emotion in typographic design: initial findings on gender effects

34
Emotion in typographic design: Initial findings on gender effects Beth E. Koch, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Design University of Minnesota Duluth

Upload: jatin

Post on 23-Feb-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Emotion in typographic design: Initial findings on gender effects Beth E. Koch, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Design University of Minnesota Duluth. Brain. “Ultimately the key to understanding all visual communication lies in the neurological workings of the brain” (Barry, 2005). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

Emotion in typographic design: Initial findings on gender effects

Beth E. Koch, Ph.D.Assistant Professor of Design

University of Minnesota Duluth

Page 2: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

Brain

Page 3: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

“Ultimately the key to understanding all visual communication lies in the neurological workings of the brain”

(Barry, 2005).

Page 4: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

Not much is empirically known about how people comprehend

visual systems such as graphic design and typography.

Page 5: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

People seem to intuitively decipher the meaning of typefaces

(Van Leeuwen, 2005)

Page 6: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

People respond emotionally …to art (Wittgenstein, 2005),

to design (Norman, 2004), and to products (Desmet, 2002).

Page 7: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects
Page 8: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

Q1: Does viewing specific typefaces produce emotional responses?

Q2: When viewing typestyle designs, do all people feel the same emotions?

Q3: Are certain emotions predominantly associated with the formative design features of typefaces— differences in classification (serif or sans serif), terminal construction (angular or rounded),

character width (condensed or extended), and weight (light or bold)?

Page 9: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

Designing EmotionsPieter Desmet, Industrial Design Professor

Delft University of Technology

Page 10: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

OMC

Page 11: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

What are we studying?Congeniality (adjectives)

Personality characteristicsEmotional connotationConnotative messages

Emotional meaningDress

Descriptions

Page 12: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

No common presentation format:Introduction to the Declaration of Independence

— Poffenberger & Franken (1923)

“Now is the time for all good men… ” — Davis & Smith (1933)

Artificial languages “ere sasesuth wid oteren bo” — Weaver (1949)

Format to approximate English — Wendt (1968)

Alphabets (ABC… abc… ?+!@...) — Kastl &Child (1968), Tannenbaum et al. (1964), Benton (1979)

“Lorem ipsum” greek —Morrison (1986)

Typeface sampler — Koch (2011)

Page 13: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

✔✔✔

Product emotion research Desmet (2002)

Page 14: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects
Page 16: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects
Page 17: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

Participants

Page 18: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

Analysisand

Findings

Paired t-Tests α = .05

People respond to type designs with emotion.

Certain emotions are associated with the formative design features of typefaces.

Page 19: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

1. People responded to type designs with emotion rather than indifference.

2. People agreed about the emotions associated with specific typefaces.

3. Certain emotions were associated withthe formative features of typefaces.

Page 20: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

n = 41

n = 18

n = 23

Disgust [Paired t(df41) = 5.4]

Page 21: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

n = 41

n = 18

n = 23

Disgust [Paired t(df41) = 5.4]

Page 22: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

HvsHDesire Hope

Satisfaction Joy

Pride Fascination

POSITIVE VALENCE n = 18 males respond to character width:

condensed versus extended

Page 23: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

n = 41

n = 18

n = 23

Disgust [Paired t(df41) = 5.4]

Page 24: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

HvsHDesire Hope

Satisfaction Joy

Pride Fascination

POSITIVE VALENCE n = 23 females respond to character width:

condensed versus extended

Page 25: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

HvsHDesire Hope

Satisfaction Joy

Pride Fascination

POSITIVE VALENCE visual comparison of responses according to gender: n = 41 participants character width: condensed versus extended

Page 26: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

HvsHDesire Hope

Satisfaction Joy

Pride Fascination

POSITIVE VALENCE visual comparison of responses according to gender: n = 41 participants character width: condensed versus extended

females

males

all respondents

Page 27: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

HvsHDisgust Fear

Dissatisfaction Sadness

Shame Boredom

NEGATIVE VALENCE n = 23 females respond to character width:

condensed versus extended

Page 28: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

HvsHDisgust Fear

Dissatisfaction Sadness

Shame Boredom

NEGATIVE VALENCE n = 18 males respond to character width:

condensed versus extended

Page 29: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

HvsHDisgust Fear

Dissatisfaction Sadness

Shame Boredom

NEGATIVE VALENCE visual comparison of responses according to gender: n = 41 participants character width: condensed versus extended

Page 30: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

HvsHDisgust Fear

Dissatisfaction Sadness

Shame Boredom

NEGATIVE VALENCE visual comparison of responses according to gender: n = 41 participants character width: condensed versus extended

females

males

all respondents

Page 31: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

IMPORTANCE OF THE METHOD

Avoids problems of self-reportAllows report of multiple feelings and

co-occuring feelingsAvoids problems with cognition of

language and readingForms keystone with emotion research

Page 32: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

IMPLICATIONS

It is increasingly important for all people to have some degree of design understanding,

not only to decipher messages, but to reciprocate with

visually appropriate responses.

Page 33: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

IMPLICATIONS

For design researchers

Page 34: Emotion in typographic design:  Initial  findings on gender effects

CONCLUSION