Qualitative and Quantitative Criterions of Performance

Evaluation within Process of Military Professionals

Training: Case of Defence

University in Brno

Dr. Aleš OLEJNÍČEKUNIVERSITY OF DEFENCE

Kounicova 65Brno

CZECH REPUBLIC

CONTENT• INTRODUCTION• EXPRESSION AND EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE

UNDER DEFENSE CONDITIONS • CONNECTION BETWEEN PERFORMANCE QUALITY

AND QUANTITY AND EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ORGANIZATION IN DEFENSE SECTOR

• PERFOMANCE QUALITY AND QUANTITY EVALUATION IN THE UNIVERSITY OF DEFENCE IN BRNO

• CONCLUSION

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION• The performance evaluation of public sector

organizations is one of the great challenges to the theory and practice of public economics

• The performance measurement in:o Private sector

• measured by rate of rate of consumer successfulness,• expressed via business profit.

o Public sector • benefit expression do not rest with consumer, • usefulness expressed by provider organization itself,• expression of mission, goals, functions and primarily organization

performance is prerequisite of its rational operation.• The seeking and determination of qualitative and

quantitative criterions of defense organization performance is highly required.

EXPRESSION AND EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE

UNDER DEFENSE CONDITIONS

EXPRESSION AND EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE UNDER

DEFENSE CONDITIONS • Inputs - tangible• Outputs - intangible• Evaluation of outputs and performance of the army units,

military organizations or different parts of defense sector is possible by force of 3E methodology.

• We are able gain the information about level of productivity by way of simultaneous comparison of these quantities (outputs x inputs).

• Accurate expressed and measurable performance is crucial for resource allocation

• For increasing productivity is necessary to determine unambiguous performance standards and qualitative aims.

EXPRESSION AND EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE UNDER

DEFENSE CONDITIONS

EXPRESSION AND EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE UNDER DEFENSE

CONDITIONS

CONNECTION BETWEEN PERFORMANCE QUALITY AND QUANTITY AND EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ORGANIZATION IN DEFENSE

SECTOR

CONNECTION BETWEEN PERFORMANCE QUALITY AND

QUANTITY AND EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS

• The performance of organizations should be evaluated by quantitative and qualitative criterions that can be objectively planed and consequently checked on the basis of considered activity real results.

• The most suitable indicator for process inputs evaluating is possible to consider the costs.

• We can state the presumption from experiences that value (price) of the output could be assess on the same costs level like costs sum of each separate inputs.

• Added value should be appear as the output quality that is possible to express by evaluated way, e.g. by way of parametrically established indicator.

CONNECTION BETWEEN PERFORMANCE QUALITY AND

QUANTITY AND EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS

PERFORMANCE QUALITY AND QUANTITY

EVALUATION IN THE UNIVERSITY OF

DEFENCE IN BRNO

PROCEDURAL MODEL OF UNIVERSITY OF DEFENCE

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION WITHIN PROCEDURAL MODEL OF

DEFENCE UNIVERSITY

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION WITHIN PROCEDURAL MODEL OF

DEFENCE UNIVERSITY

THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING WITHIN PROCEDURAL MODEL OF DEFENCE

UNIVERSITYINDICATORS• Indicator of real value of evaluation point VEP

• VEP is calculated on the basis of total costs and total number of the evaluation points for study, pedagogical and scientific-research activity.

• Indicator of Effectiveness IE

• IE is indicator of departmental activities effectiveness” with huge explanatory power. We can create it with the assistance of reciprocal relationship to previous indicator VEP.

THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING WITHIN PROCEDURAL MODEL OF DEFENCE

UNIVERSITY

CONCLUSION

CONCLUSION• Presented model of the evaluation

performance of the economic effectiveness development can be used for planning purpose within determination of the planned process effectiveness within condition of armed forces or defence department as a whole.

• Example of performance evaluation both quantitative side and qualitative side shows potentiality to overcame an impossibility or big difficulty of direct financial pricing of armed forces performance.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!