environment and social assessment report

234
ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT (Sept., 2020) For Construction of Sewerage Network and Sewage Treatment Plant at Chhindwara Sub project of Madhya Project Urban Development Project Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited Original Assessment done by: M/s LN Malviya Infra Pvt. Ltd., Bhopal Revised by Contractor: M/s Laxmi Civil Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., Kolhapur Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized

Upload: others

Post on 15-May-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT

REPORT

(Sept., 2020)

For

Construction of

Sewerage Network and Sewage

Treatment Plant at

Chhindwara

Sub project of

Madhya Project Urban Development Project

Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company

Limited

Original Assessment done by:

M/s LN Malviya Infra Pvt. Ltd., Bhopal

Revised by Contractor:

M/s Laxmi Civil Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., Kolhapur

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Page 2: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... vii

1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1

1.1. Project Background ................................................................................................................................ 1

1.2. Context of the Environment and Social Assessment by the contractor ............................................. 1

1.3. Scope of ESA study ................................................................................................................................. 2

1.4. Objectives of ESA Study ........................................................................................................................ 2

1.5. Terms of Reference (ToR) for the ESA process ................................................................................... 2

1.6. Methodology ............................................................................................................................................ 3

1.7. Mitigation and Monitoring..................................................................................................................... 5

2. Project Description ..................................................................................................................................... 6

2.1. Description of Project Area.................................................................................................................... 6

2.2. Existing Water Supply and Sanitation System ..................................................................................... 9

2.3. Need of Project ...................................................................................................................................... 11

2.4. Proposed Project ................................................................................................................................... 12

2.5 Collection Network ............................................................................................................................... 24

3. Legal, Policy and Administrative Framework ....................................................................................... 25

3.1. Regulatory Framework – Environmental ........................................................................................... 25

3.2. World Bank Safeguard Policies ........................................................................................................... 28

4. Baseline Environment Profile .................................................................................................................. 36

4.1. Baseline Study ....................................................................................................................................... 36

4.2. Environmental Profile of Chhindwara Subproject ............................................................................ 36

4.3. Physical Environment ........................................................................................................................... 38

4.4. Baseline of Sludge disposal site ............................................................................................................ 43

4.5. Socio Economic Profile of Chhindwara .............................................................................................. 43

5. Assessment of Anticipated Impacts ......................................................................................................... 48

5.1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 48

5.2. Environmental Impact ......................................................................................................................... 48

5.2.1. General Impacts during Subproject Cycle ................................................................................... 50

5.3. Social Impacts ............................................................................................................................................. 55

5.3.1 Land Requirement .................................................................................................................................... 55

5.3.2. Impact on Livelihood ............................................................................................................... 56

5.3.3. Impact on Existing Utility Services .......................................................................................... 57

5.3.4. Potential impacts Due to Sludge disposal during operation phase ......................................... 58

5.3.5 Impact of COVID-19 with mitigation measures ........................................................................... 58

5.3.6. Labour Influx and child Labor ....................................................................................................... 61

6. Stakeholder and Public Consultation ...................................................................................................... 62

6.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 62

Page 3: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

ii | P a g e

6.2 Objectives of the Public Consultations................................................................................................ 62

6.3 Key Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 70

6.4 Summary of Incorporation of Public Concerns in the Designs......................................................... 71

7. Environmental and Social Management Plan ........................................................................................ 72

7.2 Monitoring and Evaluation ......................................................................................................................... 99

Total cost of EMP + SMP + Green Belt Development + Environment Monitoring works out to

42,99,725+20,00,000+33,24,234+46,97,000= INR 1,43,21,059/- ........................................................... 102

8. Tribal Vulnerability Identification and Assessment ............................................................................ 103

8.1 Distribution of Scheduled Tribes in Madhya Pradesh in Relation to India .................................. 103

8.2 Presence of Indigenous People. .......................................................................................................... 103

8.3 Public Consultation............................................................................................................................. 105

8.4 Other Vulnerable Population ............................................................................................................. 106

8.5 Strategy for addressing of Tribal and Vulnerable group through participation .......................... 106

8.6 Inclusion of Tribal and Vulnerable Population during Implementation ....................................... 107

9. Contractor’s Role in Grievance Redressal Mechanism ....................................................................... 108

10. Conclusion and Recommendations ................................................................................................... 109

Appendix 1:Screening Checklist of Chhindwara sewerage project .......................................................... 111

Appendix 2: List of Tribal Communities in State of Madhya Pradesh as Provided by Ministry of Tribal

Affairs, Government of India ......................................................................................................................... 115

Appendix 3:List of Schedule Areas in Madhya Pradesh as Specified by the Scheduled Areas under the

fifth Schedule of Indian Constitution ............................................................................................................. 117

Appendix 4: List of Participants with Photographs of various meetings held during the ESA study in

Chhindwara ..................................................................................................................................................... 118

Appendix 5: Land records of proposed STP and SPS land parcel .............................................................. 121

Appendix 6: Public Consultation photographs during execution of project .............................................. 128

Appendix 7: Some of the Congested Roads ................................................................................................... 129

Appendix 8: Photos related to Environmental Management Plan .............................................................. 130

Appendix 9 A :Water Quality Standard as per BIS- IS 10500:2012 ........................................................... 132

Appendix 9 B: WasteWater Test reports Sample-A ..................................................................................... 137

Appendix 9c : Water Quality Test report of receving water Body (STP outfall) ....................................... 143

Appendix 10 : Ambient Air and Noise Pollution Test report ...................................................................... 145

Appendix 11: Land Allotment for Sludge disposal site ................................................................................ 147

Appendix 12: Labour License ........................................................................................................................ 149

Appendix 13: Application for Railway Crossing .......................................................................................... 150

Appendix 14: Letter regarding first and second stage permission from Forest Department. .................. 159

Appendix 15: Letter regarding second stage permission from Forest Department .................................. 160

Appendix 16: Labors Health Checkup Camp ............................................................................................... 165

Appendix 17: Contractor Survey for Project Affected Persons .................................................................. 166

Appendix 18: CTE for Chhindwara STP ...................................................................................................... 167

Appendix 19: Road Crossing .......................................................................................................................... 168

Appendix : 20 Treated Effluent standards as per CPCB Recommended Value under MPUDC ............. 169

Page 4: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

iii | P a g e

Appendix : 21 Sludge Disposal Plan .............................................................................................................. 170

Appendix 22: SOPs to respond COVID-19 ................................................................................................... 180

Appendix :23 Flushing Arrangement Plan for Chhindwara Sewerage System ........................................ 190

Appendix :24 Labour Management Procedures ........................................................................................... 200

Appendix :25 Grievance Redressal Format for the complaints received ................................................... 203

Appendix 26: Guidelines for the Management of Environmental, Health and Safety in the Project

construction sites ............................................................................................................................................. 204

List of Tables

Table 1.1: Showing changes as per DPR and Approved Design

Table 2. 1: Existing Percentage of Coverage by Services in old CMC area

Table 2. 2: Details of Septage Management

Table 2. 3 Decadal Population Data for Chhindwara City (Census India website, 2011)

Table 2. 4: Summary of The Population Projection (Final Revised)

Table 2. 5: Per Capita Sewage Generation (for Core area and 7 villages)

Table 2. 6: Details of 7 villages

Table 2.7: Sewage Generation in Cluster1

Table 2. 8: Depth wise Diameter of Manhole

Table 2. 9: Design inlet and outlet parameter

Table 2. 10 Action Plan for Greenbelt development

Table 2. 11 List of Plants Identified for Greenbelt and Avenue Plantation as per CPCB

Table 2.12 Estimate for Capital Cost for Green belt development (Cost included in

ESMP Chapter 7, table 7.2)

Table 3.1: Applicable Environmental Regulations for Sewerage Scheme

Table 3.2: World Bank Safeguard Policies applicable for MPUDP

Table 3.3: Comparison of National Environmental Policy and Bank’s Safeguard

Operational Policies

Table 4. 1: Site Environmental Features of Proposed Subproject Components

Table 4. 2: Ambient Air quality of Chhindwara Town

Table 4. 3: Ambient Noise Levels in Chhindwara

Table 4.4: Test result of Wastewater

Table 4. 5: Land Use Pattern

Table 4. 6: Type and Location of Various Markets in Chhindwara

Table 4. 7: Slum Locations in Chhindwara

Table 4. 8: Social Features of Proposed Subproject Components

Table 5.1: Influence Area details of proposed Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

Table 5.2 Congested Roads in Chhindwara Photographs

Table 6.1A: Public Consultation Meetings during ESA Preparation

Table 6 1B: Public Consultation Meetings during Execution of the Project

Table 6.2: Public Consultation Details during Execution

Table 7.1 Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP)

Table 7.2: Cost of Chhindwara ESMP

Table 7.3 Environmental Monitoring Plan

Table 7.4 Cost of Environmental Monitoring Plan

Table 8.1: Social Composition in Chhindwara Town

Page 5: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

iv | P a g e

Table 8.2: Ward wise detail of Scheduled Tribe population

Table 8.3: Participation of ST/SC population during Public Consultation

List of Figures

Figure 2. 1: Chhindwara Municipal Area

Figure 2. 2: Key Plan for Chhindwara City

Figure 2. 3: Waste Water Discharged Behind the House

Figure 2. 4: Project area for Sewerage (under Chhindwara Municipal Boundary)

Figure 2. 5: Zoning of the Subproject

Figure 2. 6 Google Image showing SPS Location Koladhana

Figure 2. 7 Google Image showing changed STP site at Village Sarra

Figure 2.8 Layout of STP

Figure 2.9 Process flow diagram of STP

Figure 4. 1 Trial Pits for Chhindwara Subproject

Figure 5 1: Influence area of proposed STP land site

Page 6: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

v | P a g e

Abbreviations

AC – Asbestos Cement

AMRUT – Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation

BOD – Biological Oxygen Demand

CMC – Chhindwara Municipal Corporation

CPCB – Central Pollution Control Board

CPHEEO – Central Public Health and Environment Engineering Organization

D(R)BO – Design, Review, Build and operate

DI – Ductile Iron

DO – Dissolved Oxygen

DPR – Detailed Project Report

DUAD _ Directorate of Urban Administration and Development

DWC – Double walled Corrugated

EA – Environmental assessment

EMP – Environmental Management Plan

ESMF – Environmental and Social Management Framework

ESMP – Environmental and Social Management Plan

GOI – Government of India

GOMP – Government of Madhya Pradesh

HFL – Highest flood level

IPMF – Indigenous Peoples Management Framework

LCS -- Low Cost Sanitation

LPCD – Liter per capita per day

MCm – Million Cubic Meter

MH – Manhole

MOEF&CC – Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change

MPS -- Main Pumping Station

MPUDC – Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited

MPUDP – Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Project

NOC – No Objection Certificate

NOx – Oxides of nitrogen

OHT – Over Head Tank

OP – Operational Policy

PIU – Project Implementation Unit

PMC – Project Management Consultant

PMU – Project Management Unit

PWD – Public Works Department

ROW – Right of way

SA – Social Assessment

Page 7: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

vi | P a g e

SO2 – Sulphur Dioxide

SMP – Social Management Plan

SPS – Sewage Pumping Station

STP – Sewage Treatment Plant

SPCB – State Pollution Control Board

UDHD – Urban Development and Housing Department

ULB - Urban Local Body

SMP – Social Management Plan

Issue and Revision Record: Chhindwara C-ESA –

Rev.

Originator Checker Approver Observations from Submission

DBOT contractor PMC (Submission

to MPUDC)

MPUDC (Review

& Comments) World Bank World Bank

1 - - - - 01.02.2020

2 - - - 29.05.2020 08.07.2020

3 - - - 13.07.2020 15.07.2020

4 - - - - 16.07.2020

5 22.07.2020

6 07.08.2020 15.08.2020

7 31.08.2020 03.09.2020

14.09.2020 15.09.2020

28.09.2020 29.09.2020

C-ESA Report Approved from World Bank dated 29.09.2020

Page 8: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

vii | P a g e

Executive Summary 1. Introduction

Madhya Pradesh (MP) is geographically second largest, fifth populous, and eighth most

urbanized state in India. Although MP recorded a higher rate of growth for its urban

compared to rural population in the last decade, its urbanization rate is still below the

national average population but it is projected to catch-up in the next 15 years. As per

Census 2011, MP’s total urban population is 20.1 million (28% of total population)

concentrated in 476 census urban centres.

Rapid urbanization in MP has seen sprouting of new urban settlements across the state,

more often close to the existing cities. The last decade (2001-2011) has seen 20% increases

in the number of urban centers, including 50% increase in census towns, compared to 6%

increase in the previous decade (1991-2001). In the cities MP, household access to piped

water supply ranges between 48-80%; per capita water supply ranges between 35 to 135

lpcd; access to underground sewerage range between nil to 40%; waste collection ranges

between 85-90%; and 60 to 80% of rainwater runoff is effectively drained.

Government of Madhya Pradesh through its Vision Document 2018 has shown its

determination to face the challenges of Urbanization and has undertaken many programs to

support the urban infrastructure. Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Project (MPUDP) is

one of them which envisages financial support from The World Bank for the various sub

projects of Water Supply, Waste Water Management and Heritage Conservation etc.

2. Subproject Description

Chhindwara town is the administrative headquarters of Chhindwara District under the

Jabalpur Administration Division of Madhya Pradesh. It is the largest city in the district.

The population of Chhindwara city was 138,291 (2011 census) and the Municipal area was

about 11.33 sq. km. Vide Urban Administration and Environment Department, Government

of Madhya Pradesh notification 28 F 1-14 /2014/18-3 dated 05.09.2014, the municipal limits

were increased andadjoining 24 villages were merged in it. The area of these 24 villages is

98.94 sq. km and population of these villages (census 2011) is 77,552. Thus, the new

municipal area of Chhindwara town is 110.27 sq. km and population as per 2011 census is

2,15,843. Chhindwara has no sewerage system. The generated effluent from septic tanks

and even raw sewage is flowing directly in the River Kulbehra through open drains and the

tributaries of Kulbehra River.

The intent of the Sewerage sub-project is to ensure a comprehensive, technically and

financially viable system for Sewerage collection and its treatment for the core area of

Chhindwara town i.e. Core city plus the adjoining 7 villages only. The water supply project

at 135 lpcd for old CMC area is commissioned recently. Availability of 135 lpcd with

almost 100% Household connections in the core area has resulted in increased waste water

generation in core area.

Availability of water supply in the remaining area is less than 70 lpcd. The Urban Local

Body has implemented Water Supply augmentation scheme through AMRUT for this

sparsely populated area. Due to topography and sparse distribution of the habitations,

Page 9: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

viii | P a g e

providing sewerage network in the whole CMC area is technically and financially unviable.

Hence, the DPR envisaged coverage of the core CMC area and 7 villages adjacent to the

city, with sewer network along with Sewage Treatment facility whereas, the sewage

generated in remaining17 villages spread over more than 80% of the CMC area is proposed

to be managed through “Septage Management” system supported with 4 Bio Digesters.

The contract for the Sewerage sub project at Chhindwara has been awarded to M/s Laxmi

Civil Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., Kolhapur on 21st July 2017. The present ESA is

submitted by the contractor whichis based on the designs finalized after detailed review

based on detailed topographical surveys, geo-technical investigations, joint inspection of

sites and network alignment, Enviro-social impact assessment and stakeholder

consultations. Table-1.1 below compares the provisions of DPR versus final designs.

For sewage collection the project area has been divided into two zones based on the basis of

physical barriers and topography. Projected population of Zone 1 in the year 2048 is

115,020 while in Zone 2 it is 175,899. Considering the techno economics of material, pipes

of 150 to 300 mm diameter has been proposed of DWC and above 300 mm and up to 1000

mm of NP-3 concrete pipe. The minimum cover taken is 1.0 m. Total sewer network length

is 302.374 km; out of which more than 90% of the pipes range from 150 mm to 250 mm.

The maximum diameter of pipe is 1000 mm and maximum depth is 4.8 m. Manholes are

provided at every 30 m length, change in alignment and wherever required in the design as

per the requirement of site. Flushing points, where velocity of the sewerage is less than the

self - cleaning velocity have been identified and flushing is proposed. Further the flow up to

SPS at Koladhana shall be through gravity. From SPS it will be pumped to STP at Village

Sarra by 2500 m long pumping main of DI K-9 of 700 mm dia.

The Sludge generated from the STP will be withdrawn from centrifuge in the form of wet

cake and will be collected on the sludge collection yard as sludge drying bed as well as

storage of sludge. The sludge collection bed will be designed with required capacity to

accumulate the sludge for seven days. The physical and chemical characteristic of sludge

will be checked in the Laboratory accredited by NABL. The dewatering of sludge will be

done by the treatment with polyelectrolyte. The sludge will be covered properly and

covering aid to avoid contamination of surrounding environment as well as other

environmental, health and safety precaution will be ensured during sludge transportation

through authorized vehicle to the disposal site at Khasra no. 14/5 at village Salimeta, tehsil

Malikheda Dsitrict Chhindwara. The proposed site is 7.4 km from the STP site which is

temporary arrangement in future it will be developed as sanitary landfill.

Initially as per the final DPR, the proposed location of STP was at Koladhana near Bodri

Nallah in ward no. 33 at Khasra 678 having an area of 1.8 hectares. However, while making

detailed investigations at site, it was found that although the land was free of encumbrances

and encroachments but due to excessive soil cutting by locals in the course of time between

finalization of DPR and start of work, most of the land parcel selected came under

submergence of Bodhri Nallah which carries heavy storm water during rains. After Joint

field verification by the PIU and PMC and studying various options for the STP, alternate

site at Sarra in ward no 35 at Khasra no 126, 128 and 129 having an area of 2.851 hectare

Page 10: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

ix | P a g e

was selected. The selected site for STP at Sarra is “Shrub Forest” as per revenue records,

under the possession of Forest Department. Fee required by Forest Department has been

deposited by MPUDC for second stage permission from the Forest Department. This is

further added here that the site at Koladhana had ample elevated area available for MPS and

hence, it was decided not to shift the location of Main Pumping Station. Another factor

which helped in arriving at this decision was that with the changed alignment of network,

the IPS at Bail Bazar (proposed in DPR) will be avoided which will further beneficial to the

CMC as the recurring cost of O&M will reduce.

Changes from DPR & approved design are given in table 1.1.

3. Environment and Social Assessment

This report presents the Environmental and Social Assessment (ESA) of Chhindwara

Sewerage subproject under MPUDP. The ESA identifies potential impacts on the natural

environment and the social situation in subproject region during construction and operation

of the sub project. Where potential adverse effects are predicted, mitigations are developed

and its implementation is presented in the Environmental and Social Management Plan

(ESMP) and Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP)/Social Monitoring Plan (SMP).

This project has been identified as Category Ea project in accordance to the ESMF

classification for environmental assessment. This requires an EA report and an

Environmental Management Plan. Also, according to ESMF classification for SA, this sub

project is identified as a Category Sc (appendix 1). It should be noted that these

categorizations refer to categorization of MPUDP subprojects as stated in the ESMF for

MPUDP, and should not be confused with the classification of overall Projects given in OP

4.01 of The World Bank. As per safeguard policies of the World Bank, MPUDP has been

categorized as a Category A project. Public consultations are required to implement the

proposed Environmental and Social Management Plan.

4. Legal, Policy and Administrative Framework

The National and State level environmental laws and the Operational Policies of the World

Bank are applicable to MPUDP projects. The most important laws are Water (Prevention &

Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 with all of its amendments;, Air (Prevention and Control of

Pollution) Act, 1981 etc. and the World Bank OP 4.01 Environmental Assessment, OP 4.04

Natural Habitats, OP 4.11 Physical Cultural Resources and OP 4.36 Forests.

The National and State level Social laws and the Operational Policies of The World Bank

are applicable to MPUDP projects. These include Land Acquisition Act-RTFCTLARR Act

2013; MP Nagariya Kshetra ke Bhumiheen Vyakti (Pattadhruti Adhikaron ka Pradan Kiya

Jana) Adhiniyam, 1984; The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of

Street Vending) Act, 2014; The Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers

(Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 etc. and the World Bank OP/BP 4.12 Involuntary

Resettlement, OP/BP 4.10 Indigenous People.

Page 11: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

x | P a g e

Table 1.1: Showing changes as per DPR vs Approved Design

S. No. Infrastructure

/ Particulars

AS per DPR

(Location & Lat.-Long.)

As per Approved Design

(Location & Lat.-Long.)

Justification

1 STP ➢ At Koladhana near Bodri Nallah

in ward no. 33 with Khasra No.

678 having an area of 1.8

hectares.

➢ Proposed STP capacity 28.0

MLD.

➢ Proposed site 648.880m GL and

HFL 648.38m

➢ At Sarra in ward no 35

Khasra no126,128 and 129

having an area of 2.851 ha

against requirement 2.422

ha. Lat. 22° 0"53.13',

Lon.78° 56" 22.39'.

➢ STP capacity 28 .0 MLD.

➢ Proposed site 648.38m GL

and HFL 642.021m

➢ Sufficient area available for

STP construction.

Major part of the land identified for STP

(in the DPR) at Koladhana was found

under submergence of Bodri Nallah

flowing adjacent to this site. Therefore,

it was decided to change the site for

STP. After joint verification by PMU,

PIU, IVT, ULB and the contractor,

alternative suitable site at Village Sarra

was identified and selected.

2 SPS Two Sewage Pumping station (SPS)

was proposed in the following sites:

-SPS Zone 1 - SPS-1 is in Khasra

No. 991 at Bail Bazar, Land

available 4.45 ha,

SPS Zone 2- SPS-2 (MPS) near

Bodri Nallah, Koladhana Khasra no

678 Ward no 33 at the same

location of STP site. This is also the

MPS

➢ MPS - ward no. 33 at Khasra

No. 678 near Bodri Nallah,

Koladhana having available

area of 1.8 ha against a

requirement of 0.005 ha.

➢ Designed capacity of MPS is

28 MLD

➢ Average GL of the proposed

site is 648.88m against the

HFL 648.38m

Based on the topographic survey, design

of the network and change of STP site,

the sewage from Zone 1 can be taken

through gravity flow to MPS and hence,

SPS-1 site at Bail Bazar is no more

required. This will decrease the recurring

expenditure (specially expenses on

Energy) during O&M.

5 Population - 138291 (2011) - 138291 (2011) No change

- 190700 (2018) - 190700 (2018)

- 238250 (2033) - 238250 (2033)

- 290918 (2048) - 290918 (2048)

7 Treatment

Technology

- SBR SBR No change

Page 12: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

xi | P a g e

8 Sewer

Network

length &

Manhole No

- 268.2 Km

- 8268 Nos

- 302.642 Km

-11241 Nos

➢ Sewer Network is increased due to

laying of rider mains on both side of

road (as the road width is more than

7m) in some areas of the town.

➢ Number of manholes are increased

due to increase in length of sewer

network and providing manholes as

per CHPEEO Manual, 2013.

9 Cost

(Capital Cost)

- 180.76 Cr - 173.00 Cr Cost as per contract. GST and price

escalation and variations arising due to

site conditions and change of location as

per contract conditions will be extra.

10 Forest

clearance

Not Required ➢ STP location changed from

Koladhana to Sarra in ward

no 35 Khasra no126,128 and

129 needing an area of 2.851

ha.

➢ Selected Land was forest land

➢ Forest clearance is required as the land

for STP at Sarra is under Forest

Department (Shrub Forest).

➢ First Stage Clearance is received.

Required fee has been deposited for

second stage clearance to the forest

department.

➢ Please refer Appendix 14 and 15.

11 Permissions 5 Railway crossings - 5 railway crossing The railway crossings are based on the

final design of the network.

Permission for 2 crossings received.

Demand note for rest of the 3

crossings has also been received from

Railway Department (Appendix 13).

Permission is in final stage.

1. Railway Crossing no.-1,

987/22 and 988/1:

1. Railway Crossing no.-1,

987/22 and 988/1:

2. Railway Crossing no.-2, 987/6

and 987/7:

2. Railway Crossing no.-2,

987/5 and 987/6:

3. Railway Crossing no.-3, 985/4

and 985/5:

3. Railway Crossing no.-3,

985/4 and 985/5:

4. Railway Crossing no.-4,

1259/4-5:

4. Railway Crossing no.-4,

1259/4-5:

5. Railway Crossing no.-5, 1257/4

and 1257/3

5. Railway Crossing no.-5,

1257/4 and 1257/3

Page 13: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

xii | P a g e

14 road crossings

at Narsinghpur Road, Ganj Area,

Narsinghpur Road-MH 297,

Narsinghpur Road- MH-559,

Narsinghpur Road- MH-563, Chaar

Fatak, Over Bridge- MH-486, Chaar

Fatak, Over Bridge- MH-2253, Seoni

Road, NGP road Near Stadium, Jail

Chowka, DDC College, Phara Chowka,

Char Dham Chowk, Co-ed College

No Change ➢ PWD roads are handed over to the

ULB, hence no permissions are

required. Please refer Appendix no. 19

13. Influent/

Effluent

parameters

Parameters Units Indicative

raw sewage

quality

Discharge

Standards

pH pH 7-8 6.5-9

BOD Mg/l 220 <10

COD Mg/l 500 <50

TSS Mg/l 375 <20

Total N Mg/l 50 <10

Total P Mg/l 7.0 < 2

No Change Not Applicable

Comparison of Quantity As per BOQ Comparison of Quantity As per Variation % change from DPR % Quantity

Dia in mm Material Length (m) & (%) of total quantity Dia in mm Material

Length (m) & (%) of total quantity

DN 150 mm DWC - HDPE 135,179.10 (50.4) DN 150 mm DWC - HDPE 216,332.00 (71.5) (+) 60% Review of DPR designs by the

contractor, redesign to optimize the designs

based on detailed topographic survey

DN 200 mm DWC - HDPE 99,311.50 (37) DN 200 mm DWC - HDPE 40,801.00(13.5) (-) 59%

DN 250 mm DWC - HDPE - DN 250 mm DWC - HDPE 11,879.00(4.0) New dia

DN 300 mm DWC - HDPE 5,300.90 (2) DN 300 mm DWC - HDPE 7,196.00(2.4) (+) 36%

300 mm dia NP3 RCC 2969.70 (1.1) 300 mm dia NP3 RCC 0.00 (-) 100%

400 mm dia NP3 RCC 5,380.80 (2) 400 mm dia NP3 RCC 8,624.00(2.8) (+) 60%

500 mm dia NP3 RCC 8,710.71(3.2) 500 mm dia NP3 RCC 4,035.00(1.3) (-) 54%

600 mm dia NP3 RCC 3,599.80 (1.4) 600 mm dia NP3 RCC 5,219.00(1.7) (+) 45%

700 mm dia NP3 RCC 785.80 (0.3) 700 mm dia NP3 RCC 2,670.00(1.0) (+) 240%

800 mm dia NP3 RCC 2,853.60 (1.1) 800 mm dia NP3 RCC 3,791.00(1.2) (+) 65%

900 mm dia NP3 RCC 2,297.70 (0.8) 900 mm dia NP3 RCC - (-) 100%

1000 mm dia NP3 RCC 1,811.20(0.7) 1000 mm dia NP3 RCC 1,827.00(0.6) (+) 1%

268,200.81 302,374.00 (+) 13%

Page 14: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

xii | P a g e

5. Baseline Environment Profile

There are no National Parks, Wild life sanctuaries, Bird sanctuaries within 10 Km radius of

the project area, besides, there are no rare and endangered species observed in the area.

A) Geography:

Chhindwara is one of the largest cities in the Satpura range. It is on a plateau, surrounded

by lush green fields, rivers and by dense forest with diverse flora and fauna. The town is

built around the Bodri Stream (Nallah), which is also considered a tributary of Kulbehra

River.

B) Meteorology:

Chhindwara has a sub-tropical climate. A hot summer and general dryness characterize the

climate of the area, except during the southwest monsoon season. The mean maximum and

mean minimum temperature as recorded in Chhindwara is respectively 44°C and 9.8°C.

The relative humidity generally exceeds 87% in the month of August and the rest of the

year is drier. The mean annual rainfall in the region is 1,183mm.

C) Topography:

The northern part of the Chhindwara city is hilly. Natural Slope of the CMC area is north

to south with the levels with reference to MSL varying from 695 m to 644m. In the eastern

part of the City, the topography is sloped towards the Bodri Nallah and in the southern side

towards Kulbehra River (which flows from South to East of the City).

D) Geology:

Physiographically the Chhindwara district is divided broadly into main geomorphic units-

i) Satpura plateau and ii) Nagpur plateau. The hill ranges lying in the northern part of the

district belong to the Mahadeo hill ranges of the Satpura mountains stretching nearly east

west. These hills form the water divide. The district can be further divided into four parts.

I) Northern hilly region, II). Central high plateau region III). Southern low grounds IV).

Upland trough of Jam and Kanhan rivers. Presence of fluvial units showing occurrences of

alluvium in the flood plains of all major streams and rivers, buried Pedi plains showing

denudational hills of sandstone as seen in western part of the district. Similarly, structural

hills, covered by Gondwana’s, are seen in northern part, denudational hills in southern part

and dissected Deccan plateau in eastern and north-eastern parts of the district the soils in

the district are generally three types Viz., black cotton soil, sandy loam soil and clay loam

soils. Seismicity, the area falls under BIS zone-III as per seismic map of geographical

survey of India.

Air Quality:

Madhya Pradesh pollution control board has two air quality monitoring station in

Chhindwara. The air quality trends reveal that SO2 and NO2 concentration levels are low;

whereas particulate pollution has reached moderate condition.

Water Quality:

The EC value of water sample ranges between 280-1600. Nitrate Value of water samples

Page 15: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

xiii | P a g e

ranges between 1-243 and fluoride between. 09 to 0.97 in phreatic aquifer. Ground water in

phreatic aquifer is potable but excessive fluoride (1.60-20.00Mg/l) is noticed in deeper

aquifers.

In order to measure the baseline level of existing water quality and probable pollution in the

storm water drain (STP outfall, receiving water body) nearby STP site, Sarra, Biological

oxygen demand (BOD) and Chemical oxygen demand (COD), pH, TSS etc. were tested. The

BOD is 3.4 mg/l, COD 3.4 mg/l, pH 6.9, total suspended solids 28mg/l, total dissolved solid

729 mg/l, total hardness (CACO3) 516 mg/l and turbidity 9.9 NTU were observed. This is

once again reiterated here that this drain is only storm water drain carrying rain water during

rainy period only and remains dry during remaining year.

Flora and Fauna:

Common trees include Shorea robusta (Sal), Sarai, Babul, Diospyros melanoxylon

(Kendu), Boswellia serrata (Salai), Terminalia tomentosa (Asan), Terminalia bellayoica

(Bahera), Terminalia arjuna (Arjun), Pterocarpus marsupium (Paisar), Madhuca indica

(Mahua) are found the project area. The fauna reported in the area are mainly avi fauna

(highest diversity) followed by mammals and reptiles. The commonly reported avifauna

in the study area are Common crow, Myna, Babbler, Pigeon, Cattle, Egrets, Red Vented

bulbul, Sparrow, Indian Roller etc.

6. Assessment of Anticipated Impacts

Anticipated impacts and corresponding mitigation measures are discussed in phases

namely, influence area and general impacts. Based on the magnitude and duration of the

project activities, the nature, duration and extent of impact are assessed. Minor project

impacts have also been identified and basis for their insignificance has been provided.

Wherever relevant, the ESMP also addresses the minor impacts and provides

environmental and social mitigation / environmental enhancement measures. Possible

Environmental and Social Impacts during Design Phase, Construction Phase and Operation

Phase has been identified and mitigations during these phases have been suggested.

Various environmental and social impacts identified include - air pollution due to dust and

noise pollution during construction, disposal of waste produced due to excavation

activities, loss of vegetation, temporary loss of access to residents and temporary disruption

to traffic; etc.

Stakeholder consultations have been done to assess the social impacts of various

construction works specially the network laying since this activity will take place within the

town area comprising of purely residential, commercial and mixed activities and will have a

direct impact on the street vendors. Sites for construction of STP and MPS are away from

habitat. Both the sites are free from encroachments and encumbrances. The alignment of

network has been designed in such a manner that no permanent or temporary resettlement or

relocation is needed. Temporary shifting ( 2 to 3 days) of street vendors in commercial areas

may be caused during pipe laying but the same has been mitigated and measures have been

included in the ESMP. Mitigation measures include shifting of temporary vendors across the

road, placing planks at 50m interval over excavated areas minimizing the blockage of access

to shops and residences by the contractor, avoiding laying of network during weekly market

Page 16: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

xiv | P a g e

days etc. However, this is clarified here that there is no demolition of any temporary or

permanent structure involved/observed during network laying. There is no loss of

livelihood (permanent or temporary ) is observed. The joint survey has been conducted by

the PIU, PMC & contractor, as per the survey, No potential damage has been observed to

any structure. Therefore, it is not possible to calculate or assess.

In the operation and maintenance phase, main impact will be from the sludge generation

perspective. But these impacts shall be mitigated by the usage of covered trucks and

experienced & trained staff to handle the sludge which will be finally transported to the

sludge disposal site at Khasra No. 14/5, Village Salimeta, Tehsil Mohkheda, District

Chhindwara. Photographs are enclosed at Appendix 8.

7. Stakeholders and Public Consultation

The main objective for the consultation process was to involve the community at the very

early stages so as to identify likely negative impacts and find ways to minimize negative

impacts and enhance positive impacts of the project. Extensive public consultation

meetings at Chhindwara Sewerage Sub Project area were conducted while undertaking e

ESA study and then C-ESA updation.

Public sensitization and meetings were held within the project area from 28thApril 2016 to

30th April 2016 (consultation report already submitted to World Bank with ESA report

prepared by the ESA consultant) and then from 23rd July 2018 to 24th July 2018 by the

contractor with the help of respective PIU, ULB, local administration and the elected

representatives. A total of 13 meetings during ESA preparation phase and 12 consultation

meetings were held during execution as shown in Table 6.1A and 6.1B. Key outputs of

consultations have been taken into consideration and suggested changes in the design and

implementation activities.

Key issues discussed included: absence of sewerage system in the town, sludge and

stagnant pools of water in the entire town is visibly disturbing and leading to pollution and

mosquito menace, causing many health problems; Physical relocation and resettlement

should be minimized and efforts should be made to prevent loss of access to livelihood

activities; safety of children, women and cattle are important aspects for consideration

during civil construction works; restoration of roads after laying of pipe, job opportunity

during construction work as casual labour or at office.

8. Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP)

The ESMP summarizes the key impact elements identified and the remedial measures, the

actions to be taken by various parties and the monitoring activities. The ESMP has been

updated based on the approved design of the contractor. The management plan includes

mitigation measures against air pollution including dust and vehicle emissions, noise

barriers, assuring access to the residents and shops during laying of distribution network,

safety measures such as barricading and signage, ensuring disposing off the excess

excavated material, minimizing and avoiding the loss of flora and fauna, worker's safety

etc. during construction phase. Due care has been taken in the management plan to address

Page 17: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

xv | P a g e

temporary disruption to neighboring structures during excavation, minimize temporary

shifting of street vendors during network laying and the loss of income due to obstruction

of access to commercial establishment owing to temporary blocking of lanes. Air and

Water Quality Monitoring Protocol has also been given in the management plan. The total

cost of the ESMP has been estimated as INR 1.43Crore. Cost for most of the works such as

air and water monitoring, mitigation against dust, disposal of excess excavated material has

been included in the contract cost. However, provisional sums for unidentified issues that

may crop up during construction phase have been provided in the contract. The

effectiveness of the ESMP shall be monitored and assessed through spot checks. ESHS

audit of the works shall be carried out by the independent third-party audit firms.

Environmental and social risk due to change of land of STP and increase in length of sewer

network have been evaluated and detailed under chapter 5 ”Assesment of anticipated

impacts” and chapter 7 “ESMP”. Change of STP site has led to the requirement of forest

clearance at alternate site at Sarra and compensatory afforestation (to be done by Forest

Department and cost to be borne under this project). First stage clearance from Forest

Department has been obtained and the requisite fees for second stage clearance including

compensatory afforestation and impact mitigation activities has been deposited to the forest

department and also alternative land has been provided by the District Authorities for equal

afforestation. As far as social risks are concerned, there are insignificant risks involved

because this change neither involves any acquisition of private land nor does it adversely

impact any livelihood nor needs any relocation/resettlement. Public consultations were

done for creating public awareness in the project area and this in turn helped to avoid and

mitigate the social risk and impacts arising due to change of site.

9. Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring and evaluation process will involve the assessment of the following benchmarks

a) The implementation process of guidelines stipulated in the ESMP

b) Evaluate impact of the project to the environment and social setting of

Chhindwara Town

c) Monitoring of the involvement of the community through public consultations in

decision makings and the implementation of the project

10. Tribal and Vulnerable Population Identification and Assessment of Chhindwara

In Madhya Pradesh certain areas have been declared as scheduled area as specified

by the Scheduled Areas under the fifth Schedule of Indian Constitution. Some areas

of Chhindwara district are declared scheduled area in Schedule V by Government of

Madhya Pradesh. However, this does not include Chhindwara town and the project

area. However, social impact screening and assessment was done for the tribal

population in Chhindwara town and no negative impacts due to the project were

identified on tribal people. On the basis of identification, assessment and prior

informed consultations it was found that OP/BP 4.10 does not trigger as these

Page 18: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

xvi | P a g e

groups are living in dispersed manner mixed with the general population of the town

and do not form a distinct group in the town, neither do they have any separate

cultural, economic, social, or political institutions. Though tribal have dialect of

their own, however, they are well versed with local Hindi language. No negative

impact on tribal and vulnerable population has been assessed, thus, no separate

IPP/TVDP is prepared.

11. Grievance Redress Mechanism

A grievance redress mechanism is formed at city level which included formulation

of a Grievance Redressal Committee consisting of an Elected Representative

(preferably female), a person who is publicly known and accepted by the locals to

speak on their behalf (to be identified by the Elected Representatives of the CMC),

Community Development officer from PIU and CMC level community organizer.

The proposed GRC has been constituted at PIU level vide order dated 05.07.2018

and is functional.

As most of the grievances may arise due to the construction and O&M activities of

the contractor, role of the contractor in resolving the grievances is specified in

relevant section and is limited to the rectifications required within the time as

stipulated by the GRC mechanism. The Contractor has adequate mechanisms to

ensure that any complaint received by the contractor is recorded, addressed (if it is

within the scope of the contractor to address the same), information forwarded to the

GRC through PIU, etc. and complaint is closed.

12. Conclusion and Recommendations

The environment and social analysis of proposed sub-project for Chhindwara City

concludes that the project has overall positive impacts on the life and health of the

people and overall environment of the town.. There are no archeological and

historical protected/recognised areas/ sites within the project boundary. Neither any

National Park/ Wild life sanctuary/ Bird sanctuaries exist within 10 Km radius of the

project area, nor any rare and endangered species is observed in the area.

There are changes in the final designs and sites with respect to the DPR, however,

Environmental and social risks arising due to these changes, have been identified

and analysed. The type of work remains the same and hence, most of the risks also

remain the same as for the risks identified in the ESA already approved by The

World Bank. The network length has increased by appx 13% of the original

quantity, however, the kind of work included is same for the whole length. The

network laying is within the RoW.

The alternate site at Village Sarra selected for STP has same features as the original

site at Koladhana had i.e. both are near a nallah, however, the Bodari Nallah at

Koladhana carries has much more catchment compared to nallah near the STP site at

Sarra & thus, this site at Village Sarra is safer for construction of STP. The STP site

Page 19: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

xvii | P a g e

selected at Village Sarra is on Forest Land (Shrub Forest) and needs diversion from

Forest Department for which the process is already started and first stage clearance

is obtained. Fee for second stage permission has been deposited by MPUDC on

dated 10th and 11th February, 2020. This land is away from human settlement & free

from encumbrances & encroachments.

Main Pumping Station will be constructed at its originally selected location at

Koladhana. Alignment for network laying has been decided in such a manner that

all the sewage will flow through gravity to MPS and hence, IPS at Bail Bazar is not

required. This change brings a positive impact from environment, social as well as

economic point of view.

The impact identified are mostly related to construction and operation phase which

will be insignificant.

No land acquisition is required, also no permanent or temporary adverse impacts on

assets and livelihood is anticipated, hence no RAP is required as per ESMF. Only

minor damage to road side chabutarahs (Plateform -a civil structure where local

residens sitout and enjoy their leisure time) may occur during laying of network,

repairing of which is included in contractor’s scope of work and funds required for

such activities are included in the provisional sum under the contract. Loss of

income for certain days to street vendors at certain locations may occur during

construction phase however mitigation measures have been designed in a manner so

that any negative impact on the daily income of the street vendors is avoided. The

mitigation measures include shifting of street vendors across (on the opposite side)

the road and laying network in small stretches of 250m. Mitigation measures to

ensure access to residents and shops have also been proposed.

In Project area, no indigenous people are identified meeting the requirement of

indigenous people’s policy and hence, no separate Indigenous Peoples Development

Plan (IPDP) is required.

Page 20: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

1 | P a g e

1. Introduction

1.1. Project Background

Madhya Pradesh (MP) is geographically, the second largest, fifth populous, and eighth most

urbanized state in India. As per Census 2011, total urban population of MP is 20.1 million

(28% of total population) concentrated in 476 urban centers as follows: 378 municipal

bodies of which 16 are Municipal Corporations (Nagar Palika Nigams), 98 are Municipal

Councils, 264 Nagar Panchayats, and 98 Census Towns - identified as areas with urban

characteristics, but not formally notified as urban. Of the 16 Municipal Corporations, four

(Indore, Bhopal, Jabalpur, and Gwalior) are million-plus cities.

Rapid urbanization in MP has seen sprouting of new urban settlements across the state,

more often close to existing cities. The last decade (2001-2011) has seen 20% increases in

the number of urban centers, including 50% increase in census towns, compared to 6%

increase in the previous decade (1991-2001). The last decade also saw more than a quarter-

fold increase in population of the four largest urban agglomerations including Bhopal and

Indore. In the cities of MP, households’ access to piped water supply ranges between 48-

80%, per capita; water supply ranges between 35 to 150 lpcd; access to underground

sewerage range between nil to 40%; waste collection ranges between 85-90%, and 60-80%

of rainwater runoff is effectively drained.

The objective of the proposed Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Project (MPUDP)

supported by The World Bank is to enhance the capacity of relevant State-level institutions

to support ULBs in developing and financing urban infrastructure. The proposed

Chhindwara Sewerage Project is one of the subprojects under Madhya Pradesh Urban

Development project (MPUDP) funded by the GoMP and The World Bank.

1.2. Context of the Environment and Social Assessment by the contractor

This report presents an Contractor’s Environmental and Social Assessment (C-ESA) of

Chhindwara Sewerage subproject (conducted by the contractor). This ESA identifies

potential impacts on the natural environment and social aspects in Chhindwara during

construction and operation of the project. Where potential adverse effects are predicted,

mitigation has been developed and its implementation is presented in an Environmental

and Social Management Plan (ESMP) and Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP)/Social

Monitoring Plan (SMP).

This project has been identified as Category Ea project based on the environmental

screening carried out for the project as per the Environmental and Social Management

Framework (ESMF) of MPUDP (Appendix 1). This requires an ESA report and an

Environmental and Social Management Plan. With regard to social safeguards, the project

has been classified as ‘Category Sc, because neither any land acquisition is required, nor

any permanent adverse impacts on assets and livelihood is anticipated, hence no RAP is

required as per ESMF. Only minor damage to road side properties may occur during

Page 21: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

2 | P a g e

construction phase. Temporary shifting of the street vendors may also be required during

construction phase.

1.3. Scope of ESA study

The Environmental and Social Impact Assessment has been carried out at the planning

stages for the proposed Chhindwara Sewerage scheme to ensure that all adverse social and

environmental impacts are taken into consideration during the design, construction,

operation and decommissioning of the Project. Original ESA was prepared by independent

agency based on the DPR of the scheme and the same has been updated by the DRBO

Contractor. The scope of this C-ESA study covers:

a) Description of the proposed Project;

b) The baseline environmental and social profile of the ESA study area;

c) Provisions of the relevant environmental and social legislations;

d) Alternative analysis

e) Stakeholder consultation and public meetings,

f) Prediction of any adverse impacts to the environment and on assets and income

due to the proposed project.

g) Appropriate mitigation measures; and

h) Provision of an Environmental and Social Management Plan.

1.4. Objectives of ESA Study

The objectives of the ESA study are:

a) To fulfill National and State legal requirements and World Bank Safeguard policies.

b) To obtain background Environmental information of the sites and legal and regulatory

issues associated with the proposed Chhindwara Sewerage project;

c) To assess and predict the potential impacts during site preparation, construction and

operational phases of the proposed Project;

d) To make suggestions of possible alterations to the proposed design, based on the

assessment findings;

e) To propose mitigation measures for the potential adverse environmental and social

impacts and safety risks;

f) To allow for public participation; and prepare an ESA Report including an

Environmental and Social Management and Monitoring Plan.

1.5. Terms of Reference (ToR) for the ESA process

The ToR for this Environmental and Social Impact Assessment is based on the

requirements of OP 4.01 on Environmental Assessment of The World Bank and the

guidance provided in the ESMF for MPUDP. The Scope is given in Section 1.3 above.

a) Description of the nature of the proposed project;

b) Alternative analysis

c) The location of the project including the physical area that may be affected by the

project’s activities;

d) The activities that shall be undertaken during the project construction, O&M phase;

Page 22: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

3 | P a g e

e) The materials to be used, products and by-products, including waste to be generated by

the project and the methods of their disposal;

f) The potential environmental impacts of the project and the mitigation measures to be

taken during and after implementation of the project;

g) An action plan for the prevention and management of possible accidents during the

project cycle

1.6. Methodology

The ESA study was carried out based on desk review, field assessments and public

consultations with the community who is likely to get benefitted from the project as well as

the potential project affected persons and relevant Government Institutions. In the course of

the assignment, potential impacts at all stages of the project during construction and O&M

in project area is evaluated against applicable environmental and social standards,

regulations and guidelines, the existing environmental conditions and issues and concerns

raised by all project stakeholders. The assessment process incorporates the following key

stages:

1.6.1 Desk Review

A desktop study was conducted to review available published and unpublished reports,

development plans and maps in order to compile relevant baseline biophysical and socio-

economic information about the study area. The biophysical information was compiled on

environmental aspects such as Topography, Climate, Soils, Water Resources, land use and

flora and wildlife resources. On the socio-economic environment, the study compiled

information on aspects such as population, sex ratio, literacy, religious composition of

town, work force participation, share of ST and SC population, Below poverty line people,

density of town, land use, housing gap and commercial activities, poverty etc.

1.6.2 Field Visits

Field visits were conducted in the study area in order to collect site-specific information on

the biophysical and socio-economic environment and to crosscheck the secondary data.

While at the site, environmental data were recorded and potential impacts identified in the

wards having high density.

1.6.3 Stakeholder Consultation

Consultation helps to develop a sense of stakeholder ownership of the project and a

realization amongst all stakeholders that their concerns are taken seriously and that the

issues raised, if relevant, will be addressed in the Environmental and Social Assessment

(ESA) process. All relevant stakeholders have been identified using the most recent and

accurate information available. The consultation process was carried out in two stages:

during the scoping and after preparation of the draft ESA. The consultation process focused

on seeking comment on key issues and concerns, identifying potential impacts and offering

the opportunity for alternatives or objections to be raised by the potentially affected parties;

non-governmental organizations, members of the public and other stakeholders. See

Appendix 5 for a) list of stakeholder’s consultations; and b) a summary of the issues and

concerns raised.

Page 23: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

4 | P a g e

Public meetings

Public Meetings with the communities were conducted in the project area with the help of

the local administration especially the corporators and ULB officials. The selection of the

wards for the meetings was done on the basis of different categories, localities and level of

problems foreseen. The discussions during these public meetings were centered on key

emerging issues relating to the project as well as the communities. A total of 13 meetings

were held at different locations within the project from 2016-2018.

Key Informant Interviews

One-on-one interviews with government agencies and institutions in the project area were

undertaken. These interviews were conducted to augment and confirm data and

information obtained through secondary sources.

Focus Group Discussions

In total 10 focus group discussions were conducted especially with women in the fringe

areas and in slum areas of Chhindwara town were women facing open defecation

problems/having soak pit latrines. Focus groups were carried out as group meetings with

women residents during which the participants were given the possibility to discuss and

contribute to specific information. The participants in the focus groups were selected based

on their common characteristics from different communities. The focus group discussions

place particular emphasis on group dynamics, when issues of particular concern should be

addressed to explore participants’ problems, attitudes, and suggestions regarding subproject

1.6.4. Impact Assessment and Analysis

Following the identification of all project environmental aspects and potential impacts, the

level of impact that may result from each of the activity-receptor interactions were

assessed. The assessment and analyses methodologies for ESA studies are based on the

following key components of the environment in relation to the proposed Project:

a) Physical/chemical component;

b) Biological/ecological component;

c) Sociological/cultural component; and

d) Economic/operational component.

Environmental and social risk due to change of land of STP and increase in length of sewer

network have been identified and also discussed in detail under Chapter 5 - Assesment of

Anticipated Impacts and Chapter 7- ESMP. The change of STP site has led the requirement

of clearance of Forest Department since the alternate land at Village Sarra is “Shrub

Forest” belonging to Forest Department. First stage clearance has been obtained and the

requisite fees for second stage clearance including plantation and impact mitigation

activities has been deposited to the forest department and also alternative land have been

provided for equal afforestation. As far as social risk is concerned, there are insignificant

Page 24: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

5 | P a g e

risks involved because this change neither involves any acquisition of private land nor

does it adversely impact any livelihood.

1.7. Mitigation and Monitoring

1.7.1. Mitigation

Mitigation measures are taken into consideration and defined during the impact assessment

process. The results of the mitigation analysis and the mitigation measures included in

mitigation plan of the Environmental& Social Management Plan.

1.7.2. Monitoring

The following monitoring approach is proposed:

a) The monitoring plan has been included in Environmental & Social Management Plan

(ESMP);

b) The PIU and MPUDC shall monitor the implementation of ESMP and track indicators

for IEC activities, grievance redressal, participation of women, scheduled Tribes and

other vulnerable people.

c) Quarterly report shall be prepared

Page 25: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

6 | P a g e

2. Project Description

2.1. Description of Project Area

2.1.1. Background

Chhindwara town is the administrative headquarters of Chhindwara District under the

Jabalpur Administration Division of Madhya Pradesh. It is the largest city in the district.

The population of Chhindwara city was 138,291 (2011 census) and the Municipal area was

about 11.33 sq. km. Vide Urban Administration and Environment Department, Government

of Madhya Pradesh notification 28 F 1-14 /2014/18-3 dated 05.09.2014, the municipal

limits were increased andadjoining 24 villages were merged in it. The area of these 24

villages is 98.94 sq. km and population of these villages (census 2011) is 77,552. Thus, the

new municipal area of Chhindwara town is 110.27 sq. km and population as per 2011

census is 2,15,843. The figure 2.1 shows the spread of the ULB area.

Chhindwara is well connected with other parts of the country by road and railway. National

Highway 69 passes through Chhindwara. It connects Nagpur (128km) in Maharashtra to

Obedullaganj near Bhopal in Madhya Pradesh (refer Figure 2.2). The city is connected with

other parts of the country primarily through roads. The state highway SH-26 connects

Chhindwara to other prime areas in the state. Through the network of state highways, it is

connected with Bhopal (277km), and Jabalpur (196km). Nagpur at a distance of 130 km

from the city is the nearest airport. Chhindwara is well connected to the National Capital

Delhi and State Capital Bhopal through rail. A proposed broad-gauge line to Nagpur is

expected to improve the connectivity in the region.

The intent of the proposed subproject is to ensure that comprehensive, technically and

financially viable system for Sewerage system for core city and 7 adjacent villages on

priority in Chhindwara Municipal Area.

Page 26: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

7 | P a g e

Figure 2. 1: Chhindwara Municipal Area

Page 27: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

8 | P a g e

Figure 2. 2: Key Plan for Chhindwara City

Page 28: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

9 | P a g e

2.1.2. Objective of the Project

The primary objectives of the proposed subproject of sewerage of town Chhindwara are listed

below:

• To reduce the pollution by treating the waste water (sewage) of the town which is

presently being discharged in raw form into water bodies;

• Prevention of ground water and soil pollution due to infiltration of untreated liquid

waste;

• Improvement in water quality of existing water bodies;

• Improvement in environmental sanitation health and reduction in associated health

hazards to the inhabitants of the subproject towns;

• Improvement in quality of life, human dignity and increased productivity;

• Value addition to the socio-economic condition, and Substantial reduction of water

logging and flooding in sub-project area of Chhindwara

2.2. Existing Water Supply and Sanitation System

2.2.1. Brief Description of Existing Water Supply Schemes

The total potable water demand for the city of Chhindwara is met by surface water sources

and Tube wells. Kanhargaon dam on Kulbehra River being the main source, supplies 90%

of the total demand, balance being procured from bore wells and open and wells. The

existing storage capacity is 9.4 MLD and design capacity of the water treatment plants is

around 18 MLD. Presently, the per capita water supply for the city is 135 lpcd. The

coverage of the population at present is 95 % in the core area and 7 adjacent villages. A

water supply augmentation scheme for Chhindwara municipal township excluding newly

added 17 villages is recently commissioned for total water requirements for the year 2042

(ultimate design period) under Urban Infrastructure Development Scheme for Small and

Medium Towns (UIDSSMT) of Ministry of Urban Development, GOI. The total capacity

of the newly developed Water Supply System is based on 135 lpcd rate of water supply.

The sewerage sub project at Chhindwara is limited to this area only.

CMC envisaged another water supply augmentation scheme under Atal Mission for

Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) for the remaining 17 villages within

Municipal Boundary so as to provide water to its citizen at 135 lpcd. This scheme has been

implemented in the year 2018-19.

2.2.2. Brief Description of Existing Sanitation Facilities and Disposal System

There is no formal existing sewerage scheme in the CMC area. The sewage from the

houses is conveyed to the individual septic tank. The effluent from the septic tank of

individual houses discharges into open channels along the roads and finally drains through

Nallah either to the lakes or to other water bodies. This creates an unhygienic condition in

the area. The sewerage scheme is a dire need of the core area, failing which problems will

be posed to the environment of the town affecting the Public health and the commercial

Page 29: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

10 | P a g e

activities. Besides, sewage will pollute the ground water as well as surface water.

Toilets

At present 43,560 properties are in CMC area out of which more than 95% properties have

their own toilet in their premises. Approximately 36,000 properties have toilets with septic

tank facility. The effluent from Septic Tank is discharged to road side open drains. Average

size of each septic tank varies from 1.5m x1.0m and 3.0m x1.8m with depth ranging from

2m to2.5 m.

CMC was implementing Low Cost sanitation Scheme (LCS) in City in some of the newly

added areas. Total 3,185 no. of individual toilets is being constructed in city as well as in

slum areas. There are 11 public toilet blocks in the city which have total 107 seats capacity.

Presently, there is no additional requirement of public toilets in CMC area. Table 2.1

presents the basic information at a glance. There are 24 notified slums in the City, and

about 5,065 properties having total population of 20,260 in the slum area.

Table 2. 1: Existing Percentage of Coverage by Services in old CMC area

Sr. No. Description Population Percentage

1 Population 2011 215843

2 Population using Individual toilets 196020 93%

3 Population using public toilets 1070 1%

4 Population in Slum using individual toilets 12288 6%

Details of existing and ongoing sanitation system in town area, slum area and developed

area were collected from CMC and respective villages during site visits.

CMC had identified all the houses within its limits which do not have individual toilets and

had taken up the responsibility of constructing toilets for such families at individual

household level. CMC envisaged a scheme under the State owned ‘Mukhya Mantri Shahri

Swachhata Mission’ which later on was merged with the National Level Mission

"Swachchh Bharat Mission". CMC has already been declared Open Defecation Free ULB.

Sewerage System

At present, the city has no sewerage system; consequently, no sewage treatment plants

(STPs) are there as well. Sewage, as well as effluents from public toilets, etc. were found to

be directly being discharged in storm water drains (figure 2.3).

Septage Management

Chhindwara has traditionally followed a septage management approach; details are

presented in Table 2.2.

Page 30: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

11 | P a g e

Figure 2. 3: Waste Water Discharged Behind the House

Table 2. 2: Details of Septage Management

S. No. Description Details

1 Existing practice of Septage management, Mechanical

2 No. of Cleaning vehicle 1 Tractor + 1 Mud pump tanker

3 Septic Tank cleaning interval: Once in a year or two year and so on

Once in a year or two

Years 4 No. of Septic Tank in city 18000 approx.

5 No. of septic tank desludged in a day 3 Nos. approx.

6 Desludging Agency (CMC/Private) CMC

7 Existing disposal method (in Nallah or designated disposal site, etc.)

trenching ground or

open dumping 8 Land availability for septage disposal Land is available for

proposed 4 bio-digesters

2.3. Need of Project

To sustain the high rate of growth in the town the sewerage system is an important

component of the infrastructure that needs to be developed on priority. There is also ground

water pollution posing a danger of cross-contamination for the water supply mains. In all

the area raw sewage is discharged into Nallahs and drains which is a danger to public

health and also offends water pollution control regulations. It is therefore necessary to

provide a comprehensive sewerage scheme covering the core area of the CMC (figure 2.4)

and ensuring that the sewage is adequately treated before disposal into water courses.

There is also a need to implement comprehensive Septage Management service for the City

as well as surrounding developed areas and villages.

The census data on decadal population since year 1951 is presented in Table 2.3

Page 31: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

12 | P a g e

Table 2. 3 Decadal Population Data for Chhindwara City (Census India website, 2011)

Sl.

No. Year Population

Average Decadal

Growth rate (%) CAGR

1 1941 21,916 28 2.50%

2 1951 27,652 26 2.40%

3 1961 37,244 34 3%

4 1971 53,408 43 3.70%

5 1981 75,178 40 3.50%

6 1991 96,858 28 2.60%

7 2001 1,22,247 26 2.40%

8 2011 1,38,291 13 1.24%

As per the estimate made in DPR, the final population growth will be around 2.90 lakhs.

The population projection is summarized in the table 2.4 below:

Table 2. 4: Summary of The Population Projection (Final Revised)

Year 2018 2033 2048

Population Zone-1 79,555 96,485 1,15,020

Population Zone-2 1,11,145 1,41,765 1,75,898

Total 1,90,700 2,38,250 2,90,918

2.4. Proposed Project

2.4.1. Sewage Generation /Loading

The unit wastewater is determined considering the proposed improvements to the Water

Supply System, the usage from ground water sources and an appropriate return factor.

Infiltration is also considered and converted to a unit rate. Overall calculations are

presented in Table 2.5 below.

Table 2. 5: Per Capita Sewage Generation (for Core area and 7 villages)

a) Total per capita water supply 135 Lpcd

b) Sewage generation at 80% of the total water supply 108 Lpcd

c) Add for infiltration (10% of wastewater quantity) 10.8 Lpcd

d) Total unit sewage rate being admitted to system 118.8 Lpcd

Due to topography and sparse distribution of population, whole CMC area cannot be

provided with sewerage system without compromising depths or high numbers of SPS.

Additionally, population density is very low in outer areas that will lead to solid deposition

inside sewers. Hence, only part of the villages that can be connected to city sewerage by

Page 32: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

13 | P a g e

gravity is considered. Hence, the proposed "Sewerage Network and STP" project of

Chhindwara Municipal Corporation envisages dividing whole town in two clusters 1) Core

city and 7 adjacent villages, and 2) 17 villages merged with CMC in January 2015. In this

proposed sewerage scheme the seven villages were included and 17 villages were

excluded, however, these 17 villages will be considered in later stage. Details of the

villages which were included in the present sewerage scheme is provided in the table 2.6

below and the map is provided below in figure 2.4.

Table 2. 6: Details of 7 villages

SI No Ward Name Ward No

1 Partala 48

2 Khajri 3

3 Kukdajagat 4

4 Kapabhat 10

5 Sivnipranmeti 16

6 Chandangoan 36

7 Lonia Karbal 45

Based on the topography and geographical, the DPR envisaged dividing the whole project

area in two zones. While designing the system, this concept was followed. For sewage

collection, the whole project area is divided into two zones. Design Population of Zone 1 in

the year 2048 is 115,020 and that of Zone 2 is 175,899. However, now the flow from zone

1 to Main Pumping Station at Koladhana will be gravity flow as against the pumping

proposed at DPR stage. It is proposed to set up 28 MLD capacity sewage treatment plant

(STP) at Sarra village.

Figure 2. 4: Project area for Sewerage (within Chhindwara Municipal Boundary)

Page 33: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

14 | P a g e

2.4.2. Sewer Pipe:

Considering the techno economics of material, pipe up to 300 mm dia. has been taken as

DWC and above 300 mm dia. NP-3 concrete pipe has been taken. The minimum diameter

of pipe taken is 150 mm and cover taken is 1.0 m minimum. Total network length after

finalization of design is 302.374 km which is appx 13% more than the length conceived in

DPR. Out of the total designed length 150 mm diameter pipe is 216.33 km, 200 mm

diameter pipe is 40.80 km, 250 mm pipe is 11.88 km and 300 mm dia pipe is 7.20km

which means approximately 91.5% of the pipe length is upto or below 300mm dia which

requires less width of trench generally not exceeding 1.1m. Pipe of dia > 300mm and upto

1000 mm is appx 26.16 km which is 8.5% of the total length. Thus, the design is done in

such a manner that excessive depths are avoided to the extent possible. The maximum

depth is restricted to 4.8 m. Manhole is provided at every 30 m length and change in

alignment or as per the demand of site. The sewage from SPS will be pumped to STP by

pumping main of 2500m DI K-9 of 700 mm.

Sewage generation in the project boundary is presented in Table 2.7.

Table 2.7: Sewage Generation in Project Area

Sewage Generation (MLD) 2018 2033 2048

Zone 1 9.38 11.38 13.57

Zone 2 13.11 16.73 20.75

Total in Catchment Area 22.50 28.11 34.32

Page 34: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

15 | P a g e

In this cluster (project boundary) of the CMC, 90 % households have septic tank. Hence

Septage management in houses, which cannot be covered under sewerage system due to

their location or topography, has also been taken in the present project.

2.4.3. Sewage Pumping Station:

Initially, two Sewage Pumping Station were proposed – one at Khasra No. 991 (Bail

Bazar), having area of 4.45 hectares (IPS proposed at 200 sqm only) and the second at

Koladhana (this pumping station is MPS as well). Both the lands are in possession of the

CMC. As per the final optimized design (after joint investigations of PMU Bhopal, PIU

Jabalpur, Independent Verification Team, PMC and CMC), flow of sewage from zone 1 to

MPS at Koladhana will be gravity flow and hence, SPS at Bail Bazar is no more required.

Thus, now only one pumping station (which is also the Main Pumping Station) at

Koladhana is envisaged. the location of proposed STP has been shifted to the Sarra area.

Thus, as per final approved design and drawing only one SPS is to be constructed at

Koladhana near Bodri Nallah in ward no.33.

All the sewage will be collected at SPS at Koladhana from where it will be pumped to STP

by pumping main of DI K-9 of 700 mm and 2.5 km length. Zoning of the project area and

location of the sewage pumping station is below figure 2.5 and 2.6 respectively.

2.4.4. Manholes:

Circular manhole of brick masonry is proposed at all junction, change of diameter, and

change in pipe gradient and on straight run of sewer. The design of manholes is depending

upon the depth and the diameter of the sewer. The spacing is in confirmation of CPHEEO

Manual for Sewerage. Typical manhole cover and frame in Steel fiber reinforced concrete

(SFRC) / reinforced concrete heavy duty is proposed. Use of precast cement Concrete

manholes will also be done in commercially busy areas with the basic objective to cause

minimum inconvenience to the shopkeepers, vendors and consumers/ customers

(installation of precast manhole takes lesser time than construction of brick manhole).

Provision is made in each manhole to receive multiple service connections from adjacent

properties. No provision is made for direct connections to sewer pipeline between

manholes so as to prevent interference and damage to the sewer. Depth wise diameter of

manhole is presented in Table 2.8

Table 2. 8: Depth wise Diameter of Manhole

Manhole Type Dia of pipe in mm Depth (m) Dia of Manhole

Circular Type 150-250 0.91 to 1.65 900 mm

Circular Type 150-900 1.66 to 2.30 1200 mm

Circular Type 150-900 2.31 to above 1500 mm

Page 35: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

16 | P a g e

Figure 2. 5: Zoning of the Project Area

Page 36: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

17 | P a g e

Figure 2. 6 Google Image showing SPS Location Koladhana

2.4.5. Property Connection:

Property connections are proposed to be provided in this project and the arrangement

comprises a facility to convey the wastewater including grey and blackwater from the

houses to the sewers line. HDPE pipe is to be used for connecting up to the property

boundary. Provision for pipe cost and road side property chamber has been made in the

contract along with the necessary road restoration charges.

For two or more properties, a roadside chamber shall be constructed close to property

boundary & 110mm Φ HDPE pipe shall be provided from road side chamber to street

Manhole. Openings are provided to Roadside chambers so that the property owner can

make connection to the roadside chamber from his premise. The properties, which are close

to the manhole, will have a separate connection for each property and no roadside chamber

will be provided. As far as possible, the sewer shall be laid at the center of the road for road

width less than four meters. The part of connection including Inspection Chamber inside

the property has to be constructed by the property owner at their own cost.

2.4.6. Site Selection for the Proposed STP

The Sewage Treatment Plant is essential to treat the waste water collected through

Sewerage Network. This is an important component of any Waste Water Management.

Page 37: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

18 | P a g e

As per the final DPR, the STP was proposed to be constructed at Koladhana near

Bodri Nallah in ward no. 33 at Khasra 678 having an area of 1.8 hectares. But

while doing survey and geotechnical investigations, it was found that major part of

this site for STP at Koladhana was under submergence of Bodri Nallah and hence, it

was decided to change the site for STP. Further a detailed analysis regarding the

land available at Koladhana was done by MPUDC, PMC and the contractor jointly

which is as following:

a. Land requirement for construction of STP is 2.5 ha and total land available at

Koladhana is 1.8ha.

b. Bodri Nallah is dividing this land into 3 small parcels which renders the land

un-useful for construction of STP. To make the land useful, nallah will have to

be diverted and the ground filling will be required to raise its level. This is a

cost extensive job.

c. As the land was open since years and was available as an easy thorough fare, a

cart road has developed by the villagers across the land. Therefore, in case of

construction of STP on this land, alternative arrangement of road for villagers

will be needed.

d. Approx. 0.921 ha of land will be required for diverting the Nallah which will

have to be acquired by the CMC.

e. Substantial amount for construction of retaining wall of the Nallah and/or land

acquisition will be required.

f. As per contract, the available land should accommodate the future augmentation

of STP for the population of 2048.

g. The land piece is not suitable and ample for construction of STP but part of it

can be used for construction of MPS.

In view of the above, it was decided to select alternative site for construction of STP. After

studying various alternatives (in consultation with ULB) for construction of STP, land at

Village Sarra in ward no 35 Khasra no126,128 and 129 having an area of 2.851 hectare

was selected and thus the location of STP is changed from Koladhana to Sarra after a joint

field verification by the contractor’s team, PIU and PMC and final consent of IVT was

obtained. Figure 2.7 shows the alternate site for STP. The layout of the STP is also

enclosed as figure 2.8.

Page 38: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

19 | P a g e

Figure 2. 7 Google Image showing changed STP site at Village Sarra

Strip plan between Main Pumping Station to Sewage Treatment Plant

Page 39: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

20 | P a g e

Figure 2. 8 Layout of STP

Page 40: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

21 | P a g e

2.4.7. Selection of Sewage Treatment Technology:

The DPR proposed to adopt Cyclic Activated Sludge Process (SBR technology) for

treatment of sewage. However, the bid was based on the open technology norm. The

contractor had proposed to use Cyclic Activated Sludge Process (SBR technology).

Design inlet and outlet parameter given below in table 2.9. The process flow

diagram of the proposed technology for STP is given below in fig. 2.9.

Table 2.9 Design inlet and outlet parameter

a) Inlet parameters

Sr. No. PARAMETER Unit Design value

1 pH 7.0- 8.0

2 Total Suspended Solid (TSS) mg/l 1040

3 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) mg/l 130

4 Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) mg/l 220

5 Total Kjeldahi Nitrogen (TKN) mg/l 50

b) Outlet parameters as per design

Sr. No. Parameter Unit

Design value

(As per technical specification in

tender documents)

1 pH 6.5- 9.0

2 TSS mg/l Not more than 10

3 BOD mg/l Not more than 5

4 COD mg/l Not more than 50

5 NH4-N mg/l Not more than 2

6 Total Nitrogen mg/l Not more than 10

7 Fecal Coli form MPN / 100 ml Less than 100

8 Oil & Grease mg/l Not more than 5

Page 41: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

22 | P a g e

Figure 2.9 Process Flow Diagram of STP

A green belt will be developed with fast growing, tolerant and native plant species which are

specified by Central Pollution Control Board. The action plan for green belt development is

given in Table 2.10 and list of plants suggested for green belt and avenue plantation as per CPCB

guidelines is given in Table 2.11. The tall trees will be planted with 5m interval all along the

boundary and shrubs will be planted in between the trees. Trees with medium height will be

planted all along the roads with 3m interval. Odor controlling species like Osmium sanctum,

Curcuma longa, and Chrysopogonzizanioides etc. will be planted around the processing facilities.

Green belt development plan is given in table 2.12.

Page 42: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

23 | P a g e

Table 2. 10 Action Plan for Greenbelt development

S. No. Description

1 Area allocated

Along the boundary 930m2 (310m × 3m)

Along the road 160m2 (80m × 2m)

2 No of Plants to be planted

Along the boundary 56 trees and 124 shrubs

Along the road 15 trees

3 Plantation schedule

construction phase- Along the

boundary

56 trees and 124 shrubs

Operation phase- Along the road

and open spaces

15 trees

4 Manpower Requirement Horticulturist-1, Gardner1

Table 2. 11 List of Plants Identified for Greenbelt and Avenue Plantation as per CPCB

Species Maple Oak Poplar Linden Birch

As per CPCB, for absorption of gases, Plant should have following parameters (Ref.

Guidelines for Developing Greenbelts by CPCB)

a) Longer duration of foliage.

b) Freely exposed foliage through.

c) An adequate height of crown.

d) Openness of foliage in canopy.

e) Big leaves (long and laminar surfaces).

f) Large number of stomatal apertures

g) Stomata well exposed (in level with the general epidermal surface).

Page 43: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

24 | P a g e

Table 2.12 Green belt development (Cost included in ESMP in chapter 7, Table 7.2)

Plantation location Area Number of

rows

Number of

trees

Tentative area

coverage

At the car parking One row 20 45

Between West & South side of DG, HT

PANEL, Transformer, Metering room

almost three layers of plantation will be

covering, west and south side of DG, HT

PANEL, Transformer, Metering room, one

layer of plantation at car parking area

covering both side

Three rows 37 83.25

Plantation area between Front side of primary

unit, both side of 3rd & 4th C-tech basin and

Boundary wall

Three rows 25 56.25

Area in between north and east side of sludge

handling unit and boundary wall

Three rows 28 63

East side of Chlorine contact tank & Building Three rows 12 27

South side of Chlorine contact tank &

Building and Boundary wall

Two rows 1 42.75

West side of Chlorine contact tank &

Building and South side of 4th no no’s C-tech

basin

Three rows 20 45

South side of C-tech Basin and Boundary

wall

One row 25 56.25

Grand Total Area 418.4 sq.m

2.5 Collection Network

The collection network is proposed to be laid in the RoW of existing roads. Due care has

been taken to fix the alignments so as not to do any harm any vegetation or existing

structures.

Page 44: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

25 | P a g e

3. Legal, Policy and Administrative Framework

3.1. Regulatory Framework – Environmental

Implementation of the subproject will be governed by the National and State of Madhya Pradesh

environmental acts, rules, regulations, and standards. These regulations impose restrictions on

activities to minimize/mitigate likely impacts on the environment. It is the responsibility of the

project executing and implementing agencies to ensure subprojects are consistent with the legal

framework, whether national, state or municipal/local. Compliance is required in all stages of the

subproject including design, construction, and operation and maintenance.

The summary of regulations and mandatory requirements for the subproject is presented in Table

3.1 below.

Table 3.1: Applicable Environmental Regulations for Sewerage Scheme

Law Description

Environment Related

EIA Notification EIA Notification of 2006 and 2009 of Government of India (replacing

the EIA Notification of 1994), set out the requirement for

environmental assessment in India. This states that Environmental

Clearance is required for certain defined activities/projects, and this

must be obtained before any construction work or land preparation

(except land acquisition) may commence. Projects are categorized as

A or B depending on the scale of the project and the nature of its

impacts. Category A projects requires Environmental Clearance from

the National Ministry of Environment and Forest. Category B projects

require Environmental Clearance from the SEIAA.

Requirements of this act are not applicable to this sub-project

Water (Prevention and

Control of Pollution)

Act of 1974, Rules of

1975, and amendments

Control of water pollution is achieved through administering

conditions imposed in consent issued under provision of the Water

(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act of 1974 of Government of

India. These conditions regulate the quality and quantity of effluent,

the location of discharge and the frequency of monitoring of effluents.

Requirements of this act will be applicable to the sub-project and the

treatment plant proposed under the project will require obtain ‘Consent

to Establish’ and ‘Operate’ from the state pollution control board,

under this act. (Appendix 18)

Environment Protection

Act, 1986 and

amendments

Emissions and discharges from the facilities to be created or

refurbished or augmented shall comply with the notified standards.

This is an umbrella act of Government of India and will be applicable

for the project.

Air (Prevention and

Control of Pollution)

Act of 1981, Rules of

1982 and amendments.

The subprojects having potential to emit air pollutants into the

atmosphere have to obtain CTE under Section 21 of the Air

(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act of 1981 from MPPCB

before starting implementation and CTO before commissioning the

project. The occupier of the project/facility has the responsibility to

adopt necessary air pollution.

Requirements of this act will be applicable both during construction

Page 45: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

26 | P a g e

Law Description

and operation phase of the project.

Forest (Conservation)

Act, 1980 and Forest

Conservation Rules,

2003 as amended

As per Rule 6, every user agency, who wants to use any forest land for

non-forest purposes shall seek approval of the Central Government.

The act will be applicable for the project, since diversion of forest land

is required for the project component of STP.

Ancient Monuments

and Archaeological

Sites and Remains

Rules of 1959

The Rules designate areas within a radius of 100 meters (m) and 300 m

from the “protected property” as “protected area” and “controlled

area” respectively. No development activity (including mining

operations and construction) is permitted in the “protected area” and

all development activities likely to damage the protected property are

not permitted in the “controlled area” without prior permission of the

Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). Protected property includes the

site, remains, and monuments protected by ASI or the State

Department of Archaeology.

While no archeological monuments are located in the project area, the

requirements of this act will be applicable, if any material of cultural

importance is found ‘by chance’ during the implementation of the

project.

Madhya Pradesh State

Water Policy, 2003

Prepared in accordance with the National Water Policy, it states that

“for environmental balance, skillful and planned management of all

types of developmental activities, economic use on equitable basis and

in view of the prime importance of water for all human and other

living beings, an effective and sound water policy is necessary”.

Policy is detailed in 17 sections dealing with different aspects of water

resources. No. 7 deals with Water Allocation Priorities, and according

to which drinking water supply shall have the highest priority followed

by irrigation, power, tourism, etc.

Water Resource Department is nodal department for permitting

different uses of water resources. Policy also states that “clear

provision for reservation of drinking water shall be made in irrigation

projects”

Social Related

The Right to Fair Compensation

andTransparency in

Land Acquisition,

Rehabilitation and

Resettlement Act,

2013 (RTFCTLARR

Act 2013)

The Act provides for enhanced compensation and assistances

measures and adopts a more consultative and participatory approach

in dealing with the Project Affected Persons.

Page 46: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

27 | P a g e

Law Description

MP Nagariyon

Kshetra ke

Bhumiheen Vyakti

(Pattadhruti

Adhikaron ka Pradan

Kiya Jana)

Adhiniyam, 1984,

popularly known as

the Patta Act.

A separate act has been passed by the state legislature for

regularizing tenure of squatters on government land. GoMP has been

granting leasehold land titles or Pattas to “landless persons” or

residents of squatter settlements in urban areas on the basis of the MP

Nagariyon Kshetra ke Bhumiheen Vyakti (Pattadhruti Adhikaron ka

Pradan Kiya Jana) Adhiniyam, 1984, popularly known as the Patta

Act. The Act applies to all urban areas of MP. The `Patta’ Act was

introduced to grant leasehold rights to the landless persons occupying

urban lands. The Act entitles all landless persons occupying less than

50 sq m of land on a specified cut of date to leasehold rights for

residential use on the same land or on another site.

The Street Vendors (Protection of

Livelihood and

Regulation of Street

Vending) Act, 2014

GOI recently enacted the act that specifically aims to protect the

rights of urban street vendors and to regulate street vending activities.

It provides for Survey of street vendors and protection from eviction

or relocation; issuance of certificate for vending; provides for rights

and obligations of street vendors; development of street vending

plans; organizing of capacity building programmes to enable the

street vendors to exercise the rights contemplated under this Act;

undertake research, education and training programmes to advance

knowledge and understanding of the role of the informal sector in the

economy, in general and the street vendors, in particular and to raise

awareness. Requirements of this act will be applicable during

construction.

The Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional

Forest Dwellers

(Recognition of

Forest Rights) Act,

2006.

An Act to recognise and vest the forest rights and occupation in

forest land in forest dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional

forest dwellers who have been residing in such forests for

generations but whose rights could not be recorded; to provide for a

framework for recording the forests rights so vested and the nature of

evidence required for such recognition and vesting in respect of

forest land. This does not apply to this sub project.

Minimum wages Act

1948 The minimum wage act 1948 is an act to enforce minimum wages to

labourers in all categories and provide for certain other matter

connected there with. This act is applicable in this subproject

Payment of Wages

Act, 1936

This Act applies to wages payable to an employed person in respect

of a wage period if such wages for that wage period do not

exceed 12[twenty four thousand rupees] per month or such other

higher sum which, on the basis of figures of the Consumer

Expenditure Survey published by the National Sample Survey

Organisation, the Central Government may, after every five years,

by notification in the Official Gazette, specify

The Payment of

Bonus Act 1965

The minimum bonus of 8.33% is payable by every industry and

establishment under section 10 of the Act. The

maximum bonus including productivity linked bonus that can

be paid in any accounting year shall not exceed 20% of the

salary/wage of an employee under the section 31 A of the Act

Page 47: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

C-ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

28 | P a g e

Law Description

EPF Act 1952 The Employees' Provident Funds & Miscellaneous

Provisions Act, 1952 applies to all states in India except Jammu and

Kashmir. The purpose of a provident fund is to provide financial

security and stability to elderly people on retirement. The employer

is also expected to contribute to its employees retirement fund.

The

Workman Compensati

on Act, 1923

The Workman Compensation Act, 1923 was formed to provide

compensations for workers who acquired/acquire injuries caused by

accidents in the course of employment. Therefore, employers are

obligated to pay compensations to workers who got injuries that led

to disablement or even death in the course of employment

Inter-State Migrant

Workmen (Regulation

of Employment and

Conditions of

Service) Act, 1979

A key piece of legislation governing inter-state migrants in India is

the Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and

Conditions of Service) Act, 1979. The Act was enacted to prevent

the exploitation of inter-state migrant workmen by contractors, and

to ensure fair and decent conditions of employment

Occupational Helath and Safety related

Occupational, Safety,

Helath and Working

Condition Code - 2020

The Occupational, Safety, Helath and Working Condition Code –

2020 seeks to regulate health and safety conditions of labour in any

establishment with 10 or more workers. Its subsumes and replaces

13 labour laws related to OHS and working conditions.

3.2. World Bank Safeguard Policies

The Bank requires environment and social assessment (ESA) of projects proposed for Bank

financing to help ensure that they are environmentally sound and sustainable, and thus to

improve decision making. Table 3.2 presents the key safeguard policies identified under the

MPUDP environment and social management framework (ESMF). Comparison of national

environmental policies and World Bank safeguards operational policies are given in table no.

3.3.

Page 48: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

29 | P a g e

Table 3.2: World Bank Safeguard Policies applicable for MPUDP

World Bank Safe

Guard Policies

Objective Applicability Safeguard Requirements

OP 4.01

Environmental

Assessment

The objective of this policy is to ensure that Bank

financed projects are environmentally sound and

sustainable.

The environmental issues will be

addressed adequately in advance.

An integrated Environmental

Screening and Environmental

Assessment (EA) with

Environmental Management Plan

(EMP) will be developed to

manage environmental risks and

maximize environmental and

social benefits wherever it is

applicable.

Chhindwara Sewerage

Subproject involve construction

of treatment plant, outfall

sewers, and construction of deep

sewer lines in dense urban areas.

Hence, Categorized as Ea

OP 4.04 Natural

Habitats

The policy recognizes that the conservation of

natural habitats is essential for long-term

sustainable development. The Bank, therefore,

supports the protection, maintenance and

rehabilitation of natural habitats in its project

financing, as well as policy dialogue and

analytical work. The Bank supports and expects

the Borrowers to apply a precautionary approach

to natural resources management to ensure

environmentally sustainable development

This policy may be triggered in the

Project due to activity requiring

forest/ wildlife lands, locating

close to the natural habitats with

the potential to cause significant

adverse impact or degradation of

natural habitats whether directly

(through construction) or

indirectly (through human

activities induced by the project).

ESA and EMP required

OP/BP 4.12

Involuntary

Resettlement

The objective of this policy is to avoid or

minimize involuntary resettlement where feasible,

exploring all viable alternative project designs.

Furthermore, it intends to assist displaced person

in improving their former living standards;

community participation in planning and

implementing resettlement; and to provide

This policy applies to all

components of the project that

result in involuntary resettlement,

regardless of the source of

financing including projects that

are carried out, or planned to be

carried out, contemporaneously

All proposed project sites had

been subjected to screening. No

need for land acquisition, nor

adverse impact on assets and

livelihood resulting in

Involuntary resettlement are

likely. The policy is applicable,

Page 49: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

30 | P a g e

World Bank Safe

Guard Policies

Objective Applicability Safeguard Requirements

assistance to affected people, regardless of the

legality of title of land.

with the project. but no separate RAP is prepared.

Further, it is to confirmed that

the selected land for the STP

Site Sarra is only required

permission and diversion of land

from forest department to ULB,

Chhindwara.

OP/BP 4.36

Forestry

The objective of this policy is to ensure that Bank

financed projects only preservation and light, non-

extractive use of forest resources and Realize the

potential of forests to reduce poverty in a

sustainable manner, integrate forests effectively

into sustainable economic development, and

protect the vital local and global environmental

services and values of forests.

This policy is applicable since the

forest land is involved at the

proposed project component site

of Sewerage Treatment Plant.

ESMP required.

OP/BP 4.10

Indigenous

People

This policy aims to protect the dignity, right and

cultural uniqueness of indigenous people; to

ensure that they do not suffer due to development;

that they receive social and economic benefits

Some areas of Chhindwara district

falls in Schedule V area (Appendix

3), as per constitution of India, but

the share of scheduled Tribes in

the project area is 10.9% only.

Further, they are scattered all over

the town.

Based on the assessment and

consultation with the key

stakeholders it is confirmed that

the tribal people in the project

area do not exhibit typical

characteristics such as living as a

group; speak separate language

from dominant population,

having separate institutions in

close attachment to the forest

etc. Hence, the policy does not

apply. No separate IPP is

required

Page 50: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

31 | P a g e

World Bank Safe

Guard Policies

Objective Applicability Safeguard Requirements

OP/BP 4.11

Physical

Cultural

Resources

This policy aims at assisting in the preservation of

cultural property, historical, religious and unique

natural value-this includes remains left by

previous human inhabitants and unique

environment features, as well as in the protection

and enhancement of cultural properties

encountered in Bank- financed project.

This policy may be triggered by

sub-projects where cultural

property, historical, religious and

unique natural value-this includes

remains left by previous human

inhabitants and unique

environment features may be

affected due to project.

This policy is not triggered.

While there are no physical

cultural resources identified in

the sub project area.

General EH & S

Guidelines

World bank

group

The General Environment, Health and Safety

(EHS) Guidelines contain information on cross-

cutting environmental, health, and safety issues

potentially applicable to all projects.

These Guidelines are technical

reference documents with general

and industry-specific examples of

Good International Industry

Practice (GIIP). The Guidelines

contain the performance levels and

measures that are normally

acceptable to World Bank Group

and that are generally considered

to be achievable in new facilities

at reasonable costs by existing

technology.

Guide lines for Water and

Sanitation projects available at

http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/con

nect/e22c050048855ae0875cd76

a6515bb18/Final%2B-

%2BWater%2Band%2BSanitati

on.pdf?MOD=AJPERES

Page 51: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

32 | P a g e

Table 3.3: Comparison of National Environmental Policy and Bank’s Safeguard Operational Policies

S.

No

Bank’s

Safeguard OPs

Equivalent National Environmental Policy and Regulations Policy Gaps and its redressal

1. OP 4.01

Environmental

Assessment

• Environmental Impact Assessment Notification-2006, 14th

Sep-2006, as amended in 2009 and 2016

• Environmental protection Act, 1986 and subsequent

amendments

• Environmental Impact Assessment Notification-2006, 14th

Sep-2006, as amended in 2009 and 2013

• Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981;

• Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, for

Pollution-Prevention-and-Management;

• The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000

• Municipal Solid Waste (Management & Handling)

Rules, 2000 (MSW Rules)

• Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Trans-

boundary Movement) Rules, 2008.

• Batteries (Management and Handling) Rules, 2001

• The E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2016,

• Plastic waste Management Rules, 2016

• Construction & Demolition, Waste Management Rules,

2016 Right to information Act 2005

• The Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation

of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996

• Contract Labour (Regulation &Abolition) Act 1970,

• Minimum Wages Act 1948, Payment of Wages Act 1936,

• Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act 1986,

The OP 4.01 requires EA for Sewerage

subproject while EIA notification 2006 and

amendments is not applicable in this

sewerage project.

Further, considering IGP notes and Bank’s

internal guidance, the gap exists with

regard to community health and safety

issues.

The project design considers to avoid any

largescale impacts on vegetation, land and

environment due to construction and

outfall of the treated waste water.

It is also ensured to reuse treated waste

water as much as possible and also reuse of

extracted and demolition waste materials in

project construction.

Page 52: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

33 | P a g e

S.

No

Bank’s

Safeguard OPs

Equivalent National Environmental Policy and Regulations Policy Gaps and its redressal

• Inter-State Migrant workmen’s (Regulation of Employment

& Conditions of Service) Act 1979

• The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land

Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act

30 of 2013) (LARR)

2. OP 4.04 Natural

Habitats

• Biological Diversity Act, 2002,

• Wildlife Protection Act 1972 (WLPA),

Provisions from the acts meets the OP 4.04

requirements.

The proposed subproject is not in protected

area nor wildlife sanctuaries

(Environmental Sensitive areas).

However, MPUDC has adopted more

stringent treated waste water standard to

minimize the impact of receiving water of

the outfall.

3 OP 4.09 Pest

Management

Not applicable

4 OP 4.10

Indigenous

People

Not applicable

5 OP 4.11

Physical

Cultural

Resources

(PCR)

Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains

Act, 1958

Provisions from the act meets the OP 4.11

requirements.

Chance find procedures is included in

ESMP. Impacts on religious structures (not

protected, but social and cultural value)

will be mitigated or managed through

provisions for restoration or reconstruction

Page 53: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

34 | P a g e

S.

No

Bank’s

Safeguard OPs

Equivalent National Environmental Policy and Regulations Policy Gaps and its redressal

of CPRs in C-ESA.

6 OP 4.12

Involuntary

Resettlement

• The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land

Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

(Act 30 of 2013) (LARR)

• MP Nagariya Kshetra ke Bhumiheen Vyakti (Pattadhruti

Adhikaron ka Pradan Kiya Jana) Adhiniyam, 1984,

popularly known as the Patta Act.

• The Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and

Regulation of Street Vending) Act,2014

Gap exists specifically related to aspects

such as identification of non-titleholders as

PAPs; cut off dates for non-titleholders and

valuation of structures with depreciation. It

is clarified that this project does not

involve any involuntary resettlement

(permanent or temporary).

7 OP 4.36 Forest • The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (FCA)

• The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers

(Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006

Objectives of the acts are aligned with OP

4.36 requirements.

Chhindwara Subproject involved Forest

land for STP site

Hence, compensatory land has been

provided to the forest Department for

plantation as well as provision has been

made in ESMP for plantation at STP/IPS

site.

8 EHS Guidelines

for

Construction

Materials

Extraction,

April, 2007,

IFC

• Environmental protection Act, 1986 and subsequent

amendments

• Environmental Impact Assessment Notification-2006, 14th

Sep-2006, as amended in 2009 and 2013

• Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981;

• Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, for

Pollution-Prevention-and-Management;

The majority of OPs requirements are

addressed by existing regulations.

However, with regard to resource

efficiency and climate change /GHG

aspects, bridging of gap is most likely after

notification of National Resource

Efficiency Policy, 2019, currently at draft

stage.

Project design considers measures for reuse

Page 54: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

35 | P a g e

S.

No

Bank’s

Safeguard OPs

Equivalent National Environmental Policy and Regulations Policy Gaps and its redressal

• The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000

• National Resource Efficiency Policy, 2019 (Draft)

• Notification for use of fly ash, 2003 and MoEF&CC

notification dated 25th March 2015

• Municipal Solid Waste (Management & Handling)

Rules, 2000 (MSW Rules)

• Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Trans-

boundary Movement) Rules, 2008.

• Batteries (Management and Handling) Rules, 2001

• Central Motor Vehicle Act 1988 and Central Motor Vehicle

Rules 1989

• The E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2016,

• Plastic waste Management Rules, 2016

• Construction & Demolition, Waste Management Rules,

2016

• The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act

1957

of extracted materials in project

construction.

Page 55: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

36 | P a g e

4. Baseline Environment Profile

4.1. Baseline Study

The baseline environmental and social status is important to understand the region's

existing physical and biological characteristics along with cultural and social status of the

residing community. Information and data presented in this section is based on field

surveys, stake-holder interaction/consultation and secondary data collection which majorly

include the Detailed Project Report (DPR) of proposed sewerage work, by Nagar Nigam,

Water/ Air/ Noise quality monitoring report of CPCB and Madhya Pradesh State Pollution

Control Board, City census data and others. The information on the baseline environmental

conditions forms the basis to analyze the probable impacts of the proposed project vis-à-vis

the present background environmental quality of the core study area.

4.2. Environmental Profile of Chhindwara Subproject

The subproject components locations are within subproject town. None of the components

of the proposed sub project is located private land. Only the STP is proposed in the Shrub

Forest land under the possession of Forest Department at Sarra village in Chhindwara.

There are neither protected areas, like wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, nor there are any

historically, archeologically protected areas in the vicinity. Towns are densely populated in

the core/old town areas with narrow lanes, and small and closely built houses, while most

of the areas are undeveloped and are still under agricultural use. Commercial areas are

along the main roads, which are generally congested with activities, pedestrians and traffic.

Site environmental Features of proposed Sewerage Scheme components are presented in

Table 4.1.

Table 4. 1: Environmental Features of Proposed Subproject Components sites

S. No

Compo

nents

Detail of Location and Environmental features

1. STP A detailed study was done by the DBO contractor for the construction of STP at

Koladhana near Bodri Nallah in ward no. 33. After detailed investigations, it was

found that the land available at the Koladhana for the construction of STP is not

suitable due to the reasons given in Chapter 2 sub section 2.4.6. After a joint

verification of PMC & IVT, PIU, ULB as well as PMU, the land at Sarra near

Nallah in ward no.35 was selected for the construction of STP. Hence, it is

proposed to set up 28 MLD capacity sewage treatment plant (STP) based on

SBR technology at village Sarra.

The selected land parcel is Shrub Forest land under the possession of Forest

Department. The site has no trees. It is also clarified that the no one (habitation)

is dependent on the selected land parcel. The ULB through District Collector

Chhindwara applied to the Forest Department for diversion of this land.

Diversion and allotment of selected land parcel at Sarra were sought by CMC

vide letter dated 18.06.18. Department of Forest has issued first stage clearance

and has demanded requisite fee vide letter no. 2113 dated 19.07.2019 which has

Page 56: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

37 | P a g e

been paid by MPUDC dated 10th and 11th Feb., 2020 (Appendix 14 and 15).

Alternative parcel of land of 4.84 Ha as already been allotted by the District

Collector Chhindwara to the Forest Department at Harrai (Village Anjanpur,

BN-175, PHN-48, RNM-Harrai Tehsil, Dist. Chhindwara) bearing Khasra No.

126, 128 and 129.

2. SPS As per the final design of network, SPS at Bail Bazar is no more required as the

sewage from zone 1 will flow through gravity to Main Pumping Station at

Koladhana. .Only one SPS (which is also MPS) of 28 MLD capacity is proposed

at Koladhana near Bodri Nallah in ward no. 33 (Khasra no. 678) Panchnama

has been prepared and the land is received from Revenue Department on

07.01.2018 and is handed over to the contractor.

3 Sewer

network Total length of sewer network is 305.34 km (including pumping main) which

will be laid underground within the RoW of existing roads. Pipes of dia 150mm

to 300mm are of DWC HDPE and those of > 300 mm dia are of NP3 concrete

pipe. Pumping main of DI will be laid from MPS to STP.

Page 57: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

38 | P a g e

4.3. Physical Environment

4.3.1. Meteorology

Chhindwara has a sub-tropical climate. A hot summer and general dryness characterize the

climate of the area, except during the southwest monsoon season. The year may be divided

into four seasons: Cold season from December to February; Hot season from March to

about the middle of June; period from the middle of June to September is the south-west

monsoon season and October and November form the post monsoon or transition period.

The normal annual rainfall of Chhindwara district is 1139.3 mm. The district receives

maximum rainfall during south-west monsoon period i.e. June to September. About 85.7 %

of the annual rainfall falls during monsoon season. Only 14.3 % of the annual rainfall takes

place between Octobers to May period. Thus, surplus water for ground water recharge is

available only during the southwest monsoon period.

The normal maximum temperature noticed during the month of May is 440 C and minimum

during the month of December 9.80 C. The normal annual mean minimum and maximum

temperatures has been worked out as 18.20 C and 30.60 C respectively.

During the south-west monsoon season, the relative humidity generally exceeds 87%

(August month) and the rest of the year is drier. The driest part of the year is the summer

season, when relative humidity is less than 33%. May is the driest month of the year.

Wind velocity is higher during the pre-monsoon period as compared to post- monsoon

period. The maximum wind velocity, 9.5 km/hr observed during the month of June and

minimum, 3.3 km/hr during the month of November. The average annual wind velocity in is

5.4 km/hr.

4.3.2. Topography

The northern part of the Chhindwara city is hilly. Natural Slope of the CMC area is north to

south with the levels with reference to MSL varying from 695 m to 644 m. In the eastern

part of the City, the topography is sloped towards the Bodri Nallah and in the southern side

towards Kulbehra River (which passes from South to East of the City).

Sewage collection is affected by gravity and therefore accurate topographic survey of the

project area based on street levels is of prime importance to the design of the system and its

subsequent efficient performance. A detailed topographic survey has been carried out for

project area and a contour map has been prepared. The general slope of the town is in south

west direction. The sewerage network and the location of STP are envisaged in accordance

to the general slope of the town. Natural drains or water channels also play an important role

in deciding the alignment of sewerage network. Based on the general slope and natural

drainage pattern, the whole core town and the 7 villages (adjacent to core town and within

municipal limits) was divided in two zones. However, Sewage of Zone 1 will also flow to

Page 58: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

39 | P a g e

the MPS through gravity.

4.3.3. Geology

Located in the southern region of Madhya Pradesh, Chhindwara lies in the upland trough of

Kulbehra River. The area has sandy loam soil. Archaeans are exposed in parts of

Chhindwara. A few trial pits are shown in Figure 4.1 indicating the soil strata.

Figure 4. 1: Trial Pits for Chhindwara Subproject

Page 59: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

40 | P a g e

4.3.4. Air Environment:

The data on ambient air quality monitoring and Noise level data is not available as

Chhindwara is monitored by the Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board

(MPPCB).

Therefore, a rapid ambient air quality monitoring was conducted by the support

agency appointed by the MPUDC, so as to establish baseline air quality for the

town. The ambient temperature of the monitoring stations was found to be lie

between 33-34oC and relative humidity 48%. The Ambient Air Quality monitoring

was conducted at 4 locations Seoni Pranmoti, Sarra STP, SPS Koladhana and

Sanchar Colony in the Chhindwara city area. The monitoring was done on March

2019 for 24 hours (Appendix 10). The AAQM monitoring details are present

below table 4.2.

Table 4. 2: Ambient Air quality of Chhindwara Town

S.

No

AAQM Station PM 2.5 (µg/m3) NAAQ

Standards,

µg/m3

60

Maximum Minimum Average

1. Seoni Pranmoti 40.5 39.6 40.3

2. Sarra STP 52.7 51.8 52.4

3. SPS Koladhana 42.3 41.9 42.2

4. Sanchar Colony 34.8 33.2 34.0

PM 10 (µg/m3)

1 Seoni Pranmoti 90.8 91.9 91.3

2 Sarra STP 94.9 93.6 94.8

3. SPS Koladhana 90.6 89.6 90.1

4. Sanchar Colony 84.7 83.5 84.1

SO ᵪ

1 Seoni Pranmoti 12.4

12.98

11.9 12.1

80

2 Sarra STP 16.3 15.8 16.1

3. SPS Koladhana 11.8 12.6 12.1

4. Sanchar Colony 11.5 12.7 12.1

NO ᵪ

1 Seoni Pranmoti 14.6 13.8 14.2

80 2 Sarra STP 14.5 13.9 14.2

3. SPS Koladhana 12.9 11.7 12.3

4. Sanchar Colony 12.9 11.9 12.2 Source: Air Monitoring results

Monitoring results shows that levels of PM2.5, PM10, oxides of Sulphur and

Nitrogen are well within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). It

is very much lower than standards prescribed and it is not expected that

construction would increase dust levels. However as precautionary measure: dust

Page 60: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

41 | P a g e

barriers, sprinkling will be adopted for high dust emitting construction areas.

4.3.5. Noise Levels

Noise is considered to be one of the aspects of pollution, which also leads to the

degradation of the social environment and also poses health and communication

problems. The impact of noise sources on surrounding community depends on

characteristics of noise the time of day at which noise occurs, the location of the

noise source and the loudness and duration of exposure. The assessment of noise is

carried out by considering various factors like damage to hearing ability,

physiological disturbance, annoyance and general community responses. Noise

Monitoring was done at two locations and is presented in Table 4.3 below.

Table 4. 3: Ambient Noise Levels in Chhindwara

S.

No.

Place Noise Level, dB Permissible Limit, dB

LDay LNight Day Night

1 Market area 42.0 43.0 55 45

2 Sarra STP 52.3 40.2 55 45

3 Koladhana 43.0 45.0 55 45

4 Model Road 52.3 40.2 55 45 Source: Noise

Monitoring results

The day time noise level was monitored in the range of 42.0 dB to 52.3 dB while in

the night time it 40.2 dB to 45 dB (Appendix 10). The noise levels were within the

permissible limits during day and night and in accordance with National Ambient

Noise Level Standards. The sensitive receptors at various components have been

provided in ESMP.

4.3.6. Water Environment:

Water and Wastewater Quality analysis of household sewage discharging into the street

sewers and of the receiving water bodies at major wastewater outfalls has been carried out

(refer Table 4.4). These samples were tested for PH, COD, BOD, Suspended solids and total

Nitrogen Phosphorus (Appendix 9B).

Table 4.4: Test result of Waste water

S. No. Test Parameter Measurement Unit Test Method Test Result

1. pH Value - IS 3025 (part 11): 1983 7.63 a 25°C

2. TSS NTU IS 3025 (part 17) 1984 289

3. COD Mg/l IS 3025 (part 58) 2006 290

4. BOD (at 270 C for

3 days)

Mg/l IS 3025 (part 32)1988 190

5. Total Nitrogen (as

N)

Mg/l IS 3025 (part 34) 1988 35.38

6. Total Phosphorous

(as P)

Mg/l IS 3025 (part 36)2004 5.93

Page 61: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

42 | P a g e

In order to measure the baseline level of existing water quality and probable pollution in

the storm water drain (STP outfall, receiving water body) nearby STP site, Sarra,

Biological oxygen demand (BOD) and Chemical oxygen demand (COD), pH, TSS etc.

were tested. The BOD is 3.4 mg/l, COD 3.4 mg/l, pH 6.9, total suspended solids 28mg/l,

total dissolved solid 729 mg/l, total hardness (CACO3) 516 mg/l and turbidity 9.9 NTU

were observed (Annexure 9C). This is once again reiterated here that this drain is only

storm water drain carrying rain water during rainy period only and remains dry during

remaining year.

4.3.7. Ground Water Scenario

As per the studies conducted by Central Ground Water Board (Data taken from its website)

Ground water occurs under phreatic and semi-confined to confined conditions. Alluvium,

weathered granites/gneisses, lower Gondwana sandstones, weathered, fractured and jointed

massive basalts and vesicular basalts form the major phreatic aquifers; and weathered,

fractured granites are noticed as main water-bearing zones at deeper levels. It is observed

that the discharge of dug wells tapping alluvium and vesicular basalt ranges between 80

and 235 m3/day respectively and jointed massive basalts and weathered gneisses range

from 44 to 177 m3/day and from 61 to 77 m3/day respectively. Water bearing fractured

zones is encountered between the depths of 71.00 and 176.00 m bgl at deeper levels. The

discharge in weathered, fractured granite at deeper levels ranges from 0.2 to 10.00l/s.

Water level data, including historical data, are essential for not only to know the present

ground water conditions but also for forecasting future trends in response to ground water

reservoir operations. Pre and Post monsoon depths to water level maps are reproduced.

Pre- monsoon: Pre monsoon depth to water levels range from 8 to 20 meter below ground

level (mbgl). The long-term water level trend (2001 to 2010) shows declining trend ranges

from 0.02 to 0.2 m/year (Pre- monsoon). A large-scale withdrawal of ground water for

irrigation purpose is observed.

Post- monsoon: During post monsoon period, water levels ranges from 0 .70 to 15.00

mbgl. Water level fluctuation between pre and post monsoon period ranges from 0.30-

to7.60 m.

The entire Chhindwara district, command and Non-Command areas, falls under Safe

Category, except Chhindwara block which is falling under Semi -Critical category where

stage of ground water development is 93%.

The E-Coli value of water samples ranges between 280-1600. Nitrate value of water

samples ranges between 1-243 and Fluoride between.09-.97 in phreatic aquifer. Ground

water in phreatic aquifer is potable but excessive fluoride (1.60-20.00 Mg/l) is noticed in

deeper aquifers.

4.3.8. Seismicity

The country has been classified into different zones indicating the intensity of damage

frequency of earthquake occurrences. These zoning maps indicate broadly the seismic

coefficient that could generally be adopted for design of buildings in different parts of the

Page 62: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

43 | P a g e

country. These maps are based on subjective estimates of intensity from available

information on earthquake occurrence, geology and tectonics of the country. Chhindwara

lies in Zone III as per the Bureau of Indian standards, the National Standard Body of India.

This zone is classified as Moderate Damage Risk Zone

4.3.9. Biological Environment

The flora and fauna identified in the project (study) area are commonly found and not

specific to the region. There are no National Parks, Wild life sanctuaries, Bird sanctuaries

within 03 Km. radius of the project site. There is no rare and endangered species in the

project area. The prominent tree species include shrubs of Zizyphussps., latifolia, Azadiracta

indica, Magnifera indica, Lantana camera, Zizyphusmauritiyana, cassia fistula

Shorearobusta, Diospyros melanoxylon, Boswellia serrata, Terminalia tomentosa,

Terminalia bellayoica, Terminalia arjuna, Pterocarpus marsupium, Madhuca indica trees,

etc. The prominent species among the fauna include Ovisaries, Sciuridae, Bubalus bubalis,

Capra aegagrushircus Crow, sparrow and street dog.

4.4. Baseline of Sludge disposal site

For sludge disposal, 2.086 ha piece of land (Khasra No. 14/5) has been identified and

allotted by Chhindwara Municipal Corporation at Salimota village, Mohakheda Thaluq,

Chhindwara . The coordinates of the site are 21.974402 N and 78.919937 E. (Appendix 11)

This is barren land free from any habitations, trees, shrubs and encroachments and is under

the possession of government. Hard strata impermeable layer has been observed at the

proposed site.. The proposed site is well approachable by State Highway no.547

Chhindwara to Narsinghpur. The habitation is way far (approx. 700m) from the proposed

site. The distance from STP to Sludge disposal land is about 7.4 km.

4.5. Socio Economic Profile of Chhindwara

The population of Chhindwara city in 2011 census is approximately 1,38, 291 Chhindwara

Municipal Area is divided into 45 wards for development and administrative purposes. The

Page 63: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

44 | P a g e

new municipal area of Chhindwara town is 110.27 sq. km. The total households of

Chhindwara city are 37255. The brief of socio-economic profile of Chhindwara is given

below:

Profile Parameter Status/ Relevant Statistics

Town Area 110.27 sqkm (However, the Project Area is

limited to core city and 7 adjacent villages)

Households (Census 2011)/ Average

House hold size 37255/ 5.3

Population Density Average 393 person per hectare (Max density of

3655 in Ward no. 33)

Sex Ratio 950

Share of Scheduled Caste in Population 13.84%

Share of Scheduled Tribe in Population 12.72%

Literacy Rate 79%

4.4.1. Land Use Pattern

The land use pattern as per statutory Development Plan, 2021 of Chhindwara Planning area

(including the then CMC and nearby villages) is given in table 4.5. However, this

Development Plan was notified before the extension of Municipal Limits (i.e year 2015) and

seems irrelevant in view of the area of the extended CMC limits (110.27 sqkm) being much

more than the area under the Development Plan (14.21 sqkm). However, the Planning area

provides the land use pattern in core area (i.e Municipal Limits before the year 2015) and the

adjacent 7 villages which together make the Project Area under MPUDP. The percentage of

residential area in this plan is a clear indication of sparse spatial distribution of population.

Table 4. 5: Land Use Pattern

S no

Land use Area (in hectare) Percentage

Within City Planning area Within City Planning area Total

1 Residential 311.0 119.0 27.4% 41.3% 30.3%

2 Commercial 25.0 21.0 2.2% 7.3% 3.2%

3 Institutional 13.0 15.0 1.1% 5.2% 2.0%

4 Semi Public areas 89.0 86.0 7.9% 29.9% 12.3%

5 Public Utilities 24.0 5.0 2.1% 1.7% 2.0%

6 Entertainment 74.0 2.0 6.5% 0.7% 5.3%

7 Traffic & transportation 154.0 40.0 13.6% 13.9% 13.7%

8 Water bodies etc. 35.0 - 3.1% - 2.5%

9 Agricultural etc. 408.0 - 36.0% - 28.7%

Total 1,133.0 288.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Source: Chhindwara Master Plan

Page 64: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

45 | P a g e

4.4.2. Commercial Streets of Chhindwara Town

Chhindwara is an important center for the trade in the district. Around 132 villages and

other centers in the District depend predominantly on the city for daily business. The

commercial activities are spread in limited part of Chhindwara in irregular pattern. This is

important to note that these commercial streets are based on the “as and when required”

approach without an integrated City Development perspective. . Presently, there are around

8 small local level markets functioning in the city, which cater to the daily needs of

Chhindwara and adjacent areas. Also, street shopping has developed along some major

roads and in the vacant spaces across various locations in the city. The trade and allied

activities in the City take place mainly in Budhwari Bazaar, Itwari Bazaar, Golgunj, Mata

Mandir and areas near Gunj, which are established along the main roads and the busy roads

in the City. The wholesale and the retail activities take place simultaneously in few areas.

The commercial activities in the City have developed near the old city areas and most of

these activities are unregulated or unorganized. Table 4.6 presents the locations and type of

the markets in the city.

Table 4. 6: Type and Location of Various Markets in Chhindwara

S no Location Type of Market

1

Gunj Area

Grain Market

Cloth Market

Grass Market

Iron

2 Gol Gunj Books & Stationery

Readymade Garments

3 Budhwari Bazaar Grocery & vegetable market

Medicines

4 Choti Bazaar Gold, Silver, jewellery, utensils

5 Bail Bazaar Electrical & Scrap market

6 Near Bus Stand Transport services

7 Near Chota Talab Wood & Furniture

Auto spare parts

8 Near Hospital Unauthorised shops

4.4.3. BPL Population and Identified Slums

of Chhindwara BPL Population

A total of 19,282 households have been identified as BPL households in Chhindwara as in

2010 and there were about 11,271 in the year 2004 (a considerable growth of 71% in the

last six years). Considering 5.1 as average HH size the total 19,282 HHs constitute about

98,338 which is about 72% of the population in the City. However, according to the 2004-

05 estimates of the city, about 52,339 people fall under the category ‘Below Poverty Line’ .

4.4.4. Ward Wise Slum areas

The slums have sprung up in low ill-drained areas, pits, drainage lines, level crossings,

waste lands, scrub lands and nallah in contrast to the surrounding areas. Thirteen wards

Page 65: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

46 | P a g e

have been identified as the Slum wards in the City. These slums are mainly formed on the

unattended government or revenue land. Slum locations across wards are presented in

Table 4.7.

Table 4. 7: Slum Locations in Chhindwara

S no Locality War

d no Ownership

Year No of

HHs Settlement Notification

1 Indira Nagar 7 Revenue 1985 - 350

2 Rambagh 10 Private 1939 - 40

3 Kailash Nagar- Chunabhatta 10 Govt.

285

4 New Bel Bazaar 2 Govt. 305

5 Sankat mochan

slum 9 Govt. 1995 2000 200

6 NIIT Tekdi 15 Govt. 2001 2004 100

7 Near Warehouse 15 2003 12

8 Basodi Mohalla 17 Govt. 1988 1992 115

9 Basodi Mohalla 16 40

10 Sukludhana Water

Tank

17 Govt. 1990 1995 225

11 Koladhana 30 Govt. 1996 30

12 Koladhana Gondi

Mohalla

30 Govt. 1997 40

13 Slum adjacent to Vivekanand Colony

31 Revenue 1980 1984 45

14 Chapakhana Kumhari Mohalla

23 Revenue

1980 128

15 Karmkar Colony 23 Revenue 265

16 Harijanpura 34 Govt. 40

17 Pataleshwar 19 180

18 Chaudababa 18 Trust 1980 1984 370

19 Shivnagar Colony

near PWD Office 4

1990 1995 150

20 Near Bada Talab 4 Govt./Pvt. 1980 1988 60

21 Gondi Mohalla 11 50

22 DT Burman's Land 38 275

23 Mohan Nagar Nai

Abadi 39 Revenue

50

24 Krishna

Nagar Behind ITI 1 Govt.

65

Total 3,420

There are total 24 slum pockets in Chhindwara city with about 3,420 slum households. Out

of these households only 55% of the households have pattas and ownership of land is with

Page 66: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

47 | P a g e

only 7% of the households. Only in 4 slum pockets in Chhindwara city all the households

have pattas. More than 30% of the slum pockets are notified in Chhindwara city and almost

all slum areas were notified within a short duration of time from their settlement.

Social Features of Proposed Subproject Components are presented below in table 4.8.

Table 4. 8: Social Features of Proposed Subproject Components

S. No

Components Detail of Location and Social Features

1. STP It is proposed to set up 28 MLD capacity sewage treatment plant (STP)

at village Sarra. SBR technology will be used for STP.

The selected land parcel is Shrub Forest land under the possession of

Forest Department. Second stage clearance for diversion of land is

under process with Forest Department. This land has no trees.

Being government land, no acquisition of land is required. The land is

away from the settlement and is free from any type of encroachment or

encumbrances and hence, no resettlement or any type of loss of income

will be faced.

2. SPS As per the final design of network, SPS at Bail Bazar is no more

required. (Details already given in previous chapters).

MPS of 28 MLD capacity is to be constructed at Koladhana near Bodri

Nallah in ward no. 33 (Khasra no. 678). The land belongs to Revenue

Department & the possession has been given to ULB on 07.01.2018.

Being government land, no acquisition of land is required. The land is

away from the settlement and is free from any type of encroachment or

encumbrances and hence, no resettlement or any type of loss of income

will be faced.

3 Sewer network Sewerage network and pumping main is to be laid (305.34km length)

of 150mm-1000 mm dia. of DWC/ RCC/ DI K-9 pipe will be laid

underground along the RoW.

The excavations and laying of pipeline within RoW need no land

acquisition, however, following possible impacts may be foreseen:

1. The issues of access to residents and shops

2. Temporary shifting of street vendors (on moving carts or sitting

on ground)

3. Breakage of underground utilities

4. Damage to boundary walls or other structures like chabutarahs

while doing excavations

5. Traffic Diversions or restrictions

6. Public Safety from excavations

7. Safety of labour during construction activities

8. Air and Noise Pollution during Construction and O&M

9. Sludge Management during O&M

Detailed analysis and impact assessment as well as the mitigation

measures are given in forthcoming chapters.

Page 67: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

48 | P a g e

5. Assessment of Anticipated Impacts

5.1. Introduction

This Chapter identifies and discusses both positive and negative impacts associated with the

proposed Project and their mitigation measures. On the basis of screening and field visits and

parameters provided in ESMF for Environment and social, the Chhindwara Sewerage sub project

is categorized as Ea and Sc. The anticipated impacts and corresponding mitigation measures are

discussed in Phases namely: design, construction, operation and decommissioning. Based on the

magnitude and duration of the project activities and the environmental attributes of the receiving

environment presented in earlier chapter on environmental setting, the nature, duration and

extent of impact are assessed. Minor project impacts have also been identified and basis for their

insignificance has been provided. Wherever relevant, the ESMP also addresses the minor

impacts and provides environmental mitigation or environmental enhancement measures.

5.2. Environmental Impact

In the proposed Sewerage Scheme, direct and/or indirect impacts are generated which are rather

short-term as they are felt and manifested during the actual performance of the construction

activities. It is expected that impacts from these types of activities will cease once the contractor

completes the project and demobilizes from the site. Table 5.1 and figure 5.1 shows the influence

area of the proposed sub project components: -

Table 5.1: Influence Area details of proposed Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

S.

No

.

Components Influence

Area

Site selected as per DPR Site selected as per final

design and drawing of DBO

contractor

1. STP 100 m dia • Influence area of STP

covers 100 m dia, but

there is no habitat, no

noticeable aquatic life

and flora & fauna present

in the influence area

• Influence area of STP covers

100 m dia, but there is no

habitat, no noticeable

aquatic life and flora &

fauna present in the

influence area.

• In general, 5 km from the

project boundary has been

considered as Project

Influence Area

• The influence area may be

about 5 km at the

downstream from the outfall

of the STP.

• Detail of construction

impacts explained in section

5.2.2

2. SPS 50 m dia • Influence area of SPS

covers 50 m dia, but

there is no Sensitive area

at the proposed site

• Influence area of SPS

covers 50 m dia, but there

is no Sensitive area at the

proposed site

3. Sewer 1.5 m in • Excavation along the • Excavation along the

Page 68: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

49 | P a g e

Network each side

of sewer

network

roads, hauling of

construction materials

and operation of

equipment on-site can

cause traffic problems.

Roads in the core/old

town area of

Chhindwara are very

narrow. However, most

of the roads are used by

pedestrians and two

wheelers, and four

wheelers vehicles are

very limited. Potential

impact is negative but

short term and

reversible by mitigation

measures.

• Detail of construction

impacts explained in

section 5.2.2

roads, hauling of

construction materials and

operation of equipment on-

site can cause traffic

problems. Roads in the

core/old town area of

Chhindwara are very

narrow. However, most of

the roads are used by

pedestrians and two

wheelers, and four

wheelers vehicles are very

limited. Potential impact is

negative but short term and

reversible by mitigation

measures.

• Detail of construction

impacts explained in

section 5.2.2

Figure 5-1: Influence area of STP land site

Page 69: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

50 | P a g e

5.2.1. General Impacts during Subproject Cycle

Environmental and Social Impacts: Pollution abatement projects may prove beneficial for

the environment and society or they may have some adverse impacts as well. Planners and

decision makers have realized the importance of understanding the consequences of any such

projects on both environmental and social aspects, and have started taking steps to avoid any

adverse impacts. Based on the major findings obtained from the field visits and secondary data

analysis, the possible environmental and social issues with reference to the proposed sewer

works in Chhindwara are discussed in these sections. The proposed sub-project consists of

three major activities which include:

• Construction of approximately 302.642 km long sewerage network including all required

trunk/ branch/ lateral sewer.

• Construction of STP at Sarra

• Construction of sewage pumping station at Koladhana

The construction activities would generally include earthworks (excavation, filling, shuttering,

compacting), civil construction (sewer lines, STP, SPS, etc.).

Potential Environmental Impacts: The environmental impact of the proposed project may

be categorized in two phases:

i. During the construction phase which would be temporary and short term;

ii. During the operation phase which would have long term effects

The activities identified for project under each phase are:

A. Construction phase

1. Site clearing and levelling

2. Excavation and Foundation

3. Transportation of construction materials, equipment and machineries

4. Construction of STP Units and related infrastructure

5. Establishment of necessary support infrastructure such as project office, labor camp,

stores, etc.

B. Operation phase

1. Operation of STP

2. Disposal of treated effluent and the sludge

The following impacts are associated with the construction of the proposed sewerage project:

a. Impact on air environment

uring the construction phase it is expected Emissions from the diesel generator(s) and

materials transport through heavy vehicles to the site will be among various sources of air

pollution during construction phase. These emissions are temporary in nature. Bulldozers,

excavators, cranes, DG sets welding machines, trucks trailers etc. for transportation of

materials will also contribute to gaseous emissions through use of diesel as a fuel. Based on the

field observation from the site data and interaction/consultation with stake-holders, it is

Page 70: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

51 | P a g e

expected that the levels of suspended particulates, carbon mono-oxide (CO), hydrocarbons and

NOx (NO &NO2) is likely to increase during the construction phase mainly because of:

• Excavation, backfilling, compaction activity and movement of vehicles on un-paved roads

(increases dust level)

• Vehicle exhausts from construction machinery and from light and heavy vehicles for

transportation of pipes and construction material like cement, steel, aggregates etc.

• Use of portable diesel generators and other fuel fired machinery.

Interruption of existing installations on the pipeline route: The network laying will cross,

move in or move along existing installations including:

• Property accesses;

• Roads

• Underground utilities e.g. electricity and telephone links; and

• Fences and structures like chabutarahs.

These services are critical and have implications with spillover effects on the social and

economic performance.

Mitigation:

• Formal request for permission to cross, break in and build the sewer network should be

sought from affected stakeholders and the relevant institutions such as MPEB;

• Formal engagement will be done with key land and other property owners neighbouring

the sewer, in case the boundary wall or chabutarahs is expected to be damaged;

• Ensure dissemination of relevant information to each of the affected parties;

• A work plan with clear responsibilities for each party will be developed to ensure smooth

execution of the construction.

Noise generation: Construction of the proposed Project will most likely result in noise

generation by the machines that will be used e.g. excavation equipment and construction

vehicles delivering materials to site. Significance of noise impacts depends on whether the

Project would increase noise levels above the existing ambient levels by introducing new

sources of noise. Noise impacts would be considered significant if the Project would result in

the following:

• Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in

the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies;

• Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground-borne vibration or ground-borne

noise levels;

• A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels (more than 3 dBA) in the project

vicinity above levels existing before the project; and

• A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity

above levels existing before the project.

The Contractor shall put in place measures that will mitigate noise pollution arising during the

construction phase.

Page 71: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

52 | P a g e

Mitigation:

• Install portable barriers to shield compressors and other small stationary equipment where

necessary;

• Use of quiet equipment (i.e. equipment designed with noise control elements);

• Limit pickup trucks and other small equipment to a minimum idling time and observe a

common-sense approach to vehicle use, and encourage workers to shut off vehicle engines

whenever possible;

• Provision of appropriate personnel protective equipment;

• Construct mainly during the day time; and

• Consider labour based construction methodologies.

Interference with the physical setting: The proposed project could result into the following

impacts to the physical setting:

• Changes in the local topography during site grading, development of treatment systems and

laying of sewers among others;

• Blockage of natural drainage system at valley crossings;

• Excavation for creation of access routes and related structures; and

Mitigation:

• The design is done ensuring that there will be no hinderance to drainage, no change in

topography. The designs do not introduce or cause any physical changes that are not in

harmony with the physical setting of the Project area;

• The structures to be developed are aesthetically acceptable to blend in with the

surrounding;

• The contractor as much as possible, will complete the works in such a way that natural

aesthetics shall be retained at the construction locations;

• Roads will be restored to its original or better

Disposal of soil: Project construction will involve earthworks and excavation. This will result

in the generation of some spoil materials. But there will be little carting away of excavated

material. The soils may affect the surrounding environment if not adequately disposed.

Mitigation:

• Maximize the re-use of excavated materials in the works as far as feasible to ensure that no

permanent spoil dumps are created;

• Properly dispose off the spoil in the identified land allotted by the CMC at Barman Land

Parasia Road, Chhindwara at Khasra no. 11/7 to 11/14. The land is in the possession of

ULB.

• Care is being taken to avoid spoil location in land as well as the spoil is being reused for

other productive purposes.

Solid waste generation: Solid wastes generated from the construction activities are excess

excavated earth (spoils), discarded construction materials, cement bags, wood, steel, oils, fuels

Page 72: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

53 | P a g e

and other similar items. Domestic solid wastes may also be generated from the workers’ camp.

Improper waste management could cause odor and vermin problems, pollution and flow

obstruction of nearby watercourses and could negatively impact the landscape.

Mitigation:

• Construction waste will be recycled or reused as much as possible to ensure that materials

that would otherwise be disposed off as waste are diverted for productive uses;

• Measures to ensure that construction materials requirements are carefully budgeted and to

ensure that the amount of construction materials left on site after construction is kept

minimal, will be taken;

• Minimization of solid waste during construction of the Project through use of durable,

long-lasting materials that will not need to be replaced often, thereby reducing the amount

of construction waste generated over time;

• Skips and bins will be strategically placed within the labour campsite and construction site,

they will also be covered to prevent access by vermin and to minimize odour. They will be

emptied regularly;

• Measures to ensure that waste materials from the Project are disposed at suitable sites will

be taken. The construction waste such as spoils will be disposed off at designated site

provided by CMC (already explained in earlier sections). These will be include engaging

reputable truckers and conducting appropriate spot checks to verify that disposal is done in

accordance with the requirements of MSW rules;

• The domestic waste from labour camps will be collected by CMC which is already

collecting the domestic waste at Door to Door level.

b. Impact on Land Environment

The proposed project is laying of Sewerage network and construction of Sewage Pumping

Station and Sewage Treatment Plant. During construction, a small amount of vegetation

(mainly shrubs) will be cleared to give way for the sewer, SPS and STP. Normally removal of

vegetation and land clearing is associated with soil erosion, however these issues are localized

and associated with construction phase only. This is further clarified that construction of none

of the components includes removal of vegetative cover and except for some of the shrubs.

Excessive debris, trash or construction remnants (e.g. dirt piles) may create problems related to

drainage, unhygienic conditions and poor aesthetics.

There are no endangered flora & Fauna species in the project area. The sewerage project does

not envisage any destruction or displacement of any endemic floral or faunal species; hence the

impact will be insignificant.

Mitigation:

• The Contractor will ensure proper demarcation of the Project component area to be affected

by the construction works;

• Strict control of construction vehicles to ensure that they operate only within the area to be

disturbed by access routes and other works;

Page 73: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

54 | P a g e

• Retention of trees and shrubs, where possible on the potential sites for screening of the

visual impact;

• Where the proposed route requires the removal of any vegetation, care will be taken to

minimize the destruction or damage of trees.

• Plantation for trees cut due to construction, if any

• Excess excavated material during network laying will be removed within 2 days of the

backfilling

Workers accidents and hazards: Construction workers are likely to have injuries and hazards

as the construction works unavoidably expose workers to occupational health and safety risks.

Sewer network laying and construction of SPS and STP involve deep excavations and the

workers are likely to be exposed to risk of accidents and injuries resulting from accidental falls

and injuries from hand tools and construction equipment.

Mitigation:

• To reduce the workers accidents and hazards, and the contractor shall be commited to

abide by Site Occupational Health and Safety rules

• Before start of work on site, a brief meeting shall be done daily and all construction

workers should be advised of the dangers associated with construction work and how to

keep themselves safe;

• Workers should be provided with suitable personal protective equipment (PPE);

• Provision of adequate sanitary facilities to workers;

• Train all workers on Safety Health and Environment (SHE) with an aim of improving

awareness;

• Where construction activities interfere with the movement of traffic, the proper and

sufficient signage shall be provided on site and controlled by trained flagmen/flag women

and lit in night, reflectors may also be used to guide the citizen and commuters during

night.

5.2.3 Impacts during operation phase

The impacts of operation stage activities on the various environmental parameters are

examined below:

a) Air Environment

As the STP does not involve any type of unit operations releasing the gaseous emissions,

hence, the impact on ambient air quality is not going to be affected. Odor nuisance however, is

likely to be observed from the STP operations. Although SBR technology does not produce

bad odour (because it is not anaerobic process), however, any odour produced will be managed

through development of green belt around the STP site and specific odor mitigation measures,

as needed.

b) Water environment

Water resources in the project area would be the most positively benefited. The probably

environmental impacts related to water during operation stage may include unpredictable

events such as:

Page 74: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

55 | P a g e

i. Temporary flooding of adjacent areas due to accidental leakages/bursts and also due to

blockages and backlogging of lines.

ii. Water pollution and possibility of mixing with water supply line due to leakages/

overflows from the sewer lines

iii. Impairment of receiving water quality inefficient sewage treatment process

c) Noise quality

Improper handling and irregular maintenance of operating machines including pumps,

generators, air diffusers, etc. may lead to increased noise pollution during operation activity.

d) Impact on Occupational Health and Safety

As the operation of STP facilities involve handling and use of chemicals such as Lime, Poly

electrolyte, Urea, DAP etc. the safety of workers invites safety considerations. As the workers

will be equipped with necessary personal protective equipment’s (PPE) and will be trained for

safety aspects to be followed during working hours, , the impact will be insignificant as a

whole. The sludge will be disposed off to sludge disposal site Khasra no 14/5, Village,

Salimeta, Tehsil Mohkhed, District Chhindwara, hence there will be no percolation of sewage

(Appendix 11).

5.3. Social Impacts

The locations of STP and SPS have been finalized The land required for the SPS is

Government land and in possession of ULB. The land for STP at Sarra is also a Government

land owned by Forest Department (Shrub Forest) for which fee for diversion has already been

paid. Hence no land acquisition or permanent impact on assets is anticipated. Other likely

impacts are presented in ensuing sections.

Sewer network is to be laid in the RoW of roads which are in possession of CMC and hence,

neither any land acquisition nor any permission from any Statutory or private owner is needed.

However, this is clarified here that there is no demolition of any temporary or permanent

structure involved/observed during network laying. There is no loss of livelihood (permanent

or temporary ) is observed.

5.3.1 Land Requirement

After final design and drawing, it is confirmed that no private land is required for the project,

as construction of proposed infrastructure is to be done on government land. The land required

for STP and SPS as already stated above, belongs to the government and is not being utilised

under farming or any other purposes (Land records for all the proposed infrastructure enclosed

as Appendix 5). Moreover there would be no loss of community assets during the

construction, as noticed during site visits and interaction with the local people. The network

will be laid within RoW and hence, no private land will have to be acquired or purchased for

laying of network as well. Thus, there are no adverse impacts either on general or on any

vulnerable group.

New site selected for STP at Sarra village which is Shrub Forest land as per revenue records

Page 75: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

56 | P a g e

under the possession of Forest Department. As per the verification of PIU, PMC and IVT there

were no such vegetation and any habitation dependent observed at the selected site. For the

diversion of forest land to the ULB Chhindwara, Forest Act. 1980 provisions are being

followed. The letter for compensatory afforestation has been provided by Collector

Chhindwara to DFO for afforestation in compensation for the selected Shrub Forest land for

STP at Sarra village Chhindwara. The Collector has allotted land Khasra no 53/2 area 4.84

hectare at village Harrai for the requisite plantation of trees. The proposed plantation will be

done by forest department and the monitoring will be done by the department of forest itself.

However, afforestation activity at compensatory land will be ensured by the PIU, Chhindwara.

Refer appendix 14 and 15 for more details.

5.3.2. Impact on Livelihood

The excavation work for laying of network will lead to blockage of access to the residents as

well as shops/ commercial establishments, thus, some trouble in operating their business

during pipe line laying may occur for a very short period of time. Screening and site visits

along the road stretches through which pipes are to be laid reveal that there will be

temporary disruption to ongoing commercial and vending activities. These temporary

disruptions may result in loss of income during construction for certain period of 2 to 3

days. However, On the basis of final survey done by the contractor during September –

October 2019 and verification done by the PIU and PMC during October 2019, it was found

that the no shops/kiosk will be required to shift either temporarily or permanent. A survey to

identify the Project Affected Persons was done by the contractor for which the proforma

used is given at Appendix 17. Street vendors on moving cart or sitting on street will be

required to be shifted whenever the pipeline is being laid on one side of the road. This is

also important to note here that vendors on moving cart and even those who sit on street do

not have a permanent location and they keep on shifting. . No one is permanent or

temporarily impacted by the sub project. The joint survey has been conducted by the PIU,

PMC & contractor, as per the survey, No potential damage has been observed to any

structure.

The network design is done in a such a manner that no kiosk will have to be shifted and hence,

no compensation is required

The work of network laying will be done in small stretches of 250m or less. Planks over the

excavated portions will be provided at every 50m interval. This will enable the access to all the

shopkeepers with minimum inconvenience.

Street vendors will be shifted just opposite to the road (on the other side) within the same area,

and this will enable them to earn their daily livelihood without having any adverse impact on

them. Moreover, works in congested commercial areas will be taken up during weekly holidays.

The weekly market day will be avoided for construction. Congested road in Chhindwara

municipality are as follows in table 5.2 and some of the photographs of the same is enclosed as

Appendix 7

Page 76: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

57 | P a g e

Table 5.2 Congested Roads in Chhindwara

1 Ward No 30 Manhole No 3483-3484 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- Raaz Takis

2 Ward No 30 Manhole No 356-357 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- New Abadi

3 Ward No 11 Manhole No 965-966 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- Indra Nagar

4 Ward No 5 Manhole No 697-696 Road Width 2 m Location:- Shinva Nagar

5 Ward No 14 Manhole No 898-899 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- Indra Nagar

6 Ward No 31 Manhole No 2656-2657 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- Bada Emamba

7 Ward No 13 Manhole No 1092-1065 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- Sanchar Nagar

8 Ward No 17 Manhole No 594-595 Road Width 5 m Location:- Ganj

9 Ward No 13 Manhole No 1066-1065 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- Sanchar Nagar

10 Ward No 30 Manhole No 2787-2788 Road Width 1.2 m Location:- Ali Nagar

11 Ward No 08 Manhole No 3096-3097 Road Width 2.2 m Location:- Carparthiv

12 Ward No 31 Manhole No 3434-3435 Road Width 1 m Location:- Golganj

13 Ward No 25 Manhole No 3216-3217 Road Width 1 m Location:- Barari Pura

14 Ward No 29 Manhole No 3751-3767 Road Width 1 m Location:- Kumari Mohalla

15 Ward No 23 Manhole No 1765-1766 Road Width 1 m Location:- Dhimri

16 Ward No 20 Manhole No 1830-1831 Road Width 1.5 m Location:- Patahleshwar

17 Ward No 14 Manhole No 1217-1216 Road Width 1.5 m Location:- Lalbag

18 Ward No 10 Manhole No 1065-1066 Road Width 2 m Location:- Jagannath Pura

19 Ward No 33 - - Location:- Subhash Colony

20 Ward No 32 - Road Width 1.5 m Location:- Patel Nagar

21 Ward No 25 Manhole No 3216-3217 Road Width 1.5 m Location:- Bharthi Pura

22 Ward No 06 Manhole No 552-553 Road Width 3 m Location:- Shivnagar

23 Ward No 39 Manhole No 387-388 Road Width 1.5 m Location:- Badwan

24 Ward No 04 Manhole No 444-342 Road Width 1.5 m Location:- Adiwasi

25 Ward No 46 Manhole No 1342-952 Road Width 2.2 m Location:- Mandata

26 Ward No 29 Manhole No 3724-3209 Road Width 1.5 m Location:- Purna Chapparkhana

27 Ward No 33 Manhole No 4002-4015 Road Width 1 m Location:- Subhash Colony

28 Ward No 06 Manhole No 2213-2214 Road Width 1 m Location:- Sagar pesha

29 Ward No 26 Manhole No 3126-3127 Road Width 1 m Location:- Pathaleshwar

30 Ward No 06 Manhole No 2210-2211 Road Width 1 m Location:- Sagar Pesha

5.3.3. Impact on Existing Utility Services

The road excavation activities may damage the underground water pipelines or electricity

poles/cables in the vicinity of the site. This will lead to water supply interruptions, disruption in

Page 77: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

58 | P a g e

electricity supply and will involve expensive repair costs. Flooding of areas could also occur.

Officials of ULB stated that they may receive some complaints about water line breakage during

the construction phase. With no other alternative source readily available, people may have to

buy water from private tanks till the service is restored to normal. In such case a provision has

been made in ESMP that water will be supplied through tankers by Chhindwara Municipal

Corporation in the disrupted areas and it becomes the responsibility of contractor to restore the

utilities as soon as possible. Core area of Chhindwara town has congested lane, as laying of

sewerage pipes need depth and width, the damage of the public amenities /personally build

temporary religious structure likely to be get effected.

5.3.4. Potential impacts Due to Sludge disposal during operation phase

Sludge handling and disposal may lead to contamination of soil & Water, Occupational

Health and safety on workers and leakage of sludge etc. At the STP sewage sludge will need

to be removed from the active treatment plant periodically. Sludge will be compressed

through centrifuge. Most of the moisture from the sludge is taken out during this process.

Centrifuged sludge will also be allowed to dry out naturally. Design includes arrangements

for recirculation the leachate to the STP process. This ensures about 95% removal of E –

Coli and other harmful bacteria from the effluent. Sludge shall be tested for heavy metals

and other chemicals. It shall be dried on site (area to be specified for this on site). Site shall

be raised, with cutoff drains (drain leachate to be taken back to STP for treatment) & shall

be covered on top (for weather protection). After drying, this shall be sent in covered vehicle

to trenching yard Khasra No. 14/5, detailed sludge disposal plan is enclosed (Appendix 21).

This is the temporary arrangement for disposal of sludge in future it will be developed as

sanitary landfill.

5.3.5 Impact of COVID-19 with mitigation measures

Following mitigation measures will be ensured at the project site to ensure that site is safe during

COVID time:

1. Contractors should ensure that contracted workers have medical insurance, covering

treatment of COVID-19.

2. Expats or transient workers should adhere to national requirements and guidelines with

respect to COVID-19.

3. Expats or transient workers coming from countries/regions with cases of the virus:

➢ Should not return if displaying symptoms

➢ Should self-isolate for 14 days following their return

4. For self-isolation, workers should be provided with a single room that is well-ventilated

(i.e., with open windows and an open door). If a single room is not available for each

worker, adequate space should be provided to maintain a distance of at least 1 m between

workers sharing a room. Workers in isolation should limit their movements in shared

space, for example through timed use of shared spaces (such as kitchens and bathrooms)

with cleaning prior to and after use of the facilities. Visitors should not be allowed until

Page 78: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

59 | P a g e

the worker has shown no signs and symptoms for 14 days, and the number of staff

involved in caring for those in isolation should eb kept to a minimum.

5. Healthcare professionals and cleaners should visit each day (wearing the appropriate PPE

and observing hygiene requirements and make appropriate arrangements for supplying

food and water to the kitchens for the workers in isolation.

6. Ensure medical facilities are stocked with adequate supplies of medical PPE, as a

minimum:

➢ Gowns, aprons

➢ Medical masks and some respirators (N95 or FFP2)

➢ Gloves (medical, and heavy duty for cleaners)

➢ Eye protection (goggles or face screens)

7. Medical staff at the facilities should be trained and be kept up to date on WHO advice

and recommendations on the specifics of COVID19

8. Display appropriate warning signs (in Hindi and English) across the site; use simple

graphics to convey the message.

9. Have emergency contact numbers displayed across the site.

10. Ensure that all sites are enclosed with fences / compound walls leaving no leeway for

unauthorized entry; if possible, with security personnel

11. The medical staff/management should run awareness campaigns and posters on site

advising workers:

✓ how to avoid disease spread (cough/sneeze in crook of elbow; keep 1m or more away,

sneeze/cough in tissue and immediately through tissue away, avoid spitting, observe

good hygiene)

✓ the need to regularly wash hands with soap and water – many times per day

✓ to self-isolate if they think they may have come in contact with the virus

✓ to self-isolate if they start to display any symptoms, but alert and seek medical advice

12. Wash stations should be provided regularly throughout site, with a supply of clean water,

liquid soap and paper towels (for hand drying), with a waste bin (for used paper towels)

that is regularly emptied.

13. Wash stations should be provided wherever there is a toilet, canteen/food and drinking

water, or sleeping accommodation, at waste stations, at stores and at communal facilities.

Where wash stations cannot be provided (for example at remote locations), alcohol-based

hand rub should be provided.

14. Enhanced cleaning arrangements should be put in place, to include regular and deep

cleaning using disinfectant of catering facilities/canteens/food/drink facilities,

latrines/toilets/showers, communal areas, including door handles, floors and all surfaces

that are touched regularly (ensure cleaning staff have adequate PPE when cleaning

consultation rooms and facilities used to treat infected patients)

15. Other measures (such as working water sprinkling systems at crushers and stock piles,

covered wagons, water suppression or surfacing of haul roads etc.) should be used for

Page 79: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

60 | P a g e

dust suppression on site before relying upon the use of dust masks (which could

unnecessarily reduce the availability of N95/FFP2 masks for use by medical staff

performing some duties)

16. Ensure that the designs for medical facilities also consider the collection, segregation and

treatment of medical waste.

17. Projects should develop and commit to specific actions to ensure disadvantaged and

vulnerable groups have effective treatment, whether in medical facilities or in the

community.

18. Extra security during the shutdown period in order to keep site secure (onsite security

staff to be deployed if possible / CCTV /or additional locks and alarms).

19. Conduct a walkthrough of the site including site perimeter assessment to look for access

points and make them secure,

20. Close all labor camps, ensure food and sanitation and wash facility for any worker on site

– ensure that Covid 19 guidelines shared by the bank are followed

21. Disinfect regular work site gates, labour camp entry, point contractor office etc.

22. Inform local police and fire force regarding temporary closure of sites and request their

prompt/immediate support in case they receive any calls for support.

23. Submit a report of actions taken for site closure along with photographs (with date and

time) clearly indicated to PIU and MPUDC.

MPUDC requires outbreaks of Covid 19 virus to be reported. As such, it is important that PIU,

PMC, MPUDC and World Bank are informed of an outbreak on a site, and their advice taken on

coordinating any responses with project management protocols. The PIU may keep teams

informed of any concerns or problems associated with providing care to infected workers (if any)

on sub project sites. Detailed SOPis attached at Appendix 22.

COVID 19 -STRATEGIC PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE PLAN

Page 80: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

61 | P a g e

MPUDC has also issued detailed Standard Operating Process (SOPs) to respond COVID-19 for all

subprojects running under MPUDC, please refer appendix no. 22

5.3.6. Labour Influx and child Labor

The construction of civil works include specialized jobs such as construction of STP for which

the required labour force, associated goods and services cannot be fully supplied locally for a

number of reasons such as worker unavailability and lack of technical skills and capacity. In such

cases, the labour force (total or partial) would need to be brought in from outside the project

area. This rapid migration of labour to the project area may affect the project area negatively in

the terms of additional burden on public infrastructure such as local social and health services,

utilities such as water and electricity, housing and social dynamics and thus impact on local

communities. Other related issues could be increased risk of spread of communicable diseases

and increased rates of illicit behaviour and crime. Some of the adverse environmental impacts

are illegal waste disposal sites, inappropriate Waste water discharges, and camp related noise,

access roads and land use issues. Such adverse impacts may get amplified by local-level low

capacity to manage and absorb the incoming labor force, and specifically when civil works are

carried out in, or near, vulnerable communities and in other high-risk situations. Labour license

has been obtained by the contractor which is enclosed at Appendix 12. Labour health checkup

camp is also being organized by contractor time to time (Appendix 16).

There are multiple and comprehensive Acts and Rules at both state and national level that set out

the provisions for appropriate working conditions and for good labor management. However,

multiplicity of laws and rules sometimes cause confusion in its applicability in a specific context.

Further in case of contracted workers and Primary labour suppliers the enforcement weakens.

Hence, the contractor has developed labour management procedures and mitigation measures in

the C-ESMP.

This Labour Management Plan (Appendix 24) addresses specific activities that will be

undertaken to minimize the impact on the local community, including elements such as

• Communication and awareness plan on national labour and women harassment laws and its

penal implications, leave provisions and other allowances for workers benefit,

• Worker codes of conduct with respect to manual scavenging, engagement with local

residents, child labour, non-discrimination, harassment of co-workers including women

and those belonging to SC and STs and other minority social groups.

• Training programs on COVID-19, HIV/AIDS and other communicable diseases, etc.

• Workers’ Camp Management Plan addressing specific aspects of the establishment and

operation of workers’ camps provided the ULB is unable to cater to the demand for

affordable housing for this additional workforce in terms of rentals, hostels, apartments etc.

• Looking at the availability of labour and other feasibility aspects, no. of labour is restricted to

maximum 70 labors per day and scheduled activities are being performed in both zones.

• Grievance/Complaint handling Mechanism for Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme.

The responsibility for managing these adverse impacts is being clearly reflected as a

contractual obligation of the civil works contractor and supervision consultant, with

appropriate mechanisms for addressing non-compliance.

Page 81: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

62 | P a g e

6. Stakeholder and Public Consultation 6.1 Background

Public consultation is useful for gathering environmental data, understanding likely

impacts, determining community and individual preferences, selecting project alternatives

and designing viable and sustainable mitigation and compensation plans. Extensive public

consultation meetings for the Chhindwara Sewerage Project took place while undertaking

ESA study. The main objective for the consultation process was to involve the community

at the very early stages so as to identify likely negative impacts and find ways to minimize

negative impacts and enhance positive impacts of the project.

6.2 Objectives of the Public Consultations

The overall goal of the consultation process was to disseminate project information and to

incorporate the views of the project beneficiaries and Project Affected Persons (PAPs) in

the design of the mitigation measures and a management plan. The specific aims of the

consultation process are to:

The main objectives of community consultations were to:

a) To provide clear and accurate information about the project to the beneficiary

community;

b) Obtain the main concerns and perceptions of the population and their representatives

regarding the project;

c) Obtain opinions and suggestions from the likely affected communities on their preferred

mitigation measures; and

d) Identify local leaders with whom further dialogue can be continued in subsequent stages

of the project.

e) Improve project design and, thereby, minimize conflicts and delays in implementation;

f) Facilitate the development of appropriate and acceptable entitlement options;

g) Increase long term project sustainability and ownership

Public sensitization and meetings were held within project area from 28th April 2016 to

30th April 2016 (included in ESA report) and 23rd July 2018 to 24th July 2018 with the

help of respective local administration and the elected representatives. A total of 13

meetings during ESA preparation phase and 12 consultation meetings were held during

execution as shown in Table 6.1A and 6.1B. Key findings of these meetings are presented

in Table 6.2. The attendance lists is presented in Appendix 4. The public consultations

photographs during execution of the project are enclosed as Appendix 6. Representation

of all categories, genders and different income level groups in these meetings was ensured,

the share of female participation in these meetings was 39.16%.

During the series of public consultation, public including local shop keepers showed their

willingness to support/ readiness for the subproject. They discussed existing scenario with

respect to sanitation and sewerage services, absence of sewer networks and its impact on

the life and health of locals etc. Existing Household toilets are mainly based on septic

tanks and the sewer is flowing into the open drains of city. The scheme was and the

Possible interruption in commercial activity, improvement in environment, health and

hygiene etc. were discussed in detail. Mitigation against the dust and traffic management

Page 82: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

63 | P a g e

during excavation were informed to the local shop keepers. However, the local citizen was

of the view that prior information (2 to 3 days before start of the civil works) may be

given to the people of respective wards.

Project designing and location has also been suitably modified after the public

consultation like STP site has been shifted to Sarra from Koladhana due to the public

feedback during consultation regarding the Koladhana as submergence area.

Table 6.1A: Public Consultation Meetings during ESA Preparation

S. No. Date Venue Number of Participants

Total M F

1. 28-4-2016 Ward No. 01 24 15 09

2. 28-4-2016 Ward No. 03 18 10 08

3. 28-4-2016 Ward No. 04 20 12 08

4. 29-4-2016 Ward No. 08 22 14 08

5. 29-4-2016 Ward No. 12 25 15 10

6. 29-4-2016 Ward No. 17 28 20 08

7. 28-4-2016 Ward No. 24 23 12 11

8. 28-4-2016 Ward No. 34 29 15 14

9. 30-4-2016 Ward No. 38 26 16 10

10. 30-4-2016 Ward No. 41 21 11 10

11. 30-4-2016 Ward No. 45 27 20 07

12 23-07-2018 Ward No. 06 23 18 05

13 24-7-2018 Ward no. 31` 11 09 02

Total 297 187 110

Table 6-1B: Public Consultation Meetings by Contractor

S. No. Date Venue Number of Participants Total M F

1. 10-4-2018 Ward No. 02 24 11 13

2. 10-4-2018 Ward No. 03 17 10 7

3. 10-4-2018 Ward No. 05 15 11 4

4. 10-4-2018 Ward No. 06 22 13 9

5. 10-4-2018 Ward No. 08 17 7 10

6. 11-4-2018 Ward No. 16 20 13 7

7. 11-4-2018 Ward No. 18 17 15 2

8. 11-4-2018 Ward No. 14 16 13 3

9. 12-4-2018 Ward No. 48 17 7 10

10. 12-4-2018 Ward No. 7 16 0 16

11. 12-4-2018 Ward No. 17 17 4 13

12. 12-4-2018 Ward No. 24 14 8 6

Total 212 112 100

Page 83: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

64 | P a g e

Table 6.2: Public Consultation Details during Execution

S.

No

Ward

no.

Location Date Participants Issues Raised/Discussed Suggestion from

Participants

Mitigation Measures

1 02 at Krishna

nagar

10-04-2018 Local

Residents,

of ward-02

Total -24, M=11,

F=13

Participants

The Sewerage Project Background,

Environmental, Social, traffic safety

issue and benefit from the project

were explained to the Stakeholders.

Ward is not having sewer network.

Existing Household toilets mainly

based on Septic tanks.

The adverse effect of flowing sewer

into the open Nallahs of city.

The Consultants Team raise the issue

for the connection existing toilets

with the sewer line will be laid.

Operation and Maintenance of

Sewerage system for 30yrs

The people welcomed the

project, some showed dis

consent who have their

household toilets based on

septic tanks. The main

suggestion of participants

was:

• The community gave

suggestion regarding

connection with chamber.

They will take sewerage

connection only when they

get sufficient water

throughout the year.

• Community showed

concern on the

sewerage connection

charges.

Suggestion are noted down.

the decision on connection

charges will be taken by local

body representatives /state.

2 Ward

No. 03

Veer

Sawarkar

10.4.18 Local Residents,

And public

representative

of ward03

Total 17,

M=10, F=7

Participants

The Sewerage Project Background,

Environmental, Social, traffic safety

issue and benefit from the project

were explained to the Stakeholders.

Whole ward is not having sewer

network. Existing Household toilets

mainly based on Septic tanks and

adverse effect of flowing sewer into

the open drains of city.

The Consultants Team raise the issue

for the connection existing toilets

with the sewer line will be laid.

For Safety of Local Traffic as well as

to reduce the traffic congestion during

implementation.

Project was welcomed by

the people as this ward is

facing open defecation

problem too.

People were concerned of

connection charges and

monthly tariff for

maintenance of sewer line.

People also demanded for

proper traffic signage for

speed limits for minimizing

the accident

The suggestion was noted

down

Traffic signage is already

included in the scope of work of

the contractor

Page 84: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

65 | P a g e

S.

No

Ward

no.

Location Date Participants Issues Raised/Discussed Suggestion from

Participants

Mitigation Measures

3 Ward

no. 05

at Shiv

Nagar

Colony

Gali No.

1

10.04. 2018 Local

Residents,

Total -15,

M-11,F=04

participant

The Project Background,

Environmental, Social, traffic safety

issue and benefit from the project

were explained to the Stakeholders.

The Consultants Team raise the issue

for the connection existing toilets

with the sewer line will be laid.

Besides above issues the following

issues discussed with the community

Road Side Water logging due to

implementation. Effect of Noise and

Dust Pollution during construction

and after construction.

Safety of Local traffic and pedestrian

in Built-up Zone

Provision of Drain in Built- up

Section to eliminate the issue of

mixing of storm water into sewer

line create flooding or chook down

condition

• For Safety of Local traffic and

pedestrian in Built-up Zone, footpath

should be provided.

• Adequate provision for minimizing

the Dust and Noise Pollution during

construction

The suggestion was

agreed

4 Ward

no. 06

Shiv Mandir

Shiv Nagar

Colony

10.04. 2018 Local Residents,

And public

representative

of ward013

Total 22,

M=13,F=9

Participants

The Project Background,

Environmental, Social, traffic safety

issue and benefit from the project

were explained to the Stakeholders.

• For Safety of Local Traffic as well

as to reduce the traffic

congestion which interns reduce the

noise and air pollution

• Briefed about the connection to

sewerage network

• People demanded for proper traffic

signage for speed

limits for minimizing the

accident people

• They were concerned on the issue

of open defecation, health problem is

common, but more concerned of

extra charges levied on community

• Some people agreed for paying the

tariff while some did not.

The suggestion was

noted down.

Provision for safety

measures are already

in the contract.

Page 85: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

66 | P a g e

S.

No

Ward

no.

Location Date Participants Issues Raised/Discussed Suggestion from

Participants

Mitigation Measures

5 Ward

No. 8

Khajuri 10-4-18 Local Residents,

Total-17 M=07,

F=10

Participants

The Project Background,

Environmental, Social, traffic

safety issue and benefit from the

project were explained to the

Stakeholders.

Besides above issues the

following issues discussed with

the community No land

acquisition for project and avoid

damaged to public utilities and

structures coming under the alignment.

• damage restoration remains the

part of contractor

Safety of Local traffic and

pedestrian in Built-up Zone

The main suggestion of

participants was:

Provision of Drain in Built- up

Section to eliminate the issue of

road side water- logging

Community showed

concern, after damage of public

utilities or structure nobody

comes to restore nor even pay

any compensation to major

damages.

The suggestion was agreed and

Incorporated

6 Ward

No.

16

11.04. 2018 Local Residents,

And public

representative

of ward16

Total -20,

M=13,F=07

Participants

The Project Background,

Environmental, Social, traffic

safety issue and benefit from the

project were explained to the

Stakeholders.

Whole ward is not having sewer

network. Existing Household

toilets mainly based on Septic

tanks and adverse effect of

flowing sewer into the open

drains of city.

The Consultants Team raise the

issue for the connection existing

toilets with the sewer line will be

laid.

• For Safety of Local Traffic as

well as to reduce the traffic

congestion during

implementation.

The people welcomed the

project, some showed dis

consent who have their

household toilets based on

septic tanks. The main

suggestion of participants was:

• The community gave

suggestion regarding

connection with chamber. They

will take connection only when

they get sufficient water

throughout the year.

• Community showed concern

on the tariff and connection

charges. The suggestion from

people came that, not to impose

charges immediately after

connection, let the system gets

start properly than people get

convinced and

get ready to pay.

The suggestion was noted

down

and the design to HH

connection is modified

accordingly.

Page 86: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

67 | P a g e

S.

No

Ward

no.

Location Date Participants Issues Raised/Discussed Suggestion from

Participants

Mitigation Measures

7 Ward

No. 18

11.04. 2018 Local Residents,

shopkeepers

And public

representative

of ward 24

Total 17,

M=15,F=2

Participants

The Project Background,

Environmental, Social, traffic safety

issue and benefit from the project

were explained to the Stakeholders.

Besides above issues the following

issues discussed with the community

No land acquisition for project and

avoid damaged to public utilities and

structures coming under the

alignment.

damage restoration remains the part

of contractor. The Consultants Team

raise the issue for the connections

with sewer network and for proper

operation and maintenance of system

for 30yrs

The main suggestion of

participants was:

Community shown concern, after damage of public utilities or structure nobody comes to neither restore nor even pay any compensation to major damages.

The suggestion was agreed and

Incorporated

.

Design is done in such a

manner so as to avoid damages

to existing structures. Details

of utilities are also obtained

from the concerned

departments as far as possible.

8 ward

no.14

11.04.18 Local

Residents,

Shopkeepers and

Total -16,

M=13,F=03

Participants

The Project Background,

Environmental, Social, traffic safety

issue and benefit from the project

were explained to the Stakeholders.

Whole ward is not having sewer

network. Existing Household toilets

mainly based on Septic tanks and

adverse effect of flowing sewer into

the open drains of city.

The Consultants Team raise the issue

for the connection existing toilets

with the sewer line will be laid.

• The community gave

suggestion regarding

connection with chamber.

They will take connection

only when they get

sufficient water throughout

the year.

Community showed

concern on the tariff and

connection charges. The

suggestion from people

came that, not to impose

charges immediately

after connection, let the

The suggestion was agreed and

Incorporated

.

Design is done in such a

manner so as to avoid damages

to existing structures. Details

of utilities are also obtained

from the concerned

departments as far as possible.

Page 87: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

68 | P a g e

system gets start properly

than people get convinced

and get ready to pay.

9. Ward

No. 48

Near Ward

Office

12.04. 2018 Local Residents,

Ward Officer

Total-17,

M=07,F=10

Participant

s

The Project Background,

Environmental, Social, traffic safety

issue and benefit from the project

were explained to the Stakeholders.

• For Safety of Local Traffic as well

as to reduce the traffic

congestion which interns reduce the

noise and air pollution

The Consultants Team raise the issue

of septic tank disadvantages and told

about for proper operation and

maintenance of sewer system for

30yrs

• People demanded for

proper traffic signage for

speed limits for minimizing

the accident

• The people showed

concern on the pollution

issue but raise connection

charges and tariff for taking

connection to the sewer

network. Some people

asked

about the tariff /charges of

connection

The suggestion was noted

down. The traffic signage and

safety measures are already a

part of the contract. The same

will be adhered to.

10 Ward

No. 7

12.04.2018 Local Residents,

Total-16,

M=16

Participants

The Project Background,

Environmental, Social, traffic safety

issue and benefit from the project

were explained to the Stakeholders.

Besides above issues the following

issues discussed with the community

No land acquisition for project and

avoid damaged to public utilities and

structures coming under the

alignment.

damage restoration remains the

part of contractor The Consultants

Team raise the issue for the

connections with sewer network

and for proper operation and

maintenance of system for 30yrs

The main suggestion of

participants was:

Provision of Drain in Built-

up Section to eliminate the

issue of road side storm

water-mixing in sewer line

create flooding or chook

down

Community showed

concern that after damage

of public utilities or

structure nobody comes to

restore nor even pay any

compensation to major

damages.

• People asked for

Connection charges to

sewer network

In EMP the compensation for

temporary damage to public

utilities is on the part of

contractor for restoration

Regarding tariff people were

informed about the orders of

DUAD which state that the

Sewage charges will be 60%

of the Water tariff.

Page 88: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

69 | P a g e

S.

No

Ward

no.

Location Date Participants Issues Raised/Discussed Suggestion from

Participants

Mitigation Measures

11 Ward

No. 17

12.04.2018 Local Residents,

Total-17,

M=04, F=13

Participants

The Sewerage Project Background,

Environmental, Social, traffic safety

issue and benefit from the project

were explained to the Stakeholders.

Whole ward is not having sewer

network. Existing Household toilets

mainly based on Septic tanks and

adverse effect of flowing sewer into

the open drains of city.

The Consultants Team raise the issue

for the connection existing toilets

with the sewer line will be laid.

For Safety of Local Traffic as well as

to reduce the traffic congestion during

implementation.

Project welcomed by the

people as this ward

facing open defecation

problem too. Linkage of

septic tanks with sewer line

is big concern of the

people.

• Peoples also demanded

for proper traffic signage

for speed limits for

minimizing the accident

Already addressed above

12 Ward

No. 24

12.04.2018 Local Residents,

Total-14,

M=08,F=06

Participants

The Sewerage Project Background,

Environmental, Social, traffic safety

issue and benefit from the project

were explained to the Stakeholders.

Whole ward is not having sewer

network. Existing Household toilets

mainly based on Septic tanks and

adverse effect of flowing sewer into

the open drains of city.

The Consultants Team raise the issue

for the connection existing toilets

with the sewer line will be laid.

For Safety of Local Traffic as well as

to reduce the traffic congestion during

implementation.

The main suggestion of

participants was:

Project welcomed by the

people as this ward is

facing open defecation

problem too. Linkage of

septic tanks with sewer line

is big concern of the

people.

Shown concerned of

connection charges and

monthly tariff for

maintenance

• Peoples also demanded

for proper traffic signage

for speed limits for

minimizing the accident

Already addressed above

Page 89: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

70 | P a g e

6.3 Key Recommendations

Key Recommendations of Stakeholders Consultations are summarized below:

Community showed concern that in the absence of sewerage system in the town, stagnant pools

of sewage can be seen in the entire town which is not only visibly disturbing but also lead to

pollution and mosquito menace, causing many health problems, and hence welcomed the efforts

of ULB.

Physical relocation and resettlement should be minimized. Efforts should be made to prevent

loss of access to livelihood activities. Safety is an important issue especially for children,

women and cattle and therefore utmost safety measures must be provided during civil

construction works. Accidents need to be controlled through various safety measures. The

participants emphasized the provision of diversions and aligning the way in the interest of

community safety and environmental protection, repeatedly.

Special care should be taken if any structure came in the alignment in case of removing or

shifting the sacred trees, temples, mosques and other places of cultural and historical

significance (by following the rituals and customs of community concerned). Septic tanks

coming under road ROW or in encroached part, tanks, and other traditional sources of surface

water may get affected during excavation it has to be restored timely.

Further, it was revealed that the scheme is good from sanitation point of view and they would

like to make use of this scheme for cleanliness of their houses/streets. Most of the households

were found ready for getting sewer connections as presently they are facing lot of problems

due to water logging in the entire locality.

Local people are very much interested in implementation of this scheme in this locality /area

but their major concern was about the pakka road which has already been constructed recently,

will be again destroyed by digging trenches for laying the pipe line. It will create lot of

problems to them in their accessibility.

Outcome of Women’s Participation in Focus Group Discussions

In total 10 focus group discussions were conducted especially with women in the fringe areas

and in slum areas of Chhindwara town. Focus groups were carried out as group meetings with

women residents during which the participants were given the possibility to discuss and

contribute to specific information. Some of their specific concerns are summarized below:

Women discussed many health issues & unhygienic environment for them and their family

members. Women told that they gave consent of construction of individual toilet through

Swachchh Bharat mission. They were also ready to connect it to sewer line.

Some other concerns/issues were raised by the women group such as Women from poor

families indicated that they should be given work opportunities during construction as casual

labor or at project offices, which would help them earn during implementation period.

Page 90: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

71 | P a g e

Some women suggested that they will operate individual / family enterprise by opening small

tea stalls, shops/eateries to provide meals to the construction officials /temporary labourers

coming from outside. This will enhance their family income as well as their entrepreneurial

skill, which may be useful in future.

6.4 Summary of Incorporation of Public Concerns in the Designs

• Site for STP is changed from Koladhana to Village Sarra.

• One SPS at Bail Bazar is reduced.

• The network design is done in such a manner that maximum depth of excavation in the

town is restricted to 4.8m. This will make the working more feasible (as the working space

required will be less) in narrow streets.

• Excavation needed in more than 70% of the network is only up to 3m.

• Details from various stakeholders (having underground utilities) is being continuously

obtained (an ongoing process with laying of network) so that damage to underground

utilities specially water supply network, is restricted to minimum extent.

• The work of laying network will be done in small stretches of 100 to 250 m and planks at

every 50 m will be kept over the excavated portions so that maximum access is provided to

the houses and shops etc. without affecting their daily routine or income.

Page 91: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

72 | P a g e

7. Environmental and Social Management Plan Environmental and Social Management Plan to be implemented to mitigate and reduce the

project impact on various environmental and social components during construction as well as

Operation and Maintenance phase are presented below in table 7.1. and Costing of ESMP

Chhindwara are also given in table 7.2

Page 92: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

73 | P a g e

Table 7.1 Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP)

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

A. Design and Development Phase

Sewerage Accidental

leakages/

bursts

• Due to accidental

burst or leakage

of sewers,

flooding of the

nearby areas

could take place

• Backlogging due

to unexpected

heavy flowrates

Temporary • Designing sewers with adequate capacity and flow

velocity

• Regular inspection and maintenance of the sewers

PMU and

Contractor

Sewage

Pumping

Station

Pumping of

sewage

from

District

SPS1

to STP

• Noise and odour

nuisance to

surrounding

areas.

Permanent • Selection of appropriate location away from

sensitive locations such as schools and hospitals.

However, if appropriate location is not available

then extra precautions can be taken.

Zone-1

Pipe

Dia

MH

to

MH Sensitive receptor

600

1793 1794

Annapurna Mata

Mandir

500 860 861 Kalyani Mata Mandir

400

331 329

Kudthi Visa Oswal

Shwethambar Jain

Mandir

400

326 327

Janpaddurga mandir

PMU and

Contractor

Page 93: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

74 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

400 823 1063 Bharat Bharati school 400

292 291

Dr.Bhavanhodani PVT

hospital 400 287 292 Jagnnath High school 400

126 127

Pathaleshwar Shiv

Mandir 400 3129 3130 KalBhairav Mandir 400

3132 2337

mahakal mandir

mokshdham

Zone -II

Pipe

Dia

MH

to

MH Sensitive Receptor

400 3217 3218 Hanuman Mandir

800 7412 7414 Shiv Mandir

400 5282 5280

Sunrays public higher

secondary school

• The pumping station is provided with a noise

barrier and adequate green belt around the

pumping station

• Use of less noise generating equipment with

regular maintenance.

• Tree plantation around SPS

• Solid waste should not be kept for more than 24

hours and herbicide should be sprayed.

Sewage

Treatment

Plants

• Treated

water

disposal into

nearby

• Pollution of

receiving water

body (Bodri

Nallah) or land

Temporary • The treated wastewater discharge from the sewage

treatment plant will comply with the standards set

by MPUDC (Appendix 20)

• Selection of best available sewage treatment

Contractor /

PMU

Page 94: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

75 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

stream

due to

inefficient

treatment or

non-operation of

STP

technology with High BOD removal efficiency.

• Ensuring development and compliance to standard

operation and maintenance practices.

• Provision of effective screening at inlet of STP for

removal of grit, fine particles, plastics and other

suspended solids

• Provision of effective separation and controlled

disposal of digested sludge

STP

Breakdown • Discharge of

untreated sewage

leading river

pollution.

Temporary • Provision of adequate holding capacity adequate

for storage of sewage to prevent flow of untreated

sewage to river.

DBO

Contractor /

PMU

Sludge

disposal • Disposal of

sludge leading to

contamination of

land and water.

Permanent • The settled sludge coming out from the sewage

treatment plant, Septic tanks etc. will be carried

out in to the sludge drying beds proposed in the

vicinity of the STP site. The Sludge shall be dried

and transported to the proposed sludge disposal

site Khasra no. 14/5 (Appendix 11)

B. Construction phase

Sewerage

(laying

of

sewers)

Excavation,

cutting, back

filling and

compaction

operations

• Damage to

underground

utilities like

water, gas line,

electricity and

telephone

conduits, etc.

due to

construction

activities.

Temporary • all the available drawings, notes, and information

on the existing underground lines and structures in

determining the location of the existing facilities

are reviewed.

• Concerned authorities are informed and their

assistance sought to remove, relocate and restore

services of these utilities prior to commencement

of construction.

• All underground utilities encountered in

excavating trenches carefully supported,

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

Page 95: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

76 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

maintained and protected from injury or

interruption of service until backfill is complete

and settlement has taken place.

• Minimize time for replacement operations; and

appropriate scheduling as necessary especially for

water supply line.

• Damage to road

side private and

community

structure

Temporary • Joint survey of PIU and contractor has been done to

assess the incumbrances and damage to road side

private and community structures, when the alignment

of pipes finalized by the D(R)BO contractor with PIU.

• Provision as per contract for affected/damaged

structure and restoration along with construction in

contract agreement.

• However, this is clarified here that there is no

demolition of any temporary or permanent

structure involved/observed during network laying.

There is no loss of livelihood (permanent or

temporary ) is observed.

• Contractor

• PIU

Disposal of

Asbestos pipe • Impact on Soil

and Environment

Temporary • Old AC pipes are managed in a in a manner that

will minimize the risk of making it friable or

releasing asbestos dust into the environment. It is

hence important follow the following steps in

managing the existing pipe and/ or, while laying

and repairing, removing or replacing asbestos

cement pipe, start by exposing the asbestos cement

pipe with minimal disturbance.

i. Not Damaged Asbestos Cement Pipe (intact and

not deteriorated):

• Contractor

• PIU

Page 96: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

77 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

1. Place 0.006-inch-thick polyethylene (“poly”)

sheeting under the asbestos cement pipe to

prevent soil contamination.

2. Adequately wet the asbestos cement pipe with

amended water using surfactant or liquid soap

before and during removal to avoid creating

airborne dust.

3. Separate the asbestos cement pipe at the nearest

coupling (bell or compression fitting).

4. Slide the pipe apart at the joints (no saw

cutting) or use other methods that do not cause

the pipe to break, become friable or otherwise

create the potential to release asbestos fibers.

5. Wrap the wet asbestos cement pipe in two

layers of 0.006 polyethylene sheeting, seal

with duct tape and label as per the good

international practices. This can be done in the

trench or adjacent to the trench.

6. If the trench is filled with water and pipe is

damaged, follow the procedure explained

below.

ii. Damaged Asbestos Cement Pipe (deteriorated or

not intact) or when cutting or mechanical breakage

(e.g., with saws, snap or blade cutting, and/or

tapping) is necessary:

1. Place 0.006-inch-thick polyethylene (“poly”)

sheeting under the asbestos cement pipe to

prevent soil contamination.

2. Adequately wet asbestos cement pipe with

Page 97: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

78 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

amended water where cutting or breaking will

occur.

3. Saw cutting of asbestos cement pipe shall only

be conducted with a HEPA-shrouded vacuum

attachment or wet cutting equipment, unless it is

conducted within a small enclosure that isolates

the area in which the saw cutting is being

conducted to prevent the release of asbestos

fibers to ambient air, .

4. Wrap wet asbestos cement pipe in two layers of

0.006polyethylene sheeting, seal with duct tape

and label. This can be done either in the trench

or adjacent to the trench.

Packaging, Labelling, Disposal and Record Retention

iii. Place properly wrapped and labeled AC pipe as

well as all other containerized AC waste and debris

in a roll-off container(s), or covered trucks, trailers

or vans that are lined with 2 layers of 0.006

polyethylene sheeting.

1. The container shall be an enclosed and sealed

leak-tight container having proper labels

placards as required.

2. If open-top roll-off containers are used, they

must be properly sealed, labeled and secured

inside a locked fenced area when they are not

being loaded to prevent access by unauthorized

personnel, and covered to prevent water

Page 98: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

79 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

accumulation.

ii. Package, transport and dispose of AC waste in

accordance with local, state, and national

regulations.

iii. Complete waste shipment records must be

retained for 2 years by the contractor of the

facility that generated the AC waste

• Dispose of AC waste at a landfill permitted to

accept AC waste which is at Pithampur near

Indore.

Network

laying • Loss of access to

the residents and

shop keepers.

Temporary • The contractor shall excavate only 250 m in a

stretch and complete the works of laying of

pipeline and backfilling with restoration of surface.

The contractor shall proceed further only after

completion of the said works.

• Construction works at business and market area

must be completed earlier to minimize business

loss. Timings and special adjustments (considering

market timings, festivals, any other local aspect)

shall be discussed and agreed with stakeholders.

• Provisions of walkways and planks at every 60 m

interval over trenches to ensure access will note

Impeded

• Construction works at business and market area

must be completed earlier to minimize business

loss. Timings and special adjustments (considering

• Contractor

• PIU

Page 99: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

80 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

market timings, festivals, any other local aspect)

shall be discussed and agreed with stakeholders.

Alternate traffic routing to be adopted in

consultation with traffic police authorities.

• Traffic control & flag man will be ensured at

School, hospital areas during sewer network laying

• The joint survey has been conducted by the PIU,

PMC & contractor, as per the survey, No potential

damage has been observed to any structure.

• However, this is clarified here that there is no

demolition of any temporary or permanent

structure involved/observed during network laying.

There is no loss of livelihood (permanent or

temporary ) is observed.

• Accidents/

damages

due to erosion/

sliding of vertical

sides of

excavated

trenches

while

places the pipes

Temporary Maintaining the excavation by Shoring trench

sides by placing sheeting, timber shores,

trench jacks, bracing, sheet piling materials to

resist pressures surrounding the excavation

• Exposed surface are resurfaced and stabilized by

making the sloping sides of trench to the angle of

repose at which the soil will remain safely at rest.

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

• Dust Generation

due to

excavation,

cutting, back

Temporary • Dust is generated due to the disturbance of soil

and roadways. To minimize dust generated

by construction activities the surface is wetted in

all unprotected cleared areas and stockpiles with

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

Page 100: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

81 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

filling and

compaction

operations

water twice a day, especially during dry and

windy Periods.

• Water tankers carry the water and labour spray on

the dusted land

• Additionally, excavated material transported by

trucks are wetted and covered.

• Noise and

vibration

disturbances to

residents and

businesses

Temporary • Noise is a temporary nuisance caused due to

construction activity. the construction activities

are carried out only during normal working hours

after providing prior intimation to local residents

and shop keepers.

• Construction works near schools and colleges are

carried out during vacations and works near

hospitals are completed on priority basis (in

shorter time period with alternate provision of

traffic, accessibility of exit/entry gates etc.).

• Wherever possible, the less noise generating

equipment are used in all activities.

• Construction noise is not only a nuisance for the

local community, but can also be a health hazard

to construction workers due to prolonged

exposure. The protective equipment like ear

muffs and plugs for operating personnel are used.

• where feasible, a sound barrier is provided in

inhabited areas, particularly if there are sensitive

zones like hospitals, schools etc.

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

• Temporary

flooding due to

excavation

Temporary • The excavated soil material is stored on the higher

lying areas of the site and not in any storm water

run-off channels or any other areas where it is

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

Page 101: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

82 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

during

monsoons or

blockage of

surface drains

likely to cause erosion or where water would

naturally accumulate causing flooding.

• The areas where excavated soil are stockpiled are

bordered by berms to prevent soil loss caused by

rain.

• Excess soil is transported to dumping location

within 24 hrs. of completion of task in vehicles

which have top cover that will prevent dust

dispersal.

• Increased traffic

inconvenience

(emissions,

congestions,

longer travel

times, blockage

of access)

Temporary • Since some of the roads in the project area are

narrow there will be some traffic congestion,

hence alternate traffic routing is adopted in

consultation with concerned traffic police

authorities.

• Traffic dislocations also have some adverse

impact on trade and commerce, hence works at

business and market area are completed earlier.

• Traffic management plan is adopted to minimize

congestion and negative impacts at schools,

hospitals other CPRs.

• Appendix

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

• Settlement of

backfilled area

after construction

Temporary • The backfilling material is made free from

petroleum products, slag, cinders, ashes and

rubbish, or other material.

• Backfilling activity followed as per the

construction schedule, as recommended by the

DPR, which estimates that a 1 km stretch of

construction work is to be completed in

approximately 3days.

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

Page 102: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

83 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

• Proper compaction as per the soil condition and

retain the original level/ alignment and grade as it

was before the work commenced.

Spillage of fuel

and oil

Temporary • Store tanks and drums for excess capacity; forbid

pouring into soils or drains; enforce adequate

equipment maintenance procedures

• Excess soil is transported to dumping location in

vehicles which have top cover that will prevent

dust dispersal

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

Sewage

pumping

station

Excavation • Damage to

topsoil due to

excavation

activities.

Temporary • To prevent excessive disturbance of natural

vegetation, the top soil excavated is stored and

utilized for re-vegetation after completion of

work.

• Topsoil and subsoil are placed on opposite sides of

the trench and kept separate throughout

construction and rehabilitation.

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

• Construction

waste

Temporary • All the associated construction waste are

properly managed by storing and disposing off at

identified refusal sites.

• Land for construction waste disposal is identified

at Barman Land, Parasia road, Chhindwara at

Khasra no. 11/7 to 11/14. Which is under the

possession of ULB.

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

• Soil erosion

during

excavation/

filling operation

(while

constructing

Temporary • Proper stock piling of excavated soil and must be

bordered by berms.

• Shoring trench sides by placing sheeting, timber

shores, trench jacks, bracing, piles, or other

materials to resist pressures surrounding the

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

Page 103: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

84 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

foundation of

structure)

excavation

• Dust Generation

due to

construction

activities

Temporary • Excavated material transported by trucks will be

covered and/or wetted to prevent dust nuisance.

• Suppressing dust generation by spraying water on

stockpiles

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

General:

Air

Environment

due to all

construction

activities

• Air pollution due

to particulate

matter emissions

from excavation,

construction

material

handling,

transportation of

materials

Temporary • Providing curtains (polysheets/ sheets) all

around the site to control dust spreading beyond

the site.

• Sprinkling of water at regular intervals to control

dust especially places where soil is stockpiled.

• Preventive maintenance of construction equipment

and vehicles to meet emission standards

• PMU

• Contractor

• CMC

General: Noise

Environment

due to all

construction

activities

• Noise hazards Temporary • Noise attenuation with sound proof insulation for

noise generation sources like pumps, generators or

using less noise making equipment

• construction equipment and vehicles are properly

maintained to keep them with low noise.

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

General

waste during

construction • Nuisance due to

solid waste

disposal

Temporary • It is ensured that no litter, refuse, wastes, rubbish,

rubble, debris and builders’ wastes generated on

the premises must be collected in rubbish bins and

disposed of weekly at designated sites.

• Toilet facility is provided at construction site and

is maintained properly. Toilets are emptied

regularly at treatment plants and it is ensured that

it prevents the contamination of surface or sub-

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

Page 104: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

85 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

surface water

• • •

General: safety during

construction • Safety hazards to

labour and public

Temporary • The contact details of the police or security

company and ambulance services nearby to the

site are maintained.

• The handling of equipment and materials is

supervised and adequately instructed.

• the warning signs/ tapes and temporary barriers

and/or danger tape, marking flags, lights and

flagmen around the exposed construction

works warn the public and traffic flow of the

inherent dangers.

• Provision of safety precautions such as helmets,

safety shoes, gloves, dust masks, gumboots, etc.

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

Construction

camps (if

adopted)

• Nuisance due to

absence of

facility of

sanitation and

solid waste

management

Temporary • Labour camps are available for outsider labour

near STP site.

• Following measures are beingundertaken up:

• The camps established away from

environmentally sensitive area such as in close

proximity to a watercourse, on a steep slope or on

erosive soils.

• Camp sites are having adequate provision of

shelter, water supply, sanitation and solid waste

management .

• Solid waste generated from the labour camp and

office is being segregated separately dry and wet

• Contractor

• PMU

• PMC

Page 105: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

86 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

waste.

• Segregated waste is being collected by the CMC

vehicle which is engaged for SWM.

Occupational

Health and

Safety

Safety and

Health

Hazardous

• Safety hazards to

labour and

public. Workers

are seen to

working without

any PPE even at

height.

Temporary • Comply with the Occupational health and Safety

act of India

• Follow safe practices for working at height or

confined area or underground working for safety

of workers Erect warning signs/ tapes and

temporary barriers and/or danger tape, marking

flags, lights and flagmen around the exposed

construction works warn the public and traffic

flow of the inherent dangers.

• Provide adequate PPE to workers such as helmets,

safety shoes, gloves, dust masks, gumboots, etc. to

workers

• Provide handrails on both sides of walkways close

to deeper tanks and STPs need to be ensured;

• Smaller on and off switches at STP units to be

installed with protection from rain water to

minimize electrical short circuit;

• Monthly reporting of all accidents and immediate

reporting to DBO engineer and owner.

• Detailed guidelines for Occupational Health and

Safety is enclosed as Appendix 26.

• DBO

contractor

C. Operation Phase

Sewer line Leakage/

overflows • Water pollution

and possibility of

mixing with

Permanent (i) Regular monitoring of sewer line and

manholes for visible leakages/ overflows.

(ii) Immediate repair operation for the damaged

• PMU

• Contractor

• CMC

Page 106: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

87 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

water supply line portion of sewer line.

(iii) De-siltation of blocked sewers/ manholes

with sewage pumping machines-storing and

disposal at appropriate refusal area after

treatment.

(iv) proper covering of manhole and avoid

dumping of solid waste to prevent chocking

of sewer line.

Sewage

pumping

station

• Noise pollution

from operation

activities

Permanent • Proper handling and regular maintenance of

operating machines including pumps, generators,

air diffusers, noise monitoring, etc.

• PMU

• Contractor

• CMC

Flooding due

to rain water

runoff

• Rain water may

flood the STP

area in absence

of adequate

provision of

diverting rain

water flow

towards STP

from periphery

area.

Temporary • Suitable drainage provision shall be made to divert

the rainwater likely to be accumulated from

peripheral

• The entire structure shall be constructed having

plinth level 1.00 m above HFL.

• All electric supply lines, works panels,

chlorine/chemical / material storage are above

HFL

• Contractor

• ULB

Sewage

pumping

station

Solid waste • Contamination of

water resources,

blockage, bad

odour, Health

hazard and

public nuisance

Permanent • Solid waste will not be kept for more than 24

hours.

• Solid waste screened from coarse screen of the

SPS will be collected mechanically.

• Solid waste will be disposed off at identified site

for sludge disposal at Village Salimeta, The.

Mohakheda, dist. Chhindwara. at

• Solid waste disposal arrangement will be

• PMU

• Contractor

• CMC

Page 107: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

88 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

environment friendly.

Sewage

Treatment

Plant

• odour, Health

hazard and

public nuisance

Permanent • Green belt development is ensured in the

premises of STP to restrict of odour (if any)

outside the premises of STP.

• Proper boundary wall to avoid the public nuisance.

• Online monitoring system for sewage will be

ensured to maintained the targeted treated sewage

standards.

• Seasonal Air, Noise and climatic conditions

monitoring is ensured.

• Contractor

• ULB

• PMU

Disposal of

treated waste

water

• Contamination of

water and spoil

Permanent • The treated effluent will be reused for flushing

purpose, Gardens, Horticulture Purpose, STP

green development purpose and road cleaning

purpose and remaining will be disposed off at the

drains which is adjacent to the STP site. A sump

well has already proposed in the design for

collection/store treated sewage at STP site.

• Receiving water body of treated effluent of STP is

basically just a rainstorm drain. Further it is to

clarified that the receiving water body is almost

dry maximum duration in the year. confluence

point of this drain is 'Bodari Nalla' at a distance of

around 1.5 km and next confluence point is at

around 2.5 KM of distance which is Kulbehra

river.

• Standard will be ensured as per stated in Appendix

20.

Page 108: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

89 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

General

Waste Sanitary

conditions at

construction

camps and

site.

• Contamination of

water resources,

blockage of

storm drains, bad

odour, Health

hazard and

public nuisance

Temporary • Regular monitoring of provision of water supply,

excreta and solid waste management.

• Waste is emptied regularly at disposal area until

the work is completed.

• Maintaining proper hygienic environment in and

around camps and site by regular surveillance and

monitoring of waste.

• PMU

• Contractor

• CMC

Sludge

disposal • Disposal of

sludge leading to

contamination of

land and water.

Permanent • Sludge disposal plan has been prepared as per

design stage provisions and guidelines and adhere

to the same (enclosed as annex. 21).

• Ensure proper functioning of STP for digestion of

sludge and ensure adequate functioning of

dewatering units for efficient functioning of

System.

• Treated effluent quality test should be done at

least once a month

• The septage from the septic tanks will be collected

using suction vehicles which will be leak proof

and the septage will be dumped in the equitation

tanks for treatment. The suction trucks being used

should be maintained as per the best practices &

standards of maintenance.

• The settled sludge coming out from the sewage

treatment plant, will be carried out in to the sludge

drying beds proposed in the vicinity of the STP

site.

• Sludge is thickened and stabilized before it can be

efficiently disposed of or used as a soil

amendment.

• PMU

• Contractor

• CMC

Page 109: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

90 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

• Sludge drying bed has proper drainage- water

leachate does not flow into river to contaminate

and it is pumped back into the STP

• Sludge disposal strictly complies with national

standards and internationally accepted

environmental quality criteria.

• The sludge thickeners and sludge drying beds are

proposed

• Efficient Sludge dewatering with minimum land

involvement is adopted.

• Sludge is tested for heavy metals and other

chemicals. It is dried on site. Site is raised, with

cutoff drains (drain leachate is taken back to STP

for treatment) & is covered on top (for weather

protection). After drying, this is sent in covered

vehicle to trenching yard Khasra No. 14/5 at

village Salimeta, The. Mohkhed, Distt.

Chhindwara. This is the temporary arrangement

for disposal of sludge in future it will be

developed as sanitary landfill.

• The thickened Sludge is disposed on the sludge

drying bed adjoining to STP and after this it is

proposed to be transported for final disposal at

designed site. Refer Appendix 21.

• Bucket volumetric capacity will no surpassed and

free board will be kept to the top of the bucket

/wagon side structure.

• Tyre and vehicle surface will be thoroughly

Page 110: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

91 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

washed before leaving treatment plant.

• Although covering the sludge with canvas may

not be necessary for dried sludge with high solid

content, but it will be provided to avoid

undesirable situation

• Safety locks will be verified every time to avoid

accidental openings during sludge transportation.

Complete check for all container locks will be

carried out within plant yard and before truck

loading starts

• Sludge container will be leak proof and preferably

fitted for sludge transport

• Weather protection will be made for loading in

rainy season

• Transport of liquid sludge through tank truck and

dewatered sludge in dump trucks are the most

commonly used methods During first decade

generation of sludge will be lesser than next

decades. In Centrifuge unit arrangements are

made in a way that sludge cakes fall directly in

the tractor trolly from centrifuge unit. Trucks are

then transported to the disposal site.

General

Safety

Workers

exposed to

toxic gases

in sewers

• The toxic gases

are likely to

contract

Temporary • During cleaning/ maintenance operation, the sewer

line is adequately vented and ensured that no toxic

or hazardous gases are present in the line.

• PMU

• Contractor

• CMC

Page 111: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

92 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

and

hazardous

materials

In sewage

during

maintenance

work

communicable • Gases present in the sewer line is analyzed for

hazardous/toxic gases before commencing

cleaning operation.

Occupational

Health and

safety

Workers

and staff • Operation and

Maintenance of

STP and sludge

disposal

Permanent • Railing around all process tanks to be installed.

• Implement a confined spaces entry program that is

consistent with applicable national requirements

and internationally accepted standards. Valves to

process tanks should be locked to prevent

accidental flooding during maintenance;

• Maintain work areas to minimize slipping and

tripping hazards;

• Use proper techniques for trenching and shoring;

• Implement fire and explosion prevention measures

in accordance with internationally accepted

standards;

• When installing or repairing mains adjacent to

roadways, implement procedures and traffic

controls, such as:

✓ Establishment of work zones so as to separate

workers from traffic and from equipment as

much as possible

✓ Reduction of allowed vehicle speeds in work

• Contractor

• CMC

Page 112: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

93 | P a g e

Activity Potential

Negative

Impact/Concern

Duration

of

Impact

Mitigation Measures Responsible

Agency

zones;

✓ Use of high-visibility safety apparel for

workers in the vicinity of traffic

✓ Provision of proper illumination for the work

space, while controlling glare so as not to blind

workers and passing motorists

• Locate all underground utilities before digging.

Table 7. 2: Cost of Chhindwara ESMP

Phase Component

EMP of Mitigation measure Cost included in

the contract

(Yes/no/not

clear)

Cost in Rupees (or

Details provided in

contract)

Remarks

Construction Excavation, Cutting

and filling operations

Review of existing

infrastructure, shoring

trenches, reinstatement/

Resurfacing

Yes Included in Provisional

sum of contract

Damage

utilities public Proper reviewing of

existing drawing s of

utilities, informing concern

authorities and

reinstatement of public

utilities

Yes Included in Provisional

sum of contract

Dust generation Water sprinkling on

excavated material to

suppress dust and provision

of top cover when

No Water tanker: Rs.

Approximately

Rs. 28,80,000

Top cover for

dumper truck: Rs.

According to DPR 80Km stretch in

each zone will be completed in 3

years. This means approximately 75

m will be covered per day.

750 L of water will be consumed

Page 113: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

94 | P a g e

Phase Component

EMP of Mitigation measure Cost included in

the contract

(Yes/no/not

clear)

Cost in Rupees (or

Details provided in

contract)

Remarks

transported

through vehicles

33750/-

for75musingsprinkleraverage 2450

Per meter cost = Rs. 450/75m = Rs

6/- Total cost for 80 Km= Rs

480000 Keeping a 2-day margin for

construction and reinstatement of

the site2x480000= Rs. 960000/-

excavated earth disposal). Hence 5

trucks* required top cover 30 Sqm*

Cost of Top soil cover at Rs. 75/

Sqm.

9 Noise and

vibrations

Usage of sound

barriers or sheets. No. Rs. 9,29,850/- As per the schedule, the construction

in 2 zones each has to be executed

in 36 months for providing sound

barriers like GI sheets, 4Km out of

80 Km of stretch of sensitive zones

in sewer work is considered

assuming excavation, construction

and backfilling activity will take

place simultaneously at

different stretches. Considering 302

GI sheet of 3’x 8’would cover 75m

length (both sides) of

construction activity daily. (150

sheets are needed of for one side of

150 m stretch, so for 2 sides 300

sheets and 2 more sheets to enclose

one open side of the barricading;

150 m is taken as a safer option as it

will not be possible to shift the

barrier to another site same day)

Hence 302 sheets* Cost of GI sheet

Rs.1000 per sheet (Rs.70-100 per

Kg)* labour cost ( two labour at

avg. rate of Rs. 150 per day) = Rs.

Page 114: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

95 | P a g e

Phase Component

EMP of Mitigation measure Cost included in

the contract

(Yes/no/not

clear)

Cost in Rupees (or

Details provided in

contract)

Remarks

309950And

for 240 Kms = Rs.9,29,850/-

Temporary flooding or

water logging

Alternate traffic re-routing,

Ensuring storage of

excavated soil material on

the higher lying areas

Yes Included in Provisional

sum of contract

Increased traffic

inconvenience

Traffic re-routing No cost required

except diversion

signage

Included in Provisional

sum of contract

Safety hazards to

workers and

residents

Putting fences or other

barricades to demarcate

the area

No Rs. 16875 Assuming a stretch of 75m per day,

150 rods will be used, @ Rs. 75/-

period.

Labour camps Health hazards and

nuisance due to absence

of facility for sanitation

or solid waste

management

Sanitation No Cost of

construction of pit and

toilet building &

cleaning approximately

Rs. 2,24,000/-

Total no. of labour is estimated

assuming 35% of total project

working for 36 months. The labour

camps is established in Zone 2

which has the proposed major

infrastructure STP and SPS for

appropriate management and

maintenance work. This camp can

accommodate maximum 70 labour.

Page 115: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

96 | P a g e

Phase Component

EMP of Mitigation measure Cost included in

the contract

(Yes/no/not

clear)

Cost in Rupees (or

Details provided in

contract)

Remarks

However, the contractor has

engaged mostly local labour

A two toilet (male &female) with a

single septic tank has been

constructed for sanitation facility at

labour camps. Septic tank of

capacity 45 m3 will be used. Cost of

one pit is Rs. 1,20,000. Cost of one

toilet building is Rs. 80,000.

Therefore, total cost of toilet

construction at one camp site would

be Rs 2,00,000/-

Cleaning of pit cost Rs 4000/-. and

after 9 months cleaning is needed so

thrice cleaning is needed. So, for

2 pits X 1 camps X 3 times

cleaning the cost will come as

Rs.24000/-

Water Supply No Approximately Rs.

15250/-

As estimated 70 labour will be at

one camp, so approximately

maximum 14 families placed at one

camp at a time. Around 3 standposts

will be needed at camp. One

standpost construction cost is Rs

6250/-. At the rate of 135 LPCD,

10,000 L of water is needed for each

camp. At the rate

of Rs 2.5KL, the cost of water

provisioning would be Rs 25 per

day. Total cost for 36 months would

be Rs 900

Total cost of construction and

provisioning would be Rs 15250

Page 116: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

97 | P a g e

Phase Component

EMP of Mitigation measure Cost included in

the contract

(Yes/no/not

clear)

Cost in Rupees (or

Details provided in

contract)

Remarks

Dust bins No Approximately Rs.

200000/-

Solid waste generation: Generally,

about 200 grams of solid waste is

generated per 5 persons every day.

Hence two cluster dustbins (one for

biodegradable waste and one for

non-biodegradable waste of 1 cum

size at the rate of Rs. 2000/-) may

handle solid waste generated.

Total (in INR) 42,99,725.00

Social Management Plan Impact (Social) • Mitigation Measures Institutional

Responsibility

Time Frame Budget (in Rupees)

Encroached Structure

(temporary structure

over road ROW)

• Joint survey of PIU and contractor has been done to assess the exact

number of temporary kiosks along the road ROW which may be

affected during network laying.

CMC/ D(R)BO

contactor & PIU

before

construction

commence

No amount

required

Loss of

Income Livelihood • Joint survey of PIU and contractor has been done to assess the exact

number of vendors likely to be affected during network laying.

• All compensations (as per entitlement matrix in ESMF) to be disbursed

before start of excavation in the particular stretch.

• Tentative number of small Trader to be given livelihood assistance (as

per entitlement matrix) = 22, however, provision of planks over the

excavated portion at every 50m and excavations limited to 250m in one

stretch will help in not affecting the income of traders.

• Tentative number of vendors to be given livelihood assistance (as per

collectorate rate) = 43@ no. of days (average 7days)

• Although all care will be taken to shift the vendors across the road on

same area (not affecting their income),

CMC/ D(R)BO

contactor & PIU

Throughout the

construction

period

No amount

required

Page 117: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

98 | P a g e

Phase Component

EMP of Mitigation measure Cost included in

the contract

(Yes/no/not

clear)

Cost in Rupees (or

Details provided in

contract)

Remarks

Impacts to trees,

plants and standing

crops

• No impact to trees, plants and crops is observed during the joint survey.

CMC/D(R)BO

contractor, PIU

before

construction

phase

No amount

required

Unidentified Impacts • Unforeseen impacts encountered during implementation will be

addressed in accordance with the principles of the policy

CMC/D(R)BO

contractor, PIU

Throughout

construction phase 20,00,000.00

• Total SMP cost INR 20, 00,000.

00/-

• Total EMP and SMP INR 6299725.00

IEC activities • Dissemination of Project information

• Consultation with potentially affected people

• FGDs with likely beneficiaries

• Mobilization for encouraging connection specially among vulnerable

groups

MPUDC/CDO

(PIU)

During

construction and

operation phase

As per

communication

plan under TA

activities

Detail Estimation for Green Development

Item Description Quantity Amount

1 Digging holes in ordinary soil and refilling the same with the excavated earth mixed with manure or sludge in the ratio of

2:1 by volume (2 parts of stacked volume of earth after reduction by 20% : 1 part of stacked volume of manure after

reduction by 8%) flooding with water, dressing including removal of rubbish and surplus earth, if any, with all leads and

lifts (cost of manure, sludge or extra good earth if needed to be paid for separately) :

2.14.1 Holes 1.2 m dia and 1.2 m deep

As per code no 2.14 of Central Public work department

195 46166.25

2 Supplying and stacking sludge at site including royalty and carriage up to 5 km complete (sludge measured in stacks will

be reduced by 8% for payment). As

per code no 2.3 of Central Public work department

195 45932.25

3 Supply and stacking of plant of height 150- 165 cm. in big poly bags of size 25 cm as per direction of the officer-in

charge.

As per code no 7.45 of Central Public work department

195 9750

Page 118: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

99 | P a g e

Phase Component

EMP of Mitigation measure Cost included in

the contract

(Yes/no/not

clear)

Cost in Rupees (or

Details provided in

contract)

Remarks

4 Spreading of sludge, dump manure and/or good earth in required thickness as per direction of officer-in-charge (cost of

sludge, dump manure and/ or good earth to be paid separately).

As per code no 2.8 of Central Public work department

195 6035.25

5 Complete maintenance of shrubs (Outside garden features), jobs like making of basin at regular interval i/c watering,

weeding, pruning & application of fertilizer etc., (excluding the cost of material which shall be supplied by Per Shrub the

department) and as per direction of officer in charge.

As per code no 2.43 of Central Public work department

195 216450

(10-year O&M)

Total= 33,24,334/-

Grand Total EMP and SMP and Green belt development cost plus the cost given in table 7.4 =

1,43,21,059

7.2 Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring is an important tool in establishing the success or failure of a project in regards to compliance to environmental

safeguards. Evaluation is also important in assessing the achievement of the mitigation measures set out in the Environmental

Management Plan, performance and efficiency of the project in regards to ESMP. Monitoring and evaluation process will involve

the assessment of the following benchmarks:

d) The implementation process of guidelines stipulated in the ESMP

e) Evaluate impact of the project to the environment and social setting of Chhindwara Town

f) Monitoring of the involvement of the community through public consultations in decision makings and the implementation

of the project

Project implementation involves various interventions to achieve the objectives of providing safe, clean and adequate on

sustainable basis and improving health and sanitation conditions in the city. Simultaneously, to protect and improve the

environmental conditions to achieve the goal, various mitigating measures would be taken up. Table 7.3 presents the proposed

environmental monitoring plan while Table 7.4 presents the cost information of the environmental monitoring.

Page 119: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

100 | P a g e

Table 7. 3 Environmental Monitoring Plan

Env.

Component

Stage Institutional Responsibilities

Parameter Standards Locations Frequency Implementation Supervision

Air

Qu

ali

ty

Con

stru

ct

ion

PM10 μg /m3,

PM2.5 μg/m3,

SO2, NOX,

CO

CPCB

Sewer

Construction

Sites

Once in every

season

Contractor through

approved monitoring

agency/Lab

PMU through

PIU and

Contractor

Op

era-t

ion

PM10 μg /m3,

PM2.5 μg/m3,

SO2, NOX,

CO

Sewer

Operational

facilities

Twice a year

during

operation.

DBO

Contractor

and ULB

Nois

e L

evel

s

Con

stru

ct

ion

Leq dB (A) (Day

and Night)

Average and Peak

values

Ambient Noise

Standard CPCB

Sewer

Construction

Sites

Once in every

season except rainy

season

Contractor through

approved monitoring

agency/Lab

PMU through

PIU and

Contractor

Op

erati

o

n

Leq dB (A) (Day

and Night)

Average and Peak

values

Ambient Noise

Standard CPCB

Sewer

operational

facilities

Quarterly DBO

Contractor

and ULB

Tre

ated

Eff

luen

t

Op

erati

o

n

BOD,COD, pH,

TN, TSS, Total

Phosphorus Total

Coliform

Standard as per

CPCB

Inlet and

Outlet

Monthly Contractor through

approved monitoring

agency/Lab

DBO

Contractor

and ULB

Wate

r Q

ua

lity

of

Rec

ipie

nt

Na

lla/R

iver

Co

nst

ruct

ion

pH, Oil &grease,

Cl, F, NO3, TC,

Fecal Coliform

bacteria, Hardness,

Turbidity, BOD,

COD, DO, Total

Alkalinity

IS:10500

(Appendix 9A)

Near proposed

STP site

Seasonal except

rainy season Contractor through

approved monitoring

agency/Lab

PMU through

PIU and

Contractor

Op

erati

on

pH, Oil & grease,

Cl, F, NO3, TC,

Total Fecal

IS:10500

Near effluent

discharge

point in the

Monthly

Contractor through

approved monitoring

agency/Lab

DBO

Contractor

and ULB

Page 120: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

101 | P a g e

Coliform bacteria,

Hardness,

Turbidity, BOD,

COD, DO, Total

Alkalinity

(Appendix 9A) river S

oil

C

on

stru

ctio

n

Physical :Texture,

Grain Size,

Gravel, Sand, Silt,

Clay; Chemical

Parameter: pH,

Conductivity,

Calcium,

Magnesium,

Sodium, Nitrogen,

Absorption Ratio

Consider the

following methods:

IS- 2720 (Various

part);Soil

Chemical Analysis

by M.L.

JACKSON. Soil

Test Method by

Ministry of

agriculture

Sewer

Construction

Sites and IPS

Before start of the

construction work Contractor through

approved monitoring

agency/Lab

Contractor

and PMU

Soil

O

per

ati

on

Physical: Texture,

Grain Size,

Gravel, Sand, Silt,

Clay;

Chemical

Parameter: pH,

Conductivity,

Calcium,

Magnesium,

Sodium, Nitrogen,

Absorption Ratio

Consider

the following

methods: IS- 2720

(Various

parts);Soil

Chemical

Analysis by M.L.

JACKSON. Soil

Test Method by

Ministry of

agriculture

Along sewer

construction

sites, IPS

Twice in a year

(Pre- monsoon and

Post monsoon) for

first 5 years,

Contractor through

approved monitoring

agency/Lab

PMU and

PMC

Slu

dge

Op

erati

o

n

Analysis for

concentration of

heavy metals

CPCB

STP site

Monthly

Contractor through

approved monitoring

agency/Lab

PMU and ULB

Table 7. 4 Cost of Environmental Monitoring Plan

Item Location Season Year Total no. of

samples

Unit Cost Total Cost

Page 121: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

102 | P a g e

Environment Monitoring during Construction Stage

Air quality Monitoring

8 3 3 72 7,000.00 504,000.00

Metrological data 1 4 3 12 5,000.00 60,000.00

Noise / vibration 8 3 3 72 2,000.00 144,000.00

Surface Water

Quality 2 3 2 12 10,000.00 120,000.00

Soil analysis 8 2 3 48 5,500.00 264,000.00

Sub total 10,97,000.00

Environment Monitoring Cost (Operation Stage)

Air quality Monitoring

8 1 5 40 7,000.00 280,000.00

Metrological data 1 1 5 5 5,000.00 25,000.00

Noise / vibration 8 1 5 40 2,000.00 80,000.00

Surface Water

Quality 2 12 (Monthly) 5 120 10,000.00 1,200,000.00

Treated Effluent 2 12 (Monthly) 5 12 10,000.00 1,200,000.00

Soil analysis 4 2 5 40 5,500.00 220,000.00

Sludge analysis 1 12 (Monthly) 5 60 10,000.00 600,000.00

Sub-Total 36,05,000.00

TOTAL for Environmental Monitoring (in INR) 46,97,000.00

Total cost of EMP + SMP + Green Belt Development + Environment Monitoring works out to

42,99,725+20,00,000+33,24,234+46,97,000= INR 1,43,21,059/-

Page 122: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

103 | P a g e

8. Tribal Vulnerability Identification and Assessment

8.1 Distribution of Scheduled Tribes in Madhya Pradesh in Relation to India

The tribal population of Madhya Pradesh increased to 15,316,784 in 2011 from

12,233,474 in 2001.The decadal growth rate during this period is 25.20 percent. The trends in the population of the Scheduled Tribes by residence (total, Rural and Urban)

for Census Years 1961- 2011 shows that the percentage of Scheduled Tribes Population

in the Rural Areas (11.3 percent) much higher that Urban Population (2.8 percent). In Madhya Pradesh certain areas have been declared as scheduled area as Specified by the

Scheduled Areas under the fifth Schedule of Indian Constitutions2. List of Schedule

Areas and Schedules Tribes in Madhya Pradesh is provided in Appendix 3 and

Appendix 2 respectively. 8.61 percent of the Indian population is classified as ST. In

comparison to the national figure, Madhya Pradesh has 14.7 percent of its populations classified as ST.

Chhindwara Municipal Corporation area is not falling under Scheduled V areas

declared by Government of India.

8.2 Presence of Indigenous People.

The identification of Indigenous people in project area done on the basis of secondary

information:

1. Share of scheduled tribe population in project area as per census 2011and

2. declaration of scheduled V areas by Ministry of Tribal Welfare, GoI.

On the basis of these two information’s the share of scheduled tribe and vulnerable

composition in project area given in Table 8.1 and Chhindwara Municipal Corporation

is not coming under scheduled V area declared by GoI.

Table 8. 1: Social Composition in Chhindwara Town

Social Composition Population Male Female % of total population SC 31381 15926 15455 13.84

ST 28820 14566 14254 12.72

Total Population of

Town

226802

(Source: Census, 2011)

3. The concentration of tribal population in particular areas were identified on the

basis of ward wise population in 48 wards of CMC, detail of population given in

table 8.2.

Table 8. 2: Ward wise detail of Scheduled Tribe population

S.no Ward

no.

Total

HHs

Total

population

of ward

Total

populati

on (ST)

Male Female Total

populat

ion

Male Female

Page 123: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

104 | P a g e

(SC)

1 01 690 3104 449 222 227 558 296 262

2 02 1286 5914 502 289 213 968 558 410

3 03 739 3292 447 228 219 342 171 171

4 04 900 4081 757 360 397 559 295 264

5 05 857 4066 188 87 101 236 126 110

6 06 668 3008 383 197 186 621 331 290

7 07 923 4307 322 170 152 430 226 204

8 08 625 2907 287 138 149 889 448 441

9 09 607 3462 1014 387 627 176 67 109

10 10 690 3437 363 184 179 627 313 314

11 11 634 3076 143 74 69 151 76 75

12 12 575 2893 57 30 27 51 21 30

13 13 457 2371 11 6 5 6 3 3

14 14 482 2447 59 26 33 81 38 43

15 15 872 4332 294 140 154 587 300 287

16 16 757 3693 406 202 204 956 465 491

17 17 1030 4871 388 191 197 966 478 488

18 18 989 4609 561 293 268 702 365 337

19 19 662 2917 376 185 191 513 245 268

20 20 975 4587 276 134 142 279 149 130

21 21 650 3108 39 19 20 28 15 13

22 22 511 2956 2 1 1 75 30 45

23 23 678 3669 54 24 30 178 84 94

24 24 807 4107 87 43 44 1823 895 928

25 25 585 2583 166 91 75 220 98 122

26 26 857 3929 127 68 59 196 97 99

27 27 676 3601 49 27 22 271 131 140

28 28 429 2425 37 16 21 11 6 5

29 29 659 2980 80 42 38 181 95 86

30 30 730 3234 635 326 309 184 98 86

31 31 674 2780 344 194 150 199 94 105

32 32 552 2351 230 120 110 224 118 106

33 33 1092 4736 275 136 139 508 251 257

34 34 891 3936 182 85 97 534 269 265

35 35 815 3567 319 166 153 591 306 285

36 36 868 3850 138 68 70 392 188 204

37 37 595 3316 114 107 7 45 43 2

Page 124: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

105 | P a g e

38 38 923 4337 210 78 132 566 261 305

39 39 771 3452 648 328 320 658 321 337

40 40 1618 7338 2544 1303 1241 955 473 482

41 41 582 2646 1138 582 556 430 210 220

42 42 1323 5997 1145 592 553 644 334 310

43 43 3718 16896 2005 1003 1002 2658 1360 1298

44 44 665 3054 813 411 402 994 525 469

45 45 168 830 447 229 218 145 71 74

coming under

ward 1

3388

14989

1617

844

773

3147

1609

1538

Total 40643

190041

20728

10446

10282

25555

12953

12602

15 wards where population of ST is more than SC

30 wards where population of SC is more than ST

Source: Census 2011

The above table reflects that percentage of vulnerable is more than scheduled tribe.

8.3 Public Consultation

During the entire planning phase, an effort has also been made to help people including all

castes & tribes, understand the positive impacts and benefits from the project for them in

terms of better connectivity and linkage with the surrounding areas, reduction in the

problems, minimization of health risks through provisions of good services of quality

supply, underpasses, median control and other design interventions, improvement in the

economy of the people, better access to health, education facilities in the region. The

process has helped in building confidence amongst the Indigenous people of different

wards and mainstreamed them in the process and making them partners in the project. For

consultation the wards were selected on the basis of highest population of SC/ST in CMC.

During consultation process participation of Indigenous people was also ensured. The

number of Tribal and vulnerable people participated in consultation is presented in Table

8.3.

Table 8. 3: Participation of ST/SC population during Public Consultation

WARD no. SC/ST Household

Total M F

02 17 07 10

08 20 15 05

16 19 14 05

17 15 08 07

24 22 12 10

40 27 13 14

43 28 18 10

44 30 25 05

TOTAL 148

Page 125: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

106 | P a g e

8.3.1 Key Issues identified during Consultations

As stated above, the participation of vulnerable people was also ensured during public

consultations and thus, the key issues identified during consultation with vulnerable

people are same as identified in the stakeholder consultations. The main issues are:

• Few people having individual toilets with septic tanks, they haven't showed

willingness in project as they have view that Sewer connection damage their

tanks in Chhindwara Municipal Corporation.

• People complaint about contaminated water due to leakage in septic tanks of

some houses.

• Those having individual toilets demanded connection to their toilets.

• Safety measured during excavation must be ensured as some working couples

leave their small children at home.

8.3.2 Conclusion

On the basis of social Impact screening, identification, consultations as per characteristics

outlined in OP 4.10 indicated the identities and cultures of Indigenous peoples are

inextricably linked to the lands on which they live and the natural resources on which they

depend. However, both circumstances are not with ST people present in Chhindwara

town, so on the basis of this criteria they are not categorized as Indigenous people.

Hence policy OP 4.10 not triggered for this sub-project.

8.4 Other Vulnerable Population

The scheduled caste, Women headed household, destitute & disabled are being considered

as vulnerable groups. The population of Scheduled caste in Chhindwara comprise of

13.84% of total population.

8.5 Strategy for addressing of Tribal and Vulnerable group through participation

The strategy for addressing concerns relating to tribal and vulnerable groups identified

through participation is presented below. This strategy is to be applied during

implementation of the subproject:

a) Free, prior informed Consultations and information disclosure is to ensure that the

priorities, preferences, and needs of the tribal and vulnerable groups have been taken

into consideration adequately. With that objective in view, a strategy for consultation

with tribal and vulnerable communities and their elected representatives will be

developed so that these are conducted in a participatory manner.

b) Beneficiaries will be actively engaged in the project cycle and feedback of

consultations with tribal and vulnerable people will be reflected in the project

design, followed by disclosure. Their participation in project planning will inform

project design, and they should be convinced of their benefits from the project. The

awareness material prepared will be translated into the local language of the tribal

Page 126: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

107 | P a g e

and vulnerable people and made available to them.

One project information disclosure (PID) brochure will be prepared, translated into a

language understandable to the tribal people, and distributed among them. Budget

included in ESMP.

c) Project Monitoring Indicators will be designed to monitor project impact as

beneficiaries. The regular participation of groups ensured through the monitoring

Indicators.

8.6 Inclusion of Tribal and Vulnerable Population during Implementation

Implementation comprise of gaining continued support of the tribal and vulnerable

people in the project area, during project implementation.

Free prior informed consultations during implementation stage will be carried out at two

levels

a) consultation with communities for broad support for the project.

b) for participation in capacity building and awareness generation activities for

mainstreaming. (MPUDC is in the process of appointing Non-Government

Organization for this purpose)

Page 127: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

108 | P a g e

9. Contractor’s Role in Grievance Redressal Mechanism

As per the contract, setting up of Grievance Redressal cell i.e. provision of computer etc.

is within the scope of work of contractor. Complaints will be received in various manner

as under:

• Boxes ( at ULB office, Site office, Bus stand)

• In the office of contractor or ULB or PIU

• Through email and phone ( phone number will be given in GRC box)

• CM helpline

Contractor’s services are aligned to the project GRM and that the Contractor has

adequate mechanisms to ensure that any complaint received by the contractor is recorded,

addressed (if it is within the scope of the contractor to address the same), information

forwarded to the GRC, etc. and complaint is closed. Contractor is obligated to provide

information that is required by the PIU to ensure smooth functioning of the project GRM.

Major type of grievances along with their timelines for resolution are as follows:

Nature of Complaint Duration to attend

Accident Immediate

Site safety traffic signage etc Within 5 hrs to 2 days

Road restoration To be decided in discussion with

PIU/ULB (max. 7 days in case of

pipe is laid or tested)

Utility breakage viz water pipeline,

telephone line, electric line etc

Within 1-2 days

Quality related PIU to decide

Labour related issues Max. 7 days

Others To be decided by PIU depending

upon the severity of grievance.

Sincere efforts will be made to resolve grievances through participatory process with the

community and the respective ULBs, within time limit.

Closure of the Complaint

After the receipt of complaint, the contractor will resolve the grievance within the specified time

limit. However, if the issue is not resolved within time or in case the timeline given is not

adequate in opinion of contractor; he will inform the PIU accordingly. In such case, the

contractor will also consult with PIU to arrive at an agreed timeline. This will also be recorded.

After the completion of work on contractor’s part, he will inform the PIU & PMC official who

will further reconcile with the aggrieved telephonically and record whether the grievance is

satisfactorily resolved.

The format for Grievance Redressal Format for the complaints received has been appended in

Appendix 25.

Page 128: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

109 | P a g e

10. Conclusion and Recommendations

The Environmental Social Assessment (ESA) Study was carried out based on field assessments

and public consultations with the community who are likely to benefit or to be affected by the

proposed Project and the Proponent in compliance with the World Bank environmental policies

and EIA Notification 2006. The project report of the proposed sub-project for Chhindwara City

after environment and social analysis concludes that the project has overall positive benefits on

the life and environment of the people. There has been no reported land acquisition or

livelihood losses to be caused under this project. As per environmental and social management

framework guidelines of MPUDP, Environmental and Social Assessment, with a Generic

Safeguard Management Plan was conducted for addressing possible issues/ concerns arising

from proposed project.

The sewerage network will provide improved environmental conditions due to the contained

handling of wastes, leading to improved public health conditions and will likely reduce the

average medical expenses of the residents in the project areas. Because of the sewer line

connection, all the waste water will be collected and directed to treatment plant, which only

after treatment will be disposed off to the river, hence decreasing the pollutant load in the river.

Connection to sewer lines will enhance the aesthetic value of the area, as there will be more

cleanliness and no wastewater discharge to open area. This will also lead to appreciation in the

property value. This will eventually lead to increase in standard of living of the people in the

project site.

As per the DPR the Land which was selected for STP was located at Koladhana Near Bodri

Nallah in ward no 33 Khasra No. 678, having an area of 1.8 Ha., but as most part of this land

came under the submergence of Bodri Nallah, and a part of the land was encroached, hence it

was not feasible to construct the STP at Koladhana and after studying the various options for the

STP the location at Sarra in ward no 35, Khasra no 126,128 and 129 having an area of 2.851 ha

was selected and thus the location was finally changed from Koladhana to Sarra.

The DPR envisaged 2 SPS – one at Bail Bazar and one at Koladhana (as MPS). However, after

detailed investigation during Physical survey and the change of site for STP, the SPS at Bail

Bazar is no more required. The Sewage of Zone 1 will flow to MPS through gravity.

There are no environmentally sensitive areas (like wildlife sanctuaries etc.) in or near sub-

project area. However, the proposed STP land is under forest land for which the permission for

diversion of the forest land is sought from the Forest Department which is in advance stage and

the same will be received shortly.( refer Appendix 14 and 15 ) Also there are no archeological

and historical protected areas/ sites within or near the town. There are no permanent adverse

impacts on assets and livelihood anticipated, hence no ARAP is required as per ESMF. Only

minor damage to road side properties and loss of income for certain days and locations during

construction phase may be identified. Such impacts shall be assessed by D(R)BO contractor and

this ESA and SMP will be updated and approved by MPUDC. In Project area, no indigenous

people are identified meeting the requirement of IPMF, so no separate IPP is required. Hence

the impact identified are mostly related to construction and operation phase. However, a

strategy for addressing concerns relating to tribal and vulnerable groups has been identified and

Page 129: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

110 | P a g e

is to be applied during subproject implementation.

The subproject is unlikely to cause significant adverse impacts because: (i) most of the

individual components involve straightforward construction and operation, so impacts will be

mainly localized; (ii) in most cases the predicted impacts are likely to be associated with the

construction process and are produced because the process is invasive, involving excavation,

obstruction at specific construction locations, and earth movements; and (iii) being located

mainly in the already constructed facilities and built-up area will not cause direct impact on

terrestrial biodiversity values. The potential adverse impacts that are associated with design,

construction, and operation can be mitigated to standard levels without difficulty through proper

engineering design and the incorporation or application of recommended mitigation measures

and procedures.

Therefore, the ESA report has been amended (after draft design and drawing) and submitted by

the DBO contractor.

Page 130: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

111 | P a g e

Appendix 1:Screening Checklist of Chhindwara sewerage project

Page 131: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

112 | P a g e

Page 132: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

113 | P a g e

Page 133: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

114 | P a g e

Page 134: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

115 | P a g e

Appendix 2: List of Tribal Communities in State of Madhya Pradesh as

Provided by Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India

1. Agariya

2. Andh

3. Baiga

4. Bhaina

5. Bharia Bhumia, Bhuinhar Bhumia, Bhumiya, Bharia, Paliha, Pando

6. Bhattra

7. Bhil, Bhilala, Barela, Patelia

8. Bhil Mina

9. Bhunjia

10. Biar, Biyar

11. Binjhwar

12. Birhul, Birhor

13. Damor, Damaria

14. Dhanwar

15. Gadaba, Gadba

16. Gond; Arakh, Arrakh, Agaria, Asur, Badi Maria, Bada Maria, Bhatola, Bhimma,

Bhuta, Koilabhuta, Koliabhuti, Bhar, Bisonhorn Maria, Chota Maria, Dandami Maria,

Dhuru, Dhurwa, Dhoba, Dhulia, Dorla, Gaiki, Gatta, Gatti, Gaita, Gond Gowari, Hill

Maria, Kandra,Kalanga, Khatola, Koitar, Koya, Khirwar, Khirwara, Kucha Maria,

Kuchaki Maria, Madia,Maria, Mana, Mannewar, Moghya, Mogia, Monghya, Mudia,

Muria, Nagarchi, Nagwanshi, Ojha, Raj, Sonjhari Jhareka, Thatia, Thotya, Wade Maria,

Vade Maria, Daroi

17. Halba, Halbi

18. Kamar

19. Karku

20. Kawar, Kanwar, Kaur, Cherwa, Rathia, Tanwar, Chattri

21. (Omitted)

22. Khairwar,Kondar

23. Kharia

24. Kondh, Khond, Kandh

25. Kol

26. Kolam

27. Korku, Bopchi, Mouasi, Nihal, Nahul Bondhi, Bondeya

Page 135: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

116 | P a g e

28. Korwa, Kodaku

29. Majhi

30. Majhwar

31. Mawasi

32. Omitted

33. Munda

34. Nagesia, Nagasia

35. Oraon, Dhanka, Dhangad

36. Panika [in (i) Chhatarpur, Panna, Rewa, Satna, Shahdol, Umaria, Sidhi and

Tikamgarh districts, and (ii) Sevda and Datia tehsils of Datia district]

37. Pao

38. Pardhan, Pathari, Saroti

39. Omitted

40. Pardhi, Bahelia, Bahellia, Chita Pardhi, Langoli Pardhi, Phans Pardhi, Shikari,

Takankar, Takia [In (i) Chhindwara, Mandla, Dindori and Seoni districts, (ii) Baihar

Tahsil of Balaghat District, (iii) Betul, Bhainsdehi and Shahpur tahsils of Betul district,

(iv) Patan tahsil and Sihora and Majholi blocks of Jabalpur district, (v) Katni (Murwara)

and Vijaya Raghogarh tahsils and Bahoriband and Dhemerkheda blocks of Katni

district, (vi) Hoshangabad , Babai, Sohagpur, Pipariya and Bankheditahsils and Kesla

block of Hoshangabad district, (vii) Narsinghpur district, and (viii) Harsud Tahsil of

Khandwa district]

41. Parja

42. Sahariya, Saharia, Seharia, Sehria, Sosia, Sor

43. Saonta,Saunta

44. Saur

45. Sawar, Sawara

46. Sonr

Page 136: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

117 | P a g e

Appendix 3:List of Schedule Areas in Madhya Pradesh as Specified by

the Scheduled Areas under the fifth Schedule of Indian Constitution

1. Jhabua district

2. Mandla district

3. Dindori district

4. Barwani district

5. Sardarpur, Dhar, Kukshi, Dharampuri, Gandhwani and Manawar tahsils in Dhar

district

6. Bhagwanpura, Segaon, Bhikangaon, Jhirniya, Khargone and Meheshwar tahsils in

Khargone district

7. Khalwa Tribal Development Block of Harsud tahsil and Khaknar Tribal

Development Block of Khaknar tahsil in Khandwa district

8. Sailana and Bajna tahsils in Ratlam district

9. Betul tahsil (excluding Betul Development Block) and Bhainsdehi and

Shahpur tahsils in Betul district 10. Lakhanadone, Ghansaur and Kurai tahsils

in Seoni district

11. Baihar tahsil in Balaghat district

12. Kesla Tribal Development Block of Itarsi tahsil in Hoshangabad district

13. Pushparajgarh, Anuppur, Barhi, Kotma, Jaitpur, Sohagpur and Jaisinghnagar tahsils

of Shahdol district

14. Pali Tribal Development Block in Pali tahsil of Umaria district

15. Kusmi Tribal Development Block in Kusmi tahsil of Sidhi district

16. Karahal Tribal Development Block in Karahal tahsil of Sheopur district

17. Tamia and Jamai tahsils, patwari circle Nos. 10 to 12 and 16 to 19, villages Siregaon

Khurd and Kirwari in patwari circle no. 09, villages Mainawari and Gaulie Parasia of

patwari circle No. 13 in Parasia tahsil, village Bamhani of Patwari circle No. 25 in

Chhindwara tahsil, Harai Tribal Development Block and patwari circle Nos. 28 to

36,41,43,44 and 45B in Amarwara tahsil Bichhua tahsil and patwari circle Nos.

05,08,09,10,11 and 14 in Saunsar tahsil, Patwari circle Nos. 01 to 11 and 13 to 26, and

patwari circle no. 12 (excluding village Bhuli), village Nandpur of patwari circle No. 27,

villages Nikanth and Dhawdikhapa of patwari circle no 28 in Pandurna tahsil of

Chhindwara district.

Page 137: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

118 | P a g e

Appendix 4: List of Participants with Photographs of various meetings

held during the ESA study in Chhindwara

Ward No. 02 Krishna Nagar

Date 10-04-2018

Ward No. 03- Veer Sawarkar Ward No. 06 Shiv Mandir (Shiv

Nagar Colony)

1 Smt. Anita Suryawanshi Mr Chandrabhan Ugle Smt. Khatija

2 Smt. Rekha Deharia Mr Virendra Deharia Smt. Zahirabi

3 Smt. Annu Bhalavi Mr Ramesh Pawar Smt. Bulsa

4 Smt. Mini Bai Mr Rajkumar Sahu Mr Abdul Mohammad

5 Smt. Seema Gautam Mr Suresh Somkunwar Mr Sameer Khan

6 Smt Sapna khular Mr Meera Nagwanshi Mr Sudhakar Raut

7 Smt Usha Sakre Smt. Anarkali Bai Mr. Abdul Aziz

8 Smt Champa Khushwa Smt. Jamuna Banwanshi Mr. Neesar Ansari

9 Smt. Rammu Bai Smt. KantaGirhari Mr. Imran Khan

10 Smt Geeta Vishwakarma Smt. Bhagwati Unnate Mr. Narayan Malviya

11 Smt Ujra bai Khushwa Smt. KantiDhurve Smt Girja bai Yadav

12 Shri Rajkumar Sakre Smt. Manubai Smt Kiran Malviya

13 Mr Vinod Suryawanshi Smt. Kunti bai Smt. Chhotibai

14 Mr. Netram Vishwakarma Mr. Anshulal Uikey Smt. Shobha Rai

15 Mr. Kailash Bunkar Mr. Krishnakant Sigotia Smt. Meerabai Pal

16 Mr. Vishrami Malviya Mr. Santosh Sahu Smt. Hasina Been

17 Mr. Ravi Bharsiya Mr. Rajaram Uikey Mr. Amit Singh

18 Mr Yogesh Arsiya Mr. Deepak Patel

19 Mr Jeevan Mr. Golu Rajput

20 MrImraat Lal Mr. Ashok Mandre

21 Mr Avinash Bhavbhi Mr. Balkrishna Sahu

22 Mr Mannu Uikey Mr. Atmaram Yadav

23 Smt. Rekhka Verma

24 Smt. Savita bai

Ward No. 05 Shiv Nagar

Colony Gali No. 01

Ward No. 07 Ward No. 14

1 Mr Md. Zibraill Mr. Sarfaz Ahmed Maanu

Bhai (Ex Corporator) Mr. Kamal vishwakarma

2 Mr Ramsingh Verma Mr. Sunil Agarwal Mr. Jitendra Ghrekar

3 Mr Sudhir Yadav Mr. Athar Ahmed Mr. Hemant Parodiya

4 Mr Bhadulal Mr. Haseeb Ansari Mr. Hariom Menu

5 Mr Md. Ramzan Khan Mr. Firoz Mr. Pankaj Barda

6 Smt. Ranjana Thakur Mr Shoiab Sidaqqi Mr. Golu Thakre

7 Smt. Chhayabai Mr. Suresh Yadav Mr. Naseer Mohammad

8 Smt. Santrabai Mr. Nitesh Soni Mr. Mukesh

9 Mr Rahman Mr. Akhliesh Soni Mr. Santram Eitariyia

10 Smt. Seema bai Mr. Hariram Malviya Mr Shivcharan Yadav

11 Mr Prahalad Singh Mr Abdul Safi Mr Gyanand Choudhary

12 Mr Ravendra Sahu Mr. Abdul Naseer Mr. Prahlad Yadav

13 Mr. Phaile Khan Mr. Ajay Nema Mranjay Shrivastava

14 Mr. Ashok Mandre Mr. VaibhavPatel Smt. Kamal Yadav

15 Mr. Gudu Yadav Mr. Akash Thakur Smt. Savita Vaikar

Page 138: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

119 | P a g e

Ward No. Khajuri Ward No. 16 Ward No. 18

1 Smt. Ramkali Paratani Mr. Brijesh Singh Mr. Hemendra Bisen

2 Mr. Bisen Kumare Mr. Golu Vishwakarma Mr. Karan Rajput

3 Mr. Ghanshyam Mr. Umaprasad Sisodia Mr. Devman Deharia

4 SmtVisthariya Dhurve Mr. Arun Yadav Mr. Shivchand Bisen

5 Mr. Shankarlal Parte Smt. Sarita Verma Mr. P.L. Kumre

6 Mr Rambhorse Smt. Kamla Verma Mr. Amit Suryavanshi

7 Mr. Murari Pagodiya Mr. Dashrath Kolhe Mr. Ghumendra

8 Smt. Shyami Saryam Mr. Ajay Sakare Mr. T. Prasad

9 Smt. Gireesha Parte Smt. Dhankumari Mehra Mr. Yashoda Kumar

10 Mr. Dhanraj Varawa Smt. Geeta Shah Mr. Shaikh Siddqui

11 Smt Monika Dhurve Mr. Brijesh Shah Mr. Ritesh Singh Bisen

12 Smt Seema Smt. Jagrati Sisodia Mr. Ajay Thakre

13 Smt Sarita Makram Smt. Kusum Chourey Mr. Mazid Raza

14 Smt Indu Maskhole Mr. Jairam Sisodia Mr. Sandeep Ukodiya

15 Smt Lakshi Uikey Mr. MomendraSahu Mr. Ramesh Kalare

16 Smt Kajal Dhurve Mr. Arvind Nagore Smt. Sameena Khan

17 Mr. Kishen Partati Mr. Pradeep Suryavanshi Smt. Ashna Raza

18 Mr. Naveen Makserle

19 Mr. Avishek Garg

20 Smt. Seema Choudhari

Ward No.6 Ward No. 17 Ward No. 24

1 Sa1lim Khan Mr Umesh Malvi Mr Yogesh Bele

2 Taushin Khan Mr Mukesh Nirmalkar Mr Nimeechand Goyal

3 Ankit Yadav Smt Tivedhi Yadav Mr Dinesh Choube

4 Krishna Malviya Smt Dhanno Bai Mr Anand Dugh

5 Shakil Khan Mr Aanesh Vishvakarma Mr Mohsin Quesreshi

6 Mo. Moshin Khan Smt Rhesadi Mr Chiku Pal

7 Kalin Khan Smt Asma Ansari Smt Vandna

8 Naphisa Smt Anjuma Quereshi Smt Jyoti Bele

9 Ramjan Khan Smt Bharti Malvi Smt Anjali

10 Shamsher Shah Smt Bimla Malvi Smt Rupali

11 Parvin Begum Smt Vipteya Yadav Smt Laxmi Sahu

12 Ratika Khan Mrs Hakrudareya Smt Perte

13 Rafiqm Khan Smt Chandra Uike Mr Tejas Bele

14 RamkaliVanvewar Smt Anfesha Khan Mr Tikaram Sahu

15 Saira Begum Smt Insam Khan

16 Amina Begum Smt Baby Tanermalkar

17 Jamina Begum Smt Thunermalkar

18 Shakil Khan

19 Keshav Prasad Soni

20 Shahin Bano

Page 139: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

120 | P a g e

Ward No.48

1 Smt. Ramkali Vishwakarma

2 Smt Chandrakala Kumare

3 Smt. Kaushallya Raysen

4 Smt. Sahiba Quershi

5 Mr. Hari Govinda

6 Mr. Ganesh Raysen

7 Mr. Upendra Singh Thomar

8 Smt. Meena Singh

9 Mr. Damodhar Raysen

10 Smt. Geeta

11 Smt. Mamta Nirmalkar

12 Smt. Anita

13 Smt Varsha Jaiswal

14 Mr. H. N. Parteri

15 Mr. S Parteri

16 Smt Sonia Mukati Patel

17 Smt Rosmi Mukali

Page 140: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

121 | P a g e

Appendix 5: Land records of proposed STP and SPS land parcel

STP site

Page 141: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

122 | P a g e

Page 142: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

123 | P a g e

Page 143: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

124 | P a g e

Page 144: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

125 | P a g e

Page 145: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

126 | P a g e

Page 146: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

127 | P a g e

SPS Site- Koladhana

Page 147: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

128 | P a g e

Appendix 6: Public Consultation photographs during execution of project

Women participation for the proposed construction of

STP

Page 148: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

129 | P a g e

Appendix 7: Some of the Congested Roads

Location:-Raaz Takis Location:- New

Abadi

Location:-Indra Nagar Location:- Shinva Nagar

Page 149: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

130 | P a g e

Appendix 8: Photos related to Environmental Management Plan

Water Sprinkling on Excavated Materials

Page 150: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

131 | P a g e

Sanitation

Drinking Water Facilities

Page 151: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

132 | P a g e

Appendix 9 A :Water Quality Standard as per BIS- IS 10500:2012

Page 152: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

133 | P a g e

Page 153: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

134 | P a g e

Page 154: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

135 | P a g e

Page 155: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

136 | P a g e

Treated Effluent standards as per CPCB Recommended Value under MPUDC

Comparison table of World Bank, CPCB and NGT guidelines

Pollutants Units Guideline

Value as per

WB

Standard

Guideline Value

as per CPCB Standard- 2017

(Adapted by MPUDC)

Recommended

value by NGT

(30.04.2020)

pH - 6-9 6.5-9 Not recommended

BOD Mg/l 30 10 Less than 10

COD Mg/l 125 50 Not recommended

Total Nitrogen Mg/l 10 10 Less than 10

Total Phosphorous Mg/l 2 2 Less than 2

Total Suspended Solids

Mg/l 50 10 Less than 10

Total Coliform Bacteria

MPN/100ml 400 <230 Less than 230

Page 156: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

137 | P a g e

Appendix 9 B: WasteWater Test reports Sample-A

Page 157: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

138 | P a g e

Sample-B

Page 158: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

139 | P a g e

Sample-C

Page 159: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

140 | P a g e

Sample -1

Page 160: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

141 | P a g e

Sample-2

Page 161: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

142 | P a g e

Sanple-3

Page 162: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

143 | P a g e

Appendix 9c : Water Quality Test report of receving water Body (STP outfall)

Page 163: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

144 | P a g e

Page 164: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

145 | P a g e

Appendix 10 : Ambient Air and Noise Pollution Test report

Page 165: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

146 | P a g e

Page 166: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

147 | P a g e

Appendix 11: Land Allotment for Sludge disposal site

Page 167: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

148 | P a g e

Page 168: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

149 | P a g e

Appendix 12: Labour License

Page 169: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

150 | P a g e

Appendix 13: Application for Railway Crossing

At present letter regarding Demand Draft has been forwarded by MPUDCL Bhopal to Railway

department.

Page 170: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

151 | P a g e

Page 171: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

152 | P a g e

Page 172: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

153 | P a g e

Page 173: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

154 | P a g e

Page 174: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

155 | P a g e

Page 175: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

156 | P a g e

Page 176: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

157 | P a g e

Page 177: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

158 | P a g e

Page 178: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

159 | P a g e

Appendix 14: Letter regarding first and second stage permission from

Forest Department.

Page 179: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

160 | P a g e

Appendix 15: Letter regarding second stage permission from Forest

Department

Page 180: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

161 | P a g e

Land allotted for afforestation

Page 181: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

162 | P a g e

Page 182: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

163 | P a g e

Revised Demand note for second stage clearance

Page 183: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

164 | P a g e

Fee deposition for second stage clearance

Page 184: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

165 | P a g e

Appendix 16: Labors Health Checkup Camp

Page 185: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

166 | P a g e

Appendix 17: Contractor Survey for Project Affected Persons

Page 186: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

167 | P a g e

Appendix 18: CTE for Chhindwara STP

Page 187: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

168 | P a g e

Appendix 19: Road Crossing

Details of Road Crossing involved in Chhindwara subproject

S.

No.

Zone M.H.

From

M.H.

to

Length Dia of

pipe

Area

1 1 44 43 20m 150 Narsingpur Road, Ganj

Area

2 1 297 326 20m 400 Narsingpur Road

3 1 559 574 20m 150 Narsingpur Road

4 1 563 564 20m 400 Narsingpur Road

5 1 486 487 20m 200 ChaarFatak, Over

Bridge

6 1 2253 2254 20m 400 ChaarFatak, Over

Bridge

7 1 1707 1706 20m 600 Seoni Road

8 1 2180 2182 20m 150

9 2 2050 5049 20m 200 NGP road Near

Stadium

10 2 4126 4079 20m 150 Jail Chowka

11 2 4141 4093 20m 150 DDC College

12 2 4103 4431 20m 150 PharaChowka

13 2 7643 7325 20m 150 Char Dham Chowk

14 2 7638 8207 20m 150 Co-ed College

Page 188: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

169 | P a g e

Appendix : 20 Treated Effluent standards as per CPCB

Recommended Value under MPUDC

Comparison table of World Bank, CPCB and NGT guidelines

Pollutants Units Guideline

Value as per

WB

Standard

Guideline Value

as per CPCB Standard- 2017

(Adapted by MPUDC)

Recommended

value by NGT

(30.04.2020)

pH pH 6-9 6.5-9 Not recommended

BOD Mg/l 30 10 Less than 10 COD Mg/l 125 50 Not recommended Total Nitrogen Mg/l 10 10 Less than 10 Total Phosphorous Mg/l 2 2 Less than 2 Total Suspended Solids

Mg/l 50 10 Less than 10

Total Coliform Bacteria

MPN/100ml 400 <230 Less than 230

Page 189: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

170 | P a g e

Appendix : 21 Sludge Disposal Plan

Introduction

Sewage sludge consists of by-products of wastewater treatment. It is a mixture of water,

inorganic and organic materials, removed from wastewater coming from various sources

(domestic sewage, industries), storm water run- off from roads and other paved area, through

physical, biological, and/or chemical treatments. Sewage sludge is also referred to as bio-solids.

The unit wastewater is determined considering the proposed improvements to the Water Supply

System, the usage from ground water sources and an appropriate return factor. Infiltration is also

considered and converted to a unit rate. Overall calculations are presented in Table-1.

Table 1 : Per Capita Sewage Generation (for Core area and 7 villages)

Total per capita water supply 135 lpcd

Sewage generation at 80% of the total water supply 108 lpcd

Add for infiltration (10% of wastewater quantity) 10.8 lpcd

Total unit sewage rate being admitted to system 118.8

lpcd

Due to topography and sparse distribution of population, whole Chhindwara Municipal

Corporation (CMC) area cannot be provided with sewerage system without compromising

depths or high numbers of SPS. Additionally, population density is very low in outer areas that

will lead to solid deposition inside sewers. Hence, only part of the villages that can be connected

to city sewerage by gravity is considered. Hence, the proposed "Sewerage Network and STP"

project of Chhindwara Municipal Corporation (CMC) envisages dividing whole town in two

clusters:

Core city and 7 adjacent villages

17 villages merged with CMC in January 2015.

It is proposed to set up 28 MLD capacity sewage treatment plant (STP) in first cluster which is

further divided in two zones based on the topography and from the point of view of techno-

economical collection system and easy maintenance and operation (refer Figure-1). The DPR

envisages construction of Sewage Pumping Station SPS to pump the Sewage collected from

Zone 1 and Zone-2 to the main trunk leading to STP.

Page 190: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

171 | P a g e

Figure-1: Zonation of Chhindwara CMC Area

Proposed Sewerage collection, convey & treatment System

For sewage collection the whole considered area has been divided into two zones. Zone 1 design

population in the year 2048 is 115,020 and Zone 2 population is 175,899. Considering the

techno-economics, for pipes up to 300 mm diameter, has been taken as DWC and above 300 mm

NP-3 concrete pipe has been taken. The minimum diameter of pipe taken is 150 mm and with a

minimum cover of 1.0 m. The maximum diameter of pipe is 1000 mm and depth are 4.8 m. The

total network length is 305.142 km. The details are given in Table-2. Detailed flushing plan is

enclosed as appendix 23.

Table-2: Details of Pipeline Network

S. No. Diameter Length (km)

1. 150 mm 215.75

2. 200 mm 40.485

3. 250 mm 12.00

4. 300 mm 7.33

5. 400 to 1000 mm\ 27.07

Total 302.635

At every 30 m length and change in alignment manhole has been proposed. At certain point

where self-cleaning velocity during initial period is much less than desirable 0.6 m/s; flushing

system is proposed to be constructed. where it will flow up to SPS through gravity. From SPS it

will be pumped to STP by pumping main of DI K-9 of 2.5 km. The proposed Sewerage network

in Chhindwara as Shown in Figure-2.

A 28 MLD capacity sewage treatment plant (STP) is shall be construct to ensure that liquid

effluent received during the design period is treated as per standard of CPCB and discharged into

nearby water body. STP should have enquired treatment unit operations comprising of following

units.

Primary Treatment system

Inlet Chamber

Fine screen

Page 191: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

172 | P a g e

Grit removal Unit

Sequential batch reactor (SBR) – C-TECH

C-Tech is a CYCLIC ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT process. It provides highest

treatment efficiency possible in a single step biological process.

The C-TECH – System is operated in a batch reactor mode this eliminates all the inefficiencies

of the continuous processes. A batch reactor is a perfect reactor, which ensures 100% treatment.

Two or more modules are provided to ensure continuous treatment. The complete process takes

place in a single reactor, within which all biological treatment steps take place sequentially.

No additional settling unit, secondary clarifier is required

The complete biological operation is divided into cycles. Each cycle is of 3 – 5 hrs duration,

during which all treatment steps take place. The Basin operation stages are depicted in Figure-3.

Figure-3: SBR C-Tech basin operation stages

Page 192: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

173 | P a g e

A basic cycle comprises:

Fill-Aeration(F/A)

Settlement (S)

Decanting (D)

These phases in a sequence constitute a cycle, which is then repeated

C hlorination system

Treated sewage from SBR basin flow by gravity into1 unit chlorine contact tank through channel

where chlorine is added for disinfection at suitable dosing rate with 2 numbers of chlorinators

to achieve the desired Fecal Coli-Form Standard.

S ludge Handling Devices

A sludge sump pump is provided to collect sludge generated from SBR and 3 sludge pumps

(2W+ 1 SB) are installed to pump the Sludge. Three numbers of (2W + 1 SB) mechanical dewatering

device are provided to dewater the sludge. Polyelectrolyte is dosed online at the inlet of

centrifuge to enhance sludge dewatering efficiency.

Estimation of Sludge Generation

In Sewage about 99.99% water and 0.01% solid will present. Solid part of sewage is generally

called as sludge, its separation process will be carried out at all stages of treatment, mainly in

Secondary treatment. In physical treatment all floatable particles are separated by screen

chamber and grit particles allow to settle and separated., settled sludge convey to centrifuge

sump. In biological treatment sludge is generated by settlement of activated microorganisms and

nutrients. Partial amount of sludge recirculated in treatment remaining sludge pump in to

centrifuge sump. The details of sludge generation are given in Table-3.

Table-3: Details of Quantity of sludge generation

Actual Oxygen Requirement Calculation

A) Volume of sewage to be treated per day 28 MLD

B) Inlet BOD 220 mg/lit.

C) Outlet BOD 10 mg/lit.

D) BOD Removed= B – C 210 mg/lit.

E) BOD Removed in a day= A X D/ 1000 5880 kg/day

F) Oxygen required for Oxidation of BOD 1.2 kg/kg BOD

G) Oxygen required for oxidation of BOD= E X F 7056 kg/day

Sludge Wasting

A) Specific Sludge Yield considered 0.97 kg/kg BOD

removed

B) BOD Removed 5880 kg/day

C) Excess Sludge to be waste = B X A 5704 kg/day

D) No. of basins provided 4 Nos.

E) Sludge to be wasted = C / D 1426 kg/ day

F) No. of Cycles 8 Cycle/Day/basin

Page 193: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

174 | P a g e

G) Sludge to be wasted per cycle per basin = E/ F 178.25 kg/ day

H) Solid consistency in wasted sludge 0.8 %

I) Specific gravity of sludge 1.00

J) Vol. of sludge wasted per cycle per basin 22.28 m3

K) Considering running time of surplus activated sludge

pump per cycle

135 Min.

Sludge Handling System

Quantity of Sludge from SBR basin 5880 kg/day

Solid consistency of waste sludge considered 0.8 %

Specific Gravity of Sludge 1.00

Volume of sludge to be wasted in a day = 735

30.6255

m3/day

m3/hr

Hydraulic Retention Time provided in Sludge Sump 6 hrs.

Volume of Sludge sump required 184 m3

Centrifuge and Centrifuge Feed Pump

Volume of Sludge to be fed to centrifuge in a day 735 m3/day.

No. of Operative hours of centrifuge considered 20 hr./day

Capacity of centrifuge required 36.75 m3/hr.

Polyelectrolyte Dosing

Quantity of Sludge to be dewatered in a day 5880 Kg/day

Polyelectrolyte dosing 2.5 kg/tonne of dry

solids

Quantity of electrolyte required 14.70 kg/day

Design strength of polyelectrolyte solution 0.1 %

Centrate Sump and Pump House

Quantity of sludge to be fed to centrifuge 5880 Kg/day

Solid consistency of waste sludge considered 0.8 %

Volume of Waste sludge to be fed to the centrifuge 735 m3/day.

Solid concentration of dewatered sludge considered 20 %

Volume of dewatered sludge 29.4 m3/day.

Volume of Centrate sump 705.6 m3/day.

Flow rate of Centrate pump 3.5 m3/hr.

No. of working pumps provided 1 No.

No. of standby pumps provided 1 No.

Capacity of each pump required 50 m3/hr.

Sludge Disposal by Landfilling

In contract agreement 4.16 technical specification, Disposal of Sludge page no 308 it is clearly mentioned

to use landfill process for disposal of sludge

Page 194: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

175 | P a g e

ESTIMATION OF LANDFILL CAPACITY, LANDFILL HEIGHT, LANDFILL AREA

BASIC DATA

Location : Chhindwara

Waste Generation : 29.4 cum /day

Design Life : Active Period = 30 years

LANDFILL CAPACITY, LANDFILL HEIGHT, LANDFILL AREA

Waste Generation Per Year

= 29.4X365

= 10,371cum

Total Waste Generation in 30 Years

= 321930 cum

Volume of Daily Cover

(on the basis of 15 cm soil cover on top and sides for lift height of 1.5 to 2 m)

= 0.1 x 321930

= 32193 cum.

Volume of Liner and Cover Systems

(Total volume required for components of liner system and of cover system (on the assumption of 1.5m

thick liner system (including leachate collection layer) and 1.0 m thick cover system (including gas

collection layer)

= 0.125 x 321930

= 40,241

(k = 0.25 for 10 m high landfill, 0.125 for 20 m high landfill and 0.08 for 30 m high landfill. This is valid

for landfills where width of landfill is significantly larger than the height)

Volume settleable after 30 years

Volume likely to become available within 30 years due to settlement / biodegradation of waste

= 0.3 X 321930.

= 96579 cum

First Estimate of Landfill Volume

Ci = (321930+ 32193+ 40241 – 96579)

= 297785 cum.

Page 195: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

176 | P a g e

Likely Shape of Landfill

Rectangular in plan (length: width = 2:1)

Primarily above ground level, partly below ground level.

Area Restrictions: Nil

Possible Maximum Landfill Height = 20 m

Area Required = (297785)/20

= 14889.25 sqm.

= 85m X 175m

Approximate Plan area = 14875 m2 i.e about 1.488 ha.

Methodology of landfilling

Waste for land filling will be compacted in thin layer using heavy compactors to achieve high density of

the waste. Landfill cell will be covered at the end of each working day with minimum 10 cm of soil, inert

debris or construction materials Prior to commencement of monsoon season, an intermediate cover of 40-

45 cm thickness of soil will be placed on the landfill with proper compaction and grading to prevent

infiltration during monsoon. proper drainage will be constructed to divert runoff away from the active cell

of the landfill. After completion of landfill, a final cover will be designed to minimize infiltration and

erosion.

The specification of final cover is as follows: -

Top cover will have barrier soil layer comprising of 60 cm of clay or amended soil with permeability

coefficient lesser than 1X10-7 cm/sec. On top of the barrier soil layer, there will be drainage layer of

15cm. On top of drainage layer, there will be vegetative layer of 45 cm to support natural plant growth

and minimize erosion.

Transportation

Transport of liquid sludge through tank truck and dewatered sludge in dump trucks are the most

commonly used methods During first decade generation of sludge will be lesser than next decades. In

Centrifuge unit arrangements are made in a way that sludge cakes fall directly in the tractor trolly from

centrifuge unit. Trucks are then transported to the disposal site.

Table-4: Key Aspects to be considered during Sludge Generation

Volume control of hauled

material

Bucket volumetric capacity will no surpassed and free board will be

kept to the top of the bucket /wagon side structure.

Vehicle surface and Tyre

cleaning

Tyre and vehicle surface will be thoroughly washed before leaving

treatment plant.

Covering Although covering the sludge with canvas may not be necessary for

dried sludge with high solid content, but it will be provided to avoid

undesirable situation

Safety locks Safety locks will be verified every time to avoid accidental openings

during sludge transportation. Complete check for all container locks

Page 196: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

177 | P a g e

Location of Disposal

The Chhindwara Municipal Corporation has allotted the land for disposal of sludge at Salimota village,

Mohakheda Thaluq, Chhindwara Dist, Madhya Pradesh 48001. The Site Allotment Letter is enclosed

below. The coordinates of the site are 21.974402 N and 78.919937 E. The total area of the site is 2.086

ha and the Khasra no. is 14/5. The distance from STP to Sludge disposal land will be about 7.4 km. The

Route Map is enclosed as Figure-4.Link

https://www.google.com/maps/@21.9906643,78.9499733,6041m/data=!3m1!1e3

Figure-4: Route Map

will be carried out within plant yard and before truck loading starts

Us of bulk trucks Sludge container will be leak proof and preferably fitted for sludge

transport

Loading and transportation Weather protection will be made for loading in rainy season

Page 197: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

178 | P a g e

CMO Letter for Allotment of Land for sludge Disposal

Page 198: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

179 | P a g e

Site Photographs

Page 199: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

180 | P a g e

Appendix 22: SOPs to respond COVID-19

Page 200: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

181 | P a g e

Page 201: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

182 | P a g e

Page 202: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

183 | P a g e

Page 203: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

184 | P a g e

Page 204: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

185 | P a g e

Page 205: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

186 | P a g e

Page 206: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

187 | P a g e

Page 207: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

188 | P a g e

Page 208: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

189 | P a g e

Page 209: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

190 | P a g e

Appendix :23 Flushing Arrangement Plan for Chhindwara Sewerage

System

A. Need for Flushing

Self-cleansing velocity is not achieved at initial sewer of Chhindwara, the

major reason is population load on the sewerage system, which is less. In

second stage to overcome self-cleansing velocity problem, the minimum

diameter of sewer pipe is considered as 150 mm and maximum slope is

generally considered as 1 in 200 & 250 in this pipe, which is steeper slope.

Even after steep slope provision self-cleansing velocity is not achieved at

initial sewers, therefore, to overcome this problem flushing points are provided

which are mentioned in the design sheet. It is to mention that as per sewer

design (zone1 and 2) for sewer diameter 250 mm and above, 100% self-

cleansing velocity is achieved.

B. Manhole in which flushing required

The Chhindwara sewerage system is divided in two zones and as per approved

design of Chhindwara sewerage system, manhole in which flushing is required

is mentioned in design sheet. In Zone – 1, out of 3230 manholes flushing is

proposed in 273 manholes and in Zone – 2, out of 8380 manholes flushing is

proposed in 1222 manholes. Total number of Manholes required flushing as

per design are 1495, After detailed survey of all 1495 manholes at site level it

is found that about 1252 Manholes, Property Chambers are connecting more

than one septic tank and achieves required self-cleansing velocity therefore

remain 243 Manholes mentioned in Appendix c&d, self-cleansing velocity

achieved by using of Mobile tankers and STP effluent as the source of water

supply.

The Chhindwara sewer system is designed in tree structure and on header

where velocity is less flushing is provided. Example - For Zone - 2 flushing is

provided on Manhole no. 1, 16 and 19 and all falls in Manhole no 4 so till

manhole no 4 effectively three flushing are done. This is general case in

complete Chhindwara sewerage system. As per IS-4111 Part 2, the

approximate quantity of water for different diameter of pipes is given over the

length of 75 to 90 meters. The quantity of flushing water with slope and

diameter is provided in CPHEEO manual for which length b/w two

consecutive flushing points in simultaneous conduits is not provided.

C. Quantity of Water for Flushing

As per CPHEEO manual, the quantity of water needed for flushing is tabulated below

Quantity of water needed for flushing

Page 210: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

191 | P a g e

Quantity of Water in Liters

Slope 200 mm 250 mm 300 mm

1 in 200 2300 2500 3000

1 in 130 1500 1800 2300

1 in 100 1300 1500 2000

1 in 50 500 800 1000

1 in 33 400 500 700

As Chhindwara sewer system is designed for minimum 150 mm diameter of

sewer therefore as per above table about 2000 lit water per manhole will be

required for flushing of manhole. The flushing shall be done once in the 24

hours.

D. Proposal for Flushing

The clause of agreement for flushing arrangement is written as follows –

“7. Flushing Arrangements: -

7.1 Where it is not practicable to obtain gradient in the sewers, steep enough to

give self-cleansing velocity, especially at the top ends of branch sewers which

receive very little flow initially, it will have to be flushed occasionally at

suitable points to keep it reasonably clean from deposition and clogging. In this

regard, the contractor shall consider one or a combination of options such as

(a) construction of special flushing tank (manually operated or automatic

flushing tanks) at suitable points in sewer line, (b) controlled admission of a

limited amount of surface water in sewer line at required point, (c) construction

of flushing manholes at suitable points, (d) use of mobile water tankers to flush

at suitable points following pre-determined schedule considering the growth of

connections and flow, and (e) sewer cleaning equipment, and submit

methodology for keeping the sewers reasonably clean. Sewage treated to the

effluent standards prescribed can also be utilized for transportation by tankers

or using it by other means for flushing purposes. The contractor shall identify

suitable points in the sewerage system pursuant to the methodology submitted

in the technical submission and the number of points keeping in view the

Performance Standards (Fourth Schedule of OMSA) as acceptable to the

owner.”

As per above clause, point (a) construction of flushing tanks is not feasible as

the structure will be placed above ground and majorly the road is narrow at

flushing point locations this will obstruct the traffic and secondly these for

filling of flushing tanks separate pipe line / tankers will be required. Point (b)

surface water will not be available throughout the year the same may be

available for monsoon period only. Point (c) Flushing manholes are also not

suitable as per explanation given for point (a). Point (d) this point is considered

for arrangement of flushing which is explained below

Page 211: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

192 | P a g e

We are submitting our proposal for flushing arrangement -

1. If, Septic tank effluent connect to manhole, no flushing proposed as flow

achieved with less velocity also.

The working septic tanks are identified by physical survey and are mentioned

in the sheet enclosed as Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 for Zone 1 & 2.

Flushing is not proposed in these manholes as solids are less in septic tank

overflow so self-cleansing will be achieved with less velocity.

As per Appendix in Zone -1, 223 number manhole and in zone 2, 1047

number manholes receive the septic tank flow therefore flushing arrangement

is not proposed in the same.

2. If, septic tank is not present then, as per s. no. (d) use of mobile water tankers

to flush at suitable points following pre-determined schedule considering the

growth of connections and flow.

The methodology will be as mentioned in the CPHEEO manual by

positioning a butterfly valve at the head sewer mouth in the manhole and is

kept open by an extended handle, which can be operated from ground level

when the manhole cover is opened. After opening the manhole cover, the

valve is closed by a quarter turn and the manhole is filled with water. After

filling, the valve is opened to enable flushing.

As per Appendix, in Zone -1 and Zone – 2 total 243 manholes are considered

for mobile tanker flushing.

Flushing water required per day for flushing for 243 manholes is worked out as

486 KLD (0.486 MLD) (243 x 2000 lit)

E. Water for Flushing

i. Waste water generated at city area is collected and convey to STP,

influent is treated as per standard method to achieve CPCB norms. Required

quantity of effluent will be used for the flushing of each manhole.

ii. Quantity of Water requirement from STP 243X2000 =486 KLD.

F. Plan for Truck Operation

The tanker of 8000 lit will be filled in average of 20 min and tanker of 6000 lit

will be filled in about 15 min. The detailed plan for truck has been worked out

as per location of flushing point to STP. The average running of truck for

flushing of 3 to 4 manholes will not be greater than the 4 km.

As per above description, on an average Time required for truck to fill,

flush 3-4 manholes in 1.5 hours of time therefore,

Page 212: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

193 | P a g e

Each truck will cover 20 flushing points in 5 trip per day therefore it can

achieve single shift.

i.e 8 hours.

G. Capital and Operational Cost

Capital Cost

For Truck Purchase Rs. 900000 per

truck

13 1,17,00,000/- Appendix – a

B/F Valve for

Manhole

Rs. 10000 per

Manhole

243 24,30,000/- Appendix –b

Others Lump-

sum

4,00,000/-

Rs. In

Lac

145.30000/-

H. O&M Cost

Water Cost Treated Effluent

from STP

0

2 person per truck / day (one shift)

(regular Maintenance staff of zone and

STP will be used for this activity)

Rs. 400 per person for 13 tanker 10,400

Fuel

0.4 lit per trip (average considered 10

km /lit. 4km run per trip)

Rs. 70/lit for 13 tanker 1,820

Power required for pump running

(5HP Pump) min 8hr/day

Rs. 8 / unit Approx. 40 unit /day

320

Total O&M cost per day = 12,540

Total O&M cost per Month = 3,76,200

Regular Maintenance of Tanker and

others

Lumpsum / year 3,00,000

Total O&M cost per

Year

48,14,400

Rs. In Lac 48.14lac

Page 213: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

194 | P a g e

Date : 20/08/2018

To,

HARSHAL JADHAV

LAXMI CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT LTD

PUNE

Dear Sir/Madam,

We are authorized dealer for John Deere for Pune & Mumbai. We are very thankful to you for showing interest in buying John

Deere Tractors. Further to our discussion on this subject, we are sending

you the quotation. Tractor 5036D (HP 36)

QUOTATION:

1) JD 5036D (36 HP)

PARTICULAR Product Specification Price ( Rs )

Basic Billing- Ex Showroom -

John Deer 5036D (36 HP)

6,95,000 /-

All Accessories Included

RTO & Insurance Included

CGST 6% Included

SGST 6% Included

CGST 9% Included

SGST 9% Included

Total 6,95,000/-

Tipping Trailer 2 wheel

PARTICULAR Product Specification Price (Rs) Basic Billing-

Ex Showroom Size: height 46" x

width 58" x length 10

feet, double chassis,

9mm thick, 10-gauge

plate with ladder &

filter. Exel 69" water

proof with color

paint.

2,05,000/-

CGST 9% Included /-

SGST 9% Included /-

TOTAL 2,05,000/-

Page 214: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

195 | P a g e

Terms and Conditions:

• The tractor is readily available. This quotation and the above rates are valid till

31 AUG 2018.

• Delivery period 7 To 10 days Booking amount is 100%

• Three years warranty and 8 services free (Only Labour Charges Free)

• Commercial RTO & Insurance Extra at actual

Other information about the tractor company and the dealership M/s Kamal Motors is a leading tractor dealer for John Deere Tractors at Pune.

The company is known for rugged and technically advanced quality products. Our

service-oriented approach has helped us to be the most promising player in the

tractor industry in India. The market share in Maharashtra has surged threefold in

last three years. John Deere is a pioneer in tractor manufacturing in the world and

the Indian plant is located in Pune (Sanaswadi). You can learn more about our

company and the John Deere’s products at our website www.kamalmotors.in and

www.johndeere.co.in .

You are welcome to contact Mr Pandit Dudhale 91-9922909241 for any further

queries about the John Deere tractors/ farm implements, discount/ cash discount

and the tractor exchange scheme.

We eagerly await your response.

Thanks, and regards.

Mr. Pandit Dudhale Kamal Motors (Authorized Dealer For John Deere India Pvt. Ltd.)

Kamal Bagh, Wagholi, Tal. Haveli, Dist. Pune-412207

Email : [email protected]

Mob : +91-9922909241/9922927542

Page 215: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

196 | P a g e

Page 216: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

197 | P a g e

Page 217: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

198 | P a g e

Page 218: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

199 | P a g e

Page 219: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

200 | P a g e

Appendix :24 Labour Management Procedures

1. INTRODUCTION

The Labour Management Procedures (LMP) is developed to manage and mitigate potential

risks under the Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Project, funded by the World Bank. The

LMP sets out the Project’s approach to meeting state and central government requirements as

well as the objectives of the World Bank’s Environmental and Social Framework.

2. OVERVIEW OF LABOUR USE ON THE SUB PROJECT CHINDWARA

Number of Project Workers: Maximum total number of 70 labour is to be engaged in a day at all

project sites combined including Sewerage Treatment Plant, IPS and sewerage network.

Characteristics of Project labour: Labour Management Plan and procedure applies to all project

workers, weather full time/ Part time, temporary, seasonal or migrant workers. Given the nature

of the project workforce (mostly semiskilled construction labour) and characteristics of the

labour force market in MP, it is likely that the workforce, especially the lower-skilled workers,

are predominantly male. The majority of Labour are locally hired with the exception of a few

skilled workers. Provisions are made for training and Capacity development and hire as many as

possible from local communities where the activities are taking place.

Timing of Labour Requirements: The workers will generally be required full time for the

project duration. Civil Works contract workers will be as per the requirement . Duration of the

engagement of labour will be based on the duration of respective sub-components of the project

or full project tenure.

3. ASSESSMENT OF KEY POTENTIAL LABOUR RISKS

Potential Labour Risks:

Labour risks associated with contracted workers at subproject level: Subprojects is being

implemented by M/S Laxmi Civil Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and most contracted workers are

being hired locally. All contractors are having written agreement for subletting the activities in

line with objective of MP UDP .

Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) risks are low to moderate in the Sewerage Treatment

Plant, and Underground Drainage of Chhindwara . Since the majority of contracted workers are

unskilled and untrained local population, however, risk remains that some incidence may occur

that lead to injuries.

Employment risks: Workers are being hired by the contractor, either directly as project staff

or indirectly as part of contracts with Consultants or service providers. The practice shows that

civil works subcontractors do practice a Labour contract with a lump-sum payment for a certain

type of service or scope of work.

(Remark: Detailed guidelines on OHS are being enclosed as Appendix 26 of C-ESA report) 4. BRIEF OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL LEGISLATION

Following acts are applicable:- • Minimum Wages Act 1948 • Payment of Wages Act, 1936 • The Payment of Bonus Act 1965 • Employees provident fund Act 1952

Page 220: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

201 | P a g e

• The Workman Compensation Act, 1923 • Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of

Service) Act, 1979 • MP Building and other constriction workers Act (Regulation of Employment and Conditions

of Service) 1996. • Sexual Harassment of women at workplace Act, 2013 • Child Labour (Prohibition and regulation) Act,1986 • The contract Labour (regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970

Remark: The Chapter no. 3rd of C-ESA may be referred for more detail information regarding the labour

laws and policies applicable in the project.

5. RESPONSIBLE STAFF

Project Manager of Contractor’s Team are accountable and responsible for all the workers

associated with the project. Social and Environmental specialists of Contractor‘s , Project

Manager of Project Implementation Unit‘s and Team of Project Management Consultants are

jointly responsible for the following : • Implement this labour management procedure. • Ensure that civil works contractors comply with these labour management procedures, and

also prepare occupational health and safety plans before mobilizing to the field. • Ensure the contracts with the contractors are developed in line with the provisions of this

LMP and the project’s ESMF/ESMP. • Monitor contractors and subcontractors’ implementation of labour management procedures. • Monitor compliance with occupational health and safety standards at all workplaces in line

with state and National government labour legislation. • Monitor and implement training on LMP and OHS for project workers. • Ensure that the grievance redress mechanism for project workers is established and

implemented and that workers are informed of its purpose and how to use it. • Have a system for regular monitoring and reporting on labour and occupational safety and

health performance. • Occupational health and safety (OHS) , Training of workers (Tool Box Etc.) are being dealt

by Health and safety officer /Environmental of contractor. 6. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

• As specified in the labour Code, employment of project workers are based on the principles of non- discrimination and equal opportunity. There will be no discrimination with respect to any aspects of the employment relationship, including recruitment, compensation, working conditions and terms of employment, access to training, promotion or termination of employment. The following measures are being followed by contractors and implement and monitored by the PIU’s & PMC Social Safeguards Specialists, to ensure fair treatment of all labour:

• Recruitment procedures will be transparent, public and non-discriminatory, and open with respect to ethnicity, religion, sexuality, disability or gender.

• Applications for employment will only be considered if submitted via the official application procedures established by the contractors.

• Clear job descriptions will be provided in advance of recruitment and will explain the skills required for each post.

• All workers will have written contracts describing terms and conditions of work and will have the contents explained to them. Workers will sign the employment contract.

• Unskilled labour will be preferentially recruited from the surrounding communities.

Page 221: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

202 | P a g e

• The contracted workers will not be required to pay any hiring fees. If any hiring fees are to be incurred, these will be paid by the Employer.

• Depending on the origin of the employer and employee, employment terms and conditions will be communicated in two languages, in the state language and the language that is understandable to both parties.

• In addition to written documentation, an oral explanation of conditions and terms of employment will be provided to workers who may have difficulty understanding the documentation.

• All workers will be 18 years old or above for civil works. • Work hours are set 8 hours a day, 48 hours a week, with a weekly rest day for engaged

labours. 7. AGE OF EMPLOYMENT

• Contractor will ensure that no construction workers under 18 years are employed. • Contractors will be required to verify and identify the age of all workers through proper

documentary evidence. The penalty procedure are being followed if underage workers are found working on the project

8. TERMS AND CONDITIONS

• The employment terms and conditions applying to contractor’s team members are being set out in this document. These internal labour rules will apply to all who are assigned to work on the project.

• Labour wages, hours and other applied provisions are as per the standard labour law and policies. Work hours are set 8 hours a day, 48 hours a week, with a weekly rest day for engaged labours.

9. GRIEVANCE MECHANISM

• A grievance mechanism is a procedure that provides a clear and transparent framework for addressing grievances related to the recruitment process and in the workplace. This typically takes the form of an internal procedure for complaints as well as external process, followed by consideration and management response and feedback system.

• A common grievance mechanism (GM) is already developed by MPUDC for stakeholders including all types of workers to raise workplace concerns. GM is accessible to all labour, worker, employees and community through various means (written, telephone, fax, social media and online through CM Helpline etc). Grievance logbook is maintained in site office.

10. CONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT

• Construction and other contracts include provisions related to labour and occupational health and safety as provided in the World Bank Standard Documents and state/Central Government Legislation.

• Contractor will manage and monitor the performance of contractors in relation to contracted workers, focusing on compliance by contractors with their contractual agreements (obligations, representations, and warranties) and labour management procedures. This includes inspections, and/or spot checks of project locations and work sites as well as of labour management records and reports compiled by contractors. Contractors’ labour management records are being maintained by contractor and reviewed and monitored by PIU and PMC.

Page 222: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

203 | P a g e

Appendix :25 Grievance Redressal Format for the complaints received

(To be completed by the concerned PIU/ Contractor)

Name of town & Package No.

Project Name

Name of Project Manager & Concerned PIU

Name of Contractor & his Project Manager

Name of Complainant & his status (citizen/

official of ULB or any other organization/

others)

Number (given in the register) of the

complaint

Nature of Complaint (Safety issue/ utility

breakage/ accident/ quality related/

restoration/ damage to structure / others)

Date of Complaint

Date of Complaint informed to contractor

Time required/ given to contractor for

resolution (in case of safety &/or accidents,

the time given shall be immediate but not

exceeding 5 hours)

Complaint attended Date of Start

Action Taken

Date of closing of

complaint

Whether the complaint is attended in time Yes / No

If the complaint is not attended in time,

whether the complainant was informed. If

yes, when and how. If not, why

Signature of the contractor’s representative

Reconciliation from the complainant Date

Reconciliation Done by

(Name)

Statement of aggrieved

(Satisfied / Not Satisfied)

Name & Signature of PMC representative

Name & Signature of PIU representative

Page 223: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

204 | P a g e

Appendix 26: Guidelines for the Management of Environmental, Health and Safety

in the Project construction sites

Background

Madhya Pradesh is geographically the second largest, fifth populous, and eighth most

urbanized state in India. Rapid urbanization in MP has seen sprouting of new urban

settlements across the state, more often close to existing cities. To respond to the

challenges of urbanization, State government undertook an ambitious program with the

support of World Bank called Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Programme

(MPUDP). This program focused on accessing urban sector central schemes, and setting-

up three state missions to respond to the needs of towns not covered under the central

schemes. Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company (MPUDC) is implementing the

MPUDP in the state.

Construction work can be particularly hazardous and accident prone. Personal protective

equipment, fire safety, electrical safety, confined space entry, emergency preparedness,

biological safety, chemical safety, hazardous waste disposal, vehicle safety and other

precautions are essential for safe construction work.

In this context, the Project Monitoring Unit of MPUDP decided to develop a detailed

guideline to ensure the quality standards for effective management of Environment,

Health and Safety issues in the implementation of World Bank supported MPUDP. All

contractors in projects are responsible for implementing the guidelines in their respective

projects.

These guidelines are not intended to be a step‐by‐step procedure for each activity. It is a

guideline document that outlines general activities, procedures, and requirements for all

the projects throughout the construction phase of the sub projects. These procedures must

always be read and implemented in conjunction with the related Contract Conditions. The

construction works shall be undertaken in accordance with Environmental, Health and

Safety guidelines under the World Bank supported subproject.

The guidelines are organized are as follows;

1. Personal Protective Equipment’s

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) provides additional protection to workers exposed to

workplace hazards in conjunction with other facility controls and safety systems. The contractor

shall provide required PPEs to workmen to protect against safety and/or health hazards.

Primarily PPEs are required for the following protection:

✓ Head Protection (Safety helmets)

✓ Foot Protection (Safety footwear, Gumboot, etc.)

✓ Body Protection (High visibility clothing (waistcoat/jacket), Apron, etc.)

✓ Personal fall protection (Full body harness, Rope‐gap fall arrester, etc.)

✓ Eye Protection (Goggles, Welders glasses, etc.)

✓ Hand Protection (Gloves, Finger coats, etc.)

✓ Respiratory Protection. (Nose mask, SCBAs, etc.)

Page 224: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

205 | P a g e

✓ Hearing Protection (Ear plugs, Ear muffs, etc.)

• Site EHS officer should be maintained record of issue and replacement PPE.

• Store in charge must maintain 10 % extra PPE of total requirement available in the

store.

• To employee and workers must issue the PPEs without any charge. Workers/Sub-

contractor should deposit the PPE after completion of their work or no longer use.

• EHS officer should train workers for the use of PPE.

• PPE compliances should be checked during routine inspection, Safety audit etc.

• Safety shoes and helmet are mandatory PPE during construction work. All employees

must wear helmet and safety shoes in all construction project area. No one should be

permitted to enter the site without helmet and safety shoes.

• Occasional visitors should be provided helmet from security main gate during

construction project round. Safety shoes cannot be insisted upon for such occasional

visitors who are on construction project round. Normal shoes can be considered

adequate for such occasional visitors.

• Safety helmets should be worn with chin straps in accordance with the following color

code:

• All Site-based personnel and visitors to Site must ensure that suitable PPE is worn at

all times while on the construction site. Additional PPE must be kept an appropriate to

the location.

• Proper maintenance of PPE, including cleaning when dirty and replacement when

damaged or worn out. Proper use of PPE should be part of the recurrent training

programs for employees

2. Health and Safety

• All the contractor must prepare Environmental, Health and Safety Plan for their

respective project construction site under World Bank Project.

• Smoking and eating should be prohibited throughout the workplace except in

designated areas.

• Adequate internal and external lighting should be provided by all Contractors at all

workspaces.

• All portable electrical equipment should not exceed 220 volts with effective Safety

Trip system excluding portable welding sets.

• Only qualified electrician is authorized for any electrical connection, disconnection

and maintenance work.

• Instructions given on safety signs must be adhered to at all times.

• Safety sign, Posters and barricades should not be replaced or remove without

permission from the EHS officer/ nominated person for EHS.

• Fire extinguishers must not be removed from their designated places except for

extinguishing. Location of fire extinguisher must be clearly marked and known to all.

• Any person working on or near operational plant or equipment must be competent and

trained in such work.

• Do not allow to touch any hazardous chemicals or unknown item at site except

concerned person.

Page 225: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

206 | P a g e

• Work place should be kept neat & clean. Wastage/Debris should be collected at

identified areas after the completion of work on daily basis.

• Access should be free from any obstruction at site.

• Only authorized person should be allowed to sit along with driver on the machinery (if

required).

• During heavy rain, improper lighting, heavy wind blowing at site, nobody should be

allowed to work at height.

• Horse playing, Fighting, Gambling and possession or used of firearms, ammunition,

alcoholic beverages and illegal drugs should be prohibited at work site. Any person

found in possession of or under the influence of controlled substance or alcohol will be

immediately removed from site.

• Report all injuries to Project in charge immediately, no matter how slight they may be.

• Security personnel should be deployed at security posts\ gates and around affected

area.

• No Alcoholic beverages or illegal drugs are permitted on work site. The contractor

should ensure that personnel is made aware of and fully comply with this prohibition

• Security guards must be ensured no such persons or workers be allowed to the work

site during non-working hours, especially if they drunk.

• Un authorized person should not be allowed in the work site without permission from

the concerned authority.

• All workmen should be screened before engaging them on the job. Physical fitness of

the person to certain jobs like working at height or other dangerous locations to be

ensured before engaging the person on work. The final decision rests with the site

management to reject any person on the ground of physical fitness.

• Workmen under 18 years of age should not be employed at site. No children should be

permitted inside the working area.

• Crèche should be provided in workmen colony if female workers is engaged, At

construction sites where 20 or more women are ordinarily employed, a hut for children

under the age of 6 years shall be provided.

• Contractor should ensure adequate supervision at workplace to the workers.

supervisors should ensure that all persons working under them should not create any

hazards to self or to co-workers.

• Nobody is allowed to work without wearing safety helmet. Chinstrap of safety helmet

should be always on.

• Usage of eye protection equipment should be ensured when workmen are engaged for

grinding, shipping, welding and gas-cutting. For other jobs as and when site safety

coordinator insists eye protection has to be provided.

• All the dangerous moving parts of the portable / fixed machinery being used should be

adequately guarded.

• Other than the electricians with red helmet no one is allowed to carry out electrical

connections, repairs on electrical equipment or other jobs related thereto.

• Power supply should be taken through Earth Leakage Circuit Breakers (ELCB) of

30mA Sensitivity.

Page 226: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

207 | P a g e

• Inserting of bare wires for tapping the power from electrical sockets is completely

prohibited at the project site.

• All major, minor accidents and near misses to be reported to Project Manager / Site

Safety coordinator to enable the management to take necessary steps to avoid the

recurrence.

• Adequate firefighting equipment should be made available at workplace and persons

are to be trained in firefighting techniques with the co-ordination of Site Safety

Coordinator.

• All the unsafe conditions, unsafe acts identified by contractors, reported by site

supervisors should be noted down and / or safety personnel to be corrected on priority

basis.

• Littering at site is prohibited so that the work area is clean.

• Do not allow to spill any chemical / fuel / substances on ground, which may pollute

the environment

• Full body harness should be tied to safe anchoring point.

3. Working at Height

• No one should be allowed to work at or more than two meters height without wearing

safety belt and anchoring the lanyard of safety belt to firm support preferably at

shoulder level. The full body harness with double lanyard should be worn by worker

working above 2 meters.

• Ladders being used at site should be adequately secured at bottom and top.

• Material should not be thrown from heights. If required the area should be barricaded

and one person should be posted outside the barricade for preventing the trespassers

from entering the area.

• All scaffoldings / work-platforms should be strong enough to take the expected load.

The width of the working platform and fall protection arrangements should be

maintained as per recommendation of Site Safety coordinator.

• Female workmen are not allowed to work on height & high-risk areas.

• The horizontal life line with adequate strength should be provided or used for the

intended purpose only.

• The Contractor shall ensure that work is not carried out at height where it is reasonably

practicable to carry out the work safely otherwise than at height.

4. Barricades

• The Contractor shall ensure the general construction area is protected; barricades must

be erected before any excavation, extended as the excavation progresses and

maintained until the project is completed.

• The Contractor shall furnish, erect, and maintain all the necessary signs, barricades,

lighting, fencing, bridging, and flaggers that conform to the requirements set forth by

OSHA.

• All the project construction sites should be fenced and barricaded with appropriate

standards as prescribed in OSHA (WTP/STP, OHTs, IPSs, MPSs store etc.).

✓ Stairways

✓ Hatches

✓ Chutes/open trenches

Page 227: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

208 | P a g e

✓ Street openings – manholes.

✓ Elevated platforms

✓ Areas with moving machinery

✓ Excavation sites

✓ Construction sites

✓ Temporary wall or floor openings

• The following list provides guidelines for using barriers and guards:

✓ When necessary, reroute pedestrian and vehicular traffic to completely avoid a

construction site.

✓ Guard any permanent ground opening into which a person could fall with a

guardrail, load-bearing cover, or other physical barrier.

✓ Ensure that temporary floor openings, such as pits and open manholes, are guarded

by secure, removable guardrails. If guardrails are not available, have someone

guard the opening.

✓ Ensure that all stairways, ladderways, hatchways, or chute floor openings have

handrails or hinged covers.

✓ Ensure that enclosed stairways with four or more steps have at least one railing,

and that open stairways with four or more steps have two railings.

✓ Ensure that all platforms and walkways that are elevated or located next to moving

machinery are equipped with handrails, guardrails, and toe boards.

✓ Barricade any wall openings through which a person or tools could fall. Use gates,

doors, guardrails, or other physical barriers to block the opening.

✓ Mark and guard any excavation that is deeper than 12 inches.

✓ Mark and/or guard potholes and sidewalk damage as appropriate.

✓ Protect smoke detectors with some type of cover when construction work, such as

dust or fume producing activities, may affect smoke detectors.

✓ Barriers such as guardrails, hole cover, or other must be provided with suitable

signage.

• A warning barricade should be kept five (5) feet back from the edge of any excavation,

hole, platform or roof. A protective barricade may be placed closer, Barricades should

be erected before a hole is cut and extended as the excavation progresses.

• Wherever construction debris is dropped without the use of an enclosed chute.

• Work areas for electrical equipment with exposed energized parts.

• The swing radius of the rotating superstructure of cranes or other equipment.

• Wherever equipment is left unattended near a roadway at night.

• Construction areas in energized electrical substations.

• Barricade signs should be fully informative, legible and visibility displayed (during

day & night both).

• Where barricades cannot be installed, safety nets should be installed close to the level

of terrace at which danger of fall exists.

• Barricades can be removed after restoration/filling the cut outs/ trenches.

• Where secured foot hold is impracticable, safety belt with secure anchorage

arrangement should be provided. A life line with sufficient strength should be

provided all around the building to which the workers exposed to the risk of falling tie

the hooks of their safety belts.

Page 228: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

209 | P a g e

5. Stacking

• Construction materials should not be allowed to stored/scattered in the towns as per

their convenience.

• PIU and PMC must ensure all the construction materials stored at designated place by

the contractor.

• Materials should be segregated as per size and length and category and placed in neat,

orderly piles that are safe against falling. If the piles are high, they should be stepped

back at suitable intervals in height. Piles of materials should be arranged so as to allow

a passageway of not less than 1m width in between the piles or stacks for inspection

and removal. All passageways should be kept clear.

• Materials should be stacked on well drained, firm and unyielding surface. Material

should not be stacked so as to impose any undue stresses on walls or other structures.

• Materials should be stacked in such a manner as not to constitute a hazard to passer-

by.

• When the materials have to be handled manually, each workman should be instructed

by his foreman or supervisor in the proper method of lifting heavy objects.

• Workmen should be provided with suitable equipment for his personal safety as

necessary. Supervisors should also take care to assign enough men to each lifting job;

the weight carried by each man should be determined by the distance to be moved,

difficulty of movement presented, time required, etc.

• Whenever any stack exceeds 1.5 m height, suitable and safe means of access should be

provided for the use of workmen and such means of access should not disturb the

stability of the stack.

• Appropriate signs should be placed at all storage locations where special conditions

exist or where special precautions are necessary.

• No section of the plant or other structure or part of a structure or sites should be left

unguarded in such condition that it may fall, collapse or be weakened due to wind

pressure or vibration.

6. Heavy Equipment Safety

• When using heavy equipment, there are five basic guidelines that employees must

always follow to ensure safety:

✓ Know how to properly operate the equipment you are using. Training on proper

operation should be documented.

✓ Do not use heavy machinery when you are drowsy, intoxicated, or taking

prescription medication that may affect your performance.

✓ Use only equipment that is appropriate for the work to be done.

✓ Inspect your equipment to ensure that it is in good working condition before

beginning a job. In addition, ensure that regular inspections and maintenance are

conducted as appropriate.

✓ Do not stress or overload your equipment.

• Accidents do not just happen, they are caused. Therefore, employees should also

follow these guidelines:

✓ Ensure the following before leaving equipment unattended:

✓ All buckets, blades, etc. are on the ground.

✓ Transmission is in neutral.

Page 229: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

210 | P a g e

✓ Engine is off

✓ Equipment is secure against movement.

✓ Never get on or off moving equipment.

✓ Do not attempt to lubricate or adjust a running engine

✓ Turn the engine off before refueling.

✓ Keep all shields and safety guards in place.

✓ Avoid underground utilities and overhead power lines.

• The following sections provide basic guidelines for working with forklifts, frontend

loaders, and backhoes. Refer to the product documentation that accompanied your

equipment for more information and specific instructions.

• Always lower the bucket before servicing the equipment or leaving the loader

unattended.

• Be extremely careful when operating near banks and slopes.

• When cutting a bank, be careful not to cause a cave-in. Do not drive on an overhang.

Be extremely careful when operating near banks and slopes.

• When cutting a bank, be careful not to cause a cave-in. Do not drive on an overhang.

7. Trenching

• Provides requirements for employee entrance, working environment, and egress

to/from open surface trenches and excavations

• The estimated location of utility installations such as sewer, telephone, fuel, electric,

water lines, or other underground installations that reasonably may be encountered

during excavation work shall be determined prior to opening an excavation

• Utility companies or utility locator should be contacted to precisely locate such

utilities Excavation may proceed with CAUTION if:

• Utility Company/Locator cannot be located or contacted

• Utility Company/Locator cannot locate utility

• When excavating operations approach the location of underground utilities, the exact

location shall be determined by safe and acceptable mean

• While excavation is open, underground installations shall be protected, supported, or

removed as necessary to safeguard employees

• Runways/ramps shall be anchored to prevent movement or slipping

• Employees exposed to public vehicular traffic shall be provided with and wear vest or

other suitable garments marked with high visibility materials

• No employee shall be permitted underneath loads handled by digging or lifting

equipment

• Employees entering bell-bottomed holes shall wear harness and life line protection

• Excavations near structures or buildings shall be protected by shoring or other means

to assure stability of the affected structure.

• Excavations near foundation footings, sidewalks, pavement, or other appurtenant

structures shall be protected by underpinning or other suitable means to maintain

stability

• Excavated materials shall be kept a minimum of 2’ from the edge of excavations or by

the use of retaining devices

8. Emergency

Page 230: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

211 | P a g e

• All the contractor must prepare Emergency Preparedness Plan for their respective

project construction site under World Bank Project.

• Mobilized the fire squad (security) at emergency site.

• Cordon off the affected area and guide traffic / emergency vehicles and control

unnecessary gathering of persons around the site.

• Ensure vigilance at security posts / gates and be in constant contact with construction

manager / area manager and other numbers connected with safety, security,

firefighting and management.

• Entries to the demolition area should be restricted except authorized persons only.

• As the height work of OHTs, intake well, STPs etc. extra safety precaution should be

made available, Extra safety precaution mean appropriate safety nets, proper use of

safety belt, proper platform, lifeline rope to be tied at proper place etc. should be

provided.

9. Housekeeping

• All the contractor must prepare excess earth/debris and other construction materials

disposal Plan for their respective project construction site under World Bank Project.

• Adequate time shall be assigned to ensure that good housekeeping is maintained.

• This shall be carried out by team of housekeeping squad.

• The contractor shall be responsible to provide segregated containers for disposal of

debris at required places and regular cleaning of the same.

• Proper and safe stacking of material are of paramount importance at yards, stores and

such locations where material would be unloaded for future use. The storage area shall

be well laid out with easy access and material stored / stacked in an orderly and safe

manner.

• Flammable chemicals / compressed gas cylinders shall be safely stored.

• Unused/surplus cables, steel items and steel scrap lying scattered at different places

within the working areas shall be removed to the identified location(s).

• All wooden scrap, empty wooden cable drums and other combustible packing

materials, shall be removed from work place to the identified location(s).

• Empty cement bags, if any and other packaging material shall be properly stacked and

removed.

• The Contractor shall ensure that all his sub‐contractors maintain the site reasonably

clean through provisions related to housekeeping.

• The contractor at all times should keep the premises free from accumulation of waste

materials or rubbish caused by their operations.

• Keep the premises clean and free from fire hazards, and maintain the work and

materials stockpiles neat and orderly throughout the construction period to permit safe

and convenient access and movement of workers.

• Water sprinkling should be done to prevent the spread of debris, dust or other

contaminants into the air or surrounding areas at all times.

• Construction debris and rubbish as generated by construction activity should be

removed by contractor daily and not allowed to accumulate. It shall be deposited in a

designated place.

Page 231: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

212 | P a g e

• Scrap materials for reuse in temporary work shall be segregated and properly stored,

protected and covered as for new materials.

• Construction debris removed from the upper levels of the site shall be deposited

directly into a Dump sites and it should be transported through covered truck.

• The contractor should remove from the premises and site, all project signs, tools,

scaffolding, surplus materials and temporary work and structures upon completion of

the work and shall leave the work and the premises clean and acceptable to the owner.

• All surplus earth and debris are removed/disposed off from the working areas to

officially designated dumpsites. Trucks carrying sand, earth and any pulverized

materials etc. in order to avoid dust or odour impact shall be covered while moving.

• The tyres of the trucks leaving the site shall be cleaned with water, wherever the

possibility of spillage on carriageways meant for regular road traffic exists.

10. Traffic Management

• Construction activities may result in a significant increase in movement of heavy

vehicles for the transport of construction materials and equipment increasing the risk

of traffic-related accidents and injuries to workers and local communities.

• The incidence of road accidents involving project vehicles during construction should

be minimized through a combination of education and awareness-raising, and the

adoption of traffic safety rules and standard procedures

• All the contractor must prepare Traffic Management Plan for their respective project

construction site under World Bank Project.

• Contractor shall control the Traffic Management by designated site staff.

• Warn the road user clearly and sufficiently in advance.

✓ Provide safe and clearly marked lanes for guiding road users.

✓ Provide safe and clearly marked buffer and work zones

✓ Provide adequate measures that control driver behavior through construction

zones.

✓ Provide additional support in the form of a flag man at all times, to assist the

operator of the equipment or a heavy transport vehicle

• Warning signs shall be displayed in the area wherever required such as deep

excavation, work at height or any other area pointed out PIU.

• Materials hanging over / protruded from the chassis / body of any vehicle especially

• During material handling shall be indicated by red indicator (red light/flag) to indicate

the caution to the road users.

• No parking of trucks/trolleys, cranes and trailers etc. shall be allowed on roads, which

may obstruct the traffic movement.

11. Temporary Signs

• The Contractor shall provide sign boards mentioning work area or temporary facility

area. These signboards shall be properly displayed in appropriate locations.

• The signboard shall be prepared by experienced signboard manufacturer. It shall

contain the description in English, Hindi and local language. It shall also contain

relevant and appropriate graphics.

12. Routine Inspection

Page 232: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

213 | P a g e

• Inspections by the contractor and PIU and PMC Team that can be classified under this

inspection program are:

✓ Daily Inspection of site, plant and equipment (before the start of day)

✓ Weekly Inspection of scaffold

✓ Monthly Inspection of electrical hand tools by competent electrical supervisor

✓ Quarterly Inspection of temporary electrical systems by competent electrical

supervisor

✓ Half‐yearly inspection of lifting machinery, lifting appliances and equipment etc.

by competent person. The list mentioned above is not exhaustive. Contractor may

add additional categories.

13. Education and Training.

• Daily basic Tool Box Training should be carryout by the contractors at site before start

of the work

• EHS officer should conduct training on EHS in regular interval

• Monthly safety meeting should be conducted by the contractor

• Motivational program for improve & implement Safety at site should be conducted by

the contractors

14. First‐aid and Medical Facilities.

• All the contractor must ensure the availability of adequate number of first Aid facility

at respective project construction site under World Bank Project.

• Contractor can tie up with the local hospital for workers health checkup and

emergency treatment facility.

• Constructor ensure the availability of ambulance at construction site in case of

emergency.

• The Constructor will carry out quarterly awareness programme of HIV‐AIDS with the

help of AIDS control society and contractor must organize Health check-up camp for

their site workers at least once in a year.

15. Environmental Management.

15.1 Air Quality

• The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to minimise fugitive dust emissions

from operations involving excavation, grading, and clearing of land and disposal of

waste. He shall not allow emissions of fugitive dust from any transport, handling,

construction or storage activity to remain visible in atmosphere beyond the property

line of emission source for any prolonged period of time without notification to the

Employer.

• The Contractor shall use construction equipment designed and equipped to minimize

or control air pollution.

• The Contractor shall cover loads of dust generating materials like debris and soil being

transported from construction sites. All trucks carrying loose material should be

covered and loaded with sufficient free ‐ board to avoid spills through the tailboard or

sideboards.

• The Contractor shall promptly transport all excavation disposal materials of whatever

kind so as not to delay work on the project. Stockpiling of materials shall only be

allowed at sites designated by the Employer. The Contractor shall place excavation

Page 233: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

214 | P a g e

materials in the dumping/disposal areas designated in the plans as given in the

specifications.

• The Contractor shall water down construction sites as required to suppress dust, during

handling of excavation soil or debris or during demolition. The Contractor shall make

water sprinklers, water supply and water delivering equipment available at any time

that it is required for dust control use. Dust screens shall be used, as feasible when

additional dust control measures are needed especially where the work is near

sensitive receptors.

• The Contractor should carryout and submit to MPUDC Ambient Air Monitoring as per

contract specific Environment Management Plan and follow guidelines for

construction activity in related to monitoring, controlling and mitigating air pollution.

15.2 Water Quality

• The Contractor must comply with the requirements of the Central Ground Waterboard

for discharge of water arising from dewatering. Any water obtained from dewatering

systems installed in the works must be either re‐used for construction purposes and

this water may subsequently be discharged to the drainage system or, if not re‐used,

recharged to the ground water at suitable aquifer levels. The Contractor shall not be

permitted to directly discharge, to the drainage system, unused ground water obtaining

from the excavation without obtaining approval of PIU or the Agency controlling the

system

• The Contractor shall discharge/disposal wastewater arising out of site office, canteen

or toilet facilities constructed by him into sewers through a wastewater drainage

system to be constructed by the Contractor for proper discharge, after obtaining prior

approval of PIU.

• The Contractor shall take measures to prevent discharge of oil and grease during

spillage from reaching drainage system or any water body. Oil removal /interceptors

shall be provided to treat oil waste from workshop areas etc.

• The Contractor shall apply to the appropriate authority for installing bore wells for

water supply at site.

15.3 Felling of Trees

• The contractor shall identify the number and type of trees that are require to be felled

as a result of construction of works and facilities related to Project with joint

verification of PIU and PMC.

• All trees and shrubbery, which are not specifically require to be cleared or removed for

construction purposes, shall be preserved and shall be protected from any damage that

may be caused by Contractor’s construction operations and equipment. The contractor

shall not fell, remove or dispose of any tree or forest produce in any land handed over

to him for the construction of works and facilities related to subproject except with the

previous permission obtained from the concerned authority.

• The PIU shall assist the Contractor in obtaining the Applicable Permits for felling of

trees to be identified for this purpose if and only if such trees cause a Material Adverse

Effect on the construction or maintenance of the Project Works.

• Special care shall be exercised where trees or shrubs are exposed to injuries by

construction equipment, trenching, excavating, dumping, construction, chemical

damage or other operation and the Contractor shall adequately protect such trees by

Page 234: ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

ESA Report: Chhindwara Sewerage Scheme

215 | P a g e

used of protective barriers or other methods approved by the Employer. Trees shall not

be used for anchorage.

• The contractor will develop green belt/ buffer area in the proposed project component

sites as STP, IPS/SPS etc.

16. General

• Person / equipment / material should enter & exit the site only through the gate

designated. Only license holder driver / operator should be allowed to operate any

vehicle /Machinery. All vehicle /machinery should be inspected by a competent person

prior to use.

• PIU and PMC will ensure that the labor engaged by the contractor is paid regularly as

per prevailing labor laws, and that no arrears are allowed to accumulate on this

account.

• Regular working hour shall be 9.00 am to 6.00 pm including one hour for lunch on all

working days. Working days at site shall be from Monday to Saturday i.e. 06 days in a

week

• Access and egress routes for construction personnel, visitors and delivery vehicles

shall be tentatively developed by the Contractor to suit acknowledged constraints and

conditions. The vehicles shall be parked in the designated area only. Parking for site

operatives must be organized by the Main Contractor to ensure that there is no

inconvenience to local residents. Car parking will not be permitted on work site.

• The Contractor shall ensure at all times that no employee is working under the

influence of alcohol / drugs which are punishable under Govt. regulations.

17. OHS team of Contractor

• Mr. N.P. Josi - Environment and Safety Engineer

• Mr. Suraj - Site Engineer

• Mr. Praful Sontakke - Project Manager and Coordinator