Transcript
Page 1: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Two Lift Paving

Contractors Perspective

Two Lift Paving Workshop

Austin, Texas

May 23, 2013

Tim Gerhardt

Koss Construction Company

Page 2: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Overview

• Concept

• Planning

• Scheduling

– Delays– Delays

• Test Section

– Lessons Learned

• I-70 Paving

Page 3: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Concept

• European Scan Tour

– KDOT Representative

• Market Need

– Air Void Problems– Air Void Problems

– Aggregate Quality of local market

– Extended Pavement Life

• Appropriate Project / Location

• Exposed Aggregate Surface

Page 4: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Concept – Market Need

Page 5: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Concept - Project

• I-70 in Saline County, Kansas

– 2 year pavement reconstruction project

• WBL in 2007

• EBL in 2008• EBL in 2008

– Rest Area on each side

• Ideal for test sections

– Revised Typical Section Required 24’ Paving

• Uniform Shoulders on Variable Granular Base

Page 6: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Planning

• Preliminary Discussion

– April 2007 – Manhattan, KS

• KDOT, FHWA, CP Tech Center, KSU, Koss

• Highways for Life

• Workshop • Workshop

– June 2007 – Abilene, KS

• Dr. Hermann Sommer (Austrian Engineer)

• CP Tech Center

• Dr. Rob Rasmussen

Page 7: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Planning

• Mix Designs

– Stiffness of Bottom Lift

– Durability of Top Lift

• Equipment and Logistics

– Delivery and placement of bottom lift – Delivery and placement of bottom lift

• Stiffness

• Haul Road v. Front of Paver

– Delivery and placement of top lift

• Minimize deformation of bottom lift

– Production and Delivery of Two Mixes

Page 8: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Planning

• Test Section

– Expectations

– Location

– Complexity– Complexity

Page 9: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Scheduling

• Test Section

– Late Summer / Fall 2007

• 2007 Season – Extremely Wet

– Paving Crew Unavailable

– Spring 2008

• More economical to re-schedule to location where a paving • More economical to re-schedule to location where a paving crew was already working

– US-69 Side Road

» Minimal risk

» District IV

• 2008 Season – Extremely Wet

– Paving completed in June 2008

Page 10: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Test Section

Page 11: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Test Section

Page 12: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Test Section

Page 13: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Test Section

Page 14: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Test Section

Page 15: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Test Section

Page 16: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

I-70

• Plant

– Dual Drum

– Two Silos

• Split• Split

– Aggregate Bins

• Four

Page 17: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

I-70

• Delivery

– Product from either drum

– Truck could delivery either

– Color Coded Cards– Color Coded Cards

Page 18: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

I-70

• Delivery

Page 19: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

I-70

• Placement

– Haul Road

– Spreaders

Page 20: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

I-70

• Placement

– Top Lift

• Distance

Page 21: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

I-70

Page 22: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

I-70

Page 23: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

I-70

Page 24: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

I-70

Page 25: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

I-70

Page 26: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints
Page 27: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints
Page 28: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Jointing

Page 29: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Jointing

Page 30: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Jointing

Page 31: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Results

250

300

350

400

Total Length

Top Length

0

50

100

150

200

Millim

ete

rs

Top Length

4 per. Mov. Avg. (Top Length)

Page 32: Two-Lift Paving - Contractor's Viewpoints

Conclusion

• Practical Application

• Limited Production Impact

• Economical

– Economize bottom lift– Economize bottom lift

– Extended Pavement Life

• No Problem

• Team Effort


Top Related