english 2 portfolio
DESCRIPTION
My English PortfolioTRANSCRIPT
Composition II Final Portfolio
Caitlin ColettiKaren ReddingEnglish 1102
Final Portfolio
English 1102 Final Portfolio Title Table of Contents
Analytical Cover Letter....................................................................................#1 Quality Comparison.......................................................................................# Successful Paper (The original final draft submitted to me) ........................# Successful Paper (The original final draft submitted to me).........................#“What’s the Difference?” Paragraphs Revision Samples..........................................................................................# Least Successful Paper (with mark-up) .......................................................# Successful Paper (new final version) ...................................................#Successful Paper (with mark-up) .......................................................# Successful Paper (new final version) ...................................................# Essay (with mark-up) .............................................................#(new final version) ........................................................#
December 6, 2011
Dear Mrs. Redding,
My name is Caitlin Coletti and I am a Sophomore at Gainesville State
College. As I read my first assignments of the semester in English 1102, I see how
much I have improved as a writer. with the completion of my final portfolio, you
can see how much I have learned and improved as an English student. I may not be
the best writer but I certainly have learned a lot and have improved and built on the
skills that I have obtained in previous english courses.
I most certainly appreciated your constructive criticism and your
encouragement throughout the writing process. Despite my lack of understanding
you helped me to understand what it was I needed to do. I have never had an
english teacher who was so understanding and willing to help. I do not believe that
my papers are perfect; however, they are significantly improved.
I have used editing and critiquing skills that I have learned to improve my
essays. Though difficult, it made me think of how to get out of the cookie cutter
essay. Doing a portfolio for the final exam was a great alternative and new to me. I
have never done one before, but it showed me how to make my essays even better
for future classes. I have obtained a skill that I will always be able to use.
It was challenging comparing the two essays because they were in fact
different subjects; however, through correct observation I was able to see my
writing style and how I could improve upon that. Again, my papers will not be
perfect because my eyes are not perfect; however, I think that they will be
significantly improved upon. Thank you, for reviewing my English 1102 Portfolio.
I have learned a great deal and this is a class that I can use for the future.
Sincerely,
Caitlin M. Coletti
America's Continuous Progression Throughout Time
WEAKEST
The United States of America, a country who has built their reputation on their
progression through time. Through military, slavery, civil rights, prohibition, war, feminine
rights, and other social issues the United States has been able to continually progress throughout
time. The United States has had their fair share of warfare and conflict; however, throughout the
trials and tribulations a stronger and more educated nation was built upon what the people and
country went through .
During the Cold War new military war tactics were being used for experimentation
purposes. In “The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist” Robert S. Mulliken, a professor at the
University of Chicago writes about his personal experience in the military. He never
truly “fough”t because he believed there was no “true cause” and many young men have the
same view point. Mulliken then states because of the lack of awareness of the cause of fighting
that good strong military leaders are needed for men like him. He states that it is imperative for
men who are blindly in the military to have a good leader so they can establish a sense of why
they are there and to see how important their purpose is. Today, good leaders are still needed in
the military especially with what is going on in the middle east. With the tenth anniversary of the
terrorist attacks the importance of a strong military is emphasized even more (9). There are
usually two reasons for those who go into the military because of their true patriotism and
wanting to fight to defend and protect. However, many go into the service for a source of
income, and of course that makes sense too they will always have a job to feed their families.
For the majority, however, those who serve in the military are doing so to defend and protect
their country and their rights because they see how important it is. Nevertheless, because of
those going into the military strong leaders are needed because war never truly ends even with
America’s progression.
War will never truly end. The Cold war begun in the 1950s and never truly “ended” until
the 1990s. War is something that continues, it isn’t just something you learn from and never do
again. A war can end but the true conflict might not be settled and continues through out time. In
the 1950s during the Bay of Pigs with Cuba there was a conflict and it “ended” but to this day
the United States has zero to little contact with Cuba. Therefore, did war end? Is peace
something that America can strive for? It is wanted but with war and how it cycles it will never
truly end and true “peace” will not be achieved. The world in which we live in today is not
perfect, therefore not having war would be a part of a perfect world but who is striving for
perfection? Thus America continues to progress even with the continuation of war.
“Who Would Know Better Than The Girls in White?” Is an article written by Emily
Johnson about how World War II nurses contributed to advertising and America’s progression.
These women were taking america to a new level in the medical field and were portrayed as
trusted advisers and willing and able professionals and frequently pictured them performing
skilled work in the hospital and medical systems (Johnson). It was new that women could work
in the field but now they were the face of it this showed how America was progressing. By
simply having pictures taken of them for magazines and articles while doing their job that it was
a new way of advertising for America after World War II. Women’s rights were taking
off through this as well. These Nurses represented two things through their advertisement,
medical “authority” and feminine progression. This was a big stepping stone for women and
for the medical field it was a side that had never been shown. America in the 1940s was coming
along way after finishing world war II. The progression of Women’s rights took a leap then and
continued throughout the 20th century (Johnson).
Women were being shown in a more “important side” of life in Post war advertising.
They were no longer the face of health, beauty and medicinal products as they still are today.
They were the face for American warfare and how people perceived it. This took people’s
perception and spun it around. Women weren’t the face of war up to this point and still are not.
Previously, when female nurses were shown in a war setting it was showing them being in a
maternal “incompetent” role. Being a nurse was no laughing matter it was a serious role that
played a pivotal role in society and contributes to what it is today. The post world war II
advertising helped the nurses role easier and taken seriously. People were able to see what these
women were doing and how pivotal it was in contributing to the society and community
(Johnson). Essentially they were the crutches for warfare because they helped with the healing
process.
In conclusion, throughout the readings of these two articles it is shown that America has
progressed through war. Post world war II and nursing advertisement and through the 1950s and
the Cold War. Coming to the conclusion that war will never truly end and that women can play a
large role in war America can continue to progress and move forward and that is exactly what
they did. America is a pioneer for rights and progression for the country and its people.
What things that are being “carried” in O’Brien’s work, and by whom?
STRONGEST
In the novel, The Things They Carried, stories and descriptions of young men in the
vietnam war are shared. Initially when picking up the book, one may think it is just a regular
story or compilation of thoughts from one soldier to a particular audience. On the contrary, once
the reading has begun one may see that the things being carried are no longer just physical or
materialistic items. These men in the story are carrying emotional and mental burdens of love,
fear, guilt, and even confusion. Through the use of writing and story telling, Tim O’Brien is able
to share and use writing as an outlet. Through the description of each soldier the reader is able to
understand and comprehend the importance of the things they carried.
In the novel, The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien is the narrator of the story. These
stories are his personal recollections of his participation in the Vietnam War. Tim O’Brien is an
interesting character who makes it known through his writing that his obligations to his family
and home influenced him to be a soldier. Writing is a way for him to express feelings about the
war and what happened back in Vietnam and the burdens that he continues to carry. O’Brien is
carrying the guilt of war and his painful memories that he and his friends once experienced. His
point of view shapes how he handles current situations and what he is dealt with in life.
Eventually, O’Brien comes to terms with feelings and writing has been a coping mechanism for
him and what he experienced as a young soldier.
Jimmy Cross, a young soldier and leutienant in the novel often represents confusion. His
entrance into the war is without reason idea of why he is there other than that his friends joined
as well. Throughout the novel, Jimmy Cross continues to show uncertainty and confusion for his
actions in life. Jimmy Cross is often showing that he is carrying guilt. The death of Ted
Lavender bears heavily on Jimmy’s heart. Right before Ted Lavender dies; Jimmy was distracted
by Martha a girl from home. He realized that this particular distraction was imperative to get rid
of. He later burns pictures and letters from Martha. His guilt from this experience stays with him
for the rest of his life. As the Christ Figure in the novel Cross bears the grief of Lavender’s death
that others cannot hold. He later makes a personal sacrifice, by burning the letters from Martha
so that her presence will no longer confuse him. Cross makes these sacrifices in a Christ-like
perspective so that he can protect his fellow men better than he could have done before.
Mitchell Sanders is a man that has a strong sense of justice and loyalty. When Cross
leads the troops into the sewage field where Kiowa eventually dies Sanders refuses to forgive
him because he thinks Kiowa should have known better. Sanders also believes that a good war
story often lacks a moral and that sometimes a story should just be a story. He believes in
sticking to the facts. He focuses on the soldiers’ experience, which he thinks is more relevant and
applicable. Sanders who presents the stories that constitute “The Things They Carried” not to
teach a morals but to portray an experience and is an interpreter for O’Brien.
In conclusion, Tim O’Brien’s novel has literal and metaphorical uses for “carrying”.
Some of the characters hold onto guilt, grief, fear, love, and hope while others carry pictures,
letters, bibles, and other materialistic goods that they hold near to them. These men in the story
are carrying emotional and mental burdens of love, fear, guilt, and even confusion. Through the
use of writing and story telling, Tim O’Brien is able to share and use writing as an outlet.
Through the description of each soldier the reader is able to understand and comprehend the
importance of the things they carried.
Comparison Essay of Little Red Riding Hood and Freeway
FREE CHOICE
One of the most solid fairy tales of almost every generation is Little Red Riding Hood,
and it has been appreciated by populace of every age. What was profound, while reading
Perrault’s version of Little Red Riding Hood, or Grimm’s Little Red Cap; both were exact at
every place in the story line yet the endings differed. That factor was staggering; the conclusion
of Grimm’s version was happier and light hearted. Yet in Perrault’s version the main character
Little Red Riding Hood dies after the wolf’s deception. In the Grimm’s version, the storyline is
parallel, conversely the grandmother and Little Red Riding Hood are consumed. Time passes
and a hunter treads by and cuts them out of the wolf’s corpse. To ensure the wolf’s death, he is
filled with rocks to outweigh him. Continuing the epic adventure, Little Red Riding Hood and
her grandmother are prepared for the oblivion of the next wolf and drowning him. What is
humorous is Grimm’s version had the more enhanced and gripping ending. The story’s morale
implies that children, especially attractive ones, ought to acquire precautions with strangers,
because they may in fact be the prey of the predator. This story is the perfect example of a
parasitic relationship, one party benefits and the other does not. Nonetheless, in many instances
the predator can seem like the most harmless and attack where least expected. Unfortunately, it
is these placid beings that are sometimes the most treacherous, as interpreted the film adaptation
Freeway.
More differences are illustrated than similarities between the original fairy tale and the
film adaptation Freeway. Reese Witherspoon’s character, and the figurative Little Red Riding
hood, Vanessa, is a poor, illiterate, teenage girl living in the slums of Los Angeles. The First
contradiction is the setting, although Vanessa has a home like Riding Hood, it is traumatized by
substance and abuse. After her mother’s arrest, she flees to stay with her grandmother in
Shockton. Bob Wolverton, a serial killer and rapist known as the “I-5 killer", abducts her after
car breaks down, and obliges to transport her to grandmother's house. Wolverton eventually
reveals his true temperament and becomes Vanessa’s attempted murderer. After gaining control
of the situation Vanessa escapes, after shooting Wolverton and injuring him. Vanessa is then
incarcerated and questioned by two detectives. Bob survives with much handicapped damage,
loss of his eye, and a disfiguring face. While Vanessa was on trial, everyone assumed that Bob
was the prey.
Vanessa is sent to a permanent incarceration and acquires friends who plot her escape.
Later on the detectives reexamine the case, and begin to sense Vanessa’s innocence. They then
search Wolverton's home, where they find evidence such as pornography in the locked shed
beside the house, that leads to the idea that he was the predator. And the past is unlocked;
Wolverton's wife commited suicide after the discovery of his pornography and his double
lifestyle. During his entrance home, Wolverton notices the police and he then flees to Vanessa’s
grandmothers. Vanessa finds her grandmother dead when she arrives and finds “I-5 killer” with a
gun ready for his prey. After much struggle, Vanessa murders him. The detectives, who were
aware of her innocence, wait to appeal all of her previous charges.
There are several more differences between the film and fairytale. Vanessa’s
environment is far more hostile than Riding Hood’s. Vanessa has to learn to defend and provide
for herself which is a much more modern contemporary thought in the production of this film.
The protagonist, a figurative wolf (a predator), a serial killer played by the A-list actor, Kiefer
Sutherland. The similarity between the two is this, both Riding Hood characters are both tricked
by the charm and their naivety of their own characteristics. In the film, Vanessa acquires self
defense which is not done in the fairytale. In the Grimm’s version a huntsman rescues the
grandmother and Riding Hood, and the film production no one rescues Vanessa. In the Grimm’s
version the grandmother and Riding Hood deceive the wolf to his own suicide, while in the film
she gets her revenge on false imprisonment and eventually obtaining the opportunity to kill him.
Throughout the film several events, themes, motifs, and rhetorical strategy were recognized in
order to compare and contrast the theatrical production over literary work itself.
The similarities of the film and fairytale are that of a heroine and a villain nature. Several
of the main characteristics are kept true, the red basket and several other characteristics. In both
the Grimm’s (unlike the Perrault’s version) and the film production the wolf figure dies in the
end after being taken down by the antagonist. In both versions the heroine, in this case the
antagonist, must help provide for the grandmother. In order to prove her strength and the fact
that she is capable of individuality she must set the goal for herself so she can overcome the
pessimistic obstacles of life.
It is believed that the movie Freeway uses the symbolism and themes of the original
fairytale, but the film was an intense adaptation to recur thought and evoke feelings into the
audience. The film is not appropriate for all ages. Fairy tales are defined by subtly intimidating
and provoking feelings into the reader while instilling morale. Freeway, based on the classic tale
of Little Red Riding Hood, is no exception. It includes family dysfunction, street violence and
even abuse. It uses many contemporary ideals such as Vanessa, being stronger than the weak
timid girl in the original fairytale. Vanessa stands up to Wolverton, shooting him in the face
during their first confrontation of the movie, and is mixed with moments of clever wit, humor,
and climax of confrontation. However if not for the assignment, I would not have connected the
two and been able to see the literary devices instilled within the productions.
In finality, the original fairy tale is preferred because it teaches the lesson or morals
needed to be taught to the younger generation, in a childlike manner. The conventional point of
view is to dis-way the audience of stereotyping Vanessa via the character she represents. She
deserves vengeance and wallow in it. Vanessa is in fact a villain though, a young woman with a
terrible life of repeated criminal acts, and numerous foster home. The audience is almost forced
to pity her and her situation. Although this can create an accurate perception of life, and what it
may not be, it is the moral compass and the example that it should be for the younger generation.
For being a male, which is in touch with what is preferred, the original story is the one that holds
true. It may lack violence, suspense, verbose arguing; however the original story line of Little
Red Riding Hood stays true to many generations today and it appropriate for all ages.
This being discussed, the film stays true to many of the original tales. Yet, the whole
perception may be skewed by a true believer in what Red Riding Hood had to offer. The more
appropriate version is more appealing to those morally aligned and intact with what children
should be taught at an early age. With seeing the film and reading and being informed with the
moral of the story, the film is no comparison to the beloved fairytale that is enjoyed still to this
day. The conflict, complication, climax, falling action and revolution; all key parts in the film
are both suspenseful and entertaining. However, with the suspense and Hollywood’s spin it takes
away the fruitfulness of what the original character was trying to portray within her journey, and
makes it a personal journey of triumph. Yet I felt that it was not of that nature, the original was to
focus on Red’s morale not what she has overcome with the horrible cards that life has dealt her.
The film was more self-centered and the original tale was not of that nature.
Comparison and Contrast of My Strong and Weak Essays
I believe that there is a significant difference in my essays. In this English class I believe
that I have improved my writing skills significantly. I have also learned how to understand what
the essay is asking of me. It was a challenge at first; however, I learned to build on each essay
every week. The prompts were no longer a sheet of paper telling you what you have to write on.
They were open for interpretation and it was a progression of writing. Therefore, through the
passing of time through this class my papers got better with the better understanding of what it
was the essay was asking of me.
In what I consider to be my least successful essay, I partially didn’t have confidence in
my writing. I felt as if my essay wasn’t flowing well. I have always been a good english student
but papers certainly have been my weak point when I came to college. Even though I am very
good at keeping my papers organized I felt as if this one lacked organization. It was a compare
and contrast essay and I felt that the articles in which I was comparing was very difficult so it
didn’t flow with organization well.
In what I consider to be my strongest and most successful essay I had a full
understanding of what I was supposed to do. The assignment as a whole I thoroughly enjoyed
because I had to come up with a series of questions pertaining to a work in which we read. My
favorite work was Tim O’Brien’s “The Things they Carried.” My question was “What things
that are being “carried” in O’Brien’s work, and by whom?” In my essay I went in depth with
each character explainging what it was they were carrying emotional, physically, and mentally. I
felt it was my strongest piece because I fully understood the work and the question. I understood
how to answer it in such a manner to fulfill my essay prompt.
In both my essays I was well organized and knew exactly what it was that I was saying. I
believe that in the sense of organization skills that both essays were well organized. It was easy
to tell that I knew how to tactle each sub-topic of the prompt. However, the differences seem to
be that in my confidence in writing. I believe that in the O’Brien essay one can tell that I was
confident in what I believed and saw. In my first essay, I am not at all sure that full
understanding and comprehension was present while writing the paper.
America's Continuous Progression Throughout Time
WEAKEST- MARKUP
The United States of America, a country who has built their reputation on their
progression through time. Through military, slavery, civil rights, prohibition, war, feminine
rights, and other social issues the United States has been able to continually progress throughout
time. The United States has had their fair share of warfare and conflict; however, throughout the
trials and tribulations a stronger and more educated nation was built upon what the people and
country went through [I believe I had a good Introduction for this essay] .
During the Cold War new military war tactics were being used for experimentation
purposes. In “The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist” Robert S. Mulliken, a professor at the
University of Chicago writes about his personal experience in the military. He never
truly “fough”t because he believed there was no “true cause” and many young men have the
same view point. Mulliken then states because of the lack of awareness of the cause of fighting
that good strong military leaders are needed for men like him. He states that it is imperative for
men who are blindly in the military to have a good leader so they can establish a sense of why
they are there and to see how important their purpose is.[Poor Transition, I believe. Doesn’t
Flow well. Perhaps I can just make it a new paragraph. Otherwise I think I have good content]
Today, good leaders are still needed in the military especially with what is going on in the
middle east. With the tenth anniversary of the terrorist attacks the importance of a strong military
is emphasized even more (9). There are usually two reasons for those who go into the military
because of their true patriotism and wanting to fight to defend and protect. However, many go
into the service for a source of income, and of course that makes sense too they will always have
a job to feed their families. For the majority, however, those who serve in the military are doing
so to defend and protect their country and their rights because they see how important it is.
Nevertheless, because of those going into the military strong leaders are needed because war
never truly ends even with America’s progression.
War will never truly end [Poor Introduction Sentence]. The Cold war begun in the 1950s
and never truly “ended” until the 1990s. War is something that continues, it isn’t just something
you learn from and never do again. A war can end but the true conflict might not be settled and
continues through out time. In the 1950s during the Bay of Pigs with Cuba there was a conflict
and it “ended” but to this day the United States has zero to little contact with Cuba. Therefore,
did war end? Is peace something that America can strive for? It is wanted but with war and how
it cycles it will never truly end and true “peace” will not be achieved. The world in which we
live in today is not perfect, therefore not having war would be a part of a perfect world but who
is striving for perfection? Thus America continues to progress even with the continuation of war.
“Who Would Know Better Than The Girls in White?” Is an article written by Emily
Johnson about how World War II nurses contributed to advertising and America’s progression.
These women were taking america to a new level in the medical field and were portrayed as
trusted advisers and willing and able professionals and frequently pictured them performing
skilled work in the hospital and medical systems (Johnson). It was new that women could work
in the field but now they were the face of it this showed how America was progressing. By
simply having pictures taken of them for magazines and articles while doing their job that it was
a new way of advertising for America after World War II. Women’s rights were taking
off through this as well. These Nurses represented two things through their advertisement,
medical “authority” and feminine progression. This was a big stepping stone for women and
for the medical field it was a side that had never been shown. America in the 1940s was coming
along way after finishing world war II. The progression of Women’s rights took a leap then and
continued throughout the 20th century (Johnson).
Women were being shown in a more “important side” of life in Post war advertising.
They were no longer the face of health, beauty and medicinal products as they still are today.
They were the face for American warfare and how people perceived it. This took people’s
perception and spun it around. Women weren’t the face of war up to this point and still are not.
Previously, when female nurses were shown in a war setting it was showing them being in a
maternal “incompetent” role. Being a nurse was no laughing matter it was a serious role that
played a pivotal role in society and contributes to what it is today. The post world war II
advertising helped the nurses role easier and taken seriously. People were able to see what these
women were doing and how pivotal it was in contributing to the society and community
(Johnson). Essentially they were the crutches for warfare because they helped with the healing
process.
In conclusion, throughout the readings of these two articles it is shown that America has
progressed through war. Post world war II and nursing advertisement and through the 1950s and
the Cold War [This first part of the conclusion isn’t strong]. Coming to the conclusion that war
will never truly end and that women can play a large role in war America can continue to
progress and move forward and that is exactly what they did. America is a pioneer for rights and
progression for the country and its people [ Perhaps a stronger conclusion to end the essay well].
Comparison Essay of Little Red Riding Hood and Freeway
FREE CHOICE MARKUP
One of the most solid [poor choice using “solid”] fairy tales of almost every generation is
Little Red Riding Hood, and it has been appreciated by populace of every age. What was
profound, while reading Perrault’s version of Little Red Riding Hood, or Grimm’s Little Red
Cap; both were exact at every place in the story line yet the endings differed. That factor was
staggering; the conclusion of Grimm’s version was happier and light hearted. Yet in Perrault’s
version the main character Little Red Riding Hood dies after the wolf’s deception. In the
Grimm’s version, the storyline is parallel, conversely the grandmother and Little Red Riding
Hood are consumed. Time passes and a hunter treads by and cuts them out of the wolf’s corpse.
To ensure the wolf’s death, he is filled with rocks to outweigh him. Continuing the epic
adventure, Little Red Riding Hood and her grandmother are prepared for the oblivion of the next
wolf and drowning him. What is humorous is Grimm’s version had the more enhanced and
gripping ending. The story’s morale implies that children, especially attractive ones, ought to
acquire precautions with strangers, because they may in fact be the prey of the predator. This
story is the perfect example of a parasitic relationship, one party benefits and the other does not.
Nonetheless, in many instances the predator can seem like the most harmless and attack where
least expected. Unfortunately, it is these placid beings that are sometimes the most treacherous,
as interpreted the film adaptation Freeway [This intro is more of an analysis of the stories. Yet
when continuing to read the essay my introduction makes sense with the rest of my essay].
More differences are illustrated than similarities between the original fairy tale and the
film adaptation Freeway. Reese Witherspoon’s character, and the figurative Little Red Riding
hood, Vanessa, is a poor, illiterate, teenage girl living in the slums of Los Angeles. The First
contradiction is the setting, although Vanessa has a home like Riding Hood, it is traumatized by
substance and abuse. After her mother’s arrest, she flees to stay with her grandmother in
Shockton. Bob Wolverton, a serial killer and rapist known as the “I-5 killer", abducts her after
car breaks down, and obliges to transport her to grandmother's house. Wolverton eventually
reveals his true temperament and becomes Vanessa’s attempted murderer. After gaining control
of the situation Vanessa escapes, after shooting Wolverton and injuring him. Vanessa is then
incarcerated and questioned by two detectives. Bob survives with much handicapped damage,
loss of his eye, and a disfiguring face. While Vanessa was on trial, everyone assumed that Bob
was the prey [More plot summary than contrasting].
Vanessa is sent to a permanent incarceration and acquires friends who plot her escape.
Later on the detectives reexamine the case, and begin to sense Vanessa’s innocence. They then
search Wolverton's home, where they find evidence such as pornography in the locked shed
beside the house, that leads to the idea that he was the predator. And the past is unlocked;
Wolverton's wife commited suicide after the discovery of his pornography and his double
lifestyle. During his entrance home, Wolverton notices the police and he then flees to Vanessa’s
grandmothers. Vanessa finds her grandmother dead when she arrives and finds “I-5 killer” with a
gun ready for his prey. After much struggle, Vanessa murders him. The detectives, who were
aware of her innocence, wait to appeal all of her previous charges.
There are several more differences between the film and fairytale [Compare and Contrast
starts here]. Vanessa’s environment is far more hostile than Riding Hood’s. Vanessa has to learn
to defend and provide for herself which is a much more modern contemporary thought in the
production of this film. The protagonist, a figurative wolf (a predator), a serial killer played by
the A-list actor, Kiefer Sutherland. The similarity between the two is this, both Riding Hood
characters are both tricked by the charm and their naivety of their own characteristics. In the
film, Vanessa acquires self defense which is not done in the fairytale. In the Grimm’s version a
huntsman rescues the grandmother and Riding Hood, and the film production no one rescues
Vanessa. In the Grimm’s version the grandmother and Riding Hood deceive the wolf to his own
suicide, while in the film she gets her revenge on false imprisonment and eventually obtaining
the opportunity to kill him. Throughout the film several events, themes, motifs, and rhetorical
strategy were recognized in order to compare and contrast the theatrical production over literary
work itself.
The similarities of the film and fairytale are that of a heroine and a villain nature. Several
of the main characteristics are kept true, the red basket and several other characteristics. In both
the Grimm’s (unlike the Perrault’s version) and the film production the wolf figure dies in the
end after being taken down by the antagonist. In both versions the heroine, in this case the
antagonist, must help provide for the grandmother. In order to prove her strength and the fact
that she is capable of individuality she must set the goal for herself so she can overcome the
pessimistic obstacles of life.
It is believed that the movie Freeway uses the symbolism and themes of the original
fairytale, but the film was an intense adaptation to recur thought and evoke feelings into the
audience. The film is not appropriate for all ages. Fairy tales are defined by subtly intimidating
and provoking feelings into the reader while instilling morale. Freeway, based on the classic tale
of Little Red Riding Hood, is no exception. It includes family dysfunction, street violence and
even abuse. It uses many contemporary ideals such as Vanessa, being stronger than the weak
timid girl in the original fairytale. Vanessa stands up to Wolverton, shooting him in the face
during their first confrontation of the movie, and is mixed with moments of clever wit, humor,
and climax of confrontation. However if not for the assignment, I would not have connected the
two and been able to see the literary devices instilled within the productions.
In finality, the original fairy tale is preferred because it teaches the lesson or morals
needed to be taught to the younger generation, in a childlike manner. The conventional point of
view is to dis-way the audience of stereotyping Vanessa via the character she represents. She
deserves vengeance and wallow in it. Vanessa is in fact a villain though, a young woman with a
terrible life of repeated criminal acts, and numerous foster home. The audience is almost forced
to pity her and her situation. Although this can create an accurate perception of life, and what it
may not be, it is the moral compass and the example that it should be for the younger generation.
For being a male, which is in touch with what is preferred, the original story is the one that holds
true. It may lack violence, suspense, verbose arguing; however the original story line of Little
Red Riding Hood stays true to many generations today and it appropriate for all ages.
This being discussed, the film stays true to many of the original tales. Yet, the whole
perception may be skewed by a true believer in what Red Riding Hood had to offer. The more
appropriate version is more appealing to those morally aligned and intact with what children
should be taught at an early age. With seeing the film and reading and being informed with the
moral of the story, the film is no comparison to the beloved fairytale that is enjoyed still to this
day. The conflict, complication, climax, falling action and revolution; all key parts in the film
are both suspenseful and entertaining. However, with the suspense and Hollywood’s spin it takes
away the fruitfulness of what the original character was trying to portray within her journey, and
makes it a personal journey of triumph. Yet I felt that it was not of that nature, the original was to
focus on Red’s morale not what she has overcome with the horrible cards that life has dealt her.
The film was more self-centered and the original tale was not of that nature.
What things that are being “carried” in O’Brien’s work, and by whom?
STRONGEST MARKUP
In the novel, The Things They Carried, stories and descriptions of young men in the
Vietnam War are shared. Initially when picking up the book, one may think it is just a regular
story or compilation of thoughts from one soldier to a particular audience. On the contrary, once
the reading has begun one may see that the things being carried are no longer just physical or
materialistic items. These men in the story are carrying emotional and mental burdens of love,
fear, guilt, and even confusion. Through the use of writing and story telling, Tim O’Brien is able
to share and use writing as an outlet. Through the description of each soldier the reader is able to
understand and comprehend the importance of the things they carried [I think I had a really
strong introduction paragraph].
In the novel, The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien is the narrator of the story. These
stories are his personal recollections of his participation in the Vietnam War. Tim O’Brien is an
interesting character who makes it known through his writing that his obligations to his family
and home influenced him to be a soldier. Writing is a way for him to express feelings about the
war and what happened back in Vietnam and the burdens that he continues to carry. O’Brien is
carrying the guilt of war and his painful memories that he and his friends once experienced. His
point of view shapes how he handles current situations and what he is dealt with in life.
Eventually, O’Brien comes to terms with feelings and writing has been a coping mechanism for
him and what he experienced as a young soldier.
Jimmy Cross, a young soldier and leutienant in the novel often represents confusion. His
entrance into the war is without reason idea of why he is there other than that his friends joined
as well. Throughout the novel, Jimmy Cross continues to show uncertainty and confusion for his
actions in life. Jimmy Cross is often showing that he is carrying guilt. The death of Ted
Lavender bears heavily on Jimmy’s heart. Right before Ted Lavender dies; Jimmy was distracted
by Martha a girl from home [Maybe too much “fat”.]. He realized that this particular distraction
was imperative to get rid of. He later burns pictures and letters from Martha. His guilt from this
experience stays with him for the rest of his life. As the Christ Figure in the novel Cross bears
the grief of Lavender’s death that others cannot hold. He later makes a personal sacrifice, by
burning the letters from Martha so that her presence will no longer confuse him. Cross makes
these sacrifices in a Christ-like perspective so that he can protect his fellow men better than he
could have done before.
Mitchell Sanders is a man that has a strong sense of justice and loyalty. When Cross
leads the troops into the sewage field where Kiowa eventually dies Sanders refuses to forgive
him because he thinks Kiowa should have known better. Sanders also believes that a good war
story often lacks a moral and that sometimes a story should just be a story. He believes in
sticking to the facts. He focuses on the soldiers’ experience, which he thinks is more relevant and
applicable. Sanders who presents the stories that constitute “The Things They Carried” not to
teach a morals but to portray an experience and is an interpreter for O’Brien.
In conclusion, Tim O’Brien’s novel has literal and metaphorical uses for “carrying”.
Some of the characters hold onto guilt, grief, fear, love, and hope while others carry pictures,
letters, bibles, and other materialistic goods that they hold near to them. These men in the story
are carrying emotional and mental burdens of love, fear, guilt, and even confusion [Maybe a
cleaner conclusion is needed]. Through the use of writing and story telling, Tim O’Brien is able
to share and use writing as an outlet. Through the description of each soldier the reader is able to
understand and comprehend the importance of the things they carried.
America's Continuous Progression Throughout Time
WEAKEST REVISION
The United States of America, a country who has built their reputation on their
progression through time. Through military, slavery, civil rights, prohibition, war, feminine
rights, and other social issues the United States has been able to continually progress throughout
time. The United States has had their fair share of warfare and conflict; however, throughout the
trials and tribulations a stronger and more educated nation was built upon what the people and
country went through .
During the Cold War new military war tactics were being used for experimentation
purposes. In “The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist” Robert S. Mulliken, a professor at the
University of Chicago writes about his personal experience in the military. He never
truly “fough”t because he believed there was no “true cause” and many young men have the
same view point. Mulliken then states because of the lack of awareness of the cause of fighting
that good strong military leaders are needed for men like him. He states that it is imperative for
men who are blindly in the military to have a good leader so they can establish a sense of why
they are there and to see how important their purpose is.
Today, good leaders are still needed in the military especially with what is going on in
the middle east. With the tenth anniversary of the terrorist attacks the importance of a strong
military is emphasized even more (9). There are usually two reasons for those who go into the
military because of their true patriotism and wanting to fight to defend and protect. However,
many go into the service for a source of
income, and of course that makes sense too they will always have a job to feed their families.
For the majority, however, those who serve in the military are doing so to defend and protect
their country and their rights because they see how important it is. Nevertheless, because of
those going into the military strong leaders are needed because war never truly ends even with
America’s progression.
War will never truly end. The Cold war begun in the 1950s and never truly “ended” until
the 1990s. War is something that continues, it isn’t just something you learn from and never do
again. A war can end but the true conflict might not be settled and continues through out time. In
the 1950s during the Bay of Pigs with Cuba there was a conflict and it “ended” but to this day
the United States has zero to little contact with Cuba. Therefore, did war end? Is peace
something that America can strive for? It is wanted but with war and how it cycles it will never
truly end and true “peace” will not be achieved. The world in which we live in today is not
perfect, therefore not having war would be a part of a perfect world but who is striving for
perfection? Thus America continues to progress even with the continuation of war.
“Who Would Know Better Than The Girls in White?” Is an article written by Emily
Johnson about how World War II nurses contributed to advertising and America’s progression.
These women were taking america to a new level in the medical field and were portrayed as
trusted advisers and willing and able professionals and frequently pictured them performing
skilled work in the hospital and medical systems (Johnson). It was new that women could work
in the field but now they were the face of it this showed how America was progressing. By
simply having pictures taken of them for magazines and articles while doing their job that it was
a new way of advertising for America after World War II. Women’s rights were taking
off through this as well. These Nurses represented two things through their advertisement,
medical “authority” and feminine progression. This was a big stepping stone for women and
for the medical field it was a side that had never been shown. America in the 1940s was coming
along way after finishing world war II. The progression of Women’s rights took a leap then and
continued throughout the 20th century (Johnson).
Women were being shown in a more “important side” of life in Post war advertising.
They were no longer the face of health, beauty and medicinal products as they still are today.
They were the face for American warfare and how people perceived it. This took people’s
perception and spun it around. Women weren’t the face of war up to this point and still are not.
Previously, when female nurses were shown in a war setting it was showing them being in a
maternal “incompetent” role. Being a nurse was no laughing matter it was a serious role that
played a pivotal role in society and contributes to what it is today. The post world war II
advertising helped the nurses role easier and taken seriously. People were able to see what these
women were doing and how pivotal it was in contributing to the society and community
(Johnson). Essentially they were the crutches for warfare because they helped with the healing
process.
In conclusion, throughout the readings of these two articles it is shown that America has
progressed through war. Post world war II and nursing advertisement and through the 1950s and
the Cold War. Coming to the conclusion that war will never truly end and that women can play
alarge role in war America can continue to progress and move forward and that is exactly what
they did. America is a pioneer for rights and progression for the country and its people.
What things that are being “carried” in O’Brien’s work, and by whom?
STRONGEST REVISION
In the novel, The Things They Carried, stories and descriptions of young men in the
Vietnam War are shared. Initially when picking up the book, one may think it is just a regular
story or compilation of thoughts from one soldier to a particular audience. On the contrary, once
the reading has begun one may see that the things being carried are no longer just physical or
materialistic items. These men in the story are carrying emotional and mental burdens of love,
fear, guilt, and even confusion. Through the use of writing and story telling, Tim O’Brien is able
to share and use writing as an outlet. Through the description of each soldier the reader is able to
understand and comprehend the importance of the things they carried.
In the novel, The Things They Carried, Tim O’Brien is the narrator of the story. These
stories are his personal recollections of his participation in the Vietnam War. Tim O’Brien is an
interesting character who makes it known through his writing that his obligations to his family
and home influenced him to be a soldier. Writing is a way for him to express feelings about the
war and what happened back in Vietnam and the burdens that he continues to carry. O’Brien is
carrying the guilt of war and his painful memories that he and his friends once experienced. His
point of view shapes how he handles current situations and what he is dealt with in life.
Eventually, O’Brien comes to terms with feelings and writing has been a coping mechanism for
him and what he experienced as a young soldier.
Jimmy Cross, a young soldier and leutienant in the novel often represents confusion. His
entrance into the war is without reason idea of why he is there other than that his friends joined
as well. Throughout the novel, Jimmy Cross continues to show uncertainty and confusion for his
actions in life. Jimmy Cross is often showing that he is carrying guilt. The death of Ted
Lavender bears heavily on Jimmy’s heart. Right before Ted Lavender dies; Jimmy was distracted
by Martha a girl from home. He realized that this particular distraction was imperative to get rid
of. He later burns pictures and letters from Martha. His guilt from this experience stays with him
for the rest of his life. As the Christ Figure in the novel Cross bears the grief of Lavender’s death
that others cannot hold. He later makes a personal sacrifice, by burning the letters from Martha
so that her presence will no longer confuse him. Cross makes these sacrifices in a Christ-like
perspective so that he can protect his fellow men better than he could have done before.
Mitchell Sanders is a man that has a strong sense of justice and loyalty. When Cross
leads the troops into the sewage field where Kiowa eventually dies Sanders refuses to forgive
him because he thinks Kiowa should have known better. Sanders also believes that a good war
story often lacks a moral and that sometimes a story should just be a story. He believes in
sticking to the facts. He focuses on the soldiers’ experience, which he thinks is more relevant and
applicable. Sanders who presents the stories that constitute “The Things They Carried” not to
teach a morals but to portray an experience and is an interpreter for O’Brien.
In conclusion, Tim O’Brien’s novel has literal and metaphorical uses for “carrying”.
Some of the characters hold onto guilt, grief, fear, love, and hope while others carry pictures,
letters, bibles, and other materialistic goods that they hold near to them. These men in the story
are carrying emotional and mental burdens of love, fear, guilt, and even confusion [Maybe a
cleaner conclusion is needed]. Through the use of writing and story telling, Tim O’Brien is able
to share and use writing as an outlet. Through the description of each soldier the reader is able to
understand and comprehend the importance of the things they carried.
Comparison Essay of Little Red Riding Hood and Freeway
FREE CHOICE REVISION
One of the most well known fairy tales of almost every generation is Little Red Riding
Hood, and it has been appreciated by populace of every age. What was profound, while reading
Perrault’s version of Little Red Riding Hood, or Grimm’s Little Red Cap; both were exact at
every place in the story line yet the endings differed. That factor was staggering; the conclusion
of Grimm’s version was happier and light hearted. Yet in Perrault’s version the main character
Little Red Riding Hood dies after the wolf’s deception. In the Grimm’s version, the storyline is
parallel, conversely the grandmother and Little Red Riding Hood are consumed. Time passes
and a hunter treads by and cuts them out of the wolf’s corpse. To ensure the wolf’s death, he is
filled with rocks to outweigh him. Continuing the epic adventure, Little Red Riding Hood and
her grandmother are prepared for the oblivion of the next wolf and drowning him. What is
humorous is Grimm’s version had the more enhanced and gripping ending. The story’s morale
implies that children, especially attractive ones, ought to acquire precautions with strangers,
because they may in fact be the prey of the predator. This story is the perfect example of a
parasitic relationship, one party benefits and the other does not. Nonetheless, in many instances
the predator can seem like the most harmless and attack where least expected. Unfortunately, it
is these placid beings that are sometimes the most treacherous, as interpreted the film adaptation
Freeway.
More differences are illustrated than similarities between the original fairy tale and the
film adaptation Freeway. Reese Witherspoon’s character, and the figurative Little Red Riding
hood, Vanessa, is a poor, illiterate, teenage girl living in the slums of Los Angeles. The First
contradiction is the setting, although Vanessa has a home like Riding Hood, it is traumatized by
substance and abuse. After her mother’s arrest, she flees to stay with her grandmother in
Shockton. Bob Wolverton, a serial killer and rapist known as the “I-5 killer", abducts her after
car breaks down, and obliges to transport her to grandmother's house. Wolverton eventually
reveals his true temperament and becomes Vanessa’s attempted murderer. After gaining control
of the situation Vanessa escapes, after shooting Wolverton and injuring him. Vanessa is then
incarcerated and questioned by two detectives. Bob survives with much handicapped damage,
loss of his eye, and a disfiguring face. While Vanessa was on trial, everyone assumed that Bob
was the prey.
Vanessa is sent to a permanent incarceration and acquires friends who plot her escape.
Later on the detectives reexamine the case, and begin to sense Vanessa’s innocence. They then
search Wolverton's home, where they find evidence such as pornography in the locked shed
beside the house, that leads to the idea that he was the predator. And the past is unlocked;
Wolverton's wife commited suicide after the discovery of his pornography and his double
lifestyle. During his entrance home, Wolverton notices the police and he then flees to Vanessa’s
grandmothers. Vanessa finds her grandmother dead when she arrives and finds “I-5 killer” with a
gun ready for his prey. After much struggle, Vanessa murders him. The detectives, who were
aware of her innocence, wait to appeal all of her previous charges.
There are several more differences between the film and fairytale. Vanessa’s
environment is far more hostile than Riding Hood’s. Vanessa has to learn to defend and provide
for herself which is a much more modern contemporary thought in the production of this film.
The protagonist, a figurative wolf (a predator), a serial killer played by the A-list actor, Kiefer
Sutherland. The similarity between the two is this, both Riding Hood characters are both tricked
by the charm and their naivety of their own characteristics. In the film, Vanessa acquires self
defense which is not done in the fairytale. In the Grimm’s version a huntsman rescues the
grandmother and Riding Hood, and the film production no one rescues Vanessa. In the Grimm’s
version the grandmother and Riding Hood deceive the wolf to his own suicide, while in the film
she gets her revenge on false imprisonment and eventually obtaining the opportunity to kill him.
Throughout the film several events, themes, motifs, and rhetorical strategy were recognized in
order to compare and contrast the theatrical production over literary work itself.
The similarities of the film and fairytale are that of a heroine and a villain nature. Several
of the main characteristics are kept true, the red basket and several other characteristics. In both
the Grimm’s (unlike the Perrault’s version) and the film production the wolf figure dies in the
end after being taken down by the antagonist. In both versions the heroine, in this case the
antagonist, must help provide for the grandmother. In order to prove her strength and the fact
that she is capable of individuality she must set the goal for herself so she can overcome the
pessimistic obstacles of life.
It is believed that the movie Freeway uses the symbolism and themes of the original
fairytale, but the film was an intense adaptation to recur thought and evoke feelings into the
audience. The film is not appropriate for all ages. Fairy tales are defined by subtly intimidating
and provoking feelings into the reader while instilling morale. Freeway, based on the classic tale
of Little Red Riding Hood, is no exception. It includes family dysfunction, street violence and
even abuse. It uses many contemporary ideals such as Vanessa, being stronger than the weak
timid girl in the original fairytale. Vanessa stands up to Wolverton, shooting him in the face
during their first confrontation of the movie, and is mixed with moments of clever wit, humor,
and climax of confrontation. However if not for the assignment, I would not have connected the
two and been able to see the literary devices instilled within the productions.
In finality, the original fairy tale is preferred because it teaches the lesson or morals
needed to be taught to the younger generation, in a childlike manner. The conventional point of
view is to dis-way the audience of stereotyping Vanessa via the character she represents. She
deserves vengeance and wallow in it. Vanessa is in fact a villain though, a young woman with a
terrible life of repeated criminal acts, and numerous foster home. The audience is almost forced
to pity her and her situation. Although this can create an accurate perception of life, and what it
may not be, it is the moral compass and the example that it should be for the younger generation.
For being a male, which is in touch with what is preferred, the original story is the one that holds
true. It may lack violence, suspense, verbose arguing; however the original story line of Little
Red Riding Hood stays true to many generations today and it appropriate for all ages.
This being discussed, the film stays true to many of the original tales. Yet, the whole
perception may be skewed by a true believer in what Red Riding Hood had to offer. The more
appropriate version is more appealing to those morally aligned and intact with what children
should be taught at an early age. With seeing the film and reading and being informed with the
moral of the story, the film is no comparison to the beloved fairytale that is enjoyed still to this
day. The conflict, complication, climax, falling action and revolution; all key parts in the film