Download - South Carolina Power Point (2)
![Page 1: South Carolina Power Point (2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022073101/5525ff774a795998488b4cdc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
South Carolina
ACTAAmerican Council ofTrustees and Alumni
![Page 2: South Carolina Power Point (2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022073101/5525ff774a795998488b4cdc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
National Trends Public Research Universities, 1993-2007
Tuition (inflation adjusted) up 79.4%
Enrollment up 14.6%
Administrative spending up 36.9%
Instructional spending up 26.4%(Jay Greene, “Administrative Bloat at American Universities, Goldwater Institute, nr. 239 (August 17, 2010)
![Page 3: South Carolina Power Point (2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022073101/5525ff774a795998488b4cdc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Trends in UndergraduateTuition & Fees
Clemson Universi
ty
Coastal C
arolin
a University
College of C
harlesto
n
Francis M
arion Universi
ty
Lander U
niversity
S. Caro
lina State Universi
ty
The Citadel
USC - Aiken
USC - Beaufort
USC - Columbia
USC - Upsta
te
Winthro
p University
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
2004-2005 Academic Year2009-2010 Academic Year
Source: IPEDSNote: 2004-05 dollar amounts are expressed in 2009 inflation-adjusted numbers.
![Page 4: South Carolina Power Point (2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022073101/5525ff774a795998488b4cdc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Instructional vs. Administrative Spending
Source: IPEDS
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
140.0%
Change in Instructional Expenditures from 2002-03 Fiscal Year to 2007-08 Fiscal Year
Change in Administrative Expenditures from 2002-03 Fiscal Year to 2007-08 Fiscal Year
![Page 5: South Carolina Power Point (2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022073101/5525ff774a795998488b4cdc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
WhatWillTheyLearn.com
![Page 6: South Carolina Power Point (2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022073101/5525ff774a795998488b4cdc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6-Year Graduation Rates
Source: IPEDS
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
1998 Cohort2003 Cohort
![Page 7: South Carolina Power Point (2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022073101/5525ff774a795998488b4cdc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
4-Year Graduation Rates
Source: IPEDS
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
1998 Cohort
2003 Cohort
![Page 8: South Carolina Power Point (2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022073101/5525ff774a795998488b4cdc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
“Could not enormous savings be realized by expanding audiences via electronic means, by using taped lectures on multiple occasions, or by utilizing interactive computerized learning approaches in survey courses? A number of for-profit providers are showing that these techniques do have considerable promise, yet they are still used only sparingly in higher education.”
Distance Education
Richard VedderCenter for College Affordability and Productivity
![Page 9: South Carolina Power Point (2)](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022073101/5525ff774a795998488b4cdc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
“The traditional [university] structure … suboptimizes the university’s resources because it breeds wasteful competition, an inefficient use of resources and a rigidity that discourages rapid response to challenges and opportunities.”
Restructuring and Cooperation
Elizabeth Capaldi“Intellectual Transformation and Budgetary Savings Through Academic Reorganization”Change, July-August 2009