dr. jennifer schwartz poehlmann senior lecturer and
TRANSCRIPT
Through our studies with IR&DS, a comparison of students
who have completed at least 1 companion course over the
past 4 years (F2010-F2014) with students who were invited
to participate but declined – i.e. the ‘control group’ – was
possible. We have confirmed:
1) Success in Targeting At-Risk students:
• large portion of
URM
• 73% women
• 34% first gen
• Low Math SAT
• 98% never had
access to AP chem
2) Student grades trend upwards with progression
through the companion sequence
3) Student’s in companion course are more likely to
persist in science courses
• Companion course student are twice as likely to take
advanced biology or chemistry
• Most popular majors were HumBio, Bio and
Computer Science.
4) Student feedback is overwhelmingly positive
• “Having us work in groups helps us to see things in
different perspectives, I really enjoyed it.”
• “I liked that we got to make up our own questions. I
think it helped us think outside the box.”
• “The assignments were all really helpful to practice.
Even the parallel problems, which could be burdensome
but always ended up in me understanding the material
much better because we had to think a lot about how the
processes worked.”
• “This is an AMAZING class. Really made me appreciate
chemistry.”
Acknowledgements
Create your own Parallel Problem!
Pick a question (or topic) that you found challenging in this last unit and
compose a detailed step-by-step explanation of the solution
Pick a different parameter in the question that you could solve for, instead of
what was originally asked.
What information do you need in order to solve this? Alter at least some or
all of the other numbers that will be given or change the reaction.
Write a step by step solution for your problem. Did you need to make any
assumptions or use any other data that had not been given?
Leveling the Playing Field in Large Lecture CoursesDr. Jennifer Schwartz Poehlmann
Senior Lecturer and Introductory Course Coordinator in Chemistry
• The Companion Course Series is supported through
the School of H & S, VPUE, and the Department of
Chemistry at Stanford
• Data compilation and analysis was done in
collaboration with Heeju Jang from Stanford’s
Institutional Research and Decision Support.
• Academic Skills inventory was constructed together
with Adina Glickman in VPTL.
• Many thanks as well to all of our advanced Chem30-
series TA’s who have assisted in the teaching of the
companion courses!
The Challenge in Large Introductory Courses
Exam and Study Strategy Reflection
Student written Parallel Problems
Structured Group Work
Transferrable Teaching Practices Program Assessment
Post-Exam Reflection ExerciseWhat steps did I take to study for this last exam? Were any steps different
from the first exam?
In what areas of the exam did I feel most confident? What study strategies helped to prepare me for these areas?
In what areas of the exam did I most struggle? (was it not understanding a certain topic? not interpreting the question correctly? stuck on starting a question? time?)
How did I address that area in my studying before the exam? How could I change the way I approached or studied for that area?
What new strategy will I incorporate into my study plan for the next exam? How will I make time to incorporate this new strategy?
As broader and more inclusive groups of students are being admitted
to Stanford, a growing number, often from underrepresented
minorities or first generation, have found that they are at a significant
disadvantage when taking large introductory courses here at the
University. While they possess the same strong potential, these
students have not had access to the same opportunities that set other
students ahead of the curve. Without support, these students are at
high risk of leaving the sciences.
A Companion Course in Chemistry
Chemistry is a gateway course to many disciplines, thus it is critical to
ensure that it does not become a barrier to further exploration in the
sciences. To help level the playing field, we began offering a
companion series to accompany each course in the year-long
introductory sequence (Chem31A, Chem31B, Chem33) for under-
resourced students with an interest in STEM during Fall 2010.
Key features of the course include:
1 unit, course for credit/NC based on attendance
Taught Tues/Thurs between MWF course lectures to ensure
daily practice with chemistry
Close coupling with parent course content
Enrollment contingent upon instructor permission to reserve
space for students most in need of the additional support
Size limited to 45 students with instructor + experienced TA
The Companion Courses focus on helping students build better study skills, practice problem solving strategies, and
better utilize study groups both in and out of the classroom. Ultimately, our goal is for students to ‘learn how to learn’
and gain confidence in their ability to problem solve so that they are able to persevere in the face of any new
challenges that may lie ahead.
QUEST:
Questions Exploring Scientific Thinking
Student Invite and Application Process
Student Resources in Chem31A, 31B, & 33
Chem31A Chem33Chem31B
Students take an online survey in fall to self assess:
- Study skills - Resilience - Motivation
- Chemistry knowledge / confidence
Highest risk students are invited to apply for Chem31A-C
In later quarters, personal invitations are based on student
performance in previous course and advisor recommendations.
Comparison of parent course grade averages (blue) with that
of the companion course students (red) versus the control
group (black) in Chem31A, Chem31B and 33 over AY10-14.
37
100
74
110
5059
124
101
62
26
agree somewhat agree neutral somewhatdisagree
disagree
Perceptions from High School Chem
High School Chemistry was challenging for me
Chemistry at my school relied heavily on memorization
75
150
96
47
4
53
137
106
66
9
agree somewhat agree neutral somewhatdisagree
disagree
Self reported lecture study strategiesI make a point of preparing for lecture by reviewing notes,thinking of questions, etc.I always review my notes after lecture and make sure to findanswers to any points that don't make sense.
Student Example: Harry Potter, in an attempt to pass hisPotions O.W.L has to make a 1.0 L elixir of Alvin. Hethrows in an unmeasured amount of acidic newt tails(NT) into some mermaid tears (H2O). He discovers thathis solution has a pH of 5.7. What is the concentration ofnewt tails that Harry added?
NT + H2O H30+ + A- Ka = 1.89 * 10-4
Students often need guidance in learning
to use study groups effectively. Build
concrete opportunities into your class to
help facilitate student discussion.
Find a learning
space conducive
to group work
Think-Pair-Share
• Create short ‘sets’ of multiple choice
or short answer questions
• Have students first work the full set
by themselves
• Once finished, each student takes a
turn explaining one problem
Give students a common space
within which to work – a chalk
board space, huddle board, giant
post-it, etc.
If a person consumes
2000kcal/day, how much power
does it take to run a human?
If commercial jet fuel contains 3.5*107J/L of
energy, and it requires 1.8*106 watts to
power the jet, what mass of fuel is required
for a 6.0 hour flight across the country?
Take-away skills, definitions, or relationships:• Power is measured in watts, 1 watt = 1 J /sec
• Energy/time = power Or Power*time = energy (in joules)
The QuEST for Fuel Efficiency
Imagine you are a policy maker at the US Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA). According to Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
recommendations, in order to have the best chance to avoid catastrophic
warming exceeding 2°C above preindustrial levels, the US (and other
countries) would need to cut CO2 emissions back to 1990 levels by 2020
and to 80% of 1990 levels by 2050.
What minimum fuel efficiency in vehicles (in mpg) would you recommend
setting a target for, in order for the US to reach this 2020 goal?
Briefly discuss how realistic your answer is. Is it feasible to meet this goal
simply by improving vehicle efficiency?
Students apply key course concepts to
real world challenges and applications
Lead student reflection and group discussion after
each exam to reinforce growth mindset in both
content knowledge and study skills.
After assignment is completed, students
discuss results within groups to:
• Compare and defend sources and statistics that were used
in their calculations
• Justify approximations or estimations made to complete
their calculation
• Defend their conclusion based on their accumulated data
Effective time management and prioritizing
practice with material are top concerns
103
136
93
30
10
agree somewhat agree neutral somewhat disagree disagree
I study best when I'm alone
Generate group concept maps and
present their work to the class
Documented Problem Solving
Design ‘Parallel Problem’; groups
can then exchange problems