Download - Pis Gmc Rev1
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
1/28
Performance IncentiveCalculation for the Performance
Incentive Scheme (PIS)Sept 2006 Aug 2007
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
2/28
ERC-Approved Performance Indicators forTransCos PIS
1. System Interruption Severity Index (SISI)2. Frequency of Tripping (FOT)
3. System Availability (SA)
4. Frequency Limit Compliance (FLC)
5. Voltage Limit Compliance (VLC)
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
3/28
Basis of Performance Targets
1. The targets are based on the average of 5 years
historical data (2000 2004).
2. Performance measures are assessed on a per grid basis.
3. The Final Determination sets a deadband within w/cthere will neither be a reward nor penalty.
4. The lower/upper limit of the deadband is based on 1standard deviation of the target. Another 1 standarddeviation is set as the collar/cap.
5. The collar is the maximum penalty; the cap is themaximum reward.
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
4/28
THE METHODOLOGY
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
5/28
Profile Graphs
Each performance indicator have a deadband where there is no
reward or penalty.
The cap is the maximum limit for reward while collar is themaximum limit for penalty.
Positive Measure Reference Profile Negative Measure Reference Profile
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
6/28
Basis of Performance Targets
1. The expected rewards will equalpenalties.
2. The maximum reward (x%) thathas a cap value will be computedbased on ratio & proportion
x% 3%
a b=
3. If High Limit Value already exceeded themaximum measure, no reward shall begiven since it is already at a high level ofperformance.
TransCo have to maintain the high levelof performance so as not to incur anypenalty.
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
7/28
Bandwith for the PIS (from FD)
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
8/28
Weights per Performance Indicator per Grid
Performance
Indicator
%
Weightings per Grid
Luzon Visayas Mindanao
SISI 45 20 50 30
FOT 25 32 29 39
SA 10 34 33 33
FLC 10 34 33 33
VLC 10 29 36 35
Total 100
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
9/28
Allowed Reward / Penalty
TransCo is allowed by the ERC a maximum level ofreward/penalty equal to 3% of the Annual RevenueRequirement (ARR) for the year (= PhP1,316.19 Mn for2007)
The FD caps the maximum reward/penalty at PhP978.5Mnfor each year of the Second Regulatory Period
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
10/28
Allowable Reward/Penalty for the Period
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
11/28
THE PIS COMPUTATIONFOR Sep 2006- August 2007
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
12/28
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
13/28
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
14/28
x/a = R/S where: R = maximum rewardS = D C
where: D = max. PI (Cap)C = High Deadband
Therefore:x/a = R/(D - C)
x = (a x R)/ S
x =(E C)________ x R
(D - C)
where: a = actual PI High Deadbanda = E CS = D C
where: (E C)/(D - C) = Multiplier
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
15/28
THE JUSTIFICATIONS OF
THE EXCLUSIONS
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
16/28
Exclusions Considered:
Tripping of Temporary Lines in Bicol Due to Force MajeureOutage of Permanent Lines
Lack of MVAR Absorption During Off-Peak Due toSimultaneous Outage of Both Units of Sual
Impact of WESM Operation in the Control of Frequency
Frequency limit violations Caused by Operation ofTreasure and Global Steel in Mindanao
Sabotage of Transmission Towers in Mindanao
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
17/28
Justifications of exclusions
Tripping of Temporary Lines in Bicol Due to ForceMajeure Outage of Permanent Lines
Temporary lines were put up because of massive damageof permanent lines by typhoons Milenyo and Reming.
Temporary structures were put up to restore electricpower at the shortest time possible
Since the structures are just temporary the lines areprone to trippings
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
18/28
Justifications of exclusions
Lack of MVAR Absorption During Off-Peak Due toSimultaneous Outage of Both Units of Sual
Manually tripped 500 and 230 kV lines in Northern Luzonbecause of simultaneous outage Sual Units 1&2 to correctprolonged high voltage to prevent equipment damage.
Simultaneous outage of the Sual units is already a (n-2)contingency event and is already outside the single outage(n-1) contingency planning criteria of TransCo and alsocomplies with 6.2.2.3 of the PGC.
In compliance with Section 5.3(e) of WESM rules thatallows transmission lines to be switched off to keepvoltage within allowable limits.
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
19/28
Justifications of exclusions
Impact of WESM Operation in the Control ofFrequency
Before WESM, TransCo system operators were able tointervene even before the system frequency limit of 59.7and 60.3 Hz is breached.
The action is line with Section 5.1 of the WESM Rules onSystem Security and Reliability Guidelines that frequencybetween 59.7 Hz. to 60.3 Hz., is still considered in NormalState Operation.
The constraints is addressed by amendment to PGC whichbroaden the limit to within 59.4 to 60.6.
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
20/28
Justifications of exclusions
Frequency limit violations Caused by Operation ofTreasure and Global Steel in Mindanao
The load fluctuations of steel mills were very significant.These fluctuations occurred in a very short time (spike)and the generating plants assigned for primary and
secondary response could not maintain and control theresulting frequency variation within acceptable limitsprescribed by the PGC
Clause 4.3.3.4 of the PGC requires that connection ormodification of existing connection to the grid by a Usershould not result in the degradation of the Grid.
Clause 7.3.4.2 of PGC requires that User shall beresponsible that its System will not degrade the System.
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
21/28
Justifications of exclusions
Sabotage of Transmission Towers in Mindanao The sabotage of the towers is a force majuere event not
within the control of TransCo.
The exclusion falls under outage classification No. 0012 ofTransCo Circular 2003-50.
The mathematical equation discussed on page 146 of theFD recognized the exclusion mentioned in the TransCoCircular.
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
22/28
Detailed Comparison of Performance Based on Exclusions& As Filed and Corresponding Incremental Cost
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
23/28
Thank you
End of Presentation
B i f C ti th P f L l
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
24/28
Basis for Computing the Performance LevelPertaining to Excluded Events
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
25/28
Effect on Voltage Limit Compliance (VLC)
Exclusion of the following substations w/ over voltages due to
the forced outage of Sual Units 1 & 2 on 23 October 2006 6March 2007, 19-20 March 2007 & 5-9 May 2007:
1. Bauang 230 kV
2. Mexico 230 kV
3. Santiago230 kV
4. San Jose 230 kV
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
26/28
Effect on SISI, FOT & SA
Exclusion in the calculation of unserved energy due to residual
effects of the major typhoons that occurred in year 2006 thatcaused the frequent tripping of the following temporarytransmission lines:
1. Naga-Tayabas 230 kV L1
2. Naga-Tiwi 230 kV L1
3. Naga-Labo 230 kV L2
4. Naga-Daraga 230 kV Line
5. Gumaca-Labo 230 kV L2
6. Daraga-Bacman 230 kV L1
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
27/28
Frequency Limit Compliance (FLC), % refers to the percentageof time during the rating period that the system frequency is within
the allowable limits of 60 + 0.3 Hz. A Frequency Limit Violation(FLV) is committed only when the frequency excursion is beyond thelimits for 60 seconds or more. It is expressed, as follows:
where:
nf = total number of frequency limit violations (for 60 sec. or more)r = scanning rate of the SCADA/EMS, in secondsd = number of days during the rating period
100)606024(
)(
1
d
rn
FLC
f
Power Quality
-
7/29/2019 Pis Gmc Rev1
28/28
Voltage Limit Compliance (VLC), % refers to the percentage of
the number of voltage measurements during the rating period thatthe voltage variance did not exceed + 5% of the nominal voltage ofall busses (Luzon 230 & 500 kV, Visayas 69, 138 & 230 kV,Mindanao 138 kV) monitored at the high side of the substation 24hours daily.
where:
nv = total number of voltage limit violationsns = number of substationsd = number of days during rating period
100)24(
1
s
v
nd
nVLC
Power Quality