dynamic epileptic activity analysis based on...
TRANSCRIPT
DYNAMIC EPILEPTIC ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BASED ON GEOMETRIC
STRUCTURE OF ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC SIGNALS
VINOD A/L A.R.RAMACHANDRAN
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
DYNAMIC EPILEPTIC ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BASED ON GEOMETRIC
STRUCTURE OF ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC SIGNALS
VINOD A/L A.R.RAMACHANDRAN
A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the
requirements for the award of the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy (Mathematics)
Faculty of Science
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
NOVEMBER 2015
iii
for Tata
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First and foremost, I would like to give thanks to God, for without His blessing,
this undertaking would not have been possible.
My deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Prof. Dr. Tahir b. Ahmad for being
my guiding hand through the last few years. Your insight, coupled with your spirited
pursuit of knowledge has made me realize the beauty in research. I will treasure our
bond for the rest of my life. To Dr. Siti Rahmah bt. Awang, thank you for taking the
time to sit with me and work out some of the more difficult problems I encountered
during the early stages of this research. I would also like to thank Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ali
b. Abd. Rahman for being a strong critic of my work during the evaluation stages, and
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nor Haniza bt. Sarmin for introducing me to the art of publishing.
To the many other fine educators in UTM who I’ve not mentioned here, rest assured
that you will always be in heart and mind. The person I am today is the result of your
cumulative effort, and for that, I thank you.
My thanks also go out to the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation
(MOSTI) for funding my research. Their support has been invaluable to the completion
of this degree.
To my family, thank you for being there for me when I needed you most, but
was too proud to ask. Your support kept me going during the toughest of times. Thank
you for believing in me, I could not have done this without you.
Last but not least, I would like to thank my friends for making my stay in
Skudai a memorable one. Special thanks to Ady, Diren and Vishnu for keeping me
company on this amazing journey. I would also like to extend my gratitude to my
brothers-and-sisters-in-arms, Amidora, Faisal, Raja, and Siaw Yee for taking me under
their wings. Thank you.
Vinod
v
ABSTRACT
Epilepsy is a chronic brain disorder that affects people all over the world. It
is characterized by recurring seizures which are caused by sudden and brief excessive
electrical discharges in the brain. Epileptic seizures are notoriously difficult to model
due to their erratic behavior and limited availability of clean data to work with. In
this research, an emulated probability measure called the Delia measure is developed
to normalize raw EEG data before being mapped to the surface of a unit hypersphere
and modeled using a von-Mises Fisher distribution. By computing the parameters
for the distribution using genetic algorithms, it is determined that seizures can be
sorted in order of their spread, which is an indicator of seizure violence. The Delia
measure values are also used in conjunction with information theory to yield the self-
information and entropy of seizures. Based on the information content obtained,
a Type-2 fuzzy graph and a crisp graph are generated to describe the information
flow and electrode interconnectivity respectively. These graphs show that there is a
distinct difference between focal and generalized seizures, and that seizure data can be
segregated into multiple communities. Godel’s incompleteness theorem is also used in
conjunction with non-Euclidean geometry to prove that no two seizures are the same.
Together, these results verify that there exists a governing pattern for epileptic seizures.
vi
ABSTRAK
Epilepsi merupakan gangguan otak yang kronik yang melibatkan ramai orang
di serata dunia. Ia dicirikan dengan serangan secara tiba-tiba dan berulang. Ini
disebabkan oleh pelepasan cas elektrik yang berlebihan di dalam otak. Dalam
penyelidikan ini, ukuran kebarangkalian yang dipanggil ukuran Delia dibangunkan
untuk menormalkan data EEG sebelum dipetakan kepada permukaan hipersfera
menggunakan ukuran taburan von-Mises Fisher. Dengan mengira parameter
ukuran taburan tersebut menggunakan algoritma genetik, serangan sawan dapat
disusun mengikut sebaran data yang merupakan petunjuk kepada tahap serangan
sawan. Nilai ukuran Delia tersebut juga digunakan bersama dengan teori informasi
untuk menghasilkan entropi dan maklumat tentang serangan sawan. Berdasarkan
kandungan maklumat yang dicerap, graf kabur Jenis-2 dan graf klasik dijanakan
untuk menerangkan aliran maklumat dan sambungan antara elektrod. Graf-graf ini
menunjukkan bahawa terdapat perbezaan ketara antara serangan sawan fokal dan
umum. Data serangan sawan dapat diasingkan kepada beberapa kelompok. Teorem
ketaklengkapan Godel juga digunakan bersama geometri bukan-Euklidean untuk
membuktikan bahawa tidak ada dua serangan sawan yang sama. Hasil penyelidikan
ini mengesahkan bahawa wujud corak tertentu dalam sesuatu serangan sawan.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE
DECLARATION ii
DEDICATION iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv
ABSTRACT v
ABSTRAK vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF TABLES x
LIST OF FIGURES xi
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xiv
LIST OF SYMBOLS xv
LIST OF APPENDICES xvi
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Problem Background 1
1.2 Research Hypothesis 2
1.3 Research Objectives 3
1.4 Limitations 3
1.5 Research Significance 3
1.6 Dissertation Organization 4
2 LITERATURE REVIEW 6
2.1 The Human Brain 6
2.1.1 Brain Components & Function 6
2.1.2 Electrochemical Reactions in the Brain 8
2.2 The Nature & Detection of Epilepsy 9
2.2.1 Classification of Epileptic Seizures 9
2.2.2 Electroencephalography 10
2.2.2.1 Electrode Placement 12
2.2.2.2 Recording Technique 14
viii
2.3 Modeling of EEG Signals for Seizure Analysis 15
2.3.1 The FTTM Model 17
2.3.1.1 Flat EEG 18
2.3.1.2 Non-polar CEEG 19
2.3.1.3 Criticism of FTTM 20
2.4 Information Geometry 20
3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 22
3.1 Research Design & Procedure 22
3.2 Operational Framework 23
3.3 Data Sources 23
3.4 Instrumentation 24
3.5 Assumptions & Limitations 25
3.6 Preliminary Material 25
3.6.1 Probability & Measure 26
3.6.2 Topology & Manifolds 28
3.6.2.1 Topology 28
3.6.2.2 Manifolds 29
3.6.3 Graphs 30
3.6.4 Information 32
4 MEASURING EEG SIGNALS OF EPILEPTIC
SEIZURES 33
4.1 Explorative Statistics 33
4.2 Delia Measure Development 39
4.3 Delia Measure Application 46
5 MANIFOLD CONSTRUCTION 51
5.1 Mapping Measure Data to a Manifold 51
5.2 Working on the Surface of a Unit Hypersphere 57
5.2.1 Geodesics on a Unit Hypersphere 57
5.2.2 Application of the Derived Geodesic 60
5.3 Non-viability of Dimensionality Reduction 60
6 THE VMF DISTRIBUTION OF EPILEPTIC SEIZURES 62
6.1 Parameter Estimation 62
6.2 Application to Existing Data Sets 64
ix
7 VISUALIZATION OF EPILEPTIC SEIZURES VIA
GRAPHS 70
7.1 Graphs of Epileptic Seizures 70
7.2 Application to Existing Dataset 72
7.2.1 Fuzzy Graphs 72
7.2.2 Electrode Connectivity Graphs 75
7.3 Other Related Work 77
7.3.1 Non-Euclidean Analysis 78
7.3.2 Application of Genetic Algorithms to Ap-
proximating the Concentration Parameter
of vMF Distributions 79
8 CONCLUSION & DISCUSSION 81
8.1 Conclusion 81
8.2 Suggestions For Further Research 83
REFERENCES 84
Appendices A – I 93 – 129
x
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE
2.1 Brain structures and their functions. 8
2.2 Classification of epileptic seizures. 11
2.3 EEG components. 14
4.1 K-S testing of seizure data. 36
4.2 Emulated baseline and jitter values. 46
5.1 Geodesic distance values. 60
6.1 vMF parameters. 66
6.2 Average entropic content of patient data. 67
7.1 κ estimates obtained using GA. 80
8.1 Summary of computational results. 82
8.2 Summary of graphical observations. 83
xi
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE
1.1 Chapter dependency flowchart. 5
2.1 Structure of the human brain. 7
2.2 Neural synapses. 9
2.3 EEG sensors attached to a patient. 10
2.4 International 10-20 system. 13
2.5 EEG amplifier. 14
2.6 EEG montages. 15
2.7 FTTM1. 17
2.8 The Flat EEG method. 18
2.9 Sphere-cube homeomorphism. 19
2.10 Clustering on a cube. 19
3.1 Research operational framework. 24
4.1 The NicoletOneTM
EEG system. 34
4.2 Comparison between electrode and time dependency. 35
4.3 Normal tendency of epileptic seizures. 36
4.4 Loss of normal tendency for an epileptic seizure. 37
4.5 Pathway to mapping EEG signals to a manifold. 38
4.6 Delia measure of Patient A’s seizure. 46
4.7 Delia measure of Patient B’s seizure. 47
4.8 Delia measure of Patient C’s seizure. 48
4.9 Delia measure of Patient D’s seizure. 49
4.10 Delia measure of Patient E’s seizure. 50
4.11 Delia measure of Patient F’s seizure. 50
5.1 A unit hypersphere as a manifold. 54
5.2 Geodesic distance on a sphere. 58
6.1 Applying the vMF model. 65
6.2 Relation between κ and χ. 69
7.1 Entropy change in Patient A’s seizure. 72
7.2 Entropy change in Patient B’s seizure. 73
7.3 Entropy change in Patient C’s seizure. 73
xii
7.4 Entropy change in Patient D’s seizure. 74
7.5 Entropy change in Patient E’s seizure. 74
7.6 Entropy change in Patient F’s seizure. 75
7.7 Gt of Patient A at t = 1 75
7.8 Gt of Patient B at t = 2 76
7.9 Gt of Patient C at t = 3 76
7.10 Gt of Patient D at t = 4 76
7.11 Gt of Patient E at t = 5 77
7.12 Gt of Patient F at t = 6 77
A.1 Gt of Patient A at t = 1 93
A.2 Gt of Patient A at t = 2 93
A.3 Gt of Patient A at t = 3 94
A.4 Gt of Patient A at t = 4 94
A.5 Gt of Patient A at t = 5 94
A.6 Gt of Patient A at t = 6 95
A.7 Gt of Patient A at t = 7 95
A.8 Gt of Patient A at t = 8 95
A.9 Gt of Patient A at t = 9 96
A.10 Gt of Patient A at t = 10 96
B.1 Gt of Patient B at t = 1 97
B.2 Gt of Patient B at t = 2 97
B.3 Gt of Patient B at t = 3 98
B.4 Gt of Patient B at t = 4 98
B.5 Gt of Patient B at t = 5 98
B.6 Gt of Patient B at t = 6 99
B.7 Gt of Patient B at t = 7 99
B.8 Gt of Patient B at t = 8 99
B.9 Gt of Patient B at t = 9 100
B.10 Gt of Patient B at t = 10 100
C.1 Gt of Patient C at t = 1 101
C.2 Gt of Patient C at t = 2 101
C.3 Gt of Patient C at t = 3 102
C.4 Gt of Patient C at t = 4 102
C.5 Gt of Patient C at t = 5 102
C.6 Gt of Patient C at t = 6 103
C.7 Gt of Patient C at t = 7 103
C.8 Gt of Patient C at t = 8 103
C.9 Gt of Patient C at t = 9 104
C.10 Gt of Patient C at t = 10 104
xiii
D.1 Gt of Patient D at t = 1 105
D.2 Gt of Patient D at t = 2 105
D.3 Gt of Patient D at t = 3 106
D.4 Gt of Patient D at t = 4 106
D.5 Gt of Patient D at t = 5 106
D.6 Gt of Patient D at t = 6 107
D.7 Gt of Patient D at t = 7 107
D.8 Gt of Patient D at t = 8 107
D.9 Gt of Patient D at t = 9 108
D.10 Gt of Patient D at t = 10 108
E.1 Gt of Patient E at t = 1 109
E.2 Gt of Patient E at t = 2 109
E.3 Gt of Patient E at t = 3 110
E.4 Gt of Patient E at t = 4 110
E.5 Gt of Patient E at t = 5 110
E.6 Gt of Patient E at t = 6 111
E.7 Gt of Patient E at t = 7 111
E.8 Gt of Patient E at t = 8 111
E.9 Gt of Patient E at t = 9 112
E.10 Gt of Patient E at t = 10 112
F.1 Gt of Patient F at t = 1 113
F.2 Gt of Patient F at t = 2 113
F.3 Gt of Patient F at t = 3 114
F.4 Gt of Patient F at t = 4 114
F.5 Gt of Patient F at t = 5 114
F.6 Gt of Patient F at t = 6 115
F.7 Gt of Patient F at t = 7 115
F.8 Gt of Patient F at t = 8 115
F.9 Gt of Patient F at t = 9 116
F.10 Gt of Patient F at t = 10 116
xiv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
BM – Base Magnetic Plane
dEEG – Digital Electroencephalography
EEG – Electroencephalography
FACS – Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set
FM – Fuzzy Magnetic Field
FTTM – Fuzzy Topographic Topological Mapping
GNU – GNU’s Not Unix!
HUSM – Universiti Sains Malaysia Teaching Hospital
KS – Kolmogorov-Smirnov
MC – Magnetic Contour Plane
MEG – Magnetoencephalography
MLE – Maximum Likelihood Estimate
PDF – Probability Density Function
PMF – Probability Mass Function
SI – Self-information
SPS – School of Postgraduate Studies
SPSS – Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
TM – Topographic Magnetic Field
USM – Universiti Sains Malaysia
UTM – Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
vMF – von Mises-Fisher
xv
LIST OF SYMBOLS
CEEG – Cerebral EEG.
µ – Delia EEG measure.
β – Emulated baseline.
δ – Jitter.
κ – Concentration parameter.
I – Self-information
H – Shannon entropy.
xvi
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX TITLE PAGE
A Electrode Connectivity Graphs of Patient A 93
B Electrode Connectivity Graphs of Patient B 97
C Electrode Connectivity Graphs of Patient C 101
D Electrode Connectivity Graphs of Patient D 105
E Electrode Connectivity Graphs of Patient E 109
F Electrode Connectivity Graphs of Patient F 113
G Source Code 117
H C Program Output 123
I Publications 129
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
In 1968, an electrical engineer named Shun’ichi Amari postulated the use
of geometric tools to supplement existing methods in statistical analysis of real-
world models [1]. Forty years down the road, Amari’s method has bloomed into a
mathematical field of it’s own, now widely known as information geometry. Utilizing
tools that were previously exclusive to differential geometry, it provides new insight
to the extraction and analysis of statistical data, particularly those relating to the
behavior of statistical distributions itself. This research, titled Dynamic Epileptic
Activity Analysis Based On Geometric Structure Of Electroencephalographic Signals
represents an initial foray into the application of said tools to modeling the behavior of
epileptic seizures as viewed from their electroencephalographic signals.
This first chapter aims to acquaint readers with the background knowledge as
to why this project was undertaken. Discussions will cover the related literature that
motivates this project, followed by a formal statement of the issue being tackled. This,
together with a set of well-defined research objectives and their respective limitations
underline the structure of this thesis, right down to the organization of the chapters.
Kicking things off is a short introduction to epilepsy and some prior work that has
been done to address the issue.
1.1 Problem Background
Epilepsy is a chronic disorder of the brain that affects people in every country
of the world. It is characterized by recurrent seizures, which are physical reactions to
sudden, usually brief, excessive electrical discharges in a group of brain cells [2].
Part of understanding the way in which epilepsy affects the brain is the
2
analysis of the aforementioned electrical discharges. These discharges are commonly
monitored using electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetoencephalography (MEG)
apparatus. These machines however, only provide neurologists with simple details
about the seizure, such as the time and duration of the seizure, as well as its magnitude
at the point of detection. Details such as the origin of the electrical discharge and
pattern of propagation through the brain are not obtainable from simply viewing the
EEG or MEG printouts. Consequently, mathematics was introduced as a research
tool to identify, categorize, and predict the pattern in which these electrical discharges
occur.
Years of research have not resulted in marked advancements in interpretation
of EEG/MEG output. Despite being the most cost-efficient method of viewing the
brain’s activity, neurologists are still expected to spend years of training learning to
decipher the brainwave patterns that are shown on said output. Many researchers
chose to embark on the more ambitious project of predicting the occurrence of epileptic
seizures, with varying amounts of success (more on this in Chapter 2).
In 1999, Tahir et. al. developed the Fuzzy Topographic Topological Mapping
(FTTM) technique, which transports EEG/MEG signals to a fuzzified space with
the aim of identifying the location of the epileptic foci, i.e. the points at which a
seizure emanates from [3]. Ten years of research under the FTTM banner has yielded
promising results which further suggest the existence of a pattern to the electrical
discharge propagation of epileptic seizures [4]. This study, although it does not
specifically employ the FTTM algorithm, is part of the FTTM project, and represents
the next stage of the group’s research into epileptic seizures.
1.2 Research Hypothesis
The problem addressed by this research is the construction and analysis of a
geometric model for the electrical potential data of EEG signals obtained during an
epileptic seizure. Simply put, the research seeks to answer the following question:
”Can the electrical potential data of EEG signals obtained during an
epileptic seizure be embedded in some geometrical space?”
3
1.3 Research Objectives
The objectives of this research are as follows:
1. Construct a manifold to model the electrical potential data sampled from EEG
data of an epileptic seizure
2. Employ elements of information geometry to identify the existence of a
governing pattern for epileptic seizures
3. Validate the progression of an epileptic seizure as a mathematical graph
1.4 Limitations
The limitations of this research is as follows:
1. To construct a generalized manifold that can be used to compare the EEG signals
of three epileptic seizures of varying length and category
2. To analyse the distribution of data points of the EEG signals on the manifold,
resulting in a statistical distribution that describes the progression of epileptic
seizures
3. To provide physical interpretation of the results obtained
1.5 Research Significance
The results of this research are crucial to further understanding the dynamics
of epileptic seizures. As opposed to the FTTM algorithm, the data structure developed
in this research does away with fuzzification of the raw data, resulting in a more
natural model. This research also bridges the gap between the FTTM and Fuzzy Auto-
Catalytic Set (FACS) projects.
Essentially, this research has one main focus: to try and provide a geometric
view of EEG signals of epileptic seizures. It is hoped that this geometric view will
reveal some visible pattern to the distribution of EEG signals during epileptic seizures,
further corroborating existing proof of seizures being deterministic.
4
1.6 Dissertation Organization
The organization of this thesis is somewhat different compared to the general
”template” that UTM adheres to as it has been tailored to best represent the work done
in this research. Rest assured, it still conforms to the guidelines set by the School of
Postgraduate Studies (SPS). In total, there are eight chapters to this thesis, namely:
1. Chapter 1: Introduction
2. Chapter 2: Literature Review
3. Chapter 3: Research Methodology
4. Chapter 4: Measuring EEG Signals of Epileptic Seizures
5. Chapter 5: Manifold Construction
6. Chapter 6: The vMF Distribution of Epileptic Seizures
7. Chapter 7: Visualization of Epileptic Seizures via Graph Theory
8. Chapter 8: Conclusion & Discussion
The organization of the chapters are such that they remain concise, with
minimal overlap. Some additional chapters were included as part of the research being
extended from a period of three years to five. Figure 1.1 illustrates the dependencies
of one chapter on another.
Now that the project has been formally introduced, the next chapter will
proceed to acquaint readers with the pre-requisite literary background of the project.
5
Chapter 1
Introduction
Chapter 2
Literature Review
Chapter 3
Research Methodology
Chapter 4
Measuring EEG Signals of Epileptic
Seizures
Chapter 5
Manifold Construction
Chapter 7
Visualization of Epileptic Seizures via
Graphs
Chapter 6
The vMF Distribution of Epileptic
Seizures
Chapter 8
Conclusion & Discussion
Figure 1.1: Chapter dependencies for this thesis.
REFERENCES
1. Amari, S. Theory of Information Spaces - A Geometrical Foundation of the
Analysis of Communication Sytems. RAAG Memoirs. 1968, vol. 4. 373–418.
2. WHO. Epilepsy Factsheet, 2009. URL http://www.who.int/
mediacentre/factsheets/fs999/en/index.html.
3. Ahmad, T., Ahmad, R., F., Z. and Yun, L. Development of Detection Model
for Neuromagnetic Fields. Proc. BIOMED 2000. Univ. Malaya. 2000. 119 –
121.
4. Ahmad, T., Ahmad, R. S., Rahman, W. E. Z. W. A., Yun, L. L. and Zakaria,
F. Fuzzy topographic topological mapping for localisation simulated multiple
current sources of MEG. J. Interdiscip. Math., 2008. 11: 381–393.
5. Philips, H. Introduction: The Human Brain. Online,
2006. URL http://www.newscientist.com/article/
dn9969-introduction-the-human-brain.html?full=true.
6. Parent, A. and Carpenter, M. Carpenter’s Human Neuroanatomy. Williams &
Wilkins. 1996. ISBN 9780683067521.
7. Sanei, S. and Chambers, J. EEG Signal Processing. John Wiley & Sons. 2007.
ISBN 9780470025819.
8. Kandel, E., Schwartz, J. and Jessell, T. Principles of Neural Science. McGraw-
Hill, Health Professions Division. 2000. ISBN 9780838577011.
9. Hamalainen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R. J., Knuutila, J. and Lounasmaa,
O. V. Magnetoencephalography: Theory, Instrumentation, and Applications
to Noninvasive Studies of the Working Human Brain. Rev. Mod. Phys., 1993.
65: 413–497. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.65.413.
10. Zakaria, F. Dynamic Profiling Of EEG Data During Seizure Using Fuzzy
Information Space. Ph.D. Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 2008.
11. URL https://www.prismbrainmapping.com/science.aspx.
12. Upledger, J. A Brain Is Born: Exploring the Birth and Development of the
Central Nervous System. North Atlantic Books. 1996. ISBN 9781556432361.
85
13. URL http://www.nia.nih.gov/Alzheimers/Publications/
UnravelingtheMystery/.
14. Silverthorn, D. Human Physiology: An Integrated Approach. Pearson
Education. 2012. ISBN 9780321750075.
15. Scambler, G. Epilepsy. Experience of illness. Tavistock/Routledge. 1989.
ISBN 9780415017572.
16. Gastaut, H. Clinical and Electroencephalographical Classification of Epileptic
Seizures. Epilepsia, 1970: 102–113.
17. Ahmad, T., Fairuz, R., Zakaria, F. and Isa, H. Selection of a Subset of
EEG Channels of Epileptic Patient During Seizure Using PCA. Proceedings
of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Signal Processing, Robotics
and Automation. Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA: World Scientific and
Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS). 2008. ISBN 978-960-6766-
44-2. 270–273.
18. Proposal for Revised Clinical and Electroencephalographic Classification of
Epileptic Seizures. Epilepsia, 1981. 22(4): 489–501. ISSN 1528-1167. doi:
10.1111/j.1528-1157.1981.tb06159.x.
19. Berg, A. T., Berkovic, S. F., Brodie, M. J., Buchhalter, J., Cross, J. H.,
Van Emde Boas, W., Engel, J., French, J., Glauser, T. A., Mathern,
G. W., Mosh, S. L., Nordli, D., Plouin, P. and Scheffer, I. E. Revised
terminology and concepts for organization of seizures and epilepsies: Report
of the ILAE Commission on Classification and Terminology, 20052009.
Epilepsia, 2010. 51(4): 676–685. ISSN 1528-1167. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.
2010.02522.x. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.
2010.02522.x.
20. Niedermeyer, E. and Silva, F. Electroencephalography: Basic Principles,
Clinical Applications, and Related Fields. M - Medicine Series. Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins. 2005. ISBN 9780781751261.
21. URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Electroencephalography.
22. Berger, H. ber das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen. European Archives
of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 1933. 99: 555–574. ISSN 0940-
1334. 10.1007/BF01814320.
23. Koles, Z. J. Trends in EEG source localization. Electroencephalography and
Clinical Neurophysiology, 1998. 106(2): 127 – 137. ISSN 0013-4694. doi:
10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00115-6.
86
24. Jasper, H. The Ten-Twenty Electrode System of the International Federation.
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1958. 10(2): 371–
375.
25. Malmivuo, J. and Plonsey, R. Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and
Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields. Oxford University Press.
1995. ISBN 9780195058239.
26. Sharbrough, F., Chatrian, G. E., Lesser, R. P., Lders, H., Nuwer, M. and Picton,
T. W. American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines for Standard
Electrode Position Nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 1991.
8(2): 200–202.
27. Sharbrough, F., Chatrian, G., Lesser, R. P., Lders, H., Nuwer, M. and Picton,
T. W. Guideline 5: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature.
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2006. 46(3): 222–225.
28. Lehnertz, W. G. A. R. A. J. E. C., K. Is it possible to anticipate seizure onset by
non-linear analysis of intracerebral EEG in human partial epilepsies? Revue
Neurologique, 1999. 155(6-7): 454–456. Cited By (since 1996) 21.
29. Ahmad, T., Zakaria, F., Abdullah, J. and Mustapha, F. Dynamical system of an
epileptic seizure. Sensors and the International Conference on new Techniques
in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Research, 2005 Asian Conference on.
2005. 78–80. doi:10.1109/ASENSE.2005.1564510.
30. Babloyantz, A. and Destexhe, A. Low-Dimensional Chaos in an Instance of
Epilepsy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1986. 83(10):
3513–3517. doi:10.1073/pnas.83.10.3513.
31. Stam, C. Nonlinear Dynamical Analysis of EEG and MEG: Review of an
Emerging Field. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2005. 116(10): 2266 – 2301. ISSN
1388-2457. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.06.011.
32. Iasemidis, L., S.J., C., Zaveri, H. and Williams, W. Phase Space Topography
and the Lyapunov Exponent of Electrocorticograms in Partial Seizures. Brain
Topography, 1990. 2: 187–201. ISSN 0896-0267. 10.1007/BF01140588.
33. Frank, G., Lookman, T., Nerenberg, M., Essex, C., Lemieux, J. and Blume,
W. Chaotic Time Series Analyses of Epileptic Seizures. Physica D:
Nonlinear Phenomena, 1990. 46(3): 427 – 438. ISSN 0167-2789. doi:
10.1016/0167-2789(90)90103-V.
34. Theiler, J. On the Evidence for Low-Dimensional Chaos in an Epileptic
Electroencephalogram. Physics Letters A, 1995. 196(5-6): 335 – 341. ISSN
0375-9601. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(94)00856-K.
87
35. Schiff, N., Victor, J., Canel, A. and Labar, D. Characteristic Nonlinearities
of the 3/s Ictal Electroencephalogram Identified by Nonlinear Autoregressive
Analysis. Biological Cybernetics, 1995. 72: 519–526. ISSN 0340-1200.
10.1007/BF00199894.
36. Friedrich, R. and Uhl, C. Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Human
Electroencephalograms: Petit-Mal Epilepsy. Phys. D, 1996. 98: 171–182.
ISSN 0167-2789. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(96)00059-0.
37. Hernndez, J., Valds, P. and Vila, P. EEG Spike and Wave Modelled by a
Stochastic Limit Cycle. NeuroReport, 1996. 7(13): 2246–2250.
38. Le Van Quyen, M., Martinerie, J., Adam, C. and Varela, F. J. Unstable Periodic
Orbits in Human Epileptic Activity. Phys. Rev. E, 1997. 56: 3401–3411. doi:
10.1103/PhysRevE.56.3401.
39. Feucht, M., Mller, U., Witte, H., Schmidt, K., Arnold, M., Benninger, F.,
Steinberger, K. and Friedrich, M. Nonlinear Dynamics of 3 Hz Spike-and-
Wave Discharges Recorded During Typical Absence Seizures in Children.
Cerebral Cortex, 1998. 8(6): 524–533. doi:10.1093/cercor/8.6.524.
40. Peters, T., Bhavaraju, N., Frei, M. and Osorio, I. Network System for
Automated Seizure Detection and Contingent Delivery of Therapy. Journal
of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2001. 18(6): 545–549.
41. Elger, C. E. and Lehnertz, K. Seizure Prediction by Non-linear Time Series
Analysis of Brain Electrical Activity. European Journal of Neuroscience,
1998. 10(2): 786–789. ISSN 1460-9568. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.
00090.x.
42. Martinerie, J., Adam, C., Le van Quyen, M., Baulac, M., Clemenceau, S.,
Renault, B. and Varela, F. Epileptic Seizures Can Be Anticipated by Nonlinear
Analysis. Nat Med, 1998. 4: 11731176.
43. Moser, H., Weber, B., Wieser, H. and Meier, P. Electroencephalograms in
Epilepsy: Analysis and Seizure Prediction Within the Framework of Lyapunov
Theory. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 1999. 130(3-4): 291 – 305. ISSN
0167-2789. doi:10.1016/S0167-2789(99)00043-3.
44. Osorio, I., Harrison, M. A., Lai, Y. C. and Frei, M. G. Observations on
the Application of the Correlation Dimension and Correlation Integral to the
Prediction of Seizures. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2001. 18(3):
269–274.
45. Kalitzin, S., Parra, J., Velis, D. and Lopes da Silva, F. Enhancement of Phase
Clustering in the EEG/MEG Gamma Frequency Band Anticipates Transitions
88
to Paroxysmal Epileptiform Activity in Epileptic Patients with Known Visual
Sensitivity. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 2002. 49(11):
1279 –1286. ISSN 0018-9294. doi:10.1109/TBME.2002.804593.
46. van Drongelen, W., Nayak, S., Frim, D. M., Kohrman, M. H., Towle, V. L.,
Lee, H. C., McGee, A. B., Chico, M. S. and Hecox, K. E. Seizure Anticipation
in Pediatric Epilepsy: Use of Kolmogorov Entropy. Pediatric Neurology, 2003.
29(3): 207 – 213. ISSN 0887-8994. doi:10.1016/S0887-8994(03)00145-0.
47. McSharry, P., He, T., Smith, L. and Tarassenko, L. Linear and Non-linear
Methods for Automatic Seizure Detection in Scalp Electro-encephalogram
Recordings. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 2002. 40:
447–461. ISSN 0140-0118. 10.1007/BF02345078.
48. Kugiumtzis, D. and Larsson, P. G. Prediction Of Epileptic Seizures With
Linear And Nonlinear Analysis Of EEG. Lehnertz, K. and C.E., E., eds. Chaos
In Brain?: Proceedings of the Workshop. World Scientific. 1999. 329–332.
49. Jerger, K. K., Netoff, T. I., Francis, J. T., Sauer, T., Pecora, L., Weinstein, S. L.
and Schiff, S. J. Early Seizure Detection. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology,
2001. 18: 259–268.
50. Baillet, S. and Garnero, L. A Bayesian Approach to Introducing Anatomo-
Functional Priors in the EEG/MEG Inverse Problem. Biomedical Engineering,
IEEE Transactions on, 1997. 44(5): 374 –385. ISSN 0018-9294. doi:10.1109/
10.568913.
51. Stevens, J. Electroencephalographic Studies of Conditional Cerebral Response
in Epileptic Subjects. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology,
1960. 12(2): 431 – 444. ISSN 0013-4694. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(60)
90019-5.
52. Faust, O., Acharya, R., Allen, A. and Lin, C. Analysis of EEG Signals During
Epileptic and Alcoholic States Using AR Modeling Techniques. IRBM, 2008.
29(1): 44 – 52. ISSN 1959-0318. doi:10.1016/j.rbmret.2007.11.003.
53. Sivasankari, N. and Thanushkodi, K. Automated Epileptic Seizure Detection
in EEG Signals Using Fast ICA and Neural Networks. Int. J. Advance. Soft
Comput. Appl., 2009. 1, Issue 2.
54. Zakaria, F. Algoritma Penyelesaian Masalah Songsang Arus Tunggal Tak
Terbatas MEG. Master’s Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 2002.
55. Ahmad, N. Theoretical Foundation for Digital Space of Flat Electroen-
cephalogram. Ph.D. Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 2009.
89
56. Idris, A., Ahmad, T. and Maan, N. A Novel Technique for Visualization
Electrical Activities in the Brain During Epileptic Seizure. International
Conference on Applied Mathematics and Informatics - Proceedings. 2010.
94–99.
57. Idris, A. Construction of Homeomorphism between Generalized Sphere and
Cube. Simposium Kebangsaan Sains Matematik ke-16. PERSAMA. 2008,
vol. 2.
58. Amari, S., Nagaoka, H. and Harada, D. Methods of Information Geometry.
Translations of Mathematical Monographs. American Mathematical Society.
2007. ISBN 9780821843024.
59. Jeffreys, H. An Invariant Form for the Prior Probability in Estimation
Problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical
and Physical Sciences, 1946. 186(1007): pp. 453–461. ISSN 00804630. URL
http://www.jstor.org/stable/97883.
60. James, A. The Variance Information Manifold and Functions on It.
Multivariate Analysis, 1973: 157–169.
61. Atkinson, C. and Mitchell, A. F. S. Rao’s Distance Measure. Sankhya: The
Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A (1961-2002), 1981. 43(3): pp. 345–365.
ISSN 0581572X.
62. Kass, R. The Riemannian structure of model spaces: A geometrical approach
to inference. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Chicago. 1980.
63. Skovgaard, L. T. A Riemannian Geometry of the Multivariate Normal
Model. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 1984. 11(4): pp. 211–223. ISSN
03036898.
64. Chentsov, N. Statistical Decision Rules and Optimal Inference. Translations
of Mathematical Monographs. American Mathematical Society. 1982. ISBN
9780821813478.
65. Efron, B. Defining the Curvature of a Statistical Problem (with Applications
to Second Order Efficiency). The Annals of Statistics, 1975. 3(6): pp. 1189–
1242. ISSN 00905364.
66. Dawid, A. Discussion to Efron’s Paper. Ann. Statist,, 1975. 3: 1231–1234.
67. Carter, K. M. Dimensionality Reduction on Statistical Manifolds. Ph.D.
Thesis. University of Michigan. 2009. URL http://web.eecs.umich.
edu/˜hero/Preprints/carter_thesis08.pdf.
68. Franks, J. Terse Introduction to Lebesgue Integration. Student mathematical
90
library. American Mathematical Society. 2009. ISBN 9780821848623.
69. Berberian, S. Measure and Integration. AMS Chelsea Publishing Series. Amer
Mathematical Society. 2011. ISBN 9780821853283.
70. Roussas, G. An Introduction to Measure-Theoretic Probability. Elsevier
Academic Press. 2005. ISBN 9780125990226.
71. Ewens, W. and Grant, G. Statistical methods in bioinformatics: an
introduction. No. v. 10 in Statistics for biology and health. Springer. 2005.
ISBN 9780387400822.
72. Stewart, W. Probability, Markov Chains, Queues, and Simulation: The
Mathematical Basis of Performance Modeling. Princeton University Press.
2009. ISBN 9781400832811. URL https://books.google.com.my/
books?id=ZfRyBS1WbAQC.
73. Taghizadegan, S. Essentials of Lean Six Sigma. Elsevier Science. 2010. ISBN
9780080462325. URL https://books.google.com.my/books?
id=9VvWkLgiH0kC.
74. Spanos, A. Probability Theory and Statistical Inference: Econometric
Modeling with Observational Data. Cambridge University Press. 1999. ISBN
9780521424080. URL https://books.google.com.my/books?
id=G0\_HxBubGAwC.
75. Altiok, T. and Melamed, B. Simulation Modeling and Analysis with ARENA.
Elsevier Science. 2010. ISBN 9780080548951. URL https://books.
google.com.my/books?id=5SezxR5q4mYC.
76. Banerjee, A., Dhillon, I., Ghosh, J. and Sra, S. Clustering on the Unit
Hypersphere Using von Mises-Fisher Distributions. J. Mach. Learn. Res.,
2005. 6: 1345–1382. ISSN 1532-4435.
77. Lipschutz, S. Schaum’s Outline of General Topology. Serie Schaum. McGraw-
Hill. 1988. ISBN 9780070379886.
78. Lee, J. Introduction to Topological Manifolds. Graduate texts in mathematics.
Springer. 2011. ISBN 9781441979391.
79. Eidelman, Y., Milman, V. and Tsolomitis, A. Functional Analysis: An
Introduction. Graduate studies in mathematics. American Mathematical
Society. 2004. ISBN 9780821836460.
80. Zakon, E., Lucier, B. and Zakon, T. Mathematical Analysis. The Zakon Series
on Mathematical Analysis. Trillia Group, The. 2004. ISBN 9781931705028.
81. Dold, A. Lectures on algebraic topology. Classics in mathematics. Springer.
91
1995. ISBN 9783540586609.
82. Dasgupta, S. and Gupta, A. An elementary proof of a theorem of Johnson
and Lindenstrauss. Random Structures & Algorithms, 2003. 22(1): 60–65.
ISSN 1098-2418. doi:10.1002/rsa.10073. URL http://dx.doi.org/
10.1002/rsa.10073.
83. Balakrishnan, R. and Ranganathan, K. A Textbook of Graph Theory.
Universitext (Berlin. Print). Springer New York. 2012. ISBN
9781461445289. URL https://books.google.com.my/books?
id=HS9iDhAuFuUC.
84. Deo, N. Graph Theory with Applications to Engineering and Computer
Science. Prentice-Hall series in automatic computation. Prentice-Hall of India.
2004. ISBN 9788120301450. URL https://books.google.com.my/
books?id=Yr2pJA950iAC.
85. Biswal, P. Discrete Mathematics and Graph Theory. Eastern economy
edition. Prentice-Hall of India. 2006. ISBN 9788120327214. URL https:
//books.google.com.my/books?id=hLX6OG1U5W8C.
86. Gossett, E. Discrete Mathematics with Proof. Wiley. 2009. ISBN
9780470457931. URL https://books.google.com.my/books?
id=NuFeW8N2hlkC.
87. Cormen, T., Leiserson, C., Rivest, R. and Stein, C. Introduction To Algorithms.
MIT Press. 2001. ISBN 9780262032933. URL https://books.
google.com.my/books?id=NLngYyWFl\_YC.
88. Zhong, N., Li, K., Lu, S. and Chen, L. Brain Informatics: International
Conference, BI 2009, Beijing, China, October 22-24, Proceedings.
LNCS sublibrary: Artificial intelligence. Springer. 2009. ISBN
9783642049538. URL https://books.google.com.my/books?
id=lJNFQS4Q\_k4C.
89. Blue, M., Bush, B. and Puckett, J. Unified Approach to Fuzzy Graph
Problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 2002. 125(3): 355–368. ISSN 0165-0114.
doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(01)00011-2. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.
1016/S0165-0114(01)00011-2.
90. Douglas, J. W. B. A Neuropsychiatric Study In Childhood By Michael
Rutter, Philip Graham and William Yule, Clinics in Developmental Medicine,
Volume 35/36. (Pp. 272; illustrated; 375.) Heinemann Medical Books:
London. 1970. Psychological Medicine, 1971. 1(05): 437–439. doi:10.1017/
S0033291700044834.
92
91. McDermott, S., Mani, S. and Krishnawami, S. A population-based analysis
of specific behavior problems associated with childhood seizures. Journal
of Epilepsy, 1995. 8(2): 110 – 118. ISSN 0896-6974. doi:10.1016/
0896-6974(95)00019-A.
92. Surhone, L., Tennoe, M. and Henssonow, S. Premotor Cortex. VDM Verlag
Dr. Mueller AG & Co. Kg. 2010. ISBN 9786133066731.
93. Bahlmann, C. Directional Features in Online Handwriting Recognition.
Pattern Recogn., 2006. 39: 115–125. ISSN 0031-3203. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.
2005.05.012.
94. Smith, P. An Introduction to Godel’s Theorems. Cambridge Introductions to
Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. 2013. ISBN 9781107022843. URL
https://books.google.com.my/books?id=-SBpYKebkJMC.
95. Baluja, S. and Caruana, R. Removing the Genetics from the Standard Genetic
Algorithm. Technical report. Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 1995.