emanuele cosenza, sogesca: energy review, energy baseline and enpi

Supporting Local Authoritites in the Development and Integration of SEAPs with

Energy management SystemsAccording to ISO 500001www.50001seaps.eu

@50001SEAPs

3rd Centralized Training Session

Thursday, 19 November – Friday, 20 November – 2015

Lyon (FRA)

Integrating SEAP+EnMS: Energy Review, Energy Baseline

and definition of the EnPI

Emanuele Cosenza

SOGESCA Srl

[email protected]



@50001SEAPs 2

EMANUELE COSENZA

Municipalities supported in the Project Activities:

• Pordenone (52,000 inh.)

• Montecchio Maggiore (24,000 inh.)

• Marostica (14,000 inh.)

• Federazione dei Comuni del Camposampierese (11

Municipalities, 97,000 inh.)

SOGESCA

Project Development



@50001SEAPs 3

TRAINING MENU

SEAP+EnMS in theory

SEAP+EnMS in theory

• Energy review

• Energy Baseline

• Definition of the EnPI

SEAP+EnMS in practice

SEAP+EnMS in practice

• Working Group exercises on:

1. Energy use evaluation in a

Municipality

2. Definition of a Monitoring Plan

CO

FE

E B

RE

AK



@50001SEAPs

The purpose of the ISO 50001 standard is to enable

organizations to establish the systems and process necessary to

improve energy performance, including energy efficiency, use

and consumption.

ISO implementation is intended to lead to CO2 emission

reduction and environmental impacts related to energy use

and consumption;

Applicable to all types and sizes of organization;

It does not establish absolute requirements for energy

performance.

PURPOSE OF THE ISO 50001



@50001SEAPs

Help and enable

organizations to

establish the

systems and

processes necessary

to improve:

Energy

performance;

Energy use;

Energy

consumption;

Energy

efficiency

PURPOSE OF THE ISO 50001

World wide

application will

contribute to:

More efficient

use of energy

sources;

Enhanced

competitiveness;

Reduce GHG

and other

environmental

impacts

Leading to reduction

in:

GHG

emissions;

Energy costs;

Other

environmental

impacts

(climate

change);

Through systematic

management of

energy

IMPLEMENTATION



@50001SEAPs

ISO 50001 AND SEAPs: SAME PURPOSES, DIFFERENT

METHODOLOGIES

CO2 emission reduction and environmental impacts related to

energy use and consumption;

ISO 50001 applicable to all types and sizes of organization;

ISO 50001 It does not require specific improvements of the

energy performance “minimum targets”;

Otherwise SEAP “minimum targets” are defined: 20-20-20 +

(40%/2030 GHG reduction according with the new CoM)

SEAP applicable in a L.G. or groups of LGs (Joint SEAP option 1-

2). ISO 50001 in industry/Tertiary/Services etc.



@50001SEAPs

SEAP AND SEAP+EnMS, WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES?

SEAPs SEAP+EnMS

Internal Structure of the Public Administration Top Management (official commitment)

Baseline Emission Inventory Energy Baseline + definition of EnPI

Vision of the most relevant aspects Energy Policy (official commitment)

Action Plans Action Plans

Implementation Implementation

Monitoring and reporting of the actions Monitoring and measure for Effectiveness (what

to measure, how, who is the responsible,

frequency, …)

Internal and External Communication

(stakeholders involvement, Energy Days, …)

Internal and external Communication

Approval by the C.C.

Approval by JRC

Certification and Registration (stage 1 and Stage

2)



@50001SEAPs

SEAP AND SEAP+EnMS, WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES?

SEAPs SEAPs + EnMS

Energy Consumption in LGs (Buildings, Public

Lighting, Vehicle fleet)

(Should be an estimation)

Energy Consumption in Public Administration

(Buildings, Public Lighting, Vehicle fleet)

(Real consumption data)

Energy Consumption in Private sectors:

Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Private

Transport, Waste production, Renewable

energy Production (…)

Definition of EnMS boundaries:

Application of the EnMS at LG areas including

EnMS approach for private sectors

management

Definition of consumption indicators

(MWh/year – CO2 reduction/year)

Energy Performance Indicators (EnPI)

(Detailed indicators about energy use)

Definition of monitoring indicators Definition of monitoring indicators



@50001SEAPs

SEAP+EnMS BENEFITS

Allows systems and processes to be established to improve

energy performance, energy use and energy consumption;

Introduces a continual improvement process;

Creates energy monitoring plans as well as energy analysis

activites;

Formalizes energy policy and objectives

Improve energy efficiency, energy consumption and use, and the

drive toward innovation.

Institutionalization of the SEAP



@50001SEAPs

SEAP+EnMS BOTTOM LINES BENEFITS

Reduction in energy costs;

More efficient use of available energy sources;

Improved business (services in a LG) performance;

Clear definition of roles and responsibilities about energy issues;

Clear vision of the energy balance of the territory;

Networking with stakeholders for local energy planning;

Reduction in GHG emissions;

Monitoring and implementation of legal requirements focused on

energy issues



@50001SEAPs

SEAP+EnMS KEY ELEMENTS

En

erg

y M

an

ag

em

en

tTechnical

(Understanding energy use, Control)

Data metering

Analysis - Competency

People Energy Efficient culture

Awareness – Motivation – Training - Commitment

Commitment

(Organizational)

Time – Resources - Capital



@50001SEAPs

SEAP+EnMS ENERGY BASELINE, ENERGY REVIEW AND

EnPI Courrent energy sources, past and present energy use

and consumption, estimation of future energy

use and consumptio

RES potential, potentialenergy sources, energy

efficiency potentialNew Baseline forecasting

Facilities, equipments and suppliers that affect energy

use and consumption. Determine courrent energy

use and consumption

Energy use analysis

Identification of

significant energy use

Identify and

prioritize

opportunities of

improving energy

performance



@50001SEAPs

LIST OF THE PROCEDURES – EnMS DOCUMENTATION

Procedures of the System (EnMS)

• Energy Uses Evaluation Energy Review (WP3)

• Legal requirements

• Energy objectives, energy targets and EnMS Action Plan (WP4)

• Competence, training and awareness

• Communication (internal and external) (WP6)

• Documentation control

• Monitoring, measurement and analysis (WP5)

• Nonconformities, Correttive Actions and Preventive Actions

• Audit

• Management Review

• Monitoring suppliers Design

• + SEAP Management and Monitoring

Operative procedures

• Public lighting systems

• Heating plants and boilers

• Air conditioning systems

• Public vehicle fleet

• Private sectors (SEAP)

• Other



@50001SEAPs

ENERGY REVIEW

ISO 50001 par. 4.4.3: The organization shall develop, record, and

maintain an energy review. The methodology and criteria used to

develop the energy review shall be documented. To develop the energy

review, the organization shall:

Analyse energy use and energy consumption based on measurement and other data;

Based on the analysis of energy use and consumption, identify the area of significant

energy use (facilities, equipment, systems, process and personnel working for, or on

behalf of, the organization that significantly affect energy use consumption);

Identify other relevant variables affecting significant energy use (external temperatures

etc.);

Determine the current and the future energy use and consumption;

Identify, prioritize and record opportunities for improving energy performance.



@50001SEAPs

ENERGY USE ANALYSIS AND DEFINITION OF THE

ENERGY BASELINE

Definition of the boundaries in SEAP+EnMS development

Public Buidings and facilities;

Public Lighting;

Vehicles fleet;

Private sectors: Residential, Commercial, Agriculture, Industrial, Public

and Private Transport

are not included in the EnMS boundaries and are not directly

influenced and controlled by the LG, but they represent significant energy use

sectors in the LG area

LGs direct energy use

sectors influenced and

controlled by the LG



@50001SEAPs

LIST OF THE PROCEDURES

Procedures of the Sistem (EnMS)

• Energy Uses Evaluation

IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECT ENERGY USES

Considering the results of the energy analysis, the direct energy use by

the municipality are identified by the Energy Team in the following

categories or within them:

Energy Consumption of Public Buildings;

Energy Consumption of the municipal vehicle fleet;

Energy Consumption of public lighting system;

RES Installations from public initiative;



@50001SEAPs


ENERGY BASELINE

Definition of the direct energy use in LG

Category Energy Use Energy YearData

consumptionU.M.

Consumption/Year (MWh)

SCHOOLS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 580.000 KWh 580,00SCHOOLS Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 560.000,00 m3 5.491,11SCHOOLS Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 1.000,00 l 10,96ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 2.847.721,00 KWh 2.847,72ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 347.470,00 m3 3.407,14ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 750,00 l 4,95ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 1.000,00 l 10,96SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 1.012.386,00 KWh 1.012,39SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 527.406,00 m3 5.171,51SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 800,00 l 5,28SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 900,00 l 9,86OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 750.000,00 KWh 750,00OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 600.000,00 m3 5.883,33OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 800,00 l 5,28OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 500,00 l 5,48PARKING AREAS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 602.629,00 KWh 602,63CEMETERIES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 67.009,00 KWh 67,01VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption Gasoline 2012 48.723,20 l 468,23VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption LG 2012 144,06 l 0,94VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption Diesel 2012 30.665,15 l 336,09PUBLIC LIGHTING Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 6.407,71 MWh 6.407,71

TOTAL 33.078,58



@50001SEAPs


ENERGY BASELINE

Where they come from these data?

Energy bills;

Billing consumption paid to the different suppliers of energy (electricity,

natural gas, fuel, etc.)

(where possible) Other data were collected through survey and analysis

specifications developed during the performance of energy audits of

various buildings owned by LG.

Tool proposed in the 1st and 2nd Centralized Training where used for italian

Municipalities

Dati 50001 Massanzago\raccolta dati consumi energia P.A. paes

consegnato.xls

Dati 50001 Massanzago/raccolta dati consumi energia P.A. paes consegnato.xls



@50001SEAPs


ENERGY BASELINE

Definition of the direct energy use in LG: be carefull!

Category Energy Use Energy YearData

consumptionU.M.


SCHOOLS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 580.000 KWh 580,00SCHOOLS Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 560.000,00 m3 5.491,11SCHOOLS Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 1.000,00 l 10,96ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 2.847.721,00 KWh 2.847,72ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 347.470,00 m3 3.407,14ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 750,00 l 4,95ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 1.000,00 l 10,96SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 1.012.386,00 KWh 1.012,39SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 527.406,00 m3 5.171,51SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 800,00 l 5,28SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 900,00 l 9,86OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 750.000,00 KWh 750,00OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 600.000,00 m3 5.883,33OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 800,00 l 5,28OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 500,00 l 5,48PARKING AREAS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 602.629,00 KWh 602,63CEMETERIES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 67.009,00 KWh 67,01VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption Gasoline 2012 48.723,20 l 468,23VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption LG 2012 144,06 l 0,94VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption Diesel 2012 30.665,15 l 336,09PUBLIC LIGHTING Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 6.407,71 MWh 6.407,71

TOTAL 33.078,58



@50001SEAPs


ENERGY BASELINE

Definition of the direct energy use in LG: be carefull!

Procedures of the System (EnMS)


• Legal requirements

• Energy objectives, energy targets and EnMS Action Plan

• Competence, training and awareness

• Communication (internal and external)

• Documentation

• Monitoring, measurement and analysis

• Nonconformities, Correttive Actions and Preventive Actions

• Audit

• Management Review

• Monitoring suppliers Design

• + SEAP Management and Monitoring

Represent a crucial step in order

to manage direct energy use

especially for

buildings/facilities where

energy final users are third

parties



@50001SEAPs


ENERGY BASELINE

Definition of the direct energy use in a LG

Energy Consumption in LG 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Electricity Consumption in Buildings (kWh) 4.823.310 5.169.116 4.631.749 4.528.085 4.647.538

Thermal Consumption in Buildings (m3) 3.008.620 2.567.462 2.003.016 1.952.378 1.402.726

We are already in the

Monitoring phase



@50001SEAPs


ENERGY BASELINE


Energy consumption in LG 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Public Lighting (kWh) 7.309.420 7.425.813 7.492.428 7.393.484 7.085.875We are already in the

Monitoring phase



@50001SEAPs


ENERGY BASELINE


2010Diesel consumption in

LitersGasoline consumption in

Liters

LG Vehicle fleet 4.599,0 8.357,2



@50001SEAPs

LIST OF THE PROCEDURES

Procedures of the Sistem (EnMS)


IDENTIFICATION OF INDIRECT ENERGY USES

In addition, energy uses are identified in the territory, on which the City to

act by the actions of the SEAP, within the following categories:

Energy consumption in Residential sector

Energy consumption in the Local Public Transport

Energy consumption in private Transport

Energy consumption in Industry

RES production in private sectors

Energy consumption in Tertiary sector

Energy consumption in Agriculture



@50001SEAPs


ENERGY BASELINE

Definition of the indirect energy use according to the SEAP requirements

Energy use Energy U.M. Year 2010Annual consumption

in MWh according with the baseline SEAP

Hot water and heating consumptions METHANE m3 32.043.918,12 313.448,18

Electricity consumptions Electr. MWh 61.181,97 61.181,97

Hot water and heating consumptions METHANE m3 18.945.404,14 185.320,73

Electricity consumptions Electr. MWh 109.101,09 109.101,09

Local Public Transport Diesel ton 585.000,00 6.411,60

Fuel consumption in private Transport Gasoline ton 9.979,30 121.163,71

Fuel consumption in private Transport Diesel ton 13.045,46 155.580,24

Fuel consumption in private Transport Liquid gas ton 594,70 6.748,03

Thermal energy consumption in Industry METHANE m3 2.543.359,93 24.878,72

Electricity consumptions in Industry Electr. MWh 45.199,84 45.199,84

TOTAL 1.029.034,10



@50001SEAPs


ENERGY BASELINE

Definition of the direct/indirect energy use according to the SEAP

requirements

2%

9%

48%

1%

15%

0,004

25%

Final Energy Consumption per Sector [MWh]Edifici, attrezzature/impianti comunali

Edifici, attrezzature/impianti terziari (noncomunali)

Edifici residenziali

Illuminazione pubblica comunale

Industrie (escluse le industrie contemplate nel Sistema europeo di scambio delle quote di emissione – ETS)Parco auto comunale

Trasporti pubblici

Trasporti privati e commerciali



@50001SEAPs


ENERGY BASELINE

Where they come from the data consumption of private sectors?

Energy consumption data coming from D.S.O. (Electricity and Natural

Gas);

National/Regional/Provincial database (fuel sales; diesel consumption in

Residential Sector; RES Production at Local level; etc)

Following a bottom-up approach in data collection which represent one of

the requirements of our Project!



@50001SEAPs


ENERGY BASELINE

Through energy consumption data collection we defined:

Energy baseline;

Energy Review;

And now, through the "Energy use evaluation procedure" to establish:

Significant or not significant energy use

Documentazione Pordenone\50.001_Pordenone\Procedure ISO

50.001\PSE_01_Valutazione usi energia rev.1 del 13.11.2015.docx

Documentazione Pordenone/50.001_Pordenone/Procedure ISO 50.001/PSE_01_Valutazione usi energia rev.1 del 13.11.2015.docx



@50001SEAPs

DEFINITION OF SIGNIFICANT AND NOT SIGNIFICANT

ENERGY USE

DIRECT ENERGY USES

Criteria 1

Percentage of energy use compared to total

consumption

If <2%

Points 0

If >2% and

<8%

Points 5

If >8%

Points 10

Criteria 2

Potential reduction of energy consumption through

energy audits assessed complete or alternatively

estimated from literature data on improvement

opportunities applicable

If <2%

Points 0

If >2% and

<5%

Points 2

If >5%

Points 5

Criteria 3

Investment Payback period evaluated through

comprehensive energy audits or alternatively estimated

from literature data on improvement opportunities

applicable

If >10 years

Points 0

If >5 years and

<10 years

Points 2

If <5 years

Points 5

Payback period could become interesting for

ESCOs and for the Political staff who is in

charge to take decisions



@50001SEAPs


ENERGY USE

DIRECT ENERGY USESCategory Energy Use Energy Year Data consumption U.M.


% CR.1 CR.2 CR.3 TotalResults (S/NS)

SCHOOLS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 580.000 KWh 580,00 2,0% 5 2 2 9 S

SCHOOLS Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 560.000,00 m3 5.491,11 24,8% 10 5 2 17 S

SCHOOLS Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 1.000,00 l 10,96 0,0% 0 NS

ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 2.847.721,00 KWh 2.847,72 10,3% 10 2 2 14 S

ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 347.470,00 m3 3.407,14 12,3% 10 2 2 14 S

ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 750,00 l 4,95 0,0% 0 NS

ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC BUILDINGS Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 1.000,00 l 10,96 0,0% 0 NS

SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 1.012.386,00 KWh 1.012,39 3,6% 5 2 2 9 S

SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 527.406,00 m3 5.171,51 18,6% 10 2 2 14 S

SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 800,00 l 5,28 0,0% 0 NS

SPORT INFRASTRUCTURES Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 900,00 l 9,86 0,0% 0 NS

OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 750.000,00 KWh 750,00 0,0% 0 NS

OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Natural Gas consumption Nat. Gas 2012 600.000,00 m3 5.883,33 0,0% 0 NS

OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Liquid Gas consumption LG 2012 800,00 l 5,28 0,0% 0 NS

OTHER PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURES Diesel Consumption Diesel 2012 500,00 l 5,48 0,0% 0 NS

PARKING AREAS Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 602.629,00 KWh 602,63 2,2% 5 5 5 15 S

CEMETERIES Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 67.009,00 KWh 67,01 0,2% 0 5 5 10 S

VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption Gasoline 2012 48.723,20 l 468,23 1,7% 0 0 0 0 NS

VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption LG 2012 144,06 l 0,94 0,0% 0 0 0 0 NS

VEHICLE FLEET Fuel consumption Diesel 2012 30.665,15 l 336,09 1,2% 0 0 0 0 NS

PUBLIC LIGHTING Electricity consumption Electr. 2012 6.407,71 MWh 6.407,71 23,1% 10 5 5 20 S

TOTAL 33.078,58 100,0%

Let’s take a look to

the file



@50001SEAPs

DEFINITION OF SIGNIFICANT AND NOT SIGNIFICANT ENERGY

USE

INDIRECT ENERGY USES (PRIVATE SECTORS ACCORDING WITH SEAP

REQUIREMENTS)

Criteria 1

Percentage of energy use compared to the

total consumption in the territory as calculated

in the "baseline"

It is awarded the maximum score of 10 points to the

percentage increased, and proportionally intermediate

scores are assigned until reaching zero for lower

percentages.

Criteria 2

Interest from "stakeholders"

If not specific

interest of the

"stakeholders"

0 points

If general interest

of the

"stakeholders"

5 points

If specific

interest of the

"stakeholders"

10 points

Remember that according to the WP4 we have to

implement 3 measures in during the year after

SEAP approval…



@50001SEAPs


ENERGY USE

INDIRECT ENERGY USES

Energy use Energy U.M. Year 2010

Annual consumption in MWh according

with the baseline SEAP

% CR.1assessments made by

stakeholdersTotal results

Hot water and heating consumptions METHANE m3 32.043.918,12 313.448,18 30,7% 10 10

Electricity consumptions Electr. MWh 61.181,97 61.181,97 6,0% 2 2

Hot water and heating consumptions METHANE m3 18.945.404,14 185.320,73 18,1% 6 6

Electricity consumptions Electr. MWh 109.101,09 109.101,09 10,7% 3 3

Local Public Transport Diesel ton 585.000,00 6.411,60 0,0% 0 0

Fuel consumption in private Transport Gasoline ton 9.979,30 121.163,71 11,8% 4 4

Fuel consumption in private Transport Diesel ton 13.045,46 155.580,24 15,2% 5 5

Fuel consumption in private Transport Liquid gas ton 594,70 6.748,03 0,7% 0 0

Thermal energy consumption in Industry METHANE m3 2.543.359,93 24.878,72 2,4% 1 1

Electricity consumptions in Industry Electr. MWh 45.199,84 45.199,84 4,4% 1 1

TOTAL 1.029.034,10 100,0%

This evaluation come from the Baselne + Energy

Review and from meeting with stakholders.

As in Montecchio Maggiore Example



@50001SEAPs


ENERGY USE

THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS CONCERNING THE SIGNIFICANT/NOT

SIGNIFICANT ENERGY USE WILL BE REPORTED IN THE ENERGY REVIEW

DOCUMENT AS WELL AS IN THE TABLE OF THE EnPI

kWh/m2th

kWh/m3th

kWh/m2el

kWhel/th produced by renewable energy plant/year

Costs indicators:

€/kWhth/m3

€/kWhel

Analisi Energetica Iniziale Bozza rev AR 09 09 2015.docx

Analisi Energetica Iniziale Bozza rev AR 09 09 2015.docx



@50001SEAPs

INTRODUCING WORKING GROUP ACTIVITIES

Working Groups – Implementing SEAP+EnMS

Partners divided in 3 small groups will work together on:

Energy use evaluation in a Municipality – Exercise 1

15 minutes working groups

5 minutes each group: presentation of the results and discussion

Definition of a Monitoring Plan – Exercise 2

15 minutes working groups

5 minutes each group: presentation of the results and discussion



@50001SEAPs

INTRODUCING WORKING GROUP ACTIVITIES

Working Groups – Implementing SEAP+EnMS

GROUP FIFTYCRES Expert PartnerAMET Less expert partner

OURENSE Less expert partnerDENSKSTATT Less expert partner

OTHERS

GROUP THOUSANDPNEC Expert PartnerARM Less expert partner

ALBEA Less expert partnerAMORCE Non expert partnerOTHERS

GROUP ONESEAPECQ Expert Partner

EKODOMA Less expert partnerMT PARTENAIRES Less expert partner

OTHERS



@50001SEAPs 36

THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION!

Emanuele Cosenza

SOGESCA Srl

www.sogesca.it

[email protected]

http://www.sogesca.it/

mailto:[email protected]

emanuele cosenza, sogesca: energy review, energy baseline and enpi

Business