Transcript
  •  

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐1 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    Section 2.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Thissectiondescribesexistingairqualityandgreenhousegas(GHG)conditionsandtheapplicableregulatoryframework,andassessespotentialimpactsfromairqualityandGHGemissionsthatmayresultfromimplementingtheproposedproject.Finally,cumulativeimpactsandmitigationmeasuresthatwouldreducepotentiallysignificantimpactsareidentified.

    2.1.1 Existing Conditions TheproposedprojectislocatedintheSanDiegoAirBasin(SDAB);theairbasincomprisesthestudyareafortheairqualityanalysis.Ambientairqualityinthestudyareaisaffectedbyclimatologicalconditions,topography,andthetypesandamountsofpollutantsemitted.ThefollowingdiscussiondescribesrelevantcharacteristicsoftheSDAB,describeskeypollutantsofconcern,summarizesexistingambientpollutantconcentrations,andidentifiessensitivereceptors.ThissectionalsoprovidesadiscussionofGHGemissionsastheyrelatetotheGHGstudyarea,whichismuchbroaderthanthestudyareafortheairqualityanalysistoincludepotentialregionalandglobalGHGeffectsoftheproject.Existingmeteorologicalandairqualityconditionswithintheprojectareaandregionallyaredescribedbelow.

    2.1.1.1 Regional Climate and Meteorology  TheSDABcoversallofSanDiegoCountyandisborderedbythePacificOceantothewest,theSouthCoastAirBasin(SCAB)tothenorth,theSaltonSeaAirBasintotheeast,andtheU.S./Mexicobordertothesouth.TheclimateinSouthernCalifornia,includingtheSDAB,iscontrolledlargelybythestrengthandpositionofasubtropicalhigh‐pressurecelloverthePacificOcean.Precipitationismostlylimitedtoafewstormsduringthewinterseason.Windsinthestudyareausuallyaredrivenbythedominantland/seabreezecirculationsystem.Duringtheday,regionalwindpatternsaredominatedbyonshoreseabreezes.Atnight,windgenerallyslows,remainsstill,orreversesdirection,travelingtowardthesea.TheatmosphericconditionsoftheSDABcontributetotheregion’sairqualityconditions.Becauseofitsclimate,theSDABexperiencesfrequenttemperatureinversions.Typically,temperaturedecreaseswithheight.However,underinversionconditions,temperatureincreasesasaltitudeincreases.Temperatureinversionspreventairthatisclosetothegroundfrommixingwithairathigherelevations.Asaresult,airpollutantsaretrappedneartheground.Duringthesummer,theinteractionbetweentheoceansurfaceandthelowerlayeroftheatmospherecreatesamoistmarinelayer.Anupperlayerofwarmairmassformsoverthecoolmarinelayer,preventingairpollutantsfromdispersingupward.Additionally,reactiveorganicgases(ROG)andnitrogenoxides(NOX)reactunderstrongsunlightandhightemperatures,creatingsmog.Lightdaytimewinds,primarilyfromthenorthwest,furtheraggravatethisconditionbydrivingtheairpollutantsinlandtowardthewarmerfoothills.Duringthefallandwinter,elevatedcarbonmonoxide(CO)andNOXlevelsusuallyoccurondayswithsummer‐likeconditions.

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐2 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    HighairpollutionlevelsincoastalcommunitiesofSanDiegocanoftenoccurwhenpollutedairfromtheSCAB,particularlyfromLosAngeles,travelssouthwestovertheoceanatnightandisbroughtonshoreintoSanDiegobytheseabreezeduringtheday(SanDiegoCountyAirPollutionControlDistrict2010a).AreductioninsmogtransportedfromtheSCABisakeyfactorinthereductionofpeakozonelevelsseenatcoastalsitesbetween2003and2005.Ozone(O3)anditsprecursoremissions(ROGandNOX)aretransportedtoSanDiegoduringrelativelymildSantaAnaweatherconditions.DuringstrongSantaAnaweatherconditions,however,pollutantsarepushedawayfromSanDiegofarouttosea(SanDiegoCountyAirPollutionControlDistrict2009).

    2.1.1.2 Local Climate Conditions  TheprojectareaencompassestheunincorporatedareasoftheentireCounty.TherearefivedistinctclimatezonesthroughouttheCountythatrunnearlyparalleltothecoast. Maritime—runsfromthecoastto3–5milesinland. Coastal—runsfrom5–15milesinland. Transitional—runsfrom20–25milesinland. Interior—runsfrom25–60milesinland. Desert—runsabout60milesinlandtotheCounty’seasternborder.Temperatureandprecipitationvarywidelywithintheclimatezones.Forexample,averageannualprecipitationrangesfromapproximately10inchesinthecoastalandinlandareastoover30inchesinthemountains(interiorzone).Ingeneral,moremildannualtemperaturesareexperiencedinthemaritimeandcoastalareas,whereastheinterioranddesertareasexperiencewarmersummersandcoolerwinters.ThemajorityoftheunincorporatedCountyislocatedwithintheinterioranddesertzones(SanDiegoCountyAirPollutionControlDistrict2010b).ThereareseveralweatherandclimatemonitoringstationsthroughouttheCounty.Giventherangeofclimateconditionsthroughouttheunincorporatedareas,historicalclimaterecordsatfourstationswithdiverseclimaterecords,ChulaVista(coastal),ElCajon(transitional),Campo(interiorzone)andCuyamaca(interiorzone),wereassumedtoberepresentativeoftheclimateconditionsovertheprojectarea.AtChulaVista,theannualaveragetemperatureis61degreesFahrenheit(°F),withanaveragewintertemperatureof55°Fandanaveragesummertemperatureof67°F.AtElCajon,theannualaveragetemperatureis65°F,withanaveragewintertemperatureof56°Fandanaveragesummertemperatureof74°F.AtCampo,theannualaveragetemperatureis61°F,withanaveragewintertemperatureof48°Fandanaveragesummertemperatureof71°F.AtCuyamaca,theannualaveragetemperatureis53°F,withanaveragewintertemperatureof40°Fandanaveragesummertemperatureof68°F.Annualprecipitationis10inchesatChulaVista,12inchesatElCajon,15inchesatCampo,and35inchesatCuyamaca(WesternRegionalClimateCenter2015a,2015b,2015c,2015d).ThemajorityofprecipitationoccursbetweenNovemberandMarch,withJanuarybeingthewettestmonthatCampoandFebruarybeingthewettestmonthatCuyamaca(NationalOceanicandAtmosphericAdministration2004).AnnualwindspeedsatCampoaverage8.2milesperhour(mph)fromthenortheast(WesternRegionalClimateCenter2015e,2015f).NowindmonitoringdataareavailableatElCajon,ChulaVista,orCuyamaca.

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐3 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    2.1.1.3 Pollutants of Concern 

    Criteria Pollutants 

    Thefederalandstategovernmentshaveestablishedairqualitystandardsforsixcriteriapollutants:ozone,lead,CO,nitrogendioxide(NO2),sulfurdioxide(SO2),andparticulatematter(PM),whichconsistsofPMlessthanorequalto10micronsindiameter(PM10)andPMlessthanorequalto2.5micronsindiameter(PM2.5).OzoneandNO2areconsideredregionalpollutantsbecausethey(ortheirprecursors)affectairqualityonaregionalscale.PollutantssuchasCO,SO2,andleadareconsideredlocalpollutantsthattendtoaccumulateintheairlocally.PM10andPM2.5arebothregionalandlocalpollutants.Theprimarycriteriapollutantsofconcernintheprojectareaareozone(includingROGandNOX),CO,PM,andSO2.Principalcharacteristicssurroundingthesepollutantsarediscussedbelow.Table2.1‐1summarizesprimaryemissionssourcesforeachpollutant,aswellastheireffectsonhumanhealthandtheenvironment.Ozone(O3),orsmog,isaphotochemicaloxidantthatisformedwhenROGandNOX(discussedbelow)reactinthepresenceofsunlight.Ozoneposesahealththreattothosewhoalreadysufferfromrespiratorydiseasesaswellastohealthypeople.Additionally,ozonehasbeentiedtocropdamage,typicallyintheformofstuntedgrowthandprematuredeath.Ozonecanalsoactasacorrosivesubstance,resultinginpropertydamagesuchasthedegradationofrubberproducts.ReactiveOrganicGases(ROG)arecompoundsmadeupprimarilyofhydrogenandcarbonatoms.Internalcombustionassociatedwithmotorvehicleusageisthemajorsourceofhydrocarbons.OthersourcesofROGareemissionsassociatedwiththeuseofpaintsandsolvents,theapplicationofasphaltpaving,theuseofhouseholdconsumerproductssuchasaerosols,andbrewingandfermentingoperations.AdverseeffectsonhumanhealtharenotcauseddirectlybyROG,butratherbyreactionsofROGtoformsecondarypollutantssuchasozone.NitrogenOxides(NOX)serveasintegralparticipantsintheprocessofphotochemicalsmogproduction.ThetwomajorformsofNOXarenitricoxide(NO)andNO2.NOisacolorless,odorlessgasformedfromatmosphericnitrogenandoxygenwhencombustiontakesplaceunderhightemperatureand/orhighpressure.NO2isareddish‐browngasformedbythecombinationofNOandoxygen.NO2actsasanacuterespiratoryirritantandincreasessusceptibilitytorespiratorypathogens.CarbonMonoxide(CO)isacolorless,odorless,toxicgasproducedbyincompletecombustionofcarbonsubstances,suchasgasolineordieselfuel.TheprimaryadversehealtheffectassociatedwithCOisinterferencewithnormaloxygentransfertotheblood,whichmayresultintissueoxygendeprivation.ParticulateMatter(PM)consistsoffinelydividedsolidsorliquidssuchassoot,dust,aerosols,fumes,andmists.Twoformsoffineparticulatesarenowrecognized—inhalablecoarseparticles,orPM10,andinhalablefineparticles,orPM2.5.Particulatedischargeintotheatmosphereresultsprimarilyfromindustrial,agricultural,construction,andtransportationactivities.However,windonaridlandscapesalsocontributessubstantiallytolocalparticulateloading.BothPM10andPM2.5mayadverselyaffectthehumanrespiratorysystem,especiallyinthosepeoplewhoarenaturallysensitiveorsusceptibletobreathingproblems.

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐4 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    SulfurDioxide(SO2)isaproductofhigh‐sulfurfuelcombustion.MainsourcesofSO2arecoalandoilusedinpowerstationsandinindustries,andfordomesticheating.IndustrialchemicalmanufacturingisanothersourceofSO2.

    Toxic Air Contaminants 

    Althoughstateandfederalstandardshavebeenestablishedforcriteriapollutants,noambientstandardsexistfortoxicaircontaminants(TAC).ManypollutantsareidentifiedasTACsbecauseoftheirpotentialtoincreasetheriskofdevelopingcancerorbecauseoftheiracuteorchronichealthrisks.ForTACsthatareknownorsuspectedcarcinogens,theCaliforniaAirResourcesBoard(ARB)hasconsistentlyfoundthattherearenolevelsorthresholdsbelowwhichexposureisrisk‐free.IndividualTACsvarygreatlyintheriskstheypresent.Atagivenlevelofexposure,oneTACmayposeahazardthatismanytimesgreaterthananother.TACsareidentifiedandtheirtoxicityisstudiedbytheCaliforniaOfficeofEnvironmentalHealthHazardAssessment(OEHHA).Airtoxicsaregeneratedbyanumberofsources,includingstationarysources,suchasdrycleaners,gasstations,autobodyshops,andcombustionsources;mobilesources,suchasmotorvehicles,dieseltrucks,ships,andtrains;andareasources,suchasfarms,landfills,andconstructionsites.AdversehealtheffectsofTACscanbecarcinogenic(cancer‐causing),short‐term(acute)noncarcinogenic,andlong‐term(chronic)noncarcinogenic.Directexposuretothesepollutantshasbeenshowntocausecancer,birthdefects,damagetothebrainandnervoussystem,andrespiratorydisorders.

    Odors 

    Offensiveodorsrarelycausephysicalharm,buttheycanbeunpleasantandleadtoconsiderabledistressamongthepublic.Thisdistressoftengeneratescitizencomplaintstolocalgovernmentsandairdistricts.AccordingtoARB’s(2005)AirQualityandLandUseHandbook,landusesassociatedwithodorcomplaintstypicallyincludesewagetreatmentplants,landfills,recyclingfacilities,manufacturing,andagriculturalactivities.ARBprovidesrecommendedscreeningdistancesforsitingnewreceptorsnearexistingodorsources.Microbrewingoperationscanalsogeneratehydrogensulfide(H2S),whichcanleadtounpleasantodors.

    Greenhouse Gases 

    PresentintheEarth’sloweratmosphere,GHGsplayacriticalroleinmaintainingtheEarth’stemperature.GHGstrapsomeofthelong‐waveinfraredradiationemittedfromtheEarth’ssurfacethatwouldotherwiseescapetospace.ThephenomenonknownasthegreenhouseeffectkeepstheatmosphereneartheEarth’ssurfacewarmenoughforthesuccessfulhabitationofhumansandotherlifeforms.IncreasesinfossilfuelcombustionanddeforestationhaveexponentiallyincreasedconcentrationsofGHGsintheatmospheresincetheIndustrialRevolution,leadingtowarmingoftheEarth’sloweratmosphereandnoticeablebeginningstagechangesintheEarth’sclimate.TheprincipleanthropogenicGHGscontributingtoclimatechangearecarbondioxide(CO2),methane(CH4),nitrousoxide(N2O),andfluorinatedcompounds,includingsulfurhexafluoride(SF6),hydrofluorocarbons(HFCs),andperfluorocarbons(PFCs).Watervapor,themostabundantGHG,isnotincludedinthislistbecauseitsnaturalconcentrationsandfluctuationsfaroutweighitsanthropogenic(human‐made)sources.TheprimaryGHGsofconcernassociatedwiththeprojectareCO2,CH4,andN2O.Principalcharacteristicssurroundingthesepollutantsarediscussedbelow.

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐5 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    CarbonDioxide(CO2)enterstheatmospherethroughtheburningoffossilfuels(oil,naturalgas,andcoal),solidwaste,treesandwoodproducts,respiration,andalsoasaresultofotherchemicalreactions(e.g.,manufactureofcement,microbrewing).Carbondioxideisalsoremovedfromtheatmosphere(orsequestered)whenitisabsorbedbyplantsaspartofthebiologicalcarboncycle.Methane(CH4)isemittedduringtheproductionandtransportofcoal,naturalgas,andoil.Methaneemissionsalsoresultfromlivestockandotheragriculturalpracticesandbythedecayoforganicwasteinmunicipalsolidwastelandfills.NitrousOxide(N2O)isemittedduringagricultural(i.e.,fertilizerandpesticideapplication)andindustrialactivities,aswellasduringcombustionoffossilfuelsandsolidwaste.MethodshavebeensetforthtodescribeemissionsofGHGsintermsofasinglegastosimplifyreportingandanalysis.ThemostcommonlyacceptedmethodtocompareGHGemissionsistheglobalwarmingpotential(GWP)methodologydefinedintheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange(IPCC)referencedocuments.TheIPCCdefinestheGWPofvariousGHGemissionsonanormalizedscalethatrecastsallGHGemissionsintermsofcarbondioxideequivalent(CO2e),whichcomparesthegasinquestiontothatofthesamemassofCO2(CO2hasaGWPof1bydefinition).Table2.1‐2liststheGWPofCO2,CH4,andN2O,theirlifetimes,andabundancesintheatmosphere.

    2.1.1.4 Ambient Pollutant Concentrations  

    Criteria Pollutants  

    TheSanDiegoAirPollutionControlDistrict(SDAPCD)maintainsandoperatesanetworkofambientairmonitoringstationsthroughouttheCounty.Thepurposeofthemonitoringstationsistomeasureambientconcentrationsofthepollutantsanddeterminewhethertheambientairqualitymeetsthenationalambientairqualitystandards(NAAQS)andCaliforniaambientairqualitystandards(CAAQS)(discussedfurtherbelow).Monitoringdatafor3years(2013–2015)fromtheOtayMesa‐PaseoandAlpine‐VictoriaDrivestationsarepresentedinTable2.1‐3torepresenttherangeofambientairqualityconditionsthroughouttheunincorporatedarea.AsshowninTable2.1‐3,theAlpine‐VictoriaDrivestationhasexperiencedfrequentviolationsofthestateandfederalozonestandards,whereastheOtayMesa‐Paseostationdidnotviolateeitherozonestandardoverthese3years.TheOtayMesa‐PaseostationrecordedsixexceedancesofthestatePM10standardin2012.Localmonitoringdata(Table2.1‐3)areusedtodesignateareasasnonattainment,maintenance,attainment,orunclassifiedfortheNAAQSandCAAQS.Thefourdesignationsaredefinedasfollows. Nonattainment—assignedtoareaswheremonitoredpollutantconcentrationsconsistently

    violatethestandardinquestion. Maintenance—assignedtoareaswheremonitoredpollutantconcentrationsexceededthe

    standardinquestioninthepastbutarenolongerinviolationofthatstandard. Attainment—assignedtoareaswherepollutantconcentrationsmeetthestandardinquestion

    overadesignatedperiodoftime. Unclassified—assignedtoareaswheredataareinsufficienttodeterminewhetherapollutantis

    violatingthestandardinquestion.

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐6 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    Table2.1‐4summarizestheattainmentstatusofSanDiegoCountywithregardtotheNAAQSandCAAQS.

    Toxic Air Contaminants  

    AccordingtoARB’s(2009)CaliforniaAlmanacofEmissionsandAirQuality,theannualaveragedieselparticulatematter(DPM)concentrationintheSDABwas1.4microgramspercubicmeter(µg/m3)asoftheyear2000,withanestimatedcancerriskof420personsinonemillion.TheannualaveragecancerriskfromallTACswithintheSDABwas187personsinonemillion.Forperspective,1outof3Americanswilleventuallydevelopcancer,and1outof4willdiefromcancer.Therefore,thenationalaveragebackgroundcancerincidenceisequivalentto333,000personsinonemillion(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2009).

    Greenhouse Gases 

    AGHGinventoryisaquantificationofallGHGemissionsandsinks1withinaselectedphysicaland/oreconomicboundary.GHGinventoriescanbeperformedonalargescale(i.e.,forglobalandnationalentities)oronasmallscale(i.e.,foraparticularbuildingorperson).Althoughmanyprocessesaredifficulttoevaluate,severalagencieshavedevelopedtoolstoquantifyemissionsfromcertainsources.Table2.1‐5outlinesthemostrecentglobal,national,statewide,andlocalGHGinventoriestohelpcontextualizethemagnitudeofpotentialproject‐relatedemissions.

    2.1.1.5 Sensitive Receptors Theimpactofemissionsonsensitivemembersofthepopulationisaparticularconcern.ARBidentifiessensitivepopulationsassegmentsofthepopulationmostsusceptibletopoorairquality(i.e.,children,theelderly,pregnantwomen,andthosewithpre‐existingserioushealthproblemsaffectedbyairquality).Landuseswheresensitiveindividualsaremostlikelytospendtimeincludeschoolsandschoolyards,parksandplaygrounds,daycarecenters,nursinghomes,hospitals,andresidentialcommunities(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2005).Becauseagriculturaloperationsaretypicallylocatedinruralareas,thenumberofsensitivereceptorsaffectedbytheprojectisgenerallylow,butthesesensitivereceptorsdooccurthroughouttheunincorporatedarea,withhighernumbersclosertotowncenters.

    2.1.2 Regulatory Setting TheagenciesofdirectimportancetotheprojectforairqualityaretheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA),ARB,andSDAPCD.EPAhasestablishedfederalairqualitystandardsforwhichARBandSDAPCDhaveprimaryimplementationresponsibility.ARBandSDAPCDareresponsibleforensuringthatstateairqualitystandardsaremet,aswellasfordevelopingpoliciesandplanstoreducestateandlocalGHGemissions.Thefollowingfederal,state,andlocalairqualityandGHGregulationsandpoliciesareapplicabletotheproposedproject.

    1 Agreenhousegassinkisaprocess,activity,ormechanismthatremovesaGHGfromtheatmosphere.

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐7 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    2.1.2.1 Federal Regulations  

    Air Quality  

    TheCleanAirAct(CAA)wasfirstenactedin1963andhasbeenamendednumeroustimesinsubsequentyears(1965,1967,1970,1977,and1990).TheCAAestablishesfederalairqualitystandards(NAAQS)andspecifiesfuturedatesforachievingcompliance.TheCAAalsomandatesthatthestatesubmitandimplementaStateImplementationPlan(SIP)forlocalareasnotmeetingthosestandards.Theplansmustincludepollutioncontrolmeasuresthatdemonstratehowthestandardswillbemet.The1990amendmentstotheCAAidentifyspecificemission‐reductiongoalsforareasnotmeetingtheNAAQS.Theseamendmentsrequirebothademonstrationofreasonablefurtherprogresstowardattainmentandincorporationofadditionalsanctionsforfailuretoattainormeetinterimmilestones.ThesectionsoftheCAAthatwouldmostsubstantiallyaffectthedevelopmentoftheprojectincludeTitleI(NonattainmentProvisions)andTitleII(Mobile‐SourceProvisions).Table2.1‐6showstheNAAQScurrentlyineffectforeachcriteriapollutant.TheCAAQS(discussedbelow)arealsoprovidedforreference.

    Greenhouse Gases 

    Climatechangeiswidelyrecognizedasanimminentthreattotheglobalclimate,economy,andpopulation.TheEPAhasacknowledgedpotentialthreatsposedbyclimatechangeinaCauseorContributeFinding,whichfoundthattheGHGemissionsfromnewmotorvehiclescontributetopollutionthatthreatenspublichealthandwelfareandwasanecessaryfindingpriortoadoptingnewvehicleemissionsstandardsthatreduceGHGemissions.FederalclimatechangeregulationunderthefederalCAAisalsocurrentlyunderdevelopmentforbothexistingandnewsources.StandardsforCO2emissionsfromnewfossil‐fuel‐firedelectricitypowerplantshavealsobeenproposedbyEPAandoutlinedinPresidentObama’s2013“ClimateActionPlan.”FederalvehicleemissionstandardshavebeenestablishedthatspecificallytakeintoaccounttheneedforGHGemissionsreductions.Despitetheseactions,thereisstillnocomprehensivefederaloverarchinglawspecificallyrelatedtothereductionofGHGemissions.

    2.1.2.2 State Regulations  

    Air Quality  

    California Clean Air Act and California Ambient Air Quality Standards 

    In1988,thestatelegislatureadoptedtheCaliforniaCAA,whichestablishedastatewideairpollutioncontrolprogram.TheCaliforniaCAArequiresallairdistrictsinthestatetoendeavortomeettheCAAQSbytheearliestpracticaldate.UnlikethefederalCAA,theCaliforniaCAAdoesnotsetpreciseattainmentdeadlines.Instead,theCaliforniaCAAestablishesincreasinglystringentrequirementsforareasthatwillrequiremoretimetoachievethestandards.CAAQSaregenerallymorestringentthantheNAAQSandincorporateadditionalstandardsforsulfates,hydrogensulfide,visibilityreducingparticles,andvinylchloride.TheCAAQSandNAAQSarelistedtogetherinTable2.1‐6.ARBandlocalairdistrictsbearresponsibilityforachievingCalifornia’sairqualitystandards,whicharetobeachievedthroughdistrict‐levelairqualitymanagementplansthatwouldbeincorporated

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐8 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    intotheSIP.InCalifornia,EPAhasdelegatedauthoritytoprepareSIPstoARB,which,inturn,hasdelegatedthatauthoritytoindividualairdistricts.ARBtraditionallyhasestablishedstateairqualitystandards,maintainingoversightauthorityinairqualityplanning,developingprogramsforreducingemissionsfrommotorvehicles,developingairemissioninventories,collectingairqualityandmeteorologicaldata,andapprovingSIPs.TheCaliforniaCAAsubstantiallyaddstotheauthorityandresponsibilitiesofairdistricts.TheCaliforniaCAAdesignatesairdistrictsasleadairqualityplanningagencies,requiresairdistrictstoprepareairqualityplans,andgrantsairdistrictsauthoritytoimplementtransportationcontrolmeasures.TheCaliforniaCAAalsoemphasizesthecontrolof“indirectandarea‐widesources”ofairpollutantemissions.TheCaliforniaCAAgiveslocalairpollutioncontroldistrictsexplicitauthoritytoregulateindirectsourcesofairpollutionandtoestablishtrafficcontrolmeasures(TCMs).Carl Moyer Program 

    TheCarlMoyerMemorialAirQualityStandardsAttainmentProgram(CarlMoyerProgram)isavoluntaryprogramthatoffersgrantstoownersofheavy‐dutyvehiclesandequipment.TheprogramisapartnershipbetweenARBandthelocalairdistrictsthroughoutthestatetoreduceairpollutionemissionsfromheavy‐dutyengines.Locally,theairdistrictsadministertheCarlMoyerProgram.Toxic Air Contaminant Regulation 

    CaliforniaregulatesTACsprimarilythroughtheToxicAirContaminantIdentificationandControlAct(TannerAct)andtheAirToxics“HotSpots”InformationandAssessmentActof1987(“HotSpots”Act).Intheearly1980s,ARBestablishedastatewidecomprehensiveairtoxicsprogramtoreduceexposuretoairtoxics.TheTannerActcreatedCalifornia’sprogramtoreduceexposuretoairtoxics.The“HotSpots”ActsupplementstheTannerActbyrequiringastatewideairtoxicsinventory,notificationofpeopleexposedtoasignificanthealthrisk,andfacilityplanstoreducetheserisks.InAugust1998,ARBidentifiedDPMfromdiesel‐fueledenginesasTACs.InSeptember2000,ARBapprovedacomprehensiveDieselRiskReductionPlantoreduceemissionsfrombothnewandexistingdiesel‐fueledenginesandvehicles.Asanongoingprocess,ARBreviewsaircontaminantsandidentifiesthosethatareclassifiedasTACs.ARBalsocontinuestoestablishnewprogramsandregulationsforthecontrolofTACs,includingDPM,asappropriate.ARBhasadoptedseveralregulationstoreduceemissionsfromin‐usedieselvehiclesandenginesthroughoutCalifornia,includingtrucksandstationarysources(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2012).Insomecases,theTACreductionstrategiesalsoreducesmog‐formingemissionssuchasNOX.

    Greenhouse Gases  

    CaliforniahasadoptedstatewidelegislationaddressingvariousaspectsofclimatechangeandGHGmitigation.Muchofthisestablishesabroadframeworkforthestate’slong‐termGHGreductionandclimatechangeadaptationprogram.TheformerandcurrentgovernorsofCaliforniahavealsoissuedseveralexecutiveorders(EOs)relatedtothestate’sevolvingclimatechangepolicy.Briefsummariesofkeypolicies,EOs,regulations,andlegislationatthestatelevelthatarerelevanttotheprojectaredescribedbelowinchronologicalorder.

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐9 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    Executive Order S‐3‐05 (2005) 

    EOS‐3‐05isdesignedtoreduceCalifornia’sGHGemissionsto(1)2000levelsby2010,(2)1990levelsby2020,and(3)80percentbelow1990levelsby2050.Assembly Bill 1493—Pavley Rules (2002, Amendments 2009, 2012 Rule‐Making) 

    AssemblyBill(AB)1493(Pavley)requiresARBtoadoptvehiclestandardsthatwilllowerGHGemissionsfromnewlightdutyautostothemaximumextentfeasiblebeginningin2009.AdditionalstrengtheningofthePavleystandards(referredtopreviouslyasPavleyIIandnowreferredtoastheAdvancedCleanCars[ACC]measure)wasadoptedforvehiclemodelyears2017–2025in2012.Together,thetwostandardsareexpectedtoincreaseaveragefueleconomytoroughly54.5milespergallonin2025.Assembly Bill 32—California Global Warming Solutions Act (2006) 

    AB32codifiedthestate’sGHGemissionstargetbyrequiringthatthestate’sglobalwarmingemissionsbereducedto1990levelsby2020.The2008ClimateChangeScopingPlanforAB32(AB32ScopingPlan)identifiesspecificmeasurestoreduceGHGemissionsto1990levelsby2020andrequiresARBandotherstateagenciestodevelopandenforceregulationsandotherinitiativesforreducingGHGs.Thefirstupdatetothe2008ScopingPlanwasreleasedinFebruary2014andincludesrevisedGHGreductionestimatesbasedonupdatedstatewideGHGinventories.TheupdatealsodiscussestheneedforcontinuedGHGreductionprogresspost‐2020.ARBiscurrentlyworkingonasecondupdatetotheScopingPlantoreflectthe2030targetestablishedinExecutiveOrderB‐30‐15(discussedbelow).ARBisexpectingtopresentthefinal2030TargetScopingPlantotheboardinlate2016.Executive Order S‐01‐07—Low Carbon Fuel Standard (2007) 

    EOS‐01‐07mandated(1)thatastatewidegoalbeestablishedtoreducethecarbonintensityofCalifornia’stransportationfuelsbyatleast10percentby2020,and(2)thatalowcarbonfuelstandard(LCFS)fortransportationfuelsbeestablishedinCalifornia.ARBapprovedtheLCFSin2009andimplementedinLCFSasadiscreteearlyactionmeasureunderAB32andwithintheScopingPlan.Inaddition,ARBsubsequentlyapprovedamendmentstotheLCFSinDecember2011,whichbeganimplementationonJanuary1,2013.AstheresultofacourtrulingthatfoundproceduralissuesrelatedtotheoriginaladoptionoftheLCFS,ARBre‐adoptedtheLCFSregulationinSeptember2015,andthechangeswentintoeffectonJanuary1,2016.TheprogramestablishesastrongframeworktopromotethelowcarbonfueladoptionnecessarytoachievetheGovernor’s2030and2050GHGgoals.NotethattheLCFSregulationdoesnotapplytocertaintransportationapplications,includinglocomotivesandocean‐goingvessels.Also,themajorityoftheemissionsbenefitsduetotheLCFScomefromtheproductioncycle(upstreamemissions)ofthefuelratherthanthecombustioncycle(tailpipe)(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2016a).State CEQA Guidelines (2010) 

    TheStateCEQAGuidelinesrequireleadagenciestodescribe,calculate,orestimatetheamountofGHGemissionsthatwouldresultfromaproject.Moreover,theguidelinesemphasizethenecessityofdeterminingpotentialclimatechangeeffectsofaprojectandproposingmitigationasnecessary.Theyalsoconfirmthediscretionofleadagenciestodetermineappropriatesignificancethresholds,butrequirethepreparationofanEIRif“thereissubstantialevidencethatthepossibleeffectsofa

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐10 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    particularprojectarestillcumulativelyconsiderablenotwithstandingcompliancewithadoptedregulationsorrequirements”(Section15064.4).StateCEQAGuidelinesSection15126.4includesconsiderationsforleadagenciesrelatedtofeasiblemitigationmeasurestoreduceGHGemissions,whichmayinclude,amongothers,measuresinanexistingplanormitigationprogramforthereductionofemissionsthatarerequiredaspartoftheleadagency’sdecision;implementationofprojectfeatures,projectdesign,orothermeasuresthatareincorporatedintotheprojecttosubstantiallyreduceenergyconsumptionorGHGemissions;offsitemeasures,includingoffsetsthatarenototherwiserequired,tomitigateaproject’semissions;andmeasuresthatsequestercarbonorcarbon‐equivalentemissions.California Green Building Standards Code and Title 24 (2010) 

    TheGreenBuildingStandardsCode(CALGreen)appliestotheplanning,design,operation,construction,use,andoccupancyofnewlyconstructedbuildingsandrequirestheinstallationofenergy‐andwater‐efficientindoorinfrastructureforallnewprojectsbeginningafterJanuary1,2011.CALGreenalsorequiresnewlyconstructedbuildingstodevelopawastemanagementplananddivertatleast50percentoftheconstructionmaterialsgeneratedduringprojectconstruction.AdministrativeregulationstoCALGreenPart11andtheCaliforniaBuildingEnergyEfficiencyStandardswereadoptedin2013andtookeffectonJanuary1,2014.The2013BuildingEnergyEfficiencyStandardsare30percentmoreefficientthanthe2008standardsforcommercialconstruction.Part11alsoestablishedvoluntarystandardsinthe2008editionofthecodethatbecamemandatoryinthe2010editionofthecode,includingplanninganddesignforsustainablesitedevelopment,energyefficiency,waterconservation,materialconservation,andinternalaircontaminants(CaliforniaEnergyCommission2012).Thenextsetofenergyefficiencystandards(the2016BuildingEnergyEfficiencyStandards)takeeffectonJanuary1,2017.Senate Bills X 1‐2 and 350, Renewable Portfolio Standard (2011, 2015) 

    SenateBill(SB)X1‐2extendedtheRenewablesPortfolioStandard(RPS)enactedunderSBs1078and107torequireallCaliforniaelectricityproviderstoobtainatleast33percentoftheirenergyfromrenewableresourcesby2020.SB350,whichwassignedin2015,extendedtheRPSonceagaintorequire50percentrenewablesourcedenergyby2030.Senate Bill 32 and Assembly Bill 197 (2016) 

    SB32requirestheARBtoensurethatstatewideGHGemissionsarereducedtoatleast40%belowthe1990levelby2030,consistentwiththetargetsetforthinEOB‐30‐15.AB197createsrequirementstoformatheJointLegislativeCommitteeonClimateChangePolicies,requirestheARBtoprioritizedirectemissionreductionsandconsidersocialcostswhenadoptingregulationstoreduceGHGemissionsbeyondthe2020statewidelimit,requiresARBtopreparereportsonsourcesofGHGsandotherpollutants,establishessix‐yeartermsforvotingmembersofARB,andaddstwolegislatorsasnon‐votingmembersofARB.BothbillsweresignedbyGovernorBrownonSeptember8,2016.

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐11 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    2.1.2.3 Local Regulations  

    Air Quality  

    SDAPCDhaslocalairqualityjurisdictionoverprojectsinSanDiegoCounty.Responsibilitiesoftheairdistrictincludeoverseeingstationary‐sourceemissions,approvingpermits,maintainingemissionsinventories,maintainingairqualitystations,overseeingagriculturalburningpermits,andprovidingCEQAcomplianceassistanceonanas‐neededbasis.SDAPCDisalsoresponsibleforestablishingandenforcinglocalairqualityrulesandregulationsthataddresstherequirementsoffederalandstateairqualitylawsandforensuringthatNAAQSandCAAQSaremet.SDAPCDhasadoptedairqualityplanstoimproveairquality,protectpublichealth,andprotecttheclimate.TheSanDiegoRegionalAirQualityStrategy(RAQS)identifiesfeasibleemissioncontrolmeasuresandprovidesexpeditiousprogresstowardattainingthestateozonestandards.SDAPCDhasalsodevelopedplansforattainingandmaintainingfederalozonestandards,includingthe2012maintenanceplanand2007attainmentplan,bothforthe1997ozonestandard.SDAPCDiscurrentlyworkingonupdatingtheRAQSanddevelopinganattainmentplanforattainingthefederal2008ozonestandard.Theprojectmaybesubjecttothefollowingdistrictrules.ThislistmaynotbeallencompassingasadditionalSDAPCDrulesmayapplytotheprojectasspecificcomponentsareidentified. Regulation2,Rule20.2—NewSourceReviewNon‐MajorStationarySources:establishes

    AirQualityImpactAnalysis(AQIA)TriggerLevels,whichsetemissionlimitsfornon‐majornewormodifiedstationarysources.

    Rule50—VisibleEmissions:establisheslimitstotheopacityofemissionswithintheSDAPCD.TheproposedfacilityissubjecttoRule50(d)(1)and(6)andshouldnotexceedthevisibleemissionlimitation.

    Rule51—Nuisance:prohibitsemissionsthatcauseinjury,detriment,nuisance,orannoyancetoanyconsiderablenumberofpersonsortothepublic;orwhichendangerthecomfort,repose,health,orsafetyofanysuchpersonsorthepublic;orwhichcauseinjuryordamagetobusinessorproperty.

    Rule52—ParticulateMatter:establisheslimitstothedischargeofanyparticulatematterfromnon‐stationarysources.

    Rule54—DustandFumes:establisheslimitstotheamountofdustorfumedischargedintotheatmosphereinany1hour.

    Rule55—FugitiveDustControl:setsrestrictionsonvisiblefugitivedustfromconstructionanddemolitionprojects.

    Rule67—ArchitecturalCoatings:establisheslimitstotheROGcontentforcoatingsappliedwithintheSDAPCD.

    SDAPCDhasnotdevelopedadvisoryemissionthresholdsorguidancetoassistleadagenciesindeterminingthelevelofsignificanceofaproject’semissionsinCEQAdocuments.However,theCountyhasdevelopedguidancethatincludesrecommendedscreeninglevelthresholdstoassistleadagenciesindeterminingthelevelofsignificanceofaproject’semissionsinCEQAdocuments.Furthermore,CountyCodeSection87.428,DustControlMeasures,alsorequiresallclearingandgradingtobecarriedoutwithdustcontrolmeasuresadequatetopreventcreationofanuisanceto

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐12 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    personsorpublicorprivateproperty.Clearing,grading,orimprovementplansmustrequirethatmeasuressuchasthefollowingbeundertakentoachievethisresult:watering,applicationofsurfactants,shrouding,controlofvehiclespeeds,pavingofaccessareas,orotheroperationalortechnologicalmeasurestoreducedispersionofdust.Theseprojectdesignmeasuresaretobeincorporatedintoallearth‐disturbingactivitiestominimizetheamountofPMemissionsfromconstruction.

    Greenhouse Gases 

    TheCountyiscurrentlypreparingaClimateActionPlan(CAP).TheCAPwillbeacomprehensiveplanoutliningthespecificactivitiesthattheCountywillundertaketoreduceGHGemissionsinitsunincorporatedcommunities.TheCAPwillalsohelptheCountymeetstate‐mandatedGHGreductiontargets.TheCAPwillfocusonactivitiesthatcanachievethegreatestGHGemissionreductionsinthemosttechnologicallyfeasibleandcost‐effectivemanner.AdoptionoftheCAPisexpectedinthefallof2017.

    2.1.3 Analysis of Project Effects and Determination of Significance  

    TheproposedprojectconsistsofanamendmenttotheZoningOrdinancerelatedtoaccessoryagriculturalusesinunincorporatedportionsoftheCountyoverwhichtheCountyhaslandusejurisdiction(seeSection1.4,ProjectDescription,forfurtherdetails).Specifically,theproposedprojectappliestopropertieswhereactiveagricultureexistswithintheCountyorpropertieswhereagriculturalusesareallowed.Duringthescopingprocessforthisproject,whichconsideredpotentiallysignificantenvironmentalimpactsandinvolveda30‐dayNoticeofPreparationpubliccommentperiod,allthresholdsrelatedtoairqualityandGHGemissionswereconsideredtobepotentiallysignificantandarethusevaluatedbelow.NocommentsonairqualityorGHGemissionswerereceivedduringthepubliccommentperiod.Asignificantimpactonairqualitywouldoccuriftheproposedprojectconflictedwithapplicableairqualityplans,violatedanyairqualitystandard,exposedsensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations,orcreatedobjectionableodors.AsignificantimpactonGHGswouldoccuriftheproposedprojectgeneratedasubstantialamountofGHGemissionsorconflictedwithapplicableplansorpoliciesadoptedtoreduceGHGemissions.Eachoftheseissuesisevaluatedbelow.TheanalysisbelowisbasedontheevaluationguidanceandthresholdrecommendationswithintheCounty’sGuidelinesforDeterminingSignificanceforAirQuality(CountyofSanDiego2007a).

    2.1.3.1 Air Quality Plan 

    Guidelines for the Determination of Significance 

    ThefollowingsignificanceguidelinefromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesappliestoboththedirectandcumulativeimpactanalyses.Asignificantimpactwouldresultiftheprojectwould: Conflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan.Forthepurposesofthisanalysis,“conflictwithorobstructimplementation”isdefinedascircumstancesinwhichtheprojectwouldworsenexistingairqualityviolationsorexceedthegrowthprojectionsdevelopedbytheCountyandSanDiegoAssociationofGovernments(SANDAG).Aprojectisdeemedinconsistentwithairqualityplansifitwouldresultinpopulationand/or

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐13 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    employmentgrowththatexceedsestimatesusedtodevelopapplicableairqualityplans,which,inturn,wouldgenerateemissionsnotaccountedforintheregionalemissionsbudgets.Therefore,theproposedprojectisevaluatedtodetermineifitisconsistentwiththelandusedesignationsandgrowthanticipatedintheRAQSandozoneattainmentandmaintenanceplanspreparedfortheSanDiegoregion.

    Analysis 

    SanDiegoCountyiscurrentlydesignatedasanonattainmentareaforthefederal8‐hourozonestandardandthestateozone,PM10,andPM2.5standards(CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard2014;EPA2015a).TheRAQSistheregion’splanforimprovingairqualityandattainingthefederalandstateairqualitystandards.TheRAQSreliesoninformationfromARBandSANDAGtoprojectfutureemissionsanddetermineappropriateemissionsreductionstrategies.SDAPCDhasalsoadoptedanozonemaintenanceplan.TheproposedprojectconsistsofamendmentstothezoningordinancetopromoteandencourageadditionallanduseactivitiesonactiveagriculturallandsthroughouttheCounty.AlthoughtheproposedprojectwouldamendtheexistingZoningOrdinance,nochangeinlanduseswouldoccur,andtheproposedprojectwouldremainconsistentwiththeexistinglandusedesignationasdelineatedintheCountyGeneralPlan.BecausetheproposedprojectincludesdevelopmentthatisconsistentwiththeusesallowedbytheLandUseElementandagriculturalzones,thenewdevelopmentwasanticipatedinSANDAGgrowthprojectionsusedinestablishingtheRAQSandSIP.Therefore,itconformstotheforecastandwouldnotconflictorobstructimplementationoftheairqualityplans.Impactswouldbelessthansignificantandnomitigationmeasuresarerequired.

    2.1.3.2 Violate Air Quality Standards  

    Guidelines for the Determination of Significance 

    ThefollowingsignificanceguidelinefromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesappliestoboththedirectandcumulativeimpactanalyses.Asignificantimpactwouldresultiftheprojectwould: Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairquality

    violation.Forthepurposesofthisanalysis,“violateanyairqualitystandardorsubstantiallycontributetoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation”isdefinedascircumstancesinwhichconstructionoroperationalemissionsexceedthepertinentairqualitythresholds,asdescribedinAppendixDunderRegionalThresholdsforAirBasinAttainmentofStateandFederalAmbientAirQualityStandards.AsdescribedinAppendixD,emissionsinexcessofSanDiegoCounty’sscreeninglevelthresholds(SLTs)wouldbeexpectedtohaveasignificantimpactonairqualitybecauseanexceedanceoftheSLTsisanticipatedtocontributetoCAAQSandNAAQSviolationsintheCounty.

    Emissions Assumptions and Modeling Methodology 

    Implementationoftheproposedprojectwouldreviseandintroducenewpermittingrequirementsforagriculturalareas.Severaloftheserevisionswouldpromotethedevelopmentofusesthatareaccessorytoagriculturalactivities,includingmicrobreweries,dairyoperations,andretailstores.Table2.1‐7summarizesthe14usesassociatedwiththeprojectandidentifieswhetherthechanges

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐14 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    tothedraftZoningOrdinancewouldinduceincreasesinconstructionoroperationalcriteriapollutantorGHGemissions.AsshowninTable2.1‐7,severalusesassociatedwithagriculturalactivitiessupportedbytheprojectcouldresultinincreasedcriteriapollutantandGHGemissions(identifiedas“moderate”and“high”foremissionspotential).Forexample,constructionofnewbuildingswouldgenerateemissionsthatcouldresultinshort‐termairqualityandGHGimpacts.Operationofthebuildingswouldresultinlong‐termcriteriapollutantandGHGemissionsfrommobile(i.e.,vehicletrips),area(i.e.,periodicpaintemissionsfromfacilityupkeep),andenergy(i.e.,naturalgascombustion).OperationalGHGemissionswouldalsobegeneratedbyelectricityandwaterconsumption,aswellaswastegeneration.Certainuses,suchasmicrobreweries,wineries,anddairies,couldalsoresultinprocess‐relatedemissions—forexample,microbrewinggeneratesROGduringfermentation.LivestockmanagementcanalsogenerateCH4andN2Oemissions.ThedraftZoningOrdinancerevisionsidentifymaximumfloorareasandacreagesforeachnewuse,asapplicable.Thenumberofnewbuildingsandusesthatcouldbeinducedbythepermittingrevisionsiscurrentlyunknown.Accordingly,toillustratethepotentialairqualityandGHGimpactsfromconstructionandoperationofnewdevelopment,arepresentativeprojectwithineachusecategorywiththepotentialtogeneratemoderateorhighemissionswasevaluated.Table2.1‐8summarizesthekeymodelingassumptionsforeachprojectbyuse.Becauseagriculturaltourism,aquaponics/fishmarkets,andmobilebutcheringwouldnotsupportrelativelyfewnewbuildingconstructionoroperationalvehicletrips,theyhavearelativelylowemissionspotential(seeTable2.1‐7).Assuch,anillustrativeemissionsanalysiswasnotperformedfortheseusetypes.Constructionandoperationalemissionsforeachoftheprojecttypesexceptanimalraising2wereestimatedusingtheCaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel(CalEEMod),version2013.2.2.CalEEModdoesnotcontainlandusetypesforanyoftheprojectuses.Accordingly,therepresentativeprojectsweremodeledusingthefollowinglanduseassumptions,whichareconsideredmostsimilartothepotentialprojecttypes. Homestay=Hotel Microbrewery,Winery,andDairy=RefrigeratedWarehouse RoadsideSalesandAgriculturalStore=ConvenienceStoreEmissionsfromconstructionactivityandoperationalareasources,energyconsumption,wateruse,andwastewatergenerationwerequantifiedusingmodeldefaultsbasedontheprojectsizesandselectedlandusetypes,withthefollowingexceptions.Thesedefaultswerereplaced,basedonavailableinformation,tocapturetheuniqueenergyandwaterdemandsassociatedwithmicrobreweries,wineries,anddairies. CalEEModdefaultsforelectricity,naturalgas,andindoorwaterconsumptionforarefrigerated

    warehousewerereplacedbasedondataspecifictomicrobreweries.Itwasassumed120,000kilowatts(kWh),10,400therms,and2.5milliongallonsofwaterwouldbeconsumedannuallytoproduce248,000gallonsofbeer(SoundBrewingSystems2016).

    CalEEModdefaultsforelectricity,naturalgas,andoutdoorwaterconsumptionforarefrigeratedwarehousewerereplacedbasedondataspecifictowineries.Itwasassumed481,000kWhand

    2Revisionstotheanimalraisingprovisionswouldnotpermitanynewbuildingsthatwouldgenerateconstructionoroperationalemissions.

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐15 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    5,900thermsareconsumedannuallyatasmallwinery,andthat5.8milliongallonsofirrigationwaterareneededtosupportvinestoproduce12,000gallonsofwineperyear(Wuetal.2013;Dunne2014).

    CalEEModdefaultsforelectricityandoutdoorwaterconsumptionforarefrigeratedwarehousewerereplacedbasedondataspecifictoCaliforniadairies.Itwasassumed900kWhand12,337gallonsofwaterareconsumedeachyearperdairyhead(LooperandWaldner2007;Ludingtonetal.2007).

    OperationalemissionsfrommobilesourceswereestimatedusingthetripgenerationassumptionsprovidedbyChenRyan(2016)andsummarizedinTable2.1‐8.Allvehicletriplengthsweresetto9milespertheCounty’sTransportationImpactFee.Itwasconservativelyassumedallconstructionwouldtakeplaceimmediatelyfollowingadoptionoftherevisedordinancein2017.Asnotedabove,beerandwineproductioncanresultinROGemissions.Likewise,fugitiveN2Oemissionscanbereleasedduringfertilizerapplicationatwineries.LivestockmanagementalsorepresentsasourceofCH4andN2Ofrommanuremanagementandentericfermentation.Processemissionsfrombeerandwineproductionwereestimatedassuming4.17poundsofROGareemittedper1,000barrelsofbeerand6.2poundsofROGareemittedpergallonofwine(SanJoaquinValleyAirPollutionControlDistrict2010,2015).FugitiveGHGemissionsfrommanuremanagementandentericfermentationwereanalyzedusingemissionsfactorsfromICLEI(2012)andEPA(2015b).Itwasconservativelyassumedthatnewanimalswouldbedairycows,whichhavethehighestCH4andN2Oemissionsperhead.EmissionsresultingfromfertilizeruseatvineyardswerecalculatedusingemissionfactorsfromARB(2013).Theanalysisalsoaccountsforincreasedcarbonsequestrationatvineyardsassumingacarbonstockfactorof1.2metrictonsperacre(KroodsmaandField2006).AsdiscussedinSection2.10,WaterSupplyandGroundwater,themajorityoftheunincorporatedareaisreliantoneitherseparategroundwater‐dependentdistrictsorprivatewellsthatareunaffiliatedwiththeSanDiegoCountyWaterAuthority.Thewater‐relatedGHGcalculationscontainedhereinassumethatallproject‐relatedwateruseshaveassociatedsupply‐,conveyance‐,treatment‐,anddistribution‐relatedenergyrequirements.Becausetheseprocessesconsumemoreelectricitythanwaterdeliveredbyaprivatewell,theemissionsanalysisrepresentsaconservativeassessmentofpotentialwater‐relatedGHGimpacts.Theinstallation,use,anddisposalofrefrigerationsystemslikeairconditioners,chillers,andrefrigeratorsmayresultinrefrigerantleaks.Thesefugitiveleakscanresultinsmall,butpotentemissionsofhigh‐GWPgasesthatconsistmostlyofhydrofluorocarbons(HFCs).Becausetheexactrefrigerationrequirementsarenotknownatthistime,refrigeration‐relatedhigh‐GWPgassesarediscussedqualitatively.

    Analysis 

    Potentialviolationofairqualitystandardsisanalyzedseparatelyforconstructionandoperations.General Construction‐Related Impacts 

    AsshowninTable2.1‐7,severalusesassociatedwithagriculturalactivitiessupportedbytheprojectcouldresultinincreasedcriteriapollutantemissions.However,thenumberofnewbuildingsandusesthatcouldbeinducedbythepermittingrevisionsiscurrentlyunknown.Accordingly,toillustratethepotentialairqualityimpactsfromconstructionofnewdevelopment,arepresentativeprojectwithineachusecategorywiththepotentialtogeneratemoderateorhighemissionswas

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐16 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    evaluated.EmissionswereestimatedusingCalEEModbasedonthemaximumfloorareasandacreagesforeachnewuse,asshowninTable2.1‐8.ItwasconservativelyassumedallconstructionwouldtakeplaceimmediatelyfollowingadoptionoftherevisedZoningOrdinancein2017.Table2.1‐9summarizestheanticipatedcriteriapollutantemissionsfromconstructionofeachproject.AsshowninTable2.1‐9,emissionsfromconstructionoftherepresentativeprojecttypeswouldnotexceedtheCounty’sthresholdsofsignificance.Accordingly,constructionofindividualprojectsinducedbythepermittingrevisionswouldnothaveadirectairqualityimpact.However,thereisthepotentialthatmultipleusescouldbeconstructedsimultaneously.Theexactnumberandtimingofallconstructionactivitiesthatcouldoccurasaresultoftheprojectareunknown.BasedontheillustrativeanalysispresentedinTable2.1‐9,foursimultaneousmicrobreweries,wineries,ordairiescouldbeconstructedatthesametimebeforeanemissionsthresholdisexceeded.Iffiveprojectswereconstructedatonce,NOXemissionswouldbe259poundsperdayandwouldexceedtheCounty’sSLTs.SanDiegoandSonomaCountieshavethehighestdensitiesofbreweriesandwineriesperacreinthestate.3Iftheexistingdensitiesareappliedtohalftheprojectstudyarea(185,100acres),8newbreweriesand83newwineriescouldbedevelopedasaresultoftheproject.ExtendingthesamelogictotheCounty’sfourdairies,onenewdairymaybedevelopedwiththepermittingrevisions.Assuch,itishighlylikelyfiveormoremicrobreweries,wineries,ordairieswouldbeconstructedatthesametime,resultinginashort‐termimpact.Simultaneousconstructionoftheotheranalyzeduses—homestay,roadsidesales,andagriculturalstores—wouldfurthercontributetotheemissionsexceedance.Therefore,ifmultipleprojectsarebuiltsimultaneously,constructionimpactsrelatedtoaviolationofanairqualitystandardwouldbepotentiallysignificant(ImpactAQ‐1).General Operational‐Related Impacts 

    Developmentaccessorytoagriculturalactivitiesthatarepromotedbytheproposedprojectrepresentsalong‐termsourceofcriteriapollutants.Newbuildingswouldgenerateemissionsfromenergy,mobile,andareasources.Energysourcesincludenaturalgascombustionforspaceheating,whereasmobilesourcesarevisitorandemployeevehicletrips.Areasourcesincludeconsumerproducts,landscapingequipment,andtheperiodicapplicationofpaintforfacilityupkeep.MicrobreweriesandwineriesalsoreleaseROGduringthemaltingandfermentationprocesses,respectively.Thenumberofnewbuildingsandusesthatcouldbeinducedbythepermittingrevisionsiscurrentlyunknown.Accordingly,toillustratethepotentialairqualityimpactsfromoperationofnewdevelopment,arepresentativeprojectwithineachusecategorywiththepotentialtogeneratemoderateorhighemissionswasevaluated.EmissionswereestimatedusingCalEEModbasedonthemaximumfloorareasandacreagesforeachnewuse,asshowninTable2.1‐8.Itwasconservativelyassumedallprojectswouldbeginoperationin2018immediatelyfollowingconstruction.Table2.1‐10summarizestheanticipatedcriteriapollutantemissionsfromoperationofeachproject.AsshowninTable2.1‐10,emissionsfromoperationoftherepresentativeprojecttypeswouldnotexceedtheCounty’sthresholdsofsignificance.Accordingly,operationofindividualprojectspromotedbythepermittingrevisionswouldnothaveadirectairqualityimpact.However,atfull

    3Therearecurrently116breweriesinSanDiegoCounty(2.7millionacres)and450wineriesinSonomaCounty(1millionacres)(ChenRyan2016).

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐17 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    buildout,multipleuseswouldoperatesimultaneously.Theexactnumberofnewusesthatcouldoccurasaresultoftheprojectareunknown.Asanillustrativeexampleofpotentialoperationalimpactsatfullbuildout,developmentassociatedwiththethreeuseswiththelargestemissionspotential—microbreweries,wineries,andcreameries/dairies—wereestimatedbasedonexistinglandusedensities.Asdiscussedabove,itisassumedthat8newbreweries,83newwineries,and1newcreamery/dairymaybedevelopedwiththepermittingrevisions.AsnotedintheTransportationImpactAssessment(TIA)(ChenRyan2016),itisunreasonabletoassumethateveryeligibleparcelwithintheCountywillconstructorincorporatetheimprovementsthatwouldbeallowedbytheproposedproject.TheTIAanalyzespotentialtrafficimpactsatfull‐buildassumingthat7%oftheeligibleparcelswouldconstructorimplementimprovements.Thisvaluerepresentsanaverageacrossallimprovementtypes;itispossiblemoreorlessbreweries,wineries,anddairiescouldbedeveloped.Accordingly,sincetheairqualityanalysispresentsemissionsassociatedwithbreweries,wineries,anddairiesasanillustrativeexampleofpotentialimpacts,theassessmentassumesahigherpenetrationratetoensureimpactsarenotunrepresented.4Totaloperationalemissionsgeneratedbytheseusesbasedontheindividualprojectemissions(seeTable2.1‐10)aresummarizedinTable2.1‐11.AsshowninTable2.1‐11,allemissionsexceptSO2fromatheoreticalfullbuildoutscenarioformicrobreweries,wineries,andcreameries/dairieswouldexceedCountythresholdsofsignificance.Operationalemissionsfromtheotheranalyzeduses—homestay,roadsidesales,andagriculturalstores—wouldfurthercontributetotheemissionsexceedances.Therefore,ifmultipleprojectsoperatesimultaneously,operationalimpactsrelatedtoaviolationofanairqualitystandardwouldbepotentiallysignificant(ImpactAQ‐2).

    2.1.3.3 Exposure of Receptors to Substantial Pollutant Concentrations 

    Guidelines for the Determination of Significance 

    ThefollowingsignificanceguidelinefromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesappliestoboththedirectandcumulativeimpactanalyses.Asignificantimpactwouldresultiftheprojectwould: Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations.Forthepurposeofthisanalysis,schools,daycarefacilities,placesofassembly,medicalfacilities,parks,andresidencesareconsideredsensitivereceptorlocations.A“substantialpollutantconcentration”isdefinedaslevelsinexcessofapplicableCountythresholds,asdescribedinAppendixDunderHealth‐BasedThresholdsforProject‐GeneratedPollutantsofHumanHealthConcern.AsdescribedinAppendixD,emissionsinexcessofSanDiegoCounty’sSLTswouldbeexpectedtohaveasignificantimpactonairqualitybecauseanexceedanceoftheSLTsisanticipatedtocontributetoCAAQSandNAAQSviolationsintheCounty.

    4AsnotedintheTransportationImpactAssessment(TIA)(ChenRyan2016),itisunreasonabletoassumethateveryeligibleparcelwithintheCountywillconstructorincorporatetheimprovementsthatwouldbeallowedbytheproposedproject.TheTIAanalyzespotentialtrafficimpactsatfull‐buildassumingthat7%oftheeligibleparcelswouldconstructorimplementimprovements.Thisvaluerepresentsanaverageacrossallimprovementtypes;itispossiblemoreorlessbreweries,wineries,anddairiescouldbedeveloped.Accordingly,sincetheairqualityanalysispresentsemissionsassociatedwithbreweries,wineries,anddairiesasanillustrativeexampleofpotentialimpacts,theassessmentassumesahigherpenetrationratetoensureimpactsarenotunrepresented.

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐18 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    Analysis 

    Theanalysisofproject‐relatedimpactsonhumanhealthfocusesonthoselocalizedpollutantswiththegreatestpotentialtoresultinasignificant,materialimpactonhumanhealth.Thisisconsistentwiththecurrentstate‐of‐practiceandpublishedguidancebytheCaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation(2009),OfficeofEnvironmentalHealthHazardAssessment(2015),andARB(2005).ThesepollutantsarelocallyconcentratedDPMandCO.Diesel Particulate Matter 

    HealthrisksrelatedtoDPMareassessedqualitativelybasedonanticipatedprojectemissionsandproximitytosensitivereceptors.ProjectsthatrequireconstructionactivitywouldgenerateDPMemissionsfromtheuseofheavy‐dutyequipmentandtrucks.AsshowninTable2.1‐9,microbreweries,wineries,andcreameries/dairiesareanticipatedtogeneratethehighestPMemissionsofallusespromotedbytheproposedproject.TheseuseswouldalsogenerateminorDPMemissionsfrommaterialdeliveriesandexportofbottledbeveragesandotherproducts.Diesel‐poweredprocessingequipmentmayalsogenerateDPMemissions.Cancerhealthrisksassociatedwithexposuretodieselexhaustaretypicallyassociatedwithchronicexposure,inwhicha70‐yearexposureperiodisassumed.Basedonthemaximumallowablebuildingsizes,constructionactivitiesatindividualprojectsitesareanticipatedtobeshort‐termandwouldnotexceed2years(refertoAppendixD).Inaddition,DPMconcentrations,andthuscancerhealthrisks,dissipateasafunctionofdistancefromtheemissionssource.Becauseagriculturaloperationsaretypicallylocatedinruralareas,thenumberofsensitivereceptorsaffectedbyindividualprojectsisexpectedtobeminimal.SDAPCDRule1200alsoestablishesacceptablerisklevelsandemissioncontrolrequirementsfornewandmodifiedfacilitiesthatmayemitoperationalTACs,includingDPM.5UnderRule1200,permitstooperatemaynotbeissuedwhenemissionsofTACsresultinanincrementalcancerriskgreaterthan1in1millionwithoutapplicationofbestavailablecontroltechnologyorahealthhazardindex(chronicandacute)greaterthanone. GiventheruralnatureofanticipatedconstructionandrequiredcompliancewithSDAPCDRule1200,implementationoftheprojectisnotanticipatedtoexposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialDPMconcentrations.Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Carbon Monoxide Hot‐Spots 

    TheCountyrequiresananalysisoflocalizedCOconcentrationsassociatedwithtrafficcongestiontoensureconcentrationsremainbelowCAAQSandNAAQS.AsdiscussedinAppendixD,theCountyhasdevelopedasetofpreliminaryscreeningcriteriathatcanbeusedtodeterminewhetheraprojectwouldcauseorcontributetoanexistingorfutureviolationoftheambientairqualitystandards.Thecriteriaareplacementofreceptorswithin500feetofasignalizedintersectionoperatingatorbelowlevelofservice(LOS)E,ordegradationofroadintersectionswithpeak‐hourtripsexceeding3,000toLOSEorworse.Theproposedprojectwouldnotsupportanysensitivelandusesandthereforewouldnotplacenewsensitivereceptorswithin500feetofasignalizedintersectionoperatingatorbelowLOSE.

    5Specifically,Rule1200appliestoanynew,relocated,ormodifiedemissionunitthatmayincreaseemissionsofoneormoreTACandforwhichanAuthoritytoConstructorPermittoOperateisrequiredpursuanttoRule10,orforwhichaNoticeofIntentionorApplicationforCertificationhasbeenacceptedbytheCaliforniaEnergyCommission.

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐19 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    AlthoughthetrafficstudypreparedbyChenRyan(2016)didnotanalyzeintersectionoperations,itdoesindicatethattheprojectwouldimpactsevenroadwaysegmentsoperatingatLOSF.6Accordingly,theprojectmayfailtheCounty’ssecondCOscreeningcriteriaatintersectionsalongtheaffectedroadwaysegments,resultinginelevatedCOconcentrationsandpotentialhealthrisks.AscreeninganalysiswasperformedtoconfirmthatimplementationoftheprojectwouldnotcauseCOhot‐spots.TheanalysisutilizeddailytrafficcountsprovidedbyChenRyan(2016)alongtheLilacRoad(betweenValleyCenterRoadandNewRoad19)segment,whichhasthehighestprojectandcumulativeplusproject‐relatedtraffic.Itwasconservativelyassumedthatpeak‐hourvolumestravelalongtheroadwayat5mphatyear2016emissionrates.Becausepeakhourvolumeswerenotavailable,dailyvolumeswereconvertedtopeakhourusingaconversionfactorof5,whichisacommonpractice(Cookpers.comm.).Convertingdailytopeakhourprovidesaconservativeyetrealisticassessmentofprojecttrafficimpactsasadditionalvehicleswouldbespreadthroughoutseveralhoursoftheday,andduringeventhemostcongestedtimeswouldtravelatspeedsabove5mph.ElevatedCOconcentrationsaretypicallyfoundinareaswithsignificanttrafficcongestion.COisapublichealthconcernbecauseitcombinesreadilywithhemoglobinandreducestheamountofoxygentransportedinthebloodstream.Table2.1‐12presentstheresultsoftheworst‐caseCOscreening,whichwasmodeledusingtheCALINE4dispersionmodel.Worst‐casecumulativeplusproject(2035)trafficconditionswithin2016emissionratesweremodeledtoprovideaconservativeanalysisofpotentialimpacts.AsshowninTable2.1‐12,COconcentrationsarenotexpectedtocontributetoanynewlocalizedviolationsofthe1‐or8‐hourambientairqualitystandards.Becausethescreening‐levelanalysisconcentratesthehighestpeakhourvolumesatasingleroadwaysegmentatalowtravelspeed,actualCOconcentrationsthatwouldbegeneratedatmultipleintersectionsthroughouttheCountywouldnotresultinCOhot‐spots.Consequently,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.

    2.1.3.4 Objectionable Odors  

    Guidelines for the Determination of Significance 

    ThefollowingsignificanceguidelinefromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesappliestoboththedirectandcumulativeimpactanalyses.Asignificantimpactwouldresultiftheprojectwould: Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople.Forthepurposeofthisanalysis,anodor‐producingfacility,asdefinedbyARB(2005),createsan“objectionableodor”ifitresultsinanuisanceviolation,perSDAPCDRule51.Thepotentialfortheprojecttocreateobjectionableodorsisassessedqualitativelybasedontheproposedlandusetypesandproximitytosensitivereceptors.

    Analysis 

    TheproposedprojectwouldpromoteandencourageadditionalagriculturaluseswithintheCounty.AgriculturalactivitiesareconsideredbytheCountyandARB(2005)ashavingahighpotentialtogeneratenuisanceodors.Usetypesmostlikelytoresultinodorsincludecreameries/dairiesand

    6Theprojectwouldimpactfiveadditionalroadways,butthesehavebeenacceptedbytheCounty’sMobilityElementasoperatingatLOSF(ChenRyan2016).

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐20 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    animalraising.Potentialodorsassociatedwiththeseuseswouldbecausedbyanimalwastegeneratedandstockpiledonsite.Microbreweriesandwineriesmayalsoresultintemporaryodorsduringfermenterventing.Althoughthenumberofpeopleexposedtopotentialodorsisanticipatedtobeminimal,odordispersionduringwindeventsmayleadtooffsitenuisanceviolations.Therefore,impactsrelatedtoobjectionableodorswouldbepotentiallysignificant(ImpactAQ‐3).

    2.1.3.5 Generate Substantial GHG Emissions  

    Guidelines for the Determination of Significance 

    ThefollowingsignificanceguidelinefromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesappliestoboththedirectandcumulativeimpactanalyses.Asignificantimpactwouldresultiftheprojectwould: Generategreenhousegasemissions,eitherdirectlyorindirectly,thatmayhaveasignificant

    impactontheenvironment.Forthepurposesofthisanalysis,asignificantlevelofGHGemissionsisacircumstanceinwhichconstructionoroperationalemissionsexceedthepertinentGHGthresholds,asdescribedinAppendixDunderThresholdsforGreenhouseGases.

    Analysis 

    GHGemissionsduringconstructionandoperationwereassessedusingthesamemethodsasdescribedaboveinSection2.1.3.2,ViolateAirQualityStandards.TheimpactofGHGemissionsisanalyzedseparatelyforconstructionandoperationsGeneral Construction‐Related Impacts 

    AsshowninTable2.1‐7,severalusesassociatedwithagriculturalactivitiessupportedbytheprojectcouldresultinincreasedGHGemissions.However,thenumberofnewbuildingsandusespromotedbythepermittingrevisionsiscurrentlyunknown.Accordingly,toillustratethepotentialGHGimpactsfromconstructionofnewdevelopment,arepresentativeprojectwithineachusecategorywiththepotentialtogeneratemoderateorhighemissionswasevaluated.EmissionswereestimatedusingCalEEModbasedonthemaximumfloorareasandacreagesforeachnewuse,asshowninTable2.1‐8.Itwasconservativelyassumedallconstructionwouldtakeplaceimmediatelyfollowingadoptionoftherevisedordinancein2017.Table2.1‐13summarizestheanticipatedGHGemissionsfromconstructionofeachproject.AsshowninTable2.1‐13,therepresentativeprojectswouldgeneratebetween58and323metrictonsCO2eduringtheconstructionperiods.ConsistentwiththeCounty’sGHGguidance,construction‐relatedGHGemissionswereamortizedovera20‐yearperiodanalyzedwiththeoperationalemissionsdiscussedbelow.General Operational‐Related Impacts 

    Developmentofaccessoryusestoagriculturalactivitiesthatarepromotedbytheproposedprojectrepresentalong‐termsourceofGHGemissions.Newbuildingswouldgenerateemissionsfromenergyconsumption,mobileandareasources,andfromwaterconsumptionandwastewaterandwastegeneration.WineriesalsorepresentbothasourceandsinkofGHGemissions,generatingN2OduringfertilizerapplicationandsequesteringCO2throughphotosynthesis.Livestockmanagement

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐21 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    representsasourceofCH4andN2Ofrommanuremanagementandentericfermentation.Allofthesesourcesweretakenintoaccountwhenassessingproject‐generatedGHGemissions.Thenumberofnewbuildingsandusesthatcouldbeinducedbythepermittingrevisionsiscurrentlyunknown.Accordingly,toillustratethepotentialGHGimpactsfromprojectoperation,arepresentativeprojectwithineachusecategorywiththepotentialtogeneratemoderateorhighemissionswasevaluated.EmissionswereestimatedusingCalEEModbasedonthemaximumfloorareasandacreagesforeachnewuse,asshowninTable2.1‐8.Itwasconservativelyassumedallprojectswouldbeginoperationin2018immediatelyfollowingconstruction.Table2.1‐14summarizestheanticipatedGHGemissionsfromoperationofeachproject.Amortizedconstructionemissionsarealsoprovided,consistentwithCountyguidance.AsshowninTable2.1‐14,emissionsfromoperationoftherepresentativewineryandmicrobreweryprojecttypeswouldexceedtheCounty’sinterimscreeninglevelof900metrictonsCO2e.AsdiscussedinAppendixD,thisscreeninglevelisrecommendedbytheCountyasanindicatorforprojectsthatrequirefurtheranalysisandmitigationandmayresultinsignificantGHGimpacts.Thenumberofnewbuildingsandusesthatcouldbeinducedbythepermittingrevisionsiscurrentlyunknown.Therefore,theanalysishereindisclosespotentialGHGemissionsusinganillustrativeexampleofpotentialprojectbuildout.Additionaldetailtoallowforfurtheranalysisofprojectemissionsisnotavailableatthistime.Accordingly,the900metrictonsCO2escreeninglevelisusedasanindicatorofprojectsignificanceinthiscase.Becauseoperationofindividualprojectspromotedbythepermittingrevisionsexceed900metrictonsCO2e,implementationoftheproposedprojectmaypotentiallyhaveadirectGHGimpact.Moreover,atfullbuildout,multipleuseswouldoperatesimultaneously.Theexactnumberofnewusesthatcouldoccurasaresultoftheprojectareunknown.Asanillustrativeexampleofpotentialoperationalimpactsatfullbuildout,developmentassociatedwiththethreeuseswiththelargestemissionspotential—microbreweries,wineries,andcreameries/dairies—wereestimatedbasedonexistinglandusedensities.Asdiscussedabove,itisassumedthat8newbreweries,83newwineries,and1newcreamery/dairymaybedevelopedwiththepermittingrevisions.7Totaloperationalandamortizedconstructionemissionsgeneratedbytheseusesbasedontheindividualprojectemissions(seeTable2.1‐14)aresummarizedinTable2.1‐15.AsshowninTable2.1‐15,GHGemissionsfromatheoreticalfullbuildoutscenarioformicrobreweries,wineries,andcreameries/dairieswouldexceedtheCounty’sinterimscreeninglevelof900metrictonsCO2e.Operationalemissionsfromtheotheranalyzeduses—homestay,roadsidesales,andagriculturalstores—wouldfurthercontributetotheemissionsexceedances.Therefore,impactsrelatedtogreenhousegasemissionswouldbepotentiallysignificant(ImpactAQ‐4).

    7AsnotedintheTIA(ChenRyan2016),itisunreasonabletoassumethateveryeligibleparcelwithintheCountywillconstructorincorporatetheimprovementsthatwouldbeallowedbytheproposedproject.TheTIAanalyzespotentialtrafficimpactsatfull‐buildassumingthat7%oftheeligibleparcelswouldconstructorimplementimprovements.Thisvaluerepresentsanaverageacrossallimprovementtypes;itispossiblemoreorlessbreweries,wineries,anddairiescouldbedeveloped.Accordingly,sincetheairqualityanalysispresentsemissionsassociatedwithbreweries,wineries,anddairiesasanillustrativeexampleofpotentialimpacts,theassessmentassumesahigherpenetrationratetoensureimpactsarenotunrepresented

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐22 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    2.1.3.6 Consistency with GHG Plans, Policies, and Regulations  

    Guidelines for the Determination of Significance 

    ThefollowingsignificanceguidelinefromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesappliestoboththedirectandcumulativeimpactanalyses.Asignificantimpactwouldresultiftheprojectwould: Conflictwithanapplicableplan,policy,orregulationadoptedforthepurposeofreducingthe

    emissionsofgreenhousegases.Forthepurposesofthisanalysis,applicableplansincludetheAB32ScopingPlan,SB32,theCounty’sGeneralPlan,andEOS‐3‐05.

    Analysis 

    TheAB32ScopingPlanandSB32representthemostapplicableplans,policies,orregulationsadoptedforthepurposeofreducingGHGemissions.AB32codifiedtheState’sGHGemissionsreductiontargetsfor2020andidentifiedtheacceptablelevelofGHGemissionsinCalifornia,withreductionscomingintheformofchangestovehicleemissionsandmileagestandards,sourcesofelectricity,andenergyefficiency.Remainingreductionswillneedtocomefromplans,policies,orregulationsthatwillrequirenewfacilitiestohavelowercarbonintensitiesthantheyhaveunderbusinessasusual(BAU)conditions.TheAB32ScopingPlandetailsspecificGHGemissions‐reductionmeasuresthattargetspecificGHGemissionssources.TheScopingPlanconsidersarangeofactions,includingdirectregulations,alternativecompliancemechanisms,monetaryandnon‐monetaryincentives,voluntaryactions,andmarket‐basedmechanisms(e.g.,acap‐and‐tradesystem).Alsoincludedaremobile‐sourceemissionsreductionmeasures(Pavley,LowCarbonFuelStandardvehicleefficiencymeasures),energyproduction–relatedemissions‐reductionmeasures(naturalgastransmissionanddistributionefficiencymeasures,naturalgasextractionefficiencymeasures),andtheRPS(electricity).WhiletheARB’s2030ScopingPlanforachievingSB32hasnotyetbeenpublished,itisanticipatedtoextendandfurthermuchofthepoliciesandprogramsincludedintheAB32ScopingPlan.Asaresult,project‐relatedGHGemissionswouldbereducedthroughseveraloftheAB32andSB32ScopingPlanmeasures.Atthelocallevel,theCountyiscurrentlypreparingaCAPthatwillprovideaframeworkformeetingstate‐mandatedGHGreductiontargets.AdoptionoftheCAPisexpectedinthefallof2017.Untilthen,themostrelevantlocalplanistheCounty’sGeneralPlan,whichlaysoutthelong‐termlanduseplanningframeworkforfuturegrowthanddevelopmentpatternswithintheunincorporatedareasoftheCounty.TheproposedprojectisforaZoningOrdinanceAmendmentthatintroducesnewpermittingrequirementstopromotethedevelopmentofusesthatareaccessoriestoagriculturalactivities,includingmicrobreweries,dairyoperations,andretailstores.AsdiscussedinSection3.1.1,LandUseandPlanning,theproposedprojectwouldbeconsistentwiththeCounty’sGeneralPlan’sgoalsandpoliciespertainingtoagriculturaldevelopmentwithintheCounty.Onanindividualbasis,projectsallowedundertheZoningOrdinanceAmendmentwouldgenerallybesmallandresultinminoramountsofemissions;however,takenasawhole(i.e.,maximumnumberofuses)theymayresultinasubstantialincreaseinGHGemissions.Individualprojects,suchasmicrobreweriesandwineries,wouldlikelyresultinthehighestGHGemissionsgiventheamountofprocess‐relatedinputsrequired,includingelectricityandwateraswellascoolingrequirementsandfugitivereleases.

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐23 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    TheprojectwouldbeconsistentwithAB32,SB32,andtheCounty’sGeneralPlanbyprovidingforusesthatareconsistentwiththeCounty’sGeneralPlan’sgoals,policies,anddevelopmentpatternspertainingtoagriculturaldevelopmentwithintheCounty.TheseuseswouldnothindertheState’sabilitytomeetthereductiongoalsofAB32orSB32.Asdiscussedabove,EOS‐03‐05establishedalong‐termgoalofreducingstatewideGHGemissionsto80percentbelow1990levelsby2050.Achievingthislong‐termGHGreductionpolicywillrequiresystemicchangesinhowenergyisproducedandused.Thesedeepreductionsaretobeachievedonlywithsignificantchangesinelectricityproduction,transportationfuels,andindustrialprocesses,suchasincreasingenergyefficiency,avoidingwasteemissions,andreplacinghighglobalwarmingpotentialgases.Thechangesnecessitatedtoachievethesetargetswillrequireadditionalpolicyandregulatorychanges,whichareunknownatthistime.Moreover,thereiscurrentlynostatewideplanthatlaysouttheframeworkastoexactlyhowthestateplansonachievingthistargetandtowhatextentactionisrequiredatthelocalandprojectlevelinordertoachievethetarget.Therefore,theextenttowhichtheproject’semissionsandresultingimpactswouldbemitigatedthroughimplementationofsuchchangesisnotknownandwouldthusbeinconsistentwithplans,policies,orregulationsadoptedforthepurposedofreducingGHGemissionsinthelong‐term.Therefore,impactsrelatedtoconflictswithanapplicableplan,policy,orregulationwouldbepotentiallysignificant(ImpactAQ‐5).

    2.1.4 Cumulative Impacts Analysis ThegeographicscopeforthecumulativeanalysisofairqualityincludestheSDAB,whichencompassestheentireCounty,includingbothincorporatedandunincorporatedareasandtribalandpublicagencylands.BecauseGHGsareglobalpollutants,thegeographicscopefortheGHGanalysisismuchbroaderandconsidersglobaleffectsofproject‐generatedemissions.

    2.1.4.1 Air Quality Plan TheRAQSistheregion’splanforimprovingairqualityandattainingthefederalandstateairqualitystandards.ThecontrolstrategiesandemissionsforecastsanalyzedintheRAQSaccountforcurrent,planned,andreasonablyforeseeableprojectsintheSDAB.Accordingly,theRAQSconsistencyanalysiscompletedinSection2.1.3,AnalysisofProjectEffectsandDeterminationofSignificance,isinherentlycumulative;asdiscussedabove,becausetheproposedprojectincludesdevelopmentthatisconsistentwiththeusesallowedbytheLandUseElementandagriculturalzones,thenewdevelopmentwasanticipatedinSANDAGgrowthprojectionsusedindevelopmentoftheRAQSandSIP.Therefore,theprojectwouldnotconflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheairqualityplansorcontributetoacumulativelyconsiderableimpact.

    2.1.4.2 Violate Air Quality Standards  SanDiegoCountyiscurrentlyinmarginalnonattainmentforthefederal8‐hourozonestandardandnonattainmentforthestateozone,PM2.5,andPM10standards(seeTable2.1‐4).Thenonattainmentstatus,whichisaresultofpastandpresentprojects,maybefurtherimpededbyreasonablyforeseeablefutureprojects.TheprojectwouldresultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofcriteriapollutantsifemissionsexceedtheCounty’sthresholdsduringconstructionorlong‐termoperation.Inaddition,cumulativeimpactscouldoccurifemissionsofconcernfromotherpast,present,orreasonablyforeseeablefutureprojectswithinproximityoftheprojectwouldexposenearbyreceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations.

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐24 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    Asdiscussedabove,concurrentconstructionandoperationofagriculturalusespromotedbytheprojectwouldexceedtheCounty’sapplicableairqualitythresholds.TheseemissionswouldoccurduringthesameperiodasotherprojectsintheSDAB,furthercontributingtotheemissionsexceedances.Accordingly,theprojectwouldcontributetoacumulativelyconsiderableimpactonairqualitystandards(ImpactAQ‐6).

    2.1.4.3 Exposure of Receptors to Substantial Pollutant Concentrations TheprojectisnotanticipatedtoexposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialDPMorCOconcentrations.GeographicallyproximateconstructionactivitiesassociatedwithplannedandreasonablyforeseeableprojectsmayexposeadjacentreceptorstoincreasedhealththreatsfromlocalizedCOorandDPM.Effectswouldvaryaccordingtotheequipmentused,locationsofemissionsourcesandreceptors,andunderlyingmeteorology.However,giventheremotenatureoftheprojectareaandthefactthatconstructionanoperationalactivitieswouldbespreadthroughoutthe370,200‐acrestudyarea,receptorexposuretoCOorDPMinexcessofCountythresholdsisunlikely.Accordingly,theproposedprojectwouldnotcontributetoacumulativelyconsiderableimpactfromexposureofreceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations.

    2.1.4.4 Objectionable Odors  TheprojectwouldpromoteagriculturalactivitiesthatareconsideredbytheCountyandARB(2005)ashavingahighpotentialtogeneratenuisanceodors.Theseodoremissionswouldbemagnifiedwhencombinedwithodorsfromgeographicallyproximateprojects.Similartoreceptorexposuretosubstantialpollutantconcentrations,effectswouldvaryaccordingtounderlyingmeteorologyandthelocationsofodorsourcesandreceptors.Althoughthenumberofpeopleexposedtopotentialodorsisanticipatedtominimal,giventhenatureofagriculturalactivities,cumulativeodoremissionswithinthestudyareamaycreateanuisanceviolation,perSDAPCDRule51.Accordingly,theprojectwouldcontributetoacumulativelyconsiderableimpactonodors(ImpactAQ‐7).

    2.1.4.5 Generate Substantial GHG Emissions  Climatechangeisaglobalproblem,andGHGsareglobalpollutants,unlikecriteriaairpollutants(suchasozoneprecursors),whichareprimarilypollutantsofregionalandlocalconcern.Giventheirlongatmosphericlifetimes,GHGsemittedbycountlesssourcesworldwideaccumulateintheatmosphere.NosingleemitterofGHGsislargeenoughtotriggerglobalclimatechangeonitsown.Rather,climatechangeistheresultoftheindividualcontributionsofcountlesspast,present,andfuturesources.Therefore,GHGimpactsareinherentlycumulative,andtheGHGanalysispresentedinSection2.1.3isacumulativeimpactanalysis.Asdescribedabove,concurrentconstructionandoperationofagriculturalusespromotedbytheprojectwouldexceedtheCounty’sGHGSLT.Accordingly,theprojectwouldcontributetoacumulativelyconsiderableimpactonGHGemissions(ImpactAQ‐8).

    2.1.4.6 Consistency with GHG Plans, Policies, and Regulations  TheGHGanalysispresentedinSection2.1.3isacumulativeimpactanalysis.Asdiscussedabove,theprojectwouldbeconsistentwithAB32,SB32,andtheCounty’sGeneralPlanbyprovidingforusesthatareconsistentwiththeCounty’sGeneralPlan’sgoals,policies,anddevelopmentpatternspertainingtoagriculturaldevelopmentwithintheCountythatwouldnotresultinemissionthat

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐25 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    wouldimpedeprogresstoward2020or2030targets.However,asthereisnoframeworkforachievinglong‐termreductiontargets(2050),itisunknownexactlyhowthestateplansonachievingthesetargetsandtowhatextentactionisrequiredatthelocalandprojectlevelinordertoachievethesetargets.Accordingly,theprojectwouldcontributetoacumulativelyconsiderableimpactonlong‐termGHGreductionplanningefforts(ImpactAQ‐9).

    2.1.5 Significance of Impacts Prior to Mitigation TheproposedprojectwouldresultinpotentiallysignificantimpactsrelatedtoconstructionandoperationalcriteriapollutantandGHGemissions(ImpactsAQ‐1,AQ‐2,AQ‐4,andAQ‐5,direct/indirect,andAQ‐6andAQ‐8,cumulative),aswellasodors(ImpactAQ‐3,direct,andAQ‐7,cumulative).Theproposedprojectwouldresultinless‐than‐significantimpactsrelatedtoconsistencywithapplicableairqualityplansandexposureofsensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations.

    2.1.6 Mitigation Measures 2.1.6.1 Air Quality Plan 

    TheprojectwouldnotconflictwithorobstructimplementationoftheRAQSandSIP.Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant,andnomitigationmeasuresarerequired.

    2.1.6.2 Violate Air Quality Standards  SimultaneousconstructionandoperationofagriculturalusespromotedbytheprojectwouldexceedtheCounty’scriteriapollutantthresholds,andassuch,mayviolateairqualitystandards.Mitigationmeasures(describedbelow)havebeenidentifiedthatwouldreduceconstructionandoperationalemissions,butnotbelowasignificantlevel.

    Mitigation Measures  

    M‐AQ‐1:Duringtheenvironmentalreviewprocessforfuturediscretionarypermits,theCountyGuidelinesforDeterminingSignificanceforAirQualitywillbeapplied.Whenimpactsaredeterminedtobesignificant,feasibleandappropriateproject‐specificmitigationmeasureswillbeincorporated.Gradingcangeneratefugitivedust,includingPM10andPM2.5.Projectsthatinvolvesitegrading,excavation,orsubstantialmaterialmovementwillimplementthefollowingdustcontrolmeasuresduringconstruction,asapplicable,incompliancewithSDAPCDRule55. Waterthegradingareasaminimumoftwicedailytominimizefugitivedust. Stabilizegradedareasasquicklyaspossibletominimizefugitivedust. Applychemicalstabilizerorpavethelast100feetofinternaltravelpathwithinthe

    constructionsitepriortopublicroadentry. Installwheelwashersadjacenttoapavedapronpriortovehicleentryonpublicroads. Removeanyvisibletrack‐outintotraveledpublicstreetswithin30minutesofoccurrence. Wetwashtheconstructionaccesspointattheendofeachworkdayifanyvehicletravelon

    unpavedsurfaceshasoccurred.

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐26 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    Providesufficientperimetererosioncontroltopreventwashoutofsiltymaterialontopublicroads.

    Coverhaultrucksormaintainatleast12inchesoffreeboardtoreduceblow‐offduringhauling.

    Suspendallsoildisturbanceandtravelonunpavedsurfacesifwindsexceed25mph. Cover/wateronsitestockpilesofexcavatedmaterial. Enforcea15mphspeedlimitonunpavedsurfaces. Ondrydays,sweepupanydirtanddebrisspilledontopavedsurfacesimmediatelyto

    reducere‐suspensionofparticulatemattercausedbyvehiclemovement.Cleanapproachroutestoconstructionsitesdailyforconstruction‐relateddirtindryweather.

    Hydroseed,landscape,ordevelopasquicklyaspossiblealldisturbedareasandasdirectedbytheCountyand/orSDAPCDtoreducedustgeneration.

    Limitthedailygradingvolumes/area.M‐AQ‐2:Duringtheenvironmentalreviewprocessforfuturediscretionarypermits,theCountyGuidelinesforDeterminingSignificanceforAirQualitywillbeapplied.Whenimpactsaredeterminedtobesignificant,feasibleandappropriateproject‐specificmitigationmeasureswillbeincorporated.Constructionprojectstypicallyrequireequipmentsuchasbulldozers,graders,loaders,scrapers,backhoes,andheavytrucks.Projectapplicantswillutilizeclean‐diesel,alternativefuel,orotherenginecontrolstoreduceequipmentandvehicleexhaustemissionsduringconstruction.Projectapplicantswillimplementthefollowingcontrolmeasures,asapplicable,toreduceequipmentandexhaustrelatedemissions. Requireequipmenttobemaintainedingoodtuneandtoreduceexcessiveidlingtime. Utilizealternativefuels,suchascompressednaturalgas,renewablediesel,anddiesel. RequiretheuseofequipmentthatmeetsEPATier4orhigher(aspromulgated)emission

    standards. Requireolderequipmentberetrofittedwithadvancedenginecontrols,suchasdiesel

    particulatefilters,selectivecatalyticreduction(SCR),orcooledexhaustgasrecirculation.M‐AQ‐3:Duringtheenvironmentalreviewprocessforfuturediscretionarypermits,theCountyGuidelinesforDeterminingSignificanceforAirQualitywillbeapplied.Whenimpactsaredeterminedtobesignificant,feasibleandappropriateproject‐specificmitigationmeasureswillbeincorporated.Buildingconstructionmayresultinoff‐gassingofROGfromarchitecturalcoatingsandpaintsthatexceedtheCounty’sthreshold.ProjectapplicantswillreduceROGemissionsrelatedtoarchitecturalcoatingsthroughtheuseoflowVolatileOrganicCompound(VOC)coatings(VOCcontentlessthanorequalto50gramsperliter).M‐AQ‐4.Duringtheenvironmentalreviewprocessforfuturediscretionarypermits,theCountyGuidelinesforDeterminingSignificanceforAirQualitywillbeapplied.Whenimpactsaredeterminedtobesignificant,feasibleandappropriateproject‐specificmitigationmeasureswillbeincorporated.Projectapplicantswillimplementthefollowingcontrolmeasures,asapplicable,toreduceoperationalrelatedcriteriapollutantandGHGemissions.GeneralStrategies

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐27 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    Increaseenergyefficiencybyatleast10percentbeyondtheTitle24standardinplaceatthetimeofconstruction,unlessdemonstratedtobeinfeasible.

    UtilizelowVOCcoatings(VOCcontentlessthanorequalto50gramsperliter)forperiodicpaintingandfacilityupkeep.

    Plantshadetreeswithin40feetofthesouthsideorwithin60feetofthewestsideofproperties.

    Utilizecoolroofmaterials(albedogreaterthanorequalto30)orinstallgreenroofs. Installsolarwaterheaters. Maximizeinteriordaylightandutilizehighefficiencylighting. Increaseroof/ceilinginsulationbeyondtheAmericanSocietyofHeating,Refrigerationand

    AirConditioningEngineersStandard90.1‐2010. Installlow‐wateruseappliancesandfixturestoreduceindoorwaterconsumptionby

    aminimumof10percentrelativetothe2008PlumbingCodebaseline. Designandinstallabackbonerecycledwatersystemtosupplytolandscapedspaces. Installweather‐basedirrigationcontrollerstoreduceoutdoorwaterconsumption. Compostfoodwasteandotherformsoforganicwaste,asfeasible. Provideeasilyaccessibleandwell‐maintainedrecyclingbinsforvisitoruse. Provideshuttlesforvisitorsandemployeesfromthenearesttown. Incorporateonsiterenewableenergyproduction,includinginstallationofphotovoltaiccells

    orotheroptions.AdditionalStrategiesforMicrobreweries

    Prepareandimplementanenergymanagementsystem(EMS)toimproveprocess‐andfacilityenergy‐efficiencyandreduceoverallenergyconsumption.Table2.1‐16listspotentialmeasuresthatmaybeincorporatedintotheEMS.PleaserefertotheGeneralStrategiessectionforpotentialmeasurestoreducewaterconsumptionandwastegeneration.

    AdditionalStrategiesforWineries,andDairies

    PrepareandimplementanEMStoimproveprocess‐andfacilityenergy‐efficiencyandreduceoverallenergyconsumption.Table2.1‐17listspotentialmeasuresthatmaybeincorporatedintotheEMS.PleaserefertotheGeneralStrategiessectionforpotentialmeasurestoreducewaterconsumptionandwastegeneration.

    AdditionalStrategiesforDairies

    PrepareandimplementanEMStoimproveprocess‐andfacilityenergy‐efficiencyandreduceoverallenergyconsumption.Table2.1‐18listspotentialmeasuresthatmaybeincorporatedintotheEMS.PleaserefertotheGeneralStrategiessectionforpotentialmeasurestoreducewaterconsumptionandwastegeneration.

    Becausethemitigationmeasureslistedabovewillnotbeappliedtofuturenon‐discretionaryactionsthatwillresultfromtheproposedzoningordinanceamendment,impactswouldremain

  • County of San Diego  Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

    Section 2.1. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases 

     Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Agriculture Promotion Project  2.1‐28 

    February 2017ICF 54.15

     

    potentiallysignificantandunavoidable.Chapter4,ProjectAlternatives,providesadiscussionofalternativestotheproposedprojectthatwouldresultinsomereducedimpactsassociatedwithairqualityascomparedtotheproposedproject.

    2.1.6.3 Exposure of Receptors to Substantial Pollutant Concentrations TheprojectisnotanticipatedtoexposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialDPMorCOconcentrations.Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant,andnomitigationisrequired.

    2.1.6.4 Objectionable Odors  TheprojectwouldpromoteagriculturalactivitiesthatareconsideredbytheCountyandARB(2005)ashavingahighpotentialtogeneratenuisanceodors.AsdiscussedinSection2.5,HydrologyandWaterQuality,agriculturaloperationsintheCountyarerequiredtoimplementstormwaterbestmanagementpractices(BMPs)toprotectwaterquality.TotheextentthattheseBMPsreducemoistureinmanurestockpilesandpreventanimalwaste(andassociatedodor)runoff,ambientodorsfromanimaloperationsmaybelessened.Thefollowingmitigationmeasurehasbeenidentifiedtoreduceodors,butnotbelowasignificantlevel.

    Mitigation Measure  

    M‐AQ‐5:Duringtheenvironmentalreviewprocessforfuturediscretionarypermits,theCountyGuidelinesforDeterminingSignificanceforAirQualityshallbeapplied.Whenimpactsaredeterminedtobesignificant,feasibleandappropriateproject‐specificmitigationmeasuresshallbeincorporated.Creameries/dairiesandanimalraisingmaygenerateodorsfromanimalwaste.Microbreweriesandwineriesmayalsoresultintemporaryodorsduringfermenterventing.Projectapplicantswillimplementbestmanagementpracticestocontrolodors.Animal‐RelatedOperations

    Animalstallswillbecleanedatleastonceperdayincludingtheremovalofanimalwasteandsoiledbedding.

    Animalwastewillbestockpiledinanenclosed,coveredcontainmentvesseltoensureanaerobicoff‐gassingandassociatedodorgenerationisminimized.Thecontainmentvesselwillprotectanimalwastestockpilesfromheavyweatherconditions,includingwindandrainwhichmaycausesiltationandaccelerateanaerobicdecompositionofthewaste.

    Ifaprojectsiteislocatedwithin1mileofresidentsand/orsensitivereceptors,containmentvesselsstoringanimalwastewillbelocatedatthefurthestfeasibledistancefromnearbyresidentsand/or


Top Related