elearning
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
CSI Communication (May 2005) - White paper
Integration of e-Learning with Traditional Education
Shashank Hiwarkar
ETH Research Lab
Abstract
This paper presents an approach for integrating e-learning with the traditional
education system. A conceptual map is then created for this integration leading
to a functional model for open and flexible learning. In the proposed integration,
convergence of CD-based, class-based and web-based education is
recommended and an architecture to achieve this convergence is presented. In
order to transform the existing schools, colleges and universities into digital
campuses, an inclusive system architecture is designed for digital campus. A
case study is given on actual implementation in a conventional school.
Integration of e-learning with traditional education is not only possible but also
highly effective with the proposed model.
What is e-Learning?
Advances in Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) have
significantly transformed the way we live and work today. This transformation is so
ubiquitous and pervasive that we often talk about the emergence of
―knowledge economy‖, knowledge-based society‖ and ―knowledge era‖.
ICT had fundamentally three effects on human society one, the barrier of
geography has been dissolved; ―Distance is dead‖ is the new metaphor.
Second, the concept of time itself has undergone change. One can interact
now synchronously as well as un-synchronously. The events can also be simulated
and activities can take place in cyber space on pre-defined time scales. Lastly,
ICT allows us to virtualise almost any human activity, including the individual
himself along with the environment in which he is immersed in. No wonder,
advances in ICT have impacted the human civilization more than anything else
in history ever before.
Along with other fields of human activities, ICT is also having significant
transformational effects on education. e-learning strategies allow individual
learners to choose contents, time and pace of learning and in this way a new
revolution has begun in education and training. Given these transformational
roles of ICT it is important to understand how different e-learning is from
traditional education system. In other words, we must first define what e-learning
is after all .
Quite simply, e-learning should be defined as learning opportunities delivered
and facilitated by electronic means. In the e-learning mode, educational
contents are delivered by electronic technology. However, it is not correct to
assume that e-learning differs from traditional system only in the way has
contents are delivered. e-learning imparts all the three main components of
learning, namely contents, learning methodologies, and teaching or tutoring
methodologies on one hand and e-learning can supplement and complement
the traditional education system on the other hand. It can completely be an
alternative system to the traditional education system.
This paper basically focuses on integration of traditional education system with e-
learning. In e-learning, three different forms of computer based systems have
evolved, 1) CD based education (CBE), 2) Class room based learning (CEBE),
and 3) web based learning (WBE). These three approaches have their own
advantages and limitations.
Our experiments at ETH Research Lab show that the success of e-learning
strategies depends on how best we can combine all the three learning modes or
methods. We argue that this is a best method for integrating e-learning with the
traditional teaching process. In traditional education, learning approach is
through a teacher or a mediator. With the introduction of e-learning technology,
the role of the teacher gets changed to facilitator, with high quality learning
resources made available through electronic media.
The e-learning technology can create an open and flexible learning
environment with the convergence of CD based, class based and web based
education. e-learning can be easily integrated in the traditional education by
bringing learners, teachers, educational resources, libraries, schools,
administration and management system on one platform.
Conceptual Model
Traditionally our education system has two distinct processes, namely the
learning process and the learning administration or support process. Learning
system caters to the development of skills and competencies in the learners
through personal learning, group learning in class, learning from teachers and
experts, and learning from the experiences of self and others. While the learning
support system aims at supporting the learning processes of the learners. This
caters mainly evaluation and assessment process, library management
processes, seminars and workshops and the like. Traditional education system
largely focuses on the delivery of the courses and awarding certificates and
degrees to the learner.
The e-learning system architecture must address both to the learning process as
well as learning support process. In e-learning support processes are equally
important as the content and services has to be provided by educational
service providers (ESPs) as such experts normally does not exist on the campuses.
ETH Research Lab has advanced open and flexible e-learning system
architecture as shown in figure 1, providing convergence of formal, non-formal
and informal education and bringing educational service providers, activity
providers, learning resources on one single platform for achieving mass
personalized education. The conceptual model has all required subsystems
namely Learning System, Learning Support System, Delivery System,
Maintenance – Development – Production (MDP) System, and Total
Administration and QA System.
Figure 1. E-Learning Architecture for Open and Flexible Learning System
Learning system of traditional education system will be enhanced with the
availability and accessibility of virtual learning resources. Students can interact in
synchronous and asynchronous mode.
Learning Support System addresses the technology for facilitation of the learning
system. It will also include the learning from the remote tutors through the virtual
class mode, lecture on demand and formative feedback for the assessment and
evaluation.
Delivery System delivers the content in electronic form to the learners and
distributed classrooms.
Services Management (Maintenance, Development and Production) will help in
collaborating with the service providers. This enhances the knowledge repository
as compared to the traditional education system.
Total Management and QA system monitors and manages the quality education
delivery to the learner.
Functional Model
The conceptual architecture best describes the convergence of the WBE, CBE
and CEBE. With the field trials and experiments, we have observed that there is a
need for the operational support services and mini ERP services for managing the
educational institutes. Schools, colleges and universities have a whole range of
activities other than managing academics only. With technology we can make
the whole administration and management of education more effective. This
way the school, college, university can be transformed into Digital School, Digital
College, and Digital University. Our architecture aims at creating a full-fledged
digital campus driven by ICT.
The conceptual architecture of e-learning described in the previous section can
be enhanced with these services for managing the institute. Figure 2 illustrates
implementation architecture integrating all the subsystems of building a digital
campus.
Security Layer
Multilingual Layer
Message Oriented Middle-ware
LCMS
Remote
Service Authoring
Content
Management
Content
Repository
LMS
Content Authentication
User
Repository
Learning
Data
Assessment
&
Evaluation
Tracking
Learning
Administrative
System
O
S
S
CRM ERM
Service Management
Network Management.
Storage Area
S
M
S
Digital Library
School
ERP
College
ERP
SCM
Work Flow Mgt
Persistence Layer
DB DBDB
Course
Management
Service Oriented Architecture
Student School College Partner Administrator
Project Management
Billing
Modular Course
Platform
Document Flow
Resource Management.
Figure 2. Open Flexible Education Environment - Implementation Architecture.
LMS and LCMS:
Functional model for learning system and learning support systems are
implemented as Learning Management System (LMS) and Learning Content
Management System (LCMS) as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. LMS and LCMS – An Architectural Representation
Content Authoring Tool is useful for creation of the content, putting legacy
content online. With this, teachers can create their own content and publish it.
Content creation with the SCORM (Sharable Content Object Reference Model)
standards makes it interchangeable across the LMS.
Content Assembly Tools plays an important role in packaging the content
prepared with authoring tool and publishing it. Our architecture complies with
IMS Content Packaging standards for content assembly tool thus giving
interoperability. Learning Objects published with content assembly tools are
categorized with the Learning Object Metadata and stored in Catalog
Manager.
Course Repository stores the course structures which integrates the learning
objects and sequence them.
Content
Authorization
Tools
Content
Assembly
Tools
Content Manager
Content
Repository
Course Catalog
Learner
Profile
Manager
Learning Planner
Delivery Engine
Collaboration Engine
Assessment / Testing Engine
RLO
RLO
LO
Offerings
User Info
RLO
Activity
Assessment Object
Goals
Registry Info
Registry Info
Activity Info
Registry Info
Activity Info
Registry Info
Result Info
Learning Administration System
LCMS LMS
Learning Planner assists learner with the appropriate alternative plans
corresponding to the learning objective of the learner. Finally it sends the User
Information to the User Repository.
Personalized delivery of the course to the learner is managed with delivery
engine in LAN version and WAN version.
For the individual learning and group learning various collaborative services like
special interest groups, discussion forum, virtual classroom and various
enrichment contents can be delivered through collaboration engine.
Formative evaluation will help learner to plan the learning process in the
corrective way. The assessment of every learning objective and activity is
managed in the personal folder of every learner.
In addition to the Learning and Learning Support system, we observed the need
for automation of the various operations in the schools and colleges (traditional
education system). Those operations are managed with the help of SMS (Self
Managed Systems). It is a sort of mini ERP system which covers the Purchase
Management, Asset Management, Accounts and Finance Management etc. In
this process often work flow of the educational institutes need to be
reengineered. Document flow management can help in delivering paperless
operations which is the goal of all computerization.
When we collaborate with the Educational Service Providers, we need to
provide the facility for monitoring and control of the services provided by them.
Operational Support Services (OSS) helps in service collaboration, launching,
billing, support and maintenance services.
AT ETH Research Lab, we have approached this architecture with the Open
Source technologies, independent of platform and databases. Support for
multilingual technologies is also provided. XML based integration layer helps in
data exchange and collaboration across the systems.
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
With the mission of bringing Education To Home, we expect technology should
make the schools, colleges, teachers, libraries, learning resources to be
accessible and approachable to the aspiring learners.
We are implementing the ETH mission in phased manner. We have deployed the
Computer Literacy program in collaboration with Pune University. Now we are
extending it through schools and colleges. With Digital Campus, we will digitize
schools and colleges within the campus. Here e-Learning will be complementary
and supplementary to the traditional education process.
All the digital campuses should collaborate on one platform in order to build the
content and knowledge repository which can be delivered to the students
electronically. This collaboration approach will be driven through the Service
Oriented Architecture (SOA). Schematic representation of the SOA
implementation is expressed in Figure 4
Figure 4. Schematic Representation of use of SOA
Service Oriented Architecture can be applicable to the networked digital
campus as expressed in the above architecture diagram. We have used J2EE
framework to implement SOA. SOA is a collection of services on a network that
communicate with one another. The services are loosely coupled, have well-
defined, platform-independent interfaces, and are reusable. SOA is a higher
level of application development (also referred to as coarse granularity) that
focuses on business processes and uses standard interfaces. Web services use
WSDL, UDDI and SOAP. Services are published in UDDI registry along with service
providers’ information. Service Providers describe their services in a WSDL
document. The URL for WSDL is given in UDDI.
With the application of this, the Learning System of one campus can be
accessed based on the agreed terms and conditions for service sharing by other
campus through UDDI search. UDDI locates the WSDL file which locates the
service on the network. This will deliver the desired learning resources to the
learners on single sign-on. The sharing of the services, content, learning objects,
courses from different schools, colleges, and teachers is possible through this
architecture.
The common platform is portal which can be used for convergence of
educational services from the Educational Service Providers. These services can
be easily accessible to various digital campuses as the learning and teaching
resources.
Digital
School
2
Digital
School
1
Digital
School
“n”
Digital Campus
Portal
UDDI
Learner
WSDL
Binds Service
Case Study
As explained in functional model, in schools and colleges we observe the need
for computerization of administration and management to make it paperless.
Lectures can be enhanced with the electronic media and can be projected to
the students in classrooms. Interactive CDs help learners visualize and understand
the matter; teachers can make use of computers for making the lectures more
lively and effective through multimedia. In addition, documentation
management system can help issue and management of bonafied certificates,
leaving certificates and other statutory certificates for students and staff. Work
flow management system allows management of processes like lecture
scheduling; leave management, library management helps in issue and
procurement of books. Schematic representation of the implementation view of
the Digital Campus for school is explained in Figure 5.
Figure 2. Typical Implementation in Campus
We have implemented Digital Campus for School at Bhartiya Jain Sanghatna
High School, Wagholi. We have implemented the concept of the Digital School
where we have digitized the operations of the schools, CD based content of the
school syllabus for teachers and students and web based support and
enrichment material. It has got wide acceptance from the teachers and learners
as it reflected the processes and methodologies they have been following in the
school.
This system now helping in admission process, scheduling of lectures, managing
conventional and digital library resources, lecture on demand, students notes,
group learning through Special Interest Groups, pre and post examination
processes, accounts and finance management, budgetary control, asset
management of the school along with the day today administration of
attendance to payroll and also documentation management of statutory
certificates for students.
This approach was then replicated in other schools and over a period of time it
has evolved into a comprehensive system. Implementation strategies for
replication of the concept were taken with the help of the teachers themselves.
Teacher training, orientation, support, customization and management are
integral to implementation which is executed along with local agencies.
In many colleges and universities there is a growing need for the distance
learning. We have addressed this with the Learning Management System which
can cater to both formal and in-formal modes of education. For such colleges
and universities the approach can be supplementary, complementary or even
alternative to their conventional distance learning programs.
We have now embarked up a generalized e-learning product for schools,
colleges and universities. Currently the challenge lies in getting the schools into
the e-learning framework, orientation of teachers and making teachers use the
system on their own. Other challenges are installation and maintenance of
infrastructure as well as organizing budgets for the digital campus initiative in
each institution.
With Digital Campus program, schools, colleges, teachers, students, learning
resources will be able to collaborate on one platform. The convergence model
will have to be supported with the quality educational services and activities.
Some schools, colleges can themselves be the service providers for others. Best
of teachers can be accessible across the campus and through the virtual
classroom mode, they would be available to the aspiring learners across
institutions.
Conclusion
After going through the real life experience of implementation of e-learning
through several schools and colleges with the Open and Flexible Learning
Environment architecture, we feel that the success lies in the co-existence and
integration of traditional and e-learning strategies.
Current barriers for success of these convergence models are mind set, budgets
for infrastructure, preparedness of teachers and local support. However, with
marked reduction in the cost of PCs, laptops, networking and servers,
introduction of IT subject in school syllabus, spread of affordable internet and
growing awareness of the benefits of IT in education, the perceived barriers are
getting dissolved.
However, there is a great challenge of quality content creation. This must be
compliant with the emerging international standards such as SCORM / IMS to be
reusable and modifiable. This vital issue is not discussed here and it would be
presented in an ensuing paper. Our objective in this paper was to present an
implementable architecture for integration of e-learning with traditional
education in school, colleges and universities. We have also presented the results
of our implementations as a case study proving the validity of our architecture
and strategies.
References:
1. White paper on ―AN IMPLEMENTABLE ARCHITECTURE OF AN E-LEARNING
SYSTEM‖ by Xiaofei Liu, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik and Nicolas D.
Georganas
2. ―e-Learning Interoperability Standards‖, Sun white paper, January 2002 —
www.sun.com/products-n-solutions/edu/whitepapers/index.html
3. ―e-Learning theories and pedagogical Strategies‖ –
http://www.homestead.com
4. ―Evaluating the effectiveness of E-Learning Strategies for Small Medium
Enterprises‖ - Eduardo Figueira
5. ―Triple Play Solutions for the Student Residence‖ – Allied Telesyn
Mr. Shashank Hiwarkar
Mr. Shashank Hiwarkar is a Program Co-ordinator of ETH Research Lab. He is involved in
architecting the ETH Education Environment and implementing the concept of Digital
Campus in Schools, colleges and universities. He is an engineering graduate of Nagpur
University