ecre annual report 2012
DESCRIPTION
This is the Annual Report 2012 of the European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE)TRANSCRIPT
ANNUAL
2012REPORT
2012
The European Council on Refugees amp Exiles (ECRE) is a pan-European Alliance of refugee-assisting non-governmental organisations ECRE is concerned with the needs of all individuals who seek refuge and protection within Europe
It aims to promote the protection and integration of refugees in Europe based on the values of human dignity human rights and an ethic of solidarity
ECRE seeks to achieve this aim by
1 Advocating a fair and humane European asylum policy and by promoting the development of a comprehensive and coherent response by the international community to refugee movements
2 Strengthening networking between refugee-assisting non-governmental organisations in Europe
3 Developing the institutional capacity of refugee-assisting non-governmental organisations in Europe
ECRE draws on the energy ideas and commitment of an active membership of refugee-assisting non-governmental organisations and a strong secretariat It also strives to involve wider civil society the political community and refugee communities in its work It respects the cultural values of different parts of Europe
It aims to ensure that its ideas and positions are of high quality legally accurate and representative of a wide range of knowledge experience and best practice throughout Europe
Its working methods are guided by democratic values and the principle of seeking to mobilise the widest possible active involvement of its member agencies through working groups advisory groups regional fora and Europe-wide networks It encourages wherever appropriate its member agencies to take the lead on a particular project
Mission Statement
Summary
Message from the Chair 4
Message from the Secretary General 5
Refugees in Greece How Much Further 6
Access to Protection 8
ELENA Network 10
Protection in Third Countries 12
Resettlement 14
Detention 16
New Members 17
Our Members in 2012 18
Finances 20
Staff 19
Partners 22
Projects 21
4
Message from the Chair
Dear Readers
It was with great pleasure that we welcomed Michael Die-dring as ECRErsquos new Secretary General in 2012 Michaelrsquos strong commitment and over 20 yearsrsquo professional experi-ence focussed on the rule of law and international develop-ment equip him to lead ECRE in our endeavour to promote the protection and integration of refugees in Europe I would also like to take this opportunity to warmly thank Allan Leas for his exceptional leadership of ECRE during the interim period Allan truly has ECRE in his heart and the Board Secretariat and Members feel indebted to his perseverance and dedication
In 2012 ECRE also bade farewell to Ignacio Diacuteaz de Aguilar who has been a long-standing Member of the ECRE Board Ignacio has done much to assist ECRErsquos work in the larger Mediterranean region We would like to thank him deeply for having devoted his time and energy to ECRE and look for-ward to continuing to work with Ignacio in the future in other capacities We are very pleased to welcome Anna Terroacuten to the ECRE Board Anna has a long history of working in European asylum and migration matters as a former MEP and Spainrsquos Secretary of Immigration and Emigration We look forward to working together with Anna and the mem-bers of ECRErsquos Board to guide ECRErsquos work in defending the rights of those seeking international protection
This year we were delighted to welcome two new Maltese members to the Alliance aditus foundation and JRS Malta It is important for ECRE to extend its network to this country whose systematic use of migrant detention poor reception condi-tions and lack of integration prospects are of concern to the NGOs on the ground and their partners across Europe
I would like to take this opportunity to extend warm thanks to all our collaborators over 2012
Yours sincerely
Andreas KammChair of the ECRE BoardSecretary General of the Danish Refugee Council
5
Message from the Secretary General
Dear Readers
In autumn 2012 I took over the reins of ECRE and embarked upon a mission to lead this long-lasting Alliance in its endeav-our to protect the rights of asylum seekers and refugees in Europe I am deeply grateful to Allan Leas for ensuring that the transition period was smooth and for imparting upon me what ECRE means to its members and the people we serve
ECRE is a rich diverse and robust Alliance and that is its great-est strength Advocating for fair and humane asylum policies and their implementation requires a multi-faceted pan-Euro-pean approach In the coming years I intend to capitalise on the strengths of the Alliance to denounce human rights viola-tions and propose and promote fair and efficient durable solu-tions We will use a variety of means to achieve this mission rigorous research policy and legal advocacy awareness-rais-ing and sharing knowledge and expertise
Throughout 2012 we witnessed Statesrsquo failure to properly as-sure protection for all those who need and deserve it The per-sisting asylum crisis in Greece coupled with mounting racism continues to create a desperate situation for asylum seekers who see no option but to move on to try to access protection elsewhere without having the legal and safe means to do so Furthermore the European Court of Human Rights rightfully condemned Italy for intercepting migrants at high seas and pushing them back to Libya This condemnation has put the spotlight on the responsibilities of States when undertaking
border control operations outside their territory
By the end of 2012 some 850000 refugees had fled Syria out of which only 21500 sought protec-tion in the EU ECRE called and continues to call on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asy-lum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU Violence continues to escalate and the EU Member States should relax visa restrictions and family reunification rules and issue humanitarian visas through their embassies in neigh-bouring countries to facilitate access to the European territory for people fleeing Syria
While our challenges are enormous ECRErsquos potential is limit-less as well We have a duty to raise our game to help protect the rights of those fleeing persecution and violence I have accepted that challenge and look forward to working together with ECRErsquos members and partners to better protect the peo-ple we serve
Yours sincerely
Message from the Chair
Michael DiedringSecretary GeneralEuropean Council on Refugees and Exiles
6
Refugees in Greece How Much Further
In 2012 the situation for asylum seekers and refugees continued to deteriorate in Greece a country facing the full brunt of the economic crisis and lacking a functioning asylum and reception system ECRE the Greek Forum of Refugees and the film maker Matthias Wiessler joined forces to bring to the fore the voices of those who arrived in Greece fleeing countries such as Afghanistan Somalia or Sudan With the support of the European Programme for Integration and Migration (EPIM) the documentary How Much Further was released in Athens and Brussels on World Refugee Day 2012
How Much Further enters into the world of those who after months or even years on the road arrive in Greece hoping to find refuge in Europe but soon see no option but to resume their perilous journey in the hope of reaching a country that can receive them in dignity and consider their claim for asylum For most people staying in Greece means severe destitution the threat of racist violence and no hope of applying for asylum and getting their case fairly examined
The documentary is now available in English French Greek German and Serbian and has been seen by 5000 people in
English (available on YouTube and Vimeo) and over 10000 people in its Greek version In 2012 How Much Further was screened in Belgium Greece Denmark Switzerland and Ireland
Since the launch of the Greek National Action Plan in August 2010 Greek NGOs have severely criticized the authoritiesrsquo reluctance to take meaningful steps to make it operational and improve Greecersquos asylum and reception systems In May 2012 ECRE and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) presented a joint submission to the Committee of
7
Ministers of the Council of Europe focused on Greecersquos respect for its obligations arising from the MSS v Belgium amp Greece case through which the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled that returning asylum seekers to Greece violated the European Convention on Human Rights due to the inhuman and degrading treatment and lack of effective remedy available there for asylum seekers In particular the submission covered detention and living conditions for asylum seekers and access to the asylum procedure
Following the ECtHRrsquos ruling on MSS v Belgium amp Greece EU Member States have refrained from returning asylum seekers to Greece under the Dublin Regulation In 2012 however a report Human Cargo by ProAsyl and Greek Council for Refugees exposed the arbitrary readmissions from Italian sea ports to Greece
The report showed that despite an official stay on returns to Greece Italy returned people including children to Greece without verifying if they had protection needs In several cases examined in the report the returned people were detained prior to removal and upon their arrival in Greece in poor conditions
Throughout 2012 the Greek governmentrsquos response to the ever-escalating crisis for asylum seekers in Greece was to increase detention capacity Existing detention centres in Greece are notorious for particularly inhuman conditions In March 2012 the Greek government announced the establishment of 30 detention centres to hold 30000
undocumented migrants across the country In November Greece toughened its detention law for asylum seeker to a maximum of 18 months
The situation for migrants deteriorated significantly in August when the Greek Ministry of Public Order and Citizen Protection launched the operation ldquoXenios Zeusrdquo which led to the rounding up of thousands of migrants on the basis of their perceived ethnicities in a seemingly discriminatory manner ECRE called on Greece to immediately end this practice and sent a letter to EU Commissioner for Home Affairs Cecilia Malmstroumlm raising questions regarding the compatibility of the Xenios Operation with a number of safeguards laid down in the EU asylum and immigration legislation as well as the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and requesting information on the Commissionrsquos response to Greek actions
ECRE continues to monitor the situation for refugees asylum seekers and would-be asylum seekers in Greece with concern While the fact that Member States no longer return asylum seekers to Greece under the Dublin Regulation has alleviated the situation and certainly allowed the people concerned to have a fairer chance of having their claim adequately assessed the outlook remains bleak for those people in Greece with no legal means for travelling onwards and for those arriving in Greece in the hope of finding a safe haven
8
Italy condemned for intercepting migrants at high seas and pushing them back to Libya
In February 2012 the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) admonished Italyrsquos push-back policy through the Hirsi Jammaa and others v Italy case where Italy was condemned for pushing back 24 Somalis and Eritreans who were intercepted on the high seas by Italian border guards taken on board the Italian ship and handed over to Libyan officials on the basis of the Friendship Treaty between Italy and Libya in 2009 The judgment has important consequences in particular for EU Member States institutions and agencies in the context of border management policies that aim to interfere with migration routes outside EU territory as control implies responsibility
EU Member States whether they act under the aegis of Frontex or not will have to review their border control and return operations in order to ensure the full respect of the principle of non refoulement with regard to every individual intercepted outside their territory and rule out the possibility of collective expulsions as prohibited under Article 4 of Protocol IV to the ECHR in line with the ECtHRs judgment
ECRE and CIR released a joint press release following the judgment Christopher Hein Director of the Italian Council for Refugees stated that ldquosuch a sentence proves that during the push-back operations the rights of refugees were systematically violated Italy in fact denied the possibility to apply for protection and has then pushed back to Libya more than a thousand people who had the right to be received in Italy We want that this message arrives unmistakably to
Access to Protection
ECRE interview with Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen Danish Institute for International Studies
ldquo rdquoStates cannot shirk their human rights responsibilities by hiding behind the fact that they are operating beyond their physical borders
9
the Monti Government in re-contracting the co-operation agreements with the Libyan Transitional Government the rights of refugees cannot be negotiated We expect that the new Executive has clearer and stronger positions on this issue than the ones we have known about in the last weeksrdquo ECREs Acting Secretary General Allan Leas said that ldquothis ruling confirms that Statesrsquo obligations under the ECHR do not stop at their physical borders States cannot abdicate their principles values and commitment to the protection of human rights by doing outside their borders what would not be permissible in their territoriesrdquo
NGOs call for legal and safe channels to allow refugees reach Europe
In 2012 the CIR-led Entering the Territory project concluded with the publication of the report and press conference Reaching Europe in Safety The possibility to seek asylum through an embassy saved my life ECRE and other European NGOs participated in this joint project
Persons fleeing persecution often lack the means to travel legally and in safety to the EU For some people seeking asylum through embassies abroad was the only way to escape danger and find safety The lack of legal and safe means of accessing protection leaves people no option but to undertake the treacherous journey to Europe by land or sea Many of them pay for this with their lives According to estimates based only on the known incidents from 1998 to August 2011 17738 persons died attempting to reach Europe
Switzerland was the last European country that provided a formalized protected entry procedure The Swiss government abolished the procedure in 2012 Susanne Bolz Head of the Protection Unit of the Swiss Refugee Council emphasised that ldquoThe Swiss asylum procedure from abroad is not a perfect system but it saves lives In 2011 around 600 refugees received a visa to have their asylum claim assessed in Switzerland All those people who were able to enter Switzerland through the procedure at the embassies did not have to go to find a smuggler they didnrsquot have to pay lots of money they were not raped on their journey to Europe and they did not drown in the Mediterraneanrdquo
10
ELENA Network
The European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) is a forum of legal practitioners who aim to promote the highest human rights standards for the treatment of refugees asylum seekers and other persons in need of international protection in their daily individual counselling and advocacy work In 2012 the ELENA Network welcomed four new national coordinators the Croatian Law Centre the Slovakian Human Rights League the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and the Irish Refugee Council Independent Law Centre
Rule 39 Research
In April 2012 ECREELENA published a qualitative research report on the current practices of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Rule 39 interim measures Rule 39 measures are of vital importance to applicants as they constitute an avenue for the ECtHR to ensure that applicants will not be subjected to Member State action in possible contravention of their Convention rights before their cases can be heard by the court In asylum and immigration cases this frequently means preventing return and expulsion of the asylum seeker to hisher country of origin where return would violate their Convention rights
The report fruit of the collaborative work of legal practitioners active in 23 countries emphasizes several instances of non-compliance of Rule 39 indications in a number of
Member States which have led to persons being deported to countries where they are at risk of torture or other ill- treatment Moreover the research shows that there is a lack of effective national legal remedies in Member States and that the practice of accelerated procedures is placing persons at risk of refoulement Finally it is demonstrated that the right to individual petition and access to the Court is being circumvented through a variety of obstacles at the national level
The report details recommendations to the institutional bodies of the Council of Europe legal representatives and to Member States as to improving the functioning of this essential legal tool and to ensure access to effective legal remedies within State Parties themselves
11
ELENA Courses
ECREELENA has been running specialist and introductory refugee law courses for 25 years The topics of the courses are selected by the annual meeting of ELENA coordinators in response to needs identified by practitioners The courses are aimed at legal counsellors and lawyers from across Europe who defend or who are interested in defending cases concerning refugees and asylum seekers In 2012 two Advanced Courses took place one dealing with Generalised Violence Armed Conflict and the Need for International Protection and the on The Rights of Refugees
ECREELENA is deeply grateful to the experts who have lent their time to delivering these courses
Prof James Hathaway University of Michigan
Prof Luis Jimena Quesada President of the European Committee of Social Rights Council of Europe
Kees Wouters Senior Refugee Law Advisor Department of International Protection UNHCR
Blanche Tax Head of the Protection Information Unit Department of International Protection UNHCR
Mark Symes Asylum and Refugee law specialist
Flip Schuumlller Partner Boumlhler Advocaten
Nuala Mole Founder and Director of the AIRE Centre
Prof Heacutelegravene Lambert University of Westminster
Nino Hartl Country of Origin Information Expert EASO
Harald Doerig Justice at the German Federal Administrative Court
Ioana Patrascu Legal Officer European Commission
12
Instability following the Arab Spring continued in the region well into 2012 As the transitional period for Libya began and the reported numbers from UNHCR of Syrian refugees rose to 850000 by the end of 2012 all eyes were on Europes response The Danish and Cypriot Presidencies of the EU both faced pressure to react
ECRE shared its recommendations to the Danish Presidency to ensure a commitment to protection and respect for human rights of all persons including migrants and refugees in the Libyan context During the Cypriot presidency the Syrian refugee situation was further exacerbated by escalating violence rising death toll and increasing displacement in the region In its recommendations to the Cypriot Presidency ECRE called on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asylum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU and to provide continuous support to the humanitarian efforts in the region in order to meet urgent needs and maintain the protection space
In 2012 ECRE published Comments on the Commissions Communication on the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM) a landmark Communication that sets the framework for actions in the external dimension of EU migration and asylum policy in the context of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) in the next years The new GAMM is structured around the concept of mobility and aims to be more political integrating migration dialogues in political dialogues with third countries In the new GAMM the three priorities of the Global Approach (promoting labour migration addressing irregular migration and enhancing the links between migration and development) are maintained and now complemented by a fourth one refugee protection ECRE addressed the limits of the GAMM being led by a JHA approach since an overarching framework would need the ability to address the root causes of migration and displacement and enhance conditions that affect the lives of both migrants and the local communities in the region These are all areas that are and should be addressed through development cooperation More importantly Europe needs to show political leadership and position itself as a global player in international migration governance seizing the moment to develop and promote a rights-based approach to migration globally Such an approach should be accommodated in EUs development and foreign policy and EU human rights strategy
Protection in Third Countries
13
With regards to refugee protection its inclusion as one of the four priorities in the new GAMM is welcomed as a way to ensure coherence and better address the challenges arising from the asylum-migration nexus At the same time ECRE argues that Europe should develop a comprehensive and ambitious policy for refugee protection globally that encompasses the CEAS and cooperation for protection in third countries Durable solutions and capacity building for asylum need to be integrated in development with clear and consistent policy objectives Seen from this perspective the European External Action Service (EEAS) has the potential to frame the debate around asylum differently in the context of a European policy for human rights and protection globally The credibility of EU actions to promote refugee protection and durable solutions in third countries also depends on whether Europe upholds its responsibilities for protection in its territory
In 2012 ECRE embarked on a two year project to develop dialogue and advocacy on refugee protection in
development cooperation between civil society and the EU institutions The project Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development (domaid) provides the space and framework to bring together ECREs Core Group on the External Dimension civil society organisations from third countries diaspora groups academics and representatives from the European Commission to exchange around three main themes capacity building for asylum promoting durable solutions in protracted refugee situations and the role of refugee diasporas This will be done through a series of tools including platform meetings public seminars regional debriefings for the Commission by NGOs present in the field and the publication of policy papers European NGOs active in third countries have first hand experience of protection gaps challenges and EU policy in the regions making them best placed to suggest ways to respond and highlight ways forward The Domaid Project also aims to enhance cooperation and foster synergies between European NGOs and diaspora organisations as well as between European NGOs and local civil society organisations in third countries
14
In March 2012 the European Union adopted a Joint EU Resettlement Programme for Refugees The adoption of this Joint Programme was seen as very important first step towards increasing the number of resettlement places made available by EU Member States
ECRE has coordinated and drafted a comparative study for the European Parliament on the best practices for the integration of resettled refugees in the EU Member States The study was released in early January 2013 ECRE highlighted that there is a need for more attention to be placed on integration of resettled refugees and the sustainability of current programs For resettled refugees citizenship applications are often restrictive and can hinder the integration process ECRE therefore recommended that Member States grant permanent resident status to resettled refugees upon arrival to ensure refugee integration from the start
ECRE is one of six leading organisations (Amnesty International CCME ICMC IOM and Save Me) in the refugee field that have launched the Campaign 20000 by
2020 asking for more and better resettlement in Europe with the target of 20000 persons resettled annually by the year 2020 The campaign is supported by the resettlement network whose website was launched in early March 2012 and is currently being developed to include a resource library a directory of resettlement policy makers and practitioners online discussion groups opportunities for online consultations and mutual learning via an online community of practice
In addition ECRE has also been working in close collaboration with the European University Institute on a resettlement project named Know Reset (Building Knowledge for a Concerted and Sustainable Approach to Refugee Resettlement in the EU and its Member States) The project aims to provide an overview of the current state of resettlement in Europe by examining the legislation policies and practices supporting resettlement in Member States that have regular resettlement programmes as well as those that offer places on an ad hoc basis The scope of research also includes Member States that have not been involved in resettlement so far in an effort to assess whether there is potential for resettlement in the future Country profiles are prepared for each Member State on the basis of qualitative and quantitative research including information on the legal framework practices the views of different stakeholders and the public discourse in relation to resettlement
Resettlement
The project website was launched in 2012 and features an online database of national and EU primary and secondary sources (legal and policy documents statistics financial data etc) as well as comparative information on resettlement policies and practices in the EU with graphs and tables
15
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
The European Council on Refugees amp Exiles (ECRE) is a pan-European Alliance of refugee-assisting non-governmental organisations ECRE is concerned with the needs of all individuals who seek refuge and protection within Europe
It aims to promote the protection and integration of refugees in Europe based on the values of human dignity human rights and an ethic of solidarity
ECRE seeks to achieve this aim by
1 Advocating a fair and humane European asylum policy and by promoting the development of a comprehensive and coherent response by the international community to refugee movements
2 Strengthening networking between refugee-assisting non-governmental organisations in Europe
3 Developing the institutional capacity of refugee-assisting non-governmental organisations in Europe
ECRE draws on the energy ideas and commitment of an active membership of refugee-assisting non-governmental organisations and a strong secretariat It also strives to involve wider civil society the political community and refugee communities in its work It respects the cultural values of different parts of Europe
It aims to ensure that its ideas and positions are of high quality legally accurate and representative of a wide range of knowledge experience and best practice throughout Europe
Its working methods are guided by democratic values and the principle of seeking to mobilise the widest possible active involvement of its member agencies through working groups advisory groups regional fora and Europe-wide networks It encourages wherever appropriate its member agencies to take the lead on a particular project
Mission Statement
Summary
Message from the Chair 4
Message from the Secretary General 5
Refugees in Greece How Much Further 6
Access to Protection 8
ELENA Network 10
Protection in Third Countries 12
Resettlement 14
Detention 16
New Members 17
Our Members in 2012 18
Finances 20
Staff 19
Partners 22
Projects 21
4
Message from the Chair
Dear Readers
It was with great pleasure that we welcomed Michael Die-dring as ECRErsquos new Secretary General in 2012 Michaelrsquos strong commitment and over 20 yearsrsquo professional experi-ence focussed on the rule of law and international develop-ment equip him to lead ECRE in our endeavour to promote the protection and integration of refugees in Europe I would also like to take this opportunity to warmly thank Allan Leas for his exceptional leadership of ECRE during the interim period Allan truly has ECRE in his heart and the Board Secretariat and Members feel indebted to his perseverance and dedication
In 2012 ECRE also bade farewell to Ignacio Diacuteaz de Aguilar who has been a long-standing Member of the ECRE Board Ignacio has done much to assist ECRErsquos work in the larger Mediterranean region We would like to thank him deeply for having devoted his time and energy to ECRE and look for-ward to continuing to work with Ignacio in the future in other capacities We are very pleased to welcome Anna Terroacuten to the ECRE Board Anna has a long history of working in European asylum and migration matters as a former MEP and Spainrsquos Secretary of Immigration and Emigration We look forward to working together with Anna and the mem-bers of ECRErsquos Board to guide ECRErsquos work in defending the rights of those seeking international protection
This year we were delighted to welcome two new Maltese members to the Alliance aditus foundation and JRS Malta It is important for ECRE to extend its network to this country whose systematic use of migrant detention poor reception condi-tions and lack of integration prospects are of concern to the NGOs on the ground and their partners across Europe
I would like to take this opportunity to extend warm thanks to all our collaborators over 2012
Yours sincerely
Andreas KammChair of the ECRE BoardSecretary General of the Danish Refugee Council
5
Message from the Secretary General
Dear Readers
In autumn 2012 I took over the reins of ECRE and embarked upon a mission to lead this long-lasting Alliance in its endeav-our to protect the rights of asylum seekers and refugees in Europe I am deeply grateful to Allan Leas for ensuring that the transition period was smooth and for imparting upon me what ECRE means to its members and the people we serve
ECRE is a rich diverse and robust Alliance and that is its great-est strength Advocating for fair and humane asylum policies and their implementation requires a multi-faceted pan-Euro-pean approach In the coming years I intend to capitalise on the strengths of the Alliance to denounce human rights viola-tions and propose and promote fair and efficient durable solu-tions We will use a variety of means to achieve this mission rigorous research policy and legal advocacy awareness-rais-ing and sharing knowledge and expertise
Throughout 2012 we witnessed Statesrsquo failure to properly as-sure protection for all those who need and deserve it The per-sisting asylum crisis in Greece coupled with mounting racism continues to create a desperate situation for asylum seekers who see no option but to move on to try to access protection elsewhere without having the legal and safe means to do so Furthermore the European Court of Human Rights rightfully condemned Italy for intercepting migrants at high seas and pushing them back to Libya This condemnation has put the spotlight on the responsibilities of States when undertaking
border control operations outside their territory
By the end of 2012 some 850000 refugees had fled Syria out of which only 21500 sought protec-tion in the EU ECRE called and continues to call on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asy-lum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU Violence continues to escalate and the EU Member States should relax visa restrictions and family reunification rules and issue humanitarian visas through their embassies in neigh-bouring countries to facilitate access to the European territory for people fleeing Syria
While our challenges are enormous ECRErsquos potential is limit-less as well We have a duty to raise our game to help protect the rights of those fleeing persecution and violence I have accepted that challenge and look forward to working together with ECRErsquos members and partners to better protect the peo-ple we serve
Yours sincerely
Message from the Chair
Michael DiedringSecretary GeneralEuropean Council on Refugees and Exiles
6
Refugees in Greece How Much Further
In 2012 the situation for asylum seekers and refugees continued to deteriorate in Greece a country facing the full brunt of the economic crisis and lacking a functioning asylum and reception system ECRE the Greek Forum of Refugees and the film maker Matthias Wiessler joined forces to bring to the fore the voices of those who arrived in Greece fleeing countries such as Afghanistan Somalia or Sudan With the support of the European Programme for Integration and Migration (EPIM) the documentary How Much Further was released in Athens and Brussels on World Refugee Day 2012
How Much Further enters into the world of those who after months or even years on the road arrive in Greece hoping to find refuge in Europe but soon see no option but to resume their perilous journey in the hope of reaching a country that can receive them in dignity and consider their claim for asylum For most people staying in Greece means severe destitution the threat of racist violence and no hope of applying for asylum and getting their case fairly examined
The documentary is now available in English French Greek German and Serbian and has been seen by 5000 people in
English (available on YouTube and Vimeo) and over 10000 people in its Greek version In 2012 How Much Further was screened in Belgium Greece Denmark Switzerland and Ireland
Since the launch of the Greek National Action Plan in August 2010 Greek NGOs have severely criticized the authoritiesrsquo reluctance to take meaningful steps to make it operational and improve Greecersquos asylum and reception systems In May 2012 ECRE and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) presented a joint submission to the Committee of
7
Ministers of the Council of Europe focused on Greecersquos respect for its obligations arising from the MSS v Belgium amp Greece case through which the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled that returning asylum seekers to Greece violated the European Convention on Human Rights due to the inhuman and degrading treatment and lack of effective remedy available there for asylum seekers In particular the submission covered detention and living conditions for asylum seekers and access to the asylum procedure
Following the ECtHRrsquos ruling on MSS v Belgium amp Greece EU Member States have refrained from returning asylum seekers to Greece under the Dublin Regulation In 2012 however a report Human Cargo by ProAsyl and Greek Council for Refugees exposed the arbitrary readmissions from Italian sea ports to Greece
The report showed that despite an official stay on returns to Greece Italy returned people including children to Greece without verifying if they had protection needs In several cases examined in the report the returned people were detained prior to removal and upon their arrival in Greece in poor conditions
Throughout 2012 the Greek governmentrsquos response to the ever-escalating crisis for asylum seekers in Greece was to increase detention capacity Existing detention centres in Greece are notorious for particularly inhuman conditions In March 2012 the Greek government announced the establishment of 30 detention centres to hold 30000
undocumented migrants across the country In November Greece toughened its detention law for asylum seeker to a maximum of 18 months
The situation for migrants deteriorated significantly in August when the Greek Ministry of Public Order and Citizen Protection launched the operation ldquoXenios Zeusrdquo which led to the rounding up of thousands of migrants on the basis of their perceived ethnicities in a seemingly discriminatory manner ECRE called on Greece to immediately end this practice and sent a letter to EU Commissioner for Home Affairs Cecilia Malmstroumlm raising questions regarding the compatibility of the Xenios Operation with a number of safeguards laid down in the EU asylum and immigration legislation as well as the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and requesting information on the Commissionrsquos response to Greek actions
ECRE continues to monitor the situation for refugees asylum seekers and would-be asylum seekers in Greece with concern While the fact that Member States no longer return asylum seekers to Greece under the Dublin Regulation has alleviated the situation and certainly allowed the people concerned to have a fairer chance of having their claim adequately assessed the outlook remains bleak for those people in Greece with no legal means for travelling onwards and for those arriving in Greece in the hope of finding a safe haven
8
Italy condemned for intercepting migrants at high seas and pushing them back to Libya
In February 2012 the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) admonished Italyrsquos push-back policy through the Hirsi Jammaa and others v Italy case where Italy was condemned for pushing back 24 Somalis and Eritreans who were intercepted on the high seas by Italian border guards taken on board the Italian ship and handed over to Libyan officials on the basis of the Friendship Treaty between Italy and Libya in 2009 The judgment has important consequences in particular for EU Member States institutions and agencies in the context of border management policies that aim to interfere with migration routes outside EU territory as control implies responsibility
EU Member States whether they act under the aegis of Frontex or not will have to review their border control and return operations in order to ensure the full respect of the principle of non refoulement with regard to every individual intercepted outside their territory and rule out the possibility of collective expulsions as prohibited under Article 4 of Protocol IV to the ECHR in line with the ECtHRs judgment
ECRE and CIR released a joint press release following the judgment Christopher Hein Director of the Italian Council for Refugees stated that ldquosuch a sentence proves that during the push-back operations the rights of refugees were systematically violated Italy in fact denied the possibility to apply for protection and has then pushed back to Libya more than a thousand people who had the right to be received in Italy We want that this message arrives unmistakably to
Access to Protection
ECRE interview with Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen Danish Institute for International Studies
ldquo rdquoStates cannot shirk their human rights responsibilities by hiding behind the fact that they are operating beyond their physical borders
9
the Monti Government in re-contracting the co-operation agreements with the Libyan Transitional Government the rights of refugees cannot be negotiated We expect that the new Executive has clearer and stronger positions on this issue than the ones we have known about in the last weeksrdquo ECREs Acting Secretary General Allan Leas said that ldquothis ruling confirms that Statesrsquo obligations under the ECHR do not stop at their physical borders States cannot abdicate their principles values and commitment to the protection of human rights by doing outside their borders what would not be permissible in their territoriesrdquo
NGOs call for legal and safe channels to allow refugees reach Europe
In 2012 the CIR-led Entering the Territory project concluded with the publication of the report and press conference Reaching Europe in Safety The possibility to seek asylum through an embassy saved my life ECRE and other European NGOs participated in this joint project
Persons fleeing persecution often lack the means to travel legally and in safety to the EU For some people seeking asylum through embassies abroad was the only way to escape danger and find safety The lack of legal and safe means of accessing protection leaves people no option but to undertake the treacherous journey to Europe by land or sea Many of them pay for this with their lives According to estimates based only on the known incidents from 1998 to August 2011 17738 persons died attempting to reach Europe
Switzerland was the last European country that provided a formalized protected entry procedure The Swiss government abolished the procedure in 2012 Susanne Bolz Head of the Protection Unit of the Swiss Refugee Council emphasised that ldquoThe Swiss asylum procedure from abroad is not a perfect system but it saves lives In 2011 around 600 refugees received a visa to have their asylum claim assessed in Switzerland All those people who were able to enter Switzerland through the procedure at the embassies did not have to go to find a smuggler they didnrsquot have to pay lots of money they were not raped on their journey to Europe and they did not drown in the Mediterraneanrdquo
10
ELENA Network
The European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) is a forum of legal practitioners who aim to promote the highest human rights standards for the treatment of refugees asylum seekers and other persons in need of international protection in their daily individual counselling and advocacy work In 2012 the ELENA Network welcomed four new national coordinators the Croatian Law Centre the Slovakian Human Rights League the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and the Irish Refugee Council Independent Law Centre
Rule 39 Research
In April 2012 ECREELENA published a qualitative research report on the current practices of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Rule 39 interim measures Rule 39 measures are of vital importance to applicants as they constitute an avenue for the ECtHR to ensure that applicants will not be subjected to Member State action in possible contravention of their Convention rights before their cases can be heard by the court In asylum and immigration cases this frequently means preventing return and expulsion of the asylum seeker to hisher country of origin where return would violate their Convention rights
The report fruit of the collaborative work of legal practitioners active in 23 countries emphasizes several instances of non-compliance of Rule 39 indications in a number of
Member States which have led to persons being deported to countries where they are at risk of torture or other ill- treatment Moreover the research shows that there is a lack of effective national legal remedies in Member States and that the practice of accelerated procedures is placing persons at risk of refoulement Finally it is demonstrated that the right to individual petition and access to the Court is being circumvented through a variety of obstacles at the national level
The report details recommendations to the institutional bodies of the Council of Europe legal representatives and to Member States as to improving the functioning of this essential legal tool and to ensure access to effective legal remedies within State Parties themselves
11
ELENA Courses
ECREELENA has been running specialist and introductory refugee law courses for 25 years The topics of the courses are selected by the annual meeting of ELENA coordinators in response to needs identified by practitioners The courses are aimed at legal counsellors and lawyers from across Europe who defend or who are interested in defending cases concerning refugees and asylum seekers In 2012 two Advanced Courses took place one dealing with Generalised Violence Armed Conflict and the Need for International Protection and the on The Rights of Refugees
ECREELENA is deeply grateful to the experts who have lent their time to delivering these courses
Prof James Hathaway University of Michigan
Prof Luis Jimena Quesada President of the European Committee of Social Rights Council of Europe
Kees Wouters Senior Refugee Law Advisor Department of International Protection UNHCR
Blanche Tax Head of the Protection Information Unit Department of International Protection UNHCR
Mark Symes Asylum and Refugee law specialist
Flip Schuumlller Partner Boumlhler Advocaten
Nuala Mole Founder and Director of the AIRE Centre
Prof Heacutelegravene Lambert University of Westminster
Nino Hartl Country of Origin Information Expert EASO
Harald Doerig Justice at the German Federal Administrative Court
Ioana Patrascu Legal Officer European Commission
12
Instability following the Arab Spring continued in the region well into 2012 As the transitional period for Libya began and the reported numbers from UNHCR of Syrian refugees rose to 850000 by the end of 2012 all eyes were on Europes response The Danish and Cypriot Presidencies of the EU both faced pressure to react
ECRE shared its recommendations to the Danish Presidency to ensure a commitment to protection and respect for human rights of all persons including migrants and refugees in the Libyan context During the Cypriot presidency the Syrian refugee situation was further exacerbated by escalating violence rising death toll and increasing displacement in the region In its recommendations to the Cypriot Presidency ECRE called on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asylum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU and to provide continuous support to the humanitarian efforts in the region in order to meet urgent needs and maintain the protection space
In 2012 ECRE published Comments on the Commissions Communication on the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM) a landmark Communication that sets the framework for actions in the external dimension of EU migration and asylum policy in the context of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) in the next years The new GAMM is structured around the concept of mobility and aims to be more political integrating migration dialogues in political dialogues with third countries In the new GAMM the three priorities of the Global Approach (promoting labour migration addressing irregular migration and enhancing the links between migration and development) are maintained and now complemented by a fourth one refugee protection ECRE addressed the limits of the GAMM being led by a JHA approach since an overarching framework would need the ability to address the root causes of migration and displacement and enhance conditions that affect the lives of both migrants and the local communities in the region These are all areas that are and should be addressed through development cooperation More importantly Europe needs to show political leadership and position itself as a global player in international migration governance seizing the moment to develop and promote a rights-based approach to migration globally Such an approach should be accommodated in EUs development and foreign policy and EU human rights strategy
Protection in Third Countries
13
With regards to refugee protection its inclusion as one of the four priorities in the new GAMM is welcomed as a way to ensure coherence and better address the challenges arising from the asylum-migration nexus At the same time ECRE argues that Europe should develop a comprehensive and ambitious policy for refugee protection globally that encompasses the CEAS and cooperation for protection in third countries Durable solutions and capacity building for asylum need to be integrated in development with clear and consistent policy objectives Seen from this perspective the European External Action Service (EEAS) has the potential to frame the debate around asylum differently in the context of a European policy for human rights and protection globally The credibility of EU actions to promote refugee protection and durable solutions in third countries also depends on whether Europe upholds its responsibilities for protection in its territory
In 2012 ECRE embarked on a two year project to develop dialogue and advocacy on refugee protection in
development cooperation between civil society and the EU institutions The project Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development (domaid) provides the space and framework to bring together ECREs Core Group on the External Dimension civil society organisations from third countries diaspora groups academics and representatives from the European Commission to exchange around three main themes capacity building for asylum promoting durable solutions in protracted refugee situations and the role of refugee diasporas This will be done through a series of tools including platform meetings public seminars regional debriefings for the Commission by NGOs present in the field and the publication of policy papers European NGOs active in third countries have first hand experience of protection gaps challenges and EU policy in the regions making them best placed to suggest ways to respond and highlight ways forward The Domaid Project also aims to enhance cooperation and foster synergies between European NGOs and diaspora organisations as well as between European NGOs and local civil society organisations in third countries
14
In March 2012 the European Union adopted a Joint EU Resettlement Programme for Refugees The adoption of this Joint Programme was seen as very important first step towards increasing the number of resettlement places made available by EU Member States
ECRE has coordinated and drafted a comparative study for the European Parliament on the best practices for the integration of resettled refugees in the EU Member States The study was released in early January 2013 ECRE highlighted that there is a need for more attention to be placed on integration of resettled refugees and the sustainability of current programs For resettled refugees citizenship applications are often restrictive and can hinder the integration process ECRE therefore recommended that Member States grant permanent resident status to resettled refugees upon arrival to ensure refugee integration from the start
ECRE is one of six leading organisations (Amnesty International CCME ICMC IOM and Save Me) in the refugee field that have launched the Campaign 20000 by
2020 asking for more and better resettlement in Europe with the target of 20000 persons resettled annually by the year 2020 The campaign is supported by the resettlement network whose website was launched in early March 2012 and is currently being developed to include a resource library a directory of resettlement policy makers and practitioners online discussion groups opportunities for online consultations and mutual learning via an online community of practice
In addition ECRE has also been working in close collaboration with the European University Institute on a resettlement project named Know Reset (Building Knowledge for a Concerted and Sustainable Approach to Refugee Resettlement in the EU and its Member States) The project aims to provide an overview of the current state of resettlement in Europe by examining the legislation policies and practices supporting resettlement in Member States that have regular resettlement programmes as well as those that offer places on an ad hoc basis The scope of research also includes Member States that have not been involved in resettlement so far in an effort to assess whether there is potential for resettlement in the future Country profiles are prepared for each Member State on the basis of qualitative and quantitative research including information on the legal framework practices the views of different stakeholders and the public discourse in relation to resettlement
Resettlement
The project website was launched in 2012 and features an online database of national and EU primary and secondary sources (legal and policy documents statistics financial data etc) as well as comparative information on resettlement policies and practices in the EU with graphs and tables
15
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
Summary
Message from the Chair 4
Message from the Secretary General 5
Refugees in Greece How Much Further 6
Access to Protection 8
ELENA Network 10
Protection in Third Countries 12
Resettlement 14
Detention 16
New Members 17
Our Members in 2012 18
Finances 20
Staff 19
Partners 22
Projects 21
4
Message from the Chair
Dear Readers
It was with great pleasure that we welcomed Michael Die-dring as ECRErsquos new Secretary General in 2012 Michaelrsquos strong commitment and over 20 yearsrsquo professional experi-ence focussed on the rule of law and international develop-ment equip him to lead ECRE in our endeavour to promote the protection and integration of refugees in Europe I would also like to take this opportunity to warmly thank Allan Leas for his exceptional leadership of ECRE during the interim period Allan truly has ECRE in his heart and the Board Secretariat and Members feel indebted to his perseverance and dedication
In 2012 ECRE also bade farewell to Ignacio Diacuteaz de Aguilar who has been a long-standing Member of the ECRE Board Ignacio has done much to assist ECRErsquos work in the larger Mediterranean region We would like to thank him deeply for having devoted his time and energy to ECRE and look for-ward to continuing to work with Ignacio in the future in other capacities We are very pleased to welcome Anna Terroacuten to the ECRE Board Anna has a long history of working in European asylum and migration matters as a former MEP and Spainrsquos Secretary of Immigration and Emigration We look forward to working together with Anna and the mem-bers of ECRErsquos Board to guide ECRErsquos work in defending the rights of those seeking international protection
This year we were delighted to welcome two new Maltese members to the Alliance aditus foundation and JRS Malta It is important for ECRE to extend its network to this country whose systematic use of migrant detention poor reception condi-tions and lack of integration prospects are of concern to the NGOs on the ground and their partners across Europe
I would like to take this opportunity to extend warm thanks to all our collaborators over 2012
Yours sincerely
Andreas KammChair of the ECRE BoardSecretary General of the Danish Refugee Council
5
Message from the Secretary General
Dear Readers
In autumn 2012 I took over the reins of ECRE and embarked upon a mission to lead this long-lasting Alliance in its endeav-our to protect the rights of asylum seekers and refugees in Europe I am deeply grateful to Allan Leas for ensuring that the transition period was smooth and for imparting upon me what ECRE means to its members and the people we serve
ECRE is a rich diverse and robust Alliance and that is its great-est strength Advocating for fair and humane asylum policies and their implementation requires a multi-faceted pan-Euro-pean approach In the coming years I intend to capitalise on the strengths of the Alliance to denounce human rights viola-tions and propose and promote fair and efficient durable solu-tions We will use a variety of means to achieve this mission rigorous research policy and legal advocacy awareness-rais-ing and sharing knowledge and expertise
Throughout 2012 we witnessed Statesrsquo failure to properly as-sure protection for all those who need and deserve it The per-sisting asylum crisis in Greece coupled with mounting racism continues to create a desperate situation for asylum seekers who see no option but to move on to try to access protection elsewhere without having the legal and safe means to do so Furthermore the European Court of Human Rights rightfully condemned Italy for intercepting migrants at high seas and pushing them back to Libya This condemnation has put the spotlight on the responsibilities of States when undertaking
border control operations outside their territory
By the end of 2012 some 850000 refugees had fled Syria out of which only 21500 sought protec-tion in the EU ECRE called and continues to call on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asy-lum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU Violence continues to escalate and the EU Member States should relax visa restrictions and family reunification rules and issue humanitarian visas through their embassies in neigh-bouring countries to facilitate access to the European territory for people fleeing Syria
While our challenges are enormous ECRErsquos potential is limit-less as well We have a duty to raise our game to help protect the rights of those fleeing persecution and violence I have accepted that challenge and look forward to working together with ECRErsquos members and partners to better protect the peo-ple we serve
Yours sincerely
Message from the Chair
Michael DiedringSecretary GeneralEuropean Council on Refugees and Exiles
6
Refugees in Greece How Much Further
In 2012 the situation for asylum seekers and refugees continued to deteriorate in Greece a country facing the full brunt of the economic crisis and lacking a functioning asylum and reception system ECRE the Greek Forum of Refugees and the film maker Matthias Wiessler joined forces to bring to the fore the voices of those who arrived in Greece fleeing countries such as Afghanistan Somalia or Sudan With the support of the European Programme for Integration and Migration (EPIM) the documentary How Much Further was released in Athens and Brussels on World Refugee Day 2012
How Much Further enters into the world of those who after months or even years on the road arrive in Greece hoping to find refuge in Europe but soon see no option but to resume their perilous journey in the hope of reaching a country that can receive them in dignity and consider their claim for asylum For most people staying in Greece means severe destitution the threat of racist violence and no hope of applying for asylum and getting their case fairly examined
The documentary is now available in English French Greek German and Serbian and has been seen by 5000 people in
English (available on YouTube and Vimeo) and over 10000 people in its Greek version In 2012 How Much Further was screened in Belgium Greece Denmark Switzerland and Ireland
Since the launch of the Greek National Action Plan in August 2010 Greek NGOs have severely criticized the authoritiesrsquo reluctance to take meaningful steps to make it operational and improve Greecersquos asylum and reception systems In May 2012 ECRE and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) presented a joint submission to the Committee of
7
Ministers of the Council of Europe focused on Greecersquos respect for its obligations arising from the MSS v Belgium amp Greece case through which the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled that returning asylum seekers to Greece violated the European Convention on Human Rights due to the inhuman and degrading treatment and lack of effective remedy available there for asylum seekers In particular the submission covered detention and living conditions for asylum seekers and access to the asylum procedure
Following the ECtHRrsquos ruling on MSS v Belgium amp Greece EU Member States have refrained from returning asylum seekers to Greece under the Dublin Regulation In 2012 however a report Human Cargo by ProAsyl and Greek Council for Refugees exposed the arbitrary readmissions from Italian sea ports to Greece
The report showed that despite an official stay on returns to Greece Italy returned people including children to Greece without verifying if they had protection needs In several cases examined in the report the returned people were detained prior to removal and upon their arrival in Greece in poor conditions
Throughout 2012 the Greek governmentrsquos response to the ever-escalating crisis for asylum seekers in Greece was to increase detention capacity Existing detention centres in Greece are notorious for particularly inhuman conditions In March 2012 the Greek government announced the establishment of 30 detention centres to hold 30000
undocumented migrants across the country In November Greece toughened its detention law for asylum seeker to a maximum of 18 months
The situation for migrants deteriorated significantly in August when the Greek Ministry of Public Order and Citizen Protection launched the operation ldquoXenios Zeusrdquo which led to the rounding up of thousands of migrants on the basis of their perceived ethnicities in a seemingly discriminatory manner ECRE called on Greece to immediately end this practice and sent a letter to EU Commissioner for Home Affairs Cecilia Malmstroumlm raising questions regarding the compatibility of the Xenios Operation with a number of safeguards laid down in the EU asylum and immigration legislation as well as the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and requesting information on the Commissionrsquos response to Greek actions
ECRE continues to monitor the situation for refugees asylum seekers and would-be asylum seekers in Greece with concern While the fact that Member States no longer return asylum seekers to Greece under the Dublin Regulation has alleviated the situation and certainly allowed the people concerned to have a fairer chance of having their claim adequately assessed the outlook remains bleak for those people in Greece with no legal means for travelling onwards and for those arriving in Greece in the hope of finding a safe haven
8
Italy condemned for intercepting migrants at high seas and pushing them back to Libya
In February 2012 the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) admonished Italyrsquos push-back policy through the Hirsi Jammaa and others v Italy case where Italy was condemned for pushing back 24 Somalis and Eritreans who were intercepted on the high seas by Italian border guards taken on board the Italian ship and handed over to Libyan officials on the basis of the Friendship Treaty between Italy and Libya in 2009 The judgment has important consequences in particular for EU Member States institutions and agencies in the context of border management policies that aim to interfere with migration routes outside EU territory as control implies responsibility
EU Member States whether they act under the aegis of Frontex or not will have to review their border control and return operations in order to ensure the full respect of the principle of non refoulement with regard to every individual intercepted outside their territory and rule out the possibility of collective expulsions as prohibited under Article 4 of Protocol IV to the ECHR in line with the ECtHRs judgment
ECRE and CIR released a joint press release following the judgment Christopher Hein Director of the Italian Council for Refugees stated that ldquosuch a sentence proves that during the push-back operations the rights of refugees were systematically violated Italy in fact denied the possibility to apply for protection and has then pushed back to Libya more than a thousand people who had the right to be received in Italy We want that this message arrives unmistakably to
Access to Protection
ECRE interview with Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen Danish Institute for International Studies
ldquo rdquoStates cannot shirk their human rights responsibilities by hiding behind the fact that they are operating beyond their physical borders
9
the Monti Government in re-contracting the co-operation agreements with the Libyan Transitional Government the rights of refugees cannot be negotiated We expect that the new Executive has clearer and stronger positions on this issue than the ones we have known about in the last weeksrdquo ECREs Acting Secretary General Allan Leas said that ldquothis ruling confirms that Statesrsquo obligations under the ECHR do not stop at their physical borders States cannot abdicate their principles values and commitment to the protection of human rights by doing outside their borders what would not be permissible in their territoriesrdquo
NGOs call for legal and safe channels to allow refugees reach Europe
In 2012 the CIR-led Entering the Territory project concluded with the publication of the report and press conference Reaching Europe in Safety The possibility to seek asylum through an embassy saved my life ECRE and other European NGOs participated in this joint project
Persons fleeing persecution often lack the means to travel legally and in safety to the EU For some people seeking asylum through embassies abroad was the only way to escape danger and find safety The lack of legal and safe means of accessing protection leaves people no option but to undertake the treacherous journey to Europe by land or sea Many of them pay for this with their lives According to estimates based only on the known incidents from 1998 to August 2011 17738 persons died attempting to reach Europe
Switzerland was the last European country that provided a formalized protected entry procedure The Swiss government abolished the procedure in 2012 Susanne Bolz Head of the Protection Unit of the Swiss Refugee Council emphasised that ldquoThe Swiss asylum procedure from abroad is not a perfect system but it saves lives In 2011 around 600 refugees received a visa to have their asylum claim assessed in Switzerland All those people who were able to enter Switzerland through the procedure at the embassies did not have to go to find a smuggler they didnrsquot have to pay lots of money they were not raped on their journey to Europe and they did not drown in the Mediterraneanrdquo
10
ELENA Network
The European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) is a forum of legal practitioners who aim to promote the highest human rights standards for the treatment of refugees asylum seekers and other persons in need of international protection in their daily individual counselling and advocacy work In 2012 the ELENA Network welcomed four new national coordinators the Croatian Law Centre the Slovakian Human Rights League the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and the Irish Refugee Council Independent Law Centre
Rule 39 Research
In April 2012 ECREELENA published a qualitative research report on the current practices of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Rule 39 interim measures Rule 39 measures are of vital importance to applicants as they constitute an avenue for the ECtHR to ensure that applicants will not be subjected to Member State action in possible contravention of their Convention rights before their cases can be heard by the court In asylum and immigration cases this frequently means preventing return and expulsion of the asylum seeker to hisher country of origin where return would violate their Convention rights
The report fruit of the collaborative work of legal practitioners active in 23 countries emphasizes several instances of non-compliance of Rule 39 indications in a number of
Member States which have led to persons being deported to countries where they are at risk of torture or other ill- treatment Moreover the research shows that there is a lack of effective national legal remedies in Member States and that the practice of accelerated procedures is placing persons at risk of refoulement Finally it is demonstrated that the right to individual petition and access to the Court is being circumvented through a variety of obstacles at the national level
The report details recommendations to the institutional bodies of the Council of Europe legal representatives and to Member States as to improving the functioning of this essential legal tool and to ensure access to effective legal remedies within State Parties themselves
11
ELENA Courses
ECREELENA has been running specialist and introductory refugee law courses for 25 years The topics of the courses are selected by the annual meeting of ELENA coordinators in response to needs identified by practitioners The courses are aimed at legal counsellors and lawyers from across Europe who defend or who are interested in defending cases concerning refugees and asylum seekers In 2012 two Advanced Courses took place one dealing with Generalised Violence Armed Conflict and the Need for International Protection and the on The Rights of Refugees
ECREELENA is deeply grateful to the experts who have lent their time to delivering these courses
Prof James Hathaway University of Michigan
Prof Luis Jimena Quesada President of the European Committee of Social Rights Council of Europe
Kees Wouters Senior Refugee Law Advisor Department of International Protection UNHCR
Blanche Tax Head of the Protection Information Unit Department of International Protection UNHCR
Mark Symes Asylum and Refugee law specialist
Flip Schuumlller Partner Boumlhler Advocaten
Nuala Mole Founder and Director of the AIRE Centre
Prof Heacutelegravene Lambert University of Westminster
Nino Hartl Country of Origin Information Expert EASO
Harald Doerig Justice at the German Federal Administrative Court
Ioana Patrascu Legal Officer European Commission
12
Instability following the Arab Spring continued in the region well into 2012 As the transitional period for Libya began and the reported numbers from UNHCR of Syrian refugees rose to 850000 by the end of 2012 all eyes were on Europes response The Danish and Cypriot Presidencies of the EU both faced pressure to react
ECRE shared its recommendations to the Danish Presidency to ensure a commitment to protection and respect for human rights of all persons including migrants and refugees in the Libyan context During the Cypriot presidency the Syrian refugee situation was further exacerbated by escalating violence rising death toll and increasing displacement in the region In its recommendations to the Cypriot Presidency ECRE called on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asylum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU and to provide continuous support to the humanitarian efforts in the region in order to meet urgent needs and maintain the protection space
In 2012 ECRE published Comments on the Commissions Communication on the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM) a landmark Communication that sets the framework for actions in the external dimension of EU migration and asylum policy in the context of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) in the next years The new GAMM is structured around the concept of mobility and aims to be more political integrating migration dialogues in political dialogues with third countries In the new GAMM the three priorities of the Global Approach (promoting labour migration addressing irregular migration and enhancing the links between migration and development) are maintained and now complemented by a fourth one refugee protection ECRE addressed the limits of the GAMM being led by a JHA approach since an overarching framework would need the ability to address the root causes of migration and displacement and enhance conditions that affect the lives of both migrants and the local communities in the region These are all areas that are and should be addressed through development cooperation More importantly Europe needs to show political leadership and position itself as a global player in international migration governance seizing the moment to develop and promote a rights-based approach to migration globally Such an approach should be accommodated in EUs development and foreign policy and EU human rights strategy
Protection in Third Countries
13
With regards to refugee protection its inclusion as one of the four priorities in the new GAMM is welcomed as a way to ensure coherence and better address the challenges arising from the asylum-migration nexus At the same time ECRE argues that Europe should develop a comprehensive and ambitious policy for refugee protection globally that encompasses the CEAS and cooperation for protection in third countries Durable solutions and capacity building for asylum need to be integrated in development with clear and consistent policy objectives Seen from this perspective the European External Action Service (EEAS) has the potential to frame the debate around asylum differently in the context of a European policy for human rights and protection globally The credibility of EU actions to promote refugee protection and durable solutions in third countries also depends on whether Europe upholds its responsibilities for protection in its territory
In 2012 ECRE embarked on a two year project to develop dialogue and advocacy on refugee protection in
development cooperation between civil society and the EU institutions The project Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development (domaid) provides the space and framework to bring together ECREs Core Group on the External Dimension civil society organisations from third countries diaspora groups academics and representatives from the European Commission to exchange around three main themes capacity building for asylum promoting durable solutions in protracted refugee situations and the role of refugee diasporas This will be done through a series of tools including platform meetings public seminars regional debriefings for the Commission by NGOs present in the field and the publication of policy papers European NGOs active in third countries have first hand experience of protection gaps challenges and EU policy in the regions making them best placed to suggest ways to respond and highlight ways forward The Domaid Project also aims to enhance cooperation and foster synergies between European NGOs and diaspora organisations as well as between European NGOs and local civil society organisations in third countries
14
In March 2012 the European Union adopted a Joint EU Resettlement Programme for Refugees The adoption of this Joint Programme was seen as very important first step towards increasing the number of resettlement places made available by EU Member States
ECRE has coordinated and drafted a comparative study for the European Parliament on the best practices for the integration of resettled refugees in the EU Member States The study was released in early January 2013 ECRE highlighted that there is a need for more attention to be placed on integration of resettled refugees and the sustainability of current programs For resettled refugees citizenship applications are often restrictive and can hinder the integration process ECRE therefore recommended that Member States grant permanent resident status to resettled refugees upon arrival to ensure refugee integration from the start
ECRE is one of six leading organisations (Amnesty International CCME ICMC IOM and Save Me) in the refugee field that have launched the Campaign 20000 by
2020 asking for more and better resettlement in Europe with the target of 20000 persons resettled annually by the year 2020 The campaign is supported by the resettlement network whose website was launched in early March 2012 and is currently being developed to include a resource library a directory of resettlement policy makers and practitioners online discussion groups opportunities for online consultations and mutual learning via an online community of practice
In addition ECRE has also been working in close collaboration with the European University Institute on a resettlement project named Know Reset (Building Knowledge for a Concerted and Sustainable Approach to Refugee Resettlement in the EU and its Member States) The project aims to provide an overview of the current state of resettlement in Europe by examining the legislation policies and practices supporting resettlement in Member States that have regular resettlement programmes as well as those that offer places on an ad hoc basis The scope of research also includes Member States that have not been involved in resettlement so far in an effort to assess whether there is potential for resettlement in the future Country profiles are prepared for each Member State on the basis of qualitative and quantitative research including information on the legal framework practices the views of different stakeholders and the public discourse in relation to resettlement
Resettlement
The project website was launched in 2012 and features an online database of national and EU primary and secondary sources (legal and policy documents statistics financial data etc) as well as comparative information on resettlement policies and practices in the EU with graphs and tables
15
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
4
Message from the Chair
Dear Readers
It was with great pleasure that we welcomed Michael Die-dring as ECRErsquos new Secretary General in 2012 Michaelrsquos strong commitment and over 20 yearsrsquo professional experi-ence focussed on the rule of law and international develop-ment equip him to lead ECRE in our endeavour to promote the protection and integration of refugees in Europe I would also like to take this opportunity to warmly thank Allan Leas for his exceptional leadership of ECRE during the interim period Allan truly has ECRE in his heart and the Board Secretariat and Members feel indebted to his perseverance and dedication
In 2012 ECRE also bade farewell to Ignacio Diacuteaz de Aguilar who has been a long-standing Member of the ECRE Board Ignacio has done much to assist ECRErsquos work in the larger Mediterranean region We would like to thank him deeply for having devoted his time and energy to ECRE and look for-ward to continuing to work with Ignacio in the future in other capacities We are very pleased to welcome Anna Terroacuten to the ECRE Board Anna has a long history of working in European asylum and migration matters as a former MEP and Spainrsquos Secretary of Immigration and Emigration We look forward to working together with Anna and the mem-bers of ECRErsquos Board to guide ECRErsquos work in defending the rights of those seeking international protection
This year we were delighted to welcome two new Maltese members to the Alliance aditus foundation and JRS Malta It is important for ECRE to extend its network to this country whose systematic use of migrant detention poor reception condi-tions and lack of integration prospects are of concern to the NGOs on the ground and their partners across Europe
I would like to take this opportunity to extend warm thanks to all our collaborators over 2012
Yours sincerely
Andreas KammChair of the ECRE BoardSecretary General of the Danish Refugee Council
5
Message from the Secretary General
Dear Readers
In autumn 2012 I took over the reins of ECRE and embarked upon a mission to lead this long-lasting Alliance in its endeav-our to protect the rights of asylum seekers and refugees in Europe I am deeply grateful to Allan Leas for ensuring that the transition period was smooth and for imparting upon me what ECRE means to its members and the people we serve
ECRE is a rich diverse and robust Alliance and that is its great-est strength Advocating for fair and humane asylum policies and their implementation requires a multi-faceted pan-Euro-pean approach In the coming years I intend to capitalise on the strengths of the Alliance to denounce human rights viola-tions and propose and promote fair and efficient durable solu-tions We will use a variety of means to achieve this mission rigorous research policy and legal advocacy awareness-rais-ing and sharing knowledge and expertise
Throughout 2012 we witnessed Statesrsquo failure to properly as-sure protection for all those who need and deserve it The per-sisting asylum crisis in Greece coupled with mounting racism continues to create a desperate situation for asylum seekers who see no option but to move on to try to access protection elsewhere without having the legal and safe means to do so Furthermore the European Court of Human Rights rightfully condemned Italy for intercepting migrants at high seas and pushing them back to Libya This condemnation has put the spotlight on the responsibilities of States when undertaking
border control operations outside their territory
By the end of 2012 some 850000 refugees had fled Syria out of which only 21500 sought protec-tion in the EU ECRE called and continues to call on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asy-lum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU Violence continues to escalate and the EU Member States should relax visa restrictions and family reunification rules and issue humanitarian visas through their embassies in neigh-bouring countries to facilitate access to the European territory for people fleeing Syria
While our challenges are enormous ECRErsquos potential is limit-less as well We have a duty to raise our game to help protect the rights of those fleeing persecution and violence I have accepted that challenge and look forward to working together with ECRErsquos members and partners to better protect the peo-ple we serve
Yours sincerely
Message from the Chair
Michael DiedringSecretary GeneralEuropean Council on Refugees and Exiles
6
Refugees in Greece How Much Further
In 2012 the situation for asylum seekers and refugees continued to deteriorate in Greece a country facing the full brunt of the economic crisis and lacking a functioning asylum and reception system ECRE the Greek Forum of Refugees and the film maker Matthias Wiessler joined forces to bring to the fore the voices of those who arrived in Greece fleeing countries such as Afghanistan Somalia or Sudan With the support of the European Programme for Integration and Migration (EPIM) the documentary How Much Further was released in Athens and Brussels on World Refugee Day 2012
How Much Further enters into the world of those who after months or even years on the road arrive in Greece hoping to find refuge in Europe but soon see no option but to resume their perilous journey in the hope of reaching a country that can receive them in dignity and consider their claim for asylum For most people staying in Greece means severe destitution the threat of racist violence and no hope of applying for asylum and getting their case fairly examined
The documentary is now available in English French Greek German and Serbian and has been seen by 5000 people in
English (available on YouTube and Vimeo) and over 10000 people in its Greek version In 2012 How Much Further was screened in Belgium Greece Denmark Switzerland and Ireland
Since the launch of the Greek National Action Plan in August 2010 Greek NGOs have severely criticized the authoritiesrsquo reluctance to take meaningful steps to make it operational and improve Greecersquos asylum and reception systems In May 2012 ECRE and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) presented a joint submission to the Committee of
7
Ministers of the Council of Europe focused on Greecersquos respect for its obligations arising from the MSS v Belgium amp Greece case through which the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled that returning asylum seekers to Greece violated the European Convention on Human Rights due to the inhuman and degrading treatment and lack of effective remedy available there for asylum seekers In particular the submission covered detention and living conditions for asylum seekers and access to the asylum procedure
Following the ECtHRrsquos ruling on MSS v Belgium amp Greece EU Member States have refrained from returning asylum seekers to Greece under the Dublin Regulation In 2012 however a report Human Cargo by ProAsyl and Greek Council for Refugees exposed the arbitrary readmissions from Italian sea ports to Greece
The report showed that despite an official stay on returns to Greece Italy returned people including children to Greece without verifying if they had protection needs In several cases examined in the report the returned people were detained prior to removal and upon their arrival in Greece in poor conditions
Throughout 2012 the Greek governmentrsquos response to the ever-escalating crisis for asylum seekers in Greece was to increase detention capacity Existing detention centres in Greece are notorious for particularly inhuman conditions In March 2012 the Greek government announced the establishment of 30 detention centres to hold 30000
undocumented migrants across the country In November Greece toughened its detention law for asylum seeker to a maximum of 18 months
The situation for migrants deteriorated significantly in August when the Greek Ministry of Public Order and Citizen Protection launched the operation ldquoXenios Zeusrdquo which led to the rounding up of thousands of migrants on the basis of their perceived ethnicities in a seemingly discriminatory manner ECRE called on Greece to immediately end this practice and sent a letter to EU Commissioner for Home Affairs Cecilia Malmstroumlm raising questions regarding the compatibility of the Xenios Operation with a number of safeguards laid down in the EU asylum and immigration legislation as well as the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and requesting information on the Commissionrsquos response to Greek actions
ECRE continues to monitor the situation for refugees asylum seekers and would-be asylum seekers in Greece with concern While the fact that Member States no longer return asylum seekers to Greece under the Dublin Regulation has alleviated the situation and certainly allowed the people concerned to have a fairer chance of having their claim adequately assessed the outlook remains bleak for those people in Greece with no legal means for travelling onwards and for those arriving in Greece in the hope of finding a safe haven
8
Italy condemned for intercepting migrants at high seas and pushing them back to Libya
In February 2012 the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) admonished Italyrsquos push-back policy through the Hirsi Jammaa and others v Italy case where Italy was condemned for pushing back 24 Somalis and Eritreans who were intercepted on the high seas by Italian border guards taken on board the Italian ship and handed over to Libyan officials on the basis of the Friendship Treaty between Italy and Libya in 2009 The judgment has important consequences in particular for EU Member States institutions and agencies in the context of border management policies that aim to interfere with migration routes outside EU territory as control implies responsibility
EU Member States whether they act under the aegis of Frontex or not will have to review their border control and return operations in order to ensure the full respect of the principle of non refoulement with regard to every individual intercepted outside their territory and rule out the possibility of collective expulsions as prohibited under Article 4 of Protocol IV to the ECHR in line with the ECtHRs judgment
ECRE and CIR released a joint press release following the judgment Christopher Hein Director of the Italian Council for Refugees stated that ldquosuch a sentence proves that during the push-back operations the rights of refugees were systematically violated Italy in fact denied the possibility to apply for protection and has then pushed back to Libya more than a thousand people who had the right to be received in Italy We want that this message arrives unmistakably to
Access to Protection
ECRE interview with Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen Danish Institute for International Studies
ldquo rdquoStates cannot shirk their human rights responsibilities by hiding behind the fact that they are operating beyond their physical borders
9
the Monti Government in re-contracting the co-operation agreements with the Libyan Transitional Government the rights of refugees cannot be negotiated We expect that the new Executive has clearer and stronger positions on this issue than the ones we have known about in the last weeksrdquo ECREs Acting Secretary General Allan Leas said that ldquothis ruling confirms that Statesrsquo obligations under the ECHR do not stop at their physical borders States cannot abdicate their principles values and commitment to the protection of human rights by doing outside their borders what would not be permissible in their territoriesrdquo
NGOs call for legal and safe channels to allow refugees reach Europe
In 2012 the CIR-led Entering the Territory project concluded with the publication of the report and press conference Reaching Europe in Safety The possibility to seek asylum through an embassy saved my life ECRE and other European NGOs participated in this joint project
Persons fleeing persecution often lack the means to travel legally and in safety to the EU For some people seeking asylum through embassies abroad was the only way to escape danger and find safety The lack of legal and safe means of accessing protection leaves people no option but to undertake the treacherous journey to Europe by land or sea Many of them pay for this with their lives According to estimates based only on the known incidents from 1998 to August 2011 17738 persons died attempting to reach Europe
Switzerland was the last European country that provided a formalized protected entry procedure The Swiss government abolished the procedure in 2012 Susanne Bolz Head of the Protection Unit of the Swiss Refugee Council emphasised that ldquoThe Swiss asylum procedure from abroad is not a perfect system but it saves lives In 2011 around 600 refugees received a visa to have their asylum claim assessed in Switzerland All those people who were able to enter Switzerland through the procedure at the embassies did not have to go to find a smuggler they didnrsquot have to pay lots of money they were not raped on their journey to Europe and they did not drown in the Mediterraneanrdquo
10
ELENA Network
The European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) is a forum of legal practitioners who aim to promote the highest human rights standards for the treatment of refugees asylum seekers and other persons in need of international protection in their daily individual counselling and advocacy work In 2012 the ELENA Network welcomed four new national coordinators the Croatian Law Centre the Slovakian Human Rights League the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and the Irish Refugee Council Independent Law Centre
Rule 39 Research
In April 2012 ECREELENA published a qualitative research report on the current practices of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Rule 39 interim measures Rule 39 measures are of vital importance to applicants as they constitute an avenue for the ECtHR to ensure that applicants will not be subjected to Member State action in possible contravention of their Convention rights before their cases can be heard by the court In asylum and immigration cases this frequently means preventing return and expulsion of the asylum seeker to hisher country of origin where return would violate their Convention rights
The report fruit of the collaborative work of legal practitioners active in 23 countries emphasizes several instances of non-compliance of Rule 39 indications in a number of
Member States which have led to persons being deported to countries where they are at risk of torture or other ill- treatment Moreover the research shows that there is a lack of effective national legal remedies in Member States and that the practice of accelerated procedures is placing persons at risk of refoulement Finally it is demonstrated that the right to individual petition and access to the Court is being circumvented through a variety of obstacles at the national level
The report details recommendations to the institutional bodies of the Council of Europe legal representatives and to Member States as to improving the functioning of this essential legal tool and to ensure access to effective legal remedies within State Parties themselves
11
ELENA Courses
ECREELENA has been running specialist and introductory refugee law courses for 25 years The topics of the courses are selected by the annual meeting of ELENA coordinators in response to needs identified by practitioners The courses are aimed at legal counsellors and lawyers from across Europe who defend or who are interested in defending cases concerning refugees and asylum seekers In 2012 two Advanced Courses took place one dealing with Generalised Violence Armed Conflict and the Need for International Protection and the on The Rights of Refugees
ECREELENA is deeply grateful to the experts who have lent their time to delivering these courses
Prof James Hathaway University of Michigan
Prof Luis Jimena Quesada President of the European Committee of Social Rights Council of Europe
Kees Wouters Senior Refugee Law Advisor Department of International Protection UNHCR
Blanche Tax Head of the Protection Information Unit Department of International Protection UNHCR
Mark Symes Asylum and Refugee law specialist
Flip Schuumlller Partner Boumlhler Advocaten
Nuala Mole Founder and Director of the AIRE Centre
Prof Heacutelegravene Lambert University of Westminster
Nino Hartl Country of Origin Information Expert EASO
Harald Doerig Justice at the German Federal Administrative Court
Ioana Patrascu Legal Officer European Commission
12
Instability following the Arab Spring continued in the region well into 2012 As the transitional period for Libya began and the reported numbers from UNHCR of Syrian refugees rose to 850000 by the end of 2012 all eyes were on Europes response The Danish and Cypriot Presidencies of the EU both faced pressure to react
ECRE shared its recommendations to the Danish Presidency to ensure a commitment to protection and respect for human rights of all persons including migrants and refugees in the Libyan context During the Cypriot presidency the Syrian refugee situation was further exacerbated by escalating violence rising death toll and increasing displacement in the region In its recommendations to the Cypriot Presidency ECRE called on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asylum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU and to provide continuous support to the humanitarian efforts in the region in order to meet urgent needs and maintain the protection space
In 2012 ECRE published Comments on the Commissions Communication on the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM) a landmark Communication that sets the framework for actions in the external dimension of EU migration and asylum policy in the context of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) in the next years The new GAMM is structured around the concept of mobility and aims to be more political integrating migration dialogues in political dialogues with third countries In the new GAMM the three priorities of the Global Approach (promoting labour migration addressing irregular migration and enhancing the links between migration and development) are maintained and now complemented by a fourth one refugee protection ECRE addressed the limits of the GAMM being led by a JHA approach since an overarching framework would need the ability to address the root causes of migration and displacement and enhance conditions that affect the lives of both migrants and the local communities in the region These are all areas that are and should be addressed through development cooperation More importantly Europe needs to show political leadership and position itself as a global player in international migration governance seizing the moment to develop and promote a rights-based approach to migration globally Such an approach should be accommodated in EUs development and foreign policy and EU human rights strategy
Protection in Third Countries
13
With regards to refugee protection its inclusion as one of the four priorities in the new GAMM is welcomed as a way to ensure coherence and better address the challenges arising from the asylum-migration nexus At the same time ECRE argues that Europe should develop a comprehensive and ambitious policy for refugee protection globally that encompasses the CEAS and cooperation for protection in third countries Durable solutions and capacity building for asylum need to be integrated in development with clear and consistent policy objectives Seen from this perspective the European External Action Service (EEAS) has the potential to frame the debate around asylum differently in the context of a European policy for human rights and protection globally The credibility of EU actions to promote refugee protection and durable solutions in third countries also depends on whether Europe upholds its responsibilities for protection in its territory
In 2012 ECRE embarked on a two year project to develop dialogue and advocacy on refugee protection in
development cooperation between civil society and the EU institutions The project Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development (domaid) provides the space and framework to bring together ECREs Core Group on the External Dimension civil society organisations from third countries diaspora groups academics and representatives from the European Commission to exchange around three main themes capacity building for asylum promoting durable solutions in protracted refugee situations and the role of refugee diasporas This will be done through a series of tools including platform meetings public seminars regional debriefings for the Commission by NGOs present in the field and the publication of policy papers European NGOs active in third countries have first hand experience of protection gaps challenges and EU policy in the regions making them best placed to suggest ways to respond and highlight ways forward The Domaid Project also aims to enhance cooperation and foster synergies between European NGOs and diaspora organisations as well as between European NGOs and local civil society organisations in third countries
14
In March 2012 the European Union adopted a Joint EU Resettlement Programme for Refugees The adoption of this Joint Programme was seen as very important first step towards increasing the number of resettlement places made available by EU Member States
ECRE has coordinated and drafted a comparative study for the European Parliament on the best practices for the integration of resettled refugees in the EU Member States The study was released in early January 2013 ECRE highlighted that there is a need for more attention to be placed on integration of resettled refugees and the sustainability of current programs For resettled refugees citizenship applications are often restrictive and can hinder the integration process ECRE therefore recommended that Member States grant permanent resident status to resettled refugees upon arrival to ensure refugee integration from the start
ECRE is one of six leading organisations (Amnesty International CCME ICMC IOM and Save Me) in the refugee field that have launched the Campaign 20000 by
2020 asking for more and better resettlement in Europe with the target of 20000 persons resettled annually by the year 2020 The campaign is supported by the resettlement network whose website was launched in early March 2012 and is currently being developed to include a resource library a directory of resettlement policy makers and practitioners online discussion groups opportunities for online consultations and mutual learning via an online community of practice
In addition ECRE has also been working in close collaboration with the European University Institute on a resettlement project named Know Reset (Building Knowledge for a Concerted and Sustainable Approach to Refugee Resettlement in the EU and its Member States) The project aims to provide an overview of the current state of resettlement in Europe by examining the legislation policies and practices supporting resettlement in Member States that have regular resettlement programmes as well as those that offer places on an ad hoc basis The scope of research also includes Member States that have not been involved in resettlement so far in an effort to assess whether there is potential for resettlement in the future Country profiles are prepared for each Member State on the basis of qualitative and quantitative research including information on the legal framework practices the views of different stakeholders and the public discourse in relation to resettlement
Resettlement
The project website was launched in 2012 and features an online database of national and EU primary and secondary sources (legal and policy documents statistics financial data etc) as well as comparative information on resettlement policies and practices in the EU with graphs and tables
15
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
5
Message from the Secretary General
Dear Readers
In autumn 2012 I took over the reins of ECRE and embarked upon a mission to lead this long-lasting Alliance in its endeav-our to protect the rights of asylum seekers and refugees in Europe I am deeply grateful to Allan Leas for ensuring that the transition period was smooth and for imparting upon me what ECRE means to its members and the people we serve
ECRE is a rich diverse and robust Alliance and that is its great-est strength Advocating for fair and humane asylum policies and their implementation requires a multi-faceted pan-Euro-pean approach In the coming years I intend to capitalise on the strengths of the Alliance to denounce human rights viola-tions and propose and promote fair and efficient durable solu-tions We will use a variety of means to achieve this mission rigorous research policy and legal advocacy awareness-rais-ing and sharing knowledge and expertise
Throughout 2012 we witnessed Statesrsquo failure to properly as-sure protection for all those who need and deserve it The per-sisting asylum crisis in Greece coupled with mounting racism continues to create a desperate situation for asylum seekers who see no option but to move on to try to access protection elsewhere without having the legal and safe means to do so Furthermore the European Court of Human Rights rightfully condemned Italy for intercepting migrants at high seas and pushing them back to Libya This condemnation has put the spotlight on the responsibilities of States when undertaking
border control operations outside their territory
By the end of 2012 some 850000 refugees had fled Syria out of which only 21500 sought protec-tion in the EU ECRE called and continues to call on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asy-lum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU Violence continues to escalate and the EU Member States should relax visa restrictions and family reunification rules and issue humanitarian visas through their embassies in neigh-bouring countries to facilitate access to the European territory for people fleeing Syria
While our challenges are enormous ECRErsquos potential is limit-less as well We have a duty to raise our game to help protect the rights of those fleeing persecution and violence I have accepted that challenge and look forward to working together with ECRErsquos members and partners to better protect the peo-ple we serve
Yours sincerely
Message from the Chair
Michael DiedringSecretary GeneralEuropean Council on Refugees and Exiles
6
Refugees in Greece How Much Further
In 2012 the situation for asylum seekers and refugees continued to deteriorate in Greece a country facing the full brunt of the economic crisis and lacking a functioning asylum and reception system ECRE the Greek Forum of Refugees and the film maker Matthias Wiessler joined forces to bring to the fore the voices of those who arrived in Greece fleeing countries such as Afghanistan Somalia or Sudan With the support of the European Programme for Integration and Migration (EPIM) the documentary How Much Further was released in Athens and Brussels on World Refugee Day 2012
How Much Further enters into the world of those who after months or even years on the road arrive in Greece hoping to find refuge in Europe but soon see no option but to resume their perilous journey in the hope of reaching a country that can receive them in dignity and consider their claim for asylum For most people staying in Greece means severe destitution the threat of racist violence and no hope of applying for asylum and getting their case fairly examined
The documentary is now available in English French Greek German and Serbian and has been seen by 5000 people in
English (available on YouTube and Vimeo) and over 10000 people in its Greek version In 2012 How Much Further was screened in Belgium Greece Denmark Switzerland and Ireland
Since the launch of the Greek National Action Plan in August 2010 Greek NGOs have severely criticized the authoritiesrsquo reluctance to take meaningful steps to make it operational and improve Greecersquos asylum and reception systems In May 2012 ECRE and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) presented a joint submission to the Committee of
7
Ministers of the Council of Europe focused on Greecersquos respect for its obligations arising from the MSS v Belgium amp Greece case through which the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled that returning asylum seekers to Greece violated the European Convention on Human Rights due to the inhuman and degrading treatment and lack of effective remedy available there for asylum seekers In particular the submission covered detention and living conditions for asylum seekers and access to the asylum procedure
Following the ECtHRrsquos ruling on MSS v Belgium amp Greece EU Member States have refrained from returning asylum seekers to Greece under the Dublin Regulation In 2012 however a report Human Cargo by ProAsyl and Greek Council for Refugees exposed the arbitrary readmissions from Italian sea ports to Greece
The report showed that despite an official stay on returns to Greece Italy returned people including children to Greece without verifying if they had protection needs In several cases examined in the report the returned people were detained prior to removal and upon their arrival in Greece in poor conditions
Throughout 2012 the Greek governmentrsquos response to the ever-escalating crisis for asylum seekers in Greece was to increase detention capacity Existing detention centres in Greece are notorious for particularly inhuman conditions In March 2012 the Greek government announced the establishment of 30 detention centres to hold 30000
undocumented migrants across the country In November Greece toughened its detention law for asylum seeker to a maximum of 18 months
The situation for migrants deteriorated significantly in August when the Greek Ministry of Public Order and Citizen Protection launched the operation ldquoXenios Zeusrdquo which led to the rounding up of thousands of migrants on the basis of their perceived ethnicities in a seemingly discriminatory manner ECRE called on Greece to immediately end this practice and sent a letter to EU Commissioner for Home Affairs Cecilia Malmstroumlm raising questions regarding the compatibility of the Xenios Operation with a number of safeguards laid down in the EU asylum and immigration legislation as well as the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and requesting information on the Commissionrsquos response to Greek actions
ECRE continues to monitor the situation for refugees asylum seekers and would-be asylum seekers in Greece with concern While the fact that Member States no longer return asylum seekers to Greece under the Dublin Regulation has alleviated the situation and certainly allowed the people concerned to have a fairer chance of having their claim adequately assessed the outlook remains bleak for those people in Greece with no legal means for travelling onwards and for those arriving in Greece in the hope of finding a safe haven
8
Italy condemned for intercepting migrants at high seas and pushing them back to Libya
In February 2012 the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) admonished Italyrsquos push-back policy through the Hirsi Jammaa and others v Italy case where Italy was condemned for pushing back 24 Somalis and Eritreans who were intercepted on the high seas by Italian border guards taken on board the Italian ship and handed over to Libyan officials on the basis of the Friendship Treaty between Italy and Libya in 2009 The judgment has important consequences in particular for EU Member States institutions and agencies in the context of border management policies that aim to interfere with migration routes outside EU territory as control implies responsibility
EU Member States whether they act under the aegis of Frontex or not will have to review their border control and return operations in order to ensure the full respect of the principle of non refoulement with regard to every individual intercepted outside their territory and rule out the possibility of collective expulsions as prohibited under Article 4 of Protocol IV to the ECHR in line with the ECtHRs judgment
ECRE and CIR released a joint press release following the judgment Christopher Hein Director of the Italian Council for Refugees stated that ldquosuch a sentence proves that during the push-back operations the rights of refugees were systematically violated Italy in fact denied the possibility to apply for protection and has then pushed back to Libya more than a thousand people who had the right to be received in Italy We want that this message arrives unmistakably to
Access to Protection
ECRE interview with Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen Danish Institute for International Studies
ldquo rdquoStates cannot shirk their human rights responsibilities by hiding behind the fact that they are operating beyond their physical borders
9
the Monti Government in re-contracting the co-operation agreements with the Libyan Transitional Government the rights of refugees cannot be negotiated We expect that the new Executive has clearer and stronger positions on this issue than the ones we have known about in the last weeksrdquo ECREs Acting Secretary General Allan Leas said that ldquothis ruling confirms that Statesrsquo obligations under the ECHR do not stop at their physical borders States cannot abdicate their principles values and commitment to the protection of human rights by doing outside their borders what would not be permissible in their territoriesrdquo
NGOs call for legal and safe channels to allow refugees reach Europe
In 2012 the CIR-led Entering the Territory project concluded with the publication of the report and press conference Reaching Europe in Safety The possibility to seek asylum through an embassy saved my life ECRE and other European NGOs participated in this joint project
Persons fleeing persecution often lack the means to travel legally and in safety to the EU For some people seeking asylum through embassies abroad was the only way to escape danger and find safety The lack of legal and safe means of accessing protection leaves people no option but to undertake the treacherous journey to Europe by land or sea Many of them pay for this with their lives According to estimates based only on the known incidents from 1998 to August 2011 17738 persons died attempting to reach Europe
Switzerland was the last European country that provided a formalized protected entry procedure The Swiss government abolished the procedure in 2012 Susanne Bolz Head of the Protection Unit of the Swiss Refugee Council emphasised that ldquoThe Swiss asylum procedure from abroad is not a perfect system but it saves lives In 2011 around 600 refugees received a visa to have their asylum claim assessed in Switzerland All those people who were able to enter Switzerland through the procedure at the embassies did not have to go to find a smuggler they didnrsquot have to pay lots of money they were not raped on their journey to Europe and they did not drown in the Mediterraneanrdquo
10
ELENA Network
The European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) is a forum of legal practitioners who aim to promote the highest human rights standards for the treatment of refugees asylum seekers and other persons in need of international protection in their daily individual counselling and advocacy work In 2012 the ELENA Network welcomed four new national coordinators the Croatian Law Centre the Slovakian Human Rights League the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and the Irish Refugee Council Independent Law Centre
Rule 39 Research
In April 2012 ECREELENA published a qualitative research report on the current practices of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Rule 39 interim measures Rule 39 measures are of vital importance to applicants as they constitute an avenue for the ECtHR to ensure that applicants will not be subjected to Member State action in possible contravention of their Convention rights before their cases can be heard by the court In asylum and immigration cases this frequently means preventing return and expulsion of the asylum seeker to hisher country of origin where return would violate their Convention rights
The report fruit of the collaborative work of legal practitioners active in 23 countries emphasizes several instances of non-compliance of Rule 39 indications in a number of
Member States which have led to persons being deported to countries where they are at risk of torture or other ill- treatment Moreover the research shows that there is a lack of effective national legal remedies in Member States and that the practice of accelerated procedures is placing persons at risk of refoulement Finally it is demonstrated that the right to individual petition and access to the Court is being circumvented through a variety of obstacles at the national level
The report details recommendations to the institutional bodies of the Council of Europe legal representatives and to Member States as to improving the functioning of this essential legal tool and to ensure access to effective legal remedies within State Parties themselves
11
ELENA Courses
ECREELENA has been running specialist and introductory refugee law courses for 25 years The topics of the courses are selected by the annual meeting of ELENA coordinators in response to needs identified by practitioners The courses are aimed at legal counsellors and lawyers from across Europe who defend or who are interested in defending cases concerning refugees and asylum seekers In 2012 two Advanced Courses took place one dealing with Generalised Violence Armed Conflict and the Need for International Protection and the on The Rights of Refugees
ECREELENA is deeply grateful to the experts who have lent their time to delivering these courses
Prof James Hathaway University of Michigan
Prof Luis Jimena Quesada President of the European Committee of Social Rights Council of Europe
Kees Wouters Senior Refugee Law Advisor Department of International Protection UNHCR
Blanche Tax Head of the Protection Information Unit Department of International Protection UNHCR
Mark Symes Asylum and Refugee law specialist
Flip Schuumlller Partner Boumlhler Advocaten
Nuala Mole Founder and Director of the AIRE Centre
Prof Heacutelegravene Lambert University of Westminster
Nino Hartl Country of Origin Information Expert EASO
Harald Doerig Justice at the German Federal Administrative Court
Ioana Patrascu Legal Officer European Commission
12
Instability following the Arab Spring continued in the region well into 2012 As the transitional period for Libya began and the reported numbers from UNHCR of Syrian refugees rose to 850000 by the end of 2012 all eyes were on Europes response The Danish and Cypriot Presidencies of the EU both faced pressure to react
ECRE shared its recommendations to the Danish Presidency to ensure a commitment to protection and respect for human rights of all persons including migrants and refugees in the Libyan context During the Cypriot presidency the Syrian refugee situation was further exacerbated by escalating violence rising death toll and increasing displacement in the region In its recommendations to the Cypriot Presidency ECRE called on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asylum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU and to provide continuous support to the humanitarian efforts in the region in order to meet urgent needs and maintain the protection space
In 2012 ECRE published Comments on the Commissions Communication on the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM) a landmark Communication that sets the framework for actions in the external dimension of EU migration and asylum policy in the context of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) in the next years The new GAMM is structured around the concept of mobility and aims to be more political integrating migration dialogues in political dialogues with third countries In the new GAMM the three priorities of the Global Approach (promoting labour migration addressing irregular migration and enhancing the links between migration and development) are maintained and now complemented by a fourth one refugee protection ECRE addressed the limits of the GAMM being led by a JHA approach since an overarching framework would need the ability to address the root causes of migration and displacement and enhance conditions that affect the lives of both migrants and the local communities in the region These are all areas that are and should be addressed through development cooperation More importantly Europe needs to show political leadership and position itself as a global player in international migration governance seizing the moment to develop and promote a rights-based approach to migration globally Such an approach should be accommodated in EUs development and foreign policy and EU human rights strategy
Protection in Third Countries
13
With regards to refugee protection its inclusion as one of the four priorities in the new GAMM is welcomed as a way to ensure coherence and better address the challenges arising from the asylum-migration nexus At the same time ECRE argues that Europe should develop a comprehensive and ambitious policy for refugee protection globally that encompasses the CEAS and cooperation for protection in third countries Durable solutions and capacity building for asylum need to be integrated in development with clear and consistent policy objectives Seen from this perspective the European External Action Service (EEAS) has the potential to frame the debate around asylum differently in the context of a European policy for human rights and protection globally The credibility of EU actions to promote refugee protection and durable solutions in third countries also depends on whether Europe upholds its responsibilities for protection in its territory
In 2012 ECRE embarked on a two year project to develop dialogue and advocacy on refugee protection in
development cooperation between civil society and the EU institutions The project Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development (domaid) provides the space and framework to bring together ECREs Core Group on the External Dimension civil society organisations from third countries diaspora groups academics and representatives from the European Commission to exchange around three main themes capacity building for asylum promoting durable solutions in protracted refugee situations and the role of refugee diasporas This will be done through a series of tools including platform meetings public seminars regional debriefings for the Commission by NGOs present in the field and the publication of policy papers European NGOs active in third countries have first hand experience of protection gaps challenges and EU policy in the regions making them best placed to suggest ways to respond and highlight ways forward The Domaid Project also aims to enhance cooperation and foster synergies between European NGOs and diaspora organisations as well as between European NGOs and local civil society organisations in third countries
14
In March 2012 the European Union adopted a Joint EU Resettlement Programme for Refugees The adoption of this Joint Programme was seen as very important first step towards increasing the number of resettlement places made available by EU Member States
ECRE has coordinated and drafted a comparative study for the European Parliament on the best practices for the integration of resettled refugees in the EU Member States The study was released in early January 2013 ECRE highlighted that there is a need for more attention to be placed on integration of resettled refugees and the sustainability of current programs For resettled refugees citizenship applications are often restrictive and can hinder the integration process ECRE therefore recommended that Member States grant permanent resident status to resettled refugees upon arrival to ensure refugee integration from the start
ECRE is one of six leading organisations (Amnesty International CCME ICMC IOM and Save Me) in the refugee field that have launched the Campaign 20000 by
2020 asking for more and better resettlement in Europe with the target of 20000 persons resettled annually by the year 2020 The campaign is supported by the resettlement network whose website was launched in early March 2012 and is currently being developed to include a resource library a directory of resettlement policy makers and practitioners online discussion groups opportunities for online consultations and mutual learning via an online community of practice
In addition ECRE has also been working in close collaboration with the European University Institute on a resettlement project named Know Reset (Building Knowledge for a Concerted and Sustainable Approach to Refugee Resettlement in the EU and its Member States) The project aims to provide an overview of the current state of resettlement in Europe by examining the legislation policies and practices supporting resettlement in Member States that have regular resettlement programmes as well as those that offer places on an ad hoc basis The scope of research also includes Member States that have not been involved in resettlement so far in an effort to assess whether there is potential for resettlement in the future Country profiles are prepared for each Member State on the basis of qualitative and quantitative research including information on the legal framework practices the views of different stakeholders and the public discourse in relation to resettlement
Resettlement
The project website was launched in 2012 and features an online database of national and EU primary and secondary sources (legal and policy documents statistics financial data etc) as well as comparative information on resettlement policies and practices in the EU with graphs and tables
15
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
6
Refugees in Greece How Much Further
In 2012 the situation for asylum seekers and refugees continued to deteriorate in Greece a country facing the full brunt of the economic crisis and lacking a functioning asylum and reception system ECRE the Greek Forum of Refugees and the film maker Matthias Wiessler joined forces to bring to the fore the voices of those who arrived in Greece fleeing countries such as Afghanistan Somalia or Sudan With the support of the European Programme for Integration and Migration (EPIM) the documentary How Much Further was released in Athens and Brussels on World Refugee Day 2012
How Much Further enters into the world of those who after months or even years on the road arrive in Greece hoping to find refuge in Europe but soon see no option but to resume their perilous journey in the hope of reaching a country that can receive them in dignity and consider their claim for asylum For most people staying in Greece means severe destitution the threat of racist violence and no hope of applying for asylum and getting their case fairly examined
The documentary is now available in English French Greek German and Serbian and has been seen by 5000 people in
English (available on YouTube and Vimeo) and over 10000 people in its Greek version In 2012 How Much Further was screened in Belgium Greece Denmark Switzerland and Ireland
Since the launch of the Greek National Action Plan in August 2010 Greek NGOs have severely criticized the authoritiesrsquo reluctance to take meaningful steps to make it operational and improve Greecersquos asylum and reception systems In May 2012 ECRE and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) presented a joint submission to the Committee of
7
Ministers of the Council of Europe focused on Greecersquos respect for its obligations arising from the MSS v Belgium amp Greece case through which the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled that returning asylum seekers to Greece violated the European Convention on Human Rights due to the inhuman and degrading treatment and lack of effective remedy available there for asylum seekers In particular the submission covered detention and living conditions for asylum seekers and access to the asylum procedure
Following the ECtHRrsquos ruling on MSS v Belgium amp Greece EU Member States have refrained from returning asylum seekers to Greece under the Dublin Regulation In 2012 however a report Human Cargo by ProAsyl and Greek Council for Refugees exposed the arbitrary readmissions from Italian sea ports to Greece
The report showed that despite an official stay on returns to Greece Italy returned people including children to Greece without verifying if they had protection needs In several cases examined in the report the returned people were detained prior to removal and upon their arrival in Greece in poor conditions
Throughout 2012 the Greek governmentrsquos response to the ever-escalating crisis for asylum seekers in Greece was to increase detention capacity Existing detention centres in Greece are notorious for particularly inhuman conditions In March 2012 the Greek government announced the establishment of 30 detention centres to hold 30000
undocumented migrants across the country In November Greece toughened its detention law for asylum seeker to a maximum of 18 months
The situation for migrants deteriorated significantly in August when the Greek Ministry of Public Order and Citizen Protection launched the operation ldquoXenios Zeusrdquo which led to the rounding up of thousands of migrants on the basis of their perceived ethnicities in a seemingly discriminatory manner ECRE called on Greece to immediately end this practice and sent a letter to EU Commissioner for Home Affairs Cecilia Malmstroumlm raising questions regarding the compatibility of the Xenios Operation with a number of safeguards laid down in the EU asylum and immigration legislation as well as the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and requesting information on the Commissionrsquos response to Greek actions
ECRE continues to monitor the situation for refugees asylum seekers and would-be asylum seekers in Greece with concern While the fact that Member States no longer return asylum seekers to Greece under the Dublin Regulation has alleviated the situation and certainly allowed the people concerned to have a fairer chance of having their claim adequately assessed the outlook remains bleak for those people in Greece with no legal means for travelling onwards and for those arriving in Greece in the hope of finding a safe haven
8
Italy condemned for intercepting migrants at high seas and pushing them back to Libya
In February 2012 the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) admonished Italyrsquos push-back policy through the Hirsi Jammaa and others v Italy case where Italy was condemned for pushing back 24 Somalis and Eritreans who were intercepted on the high seas by Italian border guards taken on board the Italian ship and handed over to Libyan officials on the basis of the Friendship Treaty between Italy and Libya in 2009 The judgment has important consequences in particular for EU Member States institutions and agencies in the context of border management policies that aim to interfere with migration routes outside EU territory as control implies responsibility
EU Member States whether they act under the aegis of Frontex or not will have to review their border control and return operations in order to ensure the full respect of the principle of non refoulement with regard to every individual intercepted outside their territory and rule out the possibility of collective expulsions as prohibited under Article 4 of Protocol IV to the ECHR in line with the ECtHRs judgment
ECRE and CIR released a joint press release following the judgment Christopher Hein Director of the Italian Council for Refugees stated that ldquosuch a sentence proves that during the push-back operations the rights of refugees were systematically violated Italy in fact denied the possibility to apply for protection and has then pushed back to Libya more than a thousand people who had the right to be received in Italy We want that this message arrives unmistakably to
Access to Protection
ECRE interview with Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen Danish Institute for International Studies
ldquo rdquoStates cannot shirk their human rights responsibilities by hiding behind the fact that they are operating beyond their physical borders
9
the Monti Government in re-contracting the co-operation agreements with the Libyan Transitional Government the rights of refugees cannot be negotiated We expect that the new Executive has clearer and stronger positions on this issue than the ones we have known about in the last weeksrdquo ECREs Acting Secretary General Allan Leas said that ldquothis ruling confirms that Statesrsquo obligations under the ECHR do not stop at their physical borders States cannot abdicate their principles values and commitment to the protection of human rights by doing outside their borders what would not be permissible in their territoriesrdquo
NGOs call for legal and safe channels to allow refugees reach Europe
In 2012 the CIR-led Entering the Territory project concluded with the publication of the report and press conference Reaching Europe in Safety The possibility to seek asylum through an embassy saved my life ECRE and other European NGOs participated in this joint project
Persons fleeing persecution often lack the means to travel legally and in safety to the EU For some people seeking asylum through embassies abroad was the only way to escape danger and find safety The lack of legal and safe means of accessing protection leaves people no option but to undertake the treacherous journey to Europe by land or sea Many of them pay for this with their lives According to estimates based only on the known incidents from 1998 to August 2011 17738 persons died attempting to reach Europe
Switzerland was the last European country that provided a formalized protected entry procedure The Swiss government abolished the procedure in 2012 Susanne Bolz Head of the Protection Unit of the Swiss Refugee Council emphasised that ldquoThe Swiss asylum procedure from abroad is not a perfect system but it saves lives In 2011 around 600 refugees received a visa to have their asylum claim assessed in Switzerland All those people who were able to enter Switzerland through the procedure at the embassies did not have to go to find a smuggler they didnrsquot have to pay lots of money they were not raped on their journey to Europe and they did not drown in the Mediterraneanrdquo
10
ELENA Network
The European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) is a forum of legal practitioners who aim to promote the highest human rights standards for the treatment of refugees asylum seekers and other persons in need of international protection in their daily individual counselling and advocacy work In 2012 the ELENA Network welcomed four new national coordinators the Croatian Law Centre the Slovakian Human Rights League the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and the Irish Refugee Council Independent Law Centre
Rule 39 Research
In April 2012 ECREELENA published a qualitative research report on the current practices of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Rule 39 interim measures Rule 39 measures are of vital importance to applicants as they constitute an avenue for the ECtHR to ensure that applicants will not be subjected to Member State action in possible contravention of their Convention rights before their cases can be heard by the court In asylum and immigration cases this frequently means preventing return and expulsion of the asylum seeker to hisher country of origin where return would violate their Convention rights
The report fruit of the collaborative work of legal practitioners active in 23 countries emphasizes several instances of non-compliance of Rule 39 indications in a number of
Member States which have led to persons being deported to countries where they are at risk of torture or other ill- treatment Moreover the research shows that there is a lack of effective national legal remedies in Member States and that the practice of accelerated procedures is placing persons at risk of refoulement Finally it is demonstrated that the right to individual petition and access to the Court is being circumvented through a variety of obstacles at the national level
The report details recommendations to the institutional bodies of the Council of Europe legal representatives and to Member States as to improving the functioning of this essential legal tool and to ensure access to effective legal remedies within State Parties themselves
11
ELENA Courses
ECREELENA has been running specialist and introductory refugee law courses for 25 years The topics of the courses are selected by the annual meeting of ELENA coordinators in response to needs identified by practitioners The courses are aimed at legal counsellors and lawyers from across Europe who defend or who are interested in defending cases concerning refugees and asylum seekers In 2012 two Advanced Courses took place one dealing with Generalised Violence Armed Conflict and the Need for International Protection and the on The Rights of Refugees
ECREELENA is deeply grateful to the experts who have lent their time to delivering these courses
Prof James Hathaway University of Michigan
Prof Luis Jimena Quesada President of the European Committee of Social Rights Council of Europe
Kees Wouters Senior Refugee Law Advisor Department of International Protection UNHCR
Blanche Tax Head of the Protection Information Unit Department of International Protection UNHCR
Mark Symes Asylum and Refugee law specialist
Flip Schuumlller Partner Boumlhler Advocaten
Nuala Mole Founder and Director of the AIRE Centre
Prof Heacutelegravene Lambert University of Westminster
Nino Hartl Country of Origin Information Expert EASO
Harald Doerig Justice at the German Federal Administrative Court
Ioana Patrascu Legal Officer European Commission
12
Instability following the Arab Spring continued in the region well into 2012 As the transitional period for Libya began and the reported numbers from UNHCR of Syrian refugees rose to 850000 by the end of 2012 all eyes were on Europes response The Danish and Cypriot Presidencies of the EU both faced pressure to react
ECRE shared its recommendations to the Danish Presidency to ensure a commitment to protection and respect for human rights of all persons including migrants and refugees in the Libyan context During the Cypriot presidency the Syrian refugee situation was further exacerbated by escalating violence rising death toll and increasing displacement in the region In its recommendations to the Cypriot Presidency ECRE called on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asylum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU and to provide continuous support to the humanitarian efforts in the region in order to meet urgent needs and maintain the protection space
In 2012 ECRE published Comments on the Commissions Communication on the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM) a landmark Communication that sets the framework for actions in the external dimension of EU migration and asylum policy in the context of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) in the next years The new GAMM is structured around the concept of mobility and aims to be more political integrating migration dialogues in political dialogues with third countries In the new GAMM the three priorities of the Global Approach (promoting labour migration addressing irregular migration and enhancing the links between migration and development) are maintained and now complemented by a fourth one refugee protection ECRE addressed the limits of the GAMM being led by a JHA approach since an overarching framework would need the ability to address the root causes of migration and displacement and enhance conditions that affect the lives of both migrants and the local communities in the region These are all areas that are and should be addressed through development cooperation More importantly Europe needs to show political leadership and position itself as a global player in international migration governance seizing the moment to develop and promote a rights-based approach to migration globally Such an approach should be accommodated in EUs development and foreign policy and EU human rights strategy
Protection in Third Countries
13
With regards to refugee protection its inclusion as one of the four priorities in the new GAMM is welcomed as a way to ensure coherence and better address the challenges arising from the asylum-migration nexus At the same time ECRE argues that Europe should develop a comprehensive and ambitious policy for refugee protection globally that encompasses the CEAS and cooperation for protection in third countries Durable solutions and capacity building for asylum need to be integrated in development with clear and consistent policy objectives Seen from this perspective the European External Action Service (EEAS) has the potential to frame the debate around asylum differently in the context of a European policy for human rights and protection globally The credibility of EU actions to promote refugee protection and durable solutions in third countries also depends on whether Europe upholds its responsibilities for protection in its territory
In 2012 ECRE embarked on a two year project to develop dialogue and advocacy on refugee protection in
development cooperation between civil society and the EU institutions The project Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development (domaid) provides the space and framework to bring together ECREs Core Group on the External Dimension civil society organisations from third countries diaspora groups academics and representatives from the European Commission to exchange around three main themes capacity building for asylum promoting durable solutions in protracted refugee situations and the role of refugee diasporas This will be done through a series of tools including platform meetings public seminars regional debriefings for the Commission by NGOs present in the field and the publication of policy papers European NGOs active in third countries have first hand experience of protection gaps challenges and EU policy in the regions making them best placed to suggest ways to respond and highlight ways forward The Domaid Project also aims to enhance cooperation and foster synergies between European NGOs and diaspora organisations as well as between European NGOs and local civil society organisations in third countries
14
In March 2012 the European Union adopted a Joint EU Resettlement Programme for Refugees The adoption of this Joint Programme was seen as very important first step towards increasing the number of resettlement places made available by EU Member States
ECRE has coordinated and drafted a comparative study for the European Parliament on the best practices for the integration of resettled refugees in the EU Member States The study was released in early January 2013 ECRE highlighted that there is a need for more attention to be placed on integration of resettled refugees and the sustainability of current programs For resettled refugees citizenship applications are often restrictive and can hinder the integration process ECRE therefore recommended that Member States grant permanent resident status to resettled refugees upon arrival to ensure refugee integration from the start
ECRE is one of six leading organisations (Amnesty International CCME ICMC IOM and Save Me) in the refugee field that have launched the Campaign 20000 by
2020 asking for more and better resettlement in Europe with the target of 20000 persons resettled annually by the year 2020 The campaign is supported by the resettlement network whose website was launched in early March 2012 and is currently being developed to include a resource library a directory of resettlement policy makers and practitioners online discussion groups opportunities for online consultations and mutual learning via an online community of practice
In addition ECRE has also been working in close collaboration with the European University Institute on a resettlement project named Know Reset (Building Knowledge for a Concerted and Sustainable Approach to Refugee Resettlement in the EU and its Member States) The project aims to provide an overview of the current state of resettlement in Europe by examining the legislation policies and practices supporting resettlement in Member States that have regular resettlement programmes as well as those that offer places on an ad hoc basis The scope of research also includes Member States that have not been involved in resettlement so far in an effort to assess whether there is potential for resettlement in the future Country profiles are prepared for each Member State on the basis of qualitative and quantitative research including information on the legal framework practices the views of different stakeholders and the public discourse in relation to resettlement
Resettlement
The project website was launched in 2012 and features an online database of national and EU primary and secondary sources (legal and policy documents statistics financial data etc) as well as comparative information on resettlement policies and practices in the EU with graphs and tables
15
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
7
Ministers of the Council of Europe focused on Greecersquos respect for its obligations arising from the MSS v Belgium amp Greece case through which the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled that returning asylum seekers to Greece violated the European Convention on Human Rights due to the inhuman and degrading treatment and lack of effective remedy available there for asylum seekers In particular the submission covered detention and living conditions for asylum seekers and access to the asylum procedure
Following the ECtHRrsquos ruling on MSS v Belgium amp Greece EU Member States have refrained from returning asylum seekers to Greece under the Dublin Regulation In 2012 however a report Human Cargo by ProAsyl and Greek Council for Refugees exposed the arbitrary readmissions from Italian sea ports to Greece
The report showed that despite an official stay on returns to Greece Italy returned people including children to Greece without verifying if they had protection needs In several cases examined in the report the returned people were detained prior to removal and upon their arrival in Greece in poor conditions
Throughout 2012 the Greek governmentrsquos response to the ever-escalating crisis for asylum seekers in Greece was to increase detention capacity Existing detention centres in Greece are notorious for particularly inhuman conditions In March 2012 the Greek government announced the establishment of 30 detention centres to hold 30000
undocumented migrants across the country In November Greece toughened its detention law for asylum seeker to a maximum of 18 months
The situation for migrants deteriorated significantly in August when the Greek Ministry of Public Order and Citizen Protection launched the operation ldquoXenios Zeusrdquo which led to the rounding up of thousands of migrants on the basis of their perceived ethnicities in a seemingly discriminatory manner ECRE called on Greece to immediately end this practice and sent a letter to EU Commissioner for Home Affairs Cecilia Malmstroumlm raising questions regarding the compatibility of the Xenios Operation with a number of safeguards laid down in the EU asylum and immigration legislation as well as the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and requesting information on the Commissionrsquos response to Greek actions
ECRE continues to monitor the situation for refugees asylum seekers and would-be asylum seekers in Greece with concern While the fact that Member States no longer return asylum seekers to Greece under the Dublin Regulation has alleviated the situation and certainly allowed the people concerned to have a fairer chance of having their claim adequately assessed the outlook remains bleak for those people in Greece with no legal means for travelling onwards and for those arriving in Greece in the hope of finding a safe haven
8
Italy condemned for intercepting migrants at high seas and pushing them back to Libya
In February 2012 the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) admonished Italyrsquos push-back policy through the Hirsi Jammaa and others v Italy case where Italy was condemned for pushing back 24 Somalis and Eritreans who were intercepted on the high seas by Italian border guards taken on board the Italian ship and handed over to Libyan officials on the basis of the Friendship Treaty between Italy and Libya in 2009 The judgment has important consequences in particular for EU Member States institutions and agencies in the context of border management policies that aim to interfere with migration routes outside EU territory as control implies responsibility
EU Member States whether they act under the aegis of Frontex or not will have to review their border control and return operations in order to ensure the full respect of the principle of non refoulement with regard to every individual intercepted outside their territory and rule out the possibility of collective expulsions as prohibited under Article 4 of Protocol IV to the ECHR in line with the ECtHRs judgment
ECRE and CIR released a joint press release following the judgment Christopher Hein Director of the Italian Council for Refugees stated that ldquosuch a sentence proves that during the push-back operations the rights of refugees were systematically violated Italy in fact denied the possibility to apply for protection and has then pushed back to Libya more than a thousand people who had the right to be received in Italy We want that this message arrives unmistakably to
Access to Protection
ECRE interview with Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen Danish Institute for International Studies
ldquo rdquoStates cannot shirk their human rights responsibilities by hiding behind the fact that they are operating beyond their physical borders
9
the Monti Government in re-contracting the co-operation agreements with the Libyan Transitional Government the rights of refugees cannot be negotiated We expect that the new Executive has clearer and stronger positions on this issue than the ones we have known about in the last weeksrdquo ECREs Acting Secretary General Allan Leas said that ldquothis ruling confirms that Statesrsquo obligations under the ECHR do not stop at their physical borders States cannot abdicate their principles values and commitment to the protection of human rights by doing outside their borders what would not be permissible in their territoriesrdquo
NGOs call for legal and safe channels to allow refugees reach Europe
In 2012 the CIR-led Entering the Territory project concluded with the publication of the report and press conference Reaching Europe in Safety The possibility to seek asylum through an embassy saved my life ECRE and other European NGOs participated in this joint project
Persons fleeing persecution often lack the means to travel legally and in safety to the EU For some people seeking asylum through embassies abroad was the only way to escape danger and find safety The lack of legal and safe means of accessing protection leaves people no option but to undertake the treacherous journey to Europe by land or sea Many of them pay for this with their lives According to estimates based only on the known incidents from 1998 to August 2011 17738 persons died attempting to reach Europe
Switzerland was the last European country that provided a formalized protected entry procedure The Swiss government abolished the procedure in 2012 Susanne Bolz Head of the Protection Unit of the Swiss Refugee Council emphasised that ldquoThe Swiss asylum procedure from abroad is not a perfect system but it saves lives In 2011 around 600 refugees received a visa to have their asylum claim assessed in Switzerland All those people who were able to enter Switzerland through the procedure at the embassies did not have to go to find a smuggler they didnrsquot have to pay lots of money they were not raped on their journey to Europe and they did not drown in the Mediterraneanrdquo
10
ELENA Network
The European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) is a forum of legal practitioners who aim to promote the highest human rights standards for the treatment of refugees asylum seekers and other persons in need of international protection in their daily individual counselling and advocacy work In 2012 the ELENA Network welcomed four new national coordinators the Croatian Law Centre the Slovakian Human Rights League the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and the Irish Refugee Council Independent Law Centre
Rule 39 Research
In April 2012 ECREELENA published a qualitative research report on the current practices of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Rule 39 interim measures Rule 39 measures are of vital importance to applicants as they constitute an avenue for the ECtHR to ensure that applicants will not be subjected to Member State action in possible contravention of their Convention rights before their cases can be heard by the court In asylum and immigration cases this frequently means preventing return and expulsion of the asylum seeker to hisher country of origin where return would violate their Convention rights
The report fruit of the collaborative work of legal practitioners active in 23 countries emphasizes several instances of non-compliance of Rule 39 indications in a number of
Member States which have led to persons being deported to countries where they are at risk of torture or other ill- treatment Moreover the research shows that there is a lack of effective national legal remedies in Member States and that the practice of accelerated procedures is placing persons at risk of refoulement Finally it is demonstrated that the right to individual petition and access to the Court is being circumvented through a variety of obstacles at the national level
The report details recommendations to the institutional bodies of the Council of Europe legal representatives and to Member States as to improving the functioning of this essential legal tool and to ensure access to effective legal remedies within State Parties themselves
11
ELENA Courses
ECREELENA has been running specialist and introductory refugee law courses for 25 years The topics of the courses are selected by the annual meeting of ELENA coordinators in response to needs identified by practitioners The courses are aimed at legal counsellors and lawyers from across Europe who defend or who are interested in defending cases concerning refugees and asylum seekers In 2012 two Advanced Courses took place one dealing with Generalised Violence Armed Conflict and the Need for International Protection and the on The Rights of Refugees
ECREELENA is deeply grateful to the experts who have lent their time to delivering these courses
Prof James Hathaway University of Michigan
Prof Luis Jimena Quesada President of the European Committee of Social Rights Council of Europe
Kees Wouters Senior Refugee Law Advisor Department of International Protection UNHCR
Blanche Tax Head of the Protection Information Unit Department of International Protection UNHCR
Mark Symes Asylum and Refugee law specialist
Flip Schuumlller Partner Boumlhler Advocaten
Nuala Mole Founder and Director of the AIRE Centre
Prof Heacutelegravene Lambert University of Westminster
Nino Hartl Country of Origin Information Expert EASO
Harald Doerig Justice at the German Federal Administrative Court
Ioana Patrascu Legal Officer European Commission
12
Instability following the Arab Spring continued in the region well into 2012 As the transitional period for Libya began and the reported numbers from UNHCR of Syrian refugees rose to 850000 by the end of 2012 all eyes were on Europes response The Danish and Cypriot Presidencies of the EU both faced pressure to react
ECRE shared its recommendations to the Danish Presidency to ensure a commitment to protection and respect for human rights of all persons including migrants and refugees in the Libyan context During the Cypriot presidency the Syrian refugee situation was further exacerbated by escalating violence rising death toll and increasing displacement in the region In its recommendations to the Cypriot Presidency ECRE called on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asylum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU and to provide continuous support to the humanitarian efforts in the region in order to meet urgent needs and maintain the protection space
In 2012 ECRE published Comments on the Commissions Communication on the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM) a landmark Communication that sets the framework for actions in the external dimension of EU migration and asylum policy in the context of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) in the next years The new GAMM is structured around the concept of mobility and aims to be more political integrating migration dialogues in political dialogues with third countries In the new GAMM the three priorities of the Global Approach (promoting labour migration addressing irregular migration and enhancing the links between migration and development) are maintained and now complemented by a fourth one refugee protection ECRE addressed the limits of the GAMM being led by a JHA approach since an overarching framework would need the ability to address the root causes of migration and displacement and enhance conditions that affect the lives of both migrants and the local communities in the region These are all areas that are and should be addressed through development cooperation More importantly Europe needs to show political leadership and position itself as a global player in international migration governance seizing the moment to develop and promote a rights-based approach to migration globally Such an approach should be accommodated in EUs development and foreign policy and EU human rights strategy
Protection in Third Countries
13
With regards to refugee protection its inclusion as one of the four priorities in the new GAMM is welcomed as a way to ensure coherence and better address the challenges arising from the asylum-migration nexus At the same time ECRE argues that Europe should develop a comprehensive and ambitious policy for refugee protection globally that encompasses the CEAS and cooperation for protection in third countries Durable solutions and capacity building for asylum need to be integrated in development with clear and consistent policy objectives Seen from this perspective the European External Action Service (EEAS) has the potential to frame the debate around asylum differently in the context of a European policy for human rights and protection globally The credibility of EU actions to promote refugee protection and durable solutions in third countries also depends on whether Europe upholds its responsibilities for protection in its territory
In 2012 ECRE embarked on a two year project to develop dialogue and advocacy on refugee protection in
development cooperation between civil society and the EU institutions The project Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development (domaid) provides the space and framework to bring together ECREs Core Group on the External Dimension civil society organisations from third countries diaspora groups academics and representatives from the European Commission to exchange around three main themes capacity building for asylum promoting durable solutions in protracted refugee situations and the role of refugee diasporas This will be done through a series of tools including platform meetings public seminars regional debriefings for the Commission by NGOs present in the field and the publication of policy papers European NGOs active in third countries have first hand experience of protection gaps challenges and EU policy in the regions making them best placed to suggest ways to respond and highlight ways forward The Domaid Project also aims to enhance cooperation and foster synergies between European NGOs and diaspora organisations as well as between European NGOs and local civil society organisations in third countries
14
In March 2012 the European Union adopted a Joint EU Resettlement Programme for Refugees The adoption of this Joint Programme was seen as very important first step towards increasing the number of resettlement places made available by EU Member States
ECRE has coordinated and drafted a comparative study for the European Parliament on the best practices for the integration of resettled refugees in the EU Member States The study was released in early January 2013 ECRE highlighted that there is a need for more attention to be placed on integration of resettled refugees and the sustainability of current programs For resettled refugees citizenship applications are often restrictive and can hinder the integration process ECRE therefore recommended that Member States grant permanent resident status to resettled refugees upon arrival to ensure refugee integration from the start
ECRE is one of six leading organisations (Amnesty International CCME ICMC IOM and Save Me) in the refugee field that have launched the Campaign 20000 by
2020 asking for more and better resettlement in Europe with the target of 20000 persons resettled annually by the year 2020 The campaign is supported by the resettlement network whose website was launched in early March 2012 and is currently being developed to include a resource library a directory of resettlement policy makers and practitioners online discussion groups opportunities for online consultations and mutual learning via an online community of practice
In addition ECRE has also been working in close collaboration with the European University Institute on a resettlement project named Know Reset (Building Knowledge for a Concerted and Sustainable Approach to Refugee Resettlement in the EU and its Member States) The project aims to provide an overview of the current state of resettlement in Europe by examining the legislation policies and practices supporting resettlement in Member States that have regular resettlement programmes as well as those that offer places on an ad hoc basis The scope of research also includes Member States that have not been involved in resettlement so far in an effort to assess whether there is potential for resettlement in the future Country profiles are prepared for each Member State on the basis of qualitative and quantitative research including information on the legal framework practices the views of different stakeholders and the public discourse in relation to resettlement
Resettlement
The project website was launched in 2012 and features an online database of national and EU primary and secondary sources (legal and policy documents statistics financial data etc) as well as comparative information on resettlement policies and practices in the EU with graphs and tables
15
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
8
Italy condemned for intercepting migrants at high seas and pushing them back to Libya
In February 2012 the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) admonished Italyrsquos push-back policy through the Hirsi Jammaa and others v Italy case where Italy was condemned for pushing back 24 Somalis and Eritreans who were intercepted on the high seas by Italian border guards taken on board the Italian ship and handed over to Libyan officials on the basis of the Friendship Treaty between Italy and Libya in 2009 The judgment has important consequences in particular for EU Member States institutions and agencies in the context of border management policies that aim to interfere with migration routes outside EU territory as control implies responsibility
EU Member States whether they act under the aegis of Frontex or not will have to review their border control and return operations in order to ensure the full respect of the principle of non refoulement with regard to every individual intercepted outside their territory and rule out the possibility of collective expulsions as prohibited under Article 4 of Protocol IV to the ECHR in line with the ECtHRs judgment
ECRE and CIR released a joint press release following the judgment Christopher Hein Director of the Italian Council for Refugees stated that ldquosuch a sentence proves that during the push-back operations the rights of refugees were systematically violated Italy in fact denied the possibility to apply for protection and has then pushed back to Libya more than a thousand people who had the right to be received in Italy We want that this message arrives unmistakably to
Access to Protection
ECRE interview with Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen Danish Institute for International Studies
ldquo rdquoStates cannot shirk their human rights responsibilities by hiding behind the fact that they are operating beyond their physical borders
9
the Monti Government in re-contracting the co-operation agreements with the Libyan Transitional Government the rights of refugees cannot be negotiated We expect that the new Executive has clearer and stronger positions on this issue than the ones we have known about in the last weeksrdquo ECREs Acting Secretary General Allan Leas said that ldquothis ruling confirms that Statesrsquo obligations under the ECHR do not stop at their physical borders States cannot abdicate their principles values and commitment to the protection of human rights by doing outside their borders what would not be permissible in their territoriesrdquo
NGOs call for legal and safe channels to allow refugees reach Europe
In 2012 the CIR-led Entering the Territory project concluded with the publication of the report and press conference Reaching Europe in Safety The possibility to seek asylum through an embassy saved my life ECRE and other European NGOs participated in this joint project
Persons fleeing persecution often lack the means to travel legally and in safety to the EU For some people seeking asylum through embassies abroad was the only way to escape danger and find safety The lack of legal and safe means of accessing protection leaves people no option but to undertake the treacherous journey to Europe by land or sea Many of them pay for this with their lives According to estimates based only on the known incidents from 1998 to August 2011 17738 persons died attempting to reach Europe
Switzerland was the last European country that provided a formalized protected entry procedure The Swiss government abolished the procedure in 2012 Susanne Bolz Head of the Protection Unit of the Swiss Refugee Council emphasised that ldquoThe Swiss asylum procedure from abroad is not a perfect system but it saves lives In 2011 around 600 refugees received a visa to have their asylum claim assessed in Switzerland All those people who were able to enter Switzerland through the procedure at the embassies did not have to go to find a smuggler they didnrsquot have to pay lots of money they were not raped on their journey to Europe and they did not drown in the Mediterraneanrdquo
10
ELENA Network
The European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) is a forum of legal practitioners who aim to promote the highest human rights standards for the treatment of refugees asylum seekers and other persons in need of international protection in their daily individual counselling and advocacy work In 2012 the ELENA Network welcomed four new national coordinators the Croatian Law Centre the Slovakian Human Rights League the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and the Irish Refugee Council Independent Law Centre
Rule 39 Research
In April 2012 ECREELENA published a qualitative research report on the current practices of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Rule 39 interim measures Rule 39 measures are of vital importance to applicants as they constitute an avenue for the ECtHR to ensure that applicants will not be subjected to Member State action in possible contravention of their Convention rights before their cases can be heard by the court In asylum and immigration cases this frequently means preventing return and expulsion of the asylum seeker to hisher country of origin where return would violate their Convention rights
The report fruit of the collaborative work of legal practitioners active in 23 countries emphasizes several instances of non-compliance of Rule 39 indications in a number of
Member States which have led to persons being deported to countries where they are at risk of torture or other ill- treatment Moreover the research shows that there is a lack of effective national legal remedies in Member States and that the practice of accelerated procedures is placing persons at risk of refoulement Finally it is demonstrated that the right to individual petition and access to the Court is being circumvented through a variety of obstacles at the national level
The report details recommendations to the institutional bodies of the Council of Europe legal representatives and to Member States as to improving the functioning of this essential legal tool and to ensure access to effective legal remedies within State Parties themselves
11
ELENA Courses
ECREELENA has been running specialist and introductory refugee law courses for 25 years The topics of the courses are selected by the annual meeting of ELENA coordinators in response to needs identified by practitioners The courses are aimed at legal counsellors and lawyers from across Europe who defend or who are interested in defending cases concerning refugees and asylum seekers In 2012 two Advanced Courses took place one dealing with Generalised Violence Armed Conflict and the Need for International Protection and the on The Rights of Refugees
ECREELENA is deeply grateful to the experts who have lent their time to delivering these courses
Prof James Hathaway University of Michigan
Prof Luis Jimena Quesada President of the European Committee of Social Rights Council of Europe
Kees Wouters Senior Refugee Law Advisor Department of International Protection UNHCR
Blanche Tax Head of the Protection Information Unit Department of International Protection UNHCR
Mark Symes Asylum and Refugee law specialist
Flip Schuumlller Partner Boumlhler Advocaten
Nuala Mole Founder and Director of the AIRE Centre
Prof Heacutelegravene Lambert University of Westminster
Nino Hartl Country of Origin Information Expert EASO
Harald Doerig Justice at the German Federal Administrative Court
Ioana Patrascu Legal Officer European Commission
12
Instability following the Arab Spring continued in the region well into 2012 As the transitional period for Libya began and the reported numbers from UNHCR of Syrian refugees rose to 850000 by the end of 2012 all eyes were on Europes response The Danish and Cypriot Presidencies of the EU both faced pressure to react
ECRE shared its recommendations to the Danish Presidency to ensure a commitment to protection and respect for human rights of all persons including migrants and refugees in the Libyan context During the Cypriot presidency the Syrian refugee situation was further exacerbated by escalating violence rising death toll and increasing displacement in the region In its recommendations to the Cypriot Presidency ECRE called on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asylum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU and to provide continuous support to the humanitarian efforts in the region in order to meet urgent needs and maintain the protection space
In 2012 ECRE published Comments on the Commissions Communication on the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM) a landmark Communication that sets the framework for actions in the external dimension of EU migration and asylum policy in the context of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) in the next years The new GAMM is structured around the concept of mobility and aims to be more political integrating migration dialogues in political dialogues with third countries In the new GAMM the three priorities of the Global Approach (promoting labour migration addressing irregular migration and enhancing the links between migration and development) are maintained and now complemented by a fourth one refugee protection ECRE addressed the limits of the GAMM being led by a JHA approach since an overarching framework would need the ability to address the root causes of migration and displacement and enhance conditions that affect the lives of both migrants and the local communities in the region These are all areas that are and should be addressed through development cooperation More importantly Europe needs to show political leadership and position itself as a global player in international migration governance seizing the moment to develop and promote a rights-based approach to migration globally Such an approach should be accommodated in EUs development and foreign policy and EU human rights strategy
Protection in Third Countries
13
With regards to refugee protection its inclusion as one of the four priorities in the new GAMM is welcomed as a way to ensure coherence and better address the challenges arising from the asylum-migration nexus At the same time ECRE argues that Europe should develop a comprehensive and ambitious policy for refugee protection globally that encompasses the CEAS and cooperation for protection in third countries Durable solutions and capacity building for asylum need to be integrated in development with clear and consistent policy objectives Seen from this perspective the European External Action Service (EEAS) has the potential to frame the debate around asylum differently in the context of a European policy for human rights and protection globally The credibility of EU actions to promote refugee protection and durable solutions in third countries also depends on whether Europe upholds its responsibilities for protection in its territory
In 2012 ECRE embarked on a two year project to develop dialogue and advocacy on refugee protection in
development cooperation between civil society and the EU institutions The project Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development (domaid) provides the space and framework to bring together ECREs Core Group on the External Dimension civil society organisations from third countries diaspora groups academics and representatives from the European Commission to exchange around three main themes capacity building for asylum promoting durable solutions in protracted refugee situations and the role of refugee diasporas This will be done through a series of tools including platform meetings public seminars regional debriefings for the Commission by NGOs present in the field and the publication of policy papers European NGOs active in third countries have first hand experience of protection gaps challenges and EU policy in the regions making them best placed to suggest ways to respond and highlight ways forward The Domaid Project also aims to enhance cooperation and foster synergies between European NGOs and diaspora organisations as well as between European NGOs and local civil society organisations in third countries
14
In March 2012 the European Union adopted a Joint EU Resettlement Programme for Refugees The adoption of this Joint Programme was seen as very important first step towards increasing the number of resettlement places made available by EU Member States
ECRE has coordinated and drafted a comparative study for the European Parliament on the best practices for the integration of resettled refugees in the EU Member States The study was released in early January 2013 ECRE highlighted that there is a need for more attention to be placed on integration of resettled refugees and the sustainability of current programs For resettled refugees citizenship applications are often restrictive and can hinder the integration process ECRE therefore recommended that Member States grant permanent resident status to resettled refugees upon arrival to ensure refugee integration from the start
ECRE is one of six leading organisations (Amnesty International CCME ICMC IOM and Save Me) in the refugee field that have launched the Campaign 20000 by
2020 asking for more and better resettlement in Europe with the target of 20000 persons resettled annually by the year 2020 The campaign is supported by the resettlement network whose website was launched in early March 2012 and is currently being developed to include a resource library a directory of resettlement policy makers and practitioners online discussion groups opportunities for online consultations and mutual learning via an online community of practice
In addition ECRE has also been working in close collaboration with the European University Institute on a resettlement project named Know Reset (Building Knowledge for a Concerted and Sustainable Approach to Refugee Resettlement in the EU and its Member States) The project aims to provide an overview of the current state of resettlement in Europe by examining the legislation policies and practices supporting resettlement in Member States that have regular resettlement programmes as well as those that offer places on an ad hoc basis The scope of research also includes Member States that have not been involved in resettlement so far in an effort to assess whether there is potential for resettlement in the future Country profiles are prepared for each Member State on the basis of qualitative and quantitative research including information on the legal framework practices the views of different stakeholders and the public discourse in relation to resettlement
Resettlement
The project website was launched in 2012 and features an online database of national and EU primary and secondary sources (legal and policy documents statistics financial data etc) as well as comparative information on resettlement policies and practices in the EU with graphs and tables
15
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
9
the Monti Government in re-contracting the co-operation agreements with the Libyan Transitional Government the rights of refugees cannot be negotiated We expect that the new Executive has clearer and stronger positions on this issue than the ones we have known about in the last weeksrdquo ECREs Acting Secretary General Allan Leas said that ldquothis ruling confirms that Statesrsquo obligations under the ECHR do not stop at their physical borders States cannot abdicate their principles values and commitment to the protection of human rights by doing outside their borders what would not be permissible in their territoriesrdquo
NGOs call for legal and safe channels to allow refugees reach Europe
In 2012 the CIR-led Entering the Territory project concluded with the publication of the report and press conference Reaching Europe in Safety The possibility to seek asylum through an embassy saved my life ECRE and other European NGOs participated in this joint project
Persons fleeing persecution often lack the means to travel legally and in safety to the EU For some people seeking asylum through embassies abroad was the only way to escape danger and find safety The lack of legal and safe means of accessing protection leaves people no option but to undertake the treacherous journey to Europe by land or sea Many of them pay for this with their lives According to estimates based only on the known incidents from 1998 to August 2011 17738 persons died attempting to reach Europe
Switzerland was the last European country that provided a formalized protected entry procedure The Swiss government abolished the procedure in 2012 Susanne Bolz Head of the Protection Unit of the Swiss Refugee Council emphasised that ldquoThe Swiss asylum procedure from abroad is not a perfect system but it saves lives In 2011 around 600 refugees received a visa to have their asylum claim assessed in Switzerland All those people who were able to enter Switzerland through the procedure at the embassies did not have to go to find a smuggler they didnrsquot have to pay lots of money they were not raped on their journey to Europe and they did not drown in the Mediterraneanrdquo
10
ELENA Network
The European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) is a forum of legal practitioners who aim to promote the highest human rights standards for the treatment of refugees asylum seekers and other persons in need of international protection in their daily individual counselling and advocacy work In 2012 the ELENA Network welcomed four new national coordinators the Croatian Law Centre the Slovakian Human Rights League the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and the Irish Refugee Council Independent Law Centre
Rule 39 Research
In April 2012 ECREELENA published a qualitative research report on the current practices of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Rule 39 interim measures Rule 39 measures are of vital importance to applicants as they constitute an avenue for the ECtHR to ensure that applicants will not be subjected to Member State action in possible contravention of their Convention rights before their cases can be heard by the court In asylum and immigration cases this frequently means preventing return and expulsion of the asylum seeker to hisher country of origin where return would violate their Convention rights
The report fruit of the collaborative work of legal practitioners active in 23 countries emphasizes several instances of non-compliance of Rule 39 indications in a number of
Member States which have led to persons being deported to countries where they are at risk of torture or other ill- treatment Moreover the research shows that there is a lack of effective national legal remedies in Member States and that the practice of accelerated procedures is placing persons at risk of refoulement Finally it is demonstrated that the right to individual petition and access to the Court is being circumvented through a variety of obstacles at the national level
The report details recommendations to the institutional bodies of the Council of Europe legal representatives and to Member States as to improving the functioning of this essential legal tool and to ensure access to effective legal remedies within State Parties themselves
11
ELENA Courses
ECREELENA has been running specialist and introductory refugee law courses for 25 years The topics of the courses are selected by the annual meeting of ELENA coordinators in response to needs identified by practitioners The courses are aimed at legal counsellors and lawyers from across Europe who defend or who are interested in defending cases concerning refugees and asylum seekers In 2012 two Advanced Courses took place one dealing with Generalised Violence Armed Conflict and the Need for International Protection and the on The Rights of Refugees
ECREELENA is deeply grateful to the experts who have lent their time to delivering these courses
Prof James Hathaway University of Michigan
Prof Luis Jimena Quesada President of the European Committee of Social Rights Council of Europe
Kees Wouters Senior Refugee Law Advisor Department of International Protection UNHCR
Blanche Tax Head of the Protection Information Unit Department of International Protection UNHCR
Mark Symes Asylum and Refugee law specialist
Flip Schuumlller Partner Boumlhler Advocaten
Nuala Mole Founder and Director of the AIRE Centre
Prof Heacutelegravene Lambert University of Westminster
Nino Hartl Country of Origin Information Expert EASO
Harald Doerig Justice at the German Federal Administrative Court
Ioana Patrascu Legal Officer European Commission
12
Instability following the Arab Spring continued in the region well into 2012 As the transitional period for Libya began and the reported numbers from UNHCR of Syrian refugees rose to 850000 by the end of 2012 all eyes were on Europes response The Danish and Cypriot Presidencies of the EU both faced pressure to react
ECRE shared its recommendations to the Danish Presidency to ensure a commitment to protection and respect for human rights of all persons including migrants and refugees in the Libyan context During the Cypriot presidency the Syrian refugee situation was further exacerbated by escalating violence rising death toll and increasing displacement in the region In its recommendations to the Cypriot Presidency ECRE called on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asylum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU and to provide continuous support to the humanitarian efforts in the region in order to meet urgent needs and maintain the protection space
In 2012 ECRE published Comments on the Commissions Communication on the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM) a landmark Communication that sets the framework for actions in the external dimension of EU migration and asylum policy in the context of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) in the next years The new GAMM is structured around the concept of mobility and aims to be more political integrating migration dialogues in political dialogues with third countries In the new GAMM the three priorities of the Global Approach (promoting labour migration addressing irregular migration and enhancing the links between migration and development) are maintained and now complemented by a fourth one refugee protection ECRE addressed the limits of the GAMM being led by a JHA approach since an overarching framework would need the ability to address the root causes of migration and displacement and enhance conditions that affect the lives of both migrants and the local communities in the region These are all areas that are and should be addressed through development cooperation More importantly Europe needs to show political leadership and position itself as a global player in international migration governance seizing the moment to develop and promote a rights-based approach to migration globally Such an approach should be accommodated in EUs development and foreign policy and EU human rights strategy
Protection in Third Countries
13
With regards to refugee protection its inclusion as one of the four priorities in the new GAMM is welcomed as a way to ensure coherence and better address the challenges arising from the asylum-migration nexus At the same time ECRE argues that Europe should develop a comprehensive and ambitious policy for refugee protection globally that encompasses the CEAS and cooperation for protection in third countries Durable solutions and capacity building for asylum need to be integrated in development with clear and consistent policy objectives Seen from this perspective the European External Action Service (EEAS) has the potential to frame the debate around asylum differently in the context of a European policy for human rights and protection globally The credibility of EU actions to promote refugee protection and durable solutions in third countries also depends on whether Europe upholds its responsibilities for protection in its territory
In 2012 ECRE embarked on a two year project to develop dialogue and advocacy on refugee protection in
development cooperation between civil society and the EU institutions The project Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development (domaid) provides the space and framework to bring together ECREs Core Group on the External Dimension civil society organisations from third countries diaspora groups academics and representatives from the European Commission to exchange around three main themes capacity building for asylum promoting durable solutions in protracted refugee situations and the role of refugee diasporas This will be done through a series of tools including platform meetings public seminars regional debriefings for the Commission by NGOs present in the field and the publication of policy papers European NGOs active in third countries have first hand experience of protection gaps challenges and EU policy in the regions making them best placed to suggest ways to respond and highlight ways forward The Domaid Project also aims to enhance cooperation and foster synergies between European NGOs and diaspora organisations as well as between European NGOs and local civil society organisations in third countries
14
In March 2012 the European Union adopted a Joint EU Resettlement Programme for Refugees The adoption of this Joint Programme was seen as very important first step towards increasing the number of resettlement places made available by EU Member States
ECRE has coordinated and drafted a comparative study for the European Parliament on the best practices for the integration of resettled refugees in the EU Member States The study was released in early January 2013 ECRE highlighted that there is a need for more attention to be placed on integration of resettled refugees and the sustainability of current programs For resettled refugees citizenship applications are often restrictive and can hinder the integration process ECRE therefore recommended that Member States grant permanent resident status to resettled refugees upon arrival to ensure refugee integration from the start
ECRE is one of six leading organisations (Amnesty International CCME ICMC IOM and Save Me) in the refugee field that have launched the Campaign 20000 by
2020 asking for more and better resettlement in Europe with the target of 20000 persons resettled annually by the year 2020 The campaign is supported by the resettlement network whose website was launched in early March 2012 and is currently being developed to include a resource library a directory of resettlement policy makers and practitioners online discussion groups opportunities for online consultations and mutual learning via an online community of practice
In addition ECRE has also been working in close collaboration with the European University Institute on a resettlement project named Know Reset (Building Knowledge for a Concerted and Sustainable Approach to Refugee Resettlement in the EU and its Member States) The project aims to provide an overview of the current state of resettlement in Europe by examining the legislation policies and practices supporting resettlement in Member States that have regular resettlement programmes as well as those that offer places on an ad hoc basis The scope of research also includes Member States that have not been involved in resettlement so far in an effort to assess whether there is potential for resettlement in the future Country profiles are prepared for each Member State on the basis of qualitative and quantitative research including information on the legal framework practices the views of different stakeholders and the public discourse in relation to resettlement
Resettlement
The project website was launched in 2012 and features an online database of national and EU primary and secondary sources (legal and policy documents statistics financial data etc) as well as comparative information on resettlement policies and practices in the EU with graphs and tables
15
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
10
ELENA Network
The European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA) is a forum of legal practitioners who aim to promote the highest human rights standards for the treatment of refugees asylum seekers and other persons in need of international protection in their daily individual counselling and advocacy work In 2012 the ELENA Network welcomed four new national coordinators the Croatian Law Centre the Slovakian Human Rights League the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights and the Irish Refugee Council Independent Law Centre
Rule 39 Research
In April 2012 ECREELENA published a qualitative research report on the current practices of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Rule 39 interim measures Rule 39 measures are of vital importance to applicants as they constitute an avenue for the ECtHR to ensure that applicants will not be subjected to Member State action in possible contravention of their Convention rights before their cases can be heard by the court In asylum and immigration cases this frequently means preventing return and expulsion of the asylum seeker to hisher country of origin where return would violate their Convention rights
The report fruit of the collaborative work of legal practitioners active in 23 countries emphasizes several instances of non-compliance of Rule 39 indications in a number of
Member States which have led to persons being deported to countries where they are at risk of torture or other ill- treatment Moreover the research shows that there is a lack of effective national legal remedies in Member States and that the practice of accelerated procedures is placing persons at risk of refoulement Finally it is demonstrated that the right to individual petition and access to the Court is being circumvented through a variety of obstacles at the national level
The report details recommendations to the institutional bodies of the Council of Europe legal representatives and to Member States as to improving the functioning of this essential legal tool and to ensure access to effective legal remedies within State Parties themselves
11
ELENA Courses
ECREELENA has been running specialist and introductory refugee law courses for 25 years The topics of the courses are selected by the annual meeting of ELENA coordinators in response to needs identified by practitioners The courses are aimed at legal counsellors and lawyers from across Europe who defend or who are interested in defending cases concerning refugees and asylum seekers In 2012 two Advanced Courses took place one dealing with Generalised Violence Armed Conflict and the Need for International Protection and the on The Rights of Refugees
ECREELENA is deeply grateful to the experts who have lent their time to delivering these courses
Prof James Hathaway University of Michigan
Prof Luis Jimena Quesada President of the European Committee of Social Rights Council of Europe
Kees Wouters Senior Refugee Law Advisor Department of International Protection UNHCR
Blanche Tax Head of the Protection Information Unit Department of International Protection UNHCR
Mark Symes Asylum and Refugee law specialist
Flip Schuumlller Partner Boumlhler Advocaten
Nuala Mole Founder and Director of the AIRE Centre
Prof Heacutelegravene Lambert University of Westminster
Nino Hartl Country of Origin Information Expert EASO
Harald Doerig Justice at the German Federal Administrative Court
Ioana Patrascu Legal Officer European Commission
12
Instability following the Arab Spring continued in the region well into 2012 As the transitional period for Libya began and the reported numbers from UNHCR of Syrian refugees rose to 850000 by the end of 2012 all eyes were on Europes response The Danish and Cypriot Presidencies of the EU both faced pressure to react
ECRE shared its recommendations to the Danish Presidency to ensure a commitment to protection and respect for human rights of all persons including migrants and refugees in the Libyan context During the Cypriot presidency the Syrian refugee situation was further exacerbated by escalating violence rising death toll and increasing displacement in the region In its recommendations to the Cypriot Presidency ECRE called on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asylum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU and to provide continuous support to the humanitarian efforts in the region in order to meet urgent needs and maintain the protection space
In 2012 ECRE published Comments on the Commissions Communication on the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM) a landmark Communication that sets the framework for actions in the external dimension of EU migration and asylum policy in the context of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) in the next years The new GAMM is structured around the concept of mobility and aims to be more political integrating migration dialogues in political dialogues with third countries In the new GAMM the three priorities of the Global Approach (promoting labour migration addressing irregular migration and enhancing the links between migration and development) are maintained and now complemented by a fourth one refugee protection ECRE addressed the limits of the GAMM being led by a JHA approach since an overarching framework would need the ability to address the root causes of migration and displacement and enhance conditions that affect the lives of both migrants and the local communities in the region These are all areas that are and should be addressed through development cooperation More importantly Europe needs to show political leadership and position itself as a global player in international migration governance seizing the moment to develop and promote a rights-based approach to migration globally Such an approach should be accommodated in EUs development and foreign policy and EU human rights strategy
Protection in Third Countries
13
With regards to refugee protection its inclusion as one of the four priorities in the new GAMM is welcomed as a way to ensure coherence and better address the challenges arising from the asylum-migration nexus At the same time ECRE argues that Europe should develop a comprehensive and ambitious policy for refugee protection globally that encompasses the CEAS and cooperation for protection in third countries Durable solutions and capacity building for asylum need to be integrated in development with clear and consistent policy objectives Seen from this perspective the European External Action Service (EEAS) has the potential to frame the debate around asylum differently in the context of a European policy for human rights and protection globally The credibility of EU actions to promote refugee protection and durable solutions in third countries also depends on whether Europe upholds its responsibilities for protection in its territory
In 2012 ECRE embarked on a two year project to develop dialogue and advocacy on refugee protection in
development cooperation between civil society and the EU institutions The project Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development (domaid) provides the space and framework to bring together ECREs Core Group on the External Dimension civil society organisations from third countries diaspora groups academics and representatives from the European Commission to exchange around three main themes capacity building for asylum promoting durable solutions in protracted refugee situations and the role of refugee diasporas This will be done through a series of tools including platform meetings public seminars regional debriefings for the Commission by NGOs present in the field and the publication of policy papers European NGOs active in third countries have first hand experience of protection gaps challenges and EU policy in the regions making them best placed to suggest ways to respond and highlight ways forward The Domaid Project also aims to enhance cooperation and foster synergies between European NGOs and diaspora organisations as well as between European NGOs and local civil society organisations in third countries
14
In March 2012 the European Union adopted a Joint EU Resettlement Programme for Refugees The adoption of this Joint Programme was seen as very important first step towards increasing the number of resettlement places made available by EU Member States
ECRE has coordinated and drafted a comparative study for the European Parliament on the best practices for the integration of resettled refugees in the EU Member States The study was released in early January 2013 ECRE highlighted that there is a need for more attention to be placed on integration of resettled refugees and the sustainability of current programs For resettled refugees citizenship applications are often restrictive and can hinder the integration process ECRE therefore recommended that Member States grant permanent resident status to resettled refugees upon arrival to ensure refugee integration from the start
ECRE is one of six leading organisations (Amnesty International CCME ICMC IOM and Save Me) in the refugee field that have launched the Campaign 20000 by
2020 asking for more and better resettlement in Europe with the target of 20000 persons resettled annually by the year 2020 The campaign is supported by the resettlement network whose website was launched in early March 2012 and is currently being developed to include a resource library a directory of resettlement policy makers and practitioners online discussion groups opportunities for online consultations and mutual learning via an online community of practice
In addition ECRE has also been working in close collaboration with the European University Institute on a resettlement project named Know Reset (Building Knowledge for a Concerted and Sustainable Approach to Refugee Resettlement in the EU and its Member States) The project aims to provide an overview of the current state of resettlement in Europe by examining the legislation policies and practices supporting resettlement in Member States that have regular resettlement programmes as well as those that offer places on an ad hoc basis The scope of research also includes Member States that have not been involved in resettlement so far in an effort to assess whether there is potential for resettlement in the future Country profiles are prepared for each Member State on the basis of qualitative and quantitative research including information on the legal framework practices the views of different stakeholders and the public discourse in relation to resettlement
Resettlement
The project website was launched in 2012 and features an online database of national and EU primary and secondary sources (legal and policy documents statistics financial data etc) as well as comparative information on resettlement policies and practices in the EU with graphs and tables
15
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
11
ELENA Courses
ECREELENA has been running specialist and introductory refugee law courses for 25 years The topics of the courses are selected by the annual meeting of ELENA coordinators in response to needs identified by practitioners The courses are aimed at legal counsellors and lawyers from across Europe who defend or who are interested in defending cases concerning refugees and asylum seekers In 2012 two Advanced Courses took place one dealing with Generalised Violence Armed Conflict and the Need for International Protection and the on The Rights of Refugees
ECREELENA is deeply grateful to the experts who have lent their time to delivering these courses
Prof James Hathaway University of Michigan
Prof Luis Jimena Quesada President of the European Committee of Social Rights Council of Europe
Kees Wouters Senior Refugee Law Advisor Department of International Protection UNHCR
Blanche Tax Head of the Protection Information Unit Department of International Protection UNHCR
Mark Symes Asylum and Refugee law specialist
Flip Schuumlller Partner Boumlhler Advocaten
Nuala Mole Founder and Director of the AIRE Centre
Prof Heacutelegravene Lambert University of Westminster
Nino Hartl Country of Origin Information Expert EASO
Harald Doerig Justice at the German Federal Administrative Court
Ioana Patrascu Legal Officer European Commission
12
Instability following the Arab Spring continued in the region well into 2012 As the transitional period for Libya began and the reported numbers from UNHCR of Syrian refugees rose to 850000 by the end of 2012 all eyes were on Europes response The Danish and Cypriot Presidencies of the EU both faced pressure to react
ECRE shared its recommendations to the Danish Presidency to ensure a commitment to protection and respect for human rights of all persons including migrants and refugees in the Libyan context During the Cypriot presidency the Syrian refugee situation was further exacerbated by escalating violence rising death toll and increasing displacement in the region In its recommendations to the Cypriot Presidency ECRE called on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asylum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU and to provide continuous support to the humanitarian efforts in the region in order to meet urgent needs and maintain the protection space
In 2012 ECRE published Comments on the Commissions Communication on the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM) a landmark Communication that sets the framework for actions in the external dimension of EU migration and asylum policy in the context of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) in the next years The new GAMM is structured around the concept of mobility and aims to be more political integrating migration dialogues in political dialogues with third countries In the new GAMM the three priorities of the Global Approach (promoting labour migration addressing irregular migration and enhancing the links between migration and development) are maintained and now complemented by a fourth one refugee protection ECRE addressed the limits of the GAMM being led by a JHA approach since an overarching framework would need the ability to address the root causes of migration and displacement and enhance conditions that affect the lives of both migrants and the local communities in the region These are all areas that are and should be addressed through development cooperation More importantly Europe needs to show political leadership and position itself as a global player in international migration governance seizing the moment to develop and promote a rights-based approach to migration globally Such an approach should be accommodated in EUs development and foreign policy and EU human rights strategy
Protection in Third Countries
13
With regards to refugee protection its inclusion as one of the four priorities in the new GAMM is welcomed as a way to ensure coherence and better address the challenges arising from the asylum-migration nexus At the same time ECRE argues that Europe should develop a comprehensive and ambitious policy for refugee protection globally that encompasses the CEAS and cooperation for protection in third countries Durable solutions and capacity building for asylum need to be integrated in development with clear and consistent policy objectives Seen from this perspective the European External Action Service (EEAS) has the potential to frame the debate around asylum differently in the context of a European policy for human rights and protection globally The credibility of EU actions to promote refugee protection and durable solutions in third countries also depends on whether Europe upholds its responsibilities for protection in its territory
In 2012 ECRE embarked on a two year project to develop dialogue and advocacy on refugee protection in
development cooperation between civil society and the EU institutions The project Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development (domaid) provides the space and framework to bring together ECREs Core Group on the External Dimension civil society organisations from third countries diaspora groups academics and representatives from the European Commission to exchange around three main themes capacity building for asylum promoting durable solutions in protracted refugee situations and the role of refugee diasporas This will be done through a series of tools including platform meetings public seminars regional debriefings for the Commission by NGOs present in the field and the publication of policy papers European NGOs active in third countries have first hand experience of protection gaps challenges and EU policy in the regions making them best placed to suggest ways to respond and highlight ways forward The Domaid Project also aims to enhance cooperation and foster synergies between European NGOs and diaspora organisations as well as between European NGOs and local civil society organisations in third countries
14
In March 2012 the European Union adopted a Joint EU Resettlement Programme for Refugees The adoption of this Joint Programme was seen as very important first step towards increasing the number of resettlement places made available by EU Member States
ECRE has coordinated and drafted a comparative study for the European Parliament on the best practices for the integration of resettled refugees in the EU Member States The study was released in early January 2013 ECRE highlighted that there is a need for more attention to be placed on integration of resettled refugees and the sustainability of current programs For resettled refugees citizenship applications are often restrictive and can hinder the integration process ECRE therefore recommended that Member States grant permanent resident status to resettled refugees upon arrival to ensure refugee integration from the start
ECRE is one of six leading organisations (Amnesty International CCME ICMC IOM and Save Me) in the refugee field that have launched the Campaign 20000 by
2020 asking for more and better resettlement in Europe with the target of 20000 persons resettled annually by the year 2020 The campaign is supported by the resettlement network whose website was launched in early March 2012 and is currently being developed to include a resource library a directory of resettlement policy makers and practitioners online discussion groups opportunities for online consultations and mutual learning via an online community of practice
In addition ECRE has also been working in close collaboration with the European University Institute on a resettlement project named Know Reset (Building Knowledge for a Concerted and Sustainable Approach to Refugee Resettlement in the EU and its Member States) The project aims to provide an overview of the current state of resettlement in Europe by examining the legislation policies and practices supporting resettlement in Member States that have regular resettlement programmes as well as those that offer places on an ad hoc basis The scope of research also includes Member States that have not been involved in resettlement so far in an effort to assess whether there is potential for resettlement in the future Country profiles are prepared for each Member State on the basis of qualitative and quantitative research including information on the legal framework practices the views of different stakeholders and the public discourse in relation to resettlement
Resettlement
The project website was launched in 2012 and features an online database of national and EU primary and secondary sources (legal and policy documents statistics financial data etc) as well as comparative information on resettlement policies and practices in the EU with graphs and tables
15
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
12
Instability following the Arab Spring continued in the region well into 2012 As the transitional period for Libya began and the reported numbers from UNHCR of Syrian refugees rose to 850000 by the end of 2012 all eyes were on Europes response The Danish and Cypriot Presidencies of the EU both faced pressure to react
ECRE shared its recommendations to the Danish Presidency to ensure a commitment to protection and respect for human rights of all persons including migrants and refugees in the Libyan context During the Cypriot presidency the Syrian refugee situation was further exacerbated by escalating violence rising death toll and increasing displacement in the region In its recommendations to the Cypriot Presidency ECRE called on the EU and its Member States to ensure access to protection and fair asylum procedures for Syrian asylum seekers arriving in the EU and to provide continuous support to the humanitarian efforts in the region in order to meet urgent needs and maintain the protection space
In 2012 ECRE published Comments on the Commissions Communication on the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM) a landmark Communication that sets the framework for actions in the external dimension of EU migration and asylum policy in the context of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) in the next years The new GAMM is structured around the concept of mobility and aims to be more political integrating migration dialogues in political dialogues with third countries In the new GAMM the three priorities of the Global Approach (promoting labour migration addressing irregular migration and enhancing the links between migration and development) are maintained and now complemented by a fourth one refugee protection ECRE addressed the limits of the GAMM being led by a JHA approach since an overarching framework would need the ability to address the root causes of migration and displacement and enhance conditions that affect the lives of both migrants and the local communities in the region These are all areas that are and should be addressed through development cooperation More importantly Europe needs to show political leadership and position itself as a global player in international migration governance seizing the moment to develop and promote a rights-based approach to migration globally Such an approach should be accommodated in EUs development and foreign policy and EU human rights strategy
Protection in Third Countries
13
With regards to refugee protection its inclusion as one of the four priorities in the new GAMM is welcomed as a way to ensure coherence and better address the challenges arising from the asylum-migration nexus At the same time ECRE argues that Europe should develop a comprehensive and ambitious policy for refugee protection globally that encompasses the CEAS and cooperation for protection in third countries Durable solutions and capacity building for asylum need to be integrated in development with clear and consistent policy objectives Seen from this perspective the European External Action Service (EEAS) has the potential to frame the debate around asylum differently in the context of a European policy for human rights and protection globally The credibility of EU actions to promote refugee protection and durable solutions in third countries also depends on whether Europe upholds its responsibilities for protection in its territory
In 2012 ECRE embarked on a two year project to develop dialogue and advocacy on refugee protection in
development cooperation between civil society and the EU institutions The project Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development (domaid) provides the space and framework to bring together ECREs Core Group on the External Dimension civil society organisations from third countries diaspora groups academics and representatives from the European Commission to exchange around three main themes capacity building for asylum promoting durable solutions in protracted refugee situations and the role of refugee diasporas This will be done through a series of tools including platform meetings public seminars regional debriefings for the Commission by NGOs present in the field and the publication of policy papers European NGOs active in third countries have first hand experience of protection gaps challenges and EU policy in the regions making them best placed to suggest ways to respond and highlight ways forward The Domaid Project also aims to enhance cooperation and foster synergies between European NGOs and diaspora organisations as well as between European NGOs and local civil society organisations in third countries
14
In March 2012 the European Union adopted a Joint EU Resettlement Programme for Refugees The adoption of this Joint Programme was seen as very important first step towards increasing the number of resettlement places made available by EU Member States
ECRE has coordinated and drafted a comparative study for the European Parliament on the best practices for the integration of resettled refugees in the EU Member States The study was released in early January 2013 ECRE highlighted that there is a need for more attention to be placed on integration of resettled refugees and the sustainability of current programs For resettled refugees citizenship applications are often restrictive and can hinder the integration process ECRE therefore recommended that Member States grant permanent resident status to resettled refugees upon arrival to ensure refugee integration from the start
ECRE is one of six leading organisations (Amnesty International CCME ICMC IOM and Save Me) in the refugee field that have launched the Campaign 20000 by
2020 asking for more and better resettlement in Europe with the target of 20000 persons resettled annually by the year 2020 The campaign is supported by the resettlement network whose website was launched in early March 2012 and is currently being developed to include a resource library a directory of resettlement policy makers and practitioners online discussion groups opportunities for online consultations and mutual learning via an online community of practice
In addition ECRE has also been working in close collaboration with the European University Institute on a resettlement project named Know Reset (Building Knowledge for a Concerted and Sustainable Approach to Refugee Resettlement in the EU and its Member States) The project aims to provide an overview of the current state of resettlement in Europe by examining the legislation policies and practices supporting resettlement in Member States that have regular resettlement programmes as well as those that offer places on an ad hoc basis The scope of research also includes Member States that have not been involved in resettlement so far in an effort to assess whether there is potential for resettlement in the future Country profiles are prepared for each Member State on the basis of qualitative and quantitative research including information on the legal framework practices the views of different stakeholders and the public discourse in relation to resettlement
Resettlement
The project website was launched in 2012 and features an online database of national and EU primary and secondary sources (legal and policy documents statistics financial data etc) as well as comparative information on resettlement policies and practices in the EU with graphs and tables
15
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
13
With regards to refugee protection its inclusion as one of the four priorities in the new GAMM is welcomed as a way to ensure coherence and better address the challenges arising from the asylum-migration nexus At the same time ECRE argues that Europe should develop a comprehensive and ambitious policy for refugee protection globally that encompasses the CEAS and cooperation for protection in third countries Durable solutions and capacity building for asylum need to be integrated in development with clear and consistent policy objectives Seen from this perspective the European External Action Service (EEAS) has the potential to frame the debate around asylum differently in the context of a European policy for human rights and protection globally The credibility of EU actions to promote refugee protection and durable solutions in third countries also depends on whether Europe upholds its responsibilities for protection in its territory
In 2012 ECRE embarked on a two year project to develop dialogue and advocacy on refugee protection in
development cooperation between civil society and the EU institutions The project Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development (domaid) provides the space and framework to bring together ECREs Core Group on the External Dimension civil society organisations from third countries diaspora groups academics and representatives from the European Commission to exchange around three main themes capacity building for asylum promoting durable solutions in protracted refugee situations and the role of refugee diasporas This will be done through a series of tools including platform meetings public seminars regional debriefings for the Commission by NGOs present in the field and the publication of policy papers European NGOs active in third countries have first hand experience of protection gaps challenges and EU policy in the regions making them best placed to suggest ways to respond and highlight ways forward The Domaid Project also aims to enhance cooperation and foster synergies between European NGOs and diaspora organisations as well as between European NGOs and local civil society organisations in third countries
14
In March 2012 the European Union adopted a Joint EU Resettlement Programme for Refugees The adoption of this Joint Programme was seen as very important first step towards increasing the number of resettlement places made available by EU Member States
ECRE has coordinated and drafted a comparative study for the European Parliament on the best practices for the integration of resettled refugees in the EU Member States The study was released in early January 2013 ECRE highlighted that there is a need for more attention to be placed on integration of resettled refugees and the sustainability of current programs For resettled refugees citizenship applications are often restrictive and can hinder the integration process ECRE therefore recommended that Member States grant permanent resident status to resettled refugees upon arrival to ensure refugee integration from the start
ECRE is one of six leading organisations (Amnesty International CCME ICMC IOM and Save Me) in the refugee field that have launched the Campaign 20000 by
2020 asking for more and better resettlement in Europe with the target of 20000 persons resettled annually by the year 2020 The campaign is supported by the resettlement network whose website was launched in early March 2012 and is currently being developed to include a resource library a directory of resettlement policy makers and practitioners online discussion groups opportunities for online consultations and mutual learning via an online community of practice
In addition ECRE has also been working in close collaboration with the European University Institute on a resettlement project named Know Reset (Building Knowledge for a Concerted and Sustainable Approach to Refugee Resettlement in the EU and its Member States) The project aims to provide an overview of the current state of resettlement in Europe by examining the legislation policies and practices supporting resettlement in Member States that have regular resettlement programmes as well as those that offer places on an ad hoc basis The scope of research also includes Member States that have not been involved in resettlement so far in an effort to assess whether there is potential for resettlement in the future Country profiles are prepared for each Member State on the basis of qualitative and quantitative research including information on the legal framework practices the views of different stakeholders and the public discourse in relation to resettlement
Resettlement
The project website was launched in 2012 and features an online database of national and EU primary and secondary sources (legal and policy documents statistics financial data etc) as well as comparative information on resettlement policies and practices in the EU with graphs and tables
15
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
14
In March 2012 the European Union adopted a Joint EU Resettlement Programme for Refugees The adoption of this Joint Programme was seen as very important first step towards increasing the number of resettlement places made available by EU Member States
ECRE has coordinated and drafted a comparative study for the European Parliament on the best practices for the integration of resettled refugees in the EU Member States The study was released in early January 2013 ECRE highlighted that there is a need for more attention to be placed on integration of resettled refugees and the sustainability of current programs For resettled refugees citizenship applications are often restrictive and can hinder the integration process ECRE therefore recommended that Member States grant permanent resident status to resettled refugees upon arrival to ensure refugee integration from the start
ECRE is one of six leading organisations (Amnesty International CCME ICMC IOM and Save Me) in the refugee field that have launched the Campaign 20000 by
2020 asking for more and better resettlement in Europe with the target of 20000 persons resettled annually by the year 2020 The campaign is supported by the resettlement network whose website was launched in early March 2012 and is currently being developed to include a resource library a directory of resettlement policy makers and practitioners online discussion groups opportunities for online consultations and mutual learning via an online community of practice
In addition ECRE has also been working in close collaboration with the European University Institute on a resettlement project named Know Reset (Building Knowledge for a Concerted and Sustainable Approach to Refugee Resettlement in the EU and its Member States) The project aims to provide an overview of the current state of resettlement in Europe by examining the legislation policies and practices supporting resettlement in Member States that have regular resettlement programmes as well as those that offer places on an ad hoc basis The scope of research also includes Member States that have not been involved in resettlement so far in an effort to assess whether there is potential for resettlement in the future Country profiles are prepared for each Member State on the basis of qualitative and quantitative research including information on the legal framework practices the views of different stakeholders and the public discourse in relation to resettlement
Resettlement
The project website was launched in 2012 and features an online database of national and EU primary and secondary sources (legal and policy documents statistics financial data etc) as well as comparative information on resettlement policies and practices in the EU with graphs and tables
15
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
The project website was launched in 2012 and features an online database of national and EU primary and secondary sources (legal and policy documents statistics financial data etc) as well as comparative information on resettlement policies and practices in the EU with graphs and tables
15
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
16
Detention
In late June 2012 a political agreement was reached between the European Parliament and the Council on the European Commissions amended recast proposal of the Reception Conditions Directive ECRErsquos advocacy focus with regard to this Directive centred on detention and sought to put pressure on the institutions to uphold stringent safe-guards against the detention of asylum seekers ECRE Amnesty International European Institutions Office and 166 organisations comprising human rights medical and judicial civil society organisations active across Europe and internationally appealed to the EU institutions to maintain the presumption against detention in EU asylum legislation and uphold as a minimum a list of essential safeguards on the detention of asylum seekers in EU asylum legislation Despite this coordinated action certain elements of the
compromise text are disappointing such as the absence of prohibition of the detention of unaccompanied asy-lum-seeking children and the broad formulation of grounds of detention which include the possibility to detain asylum seekers in order to verify their identity or nationality or in the context of a procedure to decide on the applicantrsquos right
to enter the territory This risks encouraging the systematic detention of asylum seekers instead of making the practice truly exceptional
People fleeing violence and persecution should not be incar-cerated as they have committed no crime The detrimental effects of detention on the physical and psychological well-being of people fleeing persecution is widely document-ed This is traumatic for people of all ages and backgrounds especially children victims of torture and those suffering from mental illnesses Detention can also severely impede a persons ability to integrate successfully into a country The dangers of detention are multifold and there are alternatives ECRE will continue to advocate against the detention of asylum seekers and promote the use of alternative non-cus-todial measures such as reporting arrangements At the same time ECRE will be putting pressure on States when implementing the new acquis to adopt more favourable provisions than what is provided for in the Directive and to fully implement procedural safeguards to protect asylum seekers from arbitrary detention including an automatic judicial review of detention and effective access to free legal assistance The full application of these provisions may mit-igate the inherent risks involved in the detention provisions in the recast Reception Conditions Directive
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
17
New Members
Aditus was established in March 2011 by a group of lawyers interested in human rights and access issues As an independent voluntary non-profit organisation it was established to monitor act and report on access to fundamental human rights by individuals and groups and believes in universality interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights Moreover aditus strives to promote a rights-based understanding and application of human rights and highlights the regional and international dimensions of human rights in Malta
The Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Malta seeks to accompany serve and defend the rights of asylum seekers and forcibly displaced persons who arrive in Malta
JRS Malta provides essential services to asylum seekers beneficiaries of international protection and to forced migrants who cannot return to their country of origin JRS Malta works with migrants who are both in detention and living in the community
In 2012 the ECRE Alliance welcomed two new Members from Malta aditus and Jesuit Refugee Service Malta
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
18
Our Members in 2012
AUSTRIA Asylkoordination wwwasylkoordinationat
AZERBAIJAN International Eurasia Press Fund wwwiepf-ngoorg
BELGIUM Flemish Refugee Action wwwvluchtelingenwerkbe
Belgian Refugee Council wwwcbar-bchvbe
CIRE wwwcirebe
Belgian Red Cross - FR wwwcroix-rougebe
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Foundation of Local Democracy wwwfldba
Vaša prava BiH wwwvasapravaorg
BULGARIA Bulgarian Helsinki Committee wwwbghelsinkiorg
Bulgarian Red Cross wwwredcrossbg
CROATIA Croatian Law Centre wwwhpchr
CZECH REPUBLIC OPU wwwopucz
DENMARK Danish Refugee Council wwwdrcdk
FINLAND Finnish Red Cross wwwredcrossfi
Finnish Refugee Advice Centre wwwpakolaisneuvontafi
FRANCE Forum Reacutefugieacutes-Cosi wwwforumrefugiesorg
France Terre dAsile wwwfrance-terre-asileorg
GERMANY Arbeiterwohlfahrt wwwawoorg
Der Partitaumltische Gesamtverband wwwder-paritaetischede
Caritas Germany wwwcaritasde
German Red Cross wwwdrkde
Pro Asyl wwwproasylde
Diaconia Germany wwwdiaconiede
GREECE Greek Council for Refugees wwwgcrgr
HUNGARY Hungarian Helsinki Committee wwwhelsinkihu
Menedeacutek httpmenedekhu
IRELAND Irish Refugee Council wwwirishrefugeecouncilie
ITALY Italian Council for Refugees wwwcir-onlusorg
KOSOVO Civil Rights Program Kosovo wwwcrpkosovoorg
LITHUANIA Lithuanian Red Cross wwwredcrosslt
LUXEMBOURG Caritas Luxembourg wwwcaritaslu
MALTA aditus wwwaditusorgmt
Jesuit Refugee Service Malta wwwjrsmaltaorg
NORWAY NOAS wwwnoasorg
Norwegian Refugee Council wwwnrcno
ICORN wwwicornorg
POLAND Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights wwwhfhrpl
PORTUGAL Portuguese Refugee Council wwwcprpt
ROMANIA Romanian National Council for Refugees wwwcnrrro
RUSSIAN FEDERATION Memorial Human Rights Centre wwwmemoru
SERBIA Grupa 484 wwwgrupa484orgrs
Serbian Red Cross wwwredcrossorgrs
Asylum Protection Center wwwapc-czaorg
SLOVAKIA Slovak Humanitarian Council wwwshrsk
SPAIN ACCEM wwwaccemes
CEAR wwwceares
Rescate wwwongrescateorg
Spanish Red Cross wwwcruzrojaes
SWEDEN Caritas Sweden wwwcaritasse
Swedish Red Cross wwwredcrossse
SWITZERLAND Swiss Refugee Council wwwfluechtlingshilfech
NETHERLANDS Dutch Council for Refugees wwwvluchtelingenwerknl
UAF wwwuafnl
Pharos wwwpharosnl
TURKEY Helsinki Citizens Assembly wwwhydorgtr
UNITED KINGDOM British Red Cross wwwredcrossorguk
Asylum Aid wwwasylumaidorguk
ILPA wwwilpaorguk
Freedom from Torture wwwfreedomfromtortureorg
Embrace UK wwwembraceukorg
Refugee Action wwwrefugee-actionorguk
British Refugee Council wwwrefugeecouncilorguk
Refugee Studies Centre wwwrscoxacuk
INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS Amnesty International - EU Office wwwamnestyorg
CCME-CEC wwwccmebe
International Rescue Committee wwwrescueorg
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society wwwhiasorg
ICMC wwwicmcnet
IRCT wwwirctorg
Jesuit Refugee Service - Europe wwwjrseuropeorg
Scottish Refugee Council wwwscottishrefugeecouncilorguk
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
19
Our Members in 2012 Staff
Michael DiedringSecretary General
Ana Lopez FontalSenior Press amp Public Information Officer
Louise CarrMembership Officer
Vianney StollCommunications Officer
Kris PolletSenior Legal amp Policy Officer
Aspasia PapadopoulouSenior Advocacy Officer
Maria HennessySenior Legal Officer
Claire RimmerHead of the Projects amp Tenders Team
Anne BathilyProject Officer
Heacutelegravene Soupios-DavidProject Officer
Caoimhe SheridanProject Officer
Elona BokshiProject Officer
Julia ZelvenskaSenior Legal Officer
Laurent AldenhoffFundraising Officer
Evelyne RottiersFinance amp Administration Manager
(Michael Diedring was appointed Secretary General in October 2012 Allan Leas was ECRErsquos Acting Secretary General until then)
Special thanks to all ECRE interns in 2012 Zoeacute Gardner Pauline Hilmy Meron Knikman Maude Lacour Markella Papadouli Lucia Rozkopalova and Rita Teller
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
20
Finances
Activities and projects
Administrative and General
Other
Private Foundations
European Commission - Project Funding
Membership Fees and Activities
Conferences and Trainings
Miscellaneous Revenue
Other Projects
European Commission - Core Grant
Expenditures Revenue
70
26
4
23
20
18
16
8
8
7
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
21
Projects
Domaid - Dialogue on Migration and Asylum in Development Funded by the European Commission - EuropeAid
Comparative Study on the Integration of Resettled Refugees Tender from the European Parliament
AIDA - Asylum Information Database Funded by the European Programme on Integration and Migration - EPIM
APAIPA - Actors of Protection and Application of the Internal Protection Alternative Funded by the European Commission ndash European Refugee Fund
SHARE Funded by FIPI and Fondation Roi Baudouin
Right to Justice - Quality Legal Assistance for Unaccompanied Children Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
FRAME - Promoting the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights within the legal networks active in the field of asylum and migration in Europe Funded by the European Commission - Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Know Reset comparative study on resettlement Led by the European University Institute in Florence Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Cities that care cities that share towards a network for cities and regions engaging in resettlement (The SHARE Project) Led by ICMC Funded by the European Commission - Pilot Project on Resettlement
European Network for Technical Cooperation on the Application of the Dublin II Regulation Led by Forum Reacutefugieacutes Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Learning from Practice II (2nd part of the EDAL project) Led by the Irish Refugee Council Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
A Face to the Story - the issue of non removables in detention Led by Flemish Refugee Action Funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration - EPIM
Refugee Integration ndash Assessment Evaluation Engagement and Capacity building in select Western and Central European countries Led by UNHCR Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
Linking in EU resettlement - linking the resettlement phases and connecting (local) resettlement practitioners Led by UNHCR IOM and ICMC Funded by the European Commission - European Refugee Fund
In 2012 ECRE carried out or took part in the following projects
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
22
Partners
Core funding
Strategic Partner
European CommissionDG Education and Culture
ldquoEurope for Citizensrdquo Programme
The Atlantic Philanthropies The Sigrid Rausing Trust The Joseph Rowntree Chartiable Trust
The Dutch Council for Refugees
The generosity of our institutional partners allows us to undertake our work interact more effectively with the members or our alliance and expand our activities in improving the rights of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922
European Council on Refugees and ExilesRue Royale 146 1st floor1000 Brussels Belgium
T +32 2 234 3 800F +32 2 514 5 922