• PIU and PMC must ensure all the construction materials stored at designated place by
the contractor.
• Materials should be segregated as per size and length and category and placed in neat,
orderly piles that are safe against falling. If the piles are high, they should be stepped
back at suitable intervals in height. Piles of materials should be arranged so as to allow
a passageway of not less than 1m width in between the piles or stacks for inspection
and removal. All passageways should be kept clear.
• Materials should be stacked on well drained, firm and unyielding surface. Material
should not be stacked so as to impose any undue stresses on walls or other structures.
• Materials should be stacked in such a manner as not to constitute a hazard to passer-
by.
• When the materials have to be handled manually, each workman should be instructed
by his foreman or supervisor in the proper method of lifting heavy objects.
• Workmen should be provided with suitable equipment for his personal safety as
necessary. Supervisors should also take care to assign enough men to each lifting job;
the weight carried by each man should be determined by the distance to be moved,
difficulty of movement presented, time required, etc.
• Whenever any stack exceeds 1.5 m height, suitable and safe means of access should be
provided for the use of workmen and such means of access should not disturb the
stability of the stack.
• Appropriate signs should be placed at all storage locations where special conditions
exist or where special precautions are necessary.
• No section of the plant or other structure or part of a structure or sites should be left
unguarded in such condition that it may fall, collapse or be weakened due to wind
pressure or vibration.
6. Heavy Equipment Safety
• When using heavy equipment, there are five basic guidelines that employees must
always follow to ensure safety:
✓ Know how to properly operate the equipment you are using. Training on proper
operation should be documented.
✓ Do not use heavy machinery when you are drowsy, intoxicated, or taking
prescription medication that may affect your performance.
✓ Use only equipment that is appropriate for the work to be done.
✓ Inspect your equipment to ensure that it is in good working condition before
beginning a job. In addition, ensure that regular inspections and maintenance are
conducted as appropriate.
✓ Do not stress or overload your equipment.
• Accidents do not just happen, they are caused. Therefore, employees should also
follow these guidelines:
✓ Ensure the following before leaving equipment unattended:
✓ All buckets, blades, etc. are on the ground.
✓ Transmission is in neutral.
![Page 229: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/229.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
210 | P a g e
✓ Engine is off
✓ Equipment is secure against movement.
✓ Never get on or off moving equipment.
✓ Do not attempt to lubricate or adjust a running engine
✓ Turn the engine off before refueling.
✓ Keep all shields and safety guards in place.
✓ Avoid underground utilities and overhead power lines.
• The following sections provide basic guidelines for working with forklifts, frontend
loaders, and backhoes. Refer to the product documentation that accompanied your
equipment for more information and specific instructions.
• Always lower the bucket before servicing the equipment or leaving the loader
unattended.
• Be extremely careful when operating near banks and slopes.
• When cutting a bank, be careful not to cause a cave-in. Do not drive on an overhang.
Be extremely careful when operating near banks and slopes.
• When cutting a bank, be careful not to cause a cave-in. Do not drive on an overhang.
7. Trenching
• Provides requirements for employee entrance, working environment, and egress
to/from open surface trenches and excavations
• The estimated location of utility installations such as sewer, telephone, fuel, electric,
water lines, or other underground installations that reasonably may be encountered
during excavation work shall be determined prior to opening an excavation
• Utility companies or utility locator should be contacted to precisely locate such
utilities Excavation may proceed with CAUTION if:
• Utility Company/Locator cannot be located or contacted
• Utility Company/Locator cannot locate utility
• When excavating operations approach the location of underground utilities, the exact
location shall be determined by safe and acceptable mean
• While excavation is open, underground installations shall be protected, supported, or
removed as necessary to safeguard employees
• Runways/ramps shall be anchored to prevent movement or slipping
• Employees exposed to public vehicular traffic shall be provided with and wear vest or
other suitable garments marked with high visibility materials
• No employee shall be permitted underneath loads handled by digging or lifting
equipment
• Employees entering bell-bottomed holes shall wear harness and life line protection
• Excavations near structures or buildings shall be protected by shoring or other means
to assure stability of the affected structure.
• Excavations near foundation footings, sidewalks, pavement, or other appurtenant
structures shall be protected by underpinning or other suitable means to maintain
stability
• Excavated materials shall be kept a minimum of 2’ from the edge of excavations or by
the use of retaining devices
8. Emergency
![Page 230: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/230.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
211 | P a g e
• All the contractor must prepare Emergency Preparedness Plan for their respective
project construction site under World Bank Project.
• Mobilized the fire squad (security) at emergency site.
• Cordon off the affected area and guide traffic / emergency vehicles and control
unnecessary gathering of persons around the site.
• Ensure vigilance at security posts / gates and be in constant contact with construction
manager / area manager and other numbers connected with safety, security,
firefighting and management.
• Entries to the demolition area should be restricted except authorized persons only.
• As the height work of OHTs, intake well, STPs etc. extra safety precaution should be
made available, Extra safety precaution mean appropriate safety nets, proper use of
safety belt, proper platform, lifeline rope to be tied at proper place etc. should be
provided.
9. Housekeeping
• All the contractor must prepare excess earth/debris and other construction materials
disposal Plan for their respective project construction site under World Bank Project.
• Adequate time shall be assigned to ensure that good housekeeping is maintained.
• This shall be carried out by team of housekeeping squad.
• The contractor shall be responsible to provide segregated containers for disposal of
debris at required places and regular cleaning of the same.
• Proper and safe stacking of material are of paramount importance at yards, stores and
such locations where material would be unloaded for future use. The storage area shall
be well laid out with easy access and material stored / stacked in an orderly and safe
manner.
• Flammable chemicals / compressed gas cylinders shall be safely stored.
• Unused/surplus cables, steel items and steel scrap lying scattered at different places
within the working areas shall be removed to the identified location(s).
• All wooden scrap, empty wooden cable drums and other combustible packing
materials, shall be removed from work place to the identified location(s).
• Empty cement bags, if any and other packaging material shall be properly stacked and
removed.
• The Contractor shall ensure that all his sub‐contractors maintain the site reasonably
clean through provisions related to housekeeping.
• The contractor at all times should keep the premises free from accumulation of waste
materials or rubbish caused by their operations.
• Keep the premises clean and free from fire hazards, and maintain the work and
materials stockpiles neat and orderly throughout the construction period to permit safe
and convenient access and movement of workers.
• Water sprinkling should be done to prevent the spread of debris, dust or other
contaminants into the air or surrounding areas at all times.
• Construction debris and rubbish as generated by construction activity should be
removed by contractor daily and not allowed to accumulate. It shall be deposited in a
designated place.
![Page 231: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/231.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
212 | P a g e
• Scrap materials for reuse in temporary work shall be segregated and properly stored,
protected and covered as for new materials.
• Construction debris removed from the upper levels of the site shall be deposited
directly into a Dump sites and it should be transported through covered truck.
• The contractor should remove from the premises and site, all project signs, tools,
scaffolding, surplus materials and temporary work and structures upon completion of
the work and shall leave the work and the premises clean and acceptable to the owner.
• All surplus earth and debris are removed/disposed off from the working areas to
officially designated dumpsites. Trucks carrying sand, earth and any pulverized
materials etc. in order to avoid dust or odour impact shall be covered while moving.
• The tyres of the trucks leaving the site shall be cleaned with water, wherever the
possibility of spillage on carriageways meant for regular road traffic exists.
10. Traffic Management
• Construction activities may result in a significant increase in movement of heavy
vehicles for the transport of construction materials and equipment increasing the risk
of traffic-related accidents and injuries to workers and local communities.
• The incidence of road accidents involving project vehicles during construction should
be minimized through a combination of education and awareness-raising, and the
adoption of traffic safety rules and standard procedures
• All the contractor must prepare Traffic Management Plan for their respective project
construction site under World Bank Project.
• Contractor shall control the Traffic Management by designated site staff.
• Warn the road user clearly and sufficiently in advance.
✓ Provide safe and clearly marked lanes for guiding road users.
✓ Provide safe and clearly marked buffer and work zones
✓ Provide adequate measures that control driver behavior through construction
zones.
✓ Provide additional support in the form of a flag man at all times, to assist the
operator of the equipment or a heavy transport vehicle
• Warning signs shall be displayed in the area wherever required such as deep
excavation, work at height or any other area pointed out PIU.
• Materials hanging over / protruded from the chassis / body of any vehicle especially
• During material handling shall be indicated by red indicator (red light/flag) to indicate
the caution to the road users.
• No parking of trucks/trolleys, cranes and trailers etc. shall be allowed on roads, which
may obstruct the traffic movement.
11. Temporary Signs
• The Contractor shall provide sign boards mentioning work area or temporary facility
area. These signboards shall be properly displayed in appropriate locations.
• The signboard shall be prepared by experienced signboard manufacturer. It shall
contain the description in English, Hindi and local language. It shall also contain
relevant and appropriate graphics.
12. Routine Inspection
![Page 232: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/232.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
213 | P a g e
• Inspections by the contractor and PIU and PMC Team that can be classified under this
inspection program are:
✓ Daily Inspection of site, plant and equipment (before the start of day)
✓ Weekly Inspection of scaffold
✓ Monthly Inspection of electrical hand tools by competent electrical supervisor
✓ Quarterly Inspection of temporary electrical systems by competent electrical
supervisor
✓ Half‐yearly inspection of lifting machinery, lifting appliances and equipment etc.
by competent person. The list mentioned above is not exhaustive. Contractor may
add additional categories.
13. Education and Training.
• Daily basic Tool Box Training should be carryout by the contractors at site before start
of the work
• EHS officer should conduct training on EHS in regular interval
• Monthly safety meeting should be conducted by the contractor
• Motivational program for improve & implement Safety at site should be conducted by
the contractors
14. First‐aid and Medical Facilities.
• All the contractor must ensure the availability of adequate number of first Aid facility
at respective project construction site under World Bank Project.
• Contractor can tie up with the local hospital for workers health checkup and
emergency treatment facility.
• Constructor ensure the availability of ambulance at construction site in case of
emergency.
• The Constructor will carry out quarterly awareness programme of HIV‐AIDS with the
help of AIDS control society and contractor must organize Health check-up camp for
their site workers at least once in a year.
15. Environmental Management.
15.1 Air Quality
• The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to minimise fugitive dust emissions
from operations involving excavation, grading, and clearing of land and disposal of
waste. He shall not allow emissions of fugitive dust from any transport, handling,
construction or storage activity to remain visible in atmosphere beyond the property
line of emission source for any prolonged period of time without notification to the
Employer.
• The Contractor shall use construction equipment designed and equipped to minimize
or control air pollution.
• The Contractor shall cover loads of dust generating materials like debris and soil being
transported from construction sites. All trucks carrying loose material should be
covered and loaded with sufficient free ‐ board to avoid spills through the tailboard or
sideboards.
• The Contractor shall promptly transport all excavation disposal materials of whatever
kind so as not to delay work on the project. Stockpiling of materials shall only be
allowed at sites designated by the Employer. The Contractor shall place excavation
![Page 233: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/233.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
214 | P a g e
materials in the dumping/disposal areas designated in the plans as given in the
specifications.
• The Contractor shall water down construction sites as required to suppress dust, during
handling of excavation soil or debris or during demolition. The Contractor shall make
water sprinklers, water supply and water delivering equipment available at any time
that it is required for dust control use. Dust screens shall be used, as feasible when
additional dust control measures are needed especially where the work is near
sensitive receptors.
• The Contractor should carryout and submit to MPUDC Ambient Air Monitoring as per
contract specific Environment Management Plan and follow guidelines for
construction activity in related to monitoring, controlling and mitigating air pollution.
15.2 Water Quality
• The Contractor must comply with the requirements of the Central Ground Waterboard
for discharge of water arising from dewatering. Any water obtained from dewatering
systems installed in the works must be either re‐used for construction purposes and
this water may subsequently be discharged to the drainage system or, if not re‐used,
recharged to the ground water at suitable aquifer levels. The Contractor shall not be
permitted to directly discharge, to the drainage system, unused ground water obtaining
from the excavation without obtaining approval of PIU or the Agency controlling the
system
• The Contractor shall discharge/disposal wastewater arising out of site office, canteen
or toilet facilities constructed by him into sewers through a wastewater drainage
system to be constructed by the Contractor for proper discharge, after obtaining prior
approval of PIU.
• The Contractor shall take measures to prevent discharge of oil and grease during
spillage from reaching drainage system or any water body. Oil removal /interceptors
shall be provided to treat oil waste from workshop areas etc.
• The Contractor shall apply to the appropriate authority for installing bore wells for
water supply at site.
15.3 Felling of Trees
• The contractor shall identify the number and type of trees that are require to be felled
as a result of construction of works and facilities related to Project with joint
verification of PIU and PMC.
• All trees and shrubbery, which are not specifically require to be cleared or removed for
construction purposes, shall be preserved and shall be protected from any damage that
may be caused by Contractor’s construction operations and equipment. The contractor
shall not fell, remove or dispose of any tree or forest produce in any land handed over
to him for the construction of works and facilities related to subproject except with the
previous permission obtained from the concerned authority.
• The PIU shall assist the Contractor in obtaining the Applicable Permits for felling of
trees to be identified for this purpose if and only if such trees cause a Material Adverse
Effect on the construction or maintenance of the Project Works.
• Special care shall be exercised where trees or shrubs are exposed to injuries by
construction equipment, trenching, excavating, dumping, construction, chemical
damage or other operation and the Contractor shall adequately protect such trees by
![Page 234: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051603/62806386dcd00132ab2f1151/html5/thumbnails/234.jpg)
ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme
215 | P a g e
used of protective barriers or other methods approved by the Employer. Trees shall not
be used for anchorage.
• The contractor will develop green belt/ buffer area in the proposed project component
sites as STP, IPS/SPS etc.
16. General
• Person / equipment / material should enter & exit the site only through the gate
designated. Only license holder driver / operator should be allowed to operate any
vehicle /Machinery. All vehicle /machinery should be inspected by a competent person
prior to use.
• PIU and PMC will ensure that the labor engaged by the contractor is paid regularly as
per prevailing labor laws, and that no arrears are allowed to accumulate on this
account.
• Regular working hour shall be 9.00 am to 6.00 pm including one hour for lunch on all
working days. Working days at site shall be from Monday to Saturday i.e. 06 days in a
week
• Access and egress routes for construction personnel, visitors and delivery vehicles
shall be tentatively developed by the Contractor to suit acknowledged constraints and
conditions. The vehicles shall be parked in the designated area only. Parking for site
operatives must be organized by the Main Contractor to ensure that there is no
inconvenience to local residents. Car parking will not be permitted on work site.
• The Contractor shall ensure at all times that no employee is working under the
influence of alcohol / drugs which are punishable under Govt. regulations.
17. OHS team of Contractor
• Mr. N.P. Josi - Environment and Safety Engineer
• Mr. Suraj - Site Engineer
• Mr. Praful Sontakke - Project Manager and Coordinator