eart163 planetary surfaces
DESCRIPTION
EART163 Planetary Surfaces. Francis Nimmo. Last Week - Wind. Sediment transport Initiation of motion – friction velocity v* , threshold grain size d t , turbulence and viscosity Sinking - terminal velocity Motion of sand-grains – saltation , sand flux, dune motion - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
EART163 Planetary Surfaces
Francis Nimmo
![Page 2: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Last Week - Wind• Sediment transport
– Initiation of motion – friction velocity v*, threshold grain size dt, turbulence and viscosity
– Sinking - terminal velocity– Motion of sand-grains – saltation, sand flux, dune
motion
• Aeolian landforms and what they tell us
gv
Cq fs
3*
3/12
)(10
gd
fsft
Df
fs
Cdg
v )(
34
![Page 3: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
This week – “Water”• Only three bodies: Earth, Mars, Titan• Subsurface water – percolation, sapping• Surface flow
– Water discharge rates– Sediment transport – initiation, mechanisms, rates
• Channels• Fluvial landscapes
![Page 4: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Caveats
1. “Most geologic work is done by large, infrequent events”
2. Almost all sediment transport laws are empirical
![Page 5: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Subsurface Flow• On Earth, there is a water table below which the pores
are occupied by fluid• This fluid constitutes a reservoir which can recharge
rivers (and is drained by wells)• Surface flow happens if infiltration into the
subsurface is exceeded by the precipitation rate
![Page 6: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Flow in a permeable medium
vd
vd
dxdPk
LHgkv fd
vd is the Darcy velocity (m/s) k is the permeability (m2) is the viscosity (Pa s), typical value for water is 10-3 Pa s
• Darcy velocity is the average flow velocity of fluid through the medium (not the flow velocity through the pores)
• Permeability controls how fast fluid can flow through the medium – intrinsic property of the rock.
• Permeable flows are almost always low Reynolds numbers – so what?
![Page 7: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Permeability and porosity• Permeability can vary widely• Porosity is the volume fraction of rock occupied by voids• High porosity usually implies high permeability
Rock type Permeability (m2)Gravel 10-9 – 10-7
Loose sand 10-11 – 10-9
Permeable basalt 10-13 – 10-8
Fractured crystalline rock 10-14 – 10-11
Sandstone 10-16 – 10-12
Limestone 10-18 – 10-16
Intact granite 10-20 – 10-18
![Page 8: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Porosity and permeabilityGrain size 2b, pore diameter 2aA unit cell includes 3 pore cylinders
2
2
43
ba Porosity ( ):
18
22bk Permeability (k):
a
• Permeability increases with grain size b and porosity • E.g. 1mm grain size, porosity 1% implies k~2x10-12 m2
![Page 9: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Response timescale• If the water table is disturbed, the response timescale
depends on the permeability• The hydraulic diffusivity (m2s-1) of the water table is
Pkhyd
k is permeability, is viscosity, P is the pressure perturbation
• Knowing allows us to calculate the time t it takes a disturbance to propagate a distance d: t=d2/
• Example: a well draws down the local water table by 10 m. If it takes 1 year for this disturbance to propagate 1 km, what value of k/ is implied?
Does this make sense?
![Page 10: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
When does subsurface flow matter?• Subsurface flow is generally very slow compared to
surface flow, so it does much less geological work• But at least on present-day Mars, water is not stable
at the surface, while it is stable in the subsurface.• So subsurface flow may matter on Mars.• On Earth, it matters in regions with high permeability
where the rock is soluble (e.g. limestone or chalk)• Titan may also have regions where “rock” dissolution
is important?
![Page 11: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Groundwater sapping on Mars?
Lamb et al. 2008
Do blunt amphitheatres necessarily indicate groundwater sapping?Or might they be a sign of ancient surface runoff?
![Page 12: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Sediment transport
• At low velocities, bed-load dominates (saltation + traction + rotation)
• At intermediate velocities/low grain sizes, suspended load can be important
• At high velocities, entire bed moves (washload)• Solution load is usually minor
![Page 13: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Sediment Transport• A column of water on a slope exerts a shear stress t
• This stress will drive fluid motion
h
d
a
at singhf
f
• If the fluid motion is rapid enough, it can also overcome gravity + cohesion and cause sediment transport
• The shear stress t is a useful measure of whether sediment transport is likely
![Page 14: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Transport Initiation• Just like aeolian transport, we can define a friction
velocity u* which is related to the shear stress t• The friction velocity u*=(t/f )1/2=(gh sin a)1/2
2/12/1
2/1
*
gduf
fscrit
• The critical friction velocity required to initiate sediment transport depends on the grain size d
• The dimensionless constant is a function of u* and d and is a measure of how hard it is to initiate movement.
• A typical value of is 0.1 (see next page)
Does this equation make sense?
![Page 15: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Shields Curve
=0.05-0.2
Sediment transport harder
Small grainsLow velocities
Large grainsHigh velocities
Minimum grain size(as with aeolian transport)
![Page 16: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Transport initiation
Burr et al. 2006
Slope=0.001
Easiest on Titan – why?
![Page 17: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Water and sediment discharge
asin1 2/3 ghf
qw
w
fs
f
ss gh
fq
a
2/122/3 )(sin1
Water discharge rate (m2s-1) is well-established and depends on dimensionless friction factor fw:
Sediment discharge rate (m2s-1) is not well-established. The formula below is most suitable for steep slopes. It also depends on a dimensionless friction factor fs:
The friction factors are empirical but are typically ~0.05
![Page 18: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Worked example: cobbles on Titan
d=10cm so u*=11 cm/s (for =0.1)u*=(gh sin a)1/2 so h=9 m (for sin a
= 0.001)
Fluid flux = 20 m2s-1
For a channel (say) 100m wide, discharge rate = 2000 m3/s
Catchment area of say 400 km2, rainfall rate 18 mm/h
Comments?
2/12/1
2/1
*
gduf
fscrit
30 km
g=1.3 ms-2, f=500 kgm-3, s=1000 kgm-3
fw=0.05asin1 2/3 gh
fq
ww
![Page 19: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Braided vs. Meandering Channels
Image 2.3 km wide. Why are the meanders high-standing?
• Braided channels are more common at high slopes and/or high discharge rates (and therefore coarse sediment load – why?)
• Meanders seem to require cohesive sediment to form – due to clays or plants on Earth, and clays or ice on Mars
![Page 20: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Meanders on Venus (!)
Image width 50 km
• Presumably very low viscosity lava
• Some channels extend for >1000 km
• Channels do not always flow “down-stream” – why?
![Page 21: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Fluvial landscapes• Valley networks on Mars• Only occur on ancient
terrain (~4 Gyr old)• What does this imply about
ancient Martian atmosphere?
30 km
• Valley network on Titan• Presumably formed by
methane runoff• What does this imply about
Titan climate and surface?
100 km
![Page 22: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Fluvial Landscapes
Stepinksi and Stepinski 2006
• Martian networks resemble those of the Earth, suggesting prolonged lifetime – clement climate?
![Page 23: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Landscape Evolution Models
![Page 24: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
• Large-scale fluvial features, indicating massive (liquid) flows, comparable to ocean currents on Earth
• Morphology similar to giant post-glacial floods on Earth
• Spread throughout Martian history, but concentrated in the first 1-2 Gyr of Martian history
• Source of water unknown – possibly ice melted by volcanic eruptions (jokulhaups)?
Martian Outflow channels
50km
flowdirection
150km
Baker (2001)
![Page 25: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Martian Gullies• A very unexpected discovery
(Malin & Edgett, Science 283, 2330-2335, 2000)
• Found predominantly at high latitudes (>30o), on pole-facing slopes, and shallow (~100m below surface)
• Inferred to be young – cover young features like dunes and polygons
• How do we explain them? Liquid water is not stable at the surface!
• Maybe even active at present day?
![Page 26: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Alluvial Fans
Schon et al. 2009
• Consequence of a sudden change in slope – sediment gets dumped out
• Fans can eventually merge along-strike to form a continuous surface – a bajada
![Page 27: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Martian sediments in outcrop
Opportunity (Meridiani)
Cross-bedding indicative of prolonged fluid flows
![Page 28: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Lakes
Titan, 140km across (false colour)
Gusev, Mars150km
Clearwater Lakes Canada~30km diameters
Titan lakes are (presumably) methane/ethane and occur mainly near the poles – why?How do we know they are liquid-filled?Gusev crater shows little evidence for water, based on Mars Rover data
![Page 29: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Summary• Subsurface water – percolation, sapping
• Surface flow– Water discharge rates– Sediment transport – initiation, mechanisms, rates
• Channels – braided vs. meandering• Fluvial landscapes
dxdPkvd
Pkhyd
2/12/1
2/1
*
gduf
fscrit
asin* ghu
![Page 30: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: EART163 Planetary Surfaces](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062811/568161e3550346895dd1ff77/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Erosion• Erosion will remove small, near-surface craters• But it may also expose (exhume) craters that were previously
buried• Erosion has recently been recognized as a major process on
Mars, but the details are still extremely poorly understood• The images below show examples of fluvial features which
have been exhumed: the channels are highstanding. Why?
Malin and Edgett, Science 2003meander
channel