energy industry metadata standards initiative update€¦ · 13/07/2010 · standards initiative:...
TRANSCRIPT
© Energistics 2010
Energy Industry Metadata Standards Initiative:
July 2010 Update
ESRI User Conference July 13, 2010
San Diego, CA
© Energistics 2010
Outline
• Recap of Initiative – Opportunity, Vision, Scope
• ISO 19115 Foundation
• Initiative Deliverables
• Recent Activities
• Revised Timeline for Energy Industry Profile v1.0
2
© Energistics 2010
The Opportunity
>40% of staff time devoted to finding, retrieving, and verifying information, and data growing at 60-80%/yr
= Assembling information relevant to a question becoming more problematic, impacting balance of cost and decision quality
Use cases include: – What bathymetric maps1 are available for this area2?
– What geophysical information1 is available about Project X2?
– Is this the latest version2 of this dataset1?
– Does the copyright2 on this image1 allow me to use it? 1 or other information resource 2 or other selection criterion
3
© Energistics 2010
The Vision
Realize metadata standards and guidelines which enable stakeholders in the energy industry (“the community”) to effectively and efficiently discover, evaluate, and retrieve information resources.
The standards and guidelines will support both proprietary data management needs, and exchange of data between and within organizations.
Leverage existing standards to encourage adoption within the community and integration into the business, and exploit existing organizational resources needed for governance and long-term maintenance.
4
© Energistics 2010
The Big Picture
Metadata Catalog
External Metadata Catalog
Online (Commercial, Government, & Academic)
Partner & Subscription
delivery
Structured resources
Unstructured resources
Application auto-generated
5
© Energistics 2010
Scope
User community: Anyone cataloging, searching, evaluating or accessing information with
value to members of the energy industry: Energy companies & consortia Data & Information providers Software vendors Government agencies & Academia
Resource types: Initial focus on structured and unstructured information resources which
have associated spatial coordinates. For example,
Geospatial data sets & web services Mapping, Interpretation & Modeling project data sets Geospatial web services
Long-term vision is to include resources with location specified using place names
6
© Energistics 2010
The Approach
Build on Existing Standards - • ISO 19115/19119* metadata standards
for geographic information – internationally accepted
• Existing profiles: – North American Profile (NAP) - adapts 19115 to
FGDC standard – European INSPIRE guidelines – ANZLIC Profile - Australia, New Zealand
• Deliver “Energy Industry Profile” (EIP) v1.0 based on energy “community” requirements and best practices gleaned from existing profiles
7
* Including: 19115 Corrigendum, 19119 Amendment 1
© Energistics 2010
North America Profile (NAP): Promote selected optional fields to mandatory
Extension of code lists Addition of values to existing code lists Creation of new code lists
Introduction of a multi-lingual register Compliant to ISO 19135:2005 on registers Metadata items & code lists Accessible on the Web
Example Profile
8
© Energistics 2010
Deliverables
Profile Documentation • Normative Specification • Implementation Guidelines
Exemplars • Real world examples to accompany the specification and
guidelines • Serves as “test set” to validate specification with real
examples • Data(base) and associated XML
9
© Energistics 2010
Status: Recent Activities
Requirements Gathering Completed in Q1 2010 • Request For Comment distributed to Active Participants • Compilation of input from RFC completed
Initiated Development of Deliverables • Normative specification • Exemplar datasets
Feedback to ISO 19115 Revision Project Team • WG analyzed suggested changes to the base standard • Provided 21 detailed comments based on WG analysis &
community requirements • Received results of Project Team’s
consideration of all comments
10
© Energistics 2010
Participants
11
AAPG Apache Arizona State Geol. Survey Boise State Univ. Carbon Lifecycle Technology ConocoPhillips DCP Midstream Deloitte Services LP Devon Energy ETL Solutions Exprodat ExxonMobil 1 First American Spatial Solutions Flare Solutions Fugro Robertson Geoscience Australia Geosoft Ies Brazil Consulting & Services IHS Energy
Maersk Oil1 New Century Software North West Geomatics Oracle1 ORNL P2 Energy Solutions PEMEX PennWell PetroWEB Pioneer Natural Resources1 PPDM1 Priemere Consulting Group SAS Global Oil & Gas Schlumberger1 Shell1 Univ. of Auckland, NZ Virginia Dept of MM&E Wood Mackenzie
Dave Danko, ESRI
Lisa Derenthal, Gimmal
Alan Doniger/Tracy Terrell, Energistics1
Robert Graham, BHP Billiton
Scott Hills, Chevron1
Steve Richard, AZ Geol Survey1
Steering Team Active Participants (SMEs)
1 Energistics member; Bold italics: Accepted invitation to participate in the recent RFC
© Energistics 2010
Exemplars
Engage industry content providers to supply sample data
Include different information resource types, e.g., – Geodatabase, shapefile, layer file – Modeling application file (e.g., Petrel) – Seismic navigation data – Well log (LAS format) – Text document – Production data – Catalog metadata
12
© Energistics 2010
Expected changes in ISO 19115:2011
Changes important to the energy community initiative • New design allowing a Keyword to be assigned a class,
and identification of a reference ontology for that class.
• Added new element, and rearranged schema to facilitate recognition of documented resource type
• Increased precision of metadata timestamp (to nearest second) to enable improved metadata synchronization.
• New approach to encoding for metadata standard using citation instead of just a string.
• Incorporation of service metadata elements
13
© Energistics 2010
Impact of ISO 19115 Revision
Consider: • Significant changes expected to ISO 19115, several important
to energy community
• Would require immediate, major modification of EIP v1.0 to exploit new capabilities, and keep EIP aligned with ISO 19115
• Relatively stable ISO 19115 “Committee Draft” (CD) due Jan. 2011
Conclude: • Base EIP v1.0 on ISO 19115:2011 CD
• Delay publication of EIP v1.0 by 4-6 months (to 1Q2011)
14
© Energistics 2010
Metadata Initiative Timeline
Profile Development
SIG Reviews
Status Report @ ESRI UC 2010
2009 2010 2011
Pilot Projects
Stakeholder Reviews
Profile 1.0 Published
ISO 19115 Working Draft
ISO 19115 Committee Draft
15
© Energistics 2010
For more information …
• Go to www.energistics.org – Asset and Data Management SIG under Communities
• Email: [email protected] or [email protected], or
[email protected], or [email protected]
16
© Energistics 2010
Appendix
The following slides provide reference information for the metadata standard: – Data resources in-scope for the initiative – Use case details – Initiative participant roles – Key metadata packages in ISO 19115
17
© Energistics 2010
Data Included & Priorities
Category Representative Information Resources Profile ver.* Type Examples File-based resources
1 GIS & CAD Maps & Layer representation .mxd, .mxt, .lyr, .pdf, .dwg, .dxf, .dgn 1 GIS data (Vector, Raster) ESRI® shapefile, GeoDatabase,.tif, .jpg 1 Mapping application projects Z-MAP Plus™, PetroSys 1 Modeling application projects (Subsurface properties & structure, Simulation) GOCAD®, Intersect™, Petrel™ 1 Seismic projects data (2D, 3D/Navigation, Raw, Processed) SeisWorks®, EPOS®, PetroBank 1 Well logs (Raw and Processed) Geolog®, .las
2 Text documents (Publications, Reports, Bid packages) .doc, .pdf, .ppt, .txt 2 Tables spreadsheets, .dbf 2 Web sites .html
Relational database resources 1 GIS data (Vector, Raster, TIN) SDE™, Oracle® Spatial, PostGIS 1 Production data (Historical, Real-time) Energy Components, TOW/cs® 1 Well data (Construction, Survey, Interpretation) OpenWorks®, Finder®, SeaBed, PPDM™
2 Document Management Systems Documentum®, FileNet®, OpenText™, SharePoint® Web services
1 GIS data OpenGIS® WMS, WFS, WCS 1 Non GIS data WITSML™, PRODML™
2 Geoprocessing 2 Catalog metadata OpenGIS® CSW
Physical resources 1 Field samples & field documentation 1 Printed maps, logs, cross sections
2 Printed text documents
* Profile version: Resource types in-scope for version 1 have associated, explicit geospatial coordinates.
18
© Energistics 2010
Use Cases
3.2.1.1 Discovery A knowledge worker (user) must be able to discover and identify relevant data needed to
perform his/her work tasks. Standard metadata associated with the data enables users to locate appropriate, available resources without knowledge of the locations, organization, or naming conventions of the repositories in which the data are stored.
3.2.1.2 Recall of Existing Data A user must be able to confirm that he/she has found all existing data as required in
several scenarios. This situation arises frequently in the industry, with users new to the organization or in “look-back” scenarios where users are asked to revisit old projects, prospects, or areas given only information such as the area of interest (AOI) or project name.
19
© Energistics 2010
Use Cases (continued)
3.2.1.3 Evaluation of Data / Fit for Purpose In the energy business, a user must know the relevance or pertinence of the data to be used in
processing, modeling and analysis workflows. The knowledge worker needs to determine if the data is “fit for purpose”, by evaluating criteria such as vintage, source, quality, accuracy, lineage, etc.
3.2.1.4 On-going Data Updates Often data becomes obsolete because one or more of its ancestors has been updated. In
this case, updating the dependent data set requires knowledge of the processing lineage, including the complete hierarchy of relevant ancestors, as well as tools, methods, and parameters used to process the data.
3.2.1.5 Data Sharing Common practices in the energy industry require users to share data externally (e.g., with JV
partners) and internally (e.g., with other organizations). A user receiving the data must be able to determine the appropriate use of shared data and ensure that it is used properly and/or combined with other data without introducing errors.
20
© Energistics 2010
Use Cases (continued)
3.2.1.6 Use Constraints A knowledge worker needs to know the conditions under which they are permitted to access
and use a particular dataset. Commercial or purchased data is often acquired under license with use constraints. Additionally, it now is increasingly common to find use constraints imposed by foreign governments which prohibit export of data produced to support operations within their boundaries.
3.2.1.7 Appropriate Use A user needs to understand the intended or recommended use for a given dataset.
Metadata produced by the publisher is critical to the appropriate use of the content, whether published by a vendor, government agency, joint-venture partner, or internal organization within a company. Examples of this kind of metadata include scale-appropriateness and vintage. Lacking this metadata from the publisher, a user may use the data inappropriately or combine the content with other data in a manner that produces erroneous results.
21
© Energistics 2010
Initiative Participant Roles
• Energistics – Serves as a custodian, – Facilitates the development, and – Encourages and supports adoption
• Asset/Data Mgmt SIG – Reviews and approves standard
• Metadata Work Group – Produces the standard, and – Steers the activities of the
participants
• Active Participants – Serves as SMEs – Provides feedback and input to the
development of the standard
• Interested Parties – Reviews and plans for
implementation in their organization
22
© Energistics 2010
Key Metadata Packages
Metadata Entity
Portrayal Catalogue
Constraint Content
Distribution
Citation & Responsible
Party
Metadata Extension
Reference System
Extent
Units of Measure
Spatial Representation
Data Quality
Application Schema
Maintenance
Identification
23