ensuring independence in cme activities...from accme annual report data, 2011 criterion 8 the...
TRANSCRIPT
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 1
Ensuring Independence
in CME Activities:
Compliance Expectations of
the ACCME’s Standards for
Commercial SupportSM
CME is Independent
What is the practice-based problem we
want to address?
Why does the problem exist?
What do we want to change?
Were we effective in producing change?
Is the problem solved? If not, start again.
How do we keep
commercial bias
out of education?
The Undesirable Outcome
Through their implicit or
explicit, control of, or
influence on, CME content,
commercial interests could
create commercial bias in
CME (favoritism) that could
result in a learner’s
inclination towards, or actual,
use of a product or service
that is more than is
necessary.
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 2
Since 1992, setting the
national standard…
• Effectiveness in improving practice
• Independence from commercial
interests
• Valid content
Mission critical as part of our public trust…
…to prevent misuse or overuse of products.
Content Validity
– True
– New or Important
– Free of commercial bias
Credibility or Face Validity
– Credentials
– Independent
– Transparency
The Standards for Commercial SupportSM
are a key part of ACCME’s overall strategy
to ensure validity of CME…
Shared Value
• Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE)*
• American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC)**
• American Osteopathic Association (AOA)
• American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP)
• American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA)
• American Dental Association (ADA)
• Association of Regulatory Boards of Optometry (ARBO)
* Adopted fully as part of Accreditation Requirements
** Adopted as part of Joint Accreditation for the Health Care Team
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 3
In 2006, incorporated into
ACCME Accreditation Criteria as
Criteria 7-10
Compliance with ACCME’s Standards
for Commercial SupportSM
Criterion 7 – Independence
The provider develops
activities/ educational
interventions independent
of commercial interests.
Standards represented:
SCS 1 – Independence in
Planning
SCS 2 – Resolution of
Personal Conflicts of
Interest
SCS 6 – Disclosure
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 4
a) identification of CME needs;
b) determination of educational objectives;
c) Selection and presentation of content;
d) Selection of all persons and organizations that will be in a position to control the content of the CME;
e) Selection of educational methods;
f) Evaluation of the activity.
Standard 1:
Independence in Planning
1.1 CME decisions free of the control of commercial interest
1.2 Commercial interest is not joint sponsor
Standard 1:
Independence in Planning
As defined by ACCME…
“…any entity producing, marketing,
re-selling, or distributing health care
goods or services consumed by, or
used on patients.
The ACCME does not consider
providers of clinical service directly to
patients to be commercial interests.”
1.1 CME decisions free of the control of commercial interest
1.2 Commercial interest is not joint sponsor
on page 11
in your
syllabus
Standard 2:
Resolution of Personal COI
1. All relevant relationships disclosed
2. Continue with persons who disclose
3. Implement a mechanism to identify
and resolve conflicts of interest
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 5
Process STANDARD 2: Resolution of Personal Conflicts of interest
The provider must have implemented a mechanism to identify and resolve all conflicts of interest prior
to the education activity being delivered to learners.
The ACCME considers
financial relationships to
create actual conflicts of
interest in CME when
individuals have both
–A financial relationship with a
commercial interest and
–The opportunity to affect the
content of CME about the
products or services of that
commercial interest.
How do these circumstances
create a conflict of interest?
The potential for maintaining
or increasing the value of the
financial relationship with the
commercial interest creates
an incentive to influence the
content of the CME – an
incentive to insert
commercial bias.
Process STANDARD 2: Resolution of Personal Conflicts of interest
The provider must have implemented a mechanism to identify and resolve all conflicts of interest prior
to the education activity being delivered to learners.
Any amount…within the past 12 months…
– Royalty – Intellectual property rights – Consulting fee – Payment for promotional talk
– Ownership interest (e.g., stocks, stock options or other ownership interest, excluding diversified mutual funds)
– Other financial benefit
…Of person, spouse or partner.
The ACCME considers
financial relationships to
create actual conflicts of
interest in CME when
individuals have both
–A financial relationship with a
commercial interest and
–The opportunity to affect the
content of CME about the
products or services of that
commercial interest.
Who needs to disclose to
the provider?
EVERYONE in control of content,
for example:
–Planners
–Teachers/Faculty
–Authors
–Reviewers
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 6
SCS Element 2.3 The provider must have
implemented a mechanism to
identify and resolve all
conflicts of interest prior to
the education activity being
delivered to learners.
…one can help fulfill the other
SCS Element 2.1 The provider must be able to
show that everyone who is in
a position to control the
content of an education
activity has disclosed all
relevant financial
relationships to the
provider.
SCS Element 2.3 The provider must have
implemented a mechanism to
identify and resolve all
conflicts of interest prior to
the education activity being
delivered to learners.
…one can help fulfill the other
SCS Element 2.1
No
“commercial
content”
SCS Element 2.3 The provider must have
implemented a mechanism to
identify and resolve all
conflicts of interest prior to
the education activity being
delivered to learners.
…one can help fulfill the other
SCS Element 2.1
No financial
relationships with
a commercial
interest
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 7
Specific examples
Sometimes the mechanism involves
specifying, “Who does what?” within
an activity
Sometimes the mechanism involves
content validation
Providers’ choice of “mechanism(s)”
to resolve potential conflicts of
interest may involve:
Planners
Managers
Faculty/ Authors
Staff
Reviewers
Providers’ choice of
“mechanism(s)” must involve:
Engagement by the provider in
a process that goes beyond
disclosure, with necessary
interventions to resolve conflict
of interest implemented before
the activity.
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 8
Planners
Managers
Faculty/ Authors
Staff
Reviewers
Standard 6: Disclosure
– Individuals’ disclosure of all in control of
content to learners (including no
relationships) prior to activity
– Disclosure of commercial support…
including the nature of in-kind support.
– No use of trade names or product group
message in disclosure
Commercial Support in CME (ACCME-Accredited Providers only)
Other income
Advertising and Exhibits Income
Total commercial support with monetary value of in-
kind commercial support excluded
Total commercial support with monetary value of
in-kind commercial support included (2010 and
earlier)
From ACCME Annual Report Data, 2011, p 28
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 9
Managing Commercial
Support
81% of ACCME-Accredited Providers
receive commercial support…
… only 21% CME activities (22% of participation)
From ACCME Annual Report Data, 2011
Criterion 8
The provider
appropriately manages
commercial support.
Standards represented:
SCS 3 – Appropriate
Use of Commercial
Support
Standard 3: Appropriate
Use of Commercial Support
– Decisions & Approval
– Signed Written Agreements
– Written policies & procedures regarding Honoraria
and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses of
planners/authors…irrespective of receiving CS*
– No payments outside of agreement
– Expenditures for learners
– Accountability
*Some elements of Standard 3 (3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11) may apply
whether or not the provider receives commercial support.
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 10
Criterion 9
The provider maintains a
separation of promotion
from education.
Standard represented:
SCS 4 – Appropriate
Management of
Associated Commercial
Promotion
– Exhibit booths
– Commercial Advertising Print
Computer-based
Audio and video
Live, face-to-face
– Education materials: Agent providing
CME (distribution)
Standard 4: Managing
Commercial Promotion
Criterion 10
The provider actively
promotes improvements
in health care and NOT
proprietary interests of a
commercial interest.
Standard represented:
SCS 5 – Content and
Format without
Commercial Bias
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 11
– must promote improvements or quality in healthcare
– balanced view of therapeutic options
Standard 5: Content and Format
without Commercial Bias
CME is Independent
What is the practice-based problem we
want to address?
Why does the problem exist?
What do we want to change?
Were we effective in producing change?
Is the problem solved? If not, start again.
How do we keep
commercial bias
out of education?
Case Studies for
Ensuring Independence in
CME Activities
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 12
Purpose
To help you recognize key components
in planning CME activities independent
from commercial interests.
– Case studies
– Does the case meet ACCME
expectations?
Worksheet on page 45
Let’s discuss…
Independence
Case #1 A provider shares office space with a related organization
which is an ACCME-defined commercial interest. While
they never joint-sponsor with the commercial organization,
sometimes during their planning process the provider will
ask the editors from the commercial interest to do a
courtesy review of CME content. The provider will then
make changes to the content based on the editor’s
feedback.
Does this meet ACCME’s expectations for
Independence? Why or why not?
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 13
Case #2
Central Medical Center joint sponsors activities with
several local clinics and small community hospitals.
Recently, they have also agreed to joint sponsor an activity
developed and being presented by MedDevice medical
device manufacturer. Central Medical Center determined
that the activity would meet their educational needs, since
the activity is about a device recently purchased by the
surgery department—and the staff don’t know how to use
it.
Does this meet ACCME’s expectations for
Independence? Why or why not?
Let’s discuss…
Mechanisms to Identify
Conflicts of Interest
The CME Planning Committee for Western
Association of Surgeons meets 3 times a year
to plan their CME activities. The association
asks all speakers for their CME activities to
disclose relevant financial relationships in
order to assess whether or not a speaker has a
conflict of interest to resolve.
Does this meet ACCME’s expectation for identifying COI? Why or why not?
Case #3
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 14
In order to identify any conflicts of interest, MECC USA asks all planners and faculty for their CME activities to disclose any significant financial relationships that they or their spouse/partner has with manufacturers of products or services that will be discussed in the activity which are:
Over $5000
Last 12 months
When a relationship exists, they ask for the name of CI and nature of financial interest.
Does this meet ACCME’s expectation for identifying COI? Why or why not?
Case #4
Let’s discuss…
Mechanisms to
Resolve Conflicts of
Interest
Oz Medical School uses a form to gather
information about relevant financial relationships
from their planners and speakers. On the
bottom of this form, the person completing it is
asked to indicate how they will be resolving their
own conflict of interest (if applicable).
Does this meet ACCME’s expectation
for resolving COI? Why or why not?
Case #5
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 15
Provider A’s procedure:
– Collects information regarding relevant financial relationships from everyone who is in control of content
…then, implements one of following:
a. Recuse person(s) from presenting content that is related to their financial relationship(s)
b. Cites multiple examples of published evidence that support clinical recommendations made in the content
c. Conducts a “peer review” of materials; content is modified if bias is detected.
Does this meet ACCME’s expectation for
resolving COI? Why or Why Not?
Case #6
Let’s discuss…
Disclosure of Relevant
Financial
Relationships
Case #7
At the top of the handout materials for a Tumor
Board session, the provider has included the
following information:
“None the members of the Western Medical School
CME Committee, who planned this CME Activity, have
any financial relationships to disclose relating to the
content of the cases selected. In addition, Dr. Jones,
who is facilitating this session, has no relevant financial
relationships to disclose.”
Does this meet ACCME’s expectation for disclosure of
relevant financial relationships? Why or why not?
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 16
Let’s discuss…
Appropriate Use of
Commercial Support
Provider ABC has scheduled a well-known speaker who expects $2,000 honorarium.
ABC’s policy limits honoraria to $1,500.
Speaker offers to get additional $500 directly from a commercial interest.
Does this meet ACCME’s expectation for the
appropriate use of commercial support? Why or why not?
Case #8
Case #9
During the week following their Annual Conference, the
National Specialty Association is reviewing their
documentation for the meeting, which was commercially
supported by educational grants from Companies A, B,
and C.
• For Companies A & B, the provider has a letter of agreement
signed by both the commercial supporter and one of their staff
members.
• For company C the provider has a copy of the agreement that it
completed electronically when they were awarded the grant.
Does this meet ACCME’s expectation for the
appropriate use of commercial support?
Why or why not?
Ensuring Independence in CME Activities & Case Studies CME as a Bridge to Quality™ Accreditation Workshop
August 1-2, 2013
Copyright 2013 © – Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education – www.accme.org
For non-commercial educational use only. 17
Let’s discuss…
Separation of Promotion
from Education
Case #10
• For each of the past 10 years, Pharma ABC has both been a major
exhibitor (“Silver Level”) at Provider Y’s Annual Meeting, and has
provided commercial support for a CME symposium on new
approaches for treating heart disease
• At another cardiology meeting, a Brand Manager from Pharma ABC
mentions to Provider Y that they may reduce the size of their exhibit
hall sponsorship this year.
• Provider Y sends an e-mail to Pharma ABC’s Medical Education
Director explaining that Pharma ABC may not be eligible to provide
grant support for the CME symposium if they don’t exhibit at the
“Silver Level”.
Does this meet ACCME’s expectation for the
separation of promotion from education? Why or why not?