Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Service Planning & Standards
Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Outline
• Quality of service basics
• Service availability
• Comfort and convenience
• Defining quality transit service
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
QUALITY OF SERVICE BASICS
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Transit service
Transit serves two populations• “Choice riders”• “Transit dependents riders”
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Performance Points of View
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Quality of Service
Availability Comfort and Convenience
Frequency Passenger LoadService Span ReliabilityAccess Travel Time
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
SERVICE AVAILABILITY
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Service Availability
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
• Frequency is the number of transit vehicles in a given period of time.
• Headway is the measurement of time between transit vehicles.
• Frequency generally divided into 2 categories: High Frequency Service: Headways less than 10 minutes Low Frequency Service: Headways greater than 10
minutes
Headway = 1 Frequency
Service Frequency
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
• Frequency is important because it determines waiting times.
• Wait time for high frequency transit is, on average, half of the headway.
(That is if it’s reliable – more later)
Wait Time = Headway 2
Frequency & Wait Time
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Service Frequency
Mean Headway Passenger Perspective
Operator Perspective
≤ 5 min •No schedule needed•Bus bunching likely
•High-density (high-ridership) •Exclusive right-of-way highly desirable•Bunching can occur in mixed traffic•Possibly cannot add more frequency
> 5 – 10 min •No schedule needed•Bus bunching possible
•High-density or major activity center•Exclusive right-of-way desirable •Possible bunching•Possible to increase frequency
11 – 15 min •Need schedule•Max desired wait for missed bus
•Branded as “frequent service” •Higher-density or strong anchors•Longest possible to still be BRT
16 – 30 min •Need schedule•Adapt to schedule
•Typically 20- or 30-min headways•Moderate-density corridors•Typical commuter rail headway•Longest commuter bus headway
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Service Frequency
Average Headway
Passenger Perspective
Operator Perspective
31 - 59 •Non-clockface headways requirecheck schedules•Must adapt to the transit schedule
•Typically 40- or 45-min headways•Low-to-moderate density
60 min •Minimal service for basic travel needs•Must adapt to the transit schedule
•Maximum headway for fixed route bus •Low density with subsidy•Service coverage standard
> 60 min •Undesirable for urban transit service
•Should consider demand responsive
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Span is the length of time that transit service runs.
Spans can be all day or can have peaks.
Service Span
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Hours of Service
• Service at least hourly – Round (last trip – first trip + 1 hr)
• Hourly-or-worse service– Count the number of departures.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Service Span
Hours of Service Passenger Perspective Operator Perspective
> 18 h •Full range of purposes•Replace riskier travel (drunk driving)
•“Night” or “owl”•Added driver pay•Security•Route differences
15 – 18 h •Broad range of purposes
•More than two drivers•Route differences
12 – 14 h •Work trips with flexibility
•Two drivers per vehicle
7 – 11 h •Midday trips•Limited flexibility
•One driver with gap or part-time help
4 – 6 h •Some AM & PM choice •Commuter bus / rail•Part-time drivers
< 4 h •Lifeline service•Passengers plan around service
•Intra-county•Rotate drivers
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Access
• Is transit service provided near one’s desired origins and destinations?
• Can one get to and from the necessary transit stops or stations?
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Walk Access
• Route density– Route miles per sq mile
• Geographic coverage– Percentage of service area served
• Transit market coverage– Transit-supportive (high density) area served
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Actual walking distance
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Impact of Street Network
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Impact of Street Network
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Impact of Street Network
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Bike and Drive Access
• Bike access– Up to 1.25 mi for local bus– Up to 2.5 mi for rapid transit
• Auto access– Up to 2.5 mi for park-n-ride lots
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
COMFORT AND CONVENIENCE
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Passenger Load
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Passenger Load
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Space Available
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Reliability Measures
• On-time performance• Headway adherence• Excess wait time• Missed trips• Percent of scheduled time in operation• Distance between mechanical breakdowns
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
WHAT IS “ON TIME”?
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Reliability Measures
• On-time performance– Scheduled service (headways > 10 minutes)– % on-time vehicles– By run, by route or for system– Definition of “on-time”
• Headway adherence
cvh = Standard deviation of headway deviationsMean scheduled headway
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Excess Wait Time
Where:tw = avg wait time (min)
h = avg scheduled headway (min)cvh = coefficient of variation of headways
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Long-headway Waiting Time
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
On-time performance
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
MARTA On-time (bus)
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
MARTA On-time (rail)
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Travel Time
• Number of transit vehicles needed to operate route at a given headway – Preferential treatments measured by travel time
saved • Average speed allows peer routes or peer
agency comparison– ridership elasticity factors
• Travel time rate – 1 / avg speed– Preferential treatments
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Transit-Auto TT Ratio
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Passenger Safety & Security
• Accident rate (accidents per distance)• Passenger safety (injuries or fatalities)• Percent positive drug and alcohol tests• Number of traffic tickets issued to operators• Number of station overruns (manually operated
rail systems)• Number of fires• Number of crimes (crime rate)• Ratio of police officers to transit vehicles• Number of vehicles or stations with safety devices
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Customer Service
• Service Center Measurements– Number of call missed– Response time
• Compliment and complaint tracking• Passenger Satisfaction– Rider surveys
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Passenger Environment
• Cleanliness and appearance
• Customer information
• Equipment condition
• Operators or station agents
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
DEFINING QUALITY TRANSIT SERVICE
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Quality of Service
Availability Comfort and Convenience
Frequency Passenger LoadService Span ReliabilityAccess Travel Time
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Elements of Good Transit Service
7 Demands of Useful Service
It takes me where I want
to go.
It takes me when I want
to go.
It is a good use of my
time.
It is a good use of my money.
It respects me. I can trust it.
It gives me freedom (to change my
plans).
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Exercise comparing TCQSM & Walker
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Elements of Good Transit Service
7 Demands of Useful ServiceIt takes
me where I want to
go.
It takes me when I
want to go.
It is a good use of my
time.
It is a good use of my money.
It respects
me.
I can trust it.
It gives me freedom
(to change my plans).
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Elements of Good Transit Service
7 Demands of Useful Service
How Transit Services Them
It takes me where I want to
go.
It takes me when I
want to go.
It is a good use of my
time.
It is a good use of my money.
It respects
me.
I can trust it.
It gives me freedom
(to change my plans).
Stops/ Stations
Connectivity
Frequency Span Speed or Delay Fares Civility Reliability
Simplicity /Presentation
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Elements of Good Transit Service
7 Demands of Useful Service
How Transit Services Them
It takes me where I want to
go.
It takes me when I
want to go.
It is a good use of my
time.
It is a good use of my money.
It respects
me.
I can trust it.
It gives me freedom
(to change my plans).
Stops/ Stations
Connectivity
Frequency Span Speed or Delay Fares Civility Reliability
Simplicity /Presentation
Travel Time
Access
Passenger Load
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
STAGES OF SERVICE PLANNING
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Service Planning Steps
Crew scheduling
Vehicle scheduling
Timetabling
Frequency determination
Route design and stop layout
Network design
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood
Reference
The materials in this lecture were taken from:• Chapter 4 and 5 of the TCRP Report 165, “Transit Capacity and
Quality of Service Manual, 3rd edition”, 2013• TCRP Report 88, “A Guidebook for Developing a Transit
Performance-Measurement System”. Transportation Research Board, 2003.
• Walker, J. (2011). Human transit: How clearer thinking about public transit can enrich our communities and our lives. Island Press.
• Hickman, Mark, Fundamentals of Transportation wikibook, “Network Design & Frequency”, http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Fundamentals_of_Transportation/Network_Design_and_Frequency
• TCRP Report 113, “Using Archived AVL-APC Data to Improve Transit Performance and Management”. Transportation Research Board, 2006.