EFE MATRIX FOR GEO TELEVISION NETWORK

Key external Factor Weight Rating Weighted Score

Opportunities

1. High viewership rating2. Association with foreign broadcasters3. Complete bucket of channels4. Overseas subscription revenue5. Potential increase in viewership base6. Domestic subscription revenues7. Rebuts growth in television advertisement revenue 8. Variety of programs9. Digitization

0.080.060.060.040.070.050.070.040.05

323233332

0.240.120.180.080.210.150.210.120.10

Threats

10. Rigid Government policies11. Cable operators setting channel at last numbers12. Pressure of advertisement agencies13. Economic downturn14. Increase In competition15. Declining viewership and revenue share16. Campaigns of media literacy

0.090.070.090.060.070.040.06

4322333

0.360.210.180.120.210.120.18

Total 1.0 2.88

As the grand total is above 2.5 Hence the GEO TV is doing pretty well.

COMPETITIVE PROFILE MATRIX

GEO EXPRESS DUNYACritical Success Factors Weight Rating Score Ratin

gScore Rating Score

Famous journalistsSalaries to employeesEquipmentAdvertisementQualified staffVariety of programsNumber of channelsRelations with mediaTransmissionViewership baseRelations with news sourceRelation with government

0.100.070.080.070.080.080.100.080.070.080.090.10

443344334331

0.400.280.240.210.320.320.300.240.280.240.270.10

344333333343

0.300.280.240.210.240.240.300.240.210.240.360.30

232232322333

0.200.210.160.140.240.160.300.160.140.240.270.30

Total 1.00 3.20 3.16 2.52

As all the departments have grand total above 2.5, so all department are doing well but GEO has the maximum value and hence it is on the top.

EFE MATRIX FOR INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Key external Factor Weight Rating Weighted Score

Opportunities

Active volunteer groupStudent participationAlumni utilizationServices to the business communityFavorable demographicsInternshipsInnovative technology for teachersOutreach to the community

0.050.070.100.130.080.090.070.05

23332222

0.100.210.300.390.160.180.140.10

Threats

Confidentiality is compromisedPupil coercionCompetitorsStated budgetIncomplete training of staffDecreasing market share

0.070.030.100.070.050.04

324333

0.210.060.400.210.150.12

Total 1.0 2.73

As the grand total is above 2.5 Hence the Institute is doing pretty well.

COMPETITIVE PROFILE MATRIX

IAS IBA IERCritical Success Factors Weight Ratin

gScore Rating Score Rating Score

Highly-skilled and committed teachersPersonal contact with teachersProfessionally active facultyTechnologyLow cost - value of educationFacilitiesStudentsTeacher parents meetingLimited resources

TurnoverInsufficient Staff

0.15

0.080.130.100.090.090.070.060.080.080.07

4

3322331223

0.60

0.240.390.200.180.270.210.060.160.160.21

3

2332333433

0.45

0.160.390.300.180.270.210.180.320.240.21

4

3333232233

0.60

0.240.390.300.270.180.210.120.160.240.21

Total 2.68 2.91 2.92

As all the departments have grand total above 2.5, so all department are doing well but IER has the maximum value and hence it is on the top.