emma horizontal and vertical corrector study david kelliher astec/cclrc/ral 14th april, 2007

23
EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

Upload: gertrude-benson

Post on 04-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study

David Kelliher

ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL

14th April, 2007

Page 2: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

Introduction

• Ability to move magnets perpendicular to the beamline in the horizontal plane allows horizontal corrections to be made.

• Vertical corrections made using kicker magnets.• There will be 2 BPMs per cell, providing both

horizontal and vertical displacement measurements.

• No BPMs will be placed in those long drifts with an RF cavity.

Page 3: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

BPMs and vertical kicker location

Neil Bliss 3/4/07

Page 4: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

MADX ‘Correct’ Module

• The CORRECT statement makes a complete closed orbit or trajectory correction using the computed values at the BPMs from the Twiss table.

• There are three corrections modes – MICADO, LSQ, SVD. MICADO is used in this study as it tries to minimise the number of correctors used.

• The MICADO algorithm solves a system of linear equations

• Where b is the vector of BPM measurements, is the correction kick vector and A is the beam response matrix to a set of kicks. The algorithm iteratively minimises the norm of the residual vector r using least squares method. At each iteration it finds the corrector that most effectively lowers r.m.s BPM distortion.

bθ .Ar

Page 5: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

Error simulation

• Errors in the magnet horizontal (=50m) and vertical (=25m) position simulated by using the MADX function EALIGN.

• Random errors with a Gaussian distribution, cut-off point at 2

• MADX was run with many instances of such randomly perturbed magnets in order to generate useful statistics.

Page 6: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

Error distribution – F magnet

Page 7: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

BPM location and Horizontal orbit distortion

Page 8: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

Horizontal tune / Horizontal Orbit distortion

1 seed used to simulate random alignment errors

Page 9: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

Energy Scan1 seed D F D F

Page 10: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

10 MeV50 seeds

D F D F

1 2 3 4

Page 11: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

15 MeV50 seeds

D F D F

1 2 3 4

Page 12: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

Energy Scan1 seed

D F D F

1 2 3 4

Page 13: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

Energy Scan1 seed

D F D F

1 2 3 4

Page 14: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

Variation of Corrector strengths

Page 15: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

Variation of Corrector strengths

Page 16: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

Horizontal Correction - Conclusions

• No optimal position for BPMs can be inferred from this study.

• Outside the vicinity of energies which correspond to integral tunes, the difference in orbit correction accuracy due to BPM position is of the micron order (if all available correctors used).

• Position of BPMs down to engineering considerations.• Corrector strengths were allowed to vary in this study

(not feasible in reality). • How to find corrector strengths, constant over energy

range, which best reduce horizontal orbit distortion?

Page 17: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

Number of correctors and vertical orbit distortion

Page 18: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

Vertical Tune / Orbit Distortion

1 seed used to simulate random alignment errors

Page 19: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

1 Corrector – Variable Strength

Page 20: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

1 Corrector – Constant Strength

Page 21: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

2 Correctors – Variable Strength

Page 22: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

2 Correctors – Constant Strength

Page 23: EMMA Horizontal and Vertical Corrector Study David Kelliher ASTEC/CCLRC/RAL 14th April, 2007

Conclusion

• Due to strongly varying phase advance per cell over the energy range, it is difficult to correct with constant corrector strength

• There is no simple way to solve this problem using existing MADX routines.

• A smart interpolation method should be used to find the best set of correctors to reduce both vertical and horizontal orbit distortion over the energy range.