envc case 13 grp 3
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
1/21
Group-3
Anil Kumar
Chandana
Pradeep
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
2/21
Introduction The research has been characterized in 3 parts:
Need to "put boundaries on our ignorance
Understanding the market and identify mechanisms bywhich it could be made to work more efficiently andeffectively
Third, and partly as a consequence of these two trends,research on informal venture capital has not beencharacterized to date by a high level of theoreticalsophistication, although recent research has considered theapplicability of the pecking order hypothesis decision theory,the economic analysis of altruism, and agency theory
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
3/21
Characteristics Of The Investment Decision Situation
Decision to pursue initial awareness of opportunities Review of business plan or outline
Decision on rejection or follow-up with entrepreneur Initial reaction to the opportunityScreening
Evaluation of the merits of the info resource Degree of confidence in the referrer or enter negotiations Quality of the info is key to reject/proceed decision Issue of trust in the medium of information dissemination
Assessment
Reaction to Entrepreneur team Decision to reject or enter negotiation Management team and financial return factors increase Due diligence through network of personal contacts
Evaluation
To make investment decision
Issue of personal chemistry grow in importance Issue of deal structure and pricing grow in importance One major factor likely to lead to rejection by the investor
Negotiation
Decision to become involved or remain hands-off Decision on level of involvement.Involvement
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
4/21
Swift TrustIt is a concept relating to temporary teams whose
existence is formed around a clear purpose and common
task with a finite life span
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
5/21
Swift Trust elements
Willingness to suspend doubt about whether others who are"strangers" can be counted on in order to get to work on the group'stask
Positive expectation that the group activity will be beneficial
It is built and maintained by a high level of activity and responsiveness
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
6/21
Trust that exists between individuals in the earlystage of relationship
Trust which exist between individuals who knoweach other well enough that allows each to makepredictions about the other
Trust that exists because the parties effectivelyunderstand and appreciate the others wants
Calculus-Based Trust
Knowledge-Based Trust
Identification-Based Trust
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
7/21
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
8/21
Swift Cooperation Criteria DescriptionUtility An individuals perception of the potential economic
value of a situation. Eg. Expected return on an
investment
Importance An individuals perception of the potential noneconomic value of a situation
Risk An individuals perception of the potential loss froma situation
Competence An individuals perception of the professional abilityof another individual. Characterized by commentsregarding market analysis, data availability, quality,etc.
Coordinator judgment An individuals perception of the coordinatingpartys ability to select potentially successfulopportunities for investment
Other Comments on any other aspects of the business thatcannot be coded in any other category
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
9/21
Protocol for Trust & Cooperation
Identification It covers both the trust criteria and cooperation
criteria
Trust criteria includes calculus based-trust, knowledge
based-trust and identification based-trust Which are consistent with the factors utility,
importance, risk, competence, coordinator, judgment
Verbal protocol analysis- involves asking respondents tothink out loud while they perform a particular task and isbased on vocalization of thoughts which has the form ofinner speech
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
10/21
Classification of thought segments
in the protocols: statement type DESCRIPTION: Non-evaluative statement consisting of verbatim or
paraphrased quotation of information presented in the plan
RECALL: Non-evaluative information based on the past experience of therespondent
PRECONCEPTION:Judgmental statement based on the previousexperience/background knowledge
INFERENCE: Statement that involves a judgment on some part of the plan
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
11/21
QUESTION: Statement that seeks further information
ACTION: Statement of intention or action to be performed
(E.g. to search for the source of information)
COMMENT: Un codable or irrelevant statement
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
12/21
TRUST AND INVESTMENT DECISION
Study on proposal of investment opportunity of domain 1
Out of 10 investors, 9 are rejected the proposal
5 investors account for 71% of coded thoughts
The frequency matrix gives an indication of the informationtypes frequently used in the investors decision of domain 1
The result of this verbal protocol analysis can be summarize in 3headings:
Evidence of trust
Evidence of cooperation
Nature of the statement type
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
13/21
Verbal PROTOCOL FREQUENCY ANALYSISdescription Recall Preconcp
tionInference Question Action Commen
tTotal no
CBT - - 22 23 1 - 2 48 22.5
KBT - 1 2 1 - - - 4 1.9
IBT - - - - - - - - 0.0U Low - - 13 6 - - - 19 8.9
U Med - - 5 1 - - - 6 2.8
U High - -- - - - - - - 0.0
I Low - - 3 1 - - 2 6 2.8
I Med - - 1 1 - - - 2 0.9
I High - - - - - - - - 0.0
R Low - - 1 1 - - - 2 0.9
R Med - - 7 2 - - 1 10 4.7
R High - 1 10 6 1 - 1 19 8.9
C Low 1 1 7 25 11 1 5 51 23.9
C Med - - 1 5 - - - 6 2.8
C High - - - - - - --- - 0.0
CJ Low - 2 3 3 7 1 5 21 9.9
CJ Med - - - - - - 1 1 0.5
CJ HIGH - - 2 1 - - 2 5 2.3
Other - - 2 5 1 4 1 13 6.1
Total 1 5 79 81 21 6 20 213
% 0.5 2.3 37.1 38 9.9 2.8 9.4
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
14/21
Evidence of Trust
Calculus-based trust: 92% of trust references
Dealing with swift trust situation in which investors are being asked to expressan evaluate opinion and reach a decision on an investment opportunity thatthey are seeking for first time
Which identifies calculus-based trust as the most common form of trust inbusiness relationships
Limitation of research: lack of investors who make a positive decision toexplore the opportunity. If the investors take positive decision then they rely onknowledge based trust or identification-based trust
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
15/21
Evidence of cooperation Conclusions drawn from the table:
1. Investor thoughts are dominated by comments about the low perceivedcompetence of the entrepreneur team
2. Comments about risk account. The importance of an investors perception ofthe potential loss from a situation is consistent with the view that the initialscreening stage investors are looking more for reasons to reject anopportunity without investing significant time and effort
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
16/21
Contd
3. The issue of coordinator judgment is of considerable importance in the
initial screening situational domain. Suggesting that there may be a complexinterpretation of situational domains1 & 2
4. The utility of the opportunity, in terms of the investors perception of theeconomic value of the situation ranks relatively low
The investor perception of the potential non-economic value of thesituation, is of almost no importance at this stage of the process
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
17/21
Nature of the Statement Type Informal investors make decisions in this domain based on the preconception
and inference, there is relatively little use made of recall, action or question
Preconception are more likely to be negative than positive at this stage becausepreconceptions arise from the a lack of information in the proposal itself
This can be rectified by the entrepreneur, most reflect strongly held investorpreconceptions that have been formed before the proposal has been read
Entrepreneurs are capable of modification of the proposal
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
18/21
Contd
The combination of low competence, high risk, low coordinator judgment, low
importance and low utility generate a high cooperation threshold
When we combine with calculus-based trust, it is unsurprising that only oneinvestor in the sample would consider the opportunity further
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
19/21
Swift Trust and the Role of the
Coordinator Study to illustrate the trust issues with the coordinator judgment in the
domain 2(contains 19 business angels)- which illustrates the potentialapplicability of the swift trust/swift cooperation framework to the analysis of
informal investment decision making
2/3rd of these business angels derive information on investmentopportunities form personal networks with friends and associates
Other are more interested in the key players than the referral (perceptionthat referral made no difference)
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
20/21
Contd Opinion of the actual activities of business introduction services, some are
positive and others are negative view and 2 of them had insufficient knowledge
The criticisms of negative views are grouped into 5 headings:
i. Opportunities provided are of poor quality and people not screened
ii. The staff poor- low experience
iii. The information provided on opportunities
iv. Business introduction services often act only as forwarding agents for theinformation
v. There is low of sophistication in the matching process
-
7/28/2019 Envc Case 13 Grp 3
21/21
Majority have a low opinion of the quality of opportunities provided bybusiness introduction services
Some investors are suspicious that if a business has to seek an investorthrough a business introduction service rather than finding one through theentrepreneurs own contacts
The degree of trust in and willingness to cooperate with a coordinator bodyor organization has in turn influence on how the merits and attractiveness ofthe investment opportunity itself is perceived.
The role of the coordinator in the informal investment decision thereforerequires the development of trust in two sets of actors:
Trust in the promoters of the investment
Trust in the source of information on the opportunity