engaging home and international students: a practical theory dr rachel scudamore
TRANSCRIPT
Engaging home and international students:a practical theory
Dr Rachel Scudamore
By the end of the workshop participants will be able to:
• explain how previous educational experience can impact on student expectations;
• identify their own assumptions and preferences;
• plan for introducing new teaching strategies in their own practice.
2
Intended outcomes
Timetable
1.30 Introductions
Internationalisation
Teaching, learning and diversity
“Culture” and students
3.00 Tea
3.15 Practical teaching strategies
Assessment and feedback
4.15 Summary and conclusions
4.30 Close
Internationalisation: meanings
More / different students
Changes in who you’re teaching, how they learn and what they expect from a UK education
Internationalising the curriculum
Putting the discipline in a wider context (broader sources, application in a range of contexts)
Graduates with a “global outlook”
An outcome of studying an internationalised curriculum in an internationally mixed student / staff body
International students in the UK
https://www.hesa.ac.uk/sfr210
From: Handal & Lauvas (1987) Promoting reflective teaching. SRHE & OUP
P3Ethical / political
justification
P2Theory-based / Practice-based
reasons
P1 Action
Values
Experiences, transferred knowledge etc.
Practical theory
Action in teaching
Teac
hing
pra
ctic
e
A “practical theory”
Internationalisation: questions
What do we mean by “International” students & “Home” students
International students = more diversity (true?)
Why do students go to University?
What does learning mean?
Geert Hofstede
Separating observation and interpretation
Identity collectivism / individualism
Hierarchy larger / smaller “power distance”
Gender masculine / feminine approach to role distribution
Truth uncertainty avoidance / uncertainty tolerance
Virtue long-term orientation / short-term orientation
Hofstede’s“value dimensions” of culture
Geert Hofstede
Individual studies
www.heacademy.ac.uk/international-student-lifecycle
Communicate about:
• Learning outcomes
• Assessment
• Examples
• Perspectives
Talk about:
• Previous experiences
• Expectations
• Groundrules
• Collaboration
Culture and teaching?
Culture as values
Culture as behaviour
High context Low context
Focus on relationships Tasks separate from relationships
Greater use of non-verbal communication and implicit meanings
Highly structured and detailed messages
Values group senseValues individual initiative and decision-making
The purpose of communication ?
High / Low context cultures
After Hall (1977)
Face: a public identityBrown & Levinson (1978)
Positive Negative
Politeness strategies
Express interest, approval, sympathySeek agreementUse in-group identifiersRaise common groundShow knowledge of others’ concernsAssume / assert reciprocity
De-personalise the participantsGive deferenceDeclare an indebtednessMinimise any impositions
Politeness and “face”
After Brown and Levinson (1978)
“a sudden immersion into a non-specific state of uncertainty where the individual is not sure what is expected of him or her, nor what to expect from other people.
It can occur in any situation where an individual is forced to adjust to an unfamiliar social system where previous learning no longer applies”
Hofstede, Pedersen & Hofstede (2002)
Culture shock, learning shock
Culture shock, learning shock
From: Handal & Lauvas (1987) Promoting reflective teaching. SRHE & OUP
P3Ethical / political
justification
P2Theory-based / Practice-based
reasons
P1 Action
Values
Experiences, transferred knowledge etc.
Practical theory
Action in teaching
Teac
hing
pra
ctic
e
A “practical theory”
Approaches to engaging students
Principles drawn from theories of learning Students taking ownership Use of previous knowledge Social interaction
Constructive learning
From: Handal & Lauvas (1987) Promoting reflective teaching. SRHE & OUP
P3Ethical / political
justification
P2Theory-based / Practice-based
reasons
P1 Action
Values
Experiences, transferred knowledge etc.
Practical theory
Action in teaching
Teac
hing
pra
ctic
e
A “practical theory”
Evidence-based teaching
From: Hattie (2009) cited in Atherton (2011)
Evidence-based teaching
After Hattie (2009) cited in Petty (2009)
Influence Effect Size Source of Influence
Feedback 1.13 Teacher Students’ prior cognitive ability
1.04 Student
Instructional quality 1.00 Teacher Direct instruction .82 Teacher Remediation/feedback .65 Teacher Students' disposition to learn .61 Student
Class environment .56 Teacher Challenge of Goals .52 Teacher Peer tutoring .50 Teacher
From: Handal & Lauvas (1987) Promoting reflective teaching. SRHE & OUP
P3Ethical / political
justification
P2Theory-based / Practice-based
reasons
P1 Action
Values
Experiences, transferred knowledge etc.
Practical theory
Action in teaching
Teac
hing
pra
ctic
e
A “practical theory”
What are lectures for?
Lectures
Explicitness
Structure
Clarity
Variety
Challenging
Responsiveness
Learning outcomes
Signposts, framing
Pace, glossary
Audiovisual mix
Questions
Answers
Lecturing: a performance
What’s important?
How do I do it?
Questions and activities in lectures
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pesl/resources/largegroup/question698/
Identify main points
Write a question
Do a calculation
Decide your opinion
Match/group/rank
Propose hypotheses
Analyse a situation
Suggest reasons
Plan your reading
Fill in the graph
Label the diagram
Find an example
Propose your action
Draw a concept map
Compare/contrast
Sequence/flow
Participation in large groups
Asking questions in lectures
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pesl/resources/largegroup/askingqu287/
Using student response systems to improve interaction in lectures
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pesl/resources/largegroup/usingstu175/
See also: Altering lectures in response to student inputhttp://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pesl/resources/largegroup/altering064/
Whole group or sub-groups (structure)
Public/private? (method)
Patterns for answering (method)
Open vs closed questions (task setting)
Questions in large groups
Idiomatic language in teaching
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pesl/internationalisation/video/browse/title/idiomatx891/
Bloom’s taxonomy
Enquiry-based learning:
Task: Explore Describe Apply
Oliver, R. & Herrington, J. (2002).
Cross-cultural exchange activities: getting students started:
• discuss your name: who gave it to you, what does it mean?
• sit next to someone “different” (discuss cognitive dissonance)
• line up (by distance from home, experience, English skills, views.)
• topics in a bag (experience, expectation, surprises – student Qs)
• identify ways to learn more about other cultures 48
Intercultural competence
UKCISA (2009) Discussing difference, discovering similarities
Preparatory exercise on challenges/scenarios of working together:
• Communication preferences• Use of native language• Approach to time, planning, and punctuality• Status and group contributions• Assumptions of agreement / expression of
disagreement• Concepts of humour• Vocal dominance• Educational philosophies
Successful groupwork
A clear task
Assigned roles
• Manager• Researcher• Scribe• Reporter• Checker
Reporting on process and product
Successful groupwork
A collusion continuum (Jude Carroll)
See also: Jude Carroll on plagiarismhttp://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pesl/resources/assessment/judecarr898/
You have asked your students to write an individual report on one of three companies that you name. Three of your students do the following. Where do they cross the line between collaboration and collusion?
1. Come and see you to discuss what the coursework brief means.2. Discuss the coursework brief with other students.3. Look at how others have done similar coursework in the past.4. Discuss the good and bad points of how others have addressed the task in the past.5. Discuss the best way to tackle the assignment.6. Decide to all choose the same company to write about.7. Decide what research needs to be done on the chosen company and how to do it.8. Decide to all do a bit of research on everything but to have specialists who really go into depth on one aspect.9. Brief each other on what they found and on useful sources of information for others to check out.10. Discuss what their individual research/investigation revealed and what it all means.11. Copy each others’ scribbles and library notes.12. Identify the arguments or points that need to be made in the report.13. Structure the arguments; agree which are the strongest points.14. Share out the writing task and correct each other’s drafts.15. Pool the sections then each take the compiled first draft away and write an individual version as the final draft.16. Submit the individually written version for a mark.
“Academic language… is no one's mother tongue”(Bourdieu et al., 1994)
Repetition
Patching
Plagiphrasing
Conventional academic writing
Learning to write
Assessment design
Preparing to write
Teach students about academic writing and plagiarism
discipline-specific examples
practice exercises
peer review
Teach about the assessment criteria
Students to mark old essays and give feedback to the author
Create exercises that give you samples of the students’ writing
for giving feedback
for later comparison with submitted work
The assessed task
Require an personal approach
Give unique data / situation
Use novel formats
Relate directly to class activity
Assess in stages
Literature selection with reasons
Article analysis
Aim and plan
Draft(s) with feedback request
Redraft with commentary on how feedback is addressed
Check author knowledge of work
Don’t permit late topic changes
55
Feedback
56
Feedback
Timely ?
Specific ?
Constructive ?
57
Feedback
59
Feedback
Make the learning outcomes and your assessment criteria clear
Make the feedback relate to the criteria
Use a range of sources for generating feedback
Identify what’s done well and what to improve
Set formative tasks that build towards the summative task
Build in use of feedback as part of improvement
60
Feedback techniques
Approaches to engaging students
Principles drawn from theories of learning Students taking ownership Use of previous knowledge Social interaction
Conversations
Social contact
Active participation
Principles for action
How do your students spend their time?
Listening in class Planning their own
learning Finding answers to
questions Teaching each other Discussing with
tutor/students ?
Atherton, J.S. (2011) Teaching and learning: what works best. http://www.learningandteaching.info/teaching/what_works.htm
Barrett, T. & Cashman, D. (Eds) (2010) A Practitioners’ Guide to Enquiry and Problem-based Learning. Dublin: UCD Teaching and Learning http://www.ucd.ie/t4cms/UCDTLI0041.pdf
Black, P.J. & William, D. (1998) Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. 5(1):7-74.
Bourdieu, P. et al. "Introduction: Language and the relationship to language in the teaching situation" in Academic Discourse: Linguistic Misunderstanding and Professorial Power. Cambridge: Polity Press..
Brierley, G., Hillman, M., Devonshire, E. & Funnell, L. (2002). Description of Round Table Exercise: Environmental Decision-Making about Water Resources in Physical Geography. Available from Learning Designs Web site: http://www.learningdesigns.uow.edu.au/exemplars/info/LD26/
Brown, P. & Levinson, S.C. (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dolan, M. & Macias, I. (2009) “Motivating international students” in The Handbook for Economics lecturers. HEA Economics Network . http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/handbook/international
Hall, E. T. (1976) Beyond Culture. New York: Anchor Press
Handel, G. & Lauvas, P. (1987) Promoting reflective teaching. Milton Keynes: SRHE & OUP.
Hattie, J. (2009) Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Foster , E. Et al (2012) Higher Education: retention and engagement. HEFCE funded project. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/what-works-student-retention/HERE_Project_What_Works_Final_Report
Hofstede, G. (1980) Cultures consequences: : International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications
Hofstede, G.J., Pedersen, P and Hofstede, G. (2002) Exploring Culture. Exercises, Stories and Synthetic Cultures. Boston: Intercultural Press
Lysgaard, S. (1955) Adjustment in a Foreign Society: Norwegian Fulbright Grantees Visiting the United States. International Social Science Bulletin 7:45-51.
Montgomery, C. (2010) Understanding the international student experience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
PESL (2009) Promoting Enhanced Student Learning. University of Nottingham. http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pesl/
Petty, G. (2009) Evidence-based teaching: a practical approach (2nd ed.). Nelson Thornes.
Petty, G. (2011) Teachers toolbox. http://www.teacherstoolbox.co.uk/
Oliver, R. & Herrington, J. (2002). Explore, Describe, Apply: A problem focussed learning design. Learning Designs Web site: http://www.learningdesigns.uow.edu.au/guides/info/G4/index.htm
Surgenor, P. (2010) Teaching toolkit: Large and small group teaching. UCD Teaching and Learning resources. http://www.ucd.ie/t4cms/UCDTLT0021.pdf
Thomas (2012) Building on student engagement and belongiing in Higher Education at a time of change: a summary of findings and recommendations from the What Works? Student Retention and Success programme. HE Academy. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/what-works-student-retention/What_Works_Summary_Report.pdf
UKCISA (2009) Discussing difference, discovering similarities. http://www.ukcisa.org.uk/files/pdf/about/material_media/discussing_difference.pdf
65
References
Second language issues
More complex curriculum design options
Developing academic writing skills
66
Additional material
Students working in a second language
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pesl/internationalisation/video/browse/title/students663/
Brierley et al. (2002)
Learning academic writing and skills of argument
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pesl/internationalisation/video/browse/title/learning800/
Study skills support for international students
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pesl/internationalisation/video/browse/title/studyskx228/